Fiscal Year 1980 US Army Corps of Engineers Office of the Chief of Engineers ANNUAL REPORT FY 1980 of the Chief of Engineers on Civil Works Activities FILE COPY RETURN TO COM iSa ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTE For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 e REPLY TO ATTENTION OFs DAEN-CWM-P 15 June' 81 SUBJECT: Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1980 THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY I am forwarding the Annual Report of the. Chief of Engineers for Fiscal Year 1980 in accordance with Section 8 of the River and Harbor Act of 1888. This year's report is in one volume and includes field reports which contain information on specific projects, along with charts summarizing civil works activities Corps-wide. J. K. BRATTON Lieutenant General, USA Chief of Engineers FILE COPY RETURN TO COASTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTEh DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20314 FY 1980 Statistical Highlights ITEM 1980 1979 1978 1977 19761 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 APPROPRIATIONS2 ($ Millions) New Work3, ' Navigation ......................... 485 395 357 261 358 221 193 264 212 185 Flood Control Total ................. 873 802 895 859 1,004 580 650 631 469 419 Flood Control Mississippi River and Tributaries6.. (2 11) (15 8) (1 88) (173)6 (1 58)6 (122)6 (212 )6 (77 ) (53 ) (53 ) Multipurpose, including power ...... 538 358 455 464 479 287 288 379 390 297 Beach Erosion Control .............. 9 12 12 16 10 10 3 3 4 1 Total New Work .................... 1,905 1,567 1,719 1,600 1,851 1,098 1,134 1,277 1,075 902 Other Work7 .. . .................... 1,296 1,223 1,070 887 992 659 636 675 514 408 TOTAL ......................... 3,201 2,790 2,789 2,487 2,843 1,757 1,770 1,952 1,589 1,310 NAVIGATION (Calendar Year) Ton-Miles of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports ............. Foreign, Great Lakes Ports ......... Domestic, Coastal (Intraterritory not compiled) .......... Domestic, Great Lakes .............. Domestic, Inland ................. Domestic, Local .................. TOTAL .......................... Tons of Commerce (Millions) Foreign Coastal Ports ............... Foreign, Great Lakes Ports ......... Domestic, Coastal and Intra-territory Domestic, Great Lakes .............. Domestic, Inland ................. Domestic, Local .................. TOTAL .......................... FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billions) 7.3 19.4 POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw) 19.08 19.08 Generated (Billions of kwh) ........... 77.8 81.2 58,925.6 55,793.1 50,979.6 43,521.7 44,019.1 40,406.4 31,389.8 27,637.7 42,108.8 37,734.3 34.347.9 29,944.8 26,800.0 41,400.0 35,087.1 33,962.3 540,373.2 343,536.6 322,932.3 315,845.9 322,802.2 327,649.2 351,508.6 360,204.5 76,284.0 52,416.9 70,684.2 68,516.8 78,880.4 83,765.1 73,131.6 70,381.1 209,266.2 201,784.2 197,072.8 180,399.2 183,202.6 171,890.9 177,538.6 161,339.3 1,339.8 1,262.3 1,164.2 1,222.3 1,460.1 1,386.3 1,363.7 1,238.8 928,297.6 692,527.4 677,181.0 639,450.7 656,164.3 666,497.9 670,019.3 654,763.6 875.5 886.1 790.3 691.8 712.6 700.6 569.8 506.5 70.6 69.2 65.7 56.9 51.5 66.8 60.1 59.5 308.6 251.7 239.2 234.8 237.4 235.1 244.5 245.2 142.7 109.1 132.1 129.3 146.1 156.6 145.0 141.0 534.5 528.7 524.0 503.9 511.0 503.2 507.0 479.2 89.5 83.4 83.7 78.3 88.2 93.2 90.3 81.3 2,021.4 1,908.2 1,832.1 1,692.2 1,742.7 1,757.3 1,614.9 1,510.3 6.3 2.6 1.7 15.9 13.06 11.96 2.3 .4 17.9 16.4 16.0 14.9 14.4 14.0 13.0 12.8 83.6 64.0 108.0 82.9 76.8 71.1 72.8 68.4 RESERVOIR STORAGE (Millions of acre-feet) All Purposes ...................... 263.3 263.3 262.9 252.0 250.6 248.3 244.6 243.3 234.0 231.8 Flood Control (Maximum) ............. 120.4 120.4 120.1 104.0 102.9 101.0 99.2 98.7 91.3 91.3 Water Supply ...................... 8.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.3 7.2 6.8 6.5 6.4 6.2 Irrigation .......................... 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.87 7.8 7.8 7.8 6.8 5.8 5.8 PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS (Millions of visitor days, calendar years) .............................. 457 449 439 424 391 376 352 344 328 310 1. Includes FY 1976 and 1976T (Transition Quarter); figures cover period from 1 July 1975 through 30 September 1976. 2. Includes amounts expended on deferred-for-restudy, abandoned, or superseded projects. 3. Advance engineering and design, and construction. 4. Savings and slippage applied to projects. 5. Included in Flood Control. 6. Revised figure. 7. Operation and maintenance, surveys, administration and miscellaneous. 8. Includes New Melones and Snettisham, built by the Corps and operated by others. CONTENTS Page NEW ENGLAND DIVISION .............. ......... .......... 1-1 NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: New York, N.Y., District....................................................... 2-1 Philadelphia, Pa., District ......................................................... 3-1 Baltimore, Md., District........ .......... ............................... 4-1 Norfolk, Va., District ...................... .................................... 5-1 SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: Wilmington, N.C., District ........................................................ 6-1 Charleston, S.C., District ....................................................... ... 7-1 Savannah, Ga., District ......................................................... 8-1 Jacksonville, Fla., District ................................................................. 9-1 Mobile, Ala., District ............................................................. 10-1 LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION: New Orleans, La., District.................... .................. .... 11-1 Vicksburg, Miss., District ....................................................... 12-1 Memphis, Tenn., District ......................................................... 13-1 St. Louis, Mo., District ....... .............................. ........................ 14-1 SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION: Galveston, Tex., District.... .................................. ................. 15-1 Fort Worth, Tex., District .......................................................... 16-1 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District .................................................. 17-1 Little Rock, Ark., District ....................... ......................... 18-1 Tulsa, Okla., District ........................................................... 19-1 MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION: Kansas City, Mo., District .. f..................................................20-1 Omaha, Nebr., District...................... ................................... 21-1 OHIO RIVER DIVISION: Ohio River ................................. .... .......... ............... 22-1 Nashville, Tenn., District ........................................................ 23-1 Louisville, Ky., District..................... ..... .......... ...... 24-1 Huntington, W. Va., District ........................................ 25-1 Pittsburgh, Pa., District ....................................................... 26-1 NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION: St. Paul, Minn., District ....................................................... 27-1 Rock Island, Ill., District ........................................... 28-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn ............... 29-1 Chicago, Ill., District .......................................................... 30-1 Detroit, M ich., District .......................................................... 31-1 Buffalo, N .y., District ........................................................... 32-1 SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION: SLaons AFnragnecleissc, oC, aCliaf.l,i fD., iDstirsictrti ct ...................................................................................... 3343--11 Sacramento, Calif., District..................... ............................... 35-1 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION ................................ 36-1 NORTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Portland, Oreg., District ...................................................... 37-1 Seattle, W ash., District.........................................................38-1 W alla Walla, Wash., District .................................................. 39-1 A laska D istrict ................................................................. 40-1 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors ........................................ 41-1 Mississippi River Commission ..................................................... 42-1 Coastal Engineering Research Center.............................................. 43-1 California Debris Commission ..................................................... 44-1 Waterways Experiment Station .................................................... 45-1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses...................... 46-1 Investigations of Projects Under Federal Power Act................................47-1 Regulatory and Sunken Vessel Removal Activities.................................. 48-1 International Boundary Waters Boards ............................................. 49-1 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory .................................... 50-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ............................................... 51-1 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory .................................... 52-1 Water Resources Support Center .................................................. 53-1 APPENDICES: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1980 ......................... A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1980 ................ B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1980 ........................ C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction September 30, 1980.................... D-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power In Operation September 30, 1980 .......... E-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 1980..... F-1 Flood Damages Prevented (by Region and by District)...........................G-1 IN D E X ......................................................................... ... I-1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION* The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York- Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, N.Y. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Andrews River, Mass .............. 1-2 2. Aquatic Plant Control .............. 1-2 3. Boston Harbor, Mass ............... 1-3 4. Bristol Harbor, R.I................ 1-3 5. Cape Cod Canal, Mass ............... 1-3 6. Connecticut River Below Hartford, Conn .................... 1-4 7. Fall River Harbor, Mass............ 1-5 8. Green Harbor, Mass................ 1-5 9. Hampton Harbor, N.H ............. 1-5 10. Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Me....... 1-6 11. Jonesport Harbor, Me. ............. 1-6 12. Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard, Mass........... 1-7 13. Milford Harbor, Conn .............. 1-7 14. New Haven Harbor, Conn .......... 1-7 15. New London Harbor, Conn.......... 1-8 16. Newburt port Harbor, Mass......... 1-8 17. Norwalk Harbor, Conn ............. 1-8 18. Portland Harbor, Me.............. 1-9 19. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Me. and N.H ...... 1-9 20. Stamford Harbor, Conn ............ 1-9 21. Wellfleet Harbor, Mass ............. 1-9 22. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ........................ 1-10 23. Other authorized navigation projects ........................ 1-10 24. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) .................. 1-10 25. Authorized bridge alteration ......... 1-10 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Beach Erosion Control Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I....... 1-10 Revere Beach, Mass................ 1-10 Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects ............ 1-11 Other authorized beach erosion control projects ................... 1-11 Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) ....... 1-11 Flood Control 31. Blackstone River Basin, Mass, and R.I. ..................... 1-11 31A. West Hill Dam, Mass ............... 1-11 32. Charles River Dam, Mass ........... 1-11 33. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass ............. 1-12 34. Connecticut River Basin, Vt., N.H., Mass. and Conn .............. 1-12 34A. Ball Mountain Lake, Vt ............. 1-13 34B. Barre Falls Dam, Mass ............. 1-13 34C. Birch Hill Dam, Mass .............. 1-13 34D. Colebrook River Lake, Conn......... 1-14 34E. Conant Brook Dam, Mass ........... 1-14 34F. Knightville Dam, Mass ............. 1-14 34G. Lancaster, Israel River, N.H........ 1-14 34H. Littleville Lake, Mass .............. 1-14 341. North Hartland Lake, Vt............ 1-15 34J. North Springfield Lake, Vt ......... 1-15 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 1-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Flood Control (cont.) Page 42. 34K. Otter Brook Lake, N.MK. ............ "1-15 42A. 34L. Park River, Hartford, Conn......... 1-15 43. 34M. Surry Mountain Lake, N.H ......... 1-16 44. 34N. Townshend Lake, Vt .............. 1-16 45. 340. Tully Lake, Mass ................. 1-16 34P. Union Village Dam, Vt. ............. 1-17 45A. 35. Holmes Bay, Whiting, Me ........... 1-17 45B. 36. Housatonic River Basin, Conn ....... 1-17 45C. 36A. Black Rock Lake, Conn. ........... 1-17 45D. 36B. Hancock Brook Lake, Conn ......... 1-17 45E. 36C. Hop Brook Lake, Conn............1-18 45F. 36D. Housatonic River, Salisbury, Conn .... 1-18 46. 36E. Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass ... 1-18 36F. Northfield Brook Lake, Conn ........ 1-18 47. 36G. Thomaston Dam, Conn............ 1-19 48. 37. Johnson Bay, Lubec, Me ........... 1-19 49. 38. Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Me ... 1-19 39. Merrimack River Basin, 50. N.H. andMass ................... 1-19 39A. Blackwater Dam, N.H ............. 1-20 51. 39B. Edward MacDowell Lake, N.H ...... 1-20 39C. Franklin Falls Dam, N.H. ........... 1-20 39D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, N.H. ..... 1-20 39E. North Nashua River, Mass ......... 1-20 39F. Phillips Lake, Mass ............... 1-21 39G. Saxonville, Mass................. 1-21 52. 40. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and 53. Acushnet, Mass .................. 1-21 41. New London. Conn ............... 1-22 Saint John River Basin, Me......... 1-22 Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, Me .... 1-22 Prestile Stream, Blaine, Me ......... 1-23 Stamford, Conn .................. 1-23 Thames River Basin, Conn. R.I. and Mass ....................... 1-24 Buffumville Lake, Mass ............ 1-24 East Brimfield Lake, Mass............ 1-24 Hodges Village Dam, Mass ......... 1-24 Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn......... 1-25 West Thompson Lake, Conn........ 1-25 Westville Lake, Mass............. 1-25 Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 1-25 Flood control reservoir operations .... 1-25 Hurricane barrier operations ........ 1-26 Other authorized flood control projects ........................ 1-26 Flood control work under special authorization ................ 1-26 Deauthorized Projects .............. 1-27 General Investigations Surveys ........................ 1-27 Collection and Study of Basic Data ..................... 1-27 Navigation 1. ANDREWS RIVER, MASS. Location. On Nantucket Sound within town of Harwich, Massachusetts, about 84 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 257.) Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, extending about 2,900 feet from deep water in Nantucket Sound to a public marina, two jetties on east and west sides of harbor entrance, and 3-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. Local cooperation. Fully Complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs in the amount of $10,145 were incurred for sampling and testing and preparation of an environmental assessment. A contract for $73,500 was awarded in late September for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel. Dredging to begin in the spring. Condition at end of fiscal year. East jetty completed in June 1967. Dredging was completed in April 1968. Construction of west jetty completed in May 1973. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL. Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to eradicate or control aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 30 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations and results during fiscal year. The 1-2 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION* office received many requests from communities to help with their aquatic plant problems. Field surveys and meetings with local people were held to determine the extent and cause of the problems. In. most cases, the problems resulted from excess nutrients washing into the waters from adjacent lands. This problem does not meet the criteria for Corps participation. Condition at end of fiscal ,year. The Aquatic Plant Control program is limited to reconnaissance surveys of New England waters. Appropriate coordination will continue in the new fiscal year. 3. BOSTON HARBOR, MASS. Location. Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 246 and 248.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing Project. The existing project for Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches. Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2d session (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, Mass., dated 1967). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for environmental bioassay testing and bioaccumulation testing for $61,000 was awarded in September 1980. No work was performed this fical year. Project condition surveys were conducted at a cost of $11,675. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in May 1966 with the construction of Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. That portion of Fort Point Channel from northeasterly side of Summer Street Highway bridge to the easterly side of Dorchester Highway Bridge has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 91-624 dated 31 December 1970. Remaining area of the authorized channel from the entrance to the northeasterly side of the Summer Street Bridge has not been abandoned. (See Table 1-C at end of chapter for total Federal cost of existing project to September 1979.) 4. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, R.I. Location. Bristol Harbor is on the east side of upper Narragansett Bay, in Bristol County, about 13 miles southeast of Providence, Rhode Island. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 278, 353 and 1210.) Existing project. The project provides for an offshore breakwater 1,600 feet long located about 400 feet west of the Coast Guard pier and extending generally in a northwesterly direction. Total estimated cost (Apr 1980) is $5,951,000 of which $1,904,000 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and subsequent maintenance of the project. Assurances have not been requested. Terminal facilities. The developed waterfront of Bristol Harbor is concentrated along a half-mile stretch of east shore of harbor. In this section, there are six privately-owned landings, two owned by the Town, one by the State, and one by the Federal Government. All private landings are of granite construction and have truck access. two have gasoline and one has diesel oil service; and are used primarily for landing shellfish. Town and State piers ire open to public, and include facilities for about 50 small boats and finger piers for larger craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design was continued and a reaffirmation report is in progress. The report recommends a slight realignment of the offshore breakwater further to the southeast to protect the U.S. Coast Guard Pier and more fully protect commercial wharf areas. Condition at end offiscal year. A public meeting was held in August 1980 and local interests are in favor of the realigned breakwater. The Phase I AE&D report is scheduled for completion in March 1981. 5. CAPE COD CANAL, MASS. Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from head of Buzzards Bay, Mass., to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, Mass. In general direction canal trends from Buzzards Bay easterly to Cape Cod Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 251 and 1208.) 1-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts awarded and contract costs were: removal of boulder, $19,855; concept study, rest, and information stations, $34,685; exhibit consultant services for regional visitors center, $5,363; Sandwich bulkhead rehabilitatin study, $3,849. Other costs by hired labor and contract: condition surveys, $278,919; railroad bridge, tower and signal system, $119,316; roads, bridges and grounds, $64,526; repairs to slopes, dikes and marine structures, $67,108; real estate activities, $19,706; recreation area and facilities $882,772; traffic control, $949,456. Adminitrative costs totalled $83,427. Major Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is now underway. The rehabilitation consists of replacing the decks of both bridges, repair or replacement, where appropriate, of structural steel members and cleaning and painting the superstructures of the bridges. A continuing contract in the amount of $10,978,515 was awarded in June 1979 for rehabilitation of the Bourne Bridge and earnings for fiscal year 1980 totalled $6,160,000. The earnings for the air monitoring contract awarded in Sept. 1979 were $113,611 for the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin, extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations was completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway was completed in December 1965. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Major rehabilitation of Bourne Bridge is now underway. Canal in landcut from easterly entrance to station 430 has a minimum bottom width of 480 feet, except opposite State pier where width is 450 feet. From station 430 to Wings Neck (Hog Island Channel) width is 500 feet and beyond Wings Neck (Cleveland Ledge Channel) 700 feet. 6. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CONN. Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, Conn., 14 miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 215, 266, 267.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, Conn., elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for smallboat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River and Hamburg Cove; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. Dredging 6-foot channel, turning basin, and anchorage area at Hamburg is considered inactive. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. On both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each of river towns, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The maintenance dredging contract of various river bars awarded in June 1979 was completed and 5,000 cubic yards of material were removed. Contract costs for dredging demobiliza- 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION tion and claim resolutions were $125,300. hired labor costs were incurred in the amount of $101,077 for contract administration, surveys and layouts and plotting after dredge surveys. Condition at end of fiscal year. Except for inactive portion, existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, Conn. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. 7. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASS. Location. At mouth of Taunton River, on east side and at head of Mount Hope Bay, which empties into ocean through Narragansett Bay and Sakonnet River; it is about 18 miles northerly from Newport Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 353.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For terms of local cooperation pertinent to remaining work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, see Annual Report for 1975. Terminal facilities. In upper harbor there are several deep-draft terminals, two of which are in Somerset and four in Fall River, four more deepdraft terminals are located along the Tiverton waterfront in Rhode Island. These are modern terminals used in connection with electrical generating stations; receipt, distribution and storage of oil and petroleum products; and a State Pier for handling general cargo, and a permanent berth for the battleship Massachusetts. There are ten other wharves with berthing depth of less than 25 feet used for mooring recreational and training craft, receipt and storage of petroleum products, boat servicing and repairs. (See Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England, No. 4 Revised in 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coordination continued during the year with states of Massachusetts and Rhode Island in effort to resolve dredged material disposal problem. Maintenance: The maintenance dredging contract of the turning basin was completed. Approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $102,900. Hired labor costs of $12,000 were incurred for contract administration and inspection. Project condition surveys were conducted at a cost of $10,731. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning has been delayed due to failure in reaching a dredged material disposal solution for deepening Mount Hope Bay and Tiverton channels from 35 to 40 feet. All work for projects authorized prior to 1968 was completed in March 1959. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts' plan for the Brightman Street Bridge replacement or alteration are uncertain and dredging of the Mt. Hope Bay channel may be delayed indefinitely. 8. GREEN HARBOR, MASS. Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield about 30 miles southeast of Boston and 9 miles north of Plymouth Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 245.) Existing project. Provides for channel 6 feet deep (8 feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; 5- acre anchorage near Town pier, 6 feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200 feet extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation + 14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation + 14. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in March 1980 and work is still in progress. To date 50,000 cubic yards of material have been removed at a cost of $145,000. A seismic survey was performed in a portion of the entrance channel at a cost of $6,691. Hired labor costs for preparation of drawings and an environmental assessment were $14,597. Hired labor costs for $36,488 were incurred for supervision, administration and inspection for the maintenance dredging work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project commenced in July 1968 and was completed in October 1969. 9. HAMPTON HARBOR, N.H. Location. On New Hampshire seacoast 13 miles south of Portsmouth Harbor, 5 miles north of mouth of Merrimack River at Newburyport, Mass. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1206.) Existing project. Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 fet of south jetty and constructing a 180-foot spur to high ground, and dredging to provide a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across entrance bar. (See Table 1-B at end 1-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers in Hampton Harbor. State of New Hampshire maintains two pile and timber piers, two in Hampton about 1,500 feet north of entrance and one in Seabrook one-half mile south of entrance. Hampton pier has a 6-foot walkway to a float that has depths of 4 to 6 feet. Seabrook pier has a float and a water depth of about 3 feet at outer end. One landing is open to public. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $21,054, were incurred in preparation of plans and specifications for planned maintenance dredging of the entrance channel and repairs to the north jetty. Two contracts were awarded in September in the amounts of $215,000 for the dredging and $110,800 for repairs to the jetty. Project condition surveys were conducted at a cost of $9,166. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in November 1965. 10. ISLE AU HAUT THOROUGHFARE, MAINE. Location. This is a tidal strait about 1/2 miles long between Isle Au Haut and Kimball Island, located off the coast of Maine in East Penobscot Bay about 25 miles east of Rockland. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 309.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 75 feet wide and 6 feet deep, approximately 1,200 feet long, through the shoal at the easterly end of the waterway. The Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $137,653. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 8 wharves on the thoroughfare, of which one is a public town wharf in accordance with project requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for removal of boulders in the 6 foot channel, awarded in August 1979, was completed in October 1979. Contract earnings for the fiscal year were $12,500. Hired labor costs of $9,905 were incurred for contract administration and inspection. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in September 1958 with the removal of boulders in the project area. The controlling depth was generally 6 feet in the 6-foot channel except 5.8 feet at one location on the eastern extremity of the channel. 11. JONESPORT HARBOR, MAINE. Location. Jonesport Harbor is situated on the north side of Moosabec Reach in Washington County, Maine about 190 miles northeast of Portland, Maine, and about 40 miles southwest of the Canadian border at Eastport, Maine. Existing project. Provides for a combined 1200- foot rubble mound and cellular steel sheet pile breakwater, 1,200 feet in length; a 15-acre anchorage composed of 9 acres, 6 feet deep, and 6 acres, 8 feet deep; and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Latest approved cost estimate (October 1979) is $6,460,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; provide, maintain, and operate necessary mooring facilities and utilities including a public landing in Sawyer Cove with berthing depths alongside the landing commensurate with the depth provided in the entrance channel and including an adequate access road, parking area, and suitable related facilities open to all on equal terms, including transients; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility or other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; reserve spaces within the harbor adequate for the accommodation of transient craft; regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms, including transients; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of Jonesport Harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. There are thirteen privately owned wharves in the harbor, twelve of which are used by local fishermen and one which is used for receiving about three million gallons of petroleum annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering design is complete. Design Memorandum was approved 1 April 1980. Seismic surveys and probings to identify rock line initiated and completed. 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications have not been started. Commencement is dependent on future funding by the Congress. 12. MENEMSHACREEK MARTHA'S VINEYARD, MASS. Location. South side of Vineyard Sound about 13 miles southwest of Woods Hole, Mass. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1210.) Existing project. Entrance channel 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide between jetties to and including anchorage basin 10 feet deep in wide northern portion and 6 feet deep in narrow southern end, and channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Menemsha Creek to deep water in Menemsha Pond about 1.1 miles from entrance, and for maintenance of existing jetties. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean and spring tidal ranges at entrance are 2.7 and 3.4 feet, respectively. Latest published map is in project document (H. Doc. 365, 76th Cong., 1st sess.) (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and local interests have expended over $202,000 for improvements and maintenance of Menemsha Creek and its entrance. Terminal facilities. The town wharf on the basin has a bulkhead frontage of about 600 feet. Other public and private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $3731 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications for repairs to the east jetty and sampling and testing of material from the channel was accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $13,523. A contract for repairs to the east jetty was awarded in late September in the amount of $91,630. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. 13. MILFORD HARBOR CONN. Location On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 8 miles west of New Haven Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 219.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel, an anchorage and two riprap jetties. For further detailed description, see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Specifically authorized project. Fully complied with for completed portion. Spoil disposal areas are required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Three bulkhead wharves near entrance are used by oyster industry. Town wharf near head of navigation is open to public use. Connecticut State Shellfish Commission operates a small wharf not open to public. There are several yacht landings. Facilities are adequate for existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in September in the amount of $162,125. Hired labor costs of $8,594 were incurred in the preparation of contract plans and specifications and an environmental assessment for the planned maintenance dredging of the entrance channel. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for following inactive portions: an 8-foot east basin anchorage and section 107 6-foot anchorage. Burns Point jetty was repaired in 1963. 14. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CONN. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 67 miles east of New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 218.) Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual' Report for 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 53 waterfront facilities; 40 are within city limits of New Haven, and 5 in West Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of city wharf and U.S. Coast Guard wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Nearly half of the facilities have rail connections either on or at rear which connect with N.Y., N.H. & Hartford Railroad and most are accessible by paved streets. Nineteen wharves have mechanical-handling facilities, six wharves are open to public use upon agreement with the owners. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4 revised in 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract for maintenance dredging of the 35-foot mainship channel awarded in March 1979 was completed. During the fiscal year 100,000 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $399,200. Monitoring at the disposal area was accomplished at a cost of $100,000. Hired labor costs of $122,639 were incurred for survey work, sampling and testing and contract administration. 1-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 15. NEW LONDON HARBOR, CONN. Location. On the north shore of Long Island, at its eastern end and about 14 miles east of the mouth of the Connecticut River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic SurveyChart No. 293.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880, March 3, 1881, and July 13, 1892. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1753 and 116, respectively. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work; for new work, local interests are required to provide easements and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; make such alterations to underwater utilities as necessary to enable full realization of the project benefits; and improve berth and access channels commensurate with the project depth. Terminal facilities. There are 36 wharves and piers in a developed frontage of about 3 miles. Seven piers are owned by the Federal Government of which five are being used. One pier is owned by the State and one by the city. Eight waterfront facilities are equipped to receive petroleum products. Seven of the wharves have direct rail connections. The total available berthage space is about 27,000 feet. (For further details, see Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Southern New England, 1976.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work on existing project was completed in 1938. The Department of the Navy has twice deepened extensive lengths of the Harbor in the interest of the National Defense. In May 1980 they completed their second effort and the channel is effectively 40 feet deep today. Phase I preconstruction planning is underway to study possible channel widening and enlargement of the maneuvering area at the state pier. 16. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MASS. Location. On south bank of Merrimack River, about 2.5 miles above mouth, and about 48 miles by water north of Boston. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 331.) Existing project. Two jetties, one projecting 4,118 feet from the north shore, the other projecting 2,445 feet from the south shore, converging until 1,000 feet apart, then extending seaward 1,000 feet parallel to axis of channel; partially closing Plum Island Basin by a timber dike; channel 12 feet deep and 400 feet wide through bar, thence 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves. Portion of project for continuous channel from sea to wharves at Newburyport, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (June 1955) is $106,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty wharves extending along a frontage of about 3,500 feet of south bank of Merrimack River below highway bridge and one small pier on north side of river. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Administrative costs were $3,113 for continued work on Newburyport Harbor Model Study. Project conditions surveys were conducted at a cost of $40,613. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project except for inactive portion was completed in August 1958, with the improvement of 12-foot channel and outer harbor. North jetty was completed in 1914; south jetty was completed, except for a length of about 30 feet at its outer end, in 1905. Required rehabilitation in these jetties comleted in September 1970. Plum Island basin was partially closed in 1883 by construction of a timber dike. North Rock was removed in 1901. 17. NORWALK HARBOR, CONN. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 40 miles east of New York City. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 221 and 1213.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two city wharves, neither of which is in usable condition. There are 19 private wharves in use or in usable condition, having a total berthing space of about 3,100 feet. One has rail connections. Private wharves are inadequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 4 for Southern parts of New England (1952).) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $146,575 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, environmental statements and sampling and testing. A dredging contract was awarded in March 1980. Contract earnings were $493,424 and 72,800 cubic yards of material were removed. Disposal area 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION monitoring was performed at a cost of $100,000. Conditions at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. 18. PORTLAND HARBOR, MAINE. Location. On southwestern coast of Maine about 100 miles northeast of Boston, Mass. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 13292.) Previous. projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1936. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 37 waterfront facilities, of which 4 are not used. Seven wharves are publicly owned, 4 by the U.S. Government, 2 by State of Maine, and 1 by city of South Portland Mechanical-handling facilities are available at 24 wharves. Railroad connections have been made to 27 of them. Faciltiies are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see page 13, H. Doc. 216, 87th Cong., and Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport Harbor and Portland, Maine and Portsmouth, N.H. (revised 1964).) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the Fore River channel awarded in August 1979 is still underway. Approximately 921,000 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $2,335,320. Hired labor costs of $206,175 were incurred. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in August 1966, except for ledge encountered in House Island anchorage. Removal of ledge completed in June 1968. 19. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, MAINE AND N.H. Location. Piscataqua River forms a portion of boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Mouth of this river is called Portsmouth Harbor. It is 45 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, Mass., and 37 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, Maine. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 229 and 329.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For further details on terminal facilities see Annual Report for 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work resumed late in the fiscal year for the dredging of the minor shoal areas. Approximately 5,000 cubic yards of material were removed. Contract costs for dredging and demobilization were $90,000. Hired labor costs of $40,793 were incurred for survey work and contract adminsitration and inspection. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work has been completed. Removal of ledge rock areas in the 35-foot channel were completed in 1891. Widening and extending the 35-foot channel, except for removal of sand shoal 400 feet upstream of Interstate Bridge, and removal of railroad engine from the harbor were completed in 1966. Shoal removal was completed in 1969 in the 35-foot channel. Construction of 6-foot channel and anchorage was completed in 1971 at a reduced scope due to high construction costs, evidenced by intiial bids received. 20. STAMFORD HARBOR, CONN. Location On north shore of Long Island Sound, 32 miles east of New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 221.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1895. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 26 privately owned wharves and piers and one city wharf in use adjacent to channels in East and West Branches. Total available berthage is about 4,500 feet. None of the wharves is open to general public use, except city wharf. Two have direct rail connections. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce, but additional pleasure-craft facilities are needed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs in connection with the maintenance dredging contract were $100,100 for demobilization and claim resolution. An adjustment of $45,000 was made for work done in fiscal year 1979 by the ESSAYONS in connections with Stamford- New Haven dredging operations. Hired labor costs of $34,405 were incurred. Monitoring at the disposal area was accomplished at a cost of $75,000. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Except for inactive portion, the project was completed in 1948. 21. WELLFLEET HARBOR, MASS. Location. On Cape Cod Bay, near southern end of the hook of Cape Cod, 12 miles southeast of Provincetown Harbor and 25 miles northeast of entrance to the Cape Cod Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey charts 581 and 1208.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1895. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep and 125 feet wide from "Deep Hole" to town landing, and an 1-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 anchorage basin of the same depth 800 feet by 500 feet. The project depths refer to mean low water. The mean range of tide is 10 feet and the spring range is 11.6 feet. The latest published map is contained in H. Doc. 557, 76th Cong., 3d sess. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total actual costs for all requirements of local cooperation under term of the project authorization amount to $458,000, consisting of: $32,000 cash contribution, $166,000 for construction of a public wharf, and $260,000 for dredging in the project area. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts dredged a channel and anchorage basin 6 feet deep in 1916, at a cost of $17,363. Terminalfacilities. There are seven wharves in the harbor, only one of which is open to the public. The existing facilities are considered adequate for the existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $6,902 were incurred for drawings and specifications, and environmental assessment and sampling and testing. Condition at end of fiscal year. The channel was dredged to a depth of 4 feet in 1889. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts dredged the 6-foot channel in 1916. The existing project was completed in June 1958, with the construction of the 10-foot channel and anchorage basin. 22. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter.) 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter.) 24. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-F at end of chapter.) Alteration of Bridges 25. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, Mass. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition, non- Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,602. For details, see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control. 26. OAKLAND BEACH, WARWICK, R. I. Location. Oakland Beach is located at the southern extremity of Horse Neck in the northeasterly section of Greenwich Bay. It is bordered by Brush Neck Cove on the west and Warwick Cove on the east. Existing project. Provides for the direct placement of suitable sandfill on either side of the existing seawall that protects the parking area. Also the construction of five groin structures (the replacement of the jetty at the east limit of the study is considered a groin). The groins consist of one terminal structure located at each end of the beach, one at each end of the seawall and a low profile structure halfway between the west limit and the seawall. Also included is the construction of rock revetment placed in front of the seawall between the groins. The current estimated project cost is $719,000 of which $215,700 is non-Federal. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: contribute prior to construction 30 percent of project costs estimated at $215,700; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $1,000,000; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for project construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages due to construction of the project; and assure continued public ownership of the park and shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1981. 27. REVERE BEACH, MASS. Location. In the City of Revere, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, approximately 7 miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor and 6 miles northeast of the City of Boston. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quandrangle.) Existing project. In lieu of the project authorized by Rivers and Harbor Act of 1954 (See Annual Report for 1957) provides for raising and widening about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of suitable sandfill to a general backshore elevation of 18 feet above mean low water, thus furnishing a protective and recreational beach of about 185 feet in width behind the mean high water line. The latest approved cost estimate (Oct. 1979) is $7,040,000 of which $3,520,000 is non-Federal. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests are required to: contribute in cash 50 percent of the cost of construction of the project, presently estimated at $3,520,000; contribute in cash 50 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of ten years, now estimated at $55,000 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first ten years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the -initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning is underway. Main emphasis is being placed on locating a suitable sand source for the project. Condition at end offiscal year. Preconstruction planning is continuing. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS. Inspections of beach erosion control projects were made at the following beaches in August 1980 Connecticut - Burial Hill, Calf Pasture, Compo, Cove Island, Cummings Park, Guilford Point, Gulf, Hammonassett, Jennings, Lighthouse Point, Middle Prospect, Sasco Hill, Seaside Park, Sherwood Island Park, Short, Silver to Cedar, Southport, Woodmont Shore; Massachusetts - North Scituate, Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Plymouth Town, Quincy Shore, Revere, Wessagussett and Winthrop; New Hampshire - Hampton and Wallis Sands State Beach; Rhode Island - Misquamicut, Sand Hill Cove and Cliff Walk. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS. (See Table 1-G at end of chapter.) 30. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter.) Flood.Control 31. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MASS. AND R.I. Works covered by this plan consist of a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, Mass., and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, R.I., substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2d session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at Lower Woonsocket, R.I., substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2d session. (See Table 1-I end of chapter on reservoir and local protection projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 31A. WEST HILL DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on West River, Mass., 3 miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps - Blackstone, Mass. and R.I., Milford, Mass., and Grafton, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,367,000 for construction and $940,000 for lands and damages including highway and utility relocations, a total of $2,307,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of ordinary operation and maintenace. A contract for slope erosion repair was awarded in August 1979. Total earnings for fiscal year were $184,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. 32. CHARLES RIVER DAM, MASS. Location. On the Charles River in the city of Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, about 2.250 feet downstream of the existing Charles River Dam. (See Geological Survey Map for Boston South, Mass.) Existing project. A multiple-purpose earth and concrete dam with river pumping facilities, three navigation locks and provisions for an overhead highway viaduct. Dam about 750 feet long with maximum height of 36 feet. Pumping facilities comprised of six 1,400 cfs capacity pumps. One commercial lock 40 feet by 300 feet and 17 feet deep. Two 1-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 recreational locks 25 feet (22 feet controlling) by 200 feet and 8 feet deep. The project provides flood protection to the intensively developed urban and industrial area of Boston and its suburbs. The locks afford increased locking capacity and reduced locking time. Cost for new work was $12,856,000 for lands including relocations and $48,195,000 for construction, a total of $61,051,000. Total includes local costs of $400,000 for lands, $12,456,000 for relocations and a cash contribution of $6,700,000 a total of $19,556,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work; Planning was completed for a contract to be awarded in fiscal year 1981 to furnish, design, fabrication and installation of exhibits for Charles River Information Center. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for the Charles River Information Center. 33. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MASS. Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling an estimated 9,000 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. The latest approved cost estimate (October 1979) for new work is $8,300,000. (See Tabel 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modification or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characterisitcs of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate appraisals, boundary surveys, negotiations and closings were continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Land acquisition is continuing. To date a total of 1,783 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $995,676 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 2,424 acres at a cost of $249,836. 34. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT., N.H., MASS., AND CONN. Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, Conn., and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of 10 reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2d session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress 2d session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood-protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, Conn., as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3d session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3d session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3d session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, Conn. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, Vt.; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, Conn., authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended, to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, N.H., in lieu of 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, Mass., and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, Conn. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, Mass., substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, Mass. substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, Conn., substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, N.H., substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for flood protection on Park River, Conn., substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, N.H. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of the Gaysville Lake, Vermont project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, Vermont; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, New Hampshire were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, New Hampshire project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, Mass., Hartford, Vt. and Wethersfield Conn. authorized and constructed in accordance with section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 14 at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works proposed for construction in modified comprehensive plan.) 34A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT. Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, Vt. It is 2 miles north of village of Jamaica, Vt. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $10,448,000 for construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of $10,798,000. $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of $10,798,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract for removal of rock from spillway is complete. Total contract earnings were $69,688. A contract for repainting and repairing service bridge was completed. Total costs were $15,480. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. 34B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, Mass., 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps- Barre, Mass., and Wachusett Mountain, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of completed new work is $1,928,800 for construction and $39,000 for lands and damages including highway relocation, a total of $1,967,800. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. 34C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, Mass. and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, Mass. - N.H. and Templeton, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project .was $1,775,500 for construction and $3,075,000 for land and damages, a total of $4,850,500. Total includes $32,000 as local share for construction of recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. 34D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CONN. Location. Damsite is in town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, Conn., on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, Conn., and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $8,342,000 for construction and $5,922,000 for lands, damages, and relocations, a total of $14,264,000. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment will be made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. 34E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MASS. Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about 2 miles southwest of community of Monson. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,936,000 for construction and $1,015,000 for lands, damages, and relocation of roads and utilities, a total of $2,951,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenace: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. 34F. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is 4 miles north of town of Huntington, Mass., and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, Mass. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work was $2,594,440 for construction and $821,200 for lands and damages, a total of $3,415,640. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of rest room was completed in June 1979. Total earnings were $55,955. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed December 1941. 34G. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, N.H. Location. Lancaster, New Hampshire is located at the confluence of the Connecticut and Israel Rivers and at the intersection of U.S. Routes 2 and 3. The Israel River, a tributary of the Connecticut, has a length of about 21 miles and a drainage area of 135 square miles. The Israel River enters the Connecticut River from the east. Existing project. The local flood protection project provides for the construction of a gabion overflow weir to be placed across the Israel River, approximately 0.5 miles upstream from the Mechanic Street Bridge in Lancaster. This 162 foot long, 6 foot high weir features a vertical downstream face while the upstream face is at a 45 degree angle. The structure is 9 feet wide at the base and 3 feet wide at the top. The curent estimated project cost is $491,500. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of the local protection project is 73 percent complete. Contract earnings totalled $151,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is underway. 34H. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on middle Branch of Westfield 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION River 1 mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester. (See Geological Survey map, Chester, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $5,863,400 for construction and $1,150,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of a highway, utilities, cemeteries, and structures, a total of $7,013,400. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenace: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. 34I. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT. Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 15 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 1 mile northwest of North Hartland, Vt. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover, N.H. - Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work is $6,349,500 for construction and $963,000 for lands and damages (including highway and utility relocations), a total of $7,312,500. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in September for stabilization of slope area. The contract amount was $174,195. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. 34J. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT. Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, Vt., on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and 3 miles northwest of Springfield, Vt. (See Geological Survey maps - Ludlow, Vt. and Claremont, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work is $4,782,000 for construction and $2,050,000 for lands and damages, including highway, cemetery, and utility relocations, a total of $6,832,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in September for stabilization of slope area. The contract amount was $179,905. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. 34K. OTTER BROOK LAKE, N.H. Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene. (See Geological Survey maps - Keene, N.H. - Vt., and Monadnock, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $2,782,100 for construction and $1,378,400 for lands and damages, including highway relocation, a total of $4,160,500. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. 34L. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CONN. Location. On the Park River in the City of Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut. (See Geological Survey map of Hartford North, Connecticut.) Existing project. Authorized as a modification to completed Hartford, Conn. local protection project. (For details on completed project see Annual Report for 1960). Two sections of reinforced concrete conduit totalling 2,569 feet with width of 34 feet and height of 26.5 feet on the Park River; one section of reinforced concrete conduit 103 feet long, 36 feet wide and 27.5 feet high on the South Branch; two sections of reinforced concrete conduit 1,364 feet long, 22 feet wide and 25 feet high on the North Branch; a reinforced concrete junction structure to combine the flows from the North and South Branches and distribute them to the Park River and auxiliary conduits and thence to the Connecticut River; circular auxiliary conduit approximately 9,200 feet long to be constructed as a deep tunnel in rock with an inside diameter of 22 feet and lined with 1-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 9-inch thick precast concrete walls, an inlet structure and and an outlet structure; a concrete headwall at the entrance to the North Branch conduit extension; and two pumping stations on the banks of the Park River. The latest approved cost estimate (October 1979) for new work is $1,300,000 for lands including relocations and $58,700,000 for construction, a total of $60,000,000. Total includes local costs of $1,200,000 for lands and $100,000 for relocations, a total of $!,300,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and operation of project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion; upon completion of conduit construction replace pavements, sidewalks, drainage and other appurtenances, including those at Broad Street, Flower Street and Laurel Street and bear cost of removal replacement and modification to sewers, drains, utilities or highways beyond the area required for excavation and construction of the project; prevent changes in headpool ponding areas which would decrease the effectiveness of the improvements and if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly substitute equivalent storage capacity; and undertake all practical measures to prevent pollution from entering the Park River conduit system. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The continuing contract for the construction of the box conduit extension, pumping stations and junction structure is 99 percent complete. Contract earnings for the fiscal year totalled $2,441,353. Four relocation contracts were continued and total earnings were $335,500. The continuing contract for the construction of the auxiliary conduit tunnel is 89 percent complete. Contract earnings totalled $10,798,266. Contract for construction of inlet trash rack was completed and earnings totalled $14,526. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is underway. 34M. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, N.H. Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 5 miles north of Keene, N.H. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, N.H. - Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Estimated cost of new work for project is $2,445,500 for construction and $385,000 for lands and damages, a total of $2,830,000. Total includes $140,000 for additional recreation facilities. Local cooperattion. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of recreation facilities awarded in July 1979 is complete. Total contract earnings were $95,992. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of additional recreation facilities. Construction of dam and apurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. 34N. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT. Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, Vt., and about 2 miles west of Townshend, Vt. Reservoir extends upstream about 4 miles. (See Geological Survey maps - Saxtons River, Vt., and Londenderry, Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $5,530,000 for construction and $1,870,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations and utilities, a total of $7,400,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and apurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. 340. TULLY LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is 1 mile north of Fryville, Mass., and 3.5 miles north of Athol, Mass. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, Mass. - N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work is $1,298,800 for construction and $368,000 for lands and damages, a total of $1,666,800. Total includes $40,000 as local share of recreational facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. 34P. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT. Location. Dam is on Ompompanosuc River 4 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is one-fourth mile north of Union Village, Vt., and 11 miles north of White River Junction, Vt. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, Vt., and Mount Cube, N.H. - Vt.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost for new work is $3,186,860 and $908,300 for lands and damages, a total of $4,095,160. Total includes $84,462 for recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operatons and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of restrooms awarded in fiscal year 1979 was completed. Total contract costs were $84,462. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. 35. HIOLMES BAY, WHITING, MAINE Location. The Town of Whiting is located in the Maine Eastern Coastal Area approximately 7 miles southeast of Machias. State Route 191, which fronts the north side of Holmes Bay, is the only major access route between Machias and Cutler. Existing project. An emergency bank protection project calls for construction of a 700-foot long berm with stone slope protection on a 3:1 slope and the shaping of the roadway embankment from the top of the berm to the edge of the pavement on a 2:1 slope. This would provide adequate protection for the 700 feet of shoreline, including the shoulder of the road. Cost of new work for completed project was $207,400. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for emergency shoreline protection awarded in August 1979 was completed. Total contract earnings were $151,752. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 36. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CONN. Authorized improvements in Housatonic River Basin are comprised of seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of Housatonic River, and six local protection projects, five of which are along Naugatuck River and one on Still River. Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. An emergency bank protection project at Alford, Green River, Massachusetts was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project; also Table 1-K on dams and reservoirs and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 36A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CONN. Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook about 2 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, Conn. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work for completed project was $5,223,700 for construction and $2,958,600 for lands and damages, including roads and utilities relocation, a total of $8,182,300. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities, Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was awarded in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. 36B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CONN. Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook in town in Plymouth, Conn., about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,595,000 for construction and $2,585,000 for lands and damages including relocation of roads and railroads, a total of $4,180,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests are speci- 1-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 fically required to establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. 36C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CONN. Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, Conn., about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Latest approved cost estimate for new work is $2,708,100 for construction and $3,450,000 for lands, rights-of-way, and relocation of roads, a total of $6,158,100. Total includes $125,000 for additional recreation facilities to be constructed. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of restroom was completed. Total earnings were $59,815. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of additional recreational facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. 36D. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SALISBURY, CONN. Location. Salisbury is located in Litchfield County which is in the northwest corner of Connecticut about 10 miles south of Great Barrington. This is a rural area geared. primarily to an agricultural economy; however, there is industry in the area and there is a very popular recreation and vacation area nearby in the Berkshire Hills. Salisbury is serviced by two highways, 41 and 44. Existing project. The emergency bank protection project consists of the construction of the gabionade with riprap for control of current bank erosion along Dugway Road at two different locations contiguous to the Housatonic River east of Salisbury. The current estimated project cost is $110,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1981. 36E. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SHEFFIELD, MASS. Location. The town of Sheffield is primarily a rural community, located in the southwestern corner of Berkshire County, about 7.5 miles east of the Massachusetts-New York stateline and about 4.2 miles north of the Massachusetts-Connecticut stateline. Existing project. The emergency bank protection project provides for construction of a stone slope and the removal of approximately 3500 cubic yards of material from a gravel bar located along the east bank. The project provides protection to a section of roadway situated along the outside of a bend in the Housatonic River. The current estimated project cost is $250,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. Condtiion at end of fiscal year. Construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1981. 36F. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CONN. Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town of Thomaston, Conn. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,856,000 for construction and $975,000 for lands and damages, including roads and utility relocations, a total of $2,831,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and apurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. 36G. THOMASTON DAM, CONN. Location. On Naugatuck River about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, Conn. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $6,382,000 for construction and $7,900,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations, a total of $14,282,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was started in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. 37. JOHNSON BAY, LUBEC, MAINE Location. The town of Lubec is located in the Maine Eastern Coastal Area. It is the easternmost community in the. continental United States, situated on Holmes Bay adjacent to Campobello Island, Canada. It is approximately 25 miles northeast of Machias, Maine and 25 miles southeast of Calais, Maine. Existing project. The emergency bank protection provides for removal of the existing timber bulkhead and installation of approximately 250 linear feet of steel sheet piling to raise the existing ground up to the shoulder of Commercial Street. This would provide adequate protection for the 250 feet of shoreline, including the shoulder of the road. Cost of new work for completed project was $105,100. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for slope stabilization awarded in August 1979 was completed. Total contract earnings were $71,853. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 38. MERRICONEAG SOUND HARPSWELL, MAINE Location. The town of Harpswell is located on a coastal peninsula bounded on the west of Middle Bay, on the east by Merriconeag Sound and on the south by Casco Bay. The town's center is located about 9 miles south of Brunswick, Maine. Existing project. The project consists of the construction of a concrete gravity wall for the protection of about 270 feet of shoreline. It also includes earth excavation, removal of loose rock installation of plastic drain pipes, compacted gravel fill, top-soiling and seeding. Cost of new work for completed project was $107,700. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of this emergency shoreline protection project was completed. Fiscal year contract earnings were $13,516. Total contract costs were $78,442. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 39. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, N.H. AND MASS. Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries on New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system for four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, Mass. was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood 1-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1980 Control Act. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works included for construction under comprehensive plan.) 39A. BLACKWATER DAM, N.H. Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, N.H. 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, just above village of Swetts Mills, 12.5 miles by highway northwest of Concord, N.H. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $767,000 for construction and $553,000 for lands and damages, a total of $1,320,000. Total includes an estimated $80,000 for construction of public use facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Contract for construction of utility buildings was completed. Total earnings for fiscal year were $21,331. Contract total was $129,545. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. 39B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, N.H. Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, N.H. and 14 miles east of Keene, N.H. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual report for 1975. Completed cost of project was $1,708,300 for construction and $306,000 for lands and damages, a total of $2,014,300. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance; Ordinary operations and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in march 1948 and completed in March 1950. 39C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, N.H. Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, N.H., main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2V2 miles upstream of Franklin, N.H. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for -completed project was $6,190,500 for construction and $1,760,000 for lands and damages, a total of $7,950,500. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenace activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. 39D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKE, N.H. Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, N.H., 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, N.H., 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey maps for Hillsboro, N.H., and Concord, N.H.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,715,400 for construction and $8,737,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of roads, railroads, cemeteries, and utilities, a total of $21,452,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. 39E. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, MASS. Location. The project is located on the orth Nashua River in Fitchburg, Worcester County, in the north central section of Massachusetts about 40 miles west of Boston. (See Geological Survey map for Fitchburg, Mass.) 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Existing project. Provides for channel improvement and rehabilitation of walls and cribs of existing ERA project at Fitchburg. Includes intermittent sections of channel deepening, bank and slope protection and removal of obstructions for a distance of five miles along the North Nashua River. Improved channel has a safe carrying capacity of 9,000 cfs. The project is an integral unit of the comprehensive water resources development plan for the North Nashua River, a tributary of the Merrimack River. Total cost to date for new work was $3,126,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of channel rehabilitation project, awarded in June 1979 was essentially completed. The total contract earnngs were $1,803,500 for the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is underway and 99 percent complete. 39F. PHILLIPS LAKE, MASS. Location. On Phillips Brook one-half mile north of its confluence with the North Nashua River in Fitchburg, Worcester County, Massachusetts about 45 miles west of Boton. (See Geological Survey map for Fitchburg, Mass.) Existing projejct. Single purpose flood control project consisting of an earth-filled dam, 1,700 feet long having a maximum height of 48 feet. A chute spillway with an ogee weir 200 feet long will be located in left abutment. A concrete inlet structure with an ungated 54-inch opening will conduct normal river flows through the dam. Storage capacity will be approximately 1,600 acre-feet, equal.to six inches of runoff from a net drainage area of five square miles. The reservoir would be operated as an integral unit of the comprehensive water resources development plan for the North Nashua River, a tributary of the Merrimack River. The latest approved Federal cost estimate (October 1979) for new work is $5,730,000 for lands including relocations and $11,070,000 for construction, a total of $16,800,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to protect channels downstream of the reservoirs from encroachments which would adversely affect operation of the system; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to water rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the reservoirs; and exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of water in the basin which will affect the development of dependable stream regulations; pay or repay onehalf separable first costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities all in accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Due to controversy over the proposed flood control plan for the North Nashua River Basin, funds appropriated in FY78 were utilized to continue review of the overall basin plan. This review included an investigation of all potentially feasible structural and non-structural flood control alternatives. These alternatives have been presented to the Mayor of Fitchburg, the City Council and the Fitchburg Citizens' Advisory Committee, and as a result of these meetings the City Council has voted to "encourage" the Corps to continue its investigation of alternatives. Based on this support, the flood control plan is being reformulated and detailed hydrologic, economic and other studies have been initiated. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of advance engineering and design is underway. 39G. SAXONVILLE, MASS. Location. On the Sudbury River in the village of Saxonville in the northeasterly part of the town of Framingham, Middlesex County about 20 miles west of Boston, Massachusetts. (See Geological Survey Map for Framingham, Mass.) Existing project. About 2,500 feet of earth dikes, 1,340 feet of concrete floodwalls, vehicular flood gate, pumping station and appurtenance structures all located along the left bank of the river. In addition about 1,000 feet of existing channel will be straightened with 60-foot bottom width. Approved cost for new work is $530,000 for lands including relocations and $4,158,700 for construction, a total of $4,688,700. Total includes local costs of $520,000 for lands and $10,000 for relocations. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for road repairs was awarded in September 1980. Condition at end qf fiscal year. Project is complete. 40. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MASS. Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological Survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, Mass., and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 249, 252, 1210.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of completed project is 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 $17,997,900 for construction, and $616,500 for lands, right-of-way and relocations, a total of $18,614,400. This total includes local costs of $590,560 for lands and relocations and a $6,513,763 cash contribution. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 30 percent of first cost, including lands and rights-of-way; contribute capitalized value of annual maintenance and operation ($1,520,000) for main harbor barrier; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate improvement except main harbor barrier after completion. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $7,014,323. Local requirements fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is completed. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October. 1962, and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. 41. NEW LONDON, CONN. Location. In the city of New London, Conn., about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, Conn., and 50 miles southwest of Providence, R.I. (See Geological Survey Map for New London, Conn.) Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rockfaced earthfill dike and 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw Cove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the Cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of the dike and floodwalls will be 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures will include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Latest estimate (October 1979) for the project is $7,910,000 for construction and $1,090,000 for lands and damages including relocations, a total of $9,000,000 for new work. Total includes local costs of $1,090,000 for lands and relocations and a $1,610,000 cash contribution. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations; (c) bear 30 percent of construction cost with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; and (e) maintain and operate all works. Estimated costs to local interests are $1,090,000 for lands and relocations and a cash contribution of $1,610,000, a total of $2,700,000. Assurances have been provided. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design of remainder of project was continued. The contract on Part I - pressure conduit is complete. Earnings totalled $89,085. An additional contract awarded in March 1979 for Part - - dike and appurtenant structures is 91 percent complete. Earnings were $1,797,078. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is underway. 42. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, MAINE Comprehensive plan for water resources development within the basin is comprised of the multiple- purpose Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs on the upper Saint John River. Projects were authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 substantially in accordance with plans included in report of Department of Interior and Corps of Engineers dated August 1964 which is supplement to July 1963 report of International Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project and Upper Saint John River Hydroelectric Power Development. Local protection project at Fort Kent authorized by Chief of Engineers on 25 September 1975 in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P at end of chapter for other authorized multiple-purpose projects including power.) 42A. DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, MAINE Location. On Upper Saint John River near village of Dickey, Maine, about 340 miles north of Boston, Mass. (See Geological Survey map for Allagash, Maine.) Existing project. Plan consists of Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs functioning as a single coordinated unit. Dickey Dam, on Saint John River immediately above its confluence with the Allagash River, would consist of two rolled earthfill embankments about 10,200 feet total length with maximum height of 335 feet. Five earthfilled perimeter dikes acting in conjunction with the dam would impound a reservoir with total capacity of 7,700,000 acre-feet of which 2,900,000 acre-feet would be actively utilized for power and flood control purposes. Reservoir area at maximum operating level is 86,000 acres and its upper reaches extend into the Canadian Province of Quebec. Power facilities would be provided at the dam consisting of 4 units at 190,000 kilowatts each, one of which would be a reversible unit, for total of 760,000 kilowatts. The outlet works would include two 26 foot diameter tunnels; a low level diversion tunnel at streambed elevation and an intermediate level tunnel approximately 110 feet above streambed. A chute-type spillway with 600-foot long curved crest would be located beween the two embankments. Drainage area controlled is 2,725 square miles. Basic provisions would be included in the initial project to accommodate future installation of two additional 190,000 kilowatt reversible units at Dickey. Provisions include excavation of forebay and tailrace channels, construction of headworks 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION and powerhouse foundation, and increasing the height of Lincoln School Dam. Lincoln School Dam, 11 miles downstream from Dickey Dam, would consist of an earthfill embankment, a powerhouse in the right abutment, and a gated spillway structure between the embankment and powerhouse. Overall length would be 2,100 feet and maximum height 90 feet. Power facilities would include two 30,000 kilowatt units and one 10,000 kilowatt unit for a total 70,000 kilowatts. Concrete spillway structure would be 294 feet long and contain four 60- by 50-foot taintor gates. A public highway would be constructed across the dam and spillway. The reservoir would have 32,450 acre-feet of usable storage for regulation of Dickey Dam discharges, power pondage and afterbay storage for the Dickey pumpback operations. Drainage area above Lincoln School is 4,086 square miles. Approved estimate (October 1979) for new wc.. 'is $52,440,000 for land including relocations and $610,560,000 for construction, a total of $663,000,000. (See TAble 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. No local cooperation requirements were stipulated in the authorizing document. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design activities were continued. Efforts concentrated on the preparation of a fish and wildlife mitigation report and associated environmental impacts. A final F & W mitigation report was submitted to the BERH for review and recommendations. Environmental studies to identify the project's impact on Canada's natural and physical environment were continued. A proposed final Environmental Impact Statement was submitted for review and processing. Field survey for proposed highway relocations were initiated. Attention was also given to collection of additional field data including streamflow and water quality data, geologic studies and subsurface investigations to clarify environmental questions and to further define technical data in general engineering and economic studies. Real estate studies with emphasis placed on relocation of residents and update of real estate costs were also accomplished. Five major and several smaller preconstruction planning contracts totalling over $273,000 were awarded during the fiscal year. In addition two job changes totalling over $93,000 were added to previously awarded contracts. Work orders totalling over $190,000 were issued to other Government agencies for transmission studies and related environmental impacts, water quality and streamflow data and fish and wildlife coordination. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction has not been started. Advance engineering and design is being continued. 43. PRESTILE STREAM, BLAINE, MAINE Location. The town of Blaine is located in Aroostook County, Maine, approximately 15 miles south of Presque Isle and about 25 miles north of Houlton, Maine. The town of Blaine is bisected by U.S. Route 1 and is composed of approximately 18 square miles. Prestile Stream originates at Bishop Pond in the town of Fort Fairfield, Maine and flows in a general southerly direction for about 35 miles to its confluence with the Saint John River in New Brunswick, Canada. Existing project. The emergency bank protection consists of the repair of the stone apron downstream of Robinson Dam and installation of stone slope protection along both banks of Prestile Stream in Blamine, Maine for a distance of about 150 feet downstream of the dam. Work includes excavation and placement of two layers of stone on gravel bedding. Cost of new work for completed project was $73,700. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract awarded in August 1979 for protection of streambank was completed. Total earnings were $16,261. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. 44. STAMFORD, CONN. Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound,a bout 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, Conn. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. Latest approved estimate for new work is $10,066,000 for construction, and $1,880,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $11,946,000. Total includes local costs of $1,183,000 for lands and damages and a cash contribution of $3,368,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests will provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make modifications to existing storm drainage system which may be required to obtain full benefits of protection plan, all necessary modifications to existing sanitary sewer facilities required to prevent entry of tidalwaters, and all changes, alterations and additions to or relocations of any buildings and utilities made necessary by construction of project; bear 30 percent of total first cost, estimated at $3,584,000 and consisting of cost of items listed above plus a cash contribution estimated at $2,488,000; contribute in cash, in lieu of cost of annual maintenance and operation of tidal portion of East Branch barrier which is to be operated and maintained by the 1-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 United States, an amount presently estimated at $880,000; maintain and operate all works after completion with exception of tidal portion of East Branch barrier and aids to navigation; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances received and cash contributions have been deposited. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Administrative and technical in-house review continued on substantial claims submitted by contractor. Substantial agreement on claims settlement was reached. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of project initiated in May 1965 and was completed in January 1969. Final audit will determine cost sharing. 45. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CONN., R.I., AND MASS. Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles form Norwich, Conn., and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3d session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2d session. (See Table 1-M at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 45A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River and 8 miles northeast of Southbridge, Mass. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps - Webster, Mass. and Conn., and Leicester, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $2,157,600 for construction and $841,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations, a total of $2,998,600. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. 45B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River and 1 mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps - Whales, Mass, and Conn., Southbridge, Mass. and Conn., East Brookfield, Mass., and Warren, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work for completed project was $1,337,000 for construction and $5,720,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations, a total of $7,057,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. 45C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MASS. Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, Mass., about 5 miles north of Webster, Mass. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, Mass., and Conn., Leicester, Mass., Worcester South, Mass., and Oxford, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Latest cost estimate for new work is $1,317,100 for construction and $3,144,000 for lands and damages including highway, railroad, and utility relocation, a total of $4,461,100. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 45D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CON. Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, Conn., on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is 4 miles northeast of city of Willimantic, Conn. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $4,108,000 for construction and $2,340,000 for lands and damages, a total of $6,448,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. 45E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CONN. Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River in town of Thompson, Conn. Site is in village of West Thompson, 2 miles upstream from city of Putnam, Conn. (See Geological Survey map, Putnam, Conn.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $5,008,200 for construction and $1,965,000 for lands, damages and road relocations, a total of $6,973,200. Total includes $58,000 for recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of trailer sewage disposal area was awarded in July 1979. No work was performed. Maintenance: Ordinary Operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and compeleted in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. 45F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MASS. Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, Mass., and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps - Southbridge, Mass. and R.I., and East Brookfield, Mass.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $2,285,000 for construction, and $3,400,000 for lands and damages (including relocation of highways, utilities, cemeteries, and structures), a total of $5,685,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. 46. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year. Connecticut: October 1979 and June 1980 - Winsted, Torrington, Danbury, Waterbury/Watertown, Hall Meadow Brook, East Branch, Mad River, Sucker Brook, Pawcatuck, Ansonia, Derby, Norwalk, Stamford, Hartford, E. Hartford, North Canaan and Wethersfield. Maine: October 1979 and June 1980 - Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Indian Island, Beals Island. June 1980 - Harpswell, Blaine, Lubec. Massachusetts: October 1979 and May 1980 - Canton, Scituate, Three Rivers, Ware, West Springfield, West Warren, Weymouth, Braintree, Amesbury, Haverhill, Lowell, Hayward Creek, Lancaster, Gardner, Worcester. October 1979 and June 1980 - Blackstone, Northampton, Holyoke, Chicopee, Chicopee Falls, Lee, Springfield. June 1980- Saxonville, Charles River Dam. New Hampshire: October 1979 and May 1980 - Charlestown, Wilton, West Stewartstown, Lincoln, Shelburne, Nashua, Keene. October 1979 and June 1980 - Farmington. Rhode Island: October 1979 and June 1980 - Woonsocket. Vermont: October 1979 and May 1980-- Weston. 47. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operatins of completed Corps flood control projects during the fiscal year, including Corps operated reservoirs, hurricane barrier operations, and local protection projects accounted for damages prevented benefits of $74.6 million. The bulk of these benefits were associated with the March 1980 flood. 1-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multi-purpose in nature, and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply and flow augmentation releases were made from selected reservoirs. A large storm passed over southern New England on 21 March, depositing up to six inches of rain in western Connecticut and Massachusetts. Rainfall in central and northern New England was light for this event, and snowmelt in this region did not contribute significantly to the flood conditions. Runoff associated with this storm caused river stages to reach flood levels in parts of the Thames and Naugatuck River watersheds; and in the Westfield and Farmington Rivers, tributaries to the Connecticut, stages reached their highest levels since the flood of October 1955. As a result of regulation of Corps reservoirs and local protection projects, damages prevented in the Thames, Housatonic and Connecticut River basins were $1,700,000; $35,000,000 and $37,600,000 respectively. Connecticut River Basin. Reservoirs min the Connecticut River Basin were operated for the 21 March event, and significant storages occurred at those reservoirs in the lower basin. Storage utilized amounted to 51 percent of Littleville Lake and 22 percent at Mad River Dam, both of which represent the maximum amounts impounded since the completion of the projects. Elsewhere in the basin, Knightville Dam impounded 46 percent of storage capacity which is the largest amount since April 1960. The following projects were regulated for white water canoeing: Ball Mountain - October 1979 and May 1980; Knightville - March, April and June 1980; Littleville Lake - March and April 1980; Birch Hill - April 1980; Tully Lake - April 1980. Water supply and fish releases were made at Colebrook throughout the year. Housatonic River Basin. Reservoirs in the Housatonic were regulated during the March flood, resulting in utilization of storage at Black Rock, Hop Brook and Thomaston of 28, 24 and 22 percent respectively. At unmanned reservoirs in the basin, percent of storage utilized ranged from 15 to 40 percent of capacity. The latter figure reprelSnts the maximum amount of utilization at Hancock Brook since the project was built. Merrimack River Basin. As a result of heavy shower activity depositing 2 and 3 inches of rain throughout the Merrimack River Basin on 9-10 April, reservoirs in the basin were regulated for flood control. Although the storm created no flood problems, it did result in the maximum storage utilized during FY80 at MacDowell - 18 percent, Franklin Falls - 13 percent, and Blackwater- 8 percent. Thames River Basin. Significant storages were utilized at all reservoirs in the Thames River Basin during the March flooding. Mansfield Hollow and West Thompson stored 28 and 24 percent of capacities respectively, while other reservoirs in the basin stored about 20 percent. Mansfield Hollow was regulated for canoe races in June 1980. West Thompson Lake level was the site for AKC retriever trials on several occasions during the period. 48. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Four hurricane barriers located along the southern coast of New England protect coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes or severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, Connecticut and New Bedford-Fairhaven, Massachusetts barriers. The Fox Point, Rhode Island and Pawcatuck, Connecticut barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: Stamford Barrier. The barrier gate was closed on 10 occasions due to coastal storms. Total benefits for the fiscal year amounted to $80,000. New Bedford-Fairhaven Barrier. The barrier gates were closed on 12 occasions due to coastal storms. Total benefits for the fiscal year amounted to $200,000. Fox Point and Pawcatuck Barriers. There were no operations at these barriers during fiscal year. 49. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-N at end of chapter.) 50. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter.) Snagging and clearing -activities pursuant to Section 208 ot the 1954 Flood Control Act. Pocasset River, Cranston, R.I. Fiscal year costs were $9,605. Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act. 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Fiscal year costs were as follows: Blackstone R., Grafton, Me. $2,100 Connecticut R., Windsor, Vt. 2,460 Holmes Bay, Whiting, Me. (See Section 35 of Text) 170,103 Housatonic R., Salisbury, Conn. (See Section 36D of Text) 17,203 Housatonic R., Sheffield, Mass. (See Section 36E of Text) 46,875 Johnson Bay, Lubec, Me. (See Section 37 of Text) 82,027 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Me. (See Section 38 of Text) 16,306 Mystic R., Mystic, Conn. 2,335 Otter Brook, Caribou, Me. 1,914 Prestile Stream, Blaine, Me. 26,872 Salmon R., Colchester, Conn. 7,916 Sewall Field Cemetery, Alley Bay Beals, Me. 7.037 West Branch, Twenty Mile R., Me. 3,245 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $113,885 for disaster preparedness and $2,250 for emergency operations. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration act of 1974 as amended in 1976 (Section 32 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. P.L. 93-251). Costs for the fiscal year were $108,293 for demonstration project proposals. Total costs to 30 September 1980 were $648,828. Flood Insurance Activities (Seciton 1301-1377, Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, twenty four flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreement (IAA) H-10-77. Costs for the fiscal year were $216,190 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable orders. 51. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS A total of 12 projects were deauthorized by Congressional action on 2 November 1979 pursuant to Section 12 of Public Law 93-251, Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter.) General Investigations 52. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $3,024,149 of which $423,800 was for navigation surveys; $1,238,060 for flood damage prevention studies; $286,479 for coordination studies; $623,909 for special studies; $348,183 for comprehensive studies; $75,825 for review of completed projects; $25,559 for deauthorized review program and $2,334 for supplemental pre-authorization studies. 53. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during the past year kept closely in touch with developments in the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total costs for the fiscal year were $9,763. Total costs to 30 September 1980 were $117,331. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $161,900. Total costs to 30 September 1980 were $3,911,312. Total costs for Hydrologic Studies for the tisca year were $1,700. Total costs for the National Program of Inspection of Dams for the fiscal year were $3,554,397 of which $3,240,431 was for inspection and $313,965 was for inventory. 1-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 September 30, 1980 3. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Andrews River, Mass. Aquatic Plant Control Boston Harbor, Mass. Bristol Harbor, Bristol, R.I. Cape Cod Canal Mass. Connecticut River below Hartford, Conn. Fall River, Harbor, Mass. (Regular Funds) Contributed Funds (Other) Green Harbor, Mass. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Hampton Harbor, N.H. Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Me. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost. Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1-28 4,684 58,152 13,113 102,686 5,802 58,078 13,187 12,831 - - 7,000 7,000 5,677 101 6,951 6,582 61,335 113,989 132,797 74,675 56,081 118,775 130,531 13,941 - - 50,000 100,000 - - 34,997 83,452 -296 - - - 3,943 - - - 2,821,312 3,275,275 2,849,417 3,049,400 3,052,129 3,106,240 3,203,731 2,532,814 - - 875,000 6,850,000 - - 704,J15 6,800,607 737,432 233,589 763,534 83,500 957,806 566,782 668,696 226,380 - -1,782 - 35,280 4,132 1,089 11,005 21,000 46,000 499,692 30,332 38,888 36,959 414,605 125,605 - - 37,200 - - - 35,150 2,050 130,160 3,314 12,000 282,000 128,887 3,627 10,605 204,257 - - - 4,000 92,417 15,000 16,244 358,166 92,437 15,074 15,542 30,420 - - 116,417 8,000 - - 101,974 22,443 219,042 52 219,042 2 381,898 292,043 150,496 150,029 25,313,083 ' 25,313,083 6,566,792 6,503,324 2 150,000 118,449 32,642,750 45 32,642,750 56,724,368 56,088,447 390,677 390,677 9,020,000 8,799,722 1,541,185 10.ll 1,541,185 1o.1 8,953,166 12 8,947,677 1 60,000 60,000 5,567,726 5,562,185 14 1,936,157 ' 1,936,157 15 37,200 37,200 261,500 254,582 847,805 767,707 168,000 158,269 200,000 '" 200,000 11 1,201,558 872,205 137,653 137,653 140,747 140,747 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding. FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 September 30, 1980 11. Jonesport Harbor, New Work Me. Approp. Cost 12. Menemsha Creek, New Work Martha's Vineyard,' Approp. Mass. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Milford Harbor, New Work Conn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14. New Haven New Work Harbor, Conn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 15. New London New Work Harbor, Conn. Approp.: Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 16. Newburyport New Work Harbor, Mass. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost 17. Norwalk Harbor, New Work Conn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18. Portland Harbor, New Work Maine Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19. Portsmouth Harbor New Work and Piscataqua Approp. River, Maine and Cost N.H. Maint. Approp. Cost 20. Stamford Harbor, New Work Conn. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21. Wellfleet Harbor, New Work Mass. Approp. Cost Maint. � Approp. Cost 26. Oakland Beach, New Work Warwick, R.I. Approp. Cost - 110,000 90,000 - - 109,985 24,130 59,497 5,804 - 5,804 - 6,067 17,092 6,067 17,092 187,696 455,065 29,712 29,712 416,672 427,795 78,415 64,463 30,000 14,220 1,348 1,348 4,000 4,457 ..- -. , 23-910 2129 2233,,991100 2211,,112299 106,730 44,000 102,498 21,139 -- -__ 42,325 34,347 42,325 34,347 17,625 94,317 14,911 83,321 �- , -- 16,462 24,090 16,462 24,090 15,000 50,000 10,896 47,840 29,250 114,000 28,477 17,254 9,443 184,565 9,443 21,158 1,019,527 488,70:3 848,846 650,976 6,406 3,452 20,542 40,613 27,934 43,727 - - . 150,274 2,141,000 148,196 741,961 524,200 2,295,000 216,525 2,541,651 371,475 130,747 368,477 130,461 793,000 252,000 799,291 254,506 24,373 66,959 22,285 13.866 61,000 61,728 49,000 30,233 200,000 193,612 56,926 13 56,926 13 624,346 526,827 90,506 3 90,506 53 533,884 370,477 4,205,246 22 4,205,246 2 8,087,619 23 8,064,293 23 638,774 3 632,8523 278,034 278,034 565,225 565,225 2,763,402 2,749,703 1,415,524 1,415,524 531,12931 531,129 31 3,493,471 2 2,092,354 2 " 9,588,710 29 9,588,710 2* 4,761,650 4,673,533 5,384,043 "1 5,384,043 " 984,081 980,797 892.824 ** 892,824 3* 1,685,518 '" 1,680,605 40 157,634 o20 157634 O20 347.054 291,873 175.000 150.697 1-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 September 30, 1980 27. 31A. 32. 33. 34A. 34B. 34C. 34D. 34E. 34F. 34G. 34H. Revere Beach, Mass. West Hill Dam, Mass. Charles River Dam, Mass. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) Charles River, (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass. Ball Mountain Lake, Vt. Barre Falls Dam, Mass. Birch Hill Dam, Mass. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Colebrook River Lake, Conn. Conant Brook Dam, Mass. Knightville Dam, Mass. Lancaster, Israel River, N.H. Littleville Lake, Mass. 50,000 100,000 10,840 100,892 104,000 109,600 377,500 118,938 107,488 189,010 10,500,000 875,000 250,000 8,733,354 3,904,484 580,005 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 465,433 343 - 170,000 222,528 150,581 1,258,000 1,700,000 1,366,166 1,693,135 581,200 228,700 266,159 542,724 225,400 172,200 227,135 169,593 606 - 138,300 232,300 132,612 187,563 32,000 - 32,000 - 1,164,151 337,828 975,000 634,264 57,297 106,866 241,000 237,640 126,000 124,601 -2,809 16,689 148,000 152,261 95,000 97,995 - 87,300 83,468 72,000 123,800 67,700 68,795 116,856 77,373 195 95,000 -6,000 38,027 25,715 63,302 155,000 427,300 151,800 144,141 259,746 310,200 - 30,000 385,000 550 15,835 71,066 137,000 134,811 195,600 173, 100 196,418 150,965 149,600 333,118 75,000 5,272 4,088 97,567 37,136 985,000 1,303,469 465,500 355,720 176,500 173,823 193,000 220,530 219,800 196,652 47,800 48,119 237,000 229,49:3 -41,000 184,195 237,900 242,928 1-30 - 118,500 114,535 162,000 21 123,732 21 2,306,902 39 2,306,02 3 1,544,284 1,536,851 4 1, 177,000 41,090,427 5,554,088 5,544,640 1,674,567 1,559,686 5,402,000 5,356,554 10,797,962 10,797,962 3,143,639 3,023,870 1,967,819 1,967,819 1,888,527 1,880,559 4,815,679 41 4,815,67941 2,278,627 2,225,384 32,000 30 32,000 30 14,263,971 14,263,971 1,056,844 1,024,633 2,950,530 2,950,530 646,880 646,430 3,415,64044 3,415,640 44 2,489,804 2,461,060 491,500 386,609 7,013,412 7,0 13,4 12 1,603,691 1,584,804 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 September 30, 1980 34I. 34J. 34K. 34L. 34M. 34N. 340. 34P. 35. 36A. 36B. 36C. North Hartland Lake, Vt. North Springfield Lake, Vt. Otter Brook Lake, N.H. Park River, Hartford, Conn. (Regular Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) Surry Mountain Lake, N.H. Townsend Lake, Vt. Tully Lake, Mass. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Union Village Dam, Vt. Holmes Bay, Whiting, Me. Black Rock Lake, Conn. Hancock Brook Lake, Conn. Hop Brook Lake, Conn. - 80,000 - 1,000 - 23,238 56,762 1,000 154,000 175,900 202,300 483,400 152,972 169,543 203,340 226,211 220,000 320,100 231,800 582,600 228,005 312,852 226,554 335,301 79,400 20,000 - - 18,598 79,570 1,232 - 122,000 195,000 190,200 188,000 127,417 185,294 185,232 203,456 11,500,000 14,776,400 11,975,000 11,455,000 7,407,352 15,469,997 14,010,347 14,423,500 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7,500 140,000 36,475 199,600 210,814 _- 172,200 177,359 -157 662 168,700 144,382 80,000 42,676 233,700 183,989 200,000 28,663 171,600 182,316 - 48,800 67,201 10,000 13,770 212,300 203,579 183,000 139,448 -3 103,494 256,000 239,695 294,500 249,637 198,400 225,408' 4,462 41,786 182,100 240,142 -2,610 170,102 148,000 130,047 52,800 52,269 8,538 95,537 335,900 256,604 1-31 27,000 10,000 - 27,000 142,598 238,600 133,306 234,670 175,000 193,600 166,589 193,393 296 -18,000 62,643 25,224 148,000 133,900 149,343 132,215 28,465 11,535 173,000 193,900 172,498 184,473 - 10,000 - 8,625 112,000 142,100 113,604 122,070 69,000 96,900 66,146 81,242 - 125,000 - 29,483 162,000 196,300 157,448 194,092 7,312,225 5so 7,312,22550 2,192,015 1,926,835 6,831,526 25 6,831,526 25 3,127,097 2,859,562 4,160,448 43 4,160,448 43 1,758,914 1,758,319 55,230,000 54,109,019 220,000 173,948 2,829,610 2,829,582 2,272,543 2,253,505 7,398,413 9 7,398,41349 2,674,571 2,624,972 1,666,752 7 1,666,752 7 1,858,186 1,858,047 40,000 so 40,000 30 4,095,160 51 4,090,160 51. 2,097,956 2,094,878 .207,390 207,390 8,182,300 8,182,300 1,144,209 1,115,111 4,178,911 4,178,911 622,149 621,475 6,151,562 32 6, 146,8 14 " 1,652, 1,5 1,556,561 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 September 30, 1980 36D. Housatonic R., New Work Salisbury, Conn. Approp. - - - 18,300 18,300 Cost - - - 17,203 17,203 36E. Housatonic R., New Work Sheffield, Mass. Approp. - - - 67,608 67,608 Cost - - - 46,875 46,875 36F. Northfield Brook New Work Lake,Conn. Approp. - - - - 2,830,512 Cost - - - - 2,830,512 Maint. Approp. 87,000 99,600 108,500 100,300 864,711 Cost 80,958 88,608 121,474 106,584 864,068 36G. Thoaston Dam, New Work Conn. Approp. - - - - 14,282,112 Cost - - - - 14,282,112 Maint. Approp. 182,000 180,800 236,600 328,300 2,371,667 Cost 175,901 189,688 207,698 322,949 2,334,809 37. Johnson Bay, New Work Lubec, Me. Approp. - 7,500 115,000 -17,418 105,082 Cost - 4,824 18,231 82,027 105,082 38. Merriconeag Sound, New Work Harpswell, Me. Approp. - 21,529 76,217 9,935 107,681 Cost - 4,936 86,440 16,305 107,681 39A. Blackwater Dam, New Work N.H. Approp. - - - - 1,319,746 7 Cost - - - - 1,319,746 37 Maint. Approp. 121,000 247,500 184,400 167,000 1,651,885 Cost 120,334 143,221 270,180 169,458 1,634,845 39B. Edward MacDowell New Work Lake, N.H. Approp. - - - - 2,014,253 3 Cost - - - - 2,014,253 3 Maint. Approp. 148,000 155,000 130,500 222,500 2,085,392 Cost 149,931 143,370 141,783 206,652 2,068,849 39C. Franklin Falls New Work Dam, N.H. Approp. - - - - 7,950,487 "5 Cost - - - - 7,950,487 "3 Maint. Approp. 176,000 257,500 178,500 478,300 3,017,637 Cost 162,324 252,983 193,274 414,820 2,950,572 39D. Hopkinton-Everett New Work Lakes, N.H. Approp. - - - - 21,452,440 34 Cost - - - - 21,452,440 4 Maint. Approp. 286,200 330,000 302,200 3:34,000 3,258,740 Cost 286,855 334,353 315,696 331,016 3,253,308 39E. North Nashua New Work River, Mass. Approp. 160,000 60,000 1,350,000 1,550,000 3,200,000 27 Cost 174,299 69,364 904,611 1,933,063 3,125,506 39F. Phillips Lake, New Work Mass. Approp. - 150,000 - - 150,000 Cost - 3,115 58,162 57,800 119,077 39G. Saxonville, Mass. New Work (Regular Funds) Approp. 1,795,000 1,600,000 58,400 50,000 4,208,700 Cost 834,941 1,529,473 1,263,098 18,628 4,176,262 (Other New Work Contributed Contrib. 12,000 - - -3,497 8,503 Funds) Cost - 2,000 6,503 - 8,503 40. New Bedford, Mass. New Work (Regular Funds) Approp. - - - - 11,510,088 Cost - - - - 11,510,088 Maint. Approp. 124,959 228,800 113,800 111,000 1,853,414 Cost 160,120 117,036 226,324 103,825 1,841,666 (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. - - - - 6,513,763 " Cost - - - - 6,513,763 29 1-32 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 September 30, 1980 41. 42A. 43. 44. 45A. 45B. 45C. 45D. 45E. 45F. New London, Conn. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Dickey-Lincoln SchoolLakes, Me. Prestile Stream Blaine, Me. Stamford, Conn. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) Buffumville Lake, Mass. East Brimfield Lake, Mass. Hodges Village Dam, Mass. Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn. West Thompson Lake, Conn. Westville Lake, Mass. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 871,000 583,007 380,000 194,020 1,150,000 1,585,793 20,000 7,448 120,000 22,762 80,000 81,073 1,778,600 2,000,000 1,674,032 2,345,703 - 850,000 155,181 745,451 1,756,000 860,000 968,130 1,560,148 55,000 -4,326 36,354 26,872 - 2,037,600 27,658 2,027,900 200,319 130,944 2,000,000 2,063,403 3,000 3,000 37,959 110,000 111,097 5,903 145,000 141,426 109,000 111,186 30,000 173 113,000 112,255 143,000 136,671 -4,083 1,139 145,000 139,628 110,000 108,597 133,600 119,902 -. 96 147,300 145,221 117,400 108,545 10,000 39,017 160,600 153,720 144,200 142,467 208,900 213,540 184,800 138,283 125,800 133,881 118,500 131,277 158 968 155,600 160,447 173,500 170,978 56,000 16,582 134,900 135,054 140,600 189,032 196,400 181,672 150,500 148,218 194,900 179,642 234,800 228,251 2,003 41,421 192,000 165,364 180,500 179,818 1-33 96,000 94,541 5,862,046 5,742,672 19230,000 '1 1,094,652 " 11,560,300 11,364,586 73,674 73,674 9,790,300 9,777,635 1,342,772 1,325,220 3,367,970 24 3,367,453 24 210,000 209,969 2,998,603 9 2,998,603 1,592,122 1,576,757 7,057,043 ' 7,057,043 1,436,78:3 1,434,019 4,461,073 42 4,461,073 42 1,531,988 1,513,628 6,447,164 " 6,447,164 " 1,907,797 1,886,977 6,973,220 4 6,973,220 4* 1,373,398 1,345, 138 5,684,683 47 5,684,683 47 1,460,496 1,459,757 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1. Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Includes $935,303 emergency relief funds and $1,030,806 public works funds. 2. Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. 3. Includes $40,800 for previous project. 4. Includes $6,138,157 from public works funds and $4,849,740 from emergency relief funds. Excludes $115,432 contributed funds. 5. Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $367,620 Code 713 funds. 6. Includes $262,724 Code 711 funds. 7. Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 8. Includes $208,100 Code 711 funds. 9. Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 10. Includes $287,374 for previous projects. Excludes $130,410 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, Conn." 12. Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 13. Excludes $12,500 expended from contributed funds. 14. Includes $330,204 for previous project. 15. Includes $81,410 for previous project. 16. Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 17. Includes $130,393 for previous projects. Excludes $99,707 contributed funds expended. 18. Excludes $193,761 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $22,517 expended to date for land condemnations. 20. Includes $11,350 for previous project. Excludes $32,000 contributed funds expended. 21. Excludes $73,800 for previous project. Excludes $142,965 contributed funds expended. 22. Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 public works funds. 23. Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 24. Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 25. Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 26. Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 27. Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, Mass. 28. Includes $692,43 5 for previous projects. 29. Cash for construction only. Excludes $164,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 30. Recreational Cost Sharing. 31. Includes $162,517 for previous project. Excludes $34,500 contributed funds expended. 32. Includes $143,538Code 711 funds. 33. Includes $138,790 Code 711funds. 34. Includes $179,728 Code 711 funds. 35, Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 36. Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 37. Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 38. Includes $135,143 for previous project. Excludes $169,636 expended from contributed funds. 39. Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 40. Includes $59,420 for previous project. 41. Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 42. Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,158 Code 713 funds, 43. Includes $164,688 Code 711 funds. 44. Includes $199,304 Code 711 funds. 45. Includes $139,997 Code 711 funds. 46. Includes $466,049Code 711 funds. 47. Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 48. Includes $287,420 Code 711 funds. 49. Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. 50. Includes $228,236 Code 711 funds. 51. Includes $84,462 Code 711 funds. 52. Excludes $187,500 contributed fundsexpended. 53. Excludes $11,380 contributed funds expended. 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 Aug. 5, 1886 Sept. 19, 1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 Do. August 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Sept. 7,1940 Mar. 2, 19453 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 August 13, 1968 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950s July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) ANDREWS RIVER, MASS. (See Section 1 of Text), Channel 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide from deep water in Nantucket Sound to public marina; 2 jetties; 3-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text). Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BOSTON HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 3 of Text). Preservation of islands by seawalls. Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) 9 1/2fdtee.p , 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.6 Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) 9 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) from mouth of Weir River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate or Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads.' . . . ..I .. . Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40 foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard," Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. ' Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 feet. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S.-Navydrydock No. 3, at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel, 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 262 76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of 40-foot channel. Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending 1 mile from 40-foot main channel to L St. Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, R.I. (See Section 4 of Text). Construction of a rubblestone breakwater 1,600 feet long. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CONN. (See Section 6 of Text). Jetties at the mouth. The Hartford dike. Channel and turning basin in Eight-mile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments. Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook. Channel, anchorage, and turning basin, Eight-mile River. Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. Section 107, P.L. 86-645, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 2, 1966. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex. Doc. 206, 48th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890, p. 503. Annual Report, 1893, p. 769. Annual Reort, 1887, p. 517 Annual Report, 1893, p. 766. H. Ex. Doc. No. 162, 53d Cong., 3d sess., Annual Report 1895, p. 648. H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar. 11, 1913. H. Doc. 272, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 931, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 244, 72d Cong., 1 sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29. 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.. Public Law 420, 78th Cong. H. Doc. 733, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 244, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong.1 H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 174, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorized by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1294, 61st Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 49, 73d Cong., 1st sess.4 Ltr. Sec. War, Apr. 21, 1937. H. Doc. 368, 76th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 666, 80th Cong., 2d sess.4 Chief of Engineers, Oct. 18, 1961. Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1960. 1-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 March 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 June 2, 1874 June 13, 1902 August 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945" Mar. 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 7, 1974 June 30, 1948 GREEN HARBOR, MASS (See Section 8 of Text). Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. HAMPTON HARBOR, N.H. (See Section 9 of Text). Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet south jetty and constructing 180-foot spur to high ground, channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar. ISLE AU HAUT THOROUGHFARE, ME. (See Section 10 of Text). Channel 75 feet wide and 6 feet deep. approximately 1200 feet long at the easterly end of the waterway. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME. (See Section 11 of Text). A steel sheetpile breakwater 1200 feet in length. A 15-acre anchorage composed of 9-acres; 6 feet deep and 6 acres 8 feet deep. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. MENEMSHA CREEK, MARTHA'S VINEYARD, MASS. (See Section 12 of Text). 10-foot entrance channel; 10-foot anchorage basin; 8-foot channel. MILFORD HARBOR, CONN. (See Section 13 of Text). East jetty at the mouth of the river. West jetty at the mouth of the river. Entrance channel and anchorage basin east of it. Anchorage west of channel and present project dimensions of channel above Merwin's Wharf. 6-foot anchorage west of 8-foot channel. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 16 of Text). Construction of rubblestone jetties. Dredging the bar at entrance to harbor. Dredging channel from sea to wharves and a widened turning basin. WELLFLEET HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 21 of Text). Channel 10 feet deep, 125 feet wide and anchorage basin. OAKLAND BEACH, R.I. (See Section 26 of Text). Beach erosion control. REVERE BEACH, MASS. (See Section 38 of Text). Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill. CHARLES RIVER DAM, MASS. (See Section 32 of Text). Flood control dam and navigation locks on Charles River. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS) MASS. (See Section 33 of Text). Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totaling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, N.H. (See Section 34G of Text). Construction of a gabion overflow weir for local flood protection. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CONN. (See Section 34L of Text). Aug. 13, 1968 Flood protection on Park River in Hartford, Conn. Section 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 15, 1965. Section 107, PL 86-645, chief of engineers, February 18, 1964. S. Doc. 15, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 481, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 365, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 107, 42nd Cong., 3rd sess., and Annual Report 1873, p. 1042. Authorized by Dept., Oct. 16, 1879, Annual Report for 1879, p. 342. H. Doc. 280, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 77, 75th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 13, 1961. Annual Report 1910, p. 59. H. Doc. 703, 76th Cong., 3d sess. Annual Report 1895, H. Doc. 557, 76th Cong., 3d sess. Section 103 of 1962 River and Harbor Act. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April :30, 1980. H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2d sess., in accordance with Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. H. Doc. 370, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. P.L. 80-858, Sec. 205, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 11, 1978. S. Doc. 43, 90th Cong., 1st sess. 1-36 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 No. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 24, 1946 July 14, 1960 HOLMES BAY, WHITING, ME. (See Section 35 of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SALISBURY, CONN. (See Section 36D of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SHEFFIELD, MASS. (See Section 36E of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. JOHNSON BAY, LUBEC, ME. (See Section 37 of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. MERRICONEAG SOUND, HARPSWELL, ME. (See Section 38 of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, MASS. (See Section 39E of Text). Local Flood Protection along No. Nashua River in the city of Fitchburg, Mass. PHILLIPS LAKE, MASS. (See Section 39F of Text). Flood control, local protection project on Phillips Brook north of its confluence with the North Nashua River in Fitchburg. SAXONVILLE, MASS. (See Section 39G of Text). Flood control, local protection on Sudbury River in Saxonville, Mass. NEW LONDON, CONN. (See Section 41 of Text). Hurricane barriers protecting city of New London from tidal damage. DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, ME. (See Section 42A of Text). Construction of multi-purpose project on the upper St. John River to provide for power, flood control and recreation. PRESTILE STREAM, BLAINE, ME. (See Section 43 of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. STAMFORD, CONN. (See Section 44 of Text). Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from tidal damage. 1. Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel). 2. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 3. A portion deferred for restudy. 4. Contains latest maps. 5. Inactive. 6. A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624. Dec. 31, 1970. 7. Removal of one ledge inactive. 8. Quinipiac River 22-foot channel and turning basin deferred for restudy. 9. 15- and 12-foot channel and basin inactive. 1-37 P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 15, 1979. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14 as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 3, 1979. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14 as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 3, 1979. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 15, 1979. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 2, 1978. S. Doc. 113, 89th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 113, 89th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 61, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 478, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 236, 89th Cong., Ist sess. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14. as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. June 29, 1979. H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 1-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 BOSTON HARBOR,MASS., , Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1980 (SeeSection 3 of Text) FundsNewWork Maintenance Total Regular $21,881,851 $6,485,445 $28,367,296 Public Works 1,030,806 - 1,030,806 Emergency Relief 935,303 - 935,303 $23,847,960 $6,485,445' $30,333,405 1. Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. TABLE 1-D RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted Connecticut .Massachusetts Bridgeport Harbor Aug. 1980 Boston Harbor (Weir R.) Nov 1979 Clinton Harbor Feb 1980 Chatham Stage Harbor Mar 1980 Milford Harbor Feb 1980 Cuttyhunk Harbor Oct 1979 New Haven Harbor Feb 1980 Newburyport Harbor Sep 1980 (Quinnipiac R., Mill R.) Nov 1979 Winthrop Harbor Feb 1980 Maine New Hampshire Belfast Harbor Aug 1980 Hampton Harbor Nov 1979 Cape Porpoise Dec 1979 Little Harbor Nov 1979 Kennebec River Jun 1980 Kennebunk River Feb 1980 Rhode Island Penobscot River Apr 1980 SRceoacrkb oro RHivRerr r JJ ul 11998800 GBrloecakt ISsallatn Pdo-Hndb r of Refuge Sep 1980 Scarboro River. Jul 1980 Sep 1980 Searsport Harbor Jun 1980 Stockton Harbor Feb 1980 1-38 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report For Construction Maintenance (Construction) Apponaug Cove, R.I.' Bagaduce River, Me.": 4 Bar Harbor, Me. ' Bass Harbor, Me." Bass Harbor Bar, Me.' Beals Harbor, Me.' Belfast Harbor, Me.' Bellamy River, N.H.',:. 4 Beverly Harbor, Mass.' Boothbay Harbor, Me.' Branford Harbor, Conn.' Bridgeport Harbor, Conn." Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, Me.'." Bucksport Harbor, Me.' Bullocks Point Cove, R.I.' Bunker Harbor, Me." Buttermilk Bay Channel, Mass.' Camden Harbor, Me.' Canapitsit Channel, Ma. ' Cape Porpoise Harbor, Me.' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Me.' Cathance River, Me. ', , Chatham (Stage) Harbor, Mass.' Clinton Harbor, Conn.' Coasters Island Harbor, R.I.' 4 Cobscook Bay, Me. '.,4 Cocheco River, N.H.' ,:1' Cohasset Harbor, Mass.' Connecticut River (above Hartford), Conn. Corea Harbor, Me.' Cotuit Harbor, Mass. ' " Criehaven Harbor, Me.' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, Mass. Cuttyhunk Harbor, Mass.' Damariscotta River, Me.'. 4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, Me.' 4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, Mass." Duck Island Harbor, Conn.' Duxbury Harbor, Mass.' East Boothbay Harbor, Me.' Eastport Harbor, Me.' Edgartown Harbor, Mass.' Essex River, Mass.' Exeter River, N.H. ' . 4 Falmouth Harbor, Me.' Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. Frenchboro Harbor, Me.' Georges River, Me.' Gloucester Harbor Annisquam River, Mass.' Great Salt Pond, Block Island, R.I.'5 Greenwich Bay R.I.' Greenwich Harbor, Conn.' Guilford Harbor, Conn.' Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, R.I.' Harbor of Refuge, Pt. Judith, R.I.' Harraseeket River, Me. 4 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, N.Y.' Hendrick's Harbor Me.' Hingham Harbor, Mass.' Housatonic River Conn. Hyannis Harbor, Mass.' Ipswich River, Mass. Isle of Shoals Harbor, Me. and N.H.' Josias River, Me.I Kennebec River, Me.' Kennebunk River, Me.' Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), Mass.' Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, Mass.'." Lamprey River, N.H. "4 Little Harbor, N.H.'* 4 '4 , Little Harbor, Woods Hole, Mass.' 4 Lubec Channel, Me.' Lynn Harbor, Mass. H 1964 $ 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1953 1978 1976 1976 1907 1979 1969 1960 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1979 1976 1911 1866 1913 1979 1932 1954 1962 1939 1954 1978 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1979 1978 1948 1913 1978 1969 1978 1978 1976 1976 1893 1969 1975 1977 1979 1896 1931 1957 1954 1979 1975 1969 1977 1977 1976 1979 1895 1976 1913 1977 1906 1956 1956 156,874" 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 34,643 246,048 18,000 9,537 4,491,119 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 31,676 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 266,705-." 104,957 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,76T" 116,324 31,707 8,541 40,776 24,200 27,167 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 6,500 638,675 "" 65,614 :,' 21,759 27,454 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 1,296,934 189,037 2,000 198,758 137,222 576,856 2,714,510 4"*', 30,963 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 484,499 5,618 80,691 115,565 1,599,940 350,334 8,940 99,098 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 $ 20,453" 39 2,187 13,187 8,828 23,305 222,888 16,821 22,983 977,472 1,758,756 12,338 13,593 69,343 28,406 58,902 125,936 6,879 347,865 9,021 1,338,659 17 464,604 13,161 42,617 197,517 15,822 73,150 8,125 54,328 925,703 905 301,944 370,617 724,182 17,238 166,984 32,589 83,9384 3,032 238,584 152,377 15,041 221,219 1,180,114 296,656 6,527 186,877 457,439 1,245,874 1,380,398 5,309 3,032 6,325 78,901 2,275,876 230,982 " 32,947 643,364 113,999 1,218,226 624,248 6,587 33,563 257,685 5,224 28,941 147,616 1-39 100,000 147,887 123,757 20,000 43,500 111,260 11,643 35,000 " 10,000 35,000 25,000 too100,000 25,500 17,587 222,010 103,001 26,813 88,914 80,990 TABLE 1-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Machias River, Me.' Malden River, Mass.'. " Matinicus Harbor, Me.' Medomak River, Me.' Mianus River, Conn. Merrimack River, Mass.' Milford Harbor, Conn.- Moosabec Bar, Me.' Mystic River, Conn.' Mystic River, Mass.' Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), Mass.- Narraguagus River, Me.' New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, Mass. New Harbor, Me.' New Haven Breakwater, Conn.' Newport Harbor, R.I.' Niantic Bay and Harbor, Conn.' Northeast Harbor, Me.' Owl's Head Harbor, Me.' Patchogue River, Conn.' Pawcatuck River, R.I. & Conn.' Pawtuxet Cove, R.I.' Penobscot River, Me.' Pepperell Cove, Me. Pig Island Gut, Me. 1." Pleasant Bay, Mass. Pleasant River, Me.'. Plymouth Harbor, Mass.' Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, Mass.' Potowomut River, R.I.'. Providence River & Harbor, R.I.7 Provincetown Harbor, Mass.' Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, Mass."' Richmond Harbor, Me.'.I Richmond's Island Harbor, Me.'' Rockland Harbor, Me." Rockport Harbor, Mass.' Rockport Harbor, Me.'.-" Royal River, Me.' Rye Harbor, N.H.' St. Croix River, Me.' Saco River, Me.' Sakonnet River, R.I.'.' Sakonnet Harbor, R.I.' Salem Harbor, Mass." Sandy Bay (Harbor or Refuge), Cape Ann, Mass." Sasanoa River, Me.'.:'.' Scarboro River, Me.' Scituate Harbor, Mass.' Searsport Harbor, Me.' Seekonk River, R.I.' South Bristol Harbor, Me.' Southport Harbor, Conn.' Southwest Harbor, Me.' Stockton Harbor, Me.'.'*' Stonington Harbor, Conn.' Stony Creek, Branford, Conn.' Sullivan Falls Harbor, Me.' Taunton River, Mass.-' Tenants Harbor, Me.' Thames River, Conn.' Union River, Me.". ' Vineyard Haven, Mass.' Wareham Harbor, Mass. Warren River, R.I.' Warwick Cove, R. I.'.' Wells Harbor, Me.' Westcott Cove, Conn.' Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn.' Westport River, Mass. '.* Weymouth Back River, Mass.' Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivers, Boston Hbr., Mass. Wickford Harbor, R.I.'.- For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1972 1922 1962 1953 1978 1940 1974 1930 4957 1967 1965 1969 1953 1966 1950 1953 1972 1954 1968 1977 1978 1975 1969 1969 1966 1971 1892 1978 1956 1882 1976 1979 1972 1883 1882 1976 1979 1915 1977 1965 1950 1979 1909 1974 1969 1922 1915 1976 1971 1966 1954 1971 1962 1962 1915 1959 1978 1914 1948 1920 1967 1912 1943 1896 1890 1975 1979 1978 1972 1942 1944 1979 1973 Contributed Funds Expended (Construction) Cost to September 30, 1980 Operation and Construction Maintenance $ 32,000 $ 166,864 104,853 45,097 14,000 "' 8,989 17,000 92,359 132,435 140,898 369,891 158,224 90,506 349,319 114,00 25,227 197,582 104,932 3,222,777 792,570 502,661 " ' : 421,037 821,144 33,965 1,857,618 708,967 118,620 "4 21,705 1,242,246 40,273 733,524 94,768 66,464 32,736 138,942 17,334 124, 158 13,867 150,000 457,711 318,787 :; 574,861 295,356 11:3,718 501,020 603,055 171,:351 18,958 191,753 17,565 3,500 217 2,127,218 :2,:: 844,719:4 1,083,504 846,590 5,000 50 25,417,022 3,751,497 3,548,954" 298,636 38,764 20,000 - 119,844 1,808 1,948,462 449,956 22,000 194,963 32,000- :336,704 247,17:3 130,342 29,368 179,550 36,392 663,739 1,435,993 38,427 1,559 588,478 137,016 1,693,202 330,916 1,925,553 16,060 35,000 124 392,635 1,220,255 379,851 86,758 572,568 " 23,035 672,214 793,2:34 89,593 4,438 96,927 ' 214,175 180,042 15,971 33,000 23,216 377,328 103,513 112,487 235,929 19,871- 442,895 32,917 18,750 12,678 1,471,919 1,422,580 146,855 113,939 27,186 8,699 95,997 10,296 5,000 155,430 36,594 360,973 1,491,654 55,960 190,131 19,:308 180,824 48,740 7,184 29,875,453 ' : 1,192,687 233,410 70,435 1-40 62,000 46,500 11,380 14,000 20,385 7,015 67,500 4,383 100,0(X) 20,000 295,356 541,611 760,000 255,000 49,562 61,338 ' 19,892 78,498 21,928 10,000 69,976 67,792 2,663 18,525 7,501 107,220 212,000 21,0(X) 20,000 440,237 19,094 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report For Construction Maintenance (Construction) Wilson Point Harbor, Conn.' , 4 1895 A 54,177 Winnipesaukee Lake, N.H.' 1952 7,500 . 29,870 Winter Harbor, Me.' ,8 1976 162,937 - Winthrop Harbor, Mass.' 1895 8,992 30,385 Wood Island Harbor, Me. and Pod at Biddeford' 1957 135,612 12,451 12,000 Woods Hole Channel, Mass.' 1940 230,000 51,718 York Harbor, Me. 1977 239,654 338,404 32,161 1. Completed 22. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public 2. Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation require- Law 86-645, Sec. 107). ments, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 23. Excludes $211,649 exended for rehabilitation; jetty re- 3. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Con- paired in 1963. gress, 1st session. 24. All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. 4. No commerce reported. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of 5. Completed except for inactive portion. project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 6. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, 107). Sec. 107). 25. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for main- 7. Includes $37,714 emergency relief funds. Excludes $18,525 tenance. contributed funds, of which $1,785 was for work outside approved 26. H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminatproject. ing maintenance dredging. 8. Inactive. 27. Excludes $49,562 contributed funds "other" expended. 9. Awaiting local cooperation. Improvement to be restudied. 28. Final fund adjustment made FY1978 ($52,323.28). 10. Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, R.I. 29. Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. 11. Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an 30. Excludes local requirements of $65,000 consisting of incomplete and an inactive portion. $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction 12. Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; break- costs. waters repaired in 1961. 31. Includes $133,357 for previous project. 13. Recommendation for abandonment of existing project 32. Includes $188,647 for previous project. made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. Portion of 33. Excludes $894,475 major rehabilitation for Long Beach project authorized by the Chief of Engineers (P.L. 86-645, Sec. Dike. 107) is complete. 34. Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was 14. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds expended. expended for maintenance of contributed funds. 15. Improvement adequate for commerce. 35. Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. 16. Costs to local interests for berth improvements are esti- 36. Includes $7,889 for previous project. mated to be $60,000. 37. Includes $83,276 for maintenance for previous project. 17. Excludes $81,548 contributed funds "other" expended. 38. Includes $10,000 for revious project; 18. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Con- 39. Excludes $141,530 expended contributed funds "other". gress 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 40. Excludes $1,926,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 65th ongress, 1st session. 41. Includes $12,000 for previous project. 19. Improvement to be restudied. 42. Includes $215,801 for previous project. 20. Under State maintenace. 43. Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore 21. Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; break- R.) and $25,000 (Town R.). water repaired in 1962. 44. Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $12,577 (Weymouth Town River). TABLE 1-F NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Back Cove, Portland, Me. $ 3,571 Basin Cove, South Harpswell, Me. 3,431 Buttermilk Bay, Mass. 6,552 Clinton Harbor, Conn. 5,539 Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, Me. 25,511 Eel Pond, Falmouth, Mass. 8,928 Fore River, Braintree-Weymouth, Mass. 11,216 Hull, Mass. 3,540 Island End River, Chelsea, Mass. 30,558 Kennebunk River, Kennebunkport, Me. 35,275 Nauset Harbor Orleans, Mass. 3,468 Oak Bluffs Harior, Oak Bluffs, Mass. 5,000 Patchogue River, Conn. 960 Plymouth Harbor, Plymouth, Mass. 3,000 Portland Fore River, Portland, Me. 39 Provincetown Harbor, Mass. 4,681 Rockport and Old Harbors, Mass. 4,196 Saco River Me. 45,410 Sakonnet liarbor, R.I. 36,804 Saugus & Pine Rivers, Mass. 150 Sesuit Harbor, Mass. 2,032 Stonington Harbor, Mass. 70,426 Weskeag River, South Thomaston, Me. 2,584 1-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 1-G OTHER AUTHORIZED PEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept. 30, 1980 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, Conn.' 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, Conn.' 1964 56,286 120,179 Clark Point New Bedford, Mass. 1963 - - Cliff Walk, Newport, R.I." 1973 290,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Wetport, Conn.' 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, Conn.' 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, Conn.' 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, Conn.' 1961 15,620 31.241 Gulf Beach, Milford, Conn.' 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, Conn.' 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, N.H.' 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, Conn.' 1956 14,401 28.802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), Conn.' 1961 3,390 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, Mass. - - - Matunuck Beach, South Kingston, R.I.2 1961 - - Middle Beach, Conn.' 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R.I.3 1963 14,512 29,024 Nantasket Beach, Mass.4 1971 - - North Hampton Beach, NorthHampton, N.H.4 1963 - - North Scituate Beach, Scituate, Mass.' 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, Mass.' 1976 273,334 198,583 Plum Island, Mass.2 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, Conn.' 1958 104,573 240,819 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, Mass.' 1962 621,440 1,242,880 Sand Hill Cove Beach, R.I.' 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, Conn.' 1961 23,759 47,518 Seaside Park, Conn.' 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn.' 1959 186,830 372,802 Short Beach, Conn.I- 5_ Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Conn. 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, Conn.' 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, Mass. 1964 5,490 10,981 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, Mass. 1961 - - Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, N.H.' 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, Mass.' 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, Mass. 1960 176,567 ' 353,134 Woodmont Shore, Milford, Conn.' 1961 53,838 111,679 7 1. Completed. River. 2. Project is to be included in Point Judith water resources 6. Project is 79% complete. In addition to uncompleted work, development plan authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act. there are three additional groins, construction of which is 3. Additional Federal participation will be required based on deferred until it is determined that they are necessary. Public Law 87-874. 7. Excludes A118,215 expended for work beyond scope of 4. Project inactive, project. 5. Project is completed at no cost to Federal Government by 8. Completed except for inactive portion. using fill from federal navigation improvement at Housatonic TABLE 1-H BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs City Park Beach, Warwick, R.I. $ 4,890 Corn Hill Beach, Truro, Mass. 11,736 Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. (See Section 26 of Text) 14,342 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn. 16,525 Willard Beach, Me. 46,105 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-I BLACKTONE RIVER BASIN, MASS. AND R.I. (See Section 31 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages Total West Hill Worcester, Mass. 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,367,000 $94,000 $2,307,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. See individual report for details. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT Miles Above Estimated Costs Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, Mass. 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,000 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, R.I. 15 Channel improvement 3,740,100 1,069,000 3 4,809,100 Lower Woonsocket, RI.) 13 Floodwall, conduits and 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 channel improvement 1. Includes relocations. 3. $300 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. 2. $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 4. See individual report for details. TABLE 1-J CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT., N.H., MASS. AND CONN. (See Section 34 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Connecticut Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village' North Hartland' North Springfield Ball Mountain Townshend New Hampshire: Surry Mountain s Otter Brook' White River Junction White River Junction Sprin Ield Brattleboro Brattleboro Keene Keene 228.4 211.7 191.3 178.2 168.3 174.4 171.2 170 Earthfill 185 Earthfill 120 Earthfill 265 Rockfillearth 133 Earthfill 86 Earthfill 133 Earthfill 38,000 71,400 50,600 54,600 33,200 32,500 18,300 $3,186,860 6,349,500 4,782,000 10,448,000 5,530,000 2,445,000 2,782,100 $ 908,300 963,000 2,050,000 350,000 1,878,000 385,000 1,378,400 $4,095,160 7,312,500 6,832,000 10,798,000 7,400,000 2,830,000 4,160,500 1-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 1-J (Continued) CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT., N.H., MASS. AND CONN. (See Section 34 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Connecticut Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Massachusetts: Birch HillP Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 $1,775,500 $3,075,000 $4,850,500 Tully: Athol 148,7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,339,000 368,000 1,707,000 Barre Falls2 Worcester 130.2 %62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,800 39,000 1,967,800 earth Knightville2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,400 1,150,000 7,013,400 Conant Brook2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,936,000 1,015,000 2,951,000 earth Connecticut Colebrook River Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 $ 8,342,000 $ 5,922,000 $14,264,000 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 3,380,000 2,210,000 5,590,000 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,550,000 180,000 "' 2,730,000 1. Includes highway, railroad and utility relocation. 3. Non-Federal cost. 2. For details, see individual report. 4. Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Connecticut Landsand Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Hartford, Vt. 216 Channel improvement $ 332,000 - $ 332,000 Charlestown, N.H. 181 Riverbank protection 114,000 - 114,000 Weston, Vt. 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 Keene, N.H. 167 Channel improvement 44,000 - 44,000 Gardner, Mass. 163 Dam and levee 493,900 35,000 528,900 Northampton, Mass. 94 Wall and levee 960,000 150,000 1,110,000 Holyoke, Mass. 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Springfield, Mass. 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 West Warren, Mass. 111 Wall and levee 390,000 64,000 454,000 Ware, Mass. 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Three Rivers, Mass. 98 Wall and levee 1,580,000 700,000 2,280,000 Chicopee, Mass. 80 Wall and levee 1,738,000 250,000 1,988,000 Chicopee Falls, Mass.2 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 Huntington, Mass. 100 Riverbank proteciton 4,000 - 4,000 Riverdale, Mass. 80 Wall and levee 1,138,000 50,000 1,188,000 Sperisnt gSfpierlidn,g fMiealdss, . Mass. 76 Wall and levee 932,000 272,000 1,204,000 76 Wall and levee 1,579,00(' 30,000 1,609,000 Winsted, Conn. 115 Channel improvement 246,000 30,000 276,000 East Hartford, Conn. 52 Wall and levee 2,135,000 271,000 2,406,000 Hartford, Conn. 52 Wall and levee 6,930,00( 1,150,000 8,080,000 Park River, Conn. 51 Conduit 58,700,000 1,300,000 60,000,000 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn." 50 Channel improvement 220,300 - 220,300 Israel R., Lancaster, N.H. 2 Cabion overflow weir 475,000 - 475,000 1. To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 2. For details see individual report. 3. Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4. Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-K HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CONN. (See Section 36 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS' Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Naguatuck Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Hall Meadow Torrington, Conn. 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $1,852,400 $1,290,000 : $ 3,142,000 earthfill East Branch ' Torrington, Conn. 43.7 92 Earthfill 10 1,509,800 1,290,000 2,799,800 Thomaston Torrington, Conn. 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,000 7,900,000 14,282,000 earthfill Northfield Torrington, Conn. 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,856,000 975,000 2,831,000 Black Rock Waterbury, Conn. 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Br. Waterbury, Conn. 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,595,000 2,585,000 4,180,000 Hop Brook Waterbury, Conn. 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,702,000 3,450,000 6,152,000 1. For details of projects, see individual reports. 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970. 2. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. 3. Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT' Miles Estimated Costs Above Mouth of Lands Housatonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction I)amages-' Total Alford, Green River, 111.0 Earth diek and stone slope $ 41,400 $ - $ 41,400 Mass protection' Ansonia-Derby, Conn. 13.0 Wall, levee, channel 17,850,000 1,178,000 18,995,000 improvement and pumping station Danbury, Conn. 56.0 Walls, channel improvement 13,182,000 1,862,000 15,044,000 and bridge replacement Derby, Conn. 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping 7,583,000 647,000 8,230,000 station North Canaan, Blackberry 83.0 Snagging and clearing 73,900 - 73,900 River, Conn. project Salisbury, Conn. 76.0 Gabionade with slope protection 18,300 - 18,300 Sheffield, Mass. 96.0 Stone slope protection 67,600 - 67,600 Torrington, East Branch 51.0 Dike and channel improvement 389,200 - 389,200 Torrington, West Branch 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,300 - 228,300 improvement Waterbury-Watertown 32.0 Wall, Dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 1. For details of projects, see individual reports. 2. To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. TABLE 1-L MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, N.H., AND MASS. (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Merrimack Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Franklin Falls Blackwater Hopkinton-Everett' ,' Edward MacDowell" Franklin, N.H. Concord, N.H. Concord, N.H. Keene, N.H. 118.2 118.8 87.3 161.3 140 Earthfill 75 Earthfill 115 Earthfill 67 Earthfill 154,000 46,000 157,300 12,800 $ 6,190,500 847,000 12,715,400 1,708,300 $1,760,000 553,000 8,737,000 306,000 $ 7,950.500 1,400,000 21.452,500 2,014,300 1-45 TABLE 1-L (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, N.H., AND MASS. (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Nearest Merrimack Height Capacity and Name City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Monoosnoc'" Leominster, Mass. 100.6 71 Earthfill 2,000 $3,430,000 $ 370,000 $ 3,800,000 Phillips Fitchburg, Mass. 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 9,450,000 4,950,000 14,400,000 Nookagee Fitchburg, Mass. 107.9 106 Earthfill 8,100 9,950,000 3,750,000 13.700,000 ' Whitmanville2 Fitchburg, Mass. 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 8,240,000 4,160,000 12,400,000" 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocation. 4. Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance 2. For details, see individual report. and height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkin- 3. Project deferred, cost not been revisd on current price ton Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. basis. 5. Includes Non-Federal reimbursement. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Federal Costs Above Mouth of Lands Merrimack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Amesbury, Powow and Merrimack 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 133,400 $ - $ 133,400 Rivers, Mass.- Nashua, N.H. 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,0007 Lowell, N.H. 39.0 ' Wall and levee 490,600 90,000 580,600 Baker Brook, Mass. 101.2 Channel improvement 2,110,000 280,000 2,390,00 Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. : 98.4 Channel improvement 310,000 90,000 400,000 North Nashua River, Mass. 100.5 Channel improvement 3,150,000 - 3,150,000 Saxonville, Mass.4 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,208,700 530,000 4,738,700 1. To be borne by local interests. 3. Project deferred. Cost has not been revised on current 2. Project inactive. Cost has not been revised on current price price basis. basis. 4. For details, see individual report. 5. Excludes $15,000 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 1-M THAMES RIVER BASIN, CONN., R.I. AND MASS. (See Section 45 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Hodges Village" Webster, Mass. 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,337,000 $3, 144,000 $4,481,000 Buffumville2 Webster, Mass. 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,600 841,000 2,998,600 East Brimfield' Southbridge, Mass. 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,000 5,720,000 7,057,000 Westville' Southbridge, Mass. 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,285,000 :3,400,000 5,685,000 West Thompson Putnam, Conn. 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,014,300 1,965,000 6,979,300 Mansfield Hollow2 Willimantic, Conn. 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,108,000 2,340,000 6,448,000 1. Includes highway, railroad and utility relocaitons. 2. For details, see individual report. 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-M (Continued) THAMES RIVER BASIN, CONN., R.I. AND MASS. (See Section 45 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Federal cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Norwich, Conn. 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 1. Borne by local interests. TABLE 1-N OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual' Contributed Project Report For Construction Funds Alley Bay, Beals, Me."' 1979 $ 190,500 $ - Alford, Green River, Mass. ', 4 1977 41,419 - Amesbury, Powwow River, Mass.",' 1978 132,113 - Ansonia Derby, Conn.:' 1977 18,266,040 - Bound Brook, Scituate, Mass."4 1974 47,300 - Canton, Mass.:'. ' 1964 180,6706 92,891 Charlestown, N.H.:1, 1976 113,330 - Cherryfield, Me. : , 4 1963 203,000 - Chicopee, Mass." 1954 1,433,600 385 Chicopee Falls, Mass. 1978 2,183,912 411,292' Cocheco River, N.H.:' ' 1963 183,100 - Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, N.H.'- 1976 54,703 - Danbury, Conn.:' 1978 13,143,000 -- Derby, Conn. 1977 7,582,642 - East Branch Dam, Conn." 1973 1,959,836- East Hartford, Conn. 1951 2,135,000 7,637 Fitchburg, Mass. (See No. Nashua River) -- Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn."' 1979 220,284 - Fort Kent, Me.' .4 1979 1,977,397- Fox Point Barrier, R.I.:' 1976 11,112,801 3,679,500"4 Gardner, Mass."4 1970 495,691 15,500 Hall MeadowBrook Dam, Conn. 1970 2,572,357 - Hartford, Conn."' 1960 6,094, 100" 2,781,100 Hartford, White River, Vt.: ' 1973 332,236 - Hayward Creek, Quincy-Braintree, Mass."* 1979 2,235,470 - Holyoke, Mass." 1953 3,418,000 24,447 Huntington Mass." ' 1960 3,900 - Keene N.H.3.4 1955 44,100 - Lee, Fousatonic River, Mass.","' 1976 37,852 - Lowell, Mass.:' 1945 490,600 ' Lower Woonsocket, R.I.3' 1977 6,600,681 1,266,6382" Mad River Lake, Conn.' 1973 4,773,020 - Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. " 1967 - Monoosnoc Lake, Mass.' 1967 - Nashua, N.H.:' 1950 270,000( 327 Nookagee Lake, Mass. 1976 563,677 - Northampton, Mass.:' 1950 680,000' - North Canaan, Blackberry River, Conn. ' 1977 73,865 - North Nashua River, Lancaster, Mass.:'. 1979 81,671 Norwalk, Conn., 4 1952 52,150 2,800 Norwich, Conn.-' 1960 1,209,000 - Old Town Penobscot River, Me."4 1978 148,045 - Pawcatuck, Conn.. 1966 644,311 214,106 Riverdale, Mass. ' 1952 1,138,000 25,000 1-47 TABLE 1-N (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report For Construction Funds Shelburne, Androscoggin River, N.H.:',. 1977 $ 37,657 - Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, Mass.:'," 1978 1,803,739 - Springdale, Mass.:' 1952 700,000 - Springfield, Mass. 1950 577,000 '" 5,350 Stony Brook, Wilton, N.H. : .' 1973 19,500 - Sucker Brook Dam, Conn. : ' 1976 2,227,712 58,800 Three Rivers, Mass.' 1970 1,577,1892 - Torrington, East Branch, Conn.: ' 1963 389,200 - Torrington, West Branch, Conn.:. ' 196,3 228,300 - Trumbull Lake, Conn.' 1973 1,463,799 - Ware, Mass.:' ,4 1963 400,000 - Waterbury-Watertown, Conn. : '' 1963 263,300 - Westerly, R.I. 1966 - - Weston, Vt., 1957 13,000 1,800 West Springfield, Mass. : 1954 1,334,000'' - West Warren, Mass.:,. 1964 389,200 41,000 Whitmanville Lake, Mass. 1979 605,023 - Williamsville Reservoir, Vt.' ' 1949 146,500 - Winsted, Conn. : 1954 245,500 - Woonsocket, R.I.:' 1962 4,040,000 224,500 Worcester Diversion, Mass.' 1978 5,086,859 79,300 1. Inactive. 14. Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended 2. Hopkinton-Everett substituted for Beards Brook and for land condemnation. Bennington. 15. The Island, Townshend, and Ball Mountain Lakes were 3. Completed. substituted. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 16. Excludes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 5. Reflects FY 1967 settlement of outstanding claims. 17. Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6. Completed except for inactive portion. 18. Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 7. Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 19. Excludes $346,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 8. Excludes $147,366 flood control and coastal emergency 20. Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. funds expended. 21. Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 9. Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 22. Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and 10. Emergency Bank Protection. $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. 11. A dam was constructed at site by private interests. 23. Excludes $1,147,169 expended from Contributed Funds, 12. Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. Other. 13. To be restudied. 24. Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. TABLE 1-0 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Beverly, Mass. $ 2,700 Blackstone River, Uxbridge, Mass. 7,930 Buzzards Bay, Bourne, Mass. 3,300 Deep River, Deep River, Conn. 3,443 Gloucester, Mass. 2,508 Harbor Brook, Meriden, Conn. 2,360 Hardig Brook, Warwick, R.I. 2,168 Hop Brook & Beaver Dam Brook, Framingham, Mass. 1,419 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, Mass. 23,221 Lake Buel, Monterey & New Marlborough, Mass. 6,843 Little River & Bladens Brook, Seymour, Conn. 5,764 Machias River, Machias, Me. 4,075 Mad River, Waterbury, Conn. 4,519 Mattabasset River, Berlin, Conn. 5,0(0) Moose River, Concord, Vt. 4,298 North Branch, Park River, Hartford, Conn. 3,600 Pines River, Revere, Mass. 8,218 Pushaw Lake, Glenburn & Hudson, Me. 2,587 Sebasticook River, Hartland, Me. 54,398 Spicket River, Salem, N.H. 2,343 Willow Brook, New Britain, Conn. 2,873 Yantic River, Franklin, Conn. 3,493 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 1-P For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, Me.' 1935 6,384,394 - 1. Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities thansferred to War Assets Administration. TABLE 1-Q DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report For Deauthorized Construction Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Andover Lake, Conn. Bagaduce River, Me. (uncompleted portion) Baker Brook, Mass. Beards Brook Reservoir, N.H. Beaver Brook Lake, N.H. Bennington Reservoir, N.H. Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, Mass. Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. (uncompleted portion) Brockway Lake, Vt. Cambridgeport Lake, Vt. Chicopee, Mass. (uncompleted portion) Claremont Lake, N.H. Clyde, R.I. Connecticut River below Hartford Conn. (uncompleted portion) Cotuit Harbor, Mass. Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. (uncompleted portion) Gaysville Lake, Vt. Greenwich Point Beach, Conn. Housatonic River, Conn. (uncompleted portion) Honey Hill Lake, N.H. Ludlow Lake, Vt. Manchester Harbor, Mass. Marblehead Harbor, Mass. Mattapoisett Harbor, Mass. Mountain Brook Dam, N.H. Mystic, Conn. Napatree Beach, R.I. Narragansett Pier, R.I. North Andover and Lawrence, Mass. Norwalk-Wilton, Conn. Pawcatuck River, R.I. & Conn. (uncompleted portion) Pawtucket, R.I. Point Judith, R.I. Pontiac Diversion, R.I. Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), Mass. (uncompleted portion) Provincetown Harbor, Mass. (uncompleted portion) Saco River, Me (uncompleted portion) Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, Mass. (uncompleted portion) South Coventry Lake, Conn. South Tunbridge Lake, Vt. Stamford Harbor, Conn. (2 projects uncompleted portions) Stonington Harbor, Me. Stratford, Conn. Sugar Hill Reservoir, N.H. The Island Lake, Vt. Thumpertown Beach, Eastham, Mass. Wareham-Marion, Mass. Victory Lake, Vt. West Brookfield Reservoir, Mass. West Canaan Lake, N.H. Westfield, Mass. Westport, Conn. Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn. (uncompleted portion) 1972 1949 1973 1949 1961 1980 1946 1954 1968 1948 1979 1962 1969 1970 1959 1979 1949 1949 1968 1950 1949 1968 1966 1949 1973 1979 1949 1968 1948 1961 1979 1979 1922 1951 1979 1961 1973 1946 1961 1965 1967 1948 1948 1967 1965 1972 - Aug 1977 $ - - Aug. 1977 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Apr 1978 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1970 Apr 1951 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Oct 1976 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Aug 1977 Aug 1972 Nov 1979 Nov 1970 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Nov 1979 Nov 1977 Nov 1977 Apr 1951 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Mar 1977 Dec 1944 Aug 1977 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Jul 1960 Aug 1977 Sep 1969 Feb 1970 Nov. 1979 94,000 78,000 378,300 205,000 242,700 8,800 8,541 206,600 92,000 23,986 43,711 57,000 67,700 115,590 20,000 198,477 24,200 96,000 2,543 934,500 81,715 168,400 67,00 92,000 507,200 29,634 1-49 NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT* This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts, Connecticut, and eastern and south-central New York, including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State line to but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. It exercises jurisdiction, however, over Navigation all matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary water, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control............... 2. Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels N.Y. ............................ 3. Bronx River, N.Y. ............... 4. Browns Creek, N.Y. ................ 5. East River, N.Y. ................. 6. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. .......... 7. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. ............. 8. Great Chazy River, N.Y. ............ 9. Hudson River, N.Y................ 10. Hudson River Channel, N.Y.......... 11. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. ............... 12. Jones Inlet, N.Y. ................... 13. Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y............ 14. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. ........... 15. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. ................. 16. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y..... 17. Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J ............... ** *.... 18. New York & New Jersey Channels ... 19. New York Harbor-collection and removal of drift ...................... 20. New York Harbor-entrance channels & anchorage areas.................. 21. Raritan River, N.J............. 22. Shooters Island, N.Y. & N.J.......... 23. Westchester Creek, N.Y. ......... 24. Supervisor of New York Harbor.... 25. Reconnaissance and conditions surv ey s . . . . . . ... . . . .. *.. *.* . ** . *. . . . ..*.. 26. Other authorized navigation projects . 27. Navigation work under special authorization ......................... Beach Erosion Control 28. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) .... 2-2 29. Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y... 30. Other authorized beach erosion control 2-2 projects......................... 2-2 31. Beach erosion control work under spe- 2-3 cial authorization.................. 2-3 Flood Control 2-4 32. Ardsley, N.Y.................. 2-5 33. Elizabeth, N.J ..................... 2-5 34. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, 22--55 NN...Y......................... 2-6 35. Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, 22--77 N J.J ............................... 2-8 36. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. 2-8 Phase I ...................... 2-9 37. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, 2-9 N.J .............. . ........... 2-10 38. Sawmill River Elmsford-Greenburg, 2-1N.Y.............................. 2-10 39. South Ellenville, N.Y................ 2-11 40. South Orange, N.J.................... 41. Staten Island, N.Y. .................. 2-12 42. Yonkers, N.Y..................... 2-12 43. Inspection of completed flood control S projects...................... 2-14thorized flood control proj- 2-14 ects ......... ..................... 2-14 45. Flood control work under special au- 2-15 thorization ........................ 2-16 46. Emergency streambank and shoreline 2-16 protection under special authorization 2-16 47. Debris removal work under special 2-16 authorization ...................... General Investigations 48. Surveys................... ....... 2-162-1649. Collection and study of basic data..... *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 2-1 2-16 2-18 2-18 2-18 2-19 2-20 2-22 2-22 2-23 2-24 2-25 2-25 2-26 2-27 2-28 2-28 2-28 2-29 2-29 2-29 2-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. State indicated on March 17, 1970 its intention to cooperate. Operations and results during period. A reconnaissance report for control of nuisance plants in Lake Champlain, Vermont was completed and a General Design Memorandum was initiated. Condition as ofSeptember 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division area was completed in August 1967. Planning for the waterchestnut control in the Hudson-Mohawk basin was completed by the New York District, contracts for $181,562 accomplished during FY1971 through FY1976. Reconnaissance report for Lake Champlain, Vermont was completed and a General Design Memorandum was initiated. 2. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. Location. These channels lie along east shore of Upper Bay, New York Harbor, and with Buttermilk Channel, form an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from the Narrows to East River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 369 and 541.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938; pages 1768 and 195, respectively. Existing project. A channel 1,200 feet wide and 40 feet deep at mean low water from the Narrows to Bay Ridge Avenue, Brooklyn, thence 1,750 feet wide to junction of Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, thence 1,200 feet wide through Red Hook Channel to junction with Buttermilk Channel and a channel of same depth extending into Gowanus Bay from junction of Bay Ridge Channel with Red Hook Channel, narrowing uniformly in width to about 500 feet at 28th Street, Brooklyn. Section included in project is 4 miles long. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $4,277,197, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminalfacilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. Hopper Dredge Goethals was employed from August 19, 1980 to August 31, 1980 in Red Hook Channel, N.Y. Removed 67,633 cubic yards of material, place measurement, at a cost of $350,000 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced March 1901 and completed June 1940. 3. BRONX RIVER, N.Y. Location. Empties into a shallow bay in north shore of East River, 11 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12339.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915, page 1762, and Annual Report for 1938, page 166. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide to extend from deep water in East River to the head of navigation at the dam at East 177th Street, involving the first dredging from East River at Randall Avenue to a width of 200 feet; thence to Spofford Avenue, 150 feet; thence to Watson Avenue, 125 feet; thence to railroad bridge near Westchester Avenue, 100 feet, except in southern approach to bridge, where it is to be 140 feet. Section included in project is about 2.4 miles long. Mean tidal range is 6.9 feet in the estuary; mean range of spring tides, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of project as described above cost $1,080,910, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects, and exclusive of $10,000 contributed by local interests. Channel widening from Westchester Avenue to East 172d Street is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1953) is $299,000. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1912, page 1470. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1913, 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT provides that any right-of-way that may be necessary for the execution of the project shall be furnished, free of cost to the United States. Right-of-way within bulkhead lines below Westchester Avenue Bridge was accepted by Chief of Engineers June 1920, and above the Westchester Avenue Bridge October 1928. On September 10, 1940, the Chief of Engineers approved releases from damages furnished by adjoining property owners in each of river between Westchester Avenue and East 174th Street. On November 12, 1940, the Chief of Engineers approved an agreement under which city of New York would reimburse the United States for cost of a retaining wall to protect adjoining property in reach of river between Westchester Avenue and New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad bridge in lieu of furnishing additional right-of-way. On October 28, 1940, the Secretary of War authorized the acceptance of $10,000 from the city of New York to defray the cost of retaining wall. Additional right-of-way required in the section below East 172d Street has not been furnished. City of New York indicated it does not feel justified in acquiring any additional land along the river. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. Contract was awarded June 10, 1980 to restore project dimensions. Work started July 21, 1980, with completion scheduled for August 28, 1980. Work temporarily suspended with approximately 43 percent work finished, pending shore structure stability study. Work rescheduled for completion 1980. A total of 123,650 cubic yards, place measurement, was removed during the fiscal year at a cost of $876,038.00 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Active portion of existing project was commenced in 1914 and completed in 1941. A channel to project dimensions was completed from deep water in East River up to the Westchester Avenue Bridge in 1926. A channel 10 feet deep and 123 to 65 feet wide from Westchester Avenue Bridge to East 174th Street was completed in 1941. Work remaining under existing project consists of widening reach between Westchester Avenue Bridge and East 172d Street. Channel between East 172d Street and the upper limit of authorized project was filled in by City of New York under a Department of the Army permit and is no longer a waterway. 4. BROWNS CREEK, N.Y. Location. A narrow, crooked tidal stream emptying into Great South Bay, near Sayville, Long Island, N.Y., about 15 miles by water northeast of Fire Island Inlet, and about 65 miles by water east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from 6-foot contour in Great South Bay for 1,850 feet, and thence, with same width, 4 feet deep for 1,350 feet; also for two stone jetties to protect the entrance, east jetty to be 448 feet long and west jetty 700 feet long. Section included in project is about 0.6 mile. Mean tidal range, 0.6 feet; mean range of spring tides 0.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water up to 3.2 feet above mean high water. Cost of new work for completed portion of project is $33,976. Dredging of channel to a depth of 4 feet for 3,300 feet northward to upper limit of project and extension of jetties; east jetty to 1,400 feet long and west jetty 1,600 feet long were deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Fifteen terminals, including two ferries, with a total available dockage of 7,980 feet, are scattered along shore of creek between its mouth and head of improved channel. Three are publicly owned; all are open to the public. None has rail connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded March 19, 1980. Work started April 17, 1980, and completed June 11, 1980. A total of 31,327 cubic yards was removed at a total cost of $199,789, for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1891 and completed July 1927. East jetty was completed to a length of 448 feet in 1893. West jetty was completed to a length of 492 feet in 1892 and extended in 1927 to a total length of 700 feet. Six-foot channel has been completed. Four-foot channel has been completed for 1,350 feet. 5. EAST RIVER, N.Y. Location. A tidal strait about 16 miles long and 600 to 4,000 feet wide, connecting Hudson River and the Upper Bay at the Battery, New York City, with Long Island Sound at Throgs Neck, New York City, and separating 'Long Island from Manhattan Island and the mainland. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12339, and 12366.) Previous projects. For details see page 210 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Channels of following dimensions (depths refer to mean low water): From deep water in Upper New York Bay to Wallabout Channel, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; from Wallabout Channel to Throgs Neck, 35 feet deep, with widths 2-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 varying from about 550 to 1*,000 feet according to locality; east of F.D. Roosevelt Island up to English Place (43d Dr.), Long Island City, 30 feet deep and varying in width from 500 to 900 feet, with widening in approach from main channel; between South Brother and Berrian Islands, 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with widening in approach from main channel; from East River channel to Astoria waterfront, a flared 0.31 mile entrance channel 1,600 to 400 feet wide, a 0.64 mile channel 400 feet wide, and 'a turning basin 1,000 feet wide and 1,600 feet long, all 37 feet deep in rock and 35 feet in soft material (South Brother Island Channel); removal of Coenties Reef to a depth of 40 feet, also removal of following rocks and reefs lying outside of limiting lines of main channel to give access to wharves: Along Brooklyn shore, Brooklyn Bridge to Manhattan Bridge (Fulton Ferry Reef), to a depth of 25 feet; Jay Street Reef, 25 feet; Corlears Reef, 35 feet; Shell Reef, 25 feet; Horns Hook, 40 feet; Rhinelander Reef, 26 feet; and reef off Oak Point, 30 feet; and construction of a dike in Pot Cove in Hell Gate. Section included in improvement is about 17.8 miles long. Mean range of tide varies according to locality from 4 feet at North Third Street, Brooklyn, and 4.4 feet at the Battery to 4.9 feet at Hallets Point, 6.3 feet at Port Morris, and 7.1 feet at eastern entrance at Throgs Neck; mean range of spring tides 4.8, 5.3, 5.9, 7.6, and 8.5 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary according to locality from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery, 2.4 feet at North Third Street, Brooklyn, and 3.8 feet at Throgs Neck up to about 5.2 feet above mean high water at the Battery and 8.4 feet above mean high water at Throgs Neck; extreme fluctuations do not seriously affect navigation. Local cooperation. Resolutions of 1970 require local interests to furnish lands, easements and rightsof- way for construction and maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with project depth; provide upon transfer to the United States, a depth in the existing South Brother Island Channel and turning basin of not less than 30 feet; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor, which shall be in accordance with regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution control. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey under date of April 9, 1974. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. Preliminary engineering and design costs were incurred in the amount of $29,864.34 for proposed maintenance dredging of South Brother Island Channel. Work is expected to be advertised in October 1980. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced June 1916 and was essentially completed in November 1976. Construction of dike at Pot Cove in Hell Gate and a part of widening near pierhead line in Jay Street Reef are considered unnecessary for the needs of current navigation. 6. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean for about 0.6 mile to 12-foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 39 terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway. Nine of these are oil terminals, one of which has a railroad spur. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with a berthage of 7,655 feet. Of these, 21 have marine railways and 1 has mechanical- handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Contract was awarded August 20, 1979 combining maintenance dredging of East Rockaway Inlet navigation project to 12 feet below mean low water with Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay beach erosion control and hurricane protection project. Total navigation related material removed was 241,100 cubic yards at cost of $927,559. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long, was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 7. GLEN COVE CREEK, N.Y. Location. A narrow tidal inlet extending eastwardly about 1 mile from east side of Hempstead Harbor on the north shore of Long Island, 26 miles northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12366.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep at mean low water from deep water in Hempstead Harbor about 1 mile to the head of navigation at city of Glen Cove. Mean tidal range, 7.4 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $29,760, exclusive of $29,774 expended from contributed funds. Widening to 100 feet the upper 1,630 feet of channel and building a sand fence along north side of channel where it crosses the beach are considered inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $140,000, including 50 percent to be contributed by local interests. Existing project adopted by 1925 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 207, 68th Cong., 1st sess.). Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925, provides that local interests pay onehalf of first cost of the work, provide rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, and bulkheads, and give assurances that adequate terminals will be built. Complied with as to contribution of one-half of first cost of work done to date, cession of rights-of-way, provision of disposal areas, and the construction of terminals. Pending construction of bulkheads by local interests along southerly side of channel in the upper 1,600 feet of the improvement, a channel of less than project width has been excavated. In letter dated February 4, 1948, the Commissioner, Department of Public Works, City of Glen Cove, was notified of the conditions affecting the remaining work. There is no indication as to when compliance with these conditions may be expected. Terminal facilities. There are 1,875 feet of bulkheads along northerly side of waterway. Terminals are adequate for present needs and there is ample waterfront, both public and private, for additional terminals as needs arise. Operations and results during period. Project for dredging in outer portion of channel is awaiting resolution of local cooperation requirements. Cost in FY1980 was $7,339. Condition as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 55 percent complete. Work under the active portion of existing project was commenced August 1933 and completed August 1934. The work done provided a channel 100 feet wide from deep water in Hempstead Harbor for 3,470 feet, thence gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide for 180 feet, and 50 feet wide for about 1,450 feet to the head of the improvement. Head of navigation is at City of Glen Cove, about 1 mile above the mouth. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of widening to 100 feet the upper 1,630 feet of channel and building a sand fence along north side of channel where it crosses the beach. 8. GREAT CHAZY RIVER, N.Y. Location. A narrow fresh water stream emptying into Lake Champlain in the northeastern portion of the State of New York. The mouth of the river is approximately 1.3 miles downstream, from Coopersville and about 5.5 miles south of the Canadian Border. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 5 feet deep at low lake level and 40 feet wide from the 5-foot contour in Lake Champlain to the Village of Champlain, a distance of 5.5 miles. The mean lake level is 2.66 ft. above low lake level. The level of the lake varies from 0.6 ft. below low lake level to 8.8 ft. above low lake level. Cost for completion of the project is $18,000. This project was adopted in 1889 under the R&H Act of 1888. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one recreational marina and one boat launching site on the Great Chazy River. Recreational traffic consists of approximately 6,500 vessel trips per year. There are no commercial terminal facilities located on this waterway. Operations and results during period. Contract was awarded on July 21, 1979 for dredging to project depth of 5 feet. Work commenced September 26, 1979 and was completed October 31, 1979. FY1980 Cost $65,678. Condition as of September 30. Work under entire existing project is 100 percent complete. Work was completed in 1895. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980 was $306,097, $18,000 for new work, $288,097 for maintenance. 9. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay. Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 282, 283, 284, 747, and 748.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1764 and 226, respectively. Existing project. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 2-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.50 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of New York. Mean range of pool elevation above Federal dam at Troy, in seasons of moderage rains, is about 2.2 feet, as determined in 1934. Mean tidal range is about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.1 feet between July and September at Federal dam at Troy and about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.0 feet between July and September at Albany, extreme range due to freshets is 33.1 and 25.9 feet, respectively normal pool level above Federal dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.33 feet above mean sea level. In tidal section of river below dam, assumed lowest low water plane from Troy to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $552,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $458,000 (1957) are inactive. Construction of dikes at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminalfacilities. See Port Series No. 6, revised 1979. Operations and results during period. By use of Government plant and hired labor, stumps and snags which formed a potential menace to navigation, and other obstructions, were removed from the shores and channel of the river at a cost of $134,011 for maintenance in FY 1980. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year in performing surveys to restore horizontal and vertical controls at a cost of $99,587 for maintenance in FY 1980. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year on repairs to Cedar Hill Dike #3, at a cost of $60,777 for maintenance in FY 1980. The lock and dam in Hudson River at Troy, N.Y. were operated and maintained. Operation of lock for 1980 navigation season was suspended December 8, 1979 and resumed April 15, 1980. Cdst incurred was $551,099 for operation and maintenance in FY 1980. A maintenance dredging contract dated August 3, 1979, was awarded to perform work at Port of Albany and North Germantown. Contract amount is $1,416,740 which includes Federal amount of $938,340 and contributed fund amount of $478,400 by the State of New York, Department of Transportation, the local cooperating agency. Work commenced in FY1979 and was completed on December 19, 1979. Costs incurred during FY 1980 were $722,495 Federal funds and $279,400 contributed New York State funds. The total volume of material removed under the contract both FY1979 and 1980 was 181,550 cubic yards, pay place measurement. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and (lam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear-foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1,300 linear feet of the 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. Work remaining undler the project consists of completion of the 12-foot harbor at Troy and dredging the 27-foot and the remainder of the 32-foot channels at Albany which are not deemed necessary at this time; and reconstruction of dikes. Started coordination with State regarding mooring facilities. (See Table 2-D for total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980. 10. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. Location. Hudson River empties into Upper Bay of New York Harbor at the Battery, New York City. Section included under this title extends from deep water in Upper New York Bay about 14.5 miles to just north of Harlem River (Spuyten Duyvil Creek). (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 745, 746, and 747.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938, pages 1765, and 213 repectively. Existing prqject. A channel 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, suitably widened at bends from West 59th 2-6 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Street, Manhattan, to West 40th Street, thence 45 feet deep of same width to deep water in Upper Bay; a channel 40 feet deep for full width of river extending from northline of 59th Street to south side of Little Basin, and thence a channel of same depth to deep water in Upper New York Bay off Ellis Island, substantially as shown on maps in H. Doc. 309, 72d Cong., 1st sess., subject to provision that no dredging be done under porject within 50 feet of pierhead lines; a channel 750 feet wide and 30 feet deep along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront; removal of a shoal on New York side between West 59th and West 61st Streets to a depth of 40 feet; and removal of an obstruction north of mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek to depth surrounding river bottom. Channel included in project is about 11 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range at the Battery, 4.4 feet, and at West 129th Street, 4.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 and 4.9 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery up to 6.2 feet above mean high water and at West 129th Street from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 5.3 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminalfacilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. No work done in FY 1980. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project as commenced April 1913 and completed September 1952. Widening and deepening Weehawken-Edgewater Channel to project dimensions was completed in August 1937. Widening 40- foot channel for full width of river from Ellis Island to West 59th Street, Manhattan, was completed in March 1939. Widening 48-foot project to full project width 2,000 feet from West 40th Street to West 59th Street was completed in November 1950. Deepening 45-foot channel for a width of 2,000 feet from Upper Bay to West 40th Street was completed to project dimensions in September 1952. 11. JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. Location. Inside south shore of Long Island, the entrance being about 17 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12350). Previous projects. For details see page 1770 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 185 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an interior channel extending from vicinity of Marine Parkway Bridge along west and north shores of the bay, 18 feet deep at mean low water and 300 feet wide to Mill Basin, with a swinging basin, 1,000 feet wide and 1,000 feet long at the point; thence 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Fresh Creek Basin; and interior channel extending from the same locality along south shore to Head of Bay, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide; a channel in Mott Basin, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide extending from the channel along south shore, 3,000 feet to junction of the two branches, thence 2,200 feet in north branch (Inwood Creek) and 3,200 feet in south branch; and an entrance channel connecting the two interior channels with deep water in Atlantic Ocean, of suitable hydraulic dimensions to maintain present tidal prism in the bay, but not less than 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from opposite Barren Island to Rockaway Point, thence enlarging to not less than 200 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide to the sea, protected by one riprap jetty. Length of section included in project is 19.7 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.9 feet at Barren Island, and 5.1 feet at Head of Bay; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 and 6.1 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water to 4.9 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project is $4,466,421 (July 1961), excluding amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that in lieu of conditions heretofore prescribed local interests furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged materials for new work and subsequent maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. City of New York was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 25, 1946. In letter dated February 7, 1946, the Mayor of City of New York advised that disposal areas are available and necessary document "holding the United States free from claim for damages" would be executed. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suaitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and subsequent maintenance, hold the United States free from damages and perform all necessary alterations to existing terminals and bulkheads, and dredge adequate approaches thereto. These conditions have been fulfilled. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5 revised 1978. Operations and results during period. Preliminary engineering and design costs were incurred in the amount of $160,641 for proposed maintenance dredging. Work expected to be advertised in FY1981. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced in August 1912 and completed in June 1961. Westerly interior channel from Barren Island to Fresh Creek Basin and swinging 2-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 basin at Mill Basin were completed in April 1929. Southerly interior channel and channel in Mott Basin, including its two branches were completed in June 1961. No new work dredging of entrance channel was done, since depths provided under previous project were greater than those required under existing project. East jetty was restored to project dimensions in August 1963. 12. JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing project. An entrance jetty and a channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tides varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and 40 boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are nine public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operation and results during period. Continuing contract dated May 14, 1979, for maintenance dredging at 14 feet and 12 feet depths, was completed October 28, 1979. Total quantity dredged for the contract was 182,755 pay cubic yards. FY 1980- 62,024 cubic yards. FY 1980 cost $21,433. Another contract was awarded July 21, 1980 for dredging to a 14 foot depth. Work commenced August 18, 1980, and was completed September 9, 1980. Pay yardage 156,634 cubic yards; cost for FY 1980 was $1,678,886 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. 13. MAMARONECK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On north shore of Long Island South, 5 miles west of Connecticut State line, and 27 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12367). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1924, and 1938, pages 1759, 141, and 160, respectively. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Long Island Sound to Orient Point, and thence 80 feet wide to a point about 150 feet below the Boston Post Road, including an extension to northeast 300 feet long and 80 feet wide, all with widening at bends; for 2 anchorages, 1 of 10-foot depth about 41/2 acres in extent and the second about 14 acres in area to a depth of 6 feet; and an anchorage in the West Basin 6 feet deep at mean low water with a channel of like depth and 80 feet wide connecting this anchorage with the main channel. Section included in project, 1/4 miles. Mean tidal range, 6.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completion cost $258,996 exclusive of $151,044 and $43,023 expended from contributed funds, required and contributed funds, other, respectively, and amounts expended in previous projects. � Local cooperation. Provisions under River and Harbor Acts of 1922 and 1935 complied with except local interests must provide adequate and suitable spoil-disposal areas suitably diked or bulk-headed as needed. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of construction, to be paid in a lump sum prior to construction, final allocation of cost to be made after actual costs are determined; provide lands, rightsof- way, and suitable disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of anchorage; hold the United States free from damages; provide at all times adequate public landing facilities, open to all on equal terms, for access to the shore by users of the anchorage; and allocate an adequate portion of the anchorage to accommodate a minimum of 15 boats, and provide mooring facilities therein, specifically designated for use by transient craft on terms equal to those in portions of the anchorage designated for use by local craft. Assurances of compliance were furnished by the village of Mamaroneck and accepted by the District Engineer on April 3, 1962. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. Preliminary engineering and design costs were incurred in the amount of $15,692 for proposed maintenance 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT dredging. Dredging is proposed for FY1981. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in October 1924 and was completed in May 1966. Work completed consisted of providing a 10-foot main channel, branch channel and anchorage area in East Basin completed in April 1933. A 6-foot connecting channel and anchorage area in West Basin completed in July 1939. An enlargement of anchorage area in East Basin to a depth of 6 feet completed in May 1966. In June 1963 and May 1966 controlling mean low water depth was 10 feet for a width varying from 100 to 80 feet in main channel from Long Island Sound to East Basin anchorage are thence 9 feet to upper limit including branch channel; in East Basin anchorage areas, 10 feet in 10-foot anchorage area and 6 feet in 6-foot anchorage area; in West Basin, 6 feet in 6-foot anchorage area and 6 feet in connecting channel thereto. 14. MATTITUCK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. A tidal inlet on North shore of Long Island, 85 miles east of the Battery, New York City, and 24 miles southeast of New Haven Harbor, Conn., extending southward about 21/4 mile to village of Mattituck. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12358). Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water from Long Island Sound to a 460- by 570- foot anchorage area at village of Mattituck, protected at the entrance by two parallel jetties 400 feet apart, channel widths are 100 feet at entrance 80 feet elsewhere. Total length is about 2.2 miles. Mean tidal range at entrance, 4.9 feet; at Old Mill Bridge, Waterville, 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides at entrance, 5.8 feet; at Old Mill Bridge, 6 feet; irregular fluctuations tae to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.2 feet below mean low water up to 6.6 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Lower portion of harbor contains four commercial and two recreational boating terminals. Commercial terminals are used for handling petroleum products, sand, gravel, building materials, fish and shellfish. Recreational terminals have mooring accommodations available for 20 boats and facilities for the sale of gasoline, oil, bait, miscellaneous supplies and for repair services. Upper portion of harbor contains facilities for recreational craft and are open to the general public. Operations and results during period. Contract was awarded December 11, 1979. Work commenced May 9, 1980 and was completed May 25, 1980. Removed 24,137 Pay cubic yards. Total Cost $225,534 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Project is complete. Original dredging was completed in 1914. East jetty was completed in 1906 for a 775-foot length. West jetty was completed in 1938. 15. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.8 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments; seaward extension of the east jetty to the 12-foot contour and seaward extension of the west jetty a distance of 400 feet; construction of a fixed by-passing facility to transfer sand from the east side of the inlet to the west side. Mean tidal range in the ocean at the inlet is 3.3 feet and in the bay at Westhampton Beach is 0.6 foot. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.7 feet below mean low water up to 15.7 feet above mean low water at the bay. Estimate of cost for new work is $23,010,000 (October 1980); including $40,000 from Coast Guard and $5,370,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of July 14,1960 provides that local interests shall, prior to construction, agree to contribute in cash 45 percent of the cost of construction by the Corps of Engineers and agree to contribute in cash 50 percent of the maintenance, operation, and replacement, or perform work of equal value when and as acceptable to the Chief Engineers; And, provided further that in connection with the improvement of the inlet, local interests, prior to construction, agree to (a) make the cash contribution either a lump sum prior to commencement of the work, or in installments prior to commencement of pertinent work items, in accordance with work schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (b) furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required; and (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; (d) provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when 2-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 anJ as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlets and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; and (e) maintain for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the cost is based. Terminal facilities. No terminals are within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. However, numerous public and private terminal facilities are available in Moriches Bay and in the connecting canals. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharves and landings, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay. The yacht clubs and boatyards have equipment for servicing boats. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future commerce warrant. Operations and results during period. Preconstruction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e., navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). Formulated plans for a single purpose navigation project. Condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated. Preconstruction planning (advance engineering and design) underway. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency work is being done under the authority of PL84-99. Preconstruction planning is continuing. 16. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VT. Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. Project extends 13.5 miles from Whitehall, N.Y., at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See Lake Survey Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1932, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y., at head of Lake Champlain, to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low lake level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet, and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion, revised in (1954), was $1,573,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In Whitehall Harbor consisting of three timber wharves, aggregating 4,200 feet in length. State of New York constructed a barge canal terminal at Whitehall, just south of terminus of canal, which has been equipped with a 5-ton handoperated derrick and a storehouse. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags, at a total cost of $10,270. Government plant and hired labor were employed in replacing deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $9,883. Supplies and equipment cost $799. Total costs for the project were $20,952. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 47 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least a width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow (Putts Leap and Putts Rock). (Fender booms opposite the Delaware and Hudson Railroad trestle have been removed as they no longer are considered necessary for navigation). The work remaining to complete the project consists of widening the channel throughout its entire length to the project width of 200 feet. 17. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. Location. Newark Bay is an estuary about 1.25 miles wide and 6 miles long extending southerly from confluence of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers to New York and New Jersey Channels. Hackensack River rises near Haverstraw, Rockland County, N.Y., and flows about 45 miles into Newark Bay. Passaic River rises in highlands of northeastern New Jersey and flows about 80 miles into Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333 and 12337). Previous projects. For details see 1926 Annual Report, pages 265 and 266; and Annual Reports for 1929, 1938, 1954, and 1976, pages 301, 244, 134, and 2-11 respectively. Existing project.* (Depths are 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in other material unless noted). 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Newark Bay: An additional widening at the junction with the Kill Van Kull in the vicinity of Bergen Point by deepening a triangular area at the eastern end of the channel south of Shooters Island from 30 to 35 feet, this area to be transferred from the New York and New Jersey Channels project to the Newark Bay project. Estimate of cost for new work for active portion of existing project consisting of channels described above, is $3,925,000 (October 1977). (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial construction and future maintenance; provide depths commensurate with channel depth in approaches and berths at terminals of companies which would use improvement; and hold the United States free from damages. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests must provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and construction, hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, and accomplish without cost to the United States removal or relocation of pipelines, cables and other utilities. Assurances were furnished by Port of New York Authority and accepted June 12, 1964. Local cooperation required by previous modifications is fully complied with. Assurances of Local Cooperation for the widening east of Shooters Island in the vicinity of Bergen Point were furnished by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and accepted by the United States on October 8, 1975. Terminalfacilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35 feet below mean low water in the Main Channel and Port Newark Branch Channel, was awarded on March 21, 1979. Dredging commenced April 16, 1979, and was completed November 5, 1979. Contract Totals-removed 732,280 cubic yards at a cost of $1,490,883. For FY 1980, removed 35,373 cubic yards at a cost of $78,700. Adjustments to FY 1979 Annual Report, removed 696,907 cubic yards at a cost of $1,412,183. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of project began June 1976 and is 100 percent complete. Work was completed for modification of project consisting of additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 37 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island. Two contracts for the removal of all material including ledge rock to 37 feet mean low water were completed at a total cost of $3,772,631. There is a claim outstanding. 18. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12331 and 12333.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report, pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay, depths of 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material throughout, 600 feet wide across Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinities of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively; thence 500 feet wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide from a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line; and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook, and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1957) is $2,150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. See page 170, 1962 Annual Report for requirements under acts of May 28 and August 30, 1935. See page 156, 1965 Annual Report 2-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 for requirements under act of May 17, 1950. See page 168, 1966 Annual Report for requirements under act of October 27, 1965. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract dated August 31, 1979, for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35 feet below mean low water in specified sections of Raritan Bay Channel, was awarded to perform work near Seguine Point. This contract combined dredging of New York and New Jersey Channels with Ambrose Channel, New York Harbor. Work commenced September 10, 1979 and continued to November 1, 1979. FY1980 Portion of N.Y. and N.J. Channels was $25,500 carryover expense of Supervision and Inspection, plus overhead out of total project. Removed total of 104,594 pay cubic yards, in FY1980 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. (See Table 2-D for total cost for existing project to September 30, 1980. 19. NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor: East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J., and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1970 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterways and was funded as a maintenance activity. Estimate of first cost of improvement under Act of 1974 is $81,000,000 (October 1980) including $27,000,000 cash contribution from local interests, plus $29,600,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91- 611. Operations and results during period. New Work: Liberty State Park Contract IVA is 99 percent complete at a cost of $2,147,499. A contract for the East River Manhattan Waterfront was awarded on September 30, 1980 at a cost of $1,393,500. Engineering and design for the balance of project continued. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster and Hayward. Tigs Daly, Stanwix and auxiliary plant were assigned the work of removing and disposing of drift when not employed on other work. Removed and disposed of 495,752 cubic feet (3,873 cords) of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to timbers of large dimensions, including piles and pieces of wreckage at a cost of $2,026,586 in Fiscal Year 1980. Condition as of September 30. Work authorized under Pier and Harbor Acts of 1915, 1917 and 1930 is continuous maintenance for which no percentage of completion exists. For work authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has commenced at Liberty State Park, in New Jersey and on the East River in New York. Liberty State Park Contracts I, II, III and IVA have been completed. A contract for the East River, Manhattan Waterfront was awarded on September 30, 1980. Engineering and design for the remainder of the project is underway. 20. NEW YORK HARBOR- ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor, Mass., and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City, to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT the sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay, opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; a southerly entrance channel, Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 3.7 miles from junction with new southerly entrance channel to junction with Main Ship Channel; Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in Anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage, 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hook Flats to depths of 45, 40, and 35 feet over an area of 928 acres and an anchorage area in Gravesend Bay to 47 feet deep over area of 334 acres. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised Vol. 2, 1978. Operations and results during period. A contract dated August 31, 1979 for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 47 feet below mean low water was awarded to perform work in Ambrose Channel. This contract combined dredging of New York Harbor with New York and New Jersey Channels. Work commenced September 10, 1979 and continued to November 10, 1979. Removed total of 658,415 pay cubic yards for both fiscal years from Ambrose Channel at a cost of $894,381 for FY1980 for maintenance. U.S. Hopper Dredge "Essayons" commenced work to restore project dimensions in 35 foot portion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage on September 23, 1979 and continued to November 10, 1979. Removed total of 1,084,411 pay cubic yards for both fiscal years. Cost for FY1980 is $1,172,000 for maintenance. U.S. Hopper Dredge "Goethals" commenced work in Ambrose Channel on August 31, 1980 and worked into FY1981. For FY1980 removed 699,817 pay cubic yards at a cost of $849,675 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends near southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed in November 1960. Red Hook Flats anchorage was completed to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet in October 1976. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section) was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay Anchorage was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 21. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. Location. Rises in north-central part of New Jersey and flows generally southeasterly into Raritan Bay, between Perth Amboy and South Amboy, about 24 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 375.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1777, 359 and 259, respectively. Existing project. A channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide extending 5.8 miles from turn in New York and New Jersey Channels near Great Beds Light to Government wharf on Main Channel, widened to 600 feet for 1,000 feet long opposite wharf to form a turning basin of same depth; thence a channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide 3 miles to Washington Canal; thence 10 feet deep in soft material, 11 feet deep in rock, and generally 100 feet wide with widening at bends 5 miles to Delaware and Raritan Canal entrance at New Brunswick, and a South Channel 25 2-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 feet deep and 300 feet wide 0.8 mile from junction with Main Channel at Keasby to upper limit of Titanium Pigment Co. property; thence 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide 0.4 mile to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority; thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide 0.4 mile to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority; thence 100 feet deep and 150 feet wide 2 miles to a point 1,300 feet below upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tides is 5.1 feet at mouth of river and 5.6 feet at New Brunswick; mean range of spring tides, 6.1 and 6.6 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to winds and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. New work for completed portion of project, consisting of channels described above cost $1,237,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and including $66,000 contributed by local interests. Dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Cost estimate for this portion is $86,000 (1954). (See Table 2- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance to 25-foot channel from New York & Long Branch Railroad bridge to junction of Main and South Channels, and in South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. property. River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides local interests furnish spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor, required for maintenance of improvement, and hold the United States free from damages. Terminalfacilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, pages 274-279 and 281. Operations and results during period. No work done in FY1980. Reconnaissance surveys cost $5,687. Condition as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 96 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project was commenced September 1919 and completed July 1941. A shoal along northerly channel line in vicinity of Victory Bridge was eliminated by relocation of channel in February 1959. Main Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction with New York and New Jersey Channels to and including a turning basin of same depth opposite Government wharf, thence 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to mouth of Washington Canal, thence 10 and 11 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Delaware and Raritan Canal outlet locks at New Brunswick. South Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,200 feet, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 12,400 feet to within 1,300 feet of junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Model study of Raritan River was completed in March 1952. Work remaining under existing project is dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. 22. SHOOTERS ISLAND, N.Y. & N.J. Location. Shooters Island is located in the southernmost end of Newark Bay, about 500 feet off Staten Island, with largest portion in New York (Richmond County) and remainder in New Jersey (Hudson and Union Counties). Existing project. The removal of Shooters Island was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, PL 94-587. The project plan consists of removal of all material, exclusive of drift sources, within the area defined by the Federal channels north and south of Shooters Island to a depth of 35 feet below mean low water, the material to be used for fill along the Arthur Kill. It includes the removal of soft material (4.5 million cubic yards) and rock (800,000 cubic yards) with disposal of the material at Howland Hook and other landfill areas in the vicinity. Total project cost is estimated at $72,600,000 with $1,000,000 estimated for preconstruction planning. It is estimated that project planning will take 4 years and project construction will take 4 years. Local cooperation. Local interests would provide all necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way and disposal areas for the project; hold the United States free from damages; accomplish any necessary relocations; and make a cash contribution if determined appropriate. Terminalfacilities. None. Operations and results during period. Special Report on the environmental impacts, cost sharing, and other aspects of the project was prepared and submitted to Congress August 6, 1979 per directive of the Senate Appropriations Committee Report 95- 1069 on the FY1979 Appropriations Bill. Condition as of September 30. The Senate Appropriations Committee Report 95-1069 on FY1979 Appropriations Bill directed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to prepare a report on the environmental impacts, cost sharing, and other aspects of the project. The report was submitted on August 6, 1979 and is currently under review by the Congress and Senate. 23. WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. Location. A tidal stream flowing into East River from north at a point 14 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12336.) 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1921 and 1938, pages 238 and 164, respectively. Existing project. A 2.6 mile channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 100 feet wide for 2,000 feet through the estuary; thence 80 feet wide for 3,000 feet; and thence 60 feet wide 8,800 feet to head of navigation at East Tremont Avenue (Fort Schuyler Road), with widening at bends, and two turning basins, one near upper end of channel, the other near Eastern Boulevard (Unionport) Bridge. Mean tidal range, 7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of the project cost $98,751 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Dredging turning basin to a depth of 12 feet below mean low water, 250 by 250 feet in extent, 500 feet downstream from head of navigation, is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1965) is $38,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides that local interests agree to furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and maintenance and furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance as required; hold the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain a suitable bulkhead or other works approved by Chief of Engineers for retaining the east bank of the turning basin alongside Hutchinson River Parkway; and that local interests give assurances they will construct a public wharf when required. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for dredging to restore project dimensions (12 feet deep at mean low water), in the amount of $1,333,566 was awarded July 15, 1980. Work commenced August 11, 1980 and was scheduled to be completed November 26, 1980. For FY 1980 removed 210,000 cubic yards at a total cost of $1,277,018 for maintenance. Condition as of September 30. Work under entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project commenced March 1932 and was completed May 1933. Upper 0.5 mile of the channel was relocated by city of New York in 1941. Head of navigation is at East Tremont Avenue, Bronx, about 2.6 miles above the mouth. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging to 12 feet below mean low water a turning basin 250 by 250 feet in extent to be 500 feet downstream from head of navigation. Total cost of active portion of existing project to September 30, 1980 was $2,947,000 of which $98,751 was for new work and $2,848,329 for maintenance. 24. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29,1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injuridus materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The Supervisor of New York Harbor is also responsible for enforcing the River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) which makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of those channels by ocean steamships and ships of deep draft. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409), commonly known as the Refuse Act, applies to all navigable waters of the United States. This Statute is used for enforcement purposes by the New York District Engineer on waterway violations not within the scope of the Act of 1888 or on violations that occur within his area of jurisdiction outside of New York Harbor and Long Island Sound. The waters under the jurisdiction of the Supervisor of New York Harbor include New York Harbor and its tributaries, Raritan River, Arthur Kill, Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, Kill Van Kull, Hudson River and its tributaries to the Federal Lock and Dam at Troy, New York, the East River and its tributaries, Harlem River and Long Island Sound. Enforcement of the Act of 1888 in Long Island Sound is limited to the Sound itself, ending at lines drawn between the headlands of the many inlets and harbors along its shores. The Supervisor of the Harbor, in his capacity as District Engineer, may apprehend violators of anti-pollution laws under authority of the Act of March 3, 1899 when violations occur in the inland tributary waters of Long Island Sound. The navigable waters of the Hudson River extending north from Troy, New York to the New York District boundary line at the Canadian border are under the jurisdiction of the District Engineer. The mission includes surveillance and inspection by Patrol Boat, to the 3-mile limit, of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor; patrol of inland waters, i.e. Long Island Sound and the Hudson River, to prevent illegal deposits that would have an adverse effect on navigation or anchorage; and prevention of interference with safe 2-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 navigation in New York Harbor entrance channels and other waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District. Inspections of shorefront facilities and property are conducted by Inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios. These inspectors operate out of field offices located at Belle Meade and Jersey City, New Jersey, and Floyd Bennett Field, Fort Totten, Troy and Riverhead, New York, and Burlington, Vermont. Inspections of shorefront facilities are conducted on an 8- hour a day, five days a week schedule. The activities include inspection of construction work fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to determine if the individual or company concerned has a Department of the Army permit for such work, and if so, if the work is being performed in accordance with the provisions of the permit; investigation of illegal deposits of refuse into navigable waters or their tributaries, or on the shoreline where the material is subject to being washed into the waterways and adversely affect navigation; and obstruction, by vessels, to navigation. 25. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). Cost for preauthorization studies to start reconnaissance report was: $4,036 on Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. Cost for preauthorization to complete Detailed Project Report was $5,231 on Mallets Bay, Vt. (expanded Reconnaissance Report). Beach Erosion Control 28. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PT. I) Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 8.7 million cubic yards of sand fill including the advanced placement of a two year supply of beach nourishment, and Federal participation in the cost of periodic beach nourishment of the shore protection works for 10 years after completion of the initial beach fill. Federal participation (50 percent) includes $9,160,000 (October 1980) first cost and $1,235,000 annually for 10 years for beach nourishment a total of $23,400,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear 50.0 percent of total first cost presently estimated at $23,400,000 consisting of a cash contribution of $9,160,000 the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined and $1,424,000 annually for periodic nourishment for 10 years, total non-Federal cost $23,400,000, hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly-owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; local cooperation agreement was executed by the state May 17, 1974 and approved for Secretary of Army May 31, 1974. On May 22, 1974 sent to state an approved Escrow Agreement. Operations and results during period. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment was completed. Design for construction of a terminal groin at Beach 149 Street was completed. Condition as of September 30. Advance engineering and design is completed. Final Environmental Impact Statement on file with Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration completed in FY1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment completed. Completion of 10 year periodic nourishment and construction of groin remain. 29. FIRE ISLAND INLET, TO JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. Atlantic Coast of Long Island, N.Y., between Fire Island Inlet and Jones Inlet, about 15 miles. Fire Island Inlet is on south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City, and connects Great South Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. Jones Inlet is on south shore of Long Island, about 37 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City, and connects Hempstead Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore from Fire Island to Jones Inlets by dredging inlet shoal in Fire Island Inlet and construction of a sand dike to relieve 2-16 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT pressure of tidal currents against Oak Beach, to provide a deposition area for littoral drift, and to obtain fill material for a feeder beach and Oak Beach. Authorization initially provided for three dredging operations over a period of 10 years, but was reduced to two, based on subsequently authorized project modification for sand bypassing facilities and on limited reduction of channel maintenance costs of navigation project. . For first increment, based on cost sharing provisions of Public Law 727, 79th Congress, pertinent to beach erosion control benefits, Federal participation was authorized to extent of one-third of costs allocated to beach erosion control feature and entire cost allocated to navigation feature, a total of 42 percent for first increment. Based on provisions of 1962 River and Harbor Act enacted after completion of first increment, which modified Federal participation to extent of one-half of costs allocated to beach erosion control feature, and on deletion of navigation benefits based on maintenance experience, Federal share of second increment was evaluated at 67.9 percent. Project, as modified, provides for combined beach erosion control and navigation improvements comprising a 1,000-foot extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir with a capacity of 1,200,000 cubic y rds west ofjetty, a navigation channel 28 feet deep ahd 500 feet wide leading from the littoral reservoir to a deposition reservoir inside the inlet with a capacity of 2 million cubic yards, and other appurtenant works including jetty modifications to permit fishermen use, and dikes. Estimated Federal share of participation is 60.5 percent of the first cost of project modification. Periodic transfer of littoral drift involving the bypassing of 1,200,000 cubic yards of sand on the average of once every 2 years to a feeder beach over the economic life of the project, serving both maintenance of navigation channel and nourishment of beaches westerly of the inlet, is included in annual maintenance. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet. Total estimated Federal cost of new work is $41,146,767 (October 1980), of which $2,646,767 is for work authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, and $38,500,000 for modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act. Project documents contain latest published maps. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1958 provides local interests to obtain approval by Chief of Engineers, before starting work on any feature of project, of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecuting work on that feature; provide lands, and rights-of-ways; hold the United States free from damages; assure that water pollution that would endanger health of bathers will not be permitted; assure maintenance of recommended project during its useful life as may be required to insure realization of anticipated benefits; and assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during economic life of project. Long Island State Park Commission of State of New York, the cooperating agency, entered into an agreement with United States August 21, 1958, as modified November 18, 1959, and February 1, 1962, in which the agency adopted plan of improvement for beach erosion control authorized by Congress and agreed to furnish its share of cost, and comply with all other requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated October 7, 1958, cooperating agency requested United States to undertake and supervise construction of first increment of work. First modification to agreement enabled construction by Federal Government of a sand closure across gorge channel which was completed in 1960 at a cost of $364,000 from funds furnished by cooperating agency (contributed funds--other). Second modification enabled delineation of sand closure as a part of authorized project in accordance with Public Works Appropriation Act, 1962, which included $152,880 (42 percent of $364,000) specifically for repayment of Federal share of cost. Unused contributed funds, surplus to needs of first increment, were returned May 17, 1962. Second dredging operation was financially complete April 30, 1966, and unused required contributed funds were returned July 7, 1966. In addition to assurances similar to those cited for the work under the 1958 act, local interests, for the work under the 1962 act, must provide and maintain a parking lot with adequate sanitary facilities as may be required for recreational fishermen use of the jetty extension; and contribute about 39.5 percent of total first cost, 32.1 percent of periodic dredging cost allocated to beach erosion control for beach nourishment, and 9.8 percent of maintenance cost. Off-project fishing facilities are a non-Federal responsibility. Total estimated cost of local cooperation to be provided by local interests is $27,492,335 (October 1980) for new work, of which $2,272,335 (cash contribution) is for work authorized by the 1958 act; and $25,260,000 the 1962 act, of which $25,200,000 is cash contribution and $60,000 is other non-Federal costs for off-project facilities; exclusive of shares of annual periodic dredging and maintenance costs. Assurances executed with State April 27, 1973 approved by Sec of Army May 24, 1973. Operations and results during period. Reconnaissance survey and study of the project was initiated in FY1980. Cost to date $23,614 for Fiscal Year. A study of the inlet'dynamics and an assessment of the work completed to date was initiated. Condition as of September 30. Under the 1958 Act, the first dredging operation is complete at a cost of $1,124,826 exclusive of $1,553,331 required contributed funds. Second dredging operation is complete at a cost of $1,521,941, exclusive of 2-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 $719,504 required contributed funds. Engineering and design for work under the 1962 act was initiated in April 1965. Model test by Waterways Experiment Station was completed and report submitted November 1969. Design Memorandum was submitted to Chief of Engineers September 1971 and was approved February 1971 subject to comments, which were submitted April 1971. Advance plans and specifications submitted April 1971. The Environmental Impact Statement was submitted to the Council of Environmental Quality April 16, 1971. Contract #1 awarded June 8, 1973, and physically complete May 22, 1974. Contract #2 was awarded in June 12, 1974. Construction was commenced in July 1974 and was terminated in April 1975. Contract #3 was awarded on August 27, 1975. Construction was commenced in June 1976 and completed in June 1977. The contract area dredged is about 4,100 feet long, 500 feet wide, and follows the alignment of the outer portion of the existing jetty. The edge of the area lies about 250 feet west ofjetty and extends a distance of about 300 feet seaward of the jetty light. The dredged depths were as follows: The inner 650 foot length was dredged to 14 feet below mean low water; the middle 2,900 foot portion to 30 feet, and the outer 550 foot portion to 16 feet. A dredging overdepth of 2 feet was allowed in the contract. Near the end of Contract #3 hydrographic surveys showed that a shoal had formed in the seaward end of the contract area so that a clear navigation could not be obtained by completion of the contract work. Accordingly the remaining work was modified and realigned to permit dredging of a 500 foot wide channel with a depth of 16 feet through the shoal. This work was completed in June 1977 within the available funds. The 30 foot dredged portion is also intended to serve as a littoral reservoir to trap the predominant westward littoral drift moving past the end of the jetty and into the inlet. Funds of $21,000 were allotted to the Waterways Experiment Station in January 1975 for a computer aided historical photo-analysis study of the Fire Island Inlet system. The report on the study was issued in September 1977. A study of the inlet dynamics and an assessment of the work completed to date was initiated. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 31. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th Congress as amended (preauthorization) Cost for preauthorization study to start construction was: $19,085 on Neptune City, N.J. Bids opened August 27, 1980 with contract awarded on September 8, 1980. Flood Control 32. ARDSLEY, N.Y. Location. The Village of Ardsley in Westchester County, New York is located on the Saw Mill River approximately 5 miles upstream from its junction with the Hudson River, (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The Federal Flood Control Project provides for relocation of the existing channel from the upstream limit of the project downstream for approximately 990 feet, and providing 155 feet of concrete flume upstream from the Old Ashford Avenue bridge. Upstream of this flume along the left bank of the Saw Mill River, 510 feet of levee would be constructed along the modified channel with an additional 340 feet of closure levee. Below the Old Ashford Avenue bridge, a 60 foot L-type flood wall would be built adjacent to an existing building and capping on additional 70 feet of existing flood walls downstream of this building. Between the Conrail Railroad Bridge and Elm Street in the downtown portion of the project, 145 feet of flood wall would be constructed on the right bank of the river. A pumping station, ponding area, drainage ditches and otiher drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $2,230,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $400,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including spoil areas, within the areas necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain without expense to the United States all works after completion; provide without cost to the United States for relocation of utilities and resurfacing of a parking lot; protect the channel and flood control works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; agree to take appropriate measures to control development of the fringe areas not protected by the improvement, with a view to preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, due to the modification of or encroachment upon, such area by local interests; agree to adopt and enforce adequate land use and control measures in the area within the village along the Saw Mill River that will not be protected by the recommended project; agree to be bound by and to incorporate into, any contract for construction, the prescribed Equal Opportunity Clause, and to coop- 2-18 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT erate actively in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with 'said Equal Opportunity Clause, in accordance with Title V of Civil Rights Act of 1964 as it pertains to civil works projects; at least annually notify interests affected that the improvements will not provide protection from floods greater than the design condition. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated August 15, 1979, reaffirmed the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan. Operation and results during period. Preconstruction planning started in February 1979. Plan response to future hydrologic conditions, higher levels of protection and project cost estimates and benefit analysis were investigated. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved in March 1979. Preconstruction planning started in February 1979. Preconstruction planning continued through Fiscal Year 1980. 33. ELIZABETH, N.J. Location. In city of Elizabeth, N.J. (Union County), extending 4.2 miles upstream from mouth of Elizabeth River at Arthur Kill. The river continues 7.7 miles northward through Union and Essex counties to its headwaters in East Orange, N.J. (See Geological Survey quadrangles, Roselle, Elizabeth, Caldwell and Orange; and Army Map Service quadrangles, similarly designated.) Existing project. Includes an improved channel with levees and/or walls where necessary between Bridge Street and Arthur Kill (2.1 miles); a concrete channel between Trotter's Land and U.S. Highway No. 1 (1.4 miles); closure to high ground at upstream and downstream ends; interior drainage, including 5 pumping stations and 11 ponding areas; reconstruction or replacement of 16 bridges and associated street regrading; and utilities relocations. Total estimated Federal cost is $42,200,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation excluding maintenance is $11,840,000 including $1,170,000 cash contribution. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance, the costs and values incurred in the interest of hurricane tidal flood protection to be credited to required local contribution to the project first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works including all dredging required in the channel to maintain the design depths in the tidal reach; reconstruct all bridges and approaches except railroad bridges, and relocate existing sewerage and drainage facilities, streets, utilities, and other structures, such costs and values incurred in interest of hurricane tidal flood protection to be credited to required local contribution to protect first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection; bear 30 percent of first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection, including the two items listed above pertaining to lands, reconstruction and alterations, and a cash contribution now estimated at $1,170,000 to be paid either in a lump sum before starting construction, or in installments before starting construction, or in installments before starting pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; take necessary action to protect channels from future obstruction or encroachment including waste disposal that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view to preventing an undue increase in flood damage potential; maintain existing natural detention areas along the Elizabeth River between Union Avenue and Trotters Lane free from encroachment so as not to reduce their detention capacity; to provide any additional gravity outlets or pumping station capacities made necessary by any modifications or encroachments on the ponding areas; bear any increased Federal costs for the improvement that may result from any future requirements for parkway developments; and at least annually, notify interests affected that the improvements will not provide complete protection from fluvial floods greater than in July 1897. Agency responsible for local cooperation is city of Elizabeth (with concurrence of Union County and State of New Jersey). Signed assurances of local cooperation were accepted by the District Engineer on January 9, 1970. Operations and results during period. Advance planning continued. Construction of the Downstream Section of the project continued. Condition as of September 30. Advance planning (begun January 1966), leading to first construction (Ursino Basin) add the Penn-Central Bridge and downstream dredging contracts, has been completed. General design memorandum and its supplement submitted. Penn-Central Railroad Bridge agreement executed. Environmental impact statement submitted to the Council on Environmental Quality on April 20, 1971. Upstream Ursino Basin construction complete. Contract, executed with New Jersey Department of Transportation on June 2, 1977 for placement of 132 foot section of flume to be accomplished in conjunction with bridge replacement, has been completed. Contract for the Downstream Area Arthur Kill to U.S. Highway #1, was awarded September 29, 1978 with completion scheduled in 1981. 2-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 34. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, N.Y.-about 83 miles long. This frontage, comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay to a minimum width of 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 16 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing not to exceed 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment for not to exceed 10 years from year of completion of a useful nourishment unit. Total estimated Federal cost is $260,000,000 (October 1980) which includes participation in periodic beach nourishment for 10 years at $325,000 annually. Total estimated non- Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $168,120,000 inclusive of $109,550,000 cash contribution by local interests. Project cost estimate reflects revised cost sharing provisions of 1962 River and Harbor Act. Increased Federal participation from about 53 percent due to an adjustment of cost sharing in accordance with Section 31 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 to about 70 percent of first cost of project construction, excluding annual nourishment costs. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that before starting construction, local interests give assurance they will (a) provide lands, rights-of-way, including borrow areas, for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, and other structures made necessary by construction; (c) bear 30 percent of total first cost estimated at $168,120,000 to consist of items listed in (a) and (b) above and a cash contribution estimated at $109,550,000 or, if any section is undertaken separately apportionment of first cost will be as shown in District Engineer's report, with due regard to change in.public use and ownership and other changes before construction; provided that cash contribution be paid either in a lump sum before starting entire project, or in installments before starting pertinent items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by Chief'of Engineers, final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works and ufidertake periodic beach nourishment after completion, except that for 10 years after completion of a useful nourishment unit Federal Government would contribute, dependent on conditions of public use and ownership and other changes at time of construction an amount for entire project now estimated at $325,000 annually; (f) maintain during economic life of project continued public ownership of non-Federal publicly owned shores and continued availability for public use of privately owned shore equivalent to that upon which recommended Federal participation is based; (g) adopt appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of dunes and their protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; (i) obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for work contemplated and arrangements for its prosecution before starting any work on beach protection phase of project for which Federal participation is planned, if undertaken separately from recommended combined project; and (j) contribute in cash toward cost of hurricane protection works constructed under this plan, in addition to apportionment required in (c) above, an amount equal to increased Federal cost resulting from separate construction of beach protection work referred to in (i) above. Responsible agency is State of New York. On July 30, 1963, the State reflected the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches-Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach in vicinity of Georgica Pond; and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the Chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artifical fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the 2-20 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works furnished $844,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches- Shinnecock reach, and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967, respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton- Beach Hampton (drainage structures first); Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island Inlet-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with the Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 1966; and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island Inlet-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested that the following works be undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches- Shinnecock Reach, beach and dune fill at 11 groin site, construction of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton-Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groins in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches- Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing elevengroin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report, except for the portion of the dune mean sea level elevation 16 feet and 20 feet. Thus this stage construction established the top of dune to an elevation of 16 feet m.s.1. with a 65 foot width at that elevation and the top of berm to 14 feet m.s.l. with a 100 foot width at that elevation. These assurances also required that the State obtain and provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, to permit entry for the period of construction, and that the necessary rights will be obtained, as required, of lands, easements and rights-of-way, for maintenance and repair of the groins, dunes, and berms, and to insure the integrity of the completed structure. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Continued study of coastal protection needs for present and future conditions. Planning was completed in period for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach, consisting of placement of beach and dune fill in the initial 11 groin field constructed in 1966 and along the 9,500 feet of shore westward of the existing groin field. The draft Environmental Impact Statement on the entire project was revised and a final Environmental Impact Statement prepared for review and approval prior to submission to the Council on Environmental Quality. At the request of the local cooperating agency a Phase I design study was initiated in the Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the project. This was terminated June 6, 1978 when the Council on Environmental Quality recommended the project be reformulated. Active scoping for reformulation commenced in July 1979. Operations and results during period. Continued common base studies for reformulation. Public scoping meetings October 1980. Interagency scoping review meeting January 1980, with Federal agencies agreeing, but New York State having strong reservations. District Engineer of New York formalized his decision March 1980. Governor of New York and Council on Environmental Quality informed May 2-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1980. Plan of study submitted July 1980. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton-Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,854,565 of which $1,370,191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2, Section 1Awas completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section 1A was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 required contributed funds. Planning for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach underway. Funds in amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase I study in Reach I, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. Environmental Impact Statement on entire project prepared. The final Environmental .Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978 Department of the Interior supported by other agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6, 1978, the Council on Environmental Quality agreed with the unacceptable finding and recommended project reformulation. Subsequent to strong objections on the project's final Environmental Impact Statement, meeting were held in September 1978, January and July 1979 with Department of Interior, Environmental Protection Agency and other interested Federal agencies. Subsequently, the Federal agencies have agreed to a basis for the reformulation of the Fire Island to Montauk Point project, including a general agreement on the studies necessary to answer the outstanding concerns. Public meetings were held in October 1979 in order to delineate the full scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was submitted in July 1980. Reformulation continues. Conclusion with a new General Design Memorandum is scheduled for 1986. Completion of engineering and design, and construction of the project remain. Coordination made with the Departments of Interior and Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency to develop an acceptable solution to mitigate immediate threats to property and human welfare at Westhampton Beach where serious erosion is occurring. The interim plan has been accepted by the Departments of Interior and Commerce in letters dated December 22, 1978 and December 21, 1979 respectively. Subsequently, in a letter dated January 18, 1979, Council on Environmental Quality approved the Corps' intention to take interim remedial action in cooperation with the interested agencies. The supplemental General Design Memorandum and the Environmental Analysis have been completed. Plans and specifications have been initiated. Initiation of construction in Westhampton is presently scheduled for FY 1981. It should be noted that the proposed work at Westhampton Beach is a remedial measure to alleviate the present erosion problem. Upon completion of the reformulation study, the recommended plan of the study will be implemented for the entire Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point Reach, including Westhampton Beach. 35. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. Location. At Liberty Park, in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, directly behind Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty, in Upper New York Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12334.) Existing project. Construction of a protective levee and seawall and associated landfill along the Park shoreline, approximately 7,000 feet long, extending from south of Liberty Island to North of Ellis Island. Estimated first cost of improvement under the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 is $725,300,000 (October 1980) including $7,600,000 cash contribution from local interests. Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions provide that local interests must furnish all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the project and contribute 30 per centum of the total project costs exclusive of land costs. Operations and results during period. Coordination and preconstruction planning for the entire project was initiated. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning continued. 36. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic River Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape-26 miles long and 56 miles wide-and in New Jersey contains the major portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris and Passaic Counties and lesser parts of Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties. 2-22 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Two Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, N.J. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, N.J., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. Existing project. The project was authorized for Phase I advance engineering and design study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the February 18, 1976 report of the Chief of Engineers. The estimate of Federal Cost under the authorizing legislation is $1,030,000,000 (October 1980), plus a $2,530,000 cash contribution from local interests, and $123,300,000 for items of work to be contributed by local interests. The recommended plan for flood protection, navigation, hurricane protection and recreation, includes a flood detention reservoir, channel diversions and modifications, levees and floodwalls, and streambank filling and grading. These works would provide protection against a storm with a recurrence interval of 235 years, which is 20 percent larger than the October 1903 flood of record. Six independent tributary local protection plans are also recommended. However, because of a lack of public support for structural components of the project in the New Jersey portion of the Basin, the entire project is being reformulated during the Phase I study. The House Public Works Committee Report (94- 1702) on the 1976 Water Resources Development Act directed ". . . the reformulation of the plan for water management and flood control for the entire Passaic Basin." This report further states that local opposition to any plan, which relies upon extensive use of dikes, dams and levees, such as those proposed in previous survey reports, mandates that the following alternatives, or any combination thereof, shall be the only ones surveyed and considered: (a) A full range of nonstructural flood control alternatives to include land acquisition, flood plain mapping, floodproofing, developing early warning systems and relocation of buildings; (b) A tunnel diversion plan; (c) A system of tunnels addressing the needs of the entire basin; (d) Plans that combine local protection works where locally acceptable and nonstructural solutions including improvements to stream carrying capacity in accordance with different needs in the Lower Basin and in the Central Basin; (e) Evaluation of fulfilling water supply objectives together with flood control; (f) Aquifer recharge and underground storage; and (g) Reservoir management in the headwaters. The Phase I Study is evaluating these alternatives in the formulation of revised plans. Condition as of September 30. The reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 under the existing authorization and the Congressional guidance in House Report 94-1702. During FY 1980, the Plan of Study was presented for final public review at two public meetings, and subsequently approved by the North Atlantic Division. The Study program schedule runs through March 1985 at an estimated cost of $14 million. Aerial photography and topographic mapping of the entire Passaic River Basin were also completed. Other completed work included surveying the entire Passaic River and major tributaries and the preparation of stream cross-sections; inventorying all buildings in the flood plan as part of a flood damage survey; a Basin-wide computer data management system; inventories of fish and wildlife, wetlands and endangered species, and field work for habitat evaluation. Major progress was made on the development of Basin-wide hydrologic and hydraulic mathematical models. Other major work items included preliminary plan formulation for flood damage areas along the Ramapo River at Mahwah, N.J.-Suffern, N.Y., and at Oakland, N.J.; in the Rockaway River Basin, in the Saddle River Basin, and along Molly Ann's Brook. 37. RARITAN BAYAND SANDY HOOK BAY, N.J. Location. Comprises about 21 miles of coast in Middlesex and Monmouth Counties, N.J., and is about 30 miles southwest of New York City. It extends along Raritan and Sandy Hook Bays between entrances to Raritan River on the west and Shrewsbury River on the east. Sandy Hook, N.J., a low-lying peninsula on the east, separates Atlantic Ocean from Sandy Hook Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 70, 286, 369, 824, 1000, 1108, 1215; and Geological Survey quadrangles of South Amboy, 'Keyport and Sandy Hook.) Existing project. Federal participation in constructing levees, beach fill, interior drainage facilities and groins for beach erosion control and hurricane protection. For Madison Township section, combined shore and hurricane protection improvement provides for: about 1.7 miles of beach fill at elevations of 5.5, 10, and 15 feet above mean sea level; about 0.4 mile of tieback levees at 15 feet above mean sea level; and interior drainage facilities. Shore protection improvement is provided for Matawan Township and Borough of Union Beach 2-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 sections, including about 0.9 miles of beach fill at elevations of 5.5 and 10 feet above mean sea level for Matawan, and about 0.6 mile of beach fill at 5.5 feet above mean sea level for Union Beach. In the Borough of Keansburgh, East Keansburg, and West Keansburg, hurricane protection is provided, including about 2.7 miles of beach fill and 2.3 miles of tieback levees at an elevation of 15 feet above mean sea level; interior drainage structures; hurricane gate; and three groins in Keansburg for shore protection. Design studies relocated for Keansburgh- East Keansburg closure to an alignment west of Thorne Creek and provide additional protection in West Keansburg. Total estimated Federal cost is $8,800,000 which includes $537,000 reimbursement to local interests as federal share of costs incurred for beach protection accomplished at Keansburg in 1957. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $4,890,000, including $4,353,000 cash contribution. Project cost estimate reflects the cost sharing provisions of 1962 River and Harbor Act. These new provisions, resulted in increase in Federal participation from about 64.8 percent to about 66.4 percent of estimated project cost exclusive of reimbursable completed work at Keansburg. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the Madison and Keansburg-East-West Keansburg sections, except for those provisions affecting continuing actions such as operation and maintenance. For details see 1970 Annual Report. By resolution dated December 2, 1963, Matawan Township declined to participate in the project at the present time. The State then requested construction of Matawan Township section be deferred for inclusion in a later contract. In 1974, local interests had proposed a master plan for park development along the Cliffwood Beach portion of Matawan Township, now known as Aberdeen Township, generally in the area of the authorized Federal improvement. The third phase of the master plan provided for restoration of a fronting beach which would be opened for public recreational use. In December 1974, local interests requested that the beach restoration work which they intended to accomplish, be considered as meeting the authorized Federal plan and requested consideration for Federal reimbursement under Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1968. Subsequently, they prepared a General Design Memorandum for the beach restoration work and submitted it for review and approval in September 1977. Approval of the General Design Memorandum was made in June 1978. Approval for the Chief of Engineers to execute a supplemental local cooperating agreement under Section 215 of Public Law 90-483 was made by the Chairman of the House and Senate Subcommittees on Public Works, Committees on Appropriations, on September 8, 1978 and October 23, 1978, respectively. The agreement was executed by local interests on February 21, 1979 and by the Chief of Engineers on May 22, 1979. Construction of the work is anticipated in Fiscal Year 1980. A supplemental agreement for Union Beach will be executed if and when construction planning is started. Operations and results during period. Planning initiated for possible modification to closure structural. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design of existing project commenced November 1962 and resulted in the completion of design studies, and plans and specifications for the Madison section and the Keansburg section. Design for the Matawan section is complete. Entire project construction about 93 percent complete. Madison Township construction was completed on October 27, 1966, and accepted by the State of New Jersey for operation and maintenance on March 20, 1967. Operations and maintenance manual for Madison section completed and furnished to State of New Jersey. Construction of the shore work at Keansburg was completed on December 23, 1969 and accepted by State on February 5, 1970. Construction of Keansburg closure work completed on January 15, 1974. Additional items of improvement work incorporated into Keansburg closure work facilities. State accepted Keansburg closure work on June 6, 1974. Operation and maintenance manual for shore work and closure work at Keansburg completed. Planning initiated for possible modification to closure structural. 38. SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD AND GREENBURGH, N.Y. Location. On the Saw Mill River in the town of Greenburgh, N.Y. One portion known as Babbitt Court lies along the river immediately south of the Village of Elmsford. The second portion of the project, known as the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, is north of the Village of Elmsford, separated from Babbitt court by approximately 4000 feet. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y. Existing project. In the Babbit Court area, the project provides for approximately 1,450 feet of levees and flood walls with associated ponding and interior drainage facilities. Within the Elmsford- Greenburgh area, the existing channel is to be widened and deepened for 2,450 feet with an additional 600 feet of channel modification on the tributary, Mine Brook. Levees and flood walls will be constructed on both banks of the Saw Mill River totalling approximately 4,500 feet and extending along Mine Brook to high ground. Ponding areas, a pumping station and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the 2-24 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT project is $5,010,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,420,000 (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, (including those storm sewers and drains required to convey interior drainage to improved channels or ponding areas) utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, which would reduce or otherwise impair their flood-carrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated June 12, 1974, indicated the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan. Operation and results during period. During Phase I preconstruction planning the authorized project was found to be no longer economically justified. Project reformulation to develop an alternative plan of improvement is continuing. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved January 28, 1977. Preconstruction planning started in February 1977. Indications from Phase I planning accomplished to date, are that some features of the authorized project are no longer economically justified. Alternative flood control measures are being considered during reformulation. 39. SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on North Gully just above its confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanock, N.Y., aGbeooulto g2i mcaill esS duorvwenys, trEeallmen fvriolmle Eqluleandvrialnleg. le(S; eeA Urm.Sy. Map Service, Ellenville quadrangle.) Existing project. Includes: a 2,300 foot concrete chute, a crib dam to prevent debris from entering chute; 380 feet of walls and a stilling basin; 823 feet of levees to protect against backwater from Sandburg Creek; a ponding area, drainage ditches and other interior drainage facilities. Physical model study to determine design of stilling basin required and authorized on August 28, 1970. Existing project, also known as "North Gully at Ellenville, N.Y.", is one of three physically and functionally independent projects included in Rondout Creek and Wallkill River, N.Y. and N.J. Survey Report. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $6,120,000 (October 1980), exclusive of lands, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $590,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must, prior to construction, give assurances they will furnish all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of improvements; perform all alteration of highways, highway bridges, utility and related facilities made necessary for construction of project; hold the United States free from damages; protect channels, ponding areas and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction that would reduce their flood carrying capacity and control development of fringe areas not protected by proposed improvement with a view to preventing an undue increase in flood damage potential; and maintain and operate completed works. Agency responsible for local cooperation is State of New York. The Commissioner, New York State Department of Conservation (now Department of Environmental Conservation) executed assurances of local cooperation on March 5, 1968 which was accepted by the District Engineer for the United States on March 25, 1968. To comply with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL91-611), the preparation of an agreement of Local Cooperation is being initiated to replace the signed assurance. Implementation of project dependent upon N.Y. State's decision on proposed relocation of Route 52 located within project area. Operations and results during period. Continued coordination with the State of New York. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning was started in January 1967. Model study completed in January 1972 and final report from Waterways Experiment Station received on May 4, 1974. General Design Memorandum submitted and returned for revisions. Environmental Impact Statement submitted to Council on Environmental Quality on July 27, 1971. Completion of engineering and design and construction remain. 40. SOUTH ORANGE, N.J. Location. Village of South Orange, N.J., about 3.5 miles upstream from junction of East and West Branches of Rahway River. It is in northeastern New Jersey and lies within metropolitan area of 2-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Greater New York. (See N.J. Department of Conservation and Economic Development quadrangles and Army Map Service quadrangle sheets for South Orange, N.J.) Existing project. Provides for clearing and excavating the East Branch (7,217 feet); constructing 300 feet of floodwalls, 690 feet of levees, 3,324 feet of concrete flume; reconstructing five bridges; raising roads; providing interior drainage work, and miscellaneous utility changes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $5,158,000 exclusive of land and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,780,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. It was necessary, under project authorization, for local interests to provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; make necessary changes to highways, highway bridges and approaches, utilities, and miscellaneous existing improvements; protect channels and other flood control works from future encroachment or obstruction that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; and control development of the fringe areas not protected by the proposed improvement with a view to preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential. The Village of South Orange, New Jersey is the Local Cooperation Agency. Signed assurance of Local Cooperation was received from the Village on August 15, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on August 25, 1969. First supplemental assurance covering items of local work accepted July 6, 1970. Authority granted to accept contributed other funds for Village (December 1969 and January 1970) and in June 1971 for Essex County, Orange and East Orange. On June 1, 1970, and November 4, 1970, $40,000 and $41,000 respectively were received from the Village for non-Federal design. During Fiscal Year 1972 the following funds were received. $19,000 from the City of Orange, $395,000 from the County of Essex, and $57,000 from the City of East Orange. During Fiscal Year 1973, $105,000 was received from the County of Essex. Operations and results during period. Closeout of non-Federal remaining funds was initiated. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design was started in March 1967 and subsequently completed. Submitted General Design Memorandum and Post Authorization Letter (June 5, 1970). Final plans and specifications completed. Environmental Impact Statement submitted to Council on Environmental Quality on March 31, 1971. Awarded construction contract for Federal work and options for non-Federal work. Project construction completed in July 1976. Financial closeout of non-Federal funds remains. 41. STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. Location. About 13 miles of coast along southern and eastern coast of Staten Island (a New York City borough) from Ft. Wadsworth at the Narrows to Tottenville at the mouth of Arthur Kill along Lower New York and Raritan Bays. (See National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration Charts and Geological Survey maps for New York and vicinity, Staten Island and Sandy Hook Bay area.) Existing project. Provides shore and hurricane protection between Graham and Oakwood Beaches and at Tottenville Beach; shore protection at Great Kills Park and between Arbutus Lake and Sequine Point. Improvement includes 2.6 miles of beach fill and dunes at Tottenville Beach and between Graham and Oakwood Beaches; 2.2 miles of beach fill only at Great Kills Park and between Arbutus Lake and Sequine Point; 2.9 miles of levees at Tottenville Beach, Graham Beach and between Oakwaood Beach and Great Kills Park; two groins at Tottenville Beach and Sequine Point; interior drainage facilities including four pumping stations between Graham and Oakwood Beaches; and relocations. ENGCW-EZ April 7, 1970 5th Indorsement to NANEN-Br September 30, 1969 letter submitting Feasibility Study authorized continuing Design Memorandum to incorporate extension from Graham Beach to Ft. Wadsworth. Total estimated Federal Cost is $21,500,000 (October 1977) which includes participation in periodic beach nourishment for 10 years at $112,000 annually. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $11,200,000 including $8,470,000 cash contribution, $1,520,000 for lands and relocation, $1,210,000 estimated annual beach nourishment cost for a 10-year period, and excludes annual nourishment costs thereafter and annual maintenance and replacement costs. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; alter and relocate buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities and other structures; bear 34 percent of total first cost, estimated at $11,200,000, to consist of the two items listed above and a cash contribution now estimated at $8,470,000 which excludes $1,210,000 for 10-year nourishment, or, if any section is undertaken separately the apportionment of first cost will be as shown in District Engineer's report, with due regard to change in public ownership and other changes before construction, provided that cash contribution be paid either in a lump sum before starting entire project, or in installments before starting pertinent items, final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold the United States free from damages; maintain completed works and provide periodic nourishment during economic life of the shore protection works subject to Federal participation in 2-26 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT cost of periodic nourishment for an initial period of 10 years, non-Federal share of such costs for the 10- year period is presently estimated at 31 percent for Graham Beach to Oakwood Beach reach, 33 percent for Tottenville Beach reach, 30 percent for Great Kills Park reach, and 62 percent for Arbutus Lake to Sequine Point reach; maintain during economic life of project continued public ownership and administration of public use of non-Federal publicly owned shore upon which recommended Federal participation is based; adopt appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of dunes; and control water pollution to safeguard the health of bathers. If local interests elect to incorporate features in highway or other developments in the waterfront area which serve the purpose of hurricane protection, United States shall participate in cost of such features on a basis such that overall Federal cost for hurricane protection shall not be greater than that which would apply in the absence of such features, and such that any resultant savings in overall cost of combined features shall be shared equitably between the United States and local interests on the basis of cost allocation and cost apportionment approved by the Chief of Engineers, provided that such participation in the combined features shall be subject to the undertaking of any necessary remaining hurricane protection works by the United States. New York State Department of Public Works in letter dated December 1965 stated it was prepared to execute assurances when plans are in final form. General Design Memorandum No. 1, Ford Wadsworth to Great Kills Park, Ft. Wadsworth to Arthur Kill project Staten Island, New York submitted for review on June 30, 1976. Based on review of General Design Memorandum No. 1, additional engineering studies will be required subject to reconfirmation of New York State's intent to provide local cooperation required. In July 6, 1977 letter, New York State requested to reconfirm their intent to provide items of local cooperation for the project in light of New York City's fiscal condition. On October 30, 1977, State of New York requested that reconfirmation of local cooperation be deferred one year. No answer has been received to date and the project has therefore been placed in a deferred status. Operations and results during period. None. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning was started in January, 1966 and is about 99 percent complete. Feasibility Study of project extension from Graham Beach to Fort Wadsworth was authorized November 16, 1967 and is complete. Coordination was initiated with the National Parks Services in connection with the Gateway National Recreation Area. In April 1974 local interests submitted their formal intent to support the modified plan. Draft Environmental Impact Statement furnished to Council on Environmental Quality on March 23, 1976. Public meeting on General Design Memorandum design plans for Ft. Wadsworth to Great Kills Park portion of project held on April 22, 1976. Final General Design Memorandum continued. By June 21, 1976 letter the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation advised of the local desire for the concrete floodwall plan and their intent to support this plan. On October 30, 1977, State of New York requested that reconfirmation of local cooperation be deferred one year. Project was placed in a deferred status on January 31, 1978. Additional engineering studies and Post Authorization Change Report required on General Design Memorandum No. 1 when and if local cooperation reconfirmed by New York State. 42. YONKERS, N.Y. Location. On Sawmill River in Yonkers, N.Y., about 1 mile upstream from junction of Sawmill and Hudson Rivers. (See Geological Survey, Yonkers quadrangle.) Existing project. Project provides for: constructing a 24-foot wide concrete channel extending 3,781 feet along most congested reach of the channel; improving channel in other reaches (5,689 feet); constructing floodwalls (5,370 feet), one closure structure, closure levee, various interior drainage facilities; reconstructing or raising of nine bridges, and miscellaneous utility changes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $12,530,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $2,550,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, including those storm sewers and drains required to convey interior drainage to improved channels or ponding areas, utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, which would reduce or otherwise impair their flood-carrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, no- 2-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 tify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. An agreement of Local Cooperation was signed by the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on April 9, 1974, and signed by the New York District Engineer on April 30, 1974 for the United States and approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 17, 1974. The City of Yonkers, through the State, furnished $93,000 (contributed, funds "other") for non-Federal design costs. Operations and results during period. Construction of Contract No. 2, continued. Condition as of September 30. Started preconstruction planning December 1970. Phase I General Design Memorandum completed on October 1, 1973 and approved on April 19, 1974. Phase II General Design Memorandum completed and approved June 1, 1976. Agreement of Local Cooperation executed with New York State. Final Environmental Impact Statement and supplement in Federal Register on May 13, 1974, and August 13, 1976 respectively. Addendum filed with Council on Environmental Quality on August 25, 1976. Initial plans and specifications for Contract No. 1 completed and construction contract for this increment awarded August 30, 1974. Construction of Contract No. 1 completed. Construction for remaining increment of project (Contract No. 2) With completion scheduled in 1981. 43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of completed flood control works are performed semi-annually to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with the requirements of operation and maintenance. 44. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-I at end of chapter.) 45. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) Cost for preauthorization studies to start reconnaissance reports were: $900 on Belcher's Creek, W. Milford, N.J.; $3,140 on Canoe Brook, Livingston, N.J.; $2,656 on Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y.; and $2,770 on Esopus Creek, Ulster, N.Y. Cost to complete reconnaissance reports were: $4,726 on Kayaderosseras Creek, Village of Ballston Spa, N.Y.; and $4,801 on Lamoille River, Hardwick, Vt. Cost to start Detailed Project Reports were: $99,234 on Peckman River, Little Falls, N.J.; $58,014 on Schoharie Creek, Schoharie, N.Y.; $71,776 on Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. Cost to continue Detailed Project Reports were: $49,156 on Barney Brook, N.J.; $61,902 on Missisquoi River, Vt.; $3,414 on Nannyhagen Brook, N.Y.; $24,922 on Patroon Creek, Albany, N.Y.; and $9,618 on Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. Cost to complete Detailed Project Reports were: $63,580 on Branch Brook, Mt. Kisco, N.Y.; and $2,667 on Ramapo River, Suffern, N.Y. A contract for construction of the Chappaqua (Saw Mill River) Flood Control Project was awarded on June 9, 1980 for $1,513,775. Cost to continue plans and specification on Pine Brook, Manalapan, N.J. was $8,280. Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities-advance preparation, emergency operations, rehabilitation, emergency drinking water and advance measures (Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation). Under "Advance Preparation," the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency preparation and response, provided technical assistance to requesting localities and conducted field inspections to determine the eligibility of damaged facilities, structures, etc. for assistance under the provisions of Public Law 84-99. Under "Emergency Operations," the New York District Emergency Operations Center was activated during the following storms and emergency situations: (a) Flash flooding due to storm of November 26, 1979 in the Adirondack Mountains, N.Y.; (b) Long Island, N.Y. Coastal storm of January 17, 1980; (c) Flash flood in Catskill Mountains, N.Y. on March 21-22, 1980; (d) Heavy rain storms in New Jersey and Southern New York on April 9, 1980 and again on April 14-15, 1980; (e) Flash flooding in Vermont and Catskill Mountains, N.Y. on April 28-29, 1980; and (f) Hurricane Allen from August 3-9, 1980. During FY 1980 approximately 95,000 sand bags were distributed to local and county agencies. During this period, in addition to the semi-annual inspections of 35 Federal Flood Control Projects, inspections on non-Federal Flood Control Works were made at Warrensburgh, N.Y., Dolgeville, N.Y., Prattsville, N.Y. and Hardwick, Vt. The flash flood of March 21-22, 1980 caused damages to flood facilities at the Federal Flood Control Projects at North Ellenville, N.Y., Mt. Tremper, N.Y. and Mt. Pleasant, N.Y. "Rehabilitation" of the damage at these projects has commenced and is continuing. Under "Advance Measures" Provision of Public Law 84-99 (Code 910-500) The New York District was granted authority and funds to fill a breach in the barrier island in the vicinity of Moriches Inlet, 2-28 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Suffolk County, New York. To accomplish this emergency work a contract was let on September 19, 1980 for the placement of 1.2 million cubic yards of sand. The total cost of this contract is $11,300,000, of this amount, $9,820,000 will be Federal funds while the remainder will be funded by the State of New York. In response to a request from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, on September 7, 1980, the New York District conducted an engineering survey and made a technical analysis and evaluation of the drought problems in Northern New Jersey. All activities in connection with Federal Disaster Assistance Administration Declaration Numbers 477-New Jersey (July 23, 1975); 487-New York (October 2, 1975); 515-New York (July 21, 1976); 519- New Jersey (August 21, 1976) and 520-New York (September 3, 1976) have been completed. Remaining funds in each account have been returned to the appropriate Federal agency (Federal Emergency Management Agency). New Jersey Flood (FDAA 477): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: July 23, 1975. Mission completed June 30, 1979. New York Flood (FDAA 487): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: October 2, 1975. Mission completed June 30, 1979. New York Flood (FDAA 515): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: July 21, 1976. Mission completed June 30, 1979. New Jersey Flood (FDAA 519): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: August 21, 1976. Mission completed June 30, 1979. New York Flood (FDAA 520): Status as of September 30, 1980. Federal Disaster Declaration Date: September 3, 1976. Mission completed June 30, 1979. 46. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) Cost for preauthorization studies to start Reconnaissance Reports were: $4,754 on Hudson River, Staatsburg, N.Y.; $2,884 on Hudson River, Troy, N.Y.; $1,184 on Hoosick River, Hoosick Falls, N.Y.; $1,097 on Sandburg Creek, Ellenville, N.Y.; $1,082 on Unnamed Tributary to Hudson River at Coxsackie, N.Y.; $1,298 on Zimmerman Creek, Village of St. Johnville, N.Y. Cost to complete Reconnaissance Report was: $5,000 on Sheldon Brook, Greenburgh, N.Y. Cost to complete Detailed Project Reports were: $5,000 on Wallkill River, New Paltz, N.Y.; and $10,000 on Ho-Ho-Kus Brook, Waldwick, N.J. (expanded Reconnaissance Report). Cost to start Plans and Specification on Ho-Ho-Kus Brook, Waldwick, N.J. was $12,238. 47. DEBRIS REMOVAL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Activities pursuant to Section 202, Public Law 587, 94th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) Cost for preauthorization studies to complete Detailed Project Report was: $12,340 on Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. 48. SURVEYS (See Table 24 at end of chapter.) 49. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $209,500 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. (See also Table 2-K on completed flood plain studies.) 2-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels, N.Y. 3. Bronx River, N.Y. 4. Brown's Creek, N.Y. 5. East River, N.Y. 6. East Rockaway, N.Y. 7. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. Great Chazy River, N.Y. Hudson River, N.Y. 10. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. 11. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. 12. Jones Inlet, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cst New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. -4,194 1,799 768,577 803,964 6,438000 6, 438 n.UU c nnA nn cnn 40,000 10,741 23,198 944,454 2,128,000 1,818,710 944,454 2,128,000 1,818,710 932,000 876,038 199,790 199,790 118,729 60,000 29,865 161,742 175,434 -, , 21,000 79,260 -5,000 10,179 364,386 363,838 268,948 268,948 523,000 223,000 15,000 7,661 11,377 12,499 4,000 7,090 287,840 286,249 1,592,074 2,244,067 1,590,317 2,237,314 607,597 607,597 130,000 119,322 5,000 5,733 2,094,400 1,371,089 454,000 464,493 609,000 609,000 657,000 957,000 7,339 50,000 65,678 1,151 867,000 1,579,814 782,000 782,000 173,000 160,641 Total Cost to September 30, 1980 355,806 283,862 5,523,2973 5,523,2973 19,672,988 19,672,988 1,149,946 1,149,946Q 2,060,853" 2,004,891" 33,976" 33,976 507,117 505,369 32,750,745 32,723,662 1,531,769P . .1,501,634vI 503,9694 503,9694 4,053,902 4,053,901 29,7605 29,7605 105,601 105,601 18,000 18,000 292,920 292,919 44,281, 193.6 44,247,3965.6 23,168,75911 23,059,163. 6,771,8709 6,771,87Y 24,970,637 24,970,637 4,545,753 4,545,753 1,604,547" 1,592,188" 1,822,5,302 1,822,53012 2-30 .8. 9. NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TIA ii d)0A (V'AT AN P1TnN TANVT(AT. qTAT.iMiNT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 13. Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 14. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. 15. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 16. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 17. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. 18. New York and New Jersey Channels 19. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift (Required Contributed Funds) 20. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels an(l Anchorage Areas 21. Raritan River, N.J. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. & Oper. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. 306,270 306.270 883,465 883,437 876,000 1,726,700 873,938 1,721,005 20,000 15,692 106,000 103,862 15,000 15,000 600,000 1,511,622 1,583,200 951,028 20,000 20,000 2,000,000 2,215,839 599,352 1,259,406 140,483 1,104,842 168,358 1,104,842 2,500,000 1,470,000 1,885,346 . 2,141,628 2,069,000 3,720,224 2,053,838 3,957,772 ..- - 907,273 943,059 1,990,000 2,139,606 1,510,682 1,662,809 13,000 7,852 230,000 168,177 2200,,000000 371,146 1,931,000 1,920,480 493,250 493,250 1,700,000 1,684,529 4,808,550 4,809,503 894,400 1,065,128 935,236 659,227 - -210,200 -103,646 6,618 225,000 228,526 25,000 62,948 3,390,000 23,000 23,000 - 165,000 - 133,765 -260,000 -249,480 140,500 140,500 1,400,000 764,038 2,001,000 2,026,586 420,000 265,867 8,644 1,654,726 2,288,438 2-31 Total Cost to September 30, 1980 7,729,810 7,722,025 339,720 339,720 308,677 304,369 151,044 151,044 177,92513 177,9251 963,084 934,165 831,000 802,415 9,422 9,422 3,390,000 681,81114 681,81114 815,2951 .516 815,27415.16 28,384,51017,18 28,384,5117.18 15,999,03619 15,999,03619 73,052,435.21. 73,052,4352.21.2 22,514,7592 22,879,235m 454,773 454,773 8,345,000 7,258,973 35,562,19624 35,808,80224 997,81324 997,81324 3,286,801 2,803,389 45,009,710a 44,999,1148 19,143,824 18,904,761 1,551,470*.' TABLE 2-A (Continued) See Section -. in Text Projects 22. Shooters Island, N.Y. 23. Westchester Creek, N.Y. 24. Supervisor of New York Harbor 28. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) (Required Contributed Funds) 29. Fire Island Inlet, to Jones Inlet, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 32. Ardsley, N.Y. 33. Elizabeth, N.J. (Other Contributed Funds) 34. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) 35. Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, N.J. 36. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. Phase I 37. Raritan Bay & Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) 38. Sawmill Elmsford- Greenburg, N.Y. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COSTAND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 27,933 22,933 100,000 98,000 692.000 697,530 1,880,000 1,433,916 1,433,560 1,377,770 2,580,000 3,084,116 1,509,308 1,946,256 760,000 500,925 31,491 70,000 103,750 656,000 656,595 -905,000 -237,201 - 77,536 1,650,000 701,359 45,000 61,063 9,672 1,000 - 60,000 - 42,301 - 1,040,000 - 1,006,417 4,298 1,721 100,000 3,015 1,087 119,000 6, 8,( 89,000 89,000 647 - 1,284,000 - 1,277,019 804,200 882,000 804,200 881,233 300,000 1,250,000 76,509 948,577 30,000 751,752 58,093 861,766 - 2,800,000 - 2,722,981 65,000 66,000 65,000 23,614 - 2,226,592 - 1,807,377 100,000 100,000ooo 77,847 83,684 700,000 5,810,000 032,798 5,345,348 - 416,444 - 721,605 287,000 600,000 283,212 627,312 - 14,000 3,699 35,583 4,004 200,000 42,539 62,043 26,441 2,417 6,353 71,000 Total Cost to September 30, 1980 1,551,470 v .* 10,113,703' 10,108,903" 100,000 98,647 175,933 :' 175,933m 2,921,311:4 2,914,330 " 24,423,247 24,422,688 9,370,356 8,820,173 11,220,001 8,706,843 11,958,767 11,958,768 149,298 106,912 6,355,900 6,085,899 200,000 161,531 24,229,800 23,687,628 745,744 1,034,139 5,541,438 5,543,522 13,973:" 13,973:" 4,012,930 3,650,186 108,043 72,441 1,040,000 1,040,000 7,792,800 7,783,531 262 262 3,291,384 3,276,858 490,000 2-32 c NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 39. South Ellenville, N.Y. 40. South Orange, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 41. Staten Island, N.Y. 42. Yonkers, N.Y. (Other Contributed Funds) Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 99,508 1,672 7,860 25,000 10,410 114,663 126,3 1,330 3,1 - 25,000 8,112 366 87,849 - 10,000 43 1,840 -70,000 16 12,573 3,184 98,910 98,910 2,272 600,000 2,100,000 2,500,000 2,200,000 465,552 1,152,649 2,610,334 2,409,616 11,582 375,000 9,340 90,189 61,200 81,453 428,386 289,700 282,965 5,088,900 5,088,900 1,878,910 1,768,584 695,000 687,956 9,977,900 9,192,562 529,200 273,982 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division accounts. 3. Includes $1,246,100 for new work for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 4. Excludes $100,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public works funds. 5. Deferred. 6. Includes $5,112,594 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $31,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds, other. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 9. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $69,629 for new work for previous projects and $668,820 expended from public works funds. 11. Incl udes $2,961 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Excludes $34,580 for new work expended from contributed funds. 14. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 15. Includes $19,140 for maintenance for previous projects. 16. Includes $31,166 for U.S. Lake Survey Revisory and Inshore Sounding Program. 17. Includes $1,836,403 for new work expended from contribu1te8d. fEuxncdlsu.des $285,600 for new work expended from contributed funds. 19. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 20. Includes $12,809,975 for new work for previous projects, and $6,621 for new work for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 21. Excludes $7,712 for new work expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 23. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 24. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O&M funds.) 25. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing project. 26, Includes $673,155 for new work or previous project. 27. Excludes $292,685 for new work expended from Ordinance funds and $66,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 28. Includes $6,187,694 for new work for previous projects. 29. Includes $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 31. For pilot program to improve coastal storm warnings. 32. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 33. Includes $77,182 for new work forprevious projects. 34. Includes $66,000 for maintenance or previous projects. 35. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 36. Excludes $292,685 for new work expended from Ordinance funds and $66,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 37. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects. 2-33 TABLE 2.A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents River and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 104 River and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor Act of 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 Mar. 4, 1913 Sept. 19,1890 Mar. 2, 19159 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Do. July 18, 1918 Sept. 22, 1922 E. Pub. Wks. Comm. Res., Dec. 15, 1970 and S. Pub. Wks Comm. Res. Dec. 17, 197010 July 3, 1930 March 3, 1925 1889 June 25, 1910 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths. Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully by the United States. Modified project to include control of waterchestnut. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CIIANNELS, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 40 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide. Dredging to obtain first a depth of 35 feet, subsequently increasing depth of 40 feet for full width. Widening of Bay Ridge Channel to 1,780 feet. BRONX RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from East River to Dam at East 177th Street. BROWNS CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) 6 foot channel for 1,850 feet and 4 feet for 1,350 feet, and construct 2 jetties. EAST RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Removal of Coenties Reef to 35 feet, conditioned upon local interests increasing depth to 40 feet. Channel across Diamond Reef 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Channel east of Blackwells Island to 20 feet; channel between South Brother and Berrian Islands, to 20 feet; channel between North and South Brother Islands to 26 feet. Channel 40 feet deep through East River and Hell Gate. Secure a depth of 40 feet in channel through East River and Hell Gate as soon as practicable. Depth limited to 35 feet in through channel between Wallabout Channel and Throgs Neck, Channel east of Blackwells Island, 30 feet to English Pl. and eliminated 20-foot channel north of English P1. Eliminated channel between North and South Brother Islands except as authorized prior to existing project. Remove certain rocks and reefs and construct dike mipno t cove, Hell Gate. Spur channel to Astoria waterfront 37 feet in rock, 35 feet in other material, for a length of 0.95 mile for varying widths, and a turning basin. (South Brother Island Channel). EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. GLEN COVE CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide. GREAT CIIAZY RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 40 feet wide and 5 feet deep at low water from the 5 foot curve in the lake to Champlain Village, a distance of 5.5 miles. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam.2 HI. Doc 37 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 337, 54th Cong. 2d sess. (Annual Report 1899, p. 1177). Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 897, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Ex Doc. 22, 51st Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 188, 63d Cong., 1st sess. Do. Do. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 67th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-60, 91st Cong., 2d sess, H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 207, 68th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Act 1888, Adopted in 1889 H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2d sess.' 2-34 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 Mar 4. 1913 Mar. 4,1915 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935") Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, N.Y. Channel 27 feet deep below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project July 1, 1935. Relocation of 12-foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany and Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 30 feet deep from Ellis Island to Newark St., 40 feet deep through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point and channel 26 by 550 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Remove shoal east side of river between West 19th and West 32d Sts.; remove rock near Battery to 40 feet; remove obstruction near Spuyten Duyvil Creek. Additional dredging through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point. Remove shoal between West 32d and West 61st Sts. to 40 feet and widen 40-foot channel between the Battery and Canal St. to 2,000 feet. Channel 30 by 750 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Modification of conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 40 feet deep between pierhead lines from 20th St., Manhattan, to a point 1,300 feet below Newark St. Hoboken, thence 2,800 feet wide to deep water off Ellis Island. Channel 30 feet deep between 40-foot channel and channel along Jersey City waterfront. Widen 40-foot channel to full width of river from north line of 59th St. to south side of Little Basin, thence a channel of same depth to deep water off Ellis Island. Waiver all conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 45 and 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of 1 jetty Interior channel along west shore of bay, 18 and 12 feet deep; interior channel along south shore, 15 feet deep; entrance channel 20 and 18 feet deep; and 1 riprap jetty all in lieu of work heretofore authorized. Modified conditions of local cooperation. Channel 15 feet deep in Mott Basin including its 2 branches. JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 12 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 20, 1935 MAMARONECK IIARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 13 of Text) Dredging 10-foot channel and anchorage. Dredging 6-foot anchorage in West Basin and its approach channel. H. 1Dsto sce. s3s5.I0, 68th Cong., H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess.I S Doc. 155, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H. Doc. 228, 83d Cong., 1st sess.I H. Doc. 719, 62d Cong. 2d sess. Annual Report 1914, pp. 234-235 H. Doc. 1697, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 313, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 450, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 309, 72d Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate committee print, 75th Cong., 1st sess.I H. Doc. 1488, 60th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 700, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 665, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map). H. Doc. 409. 77th Cong. H. Doc. 651, 66th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' 2-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts- Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960' June 3, 1896 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 11, 1964 July 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Sept. 6, 19337 Aug. 30, 1935 May 28, 19358 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 Dredging 6-foot anchorage in East Basin. MATTITUCK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 14 of Text) Dredging 7 foot channel and 2 riprap jetties. 250-foot extension of west jetty. Dredging anchorage area and deepening channel at upper end. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 15 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 16 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. (See Section 17 of Text) 16-foot channel in Passaic River. Widening 16-foot channel in Passaic River. 20-foot channel in Passaic River.6 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 30-foot channel in Passaic River. 35 and 37 feet in main channel of Newark Bay and branch channel to an inshore channel at Port Newark terminal and remove portion of rock area at Bergen Point to same depths. Modification of local cooperation for 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 34-32-foot channel in Hackensack River including approach channel in Newark Bay from branch channel at Port Newark Terminal and a 25-foot turning basin. 35-foot channels at Port Elizabeth. Widening 35-foot channel in Newark Bay, provision of two maneuvering areas, widening entrance into Port Elizabeth and Port Newark branch channels, deepening and widening Newark Bay 32-foot channel, and provision of a turning basin at junction of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers; and deepening 12-foot channel in Hackensack River to 15 feet. Additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 35 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30-foot channel south of Shooters Island. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 18 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet. Channel 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. 2-36 H. Doc. 209, 86th Cong., 2d sess.' 'Contains latest published maps. Annual Report 1891, p 843. H. Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess.i H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 284, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 156, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 250, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 430, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 252, 82d Cong., 1st sess.I H. Doc. 289, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 494, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' Report on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 89th Cong., 1st sess. NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 4, 1915 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Oct. 23, 1962 NEW YORK HARBOR, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 19 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 20 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet for width of 1,000 feet (dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, Dec. 27, 1886, by authority of act of Aug. 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Maintenance of entrance channel under 1 head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands. Relocation of southerly section of Anchorage Channel. Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet. Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet. Dredgin South Channel. Elimination of portion of Baysi e-Gedney Channel. Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Deepen Gravesend Bay Anchorage. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Washington Canal, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to canal locks and 10 feet deep thru South Channel.9 Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide up to New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge. Channel 10 feet dee in earth and 11 feet in rock to New Brunswick. Width reduced to 100 feet. Relocation of lower reach of South Channel. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide to junction of main and south channels, thence of same depth on South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction of main and south channels to government wharf, including a turning basin. In South Channel, maintenance of 15-foot channel to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority. 2-37 P.L. 91-611, 91st Cong., H.R. 19877. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 Annual Reports 1887, p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc. 159, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1899, p. 1279). H. Doc. 518, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 183, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess.I Senate committee print, 75th Cong., 1st sess.I S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong., st sess. S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1341, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 127, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 454, 70th Cong., 2d sess. RiDveorcs. a3n1d, 7H1satr bCoornsg C.,ommittee 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 74, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Report on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers (report not printed) H. Doc. 455, 86th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act 1976, P.L. 94-587 Sept. 22, 1922 Sept. 3, 1954 1965 Flood Control Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act 1958 River and Harbor Act 1962 River and Harbor Act Section 201 Flood Control Act of 1965 1965 Flood Control Act 1960 River and Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act Section 101 (a) 1962 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act SHOOTERS ISLAND, N.Y. & N.J. (See Section 22 of Text) Removal of the island within area defined by Federal channels north and south to a depth of 35 feet below mean low water. WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 23 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and two turning basins. Turning basin 250 by 250 feet in extent, 12 feet deep. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PART 1). (See Section 28 of Text) Hurricane barrier, dikes, levees, floodwalls, fill placement, stoplog structures, stairways, ramps, road raising, fishing platforms, annual nourishment. Authorized beach erosion control aspect to be constructed independent of the hurricane flood protection aspect of the project. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 29 of Text) Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet. Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches. ARDSLEY, N.Y. (See Section 32 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, levees, various drainage structures. ELIZABETH, N.J. (See Section 33 of Text) Channel improvement, flume, levees, floodwalls, bridges, interior drainage facilities. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. (See Section 34 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins, beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interest shall contribute 30 percent of the first costs. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. (See Section 35 of Text) Approximately 7,000 feet of seawall and elevated pedestrian walkway. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. PHASE I (See Section 36 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involyving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. RARITAN BAYAND SANDY HOOK BAY, N.J. (See Section 37 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, interior drainage structures, groins, beachfill. SAW MILL RIVER at ELMSFORD and GREENBURGII, N.Y. (See Section 38 of Text) Levees, floodwalls, channel improvement. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 92, 82nd Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 215, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 215/89/1. Doc. 249, 89th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 425, 86th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 H. Rpt 94-1702 H. Doc. 464, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 11.D oc. 94-465, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 2-38 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1962 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 39 of Text) Levees, drainage ditches, walls, a concrete chute and a crib dam. SOUTH ORANGE, N.J. (See Section 40 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, a concrete flume, raising roads drainage facilities, bridge reconstruction. STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. (See Section 41 of Text) Beachfill, groins, drainage facilities, four pumping stations. YONKERS, N.Y. (See Section 42 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, closure structure, various drainage facilities, reconstruct or raise nine bridges. S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 2d sess.I S. Doc. 67, 89th Cong., 1st sess.I H. Doc. 181, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 258, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy to 12 feet deep considered inactive. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. 4. Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 5. Also Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933, and April 27, 1935. 6. Portion from 3,000 feet above Lincoln Highway Bridge to Jackson Street Bridge complete. From Jackson Street Bridge to Nairn Linoleum Works considered inactive. 7. Public Works Administration. 8. Emergency Relief Act of 1935. 9. Public Resolution 67, 63d Congress, 3d session. 10. Authorized under Section 201 Flood Control Act 1965 (Public Law 89-298, 89th Congress, October 27, 1965). 2-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Completed: 1917 Cost: $1,463,014 TABLE 2-D TOTAL COSTS FOR EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 See Section Operation of Text Project Funds New Work Rehabilitation Maintenance and Cost Total 9. Hudson River, Regular $38,560,839 - $13,299,122 $11,077,638 $62,937,599 N.Y. Public Works 238,350 - - - 238,350 Emergency Relief 311,461 - - 311,461 TOTAL $39,110,650 - $13,299,122 $11,077,638 $63,487,410 18. N.Y. and N.J. Regular $57,412,152 $454,773 $21,653,546 - $79,520,471 Channels Public Works 807,000 - - - 807,000 Emergency Relief 2,023,308 - - - 2,023,308 Contributed 7,712 - - 7,712 TOTAL $60,250,172 $454,773 $21,653,546 - $82,358,491 2-40 2.2 miles 153.8 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet __ __ __ NEW YORK, N.Y DISTRICT SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (SEE SECTION 24 OF TEXT) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1980 TABLE 2-E 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Number of Investigations a. Unauthorized Construction b. Unauthorized Dredging or Fill c. Deposit of Refuse d. Interference (vessel) with Navigation 4. Disposition of Cases a. Unfounded Complaints b. Violations Corrected c. Corrective Action in Progress d. Referred to U.S. Attorneys e. Closed in District Office after Coordination with Concerned Agencies 5. Number of Warning Letters Issued 6. Fines Imposed by U.S. District Courts 7. Status of Cases Referred to U.S. Attorneys a. Number Pending Prior to 1 October 1978 b. Number Referred During Fiscal Year 1979 c. Number Closed in Fiscal Year 1979 Total Total Total Number of Cases Supplemental Investigations Total Number of Investigations Total Cases Total Number Pending 1 October 1980 2-41 1,348 1,032 4 2,384 13,296 2,216 15,512 71 30 20 8 129 25 154 56 46 77 11 136 326 158 67 +11 -8 70 _ ___ ________ TABLE 2-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 80 Name of Project Date Survey Conducted NEW JERSEY Newark Bay, Hackensack, and Passaic Rivers, N.J ....................... New York and New Jersey Channels.................................... Raritan River, N .J ................................................... Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J.................................. Dec. 1979 Oct. 1979, June 1980 June 1980 June 1980 NEW YORK Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channel...................................... East River, N .Y ..................................................... East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. .................... ....................... Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. ........................................ Great South Bay, N.Y. .......... ...................................... Harlem River, N.Y................................................. Jamaica Bay, N.Y................................................... Jones Inlet, N .Y...................................................... Harlem River, N.Y.................................................... Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y................................. M oriches Inlet, N.Y.................................................... New York Harbor, N.Y................................................ Peconic River, N.Y .................................................... Peekskill Harbor, N.Y................................................. Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. ............................................ Nov. 1979 May 1980 Nov. 1979, Dec. 1979 Feb. 1980 Nov. 1979, April 1980 Oct. 1979, Nov. 1979 Mar.1980 Jan. 1980 Oct. 1979, Nov.1979 Mar. 1980, April 1980 July 1980 Nov. 1979, Feb. 1980, April 1980, Sept. 1980 Aug. 1980, Sept. 1980 Jan. 1980 Nov. 1979 Cost of the above work in FY 1980 was $914,867. 2-42 I - NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Burlington Harbor, Vt.' 1966 706,4149 283,556 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. 1979 - 3,791,773 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt.'.2 1909 31,000 1,288 Cheesequake Creek N.J. (Active) ',2 ' 5 1953 40,000 30,675 Coney Island Inlet, N.Y. 1973 111,371 284,109 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. (Active)"5 1952 69,489 6,203 East Chester Creek, N.Y. 1975 592,0564,23 755,0424 Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y.' 1953 64,584 11,571" Fire Island Inlet, N.Y. 1973 594,355 2,908,786 Flushing Ba and Creek, N.Y.' 1974 2,102,9056.7 727,7646 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (Active)" 1 1966 72,000m 2,455 Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt.,.2 1892 34,750 115 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. 1972 346,831 255,291 Great Kills Harbor, N.Y..2 1962 137,3011s 88,029 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. 1976 5,644'3 457 Great South Bay, N.Y.' 1974 266,857 1,290,469 Greenport Harbor, N.Y.' 1953 74,681 21,720 Harlem River, N.Y.' 1969 3,616,119 480,777 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. 1969 39,468 76,49716 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. (Active)" 1953 71,5358s.-3 60,535 Keyport Harbor, N.J.' 1968 40,475 215,951 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. 1976 791,6807 1,236,709 Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. 1970 76,065 267,768 Lemon Creek, N.Y. (Inactive) 2'. 1937 6,62119 1,621 Little Neck Bay, N.Y.' 1969 1,741,21020 537 Lon Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. 1979 245,146 2,379,862 Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (Inactive)' 1948 4,636 Matawan Creek, N.J. (Active)' 6 1976 21, 165,341 Milton Harbor, N.Y. 1971 151,373 525,520 New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y.".2 1971 73,2148 142,411 Newtown Creek, N.Y. (Active)" 1974 1,168,354 1,626,35124 Northport Harbor, N.Y.' 1956 78,64425 1,487 OOrtotewro Cc rCeereke, kV, t.N O.Yt.e (InraecVti.v1e9)7'7 11994593 6260502,0550440 1122647,,059055919 Peconic River N.Y.' 1951 19,400 6116,037 Peekskill Hlarbor, N.Y.'19 19,4 66,037 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y.' 1972 198,415 229,111 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. (Active)" 1967 433,470 443,79526 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y.' 1977 221,128 359,294 Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. 1949 27p28:4 5734 Rahway River, N.J. (To Be Restudied) 1949 37,000 5734 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J.' 1972 810,500 2,019,141 Rondout Harbor, N.Y.' 1895 98142,43768 2491 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y.' 1964 121,805 11,710249 Sag Harbor, N.Y.' 1964 12180528 115710 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt." 1917 35089 154, Sandy Hook Bay, N.J.' 15 0 3'> 5 6 Sandy Hook Bay, at Leonardo, N.J. 1967 56,470 93,964 SaugerHtioeosnkd By a at Leonardo, N.J. 1968 81,905 169,18130 Saugerties Haror, N.Y. 1971 150,000 475,496 Shark River, N.J."2 1948 33,828 5,364 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y.' 1961 - 22 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. 1978 373,940 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. 1979 1,145,4582 1,732,880 Shrewsbury River, N.J. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. 1973 7,730,476 - bridge across Arthur Kill, N.Y. ,.2 1895 7,000 13 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y 1888 70,500m 235 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive) 1974 69,836 431,199 Tarry town Harbor, N.Y.' 1895 16,500 1,260 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (Inactive) 1953 18,174 36,312 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. 1950 13,000 44,691 Wappinger Creek N.Y. 1953 206,116" 212,827 Washington Canal and South River, N.J.' 1949 - 2,781 Waycake Creek, N.J.' 3 1953 49,823 178,398 Woodbridge Creek, N.J.' 2-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1. Completed. 2. No commerce reported. 3. Awaiting local cooperation. .4. Costs for previous projects only. 5. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 6. Includes $628,502 for new work and $210,365 for maintenance for previous projects. 7. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $58,425 contributed funds other and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes costs of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,425,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $286,606 for maintenance for previous projects. 11. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Excludes $29,774 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $4,813,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 14. Excludes $94,366 for rehabilitation. 15. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 16. Includes $64,034 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 18. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH 19. This amount also included in costs for New York and New Jersey channels. No work has been done on the existing project for Lemon Creek. 20. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 21. Includes $220,894 for new work for previous projects. 22. Excludes $36,311 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $119,276 for new work expended from contributed funds. In addition, excludes $72,619 for new work expended from contributed funds, other. 24. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 27. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 28. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 29. Excludes $53,790 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Excludes $365 for new work expended from contributed funds. 32. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 33. Uncompleted portion deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 34. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $20,646 for previous projects. EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets 1959 - North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. 1979 8,880,000' Perth Amboy, N.J. 1966 - 1. Deferred. 2-44 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass.' Bennington, Vt. Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn." 3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) Herkimer, N.Y. Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y.' Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwick Dams,'43. 9 Johnson Gorges' Mississquoi River at Richford, Vt.' '3 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. North Ellenville, N.Y. Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, Vt. 4"10 Rahway, N.J. Rahway, South Branch, N.J. Rome, Mohawk River, N.Y.4 Rosendale, N.Y. Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt. 4 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y.' Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y.",3 Waterbury Reservoir, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Waterbury, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Waterfor(, Hudson and Mohawk Rivers, N.Y.4' Winooski River, Vt.' Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $23,507 emergency relief funds. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1964 1974 1959 1963 1976 1973 1956 1939 1939 1965 1968 1978 1937 1971 1979 1959 1975 1963 1976 1967 1959 1976 1951 1940 1940 1970 Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Operation and Construction 6,282,3072 670,000 363,515 2,832,084 1,185,365 1,301,2759 1,064,626 49,8376 221,476 15,409,3257 3,900,650 973,1428 15,863,723 3,684,966 211,015 109,702 1,564,976 142,075 883,769 9,253 5,897,427 1,549,929 Maintenance 8,200 - - 8,0 6. Excludes cost of $2,718,624 under other contributed funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 10. Entire project deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2-45 TABLE 2-I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 2J4 SURVEYS (See Section 48 of Text) Study Class Cost Navigation Studies $362,065 Flood Control Studies 846,207 Beach Erosion Studies 0 Special Studies' 5,794,454 Total Surveys $7,002,726 'Includes review of Authorized Projects, Inventory of Dams, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, International Water Studies, Phase 1 Studies and $2,596,788 by North Atlantic Division. TABLE 2-K FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING THE PERIOD (See Section 49 of Text) Requesting Agency Date Completed NONE-PROGRAM TERMINATED TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (See Section 49 of Text) Studies and Services Costs Flood Plain Technical Services $75,473 Flood Plain Management Unit 80,522 Flood Plain Management Unit-North Atlantic Division Office 53,505 Total $209,500 2-46 Location Federal Cost PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, N.J., inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, Md. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Channels and Harbors Flood Control Local Protection Page 1. Absecon Inlet, N.J............... .3-2 2. Barnegat Inlet, N.J............... 3-2 3. Cold Spring Inlet, N.J............. .3-3 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, N.J. . .. 3-3 5. Delaware River, Pa., N.J. and Del. Philadelphia to the Sea ........... 3-4 6. Delaware River at Camden, N.J ..... 3-5 7. Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del. . 3-6 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del ...... 3-6 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del............... .3-7 10. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del., and Md..... .3-7 11. Little River, Del. ............... . 3-9 12. Manasquan River, N.J............. .3-9 13. Mispillion River, Del ............ 3-10 14. Murderkill River, Del............ .3-10 15. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway . . . 3-11 16. Raccoon Creek, N.J..............****** 3-12 17. Schuylkill River, Pa..............a* ** 3-12 18. Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, Del. ........... 3-13 19. Wilmington Harbor, Del .......... 3-13 20. Other Authorized Navigation Project.s............. ........... 3-14 21. Navigation Work Under Special3-14 Authorization ..... **........1* Beach Erosion Control Page 39. Surveys .................... ... 3-14 40. Collection and Study of Basic Data 41. Shoreline Erosion Control . . 3-14 Demonstration .............. 22. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........... 23. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization 24. Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, N.J........ 25. Delaware Coast Protection, Del. 26. Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Schuylkill River Basin, Pa ..... 27. Liberty State Park, N.J....... 28. Tamaqua, Pa.............. Page .... 3-14 .... 3-15 .... 3-15 .... 3-15 ... 3-16 Reservoirs 29. Beltzville Lake, Pa........... 30. Blue Marsh Lake, Pa .......... 31. Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa . . . . . . 32. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir,Pa. .............. 33. Prompton Lake, Pa.......... 34. Trexler Lake, Pa............ 35. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects. ............ 36. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . ................. .37. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........ 38. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .................. Page ... 3-16 S.. 3-17 . .. 3-17 ... 3-18 . .. 3-18 S.. 3-19 S.. 3-20 ... 3-20 S.. 3-20 S.. 3-20 General Investigations Page . 3-20 . 3-20 . 3-20 *All costs and financial statement for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. ABSECON INLET, N.J. Location. On New Jersey coast about 65 miles north of Delaware breakwater, between Brigantine Beach on the north and Absecon Beach on the south. It forms entrance to harbor at Atlantic City, N.J. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 826 and 1217). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1936, page 319. Existing project. This provides for an inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide, for an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the inlet channel into Clam Creek, and for a turning basin 15 feet deep within Clam Creek. The act authorizing the inlet entrance channel also provides that should the channel at any time have a deleterious effect on the Atlantic City Beach, work upon the improvements may cease; it being understood that the project is adopted on the basis that the interests of the beach in front of the city are superior to those of the inlet. The total length of the section included in the project is about 1.5 miles. The extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. The cost for the completed project was $307,712. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for maintenance when and as required for the dredging of the entrance channel into Clam Creek and the turning basin within Clam Creek. Terminal facilities. See pages 239 and 240 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $10,209 for coastal engineering study. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $11,390 for engineering and design and general maintenance. Other cost were for coastal engineering study. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project was completed May 1957. Inlet channel was completed in 1938. Dredging entrance from inlet channel into Clam Creek was completed in 1957. Costs for existing project were $307,712 for new work and $5,542,505 for maintenance, a total of $5,850,217. 2. BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. Location. On east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep through inlet and 10 feet through outer bar, channel to be protected by two converging stone jetties extending to 12-foot contour in the ocean and spaced 1,000 feet apart at outer ends; a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from gorge in inlet to Oyster Creek Channel just northwest of Sunset Shoal, thence via Oyster Creek Channel to deep water in the bay; and maintenance of a channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat City Harbor with main inlet channel. Total length of section included in project is about 4.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Extreme tidal range at inlet is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $448,849 exclusive of $300,000 contributed by local interests. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance contract: Costs,for major accomplishments were $23,039 for coastal engineering study. Other costs were for photo service and engineering survey. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were estimated at $130,800 for dredging by Hopper Dredge Fry. An estimated 18,500 cubic yards of material was removed during the period of 29 July 1980 thru 30 September 1980. Other costs incurred were for engineering surveys, general maintenance, coastal engineering, condition and operation study, plans and specification, study management, and engineering, supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project was completed in 1940. (For details, see page 203, Annual Report for 1964). Cost under existing projects, excluding $300,000 contributed funds expended for new work, were $448,849 for new work and $7,770,008 for maintenance, a total of $8,218,857. 3. COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. Location. In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties; thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $879,275 exclusive of $100,000 contributed by local interests and $50,000 Navy Department funds. (See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor, which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities. See page 238, Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $7,743 for coastal engineering. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $31,564 for engineering and $10,854 for surveys. Other costs incurred were for coastal engineering and economic studies, plans and specifications, study management and report preparations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962.) 4. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND TRENTON, N.J. Location. Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodietic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous projects. For details see page 1778 of Annual Report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central Railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry 3-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, N.J., and for construction such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Total estimated cost for new work is $69,663,904 (July 1965), exclusive of amounts expended for previous projects; $15,000 contributed funds and dredging upper channel, Newbold Island to Trenton, estimated cost $7,507,900 (July 1962). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interests complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities. There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., to Trenton, N.J. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966) Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $38,055 water control management; $26,092 chemical characterization studies; $32,350 water quality testing. Other costs incurred were for miscellaneous studies. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $40,570 plans and specifications; $167,051 engineering and general maintenance. Other costs incurred were for miscellaneous engineering studies and. supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1980.) 5. DELAWARE RIVER, PA., N.J. AND DEL., PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location. See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous projects. For details see page 1779 of Annual- Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and a width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and of 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to general navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Bend and 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion of project is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion is $2,951,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) '. Local cooperation. Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities. There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966 - Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $301,061 raise banks; $135,406 chemical leachate studies; $113,595 raise dikes; $92,908 ground-water studies and $85,288 maintenance of disposal area. Other costs incurred were for water control management, environmental service, handling shore pipe, construct steel sluices, subsurface exploration, sample testing and energy conservation. Maintenance dredging Marcus Hook Anchorage commenced 1 October 1979 thru 31 January 1980. Removed an estimated total of 2,548,247 cubic yards of material at an estimated cost of $3,159,950. Dredging of Mantua Creek Anchorage commenced 1 October 1979 through 15 October 1979. Removed a total of 90,978 cubic yards of material at a cost of $169,219. Dredging of New Castle and Deepwater ranges commenced 21 July 1980 through 13 September 1980. Removed a total of 923,241 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,874,450. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $659,185 general maintenance; 205,915 disposal area; $172,947 studies and surveys; $-775,325 amortization, and $470,060 miscellaneous engineering and design, supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for plans and specifications; pier repairs, submerged pipeline, handling shore pipe and environmental monitoring. Dredging of 40 foot channel by U.S. Hopper Dredge Comber and Goethals commenced 1 October, 1979 through 30 September, 1980. Removed an estimated total of 3,284,400 cubic yards of material at a cost of $7,710,300. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from naval base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, enlarge Marcus Hook and Mantua Creek anchorages, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1980.) 6. DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, N.J. Location. Camden, N.J., on east bank of Delaware River, is directly opposite city of Philadelphia, Pa. It is about 51 miles above mouth of river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910. No work was done on this project. For further details, see page 321, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See page 217, Annual Report for 1962. Cost for new work for completed portions of project was $464,906 and $15,000, Federal and non-Federal funds, respectively. Deepening 37-foot portion of project has been deferred for restudy. Estimated cost of this portion, as revised in July 1960, was $850,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 55 piers, wharves, and docks near project area along Delaware River waterfront at Camden and Gloucester, N.J., including 3 oil terminals on Petty Island. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs incurred were for economic study. 3-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Conditions as of Sept. 30. Project was about 36 percent complete. Work remaining is deepening channel from 30 to 37 feet which was placed in deferred restudy category. Controlling depths at local mean low water were as follows: In February 1962, 11.8 feet at northerly end of 18-foot channel opposite Cooper Point; and 30 feet in front of marine terminal. Project depths are well maintained in 30-foot depth section of channel. Cost under existing project, excluding $15,000 contributed funds expended for new work, were $462,906 for new work; and $334,640 for maintenance, a total of $797,546. 7. HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. At lower end of Delaware Bay, a few miles from Atlantic Ocean on Delaware side of bay. It is about 120 miles south of New York Harbor, about 114 miles north of entrance to Chesapeaka Bay and about 101 miles from Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1218, 1219 and 379.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1874, Chart II, page 146; page 330; and 1938, page 330. Existing project. For details see page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. New work cost for completed project was $2,412,778. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Dredging commenced 24 September 1980 and was completed 30 .September 1980, 210,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $319,500. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs incurred were for environmental monitoring, engineering surveys and supervision and administration. Conditions as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see page 230 of Annual Report for 1962. Controlling depth at mean low water in channel in July 1963 was 16.8 feet. Costs for existing project were $2,412,778 for new work and $931,600 for maintenance, a total of $3,344,378. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL. Location. Indian River rises in Sussex County, Del., and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project. This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. The cost for new work for the completed project was $511,210, exclusive of $10,000 expended on previous projects and exclusive of $210,000 contributed funds. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities. There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 mile west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 mile north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $14,205 water and sediment testing; and $13,018 coastal engineering study. Other costs incurred were for public involvement, jetty rehabilitation, and economic work. Dredging of miscellaneous shoals commenced 14 February 1980 through 30 July 1980. Removed a total of 177,418 cubic yards of material at a cost of $658,573. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $130,988 for engineering and design maintenance, surveys, supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for environmental impact statement and monitoring, coastal engineering study, jetty rehabilitation and plans and specifications. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. Costs under existing project, excluding $210,000 contributed funds expended for new work, were $511,210 for new work, $2,294,006 for maintenance and $1,323,775 for major rehabilitation, a total of $4,128,991. 9. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, Del. It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence through marshes back of Cape Henlopen to Lewes River; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous projects. A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, with a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of one highway bridge and one railroad bridge at Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The cost for new work for the completed portion of the project was $561,514, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $60,000 contributed funds. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities. See page 228, Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $21,462 for feasibility study. Other costs incurred were for water control management. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $27,778 for preparation of scope of work. Other costs incurred were for miscellaneous engineering and surveys. Conditions as of Sept. 30. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. 10. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL., AND MD. Location. Begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, Pa., and passes through sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, Md. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, Del., with main 3-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous projects: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total length of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of mean low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is $139,574,000 (October 1977). Total estimated cost of new work including original purchase is $151,683,755. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities. Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $1,440 for protection of bridge fenders. New work, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $1,119 for protection of bridge fenders. Other costs incurred were for supplies and material. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $116,166 bridge painting; $62,241 bridge inspection; $86,175 studies of bridge load carrying capacity, and $96,505 for rip rap. Other costs incurred were for bridge welding, locks and dispatch service for operation and maintenance of traffic, plans and specifications, service facilities for building, grounds and utilities, general maintenance, equipment maintenance, monitoring, surveys and miscellaneous studies. Dredging in Upper Chesapeake Bay commenced 12 October 1979 through 20 January 1980. A total of 1,477,109 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $2,717,939. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $215,567 locks and dispatch service for operation and maintenance of traffic; $256,672 service facilities for building grounds and utilities; $79,947 bridge painting; $202,933 engineering and design general maintenance; $240,217 engineering and supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for equipment rental and maintenance, preparation and maintenance of disposal area, bridge repairs, accident investigation, snagging and clearing, plans and specification and surveys. Dredging by U.S. Hopper Dredge Comber commenced 23 February 1980 through 2 April 1980. A total of 269,907 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $703,100. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT deep and 250 and 400 feet wide, Delaware River to Pooles Island, was completed in 1938. Highlevel fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit Bridge and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Total cost of existing project to Sept. 30, 1980 was $211,775,410 of which $121,822,521 was new work ($4,756,248 emergency relief funds and $117,063,324 regular funds), and $89,952,889 regular funds for maintenance. 11. LITTLE RIVER, DEL. Location. In Kent County, Delaware, flows easterly 7 miles, and empties into Delaware Bay about 32 miles above Cape Henlopen. Existing project. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water from the 5-foot contour in Delaware Bay to the bridge at Little Creek Landing, 3 miles above the mouth, 60 feet wide across the bar outside the mouth and 40 feet in the river, including several cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, which shortened the distance about .5 mile. Cost for new work for the completect project was $12,016. Existing project was adopted by 1912 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 626, 62d Cong., 2d Sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three pile-and timber wharves or landings on this stream, which are considered adequate for the existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Costs for major accomplishments were $8,486 for reconnaissance report. Other costs incurred were for study management. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project was completed in 1914. 12. MANASQUAN RIVER, N.J. Location. This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project. A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of north jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet to a depth of 8 feet; for a 19-acre anchorage to 10 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5-acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10- and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10- and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities. Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate for present requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $17,493 for sand by-pass system. 3-.9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $73,185 for plans and specifications. Other costs incurred were for miscellaneous engineering and administration. Rehabilitation, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $2,196,655 for rehabilitation of south jetty. Other costs incurred were for sand by-pass study. Rehabilitation, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $115,089 for miscellaneous engineering, supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for lab inspection, testing and sampling. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19 acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5 acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive category. Costs under existing project, excluding $300,000 (new work) contributed funds expended, were $518,249 for new work $3,524,146 for major rehabilitation, and $2,978,807 for maintenance, a total of $7,021,202 13. MISPILLION RIVER, DEL. Location. Rises in Kent and Sussex Counties, Del., flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous projects. For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details see page 243 of Annual Report for 1957. Local Cooperation. Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs incurred were for miscellaneous engineering and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 800 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water: In October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Milford, 6.1 feet. Costs for existing project were $229,050 for new work. $253,491 for minor rehabilitation, and $658,419 for maintenance, a total of $1,140,960. 14. MURDERKILL RIVER, DEL. Location. Rises in Kent County, Del., flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Helopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1218.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay- to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work rivised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st sess.). (See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62nd Congress 3d session. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $323,921 dredging of 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT miscellaneous shoals. Dredging commenced 2 November 1979 through 10 January 1980. Removed a total of 112,924 cubic yards of material. Other costs incurred were for environmental monitoring. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $10,931 for study management. Other costs incurred were for environmental monitoring report and studies, miscellaneous engineering and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. 15. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location. A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, N.J., to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, N.J., to Delaware Bay above Cape May, N.J., by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, N.J., and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 133, 76th Cong., 1st sess.). Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess., as extended by Public Law 240, 82nd Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Local cooperation. The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rightsof- way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintaip, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvement. Terminal facilities. See Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $13,000 for plans and specifications. Dredging was performed during the period of 1 July 1980 through 30 September 1980. Removed a total of 188,824 cubic yards of material at a cost of $416,946. Other costs incurred were for hydro-graphic survey and water control management. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $156,134 for general 3-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 maintenance and engineering surveys; $73,471 inspections and repairs. Other costs incurred were for plans and specifications, environmental monitoring, engineering, supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept 30. Existing project isabout 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942; two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrance and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining, dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. 16. RACCOON CREEK, N.J. Location. Rises in Gloucester County, N.J., flows northwesterly 16 miles through the county, and empties into Delaware River about 20 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 295.) Previous projects. For details see page 1784, Annual Report for 1915, and page 344, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, in Delaware River to the mouth and within the creek to Bridgeport, 13 miles above the mouth; thence 60 feet wide to Springers wharf, 5 miles above the mouth; and thence 40 feet wide to Swedesboro, 9 miles above the mouth. It also provides for a cutoff at Molonox Shoal, 7'/2 miles above the mouth, and a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib south jetty at the mouth, 950 feet long. Section included in the project is about 93 miles long. Mean tidal range at the mouth is 5.8 feet, and at Swedesboro 4.4 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 10 feet. Estimated cost (1913) for new work is $106,535, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three wharves of pile-and-timber construction, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs incurred were for environmental tests. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $9,061 for special study #1 and 2. Other costs incurred were for environmental studies, study management, design and report preparation. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1922. Controlling depths at mean low water were 8.1 feet (Mar. 1965) from Delaware River to mouth; thence 7.9 feet (July 1964) to highway bridge at Bridgeport; thence 5.5 feet (Aug. 1964) to Swedesboro. Costs under the existing project were $83,665 for new work and $337,663 for maintenance, a total of $399,110. 17. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. Location. Rises in Schuylkill County, Pa., flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project. For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the city of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the city of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within.limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7-Revised 1967-Corp of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $40,412 for water control management; $-203,950 maintenance dredging. Other costs incurred were for discharge study. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $60,374 general maintenance, engineering, supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for plans and specifications and miscellaneous studies. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. Costs under existing project were $2,809,007 for new work and $20,954,750 for maintenance, a total of $23,763,757. 18. WATERWAY FROM INDIAN RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH BAY, DEL. Location. In southeasterly part of Sussex County, connects Rehoboth Bay with Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from water of 6-foot depth in Rehoboth Bay to water of the same depth in Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.7 miles. The mean tidal range in the vicinity of the project in Rehoboth Bay is 0.5 foot; in Indian River Bay 0.9 foot. The extreme tidal range is from 1.5 feet below mean low water to about 2.5 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $90,908, exclusive of $20,000 contributed by local interests. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (H. Doc. No. 304, 81st Cong., 1st sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. Local cooperation. The act authorizing the project provides that local interests shall give assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rightsof- way, and suitable disposal areas for initial work and subsequent maintenance when and as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including such damages as may occur to public or leased oys'te beds; and (c) make a cash contribution of $20,000 toward the construction of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were approved on February 27, 1956. Conditions of local cooperation have been complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for subsequent maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are no terminal or transfer facilities in the area that are fully open to public use. However, existing facilities that are available on a limited basis are adequate for the present demand, and can be expected to expand to meet future needs. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $168,840 for dredging miscellaneous shoals. Dredging commenced 14 February 1980 through 30 July 1980. Removed a total of 39,008 cubic yards of material. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $31,608 for engineering surveys, supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing channel was completed on July 7, 1956. Controlling depth at mean low water in July 1970 was 4.8 feet. Costs under existing project, excluding $20,000 contributed funds expended for new work, were $90,908 for new work and $241,374 for maintenance, a total of $332,282. 19. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DEL. Location. Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, Del., flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through city of Wilmington, Del., and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelpha, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous projects. For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. 3-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing Project. This provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for a distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, Del., approximately 9.9 miles above the Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 35 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of the Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 8, revised 1966,-Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $555,398 for rehabilitation of South jetty; $675,476 raise banks. Other costs incurred were for water sediment testing, water control management, environmental monitoring and engineering and design. Dredging of harbor commenced on 5 January 1980 through 13 March 1980. A total of 819,397 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $540,595. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $434,973 general maintenance, engineering and design, supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for disposal area, plans and specifications, handling shore pipe and submerged pipeline, study management, steel sluices, environmental monitoring, engineering studies and surveys. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of existing project to Sept. 30, 1980 is $21,971,181 of which $1,552,604 is for new work ($206,177 emergency relief funds and $1,346,427 regular funds), and $20,418,577 regular funds for maintenance. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECTS NAVIGATION (See Table 3-E at end of chapter.) 21. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Study Identification Cedar Creek, Sussex City, Del. (DPR) Delran, N.J. (DPR) Little Assawoman Bay, Del. (RECON) Pleasantville, N.J. (RECON) Riverfront Park Marina, Toms River, N.J. (RECON) Fiscal Year Cost $83,666 91,968 4,612 4,975 4,878 MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGE PURSUANT TO SECTION III, PUBLIC LAW 90-483 Study Identification Delaware River, Pennsville, N.J. Indian River Inlet, Del. Fiscal Year Cost $26,161 18,468 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 3-F at end of chapter.) 23. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 3-G at end of chapter.) FLOOD CONTROL LOCAL PROTECTION 24. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP N.J. Location. The project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the western boundary of Lower Township. 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. The project consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; maintenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Estimated cost of the project (October 1980) is $31,000,000 which includes $4,500,000 required non-Federal costs. Existing project was authorized for Phase I studies in Section 101 (a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the plan presented in House Document 94-641. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection in letter dated 20 April 1972. Prior to completion of Phase I report, firm commitments will be required from the project sponsors. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Costs incurred were for Phase I study management. Condition as of Sept. 30. Division Engineer's report completed and released. 25. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DEL. Location. The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and Starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware- Maryland border. Existing project. Provides a plan of improvement which consists of the construction of dunes and beach fill; the construction of bulkheads at Rehoboth and Dewey beaches; periodic nourishment of the beaches; placement of sand fences; planting dune grass and maintenance and replacement of exisitng structures. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong., 2d sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1977) $39,100,000 includes $10,900,000 required non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, July 8, 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Miscellaneous engineering, design, supervision and administration costs were $5,600. Condition as of Sept. 30. Work accomplished was engineering and design. 26. HAY CREEK, BIRDSBORO, SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. The project is within the urban community of Birdsboro, Berks County, Pennsylvania, at the confluence of Hay Creek and Schuylkill River. The project starts at a point just below East Main Street in Hay Creek and extends upstream about 3,750 feet along Hay Creek to a point just above First Street. Existing project. The plan of improvement includes a 3,750 foot combination earth levee and concrete flood wall beginning at a point just below East Main Street and proceeding upstream approximately 900 feet above First Street. Included also are 2 new raised bridges to replace those at East Main Street and First Street and modification to an existing railroad bridge, as well as interior drainage facilities. Project was authorized in 1976 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were received from the Borough of Birdsboro, Pennsylvania, in a letter dated 16 January 1973 which was signed by the Borough Manager. Continued interest in the project has been re-established in letter dated 13 September 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $10,678 public involvement and coordination. Other costs incurred were for bridge drawings. New work, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $35,672 preparation of report; $11,806 study management; $13,023 engineering and design supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for investigations, public involvement and coordination, economic study and environmental study. Condition as of Sept 30. Work accomplished was advance engineering and design. 27. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. Location. At Liberty Park, in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, directly behind Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty, in Upper New York Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12334.) 3-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing project. Construction of a protective levee and seawall and associated landfill along the Park shoreline approximately 7,000 feet long, extending from south of Liberty Island to North of Ellis Island. Estimated first cost of improvement under the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 is $22,500,000 (October 1979) including $6,750,000 cash contribution from local interests. Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions provide that local interests must furnish all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the project and contribute 30 per centum of the total project costs exclusive of land costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Costs incurred were $1,647 for design memorandum and plans and specifications. Condition as of Sept. 30. Coordination and preconstruction planning underway. Completion of engineering and design and construction remain. Project transferred to New York District 20 February 1980. 28. TAMAQUA, PA. Location. The project is located in Tamaqua Borough and Walker Township, Pennsylvania. Both municipalities are within Schuylkill County. Existing project. The project will provide a 2,930 foot long tunnel, 10 feet in diameter with appurtenant structures, through Sharp Mountain. It will extend from Wabash Creek on the west boundary of Tamaqua to the Little Schuylkill River just south of its confluence with Wabash Creek. The proposed improvement includes an intake structure, a stilling basin, and a 70-foot long highway bridge. Estimated cost of project (October 1980) is $6,120,000 including $200,000 required non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. The Borough of Tamaqua is the local sponsor. The Borough, by letter of 25 June 1968, indicated its intention to comply with the items of local cooperation. The assurance was reaffirmed by the Borough on 2 September 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $22,008 for Phase I report. Other costs incurred were for subsurface exploration and lease of equipment. New work, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $16,047 study management; $6,599 public involvement and coordination; $15,595 advance engineering and design, supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for plan formulation, investigations and testing material. Condition as of Sept. 30. Work accomplished was advance engineering and design. RESERVOIRS 29. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, Pa.-1960.) Existing project. A multiple purpose development project to provide water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,500 feet long rising 160 feet above creekbed; a spillway around north end of dam; and gatecontrol outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 68,200 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,200 acre-feet of inactive storage, 40,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,000 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) Design changes, based on planning to July 1965, indicate an earthfill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed, a controlled reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 41,220 acre-feet for water supply, water quality control and recreation. Estimated cost of project (July 1974) is $22,944,200 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated; ultimate Federal cost is $16,100,000. Local cooperation. Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16, 1966. 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $16,075 peak discharge study; $41,607 modify air treatment; $13,996 repair water quality systems. Other costs incurred were for operations and minor maintenance, underwater inspection, water control management, underwater inspection of outlet works, water testing, miscellaneous engineering study, supervision and administration. , Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $51,391 water control management; $123,939 operations and minor maintenance, engineering, supervision and administration; $38,872 repair water quality system. Other costs incurred were for recreation facilities, inclinometer readings, inspections, environmental study, dam safety training, data analysis, cost allocation, energy conservation, dam survey, modify air treatment, investigation of storm drainage, equipment maintenance and audit. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project is about 99 percent complete. Acquisition of the necessary land is complete. 30. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, Pa.) Existing project. A multiple purpose development project to provide supplies of water, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam, 1,775 feet long and rising 98 feet above creekbed, with a spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H. Doc 522 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1979), $63,012,000 includes $16,132,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published maps). Local cooperation. Project was approved, subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $574,312 road relocation; $110,394 highway relocation; $73,081 pipeline relocation; $92,856 guber restoration. Other costs incurred were for real estate activities, utilities, recreation facilities, engineering and supervision and administration. New work, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $93,883 for engineering and design, supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for plans and specifications; pumping plant, relocation and road construction, operating equipment, surveys, lab inspection and project office costs. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $32,685 lawn maintenance; $25,445 sewage; $15,680 stream gaging; $40,950 water quality monitoring; $15,000 peak discharge study. Other costs incurred were for water control management, janitoral services, fuel oil, reservoir operation and maintenance, snow survey and supervision and administration. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $99,382 reservoir operation and maintenance, $64,542 water control management; $29,745 sewage treatment; $279,415 supervision and administration. Other costs incurred were for hydro power study, data analysis, periodic inspections, inspection report, dam survey, inclinometer readings, fuel oil, building inspection and miscellaneous studies. Condition as of Sept. 30. Continued normal operation and maintenance and management of recreation facilities. 31. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA. Location. Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, Pa.) Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1976 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587, 3-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 79th Cong., 2d sess.) provided for a single purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway increasing height of dam, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 263 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 180,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 2,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1980) is $65,800,000 including $58,900,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Local cooperation. None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $22,966 water control management; $15,000 slope deformation measurement; $10,000 peak discharge study; $13,448 rent and utility service. Other costs incurred were for reservoir operation and maintenance, underwater inspection, water testing, landscaping, erosion control, and bridge repairs. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $107,734 reservoir operation and maintenance; $20,604 water control management; $8,606 supervision and administration, $6,359 surveys; $4,520 periodic inspections. Others costs incurred were for plans and specification; general maintenance, recreation facilities minor maintenance, miscellaneous engineering surveys and studies. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. 32. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA. Location. In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, Pa., between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) Existing project. A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creekbed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, Pa. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess.). Federal cost of new work was $4,064,510. Non-Federal funds not required. Local cooperation. Assurances of compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $11,780 water control managE!ment. Other costs incurred were for A/E services. Maintenance, hired labor: Cost for major accomplishments were $21,564 reservoir operations and minor maintenance; $13,126 water control management. Other costs incurred were for safety and periodic inspections, data analysis, and supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project was completed in June 1960. 33. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location. In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, Pa., between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, Pa., and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess.) provide for a singlepurpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of a control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet; 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1980) is $39,310,000 including $28,850,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Local cooperation. Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply is not urgent at this time. Study is continuing in order to resolve this question before completion of preconstruction planning. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Costs for major accomplishments were $15,942 survey service slope; $14,118 water control management. Other costs incurred were for peak discharge study, plans and specifications, reservoir operation and minor maintenance. Maintenance, hired labor: Costs for major accomplishments were $30,006 reservoir operation and minor maintenance; $28,477 water control management. Other costs incurred were recreation facilities, hydropower study, inspection; dam survey, inclinometer readings; A/E service, slope investigations, data analysis, engineering and design, supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was advance engineering and design. 34. TREXLER LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Jordon Creek about 0.5 mile downstream from its confluence with Mill Creek and 8 miles northwest of Allentown, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangel Sheet, W. Allentown, Pa.) Existing project. A multiple-purpose development project to provide supplies of water, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for a concrete gravity type dam 800 feet long rising 120 feet above creekbed, a spillway in stream channel, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through sluices in spillway section. The lake, a unit of the comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a capacity of 39,000 acre-feet at spillway crest with 800 acre-feet of inactive storage, 24,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 14,000 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1978), $47,500,000 includes $29,600,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. The portion of assurances dealing with water supply requirements is being studied jointly by Delaware River Basin Commission and Lehigh- Northampton County Planning Commission. Condition as of Sept. 30. Some design work has been completed. Construction has not started. 3-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: Lehigh River at Allentown, Pa., 24 April 1980 and 26 November 1980; Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Pa.; 6 May 1980 and 23 November 1980; East Branch, Delaware River at East Branch; 6 May 1980 and 6 November 1980; Chester River at Chester, Pa., 16 April 1980 and 13 November 1980, Rancocas Creek at Mount Holly, N.J., 9 April 1980 and 14 November 1980; Broadkill and McMichael Creeks at Stroudsburg and East Stroudsburg, Pa., 7 July 1980 and Middle Creek, Wallenpaupack Creek and Lackawaxen River at Hawley, Pa., 8 July 1980. Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $6,065. Total costs were $72,379. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 3-H at end of chapter.) 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Also feasibility study pursuant to Emergency Bank Protection Authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-I at end of chapter.) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $119,428 for advance preparation and $1,218 for rehabilitation. 38. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 3-D at end of chapter.) 39. SURVEYS Costs for the period were $674,191 for navigation studies; $761,079 for flood control studies; and $172,731 for special studies, a total of $1,608,001. 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $408,240. 41. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION Location. Demonstration projects will be undertaken at a total of 16 sites nationwide, 6 of which are located in the Delaware Bay and include Pickering Beach, Kitts Hummock, Slaughter Beach, Bowers Beach, Broadkill Beach, and Lewes, Delaware. The latter three sites will only be monitored as there are presently Federal and State projects in progress. Existing project. Section 54 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 authorized a nationwide, 5 year program to test and evaluate low cost shoreline erosion control measures, both structural and vegetative, which can be implemented by individual private property owners. The emphasis of the program is not to solve individual problems, so much as to explore the effectiveness of various ways to control erosion at different types of shorelines. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Costs incurred were $48,263 for beach protection at Pickering Beach; $-2,597 Kitts-Hummock; and $12,585 Slaughter Beach. New work, hired labor: Costs of $68,888 were incurred for monitoring, miscellaneous engineering, design, supervision and administration. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction in progress at all sites. 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Sept. 30, 1980 1. Absecon Inlet, N.J. 2. Barnegat Inlet, N.J. 3. Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa. and Trenton, N.J. 5. Delaware River Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea 6. Delaware River at Camden, N.J. 7. Harbor of Refuge Delaware Bay, Del. 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp.. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 188,000 179,000 185,354 175,776 8,000 12,546 - 534,2091 - 534,209' 24,400 5,780,3622 23,720 5,770,2912 - - - - 448,8493 - - - - 448,8493 276,000 103,500 808,756 205,400 7,784,635 280,225 85,323 815,941 203,897 7,770,008 - - - - 879,275 - - - - 879,275 141,000 139,115 15,000 121,000 7,994 127,971 84,900 1,904,488 62,943 1,880,611 S- - - 1,134,346 S - - 1,134,346 - - - - 72,147,8004 - - - - 72,147,8004 972,500 1,109,000 174,350 400,500 18,844,735 s 983,329 1,096,990 174,470 405,837 18,836,820 s - - - - 57,879,8726 - - - 57,879,0286 7,984,700 8,844,181 11,860,244 14,897,900 218,565,6167 8,107,426 8,783,238 11,877,621 14,850,493 218,449,095 - - - - 508,324 - - - 508,324 - - - - 462,906 - - - - 462,906 -- 3,000 -- 2,615 21,200 21,369 20,200 13,651 335,962 335,577 - - - 5,162,2301o - - - 5,162,23010 - - 721,000 1,126,45411 - -- 531,555 937,00911 - - - 511,2108 - - - 511,2108 25,000 133,000 836,200 2,350,923 12,491 129,182 795,533 2,294,006 - - -- 1,323,775 - - - 1,323,775 24,000 29,971 40,000 35,100 - 561,5149 - 561,5149 48,400 1,068,578 53,407 1,067,937 3-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Sept. 30, 1980 23,639 4,586,601 4.189,814 32,193 8,930,000 9,207,729 394,000 412,481 12,826,000 12,871,902 10. Inland Waterway New Work from Delaware Approp. River to Chesa- Cost peake Bay, Del. Maint. and Md. Approp. Cost 11. Little River, New Work Del. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12. Manasquan New Work River, N.J. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 13. Mispillion New Work River, Del. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 14. Murderkill New Work River, Del. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 15. New Jersey New Work Intracoastal Approp. Waterway Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 16. Raccoon New Work Creek, N.J. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17. Schuylkill New Work River, Pa. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18. Waterway from New Work Indian River Inlet Approp. To Rehoboth Bay, Del Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -2,000 606 312 - 102,000 153 97,215 30,000 30,186 2,949 8,140,300 3,173,706 132,808,5911 2 132,532,27512 98,247,53013 97,090,998'3 - 12,016 - 12,016 300 288,762 8,486 288,310 - 557,24921 - 557,24921 87,900 2,980,4372 2 107,234 2,980,86122 2,555,000 3,770,600 2,346,583 3,524,146 40,0 32,0 3,000 116,0 6,768 115,7 - 377,84823 - 377,84823 00 734,58624 68 719,59124 - 253,491 - 253,491 - 37,630 - 37,630 )00 781,774 10 780,467 - - - - 71,54914 - - - - 71,54914 517,500 707,000 616,500 721,000 14,329,4711 s 522,926 712,627 609,969 729,452 14,324,0921 s - - - - 1,196,581 -..- 1,196,581 .- - 83,6652 s -.-- 83,6652 s - 23,000 - 21,461 168,800 666,000 175,440 663,456 992,000 998,355 339,902 337,663 - 3,334,007 6 - 3,334,00716 -71,000 20,958,933 -74,182 20,954,750 - 200,700 - 200,451 90,908 90,908 241,856 241,374 3-22 - - 20,000 - - 11,362 106,000 630,000 110,000 98,546 629,493 100,576 - - 660,000 - - 621,963 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Sept. 30, 1980 19. Wilmington Harbor, Del. 24. Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, N.J. 25. Delaware Coast Protection, Del. 26. Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Schuylkill River Basin, Pa. *27. Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, N.J. 28. Tamaqua, Pa. 29. Beltzville Lake, Pa. 30. Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. 31. Francis E. Walter Dam Pa. 32. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. 33. Prompton Lake Pa. 34. Trexler Lake, Pa. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp.,. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - - - 1,954,72517 - - - - 1,954,7251 7 589,000 1,135,000 1,438,800 2,129,500 20,426,96718 566,774 1,099,459 1,499,867 2,126,142 20,418,57718 - 150,000 - 111,705 100,000 890,000 9,708 940,056 37,948 35,000 - 80,000 135,305 - 69,354 139,339 - 60,000 - 42,301 84,000 20,063 50,000 250,000 150,000 48,751 184,466 174,195 - - 100 236,900 267,500 279,000 227,656 248,006 288,510 12,994,000 13,089,170 21,300 20,896 1,2,050,000 9,520,284 42,000 41,899 6,648,900 8,944,290 298,000 227,892 320 5,600 100,000 84,425 -62,043 1,595 75,000 70,911 150,000 149,973 1,429,000 1,429,327 315,305 293,118 81,957 63,959 525,000 478,323 - 22,931,831 - 22,931,130 405,800 1,787,075 387,020 1,720,557 700,000. 1,085,782 704,600 685,710 63,011,300 62,956,559 1,065,900 976,397 - - - - 11,127,4321 9 - - - - 11,127,40719 206,800 946,500 234,000 226,500 2,653,521 186,804 244,992 224,838 247,578 2,634,886 50,600 50,222 51,000 46,310 60,000 64,402 158,200 206,000 135,000 142,594 185,363 151,430 375,000 - -14,700 249,175 78,831 42 - 4,073,105 - 4,073,105 55,100 881,964 56,066 881,313 - 4,609,48320 - 4,609,46920 154,400 1,329,816 151,749 1,304,192 32,357 1,316,464 - 1,316,464 *Transferred to New York advice number 1-743. District 20 February 1980, 3-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $226,497 for new work for previous projects.' 2. Includes $235,786 for maintenance for previous projects. * 3. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 4. Includes $2,489,173 for new work, for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) to Delaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under the 1954 modification. 5. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects. 6. Excludes $12,976,058 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, N.J. under 1954 modification. 7. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects. 8. Excludes $10,000 for previous project and $210,000 contributed funds. 9. Excludes $60,000 contributed funds. 10. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 11. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, fiscal year 1963. 12. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous orojects. 13. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds and $99,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 15. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department funds expended for maintenance. 16. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 17. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project. 18. Excludes $60,000 contributed funds expended for maintenance. 19. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $39,975 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 20. Includes $74,000 appropriate and $66,498 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 21. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds expended on new work. 22. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 24. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 25. Excludes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 22, 1922 July 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1907 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 ABSECON INLET, N.J. (See Section 1 of Text) An inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep. A channel 15 feet deep into Clam Creek and a turning basin. BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 2 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND TRENTON, N.J. (See Section 6 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa. and Delair Bridge. Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, N.J., and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, N.J. Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek H. Doc. 375, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 504, 79th Cong., 2d sess.I Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 262, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess! Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 3-24 TABLE 3-A (continued) TABLE 3-B (continued) PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 June 20, 19384 Mar. 2, 1945s Mar. 2, 1945s Mar. 2, 1945 s Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 June 3, 1896 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, Pa. DELAWARE RIVER, PA., N.J., AND DEL., PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantus Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, N.J., and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, Pa. A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth n channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge and in anchorage at Port Richmond. A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (See Section 7 of Text) Breakwater construction Construction of 10 ice piers Construction of 5 additional ice piers Channel 18 feet deep to Queen Anne pier at Lewes, Del. (no work has been done on this channel). Channel 15 feet deep to pier of Atlantic Fisheries Co. about 0.7 mile east of Queen Anne pier. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL. (See Section 9 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (See Section 10 of Text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes, and basin. For a 10-foot depth from I elaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extneding jetties. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong., 2d sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong., 3d sess.I 1 H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess.I H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 112, 53d Cong., 1st sess. (subproject, approved by War Depar ment, Apr. 23, 1900). (Subproject, approved bN War Department, June 30, 1902.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 70th 1st sess.I Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 74th Cong., 1st sess! River and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 1st sesst H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess.1 3-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL. AND MD. (See Section 12 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth, and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay at water of that depth in the bay, including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, with a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high level fixed railroad bridge over cutoff; high level fixed highway bridge at Reedy Point and Summit; and an anchorage in Elk River 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, averaging 3,700 feet long. MANASQUAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 13 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot anchorages. 7 RACCOON CREEK, N.J. (See Section 16 of Text) A channel of 7-foot depth to Springers wharf and 5 feet to Swedesboro. A cutoff, Molonox Shoal A 7-foot depth extension to Swedesboro and jetty at mouth SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. (See Section 19 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point, thence 30 feet, 26 feet, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DEL. (See Section 20 of Text) Depths of 21, 10, and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24,173d Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee Doc., 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 356, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 56th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1900, p. 1590. Specified in act. H. Doc. 800, 63d Cong., 2d sess., (contains latest published maps.) H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1896, p. 973; Annual Report 1897, p. 1250.' H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 3-26 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19358 Completion of new south jetty by the United States; subject to Rivers and Harbors Comprovision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States mittee Doc. 32, 73d for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may Cong., 2d sess. subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Oct. 17, 1940 Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided 3d sess. occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. July 14, 1960 A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lodbell S. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., Canal including turninb basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington 2d sess. Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. 1. Contains latest published maps. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from 2. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Avenue, de- 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, ferred for restudy. 1935. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be inactive. 3. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered 1933. inactive. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from 8. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for Administration. restudy. TABLE 3-C TOTAL COST FOR EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Totals 4. Delaware River be- Public Works $2,189,956 - -$ 2,189,956 tween Philadelphia, Emergency 2,636,456 - - 2,636,456 Pa., and Trenton Relief N.J. Regular 64,727,215 $ 18,142,880 - $82,870,095 Totals $69,553,627 $ 18,142,880 - 87,696,507 5. Delaware River, Pa., Public Works 813,046 - - 813,046 N.J. and Del., Regular 44,089,923 $216,683,249 $508,324 260,773,172 Philadelphia Totals $44,902,969 $216,683,249 $508,324 261,586,218 to the Sea TABLE 3-D RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 38 of Text) Project Date Survey Conducted Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. October 1972 3-27 --j- -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHO] Project Absecon Creek, N.J.' Alloway Creek, N.J.' Appoquinimink River, Del. Aquatic Plant Control Big Timber Creek, N.J.' Broadkill River, Del. Chester River, Pa.3 Cohansey River, N.J. Cooper River, N.J.' Delaware River, N.Y., N.J., and Pa., at or near mouth of Neversink River 4 Dennis Creek, N.J.' Double Creek, N.J.' Goshen Creek, N.J.' Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. 1'6 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del.1'6 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, Del. Leipsic River, Del.' Little Egg Harbor, N.J. 1 4 Mantua Creek, N.J. Maurice River, N.J. Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth9 Delaware Bay to Millville Oldmans Creek, N.J. Pepper Creek, Del.1 Rancocas River, N.J. St. Jones River, Del. Delaware Bay to Lebanon i 1 2 Jetties and new entrance at mouth9 Salem River, N.J. Delaware River to fixed bridge 1 3 Penns Neck Bridge to fixed bridge1 s Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa.1 Smyrna River, Del. Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing1 6 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge 9 Toms River, N.J. Channel 5 ft. deep' Channel 12 feet deep 9 Tuckerton Creek, N.J. Woodbury Creek, N.J.' TABLE 3-E 1917 1897 1912 1905 1928 1898 1979 1931 1966 1948 1941 1965 1942 1961 1961 1955 1949 1950 1972 1940 TS Co)st To September 30, 1980 RIZED NAVIGATION PROJEC' For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1969 1931 1931 1975 1962 1976 1931 1938 1962 Construction 11,935 21,398 36,973 87,594 58,6652 68,228 6,000 146,75619 33,102 4,701 7,800 15,359 208,964 224,704 168,41220o 36,956 15,048 169,6878 143,984' 0 31,188 138,094 44,500 207,102 107,63414 4,291,810 198,844 10,050 60,242 27,0931 3-28 Operation and Maintenance 167,682* 35,761 41,270 53,986* 243,641 1,139 745,931 379,244* - 870 14,336 97,18021 32,345 339,340* 137,050 32,125 1,797* 13,090 66,093 1,792* 288,987 5 197,327 33,311 616,432* 56,474 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Includes $6,000 new work and $63 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 4. Abandonment recommended in House Document 467, 69th Congress, 1st Session. 5. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 6. Harbor not now required by commerce. 7. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 8. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 9. Deferred. 10. Includes $43,000 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 12. Includes $54,590 new work on $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 13. Includes $55,809 new work and $48,000 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 14. Exclusive of $51,825 contributed by local interests. 15. Deferred. Dredged under previous project to 9 foot depth. 16. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 17. In addition $20,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 18. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 19. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 20. Entire amount expended on previous project repealed in 1905. 21. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous projects. *Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. TABLE 3-F OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) For Last Cost Full Report To September 30, 1980 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic City, N.J. 1972 2,083,289 - Barnegat Light, N.J. 1964 70,908 - Cape May City, N.J. 1961 22,957 - Long Beach Island, N.J. 1964 40,665 - North Wildwood, N.J. 1961 - - Ocean City, N.J. 1969 395,8313 - Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del. 1965 326,116 - Stone Harbor, N.J. 1961 - - Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. 1961 - - 1. Operation and maintenance required by law to 3. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests be assumed by local interests, and $272,766 Federal participation expended under 2. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works Public Works Acceleration Program for Extension of five funds expended for extension to two groins, existing groins completed 11 May 1964. TABLE 3-G BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION' (See Section 23 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Cost Broadkill Beach, Sussex County, Del. $13,130 Lewes, Delaware 15,705 1. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public law 87-874 (Preauthorization). 3-29 TABLE 3-E (continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 3-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, Pa. 1961 1,615,581 1 Aquashicola Reservoir, Pa. 1963 - - Bethlehem, Pa. 1966 4,520,995 1 Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa. 1963 - - Mt. Holly, N.J. 1946 283,665 -1 Tocks Island Lake, Pa., N.J. and N.Y. 1979 65,106,260 - Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) Pa. 1979 195,223 - 1. Maintenance assumed by local interests as re- 2. New project deferred. quired by authorizing project. TABLE 3-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 1 (See Section 37 of Text) Study Fiscal Year Cost Lambertville, N.J. $ 1,488 Millcreek, Bucks County, Pa. 43,563 Monocacy Creek, Bethlehem, Pa. 83,082 Woodlynne, N.J. 53,106 1. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION2 (See Section 37 of Text) Study Fiscal Year Cost Darby Creek, Landsdowne, Pa. $ 716 Kaempfer Brook, Liberty, N.Y. 4,861 2. Feasibility study pursuant to emergency bank protection, provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. 3-30 BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, Md., on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Page Md .............................. 4-2 2. Baltimore Harbor, Md., Collection and Removal of Drift ..... 4-4 3. Chester River, Md ................ 4-4 4. Crisfield Harbor, Md .............. 4-5 5. Duck Point Cove (Hearns Creek), Md ...................... 4-5 6. Harbor of Baltimore, Md., Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits ................... 4-6 7. Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md ....................... 4-6 8. Knapps Narrows, Md ............. 4-6 9. La Trappe River, Md................ 4-7 10. Little Wicomico River, Va......... 4-7 11. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. ................... 4-7 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md...... 4-8 13. Pocomoke River, Md .............. 4-8 14. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection and Removal of Drift ...................... 4-9 15. Rock Hall Harbor, Md.............. 4-9 16. St. Catherines Sound, Md ......... 4-10 17. Tilghman Island Harbor Md...... 4-10 18. Tuckahoe River, Md..............4-11 19. Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, Md........................4-11 20. Washington Harbor, D.C......... 4-11 21. Wicomico River, Md ............. 4-12 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Additionally, all tables Navigation (Cont'd) Page 22. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................... 4-13 23. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 4-13 24. Navigation work under special authorization ............... 4-13 Beach Erosion Control 25. Colonial Beach, Va ............. 4-13 26. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........... 4-13 27. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ................... 4-13 Flood Control 28. Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, D.C. and Md ....... 4-14 29. Bloomington Lake, North Branch, Potomac River, Md. & W. Va......................4-14 30. Bull Run, Pa .................... 4-15 31. Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va...................4-15 32. Fourmile Run, Va..............4-15 33. Lackawanna River Basin, Pa. ........................ 4-16 33A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa........ 4-16 34. Lock Haven, Pa ................ 4-16 which are referenced in text appear at the end of this chapter. 4-1 REPORT OF THIE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Flood Control (Cant'd) Page 35. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, Pa ................. 4-17 36. Southern New York Flood .Control Projects ................... 4-17 36A. Addison, N.Y ..................... 4-17 36B. Almond Lake, N.Y ................ 4-17 36C.Arkport Dam, N.Y ............... 4-18 36D.Avoca, N.Y ....................... 4-18 36E.Binghamton, N.Y .............. 4-18 36F.Canisteo, N.Y ..................... 4-19 36G. Corning, N.Y ...................... 4-19 36H. East Sidney Lake, N.Y ............. 4-19 36I. Elmira, N.Y ...................... 4-20 36J. Hornell, N.Y ....................... 4-20 36K. Lisle, N.Y ......................... 4-21 36L.Oxford, N.Y..................... 4-21 36M.Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. .......... 4-21 36N.Whitney Point Village, N.Y....... 4-22 37. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, Pa ........... 4-22 38. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, N.Y. and Pa ............... 4-22 38A. Cowanesque Lake, Pa .............. 4-22 38B.Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa ......... 4-23 39. Tyrone, Pa ........................ 4-23 40. West Branch of Susquehanna River, Pa ......................... 4-24 Flood Control (Cont'd) 40A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa ............ 40B. Curwensville Lake, Pa ........... 40C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa ..... 41. Wyoming Valley, Pa................ 42. York, Codorus Creek, Pa .......... 43. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works .............. 44. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .............. 45. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. 46. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ............. Page 4-24 4-24 4-24 4-25 4-25 4-25 4-26 4-26 4-26 Water Supply 47. Potomac Estuary Pilot Water Treatment Plant, D.C ............ 4-26 48. Washington Aqueduct .............. 4-26 General Investigations 49. Surveys ........................ 4-27 50. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..................... 4-28 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD. Location. Baltimore Harbor is at head of navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near town of Westminister in Carroll County, Md., and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278). Previous project. For details see page 274 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing Project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, Va., and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, Md. with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 2.3 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50- foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.2 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 8.9 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 19.9 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 13.0 miles long from the Cutoff-Brewerton Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Sections; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordinance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22- foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch: (a) Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.4 miles; (b) Ferry Bar West Section: a channel, 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, from the Ferry Bar East Section to Ferry Bar, a distance of 0.8 miles; (c) Spring Garden Section: a channel, 27 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from Ferry Bar to and including a turning and anchorage basin immediately below the Western Maryland Railway Bridge, a distance of 1.0 miles; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39- foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interest: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.2 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Quarantine Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 600 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,300 feet wide; (3) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (4) Fort Mcllenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost (October 1980) for new work is $348,680,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $62,200,000 for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 of which $57,900,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,240,000 is non-Federal; and $278,150,000 for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $170,000,000 is Corps of Engineers, $150,000 is U.S. Coast Guard, and $108,000,000 is non-Federal. Widening 35-foot depth from Port Covington Channel from 150 to 400 feet to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at upper end is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $1,603,000. Local cooperations. Fully compiled with for improvements authorized under River and Harbor Act of 1945 and prior acts. River and Harbor Act of 1958 requires local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal area for construction and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages, and provide and maintain all necesary alterations in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities. Local interests gave formal assurance that terms will be complied with. River and Harbor Act of 1970 requires local interest to: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining work; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; (c) provide and maintain at local expense adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms, and depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving terminals commensurate with the depth provided in the related project area; (d) accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; (e) prohibit erection of any structure within 125 feet of the project channel or turning basin; and (f) establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the channels and harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight 4-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The three grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 13 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No: 10 (revised 1978)" on Port of Baltimore, Md., (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for widening the approach channels to the C&D canal (Swan Point and Tolchester Sections) were completed and the work was advertised September 5, 1980. A contract award is scheduled for October 1980. Pre-construction planning continued on work authorized by the 1970 River and Harbor Act. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channel were made at a cost of $100,000. Maintenance dredging of the Swan Point and Tolchester Approach Channels to the C&D Canal, by contract, began January 10, 1980 and was completed April 16, 1980. A total of 872,340 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in an approved open water disposal area at a cost of $2,429,148. Maintenance dredging of the inbound side of the Craighill- Cutoff Angle by contract began January 12,1980 and was suspended on June 1, 1980 until January 1, 1981. A total of 535,516 cubic yards of material was removed to date and deposited in an approved open water disposal area at a cost of $1,031,088. - Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the project channel were made at a cost of $30,931. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act and prior acts was completed in March 1954 except for inactive portion. Norfolk District undertook jurisdiction of the channel in York Spit Section in fiscal year 1942 and the channels in Cape Henry and Rappahannock Shoal Sections in fiscal year 1961. Project as authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act is 85 percent complete. Work within the Baltimore District is 78 percent complete. The work remaining to be done is dredging the Connecting Channel to the C&D Canal and remaining width of the approaches thereto. Work within the Norfolk Districton Cape Henry, York Spit and Rappahannock Shoal Sections was completed in March 1967. Preconstruction planning was initiated in October 1976 on the project as authorized by 1970 River and Harbor Act. Total costs for existing project were $54,022,306 of which $29,627,399 was for new work and $24,394,907 was for maintenance. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD. COLLECITON AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, Md., and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See report for Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 31,860 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is one of the continuous maintenance. Navigation has been made safer by continued patrol of the harbor and removal of drift material which began in July 1949. 3. CHESTER RIVER, MD. Location. Rises in Kent County, Del., flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 miles south of highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of Annual Report for 1960. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long, lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of Channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT from Chester River to Estern Bay through Kent Island Narrows is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance of Wells Cove section of project. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the 7 marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with proposed maintenance dredging of the project channel was initiated. Condition at end offiscal year. Active portion of existing project was completed in 1950. Total costs of existing project were $800,779 of which $32,454 was new work and $768,325 for maintenance. 4. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD. Location. Along western limits of town of Crisfield on east bank of Little Annemessex River, an estuary of Tangier Sound on east side of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 279 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 425 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to Somers Cove Light, thence 266 feet wide to the bend about 1,800 feet southwest of railroad pier, and thence of irregular width to a point opposite Consumers Ice Co.; a spur channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the ice plant to Hop Point; a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River via Cedar Creek, a landcut, and Daugherty Creek Canal to Big Annemessex River; a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide and about 875 feet long roughtly parallel to Brick Kiln Road, with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading therefrom to 7- foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers; and an anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long, with an approach channel 10 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 10- foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River through the present entrance to Somers Cove. Mean range of tide at Crisfield is about 1.9 feet. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Waterfront of Crisfield Harbor is built up principally with solidbulkhead wharves and pile-and-timber piers. Most wharves are privately owned, but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Few of the terminals have mechanical freight-handling devices, but most of the freight is transferred by hand. There are three boatrepair yards with marine railways having capacities up to 250 tons. Existing terminals are adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. Sufficient areas are available north of Hop Point and on Somers Cove for construction of additional terminals as needed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Modification to dredging contract made at a contract cost of $21,200. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in August 1961. 5. DUCK POINT COVE, MD. Location. A small indentation about 4,000 feet long on east shore of Fox Creek, about 2.5 miles above mouth. Fox Creek is a shallow tidal estuary about 4 miles long entering Honga River about 4 miles above its junction with Hooper Strait, which, in turn, connects with Chesapeake Bay on east side, at a point about 15 miles north of mouth of Potomac River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from that depth in Fox Creek to a mooring basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, roughly parallel to county road at head of waterway. Cost of new work for completed project was $25,289. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must, for future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages to oyster beds and furnish spoil-disposal areas. Assurances were accepted by the Chief of Engineers October 26, 1949. Terminal facilities. There are three privately owned packing-house wharves on north bank of 4-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Duck Point Cove which are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Facilities are adequate for present needs. The commissioners of Dorchester County indicated that a public terminal would be built. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional terminals if, and when, necessary. Operations and results during fiscal year. A reconnaissance report, which determined that the project was justified for continued funding, was forwarded to higher authority in May 1980. The total costs for a condition survey and the reconnaissance report were $15,600. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed October 1950. 6. HARBOR OF BALTIMORE, MD. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS. Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters, and all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries within State of Maryland. Existing project. Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888, Sections 10 and 13 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and other related Federal laws. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance operations, by supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore, included: 1,500 inspections; 230 detailed investigations of violations of Federal laws with cease and desist orders issued in all cases; 73 cases sent to U.S. Attorney for further action; and 151 cases were closed. No fines were imposed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under existing project began in July 1959 and is one of continuing operation and maintenance. 7. ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD. Location. Island Creek in St. Marys County, Md., is a tidal estuary three-fourths of a mile long, flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the right bank of St. Marys River at its junction with the Potomac River, 11 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay and 97 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. It lies entirely within the lower half of St. Georges Island. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long from the St. Marys River through the entrance to Island Creek and a turning basin 5 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long within the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. Costs of Federal new work for the completed project were $6,230. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On Island Creek there are five small private landings or stagings which are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the Island Creek channel, by contract, began September 18, 1979 and was completed October 30, 1979. A total of 22,220 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited ashore in authorized disposal areas at a cost of $209,785. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in May 1956. 8. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD. Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles south of Baltimore, Md. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, Md. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. MHaairnritse nanCcree:e kA caornedai tioant suar vecyo swt aso mf ad$e1 0o,f9 t5h6e. Maintenance dredging of the protion of the project west of the Route 33 bridge to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay, by contract, began March 10, 1980 and was completed April 13, 1980. A total of 26,446 cubic yards of dredged material was deposited on a upland disposal site and 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 38,316 cubic yards of sand was deposited in an open-water disposal site. Total contract costs were $280,930 with $27,608 contributed by local sponsors for dike construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in April 1935. 9. LA TRAPPE RIVER, MD. Location. La Trappe River rises in Talbot County, and flows in a generally southwesterly direction, and empties into the Choptank River about 12 miles above the mouth. The river is about 4 miles long. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1225.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 11 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide across the bar at the mouth, and 8 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide inside the bar as far as Trappe Landing, with a turning basin at the latter pont. The length of the section included in the project is about 3 miles, the lower end extending into Choptank River. The mean range of tide is 2 feet. The estimate of cost for new work, revised in 1896, is $9,750. The latest (1922) approved estimate for annual cost of maintenance is $1,400. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one wharf, consisting of 225 feet of solid bulkhead and 200 feet of open-pile construction, which is served by this improvement. It is privately owned, butopen to the general public. The wharf is partially dilapidated however, the usable portion is considered adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient areas are available for the construction of additional terminals if and when needed. Operations and results during fiscal year. A reconnaissance report, which determined that the project was not justified for continued funding and that an indepth report should not be made, was forwarded to higher authority in May 1980. The total costs for a condition survey and the reconnaissance report were $16,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1908. The costs of the existing project were $8,064 for new work and $40,475 for maintenance, a total of $48,539. 10. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA. Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, Va., flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in Potomac River to deep water in Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to 8- foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at entrance are: Mean, 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking and packing plant, and a marine railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with proposed rehabilitation of the south timber bulkhead and with proposed maintenance dredging of the project channel was initiated. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in December 1937. 11. LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD. Location. This is a tidal waterway, about 1.5 miles long and from one-eighth to one-half mile wide, branching off from Tangier Sound between Deal Island and Little Deal Island, Md. It is about 12 miles north of Crisfield Harbor, Md. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. The original project was dated March 3, 1881. For further details see page 1790 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Tangier Sound to and including a mooring basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. The cost for new work for the completed project was $39,658, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are three packinghouse wharves and a small marine railway above the head of the project channel at Wenona. The facilities are privately owned but are open to the 4-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 public for transaction of business with the owners. Present facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient areas are available for the construction of additional terminals when and as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Settlement of claim on dredging contract was made at a cost of $41,913. Negotiations continued on settlement of another claim for payment of interest on contract modification. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in July 1950. The total costs for the existing project were $360,600, of which $39,658 was for new work and $320,942 was for maintenance. 12. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD. Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1220.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the 16-foot depth curve in Atlantic Ocean through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 6 feet above mean low water and a top width of 12 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the project harbor; a depth of 14 feet and 150 feet wide to the head of the harbor, a length of approximately 3,400 feet; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Terminal facilities for channel across Sinepuxent Bay to Assateague Island termini of channel. Adequate timber bulkhead landing at both South Point and Assateague Island termini of channel. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was made of the Isle of Wight Bay Channel area at a cost of $4,122. Maintenance dredging of the inlet channel, by contract, began February 22, 1980 and was completed on March 14, 1980. A total of 38,640 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited on the Assateague Beach at a cost of $318,893. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1936. 13. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD. Location. Pocomoke River is a tributary of Pocomoke Sound, a tidal estuary on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles north of Cape Charles, Va. Previous project. For details see page 282 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for channel 11 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from 11-foot depth in Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and for construction of a dike along offshore side of channel between Tulls Point and end of existing dike; and a channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 to 130 feet wide from Shad Landing to bridge at Snow Hill. Length of project is about 8.7 miles from Pocomoke Sound to Williams Point. and about 4.5 miles from Shad Landing to Snow Hill, Md. Shad Landing is about 25.7 miles above mouth of river. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet in Pocomoke Sound and 2.5 feet in river at Snow Hill. Prolonged high winds on Chesapeake Bay frequently cause greater fluctuations. Estimated 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT cost (1969) for new work is $1,071,458 exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Extension of channel above bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep and widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $22,000 (1956). Local cooperation. Complied with for section of project from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River and from Shad Landing to highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by acts of June 3,1896, and August 30, 1935, except local interests must furnish releases from damage to oyster beds and spoil disposal areas as required for future maintenance. Terms for section of project above highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by act of March 2, 1945, required local interests to furnish all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages resulting from improvement; and contribute one-half the initial cost of that portion of project, but not to exceed $4,250. This portion is considered inactive. Terms for 11-foot depth channel from Pocomoke Sound to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point authorized by act of September 3, 1954, require local interest provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of project; and hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance, including such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Waterfronts at Pocomoke City and Snow Hill are built up principally with earthfilled timber bulkheads, the majority of which are privately owned. A few of the warehouses and factories on the river at these communities have railroad sidings and mechanical freighthandling facilities. Any appreciable increase in commerce at Pocomoke City or Snow Hill would necessitate construction of new facilities and repair of existing structures. Adequate space is available for development of additional terminals. Operations and results during fiscal year. Negotiations continued on settlement of claim for payment of interest on contract modification. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is about 19 percent complete. Work remaining is the inactive portion authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Total costs for existing project were $1,241,039 of which $171,226 was for new work and $1,069,813 was for maintenance. 14. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, D.C. COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, D.C. and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington Area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, Va. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See report for Washington Harbor, D.C. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 170,980 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is one of continuous maintenance. Navigation has been made safer by continued patrol and removal of drift material which began in July 1966. 15. ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD. Location. Shallow, open cove on east side of Chesapeake Bay immediately to south of Swan Point and 23 miles southeast of Baltimore. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Previous project. For details see page 279 of Annual Report for 1957. Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from 10-foot depth curve in Swan Creek Inlet to a channel of same dimensions, 700 feet long parallel to harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide, 250 feet long in a northwesterly extension of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 350 feet long on an extension of the center line of the 10-foot basin; with an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 600 feet long attached to and extending in a southwesterly direction from the west end of above mentioned 8-foot basin; with twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of seven feet above mean low water; 4-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 relocating the existing entrance channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. The estimated cost of this work is $1,747,000, of which $1,070,100 is Federal cost, $625,000 is required local cash contribution, and $51,700 is for the required retaining dike, bulkheads, and embankments. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1937 and 1948, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. For work authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 29, 1980, local interests must, among other requirements, provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and contribute, in cash, 36.9 percent of the first cost and all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000, to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction, or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. For details see page 4-9 of Annual Report for 1979. Terminal facilities. There are several private terminals, a marine railway, a public timber-pile wharf, and a public bulkhead wharf about 500 feet long. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications was completed July 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1937 and 1948 was completed in August 1956. Total costs were $397,092, of which $331,766 was for new work and $65,326 was for maintenance. 16. ST. CATHERINES SOUND, MD. Location. St. Catherines Sound, a tidal estuary of the Potomac River, is in St. Marys County, Md. It is situated near the junction of the Potomac and Wicomico Rivers, 34 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay, and 76 miles south of Washington, D.C. It is 2 miles in length and flows in a southeasterly direction parallel with the Potomac River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long at the lower entrance from the Potomac River and a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide and 3,300 feet long at the upper entrance from the Wicomico River. Mean range of tide is 1.9 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work for the completed project was $29,947, exclusive of $600 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish releases from damages and spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Total actual costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of the project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, amount to $600. Terminal facilities. There are numerous privately owned wharves and stagings located in St. Catherines Sound and White Neck Creek, a tributary of St. Catherines Sound, of which three are open to the public. There are two marine railways in White Neck Creek. The terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the upper entrance channel to St. Catherines Sound, by contract, began October 24, 1979 and was completed December 4, 1979. A total of 22,052 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited ashore in an authorized disposal area at a cost of $158,822. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was started in March 1957 and completed in April 1957. 17. TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MD. Location. This harbor (also called Dogwood Harbor) is about 60 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor on eastern side of Tilghman Island, which lies between Chesapeake Bay and Choptank River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78). Previous projects. For details see page 278 of Annual Report for 1966. Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Harris Creek to and including an anchorage basin of irregular shape 500 feet long by 200 feet wide, with a 6-foot depth. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way for new work and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; build and maintain a suitable public landing with adequate approaches thereto; make required alterations and relocations; and make a lump sum cash contribution of 20.3 percent of the first cost of providing the channel and basin. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on January 27, 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 1967. Local interests contributed $14,200, the local first cost of providing the channel and basin. Terminal facilities. Consist of one pier operated by a local seafood packer for transfer of seafood to processing plant. Local interests will construct a public landing and approach road thereto in accordance with terms of local cooperation as part of project development. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the project channel, by contract, began February 8, 1980 and was completed March 9,1980. A total of 23,500 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in an upland disposal site. Federal contract costs were $337,127 with local interests contributing an additional $21,692 for dike construction. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was started in February and completed March, 1971. Total Federal costs for existing project were $425,106 of which $56,800 was for new work and $368,306 was maintenance. 18. TUCKAHOE RIVER, MD. Location. This river (formerly called Tuckahoe Creek) rises in Queen Anne County, Md., flows in a generally southerly direction, and empties into Choptank River about 8 miles below Denton, Md. It is about 25 miles long, 50 to 100 feet wide, and is narrow and crooked. The tide extends about 13 miles upstream from the mouth. The drainage area is 115 square miles. The discharge is unknown. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey chart No. 78.) Previous projects. None Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 50 feet wide from Waymans Wharf to Rolphs Landing and for removing a shoal below Waymans Wharf. The length of the section included in the project is about 1.3 miles, and its lower end is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. The mean range of tide is 2.3 feet and the extreme tidal range is 4.3 feet under ordinary conditions. The estimate of cost for new work, made in 1908, is $15,600. The latest (1908) approved estimate for annual cost of mainte0n .ance i0s f$fP5t f0 %f0.. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. One solid bulkhead wharf and one open-pile wharf are served by this improvement. They are privately owned and only one is open to the general public. Both are in such a dilapidated condition as to be of little use, and additional terminal facilities would be desirable were it not that the traffic on this section of the river is almost negligible. (For a full description of terminal facilities see II. Doc. No. 652, 66th Cong., 2d sess.) Operations and results during fiscal year. A reconnaissance report, which determined that the project was not justified for continued funding and that an indepth report should not be made, was forwarded to higher authority in May 1980. The total costs for a condition survey and the reconnaissance report were $16,400. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1914. The total expenditures have been $9,727 for new work and $23,489 for maintenance, a total of $33,216. 19. UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD. Location. Natural waterway lying between Deal Island and mainland of Somerset County, Md., on eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 277 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Entrance channel from Tangier Sound 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, thence of irregular width to and along south shore of Thorofare, protected by two stone breakwaters at entrance, north breakwater is about 410 feet long and south breakwater about 310 feet long, with a turning basin at inner end 9 feet deep on south side of channel to within 50 feet of bulkhead along south shore, an anchorage area 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending across waterway parallel to highway bridge to within 50 feet of bulkhead on south shore, and an anchorage area 650 feet long, 300 feet wide, and 9 feet deep on north side of channel between breakwater and 6-foot anchorage. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $62,116. Local cooperation. Fully complied with.. Terminal facilities. A small packing-house wharf on shore of Tangier Sound south of project channel; two small packing houses along approach channel at which seafood is landed; and a public wharf at turning basin with a suitable road connecting it with the road system. Operations and results during fiscal year. Modifications were issued for the dredging contract at a cost of $7,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1939. 20. WASHINGTON HARBOR, D.C. Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, Md., and northerly 195 4-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 miles from Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Previous project. For details see page 291 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, D.C., and Anacostia River, D.C. Project provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to Francis Scott Key Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with width increased as necessary to afford a low-water cross section area of 25,000 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street, S.E. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Estimated Federal cost (1955) for new work is $572,000, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of tidal basin gates by hired labor. Maintenance dredging of Washington Harbor was accomplished during April 1980 by the Government sidecast dredge "FRY". There were 4,000 cubic yards of material removed from the channel adjacent to Haines Point at a cost of $17,600. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is about 30 percent complete. Channels and basins in Anacostia River are complete and those at forks of channel at Haines Point are partially complete. Except for dredging between limits of 2,000 feet above and 3,000 feet below Memorial Bridge, no new work has been done downstream of Key Bridge in Virginia channel. Work remaining to complete project consists of removing rock in Virginia Channel upstream of Memorial Bridge and dredging Virginia Channel from Giesboro Point upstream to a point 3,000 feet below Memorial Bridge. Total costs for existing project were $2,217,361 of which $162,006 was for new work and $2,055,355 was for maintenance. This excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 21. WICOMICO RIVER, MD. Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, Md., and flows genrally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on each side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 275 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-and-timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a Tshaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was made of the Upper River channel area at a cost of $6,291. Proposed maintenance dredging contract for this fiscal year was not awarded due to unresponsive bids. Project has been deferred until next fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1942 except for enlarging basin in Webster Cove which was completed November 1956. Total costs for existing project were $3,076,536 of which $421,609 (Federal funds) and $14,000 (contributed funds) were for new work, and $2,607,927 (Federal funds) and $33,000 (contributed funds) were for maintenance. 22. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-C at end of chapter.) 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 4-D at end of chapter.) 24. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies were $57,097, for Jackson Creek, Va., $783 for Northeast Creek, Md. (formerly Back River, Md.) and $45,574 for Tilghman Island Harbor and Neavitt Harbor, Md. Beach Erosion Control 25. COLONIAL BEACH, VA. Location. Colonial Beach, Westmoreland County, Va., is located on the right bank of the Potomac River 40 miles upstream from its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 69 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 558.) Existing project. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 103 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area downstream from Hawthorne Street southward to provide an additional beach area of about 107,200 square feet, stabilizing with vegetation about 200 feet of the bank behind the beachfill and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater with estimated lengths of 200 feet each, to stabilize the beachfill area; and extending and widening the existing beach at Castlewood Park to provide an additional beach area of about 59,300 square feet; constructing three segments of offshore breakwater with estimated lengths of 200 feet each of two of the segments and 300 feet for the third segment; removing debris in the beachfill area; and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of the Castlewood Park beachfill. The estimated cost of this work is $1,155,000 of which $577,500 is Federal cost and $577,500 is required local cash contribution. Local cooperation. Among other requirements, local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations required for construction including periodic nourishment and provide a cash contribution equal to 50 percent of the final project construction cost (excluding lands and relocations). Operations and results during fiscal year. None Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications and construction not yet started. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 4-E at end of chapter.) 27. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION" Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal Year cost was $23,402 for Colonial Beach, Va. 4-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Flood Control 28. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIB- .UTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION IMPROVE- .MENTS, D.C. AND MD. Location. Project is' on Anacostia River at confluence of northeast and northwest branches of Bladensburg, Md., about 9 miles above mouth at Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Existing project. Channel improvements of Anacostia River from foot of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia, to junction of Northeast and Northwest Branches at Bladensburg, Md.; channel improvement in Northeast Branch from mouth upstream to near Longfellow Street in Riverdale, Md.; channel improvement in Northwest Branch from mouth upstream to near 38th Street in Brentwood, Md.; levees along both banks of the streams to protect Bladensburg, Edmonston, Riverdale, Cottage City, and Colmar Manor, Md.; interior drainage facilities in these communities, including four pumping stations and necessary intercepting sewers and alterations and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Portion of channel improvement of Anacostia River from vicinity of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia to near Defense Highway Bridge on U.S. Route 50, provides for navigation channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide with a commercial boat basin, and a recreational boat basin having a capacity of 150 boats, both on east bank of river near Bladensburg, Md. Federal cost for new work for completed project was $6,042,325. Estimated cost to local interests for construction, lands, and damages is $6,275,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the Upper Anacostia River area, by contract, began November 2, 1979 and was completed January 12, 1980. A total of 61,000 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited ashore in authorized disposal areas at a cost of $497,560. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was started in November 1954 and completed in November 1959. Project was transferred to Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission November 17, 1959 for operation and maintenance. (For details see Annual Report for 1967.) 29. BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD. & W. VA. Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, Md., and Mineral County, W. Va. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, Md. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, Md., and Piedmont, W. Va. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," Md.) Existing project. Plan of improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam will be 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet would be provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement would be 92,000 acre-feet. Reservoir would control a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities will be provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Estimated cost (1980) of new work is $172,100,000 of which $57,137,000 is required non-federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Maryland Potomac Water Authority for repayment of initial water supply costs was executed on November 4, 1970. Satisfactory assurances covering repayment of costs allocated to future water supply have been received from the Commonwealth of Virginia, the District of Columbia, the State of Maryland, and the State of West Virginia. Federally approved water quality standards being put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Relocation of State Route 46 continued at a cost of $2,385,000 and is 95 percent complete. Utility relocations were completed. Costs were $115,174. Construction of the dam enbankment and intake structure was begun December 27, 1976 and is 96 percent complete. Costs were $19,760,000. Work on the spillway and dike was begun September 1, 1977 and is 99 percent complete. Costs were $2,150,000. The contract for remaining reservoir clearing awarded May 2, 1979 was completed. Costs were $113,863. The contract for construction of three water quality monitoring stations awarded May 2, 1979 was completed. 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICTL Costs were $206,260. Instrumentation of the dam by hired labor continued at a cost of $103,936. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $142,696 and $1,125,573, respectively. Maintenance: A reconnaissance 'study for hydropower was initiated. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the project began in June 1971. The overall project is 88 percent complete. 30. BULL RUN, PA. Location. In Loyalsock. Township which is located on the left or north bank of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River just downstream from Williamsport, Pa. The proposed project would provide protection to Loyalsock Township from the limit of the Williamsport Project at Millers Run approximately one mile downstream along the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. Existing project. Provides for alteration of 4,100 linear feet of the proposed highway embankment design by providing an impervious core which will serve as a levee to provide protection from flood stages on the West Branch Susquehanna River, tie back levees from the highway embankment to high ground, and a pumping facility at Bull Run to provide protection from backwater from the West Branch and from interior drainage on Bull Run. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $3,000,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $3,000,000. An agreement for local cooperation complying with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was accepted for the Secretary of the Army on September 21, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract was awarded July 11, 1979 by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation for its highway embankment which includes the impervious core. Construction advanced to 75 percent complete at a cost of $1,000,000. Plans and specifications for the tie back levees and pump station were completed and a construction contract was awarded September 26, 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. remaining is construction of project. Work 31. CUMIERLAND, MD., AND RIDGELEY, W. VA. Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with South Branch of Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, D.C. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flint Stone, Md., W. Va., and Pa.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along left bank and levees along right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, W. Va., to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Striet Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and floodwall in West Cumberland, Md., on left bank of North Branch of Potomac River from mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and floodwall in Ridgeley, W. Va., on right bank of North Branch of Potomac River, from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, W. Va.; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va.; removal of Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on North Branch of Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project was $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive' of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removal of gravel deposits, grass cutting of areas channelward of levees, and removal of brush and debris from channel were accomplished as required in channel area. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was started in March 1949 and completed in May 1959, except for.' minor items of land acquisition, which were completed in June 1963. Project was transferred to City of Cumberland, Md., for operation and maintenance May 1959. 32. FOURMILE RUN, VA. Location. The project is located in the City of Alexandria and in Arlington County, Va., on Fourmile Run immediately above its confluence with the Potomac River at Washington, D.C. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for Alexandria, Va., Annandale, Va., Falls Church, Va., and Washington West, D.C., Md., and Va.) 4-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing project. Provides for construction of a floodwall protection system, an improved channel, and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Total estimated cost (1980) of new work is $54,009,000 of which $2,439,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. See page 4-17 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. Agreements for local cooperation complying with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and Subsection 84 (b) of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act were accepted for the Secretary of the Army on April 23, 1974. Agreements for local cooperation concerning recreation cost sharing were accepted for the Secretary of the Army on May 30, 1974. An interjurisdictional agreement among Alexandria, and Falls Church and Arlington and Fairfax Counties were executed in March 1977 for implementing a watershed control program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the permanent railroad bridges was completed. Costs were $434,795. Purchase of materials and construction management by the railroad continued. Costs were $649,650. Construction of the remaining channels began July 20, 1978 and is 99 percent complete. Costs were $4,150,280. Plans and specifications for channel redredging advanced to 90 percent complete. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $75,880 and $141,674 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1974. The overall project is 95 percent complete. Silting of the channel in the area of the completed portions of the project has occurred. The estimated costs for redredging the channel to design limits is $2,285,000. 33. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA. Flood Control act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pa., substantially as recommended by Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. (See Tables 4-F and 4-G at end of chapter.) (See Geological Survey maps: "Avoca," "Carbondale," "Clifford," and "Scranton," Pa.) 33A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA. Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, Pa. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project will control a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provide flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400, of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract for resurfacing of the primary access road and parking area was awarded September 26, 1980 at an estimated cost of $55,890. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in November 1967 and was completed in October 1970. 34. LOCK HAVEN, PENNSYLVANIA Location. The project is located in the City of Lock Haven and Castanea and Woodward Townships, Pennsylvania, and is situated on the West Branch Susquehanna River and Bald Eagle Creek, 194 miles above the mouth in Clinton County, Pennsylvania. Existing project. The recommended plan of improvement provides for approximately 24,500 feet of earth levee and approximately 6,500 feet of floodwall with associated interior drainage facilities and closure structures to protect against a design flood discharge of 310,000 cubic feet per second. Local cooperation. See page 4-19 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A letter dated February 21, 1974 was furnished by the Mayor of 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Lock Haven stating the City's intent to comply with the requirements of local cooperation. A letter of intent has also been furnished by the Board of Supervisors of Castanea Township stating its willingness to cooperate with the City of Lock Haven in providing the local cooperation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I of advanced engineering and design was completed in September 1980 with the issuance of the Division Engineer's public notice. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I planning is complete and the report has been submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors for review. 35. RAYSTOWN LAKE RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA. Location. Damsite is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, Pa.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Payment of real estate deficiency judgements were made in the amount of $162,785. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of project continued. A contract for preparation of plans and specifications for visitor center was awarded on January 26, 1979 and is due to be completed in Debember 1980. Costs to date were $45,170. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in November 1968. The dam and appurtenances were operationally complete November 1, 1973. The overall project was completed in December 1978 except for minor completion items. 36. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of Susquehanna River to and including Chemung River. Individual units which constitute approved plan of improvements are listed in Table 4-H at end of chapter. (Also see Table 4-I at end of chapter.) 36A. ADDISON, N.Y. Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, N.Y. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to mouth of Tuscarora Creek, removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at southwest edge of village to high ground at southeast edge of village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1947. 36B. ALMOND LAKE, N.Y. Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, N.Y., on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, N.Y.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, N.Y. Recreation facilities include a boatlaunching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping areas. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at 4-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam was operationally complete in fiscal year 1949 and physically complete in fiscal year 1956. Recreational facilities, including a seasonal recreation pool of 124 acres and boating, picnicking and sanitary facilities, were completed in fiscal year 1966. 36C. ARKPORT DAM, N.Y. Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, N.Y., on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, N.Y.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8- foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam was operationally complete in fiscal year 1940 and physically complete in fiscal year 1953. 36D. AVOCA, N.Y. Location. On the Cohocton River of Village of Avoca, N.Y., about 30 miles upstream from confluence of Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realinement of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above Erie Railroad to below junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1939. 36E. BINGHAMTON, N.Y. Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, N.Y. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete floodwalls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on right bank of Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near city limits to existing floodwall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on left bank of Chenango River north of city limits in Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete floodwalls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to junction with Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete floodwall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Susquehanna River, extending from Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete floodwall and capping about 125 feet of concrete floodwall, on right bank of Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete floodwall and raising about 125 feet of existing floodwall on left bank of Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from Erie Railroad to high ground along right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete floodwall, and about 200 feet of new concrete floodwall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on Chenango River and in March 1936 on Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1943. 36F. CANISTEO, N.Y. Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in Town of Canisteo, N.Y., situated along the south side of Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on right bank of Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State HIighway Route 21 above Town to a point at intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check lams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end offtscal year. Existing project was completed in 1948. 36G. CORNING, N.Y. Location. On Chemung River in City of Corning, N.Y., about 44 miles upstream from confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, N.Y.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete floodwalls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Chemung River, extending from Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below city; about 200 feet of concrete floodwalls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on left bank of Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realinement of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between existing improved channel above Sixth Street and Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance. Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1942 except for work on Monkey Run, which was completed n 1955. 3611. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, N.Y. Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, N.Y., on Ouleout Creek, about five miles above 4-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 confluence of the creek with Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, N.Y.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, N.Y., exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, N.Y., cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam was operationally complete in fiscal year 1949 and physically complete in fiscal year 1956. 36I. ELMIRA, N.Y. Location. On Chemung River in City of Elmira, N.Y., about 27 miles upstream from confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below city near upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on left bank of Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and east Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on right bank of Diven Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit inclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on left bank of Seely Creek, extending from Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size form 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. 36J. HORNELL, N.Y. Location. On Canisteo River in City of Hornell, N.Y., about 42 miles upstream from confluence of Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees, concrete floodwalls, and check dams consisting of: realinement of about 4,600 feet of Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to junction of Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and Erie Railroad; construction of about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; construction of about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete floodwall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete floodwall, on right bank of Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to Erie Railroad; construction of about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete floodwall on left bank of Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around sewagedisposal plant on left bank of Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realinement and improvement of Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete floodwall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of floodwalls and levees, and related 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract for rehabilitation of a portion of the Canacadea Creek floodwall was awarded September 23, 1980 at an estimated cost of $318,500. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1941. Rehabilitation of check dam on Canacadea Creek, by contract, began May 18, 1966 and was completed January 12, 1967. Rehabilitation of deteriorated floodwalls along Canacadea and Crosby Creeks, by contract, began June 19, 1962 and was completed May 21, 1963. 36K. LISLE, N.Y. Location. On Tioughnioga River in Village of Lisle, N.Y., about 12 miles upstream from confluence of Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees and concrete floodwalls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to confluence with Tioughnioga River, realinement of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realinement of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1948. 36L. OXFORD, N.Y. Location. On Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, N.Y., about 40 miles upstream from confluence of Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees and clearing of Chenango River channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on left bank of Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along railroad to high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for Village of Oxford on left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1938. 36M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, N.Y. Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, N.Y., on the Otselic River about 0.7 of a mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, N.Y.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, N.Y. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscat year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Boundary survey and monumentation, by contract, began in 4-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 August 1977 and was completed in April 1980 at a cost of $169,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam was operationally complete in fiscal year 1942 and physically complete in fiscal year 1953. Recreational facilities were completed in fiscal year 1971. 36N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, N.Y. Location. On Tioughnioga River at the confluence of Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, N.Y.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees, consisting of realinement of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River channel, above confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along right bank of Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above village to Collins Street just below village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. I Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1948. 37. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA. Location. Dam is on Lackawanna River, 39 miles from mouth of stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, "Honesdale, Pa.") Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and remainder utilized to maintain existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, Pa., at this site. Reservoir area of 422 acres, and pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for constuction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was completed in 1964. 38. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, N.Y. AND PA. Plan of improvement authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, Pa., Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa., local protection works at Elkland, Pa., and Nichols, N.Y., and channel improvements at Cortland, N.Y. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. (See Tables 4-J and 4-K at end of chapter.) 38A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA. Location. Dam will be on Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, Pa. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, Pa.) Existing project. Provides for construction of an an earthfill dam, 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway in right abutment and a gated conduit in valley floor. Flood control storage would be 82,000 acre-feet, equivalent to 5.6 inches of runoff from drainage area. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated Federal cost (1980) of new work is $106,000,000 of which $60,820,000 is for construction and $45,180,000 is for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for the relocation of the Town of Nelson). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, will be replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on 25 August 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Land acquisition continued at a cost of $127,305. Utility relocations continued at a cost of $110,999. Construction was completed on: dam and appurtenances, at a cost of $3,046,000; Unit II municipal facilities, at a cost of $51,800; public 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT use and access facilities, at a cost of $895,000; and on the municipal water treatment plant for the new Nelson townsite, at a cost of $252,303. Construction continued on the highway relocation I Tnit III, 99 percent complete, at a cost of $4,275,041. Land acquisition for the Town of Nelson continued at a cost of $25,890. Instrumentation of the dam by hired labor continued at a cost of $163,232. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $383,966 and $629,131, respectively. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance was initiated. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began July 24, 1973. The overall project is 97 percent complete. 38B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA. Location. The dams will be located in Tioga County, Pa., upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, Pa.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, a maximum height of 121.5 feet above streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams will be of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Estimated Federal cost (1980) of new work is $192,700,000 of which $133,570,000 is for construction and $59,130,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition continued at a cost of $76,241. Work was completed on: utility relocations at a cost of $62,320; Mansfield Unit III, at a cost of $530,000; relocation of LR 58065 and LR 58066, at a cost of $317,503; excavation and embankment construction, at a cost of $4,530,000; and public use and access facilities at Ives Run, at a cost of $434,000. Instrumentation of the dam by hired labor continued at a cost of $69,770. Work in connection with review of project safety was continued at a cost of $73,755. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $260,525 and $297,645 respectively. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance was initiated in October 1978 (FY 1979) with normal operation and maintenance of the project continuing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began October 5, 1971. The overall project is 96 percent complete. 39. TYRONE, PA. Location. On left bank of Little Juniata River, 15 miles above its confluence with Frankstown Branch, and 116 miles above mouth of Juniata River. Bald Eagle Creek, Sink Run, and Schell Run, draining 53, 7, and 2 square miles, respectively, flow through city. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, "Tyrone, Pa.") Existing project. Plan of improvement for Little Juniata River will consist of levees and walls along left bank, a drop structure, channel improvements in river, and protection of bridges. Channel improvements on Bald Eagle Creek will consist of new levee and wall on right bank, concrete overflow dam, concrete flume, and stilling basin. Sink Run will be diverted to Schell Run watershed about a mile upstream from the borough. Improvements for Schell Run will consist of a conduit with intake structure and a debris basin at the upstream end, and a stilling basin at the downstream end. Improvement will provide piotection for Borough of Tyrone against a flood discharge equal to maximum flood of record, which occurred in March 1936. Estimated Federal and local costs (1979) are $42,000,000 and $4,100,000, respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way necessary for construction of project, hold the United States free from damages due to construction works, and maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. An agreement of local cooperation was signed by the Director of Real Estate, Office of the Chief of Engineers, for, and in behalf of, the Secretary of the Army on February 14, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Correction of several minor construction items in connection with the completed Sink Run work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began July 20, 1972. Construction of the Schell Run pressure conduit was completed in November 1974, and construction of the Sink Run Diversion to Schell Run was completed in November 1975. The completed portions of the project were accepted by local interests on 4-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 October 16, 1980. The District will recommend that the unconstructed portion of the project be reclassified to the deferred category. 40. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA. A system of three flood control reservoirs in headwaters of West Branch Susquehanna River, Pa. The reservoirs, to be known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, formerly known as Kettle Creek, and Foster Joseph Sayers formerly known as Blanchard, are on West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Pa.; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, Pa.; and on Bald Eagle Creek about 1 mile upstream from Blanchard, Pa., respectively. (See Table 4-L at end of chapter.) In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir, formerly known as First Fork Reservoir, with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joscph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, Pa., was constructed by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 40A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA. Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, Pa. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, Pa.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in May 1959 and was completed in February 1962. 40B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA. Location. Dam is on West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, Pa. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, Pa.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 2,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, with an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works located in the left abutment consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Recreation facilities include a seasonal recreational pool of 790 acres, access roads, parking areas, beach area, boat dock and launching ramp. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. A continuing contract for repair of downstream wet areas was awarded on August 27, 1979 and completed January 2, 1980 at a cost of $158,502. Boundary survey and monumentation, by contract, began in August 1979 and is 82 percent complete. Costs were $127,430. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began May 1962 and was completed November 1966. 40C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA. Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, Pa., about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, Pa. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, Pa.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, with an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment. consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities will include a summer recreation pool of 1,730 acres, a conservation pool of 630 acres for the preservation of fish life, access roads, parking areas, boat docks and launching ramps, and camping areas. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract for paving of access roads was awarded September 26, 1980 at an estimated cost of $47,719. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and has been operational since August 1969. Construction of the project began in March 1965 and was completed in September 1972. 41. WYOMING VALLEY FLOOD CONTROL LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Location. The project is located in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, on the Susquehanna River. The project area is limited to the four existing Federal flood control projects. These levee improvements are in Plymouth, Kingston- Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. The project lies in the 11th Congressional Disrict of Pennsylvania. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for: raising the existing levees from four to five feet above the presently authorized top of levee; raising or replacement of the Market Street, Carey Avenue, and Plymouth-Breslau Highway Bridges; modification of the substructures of the Wilkes-Barre Connecting Railroad Bridge above North Street and below Market Street which includes channel excavation under, upstream, and downstream from the bridges; and limited channel clearing in reaches of the river where substantial stage reductions can be realized. Local cooperation. See page 4-29 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. By letter dated February 21, 1973, Luzerne County assured its full cooperation on the project. Luzerne County has also agreed to represent local interests in furnishing local cooperation for any municipality that does not provide the necessary assurances. Letters expressing intent to comply with rreecqeuiivreedm efrnotms oPf llyomcaol uctoho Bpeorraotuiognh h(aFveeb raulsaor yb e1e3n, 1973) and Kingston Borough (February 28,1973). Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I of advance engineering and design was initiated in November 1977. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I planning is 84 percent complete. 42. YORK, CODORUS CREEK, PA. Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek with its tributary branches in York County in south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, "Pennsylvania - York and Hanover.") Existing project. Construction of Indian Rock Dam, an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at top, rising 83 feet above streambed, with a reservoir providing for controlled storage of 28,000 acre-feet at elevation of spillway crest. Dam is on main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in right abutment and uncontrolled spillway is on right bank, discharging upstream from tunnel outlet. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of drainage area above York. Plan also provides for improvements in Codorus Creek Channel in vicinity of and through City of York for about 22,969 feet extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening channel, constructing bank protection, removing York Roller Mill Dam, and construction of a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for completed project was $5,061,167, of whcih $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract for rehabilitation of a levee drainage structure began July 24, 1980 and will be completed in October 1980 at an estimated cost of $73,045. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was operationally complete in November 1947 and remaining construction features were completed in September 1952 and November 1955. 43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia, were inspected during the period by hired labor. 4-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 44. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS . Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, Pa., was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $10,013. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, Md., were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $12,016. 45. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 4-M at end of chapter.) 46. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). (See Table 4-N at end of chapter.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Cost during the period was $148,095 for Pine Grove, Pa. Water Supply 47. POTOMAC ESTUARY PILOT WATER TREATMENT PLANT, D.C. Location. The project is located in Washington, D.C., on the north side of the District of Columbia's Water Pollution Control Plant (Blue Plains), about 600 feet east of the Potomac River shoreline. Existing project. The project consists of a water treatment plant with a maximum capacity of one million gallons per day that includes advanced treatment processes and an evaluation laboratory. Local cooperation. On June 28, 1977 the Government of the District of Columbia issued a real estate permit for the construction of the pilot plant on 1.5 acres of land available at the Blue Plains wastewater treatment facility in Washington, D.C. A review during preconstruction planning determined that cost sharing for the pilot plant by local governmental entities is not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the pilot plant was completed except for punch list items which are being corrected by hired labor and contract. Contract cost was $274,000. A consultant contract for the operation, maintenance and evaluation, of the Pilot Plant was awarded and the notice to proceed was issued on May 1, 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in September 1977 and the Corps took beneficial occupancy June 30, 1980, effective May 16, 1980. Work remaining includes calibration, two years of testing, and evaluation of the plant and preparation of a report on the testing program. 48. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station, and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2,1967, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to adjacent Maryland areas and to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in the following Public Laws: Public Law 378,64th Congress, of March 3, 1917; Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Prior to July 1, 1880, expenses of Washington Aqueduct for construction, operation, and maintenance were paid entirely out of revenues of the United States. From July 1, 1880 to June 30, 1882, one-half of the expenses of operation and maintenance were paid by the United States and the other half came from the general revenues of the District of Columbia. From July 1, 1882 to June 30, 1898, one-half of construction costs were charged to a capital account on the books of the United States 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Treasury to be repaid by the District of Columbia from water rents with 3 percent interest. From July 1, 1898 to June 30, 1916, one-half of the expenses of construction, operation, and maintenance was paid by the United States Government. From July 1, 1916 to June 30, 1927, 60 percent of the expense of construction was paid from the general revenues of the District of Columbia and 40 percent was paid by the United States Government. From July 1, 1916 to January 22, 1976, all expenses of the operation and maintenance were paid form the Water Fund of the District of Columbia which was established by Congress to receive the water revenues from water consumed by the Federal Government, the District of Columbia, Arlington County, Va., and Falls Church, Va., as well as loans from the U.S. Treasury for Capital Improvements. From July 1, 1927 to January 22, 1976, all expenses for construction were paid from loans and revenues deposited in the Water Fund. Since January 22, 1976, expenses for operation and maintenance and construction have been paid from the General Fund. The Revenue Funds Availability Act of 1975, approved January 22, 1976, combined various District of Columbia special funds into one General Fund for the District of Columbia. Fiscal year 1948 through fiscal year 1954, pursuant to Public Law 195, 80th Congress, 1st Session, $1,000,000 was authorized each year for water consumed by the Federal Government. Public Law 364, 83rd Congress, 2nd Session, known as the "District of Columbia Public Works Act of 1954," provided for payment by the United States for all water and water services furnished within the District of Columbia at the rates applicable to other consumers in the District of Columbia. For water used outside the District, the rates applicable are those charged in the respective local jurisdictions within which the Federal facilities are situated. Operations and results during fiscal year. An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, Virginia; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, Virginia and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1980 was 75,128 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 278 million gallons and average daily consumption was 202.7 million gallons. Average per capita consumption was 190 gallons per (lay. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, Virginia was 39.48 million gallons per day. Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $2,706,333 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. On 23 June 1952, fluoridation equipment was placed into service. The application of fluoride to the water supply has been continuous since that date. Average turbidity of raw water from the Potomac River was 13 Formazin Turbidity Units and the average Most Probable Number of coliform bacteria per 100 milliliters was 18,440. After treatment, the average turbidity of the filtered water was 0.42 and the average Most Probable Number of coliform bacteria per 100 milliliters was 0.08. The average calcium carbonate alkalinity of the filtered water was 62 milligrams per liter and the average pH value was 8.1. Average hardness was 127 milligrams per liter. Analyses were made for coliform bacteria on water taken from 220 sampling points in the collection, purification, and distribution systems. During Fiscal Year 1980 direct operating costs of water treated and delivered to the system per million gallons was $134.58. Similar costs during Fiscal Year 1979 were $122.45 per million gallons. Visitors. During the year, 340 persons toured the water supply facilities. Control. All funds were expended in conformity with the following legislative provision: "Nothing herein shall be construed as affecting the superintendence and control of the Secretary of the Army over Washington Aqueduct, its rights, appurtenances, and fixtures connected with the same, and over appropriations and expenditures therefore as now provided by law." Condition at end of fiscal year. The intakes, conduits, reservoirs, filter plants, pumping stations, mechanical equipment, and structures were generally in good condition. During periods of maximum demand, the Little Falls raw water pumping station was operated to augment the raw water supply provided by the gravity-flow conduits. The status of construction work authorized with "no year" funds was as follows at the end of FY 80: Water Treatment Plant Wastewater Disposal, 10 percent and McMillan Water Treatment Plant Replacement, 3 percent. General Investigations 49. SURVEYS Costs for the period were $4,363,909 of which $95,414 was for navigation studies, $47 for flood damage prevention studies, $87,642 for shoreline 4-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 protection studies, $2,912,365 for special studies, $351,946 for comprehensive basin studies, $9,964 for review for deauthorization, $227,104 for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interests, and $679,427 for supplemental preauthorization (Phase I) studies. 50. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $168,803. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. The national program of inspection of dams, authorized by Public Law 92-367, was continued in fiscal year 1980. Expenditures under this program totaled $1,917,198, of which $1,820,265 was for inspection of dams and $96,933 was for inventory of dams. 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. 2. Baltimore Harbor Md. Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Chester River, Md. 4. Crisfield Harbor, Md. 5. Duck Point Cove (Hearns Creek), Md. 6. Harbor of Baltimore Md. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits 7. Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md. 8. Knapps Narrows, Md. 9. La Trappe River, Md. 10. Little Wicomico River, Va. 11, Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 280,000 149,501 1,394,8642 1,413,9223 139,201 141,526 54,198 54,198 12,902 12,902 202,593 209,991 209,117 191,517 -25,018 20,839 193,891 205,372 530,000 503,514 937,5754 934,7285 141,053 140,806 184,602 184,602 13,180 13,180 199,015 199,660 7,479 7,479 160,000 233,939 203,8806 211,6087 161,000 160,268 304,037 282,837 191,225 191,225 58,225 58,225 -7,676 25,276 130,000 134.179 6,756 6,756 217,120 217,073 158,712 158,712 555,955 556,101 25,000 86,190 4,287,2198 3,799,8639 197,089 198,013 25,943 25,943 27,000 48,200 25,906 25,906 248,254 248,254 202,940 201,003 306,902 306,902 22,322 22,322 12,339 12,339 42,000 42,000 383,859 383,859 38,413,7151 38,391,4021 25,284,1831o0 24,794,709 10o 2,067,710 2,066,192 70,49511 70,49511 768,325 768,325 349,15412 349,15412 476,13313 476,133s13 25,289 25,289 49,964 49,964 3,568,740 3,568,740 23,836 23,836 317,210 315,272 46,12114 46,12114 885,526 885,526 8,064 8,064 40,475 40,475 81,88515 81,8851s 493,741 493,741 44,65816 44,65816 320,942 320,942 350,19307 350,1937 4,811,408 4,811,408 264,000 264,000 4-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project 14. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection & Removal of Drift 15. Rock Hall Harbor, Md. 16. St. Catherines Sound, Md. 17. Tilghman Island Harbor, Md. 18. Tuckahoe River, Md. 19. Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. 20. Washington Harbor, D.C. 21. Wicomico River, Md. 28. Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, D.C. and Md. 29. Bloomington Lake, North Branch Potomac River Md. & W. Va. 30. Bull Run, Pa. (Contributed Funds) FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 430,888 175,270 333,354 341,041 13. Pocomoke -River, Md. Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 21,534 21,534 5,000 7,903 81,182 81,182 148,952 151,063 572,855 572,855 27,230,000 26,746,695 10,000 3,990 -350,000 973,795 106,000 13,239 13,239 341,711 341,752 66.662 66,662 399,308 403,024 84,000 85,596 20,262 20,262 158,191 120,616 367,473 367,473 6,885 6,885 .....-.. . . 2,730 20,000 20,000 -49,790 837,039 22,623 22,623 13,47#,000 13,344,042 85,000 88,794 55,225 54,681 157,886 157,872 18,912 18,859 24,200,000 22,776,641 1,556,000 82,127 4-30 -4,700 1,096 20,172 20,717 443,362 442,111 44,831 44,884 26,534,000 29,216,325 105,466 260,000 133,869 322,825 335,285 332,502 36,000 32,600 579 579 58,136 58,136 191,72618 191,72618 1,069,813 1,069,813 3,627,075 3,627,075 425,16019 419,52319 75,08820 75,08820 29,94721 29,94721 231,740 194,165 56,83022 56,83022 368,306 368,306 9,727 9,727 23,489 23,489 62,44623 62,44623 317,571 317,571 3,191,00724 3,191,00724 3,886,96425,2 3,886,96425,2S 471,6092 471,60927 2,607,92728 2,607,92728 6,042.325 6,042,325 1,449,655 1,449,655 152,845,300 151,919,082 10.,000 3,990 1,429,000 1,374,251 260,000 106,000 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continue( See Section in Text Project 31. Cumberland, Md. and Ridgeley, W. Va. 32. Fourmile Run, Va. (Contributed Funds) 33A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa. 34. Lock Haven, Pa. 35. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, Pa. 36A. Addison, N.Y. 36B. Almond Lake, N.Y. 36C. Arkport Dam, N.Y. 36D. Avoca, N.Y. 36E. Binghamton, N.Y. 36F. Canisteo, N.Y. 36G. Corning, N.Y. d) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22,099 29,050 11,200,000 11,208,768 253,272 290,350 42,212 42,212 2,875,000 3,649,134 840,561 829,984 5,555 5,555 123,823 107,220 55,376 50,046 15,700 16,019 16,763 16,763 6,056 25,268 48,711 48,299 34,376 34,376 8,625,000 10,396,272 715,633 822,059 5,200 28,700 54,147 53,538 28,591 11,591 3,374,000 3,334,501 716,566 737,930 153,335 83,214 23,722 23,722 10,428,000 8,592,206 716,415 665,956 47,000 23,500 48,753 48,753 450,500 375,419 3.235,000 2,710,421 1,092,457 1,106,145 9,851 9,851 151,618 169,752 75,445 77,831 18,844 18,844 16,165 16,165 23,948 22,748 24,599 31,299 249,000 1,054,116 1,349,159 1,370,264 15,575 15,575 141,767 140,381 53,398 54,384 15,289 15,289 16,142 S16,142 25,506 25,183 22,751 25,001 111,363 1,249,700 1,243,020 9,981 9,981 167,543 166,122 54,439 55,397 10,225 10,225 17,197 17,197 21,561 24,134 24,606 24,606 15,633,97029,30 15,633,97029,o 320,799 303,799 8,536,300 48,431,404 2,924,842 2,857,543 2,320,400 2,320,400 504,077 433,347 450,5001 450,50032 77,408,700 77,408,700 5,932,201 5,905,385 827,050 827,050 75,929 75,929 5,760,211 5,760,211 1,671,368 1,668,199 1,910,000 3 1,910,000 3 769,211 768,211 436,37434 436,37434 252,135 252,135 2,952,00035 2,952,000 5 258,981 258,981 1,183,11136 1,183,11136 396,080 396,080 3,322,000^7 3,322,00037 410,558 410,558 4-31 75,081 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See t Total Cost Section to in Text Project 36H. East Sidney Lake, N.Y. 361. Elmira, N.Y. 36J. Hornell, N.Y. 36K. Lisle, N.Y. 36L. Oxford, N.Y. 36M. Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. 36N. Whitney Point Village, N.Y. 37. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, Pa. 38A. Cowanesque Lake, Pa. 38B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. 39. Tyrone, Pa. 40A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 118,910 114,531 25,000 28,518 14,761 14,761 64,089 93,485 14,079 138,443 6,495 6,495 175,725 171,264 9,500 10,162 92,171 91,350 17,942,000 16,520,448 39,620,000 37,112,490 275,000 354,646 112,061 111,909 205,431 210,505 99,611 10,022 10,022 124,296 123,096 13,683 13,683 9,341 9,341 214,014 213,898 12,473 12,473 96,175 98,880 21,777,000 20,226,177 20,285,000 20,049,495 152,252 152,066 200,000 47,171 113,915 116.527 147,627 146,521 16,871 5,231 5,231 126,369 92,008 15,900 15,900 10,464 10,464 263,368 269,145 12,728 12,728 98,948 98,203 24,490,000 28,866,737 11,710,000 16,455,618 456,325 440,151 -100,000 31,120 155,381 148,574 149,088 149,174 -5,000 12,519 12,519 664,200 277,799 28,081 28,081 8,536 8,536 122,667 117,866 10,582 10,582 88,204 88.943 10,913,000 10,679,151 90,700 82,245 7.455,000 7.194,556 646.324 656.397 -80.000 13.087 135.880 142,132 4-32 6,049,504 6,049,504 1,868,501 1,866,574 6,883,305 6,883,305 133.349 133,349 4,558,6988 4,558,698- 2,105,593 1,682,581 661,19931 661,19939 480,322 480,322 131,00040 131.00040 110.708 110,708 5,421,539 5,421,539 2,223.597 2,216.465 424.096 424.096 177.661 177.661 5.725.700 5,725,700 1.045.069 1.044.032 102,882.700 102,315,606 90.700 82.245 185,574,800 184.938.624 1.254.901 1,248.614 6.401.016 6.389.089 7.103.001 7.103.00 1.816.812 1.815.312 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 40B. Curwensville Lake, New Work Pa. Approp. - - - - 20,396,060 Cost - - - - 20,396,060 Maint. Approp. 164,499 179,337 309,555 510,821 3.324,898 Cost 161,725 182,294 301,301 519,199 3,323,456 40C. Foster Joseph New Work Sayers Dam, Pa. Approp. ' - - - - 30,887,06341 Cost - - - - 30,887,06341 Maint. Approp. 394,087 271,590 263,822 331,200 2,491,515 Cost 410,940 311,999 266,048 266,444 2,421,332 41. Wyoming Valley, New Work Pa. Approp. - 320,000 - - 320,00042 Cost - 273,751 46,249 - 320,00013 42. York, Cordorus New Work Creek, Pa. Approp. - - - - 5,061,16744 Cost - - - - 5,061,16744 Maint. Approp. 198,799 165,495 191,874 279,952 2,578,27345 Cost 189,963 169,725 203,717 281,082 2,577,06045 47. Potomac Estuary New Work Pilot Water Treat- Approp. 975,000 4,000,000 2,506,000 2.100,000 10,496,000 ment Plant, D.C. Cost 402,979 3,844,078 2,916,639 1,891,094 9,669,675 1. Includes $8,764,003 for previous projects. 24. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 2. Includes $600,500 for sections of project in Norfolk 25. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. District. 26. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under 3. Includes $600,404 for sections of project in Norfolk provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. District. 27. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes 4. Includes $20,000 for sections of project in Norfolk $14,000 contributed funds. District. 28. Excludes $33,000 contributed funds. 5. Includes $16,857 for sections of project in Norfolk 29. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. District. 30. Excludes $1,402,001 contributed funds and 6. Includes -$12 for sections of project in Norfolk $197,513 public works acceleration funds. District. 31. Excludes $456,000 for Phase I under General 7. Includes $3,330 for sections of project in Norfolk Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. District. 32. Excludes $454,673 for Phase I under General 8. Includes $31,781 for sections of project in Norfolk Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. District. 33. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 9. Includes $30,931 for sections of project in Norfolk 34. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. District. 35. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 10. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 36. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 11. Includes $38,041 for previous projects. 37. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 12. Includes $87,740 for previous projects. 38. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and 13. Includes $2,839 for previous projects. excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 14. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 39. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 15. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 40. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 16. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 41. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance 17. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of sanitary emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. system for public use. 18. Includes $20,500 for previous project. 42. Excludes $875,000 for Phase I under General 19. Includes $87,757 for previous project. Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 20. Includes $9,762 for previous project. 43. Excludes $868,470 for Phase I under General 21. Excludes $600 contributed funds. Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 22. Includes $30 for previous project and excludes 44. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. $14,200 contributed funds. 45. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 23. Includes $37,343 public works funds and $330 for previous project. TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD. (See Section 1 of Text) Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.2 H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 4-33 Aug. 8, 1917 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 T A BLE 4-BF (Cioitfinud) A net AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION WOrK AutIlOrlZzeC Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. Increased anchorage facilities. For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar Section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below Pennington Ave. Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordnance Depot. Uniform main channel 39-feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 40 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Ave. Bridge. A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950- foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch - East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch - West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from thedepth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD. - COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 2 of Text) Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. CHESTER RIVER, MD. (See Section 3 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. River and Harbor Act of 1948. E. Doc. 25, 42d. Cong., 3d sess. 11. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st. Cong., 1st sess. 4-34 S76ocume--- Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers. I. Doc. 86, 85th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st sess. Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 3, 1873 Sept. 19, 1890 AM q; t-15 v v loCUumens BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Table 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Do .... Mar. 3, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 14, 1958 A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7-foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. CRISFIELD HIARBOR, MD. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12-foot channel of varying widths to opposite Consumers Ice Co., thence 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from ice plant to Hop Point. 7-foot channel 100 feet wide from opposite Hop Point to an anchorage parallel to Brick Kiln Road. For the 7 foot x 60 foot channel in Little Annemessex River... A mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide, and about 875 feet long roughly parallel to Brick Kiln Rd., with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading therefrom to the 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers. An anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet by 600 feet by 1,000 feet with an approach channel 10 feet by 100 feet from 10-foot depth in Little Annemessex River through a land cut in Jersey Island to south side of basin. Change location and dimensions of approach channel to Somers Cove to plan No. 2 through the present entrance, at no increase in Federal cost of modification. DUCK POINT COVE, MD. (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from that depth in Fox Creek to a mooring basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, roughly parallel to county road at head of waterway. HARBOR OF BALTIMORE, MD. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS (See Section 6 of Text) Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its tributaries to prevent and detect violaLions, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD. (See Section 7 of Text) A channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide through the entrance to Island Creek with an anchorage basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long in the creek. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD. (See Section 8 of Text) A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, Md., with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. LA TRAPPE RIVER, MD. (See Section 9 of Text) A channel 11 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide across the bar at the mouth, and 8 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide inside the bar as far as Trappe Landing, with a turning basin at the latter point. The length of the section included in the project is about 3 miles, the lower end extending into Choptank River. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA (See Section 10 of Text) A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to (leep water in Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. H. Doc. 99, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report for 1891, p. 1216. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 4-35 H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 355, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 72, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 457, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 241, 76th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29,1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802 dated August 28, 1958. Aug. 28, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 30, 19354 Sep. 3, 19545 Jun. 3, 1896 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD. (See Section 11 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, from Tangier Sound to the wharves at Wenona; widening the angles and the end to furnish anchorage basins. Modified to provide a channel 60 feet wide, 7 feet deep from Tangier Sound to and including a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD. (See Section 12 of Text) Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west side of the bay with 2 turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD. (See Section 13 of Text) A 9-foot channel from Shad Landing to Snow Hill. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River. Extend channel above bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep, widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end.6 Channel 11 feet deep by 150 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence a channel of the same depth and 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and dike construction along south side of channel from existing dike to Tulls Point. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, D.C. - COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 14 of Text) Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, D.C. area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, Virginia. ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD. (See Section 15 of Text) Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Swan Point Inlet to a channel of the same dimensions, 700 feet in length parallel to the harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and about 800 feet long in northwesterly extension of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; and twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. Deepening the approach channel to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet from the 10-footcontour in Swan Creek Inlet to the existing channel parallel to the harbor terminals; deepening to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet the existing channel parallel to the harbor terminals; deepening to 10 feet the eastern 250 feet of the present basin; deepening to 8 feet the western 350 feet of the present basin; and a new anchorage basin 600 feet long, 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep attached to and extending from the west end of the existing basin. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 204, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 273, 80th Cong., 1st sess.1 4-36 H. Doc. 76, 60th Cong.. 1st sess. H. Doc. 238, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 444, 82d Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report for 1895. p. 1167. H. Doc. 227, 74th Cong., 1st sess. ' H. Doc. 429. 76th Cong., 1st sess. ' H. Doc. 486, 81st Cong., 2d sess. ' Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 29, 1980 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 May 17, 19506 Sep. 15, 1980 Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. ST. CATHERINES SOUND, MD. (See Section 16 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long at the lower entrance from the Potomac River and a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide and 3,330 feet long at the Upper entrance from the Wicomico River. UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD. (See Section 19 of Text) A 9-foot channel 75 feet wide protected by breakwater at entrance, with turning basin at inner end and anchorage area 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Widen entrance channel to 100 feet, extend 9-foot turning basin and 6-foot anchorage, and dredging an additional anchorage area on north side of channel. WASHINGTON HARBOR, D.C. (See Section 20 of Text) Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area of 25,000 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street S.E. Channel lengths including turnin basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. WICOMICO RIVER, MD. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell St., including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a T-shaped harbor. COLONIAL BEACH, VA. (See Section 25 of Text) Construction of a stone revetment in sections totaling 7,350 feet in length along Irving Ave. between Hawthorne St. and Castlewood Park. Extending and widening the existin Central Beach area. stabilizing the bank behind the beach ill with vegetation, and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater; and extending and widening of the existing Castle Beach area, constructing three segments of offshore breakwater, removing debris in the beachfill area, and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of Castlewood Park beachfill. Detailed Project Report, December, 1978 H. Doc. 242, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 75th Cong., 1st sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947. H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd sess.1 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 109, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report, May, 1980 4-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 4-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION worK Autnorizea May 17, 1950. Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 2, 1976 Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 25, 1970 Jul. 14, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 June 22, 1936 modified by Acts of June 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17. 1950; and July 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 ANACOSTIA RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION & NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, D.C. & MD. (See Section 28 of Text) Channel improvements, levees, pumping stations with connecting storm sewers, pressure conduit and relocation and reconstruction of 4 highway bridges and 1 railroad bridge. BLOOMINGTON LAKE, NORTH BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER, MD. & W. VA. (See Section 29 of Text) Construction of Bloomington Lake project. BULL RUN, PA. (See Section 30 of Text) Consists of an impervious core incorporated in the proposed highway embankment of the Williamsport Beltway to utilize it as a levees, closure structures, pumping stations and tie-back levees. CUMBERLAND, MD. AND RIDGELEY, W. VA. (See Section 31 of Text) Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. FOURMILE RUN, VA. (See Section 32 of Text) Construction of a levee and floodwall protection system with associated interior drainage facilities, an improved channel, and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Modification providing for channel capacity of 27,000 c.f.s.; increase channel bottom widths along Fourmile Run; deletion of pumping stations, ponding areas, and levees, except for a short levee on Long Branch; and the addition of recreation as a project feature. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA. (See Sectior 3, of Text) Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. LOCK HAVEN, PA. (See Section 34 of Text) Authorized the phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCHI, JUNIATA RIVER, PA. (See Section 35 of Text) Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 36 of Text) Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA. (See Section 37 of Text) Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, N.Y. AND PA. (See Section 38 of Text) Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood protection works at Elkland, Pa., and Nichols, N.Y. and channel improvement at Cortland, N.Y. Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relocate the Town of Nelson, Pa., to a new townsite. H. Doc. 202, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Detailed Project Report October 1976. H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. I. Doc. 358, 91st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 577, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 11. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2d sess. 11. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2d sess. I. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 4-38 vocuments --I- A -- iI r\ --- BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents TYRONE, PA. (See Section 39 of Text) Dec. 22, 1944 Levees, walls, drop structure, channel improvements, and H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., protection of bridges. 2d sess. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA. (See Section 40 of Text) Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of three flood control reservoirs. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st sess. WYOMING VALLEY, PA. (See Section 41 of Text) Oct. 22, 1976 Authorized the phase I design memorandum stage of advance H. Doc. 482, 94th Cong., engineering and design. 2d sess. YORK, CODORUS CREEK, PA. (See Section 42 of Text) June 22, 1936 Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., Codorus Creek. 2d sess. POTOMAC ESTUARY PILOT WATER TREATMENT PLANT, D.C., MD. & VA. (See Section 47 of Text) Mar. 7, 1974 To construct, operate, and evaluate a pilot project on the H. Doc. 2, 93rd Cong., Potomac Estuary for the treatment of water at an estimated 1st sess. cost of $6,000,000. 1. Contains latest published maps. authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to400 feet eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth Ocean City. channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. provi(ling a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning above mean low water was accomplished with maintenance basin at the upper end. funds in 1956. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program 6. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-C (See Section 22 of Text) Date Survey Project (Conducted) MARYLAND Ilonga River and Tar Bay February 1980 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves January 1980 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork) April 1980 Neale Sound February 1980 Queenstown Harbor April 1980 Slaughter Creek March 1980 St. Michaels Harbor November 1979 Town Creek January 1980 VIRGINIA Monroe Bay and Creek May 1980 Items for which no (late is furnished reflects costs for gathering data only. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-D (See Section 23 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1980 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Accontink Creek, Va.i Anacostia River and Flats2 Annapolis Harbor, Md. 3 Aquia Creek, Va." 1878 1953 1946 1928 $ 5,000 3,910,582 34,2501 52,4656 15,623 11,770 4-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-D (Continued) (See Section 23 of Text) For LFaosrt Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Back Creek, Md.3 1946 23,061 10,441 Betterton Harbor, Md.5 1960 3,482 - Black Walnut Harbor, Md.3 1966 32,631 69,529 Bonum Creek, Va.3,7 1971 202,0008 23,181 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, Va.3 1950 15,755 6,454 Breton Bay, Md.3 1950 47,9249 12,621 Broad Creek River, Del.3 1964 64,51010 114,373 Broad Creek, Md.* 1962 28,227 73,763 Broadwater Creek, Md.5 1949 - 212 Cadle Creek, Md.5 1949 - - Cambridge Harbor, Md. 1979 195,974 654,258 Channel connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, Md.12 1940 112 - Choptank River, Md. 1979 96,796 94,095 Claiborne Harbor, Md.3 1978 42,974 86,857 Coan River, Va." 1937 - - Corsica River, Md.3 1948 39,07112 56,974 Cuckold Creek, Md.13 1978 5,720 - Cunninghill Cove, Md.13 1977 11,200 - Cypress Creek, Md.3 1947 3,057 3,787 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, Md.3 1932 90,12114 44,892'1s Fishing Bay, Md. 1979 33,874 649,596 Fishing Creek, Md.3 1978 111,242 486,563 Goose Creek, Md.3,7 1973 75,900 8,312 Governor's Run, Md.u 1950 - Hellens Creek, Md.u 1950 - Herring Creek, Md.3 1961 284,80016 4,596 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, Md. 1979 50,591 113,476 HongaRiver and Tar Bay, Md.3 1978 66,11917 911,803 Island Creek, Md.3 1948 6,230 5,608 Lake Ogleton, Md." 1950 - - Lowes Wharf, Md.3 1971 21,000 39,122 Little Creek, Kent Island, Md.' 1958 23,00018 1,108 Lower Machodoc Creek, Va.3 1904 9,916 1,634 Madison Bay, Md.3,7 1977 125,550 - Manokin River, Md.3,19 1919 34,78820 32,724 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, Md.3 1947 38,71521 16,506 Mill Creek, Md.5 1949 - Monroe Bay and Creek, Va.3 1972 12,460 87,260 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, Md.*, 1966 64,001 7,102 Nan Cove, Md. M, 1965 34,86122 - Nanticoke River at Bivalve, Md.3 1975 240,817 122,173 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), Del. and Md.3 1976 143,134 305.51723 Nanticoke River, Md. 3 1971 73,243 52.356 Neabsco Creek. Md. *5 1978 14,600 - Neale Sound, Md.3 1973 12,60024 80,937 Neavitt Harbor, Md.3,7 1968 36,500 3,215 Nomini Bay and Creek, Va.3 1946 78446 31,863 Northeast River, Md. 3 1972 28,48926 128,153 Occoquan Creek, Va." 1971 66,25326 171.609 Parish Creek, Md. 3 1963 19,17028 47,217 Patuxent River, Md." 1905 14,00030 - Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, D.C., Elimination of Waterchestnut 1977 - 184.394 Potomac River at Alexandria, Va.3 1965 95,214 491,500 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, Md.* 1920 10,324 6.216 PPoottoommaacc RRiivveerr abte loMwo uWnta sVheinrn on,n ,V Da..3C .3 11995706 11573,,080306 169543.,140799a1 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, D.C.' 1956 1,744,69232 27.461 Queenstown Harbor, Md.* 1958 72,8583" 34,942 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, Md.* 1978 155,366 231,424 Shad Landing State Park, Md.3 1966 33,531"4 2.228 St. George Creek Md.* 1971 St. Jeromes Creek, Md. 1973 44,357 . St. Michaels Harbor, Md.*** 1964 16,72336 4.097 St. Patricks Creek, Md.3 1956 15,75224 2,188 St. Peters Creek, Md.*** 1963 46,740"7 9.206 Slaughter Creek, Md.* 1976 4,140 130 Smith Creek, Md.3 1936 5.252 27 Susquehanna River at and below Havre de Grace, Md. 1974 293,5703 368.305 4-40 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-D (Continued) (See Section 23 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1980 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Susquehanna River at Williamsport, Pa.8'7 1974 57,03139 - Town Creek, Md.s 1950 43,220 5,209 Tred Avon River, Md. 1979 523,130 13,843 Twitch Cove Big Thorofare, Md. 1979 193,175 1,052,523 Tyaskin Creek, Md.3 1923 16,29740 18,530 Uper Machodoc Creek, Va.3 1971 20,281 13,715 Warwick River, Md. 3 1973 22,04141 84,128 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, Md. 11 1939 305 - 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was 21. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department deauthorized August 5, 1977, under section 12, PL 93-251, as and $54,000 from contributed funds. amended 22. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 23. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 3. Completed. 24. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 4. Includes $8,476 for previous project. 25. Includes $20,640 for previous project. 5. Entire project inactive. 26. Project complete except for dikes. 6. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 27. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 28. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration 8. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. funds. 9. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 29. Abandonment recommended in 1903 (Rivers and 10. Includes $50,000 for previous project. Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 61st Cong., 2nd sess.) 11. Entire project was deauthorized August 5, 1977, 30. Includes $10,617 for previous project. under section 12, PL 93-251, as amended. 31. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds 12. Includes $30,000 for previous project. expended for waterchestnut removal. 13. Approval of authorized but unconstructed project 32. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 33. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 14. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes 34. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. $8,414 contributed funds. 35. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 15. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 36. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 16. Excludes $10,306 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 17. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes 38. Includes $22,905 Works Progress Administration $27,668 emergency relief funds. funds and $97,390 for previous project. 18. Excludes $1,100 contriubted funds. 39. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 19. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 40. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 69th Cong 1st sess.) 41. Includes $6,000 for previous project. 20. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E (See Section 26 of Text) For FLoars t Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Colonial Beach, Va.1 1950 - - Oxford, Md.2,3 1978 $ 97,7504 - 1. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Completed. 4. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 4-41 TABLE 4-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA (See Section 33 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Reservoir Estimated Nearest Above Height Capacity Lands and non-federal Name City River Mouth in feet (acre-feet) Construction damages' Total costs Aylesworth2 Carbondale Aylesworth 1.0 90 1,700 $2,153,559 $114,641 $2,268,2003 Creek Fall Brook4 Carbondale Fall Brook 5.0 67 1,400 - - 1,500,0005 1. Includes relocations. 2. Completed. 3. Excludes $52,200 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. 4. Recommended for deauthorization August 20, 1980. 5. Preliminary estimate. LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Estimated Above Lands and non-federal Location River Mouth Type of structure Construction damages Total Costs Scranton, Pa.' Lackawanna 9 Levee and floodwall $2,006,800 - $2,006,800 $4,090,0002 1. Completed. 2. Includes $760,000 for required lands and relocations for Federal portion of project and $3,300,000 for dredging of Lackawanna River and constructing channel improvements on Roaring Brook and Stafford Meadow Brook by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA COST OF NEW WORK AND MAINTENANCE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 TABLE 4-G (See Section 33 of Text) Percentage of Construction Unit New Work Maintenance Completed' Reservoirs: Aylesworth $2,320,400 $ 433,347 100 (1970) Fall Brook2 46,1003 - - Local flood protection: Scranton 2,006,800 - 100(1969) Total $4,373,300 $ 433,347 1. Year operationally completed indicated in parentheses. 2. Recommended for deauthorization August 20, 1980. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4-42 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-H SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 36 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Reservoir Nearest Above Height Capacity Lands and Name City River Mouth in Feet (acre-feet) Construction Damages2 Total Davenport Center3 Oneonta Charlotte Creek 5 100 52,500 $17,490,000 $ 7,510,000 $25,000,000 West Oneonta3 Oneonta Otsego Creek 2 86 34,500 8,800,000 2,800,000 11,600,000 East Sidney4 Sidney Ouleout Creek 4 146 33,550 5,279,894 587,244 5,867,1885 Copes Corner3 Sidney Butternut Creek 3 75 37,900 13,250,000 2,750,000 16,000,000 Whitney Point4 Binghamton Otselic River 1 95 86,440 3,978,533 1,096,467 5,075,0006 Arkport 4 IHornell Canisteo River 50 113 7,900 1,777,732 132,268 1,910,000 Almond4 Iornell Canacadea Creek 3 90 14,800 4,746,587 954,024 5,700,6117 Total $55,322,746 $15,830,003 $71,152,749 1. All dams are in New York State; all are earthfill type except East Sidney. 2. Includes relocations. 3. Recommended for deauthorization August 20, 1980. 4. Completed. 5. Exclusive of $182,366 for recreational facilities. 6. Exclusive of $346,539 for recreational facilities. 7. Exclusive of $59,600 for recreational facilities. LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Estimated Location Above Lands and non-federal New York River Mouth Type of Structure Construction Damages Total Costs Oxford' Chenango 40 Levee and channel $ 96,944 $ 34,056 $ 131,000 $ 11,000 improvement Lisle' Tioughnioga 12 Wall, levee, and 605,000 56,199 661,199 68,000 channel realinement Whitney Point' Tioughnioga 10 Levee and channel 411,653 12,443 424,096 62,500 realinement Binghamton' Susquehanna 328 Wall, levee and conduit 2,844,6822 107,318 2,952,0002 711,000 Elmira Chemung 27 Wall, levee and conduit 6,744,130 139,175 6,883,305 922,000 Corning' Chemung 44 Wall, levee, flume and 3,164,0003 158,000 3,322,0003 686.471 conduit Painted Post' Cohocton - Wall, levee channel re- 402,948 11,233 414,181 50,800 alinement Addison' Canisteo 8 Wall, levee and channel 814,236 12,814 827,050 125,000 realinement Bath' Cohocton 21 Wall and levee 638,332 - 638,332 43,700 Avoca' Cohocton 30 Levee, channel improve- 406,589 29,785 436,374 69,300 ment and realinement Canisteo' Canisteo 36 Levee and wall 1,125,750 57,361 1,183,111 35,000 HIornell' Canisteo 42 Wall, levee and channel 3,993,4524 565,246 4,558,6984 - realinement Total $21,247,716 $1,183,630 $22,431,346 $2,784,771 1. Completed. 2. Excludes contributed funds of $160,095 by City of Binghamton and $3,000 by Village of Port Dickinson. 3. Excludes $250,000 of construction by State of New York and $34,729 contributed funds by City of Corning on Monkey Run. 4. Excludes contributed funds of $15,000 by City of Iornell. 4-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 SOUTHERN N"W YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS COST OF NEW WORK AND MAINTENANCE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 TABLE 4-I (See Section 36 of Text) Percentage of Construction Unit New Work Maintenance Completed' Reservoirs: Davenport Center2 $ 286,4003 $ - - West Oneonta2 189,1003 - - East Sidney 6,049,504 1,866,574 100 (1950) Copes Corner 2 160,7003 - - Whitney Point 5,421,539 2,216.465 100 (1942) Arkport 1,910,000 768,211 100 (1939) Almond 5,760,211 1,668,199 100 (1949) Local flood protection: Oxford 131,000 110,708 100 (1938) Lisle 661,199 480,322 100 (1948) Whitney Point Village 424,096 177,661 100(1948) Binghamton 2,952,0004 258,981 100(1943) Elmira 6,883,305 133,349 100 (1950) Corning 3,322,0001 410,558 100 1955) Painted Post 414,181 17,890 100 1938) Addison 827,050 75,929 100 1947) Bath 638,332 - 100 (1948) Avoca 436,374 252,135 100 (1939) Canisteo 1,183,111 396,080 100 (1948) Hornell 4,558,6986 7 1,682,581 100 (1941) Almond Village9 24,6223 - - Total $42,233,42210 $10,497,753 1. Year operationally completed indicated in parentheses. 2. Recommended for deauthorization August 20, 1980. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Does not include $163,096 contributed funds. 5. Includes Monkey Run. Excludes $250,000 of construction by State of New York and $34,729 contributed funds by City of Corning. TABLE 4-J . 6. Includes Canacadea Creek, Chauncey Run, and Crosby Creek. 7. Does not include $15,000 contributed funds. 8. Installation of gates on outlets completed in 1955. 9. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1953. 10. Does not include $212,825 contributed funds. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONROL PROJECTS, NEW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA (See Section 38 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS' Estimated Federal Cost Miles Reservoir Estimated Above Height Capacity Lands and non-federal Name City River Mouth in Feet (acre-feet) Construction Damages2 Total costs Cowanesque Corning, Cowanesque 2 145 95,700 $ 60,820,000 $ 45,180,000 $106,000,000 - N.Y. River Tioga- Corning, Tioga River 20 125 130,000 133,570,000 59,130,000 192,700,000 - HaTmomtalo nd N.Y. $194,390,000 $104,310,000 $298,700,000 - 1. All dams are in Pennsylvania and of earthfill type. 2. Includes relocations. 4-44 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS Federal Cost Miles Estimated Above Lands and non-federal Location River Mouth Type of structure Construction Damages Total costs Cortland, N.Y. Tioughnioga 30 Channel improvement $ 324,486 - $ 324,486 $ 52,300 Nichols, N.Y. Susquehanna 297 Levee 1,487,800 - 1,487,800 270,000 Elkland, Pa. Cowanesque 12 Levee 1,297,850 - 1,297,850 228,000 Total $3,110,136 - $3,110,136 $550,300 SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NEW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA COST OF NEW WORK AND MAINTENANCE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 TABLE 4-K (See Section 38 of Text) Percentage of Construction Unit New Work Maintenance Completed' Reservoirs Cowanesque $102,315,606 $ 82,245 97 (1980) Tioga-Hammond 184,938,624 1,248,614 96 (1978) Local flood protection: Cortland 324,486 100(1963) Nichols 1,487,800 -100 (1971) Elkland 1,297,850 - 100 (1966) Total $290,364,366 $1,330,859 1. Year operationally completed indicated in parentheses. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF PROJECT TABLE 4-L (See Section 40 of Text) Reservoir Curwensville Alvin R. Bush Foster Joseph Sayers Nearest large community Stream distance from mouth of Susquehanna River Drainage area above dam Reservoir: Spillway elevation above m.s.l. Flood control capacity: Total area of reservoir Reservoir length at spillway crest Conservation pool area Relocation required Dam: Type Top elevation above m.s.l. Height above streambed TDoeps glenn gfrteheboard Spillway: TLyopcaetion Heght above streambed Width Design discharge Curwensville, Pa. 308 miles 365 sq. mi. 1,228 ft. 124,200 acre-ft. 3,020 acres 14 miles 540 acres Railroad, cementery, highway, utilities Earthfill 1,257.0 ft. 131 ft. 4.9 ft. 2,850 ft. Adjacent saddle Uncontrolled overflow 102 ft. 480 ft. 164,000 c.f.s Renovo, Pa. 285 miles 226 sq. mi. Blanchard, Pa. 207 miles 339 sq. mi. 937 ft. 75,000 acre-ft. 1,430 acres 8.8 miles 160 acres Highway, utilities, cemetery Earthfill 967.7 ft. 165 ft. 5 ft. 1,350 ft. Adjacent right abutment Uncontrolled chute 135 ft. 250 ft. 127,000 c.f.s 658 ft. 99,000 acre-ft. 3,650 acres 9.7 miles 370 acres Railroad, highway, cemetery, utilities Earthfill 683.0 ft. 100 ft. 5.3 ft. 6,835 ft. Adjacent saddle Uncontrolled overflow 74.0 ft. 600 ft. 203,000 c.f.s 4-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF PROJECT TABLE 4-L (Continued) (See Section 40 of Text) Reservoir Curwensville Alvin R. Bush Foster Joseph Sayers Outlet works: Location Left abutment Right abutment Left abutment Type Controlled Controlled Controlled No. of conduits 1 1 1 No. of gates 3 3 3 Gate size 5.5 by 12 ft. 5 by 10 ft. 5.5 by 12 ft. Outlet Capacity 10,000 c.f.s 8,120 c.f.s 9,500 c.f.s Length of stilling basin 82 ft. - 104 ft. Federal Cost: Construction $10,255,450 $5,586,978 $18,723,446 Lands and damages 10,170,610 1,516,022 12,163,617 Total $20,396,060 $7,103,000 $30,887,063 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-M (See Section 45 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1980 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Almond Village, N.Y. 1,2 Anacostia River and tributaries, Prince Georges Co., Md. 4 Bainbridge, N.Y.6,7 Bath, N.Y. 2 ,6 Bayard, W. Va. 6,7 Bridgewater, Va. 6,7 Conklin-Kirkwood, N.Y.6,7 Copes Corner Lake, N.Y.2,9 Cortland, N.Y. 5,o0 Davenport Center Lake, N.Y.2,9 Elkland, Pa. 5 Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, N.Y.5 Fall Brook Lake, Pa. 9,12 Forest Heights, Md.6,7 Genegantslet Lake, N.Y.u Greene, N.Y.6 ,7 Harpers Ferry, W. Va. 14 Kingston-Edwardsville, Pa.6 Kitzmiller, Md.6,7 Moorefield, W. Va. 17 Nichols, N.Y.6 Norwich, N.Y.6 ,7 Painted Post, N.Y.2, 6 Plymouth, Pa.6 Savage River Dam, Md. Scranton, Pa.6"*2 Sixes Bridge Lake, Md. & Pa.22 South Plymouth Lake, N.Y.9 Sunbury, Pa.6 Swoyersville and Forty Fort, Pa.6 Unadilla, N.Y.6 Upper Marlboro, Md.6 ,7 Verona Lake, Va. 20 Washington, D.C. and vicinity West Oneonta Lake, N.Y.2,9 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, Pa.6 Williamsport, Pa.6 1970 1977 1959 1970 1965 1953 1955 1970 1970 1970 1971 1979 1970 1964 1954 1951 1937 1979 1965 1941 1974 1950 1970 1958 1954 1971 1974 1953 1953 1968 1970 1965 1978 1953 1970 1958 1979 $ 24,6223 1,000,0006 382,000 638,332 55,2188 136,500 71,000 160,7003 324,486 286,4003 1,297,850 7,034,53411 46,1003 430,000'3 214,5783 37,000 4,731,39415 501,5006 7,9283 1,487,800 94,500 414,181 1,911,68918 2,271,93919 2,006,800 100,0363 6,063,00021 2,728,113 1,000,00022 590,013 992,000 331,92723 189,1003 3,853,45724 12,964,89326 33,999 - - - - - - - - - - -399 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1953. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 5. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 6. Completed. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 8. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 9. Recommended for deauthorization August 20, 1980. 10. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 11. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 12. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 4-46 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 13. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 14. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 15. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 16. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 17. Deauthorized October 3, 1978. 18. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 19. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 20. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 21. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 23. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 24. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 25. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIESREPAIRS, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84th CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) TABLE 4-N (See Section 46 of Text) Project Federal Cost Disaster Preparedness Program $ 100,973.96 Flood Emergency Operations 33,333.16 Advance Measures Forty-Fort, Pa. 277,833.62 Total $ 412,140.74 WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, AND CAPITAL OUTLAY COST AND FINANCIAL SUMMARY AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 TABLE 4-0 (See Section 48 of Text) Water Supply Costs: Total accrued expenditure costed for the period was $12,778,955 distributed as follows: Operating Expenses $ 9,289,880 Deferred 699,238 Total Operating Expenses $ 9,989,118 Total Capital Outlay 2,789,837 Total Cost for Fiscal Year 1980 $12,778,955 Operating expenses, cost per million gallons 135 Financial Summary: Net Appropriations $287,986,718 Less Unexpended Balance 66,958,726 Total Costs $221,027,992 4-47 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT * This District comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, Virginia, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, Virginia. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Appomattox River, Va......................5-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River ................... 5-2 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) .................. 5-3 4. Channel to Newport News, Va............... 5-4 5. Chincoteague Bay, Va......................5-4 6. Chincoteague Iplet, Va ..................... 5-4 7. Deep Creek, Newport News, Va............. 5-5 8. Greenvale Creek, Va ....................... 5-5 9. Hampton Creek, Va.........................5-6 10. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va. Collection and Removal of Drift .......................... 5-6 11. James River, Va .......................... 5-7 12. Lafayette River, Va ........................ 5-7 13. Norfolk Harbor, Va.........................5-8 14. Nottoway River, Va ........................ 5-9 15. Starlings Creek, Va.........................5-9 16. Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) ...... ..... **................. 5-10 17. Tangier Channel, Va. ................. 5-10 18. Thimble Shoal Channel, Va...............5-10 19. Waterway on the Coast of Virginia ........... * .............. 5-11 20. Winter Harbor, Va.......................5-11 21. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys........................5-12 Navigation (Cont'd) Page 22. Other Authorized Navigation Projects........................ 5-12 23. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization......................5-12 Beach Erosion Control 24. Virginia Beach, Va........................5-12 25.. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ................ 5-13 26. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control..........................5-13 Flood Control 27. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Va. .... ................... 5-13 28. Richmond Filtration Plant, Va..............5-13 29. Richmond, Va....... ....... ......... 5-14 30. Virginia Beach Streams Canal Number 2, Va. ..... ................. 5-15 31. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..........................5-15 32. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 5-15 General Investigations 33. 34. Surveys...................................5-15 Collection and Study of Basic Data ............................ 5-16 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referred in text and also appear at the end of this chy, 5-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980. Navigation 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA. Location.This river rises in Appomattox County, Va., flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, Va. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, Va., a distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 531). Previous projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 80 feet wide and 12 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 12 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep: and a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 3.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal Facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, Virginia and the other is at Hopewell, Virginia near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $10,116. A condition survey was conducted in May 1980. Condition at end of year. The existing project is complete. For complete details, see Annual Report'for 1972. Periodic maintenance dredging to full project dimensions was to have been accomplished in fiscal year 1980. However, because of disposal problems, dredging was deffered. 2.ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location.Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, Va., between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, Va., 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia - North Carolina State line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, Va., and mouth of Pasquotank River, N.C. These routes are shown on Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12206. Previous projects. For details, see page 476 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of a tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, Va. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 80 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles, and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams, and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection to canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation, None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for 1970. 5-2 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT* Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and ordinary maintenance of the project consisting of real estate management services, condition and operation studies, operation and care of locks, bridges, spillways, wharves, canal plants, grounds, roads, buildings, etc. with Government plant and hired labor were carried on during the fiscal year at a cost of $1,275,100. Permanent operating equipment used on both routes was purchased at a direct cost of $27,119. Replacement of bridge decks at Great Bridge and South Mills was accomplished by contract at a direct cost of $99,783. Maintenance repairs to bridges, lockgates and bulkheads on both routes with government plant and hired labor were accomplished at a direct cost of $52,592. Maintenance engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activity costs, less credits for collections for quarters and damages to government property amounted to $243,108. Maintenance dredging by contract in the vicinity of the mooring dolphins at Great Bridge was accomplished between 1 October 1979 through 21 March 1980. There were removed 35,408 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $58,114. Maintenance dredging by contract of the Dismal Swamp Canal Feeder Ditch was conducted from 1 October through 13 October 1979. There were 33,630 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $11,869. A condition survey was performed during June 1980 on the lower North Landing River. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. For construction details, see annual report for 1966. Annual maintenance dredging is being done to provide full project dimensions on the Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Routes and about a 7-foot usable depth on the Dismal Swamp Canal Route, which is considered adequate for existing traffic. 3. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 3A.CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. Location. At mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12222). Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular flunctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 3B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12225). Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). 3C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12221). Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditons mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations and results during fiscal year. A condition survey was performed in the Rappahannock Shoal Channel in November 1979. Maintenance engineering and supervision and administration amounted to $30,931. 4. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel connects deep-water and James River with Hampton Roads. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12245). Previous projects. For details see page 459 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredging a channel 45 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from that depth in Norfolk 5-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Harbor Channel about 4.5 miles to Newport News and 2 deepdraft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over 1,200 swing radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of regular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Latest published description of terminal facilities is in Port Series No. 11 revised 1959, part 2 on Ports of Hampton Roads, Virginia prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Since 1959 piers 3, 4 and 5 have been replaced by a new cargo pier. Container handling facilities have been added and the capability of the port for handling general cargo and coal has increased. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of the project was accomplished by contract between 12 April 1980 and 29 May 1980. There were 967,382 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $1,479,661. Engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $25,889. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work dredging of the 40-foot project was commenced in March 1929 and was completed in June 1931. Deepening and widening the channel to 45 feet deep and 800 feet wide commenced March 1967 and was completed in December 1969. New work dredging, to a 40-foot depth, of the 2 anchorages opposite Newport News was completed. Work remaining to complete the project consists of deepening the two deepdraft anchorages opposite Newport News from 40 to 45 feet. Periodic maintenance is being done to provide full project dimensions on the completed portions of the project. 5. CHINCOTEAGUE BAY, VA. Location. Chincoteague Bay is a shallow sound on the Atlantic coast of Maryland and Virginia. Greenbackville and Franklin City occupy low-lying ground on the westerly shore of the bay 4 miles from its southwest end. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12211.) Previous projects. For details, see page 244 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. This provides for an L-shaped harbor 5 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,500 feet long, with an approach channel of the same depth and width in Chincoteague Bay. The mean range of tide is about 2 feet. The cost of new work for the completed project was $25,126. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of August 26, 1937 (H. Doc. 233, 75th Cong., 1st sess.) The latest published map is in the project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction, local interests are to furnish spoil-disposal areas as required for maintenance. Termninal facilities. About 750 feet of public bulkhead has been built along the south side of the channel which is primarily used by commercial boats for berthing and unloading their catch. This facility is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration cost amounted to $13,916. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in June 1939. Periodic maintenance dredging to maintain full project dimensions will be accomplished. 6. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA. Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12211). Previous projects. None. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet; thence, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by the sidecaster dredge, Fry was accomplished between 15 November 1979 and 29 January 1980, and 1 May 1980 and 28 July 1980. There were 79,834 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $321,152. Maintenance engneering and design and supervision and administration and quantity surveys amounted to $113,962. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work dredging of project was completed during fiscal year 1974. Annual maintenance dredging at the outer bar will be accomplished. 5-4 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT 7. DEEP CREEK, NEWPORT NEWS, VA. Location. Deep Creek is a tidal estuary of the James River, lying wholly in the city of Newport News, Va. It is about 3 miles in length, flows in a southeasterly direction, and empties into the James River on its northerly side about 10.5 miles upstream from the mouth of the James River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12222.) Previous projects. For details, see page 360 of Annual Report for 1962. Existingpoject. This provides for an approach channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide extending from the 8-foot depth contour in James River to a point where the natural creek entrance to Deep Creek is constricted, a distance of 9,040 feet: thence 8-feet deep and 60 feet wide through the constricted entrance, a distance of 700 feet: the enlargement of the harbor in Deep Creek opposite Menchville, extending upstream to a point near Parkers Landing and to the foot of Maxwells Lane, from 6.4 acres to about 20 acres with depth of 8 feet, 400 to 740 feet wide and 1,940 feet long, and a harbor 300 feet wide by 600 feet long to a depth of 6 feet upstream of the existing harbor. Under ordinary conditons the mean tidal range is 3 feet. The extremes of irregular fluctuations referred to mean low water due to the combined effect of wind and tides are minus 2 feet and plus 9.8 feet. Local cooperation. (a) Fully complied with for initial construction under Section 122 of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to review the requirement of local cooperation with respect to providing a spoil disposal area for the project at Deep Creek, Warwick County (now within the city of Newport News), Virginia authorized by the Act of August 26, 1937 (commonly referred to as the River and Harbor Act of 1937, 50 Stat. 846), to determine if (1) such requirement should be elimated, and (2) Craney Island disposal area should be used as the spoil disposal area for dredged material from such project. Such review shall be completed and submitted in a report to Congress within two years after the date of enactment of this section. (b) Beginning on the date of enactment of this section. (1) the requirement of local cooperation described in subsection (a) shall be suspended, and (2) Craney Island disposal area shall be ued as the spoil disposal area for dredged material from such project until Congress, by a statute enacted after the date on which the report required by subsection (a) is submitted, removes such suspension. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned piers and one public county pier and bulkhead of wooden construction at Menchville. One pier is used for pleasure craft only. The remainder are commercial. There is also a shore landing for the receipt of sand and gravel, several privately owned wooden piers and two marinas are on the south side of the harbor. The wharves have no rail connections, but are served by State highways. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging, by contract, was conducted from 25 October 1979 through 18 January 1980. There were removed 255,975 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $1,403,070. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $70,912. These costs were associated with contract maintenance dredging. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construciton of the project to a depth of 6 feet at mean low water over depths of 50 to 80 feet was commenced in March and completed in May 1939. Construction of the channel and harbor to project dimensions was commenced in March and completed in November 1956. Proposals in recent years to dispose of dredge material on marshy islands in the James River have been environmentally unacceptable. Construction of the 1979 modification to extend the harbor upstream by 600 feet and widen the entrance channel to 100 feet at the harbor entrance has not started. 8. GREENVALE CREEK, VA. Location. A tidal estuary that enters the north side of Rappahannock River about 20 miles above its mouth. It is wholly in Lancaster County, Virginia about 60 miles north of Norfolk, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12237). Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from that depth in Rappahannock River about 950 feet to the mouth of Greenvale Creek, then 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the mouth into the creek for about 2,400 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 215 of Annual Report, 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursement to the Federal government of $11,000 in contributed funds for a maintenance dredging contract completed in fiscal year 1978 was accomplished. Condition studies were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $4,004. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work dredging of the project was accomplished in December 1965. Maintenance dredging in 1972 restored full project dimensions. Periodic maintenance will be accomplished. 5-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 9. HAMPTON CREEK, VA. Location. A tidal estuary of Hampton Roads within the city of Hampton, Va. It is about 3 miles long, flows southerly and empties into Hampton Roads about 1.5 miles west of Fort Monroe. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 400 and 1222.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep from vicinity of Old Point Comfort across Hampton Flats and up the creek to Hampton Highway Bridge at Queen Street about 2.8 miles, with a width of 200 feet in outer portion of channel and 150 feet in the creek, suitably widened at the bends; a channel in Herberts Creek 180 feet wide and 12 feet deep, extending from the channel in Hampton Creek upstream to Kecoughtan Road about 0.6 mile. Under ordinary conditions, the mean tidal range is 2.6 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The conditions imposed by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and March 2, 1945, pertaining to the initial construction, have been fully complied with. The River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965, deleted requirement for providing spoil-disposal areas for maintenance. Local interests have contributed toward disposal costs for material deposited in Craney Island Disposal Area. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For details see page 319 of Annual Report for 1967.) Operations and results during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in late September 1980 with work to be completed in fiscal year 1981. Engineering and design and supervision and administration in support of the dredging contract award amounted to $12,198. Condition studies were accomplished at a cost of $18,264. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. For details of construction, see page 320 of Annual Report for 1967. Work on the maintenance dredging contract awarded in late September 1980 will commence in early fiscal year 1981. Periodic maintenance will continue to be accomplished. 10. HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. - COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, Virginia; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, Virginia; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 12248, 12245, and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a seperate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, Virginia and Channel to Newport News, Virginia. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the project incinerator amounted to $18,366. Maintenance operations, amounting to $99,371, consisted of collection and disposal of an estimated 60,540 cubic feet of a variety of floating refuse, ranging from discarded furniture to heavy timber and piling. Engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $23,130. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is one of continuous operation and maintenance for which no percentage of completion exists. Operations under existing project began in July 1950. Cost for removal of drift before then was carried under Norfolk Harbor, Virginia. The incinerator constructed at Craney Island disposal area began operation in Fiscal Year 1974. 11 JAMES RIVER, VA. Location. The river is formed by junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, Virginia, flows easterly 340 miles, and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 12248 and 12251). Previous projects For details see Annual Report for 1938. 5-6 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT* Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and thence a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long, along side the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; en largement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and turning dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet, City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods, are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. Estimated (1971) total cost for new work is $71,145,940 including required non-Federal cost for conditions of local cooperation imposed by the River and Haror Acts of 1930, 1945, and 1950, estimated (1939) to be $1,949,700; and by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, estimated (1971) to be $2,950,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by Riverand HarborActs of 1930, 1945,and 1950. The conditions imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 have not been complied with. Terminal facilities. Rivers commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharf, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal,located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 milesdownstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwate terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves ocean-going vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served b 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operation and results duringfiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $61,445. Operation of the project including condition surveys and special studies and reports amounted to $260,334. Condition at end offiscal year. A dredging contract for maintenance of the Richmond Harbor and Deepwater Terminal was awarded at the end of fiscal year 1980 with work to be completed in fiscal year 1981. Construction of existing project commenced in 1884 and continued intermittently through various modifications until 25-foot and 18-foot channels were completed in November 1947. (See Annual Report for 1965 for details on completion date.) Annual maintenance dredging to maintain 18 and 25 foot controlling depths on the project has not been accomplished since 1975 due to contamination of the river by the pesticide Kepone. Work remaining to complete the project consists of deepening the channel from 25 to 35 feet deep from the mouth of the Richmond Deepwater Terminal and widening to 300 feet between Hopewell and Deepwater Terminal. Also remaining are construction of a mooring basin at Hopewell and enlargement of a turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal. Uncompleted portions of the project are considered inactive. 12. LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA. Location. This river is a tidal estuary of Hampton Roads, formed by two branches lying wholly in the city of Norfolk, Va. The two branches, each about 2 miles long, flow from the northeast and southeast and join at a point about 3.5 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12245.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1969. Existingproject. A channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Hampton Roads to the Hampton Boulevard bridge, thence 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 100 feet long, a total length of approximately 4.0 miles. East Haven is located at the upstream limits of the Lafayette River project, immediately downstream of the Granby Street Bridge, and provides for a channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Lafayette River to the upstream end of the creek, a distance of approximately 2,500 feet. All depths referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Terminal facilities. See Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications and other engineering and design andsupervision and administration costs during the year amounted to $7,659. These costs are associated with the East Haven modification. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs associated with condition studies amounted to $19,313. 5-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of the East Haven modification which was awarded in late fiscal year 1980 and scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1981. Periodic maintenance dredging will be accomplished. 13. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA. Location. Norfolk, Virginia is 187 miles south of Baltimore, Maryland and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 45-foot contour at Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge over Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 12245 and 12253.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existingproject. A main channel 45 feet deep, 1,500 feet wide, from that depth in Hampton Roads near Fort Wool to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal Piers; thence, at same depth 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence, 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide to mouth of Southern Branch of Elizabeth River; and 450 feet wide up this branch to the Belt Line Railroad bridge, including an approach in turning area to same depth and at a maximum width of 830 feet ovpposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard, extending downstream 3,250 feet from Belt Line Railroad bridge; thence, 40 feet wide, 375 feet wide and 1 mile long to Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); thence, 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide and 3.1 miles long to a point 1,900 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway (Gilmerton's Bridge); thence, 35 feet deep, 250 feet to 500 feet wide to a point 1.6 miles above Interstate 64 high level bridge. A turning basin at the mouth of St. Julian's Creek, 35 feet deep and 400-600 feet square, and a turning basin at the mouth of Main's Creek 35 feet deep and 600 feet square, the upstream end of the project. A channel in Eastern Branch, 25 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 1.09 miles long from 40-foot channel to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge; thence, 25 feet deep, 300 feet wide, 0.55 mile long to Campostella Bridge; thence, 25 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 1.2 mile to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); and for maintenance at at depth of 25 feet of existing turning basin about 5.5 acres in extent at head of existing project just below the Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginian) Railway bridge. A channel in Western Branch, 40 foot channel in Elizabeth River, 24 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.78 mile long; thence, 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for 0.37 mile to West Norfolk Highway bridge; thence, 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide, 0.57 mile long. A channel in Scotts Creek between 40-foot channel at mouth and a point 100 feet above former location of Atlantic Coast Line Railroad bridge (about 0.73 miles upstream), 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Anchorage areas on west side of 40 foot channel opposite Lamberts Point and south of Craney Island aggregating 173 acres, consisting of 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep; 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep; and 1 anchorage 1,000 feet wide, 3,000 feet long and 20 feet deep. Another anchorage of 45 acres and 12 feet deep near Pinner Point. Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep over a swinging radius of 1,200 feet and a trapezoidal shaped disposal area of about 2,500 acres of flats adjacent to the north of Craney Island, inclosed by stone-faced levees, 3 sluiceways in west levee, and an access road. Facilities for unloading of hopper dredged material consisting of mooring dolphins; a mooring barge anchorage 100 by 600 feet, 21 feet deep, with approach channel 300 to 3,600 feet; 30-foot deep connecting anchorage with Norfolk Harbor 45 foot channel; and a 28-inch discharge pipe line to the leveed area. Facilities for contract rehandling of bucket dredged material consisting of a rehandling basin 1,000 by 1,200 feet, 40 feet deep, protected by a spur levee extending 2,350 feet from main levee and provided with approach exit channels, 200 feet wide by 18 feet deep to Norfolk Harbor 45 foot channel and a pipe line trestle from rehandling basin to leveed area. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.7 feet, and exteme is 3.4 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations, due to combined effect of tides and winds refered to mean low water on -3.5 feet and +9.6 feet. Eastern Branch, 30-foot channel portion is considered inactive. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Latest published description of terminal facilities is in Port Series No. 11 (revised 1971, part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work dredging, by contract, of the 35-foot channel in the Southern Branch was completed 4 May 1980. There were removed an estimated 1,372,150 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $2,684,012. New work engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $90,391. Operation of the Craney Island portion of the project including condition and operation studies, office studies and reports, care of buildings, grounds, utilities, roads, levees, plant and hopper dredge pipeline amounted to $432,806. Equipment for use at Craney Island was purchased at a direct cost of $49,484. Operation of the Norfolk Harbor portion of the project including condition surveys, care of buildings and grounds, commercial statistics, and budgeting and scheduling amounted to $576,174. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the 45-foot channel, was performed from 1 November to 18 June 1980. There were 1,521,383 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $1,581,110. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Sewells Point anchorage was performed from 1 October through 18 November 1979. There were removed an estimated 701,406 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $64,065. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT Maintenance dredging of Craney Island Rehandling Basin, was accomplished from 23 February through 30 September 1980. There were removed 1,300,000 cubic yards of credited material financed by user tolls. Maintenance engineering and design and real estate activities and supervision and administration costs for both projects amounted to $242,707. A condition survey was conducted in Western Branch of Elizabeth River, Norfolk Harbor 40-foot channel. Condition at end of fiscal year. For details on construction on portion of existing project completed prior to FY66, see Annual Report for 1965. Since 1965 new work dredging of 45-foot channel from Fort Wool to Norfolk and Western Railway Company coal piers was completed in August 1967. New work dredging of turning basin in 35-foot channel opposite St. Julian's Creek was completed in July 1966. New work dredging of 40-foot channel between Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad bridge and Norfolk and Western Railway bridge was completed July 1968. New work dredging of the new deep-draft anchorages opposite Sewells Point was completed in February 1972. New work dredging of the extension of the Southern Branch 35-foot channel was completed during the fiscal year 1980. Work remaining to complete the active portion of the project consists of deepening one of the deep-draft anchorages to 45 feet. Annual maintenance dredging is being done to provide full project dimensions in the 45-, 40-, and 35-foot main channels. 14. NOTTOWAY RIVER, VA. Location. The study section of the Nottoway River, a major tributary of the Chowan River, is located in Southampton County in southeastern Virginia. (See Courtland and Sebrell, Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Previous projects. None. Existing project. Channel width of 15 feet from the public boat ramp located 700 feet above Route 653 (Carey's Bridge) downstream to open water just below the Seaboard Coast Line Railway Bridge. Under normal river conditions, the water depths are adequate for the recreational craft using the river. Therefore, dredging is not a part of this project. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. Snagging and clearing operations were completed during fiscal year 1980 at a cost of $32,249 of which $2,104 was Federal and $30,145 was Non-Federal. Final payment has been delayed due to low water level in river which have delayed final inspection and clean-up. Engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $9,877. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete, except for final inspection and clean-up. 15. STARLINGS CREEK, VA. Location. A small estuary tributary to Pocomoke Sound on eastern side of Chesapeake Bay, adjacent to the town of Saxis, Virginia, on Saxis Island in Accomack County. This Eastern Shore creek is approximately 70 miles north of Norfolk, Va., and 80 miles southeast of Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12228.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from that depth in Pocomoke Sound to mouth of Starlings Creek, thence a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 1,100 feet long, and thence an approach channel 60 feet wide connecting the turning basin with a harbor of refuge, 7 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. For details, see page 315 of Annual Report for 1965. Local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details, see page 315 of Annual Report for 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging, by contract, in the entrance of channel and turning basin was conducted from 26 October to 6 December 1979. There were removed 20,916 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $55,323. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration and quantity survey costs amounted to $11,204. Condition at end of fiscal year. Entrance channel and turning basin were completed in 1937. Periodic maintenance dredging is being done to maintain full project dimensions. 5-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 16. SUPERVISION OF THE HARBOR OF HAMPTON ROADS (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) Laws enacted for the preservation of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, Virginia, its adjacent and tributary waters, and so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States, within or to the east of the State of Virginia, are administered by the Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads. Laws relating to the supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads and its tributary waters are the New York Harbor Act of 1888, as amended, the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Clean Water Act of 1977, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuary Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 and the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. Supervision was exercised by means of 4 patrol vessels including 4 small outboards (530 patrols, 4240 manhours), 4 - 7 patrol cars (1800 patrols, 14,400 manhours), and commercial aircraft for aerial photographic reconnaissance (45 patrols, 360 manhours). Patrols were conducted to detect unauthorized dredging, filling and/or construction activities in navigable waters, perform regular compliance inspections of permitted projects, and to evaluate proposals for construction, dredging and filling activities under the Corp's regulatory jurisdiction. An educational program continued in an effort to inform the public of the need and requirements for Department of the Army permits. This program was effectual through press releases, public notices, public talks, and personal interviews with interested agencies, committees and private industries. Agreements were continued with various Federal, State, and local agencies having related or similar responsibilities and functions to obtain maximum results with minimum costs by eliminating duplication of effort. The joint permit application adopted between the Norfolk District and the State of Virginia on 1 October 1978 was continued with decreases in the numerous forms of paperwork required to process a permit application. The Norfolk District's Regulatory Functions Branch continued to maintain the Northern Neck Project Office and also established an Eastern Shore Project Office in Accomac, Virginia. Each of these project offices provide readily available Corps personnel to assist waterfront owners, contractors, and the general public with their questions and problems on waterfront construction and the permit requirements of the Corps regulatory program. Summary of legal action during fiscal year. Disposition of legal action to end of fiscal year for violations of Federal Statutes is as follows: 3 cases referred for litigation, of which two were resolved through consent decrees and payment of a $500 fine and $5000 fine. Of the 174 cases investigated this fiscal year, 134 were resolved through either voluntary restorations or after-the-fact permit applications. The remaining forty (40) are still pending. 17. TANGIER CHANNEL, VA. Location. A tidal channel about 2 miles long extending from Tangier Island, Virginia, northeasterly to deepwater in Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay and northwesterly to deep water on Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart No. 12228.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from 8-foot contour to Tangier Sound to day marker no. 4, and thence 8 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the town of Tangier, with an anchorage basin adjacent to town 400 feet square and 7 feet deep. A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide for about 4,000 feet from the anchorage basin north-westerly across Tangier Island to Chesapeake Bay. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.7 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish spoil disposal area as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Accomack County constructed a public dock in 1961. There are four privately-owned docks adjacent to existing project and two marine railways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of the east channel was accomplished from 23 May to 17 June 1980. There were removed 52,698 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $209,032. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $45,732. Condition at end of fiscal year. Channel from Tangier Sound to anchorage basin at Tangier was completed in 1948. Construction of channel across Tangier Island began in December 1965 and was completed in January 1966. Periodic maintenance dredging is being done to provide full project dimensions. 18. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. Location, In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center 5-10 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1222.) Previous projects. For details, see page 470 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 45 feet deep at mean low water with auxiliary channels 450 feet wide and 32 feet deep at mean low water adjoining each side of 1,000-foot channel. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation, None required. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See "Norfolk Harbor, Va.," "Channel to Newport News, Va.," etc. Operations and results during fiscal year. A NOAAOcean dump disposal study was conducted during the fiscal year at a direct cost of $50,000. Condition surveys were completed during July 1980 at a cost of $9,693. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete, except for auxiliary channels which are in an inactive status. New work dredging of channel 750 feet wide and 40 feet deep was commenced in December 1917 and completed June 1929. Widening this channel to 1,000 feet at same depth was commenced in February and completed in April 1957. Deepening this channel to 45 feet commenced December 1965 and was completed in May 1970. Periodic maintenance dredging is being done to maintain a 45-foot depth in the 1,000-foot wide main channel. 19. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares, and bays, to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, Virginia. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorizes relocation of portions of the waterway and widening to 100 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see Annual Report for 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition surveys were performed from March through May 1980 in the Chesapeake Bay to Mogothy Bay. Condition surveys of various other cuts were conducted from April through September 1980. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost amounted to $177,718. Tide guaging work amounted to $45,843. Real estate activity cost amounted to $782. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1959. Construction of 1970 modification is inactive. Annual maintenance dredging was to have been accomplished in fiscal year 1979. However, local interests would not comply with the Corps 1978 cost sharing policy for disposal area retaining dikes and the project was not maintained. Recent policy changes; however, in diking costs make it possible for dredging in FY 1982. Project is known to be critically shoaled at Magothy Bay, Gull Marsh Flats, North Channel and Metompkin Bay. 20. WINTER HARBOR, VA. Location. A tidal estuary in Mathews County, Va. entering Chesapeake Bay on its western shore 42 miles north of Norfolk, Va., and 4.9 miles north of New Point Comfort. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 12235 and 12238.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide extending about 7,600 feet from that depth in Chesapeake Bay to vicinity of public landing, and a mooring and turning basin of the same depth and 400 feet square, with flared approach, at inner end of channel. Mean range of lunar tides is 2 feet with estimated variations, induced by storms, from 2 feet below to 8.5 feet above mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. Local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Three privately owned wooden wharves on Winter Harbor and its branches which handle bulk of commerce on the project and are open to all equally. There are also 22 small private wooden foot wharves and numerous shore landings. In addition there is a public bulkhead and landing which is open to all on equal terms. 5-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging, by contract, in the entrance channel to 7 feet was conducted from 24 April to 27 June 1980. There were removed 22,536 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $51,482. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $14,897. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in July 1956. Periodic maintenance dredging is being done to provide full project dimensions. 21. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 5-E at end of chapter.) 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 5-F at end of chapter.) 23. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Three reconnaissance reports: Sarah's Creek, Gloucester, VA; Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet, VA; and Starlings Creek, VA were completed duringthefiscal year. Two detailed project reports: Chesconnessex Creek, Accomack County, VA, and Poquoson River, York County, VA were terminated during the fiscal year. Three detailed project reports: Bush Park Creek, Middlesex Co., VA, Chincoteague Inlet, Accomack Co., VA; and Tylers Beach, Isle of Wight Co., VA were in progress at the end of the year. Beach Erosion Control 24. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia - North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12207.) Existing project. Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 feet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to insure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges therewith would be less than the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The United States shall participate in the first cost of the project to the full extent of its proportionate share of cost as a landowner, plus one third total first cost of restoring and protecting all publicly-owned sections of the shore. The 1962 modification provided that the United States shall further participate in periodic beach nourishment of the beach in the amount of one third the cost for 25 years from date of commencement of operations in placing an initial quantity of nourishment material equal to deficiency in the design beach at that time. Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act increased Federal participation to one-half of the cost incurred after October 23, 1962. Estimated Federal cost (1980) is $5,750,000. Estimated cost to local interests is $5,750,000. Construction of the groin system is not included in above estimate. The 1962 estimate for this work was $549,000 Federal cost and $531,000 cost to local interests. The 1974 modification provides for structural and non-structural improvements. Structural measures would be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street. This would include raising the beach to elevation 10 feet and a width of 100 feet, driving a sheet pile wall just seaward of the existing bulkhead from Rudee Inlet to 57th Street; and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 57th to 89th Streets. The estimated cost (1980) of the structural improvements are Federal $28,700,000 and non-Federal $15,000,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954, imposed conditions that local interests (a) adopt plan of restoration and protection; (b) submit for approval by the Chief of Engineers, before commencement of work, detailed plans and specifications for the project and also arrangements for prosecuting the work; (c) assure maintenance of protective and improvement measurements during their useful life as may be required to serve their intended purpose; (d) provide all lands and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; (e) assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted; and (f) assure continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, and its administration for public use only. The modification of the project by the River and Harbor Act of October 23, 1962, continued the terms of local cooperation specified in the original project. The conditions of local cooperation have been combined within the initial beach restoration and in the nourishment program to date. Conditions pertaining to construction of groins have not been complied with. A formal agreement with the cooperating agency (City of Virginia Beach and the Virginia Beach Erosion Commission) for the initial beach restoration was entered into on October 19, 1955. An amendment to the original agreement, covering periodic nourishment, was entered into on November 1, 1963. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning of the 1974 modification was continued at a cost of $219,562. Local interests were reimbursed $288,773 for the Federal share of periodic nourishment of the beach, and Federal costs pertinent thereto amounted to $5,998. 5-12 ' NORFOLK, VA.,DISTRICT * Condition at end of fiscal year. Beach restoration by local interests was commenced in June 1952 and completed in August 1953. Construction of groins has been deferred indefinitely. Local interests acquired their own dredging plant and borrow areas and replenished the beach until 1975 when the borrow areas could not be extended. During fiscal year 1975, a 5-year supply of beach nourishment material was stockpiled at nearby Fort Story to be transported to the beach by local interests. 25. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shoreline erosion control demonstration projects were completed at Hampton National Wildlife Refuge and Buckroe Beach, Hampton, Va. at a cost of $9,874. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL (See Table 5-D at end of chapter.) Flood Control 27. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA. Location. Site of proposed Gathright Dam is on Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 and Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in reach of Jackson River known as the Gorge. About 19 miles upstream from Covington, Virginia at the elevation at the top of the conservation pool, Gathright Reservoir will extend upstream about 9 miles (see Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long rolled rock filled dam with an impervious core, with a top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right back 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam; a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch, about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Estimated Federal cost (1979) is $83,000,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Lands and damages continued at a direct cost of $66,224. Contract cost for Morris Hill Recreation area and the Administration-Visitors Center amounted to $984,000. During the fiscal year, work continued on contracts for the relocation of Route 600 at a cost of $1,700,000, an impervious fill and recreation facilities in Fortney Branch at a cost of $789,000, and Bolar Mt. recreation areas at a cost of $1,571,104. Miscellaneous hired labor and contract costs for relocations and reservoirs amounted to $68,028. Archeological investigation of sites in the reservoir area and related hired labor during the fiscal year amounted to $198,990. Miscellaneous contract cost for recreational facilities and grouting amounted to $619,202. Contract costs for the Collection Trench awarded during the fiscal year amounted to $125,000. Miscellaneous hired labor work, surface instrumentation, litigation, construction facilities, buildings grounds, utilities, and permanent operating equipment amounted to $67,640. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs of the project amounted to $536,039. Operation and maintenance of the completed portions of the project amounted to $847,395. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is operational for flood control. Overall, the project is about 96 percent complete. Construction is continuing. 28. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA. Location. The city of Richmond's Water Filtration Plant lies on the north side of the James River. The plant is separated on the south from the river by the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway embankment. The Old James River and Kanawha Canal forms the plant's northern boundary. The canal is owned by the C & O Railroad Company; however, the city of Richmond has acquired all water rights. (See Richmond and Bon Air, Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Previous projects. None. Existing project. The project will provide for protection of the filtration plant proper. The basic plan provides for 5-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 inclosing three sides of the plant and tying into high ground. The walls will have an average height of about 9 feet with a top elevation of 117.0 feet m.s.l. The degree of protection provided is equivalent to the Standard Project Flood. A total of 11.5 acres will be protected from the design flood having a recurrence of 360 years over the project economic life of 50 years. Local cooperation. Requirements are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and excavated material disposal areas as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for construction of the project. (b) Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; (c) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) Maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. (e) The city in acquiring land easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for project construction, operation and maintenance will comply with the provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646 approved 2 January 1971; (0 The city will comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) to wit: that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination in connection with this project on the grounds of race, color, or national origin. Operation and results during the fiscal year. Phase II engineering initiated in the beginning of the fiscal year was completed at a cost of $185,974. Condition at end offiscal year. Preconstruction work is continuing with preparation of the plans and specifications necessary before project construction. 29. RICHMOND, VA Location. Located in the piedmont plateau of Virginia, the city of Richmond is bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into the Shockoe Creek area on the north bank and the southside industrial commercial complex. (See Richmond, Virginia quadrangle of geological survey.) Previous projects. None Existing project. The project will provide for construction of floodwalls and levees to protect against a flood 15.4 feet above the March 1936 flood, or 6.4 feet above the June 1972 flood on both sides of the river in the downtown area. This improvement will provide protection against the Standard Project Flood (SPF). The probability that one or more flood events will exceed the SPF in Richmond during the 100-year life of the project is about 14 percent. The floodwalls and levees, are as follows: (a) Shockoe Creek area - 1,840 feet of cantilever floodwall, 2,280 feet of concrete gravity floodwall, 12 closures, and 1 pumping station; (b) Southside area - 750 feet of cantilever floodwall, 10,280 feet of earth levee, 10 closures, and 2 pumping stations. Local cooperation. Requirements are as follows: a. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. b. Maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, c. Adopt and enforce adequate regulations to reduce flood damages along the James River in the area within the city of Richmond, Virginia, that will not be protected by the recommended improvements. d. Prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on ponding areas necessary for the proper functioning of the project. e. Publicize flood plain information in the areas concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the flood plain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future development and protection levels provided by the project. f. At least annually, inform affected interests regarding the limitation of the protection afforded by the project. g. The city in acquiring land, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for project construction, operation, and maintenance will comply with the provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971. h. The city will comply with Section 601 of Title Six of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352), to-wit: that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, on grounds of race, color, or national orgin. Terminal facilities. None 5-14 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT Operations and results during the fiscal year. Phase I planning in progress at the beginning of the fiscal year, was completed at a cost of $182,014. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I report is complete and is beginning the review process before pro-. ceeding to Phase II. 30. VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2, VA. Location. The canal number 2 watershed with a drainage area of about 37 square miles lies within the city of Virginia Beach. The city consists of 255 square miles of primarily low, flat terrain with about 75 percent of the area below elevation 15-feet, mean sea level. The existing canal, from the Eastern Branch of the Lynnhaven River to the North Landing River is about 12 miles long and follows a northsouth alignment. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12205) Previous projects. None. Existing project. The project calls for a channel starting north of Virginia Beach Blvd. Bridge 1.1 miles south to a point approximately 600 feet east of the Lynnhaven Park.- way bridge over London Bridge Creek. Channel dimensions in this section would be -9 feet m.s.l. with an 80-foot bottom width. Top width would be approximately 116 feet. From the southern end of this channel, a land cut would be made following the alignment of an existing drainage ditch to rejoin the waterway south of the Magic Hollow subdivision. Channel dimensions would be -5 feet m.s.l. with a 60-foot bottom width. Along one side of the land cut would be a 20- foot-wide cut at 0 m.s.l. for marsh planting. Top width would vary with the ground level but will average 152 feet and length would be 2.3 miles. The London Bridge Creek Channel south of the 1.1 mile section will be maintained at it's present dimensions. Local cooperation. Requirements are as follows: a. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas for excavated material as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project. b. Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction, excluding railroad bridges and approaches and facilities necessary for the normal interception and disposal of local interior drainage at the line of protection. c. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, not including damages to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. d. Maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. e. At least annually inform affected interests regarding the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. f. Publicize flood plain information in the areas concerned, provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the flood plain, and adopt such regulations as may be necessary to prevent unwise development within those areas that would be inundated by floods of tidal and fluvial origin which would be expected to occur once within a 100-year period. Provided further that, unless otherwise stated in these recommendations, the exact amount of non-Federal contributions shall be determined by the Chief of Engineers prior to project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I planning, in progress at the beginning of the fiscal year, was completed at a cost of $84,244. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is continuing. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 5-G at end of chapter.) 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION A reconnaissance report for Old Town Creek, Colonial Heights, Va. was in progress at the end of the fiscal year. Total cost of the reconnaissance report during the fiscal year was $3,687. General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $1,366,234 of which $311,488 was for navigation studies; $134,668 for flood control studies; $275,750 for beach erosion control studies; $29,910 for technical participation in water resources planning by the Commonwealth of Virginia; $3,116 for review of watershed plans of the Soil Conservation Service; $966 for National Wild and Scenic Rivers; and $5,114 on technical engineering assistance on Streambank Erosion; $9,990 for Water Quality Management; and $10,299 for Coastal Zone Management; and $584,933 for Inspection of Dams Program. 5-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year cost of Flood Plain Management Services was $114,412. Major emphasis during the fiscal year was on management and technical services. 5-16 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Total Cost to in Text Sept. 30, 1980 1. Appomattox River, New Work Va. (Regular Funds) , 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, Fla. (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 3. Baltimore Harbor Channels (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 4. Channel to Newport News, Va. (Regular Funds) 5. Chincoteague Bay, Va. (Regular Funds) 6. Chincoteague Inlet, Va. (Regular Funds) Deep Creek, Newport News Va. (Regular Funds) Greenvale Creek, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Hampton Creek, Va. (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Recreation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,720 2,720 1,376,000 1,329,649 5,000 47,573 600.500 600,404 368 368 42.126 42.126 4,389 4.388 301.630 299,650 6,798 6,798 55.647 55.647 61,071 61,071 10,116 10,116 1,435,000 1,736,937 1,688,000 1,441,125 1,665,970 1,767,686 (-)25.129 - . - - . � 20,000 16,857 198,564 198,564 10,588 10,588 286,000 277,873 69,000 59,281 (-)1,865 116, 103,000 102,979 (-)12 3,330 13,383 12,945 162,000 163,479 18,976 9,394 36,427 13,186 4,500 S4,521 32,000 30,931 1,505,550 1,505,550 13,478 13,916 429,000 435,114 12,593 1,450,740 1,473,982 4,004 4.004 870,341(1) 870,341(1) 828,876 828,876 3,688,372(2) 3,688,372(2) 32,873,695(3) 32,829,340(3) 479,947 479,947 59,871 59,871 8,015,070(4) 8,015,070(4) 5,793,078(4) 5,792,009(4) 8,955,974 8,955,974 3,481,670 3,481,670 25,126 25,126 157,589 157,589 877,000 876,464 294,987 288,278 2,030,493(5) 2,030,493(5) 20,003 20,003 185,929 185,929 2,910 2,910 11,000 12,500 11,000 12,500 7,741 7,741 5-17 13,126 13,126 8,049 8,049 480,294 30,462 186,237(6) 186,237(6) 1,057,546 607,714 TABLE 5-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Total Cost to in Text Sept. 30, 1980 10. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) Hampton Roads and the Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va. Collection and Removal of Drift (Regular Funds) James River, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Lafayette River, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Norfolk Harbor, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Nottoway River, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed) Starlings Creek Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Supervision of Harbor of Hampton Roads, Va. (Regular Funds) Tangier Channel, Va. (Regular Funds) 14,400 160,000 168,768 443,997 366,582 20,000 4,473 4,472 4,249 4,295 11. 146,000 135,208 278,000 365.029 15,000 35,000 49,000 39,445 11,063 11,063 214,000 133,000 216,376 140,867 262,000 1,597,195 261,840 521,781 - 50,000 130,000 17,977 15,643 15,643 114,000 2,010,880 107,950 1,998,100 3.568.067 2,661,800 3.383,049 2,896,837 30,000 = . New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Coast Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 66,000 24,961 43,000 7,659 19,313 19,313 125,000 2,965,500 2,946,346 125,544 30,000 (-)13,000 11,981 30,145 6,178 6,178 198,000 196,078 335,761 304,436 5-18 14,830 14,830 188,000 192,128 82,888 115,951 185,134 119,588 981 66,527 194,400 151,000 177,393 169,070 65,382 24,560 65,178 254,764 1,992,739 1,941,858 20,000 19,035 46,000 5,926 43,000 12. 62,969 62,969 13. 90,636 76,236 1.970,619 1,968,798 7.639,909(6) 7,639,909(6) 18,482,797 17,187.631 228,456 178,456 263,339 149.419 95,251 95,251 188,962 63,962 33,549,115(7) 33,530,285(7) 44,630,996(8) 44,596,875(8) 179,480 53,936 53,000 36,942 43,000 30.145 66,242 66.242 563,964 563,964 14. 15. 16. 17. 2,973 2,973 3,725,928 3,724,727 116,550 116,550 1,304.631 1,304,631 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Total Cost to in Text Sept. 30, 1980 18. Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. Richmond, Va. Va. Beach Streams Canal No. 2, Va. Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (Regular Funds) Waterway on the Coast of Va. (Regular Funds) Winter Harbor, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Va. Beach, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Gathright Lake, Va. (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Aprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 6,925 6,925 366,828 972,984 13,350 13,350 200,000 116,924 12,718 12,718 81,000 83,808 167,065 112,111 15,000 15,000 56,000 153,751 59,693 59,693 �.. 224,000 224,343 11,425 66,379 300,000 294,771 9,700,000 8,514,000 8,658,000 2,500,000 6,687,204 7,367,694 7,956,185 6,600,227 130,000 123,981 419,000 407,135 75,000 74,234 111,000 110,896 711,000 700,437 100,224 45,908 499,896 485,815 100,000 96,548 876,000 847,395 198,000 185,974 172,000 182,014 82,000 84,244 (1) Includes $22,500 for previous projects. (2) Includes $292,096 for previous projects. (3) Includes $52,804 for previous projects. (4) Costs prior to 1942 are included in the Baltimore Harbor and Channels MO (Baltimore District). Costs listed are for York Spit Channel, Va.; Rappahannock Shoal Channel, Va.; and Cape Henry Channel Va. (5) In addition, $36,000 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. (6) Includes $763,000 for previous projects. (?)Includes $2,561,704 for previous projects and new work. (8) Includes $72,039 for previous projects. (9) Excludes $5,000 contributed funds expended for new Work. 5-19 25,490 25,490 488,000 441,687 17,203 17,203 260,000 234,765 (-)5,317 19 20. 24. 27. 28. 13,534,967 13,534,967 5,533,294 5,533,294 850,498 850,498 5,965,332 5,962,736 171,334(9) 171,334(9) 269,655 269,655 15,000 15,000 2,440,195 2,421,381 204,683 204,683 78,838,527 77,713,249 2,136,000 2,078,948 373,224 306,116 782,896 778,725 182,000 180,792 29. 30. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA. (See Section 1 of Text) March 3. 1871 June 13. 1902 Mar. 3, 1909 June 25, 191(0 Jan. 21. 1927 Mar. 2. 1945 Annual Report 1874, pt.II p. 54 H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1467 H. Doc. 952, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 215, 69th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 223. 76th Cong., 1st sess.(1) Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. Increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of ance of diversion works. Channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water water between mouth and Petersburg. Existing project dimensions... ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, Va. to sounds of North Carolina Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal.) Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,00 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 3 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 3 of Text) A channel 42 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, two deep-draft anchorage berths opposit Newport News to a depth of 40 feet and 1,200 foot sawinging radius Channel 45 feet deep, 800 feet wide deepening of four 40-foot anchorages to a depth of 45 feet. CHINCOTEAGUE BAY, VA. (See Section 5 of Text) L-shaped harbor 5 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,500 feet long with approach channel of same depth and width. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 190, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 550, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 486, 67th Cong., 4th sess. H. Doc. 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., lst sess. H. Doc. 23, 75th Cong., 1st sess.(2) 5-20 TABLE 5-B H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Congs., 3d sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62d Congs. 2d sess. H. Doc. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 23, 71st Cong., 1st sess.(2) Not Available H. Doc., 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Mar. 3. 1899 July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3. 1925 July 3. 1930 June 26. 1934 Mar. 2. 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2. 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31. 1970 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 26, 1937 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Documents CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA. (See Section 6 of Text) Existing project DEEP CREEK, NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep from James River to Hicks Landing with widths of 80 feet and 50 feet;a turning basin 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 105 feet long; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and 6.4 acres in area; and a timber jetty 800 feet long on the north side of the anchorage. Existing project dimensions and elimination of timber jetty. Widening of Federal entrance channel to 100 feet and extend harbor upstream 600 feet. GREENVALE CREEK, VA. (See Section 8 of Text) Existing project HAMPTON CREEK, VA. (See Section 9 of Text) A channel 9 feet deep, varying from 300 feet wide on bar at mouth to 200 feet wide at Hampton Highway Bridge. A channel 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide across Hampton Flats and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Hampton Creek. A channel in Herberts Creek 80 to 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep from Hampton Creek to Kecoughtan Roads. Delete requirement for providing spoil-disposal area. HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. COLLETION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 10 of Text) Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters JAMES RIVER, VA. (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 22 feet deep from mouth to Richmond and construct spur and training dikes Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Form a turning basin by widening channel at Richmond Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Removal of Trigg cofferdam Turning basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA. (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Hampton Roads to Hampton Blvd. bridge. Knitting Mill Creek modification East Haven Creek modification NORFOLK HARBOR, VA. (See Section 13 of Text) Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal 45 feet deep, Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point. Approved in 1972 H. Doc. 76, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 601, 80th Cong., 2d sess. Approved in 1979 Alpproved in 1965 Annual Report, 1889, p. 974 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 559, 76th Cong., 3d sess.(1) H. Doc. 201, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Congs., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68, 74th Cong., 1st sess. (2) H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 5, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1967 Approved in 1979 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Sept. 19, 1890 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 May 17, 1950 July 5, 1884 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 5-21 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980, TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 Aug. 8. 1917 Mar. 30, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 June 30, 1948 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 July, 14, 1960 Harbor of Refuge (Sec. 107) TANGIER CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 17 of Text) Channel from Tangier Sound and anchorage Changed channel and anchorage dimensions Modified project dimensions Channel across Tangier Island H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73d Cong., 2d sess.(3) H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2d sess. SOUTHERN BRANCH Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet. Depth of 40 feet and waidth of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia Ry. bridge; thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR Bridge Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square. Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard; thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end 40 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. (See Section 10 of Text) EASTERN BRANCH Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet Removal of shoals at mouth Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella Bridge WESTERN BRANCH Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge SCOTTS CREEK Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge. ANCHORAGES 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square; anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square; and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius NO'TTOWAY RIVER, VA. (See Seciton 14 of Text) Existing project. STARLINGS CREEK, VA. (See Section 15 of Text) Entrance channel and turning basin. 5-22 H. Doc.373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess(4) H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 605, 63d Cong., 2d sess.(2) S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess.(2) H. Does. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1979 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 46, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Approved 1963 H. Doc. 107, 63d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 51, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 141, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1964 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 3, 1934 (P.W.A. Act) and Sug. 30 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Documents Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 201) May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 Oc.t 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 July 24, 1946 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 22, 1976 THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 18 of Text) A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide. Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channels on either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide. Channel 45 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 19 of Text) Existing project adopted Project modified Project widened to 100 feet, partially relocated, and incorporated in Deleware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterway in Delaware-Maryland-Virginia. WINTER HARBOR, VA. (See Seciton 20 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide and a mooring and turning basin of the same depth. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. (See Section 24 of Text) Project authorized. Project modified. Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA. (See Section 27 of Text) Project authorized RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA.(See Section 28 of Text) Project authorized RICHMOND, VA. (See Section 29 of Text) Project authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering VA. BEACH STREAMS, CANAL NO.2, VA. BEACH, VA. (See Section 30 of Text) Project Authorized (1) 16 feet at mean low water. (2) Contains latestpublished map. (3) Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 23, 1935. (4) For latest published map, see H. Doc. 1246, 62d Cong., 3d sess. 5-23 H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83d Cong., 2d sess(2) H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1970 H. Doc. 319, 81st Cong., 1st sess.(' H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 543, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 642, 94th Cong., 2d sess Oct. 27, 1965 H. Doc. 640, 94th Cong., 2d sess (Sec. 201) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 5-C ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 2 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Depth on Miles Width Length Miter Sills Year from of Avail- Opened Nor- Location Chain- able Lift Upper Lower Character to folk ber for Full (feet) (feet) (feet) of Navi- Cost Va. (feet) Width Foundation gation (feet) 12.4 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal (Great Bridge, Va.) 10.7 Dismal Swamp Canal (Deep Creek) 33.1 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills, N.C.) 75 52 52 600 300 300 2.7 12 12 (1) (1) 12 12 12 13 Piles in sand and shells Natural earth with cutoff walls Natural earth with cutoff walls 1932 1940 1941 499,913 348,879 373,556 (1) 16 feet at mean low water. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION TABLE 5-D (See Section 26 of Text) For Last Full Report, See Annual Report For Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Construciton Maintenance Additional Expenditure For New Work Expended From Contributed Funds Anderson Park, Newport News, Va. Hampton Institute 1979 1976 $471,474 $156,906 $176,671 $175,845 5-24 _ NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 21 of Text) Name of Project CONDITION SURVEYS Appomattox River Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Lower Northlanding River Baltimore Habor & Channels Rappahannock Shoal Channel Broad Creek Channel Connecting York River With Back Creek to Slaights Wharf Channel from Phoebus James River City Point Shoal Dancing - Swann Channel Goose Hill Channel Jordon Point-Windmill Point Harrison Point Bar Richmond Deepwater to Hopewell Richmond Deepwater Term Richmond Harbor to Deepwater Term Rocklanding Shoal Tribell Shoal Channel Lafayette River Hoskins Creek Lynnhaven Inlet Lynnhaven The Narows Norfolk Harbor Western Branch of Elizabeth River Norfolk Harbor 40' Channel Quinby Creek Thimble Shoal Channel Totuskey Creek Urbanna Creek Waterway on the Coast of Virginia Chesapeake Bay to Magothy Bay Eckichy Marsh Goulds Marsh Lewis Creek Magothy Bay Ramshorn Channel Sloop Channel Willoughby Channel RECONNAISSANCE SURVEYS Bush Park Creek Chesconnessex Creek TribeUl Shoal Channel Lynnhaven Inlet May 80 Jun 80 Nov. 79 Jan. 80 Jan 80 Aug.80 Jul 80 Aug. 80 Aug. 80 Jun 80 May-Sep 80 Apr 80 May 80 Aug. 80 Aug. 80 Jan. 80 Jan. 80 Nov.-Dec. 80 Dec. 80 Feb-Apr. 80 Jul 80 Jul 80 Jan. 80 Jan. 80 Mar.-May 80 Aug. 80 Aug. 80 May 80 Apr 80 Aug. 80 Sep. 80 Sep. 80 Jan. 80 Nov. 79 Nov. 79 Sep-Oct. 80 5-25 TABLE 5-E Date Survey Conducted Vv "MYVV\ry REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (bee ecution zz of ie) For Last Full Report, See Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Additional Expenditure Project Annual Report For New Work Expanded For Construction Maintenance From Contributed Funds Aberdeen Creek, Va. 1 Blackwater River, Va. Active portion 1, 11 Broad Creek, Va. 1 Cape Charles City Harbor, Va. Active portion 1, 2 Carters Creek,, Va. Active portion 1, 3 Channel from Phoebus Va. to deepwater in Hampton Roads 1 Channel connecting York River, Va. Back Creek to Slaights Wharf 1 Chesconessex Creek, Va. 1 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. Chowan River, N.C. 1 Cockrells Creek, Va. 4 Cranes Creek, Va. Davis Creek, Va. 1 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., Va. 1 Dymers Creek, Va.1 Horn Harbor, Va. 1 Hoskins Creek, Va. 1 Jackson Creek, Va. 1 Jarvis Creek, Va. 4 Kings Creek, Va. 4 Little Machipongo River, Va. 1 Little River (Creek), Va. 1, 13 Locklies Creek,Va. 1 Lynnhaven Inlet, Va. Merherrin River, N.C. 1 Milford Haven, Va. 1 Mill Creek, Va. 1 Mulberry Creek, Va. 1 Nandua Creek, Va. 1 Nansemond River, Va.8 Newport News Creek, Va.1 Occohannock, Creek, Va. Active portion 1 Onancock River, Va. 1, 5 Oyster Channel,Va. 1 Pagan River, Va. 1, 6 Pamunkey River, Va. Active portion 1 Parker Creek, Va. 1 Parrotts Creek, Va. 1 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot 1 Queens Creek 1 Quinby Creek, Va. Rappahannock River, Va. 9, 10, 12 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va. 4 Taskinas Creek, Va. 1975 1975 1962 1968 1951 1944 1950 1968 1978 1975 1949 1978 1971 1974 1953 1964 1977 1971 1979 1957 1972 1966 1928 1977 1950 1950 1937 1950 1950 1978 1962 1951 1963 1979 1950 1964 1974 1957 1947 1979 1977 1978 1950 1975 $109,643 $175,135 342,118 138,704 27,888 71,301 705,685 338,558 28,398 11,500 3,277 32,288 14,855 36,358 25,516 49,396 107,220 6,274 97,612 83,000 5,582 13,987 44,100 8,500 39,259 5,593 15,000 168,623 11,581 334,725 47,734 24,568 5,445 2,393 6,988 167,477 135,600 13,859 187,914 119,117 51,425 31,376 15,530 37,045 165,566 26,949 104,176 414,633 7,479 29,856 11,982 11,622 146,911 29,698 4,610 88,445 588,003 34,073 54,343 427,290 6,663 928,815 49,591 29,411 3,555 2,458 38,521 414,403 96,359 70,136 426,173 227,125 283,314 161,183 132,794 36,883 66,162 101,654 447,598 1,644,039 135 5-26 19,300 6,000 1,200 2,500 5,700 4,000 500 16,955 1,350 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT TABLE 5-F (Cont.) AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) For Last Full Report, See Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Additional Expenditure Project Annual Report For New Work Expended For Construction Maintenance From Contributed Funds Totuskey Creek, Va 1970 167,869 440,852 2,000 Tylers Beach, Va. 1978 63,268 101,299- Urbanna Creek. Va. 1, 7 1963 55,724 87,431 Whitings Creek, Va. 1 1971 21,630 107,765 500 Willoughby Channel, Va. 1 1953 8,500 34,766- Wishart Point Channel, Va.1 1975 118,762 54,147 30,625 York River, Va. 1958 Active portion 1 180,904 228,105 1 Completed 7 In addition, $61,087 was expended foor rehabilitation.. 2 Includes $445,291 military funds expended fro new work dred- 8 Includes $30,000 for new work and $7,000 for maintenance for ging on existing project and $83,041 military funds expended for previous projects. new work on construction of wharf and bulkhead. 9 In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 3 In addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from cont- 10 Includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. buted funds. 11 Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 4 Inactive 12 Includes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. 5 Includes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for 13 Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. previous projects. 6 Includes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. TABLE 5-G OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOL CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 31 of Text) For Last Full Report, See Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Additional Expenditure Project Annual Report For New Work Expended For Construction Maintenance From Contributed Funds Buena Vista, Va. 1977 $417,900(1) - Nemarket Creek, Va 1970 1,000,000 9,244 550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. 1973 1,851,933 25,289 516,256 Salem Church Lake, Va. 1976 1,896,716(1)(2) - (1) Preconstruction planning terminated. (2) Includes $144,785 for previous projects. 5-27 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT* WILMINGTON, N. C. DISTRICT This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. It includes a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District) ........ 6-2 2. Beaufort Harbor, N. C.................6-3 3. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above W ilmington...................6-4 4. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C ...... .. ..... 6-4 5. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C............6-4 6. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C.........6-5 7. Morehead City Harbor, N. C.... ..... 6-6 8. NeuseRiver,N.C.....................6-6 9. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C...................6-7 10. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C...........6-7 11. Roanoke River, N. C.................. 6-8 12. Rollinson Channel, N. C...............6-8 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C...............6-8 14. Stumpy Point Bay, N. C...... ....... 6-9 15. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C..........6-9 16. Wilmington Harbor, N. C..............6-10 17. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.............. ...... ... 6-10 18. Other Authorized Navigation Projects..........................6-10 19. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 6-10 Beach Erosion Control 20. 21. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. Co......... 6-10 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects...................6-11 22. Adkin Branch, Lenoir County, N. C................. 6-11 23. Black River, Harnett County, N. C................6-11 24. Cape Fear River Basin, N. C... ...... 6-12 24A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Formerly New Hope Lake, N.C.)............... ...... 6-12 24B. Howards Mill Lake, N. C.............6-13 24C. Randleman Lake, N. C.................6-13 25. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C.......................6-14 26. Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C..............6-14 27. Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C................6-15 28. Leesville, Va.-Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project................ 6-15 29. Neuse River Basin, N. C............6-15 29A. Falls Lake, N. C.....................6-16 30. Scuppernong River, N. C..............6-16 31. Yadkin River Basin, N. C. and S. C ............... ............ 6-17 31A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C......................6-17 32. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects............... 6-17 33. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.................... 6-18 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization...............6-18 * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Other tables referenced in the text also appear at the end of this chapter. 6-1 Navigation Page Flood Control Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Page 35. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C.........................6-18 35A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N. C........................6-18 35B. Philpott Lake, Va...................6-18 36. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations...............6-19 General Investigations Page 37. Surveys.......................6-20 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................ 6-20 Navigation 1. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwaterintrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein: a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harboraccess channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. Length of channels and basins total 347.1 miles. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock bridges was authorized in October 1976. Estimated Federal Cost is $41,400,000 (1980). The six mooring basins along the AIWW were deauthorized 5 August 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251.The south jetty at Masonboro Inlet has an estimated Federal cost of $9,110,000 (1980). A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 at an estimated Federal cost of $1,000,000. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at 6-2 L I WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the modification. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Act of 1976 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non- Federal cost-sharing requirement for the Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock bridges. The three remaining bridges were not included in this modification and are awaiting reauthorization to reflect 100 percent Federal funding. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design for replacement of two highway bridges cost $47,587, environmental studies cost $5,016, land cost $1,881 and construction cost $1,189,077. Construction of the south jetty at Masonboro Inlet cost $2,501,263. Preauthorization studies for a Section111 project at Masonboro Inlet cost $37,763. Engineering and design and environmental studies for the Section 111 project cost $91,437. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 120,997 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $147,446; 89,694 cubic yards from shoals in Topsail Inlet at a cost of $122,116 and 21,707 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $35,200. During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell maintained survey and dredging ranges and conducted clearing and snagging operations at a cost of $132,636. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 14,795 cubic yards from shoals in Topsail Inlet at a cost of $33,600. Between November 3, 1979 and March 31, 1980, the contract dredges Arlington and Clarendon removed 344,227 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between the Alligator-Pungo land cut and Camp Lejeune at a cost of $521,598. Between October 1 and November 14, 1979, the contract dredge Cherokee removed 160,487 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between the Neuse River and the South Carolina state line at a cost of $505,679. Between July 4 and September 30, 1980, the contract dredge Marion removed 278,715 cubic yards from shoals in the through waterway between the Neuse River and the South Carolina state line at a cost of $677,854. Marking of easements along the AIWW cost $250,993. Mosquito control tests in disposal areas cost $35,645. Masonboro Inlet monitoring program cost $40,021. Engineering and design for dredging of Masonboro Inlet cost $2,074. Comprehensive Audy cost $350. Inspection of five highway bridges cost $6,757. Repairs to highway bridges cost $19,806. Condition and operation studies cost $288,394. Five highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $648,423. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in August 1980, except for the training wall and three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet, the Section 111 modification and the bridge replacement program. A construction contract for Wilkerson Creek bridge was awarded on February 14, 1978 and is scheduled for completion in July 1981. The Section 111 modification to place material on Wrightsville Beach was awarded November 1980. Total cost for existing project to September 1980 was $65,412,993, of which $22,411,590 was for new work and $43,001,403 was for maintenance. 2. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of 6-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 channels is 6.9 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between July 15 and August 6, 1980,the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 40,176 cubic yards from shoals in Bulkhead Channel at a cost of $91,625. Prior year dredging cost $45,688. Condition and operation studies cost $16,205. Contributed funds of $4,500 were expended for diking. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965. (For further details see Annual Report 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1980, were $573,389 for new work and $2,439,711 for maintenance, including $110,078 contributed funds, a total of $3,013,100. 3. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Periodic inspections and evaluation of three locks and dams cost $18,787. Reconnaissance report for justification of continued maintenance cost $1,191. Repairs to lock gate sealing systems cost $531,311. During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations at a cost of $152,255. Preparation of a hydropower reconnaissance study cost $23,921. Engineering and design for pipeline dredging cost $1,870. Construction of security fences had a cost adjustment of -$17. Condition and operation studies cost $36,078. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $206,632. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980, were $13,395,504 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $9,785,050 for maintenance. 4. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 116,662 cubic yards from shoals in Bardens Inlet at a cost of $137,035. Between March 13 and April 8, 1980, the contract dredge Marion removed 73,716 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel at a cost of $291,969. Condition and operation studies cost $16,666. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 5. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from,6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interest must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating, an amount presently estimated at $36,250; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning for the latest modification cost $5,686. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 220,975 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $193,519. Condition and operation studies cost $7,783. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. This is the first report since authorization. 6. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Roanoke Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach and bottom protection for the highway bridge over Oregon Inlet; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $80,100,000 (1980). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related projects areas; (f) provide and maintain necessary stone for bottom protection along the bridge over Oregon Inlet or the cost of such protection works; (g) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilties as well as their maintenance; (h) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (i) and 6-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and will be reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Environmental and archeological studies cost $87,678. Engineering and design cost $378,690. Real estate support cost $1,131. Reimbursement to the State of N. C. for dredging Wanchese Harbor cost $510,051. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 438,000 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $618,624. Repairs of survey and dredging ranges cost $16,800. Between December 16, 1979 and February 23, 1980, the contract dredge Marion removed 228,933 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese at a cost of $433,645. Engineering and design for pipeline dredging cost $2,099. Design of berthing facility for the Schweizer cost $13,517. Oregon Inlet model study cost $95,376. Condition and operation studies cost $50,003. Contributed funds of $54,000 were expended for diking. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 7. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a bar channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, thence an inner channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, a turning basin 35 feet deep, and connecting shallow-draft channels. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. A newly authorized modification provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200 foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin. Project deepening was completed on 2 August 1978. The estimated Federal cost is $41,100,000 (1980) for the jetties. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully compiled with except for construction of the jetties which requires that all lands needed for construction be provided without cost to the United States. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Monitoring of Beaufort Inlet cost $4,457. Monitoring of Bogue Banks and Shackleford Banks cost $33,288. Ocean dumping studies cost $4,053. Maintenance of tide gages cost $13,281. Between March 25 and April 29, 1980, the U. S. sidecasting dredge McFarland removed 215, 548 cubic yards from shoals in bar channel at a cost of $1,091,467. Between February 10 and 21, 1980, the U. S. hopper dredge Comber removed 32,226 cubic yards from shoals in the bar channel at a cost of $218,446. Between December 14 and 21, 1980, the U. S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 46,836 cubic yards from shoals in the bar channel at a cost of $306,506. Repair of survey and dredging ranges by the U. S. snagboat Snell cost $15,527. Condition and operation studies cost $107,843. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the jetties. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1980 was $25,025,999 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $18,524,430 for maintenance, including $105,557 contributed funds. 8. NEUSE RIVER, N. C. Location. Neuse River rises in the north central part of North Carolina near Raleigh, flows generally southeasterly to a point 30 miles below New Bern where it empties into Pamlico Sound. Total length about 350 miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 538 and 1231.) 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 300 feet wide and 12 feet deep at mean low water from a point 10 miles below, up to, and in front of New Bern; thence 120 feet wide and 10 feet deep, from the railroad bridge at New Bern to a point about 3 miles upstream; a channel 4 feet deep at dead low water to Kinston; and, during 9 months of the year, 3 feet deep at dead low water to Smithfield, to be obtained by dredging and snagging. The section included in the project is about 160 miles long. Estimated cost of new work is $488,200 (1964). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878; June 13, 1902; January 21, 1927; and two modifications, one providing for a channel 120 feet wide and 10 feet deep was authorized October 15, 1965 and the other providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the highway bridge across the mouth of Dawson Creek to deep water in the Neuse River was authorized August 4, 1969, both under authority of section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. The 300-foot wide channel in front of New Bern was deauthorized August 5, 1977. Local cooperation. For the section 107modification, local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project; continue to provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including a public landing, with suitable supply facilities, open to all on equal terms; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the creek by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. There are thirty wharves on this stream, of which two are below New Bern, sixteen at or near New Bern, three at Bridgeton, and nine above New Bern. Total frontage is 2,900 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $5,091. Project condition surveys cost $1,840. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1971. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) 9. OCRACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 43 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide, and construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean. Construction of the jetty has been deferred for restudy. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between April 2 and 13, 1980, the U. S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 8,790 cubic yards from shoals in Ocracoke Inlet at a cost of $33,989. Condition and operation studies cost $20,511. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 10. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location* The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N.C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coast Line Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long, in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3, 1879; August 11, 1888; March 2, 1907; July 25, 1912; July 3, 1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 6-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in usable condition above Washington. They have. a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $5,030. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 11. ROANOKE RIVER, N. C. Location. Rises in Blue Ridge Mountains, west of Roanoke, Va., flows southeasterly about 398 miles, and empties into westerly end of Albemarle Sound, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1228 and Post Route Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Albemarle Sound to 1 mile above Plymouth, N. C.; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Hamilton; and thence a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide to Palmyra Landing. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1871; July 3, 1930; and June 20, 1938. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Thirty-two waterfront facilities serve the waterway. Facilities appear adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $4,782. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 12. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2, 1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $5,876. Project condition surveys cost $666. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 13. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between September 5 and 30, 1980, the contract dredge Buxton removed 7,500 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough channel at a cost of $110,489. Condition and operation studies cost $13,721. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 14. STUMPY POINT BAY, N. C. Location. On southeastern side of the mainland, Dare County, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. A channel 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Pamlico Sound to a basin in the harbor at Lake Worth, 75 to 100 feet wide, 550 feet long and 10 feet deep, plus an irregularly shaped area providing access to the public wharf, together with protective breakwaters at entrance to the harbor. Project was authorized by 1948 River and Harbor Act and under Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bulkheads in existing basin provide about 550 linear feet of berthing space, and a wholesale fishhouse provides about 250 feet. Part of the space along the bulkheads is publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, but any appreciable increase will require additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $5,083. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed on September 20, 1967. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) 15. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. The project is complete except for 7-foot modification to Davis, N. C. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. For the uncompleted Davis modification, local interests must: (a) Provide, without cost to the United States and in accordance with the provisions of acquisition contained in PL 91-646, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970, all lands and easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and for construction and maintenance of aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material; and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and maintenance of the project; (c) provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, depths in berthing areas and local access channels commensurate with depths provided in related project areas; (d) provide and maintain, at local expense, an adequate public wharf, with terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of pollutants into the waters of the channel and basin by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (f) assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $1,000,000. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for pipeline dredging cost $11,012. Project condition surveys cost $5,684. 6-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972 except for the modification to Davis, N. C. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 16. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River; a 38-foot-deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. For further details, see Port Series No. 12, part 2, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 22, 1979 and March 5, 1980, the U. S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 1,106,999 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $2,375,578. During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell repaired and replaced survey and dredging ranges at a cost of $121,104. Between August 18 and September 30, 1980, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 781,482 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a cost of $481,078. Between February 4 and April 4, 1980, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 504,147 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $868,655. Installation of a tide gage at Baldhead Shoal channel cost $20,777. An alligator survey of Eagle Island cost $4,546. Long range dredge material study cost $6,358. Engineering and design for dredging of the ocean bar cost $4,228. Underwater archeological surveys cost $907. Ocean dumping bioassay study cost $6,920. Construction of dikes on Eagle Island cost $5,372. Condition and operation cost $152,681. Contributed funds of $395,557 were expended for diking and $80,270 for dredging at the state ports. $14,007 in contributed funds was refunded to the State of North Carolina. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed July 1973. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1980, was $47,292,745 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $32,203,133 was for maintenance, including $1,670,788 contributed funds. 17. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 6-C.) 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 6-D.) 19. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). (See Table 6-E.) Beach Erosion Control 20. FORT FISHER AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is located in New Hanover County about 20 miles south of Wilmington, North Carolina, on the peninsula which separates the lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See U. S. Geological Survey quadrangle sheet for Kure Beach, N. C.) Existing Project. Provides for a rubble revetment approximately 2,000 feet in length along the entire upland bluff fronting the Fort Fisher Historic Site; placement of an artifical beach fill having a total length of 8,000 lineal feet, fronting the historic site and the immediate adjacent shore to the south; and the construction of seven groins. Estimated Federal cost of construction is 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT $27,900,000 (1980). The project was authorized under Section 201 of Public Law 89-298 on November 22, 1976. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable beach fill material borrow areas, as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project; (b) Provide a cash contribution for the shore protection project equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and alterations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law, which contribution is presently estimated at $3,000,000 or 30 percent; (c) Enter into a written agreement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army concerning accomplishment of the above preconstruction requirements and that the State will: (1) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; (2) Provide a cash contribution for periodic beach nourishment equal to the appropriate percentage of the total cost per nourishment operation, which contribution is presently estimated at an average annual amount of $108,000; (3) Maintain the groin and revetment structures after completion of construction in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (4) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the beach for continued public use during the life of the project; (5) Adopt appropriate ordinances or provide other means to insure preservation of the beach fill areas and the dunes; and (6) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $213,399. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is in the preconstruction planning stage. 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 6-F.) Flood Control 22. ADKIN BRANCH, LENOIR COUNTY, N.C. Location. Adkin Branch is a tributary of the Neuse River and is located in central Lenoir County and the Coastal Plain Region of North Carolina. The stream flows in a southeasterly direction for about 6 miles to the Neuse River. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Kinston, N. C.). Existing project. Provides for deepening and widening the channel to a 30-foot bottom width from the mouth of Adkin Branch to Lincoln Street, 0.5 mile; thence 26 feet wide to Seaboard Coast Line RR Crossing, 1.8 miles; thence 21 feet wide to Highland Drive, 0.4 mile; thence 17 feet wide to Queen Street, 0.5 mile; constructing drop structures at stations 52 + 00, 110 + 62, 143 + 08, and 165+ 78; modifying the existing bridges at Caswell Street, Gordon Street and Washington Avenue to 30-foot clear spans; and installing safety fence around structures, 0.3 mile. Total length of project is 3.2 miles. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $1,473,000 (1979). Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, April 1, 1971, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for project construction; hold the United States free from damages, and adjust claims concerning water rights; maintain and operate the project after its completion; control land use in the flood plain to prevent development which would be subject to flood damage; contribute 16.75 percent of construction costs, now estimated at $288,000; and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has been made. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $5,478. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of plans and specs is indefinite. 23. BLACK RIVER, IIARNETT COUNTY, N.C. Location. The river rises near Angier in Harnett County, N. C., and flows in a southerly direction about 25 miles to its confluence with South River. (See Army Map Service quadrangle sheet 5254, Fayetteville, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for 5.5 miles of channel excavation on Black River, beginning at a point 8,000 feet below County Road 1780, with a 35-foot bottom width to the Durham and Southern Railroad. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on February 9, 1968, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 6-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate project after completion. Formal assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project monitoring cost $21,000. Construction cost $52,256. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded 25 September 1978, and was completed in December 1979. 24. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report is to be prepared and submitted in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-G on Dams and Reservoirs). Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, Randleman, and Howards Mill Lakes, which were revised in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. The joint study accomplished by the Departments of the Army and Agriculture was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 24A.B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. (FORMERLY NEW HOPE LAKE, N. C.) Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-footdiameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir will have a gross storage capacity of 778,000 acre-feet, of which 543,000 acre-feet will be for flood control and a conservation pool of 235,000 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $121,000,000 (1980), consisting of $63,514,800 for construction, and $57,485,200 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,400,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $10,000 annually. Assurances that these obligations for water storage would be assumed have been received from the Department of Natural and Economic Resources, State of North Carolina. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate operations cost $131,300. Relocation of N.C. Roads 1715 and 1941 continued at a cost of $74,300. N. C. Roads 751 and 1731 continued at a cost of $169,200. Utility relocations continued at a cost of $111,800. Reservoir clearing was completed at a cost of $113,600. Construction of Crosswinds access area and boat ramp continued at a cost of $358,300. Construction of Crosswinds marina continued at a cost of $437,000. Archeological excavations continued at a cost of $284,300. Status of plans and specs: All road relocations, 100 percent; Chatham County I & II recreation area, 84 percent; Project O&M facilities, 93 percent; and fish and wildlife facilities, 40 percent. Total Federal expenditures were $3,425,461. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance on completed features cost $238,554. Condition at end of fiscal year. U. S. 64; N. C. Roads 1938, 1939, 1906/1907; N. C. Road 1939; N. C. Road 751 at White Oak Creek; N. C. Roads 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 1008(B) and 1743; N. C. Road 1141; N. C. Roads 1900A and 1717; N. C. Roads 1726 and 1110; N. C. Road 1008C; N. C. Road 1008A; cemetery relocations; railroad relocation, reservoir clearing and the dam are complete. 24B. HOWARDS MILL LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 35 miles south of Greensboro, N. C., and about 15 miles southeast of Asheboro, N. C. The damsite is in Moore County about 1 mile below the Randolph County line, and the main body of the reservoir will lie mostly in Randolph County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for the construction of an earth dam 2,765 feet long with a maximum height of 106 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 233,000 acre-feet, consisting of 159,000 acre-feet for flood control, 50,000 acrefeet for conservation, and 24,000 acre-feet for sedimentation. Howards Mill Lake is the third project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control and recreation. The project items may be modified during detailed preconstruction planning. Estimated cost of new work is $33,600,000 (1980), consisting of $18,874,000 for construction and $14,726,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. Howards Millwas reclassified to the deferred category on October 2, 1980 due to doubtful economic justification. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) In accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement; presently estimated at $1,600,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements of recreation and fish and wildlife facilities, the average annual amount presently estimated at $186,000; (b) prevent encroachment on downstream channels to the extent needed to provide effective reservoir operation; and (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $968. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was reclassified to the deferred category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. 24C. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,400 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, water-quality control, and recreation. The project items may be modified during detailed preconstruction planning. Estimated cost of new work is $100,000,000 (1980), consisting of $52,860,000 for construction and $47,140,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (1) In accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act (P.L. 89-72): (a) Administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife and to assure access to such development to all on equal terms; (b) pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $13,600,000; and (c) bear all the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $463,000 annually: (2) In accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, assure payment to the United States of all costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $37,500,000 for construction and $364,000 annually for operation, maintenance, and major replacement; (3) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project; (4) Prevent encroachment on downstream channels to the extent needed to provide effective reservoir operation; and (5) Exercise to the full extent of their legal capability control against removal of stream-flow made available for preservation of downstream fishery habitat. These assurances are subject to the provision that Federal participation in measures required to safeguard the quality of water in Randleman Reservoir shall not be provided as a substitute for the responsibility of local 6-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 interests to provide adequate treatment in accordance with water quality standards established purstiant to the Water Quality Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500). Reasonable assurances that the requirements will be fulfilled have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $830,789. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is in the preconstruction planning stage. 25. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 25,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of sufficient material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the inactive category, February 1975. Approved estimated cost for new work is $18,900,000 (1980). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for construction cost $184,248. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project restoration is scheduled to be initiated in FY 1981. 26. DEEP CREEK, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, N.C. Location. The stream rises in Halifax County and flows southerly to its confluence with Fishing Creek, about 0.5 mile upstream of the Fishing Creek and Tar River confluence, which is about 8.0 miles above Tarboro. All of the project is in Edgecombe County, N. C. (See U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, Parmele and Tarboro, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for channel improvement and dike construction in the Deep Creek basin, consisting of the construction of a dike and drainage appurtenances on the north, west, and south sides of the town of Speed, for a distance of about 7,700 feet, to a maximum height of 9.5 feet, with a 10-foot-top-width; relocation and channel excavation of 2,800 feet of Knight Swamp along the northern dike segment and 1,600 feet of Longs Branch along the southern dike segment, to 20-feet and 15-foot-bottom widths, respectively, and enlarging 2,800 feet of Deep Creek to about an 80-foot-bottom width along the western dike segment, utilizing excavated material for dike fill; channel excavation of an additional 500 feet of both Knight Swamp and Longs Branch upstream of the dike to bottom widths of 10 feet; and snagging and clearing 8.56 miles of Deep Creek from Tar River to 1 mile upstream of SR 1506, with such modifications as in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable, at an estimated Federal cost of $612,000 (1979). The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 18, 1977, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way utility relocations or alterations, and road and bridge construction and alterations necessary for project provision (the acquisition of all lands or interest in lands anceccoersdsaanryc e for the project shall be accomplished in with provisions of P.L. 91-646, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970); hold and save the United States free froms due to the construction works when not caused by the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; maintain and operate the project after completion, without cost to the United States, in accSoercdraentacrey wofit ht her egulations prescribed by the Army; prescribe and enforce 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on channels which would reduce their flood carrying capacity or hinder maintenance and operation and regulate land use in the 100-year improved flood plain within the diked area to prevent any development which would be subject to flood damage in accordance with acceptable flood plain management practices; bear all project costs in excess of $2 million; and notify interests affected, at least annually, that the improvements will provide protection against the 100-year flood within the diked area and about the 5-year flood along the cleared and snagged reach, but complete flood protection is not provided. Formal assurances have been requested. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $17,997. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is underway and construction is scheduled for FY 1981. 27. JOYCE CREEK, CAMDEN COUNTY, N. C. Location. Joyce Creek rises in the northeastern part of Camden County, N. C., and flows generally southward for about 10 miles to Turners Cut near South Mills, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1227 and Army Map Service quadrangle sheet, South Mills, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a channel 40 feet wide, from the confluence with Turners Cut to County Road 1224 at Tar Corner, 3.9 miles; thence a channel, 30 feet wide, to the confluence with Mill Run and Cypress Run, 1.7 miles; thence on Cypress Run, a channel, 10 feet wide, to County Road 1233, 1.8 miles; and on Mill Run, a 10-foot-wide channel from confluence with Joyce Creek to County Road 1232, 2.2 miles; a total of 9.6 miles. Estimated Federal construction cost is $510,000 (1979). The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on March 29, 1967, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachment; provide a cash contribution of 21.5 percent of construction costs, now estimated at $123,000; and accomplish associated drainage works necessary to realize the benefits from the Federal improvement. Camden County is project sponsor based on favorable referendum in 1974. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $8,792. Project reanalysis cost $22,556. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project reanalysis is complete. EIS is underway and plans and specs are to be revised. Construction is scheduled for FY 1981. 28. LEESVILLE, VA., ROANOKE RIVER, SEC. 32, DEMO. PROJECT Location. The project is located on the Roanoke (Staunton) River in southwest Virginia near the Town of Leesville. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Leesville, Va.) Existing project. The project provides for a total of about 2,450 linear feet of streambank protection on three separate sites along a 3-mile segment of the river between Leesville Dam and the town of Leesville. Three methods of erosion control are planned, these are: wooden fence groin, rubber tire mattress and horizontal drains. The project was funded for construction by the Chief of Engineers in February 1978, under Section 32, P.L. 93-251. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate project after completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $13,142. Monitoring cost $7,414. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded September 26, 1980 and is scheduled for completion in 1981. 29. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-G on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1980. 6-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 29A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse RFier about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 92 feet above streambed. The dam will have a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100-feet wide, will be located in the east abutment. The reservoir will have a gross storage capacity of 397,000 acre-feet, of which 243,000 acre-feet will be for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 71,000 acre-feet for water-quality control, and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Project items may be modified in detailed planning. Estimated cost of new work is $143,000,000 consisting of $61,312,000 for construction and $81,688,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $11,800,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $75,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $19,200,000, and, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,028,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non- Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition continued at a cost of $6,297,200. Relocation of N. C. Route 98 was completed at a cost of $1,322,600. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1811, 1800 and 1637 was continued at a cost of $873,200. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1801/1902 and 1901 was continued at a cost of $1,899,500. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1901, 1726 and 1721 was initiated at a cost of $77,200. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1909/1910 was completed at a cost of $61,500. Relocation of N. C. Roads 2002 and 1005 was continued at a cost of $562,800. Relocation of N. C. Roads 1901/1906 was continued at a cost of $345,800. Relocation of N. C. Road 1907 was continued at a cost of $629,300. Cemetery and utility relocations cost $297,600. Reservoir clearing was completed at a cost of $2,213,500. Dam construction was continued at a cost of $3,502,800. Status of plans and specs: All road relocations, 100 percent; Southern Railway, 100 percent; group II clearing, 100 percent; spillway bridge, 100 percent; Holly Point Beach area, 5 percent; Rolling View Marina, 40 percent; Dr. B. W. Wells Beach area, 5 percent; and Beaverdam Beach area, 5 percent. Total Federal expenditures were $19,557,763. Condition at end of fiscal year. N. C. Route 98; N. C. Route 50; SR 1909/1910; SR 2010/2002; initial clearing and main operations area are complete. SR 1811, 1800 and 1637; SR 1801/1902 and 1901; SR 1901, 1726 and 1721; SR 2002/1005; SR 1901/1906; SR 1907; Southern railway relocation; complete clearing and the dam are underway. 30. SCUPPERNONG RIVER, N.C. Location. The stream rises in the east-central portion of Washington County, N. C., flows east into Tyrrell County, and thence north into Albemarle Sound, a total distance of about 22 miles. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Creswell, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a 7 0-foot-bottom.width channel, with depths ranging from 9 feet to 12 feet, along Scuppernong River from Spruills Bridge to the confluence with Mauls Creek, a distance of 2.0 miles, and excavating a 4 5-foot-bottom.width channel, 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT with depths ranging from 6 feet to 8 feet, along Mauls Creek from Scuppernong River to County Road 1163, a distance of 1.8 miles. Total project length is 3.8 miles. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $411,000 (1979). Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1966 (with modification adding Mauls Creek approved June 16, 1967), under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project after completion; contribute, in cash, 19.4 percent of construction costs, currently estimated at $82,000; and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has not been made. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project reanalysis cost $5,206. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are underway with completion scheduled in 1981. 31. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980 while Reddies River remains under Charleston District. (See Table 6-G on Dams and Reservoirs.) 31A.W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acrefeet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost (1979) is $9,590,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance cost $642,344. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in February 1963. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1980: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; and Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; and Lick Run, 6-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Roanoke, Va. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $19,245. Total cost to September 30, 1980, was $172,804, charged to operations. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 6-H.) 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization. (See Table 6-I.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for normal operations were $46,583. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Tables 6-G for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-G on Dams and Reservoirs.) 35A.JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost (1980) is $67,220,000 for construction and $24,521,000 for land and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $91,741,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of four comfort stations and one utility building at Northbend Buffalo Public Use Area, Tailrace Area and Rudds Creek was completed at a cost of $49,040. Design was continued at various sites at a cost of $5,140. Costsharing development at various sites cost $38,551. Total cost for new work was $92,731. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance of the project was performed at a cost of $2,861,728. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 35B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. On Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate (1980) is $13,515,000 for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $14,672,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design was continued at various sites at a cost of $5,616. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance of the project was performed at a cost of $836,790. 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 36. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS John H1. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1980 at 11.3 feet above rule curve or at elevation 310.77 feet, mean sea level. Heavy rainfall in September 1979 at the beginning of this fiscal year created high inflows into Kerr Reservoir. Kerr Reservoir finally peaked at the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 314.15 on October 7, 1979, or about 15.1 feet above rule curve. The reservoir was drawn down to elevation 299.63 on November 10, 1979 or about 2.8 feet above rule curve. Then, rainfall over a period of six days caused a rise to elevation 302.38 on November 18, 1980 or about 6.1 feet above rule curve. Then, with minor fluctuations in elevation, the reservoir was pulled down to elevation 295.44 on January 5, 1980 or near rule curve. Rainfall over a period of days then caused a gradual rise in the reservoir level to elevation 303.24 on January 25, 1980 or 7.7 feet above rule curve. The reservoir surface was pulled down steadily to elevation 295.60 on February 14, 1980 or 0.1 feet above rule curve. Kerr Reservoir then fluctuated near rule curve until rainfall caused a rise to elevation 305.05 on March 27, 1980 or 4.8 feet above rule curve. After being pulled down to elevation 302.86 on April 8, 1980 or 1.3 feet above rule curve, large inflows caused by two separate rainfalls caused Kerr Reservoir to rise to elevation 308.32 on April 19, 1980 or 6.3 feet above rule curve. The reservoir was pulled down to rule curve elevation 302.0 on May 10, 1980. Kerr Reservoir then had minor fluctuations above and below the rule curve until early August 1980 when the combination of low rainfall and high temperatures, resulting in low streamflows, caused the reservoir level to drop below rule curve for the remainder of the fiscal year. The minimum elevation of the fiscal year of 295.38 on September 24, 1980 or 4.1 feet below rule curve occurred during this dry period. Kerr Reservoir was at elevation 295.61 on September 30, 1980 or 3.9 feet below rule curve. Philpott Lake began the Fiscal year at 4.9 feet above rule curve or at elevation 976.41 feet, mean sea level. The lake rose slightly at the beginning of the Fiscal year to elevation 976.90 on October 2, 1979 and then was gradually drawn down from October through December to elevation 971.55 on December 21, 1979 with additional rainfall causing only minor rises in lake levels. The lake remained near rule curve elevation through the middle of March with only one slight rise to elevation 973.56 on January 21, 1980. Periods of heavy rainfall caused Philpott to rise to elevation 975.48 on March 22, 1980 and then to elevation 979.88 on April 15, 1980 which was the maximum elevation for the Fiscal year. The lake was steadily drawn down to elevation 975.24 by April 19, 1980 and, with above normal precipitation, fluctuated about 0.5 foot above to one foot below elevation 975 until June 11, 1980 when the lake neared rule curve elevation 973.5. Philpott Lake remained near rule curve through July and, with below normal precipitation in August and September, dropped gradually below rule curve to the minimum elevation for the year of 970.40 on September 26, 1980 or about 1.5 feet below rule curve. Philpott Lake was at elevation 970.48 on September 30, 1980 or 1.6 feet above rule curve. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located on the Yadkin River in the Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1980 at elevation 1,030.9 feet, mean sea level. The reservoir level remained at or near the normal pool elevation of 1,030.0 until early November. Substantial rainfall produced a rise in the reservoir level to elevation 1,035.1 on November 3, 1979. By November 6, 1979 the reservoir level had returned to near elevation 1,030.0. Reservoir levels continued near the normal pool elevation until mid- March 1980 with the exception of an occasional fluctuation slightly above the normal pool. Rainfall in mid-March produced a double peak in the reservoir level with the latter peak resulting in the higher elevation of 1,034.8 feet, mean sea level, on March 21, 1980. Storm events producing heavy rainfall during April 6-8, and 11-14, 1980, resulted in a peak elevation of 1,045.75 feet (15.75 above normal) on April 15, 1980, the maximum level for Fiscal Year 1980. The reservoir level gradually returned to near elevation 1,030.0 by April 21, 1980 and with the exception of an occasional rise it remained near this level until mid- August. Below normal rainfall conditions produced a gradual decline in the reservoir level to elevation 1,027.35 feet, mean sea level on September 25, 1980, the minimum reservoir level for Fiscal Year 1980. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir ended the Fiscal Year at elevation 1,027.8 feet mean sea level on September 30, 1980. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake project, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, was operated during the Fiscal year primarily as a "dry reservoir," pending dam inspection and toe drain modifications. Discharge gates were fully open all year except for several days when dam inspections were being made. Due to the limited capacity of the discharge facilities, inflow exceeded outflow on numerous occasions 6-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 causing lake levels to fluctuate considerably. During normal or low inflow periods, lake levels remained near 159-165 feet, mean sea level. Peak elevation for the Fiscal year occurred' on November 13, 1979 at 195.0 feet. Year-end elevation was 159.0 feet. In the Roanoke River Basin below Kerr Dam, a minimum stage of 13 feet was provided at Weldon, N. C., during the striped bass spawning season; All inflows to Kerr reservoir were controlled without having to spill water over the spillway or through the sluices. Gross generation amounts for the year at Kerr and Philpott projects, respectively, were 593,548,800 kilowatthours and 40,044,150 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $130,993 for John H. Kerr project, $44,228 for Philpott, $64,228 for W. Kerr Scott and $25,996 for B. Everett Jordan. Flood damages prevented by Kerr and Philpott projects amounted to $0.6 million and 1.0 million, respectively. Cumulative flood damages prevented to date by Kerr is $58 million and $17 million by Philpott. Flood damages prevented by W. Kerr Scott Dam in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin amounted to $2.0 million. Flood damages prevented by B. E. Jordan project are undetermined. General Investigations 37. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $1,341,449, of which $19,510 was for navigation studies, $447,597 was for flood control studies, $245,098 was for beach erosion studies, $2,532 for project deauthorization review, $6,000 for soil conservation service, $8,879 for water quality management, $29,264 for coastal zone management, $7,658 for technical assistance for shore and streambank erosion, $13,400 for hydrologic studies, $55,697 for cooperation with states, and $505,814 for dam inspection and inventory. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non-Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $231,509. Total costs to September 30, 1980 were $2,553,705. (See Table 6-J for Completed Flood Plain Studies.) 6-20 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) 2. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Contributed Funds) 3. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 4. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 5. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. 6. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Contributed Funds) 7. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. (Contributed Funds) 8. Neuse River, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. 10. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 175,000 229,398 2,869,099 2,607,894 105,724 100,677 2,000 2,000 4,015,000 1,773,692 3,583,715 4,192,222 3,080,000 4,852,500 3,977,694 4,059,147 390,260 312,374 395.307 269,441 -- - 534,800 647,751 535,910 617,079 335,589 366,905 3,398,7752 3,874,0242 3,380,400 3,468,592 110,585 153,518 4,500 4,500 1,153,460 972,028 102,269 93,433 112,997 445,034 102,269 93,322 110,922 445,670 114,102 114,102 55,000 65,555 1,218,800 1,101,274 1,270,400 191,282 940,234 940,234 174,216 174,216 220,000 193,975 941,547 1,036,264 2,235,000 4,409,042 1,371,353 1,352,955 9,778 9,778 103,620 103,620 285,000 284,885 871,910 831.929 1,587 18,689 105,200 84,466 1,714 1.714 19,200 22,859 109,502 19,200 22,859 109,502 8,774 8,774 93,5458 84,231'9 201,302 201,302 1,387,000 977,550 1,180,672 1,230,064 54,000 54,000 -4,411 1,777,561 1,794,868 6,931 6,931 54,832 54,500 5,030 5,030 6-21 22,773.416' 22.610,297' 43,030,5873 43,001,4033 598,389' 598,389' 2,342,487 s 2,342,487 s 110,078 110,078 3,759,5736 3,759,5738 9,976,802' 9,793,228' 88,328 88,328 1,759,336 1,757,786 143,294 133,980 975,189 975,189 3,576,945 '0 3,141,235' 12.277,062 12,261.129 54,000 54,000 6,546,053" 6,546,053" 18,725,255"2 18,703,430" 105,557 105,557 465,223 465,223 324,928 324,928 12,000 ,3 12,000' 3 346,240 346,240 815,044 814,712 674,651 674,651 768,978 768,978 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section" Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 11. Roanoke River, N.C. Navigation 12. Rollinson Channel N. C. 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Contributed Funds) 14. Stumpy Point Bay, N. C. (Contributed Funds) 15. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 22. Adkin Branch, N. C. 23. Black River, N. C. 24A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24B. Howards Mill Lake, N. C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib: Cost: New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 37,987 37,987 254,956 260,655 - 34,506 - 34,506 9,572 1,971 - 29,882 37,483 300,116 32,645 310,940 300,376 32,645 310,940 3,536 3,536 - 98,000 306 570,000 574,850 61,500 46,482 1,970,874 1,719,037 31,000 610,308 71,500 36,943 - - 21,601 351,391 21,601 351,391 - 124,000 - 124,000 81 4,874 27,643 - 29 1,587 30 1,299,939 1,34 1,526,809 1,33 - 14 94,416' 13 37,901 72,260 33,000 298,000 22,451 39,898 6,238,500 8,700,000 4,956,275 8,104,548 43 I- - 1,766 - 1,766 4,782 4,782 6,542 6,542 144,300 124,210 75,000 5,083 5,083 16,696 16,696 0,000 -963 5,645 - 7,000 4,016,800 3,031 4,048,204 3,720 514,347 7,713" 489,834" - 260,000 - 213,399 0,000 9,000 2,777 5,478 51,000 220,255 5,925,000 8,507,742 - 284,800 - 251,986 25,000 65,778 12,725 441 - 23,000 73,256 3,548,000 3,425,461 214,028 238,554 968 6-22 404,584 404,584 547,291 547,291 589,105 589,105 744,459 744,459 184,284 184,284 1,751,692 1,731,602 75,000 268,381 268,381 611,201 611,201 124,000 124,000 502,567 502,567 1,598,622 1,598,622 2.452 2,452 18,715,226" 18,715,226" 31,144,470 ' 31,134,959' 1,709,567 1,670,788 260,000 213,399 228,477 216,216 481,290 466,951 84,760,700 83,336,592 1,721,389 1,721,389 498,828 490.540 698,400 698,400 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 24C. Randleman Lake, N. C. 25. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26. Deep Creek, N. C. 27. Joyce Creek, N. C. 28. Leesville, Va. - Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo Project 29A. Falls Lake, N. C. 30. Scuppernong River, N.C. 31A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C. 35A. Roanoke River Basin, Va., and N. C., John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir 35B. Roanoke River Basin, Va., and N. C., Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 173,000 614,000 540,000 113,679 548,336 549,830 - - -1,586 9,641 95 - 120,355" 18,200 107,850 '0 30,348 9,000 21,4992 13,088 27,80922 - 120,000 - 13,480 11,151,000 17,000,000 11,450,424 15,050,259 131,579 569,600 552,611 295,000 32,506 2,449,400 2,472,605 20,000 78,755 702,100 702,382 805 651,400 641,878 154,000 110,545 2,992,407 2,645,119 42,000 16,337 871,000 828,362 13,000 21 12,977" 23,0003 19,7841 124,355 9,305 18,100,000 19,009,130 10,000 26 10,000 6 85 733,900 692,071 361,000 366,931 2,779,254 3,012,183 71,000 70,359 747,700 760,478 1. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 2. Includes $37,763 for preauthorization cost. 3. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 4. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 5. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 6. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 7. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 8. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, - $2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000. 9. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686. 10. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 11. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 12. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 13. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N. C. 14. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 15. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 16. Includes $92,374 refund to local interests. 17. Includes $8,000 refund to local interests. 18. Includes $14,007 refund to local interests. 19. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 69, $19,300; FY 71, $6,900; FY 72, $5,000; FY 74, $11,655; FY 75, $12,000; FY 76, $4,000; FY 77, $22,836; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 77, $38,664. 20. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 70, $17,970; FY 71, $4,806; FY 72, $7,162; FY 73, $1,263; FY 74, $1,464; FY 75, $22,190; FY 76, $2,773; FY 77, $24,063; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 77, $26,159. 21. Includes $309 preauthorization cost. 22. Includes $1,492 preauthorization cost. 23. Includes $11,474 preauthorization cost. 24. Includes $22,556 preauthorization cost. 25. Includes $7,414 monitoring cost. 26. Preauthorization cost. 27. Includes $5,206 preauthorization cost. 6-23 800,000 830,789 275,000 184,248 19,000 17,997 36,000"4 31,348 24 113,400 ' 20,556 " 24,033,000 19,557,763 10,000" 5,20627 - 643,575 642,344 - 18,000 92,731 3,003,740 2,861,728 - 50,000 5,616 826,616 836,790 3,238,588 3,109,056 1,731,772 1,641,020 790,988 779,672 170,555 169,172 191,149 182,409 357,755 43,341 89,493,996 83,562,296 93,905 89,111 8,840,826 8,840,826 6,350,186 6,260,586 89,186,427 88,822,303 34,319,166 33,961,464 14,210,384 14,196,283 10,671,735 10,634,739 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 Nov. 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 1 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River-Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River Section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins. A 12-foot channel in New River. 5 Vicinity of Fairfield, drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.6 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek. 7 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.1 Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.1 H. D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report. July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 6-24 TABLE 6-B (Continued) WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 2 of text) March 3, 1881 A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. March 2, 1907 Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and Specified in act. shore protection. March 3, 1925 Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess. 1 July 3, 1930 Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess. 1 Channel, and in front of Beaufort. March 2, 1945 Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 all to 12 feet deep. May 17, 1950 Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 1 Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. May 21, 1965 Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants Detailed Project Report sec. 107 and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in April 1965 July 14, 1960 front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 13 of text) July 3, 1930 Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Rivers and Harbors Committee Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training Doc. No. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. wall at entrance. Oct. 17, 1940 Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Feb. 7, 1967 Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 Detailed Project Report sec. 107 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot July 9, 1965 July 14, 1960 Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River. 5. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 6. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 7. A 6- by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12 by 90-foot project classified as inactive. 6-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 17 of Text) Project Date Survey Conducted Knobb's Creek, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Smiths Creek (Pamlico County), N. C. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C. September 1979 September 1980 June 1980 January 1980 6-26 TABLE 6-C . _,. _ _ __ WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Controls 1 (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 - Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) 1978 125,534 - Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. 1976 29,1014 66,630 Avon Harbor, N. C.1 1975 74,096 89,214 Bay River, N. C.1 1950 44,382 49,627 Belhaven Harbor, N. C.1 1974 126,687 39,100 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thproughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.1 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 - - Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 1941 64,395 32,247 Drum Inlet, N. C.1 1979 166,119 1,048,666 Edenton Harbor, N. C.1 1960 73,750 47,642 Far Creek, N. C.1 1978 164,642 541,897 Fishing Creek, N. C.1 1922 22,715 8,633 Harbor of Refuge, N. C. 1934 1,363,799 32,854 Knobb's Creek, N. C.1, 2 19613 80,500 47,664 Mackay Creek, N. C.1 19383 13,375 6,273 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.1 1950 10,688 61,139 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.1 19103 13,750 414 Scuppernong River, N. C.1 1950 81,164 80,682 Shallotte River, N. C. 1976 18,181 133,832 Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N. C.1 1975 113,273 36,048 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.1 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.1 1936 12,452 23,686 Swift Creek, N. C.1 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.1, 5 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,221 Waterway Connecting Swapquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C.' 1978 110,799 182,450 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,887,189 Wright's Creek, N. C.1 1978 68,325 166,233 1. Completed. 4. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin 5. 8-foot modification deauthorized August5,1977 under River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 6-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-E (See Section 19 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Belhaven Harbor, N. C. 6,964 Calico Creek, N. C. 35,969 Carolina Beach Inlet, N. C. 6,614 Lockwoods Folly and Shallotte River Inlets 5,686 Wrights Creek, N. C. 1 1,950 1. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107 were initiated under the District Engineer's Authority. TABLE 6-F OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report Project See Annual Operation and Report for Construction Maintenance Fort Macon State Park, N. C. 1973 620,000 6-28 TABLE 6-G DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construc Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages 1 24. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan 2 Moncure, N.C. Haw 4.3 112 E 778,000 - 63,514,800 57,485,200 121,000,000 River Basin, Howards Mill 2 Carthage, N.C. Deep 55.0 106 E 233,000 - 18,874,000 14,726,000 33,600,000 N.C. Randleman 2 Randleman, N.C. Deep 85.0 110 E 108,000 - 52,860,000 47,140,000 100,000,000 i Small reservoirs - Various - 20 to 70 + E 923,000 - - - 38,454,000 29. Neuse River Falls 2 Falls, N.C. Neuse - 92 E 397,000 - 61,312,000 81,688,000 143,000,000 1 Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Wilson Mills, N.C. Neuse - 81 CGE 201,000 - - - 13,000,000 Beulahtown Kenly, N.C. Little - 50 E 81,000 - - - 9.300,000 Bakers Mills Princeton, N.C. Little - 53 E 36,000 - - - 6,600,000 Little Buffalo Kenly, N.C. Little Buffalo Creek - 51 E 13,000 - - - 1,100,000 Buckhorn Wilson, N.C. Contentnea Creek - 63 E 119,000 - - - 17,300,000 Wiggins Mill Wilson, N.C. Contentnea Creek - 42 E 35,000 - - - 6,700,000 Stantonsburg Stantonsburg, N.C. Tisnot Swamp - 36 E 48,000 - - - 5,100,000 Great Swamp Fremont, N.C. Great Swamp - 39 E 18,000 - - - 1,800,000 Black Creek Wilson, N.C. Black Creek * - 33 E 17,000 - - - 1,500,000 Aycock Swamp Fremont, N.C. Aycock Swamp - 37 E 7,000 - - - 550,000 Hillsboro Durham, N.C. Eno - 136 E 123,000 - - - 8.100,000 Orange Durham, N.C. Little - 107 E 57,000 - - - 3,500,000 31. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Yadkin-Pee Dee 404.0 148 E 153,000 - 5,335,169 3,360,657 8,695,826 Basin, N.C.&S.C. 35. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Boydton, Va. Roanoke 178.7 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,220,000 24.521,000 91,741,000 ' Basin, Va. and N.C. 2 N.C. Philpott, Va. 2 Bassett, Va. Roanoke 336.2 220 CG 1 1 249,800 14,000 13,515,000 1,157,000 14,672,000 Gaston, Va. and N.C. 6 Roanoke Rapids. N.C. Roanoke 144.9 108 CG.E 432,000 54,000 27,000,000 3,500,000 30,500,000 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke 137.0 75 CG 59,300 83,000 31.300,000 800,000 32,100,000 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Altavista, Va. Roanoke 314.2 244 CG 825,000 41,000 28,000,000 3,800,000 31.800.000 Leesville, Va. 9 Altavista, Va. Roanoke 293.7 95 CG.E 76,900 20,000 9,100,000 1,000,000 10,100,000 Taber, Va. Altavista, Va. Roanoke 275.0 54 CG 34,000 12,000 8,000,000 1,700,000 9,700,000 Melrose, Va. Brookneal, Va. Roanoke 262.9 110 CG.E 120,000 43,000 17,700,000 6,000,000 23,700,000th Randolph, Va. Chase City, Va. Roanoke 227.8 147 CGE 350,000 48,000 22,100,000 4,700,000 26,800,000 Stuart, Va. and N.C. Spray, N.C. Roanoke 297.2 138 E 163,000 15,000 9,000,000 1,100,000 10,100,000 Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Danville, Va. Roanoke 265.9 126 CG.E 248,000 80,000 27.800.000 6,400.000 36,000,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,400,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 4. Includes $11,800,000 presently allocated to water supply and $192200,000 recreation and fish and wildlife. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $37,500,000 presently allocated to water supply and $13,600,000 allocated to recreation. c, Key E - Earth CG - Concrete Gravity U F 0 Fc z a TABLE 6-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.1 Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina- South Carolina State Line) Conetoe Creek, N. C.1 Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 Core Creek, N. C.1 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.1 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.1 Filberts Creek, N. C.1 Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.1, 10 Gardners Creek, N. C.1 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. 1 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C. Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.1, 10 New River, N. C.1 New River, Onslow County, N. C.1 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.1 Ocracoke Island, N. C. Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.1 Pungo Creek, N. C.1 Pungo River, N. C.1, 2 Simmons Bay, N. C.10 South Creek, N. C.1 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.1 Tar River, N. C. Tar River, N. C.1 Tar River and tributaries, N. C.1 Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C.1 Trent River, N. C.1 Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N. C. & S. ('. 1. 1 ) White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C. 1 Wrightsville Beach, N. C. 1972 1976 1960 1939-1943 and 1958 1965 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1974 1974 1978 1979 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1975 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1963 1971 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1974 1953 1961 1963 / 1973 283,846 572,1145 29,867 50,889 236,2239 223,413 138,1176 37,7773 339,197 54,5978 50,430 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 51,896 580,977 95,873 129,592 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6023 186,435 194,3677 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 139,339 64,769 67,821 214,286 1,061,3024 - - - 235,787 61,473 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 6-30 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 34 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Ararat River, Surry County, N. C. 4,788 Cashie River, N. C. 24,987 Columbia, Tyrrell County, N.C. 4,766' Jack's Creek, N. C. 230 Pinetops, Town Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C. 1,835 Roanoke Island, N. C.2 542 South River, N. C.1 8,000 Swift Creek, N. C. 196 Shoreline Erosion Control- Sec. 542 150,698 1. Accomplished pursuant to Section 208. 2. Accomplished pursuant to Section 54. FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL PERIOD TABLE 6-J (See Section 38 of Text) Requesting Date Federal Location Agency Completed Cost None 6-31 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). Due to a recent realignment, work underway in western-central North Carolina, formerly in our district, will be carried through its current phase before being turned over to Wilmington. The district embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackay and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Beach Erosion Control 1. Aquatic Plant Control, S.C ............................... 7-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla ........................... 7-2 3. Charleston Harbor, S.C ......... . 7-3 4. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C .................... 7-3 5. Folly River, S.C. ............... 7-4 6. Georgetown Harbor, S.C.......... 7-4 7. Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C.........................7-5 8. Lynches River & Clark Creek, S.C ...................... Murrells Inlet, S.C............... Port Royal Harbor, S.C............. Shipyard River, S.C .............. Town Creek, S.C................... 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys....... 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............. 7-6 7-6 7-6 7-7 7-7 ..........7-7 ......... 7-7 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .............. 7-7 16. Hunting Island Beach, S.C ......... 7-8 17. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 7-8 Flood Control 18. Leith Creek, S.C ................. 7-8 19. Scotts Creek, S.C ................ 7-8 20. Reddies River Lake, N.C ........... 7-9 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............. 7-9 22. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................... 7-9 23. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............. 7-9 General Investigations 24. 25. Surveys..........................7-10 Collection and Study of Basic Data ....................... 7-10 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 7-1 Navigation Page Page 9. 10. 11. 12. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, S.C. Location. The project areas include navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in the Charleston District. Existing projects. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths and navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and Stage agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers. The act provides that research and planning cost shall be borne fully by the United States. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and contribute 30 percent of the cost of field operations. Requirements are being met in South Carolina. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New Work: A reconnaissance survey of noxious aquatic plants in South Carolina was made during the period. Results of the survey indicated that Brazilian elodea and water primrose are the worst aquatic plant problems in the State public waters. Brazilian elodea alone has infested an estimated 26,000 acres of Lake Marion. Through the use of biological control agents (stem borers and flea beetles) alligator weed growths have been reduced to a non-problem status in most navigable waters. Alligator weed growths, however, still obstruct many river oxbows, back waters and coves. A final General Design Memorandum for Aquatic Plant Management in South Carolina has been prepared. The proposed program provides for a comprehensive plan to manage noxious aquatic plants within the state waters of South Carolina including the Santee-Cooper Lakes. Target species include Brazilian elodea, alligator weed and water primrose. Although there are no herbicides certified for use on alligator weed, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act as amended now permits the use of any herbicide on alligator weed provided that it be. applied according to instructions on the label. A final Environmental Impact Statement for the program has been completed. Costs incurred were $49,174 for planning and reconnaissance survey. Condition at end of fiscal yvear. A final General Design memorandum for noxious aquatic plant management was completed which outlines control procedures. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts at Little River near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534 and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal yiear. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed by the pipeline dredges Arlington and Clarendon during October 1979 - February 1980, removing 1,449,452 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,672,219. Costs of $18,825 were incurred for contract dike management. Costs of Riverine Utility Craft Operation were $11,918. Mosquite abatement control contract costs were $96,928. Clearing and snagging by the U. S. maintenance vessel Snell was performed at a cost 7-2 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT of $85,400. Condition surveys, shoaling studies, reestablishment of rights-of-way, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $550,373. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,898 for new work and $30,209,553 for maintenance, for a total of $37,555,451. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, S. C., and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1808 of Annual Report 1915; page 579 of Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 35 feet deep with varying widths from the Atlantic Ocean to the mouth of Goose Creek, a total of 26.3 miles, together with a 35-foot depth by 500-foot width channel via Town Creek. Also, a 10-foot depth by I 10-foot width channel on the Mount Pleasant side of the harbor into Shem Creek to U. S. Highway 17 bridge, and a 30-foot anchorage basin in the lower harbor between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. A 40-foot channel estimated to cost $6,060,000 (1960) was authorized to be executed when found necessary in the interests of national defense from the 40-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean to U. S. Naval Base. For further details see page 425 of Annual Report for 1962. The Phase I Design Memorandum stage of Advance Engineering and Design for deepening of the 35- foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, and deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet have been authorized. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with their responsibility to date but are experiencing difficulty in securing disposal areas for dredged material, for continued future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about I mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River waterfront. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately 10 miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U. S. Navy Department has modern facilities for construction and maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U. S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during .fiscal 'ear. New Work: Phase I AE&D for deepening and modifying channels was initiated in October 1977. Expenditures were $17. Maintenance: The pipeline dredges Clinton and Florida performed maintenance dredging under contracts during October 1979 - March 1980, removing 3,922,822 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,777,199. The Manhattan and Sugar island performed dredging in the entrance channel at a cost of $2,835,410. Costs of $195,000 were incurred for the Essa vons. Contract dike management cost $283,101. Government furnished materials for dike management cost $4,017. Funds of $26,286 were spent for Riverine Utility Craft operation. Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $552,586. Condition at end of fiscal Y'ear. Jetties protecting the entrance channel across the bar were completed in 1895. The existing project was completed in October, 1962 except for the national defense portion. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $3,328.349 for new work and $63,537,595 for maintenance, a total of $66,865,944. 4. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, S. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) 7-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor is the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, causing density currents which trap sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem is to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act provides that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydro Plant be reduced to a weekly average of 3,000 cubic feet per second. This flow will not establish a density current in the harbor. The excess water then impounded in Lake Moultrie will be directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility will be constructed on the new canal where the ground elevations decrease to become swampland adjacent to the Santee River. This plant will replace those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 12,600 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the proposed 3,000 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, will approximate the existing average Pinopolis flow. The three generators at the new plant will be rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the plan will also provide for construction of a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. Estimated cost of the project (1979) $139,000,000, all Federal. (See table at end chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. is of Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Funds were received for initiation of construction during FY 75. Costs during FY 80 were $793,747 for lands and damages, $648,048 for railroad relocations; $12,287,782 for power plant, $461,519 for turbines, $848,850 for generators, $43,263 for governors, $199,999 for transformers, $39,425 for oil circuit breakers, $334,949 for main control switchboards, $61,851 for 480KV switchgear, $61,817 for 15KV switchgear, $3,900 for disconnect switches and busswork, $539,086 for powerhouse crane, $302,107 for intake and draft tube crane, $3, i164,999 for entrance channel, $441,010 for intake canal, $9,387,526 for tailrace 'canal, $4,547 for relocation of telephone cable, $408,384 for cultural resources preservation, $27,126 for buildings, grounds and utilities, and $11,788 for permanent operating equipment. Engineering and design costs were $1,147,123; supervision and administration costs were $1,163,932. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed at the end of FY 74. The General Design Memorandum was completed in January 1972 and work is proceeding on schedule on other phases of the project. Construction was initiated March 1977. The project is 40% complete. 5. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. Location. Folly River Project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides: an entrance channel, 11 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River 1 mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending 3 miles downstream from U.S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek 9 feet deep by 80 feet wide extending 3 miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with Folly River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Total expenditures amounted to $54,685; costs of $48,573 were incurred for the Currituck, and engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $6,112. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was physically completed in FY 1979. 6. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. 7-4 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT Existing project. The authorizations provide for channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17.bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Biannual dredging has been authorized, but local interests have not been able to provide the required disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosoted-timber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Disposal area dike management was performed by contracts at a cost of $30,013. Government furnished materials for dike management cost $1,346. The pipeline dredges Arlington and Clarendon performed maintenance dredging in the Sampit River and Winyah Bay by contract October 1979 -January 1980, removing 2,461,202 cubic yards of material with FY 80 costs of $1,351,538. Maintenance dredging in the entrance channel was performed by hopper dredge Sugar Island during January - April 1980 removing 321,524 cubic yards at a cost of $1,253,677. Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $214,976. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903-04. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $27,324,994 for maintenance, a total of $31,940,897. 7. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shalotte, N.C., to Georgetown, S.C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a 10 by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel will be stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,200 feet and 3,000 feet long on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Estimated costs of the project (1979) are $14,700,000 Federal cost and $2,470,000 non- Federal cost ($1,320,000 contributed funds and $1,150,000 for lands). (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. In a letter dated 28 December 1976, the Horry County (South Carolina) Planning and Promotion Commission gave assurances of cooperation. Since certain lands to be furnished by non-Federal interests lie in North Carolina, a letter dated 18 April 1977 has been supplied by the Brunswick County (North Carolina) Commissioners, agreeing to provide to the United States the necessary project lands lying in North Carolina. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Expenditures amounted to $160,367 for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Maintenance: Sidecasting dredge Merritt performed maintenance dredging March-April 1980 removing 17,753 dubic yards of material at a cost of $43,289. Contract dredging was performed by the pipeline dredge Richmond during October - November 1979 resulting in the removal of 86,535 cubic yards of material for $232,242. Engineering and design, surveys, and administration costs were $23,519. Condition at end of fiscal y'ear. The contract plans and specifications have been completed. Lands are in the process of being acquired. Emergency dredging operations are being performed annually until the project is constructed. 7-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 8. LYNCHES RIVER AND CLARK CREEK, S.C. Location. Lynches River is a tributary of the Great Pee Dee River, into which it flows at a point about 65 miles above the mouth of the Great Pee Dee River. Shortly above this point, a branch of Lynches River, known as Clark Creek, leaves it and flowing about 7 miles, empties into the Great Pee Dee River about 10-1/2 miles below the mouth of Lynches River. Existing project. The project provides for a clear 4-foot navigation channel through Clark Creek, the principal mouth of Lynches River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Funds of $18,571 were spent on surveys and supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. Snagging operations were carried on from 1888 to 1892 and from 1907 to 1910. Channel is currently clogged with debris and silt. 9. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a 10 by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel will be stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Estimated cost of the project (1979) is $12,700,000 Federal cost and $2,380,000 non- Federal cost ($1,380,000 contributed funds and $1,000,000 for lands). (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A letter of intent to provide cooperation dated 4 November 1975 has been received from the Georgetown County Board of Commissioners. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Expenditures for jetties and channels contract were $2,976,295, $41,462 for monitoring system contract, $248,489 for engineering and design and $172,596 for supervision and administration. Maintenance: Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $107. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Advance engineering and design studies are compelte. The maximum benefits are achieved with a 10-foot entrance channel and an 8-foot inner channel. The 2-foot depth difference between the authorized depth and the construction depth has been reclassified as "inactive." The entrance channel and the jetties have been shortened to the 10-foot ocean contour rather than the 12-foot contour. The first construction contract was awarded 2 September 1977. The recreational facilities (comfort station and parking lot) contract was awarded 25 July 1980. The project is 90% complete.. 10. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of entrance to Savannah River, Georgia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. The South Carolina State Ports Authority constructed a marginal concrete wharf and operates modern terminal facilities which are considered adequate for present commerce of the port. 7-6 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The hopper dredge McFarland performed maintenance dredging in the entrance channel during March 1980 removing 105,422 cubic yards of material for $574,847. Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $19,483. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. 11. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U.S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about 3 miles and empties into Cooper River about three-fourths mile above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a'i channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to Macalloy Inc.'s plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Gulf Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal faicilities. In the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Gulf Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is Macalloy Inc.'s wharf for handling ores. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal y'ear. Maintenance: Pipeline dredge Cherokee performed dredging November and December 1979 removing 474,756 cubic yards of material at a cost of $387,005. Engineering and design, surveys and supervision and administration costs were $11,628. Condition at end offiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $6,884,787 for maintenance, a total of $7,372,611. 12. TOWN CREEK, S.C. Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, S. C. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local, cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sidecasting dredge Merritt performed maintenance dredging during June and July 1980 removing 75,552 cubic yards of material with costs of $172,358. Engineering and design, surveys and supervision and administration costs were $40,551. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $3,220 were incurred for condition surveys on Adams Creek, S.C. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 96-645 (Preauthorization). None. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th (Cong.) Pipeline dredge Richmond removed 45,640 cubic yards of material from Calabash Creek, N.C. and S.C. with costs of $156,154. Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $41,735. 7-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 Beach Erosion Control 16. HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S.C. Location. Hunting Island is a state park comprising about 1,850 acres of wooded land located along the southeastern shore of South Carolina in Beaufort County, 16 miles east of the Town of Beaufort, 9 miles southwest of Edisto Beach, and 35 miles northeast of Tybee Roads at the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart Nos. 11513 and 11517). Existing project. The authorized project provides for periodic nourishment of about 10,000 feet of beach on the northern part of the island with initial placement of 750,000 cubic yards of sand for advance nourishment, and construction of one pre-stressed concrete groin at the north end of the island. Federal participation in periodic nourishment is limited to a period of 15 years. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met by the State of South Carolina and accepted by the Chief of Engineers. The State has contributed 30 percent of the construction costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Pipeline dredge Savannah placed 924,838 cubic yards of material on the beach during January - April 1980 at a cost of $1,840,081. Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $65,199. Condition at end offiscal year. The first three nourishments were designed to restore the feeder beach to the condition prevailing after the initial beach nourishment. The third nourishment was completed 30 April 1980. 17. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. None. Flood Control 18. LEITH CREEK, N.C. Location. Leith Creek is located entirely within the limits of Scotland County, North Carolina. The creek flows through the city of Laurinburg and forms a political boundary between the cities of Laurinburg and East Laurinburg. Existing project. The authorized project consists of 1.97 miles of channel conveyance improvement including replacement of two highway bridges, and relocation of three utility crossings. The project, was authorized under general authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations and highway bridge alterations necessary cor construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that improvement will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plain development. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: During the fiscal year, the Charleston District prepared plans and specifications for project construction and coordinated with local project sponsors. Costs during the fiscal year were $1,745. Condition at end offiscal year. The project is in the preconstruction stage and is scheduled for construction in FY 1981. Local project sponsors have indicated problems in obtaining construction easements in the lower project reaches. 19. SCOTTS CREEK, NEWBERRY COUNTY, S.C. Location. Scotts Creek watershed is located in Newberry County, South Carolina. It is formed by two tributaries, North and South Fork Scotts Creek, which originated upstream of the City of Newberry and converge approximately 1 mile southwest (downstream) of the Newberry, South Carolina city limits. Scotts Creek flows into Bush River, which flows into the Saluda River near the upper extremities of Lake Murray. Existing project. The authorized project consists of clearing and snagging the existing channel from S. C. Highway 34 upstream a distance of .35 mile to S. C. Highway 34 B-Pass. Channel enlargement begins at this point and extends an additional 2.29 miles upstream on the North Fork of Scotts Creek. Local interests are to provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise development of the flood plain, thereby reducing damages to future development. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interest must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that the improvement will not provide 7-8 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT complete flood protection; and prevent unwise and uneconomical future development of the flood plain area through flood plain management techniques. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs were $693. Condition at end of fiscal year. City and County officials have withdrawn local sponsorship of the authorized project. Project was deauthorized August 1979. 20. REDDIES RIVER LAKE, N.C. Location. Reddies River flows into the Yadkin River near the Town of North Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and is a tributary to the Yadkin-Pee Dee River. The authorized lake and damsite are located entirely in Wilkes County, North Carolina. Existing project. Reddies River Lake is the second unit in the authorized plan for the upper Yadkin River Basin. The first unit, W. Kerr Scott Reservoir, is located about 5 miles upstream from the mouth of the Reddies River and was completed in 1962. The Reddies damsite is located on Reddies River at mile 1.7, near the Town of North Wilkesboro. Total tributary area above the damsite is 97 square miles. Project works contemplate construction of a rolled-earth dam about 165 feet high with a saddle spillway and a gated outlet conduit. The conservation pool will cover about 680 acres and the flood control pool about 1,335 acres. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1946; however, the project was deferred for restudy in 1950. An economic restudy was submitted in FY 69 and approved in FY 70. Presconstruction planning funds were appropriated in FY 70, but the funds were held in budgetary reserve throughout FY 70. Work began in January 1971 on the General Design Memorandum and Phase I was completed in March 1975. The Site Selection Design Memorandum was completed in May 1972, while the Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis Design Memorandum was completed in March 1973. A public meeting was held in October 1972 to solicit the public's views on this project. The Phase I General Design Memorandum has been returned to the Charleston District for complete reanalysis of benefits, additional justification for water supply and other revisions considering current report criteria. Estimated cost of the project (1979) is $33,500,000 of which $7,259,000 is reimbursable for water supply under the Water Supply Act of 1958, and $2,934,000 for recreation. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. The State of North Carolina and the Charleston District are currently in the coordination stage to acquire additional water supply justification and other State furnished data which will be needed to revise the General Design Memorandum Phase I. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preliminary planning for advanced engineering and design is continuing. Engineering and design costs were $15,780. Condition at end of fiscal year. No funds have been appropriated for FY 1981 and revision of the Phase I GDM will be rescheduled upon receipt of funding. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made of the following projects during the period; Cowpen Swamp, S.C. and N.C., Crab Tree Swamp, S.C., Gapway Swamp, S.C., Simpson Creek, S.C., Simmons Bay Creek, N.C., Saluda River, S.C., Simmons Bay Creek, N.C., Saluda River, S.C., Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, N.C., Todd Swamp, S.C., Buck Creek, S.C., Old Field Swamp, N.C., Edisto River, S.C., Sawmill Branch, S.C., Shot Pouch Creek, S.C., Turkey Creek, Sumter County, S.C., Kingstree Branch, S.C., and Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $25,133. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-F.) 23. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-E). Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). 7-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 Federal csts for FY 1980 were $108,090 for advance preparation, $6,441 for emergency operations, and $442,200 for rehabilitation. Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control (Section 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 708, 83rd Congress, Preauthorization). None. General Investigations 24. SURVEYS Total cost for the period was $566,088 of which $204,782 was for navigation studies, $289,938 for flood control studies, $44 for beach erosion cooperative studies, $50,057 for coordination studies with other agencies, and $21,267 for supplemental preauthorization (Phase I GDM) studies. 25. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost during the period was $604,000 of which $384,517 was for inspection of dams, $214,105 was for flood plain management studies, and $5,378 was for hydrologic studies. (See Table 7-G at end of chapter for Completed Flood Plain Studies.) 7-10 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT DURING PERIOD See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 1. Aquatic Plant Control, S.C. New Work: Federal Funds Approp. Cost 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk Va. and the St. Johns River, Fla. 3. Charleston Harbor S.C. 4. Cooper River Charleston Harbor, S.C. 5. Folly River, S.C. 6. Georgetown Harbor S.C. 7. Little River Inlet N.C. and S.C. 8. Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. 9. Murrells Inlet, S.C. 10. Port Royal Harbor, S.C. Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 52,028 3,435 52,028 - 7,455,3781 - 7,455,3781 2,310,000 1,790,892 3,451,000 3,146,492 2,300,000 2,336,056 27,400 30,893 1,950,000 1,512,992 227,000 180,276 200,000 157,134 800,000 115,554 100,000 150,000 143,355 792,200 802,003 2,750,358 3,694,704 250,760 123,009 2,346,000 2,765,245 5,355,000 7,423,915 42,000 21,412 2,343,417 2,898,753 -35,000 107,463 360,000 232,238 4,355,240 4,582,202 360,000 460,000 40,000 108,276 804,935 816,385 2,100,000 1,663,475 127,734 2,672,000 2,635,886 15,775,000 15,234,132 265,000 215,922 1,600,000 1,098,931 150,000 124,837 199,000 225,031 4,193,000 3,814,593 260,000 9,000 17,631 403,000 402,675 2,035,000 2,435,663 30,410,3042 30,278,9752 - 10,165,5643 17 10,165,5643 7,375,299 63,986,8874 7,673,599 63,939,5844 32,370,000 32,382,778 62,017,583 60,898,713 -18,000 54,685 338,927 337,736 - 7,061,7555 - 7,061,7555 2,375,000 27,521,0756 2,851,550 27,439,5506 124,000 1,339,428 160,367 1,316,440 188,000 299,050 20,000 18,571 3,075,000 2,778,842 660,000 660,000 1,340,124 1,299,828 9,500 9,500 32,332 30,903 13,224,240 12,022,007 1,380,000 1,120,000 - 701,5697 107 701,5697 - 1,786,100 - 1,786,100 594,000 594,330 5,860,569 5,860,545 7-11 17,000 14,770 22,000 10,981 35,000 17,272 45,000 49,174 307,100 278,084 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 TABLE 7-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 11. Shipyard River, New Work: S.C. Approp. - - - - 491,9748 Cost - - - 491,9748 Maint. Approp. 283,000 62,000 290,000 405,000 6,892,192 Cost 43,731 301,056 362,841 398,634 6,884,787 12. Town Creek, S.C. New Work: Approp. - - - 219,521 Cost - - - 219,521 Contributed Funds Approp. - - - 8,600 Cost - - - 8,600 Maint. Approp. 175,000 200,000 145,000 110,000 630,000 Cost 166,747 202,728 43,151 212,909 625,535 16. Hunting Island New Work: Beach, S.C. Federal Funds Approp. 1,194,000 - - 200,000 2,881,117 Cost 28,305 30,102 19,420 1,293,280 2,848,053 Contributed Funds Approp. .- 512,000 100,000 1,249,336 Cost - - - 612,000 1,249,336 18. Leith Creek, S.C. New Work: Approp. 3,750 33,500 8,000 - 167,671 Cost 10,125 28,335 6,178 1,745 162,145 19. Scotts Creek, S.C. New Work: Approp. 75,000 - -4,340 - 201,466 Cost 67,273 17,173 1,561 693 201,466 20. Reddies River Lake, New Work: N.C. Approp. 17,000 35,000 14,000 - 985,800' Cost 15,200 27,481 44,503 15,780 985,800' 1. Includes $109,480 for new work for previous project. 2. Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3. Includes $6,586,455 and $3,328,349 for the existing project. 4. Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects. In addition, $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 5. Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 6. Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 7. Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-14 incurred through FY 73. 8. Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 9. Includes $131,500 expended in 1951. For a definite project report see FY 51 Annual Report. 7-12 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&H Act of Sept. 19, 1890 R&H Act of June 13, 1902 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1919 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935' R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 18, 1878 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of July 18, 1918 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 R&H Act of Oct. 17, 1940 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of text) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U. S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of text) Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Estherville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, S. C. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of 10 feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep 90 feet wide. Anchorage basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, 12 feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, S.C. 4 CHIARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 3 of text) 2 jetties. 5 Increase in depth to 30 feet width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725) A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek, for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, I10 feet wide and 10 feet deep, including a turning .basin at the upper end. Sec. 302, 1965 River & Harbor Act (H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong. 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1900, p. 1908 Annual Report, 1903, p. 1133. H.D. 178, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong., Ist sess. 3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1878, pp.553-572 H.D. 288, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2d sess., Pt. 1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58 and 61-63. H.D. 249, 69th Cong., Ist sess. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 7-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 TABLE 7-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 14, 1960 Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 R&H Act of Aug. 13, 1968 Authorized by Chief of Engrs. on Dec. 23, 1977 under authority of Section 107 R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Aug. 5, 1886 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 30, 1948 R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, PL 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974 R&H Act of Aug. I1, 1888 An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie.6 Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advance Engineering and Design. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON, S. C. (See Section 4 of text) Redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. FOLLY RIVER, S. C. (See Section 5 of text.) Consists of stable all-tide channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and 11 feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S. C. (See Section 6 of text) Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N. C. AND S. C. (See Section 7 of text) Provides for an entrance channel 12 feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence 10 foot by 90 foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. LYNCHES RIVER and CLARK CREEK, S. C. (See Section 8 of text.) Provides for a clear 4-foot navigation channel through Clark Creek, the principal mouth of Lynches River. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., Ist sess. S.D. 136, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 7 H.D. 35, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H.D. 436, 94th Cong., 2d sess. River & Harbor Act of 1968, S.D. 88, 90th Cong. Detailed Project Report H. Ex. Doc. 258, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. I1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1115. H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1609. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., Ist sess. S.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 79-14. H.D. 362-2, 92d Cong. IH.D. 10203, 93d Cong., 2d sess. River & Harbor Act of 1888, and Annual Report 1888, p. 128 7-14 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by the House Committee on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971 and the Senate Committee on Public Works on Nov. 18, 1971, under auth. of Sec. 201, PL 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974 R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 19378 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on Feb. 12, 1974 under Auth. of Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&tH Act of Oct. 27, 1965 Water Resources Develop- Act of Oct. 22, 1976 MURRELLS INLET, S. C. (See Section 9 of text) Provides for an entrance channel 12 feet by 300 feet P.L. 79-14. across the seaward bar; thence 10 foot by 90 foot H.D. 137, 92d Cong. inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the H.D. 10203, 93d Cong., 2d sess. Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S. C. (See Section 10 of text) A channel from the ocean through Port Royal River & Harbor Act (H.D. 469, Sound to Port Royal, S. C.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet 81st Cong., 2d sess.) wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the S. C. State Ports Authority. SHiIPYARD RIVER, S. C. (See Section 11 of text) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. S.D. 350, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Cooper River upstream 1-1/ 16 miles. Channel depths of 12 and 20 feet. Rivers & Harbors Committee, Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 28-foot channel from Cooper River to the Gulf Oil Rivers & Harbors Committee, Corp.'s terminal, and the deepening of the channel Doc. 43, 73d Cong., 2d sess. above that point to 20 feet from the depth of 12 above that point to 20 feet from the depth of 12 feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and Rivers & Harbors Committee, a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp.'s terminal, Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. TOWN CREEK, S. C. (See Section 12 of text) An entrance channel 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide Detailed Project Report. across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the AIWW, a distance of 6.2 miles. HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S. C. (See Section 16 of text) Provides for periodic nourishment for about 10,000 H.D. 323, 98th Cong., 2d sess.9 feet of beach on the northern part of the island with initial placement of 75,000 c.y. of sand for advance nourishment, and construction of one prestressed concrete groin at the north end of the island. Extended length of periodic nourishment from P.L. 94-587 10 to 15 years. 7-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 TABLE 7-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents LEITH CREEK, N.C. (See Section 18 of text.) Auth. by Chief of Engineers Channel conveyance improvements extending a Detailed Project Report on 8 December 1977 under distance of 1.97 miles with bottom widths varying auth. of Sect 205 F.C. Act from 35 to 30 feet. of 1948, as amended. SCOTTS CREEK, NEWBERRY COUNTY, S.C. (See Section 19 of text.) Auth. by Chief of Engineers Clearing and snagging of existing channel from S.C. Detailed Project Report on Nov. 14, 1975 under Highway 34 upstream for .35 miles to S.C. Highway auth. of Sec. 205 F.C. Act 34 By-Pass; thence, channel enlargement for 2.29 of 1948 as amended. miles upstream on North Fork of Scotts Creek. REDDIES RIVER LAKE, N.C. (See Section 20 of text.) Flood Control Act of Reddies damsite is located on the Reddies River at S.D. 31, 81st Cong., 1st sess., July 24, 1946. mile 1.7, near the town of North Wilkesboro, N.C. Definite Project Reports. 1. Included in Public Works Administration program, September 6, 1933. 2. Included in Emergency Relief Administration program, May 28, 1935. 3. Contains latest published maps. 4. Inactive. 5. Completed under previous projects. 6. For national defense. 7. Contains latest published maps. 8. Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program, May 28, 1935. 9. Contains latest published maps. 7-16 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, S.C.' 1978 $125,697 $ 8,539 Aquatic Plant Control, N.C. and S.C. '5 1968 379,680 Archers Creek, S.C. 1914 20,646 Ashley River, S.C.' 1955 260,996 525,142 Edisto River, S.C.'2 1938 33,103 900 Great Pee Dee River, S.C.' 1950 183,712 269,673 Mingo Creek, S.C..2 1950 29,050 7,150 Salkahatchie River, S.C. 1.2.4 1896 15,841 Santee River, N.C. and S.C.' 1950 99,750 178,544 Village Creek, S.C.' 1978 26,500 90,773 Waccamaw River, N.C. and S.C.' 1978 262,814 272,655 Wateree River, S.C.' 1940 60,000 151,784 1. Completed. 2. No commerce reported. 3. Curtailment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Session). 4. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., Ist Session). 5. Pilot Program. TABLE 7-D DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Project Yadkin River, N.C. Yadkin River, N.C. Name W. Kerr Scott Dam Reddies River & Reservoir Lake See Section in Text See Wilmington District 20 Annual Reports' Nearest City Wilkesboro N. Wilksboro River Yadkin-Pee Dee Reddies Miles above Mouth 404 1.6 Height of Dam (ft) 148 165 Type Earth Earth Reservoir Capacity (acre-feet) 153,000 58,350 Design & Construction 5,335,169 24,861,000 Land & Damages 1,873,657 3,911,000 Cost Relocations 1,487,000 4,728,000 Total 8,695,8262 33,500,000. I. Project and costs transferred to Wilmington District 31 March 1980. 2. Actual. 3. Estimated 1979. 7-17 TABLE 7-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, FY 1980 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies pursuant to Sec. 205 (See Section 23 of text.) STUDY IDENTIFICATION FISCAL YEAR COSTS Free Nancy Branch and Fourth Creek, N.C. $7,144 Hopkins Creek, Greenville, S.C. 2,030 Langston Creek, S.C. 4,861 TABLE 7-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Federal Full Report Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Briar Creek, N.C.' 1976 $ 76,000 Buck Creek, N.C. and S.C. 1,2 1970 298,167 California Branch, S.C.' 1979 33,821 Cowpens Swamp, S.C.'. 2 1960 18,679 Crabtree Swamp, S.C.I. 2 1969 97,000 Edisto River, S.C.1, 3 1947 6,379 Edisto River, North Fork, S.C.1,2 1969 127,660 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadys Landing, S.C.'.2 1958 3,160 Gapway Swamp, N.C. and S.C.',2 1969 339,197 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, S.C.' 1978 247,242 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C.1, 2 1979 763,022 Oil Field Swamp, N.C. I. 2 1969 86,600 Reedy River, S.C.1, 3 1974 4,500 Roaring River, Wilkes County, N.C.'. 5 1978 370,000 Saluda River, S.C,'.,2 1963 99,000 - Sawmill Branch, S.C.'. 2 1971 248,605 Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, S.C.1.2 1971 77,400 Simmons Bay, N.C.1, 2 1963 186,435 Simpson Creek, S.C.1, 2 1957 81,000 Sugar & Briar Creek, N.C.'. 4 1975 - - Todd Swamp, S.C.I. 2 1964 29,000 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, S.C.'. 2 1974 319,669 W. Kerr Scott Dam & Reservoir, N.C.1,2,6 Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. and S.C.1, 2 1961 67,821 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Completed. 3. Discontinued due to lack of interest. 4. Project modified. Cost transferred to Little Sugar Creek, N.C. and Briar Creek, N.C. 5. Phase I only. 6. Project and costs transferred to Wilmington District 31 March 1980. TABLE 7-G COMPLETED FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES (See Section 25 of text) None 7-18 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT* The District comprises drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, S.C., and Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla., including the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, a considerable portion of western South Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga .................. 2. Aquatic Plant Control ......... 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Fla. (Savannah District) ., 4. Brunswick Harbor, Ga ........ 5. Savannah Harbor, Ga . ......... 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, Ga ................ 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................ 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................ 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. Beach Erosion Control 10. Tybee Island, Ga . ............ Flood Control 11. Broadway Lake, Anderson County, S.C . .......... ............... Page 8-1 8-2 8-3 8-3 8-4 8-5 8-6 8-6 8-6 8-6 Flood Control (cont) 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 13. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 14. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 15. 'Savannah River Basin, Ga. and S.C . ....................... 15A. Clarks Hill Lake, Ga. and S.C. .. 15B. Hartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. .... 15C. Richard B. Russell Dam and .Lake, Ga. and S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, Ga. and S.C.) ...... 16. West PointLake, Chattahoochee River Basin, Ga. and Ala ...... General Investigations 17. Surveys ........................ 18. Collection and Study of Basic D ata ........................... 8-7 19. Research and Development ..... Navigation 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND Precious projects. Prior projects for the OCMULGEE RIVERSGAAltamaha River have been adopted, and expen- OMULGEE RIVERS, GA ditures made under them, by River and Harbor I Location. These rivers are entirely within the Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and At- for the Oconee River by River and Harbor Acts of mospheric Administration Survey Map of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, Georgia, formerly U.S. Geological Survey mapof 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by River and Har- Georgia.) For full description of these rivers, see bor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, page 636, Annual Report for 1932. 1890. * All costs and( financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Other tables referenced in the text also appear at the end of this chapter. 8-1 Page 8-8 8-8 8-8 8-8 8-8 8-9 8-9 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-10 _? __ It IEP)RIT ()F TlE ('IEF (OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 For further details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. Exristing project. The authorized project provides for an appropriation of $40,000 annually for the Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, to maintain a 3-foot depth during ordinary summer low water and to gradually increase channel depth, so far as practicable without sacrificing the maintenance work. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, Ga.), a length of 137 miles, the lower 139 miles of the Oconee River, and the lower 199 miles of the Ocmulgee River. The Altamaha River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33 above, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet, above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet, above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents: Altamaha River, House Executive Document 283, Fifty-first Congress, second session; Oconee River, House Executive Document 211, Fifty-first Congress, first session; Ocmulgee River, House Executive Document 215, Fifty-first Congress, first session; and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, Ga., House D)ocument 610, Seventy-seventh Congress, second session. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local coopera tion. Fully complied with. 71c'rminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed in recent years at several points. Operations and results during fiscal Iear. Maintenance: No maintenance was performed during the fiscal year. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bank-protection works need repairs. The final Environmental Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. Tro September 30,. 1980, costs under the existing project were $60,847 for new work and $1,865,351 for maintenance, of which $69,356 were contributed funds, a total of $1,926,198. (See Table 8- A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Loca tion. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of waterhyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Locl cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate totheextent of 30 l)ercent of the cost of the program. Re- (uirements are being met. Oper(itions and results during fiscal yar. Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported aquatic plant infestation in the Satilla River and in other river basins in the State of Georgia. Actual control work under the Aquatic Plant Control Cost Sharing Program with the Georgia Game and Fish Division is scheduled for FY 81. Cost during the fiscal year was $30,()04. The final Environmental Statement appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 8-2 SAVANNAH., GA. I)ISTRICT 3i. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK VA., AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLIA. (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161 mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, S.C., with Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. (See NOAA charts 11489 - 11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Pre'ious projects. (Between Savannah, Ga., and Fernandina, Fla.) For details see Annual lRepl)orts for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, S.C., and Savannah, Ga.; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters, between Savannah, Ga., and Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla.; and a suitable anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, Ga. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, S.C., and Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla., is from 6 to 8 feet, with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet, due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive of adequate terminal facilities at ports of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded on October 31, 1979 to remove material from the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The contract pipeline dredges Cherokee and Dauntless removed 1,108,843 cubic yards of material from the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway during the period from January 10, 1980 to June 1,1980 ata total costof $807,510. The government cost for condition and operation studies, water pollution and environmental studies amounted to $29,922. Survey and inspection report cost, including real estate inspection, amounted to $28,660. Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $6,241. The Maintenance Program Evaluation study was continued during the fiscal year and the cost amounted to $33,616. The study is scheduled for completion in FY 81. Total cost for the fiscal year amounted to $905,- 951. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) ( ' d it ion at end of fiscal ytear. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 19 11. is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly en(l of the South Channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. The final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Costs of the existing completed project to September 30, 1980, were $763,599 for new work and $12,601,152 for maintenance, a total of $13,364,751. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The Harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Ga., and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Prerious projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Academy Creek; a channel in Back River 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simon Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at theCity of Brunswick 7.3 feet, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Twenty-nine wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 12,226 feet. In addition, the Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modern docks with 1,500 feet of aprons on East River. A tank farm for handling residual oil has been constructed on Brunswick Port Authority's property. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1972). Operations and results duringfiscal year. New Work: Phase I advanced engineering and design for modification of Brunswick Harbor was continued and the cost for the fiscal year was $184,067. 8-3 REPORT OF'Tl' IlE ('HIIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the bar channel and Cedar Hammock Range was awarded January 7, 1980. The hopper dredges Manhattan Island and Sugar Island removed 107,128 cubic yards of material from Cedar Hammock Range and 1,742,938 cubic yards from the bar channel at a total cost of $3,- 197,822 including inspection, administration and other government costs. A contract for maintenance dredging of East River was awarded May 9, 1980. The contract dredge Cherokee removed 566,568 cubic yards of material from East River during the period of May 29, 1980 to June 26, 1980 at a total cost of $354,278 including inspection, administration and other government costs. An emergency dredging contract was awarded to remove material from Turtle River and East River. The contract dredge Dauntless completed this work September 15, 1979, and a credit of $56,486 was received in FY 80. Routine condition surveys, water, air, and environmental studies, inspection and reports, and other essential activities amounted to $37,739. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost amounted to $49,834. Distribution of Engineer Yard and radio communications costand otheryearend adjustments amounted to $6,973. Contributed credits received for dredging amounted to $1,354. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $3,588,806. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) ('< dition, at end of fiscal year. The existing p)roject was completed in December 1960. (;eneral condition of the harbor works is satisfactory. providing maintenance dredging continues. Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October3, 1975. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1980, were $29,904,584, of which $3,929,119 was for new work and $25,975,465 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston Harbor, S.C., and 70 statute miles north of Brunswick Harbor, Ga. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Prerious projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the Seaboard Coast Line terminal; 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal); and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Turning Basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet wide by 600 feet long near Savannah Sugar Refinery terminal and atthe extreme upper limit of the project near Continental Can Company terminal; and Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. Latest (FY 80) estimate of total Federal cost for new work modification is $34,129,000 ($11,842,000 for Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works, $8,660,000 for LASH and Kings Island Turning Basins, $13,400,000 for the Widening and Deepening of Channels and Turning Basin and $227,000 U.S. Coast Guard costs). Estimated local cost for LASH and Kings Island Turning Basins is $2,102,000 and $339,000 for Widening and Deepening of Channels and Turning Basin, and $455,000 for Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable spoil areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Commissioners, as local assurers, have metall requirements todate. 'erm'inal facilities. Fifty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with useof (lolphins, have a combined berthing space of 30,154 feet with water depths alongside ranging up to 38 feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are three container berths with 95 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, D)ISTRICT berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1972) and Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Activities in connection with Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works modification and bar channel improvements continued. Under Savannah Harbor Extension, engineering and design for the enlargement of the Kings Island Turning Basin was completed in FY80 ata costof $129,619 Federal funds and $10,645 contributed funds for the fiscal year. A construction contract for the turning basin was awarded in August 1980 at a cost of $5,640,470. This work will be completed in FY 81. Under the Sediment Basin authority, a continuing contract was awarded March 29, 1972 for construction of the tide gate structure and access road, and the cost for this fiscal year for tide gate instrumentation, amounted to $1,113. The total cost for new work during the fiscal year amounted to $141,377 of which $130,732 was Federal funds and $10,645 contributed funds. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Maintenance: A contract for the hopper dredges Manhattan Island and Sugar Hill was awarded January 7,1980 and 741,064 cubic yards of material were removed from the bar channel between January 31, 1980 and May 30, 1980 at a total cost of $1,259,111, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. Under a contract dated August 19, 1980, the contract pipeline dredge Savannah, removed 373,776 cubic yards of material from the upper harbor between August 20, 1980 and September 30, 1980, at a total cost of $615,097, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A continuing contract for removal of material from the Sediment Basin and main channel was awarded with work commencing May 30, 1979. Contract pipeline dredges Savannah, Cherokee and Clinton removed 3,557,826 cubic yards of material from the main channel during the period from October 1, 1979 to May 30,1980 at a total cost of $2,038,004, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A contract for the removal of material from the Sediment Basin was awarded July 3, 1980, with work beginning July 7, 1980, and continuing through September 30, 1980. Under this contract the pipeline dredge Cherokee removed 2,736,000 cubic yards of material ata total costof$1,051,55 4 , including inspection, overhead and other government cost. The District's portion of the operating account of the U.S. hopper dredge Hyde amounted to $187,272 for the fiscal year. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $132,124. Operation and maintenance of the tide gate system cost $153,347. (Credits received from agitation dredging of private shipping interest slips amounted to $51,214.) Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $144,653. The cost for Fort Jackson remedial work for the -fiscal year amounted to $5,588. Condition surveys, water quality monitoring, water and air pollution studies, environmental studies, testing, inspection and reports, and government supervision and administration costs were $460,894. Miscellaneous cost amounted to $1,564. Total operation and maintenance costs for the fiscal year amount to $5,997,994. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is incomplete. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. Final Environmental Impact Statements appeared in the Federal Register January 17, 1975, January 30, 1976, and June 25, 1976. A notice of availability on the Final Supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register January 8, 1980. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $35,135,856 Federal cost and $315,893 contributed funds for new work and $100,036,591 Federal cost and $852,858 contributed funds for maintenance, a total of $136,341,198. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6.. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tuaaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast314 miles, forming the boundary line between the two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, Ga. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, Ga.) from the upper end of Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, 3 miles above Fifth Street Bridge, a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limitofthe project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredg- 8-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 ing, removal of snags, overhanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level)of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Latest approved project cost estimate for providing a 9- foot channel (Sept. 1963) is $6,576,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Recreation facilities at New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam cost $17,000. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. The City Council of Augusta, Ga.,and the Georgia and South Carolina Ports Authorities have agreed to act as local assurer. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a State port at Augusta, Ga., costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. In addition, Koch Refining Company maintains a terminal below Augusta and Allied Chemical Co. maintains a terminal at Sylvania. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Snagging operations performed by U.S. crane barge No. 2 with towboat Tomankins removed 2,863 snags during the period of January 28, 1980 through September 26, 1980 at a cost which amounted to $264,829. The contract dredge XL removed 45,757 cubic yards of material from the channel during the period from October 1, 1980 through October 15, 1980 at a total cost of $259,837, including inspection, administration, and other government cost. Routine maintenance and operation of the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam and its recreational area, which accommodated 184,034 visitors, amounted to $106,223. Routine condition surveys, real estate activities, water pollution and environmental studies, inspection and.reports and other administrative costs amounted to $196,388. Dike and bank revetment cost amounted to $321,261. Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $10,660. Credits received for housing of lock employees amounted to $2,559. Total operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $1,156,639. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. Project depth of 9 feet was maintained 70 percent of the period. Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register Februaryl8, 1977. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $19,270,198 of which $6,646,551 was for new work and $12,623,647 for maintenance.(See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS No reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted during the fiscal year. (See Table 8-C.) 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Operation and maintenance reconnaissance studies were made on St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga., and on the Satilla River, Ga., at a cost of $4,681 and $4,669, respectively. (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization Studies). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $105,618. Detailed project studies were continued for navigation projects at Bellville Point, Ga., Cedar Point, Ga., Meridian, Ga., and Valona,Ga. A reconnaissance study recommending detailed studies was performed on Lazaretta Creek, Ga. Beach Erosion Control 10. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, Georgia. (See NOAA Charts 11512, 11513 and 11509, formerly U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440,1240, and 1241, and on maps included in H. D. 92-105, 92d Cong.) The only portion of the island that has been developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has had a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number ofwhich 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, I)ISTRICT have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two add itional, intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feetof beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the new terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost, including costs for construction, engineering, and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-ofway; and relocations; of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers, presently estimated at 51.0 percent or $4,420,000 (FY 80 estimate) to be paid in a lump sum priortostartof construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide, after the first 15 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the-project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (d) hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from construction, maintenance, and nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project; and provided further, that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from 1st. Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Federal cost of activities during the year amounted to $95,885 and no funds were expended from non-Federal contributions. (See Table 8- A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Candition at end of fiscal year. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with CEQ on November 13, 1973. A draft supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement was published in the Federal Register April 14, 1978. The initial construction contract for the terminal groin was awarded September 13, 1974 in the amount of $980,642. The groin was completed and formally accepted on June 17, 1975. The second contract, for initial beach fill and advance nourishment, was awarded June 18, 1975 in the amount of $2,175,000. This resulted in the placement of 2.3 million cubic yards of sandfill along most of the entire length (13,300 feet) of ocean beach front. The sand was removed by hydraulic pipeline dredge from a massive sandbar borrow area off the south end of Tybee Island. Completed in March 1976, the project provides approximately 124 feet of beach seaward of the seawall (accessible at average high tide), doubling the public beach area. Erosion has occurred along the beach front. Results of beach monitoring indicate a decreasing or stabilizing erosion rate. The southernmost section south of 13th Street has experienced the most critical erosion. However, the available beach surface for recreational purposes has increased since project completion. Total project cost is estimated to be $8,660,000, which includes $4,420,000 in non-Federal, contributed funds. Costs to date of existing project were $2,- 437,120 (Federal funds) and $2,024,856 (contributed funds). Flood Control 11. BROADWAY LAKE, ANDERSON COUNTY, S.C. Location. The Broadway Lake is located about 4 miles southeast of Anderson, South Carolina. It is formed at the junction of Broadway Creek and Neals Creek in the headwaters of Rocky River, a tributary of the Savannah River. Existing project. The authorization provides for the Corps of Engineers to undertake a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from an existing lake known as Broadway Lake, owned by Anderson County, South Carolina. This lake has a surface area of about 1 square mile and a tributary area of about 44 square miles with an existing dam and concrete spillway. The spillway is 50 feet wide, about 19 feet high, and flanked by an earth embankment on the west side. The total length of thedam is about 610 feet. The National Dam Safety In- 8-7 REPO()RT ()OFT IE CHIEF( )OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 spection Program determined that the dam did not meet the safety criteria. Since the repairs of the dam, spillway, and low-level outlet are not within the authority of the demonstration project, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers will withhold implementation of the project pending repairs to the dam by State or local authorities. Local cooperation. The local interests are now making the necessary repairs to the dam. Local interests have expressed a willingness to provide necessary easements, and rights-of-way for removal of silt and aquatic weeds, as well as provide lands for disposal areas. They will be required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works other than damages due to the faultor negligence of the United Statesor its contractors. The United States should be relieved of any liability due to dam failure from construction activity in the lake. The local assurer is Anderson County. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is inactive, pending completion of repairs to the dam by local interest. The Office of the Chief of Engineers is preparing a Significant Post Authorization Change Report for submittal to Congress. Draft Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register August 29, 1977. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Physical inspections of the Augusta and Macon levees were made during the fiscal year. Cost for the period was $9,623. (See Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement.) 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D.) 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization Studies). Preauthorization studies on Bay Gall Creek, Ga., and Little Lotts Creek, Ga., were terminated. Preauthorization studies on Conley Creek, Ga., Casey Canal, Ga., and Trail Creek, Ga., were continued during the fiscal year. A reconnaissance report was made on Whitner Creek, S.C. The total cost for the fiscal year was $309,871. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work, (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Revisions to emergency manuals, emergency planning, and other expenditures cost were $123,364, including $203 for reimbursement activities pursuant to Public Law 91606. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 15. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on Savannah River and its tributaries in Georgia and South Carolina. (See Geological Survey maps of Ga. and S.C.) Existing project. The Flood Control Actof 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin for flood control and other purposes (H. D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the Clark Hill Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Trotters Shoals which will replace Goat Island and Middleton Shoals was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. Clark Hill and Hartwell Lakes are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes at end of chapter.) Duke Power Company has completed construction of the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and is constructing the Jocassee pumpstorage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry - Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on Clark Hill, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 15A. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Clarks Hill Lake is located at mile 237.7 on Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, Ga. (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and South Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Clarks Hill Dam and 8-8 SAVANNAHII, GA, I)ISTRICT Lake, the final costof which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet, and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet, and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. Total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. At maximum power pool elevation 330, the lakecovers 70,000 acres. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,045,000 acre-feet; and dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 280,000 kilowatts, with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperatimon. None required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Cost of recreational activities during the period from Construction General funds (Code 710) amounted to $146,287. Gross generation of electric energy for the period was 981,962,900 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented amounted to $1,518,000. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $4,346,877. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 15. IHIARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps of Ga. and S.C.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravity-type structure, 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum power pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control 293,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,416,000 acre-feet; and (lea(d storage 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000- kilowatt generators having generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts have been installed. A fifth 80,000-kilowatt generator is planned for installation in the future which would then provide a total generating capacity of 344,000 kilowatts. A draft Environmental Statement covering this aspectof Hartwell appeared in the Federal Register April 7, 1978. Latest approved project estimate (Aug. 1968) is $88,300,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost of activities during the fiscal year amounted to $1,223,614. Of this amount $308,912 was expended from Construction General funds (Code 710) for the construction of miscellaneous recreational facilities, and $914,703 was expended for engineering and design and construction for the addition of a fifth unit to the power dam. The procurement contract for the turbine for the fifth unit was awarded July 17, 1979, and the procurement contract for the generator was awarded on September 16, 1980. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 697,257,000 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year amounted to $727,000. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $4,709,332 of which $493,780 was expended on field investigation and study for future remedial work to cut off seepage under two existing diversion dams on the lake. A final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register August 21, 1978. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 15C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC, (FORMERLY TROTTERS SHOALS LAKE, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam and about 37.4 miles above Clarks Hill Dam. (See NOAA Survey maps of Ga. and S.C.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations of the Chiefof Engineers at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. The latest approved (FY 80) cost estimate for the project is $428,000,000, of which $347,317,000 is for construction, $30,287,000 for lands and damages, and $50,396,000 for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Approval was received January 1977 to include minimum 8-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 provisions for pumped storage. A notice of availability of a final Environmental Impact Statement covering pumped storage was published in the Federal Register October 26, 1979. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New Work: Contracts were awarded during the fiscal year as follows: Generators supply awarded October 29, 1979; relocation of Seaboard Coast Line Railroad (R-2) awarded November 15, 1979; Powerhouse crane supply awarded September 18, 1980; Transformers supply awarded September 26, 1980; and relocation of Carolina Pipeline awarded September 27, 1980. Fiscal year cost for land acquisition and associated cost amounted to $2,176,803. Relocation of Georgia Route 72 cost amounted to $8,309,209. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad (R-1) relocation cost amounted to $8,990,390, and SCL (R-2) relocation amounted to $1,781,209. American Telephone and Telegraph cable relocation costs were $150,000. Other relocation costs were $133,780. Reservoir equipment costs amounted to $58,125. Concrete dam costs were $24,589,234. Earth embankment cost amounted to $9,982,299. Excavation cost was $200,751. The amount of turbines cost was $1,236,787. Generators cost amounted to $49,999. Cultural resources amounted to $817,879. The cost for engineering and design and supervision and administration was $7,859,226. Undistributed construction cost for the fiscal year amounted to $503,129. Design memorandum submitted during the fiscal year were: Relocation of Cemeteries (Groups II and III); Relocation of Abbeville Raw Water Pumping Station (resubmitted); Relocation of Calhoun Falls Raw Water Pumping Station (resubmitted); Sedimentation Ranges; Relocation of Abbeville-Anderson County Roads; Reservoir Clearing and Mosquito Control; Relocation of Powerline (resubmitted); Resource Manager Office and Operational Boat Ramps; and Master Plan. Total cost for the fiscal year amounted to $66,838,820. Total costs of the project to September 30,1980 were $137,465,203. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 16. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL The West Point Lake located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Ga., was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H. D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project is being designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. It is being designed and constructed by Savannah District for Mobile District. For complete information see Mobile District. General Investigation 17. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,051,724, of which $145,753 was for navigation studies; $814,468 for flood control studies; and $91,503 for special studies. 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods, potential flood damages, and identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities were as follows: Guides, Pamphlets, and Supporting Studies, $30,000; Flood Plain Management Services, $103,953, and Technical Services, $162,185. Flood Plain Management Services included responses to other Federal agencies to aide them in fulfilling the requirements of Executive Order 11988 (Management of Base Flood Area). Through the Technical Services Program, flood problems in several areas were analyzed and possible improvements were identified. Throughout FY 80, the Flood Plain Management Services Branch conducted Flood Insurance Studies for the Federal Insurance Administration at a cost of $297,000. 19. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Hydrologic studies during the fiscal year cost $14,500. 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 1. Altamaha, Oconee . and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. 2. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&11 Act) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va., and the St. Johns River, Fla. 4. Brunswick Harbor, Ga. 5. Savannah Harbor, Ga. 6. Savannah River below Augusta, Ga. 10. Tybee Island, Ga. 11. Broadway Lake, S.C. 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 15A. Clarks Hill Lake, Ga. and S.C. 151. HIartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. New Work:, Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 41,000 43,369 12,400 9,772 " 129 5,000 7,847 676,000 378,000 676,759 333,927 - 300,000 - 172,360 3,534,000 1,394,000 3,441,321 1,448,727 2,277,000 -13,300 1,604,140 916,039 5,359,000 9,487,025 4,838,880 9,902,135 50,000 47,777 35,000 14,619 1,145,000 1,149,907 68,000O 152,549 2,520,000 2,598,924 86,000 229,272 11,835,000 11,969,503 713,000 1,615,542 1,418,400 691,751 1,568,459 1,449,937 30,306 99,000 91,034 4,000 5,838 122,000 117,144 2,812,237 2,842,949 326,000 14 247,488 14 2,466,000 2,451,527 165,373 203,497 7,781 5,000 4,528 292,413 144,326 2,631,000 2,634,883 426,000 147,801 2,756,000 2,745,141 185 22,000 22,393 167,000 398,531 3,002,854 2,507,638 488,000 609,505 3,566,000 2,664,683 85,000 30,004 863,000 905,951 142,000 184,067 3,612,200 3,588,806 450,000 130,732 6,454,000 5,997,994 1,286,200 1,156,639 95,885 10,000 9,623 374,900 146,287 4,641,000 4,346,877 2,043,300 1,223,614 4,875,000 4,709,332 821,457 1 821,457 1 1,910,182 2,3 1,907,945 2,3 150,359 74,897 958,096 4 958,096 4 12,750,721 5 12,735,950 5 4,573,608 6 4,572,584 6 26,056,101 1 26,029,879 I 42,758,721 8 42,396,240 8 100,849,940 9 100,335,485 9 6,740,031 1o 6,740,031 10 12,807,492 12,623,647 2,515,300 13 2,437,120 13 99,000 99,000 66,518 65,940 82,864,920 11 82,625,741 11 32,152,594 31,092,825 92,415,307 12.14 91,180,312 12,14 29,725,507 28,421,612 8-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 8-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 15C. Richard B. Russell New Work Dam and Lake. Ga. Approp. 11,870,000 19,338,00() 29,390,000 67,191,000 138,573,.500 and S.C. (Formerly Cost 11,349,282 16.734.314 32,532,45() 66,838,820 137,465,203 Trotters Shoals) 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 10. Includes $93,480 for ?revious projects. Includes 2. Includes $111.950 for previous projects. $1,634,562 from Public Works und. 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. I11. I)oes not include $395,634 accelerated PIublic Works 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. unlds. Includes $3,581,613 appropriated under Code 710 of 5. Includes $134,798 for previous projects. wvhich $3,342,434 has been expended. 6. Includes $643.465 for previous projects and includes 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing Funds. Includes $2,585,800 appropriated under Code 710 of project. Does not include $10.000 contributed funds. which $2.111,537 has been expended. 7. Includes $54.414 for previous projects. Includes 13. D)oes not include $2,024,856 contributed funds. $4.995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing 14. Includes $210,000 appropriated for AE&D for 5th project. Excludes $252,557 contributed by Brunswick and Ga. unit of which $210,000 has been expended. Port Authorities. 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels and $315,893 contributed funds. 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects. Does not include $852.858 contributed funds. TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized I)ocuments R&II Acts of July 25,1912 and March 2. 1945 R&IH Act of Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 R& H Act of June 3, 1896 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1899 R&II Act of July 13. 1892 R&tH Act of Mar. 3, 1905 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R& H Act of Aug. 8. 1917 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1919 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1919 R&II Act of Mar. 3,1925 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. .JOIINS RIVER, FLA. (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) (See Section 3 of Text) Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Savannah, Ga. route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, Ga. to Fernandina, Fla. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. to St. Johns River, Fla. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown ax)ve, into "Waterway between Beaufort, S.C.and St.Johns River, Fla." Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, S.C. and Savannah, Ga. II. I). 443, 62d Cong., 2(d sess. II. 1). 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. II. 1).25 1, 89th Cong., 1st sess. II. I). 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. I. I). 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. II. I). 41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. 11. 1). 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. II. D). 1236, 60th Cong., 2dsess. I. 1). 581, (3d Cong., 2d sess. II. I). 1391, 62d( Cong., 3d( sess. S. 1). 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. 8-12 SAVANNAII, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&II Act of July 3, 1930 R&II Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R& II Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R& II Act of June 20, 1938 R&II Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&tI Act of Mar. 3, 1879 R&II Act of Mar. 2, 1907 IR&II Act of Mar. 2, 1919 It&lI Act of July 3, 1930 R&Ill Act of July 3, 1930 R&ll Act of June 20, 1938 I&ll Act of May 17, 195() \VRI) Act of Oct. 22, 1976 t& II Act of Mar. 2, 1907 I&ll Act of June 25, 1910 I&ll Act of July 25, 1912 &ll1 Act of Aug. 8, 1917 lt&ll Act of ,Jan. 21. 1927 R&ll Act of ,Jan. 21, 1927 lt&lIl Act of July 3. 1930 IU&l Act of Aug. 30, 1935 It&l Act of Mar. 2, 1945 IR&ll Act ot Nov. 7, 1945 Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, S.C.and Savannah, Ga. via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound A 12-foot channel between Savannah, Ga. and Fernandina, Fla. various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt. Ga. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, Ga. not now traversed bythe main route, at no additional cost to the United States. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA. (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of 2 spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar andat Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cutfrom AcademyCreekto Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. SAVANNAH IIARBOR, GA. (See Section 5 of Text) Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge. I)efinite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry.Bridgeto the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 3() feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general Width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry.Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating d(lam across South Channel; relocation of the inland waterway; dredging I)rakies Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of p)rojects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 30() feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project an(d eliminated from the project (a) the relating (dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland Waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. I)eepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to :30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. )eepening the channels to 36 feet (leel) an(l 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deel) an(d generally 4(X) feet 8-13 S. D. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. II. D. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 11. D. 114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 959 II. D. 407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. SI. D. 393, 64th Cong., 1st sess. S. I). 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S. I). 132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 11. 1). 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. I I. D. 110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. II. I). 181, 59th Cong., 1st sess. II. I). 5(63, 62d Cong., 2d sess. I. 1).14 71, 64th Cong., 2dsess. 11. 1). 261, 69th Cong., 1st sess. II. 1).26 2, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. 1). 39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. II. 1).27 6. 73d Cong., 2d sess. II. I). 283, 76th Cong., 1st sess. II. 1).2 27, 79th Cong., 1st sess. REI'()ORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 8-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&I Act of July 24, 1946 R&H Act of Sep. 3. 1954 R&It Act of Oct. 23. 1962 R&IH Act of Oct. 27. 1965 R& H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 SIPWC Resolution of .June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 R&H Act of Sept. 19.,1890 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1930 R&l Act of Aug. 26. 1937 R&H Act of May 17, 1950 SP)WC Resolution of June 22, 1971 and lPWC of June 23. 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965. wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide, upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feetto500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes. (2) Enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 1,600 feet by 38 feet. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA. (See Section 6 of Text) For a 5-foot channel. Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel TYBEE ISLAND, GA. (See Section 10 of Text) Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin system, and periodic beach nourishment. 11. I). 678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. II. I). 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. S. 1). 115, 87th Cong.. 2d sess. 11. I). 226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. II. 1). 263. 89th Cong., 1st sess. II. I). 94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8. 1976. 11. 1). 255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. an(d Annual Report. 1890: p). 1328 II. I). 962. 60()th Cong.. 1st sess. 11. 1). 101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee lPrint. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Ilarbors Committee. I)oc. 39, 75th Cong.. 1st sess. S. I). 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. II. I). 105, 92d Cong. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, I)ISTRICT TABLE 8-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents BROADWAY LAKE, S.C. (See Section 11 of Text) Water Resources Develop- Provided for undertaking a demonstration project for the IP. L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. ment Act of March 7, removal of silt and aquatic growth from Broadway Lake. 1974 CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. (See Section 15A of Text) Flood Control Act Approved the general plan for the comprehensive develop- 1l1. 1). 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. of Dec. 22, 1944 ment of the Savannah River Basin and provided for con- P. L. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. struction of the Clarks Hill Project. HARTWELL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. (See Section 15B1 of Text) Flood Control Act Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. II. D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. of May 17, 1950 P. L. 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Act Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Project. P. L.85-500,85th Cong.,2dsess. of July 3, 1958 Water Resources Develop- Provides for installation of 5th unit. P. L. 94-587, Sec. 182b, ment Act of 1976 85th Cong. RICHIARD B1. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA, AND S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA.and S.C.) (See Section 15C of Text) Flood Control Act Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. S. D. 52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. of Nov. 7, 1966 1. Contains latest published maps. TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 in Text) For Last Cost To Sept 30, 1980 SFeuell ARnenpuoartl Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R&lI Act 1962) 1968 25,700 1)arien lHarbor, Ga. 1975 199,723 185,433 1.2 Funcy Bluff Creek, Ga. 1935 8,000 7,200 St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga. 1951 15,688 69,617 Sapelo IHarbor, Ga. 1929 17,906 19,594 Satilla River. (;a. 1951 9,452 56,841 Savannah River above Augusta, Ga. 4 1929 69,60()0 5,870 Savannah River at Augusta, Ga. 1929 200.556 17,444 I. (Channel a(ldeq(uate for commerce. 2. (Completed. 3. Project recommendled for abandonment in I. D. 467, ;9th (Cong.. 1st sess. 1. No commerce reported. 5. About84 percentcompleted.Owing to construction of 2 power dams which submerged much of the work under the lresent and former projects, this improvement cannot be (co)nleted as originally planned. 6. Excludes $185,000) contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). 8-15 TABLE 8-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 13 in Text) For Last Cost To Sept 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, Ga. 1941 643,016 - Curry Creek Dam and Lake, Ga. 1974 - - D)unn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, Ga. 1977 132,640 - Macon, Ga. 1955 380,043 - Peacock Creek, Liberty County, Ga. 1976 582,163 - 1. Completed. TABLE 8-E SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA. AND S.C. DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total Clarks Hill, Ga. and S.C. Savannah $79,156,000 $79,156,000' Hartwell, Ga. and S.C. Savannah 89,240,000 89,240,0002 Goat Island. Ga. and S.C. Savannah 36,400,00()0 36,400,000 3 Middleton Shoals, Ga. and S.C.5 Savannah 16,500,000 16,500,0003 Chattooga units (4), Ga. and S.C. Chattooga 41,700,0(X) 41,700,0003 Tallow Hill, Ga. Broad 39.,000,0(X) 39,000,0003 Anthony Shoals, Ga. Broad 18.10,0(X).0 18,100,0003 Newry-Old Pickens, S.C. Keowee 29,500,0(00) 29,500,0003 1. Final cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2. Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) 6. Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee-Toxaway Project. 8-16 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT* With the exception of a small area in the Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernannortheastern section of Florida, this district com- dina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. prises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of It also includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds Islands. tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Navigation (cont.) Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 30. Other Authorized Navigation 1965 ................................ 9-2 Projects ... .......... .............. 9-17 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 31. Navigation Work under Special between Norfolk, Va. and St. Authorization .................. .. 9-17 Johns River, Fla...................... 9-2 3. Canaveral Harbor, Fla..................9-3 Beach Erosion Control 4. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, 32. Brevard County, Fla ..... . ... ....... 9-17 Fla ............................... 9-3 33. Broward County, Fla. Beach 5. Charlotte Harbor, Fla................. 9-3 Erosion Control and Hillsboro 6. Clearwater Pass, Fla.................. 9-4 Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project ......... 9-18 7. Cross Florida Barge Canal............. 9-4 34. Dade County, Fla................. 9-19 8. Fernandina Harbor, Fla. .............. 9-5 35. Duval County, Fla ................ 9-19 9. Fort Myers Beach, Fla................. 9-5 36. Fort Pierce, Fla ..................... 9-20 10. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. ............. 9-6 37. Manatee County, Fla..................9-20 11. Intracoastal Waterway, 38. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Caloosahatchee River to Martin County line to Lake Worth Anclote River, Fla .................. 9-6 Inlet and from South Lake Worth 12. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville Inlet to Broward County line .......... 9-21 toMiami,Fla....................... 9-7 39. Pinellas County, Fla. ................ 9-21 13. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla............... 9-7 40. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 14. John'sPass,Fla................... 9-8 Control Projects .................... 9-22 15. Longboat Pass, Fla................... 9-9 41. Beach Erosion Control Activities 16. New Pass, Sarasota, Fla............... 9-9 under Special Authorization ........... 9-22 17. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla ........... 9-9 18. Oklawaha River, Fla.................. 9-10 Flood Control 19. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla............... 9-11 42. Central and Southern Florida .......... 9-22 20. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla................ 9-11 43. Four River Basins, Fla................. 9-24 21. Ponce Harbor, P.R................... 9-11 44. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R ..... 9-24 22. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla........... 9-12 45. Inspection of Completed Flood 23. Removal of Aquatic Growth Control Projects .................... 9-25 From Navigable Waters in the 46. Other Authorized Flood Control State of Florida...................... 9-13 Projects ........................... 9-25 24. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla........... 9-13 47. Flood Control Work under Special 25. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla................ 9-14 Authorization .................... 9-25 26. St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla......... 9-15 27. San Juan Harbor, P.R................. 9-15 General Investigations 28. Tampa Harbor, Fla .................. 9-16 48. Surveys ........................... 9-25 29. Navigation Projects on which 49. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 9-25 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ...................... 9-17 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 9-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 28,941 acres of hyacinth, 6,621 acres of hydrilla, 1,401 acres of minor plant and 3,398 acres of hyacinth and waterlettuce mix controlled during the period (3,440 acres to the Corps and 36,921 acres by the State). Costs incurred were $715,168 for engineering and $1,624,648 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress. About 456,420 acres of aquatic plant growth have been treated in Florida under the program. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracostal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, Florida, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 841-SC.) Previous project. For Details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12 by 90 to 150 feet from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (HD 898/62/2) and 1938 (HD 618/75/3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $56,009. Engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $88,308 and $4,343, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. Total costs under the existing project to September 30, 1980, have been $263,659 for new work and $1,519,840 for maintenance, a total of $1,783,499. 3. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 456 and 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the 37-foot and 36-footdepth entrance channel and 35-foot-depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; two entrance jetties 100 feet long (constructed of native stone core and granite sides and cap); a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (ocean) for harbor dike and lock, and mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-C for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (Oct. 1979 price levels) of the 1962 modification to the project is $18,800,000 Federal cost and $1,152,000 non-Federal cost ($243,000 contributed funds and $909,000 other 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT costs); $700,000 costs to NASA and $34,000 costs to U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2d session. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $243,000. Terminal facilities. South of the barge canal and west of the turning basin is a 1,800-foot-long concrete bulkhead having a 12-foot-depth berthing area which accommodates shrimp and commercial fishing boats. Finger piers at the west end of the bulkhead are available for charter boats. On the south side of the east turning basin is a 1,060-foot-long marginal wharf, complete with utilities, operated by the Canaveral Port Authority. There are three newsprint warehouses with a combined storage capacity of 120,000 square feet. On the south shore of the ship canal, parallel to the channel are 1,200 feet of oil docking facilities, complete with pipelines to the storage tanks. Bulk cement unloading facilities are located on both the north and south shores. At the easterly end of the barge canal is a terminal for handling bulk construction materials. A new 1,000-foot tanker berth with 45-foot available depth is in operation on the south side of the harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of locks amounted to $1,605,681 for the fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $10,350. Condition and operation studies for the year cost $39,666. Dredging by contract amounted to $2,386,218. Operation of service facilities cost $15,697. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $124,667 and $160,001 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is about 50 percent completed. The perimeter dike and jetties are in good condition. Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor, and extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 4. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1254.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10-foot-depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8-footdepth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses, 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $11,355. Contract dredging amounted to $514,817. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $10,751 and $24,278 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 5. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on the west costs of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1255.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande, thence 10 by 100 feet from deep water at Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. 9-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water level about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower it about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $15,563. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda. both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging costs amounted to $729,907. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $7,010. Condition and operation studies cost $8,234. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $11,682 and $14,319 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1980, have been $420,169 for new work and $5,126,261 for maintenance, a total of $5,546,430. In addiition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 6. CLEARWATER PASS, FLA. Location. Clearwater Pass is a natural inlet connecting Clearwater Bay with the Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 25 miles north of the entrance to Tampa Harbor and 14 miles south of the mouth of Anclote River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 858 and 1257.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf of Mexico through Clearwater Pass, thence 8 by 100 feet eastward to the Intracoastal Waterway; a side channel 8 by 100 feet; and a turning basin 8 feet deep by 100 feet to 450 feet wide by 850 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean range of tide is 1.8 feet at Clearwater Marina. Length of the project is 3 miles. For further details see 1961 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $42,783. Terminal facilities. The city of Clearwater operates a recreational pier. There are several marinas providing service for charter boats and small recreational craft and one marine railway. All facilities are accessible by highway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs totaled $62,924 and $4,799, respectively. Hired labor surveys, reports and inspections cost $916. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1961. 7. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for.a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-D for Locks and Dams.) Operation and maintenance of the locks and dams is a Federal responsibility. Estimated cost of new work (1970) is $179,000,000 Federal, and $19,500,000 non-Federal for lands, rights-of-way, and other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation.*L ocal interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-E for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, m.s.l. by discharging through the Rodman spillway. The only exception was a winter drawdown of the lake from 18 ft. to 14 ft. to reduce the volume of noxious aquatic vegetation in the lake. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 ft., m.s.l., by 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT discharging through the Inglis Bypass Spillway, supplemented during periods of excessive inflow, with additional releases through the Inglis Dam spillway. Daily discharges of 200 cfs were initiated at the Inglis Dam spillway at weekly intervals to improve water quality in the reservoir. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 28 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway, Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. 8. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 453.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32-foot-depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800-foot-wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and two jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is 7 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are two large wharves operated by industrial plants; twelve wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; three oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sports-man's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract work for the Ft. Clinch Fishing Pier Recreation Facilities amounted to $1,013,174. Engineering and design and supervision and administration of recreational facilities at Fort Clinch incurred costs of $7,304 and $58,815 respectively. The above costs include $524,765 contributed funds. Maintenance: Dredge MacFarland removed material in December 1979 at a cost of $5,275. Dredge Davison removed 181,410 cubic yards of material in the first and third quarters of FY 1980 at a cost of $2,262,133. Condition and operation studies cost $58,769. Operation and maintnenace of district communications net work cost $2,070. Engineering and design costs and supervision and administrative costs were $7,192 and $8,240, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The outer harbor channel has been deepened to 34 feet in development of a military project. 9. FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 855-SC and 1255.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11l by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water furface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,095. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimppacking houses and several fish-packing houses, two marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational-craft facilities include nine marinas, a boat and motor testing laboratory, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed by contract at a cost of $371,813. Condition surveys cost 9-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 $4,918. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $8,466 and $22,464, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 10. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. Location. On eash coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 582.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27-foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Sta. 100 + 00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30 + 00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130 +00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet and the entrance and 0.7 foot at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 feet by 300 feet with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording a berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. There is a pre-cooling plant, a warehouse, and a fruit packing house available. North pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connnections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 20 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum products in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintnenace: Condition and operation studies cost $1,958. Hired labor surveys cost $2,325. Supervision and administration costs were $148. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interest in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. Jetties and revetments are in good condition. 11. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 856-SC, 857-SC, and 858.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Place of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Brande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water level by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water level by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for constructing Cats Point and Sunshine Skyway Channels was $9,707 and $4,766, respectively. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and eleven privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are six wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use of commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Clearing and snagging operations cost $136,119. Maintenance of channel slopes and berms was performed by hired labor for $2,768. Operation and maintenance of district com- 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT munications network cost $6,210. Condition and operation studies cost $25,577. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,503 and $12,640, respectively. Hired habor surveys, inspections and reports cost $1,513. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Jetties at Caseys Pass were maintained in F.Y. 80. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1980 were $7,597,078 for new work and $4,147,625 for maintenance, a total of $11,744,703. In addition, $14,473 contributed funds were expended for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 12. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. Location. The waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 841-SC, 843-SC, 845-SC, and 847-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified to 10-foot-depth from Fort Pierce to Miami by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8-foot-fepth; and operation and maintenance of the Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of the tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in the Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns river, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design costs were $287. Maintenance: Removal of snags by Dredge Cypress cost $233,455, and a contract for dredging cost $153,762. Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $14,490. Condition and operation studies from the St. Johns River to Melbourne, Florida and from Melbourne to Miami cost $60,253 and $46,660, respectively. Other condition and operation studies cost $12,581. Maintenance excavation was performed at a cost of $14,141. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $68,922 and $128,923, respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $25,007. Operation and care: The highway bridge near Palm Valley was operated and maintained at a cost of $70,691. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete except for construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, which is in an inactive status. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1980, were $16,956,271 for new work: $19,916,505 for maintenance and $1,286,843 for operation and care, a total of $38,159,609, regular funds. In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 13. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 636-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 by 400-1,200 feet from the ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 9-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 feet deep to the F.E.C. Railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30-foot channel in Arlington Cut and in the Old Dame Point-Fulton Channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40-foot-depth entrance channel; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; and construction of training walls and revetments. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 26.8 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Terminal facilities. There are approximately 100 waterfront facilities serving the port, including 29 commercially operated, four of which are open to the public. There are 12 commercial oil terminals and four oil docks operated by the Navy. Rail connections are available to all but one of the oil terminals and to most commercial facilities. A superphosphoric acid storage and handling facilitiy is located at Jacksonville Bulk Terminal. Jacksonville Shipyards have facilities for building and repairing large vessels, and numerous facilities are available for repairing and servicing small craft. Jacksonville Port Authority operates municipal docks at two locations, Talleyrand and Blount Island. Available at Talleyrand are over 600,000 square feet of warehousing, a 4,300-feet of marginal wharf, 102 acres of paved open storage, two container cranes, a container straddle carrier, and a 50-ton gantry crane. The facility has extensive rail and highway connections. At Blount Island Terminal there are a total of 3,550 feet of marginal wharf, nearly 200 acres of paved open storage, 27 acres of container storage area, an automobile processing plant, three transit sheds, four cranes and a 900-ton capacity gantry crane. There are also two 900-foot container berths, a concrete and steel roll on/roll off platform, and two mobile roll on/roll off ramps for servicing container vessels. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channel deepening to 38 feet from Mile 18.8 to Mile 20.0 was completed during F.Y. 1978 with final fund adjustment of $20,334. Supervision and administration costs were $915. Costs above include $43,985 for contributed funds. Maintenance: The dredge Goethals removed 1,077,562 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,366,671. Dredging by hired labor cost $962,542. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $10,350. Condition and operation studies cost $297,836. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $126,061 and $49,995, respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $5,694. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty is in good condition; revetments and training walls are in poor condition. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1980, were $43,786,128 for new work, $32,199,545 for maintenance, a total of $75,985,673, regular funds. In addition $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 14. JOHNS PASS, FLA. Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwestward of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1257.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately one thousand linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $53,732. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract amounted to $274,504. Condition and operation studies cost $472 for the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,138 and $17,095, respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $6,206. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. As of June 1968 authorized depths were available throughout the project. 15. LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1256.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alinement to the Intracoastal Waterway and extending along Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. The estimated cost of the project, taken from the project document is $814,000 first cost ($706,900 Federal and $107,100 non-Federal) and $87,300 in annual costs ($80,300 Federal and $7,000 non-Federal). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contributed funds were returned to local interest in the amount of $5,327. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies amounted to $9,813. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $7,044 and $25,012, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Dregding contract for Sarasota Bay completed. 16. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 857-SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $45,811. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with two finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and condition surveys cost $18,342 for the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $70,323 and $5,270, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. 17. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 11428 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80 to 100 feet to the Intracoastal 9-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami; near Stuart; an 8-foot depth basin at Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200-foot channel from the Gulf to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Fort Myers with a 10-foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80-foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60-foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $502,407. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, 1 municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/ municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River on St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, a municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations of Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440-foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125-foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150-foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125-foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50-foot wharf at Alva; and a 30-foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-F for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing the 8-foot depth basin at Stuart, which is inactive. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1980, were $4,680,311 for new work, $7,803,636 for maintenance, and $5,752,913 ($67,558 excluded which represents services rendered without reimbursement) for operation and care, a total of $18,236,860. 18. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles above Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 6 feet deep from the river mouth to the head of Silver Springs Run; clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles in the river and 5.4 miles in Silver Springs Run. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Numerous private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation-craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Road 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Oklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Snagging and clearing cost $20,251. Supervision and administration costs were $3,337. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing a 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs run, which is in an inactive status. The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT replaced under the Four River Basins, Fla., flood control project. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1980 have been $311,352 for new work and $1,874,260 for maintenance (excluding $11,414 under provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation), a total of $2,185,612. 4 19. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 291 and 1248). Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 meet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $509,506. Terminal facilities. The port has two slips, four marginal wharves containing 25 berths along 5,039 feet of bulkheading, six roll-on/roll-off ramps, nearly 200,000 square feet of warehouse space, 43 acres of open storage space, and seven petroleum storage tanks connected with terminals by pipeline. Rail and highway connections, water supply, and other facilities have been provided in warehouses and shipside of slips. A new raw sugar warehouse and terminal, as well as a new cement storage warehouse are now optional. The wharves are owned by the Port of Palm Beach District. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The dredge McFarland removed 256,426 cubic yards of material in December 1979 and May 1980 at a cost of $287,989. Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $42,618. Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $3,340. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $12,480 and $10,921, respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $5,738. Real estate management costs amounted to $4,379. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in good condition. 20. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long, respectively, and a weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. The project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,377,884. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contributed funds in the amount of $37,887 were returned to local interests. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $2,070. Condition and operation studies cost $59,955. Emergency jetty repair by hired labor cost $4,097. Jetty repair by contract cost $20,659. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $63,198 and $9,920, respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports costs $4,984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Ocean jetties and weir are in good condition. 21. PONCE HARBOR, P. R. Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 927 and 902.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. 9-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long entending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier; dredging an area off the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep. into the harbor, and a 36-foot-deep, irregulary shaped turning basin with a diameter of 950 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. Estimated Federal cost of new work (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $5,020,000 with no local contribution required. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from local interests, assuring compliance with local requirements. Further assurances are not required until completion of Phase I GDM. No contribution is required from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 2,611 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. An additional 1,200 feet of bulkhead wharf and a 72.5 ton container lift shore crane were recently completed. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has four steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 880,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $56,105 and $5,698, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $1,325. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is about 13 percent complete. South and north jetties are in fair condition. Maintenance dredging is required in the turning basin at the municipal terminals. 22. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 546.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 40 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; planning for a soth jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1979 price levels) of the 1974 authorization is $32,000,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost and $1,673,000 non-Federal cost $143,000) contributed funds and $1,530,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local Cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under House Document 144/93/1, local interest must: provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. All public port facilities except one are owned and operated by Port Everglades Authority. There are 27 commercial ship berths providing a total berthing space of over 16,000 linear feet. Ten berths are in three slips ranging from 700 to 1600 feet long and from 300 to 306 feet wide. Water depth is 37 feet mean low water at all but 7 of the berths where depth is 33 feet mean low water. There are eight transit warehouses with a capacity of 497,000 square feet, and over 100 acres of open storage. Private companies maintain over 200 storage tanks for petroleum products, and operate piping facilities extending from the port south to Miami. A 30-ton container crane was placed in service at the port in 1979. The remaining facility is operated by Broward County Port Authority and serves as a base for oceanographic research vessels operated by the Nova University Oceanographic Laboratory. All wharves are served by railway and highway connections. Marine repair and drydocking facilities are available for small and medium size vessels. A large passenger pier and terminal complex is located in the south part of the harbor. A Foreign Trade Zone, containing 140,000 square feet of warehouse space, is located less than 1/2 mile from dockside. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Dredging for Section 1 was performed by contract at a cost of $8,852,585. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $125,958 and $46,464, respectively. Maintenance: Costs for condition and operation studies amounted to $142. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $25 and $16, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 144/93/1. 23. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Waterhyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce is found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechancial chemcial, or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 10,099 acres of hyacinths, 4,781 acres of hydrilla, 9 acres of minor plant and 17,344 acres of waterlettuce and hyacinth mix was controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinths in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed are under reasonable control. 24. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1243 and 1244.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 feet by 200 feet along the best natural alinement as may exist from time to time across the new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island paralles to and coestensive with the groin, future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastain River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $137,500. 9-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 ft. in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge; these consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract at a cost of $993,123. Condition and operation studies cost $6,376. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $946 and $14,091 respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $365. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is completed except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1980 were $1,405,131 for new work and $4,096,377 for maintenance, a total of $5,501,508. 25. ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1247.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Plane of reference is mean low water. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about 1 foot on the land side of the inlet. The estimated cost of the 1974 modification (Oct. 1979 price levels) to the project is $6,290,000 Federal cost and $2,525,000 non-Federal cost ($2,260,000 contributed funds and $265,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.2 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each five years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect the water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification have not yet been requested from the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A dredging and jetty construction contract was awarded in F.Y. 1979 and incurred costs of $1,277,173. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $54,883 and $98,229, respectively. Above costs include $346,935 contributed funds. Maintenance: Removal of shoals in the 6-foot channel by U.S. Dredge Merritt incurred costs of 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT $53,107. Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $4,140. Condition and operation studies cost $1,783. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,935 and $664, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 294/93/1. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1980 were $1,966,900 for new work (including $201,248 contributed funds) and $2,133,478 for maintenance, a total of $4,100,378. 26. ST. PETERSBURG HARBOR, FLA. Location. St. Petersburg is on west shore of Tampa Bay 8.75 miles southwest of Port Tampa City. Entrance from Gulf of Mexico to Tampa Bay is about midway of west coast of Florida, about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola, Fla., and 65 miles north of Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 586 and 1257.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report of 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel 24 by 300 feet from Tampa Bay southwesterly and thence westerly along south side of Port of St. Petersburg basin to Bayboro Harbor: a 24-foot depth in the port basin and in the area between the entrance channel and the Maritime Service south bulkhead; a channel 15 by 100 feet in Bayboro Harbor along southwesterly 300 feet of the Maritime Service bulkhead; a basin 12 by 800 by 700 feet-1,400 feet in Bayboro Harbor, a channel 12 by 75 by 300 feet in the mouth of Salt Creek; an entrance channel 20 by 200 feet extending northerly about 5.5 miles from deep water in lower Tampa Bay; and thence a channel 19 by 250 feet leading westward to the 24-foot depth entrance channel, and a channel 16 by 200 by 6,200 feet on the easterly side of the Point Pinellas lighted beacon. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas; hold United States free from damages; and strengthen or move structures necessary to safeguard the channels and adjacent lands and structures. Requirements for active part fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A 1,500-foot-long municipal wharf and two warehouses at the Port of St. PBeaytebrosrbou rHga trubronri ntgh e bUas.iSn.. MFraormiti mtuer ning basin to training station has 1,360 feet of wharfage space. On Bayboro Harbor, there are 5 oil company wharves, 2 marine repair and supply plants, a sand and shell wharf, 6 marine railways, steam-electric plant and fuel wharf of the Florida Power Corp., and 4 privately owned marginal wharves. Two oil companies have terminals on Salt Creek and there are three municipal yacht basins north of Port of St. Petersburg. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce and are open to all equally. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $49,032 and $4,721, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal yea?. Project is complete except for 24-foot-depth channel and basin from Tampa Bay to Bayboro Harbor which is considered inactive. Controlling depths: 20.5 feet in 20-foot channel leading northward from Tampa Bay in April 1966; 19 feet in 19-foot entrance channel and 17 feet throughout Port of St. Petersburg basin in March 1963; 14.5 feet in Point Pinellas Channel in May 1938; and 12 feet in Bayboro Harbor and in mouth of Salt Creek in August 1957. Total Federal costs for existing project through September 30, 1980 were $255,608 for new work and $243,526 for maintenance, a total of $499,134. 27. SAN JUAN HARBOR, P. R. Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico about 35 miles from the island's east end and 1100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 908.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing its width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400 foot width; an advance maintenance area 500 feet wide, 1,200 feet long and 44 feet deep at the mouth of Cano de Martin Pena.; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width and six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and 9-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 feeder channels; provide alterations as required in sewer water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. Local interests have complied with authorization requirements to date. There is no non-Federal contribution required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 at front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for the handling of loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to general public. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet .nf berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18-foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost for maintenance dredging of 1,301,971 cubic yards of material in the various channels in San Juan Harbor performed by Dredge MacFarland amounted to $2,204,537. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $789 and $1,194 respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $3,803. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1980 were $13,027,284 for new work and $10,441,913 for maintenance, a total of $23,469,197 regular funds. In addition, $427,068 was expended for new work and $24,737 for maintenance from public works funds and $100,000 for new work from contributed funds. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712; this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in above costs. 28. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 586, 587, and 1257.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Affia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; turning basins at Port Sutton, Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, and 44 by 200 feet in Port Sutton terminal channel. (The 46-foot and 44-foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that a 4-foot underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a 1-foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet, respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1979 price levels) of the 1970 modification to the project is $202,400,000. Federal ($201,000,000 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Corps of $1,400,000 U.S. Coast Guard) cost and $1,470,000 non-Federal cost ($1,200,000 contributed funds and $270,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, HD 401/91/2 and HD 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. Terminal facilities. There are 93 commercial piers and wharves at Tampa, including those on Hillsborough River and Old Tampa Bay at Rattlesnake, Florida. Most facilities have railway connections. Municipal terminals (called Metroport) on Ybor Channel consist of a slip 750 by 350 feet with a total of 2255 feet of berthing space and a steel-framed transit shed. The Tampa Port Authority operates an 800-head capacity cattle-loading wharf on the east side of Sparkman Channel. Ship repair facilities including a 900-foot drydock are available. There are 19 commercial oil terminals, 11 dry bulk terminals, 16 terminals for handling phosphate and phosphate related products, 2 privately owned cement storage facilities and a dockside cold storage facility. At Holland terminal there are four general cargo berths, a 600-foot roll on/roll off dock and two facilities specifically tailored for the importation and processing of pickup trucks. A liquid bulk facility is in operation at Hookers Point. Also at Hookers Point are ammonia storage tank facilities which are connected by pipeline to fertilizer plants in Polk and Hillsborough counties. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17 revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the 43-foot dredging project Egmont Channel, Cut 1, Section 1B and Egmont Key to Mullet Key, Section 2A continued at a cost of $5,028. Construction of a 43-foot dredging project Egmont Cut 1, Section IC and Mullet Key to Mariposa Key/Tampa Harbor continued at a cost of $3,363,270. Hired labor costs for channel and canal construction were $2,723,844 which included dredging work by hired labor removing 629,650 cubic yards of material from Section 4. A contract for construction of a 43-foot project, Alafia River to East Bay Section 5 was completed incurring $1,425,588 in costs. Construction of a dredging channel Section 4 Part, Cut A and /2 Cut C was awarded and incurred costs of $1,547,275. A contract for study of vegetation on disposal areas cost $118,437. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $584,632 and $494,469, respectively. The above costs include $58,746 contributed funds. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $12,420. Condition and operation studies cost $132,842. Contract and hired labor dredging costs amounted to $4,814. Hired labor surveys, inspections, and reports cost $2,368. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $179,315 and $12,509, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (HD 401/91/2 is 40 percent complete.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1980 were: Main project: $100,086,356 for new work and $11,802,897 for maintenance, a total of $111,889,253 regular funds. In addition, $1,329,300 was expended for new work from public works funds, $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds, and $395,366 from contributed funds. On Hillsborough River $270,466 was expended for new work. 29. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-I.) 31. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Boot Key Harbor, Florida; Cedar Island Keaton Beach, Florida; Dunedin Pass, Florida; Stokes Landing, Florida; and Wiggins Pass, Florida were $48,114, $40,228, $24,553, $5,695 and $5,455, respectively. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 32. BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the 9-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1245 and 1246.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sandtransfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $6,090,000 Federal costs and $6,150,000 non-Federal cost ($6,090,000 cash contribution and $60,000 for lands). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rightsof- way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract for beach restoration work was awarded in July 1980 and incurred costs of $190,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration for the fiscal year cost $30,521 and $3,675, respectively. Costs include $19,204 contributed funds. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $12,833. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 15, 1974, and is nearing completion. 33. BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in northern part of Broward County. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1248.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to provide and maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a protective and recreational beach at four locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $8,580,000 Federal and $13,500,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first 'cost of beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet, establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract work for beach replenishment amount to a cost of $2,850,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $7,301 and $531. 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $12,951. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 34. DADE COUNTY, FLA. Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey chart No. 1248.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide a elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Baker Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $33,700,000 Federal cost and $28,147,000 non-Federal cost $26,900,000 cash contribution and $1,247,000 other costs). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (HD 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cost for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownernship, and the entire maintenance cost for the dune, all between Government cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based: (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide completion protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach erosion control and hurricane protection along the Dade County shoreline from 80th Street to 63rd Street was completed at a fiscal year cost of $41,316. A third contract was awarded in January 1979 for work between 63rd Street and 37th Street and was completed incurring costs of $735,110 for the fiscal year. A fourth contract was awarded in May 1980 for work between 37th Street and Lincoln Road and incurred costs of $4,326,500 for the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $201,741 and $69,566, respectively. Costs above include $2,276,480 contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. The first second and third beach replenishment contracts have been completed with a fourth contract started during the fiscal year. 35. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1243.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of constructing with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. 9-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1979 price levels) $10,100,000 Federal and $8,780,000 non- Federal ($7,200,000 contributed funds and $1,580,000 for other costs). Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (HD 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5.percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Estimated contributed funds for new work is $7,200.000 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A second contract for beach restoration was started in August 1978 and is complete, having incurred costs of $1,587,952. A third contract providing beach replenishment was started in May 1980 and incurred costs of $475,204. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $15,989 and $40,514, respectively. Costs above include $844,575 contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. The first and second beach replenishment contracts are complete and a third beach replenishment contract is 60 percent complete. 36. FORT PIERCE, FLA. Location. Fort Pierce Beach erosion project fronts the Atlantic Ocean and is on coastal barrier island in St. Lucie County which separates Indian River from the ocean. Area is 120 miles north of Miami and about 225 miles south of Jacksonville. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 582.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the cost of a shore restoration and protection project which involves construction and periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation amounts to one-half such costs for that part of the ocean shoreline extending 1.2 miles southward of Fort Pierce navigation inlet, and 70 percent of such costs for the adjacent 0.1 mile shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park. Mean range of tide in area is 2.6 feet. Cost estimate (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $2,600,000 Federal and $2,370,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (HD 84/89/1) as modified by section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute one-half the costs of protecting and periodically nourishing for 10 years the reach of shoreline starting at and extending 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet and 30 percent of cost of protecting and periodically nourishing 0.1 mile of shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park; obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for the project; establish in public ownership and beach within project limits prior to reimbursement; furnish all lands and rights-of-way; furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores; exclude permanent human habitation and provide full park facilities at the Lions Club Beach Park; provide periodic nourishment of the beach; control water pollution; hold United States free from damages; and execute such further assurances and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the intent of Congress expressed in the acts authorizing or modifying the project. River and Harbor Act of 1965 authorized construction of the project by local interests. Section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act modified the project to provide for construction by Secretary of Army and section 215 of the same act permitted construction by local interests. Local interests, have elected to construct the project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 2, 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for beach nourishment was awarded in July 1980 and incurred costs of $1,428,292 for the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $46,625 and $6,505 respectively. Costs above included $732,098 contributed funds. Maintenance: Costs for project condition surveys amounted to $295. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is being constructed by local interests and is nearing completion. 37. MANATEE COUNTY FLA. Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1256.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project. The plan provides for the entire 71/ mile shoreline of Anna Maria Key and will consist of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a 50 foot berm width and a natural 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. Also, the project consists of periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for the 50-year project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $5,950,000 Federal and $6,204,000 non- Federal ($5,950,000 contributed funds and $254,000 for other costs). If public ownership of the private beaches is established before construction of the improvements the local share of the estimated first cost of construction and periodic nourishment would be reduced from 85.8 percent to 48.9 percent. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) provide a cash contribution equal to 85.8 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for land, easements, rights-ofway, relocations and alterations, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide a cash contribution for periodic beach nourishment equal to 85.8 percent of the annual nourishment cost, such contribution to be made pior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (d) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction; (e) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (g) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; and (h) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Egnineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the year were $18,756 and $2,310, respectively. 38. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE OF LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE. Location. Palm Beach County is on east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Northerly reach of the project is separated from the southerly reach by Palm Beach Island. Project consists of about 12.2 miles of ocean coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survery Charts 1247 and 1248.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward the cost of a local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 4.8 percent of the cost for the Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 11.6 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 5.1 percent for South Lake Worth Inlet- Boca Raton Inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $3,900,000 Federal and $15,900,000 cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications prior to commencement of work and furnish assurances that they will maintain public ownership of publicly owned shores, maintain protective measures and provide periodic nourishment of protective beaches, and control water pollution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $106,281 and $6,340, respectively. Maintenance: costs for project condition surveys amounted to $13,115. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests provided initial beach fill at Delray Beach which was completed in August 1973. A periodic nourishment contract at Delray Beach was awarded in FY1979 by local interests. 39. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote river. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts Nos. 858 and 1257.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet 9-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $2,510,000 Federal Funds and $10,755,000 non- Federal funds. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rightsof- way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A beach replenishment contract at Long Key was completed and incurred costs of $397,080. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $177,892 and $22,541, respectively. Costs above include $290,803 contributed funds. Maintenance: costs for project condition surveys amounted to $1,761. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in 1969 and is 50 percent completed. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1980 were $1,434,746 Federal funds and $1,405,342 contributed funds for new work and $5,556 for maintenance. 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-J.) 41. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring during the fiscal year were El Tuque Beach, P.R., $45,113, Ft. Clinch State Park, Fla., $388, Key Biscayne, Fla., $3,741, North Shore Beach, St. Petersburg, Fla., $57,251, and Punta Salinas Rec. Area, P.R., $61,596. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-483 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1974, Public Law 93-251. The Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Program included costs of $12,834 for Key West, Fla. $8,146 for demonstration and $257,260 for Stuart-Jensen Beach, Fla., of which $13,186 are contributed funds. Flood Control 42. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is located generally within the southeastern eighteen counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section above the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, Fla.) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports, 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargment of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shore of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent overdrainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in the Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee river basins, and in South Dade County. Project also provides for navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft, consisting of locks and channel dredging in the upper Kissimmee and St. Johns basins. The project includes a total of 897 miles of levees, 954 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 194 floodway control and diversion structures, 55 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-K. See also Table 9-L for principal features of locks and dams. Estimate of cost for new work (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $613,500,000 Federal funds ($612,000,000 Corps and $1,500,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $151,000,000 contributed funds, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. Local interests' costs in reviewing plans and specifications are expected to be $550,000. In addition, estimated cost to local interests of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations is $135,850,000. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-M for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must proivde, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date except those for the Small Boat Navigation feature added in 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Total estimated contributed funds amount to $151,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-N for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. lucie locks; 5 hurricane gates; 20 gated drainage culverts through the levee; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 - total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Sec. 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W. P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and Maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. REG ULA TION Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 9-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. During the period, Lake Okeechobee continued to be regulated under a regulation schedule ranging from 15.5 feet to 17.5 feet. Discharges were made through St. Lucie Canal and/or Caloosahatchee River whenever the lake exceeded the regulation schedule. Schedules for the water conservation areas remained the same except for a temporary 0.2 foot lowering of the Water Conservation Area No. 3A regulation schedule during the October and November to alleviate a deer crisis due to highwater. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the remainder of the project facilties, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was about 42 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been continued. For construction completed prior to Fiscal Year 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9-P.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1980 were $247,006,558 for new work, $26,938,161 for maintenance, a total of $273,944,719. In addition, $46,694,089 has been expended from contributed funds for new work. 43. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins-the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers-and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provides for: Green Swamp Area-a conservation area and three storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hilsborough River-four flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures, and levees; Oklawaha River-a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of part of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River-one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River-Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon: outlet canal and control structure; Anclote River: control structure and channel improvement; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-Q on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1979 levels) is $153,000,000 Federal funds $91,100,000 non-Federal cost. $31,200,000 tributed funds; $35,200,000 for lands damages; and $24,700,000 for relocations. Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) price and conand (See Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction ($31,200,000). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work was completed on C-135, Sec. 4B and L-112 and incurred $303,041 in cost for the fiscal year. A contract for recreation facilities at Lake Tarpon cost $58,978. Construction of structures 155 and 163, L-112 R and Floodway, continued at a cost of $1,662,469. A contract for construction of S-159 Middle and Lower Structure incurred costs of $2,841,418. Costs for construction of S-159 upper structure amounted to $2,434,994. Clean-out under bridges by contract cost $254,199. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the year were $678,754 and $498,729, respectively, including Code 710 funds for recreation. Final close-out costs for previous contracts amounted to $41,476. Costs above include $1,295,292 contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and is 35 percent complete. See Table 9-R for construction of major features of the project completed to date. 44. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS P.R. (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Carribean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement-one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2-mile tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1979 price levels) is $193,000,000 Federal cost and $51,900,000 non-Federal cost ($40,320,000 for lands and damages; $4,126,000 for relocations; and $7,454,000 for highway bridges). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been accepted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract work for improvement on the Upper Bucana Channel, Section 3 incurred costs of $1,165,501. A contract for improvement on the Upper Bucana Channel, Section 4 was awarded in December 1978 and incurred costs of $1,902,787 for the fiscal year. A contract for Section 5A was awarded in April 1979 and incurred costs of $982,000. A contract was also awarded in June 1979 for Section 5B on the Upper Bucana Channel and incurred costs of $1,219,876 for the fiscal year. A test excavation and grouting contract for Cerrillos Dam incurred costs of $510,000 under engineering and design during the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,234,177 and $950,385, respectively. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports incurred $9,229 in costs. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in September 1975 and is 15 percent complete. 45. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $13,398. 46. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-S.) 47. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-T.) Emergency flood control activities- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $148,307 for the Disaster Preparedness Program and $34,396 for a rehabilitation report for Central and Southern Florida project for a total of $182,703. General Investigations 48. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year (all Federal funds) were: navigation studies, $737,992, flood damage prevention studies $1,593,706, shoreline protection studies, $301,820 and special studies $646,150 for a total of $3,279,668. 49. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for Inspection of Dams amounted to $195,736. The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. Hired labor costs for flood plain management services incurred during the fiscal year were anticipated studies, $1,290, Companion FPI Study, Boggy Creek, Fl., $2,500, FPMS Unit, Jacksonville, $50,004; Tallaboa River Basin, P.R., $7,243, Technical Services, $138,715. 9-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text - Project 1. 2. 3. 5. .Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. John's River, Fla. (Federal Funds) Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Clearwater Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (Federal Funds) 7. 8. 9. 10. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 974,000 906,000 2,549,000 2,225,000 990,519 887,566 2,317,673 2,339,816 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New York: Approp. Cost 12,994 13,004 1,871,400 1,871,657 21,616 21,616 - . 1,325,000 1,324,733 333,000 319,737 11,035 947,000 975,044 120,000 22,497 1,248,895 1,205,289 12,439 12,439 13,337 13,346 6,912 6,912 -211,269 -217,311 2,070 2,070 53,939 53,541 22,737 49,806 733,425 735,539 839,600 852,907 295,000 113,189 223,883 236,042 7,199 7,199 402,000 400,980 116,200 108,496 2,320,000 1,017,033 85,805 49,790 -. -67,947 -67,411 12,254 12,254 467 932,568 921,118 700,000 88,092 1,719,600 1,750,655 700,000 199,751 70,000 33,978 141,000 148,660 5,061,000 4,342,280 525,255 561,201 770,800 771,152 68,700 68,639 1,365,800 1,324,473 -254,000 554,528 2,343,300 2,343,679 105,000 524,765 371,700 407,661 " - 578 4,500 442 4,431 9-26 9,328,170 9,184,576 842,767' 842,767' 361,225' 361,225' 1,519,884 1,519,840 7,341,9103 7,341,9103 18,951,131 16,920,745 305,290 305,290 903,667 903,598 159,975 159,975 533,1691 533,169' 5,126,326 5,126,261 46,349 s 46,349' 1,166,718 1,166,657 62,842,473 62,838,471 9,599,816 9,533,233 4,149,816 4,067,122' 9,047,439 9,047,426 805,000 724,516 158,140" 158,140 643,306 643,245 356,056 356,056 2,230,857 2,230,788 18,574 18,574 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Contined) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 11. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 12. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (Federal Funds) 13. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Johns Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) 15. Longboat Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. New Pass Sarasota, Fla. (Federal Funds) 17. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Oklawaha River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 19. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 20. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 575,450 680,849 2,040,000 2,155,404 3,518,000 3,874,709 3,615,000 4,995,309 1,415,000 1,267,271 3,138,175 3,037,904 -313,000 1,429,511 - 1,550,000 - 1,113,940 102,906 103,406 7,764 7,764 1,080,000 390,605 172,324 71,185 642,000 601,158 27,171 22,929 813,000 906,411 19,700 19,260 39,000 37,722 3,778 3,778 -95,767 605,552 95,812 1,064 53,733 50,000 63,756 925,600 856,189 10,000 2,992 218,000 231,738 9-27 214,607 371,683 3,000 2,004 2,770,000 2,764,574 -97,500 393,720 440,110 443,550 11,728 1,500 1,157 70,000 37,340 13,763 13,763 4,502 4,502 510,000 39,768 1,813,114 1,037,318 19,918 27,368 10,788 11,191 185,000 186,330 287 798,000 828,885 -63,613 - 63,404 4,711,635 2,819,143 43,986 268,800 301,415 41,887 41,869 5,327 94,300 93,935 28,843 1,206,000 1,968,713 1,293 23,600 23,588 366,700 367,465 8,112,5578 8,112,5578 4,601,611' 4,598,374' 19,251,59810 19,250,88910 21,507,903" 21,419,750" 47,596,27812 47,596,278" 34,638,58613 32,742,9443 102,813 102,813 927,654 927,654'4 82,098" 81,755 373,716 373,671 1,020,233 1,020,233 55,650 55,632 172,324 172,324 45,811"6 45,811 1,340,172 1,339,807 21,392,59017 20,902,58617 21,222,66618 21,137,699" 503,700 503,700 315,264" 315,264" 1,885,68610 1,885,6742o 6,904,021s 6,904,02111 3,175,309" 3,175,272" 1,953,277 1,953,277 TABLE 9-A (Contined) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section . Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 20.(Cont.) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Ponce Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 22. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 23. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 24. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 25. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 26. St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 27. San Juan Harbor, P. R. (Federal Funds) 28. Tampa Harbor, Fla. (Main Project) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Brevard County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work; Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 175,000 1,580,000 124,533 1,501,274 -172 - 107,000oo 11,220 11,220 5,298 5,298 200,000 -50,000 70,384 64,543 20,204 303,974 20,204 303,544 700,000 1,950,000 667,804 1,971,279 1,065,000 1,064,852 75,000 43,505 170,000 169,256 9,809 9,809 6,737 10,203 8,500,000 10,787,392 2,216,000 2,206,042 41,000 65,817 20,838 5,500 188,000 187,913 30,000 66,694 500,000 496,969 21,283 15,876 13,725 1,651,449 1,651,417 15,084,740 17,637,704 -649,000 -692,877 143,000 105,067 26,483 157 157 41,541 9-28 1,010,000 1,136,384 161,400 164,883 37,887 469,409 5,375,764 5,375,737 2,415,600 2,415,600 1,379,000 576,409 410,882 3 346,089~" 964,321 964,321 20,528,7734 16,025,695 u 1,004,652 1,004,652 13,690,370 13,502,414 1,476,4342 1,476,43425 4,096,415 4,096,377 98,000 96,404 3,602 3,602 530,000 76,296 1,176 1,588 2,500,000 2,415,309 696,000 S83,499 1,350,000 305,918 183,070 186,845 540,000 126,739 66,500 68,076 82,128 79,696 32,895,000 33,030,922 974,956 1,028,633 152,460 198,480 1,400,000 23,518 15,519 15,519 18,860 3,153,6026 1,792,34126 2,133,549 2,133,478 615,000 548,183 255,95727 255,60817 1,565,348" 243,526w" 13,774,968" 13,774,9682 10,486,784" 10,486,6433 102,047,64331 100,939,40631 11,822,62232 11,820,00432 569,962 454,112 2,346,492 731,062 28,509 28,509 2,327,000 536,759 125,000 61,803 1,325 1,325 13,058,000 9,025,007 165 183 2,400,000 2,312,103 402,200 1,014,901 1,400,000 1,083,350 63,700 63,629 346,935 1,375,000 53,753 2,208,000 2,210,323 11,293,100 10,203,797 337,100 334,640 150,000 58,746 425,000 204,992 12,833 12,833 1,701,000 19,204 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Contined) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 33. Broward County. New Work: Fla. Beach Erosion Approp. Control and Hills- Cost boro Inlet, Fla., Maint: Navigation Project Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 34. Dade County, New Work: Fla. Approp (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Ceost 35. Duval County. New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 36. Ft. Pierce, Fla. New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 37. Manatee County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost 38. Palm Beach New Work: County, Fla. from Approp. Martin County line Cost to Lake Worth Maint: Inlet to Broward Approp. County line Cost (Federal Funds) 39. Pinellas County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 42. Central and New Work: Southern Florida Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 43. Four River New Work: Basins, Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 44. Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. P. R. Cost (Federal Funds) 2,002 3,277 3,277 2,800,000 2,369,242 2,500,000 1,233,737 3,150,000 108,009 1,889,500 41,199 1,950,000 1,913,144 65 65 22,372 211 211 2,443,956 3,900,000 1,937,473 4,473,050 2,979,000 1,450,000 2,173,272 3,702,699 600,000 2,395,167 2,300,000 1,915,955 50,000 18,229 200 200 75,000 120,000 37,902 107,352 701 449 449 -4,792 1,225 1,225 -1,209 5,430,000 6,006,633 2,396,000 2,320,552 2,683,630 1,088,792 9,796,000 5,368,976 400,000 907,610 2,850,000 2,857,832 12,951 12,951 2,720,000 3,097,753 2,201,600 2,276,480 1,974,650 -400,750 1,596,786 1,275,084 1,108,286 25,000 55,200 27,980 27,980 2,000 51,189 900,000 729,296 57 57 180,000 77,866 2,184 2,184 72,000 44,961 6,506,000 8,235,534 2,317,000 2,336,408 1,748,300 1,585,151 4,093,445 6,647,101 5,514 610,848 380,000 93,081 386 386 432,000 112,765 6,105,000 7,145,663 2,696,000 2,602,459 1,215,000 1,402,144 3,010,350 5,423,550 598,789 826,279 844,575 773,000 749,324 295 295 908,000 732,098 25,000 21,066 112,621 13,115 13,115 306,710 1,761 1,761 290,803 6,070,000 5,891,260 4,681,500 4,372,350 1,222,330 7,476,000 7,395,814 1,007,225 1,295,292 5,703,100 5,696,442 18,290 18,290 1,758,841' 1,758,8411 14,638,95633 14,567,92633 9,482,63134 9,386,18834 5,678,900 5,643,684 4,442,400 3,910,015 1,175,44835 1,150,20135 30,884 30,884 908,000 732,098 222,000 217,509 1,830,834 1,772,728 13,621 13,621 1,539,693 1,434,746 5,556 5,556 1,503,183 1,405,342 247,236,39736 247,006,558" 27,471,361 26,938,161 47,729,075 46,694,089 60,997,095 60,751,85837 9,754,330 9,599,474 5,850,000 5,594,000 6,060,000 9,940,000 33,935,568 4,728,952 5,145,594 8,547,368 9,973,955 33,844,322 9-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1. Work-in-kind. 2. Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3. Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock and $1,003,000 contributed funds for new work. 4. Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project from contributed funds. 5. Excludes $42,783 contributed funds for new work. 6. Includes $135,686 expended for recreation facilities. 7. Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Sec. 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 8. Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work. 9. Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. 11. Includes $213,222 for maintenance on preious projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 12. Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 13. Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 14. Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 15. Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. 17. Includes $16,222,275 for new work under previous project, $549,348 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed proiect report prepared under Section 107 mofidication to the project. 18. Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects and $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement. 19. Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 20. Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for the permanent indefinite appropriation. 21. Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. 22. Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. 23. Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 24. Excludes $323,456 contributed funds. 25. Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. 26. Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 27. Includes $32,689 under previous project. 28. Includes $20,532 under previous project. 29. Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 30. Includes $44,730 in maintenance under previous project. 31. Includes $853,050 for new work under previous project. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. 32. Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 33. Includes $2,299,526 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 34. Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 35. Excludes $300,083 in property for services furnished by local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 36. Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla., project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. 37. Includes costs of $55,992 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 P.L. 675/77 July 23, 1942 June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cut-offs CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 3 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. (See Section 4 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at the bend Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel CLEARWATER PASS, FLA. (See Section 6 of Text) Entrance channel 10 x 150 feet, inside channel 8 x 100 feet, and a turning basin CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 7 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 8 of Text) Entrance jetties Raising and extending jetties to provide 19-foot depth Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20- to 24-foot depth and 400- to 600-foot channel width Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor Provided for a 26-foot channel Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 293, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 9-31 TABLE 9-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act. Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. March 1, 1962 By Senate and House Public Works Committee Auth. by Chief of Engineers March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. (See Section 9 of Text) 12- x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals Extension of 11- x 125-foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 10 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. (See Section 11 of Text) 9- x 100-foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U. S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1 Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act H. Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 6- x 80-foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 PARA June 26,1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. Do. July 3, 1958 Chief of Engineers Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami Channel width of 100 feet Operation and care of Palm Bailey Bridge Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach Channel 12 x 125 feet Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian Turning basin at Vero Beach Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 9-32 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1907 June 14, 1880 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 5, 1920 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 2, 1964 Under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act. Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 13 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. Jetties at entrance (maintenance only) Extension of jetties, etc. (maintenance only) Main channel 30 by 300-600 feet; anchorage basin at Mayport; and training walls and revetments ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO THE OCEAN Consolidation of above projects Widening bend at Dame Point to 900 feet Widening Drummond, Trout, and Six Mile (now Long Branch) Creeks Cut to 400 feet; and Terminal Channel 30 by 400 feet Maintenance of existing channel widths; widening Terminal Channel to 590 feet; the 28-foot area between Laura St. and St. Elmo W. Acosta Bridge; channel along south side of Commodore Point; and basin at Naval Reserve Armory Main channel 34 feet deep via Terminal Channel Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff 34 by 500 feet Maintain existing entrance channel depths of 40 and 42 feet; deepen main ship channel to 38 feet to Mile 20 and widen channel near Mile 5 and near Mile 7 JOHN'S PASS, FLA. (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 10 x 150 feet in the gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW-2.6 miles long LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. (See Section 15 of Text) 12- x 150-foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10- x 100-foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. (See Section 16 of Text) 10- x 150-foot entrance channel; 8- x 100-foot inner channels; and 8-footdeep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. (See Section 17 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to JacksonvilleMiami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart H.Doc. 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 767 H.Ex.Doc. 346, 53rd Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report 1895, p. 1586 H.Doc. 611, 61st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 483, 70th Cong. 2d sess. S.Comm. print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 322, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 230, 78th Cong. 2d sess. S.Doc. 179, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 214, 89th Cong., 1st sesq. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 76, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 Do. Auth. by Chief of Engineers November 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976 S.R. October 1, 1976 Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Enlarge existing 8- x 90-foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. (See Section 18 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 19 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests, to 20 feet Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot-square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and restoring existing jetties Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1. 1949 An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long, merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. (See Section 20 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south side of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir PONCE HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 21 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot-depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion of the adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 76, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 185, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185. 73d Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 705, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 9-34 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Def. Act of March 4, 1929 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 22 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase turning basin in size and depth Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 23 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical, or other means Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 24 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. (See Section 25 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet thru bar cut, tapering to 150 feet thru the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period ST. PETERSBURG HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 26 of Text) Dredging Point Pinellas Channel 16 x 200 feet Channel 19 x 250 feet westward from Tampa Bay into and including the basin at the port of St. Petersburg Channel 20 x 200 feet leading southward from previous authorization to Tampa Bay Entrance channel 24 x 300 feet from Tampa Bay to and including a 12-foot basin in Bayboro Harbor; Maritime Service channel 15 x 100 x 300 feet; channel 12 x 75 x 300 feet in mouth of Salt Creek SAN JUAN HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 27 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel Modified condition of local cooperation H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93d. Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act S.Doc. 229, 70th Cong., 2d sess. R.&H. Committee Doc. 71, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 70, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 9-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 August 4, 1976 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Do. Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal DeeApremniyn gT epromrtiinoanls of entrance and approach channels and basins to and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32-foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage A bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 28 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybox, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12-foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under the title Improving Hillsborough Bay, Fla.) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, pp. 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. 9-36 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 Do. Do. May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly .. For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950) For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the Gulf to Mullet Key Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a turning diameter of 1,200 feet Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 32 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 9-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 October 27, 1965 S.R. May 31, 1974 H.R. November 20, 1975 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS June 30, 1948 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Do. Do. Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Do. August 13, 1968 Do. BROWARD COUNTY, FLA., BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 33 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, Fla. and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsborough Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades DADE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 34 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 35 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project FORT PIERCE, FLA. (See Section 36 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection projects MANATEE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 37 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 38 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 39 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 42 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County Project for Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties Improvement of supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 84, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 93, 37th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong. 1st sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 9-38 TABLE 9-B (Contin Acts Approved December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT ed) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. (See Section 43 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (See Section 44 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply, and recreation LAGO de PORTUGUES, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation PONCE, P.R. Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control Documents H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-39 - - TABLE 9-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 3 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, Fla. Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock Dimensions 90' wide; 600' long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,966,539 56 x 400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was con- increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a Federal structed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost responsibility. ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible with TABLE 9-D CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 7 of Text) R. N. Henry H. Buckman Eureka Lock Bert Dosh Dunnellon Inglis Lock Lock and Dam Lock Lock and Dam Nearest town Palatka, Sparr, Ocala, Dunnellon, Inglis, (miles) 11.2 15.8 8.9 2.5 3.2 Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 90.4 111.4 127.7 156.5 168.6 Lock dimensions (ft.)' 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 Normal lift (ft.) 20 20 0-152 12-272 28 Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) 14 17 16-31' 16-31' 18 Lower (ft.) 15 14 16 18 15 Character of Piles in Piles in Piles in Rock Rock foundation sand sand sand Kind of dam Movable Movable None None Movable Type const. Earth3 Earth3 - - Earth3 Percent complete 100 100 0 0 100 Estimated contract cost $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 'Clear width and greatest available length. 'Pool level varies with natural ground water profilefrom min3 imum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-40 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-E CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 7 of Text) Work Performed Cost Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of communications network, $10,350 Removal of debris, mosquitoes, and aquatic plant life from reservoirs 74,545 Analysis of hydrologic and meteorologic data for scheduling releases from Lake Ocklawaha and Inglis Bypass 6,429 Reimbursement to USGS for water quality surveillance 29,850 Water qaulity suveillance 29,067 Acaqnudis eitqiounip manedn tm aintenance of tools, 32,214 Maintenance of canal and dam slopes and berms 120,799 Collection for quarters -2,876 Clearing and Snagging, Lake Ocklawaha 17,518 Real Estate Management 9,111 Condition and operation studies 47,562 Gate Hoist Frame Repairs, Rodman and Inglis Dams 175,876 Engineering and design 5,152 Supervision and administration 243,220 Maintenance of roads 13,691 Trash removal 334 Total 813,142 Operation and care: Inglis Eureka and Buckman Locks, Rodman Dam Inglis Dam and Spillway. Inglis Bypass and Spillway, and buildings and grounds, and recreational facilities maintained by hired labor 483,141 Buildings and grounds maintained by contract 14,971 Sanitary facilities at recreation areas 13,219 Total 511,331 9-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 9-F OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 17 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Engineering and design $27,972 Supervision and administration 2,164 Total applied cost 30,136 Maintenance: District communications network 20,700 Repair and replacement of project signs 14,527 Snagging and clearing navigation channels 46,183 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities 52,662 Collection for Quarters -12,115 Service and maintain traffic counters 5,982 Maintenance of downstream safety barriers and repair electrical system 6,575 Real Estate 61,817 Reevaluate and update master plan 17,807 Condition and operation studies 41,907 Maintenance of Operating Equipment 7,733 Fill old St. Lucie Lock 368,333 Dredging Crossroads 434,384 Engineering and design 45,705 Supervision and administration 171,385 Hired labor surveys, inspections, and reports 69,928 Total applied cost 1,353,513 Operation and care: Hired labor cost of operating Moore Haven, Ortona and St. Lucie Locks and maintenance of structures and grounds 615,200 9-42 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-G REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 23 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. John's River and tributaries and Withlacoohee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 27,700 $1,658,494 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 4,524 270,808 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines, and work tools 53,249 Snagging and clearing 113,663 Misc. Hired Labor Surveys and Equipment 1,665 Operation of communications network 10,350 Engineering design 79,323 Supervision and Administration 124,551 Total 32,224 2,312,103 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 29 of Text) Date Cost Incurred Survey During Project Conducted Period Anclote River. Fla. March 1980 $13,221 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. March 1980 11,619 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. June 1980 4,648 Big Marco Pass, Fla. July 1980 9,780 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. January 1980 3,846 Christiansted Harbor, VI. April 1980 110 Courtenay Channel, Fla. January 1980 5,501 Crystal River, Fla. April 1980 19,560 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. March 1980 5,183 Everglades Harbor, Fla. February 1980 3,694 Homosassa River, Fla. April 1980 1,039 IWW, Miami to Key West, Fla. July 1980 5,836 Key West Harbor, Fla. February 1980 23,423 Kissimmee River, Fla. April 1980 449 Largo Sount Channel, Fla. November 1979 57 Manatee River, Fla. January 1980 1,955 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. July 1980 1,527 Melbourne Harbor, Fla. January 1980 5,659 Miami Harbor, Fla. November 1979 54,062 Orange River, Fla. October 1979 5 Ozona, Fla. October 1979 5 Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. May 1980 4,197 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. October 1979 129 Rice Creek Fla. November 1979 1,873 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, Fla. October 1980 2,970 Steinhatchee River, Fla. February 1980 884 Suwannee River, Fla. October 1979 23,261 Withlacoochee River, Fla. October 1979 29,962 'Costs of surveys included with maintenance costs under Section "Other authorized Navigation Projects." 9-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, Fla. 1974 267,427 588,401 Aquatic Plant Control, Fla. (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 2,619,7001 � Arecibo Harbor, Fla. 1979 1,128,0753 1,109,637 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. 1939 5,099,153- Bakers Haulover Inlet. Fla.' 1965 243,235' 23,293 Bayport, Fla s 1972 58,4956 - Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla 1977 168,5697 45,358 Christiansted Harbor. St. Croix. V.I.,8 1964 303,317 37,741 Courtenay Channel, Fla.' 1940 22,846 13,962 Crystal River, Fla.' 1941 25,000 86,431 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla.' 1970 9,627 54,882 Everglades Harbor, Fla.' 1964 221,509" 47,043 Fajardo Harbor, P.R.4 1945 - - Guayanes Harbor, P.R.' 1945 - - Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. 1974 38,850 - Homosassa River, Fla.1 1937 3,9991 5,431 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. 1977 347,521 122,520 Hudson River, Fla.' 1974 9,889 - Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla.' 1963 243,079 13,305 Key West Harbor, Fla.' 1972 1,548,89211 449,545 Kissimmee River, Fla.' 1931 23,479 25,791 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla.5, a2 1931 10,276 8,166 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. 4, 13 1966 117,44311 39,754 Little Manatee River, Fla. * 1949 11,90311- Manatee River, Fla.12 1970 123,350 176,809 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. 1979 168,187 665,609 Melbourne Harbor, Fla.' 1970 17,696 58,354 Miami Harbor, Fla. 1979 24,266,066's 2,175,327 New River Fla.' 1956 36,518 18,650 Orange River, Fla.' 1962 2,000 22,737 Ozona, Fla., channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 14,560 Palm Beach, Fla., side channel and basin' 1946 - - Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. 1 17 1966 41,29718 33,174 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. 1973 400,000'1 253,088 Rice Creek, Fla.' 1957 85,20820 15,152 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, Fla.12 1978 1,171,24321 877,3572 St. Thomas Harbor. V.1.' 1949 1,989- Steinhatchee River, Fla.' 1940 135,053 38,718 Suwannee River, Fla." 1977 76,41823 193,472 Withlacoochee River, Fla.' 1969 614,912"4 363,922 1. Complete. 2. Excludes $918,205 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $288,000 contributed funds for new work. 4. Excludes $243,235 for contributed funds. 5. Inactive. 6. Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. 7. Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 8. Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 9. Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 10. In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 12. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 13. Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R& H Act. 14. Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 15. Expended on restudy. 16. Includes $2,202,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $452,500 for recreation facilities. Excludes $2,262,710 contributed funds which includes $343,479 workin- kind and $160,429 in costs for North Jetty Recreation facility. 17. Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chef of Engineers under Sections 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 18. Excludes $41,296 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 21. Beresford Cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam, Lake, and Volusia Counties in inactive status. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 22. Includes $25,838 under previous project. 23. Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 24. Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 9-44 TABLE 9-I JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-J OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park 1969 34,862' - Key West, Fla. 1963 96,3402 3,794 Lee County, Fla. 1971 - - Lido Key, Fla. 1971 Mullet Key, Fla. 1973 436,2013 1,656 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140' 6,257 San Juan, Puerto Rico 1965 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. 1978 1,667,220 1,022 1. Includes $2,462 cost of reconnaissance and detailed project reports but excludes $13,818 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $192,168 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $187,133 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $781,188 in property or services furnished by local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 5. Excludes $714,522 contributed funds. 9-45 TABLE 9-K REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 42 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Com- Actual No. Name (miles) (ft.) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, Fla. 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, Fla. 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, Fla. 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, Fla. 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, Fla. 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culbert spillway with automatic conconstructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. trol. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-L CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 42 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Character Kind Kind Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool Depth of of of of Percent Contract Town Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) sins (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete Cost W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam' S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock Moore Haven Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 HGS-6 Mod. S-308B S-57 S-58 S-59 S-60 S-61 S-62 S-63 S-63A S-96 S-96A S-53 S-55 S-157 S-158 At Olga 0 56 x 400 2.5 3.0 14 Piles in ciay Frostproof Avon Park Sebring Sebring Okeechobee Okeechobee Hoore Haven Clewiston Okeechobee Pahokee Ashton Ashton Kissimmee Ashton St. Cloud Ashton Ashton Ashton Sebastian Sebastian Eau Gallie Christmas Sebastian Titusville 23 26 20 25 14 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 11 9 566 6 10 12 14 14 16 8 12 4 15 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 50 x 250 50 x 60 50 x 60 56 x 400 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 30 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 4.2 6.3 6.0 7.2 5.8 4.6 9.4 5.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.5 10.0 20.0 4.5 48.5-52.33 46.3 40.0 34.0 26.8 21.0 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 62.0 64.0 58.0 64.0 55.0 61.0 62.0 57.0 24.0 25.0 17.5 14.0 20.0 4.0 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 12.9 7.5 18 6 6 6 6666666666 6 clay Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Piles in sand Slab on sand Piles in sand and slab on sand Slab on sand Earth foundation, sand Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Movable Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete None Steel sheet pile lockwalls None Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete Fixed Reinforced concrete None Concrete and steel sheet pile None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. 'Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (5-79) is a Federal responsibility. 3The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. 'Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. *Estimated. :'The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 96 0 100 0 000 100 000000000 $3,803,655 $1,191,574.70 $1,513,693,91 $1,050,600.69 $1,326,073.12 $1,213,248.51 $1,320,039.84 $240.0002 $3,122,0002 340,3002 $8,308,700 $1,301,0002 $1,301,0002 $1,301,0002 $1,301,0002 $689,217 $1,301,0002 $1,301,0002 $1,274,0002 $1,141,0002 $1,086,0002 $1,054,0002 $1,080,0002 $1,374,0002 $1,242,0002 TABLE 9-M REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 42 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized %/0 Cash Contributions' June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sept. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 July 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Recreation Features 42.0 Water Resources 20.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for 50.0 under Provisions of recreational craft Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act 'Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp which is computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 42 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Construction of: Locks $234,506 Channels and canals 1,524,795 Levees 755,633 Pumping plants 1,842,849 Floodway control and diversion structures 1,198,285 Engineering and design 985,847 Supervision and administration 571,675 Total applied cost 7,113,590 Maintenance: Operation and care of facilities, buildings and grounds 49,777 Operation of district communications network 27,190 Repair or replacement of project signs 61,596 Patrol, inspections, and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike 468,426 Repair and stabilize crown road, Herbert Hoover Dike 54,731 Remove weed growth and replant grass on levee slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 32,341 Rebuild and regrade levee slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 2,434 Clean out landslide toe ditches and berms on Herbert Hoover Dike 13,772 Repair or replace culverts, Herbert Hoover Dike 4,706 Repair fences, Herbert Hoover Dike, LD-3 60,430 Recreation area, W.P. Franklin Lock 40,586 Berms, fences and shrubs on C-43 756 Clear debris from landslide entrance channel to all culverts, approach channels at HGS and floodway channels 18,066 Repair and riprap eroded berms, Herbert Hoover Dike 1,032,509 Remove trees and riprap slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 138,788 Operations W.P. Franklin Lock and Spillway (S-79) 125,010 Operations and maintenance of spillways: St. Lucie (S-80); Moore Haven (S-77); Ortona (S-78); S-10, 11, & 12 73,365 Operation of four hurricane gate structures 33,106 Operation and maintenance of 20 drainage culverts, thru levees and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal 7,230 Mowing grass on levee slopes Herbert Hoover Dike 88,838 Collection for quarters anddamages -4,376 Operation of Port Mayaca Lock and Spillway 113,107 Reimbursement to U.S.G.S. for cooperative stream gaging 29,660 Analysis of data for scheduling releases 182,982 Water quality studies 351,327 Real Estate Management 5,344 Dam Safety Studies 4,620 Service and maintain traffic counters 7,141 Reconnaissance Reports, Major Rehab. 11,572 Survey Water Data Gauges 180,064 Periodic Surveys 21,568 Emergency Repair, HGS-4 244,468 Repair St. Lucie Tieback Levee 58,212 Rehabilitation of existing equipment for the hydrometer network 42,684 Dewater, repair, sandblast and paint S-12, HGS-3 277,302 Reevaluate and update master plan 25,480 Performance momtoring 3,173 Maintenance of Airboat 3,712 Engineering and design 64,562 Supervision and administration 416,091 Total applied cost 4,372,350 9-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 42 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Pumping Plants: S-332 Jan 79 - Jul 80 Aug 1980 Structures S-310 Oct 77 - Jun 80 Feb 1980 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 42 of Text) Construction Approx. 0/0 Feature Started Complete Channels and Canals: C-103 March 1979 60 C-304 January 1980 67 Levees: L-18 & 19 April 1980 10 L-24 & 25 January 1980 23 Pumping Plants: S-331 March 1979 60 Structures: S-151 January 1980 67 S-339 February 1979 95 S-340 February 1979 95 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-Q FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 43 of Text) Nearest town 20 miles Name of nearest town Ocala, Fla. Distance above mouth of River 65.5 miles Lock dimensions 30 x 125 feet Normal lift 18.0 feet Elevation of normal pool surface 58 feet Depth of sills 12 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Kind of dam None Type of construction Reinforced concrete Percent complete 100 Estimated Cost (including dam and spillway) $2,032,000 TABLE 9-R FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 43 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 July 1968 - Mar. 1970 Not transferred Alteration of Facilities B-195 May 1971 - Jan. 1973 Do. B-594 Jan. 1973 - Jan. 1974 Do. Alteration of Facilities B-196 Oct. 1972 - Jan. 1975 Do. SCL RR Br., B-196 Dec. 1972 - July 1975 July 1975 Channels and Canals: C-135 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 Dec. 1968 C-135, Sec. 1A July 1966 - Aug. 1967 Oct. 1967 C-135, Sec. lB May 1968 - Sep. 1972 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 Jan. 1971 - Dec. 1973 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 3A Dec. 1972 - Apr. 1975 Oct. 1977 C-135, Sec. 3B Feb. 1975 - Aug. 1977 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 4A Apr. 1976 - Jan. 1979 Not transferred C-136 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Nov. 1977 C-231, Phase I July 1973 - Apr. 1975 Dec. 1975 C-231, Phase II July 1973 - Jan. 1974 Dec. 1975 C-331 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Sep. 1968 C-531 Apr. 1966 - Jan. 1969 Apr. 1969 C-534 June 1970 - July 1971 Nov. 1971 Structures: S-160 May 1967 - Dec.1968 Dec. 1968 S-161 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Nov. 1977 S-162 Apr. 1975 - June 1977 Apr. 1977 S-353 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Nov. 1968 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway Apr. 1967 - Mar. 1969 Dec. 1975 S-551 July 1970 - Feb. 1972 Not transferred Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 June 1968 - July 1970 Dec.1975 L-212, Sec. 2 July 1970 - Sep. 1971 Dec. 1975 9-51 TABLE 9-S REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 46 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, Fla. 1960 $66,485' Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection 1966 Hillsborough Bay, Fla.s 1969 Hogtown Creek, Fla. 1972 83,299- Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla.' 1966 1. Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project 2. Inactive. was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under 3. Includes $44,282 for reconnaissance and detailed project Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as Modified by P.L. 685, reports. 84th Congress. TABLE 9-T FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 47 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Reconnaissance Report: Estate Mon Bijou, V.I. $5,000 Mill Creek, Fla. $1,587 Pinellas Park, Fla. 1,238 Seminole Basin, Fla. 5,000 Detailed Project Report: Rio Tallaboa, P.R. $121,949 Sabana Grande, P.R. 84,137 Savan Gut-St. Thomas, V.I. 87,001 9-52 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT* This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama, south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River basin, to and including Pearl River Basin. It includes a section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Apalachicola Bay, Fla.............. 10-2 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ....................... 10-3 3. Bayou Coden, Ala.............. 10-3 4. Bayou La Batre, Ala............ 10-3 5. Biloxi Harbor, Miss ............ 10-4 6. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala .................... 10-4 7. Blackwater River, Fla.......... 10-6 8. Cadet Bayou, Miss .............. 10-6 9. Dauphin Island Bay, Ala ......... 10-6 10. Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala ........ 10-7 11. East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla ....................... 10-7 12. East Pearl River, Miss. and La ......................... 10-8 13. Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala ................... 10-8 14. Fly Creek, Ala ................ 10-9 15. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border (Mobile District) ....................... 10-9 16. Gulfport Harbor, Miss.......... 10-10 17. Mobile Harbor, Ala ............. 10-10 18. Panama City Harbor, Fla ........ 10-11 19. Pascagoula Harbor, Miss ........ 10-12 20. Pearl River, Miss. and La........ 10-12 21. Pensacola Harbor, Fla .......... 10-13 22. Perdido Pass Channel, Ala ....... 10-14 Navigation (Cont.) Page 23. Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla ......... 10-14 24. Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District ................... 10-14 25. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala., and Miss ....................... 10-15 26. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .......................... 10-16 27. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... .... 10-16 28. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. 10-16 Beach Erosion Control 29. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ........................ 10-16 Deauthorized Projects 30. Deauthorized Projects ............. 10-16 Flood Control 31. Okatibbee Lake, Miss........... 10-16 32. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, Miss....................10-16 33. Edinburg Lake, Pearl River, M iss ............................. 10-17 34. Gordons Creek. Hattiesburg, Miss ............... 10-17 35. Houlka Creek, Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Miss ......... 10-17 *All cost and finance statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Flood Control (Cont.) 36. Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala ................. 10-17 37. Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala ............................ 10-18 38. Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala ................... 10-18 39. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. 10-18 40 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 10-19 41. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 10-19 Multiple Purpose Prjects Including Power Page 42. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala., and Ga .............................. 10-19 42A.Carters Lake, Ga ............... 10-20 42B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala ............................. 10-20 42C. Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, Ala ............................. 10-21 42D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala ............................... 10-21 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power (Cont.) Page 42E. Coosa River Navigation ........... 10-21 43. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, Ga...................... 10-22 44. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Ala., Ga., and Fla.............. 10-22 44A. Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga ......... 10-23 44B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga ............. 10-24 44C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla ......................... 10-24 44D. Spewrell Bluff Lake, Ga ......... 10-25 44E. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga ................... 10-25 44F. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, Ga. and Ala. ......... 10-26 45. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .............. 10-26 General Investigations 46. Surveys ....................... 10-27 47. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......................... 10-27 Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FLA. Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing prqject. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by -880 feet and nine feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, six feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, with a connecting channel six feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound; (f) a channel ten feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100- foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. (See Table 10-B for authorized modifications of Two Mile project.) Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pileand- timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included $5,575 for channels; $41,655 for condition studies; $1,317 10-2 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT for engineering and design; and $5,151 for supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile were completed in September 1977. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $1,898,848 for new work and $2,083,268 for maintenance, a total of $3,982,116. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 30 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in Alabama, Georgia, Florida and Louisiana. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning, engineering, design, supervision with the States of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi cost $18,295. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $372,287. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, ALA. Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The project provides for a channel eight feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence eight feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin eight feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $632; operational studies cost $2,884; and, engineering, design, supervision and administration $9,583. Condition at end offiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated 31 March 1975 and completed 26 March 1976. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $325,051 for new work and $56,290 for maintenance, a total of $381,341. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, ALA. Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, Ala., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. 10-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies amounted to $1,195. Engineering, design, supervision and administration costs amounted to $5,261. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $311,095 for new work and $1,125,302 for maintenance, a total of $1,436,397. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $5,261. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12- foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10- foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications authorized by River and Harbor Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 28 March 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide ard 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel six feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive and excluded from the foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-and-timber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Modifications to the project consisting of construction of a small craft harbor under authority of Sec. 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act were completed for a fiscal year cost of $225,848. Maintenance: The contractors dredge, Little Rock, operating in the Biloxi Back Bay Channel during the period 23-31 August 1980, removed 38,889 cubic yards of material at a cost of $115,472. Other cost include: condition and operation studies, $41,690; and, engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs, $93,822. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. This 1966 authorized modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal costs under existing project as of 30 September 1980 were $1,171,054 for new work and $3,786,812 for maintenance, a total of $4,957,866. Contributed funds for new work amount to $78,600. 6. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows 10-4 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence, the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to the vicinity of Birmingham is about 415 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides essentially for a canalized channel nine feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams with 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Warrior replaced locks 8 and 9; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) is under rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock. The Jackson Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Estimated costs (1980) of major rehabilitations at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam is $49,800,000, and cost of providing recreation facilities at completed projects (Code 710) is $1,510,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-C for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam: Rehabilitation of lock and dam: Lands and damages cost $1,325; buildings, grounds and utilities cost $473,886; and engineering, design, supervision, and administration cost $72,155. Cost for recreational improvements amounted to $2,087 for Demopolis Lock and Dam. Recreational attendance at locks and dams during CY 1979 totaled 4,648,000 recreational user days. Maintenance: Four contractors' dredges operating during the period 2 May thru 30 September 1980 removed an estimated 2,900,500 cubic yards of material from various locations along the waterway, all for a cost of $3,789,065. The snagboat Ros removed 7,667 obstructions for a cost of $460,399. Other general charges for the waterway included: locks and dams, $20,873; operation studies, $530,434; water control management, $482,361; lands and damages, $11,736; permanent operating equipment, $64,430; and, engineering, design, supervision, administration and other cost, $1,527,893. Other maintenance costs for the system include: Jackson Lock and Dam, $685,403; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $1,287,286; Warrior Lock and Dam, $348,048; Oliver Lock and Dam, $552,454; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $302,890; Holt Lock and Dam, $473,183; and reservoir operation, $1,613,240. Condition at end offiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11, and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original locks and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1, 2, and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville 10-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15, and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed 6 February 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was essentially completed in 1980. The cost to September 30, 1980 for replacement of the lock was $49,713,175. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $152,651,229 for new work and $101,552,700 for maintenance, a total of $254,203,929. 7. BLACKWATER RIVER, FLA. Location. The river rises in south-central Alabama and flows southwesterly 75 miles through Alabama and Florida, emptying into Blackwater Bay, an arm of Pensacola Bay (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11382.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1949. Existing projects. The project provides for a 9- foot by 100-foot channel from the mouth upstream for 12 miles to Milton. Plane of reference is mean low water. The improved portion of the river is tidal throughout. Mean range is 2 feet and extreme 3 feet, except during storms. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A terminal serving a grain elevator and a petroleum terminal at Milton, and natural landings along the river are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation studies cost $1,903. Supervision and administration cost $136. Reconnaissance and condition surveys cost $4,764. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1906 and completed in 1916. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $36,650 for new work and $254,041 for maintenance, a total of $290,691. 8. CADET BAYOU, MISS. Location. Cadet Bayou (also known as Bayou Caddy), is a small tidal stream in southwest Hancock County, Mississippi, which flows easterly through marshland and empties into Mississippi Sound about 10 miles southwest of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11371). Existing project. The existing project provides for an 8- by 100-foot channel from the 8-foot depth in Mississippi Sound for about 7,800 feet to the mouth of Cadet Bayou, thence an 8- by 80-foot channel extending 700 feet into the bayou to a 6- by 60-foot turning basin (in addition to the 80-foot channel width) 130 feet long, thence a 6-.by 60- foot channel continuing upstream for 8,800 feet to a second turning basin 110 feet wide (in addition to the 60-foot channel width) and 100 feet long thence a 6- by 60-foot channel approximately 870 feet to the end of the project. The total length of improved channel is about 18,400 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.6 feet in the vicinity of Cadet Bayou. Extreme range, except during storms is about 3.5 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned pile-and-timber wharves, a boatyard, marine ways near the mouth, and several natural landings are located along the bayou. A fishing camp at mile 2 provides necessary facilities for recreational boating needs, including about 250 feet of marginal wharf. Local interests will be required to provide, maintain, and operate a public wharf for commercial boating interests near the mouth of the bayou, and another for recreational boating interests in the upper reaches. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included condition and operation studies, $1,557; engineering, design, supervision and administration $551. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced and completed in December 1970. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $87,921 for new work and $490,007 for maintenance, a total of $577,928. Contributed funds for new work amount to $31,000. 9. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, ALA. Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing prject. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel seven feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about seven acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel four feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin seven feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin 10-6 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about four feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local. cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Emergency dredging to extend the Fort Gaines Channel to allow for ferry service amounted to $253,886 for removal of 92,076 cubic yards of material. Maintenance: The contractors' dredge, Little Rock, performed maintenance dredging during the period 1 January thru 20 February 1980 and removed 40,655 cubic yards from the Fort Gaines Channel at a cost of $202,924. Hired labor costs included $818 for project condition surveys; $28,000 for operation studies; $3,598 for water control management and $8,894 for engineering, design, supervision and administration and other costs. In addition, $29,400 for emergency dredging was reimbursed by FEMA. Condition at end offiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $292,864 for new work and $866,293 for maintenance, a total of $1,159,157. 10. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, ALA. Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376). Existing project. The Dog River project provides for an 8-foot deep by 150-foot wide cBhaayn snheilp f crhoamn naeblo tuot a3n,d00 u0p f eDeotg e Rasivt eorf, tah eto Mtaol bdiilsetance of 26,200 feet, thence six feet by 100 feet for 12,300 feet to a point about 2,400 feet above the mouth of Halls Mill Creek, and a 6-foot by 100- foot spur channel from the main channel to the mouths of Perch and Halls Mill Creeks. Overall length of the proposed improvement is about 7.8 miles. This portion of the project has not been constructed due to local interest's inability to comply with cost-sharing responsibilities. The Fowl River project provides for a channel eight feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November, 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the Fowl River portion. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contractors dredge, Little Rock, operating during the period 12 January to 20 February 1980, removed 69,012 cubic yards of material from the Fowl River Channel at a cost of $224,042. In addition funds were reimbursed by FEMA in the amount of $29,400 for emergency dredging resulting from Hurricane Frederic. Hired labor costs included $500 for project condition surveys; $27,167 for condition and operation studies and $5,884 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Total Federal costs on the existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $859,208; $190,695 for new work and $668,513 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $114,100. 11. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FLA. Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 100-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. The west jetty is 10-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 provided with a low weir section 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 500 feet by 1,500 feet located between the west jetty and the navigation channel. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors dredge, Little Rock, operating in a portion of the East Pass and Lagoon Channels removed 14,267 cubic yards of material at a cost of $303,001. Hired labor dredging removed 45,954 cubic yards of material near the entrance channel during the period 14 August to 26 September 1980 at a cost of $124,972. Other hired labor costs included $27,317 for condition studies; $7,603 for water control management and $106,276 for engineering, design, supervision, administrationand other costs. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $916,715 for new work and $3,138,459 for maintenance, a total of $4,055,174. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 12. EAST PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. Location. The project is located at the mouth of East Pearl River, in a main tributary of Pearl River, Mississippi and Louisiana, which forms the boundary between southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Its mouth is 35 miles by water west of Gulfport Harbor, Miss., and 35 miles east of New Orleans, La., via Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11371.) Previous project. For details see page 1846 Annual Report for 1915 and page 504, Annual Report for 1934. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1.3 miles long, at the mouth of East Pearl River, connecting the 9-foot contour in Lake Borgne with the same contour in East Pearl River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet; while the extreme range is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminalfacilities. Natural available landings are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired laoor for the year included $48 for operational studies and $5,954 for project condition surveys.. Condition at end offiscal year. This project was completed in January, 1911. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $8,928 for new work and $462,614 for maintenance, a total of $471,542. 13. ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FLA. AND ALA. Location. The river is a single stream which rises in central Alabama, flows southwesterly to the Florida State line, thence southerly through Florida to Escambia Bay, an arm of Pensacola Bay. That part of stream in Alabama is known as Conecuh River and that in Florida as the Escambia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11382.) Previous project. For details see page 554 Annual Report for 1961. Existing project. The project provides for a 10- foot wide by 100-foot deep channel in Escambia Bay for 5.5 miles to the mouth of Escambia River, thence up Escambia River to about mile 7, thence a channel five feet deep for 50.9 miles to the Florida State line, and thence improvement of Conecuh River to the mouth of Patsaliga Creek, a distance of 79.5 miles. The project, including the portion in Escambia Bay, is 142.9 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide at the mouth of the river is 1.5 feet and extreme range, except during storms, is three feet. Ordinary seasonal fluctuation at the state line does not exceed eight feet. The highest flood stage on record (1919) was 31.3 feet at the state line and 50.6 feet at River Falls, Alabama, 137.5 miles above the mouth. The existing project was completed in 1960 at a cost of $137,324. (See Table 10- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Chemstrand Corporation, at mile 7, provides a barge slip and facilities for handling and storing industrial chemicals and other materials received at their plant. Gulf Power Company, at mile 4, maintains a slip, marginal wharf, and facilities for handling coal. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors' dredge, Hendry #6, operating during the period 14 January thru 10-8 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT 19 February 1980, removed 104,750 cubic yards of material at a cost of $558,871. Other costs included condition and operation studies, $5,446; and engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs, $35,639. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to adoption of the modification authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act, was commenced in 1881 and completed in 1882. Construction of the modification authorized in the 1958 River and Harbor Act was commenced and completed in 1960. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $137,324 for new work and $929,271 for maintenance, a total of $1,066,595. 14. FLY CREEK, ALA. Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Ala., 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Faihope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Ala. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on both banks near mouth of creek, consisting of a small pile-and timber service wharf, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a marginal timber wharf and shed for commercial fishing boats on right bank of creek immediately above first bend. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condtion and operation studies amounted to $59. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30,1980 amounted to $225,934 of which $29,000 was for new work and $196,934 for maintenance. 15. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama, to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with for the work authorized prior to 1966. For modification of the Gulf County Canal which was authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required in connection with disposal of spoil, or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save theUnited States free from all damages due to construction and maintenance of the project including damages to wharves, piers, bridges, and other structures; provide and maintain at local expense adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas commensurate with depths provided in related project area; and accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other facilities as-well as their maintenance. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle - Apalachicola Bay section: Hired labor costs included $22,224 for condition and operation studies and $6,585 for supervision and administration. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: 10-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Hired labor costs included $5,745 for condition surveys; $496 for water control management studies; $33,176 for channels and canals, and, $4,768 for supervision and administration. St. Andrew Bay- Choctawhatchee Bay section: The contractors' dredge, Manchai, operating during the period 29 February through 16 March 1980, removed 88,550 cubic yards of material at a cost of $437,539. Other costs for the year included: bank stabilization, $194,096; project condition studies, $73,314; water control management, $2,765; and, engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs, $88,483. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Costs for the year include condition and operation studies, $8,716; bank stabilization, $976,022; and engineering, design, supervision and administration, $46,961. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: The contractors' dredge, Little Rock, operating during the period 1- 30 September 1980, removed 39,626 cubic yards of material near Mile 154 at a cost of $161,734. Other costs for the year included: condition and operation studies, $275,145; bank stabilization, $5,286; channels and canals, $210,879; and engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs, $50,463. Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Hired labor costs included $78,958 for condition and operation studies and $5,252 for engineering, design, supervision, and administration. In addition, compliance inspections cost $294,876; direct charges to Mobile Area Office cost $16,657; and, direct charges to Panama City Area Office were $2,666. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which is deferred for restudy. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1980, were $33,976,539, of which $6,434,694 was for new work and $27,541,845 for maintenance. 16. GULFPORT HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 44 and 90 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and Mobile Harbor, Alabama, respectively, and 78 miles east of New Orleans (via Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747, Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commerical smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straightapproach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a small-boat basin, all at a depth of eight feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern railconnected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors' dredge, Diesel, performing maintenance dredging during the period 16 January thru 12 April 1980; removed 1,999,224 cubic yards of material from the Ship Channel and Anchorage Basin at a cost of $1,376,709. Hired labor dredging removed 21,567 cubic yards of material from Ship Island Bar at a cost of $121,689. Other hired labor cost included $170,149 for condition studies and $66,083 for engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs. Condition at end offiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $635,758 for new work and $18,783,777 for maintenance, a total of $19,419,535. 17. MOBILE HARBOR, ALA. Location. The project is located along the lower five miles of Mobile River, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 42-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 40- 10-10 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in) Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Air Force Base ocean terminal, and continuing thence to a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channel excavation cost, $21,604,010, and, engineering, design, supervision and administration cost, $363,602, all for work on Theodore Channel. Maintenance: The contractor's dredge, Paul F. Jahncke, performing maintenance dredging from the period 30 October 1979 to 1 February 1980 removed 9,387,548 cubic yards of material from the Lower Bay Channel at a cost of $5,892,000. Hired labor dredging during the period 15 October 1979 to 9 March 1980 cost $1,722,740 for removal of 607,749 cubic yards of material from the Outer Bar Channel. Other hired labor costs included $504,360 for natural resource management; $36,980 for water control management and $365,883 for engineering, design, supervision and administration and other costs. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1931 and completed in July 1965 except for the Theodore Channel portion, presently under construction. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $36,068,903 for new work and $47,130,764 for maintenance, a total of $83,199,667. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $1,550,000 and for maintenance amounted to $29,500. 18. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project (as modified) provides for a channel about 3.7 miles long extending from deep water in the bay (intersection of Bay Harbor and Dyers Point Channel) across Lands End to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 40 feet deep in the bay and across Lands End, and 450 feet wide, 42 feet deep and about 1.1 miles long in the approach channel in the Gulf, protected by two jetties, each about 700 feet long; branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intormodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing aut 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel; a channel in Watson 10-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Bayou, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge, about 1.75 miles; channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities. The east and west jetties have been reworked and are presently about 2,075 and 2,896 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal range 1.3 feet and extreme 3.0 feet. (See Table 10- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Hired labor cost amounted to $3,077 for project condition surveys; $25,734 for condition and operation studies; and $5,707 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $1,434,485 for new work and $3,326,156 for maintenance, a total of $4,760,641. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 19. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), in southeastern Mississippi, about 61 miles by water west of Mobile Harbor, Alabama, and about 44 miles by water east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impoundwiindge , araenad faobr oluittt o1r,a5l0 0d rfiefte,t 4lo0 nfge eta ddjeaecpe,n 2t 0t0o fteheet channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Dog River, thence up Dog River to Highway 63 bridge; and (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Dog River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors dredges, Ponchartrain, Port Arthur and Blackburn, operating in the Pascagoula Sound Channel, Impoundment Basin and Bayou Casotte Channel during the period 8 October 1979 to 25 January 1980 removed a total of 4,105,436 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,635,888. Hired labor hopper dredging removed 133,612 cubic yards of material from Horn Island Bar Channel at a cost of $297,975. Other hired labor cost included $222,150 for project condition studies; and, $90,173 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965. Total Federal costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $5,668,543 for new work and $18,775,742 for maintenance, a total of $24,444,285. Contributed funds for maintenance amounted to $253,350. 20. PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. Location. Pearl River rises in east central Mississippi and flows southwest about 172 miles to Jackson, Mississippi, thence southeast about 269 miles to the head of its delta, where it divides into West Pearl and East Pearl Rivers. West Pearl River flows about 34 miles to the Rigolets, a tidal pass connecting Lake Pontchartrain with Lake Borgne, an arm of the Gulf of Mexico. Previous project. For details see page 750, Annual Report for 1938 and page 463, Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the mouth of West Pearl River for 58 miles to the mouth of Bogalusa 10-12 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Creek at Bogalusa, Louisiana, seven feet deep at low water with a bottom width of 100 feet in the river sections and 80 feet in the canal section; with locks 65 by 310 feet clear inside dimensions. The plan of improvement may be divided into three sections as follows: the river section from the mouth of West Pearl River to mile 28.5 at Holmes Bayou with a channel seven feet deep and 100 feet wide to be obtained by dredging, snagging, and construction of cutoffs and easement of critical bends at eight locations below lock one along Pearl River in its reach from its mouth to mile 26, all at a depth of seven feet; the canal section from mile 28.5 to 48.7 at Pools Bluff with a channel seven feet deep and 80 feet wide to be obtained by construction of three locks in the canal with sills across Bogue Chitto at mile 44 and across the river at mile 48.7; the river section from mile 48.7 to 58 at the mouth of Bogalusa Creek to be obtained by dredging, snagging and easing of bends. At Bogalusa the mean variation of water surface is 10 feet and extreme, 23 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Estimated cost of the project (1980) is $8,429,100 including $8,274,494 for improvements completed prior to 1966, and $154,800 cost for providing recreational facilities (Code 710). (See Table 10-D for features of locks included in existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The city of Bogalusa provides a barge terminal consisting of a wharf, transit shed, and access road at Richardson's Landing at the head of the project. A privately-owned wharf at the Pearl River Highway Bridge near Pearl River Station, Louisiana, is used for unloading logs. Only natural landings exist at various locations on the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included $2,984 for condition and operation studies; $20,841 for water control management studies; $2,243 for permanent operating equipment; $7,948 for engineering, design, supervision and administration; and other costs. Cost for Pearl River Reservoir amounted to $23,806. In addition, specific costs for various lock operations amounted to $41,222 for Lock No. 1, $22,649 for Lock No. 2, and $20,326 for Lock No. 3. Recreation attendance at the three locks during CY 1979 totaled 844,500 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to adoption of modifications authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, was commenced in October 1938 and completed in January 1956. All locks were opened to navigation in November 1953. No work has been initiated on modifications (cut-offs and easements of bends below Lock 1) authorized by the 1966 Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $8,418,465 for new work and $4,297,017 for maintenance, a total of $12,715,482. Contributed funds for new work amount to $65,000. 21. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel; (d) an inner-harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work performed by hired labor, $42,260 for condition and operation studies; $2,787 for water control management studies; $2,000 for buildings, grounds, and utilities; and, $6,201 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except those features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1980 were 10-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 $875,005 for new work and $3,525,318 for maintenance, a total of $4,401,323. 22. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, ALA. Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence nine feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Condition at end of fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included condition and operation studies, $15,563; water control management studies, $853; channels and canals, $128,169; and, engineering, design, supervision and administration, $14,862. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1980 were $629,860 for new work and $3,009,261 for maintenance, a total of $3,639,121. ContribuL -s from local interest amount to $510,000 for rnew work and $10,325 for maintenance. 23. PORT ST. JOE, FLA. Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 115 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11389.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) An entrance channel 37 feet deep, 500 feet wide at its outer end and diminishing progressively in width to 400 feet at the first bend, a distance of 3.6 miles, thence continuing at a depth 37 feet and a width of 400 feet, through the second and third bend for 3.3 miles, thence continuing at a depth of 35 feet and a width of 300 feet 2.4 miles to a point in St. Joseph Bay where the entrance channel joins the north channel, a total overall distance of 9.3 miles, thence continuing in the north channel at a depth of 35 feet and a width of 300 feet to the north end of the turning basin at Port St. Joe, a distance of about 4.7 miles; (b) a turning basin 32 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 2,Q000 feet long, and a harbor channel therein 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long, adjacent to the waterfront at Port St. Joe; and (c) a channel 27 feet deep, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long leading from the south end of the turning basin to deep water in St. Joseph Bay. Average tidal variation is 1.4 feet and extreme, except during storms, is about 4 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Rail and highwayconnected terminal facilities available at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1969.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors dredge, Paul F. Jahncke, operating during the period of 9-29 July 1980, removed 272,905 cubic yards of material from Range D and the silting basin, for a cost of $572,972. Other costs included condition and operation studies, $34,865; water control management, $7,534; and, engineering, design, supervision and administration, $47,168. Project condition surveys cost $2,194. Condition at end offiscal year. The project was completed in July 1962. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1980 were $1,960,862 (including $20,000 contributed funds) for new work and $2,099,681 for maintenance, a total of $4,060,543. 24. REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT Location. The project is for all streams tributary to the Gulf Coast in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extermination or removal of plants from navigable waters of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, so far as they are or may become an obstruction to commerce, by any mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever; for construction and operation of boats equipped with suitable machinery for such removal, and construction and operation of log booms to prevent plants drifting from one stream to another. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. 10-14 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Extermination and removal of plants along the navigable coastal streams within the Mobile District was accomplished during FY 1980 at a cost of $22,859. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, which is for maintenance, was commenced about 1899, and work has been carried on since that time. Total Federal costs for the project through September 30, 198( amount to $1,098,294. 25. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, ALA. AND MISS. Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 232 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Location. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 232.2 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. The plan of improvement consists of three sections: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 147.3 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the lateral canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 45.6 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which the bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39.3 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River; the total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Estimated (1980) Federal cost for new work is $1,960,000,000, including $600,000 for work by the U.S. Coast Guard, and $9,400,000 for National Park Service, plus $170,000,000 non-Federal cost for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must make and maintain alterations in highways and hdirgahinwaagye brfaidcgileitsi easn da innd s epwroerv,i wdea tearn-dsu pmpalyin, taanind suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held 5 December 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total cost of new work during the fiscal year was $112,719,590, of which $806 was for work below Demopolis; $3,307,599 for Demopolis Lake; $9,468,762 for Gainesville Lock and Dam; $9,377,590 for Aliceville Lock and Dam; $6,956,112 for Columbus Lock and Dam; $21,180,515 for Aberdeen Lock and Dam. Canal section cost included: Lock A, $8,695,903; Lock B, $23,543,911; Lock C, $9,431,026; Lock D, $13,456,963; Lock E, $5,065,543. Engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs associated with the overall project amounted to $2,234,860. Maintenance: Cost for operation of the completed portion of the project during the year amounted to $2,183,137, which included the removal of 559,597 cubic yards of material from the channel below Gainesville, at a cost of $635,441. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $477,185,818 for new work, and $2,876,896 for maintenance for a total of $480,062,714. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is about 48 percent complete, including work being performed by Nashville District, which costs are not reported on by Mobile District. 26. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-E.) 10-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-F.) 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $392,710. (See Table 10-G.) Studies conducted under Section 103, 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to $22,215. (See Table 10-G.) Studies conducted under Section 54, Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974, Public Law 93-251, amounted to $62,399. Studies conducted under Section 55 WRD Act of 1974 Public Law 93.251, for providing technical and engineering assistance to non-Federal public interests for developing methods for the prevention of shore and stream bank erosion control cost $13,239. Beach Erosion Control 29. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-H.) 30. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS) Projects deauthorized under Section 12, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress, as amended. (See Table 10-I.) Flood Control 31. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MISS. Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acrefeet between a minimum elevation of 328 and topof- conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 acre-feet to 59,500 feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs for the year included: $50,472 for dams and reservoirs; $17,587 for service facilities; $180,667 for recreational management; $27,830 for condition studies; $41,500 for water control management; $39,414 for recreation facilities; $58,476 for permanent operating equipment; $9,694 for bank stabilization; $94,080 for engineering, design, supervision and administration; and, $3,468 for miscellaneous. Credit to operations and real estate administration amounted to $1,116. Due to flood control the reduction in flood losses was estimated to be $539,400. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1979 totaled 1,111,800 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $9,017,628 for new work and $3,427,494 for maintenance, a total of $12,445,122. 32. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MISS. Location. The project is on Tallahala Creek, 81.1 miles above its mouth, in Jasper County, Mississippi, 13 miles north of Laurel. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The dam will consist of a compacted earth fill 8,000 feet long, with top elevation 343.5 feet above national geodetic datum, or a maximum 71.5 feet above streambed elevation, with a top width of 18 feet, and a 300- foot long saddle dike with maximum height of 15 feet in the left abutment. The spillway which is 6,000 feet northeast of the left abutment, will consist of an unpaved, free-overflow type, 500 feet long, with fixed crest at elevation 335.0. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam will serve an 8-foot diameter, horseshoe-shaped concrete conduit. The reservoir at maximum pool elevation 306.5 will have an area of 4,000 acres and a total capacity of 63,000 acre-feet of which 35,900 acre-feet between elevations 288.5 and 302.0 will be used for water supply, 20,000 acrefeet between elevations 302.0 and 306.5 will be used for water quality improvement, and 7,100 acre-feet below elevation 288.5 will consist of dead storage. A volume varying seasonally from 10-16 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT 50,000 to 70,000 acre-feet between elevations 306.5 and 315.0 will be reserved for flood storage. Estimated Federal cost (1980) is $90,500,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to reimburse the United States for all costs allocated to water supply Act of 1958, as amended; and one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to general recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. In addition, local interests are required to reimburse the United States for the annual operation, maintenance and replacement cost allocated to water supply, and bear all cost of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife areas and facilities for initial development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost, $51,263. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 33. EDINBURG LAKE, PEARL RIVER, MISS. Location. The project would be located on Pearl River about two miles east of Edinburg, Mississippi, and about 130 river miles above Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water quality control, general recreation, fish and wildlife enhancement, and area redevelopment. The dam will consist of a compacted earth-fill and concrete structure 7,154 feet long including spillway section and retaining wall. The top of dam elevation would be 412.5 national geodetic datum with a maximum height of 54 feet above the existing streambed. Top width of dam would be 32 feet. The gated spillway would have a length of 292 feet with the crest at elevation 375. Flow over the crest would be regulated by six tainter gates, 42 feet long and 23 feet high. To provide for maximum releases of about 594 c.f.s. for all pool levels of conservation storage, two sluices would be provided in the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir at maximum pool elevation 395.6 (100-year flood pool) would have a pool area of 27,000 acres and a total reservoir storage capacity of 486,000 acre-feet. Of this amount, normal sedimentation storage would be 40,600 acre-feet; water quality, 90,200 acre-feet; recreation, 69,000 acre-feet; and flood control, 286,200 acre-feet. Normal pool elevation 282.0 would result in a 16,000 acre pool during the recreation season. The estimated Federal cost of the project (1980)is $152,000,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest would be required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement incurred therefore. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design, cost $6,096. 34. GORDONS CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MISS. Location. The project is located along the lower 12,320 feet of Gordons Creek between its mouth at Leaf River and Broad Street Bridge, within the city limits of Hattiesburg, Miss. Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood damage reduction along and upstream of the project limits by clearing, snagging, widening and the removal of debris. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Will be turned over to local interest to maintain after project completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channel improvements cost $79,594. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in June 1979 and was completed in June 1980. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1980 were $753,322, all for new work. 35. HOULKA CREEK, CHICKASAW AND CLAY COUNTIES, MISS. Location. The project is located along the lowermost 34.1 miles of Houlka Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi. The upper limits of the project extend to Mississippi State Highway 32. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement by clearing, snagging and the removal of debris at selective locations along the 34.1 mile project length between top banks. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Clearing, snagging and channel improvements cost $121,036. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1979 and was completed in September 1980. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1980 were $237,496, all for new work. 36. MURDER AND BURNT CORN CREEKS, BREWTON, ALA. Location. The project is located in the vicinity of Brewton and East Brewton, Alabama along the 10-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 lower 4.05 miles of Murder Creek and 0.93 miles of Burnt Corn Creek. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing, snagging and removal of debris from the bottom and side slopes of the creeks. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Clearing, snagging and channel improvement cost $99,037. Condition at the end of thefiscal year. Construction commenced in January 1979 and was completed in December 1979. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 1980 were $190,974, all for new work. 37. TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISS. AND ALA. Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line, by clearing the banks of trees and underbrush to flood stage, the removal of drift jams and the excavation of 13 cutoff channels; and for additional channel improvements and related works for flood control of the Tombigbee River and tributaries above the mouth of and including the Noxubee River in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers, to protect people and valuable agricultural property from overflow waters of the Tombigbee River. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1936 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel work cost $28,120. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. The over-all project, as modified, is about 47 percent completed. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $134,801 for new work and $1,151,702 for maintenance, a total of $1,286,503. 38. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MISS. AND ALA. Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River by means of channel clearing and snagging. Approved estimate of cost (1980) for new work is $158,541,000; consisting of $141,300,000 Federal funds, and $17,241,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion; and contribute $17,241,000 in cash or equivalent work. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $295,201. Ccndition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in June 1965, and the overall project is about five percent complete. Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $7,838,755 for new work. Contributed cost for new work has amounted to $49,752. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood-protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama, in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama- Coosa River Basin; and channel rectification projects on Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Old Town Creek, Tupelo, Mississippi; Big Brown Creek, Donovan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek, and Mantachie Creek, Fulton, Mississippi; Houlka Creek, Chickasaw and Clay Counties; and Luxapalila Creek, Alabama, in the Tombigbee River Basin; Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Pascagoula River Basin; Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Alabama, Conecuh River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi, in Chickasawhay River Basin; Jackson and East 10-18 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Jackson, Mississippi, in the Pearl River Basin; Clanton, Alabama; Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Armuchee Creek, Armuchee, Georgia; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas at Bainbridge, Georgia, in the Apalachicola- Chattahoochee-Flint Rivers Basin; and a drainage project in Jackson County, Florida. Projects at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia, and Collinsville, Alabama, include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 1980 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the projects. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Follow-up for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $23,615. Total cost to September 30, 1980 was $228,000 charged to maintenance. 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-J) 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-K) Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief activites under Public Law 8750. (See Table 10-K) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Powers 42. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previousm project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama- Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The present phase of improvement, now under construction, provides for construction of Jones Bluff and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a ninefoot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and for construction of Carters Dam, a multiplepurpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Estimated cost (1980) for new work on the present phase of Alabama-Coosa Rivers (exclusive of Coosa River navigation) is $292,026,650, consisting of $288,641,250 for structures, and $3,385,400 for supplemental channel improvements, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and Coosa River navigation project. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets 10-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued on Carters Dam and Jones Bluff Lock and Dam. Expenditures for work at Jones Bluff amounted to $3,533,201, Millers Ferry $3,160, and Carters $150,720. Engineering and design for Coosa River navigation segment amounted to $2,251,959. Total cost of new work amounted to $5,939,040. Maintenance: The contractors dredges, Armadillo, Vicksburg and BTD-51, removed 1,936,929 cubic yards of material during the period 2 May thru 30 September 1980 all at a cost of $1,978,091. Final contract payments were not made during the fiscal year. Condition and operation studies cost $183,047; water control management, $113,717; lands and damages, $10,794; buildings, grounds and utilities, $45,918; engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs, $113,569. Alabama-Coosa River Locks cost $315,986, Coosa River Reservoir operations cost $256,415; flood control monitoring cost $11,523. In addition, operation of Jones Bluff Lock and Dam cost $1,319,160; Millers Ferry Lock and Dam $1,903,222; Carters $1,485,797; all for a total maintenance cost of $7,737,239. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962 on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Jones Bluff Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was essentially completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Jones Bluff Lock and Dam is about 93 percent complete, and the overall project is 98 percent with completion scheduled for 1981. (See Table 10-L) 42A.CARTERS LAKE, GA. Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama- Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Carters, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258- foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a power house on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. The estimated cost (1980) is $111,380,000. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $150,721 of which power plant cost $88,953; recreation facilities $18,325; engineering, design, supervision, and administration $33,443. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $1,485,797. Gross power generation amounted to 721,360,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1980, of which 271,950,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1979 totaled 546,500 recreational user days. Reduction in flood losses due to operation of the project amounted to $700 for the year. In addition, joint operation of Carters with Allatoona Lake project reduced flood losses by $3,847,100 during the year in the vicinity of Rome, Ga. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. 42B.CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is at elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. 10-20 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: none. Maintenance: none. Recreation attendance during CY 1979 totaled 690,500 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $28,151,450. 42C.JONES BLUFF LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 245.4 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 245.4. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. The approved estimated (1980) cost is $86,200,000. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $3,533,201, which included land and damages, $212,161; power plant, $295,301; roads, $37,089; recreation facilities, $2,677,189; engineering, design, supervision and administration, $311,461. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost amounted to $1,319,160. Gross power generation amounted to 353,095,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1980, of which 346,726,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at R. E. "Bob" Woodruff Lake during CY 1979 totaled 1,731,300 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 is 93 percent complete, and is scheduled for completion in FY 1981. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last uniton line in November 1975. 42D.MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravitygated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream parallel to the lock to the powerhouse intake structure, a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. The approved estimated (1980) cost is $62,909,800. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $3,160 which was for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration incidental thereto cost $1,903,222. Gross power generation amounted to 393,913,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1980, of which 392,250,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during CY 1979 totaled 2,732,400 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operation in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1980 were $62,680,248 for new work and $13,111,039 for maintenance, a total of $75,791,287. The remaining work to be done consists mainly of construction of recreational facilities. 42E.COOSA RIVER NAVIGATION Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on 27 January 10-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The estimated 1980 cost is $743,950,000 of which 694,950,000 is Federal and $49,000,000 non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funding was initiated in FY 1978 for preconstruction planning. FY 1980 costs were $1,705,892 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. 43. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA. Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing prcject. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravitytype dam is about 190 feet from elevation, 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installed capacity will be 110,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. Cost was $31,424,738, excluding an estimated (1980) $5,756,000 including $128,000 non-Federal costs, for addition of recreation facilities at the completed project (Code 711 and 712 funds). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities cost $149,422. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $3,230,215. Gross power generation at Allatoona Reservoir amounted to 245,271,600 kilowatt-hours during FY 1980, of which 239,544,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during CY 1979 totaled 7,948,600 recreational user days. Benefits attributed to flood control storage and regulation amounted to $328,600. In addition, joint flood control operation with Carters Dams resulted in reduced damages of $3,847,100 in the vicinity of Rome, Georgia. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1980 were $33,785,891 for new work and $25,655,984 for maintenance, a total of $59,441,875. 44. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA. Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 for Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chat- 10-22 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT tahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage o Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles, to be accol .lished by dredging, contraction works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River, three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River, and minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River. Plane of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage is provided at Sidney Lanier (Buford), Lazer Creek, Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Spewrell Bluff, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10.- M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: (See report for individual project cost.) Maintenance: The contractor's dredge, Hendry #6, removed 472,947 cubic yards of material from Apalachicola River between mile 7 and mile 104, at a cost of $1,008,883. The dredge, Little Rock, operating between mile 6 and mile 46 on the Chattahoochee River, removed 165,192 cubic yards of material at a cost of $465,870. The U. S. Snagboat, Montgomery, removed 4,575 obstructions for a cost of $569,419. Other costs included: resource management, $16,935; condition and operation studies, $378,648; water control management, $123,525; dams, $84,358; permanent operating equipment, $30,478; buildings, grounds and utilities, $33,893; and $1,437,292 for engineering, design, supervision and administration and other costs. Operation of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $292,115 and reservoir operations amounted to $172,589. Operations and maintenance locks and dams: Lake Sidney Lanier cost $4,013,988; Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, $3,320,360; Walter F. George Lock and Dam, $3,006,667; and West Point Lake, $2,332,469. Total FY 1980 cost for entire project was $20,751,753, of which $3,548,622 was for new work and $17,203,131 was for operation and maintenance. Detailed information on operations and costs applicable to the individual dam projects is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Condition at end offiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. Spewrell Bluff and Lazer Creek Dams are in the design stage but no work was performed during FY 1980. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Work remaining to complete the project consists of minor land acquisition at Lake Sidney Lanier and George W. Andrews Lock and Dam; completion of recreational facilities at Lake Sidney Lanier, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam; construction of Lazer Creek, Spewrell Bluff and Lower Auchumpkee Creek Dam; and completion of construction of West Point Dam. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 44A.LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. Location. The dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel 10-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power funnels. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of recreational facilities at the completed project cost $2,458,356, including engineering, design, supervision, and administration. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $4,013,988. Gross power generation amounted to 279,617,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1980, of which 275,146,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during CY 1979 totaled 15,570,300 recreational user days. Flood control benefits attributed to the project for FY 1980 amounted to $542,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26,1957; and the third on October 10,1957. The project is essentially complete except for adding additional recreational facilities. 44B.GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama.) The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance including operation and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with, Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreational attendance at George W. Andrews Lock and Dam during CY 1979 totaled 266,900 recreational user days. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963. Work remaining consists of construction of recreational facilities. 44C.JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FLA. Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section 10-24 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. Project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River; and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Credit to recreational facilities provided at completed project amounted to $13,246. Maintenance: operation and maintenance cost $3,320,360. Gross power generation amounted to 237,975,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1980, of which 233,330,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during CY 1979 totaled 3,696,900 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The lock was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. 44D.SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. Location. The dam is on the Flint River in Talbot and Upson Counties, Georgia, about nine miles west of Thomaston. The lake will extend into Meriwether, Pike, and Spalding Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: a dam 2,475 feet long with maximum height of 211.0 feet, a 326-foot long gated spillway with six tainter gates 38 feet high and 45 feet wide, concrete non-overflow abutments 1,149 feet across the main channel including 268 feet for the power intake, with an earth-rock fill dike 580 feet long to high ground on the left bank, a 420-foot saddle dike on the left bank, and a power plant with three 50,000-kw units located in the left bank. The reservoir would have an area of 13,330 acres at maximum power pool elevation of 695 national geodetic datum. Usable storage of 241,510 acre-feet would be provided for power generation between elevations 665 and 695 and 195,010 acre-feet would be reserved between elevations 695 and 706.5 for flood storage. Approved estimated (1980) cost is $333,000,000, of which $235,120,000 is for construction and design, and $97,880,000 for lands, damages, and relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 44E.WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The non-overflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,400 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities cost $7,563. Maintenance of the project for operation and care was $3,006,667. Gross power generation amounted to 562,870,000 during FY 1980, of which 553,434,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1979 totaled 4,714,400 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed on-the-line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. 44F.WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND ALA. Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acre-feet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 which were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. The ultimate installation is 108,375 kilowatts. Approved estimated cost of new work (1980) is $131,900,000, of which $89,721,900 is for construction and design; $19,348,000 for lands and damages; and $22,830,100 for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: During fiscal year 1980 real estate acquisitions, power plant construction, and work on recreation facilities continued. Total cost for new work amounted to $1,095,945 of which $21,400 was for real estate; -$56,700 for relocations; $4,900 for dams; $82,500 for power plant; $10,000 for roads; $818,200 for recreation facilities; -$3,400 for buildings, grounds and utilities; -$3,600 for permanent operating equipment; $222,649 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. Maintenance: Operation and care of the project cost $2,332,469. Gross power generation amounted to 290,167,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1980, of which 284,913,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1979 totaled 3,730,700 recreational user days. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was about 98 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. 45. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost of $11,523 for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombighee Rivers System. 10-26 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT General Investigations 46. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $2,389,253 of which $958,312 was for navigation studies, $727,330for flood control studies, $9,123 for beach erosion studies, $479,653 for special studies; $4,590 for review of completed projects (Allatoona Dam), $3,651 for water quality management; $582 for coastal zone management; $49,440 for planning assistance to states; $395 for National Wild and Scenic Rivers System; $211 for technical assisstance on shore and streambank erosion; $155,967 for supplemental pre-authorization studies. 47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the completion of 11 Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by HUD. In addition, Flood Plain Management were performed at a cost of $219,031. (See Table 10-N for listings of studies completed during FY 1980.) For listing of previous reports see page 10-50 Annual Report for 1974, page 10-44 of FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-46 of FY 1977 Annual Report, and page 10-48 of FY 1978 Annual Report. The National Program for inspection of non- Federal dams cost $330,388. 10-27 TABLE 10-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 1. Apalachicola Bay Fla. 2. Aquatic Plant Control (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Bayou Coden, Ala. (Contributed Funds) 4. Bayou La Batre, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (Contributed Funds) 6. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. 7. Blackwater River, Fla. 8. Cadet Bayou, Miss. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. 10. Dog and Fowl Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Sept. 30,1980 -335 594,400 548,160 -13,000 14,298 -24,000 21,992 16,000 5,864 6,121 3,966 6,000 302,507 91,000 92,974 50,000 40,374 292,864 292,864 868,026 866,293 - 2,033,4611 - 2,033,461 2 56,800 2,255,807 2 53,698 2,252,034 17,000 386,287 18,295 372,287 - 21,225 - 21,225 3 - 330,7013 - 330,701 11,832 57,378 12,899 56,290 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 311,095 - 311,095 13,400 1,140,386 6,456 1,125,302 - 10,500' - 10,500 115,281 1,215,436 225,848 1,215,436 247,000 3,899,529, 250,984 3,883,321 24,000 102,600 24,000 102,600 -11,000 153,462,5667 549,453 153,258,160 426,000 102,180,323, 149,695 101,602,700 41,65009 - 41,650 4,763 254,725 6,803 254,041 - 87,921 - 87,921 1,700 490,017 2,108 490,007 - 31,000 - 31,000 -27,634 2,075 -5,036 - 546 - 546 309 3,000 231,837 2,419 228,026 422,001 228,430 419,720 227,240 591,000 859,900 112,591 126,597 5,104,000 5,835,000 5,016,255 5,739,467 531 4,664 531 4,664 368,481 35,727 277,765 123,839 97,000 96,886 53,646 29,535 45,000 41,577 146,000 35,433 877,441 861,328 197,000 755,719 10,716,400 9,652,581 3,006 282 1,712 3,898 11,' 12, 30,152 231,018 39,688 244,234 10-28 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Rivers, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. East Pearl River, Miss. 13. Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. 14. Fly Creek, Ala. 15. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mcxican Border 16. Gulfport Harbor, Miss. 17. Mobile Harbor, Ala. (Contributed Funds) (Regular Funds)* (Contributed Funds) 18. Panama City Harbor, Fla. Funding Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost NAewpp rWopo.rk: Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Sept. 30, 1980 197,500 197,481 17,000 17.000 7,433 111,254 256,800 3,201 114,632 257,593 232,600 379,100 194,918 409,174 147,456 145,773 4,027 4,027 333 333 2,009,000 2,199,414 1,556,264 1,541,929 400,000 230,853 3,579,000 3,656,127 25,000 17,137 123,794 123,113 1,534 14,692 9,929 85,409 19,089 1,991,000 1,698,460 142,600 143,629 250,000 415,398 4,280,493 4,225,031 -25,900 389 -8,525 -8,843 190,965 190,965 668,593 668,513 114,100 114,100 916,715 916,715 17,000 576,000 3,146,160 24,291 569,269 3,138,459 - - 398,000 - - 398,000 - - 37,128to - - 37,128o " 5,954 462,664 51 6,002 462,614 ii - - 208,4991, - - 208,499 16,550 628,163 1,072.398a 21,120 628,119 1,072,161 - - 29,000 - - 29,000 30,242 -3,000 198,358 92,079 59 196,934 - - 6,480,299n * - 6,480,299 1,656,100 3,040,200 1,913,733 3,002,607 1,280,000 1,707,000 1,259,169 1,734,630 5,700,000 22,700,000 5,085,558 21,967,612 500,000 1,050,000 442,360 1,037,345 2,018,000 10,228,000 1,999,508 8,521,963 17,500 17,500 48,071 44,704 27,721,72214 27,606,982 904,77516 904,775i 21,103,508' 21,096,074i 44,188,9371,7 42,752,007 1,550,000 1,479,705 53,026,483is 51,227,435 29,500 29,500 - 1,638,045 , S 1,638,045" 30,577 3,840,6172 34,518 3,839,7602 10-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project (Contributed Funds) 19. Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Pearl River, Miss. and La. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Pensacola Harbor, Fla. 22. Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Port St. Joe Harbor, FLa. (Contributing Funds) 24. Removing Water Hyacinths (Mobile District) 25. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala. and Miss. Funding FY77 New Work: Contrib. - Cost New Work: Approp., Cost Maint: Approp. 1,402,300 Cost 1,267,555 Maint: Contrib. - Cost- New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 131,500 Cost 136,649 New Work: Contrib. - Cost New Work: Approp. - Cost Maint: Approp. 63,900 Cost 63,207 New Work: Aprop. Cost Maint: Approp. 386,000 Cost 386,590 New Work: Contrib. - Cost Maint: Contrib. - Cost - New Work: Approp. - Cost New Work: Contrib. - Const. Maint: Approp. 1,934 Cost 1,934 Maint: Approp. 43,000 Cost 43,342 New Work: Approp. 70,250,000 Cost 75,619,562 Maint: Approp. Cost FY78 FY79 FY80 Sept.30,1980 - - - 80,000 - - - 80,000 21 - - - 6,572,98521 - - - 6,572,985 1,176,412 1,141,000 4,268,500 19,262,2462 1,277,620 1,173,849 4,246,186 19,238,366 63,250 - 191,000 444,350 37,950 20,500 175,000 423,550 S. . 8,562,908, - - - 8,562,908 141,500 193,000 135,900 4,467,505 133,628 197,459 142,019 4,465,189 - - - 65,000 - - - 65,000 - - - 1,469,693a - - - 1,469,693 174,292 41,184 51,200 3,653,013 170,485 43,107 53,248 3,651,967 - - - 629,860 - - - 629,860 36,500 287,000 261,800 3,124,217 26,547 285,809 159,447 3,009,261 - - - 510,000 - - - 510,000 - - - 10,325 - - - 10,325 - - - 1,960,862 - - - 1,960,862 - - - 20,000 - - - " 20,000 4,652 44,670 672,794 2,107,843 4,652 44,473 664,732 2,099,681 55,000 21,000 21,800 1,098,471 41,559 37,284 22,859 1,098,294 80,245,000 80,321,000 124,348,000 491,066,200" 73,785,795 86,293,989 112,719,590 477,185,818 - 315,000 424,000 2,477,000 3,450,331u - 283,667 410,092 2,133,137 3,111,227 32. Okatibbee Lake, Miss. 32. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, Miss. 33. Edinburg Lake, Miss. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 398,800 Cost 387,723 New Work: Approp. 700,000 Cost 759,678 New Work: - - 3,000 9,020,628 - - - 9,017,628 512,400 484,000 546,800 3,460,892 500,088 513,940 522,072 3,427,494 1,450,000 -1,186,000 -190,000 3,755,757 492,180 191,957 51,263 3,611,319 10-30 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Sept. 30, 1980 34. Gordon's Creek, Miss. 35. Houlka Creek, Miss. 36. Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. 37. Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. 38. Tombigbee River Tributaries Miss. and Ala. (Regular Funds) Contributed Funds) 42. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. 42A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, Ga. 42B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala. 42C. Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, Ala. 42D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. 42E. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, Ala. 43. Allatoona Lake,, Coosa River Basin, Ga. 44. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Ala. and Ga. Approp. Cost 16,646 New Work: Approp. 38,000 Cost 23,013 New Work: Approp. 174,000 Cost 19,886 New Work: Approp. 25,000 Cost 20,357 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. 1,742,300 Cost 544,940 New Work: Contrib. 1,800 Cost New Work: Approp. 4,930,000 Cost 2,775,939 Maint: Approp. 6,042,100 Cost 5,849,406 New Work: Approp. 2,480,000 Cost 1,592,012 Maint: Approp. 1,719,000 Cost 1,493,569 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. 2,450,000 Cost 1,084,372 Maint: Approp. 811,800 Cost 734,239 New Work: Approp. Cost 15,481 Maint: Approp. 1,361,000 Cost 1,342,603 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. -405,000 Cost 63,349 Maint: Approp. 2,023,000 Cost 1,977,974 New Work: Approp. 7,994,000 Cost 7,185,162 Maint: Approp. 11,568,200 Cost 11,429,229 7,883 47,244 49,210 20,000 58,352 5,000 8,598 11,363 575,000 480,281 34,000 35,500 150,000 57,982 6,096 79,594 0 121,036 5,974 99,037 25,000 -1,000 150,000 22,642 839 28,121 S450,000 644,151 394,648 295,201 5,902,300 1,716,089 8,627,900 8,371,155 2,250,000 489,991 2,328,400 2,248,555 3,200,000 957,294 1,140,000 1,110,772 20,000 3,482 2,036,300 1,987,063 500,000 262,967 831,000 157,218 2,565,300 2,587,913 5,828,000 6,323,085 -t 1,052 2,525,000 5,731,313 8,020,000 8,369,084 1,126,304 1,636,000 1,881,118 -675,000 1,844,048 1,054,000 1,124,435 1,625 2,278,000 2,265,592 3,200,000 2,759,336 -358,000 416,831 3,245,000 3,271,631 3,473,000 3,555,113 3,835,000 5,939,040 7,872,700 7,737,239 -1,100,000 150,720 1,462,800 1,485,797 2,799,000 3,533,201 1,390,800 1,319,160 -14,000 3,160 1,866,300 1,903,222 2,150,000 2,251,959 164,700 149,422 3,220,800 3,230,215 2,872,000 3,548,622 573,000 570,895 781,526 753,322 250,000 237,496 190,974 190,974 134,801 134,801 1,174,100 1,151,702 8,264,225 7,838,755 80,700 49,752 294,334,708 292,761,182 48,655,874w 48,126,911 110,280,340 109,857,498 8,080,200 7,994,882 27,997,450 27,997,450 78,687,800 78,113,388 5,963,778 5,834,463 62,680,778 62,680,248 13,209,485 13,111,039 5,850,000 5,274,262 33,890,154, 33,785,891 25,769,043 25,655,984 339,021,866w 337,940,324 17,024,500 17,048,000 16,231,700 137,895,104" 16,371,061 15,839,945 17,203,131 136,292,212 10-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 Sept. 30,1980 44A. Lake Sidney New Work: Lanier, Ga. Approp. 399,000 242,000 877,000 2,208,000 52,149,756U Cost 76,827 462,805 468,186 2,458,356 51,425,581 Maint: Approp. 2,299,000 4,092,400 4,429,000 3,441,800 28,357,927 Cost 2,148,929 3,942,929 4,182,496 4,013,988 28,306,275 44B. George W. Andrews New Work:X Lock and Dam, Approp. - - - - 13,038,427a Ala. and Ga. Cost . 13,038,427 Maint: 86 H36 8 Approp. 36 86 86 6 Cost 44C. Jim Woodruff Lock New Work: and Dam, Ga. and Approp. 30,000 25,000 55,000 12,000 47,942,010 Fla. Cost 15,378 171,950 87,795 -13,246 47,877,346 Maint: Approp. 2,304,000 2,945,700 3,347,000 3,152,400 28,345,081 Cost 2,328,304 2,988,662 2,838,434 3,320,360 27,873,116 44D. Sprewell Bluff Lake, New Work: Ga. Approp. - - - - 2,169,600 Cost 1,481 - - - 2,158,475 44E. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. 65,000 61,000 85,000 -7,000 87,181,537" Ala. and Ga. Cost 112,104 59,738 98,781 7,563 87,145,740 Maint: Approp. 1,939,200 2,246,000 2,538,000 2,906,300 28,891,384 Cost 2,013,813 2,217,879 2,337,818 3,006,667 28,680,726 44F. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. 7,500,000 5,500,000 2,456,000 659,000 129,346,411 Basin, Ga. and Ala. Cost 6,979,372 5,628,594 2,900,352 1,095,949 129,112,632 Maint: Approp. 1,399,000 1,844,400 2,716,000 1,887,700 9,094,800 Cost 1,283,934 1,938,504 2,224,328 2,332,469 8,988,201 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Estimated cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $563,573 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $5,000 for previous projects. 10. Includes $28,200 for previous projects. 11. Includes $71,175 for previous projects. 12. Includes $110,700 for previous projects. 13. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 14. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 15. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 16. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M funds. 17. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects $14,000 Public Work funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 18. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 19. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48.001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 20. Includes $518,604 for previous projects. 21. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 22. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 23. Includes $144,443 for previous projects and $143,971 for recreation facilities on completed projects. 24. Includes $168,172 for previous projects. 25. Includes 594,688 for previous projects. 26. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 27. Includes $2,100,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 28. Includes 234,331 for previous projects. 29. Includes 3,692,483 for previous projects. 30. Includes 2,978,050 for previous projects. 31. Includes $2,361,153 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds and $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; $9,408,807 funds for recreational facilities at completed projects; $6,630,486 for Lake Sidney Lanier, $1,402,919 for Jim Woodruff, $84,014 for George W. Andrews, and $1,291,390 for Walter F. George. 33. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 34. Includes $6,630,486 for recreational facilities. 35. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 36. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers project. 37. Includes $1,402,919 for recreational facilities. 38. Includes $1,291,390 for recreational facilities. 10-32 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Nov. 21,1963 Feb. 5, 1975' APALACHICOLA BAY, FLA. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels, 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel At East point, Fla., a channel 6 feet deep 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fla., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. deorge Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fla., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channels is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep 100 feet wide and about I mile long, parallel to shore at Nwo Mile, Fla., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater would be about 6,150 including two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fla., Ala., Miss., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, ALA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel BAYOU LA BATRE, ALA. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Seas. H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-33 H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 June 2, 1969 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZED LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979 July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sept. 19, 1890 Sept. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500- by 2 600-foot turning basin in the lake thence, a channel 12 by 00 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500-foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150- foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about 1 mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and, into a retangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887. Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis. Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12. H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 3d Session. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858. H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293. Public Law 317. H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, p. 876. H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 45, 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 10-34 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 May 20, 19691 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 19, 1969 July 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 July 25, 1910 July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. BLACKWATER RIVER, FLA. (See Section 7 of Text) A 9- by 100-foot channel from mouth for 12 miles to Milton. CADET BAYOU, MISS.(See Section 8 of Text) An 8- by 100-foot entrance channel extending from the 8-foot depth contour in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, thence an 8- by 80-foot channel for a distance of about 1,900 feet into the bayou to a turning basin 8 feet deep, and a channel continuing therefrom 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide upstream for 8,750 feet with a second turning basin 6 feet deep located 900 feet downstream from the upper limit of the improvement. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, ALA. (See Section 9 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and(b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 10 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FLA. (See Section 11 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) EAST PEARL RIVER, MISS. (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 9 feet deep, 200 feet wide and about 1.3 miles long at the mouth of East Pearl River, connecting the 9-foot contour in Lake Borgne with the same contour in East Pearl River. ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FLA. AND ALA. (See Section 13 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel in Escambia Ba for 5.5 miles to mouth of Escambia River, thence up Escambia River to about mile 7, thence a channel 5 feet deep for 50 miles to Florida State line and thence improvement of Conecuh River to mouth of Patsaliga Creek, a distance of 80.5 miles. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, ALA. (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 11. Doc. 193, 58th Cong., 2d sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H.Doc. 209, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 328, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 75, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 10-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 15 of Text) Aug. 26, 1937 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 23, 1942 June 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 July 23, 1930 APALACHICOLA BAY TO ST. MARKS RIVER, FLA. A channel 9 feet and 100 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachicola Bay, Fla. via St. George Sound, Carrabelle, Crooked, and Ochlockonee Rivers and Ochlockonee and Apalachee Bays to St. Marks River, Fla. APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FLA. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FLA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FLA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FLA., TO MOBILE BAY, ALA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, ALA., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FLA., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water except in the section between Mobile, Ala., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf Count Canal, Fla., and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 16 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Miss., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Miss. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. H. Doc. 291, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess: Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 'H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-36 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 30, 1948 July 3, 1958 Aug. 26 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967 June 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 300 feet across SShip Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Miss. Sound, and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Miss. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. MOBILE HARBOR, ALA. (See Section 17 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the Mobile Bay Channel to turning basin at the inner end of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bar Channel to 42 by 600 feet. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307, to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 18 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagood from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River 25 j@-0) 1et through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 2: .cross Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, thence 22 by 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. 10-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 June 14, 1880 Apr. 21, 1900 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1966 June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 27, 1962 Work Authorized Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests Cutoff channel 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Cassotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet, provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide: and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. (See Section 20 of Text) Provided for a 5-foot channel. Lealized construction of a fixed highway bridge at kport. A channel from the mouth of West Pearl River for 58 miles to the mouth of Bogalusa Creek at Bogalusa, La., 7 feet deep at low water with a bottom width of 100 feet in the river sections and 80 feet in the canal section; with locks 65 by 310 feet clear inside dimensions. Construction of cut-offs and easement of critical bends at eight locations below lock 1 with no increase in project depth. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 21 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvement of Bayou Chico. Modified improvement of Bayou Chico, Fla. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 360 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. Documents River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 98, 45th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 408, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 743, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-38 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 July 25, 1912 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 July 27, 1916 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 June 7, 1968 Mar. 7, 1974 PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, ALA. (Section 22 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemound jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. PORT ST. JOE, FLA. (See Section 23 of Text) A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide across the bar at the entrance to the bay. An entrance channel 300 feet wide and 29 feet deep, and a bay channel 200 feet wide and 27 feet deep, with a turning basin at the proposed municipal pier at Port St. Joe. Adoption of south channel 27 feet deep and 200 feet wide from bay to turmning basin, provision of a 32- by 300-foot entrance channel a 32- by 200-foot north bay (inner) channel, and a 32- by 1,000-by 2,000-foot turning basin. Enlargement of the channel to provide for a depth of 37 feet and a width of 500 feet at the Gulf end, diminishing in width to 400 feet over a distance of 3.6 miles, thence 37 by 400 feet for a distance of 3.3 miles thence 35 by 300 feet in St. Joseph Bay to the turning basin a distance of 7.1 miles, and a harbor channel in the basin 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long. REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT (See Section 24 of Text) Appropriations made for the States of Florida and Louisiana and provided for the extermination or removal of plants, the building of boats, and the establishment of booms. Appropriation made for Florida, provided that no chemical process injurious to cattle shall be used. And also made available for use in that State the operating plan pertaining to the work of Louisiana. Appropriation made available for the State of Alabama. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, ALA. AND MISS. (See Section 25 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 148 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Miss,; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 44 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width would be 280 feet) for 40 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 232 miles. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MISS. (See Section 31 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MISS. (See Section 32 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. EDINBURG LAKE, MISS. (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water quality control, general recreation, fish and wildlife enhancement, and area redevelopment. GORDON'S CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MISS. (See Section 34 of Text) Flood control improvements along Gordon's Creek consisting of channel enlargement by excavation to a bottom width of40 Mt for a distance of 6,489 feet, and, clearing and DPR (Sec. 205) 10-39 S. Doc. 94th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 660, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S . Doc. 17, 77th Cong., 1st sess., and report of Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 595, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 91, 55th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 143, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. Feb. 20, 1977$ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Mar. 1, 1977' Apr. 21, 1978 Aug. 18, 1941 July 23, 1958 July 8, 1980 Mar. 2, 1945 June 28, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1944 July 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Work Authorized snagging of an additional 5,831 feet for a total project length of 12,320 feet. HOULKA CREEK CHICKASAW AND CLAY COUNTIES, MISS. (See Section 35 of Text) Selective clearning and snagging between tops of banks of the lowermost 34.1 miles of Houlka Creek. Removal of snags and debris. MURDER AND BURNT CORN CREEKS BREWTON, ALA. (See Section 36 of Text) Clearing and snagging along the lower 4.05 miles of Murder Creek and 0.93 miles of Burnt Corn Creek by selective removal of live and dead trees between tops of banks. TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISS. AND ALA. (See Section 37 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MISS. AND ALA. (See Section 38 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. (See Section 42 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake Ga., Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala., Jones bluff Lock and Dam, Ala., and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA. (See Section 43 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation APALACHICOLA CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., 6A. AND FLA. (See Section 44 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Authorized recreation facilities. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. (See Section 44A of Text) Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. (See Section 44B of Text) Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at George W. Andrews site. Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FLA. (See Section 44C of Text) Documents DPR (Sec. 208) DPR (Sec. 208) Special Report on Record in OCE. (Public Law 222, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. PL (96-304) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 324, 7th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 10-40 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. (See Section 44D of Text) Dec. 30, 1965 Authorized construction H. Doc. 567, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, ALA, AND GA. (See Section 44Eof Text) May 19, 1953 Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George H. Comm. on Public Works. site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND ALA. (See Section 44F of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Authorized construction for flood control, power, H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 2d Sess. streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of Flood Control Act of 1948. 1960 River and Harbor Act. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1954. TABLE 10-C BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolies Warrior Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 338.2 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Oak Grove Distance (miles) 3)within city) 6 15 Lock: Greatest length available for full width (feet) 600.0 600.0 600.0 450.0 600.0 600.0 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 95 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 12.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated TY cnstructin Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1940 1969 Under const. Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1939 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam $21,597,2648 $19,774,583 $13,295,5538 $4,450,874 $28,100,000' $49,713,000' 1. Single lift lock 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Cost to date (FY 80) for replacement of single lift lock which was essentially completed in FY 80. Excludes $1,435,636 cost of land submerged, damage to structures, and cost of spillway. Also excludes $3,824,859 cost of original double lift lock. 10-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-D LOCKS IN PEARL RIVER PROJECT (See Section 20 of Text) Lock Pearl River Lock No. 1 Pearl River Lock No. 2 Pearl River Lock No. 3 Miles above mouth 29.7 40.8 44.0 Nearest town Pearl River, La. Bush, La. Sun, La. Miles to nearest town 9 3 2 Greatest length available 310 310 310 for full width (feet) Lift (feet) 26.7 14 11 Depth over sills at low 10 10 10 water (feet) Character of foundation Sand, gravel, silt, clay Sand, gravel, silt, clay Sand, gravel, silt, clay Type of construction Concrete and steel Concrete and steel Concrete and steel Year completed 1949 1950 1950 Date opened for navigation November 1958 November 1953 November 1953 Actual cost of lock $2,119,100 $1,967,537 $1,497,539 TABLE 10-E RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 30 of Text) Cost During Project Date of Survey Fiscal Year Bon Secour River, Ala. February 1980 12,764 Carrabelle Harbor, Fla. July 1980 8,996 Panacea Harbor, Fla. June 1980 7,573 Pass Christian, Miss. September 1980 398 St. Marks River, Fla. June 1980 12,125 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. June 1980 1,119 Total $42,975' 1. Other cost of surveys, included under 0 & M for respective projects are: Bayou Coden, Ala., $632; Blackwater River Fla., $4,763: Dauphin Island. Ala., $818; East Pearl River, Miss., $5 954 Escambia and Conecuh Rivers Fla. and Ala., $28,163; Fowl River, Ala., $500; Panama ity, Fla., $3,077; and Port St. Joe, Fla., $2,194. 10-42 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Bluff Creek Miss. 1963 $ 1,000 $ 6,883 Bogue Chitto, La.2 1909 14,913 2,930 Bon Secour River, A2la. 1979 118,615 91,194 Cahaba River, Ala. 1894 45,000 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. 1979 481,627 373,223 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. and Ala. 1973 171,885 291,694 Holmes Creek, Fla. 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, Fla. 1972 289,496 73,827' Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Miss. 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, Miss.' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla.' 2 1900 5,000 Old Town Creek, Miss.' 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga.2 1907 32,656 Panacea Harbor, Fla. 1979 122,383 90,880 Pascagoula River, Miss. 1956 15,000 179,380 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. 1976 59,313 134,367 Pearl River, Miss., Edinburg to Jackson 1911 31,872 36,991 St. Marks River, Fla. 1965 1,710,809 51,922 Tallapoosa River, Ala. 1893 43,972 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouthl 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. 1979 29,195 458,955 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Cong. Doc. 96-157, 1st Session. TABLE 10-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 28 of Text) Study Authority Fiscal Year Costs Alligator Harbor, Fla. 107 $ 14,885 Bon Secour, Ala. 107 13,109 Cadet Bayou, Miss. 107 4,345 East Point, Fla. 107 7,106 Escatawpa River, Pascagoula, Miss. 107 3,338 GIWW to Port Bienville, Miss. 107 1,777 Gulfport Harbor, Miss. 107 5,000 Lake Krebs, Miss. 107 22,007 Panacea, Fla. 107 21,173 Rysco Shipyard Channel, Fla. 107 49,554 Shell Point, Waukulla Co., Fla. 107 24,568 Liza Jackson State Park, Ft. Walton, Fla. 103 3,416 Total $169,258' 1. Excludes $225,848 for Biloxi Small Craft Construction. 10-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 29 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance2 Harrison County, Miss., shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. TABLE 10-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document1 Deauthorized Bayou Galere, Miss. Navigation 1946 H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 5 Aug. 1977 1st Sess., as amended. 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-F. TABLE 10-J OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction MaintenanceO Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala. 1965 $144,194- Armuchee Creek, Ga.2 1966 115,547- Baldwin and Hannon Sloughs, Montgomery, Ala.'1 1973 55,995- Beaver Creek, Montezuma, Ga. 1958 149,815- Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala.2 1953 125,389 Clanton, Ala. 1964 274,024- Collinsville, Ala. 1940 71,119- Jackson and East Jackson, Miss. 1979 7,190,200- Lake Douglas, Decatur County, Ga. 1970 164,998- Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. 1965 113,849m Pearl River, Miss., and La., Jackson, Miss.2 1937 Prattville, Autauga Creek, Ala.2 1946 649,280 Rome, Coosa River, Ga.2 1955 384,550 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss. 1956 142,637 Town Creek, Americus, Ga.2 1965 340,409 Trussville, Ala.2 1965 141,334 West Point, Chattahoochee River, Ga.2 1955 599,637 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. 1966 330,734 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no construction work has been done. 2. Completed. 3. Work authorized before 1941 completed. No work done on project proposed in 1941. 4. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-44 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) (a) Study Authority Fiscal Year Costs Big Cedar Creek, Ga. 205 $ 4,832 Bishop Creek, Pelham, Ala. 205 67,211 Bray Creek, Houston, Miss. 205 737 Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss. 205 60,630 Chattahoochee River, Helen, Ga. 205 86,677 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. 205 2,054 Cochgalechee Creek, Ala. 205 3,470 Horseleg Creek, Rome, Ga. 205 75,786 Sellers Creek, Mendenhall, Miss. 205 77,514 Sope Creek, Marietta, Ga. 205 29,566 Town Branch, Summerville, Ga. 205 11,981 1-20 Bridge, Jackson, Miss. 14 1,400 Valpariso, Fla. 14 7,348 Total $429,2061 1. Excludes construction costs of $79,594 for Gordons $75,620 for Leaf River, Miss. Creek, Miss.; $103,770 for Chickasawbogue Creek, Ala.; and TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Sections 42 and 43 of Text) Clalborne Millers Ferry Jones Bluff Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam' Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.11 42.2 245.41 26.8 47.8' Nearest town Claiborne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga. Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 - - Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 Varies seasonally Depth over sills at low water 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 - - (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 (acre-feet) 96p360 331v800 2349200 472,800 670,0 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 93 100 100 Cost to date: $27,997,450 $62,680,248 $78,113,388 $109,857,498 $33,785,891 1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 10-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 44 of Text) Existing Projects Authorized Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Lower Woodruff Andrews George Lake Auchumpkee Lazer Spewrell Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney Creek Creek Bluff and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Lake Lake Lake Miles above mouth 107.61 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 233.43 255.83 263.8 Nearest town Chattahoochee, Columbia, Ala. Ft. Gaines, West Point, Buford, Ga. Roberta, Ga. Thomaston, Manchester, Fla. Ga. Ga. Ga. Ga. Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 7 8 8 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - - - - - available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - - - - - Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - - - - - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190 (Summer) 635 (Summer) 1070 417 543 700 surface (msl)- 185 (Winter) 625 (Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 - - - - - water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Gated Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 67 62 114 95 192 130 142 180 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth Concrete Concrete Concrete and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 548,000 342,000 486,200 (acre-feet) Power development 30,000 - 130,000 73,875 86,000 81,000 87,000 150,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 98 100 - - - Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - - - - Estimated cost: - - - - - $206,000,000 $239,000,000 $333,000,000 Cost to date: $47,877,346 $13,038,427 $87,145,740 $129,112,632 $51,425,581 - - $2,158,475 1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Above mouth of Flint River (river miles). 4. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 5. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge. 1 n-4 TABLE 10-N MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1979 AND FY 19801 (See Section 47 of Text) Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Ft. Payne, Alabama (Prepared for Federal Insurance Oct 78 $40,200 Administration, HUD) Geneva, Alabama (Prepared for Federal Insurance Oct 78 32,800 Administration, HUD) Picayune, Mississippi (Prepared for Federal Insurance Oct 78 46,000 Administration, HUD) Kennesaw, Georgia (Prepared for Federal Insurance Jan 79 4,100 Administration, HUD) Powder Springs, Georiga (Prepared for Federal Insurance Jan 79 5,500 Administration, HUD) Montgomery, Alabama (Prepared for Federal Insurance Feb 79 186,500 Administration, HUD) Fulton Co., Georiga (Prepared for Federal Insurance Sep 79 209,000 Administration, HUD) Montgomery Co., Alabama (Prepared for Federal Insurance Apr 80 104,600 Administration, HUD) Special Flood Hazard Information Chattahoochee River, Walter Lower Chattahoochee Area Planning Apr 79 133,000 R. George to West Pt. Dam, Ga. and Development Commission Mulberry Fork and Cane Creek, Ala. Birmingham Regional Planning Commission July 79 50,000 Coldwater Creek, Ala. Coldwater United Methodist Church July 79 10,000 Yellowjacket Creek & City of Hogansville, Ga. July 79 10,000 Hogansville Branch, Ga. 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY and, for reports completed in FY 1976 and'FY 1977, see FY 1965 thru FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports com- 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Anpleted in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page-10-44; nual Report for FY 1978 reports. 10-47 1980 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT* District comprises a portion of Louisiana, including drainage area of Red River south of Fulton, Ark., embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes, drainage area of Ouachita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; on Red River including its south bank levees and tributaries from Index, Ark., to its junction with Old River and Atchafalaya River; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control Program, La ..................... 11-2 2. Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, La......... 11-3 3. Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, La................. 11-4 4. Barataria Bay Waterway, La.......... 11-4 5. Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche- Jump Waterway, La................. 11-5 6. Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, La .......................... 11-6 7. Bayou Teche, La. ................... 11-7 8. Calcasieu River and Pass, La.......... 11-8 9. Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La ....................... 11-8 10. Freshwater Bayou, La .............. 11-9 11. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.)..................... 11-10 12. Houma Navigation Canal, La........ 11-13 13. Mermentau River, La.............. 11-13 14. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, La............... 11-14 15. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La......................... 11-16 Navigation (cont.) Page 16. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La ...................... 11-17 17. Overton-Red River Waterway, La............................. 11-17 18. Petit Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, La .................. 11-18 19. Red River emergency bank protection .......................... 11-19 20. Red River Waterway- Mississippi River to Shreveport, La............................ 11-20 21. Removing water-hyacinth, La........ 11-22 22. Tangipahoa River, La................ 11-22 23. Vermilion Lock, La ................ (replacement of lock)................ 11-22 24. Waterway from Empire La., to Gulf of Mexico..................... 11-23 25. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, La. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.)....................... 11-23 26. Other authorized navigation projects ........................... 11-24 27. Navigation work under special authorization ................ 11-24 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 11-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Flood Control 28. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, Ark. and La....................... 11-24 29. Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La ........ 11-25 30. Bayou Pierre, La................... 11-25 31. Brush Bayou, La ................... 11-26 32. Caddo Lake, La .................. 11-26 33. Grand Isle & Vicinity, La. .......... 11-26 34. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, La., (hurricane protection) .......... 11-27 35. Larose to Golden Meadow, La. (hurricane protection) ............ 11-28 36. McKinney Bayou, Ark. and Tex ............................... 11-29 37. Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La. (New Orleans to Venice, La., hurricane protection) ................... 11-30 38. Red River below Denison Dam (New Orleans Dist.) ................ 11-31 Flood Control (cont.) Page 39. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (New Orleans Dist.) ................ 11-31 40. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark ............... 11-32 41. Wallace Lake, La ............... 11-33 42. West Agurs, La ................ 11-33 43. Inspection of connected flood control projects .................. 11-34 44. Other authorized flood control projects ......................... 11-34 45. Flood control work under special authorization ............... 11-34 General Investigations 46. Surveys ........................ 11-34 47. Collection and study of basic data ...................... 11-34 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM, LA. Location. Lakes and streams in State of Louisiana. Existing project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growth from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, in combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures. The modification of the 1965 Act provides for comprehensive program for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious plant growths from navigable waterways, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures. Research and planning costs undertaken pursuant to 1965 Act shall be borne fully by the United States and shall not be included in costs to be shared by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests must hold and save the United States free from claims and participate in project to extent of 30 percent of cost of operations. State of Louisiana, Office of Public Works, and Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries furnished a joint assurance of local cooperation, which was approved Apr. 29 and accepted May 4, 1959. Under provisions of continuing contract, local agencies are performing work in kind, exceeding 30 percent of cost of program. Operations and results d(uring fiscal year. Combined efforts by Corps of Engineers crews and crews of the State of Louisiana, Department of Wild Life and Fisheries, continued against aquatic vegetation problems throughout the State. Water-hyacinth control requires maintenance work in all areas, and waterhyacinth persists as the most serious aquatic pest. Control maintenance by the Corps of cleared areas continued in the Mermentau River, Bayou Lacassine, Bayou Queue de Tortue, in the Bayou Teche Basin south of U. S. Highway 190, including the lakes west of the Atchafalaya Floodway, in the feeder areas of the Port Allen- Morgan City Route of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and in the feeder areas to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in Coastal Louisiana. Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT crews continued maintenance efforts in the major lakes and streams of north Louisiana, in the Atchafalaya Floodway, in the Louisiana portion of the Toledo Bend Reservoir, and the Pearl River Basin within Louisiana. During the fiscal year, 24,216 acres of water-hyacinths were destroyed in the State of Louisiana. Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries crews destroyed 15,131 acres and Corps of Engineers crews destroyed 9,185 acres primarily by herbicide treatment. The alligatorweed flea beetle (Agasicles hygrophila) population has increased to the point that they are again exercising significant control of this plant in many areas of the state. In addition, the stem boring moth (Vogtia malloi) has spread to such an extent that it is found associated with alligatorweed in all locations. The water-hyacinth weevils (Neochetina eichhorniae and Neochetina bruchi) have been spread throughout all areas of the state that waterhyacinth infest and adult feeding scars are more prevalent everywhere. Submersed weed problems in Toledo Bend Reservoir have reached serious proportions and Caddo Lake is also experiencing interference with boating and fishing. Hydrilla verticillata, an introduced exotic submersed weed species, continues to spread along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and poses a threat to water-related activities. Condition as of Sep. 30. Operations under 1958 River and Harbor Act, initiated May 1959, are complete. Operations under 1965 Act were initiated in Fiscal Year 1968. Waterways are being cleared, then maintained as required. 2. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA. Location. The improvement is located in the parishes of Assumption, Terrebonne, and St. Mary, La., in the vicinity of Morgan City, along Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, and the Lower Atchafalaya River to the Gulf of Mexico. (See MRC alluvial maps, Morgan City, Belle Isle, and Point au Fer quadrangles, NOS Coast Charts 11351 and 11355 of Intracoastal Waterway, and Coast Chart 11354 for the Atchafalaya River system.) Existing project. Provides for enlargement and extension of project, Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to the Gulf of Mexico, La., to obtain navigation channels 20 feet deep over a bottom width of 400 feet from vicinity of U. S. Highway 90 crossing over Bayou Boeuf to the Gulf of Mexico via Bayou Boeuf, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Bayou Chene, Avoca Island Cutoff, the lower Atchafalaya River, Atchafalaya Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, and from near U. S. Highway 90 to Bayou Chene via Bayou Black and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The 400-foot channel extends into the Gulf of Mexico to the 20-foot contour, and the width in Bayou Boeuf would be reduced to 300 feet where necessary because of industrial development on both sides of the bayou. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $27,800,000 Federal and $1,990,000 non-Federal, including $720,000 contributed funds. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $220,000. Local cooperation. The local agency must provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the cost of such retaining works; accomplish and maintain all modifications to roads, bridges, pipelines, cables, and any other utilities and improvements necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project. In addition, the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 are applicable. Assuring Agency: Morgan City Harbor and Terminal District. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the project to provide (a) 25 percent local contribution of the cost of spoil disposal retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments and (b) waiver of requirement (a) if political subdivisions are participating in and are in compliance with approved plan in area of dredging activity for construction, modification, expansion, or rehabilitation of waste treatment facilities, and if applicable water quality standards are not being violated. In addition,the provisions of Public Law 93-251 are applicable. Basic. assurance was approved on behalf of United States on Dec. 10, 1973, and amended assurance containing the applicable provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 was approved on behalf of United States on Feb. 25, 1974. In an effort to expedite the project, local interests have accomplished the surveys, soil borings, testing, and the basic mapping at an estimated cost of $250,000, for which they will not be reimbursed. As a convenience to local interests and to avoid confusion in 25 percent and 75 percent acquisition cost, the New Orleans District agreed to acquire all lands, with local interests reimbursing the Government for their 25 percent portion. An escrow agreement has 11-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 been executed between the local interests and the Government, whereby, they will advance funds in a sufficient amount to provide for their portion of the acquisition and diking cost. To date, $340,000 has been withdrawn of the original $518,000, leaving total in escrow of $178,000 as of Sept. 30, 1979. Local interests have asked that the Government invoke the navigation servitude under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, thereby requiring pipeline owners to relocate their pipeline at no expense to local interests or the Government. Terminal facilities. Two large and three small public wharves at Morgan City are open for use by all without charge. In addition, there are numerous privately owned facilities on both banks of the lower Atchafalaya River in Morgan City and Berwick, La., and along Bayou Boeuf and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Fabrication and repair facilities are located on Bayous Boeuf and Black. Adequate acreage is available for expansion of existing terminals and construction of new terminals along Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Public and private terminals in the project area are adequately connected with rail, water, and highway transportation facilities. No additional public wharves are required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued engineering studies and investigations. Contract for dredging at Bayou Chene reach, stations 269+00 to 1030+00 is expected to be initiated in November 1980. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated on the Atchafalaya Bay and gulf reach in April 1974. The project is 53 percent complete. 3. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, MORGAN CITY TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA. Location. Atchafalaya River is the outlet of Red River and diverted flow from Mississippi River. It begins about 4.5 miles west of Old River navigation lock on northern boundary of Pointe Coupee Parish, and flows generally south about 135 miles and empties into Atchafalaya Bay, an inlet of the gulf. Section under improvement is from 20-foot contour in Atchafalaya Bay, 4 miles beyond mouth of Atchafalaya River, to 20-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (See NOS Coast Chart 11351, MRC alluvial valley maps, Morgan City, Belle Isle, and Point au Fer quadrangles, and NOS Small-Craft Chart 11355 of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Chart 11354 of the Atchafalaya River System.) Existing project. A 20- by 200-foot channel from 20-foot contour in Atchafalaya Bay to 20-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. Project depth refers to mean low water. Normal range of tide is 10 inches; extreme range, 14 inches; hurricane range, 10 feet. The existing project, prior to the modification of August 1968, was completed at a cost of $501,963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except for modification of project in connection with Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, La., which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. At Morgan City there are several small private wharves and two large and three small public ones open for use of all without charge. There are no warehouses needed, as business section is on riverfront and all freight is transferred directly from boats to stores. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, and water quality studies. Dredging in the main channel, stations 0+00 to 475+00, began Nov. 8, 1979, and completed Mar. 7, 1980, with a total of 3,021,518 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in Fiscal Year 1911 and completed in Fiscal Year 1914. 4. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA. Location. In Jefferson Parish, La., and extends about 37 miles southerly from junction of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Bayou Barataria near Lafitte Post Office. From its origin it extends southerly through Bayou Barataria, Bayou Dupont, a land cut(known as Dupre Cut) through marsh area, Bayou Cutler, Bayou St. Denis, and Barataria Bay to east end of Bayou Rigaud. At its southerly terminus it also connects with Barataria Pass and through that pass with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOS Coast Charts 11352, 11340, and 11535 and Geological Survey quadrangles, Barataria, Bay Dogris, Wilkinson Bay, and Barataria Pass.) Previous Project. For details see page 562 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A channel about 37 miles long with a 12-foot depth and 125-foot width from its beginning at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Grand Isle, La., following route of previous project to mile 15.5 in Bayou St. Denis; thence by a relocated channel along western shore of Barataria Bay and through Barataria Pass to 12- foot-depth contour in the gulf, with an extension 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT of project to include westerly 4.3 miles of Bayou Rigaud. Normal range of tide is 30 inches at mouth and 6 inches at head. Elevation of water surface near mouth, due to hurricanes, has been over 6 feet. Existing project was completed at a cost of $1,499,648. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately-owned wharves at Lafitte; three privately-owned facilities at Grand Isle; and wharfage in Bayou Rigaud at Grand Isle constructed by shrimping industry are available to all boats without charge. About 7 miles below Lafitte there is a large oil terminal for transferring production of Lafitte field to barges. Adjacent to Bayou Barataria and along Bayou Rigaud adequate sites are available for future use. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in May 1960 and completed in November 1963. 5. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHIE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA. Location. Prior to 1902, Bayou Lafourche was an outlet of Mississippi River, its head being at Donaldsonville, La., 80 miles above New Orleans. It flows southerly 107 miles to Gulf of Mexico. (See NOS Coast Charts 11340 and 11357; MRC alluvial valley maps; Donaldsonville, White Castle, Napoleonville, Thibodaux, and Lac des Allemands quadrangles; and Geological Survey maps, Houma, Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Mink Bayou, Leeville, and Belle Pass quadrangles.) Previous projects. For details see page 564 of 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for permanent closure of head of bayou without a lock, a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Canal Boulevard in Thibodaux to Lockport, and from Larose to Gulf of Mexico with a jettied entrance at Belle Pass, and the closure of Pass Fourchon. These improvements are about 50.5 miles long, and the modification of Jul. 14, 1960, provides for an additional 66 miles of improvement as follows: a 12- by 125-foot channel, extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at mile 37.2 west of Harvey Lock to enter Bayou Lafourche below highway bridge at Leeville at about mile 12; a 12- by 125-foot channel in Bayou Lafourche from point of junction with proposed 12- by 125-foot channel to 12-foot-depth contour in gulf; modification and extension of existing jetties from 6- by 12-foot contour, if found advisable to reduce maintenance dredging in the gulf; and a channel 9 by 100 feet in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to vicinity of lower limits of Golden Meadow; and a 12- by 125-foot channel from Bayou Lafourche at Leeville from point where auxiliary channel connects with Bayou Lafourche through Southwestern Louisiana Canal to and through Bayou Rigaud to connect with enlargement of Bayou Rigaud recommended under project "Barataria Bay Waterway, La." Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth and 3 inches at head; from severe rains, 3 to 10 feet at head; from hurricanes, up to 10 feet at mouth. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $10,500,000 Federal and $6,050,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $43,000. Excavation of a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Thibodaux to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Lockport is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (July 1974) is $733,000. Local cooperation. Original assurances received and accepted on all items of work in the project. Provisions of Public Law 91-611 are not applicable; however, provisions of Public Law 91- 646 are applicable. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been executed by the Jefferson Parish Council and Lafourche Parish Police Jury; however, the Louisiana Office of Public Works has not executed supplemental assurances. Golden Meadow to gulf: Local agency has acquired all rights-of-way and furnished rightsof- entry. Leeville to Grand Isle: No action is apparent on this stretch by either the Lafourche Parish Police Jury, the Jefferson Parish Council, the local assurers, or the State of Louisiana, Office of Public Works. Rights-of-way are not available due to multiplicity and other complications of ownership. The "Jump" portion of the project was classified as inactive on May 4, 1977. The Jefferson Parish Council and the Lafourche Parish Police Jury were requested to provide information as to whether they still favor construction on this part. If reactivation is favored, it should be with the understanding that they would have to provide required rights-ofway when requested. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission stated that they may provide assurances for that portion of the project located in Lafourche Parish. These assurances were forwarded to the Greater Lafourche Port 11-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Commission on Jan. 22, 1979. On Mar. 9, 1979, we requested information as to the status of their execution of the assurances. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission appears to be reluctant to execute the required assurances. Terminal facilities. There are numerous private warehouses, wharves, and stiff-leg derricks for handling cane along bayou. At Lockport, Barker Barge Line has a barge wharf with covered shed, and Southern Pacific Railroad maintains a large wharf with covered shed. At Golden Meadow each of the seafood canneries has docking facilities suitable for its needs. Four oil companies have docks at Leeville for transferring production of Leeville oil fields to barges. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of existing projects was initiated in Fiscal Year 1939 and is 10 percent complete. Dredging between Larose, La., and Gulf of Mexico was completed in 1939, and that segment between Lockport and Napoleonville, La., is in an inactive status due to lack of right-of-way and spoil area. Jetties at mouth of Belle Pass were completed in 1939, and later damaged by storm action, which required placement of additional stone adjacent to both sides of steel sheet pile jetties in 1940, and repair and extension of jetties in 1941. During Fiscal Year 1948, stone jetties were repaired and extended inland about 700 feet from shoreline; and steel sheet pile section was strengthened for about 250 feet gulfward of stone jetties, by placement of stone on both gulf and bayou sides. On May 31, 1949, an automatic tide gage for recording hurricane and storm tides was installed. Modification of Jul. 14, 1960, was initiated in February 1963 and is 10 percent complete, with 12- by 125-foot channel completed in September 1963 from Leeville to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico, the 9- by 100-foot channel completed in August 1966 from Golden Meadow to Leeville, and the 9- by 100-foot channel from Golden Meadow to Leeville completed in August 1966. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission requested, and was granted, a permit to dredge a new channel 20 by 300 feet wide west of the existing channel from mile 0.76 in Bayou Lafourche to the 20-foot depth in the gulf, and to close the existing jettied channel after completion of the new channel. This work was completed in March 1968 and the Port Commission must maintain the channel at no less than 12 by 125 feet. 6. BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA. Location. Bayou Teche has its source in Bayou Courtableau, in St. Landry Parish, and flows southeasterly 125 miles to its confluence with lower Atchafalaya River, about 10.5 miles above Morgan City, La. Vermilion River, also called Bayou Vermilion, is formed by junction of Bayous Fusilier and Bourbeau, west of Arnaudville, La., and flows southwesterly 72 miles to western end of Vermilion Bay. Bayou Teche is connected with Vermilion River by Bayou Fusilier at Arnaudville; and by Ruth Canal, an artificial, privately-owned, nonnavigable waterway, constructed for diversion of water from Bayou Teche to Vermilion River for rice irrigation. (See NOS Coast Charts 11340 and 11349; MRC alluvial valley maps; and Geological Survey maps.) Existing project. A navigable channel 51 miles long and 8 by 80 feet from 8-foot-depth contour in Vermilion Bay to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, thence 9 by 100 feet to head of navigation (mile 52) at Lafayette, La. (fixed bridge at Louisiana State Highway 729, formerly State Highway 1092), with additional enlargement below Abbeville necessary to provide adequate capacity for floodflows; improvement of Vermilion River from Lafayette, La., mile 52, to its junction with lower end of Ruth Canal, mile 57.2, by both widening and deepening to provide a channel 6 by 60 feet, mean gulf level, in order to provide adequate capacity for flood discharges from upper Vermilion River Basin, and also serve irrigation interests by conducting flow of Ruth Canal to lower Vermilion River during rice season. Clearing and enlargement of channel from Ruth Canal to Bayou Fusilier by both widening and deepening to provide a cross section about 50 percent larger than that of existing channel. This improvement is required in interest of flood control in upper Vermilion Basin. Enlargement of channel of Bayou Teche from its head in Bayou Courtableau to a point about 21 miles downstrean thereof, by widening and deepening to provide a channel of 35-foot bottom width at minus 2 and minus 3, mean gulf level. Increasing height of Keystone Dam by 3 feet (later revised to 1.5 feet) by installation of a fixed crest spillway. (See individual report for Bayou Teche, La.) In connection with these improvements, the project also provides for replacement of an existing pontoon bridge at Woodlawn over Vermilion River with a verticallift structure and lengthening and strengthening approaches to five existing movable bridges over Vermilion River below Lafayette, La., located at Louisiana State Highway 43 at Perry, La.; Southern Pacific Railroad at Abbeville, La.; Louisiana State Highway 25 at Abbeville, La.; 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT Milton, La.; and U. S. Highway 90 (Pinhook Bridge) just below Lafayette, La. Similar work on existing fixed spans over nonnavigable streams is provided for on 11 bridges over Bayou Vermilion above Lafayette, La., and three over upper Bayou Teche. New work completed in 1957 cost $2,891,922. Project was reclassified "Operation and Maintenance, General" under category, "Navigation (Locks, Dams, Reservoirs, and Canals)" by authority of Chief of Engineers, Apr. 23,1956. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned, publiclyoperated terminals are located on Bayou Teche at Franklin, Jeanerette, New Iberia, and Arnaudville. Other privately-owned boat landings are located at frequent intervals throughout the bayou and public landing is permitted without charge. Facilities on the Vermilion River include a public wharf and two privately-owned barge landing piers at Abbeville equipped for barge truck transfers of general commodities, seven landings for the transfer of petroleum products, and several private landings all along the waterway suitable for small craft. The Vermilion Sugar Company maintains a barge slip at its mill. Present facilities are adequate for existing commerce and there is ample space available for construction of more wharfage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and snagging and clearing above Lafayette, La. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced March 1944 and was completed March 1957, when Keystone Dam was raised to provide an increase of 1.5 feet in pool elevation, in order to increase flow through Ruth Canal into Vermilion River. This work was accomplished under navigation improvement "Bayou Teche, La." 7. BAYOU TECHE, LA. Location. Has its source in Bayou Courtableau, in St. Landry Parish, flows southeasterly for 125 miles, and joins lower Atchafalaya River about 10.5 miles above Morgan City, La. (See NOS Sailing Chart 11340, and MRC alluvial valley maps, and Palmetto, Opelousas, Carencro, Arnaudville, St. Martinville, Loreauville, Derouen, Jeanerette, Foster, and Belle Isle quadrangles.) Pr'ecious projects. For details see page 569,1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide on the bottom from mouth of stream to New Iberia, La., mile 54.5, thence 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide on the bottom to Keystone Lock, 18 miles, and thence 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide on the bottom from Keystone Lock to Arnaudville, La., 34 miles, to be secured by dredging, removing snags and overhanging trees, and construction of a lock and dam and regulating works. (See Table 11-C on Keystone Lock.) Raising pool level by 1.5 feet above Keystone Dam by installation of a fixed crest spillway on dam is provided for in flood control project for Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, La. Under project, flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries, East and West Calumet floodgates, with a width of 45 feet and sill elevation of minus 9.02 feet, mean low gulf level, were constructed in Bayou Teche at east and west approaches to Wax Lake Outlet from February 1949 to September 1950, and a lock was constructed in lower Atchafalaya River in vicinity of Berwick, La., from November 1948 to September 1951. (See Table 11-C on Berwick Lock.) Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth; 4 inches just below Keystone Lock; extreme, 12 inches at mouth; 6 inches just below Keystone Lock; and zero above lock; due to freshets, 4 to 5 feet at mouth; 12 to 15 feet just below Keystone Lock, and 2 to 7 feet above Keystone Lock. Estimated cost for new work (1954) is $1,080,000, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects and estimated cost (1954), $371,400 for widening and deepening channel between miles 50.06 and 72, Keystone Lock and Dam, which is inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small, privately-owned wharves are available at all towns along bayou; public landing is permitted without charge. There are privately-owned terminals for transferring crude oil to barges near towns of Charenton, Jeanerette, Oliver, and St. Martinville. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of Keystone Lock and facilities, condition and operation studies, and stream gaging. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in 1891 and completed July 1928, except widening channel to bottom width of 80 feet from mile 50.06 to New Iberia, and to bottom width of 60 feet from New Iberia to Keystone Lock, which is inactive. For further details see Annual Report for 1966. 11-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 8. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA. Location. Calcasieu River has its source in southwestern Louisiana, and flows southerly to the gulf. About 25 miles from the gulf it debouches into Calcasieu Lake, which is about 18 miles long. Connection between lake and gulf, about 7 miles long, is known as Calcasieu Pass. (See Geological Survey maps, Edna, Thompson Bluff, Hecker, Moss Bluff, Lake Charles, West Lake, Moss Lake, Hackberry, Sweet Lake, Brown's Lake, Holly Beach, Grand Bayou, and Cameron quadrangles; and NOS Small-Craft Charts 11341 and 11348 of Intracoastal Waterway and NOS Small-Craft Chart 11347 of Calcasieu River and Lake.) Preious project. For details see 1936 and 1938 Annual Reports, pages 719 and 819, respectively. Existing project. Provides for a channel 40 by 400 feet(35.9 miles long) from Lake Charles to sea end of jetties in Gulf of Mexico; an approach channel 42 by 800 feet from sea end of jetties to42 feet deep in the gulf; extension of 35- by 250-foot channel from its present upstream limit at mile 34 to vicinity of U. S. Highway 90 Bridge (mile 36.2); a 750- by 1,000-foot turning basin at upper end with a 35-foot depth; improvement of river from Lake Charles to Phillips Bluff (52.6 miles) by removing logs, snags, overhanging trees, and by dredging; maintenance of existing 12- by 200- foot channel in old channel of Calcasieu River at Cameron, La., which connects with project at mile 2.25; and reconstruction and extension of existing jetties initially to seaward end of east jetty, and further extension to 15-foot-depth contour if found advisable to reduce maintenance dredging costs. Improvement is 113.6 miles long. Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth, diminishing to zero at Phillips Bluff; extremes range from 14 inches to zero. Estimated cost for new work (July 1975) is $19,518,000 Federal, and $1,409,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $404,700. Local cooperation. Local interest furnished all rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas for completed features. For construction and future maintenance of modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-ways, and spoil-disposal areas; alter pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities and hold and save the United States free from damages. Assurances were accepted and right-of-entry was furnished for the modification. The local agency is )resently finalizing transfer to the United States of the few remaining tracts with acceptable title evidence. Assurance Agency: Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District. Trminal fawilitie.. Facilities at Iort of Lake Charles are owned by Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District and operated by a board of commissioners. In addition to municipally-owned terminals, there are several privately-owned and operated wharf structures on existing ship channel. (For further details, see Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, Fla., Pensacola, Fla., Baton Rouge, La., Panama City, Fla., Pascagoula, Miss., Lake Charles, La., Gulfport, Miss.," revised 1957, and Folio of Navigation Maps Intracoastal Waterway, New Orleans to Port Arthur, 1968, 13th edition, published by the MRC.) Operations and results d(uring fisc(l year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of the salt-water barrier, stream gaging, and condition and operation studies. Maintenance by contract: Removal of 11,998,077 cubic yards of shoal material, mile 15.5 to mile 36.0 was completed Sep. 3, 1980. Dredging in the Bar Channel, stations 0+00 to 431+00, began Jun. 1, 1979, and is 90 percent complete, with a total of 9,200,000 cubic yards of material removed. One contract, mile 15.5 to mile 3.0 was initiated Aug. 23, 1980, with a total of 1,741,024 cubic yards removed. Condition as of Sep. o0C. onstruction under the existing project was initiated in Fiscal Year 1939 and completed October 1968, except extension of the jetties to 15-foot-depth contour, which has been deferred until found advisable to accomplish same. Construction of modifications, described in Table 11-B, was as follows: Work authorized by Mar. 2, 1945, R&H Act was initiated in September 1948 and completed in June 1949; Work authorized by Jul. 24, 1946, FC Act was initiated in September 1948 and completed in April 1953; and Work authorized by Jul. 14, 1960, R&H Act was initiated in April 1962 and completed in October 1968. A turning basin or ship anchorage for vessels using waterway was constructed from April to June 1952, between St. Johns Island and vicinity of Cameron, La., about 1.1 miles. Calcasieu Pass jetties, initiated under previous project and completed in May 1942, extended to 10-foot-depth contour. East jetty, about 8,620 feet long, was built to about 6 feet above mean low gulf and extends seaward from existing gulf shoreline for 6,820 feet. West jetty, 8,050 feet long, was built to about 4 feet above mean low gulf and extends seaward from existing gulf shoreline for 6,795 feet. 9. CALCASIEU RIVER AT DEVIL'S ELBOW, LA. Loc(ation. In southwest Louisiana on the east side of the Calcasieu River and Pass. La., project and about 12 miles south of Lake Charles. Existing project. Provides for a 40- by 400-foot channel extending a distance of about 2.8 miles, 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT from the existing ship channel in Calcasieu River at mile 22.6 eastward through Devil's Elbow and in the land cut into the industrial park, and a turning basin at the head of the channel, 40 feet deep. 1,200 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. Estimated cost for new work (July 1974) is $5,490,740 Federal and $798,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $68,000. Local cooperation. Assuring Agency: Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District. All assurances for the project have been received, and were accepted Dec. 6, 1973, wherein they agreed to provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and a subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain at local expense adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas commensurate with the depth provided in the project channel; prohibit erection of any structure within 125 feet of the project channel authorized at the time of construction; establish regulations prohibiting discharges of pollutants into the waters of the channel and harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control and regulate and promote the wise use, growth, and development of the area surrounding the channel for waterborne commerce and comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Sec. 221 of Public Law 91-611. Terminal facilities. There are public terminal facilities at the Port of Lake Charles, mile 34.0, of the Calcasieu River ship channel, including storage sheds, rail and highway service, and transfer equipment. Privately-owned industrial facilities along the channel have been developed, including a major tanker terminal(about mile 29) and a dock to serve the aluminum complex at the industrial park. Additional public facilities in the industrial park will be provided when needed. Operation and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaissance surveys and preparation of plans and specifications for dredging. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed in September 1978. 10. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA. Location. In Vermilion Parish, La., between Atchafalaya and Calcasieu Rivers, from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock, to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou. Waterway is routed 22.6 miles along Schooner Bayou Cutoff, Schooner Bayou, Six Mile Canal, Belle Isle Canal, and Freshwater Bayou. (See NOS Small-Craft Chart 11350 of Intracoastal Waterway.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a new 12- by 125-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock, to 12- foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou; construction of an 84- by 600-foot lock with a depth of 16 feet over sill near Gulf of Mexico; and construction of jetties from shoreline to 6-foot-depth contour in Gulf of Mexico, if maintenance dredging of channel without jetties proves to be more expensive than construction and maintenance of jetties. Until such determination has been made, offshore channel should be dredged and maintained to provide a 12- by 250-foot channel. In event jetties are provided, offshore section should then be maintained to 12- by 125-foot project in jettied reach, and 250 feet beyond. Existing project was completed in 1968, except for construction of jetties at a later date, if necessary. Estimated cost of construction of jetties (July 1971) is $3,118,100. Estimated total Federal cost is $10,400,000 (1971) and the total non-Federal cost for the existing project is $171,000. In addition, the Coast Guard is to provide navigational aids at an estimated cost of $19,100. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Extensive public and private terminal and transfer facilities do not exist in area, and none would be required for improved channel. Private terminals exist at site of oil and gas operations in area and sufficient private and public wharf facilities are along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and its connecting waterways. Sites are available along proposed improvement for construction of any additional private and public terminals that might be required for utilization of channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and ordinary repairs to lock, condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, water 11-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 quality studies, and channel patrol. Maintenance dredging under one contract was initiated Dec. 11, 1979, with the removal of 1,776,300 cubic yards of material from the channel between Freshwater Bayou Lock and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Contract is 60 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated April 1963 and completed August 1968, except for construction of jetties at a later date, if required to reduce the cost of maintenance dredging. 11. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. Section of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway within New Orleans District extends from Lake Borgne Light 29 near mouth of Rigolets. to Sabine River, La. and Tex. Section from Lake Borgne Light 29 to Mississippi River follows Rigolets and Lake Pontchartrain to lake end of State-owned Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, thence via this canal to Mississippi River, a distance of 40.5 miles. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., modified project to provide for a land cut through marsh from Rigolets to a point on Inner Harbor Navigation Canal about 22.5 miles from Mississippi River, eliminating passage through Lake Pontchartrain and five drawbridges, a distance of 30.8 miles to Mississippi River by this route. From Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to entrance to Harvey Lock, route follows Mississippi River for 5.5 miles. Section from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, La., leaves Mississippi River through Harvey Lock about 3.3 miles above Canal Street and follows Harvey Canal No. 1 and Bayou Baratariato Bayou Villars, a land cut south of Lake Salvador to Harvey Canal No.2, Harvey Canal No.2 to Larose, La., and a land cut to Houma, La., thence over a land cut south of Bayous Black and Cocodrie, thence through Bayou Cocodrie and a land cut to Bayou Black; thence through Bayous Black, Chene, and Boeuf to Atchafalaya River, about 0.5 mile south of Morgan City, La., a total of 95.5 miles. Alternative connection with Mississippi River near Algiers, La., about 10.3 miles below Harvey Lock, consisting of a lock and land cut about 9 miles long intersecting Intracoastal Waterway at about mile 6 is complete. An alternative route from Mississippi River follows Bayou Plaquemine passing Indian Village, La., and continuing on through lower Grand River to and through a lock at Bayou Sorrel in East Atchafalaya Basin protection levee, thence through levee borrow pit to Berwick Bay; and thence through Berwick Bay to Morgan City, La., a total of 56 miles. This alternative route was enlarged from vicinity of Morgan City to Indian Village, La., and extended from Indian Village, La., through Bayou Grosse Tete and a new land cut to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River near Port Allen, La., a total of 65 miles. Section from Atchafalaya River to Vermilion River, La., begins at western end of Mississippi-Atchafalaya section and follows Atchafalaya River about 2.5 miles, portions of Little Wax Bayou, Possum Bayou. cutoffs, a land cut passing through North Bend Plantation to Bayou Bartholomew, Bayou Bartholomew to Little Bay, a land cut skirting north edge of Cote Blanche Island and west edge of Weeks Island to Vermilion River, about 24 miles below Abbeville, La., a total of about 63.6 miles. Franklin Canal, St. Mary Parish, La., extends southwesterly from Franklin, La., on Bayou Teche, for 5.5 miles to Bayou Portage, a section of "The Inland Waterway from Franklin to the Mermentau River, La.," and through bayou for 0.75 mile to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 121 miles west of Harvey Lock. Section from Vermilion River to Mermentau River, La., begins at western end of Atchafalaya-Vermilion section and follows Vermilion River 1.3 miles, a part of Schooner Bayou Cutoff canal, and a land cut running generally northwesterly to Mermentau River at a point about 0.5 mile above its entrance into Grand Lake and about 16 miles below town of Lake Arthur, La., a total of about 42.7 miles. Vermilion Lock was constructed about 1.75 miles west of Vermilion River to prevent ingress of salt water from Vermilion Bay. Section from Mermentau River to Calcasieu River, La., begins at western end of Vermilion- Mermentau section and follows Mermentau River upstream for about 1.5 miles, a land cut running west-southwesterly to Lake Misere, passing north of lake and Bayou Misere, westerly to Sweet Lake, south and west of Sweet Lake, northwesterly to Bayou Tete Bois, through Bayou Tete Bois, Black Bayou, and cutoffs to a point on Calcasieu River about 16.6 miles below city of Lake Charles, La., a total of about 37.1 miles. Calcasieu Lock was constructed near intersection of Calcasieu River and Intracoastal Waterway, mile 238 west of Harvey Lock, Calcasieu Parish. about 16.6 miles below Lake Charles, La. Section from Calcasieu River to Sabine River, La. and Tex., begins at western end of Mermentau- Calcasieu section, and follows Calcasieu River upstream about 1.6 miles, a land cut running southwesterly 2.8 miles, thence west 22 miles to Sabine River at a point about 3 miles below Orange, Tex., a total of about 27.1 miles. (See MRC alluvial valley map and Rigolets, Chef Menteur, St. Bernard, New Orleans, Barataria, 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT Baton Rouge, Grosse Tete, Chicot Lake, Foster, Napoleonville, Morgan City, Belle Isle, Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, and Derouen quadrangles; Geological Survey maps, Cutoff, Houma, Gibson, Abbeville, Forked Island, Grand Lake East, Grand Lake West, Lake Charles, Sulphur, and Orange quadrangles; and NOS Small-Craft Charts of Intracoastal Waterway, gulf section, Galveston Bay, Tex., to Waveland, Miss.) Precious projects. For details see page 544 of 1963 Annual Report. E.cisting project. Provides for a waterway, within the district, from Lake Borgne to Sabine River by the following improvements; a channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, except in vicinity of Houma, miles 50.5 to 63.5, which is to be maintained at 12 by 125 feet; a channel 16 by 150 feet through bypass route around Houma, La., miles 50.5 to 63.5, and through alternative connection in Mississippi River below Algiers, La., about 9 miles long, a channel 16 by 200 feet from Atchafalaya River to Sabine River; a channel 12 by 150 feet in section between Lake Borgne Light 29 and New Orleans (via land cut through marsh and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal), 33.1 miles long; an alternative route 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide between Lake Borgne Light 29 and New Orleans (via Rigolets, Lake Pontchartrain, and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal), 40.5 miles long; a channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide for Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route from Mississippi-Atchafalaya section of waterway, in vicinity of Morgan City, through lower Atchafalaya River (Berwick Bay) and borrow pit of East Atchafalaya protection levee to and through Bayou Sorrel Lock which was constructed under existing project "Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries," thence through Lower Grand River to Indian Village, and thence by way of Bayou Grosse Tete and a new land cut to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River near Port Allen, La., opposite lower limit of Port Baton Rouge; a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Indian Village on Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route through Bayou Plaquemine and Plaquemine Lock to Mississippi River at Plaquemine, La., improvementof Franklin Canal as a connecting channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (mile 121) to Franklin, La., to afford a channel 8 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide with a width of 100 feet in its upper 300 feet; and a saltwater guard lock (Calcasieu Lock) in waterway at mile 238 west of Harvey Lock. Project also provides for: widening at bends; passing places; mooring basins; locks or guard locks; such railroad bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary; purchase of pipeline dredge; construction and operation of new drainage canals and pumping facilities to restore parish drainage systems where intercepted; construction of movable bridges at Missouri Pacific Railroad and State Highways 31 and 996 (in lieu of State Highway Bridge 31, a tunnel was constructed, and additional cost over estimated cost of bridge was borne by local interest); fixedtrestle bridges for crossing proposed landside drainage canals; lift bridges at Louisiana ighway 168, Port Allen, La., at Texas & Pacific Railway, Port Allen, La., and at Texas & Pacific Railway, Morley, La.; and for annual payments to Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans for use of a portion of Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. Length of waterway within district is 384.1 miles via northerly or Port Allen route, and 299.4 miles via southerly or Harvey Canal route. Normal range of tide, 10 inches; extreme range, 14 inches. A severe storm may cause a high tide of from 6 to 9 feet. Estimated cost for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $157,833,827 Federal and $27,535,000 non- Federal, divided as follows; Algiers Lock and canal, completed June 1961, $15,895,924 Federal and $2,185,000 non-Federal; Plaquemine- Morgan City route, completed October 1963, $26,869,372 Federal and $2,250,000 non-Federal; and remainder of waterway (October 1980), $115,068,531 Federal and $23,100,000 non- Federal, including $73,700,000 Federal and $21,500,000 non-Federal for modification (authorized by Public Law 87-874), October 1962. In addition, the Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $32,000. Construction of bulkheads and jetties at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur, La., is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (1956) of this item is $440,000. Construction of a double-leaf bascule, four-lane highway bridge provided for under this project has become unnecessary because portion of project over which bridge was to be constructed was incorporated in project "Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet" which provides for a larger bridge. Bayou Sorrel and Bayou Boeuf Locks were constructed and are being maintained and operated with "Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries" funds. Therefore, construction, maintenance, and operation costs are not included in approved estimates referred to heretofore. (See Table 11-D for locks on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in New Orleans District.) Local cooperation. Algiers Lock and Canal: All assurances required for construction were furnished. Local agency has failed to convey all fee and easement tracts with acceptable title 11-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 evidence to the United States. However, authority has been received to accept the interests conveyed as best available from local agency with the understanding that the United States rely upon assurances of local cooperation should any claims against the United States occur as a result of failure of local agency to complete transfer of title. Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route: All assurances required for construction were furnished. Title by United States has been acquired to all but 35 tracts, for which local agency failed to comply fully" with curative requirements in title certificate. Authority was given to accept the tracts conveyed as best available from local interests and to rely upon assurances of local cooperation furnished by local agency should any claims against the United States occur as a result of failure of local agency to complete transfer of title. Louisiana Office of Public Works has furnished assurances for maintenance and improvement. Modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1962: Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas for enlargement and future maintenance of project, make alterations to utilities; construct, maintain, and operate all bridges desired in connection with bypass channel around Houma, La., and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances were requested in April 1963; however, none of the 11 local agencies involved has furnished assurances requested. Main objection to participation is requirement that local interests be responsible for alteration of utilities. Replacement of Vermilion Lock: The Vermilion Parish Police Jury was requested to execute an Agreement of Local Cooperation on Oct. 26, 1972, agreeing to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the replacement lock and approach channels thereto, and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project, including erosion of the channel beyond the rights-of-way furnished for the replacement lock and the approach channels thereto and comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Sec. 221 of Public Law 91-611. They furnished formal assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. The assurances were executed by the Police Jury on Dec. 6, 1976, and were accepted by the District Engineer on behalf of the United States on Feb.8, 1977. The Acting Director of Real Estate for the Secretary of the Army approved the assurances on Jul. 5, 1977. Terminal facilities. Large terminal and transfer facilities, suitable for receiving and shipping commodities by barge, are available at principal cities in Louisiana; namely, New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Harvey, Morgan City, and Lake Charles. Facilities at New Orleans are on Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. Canal and facilities were leased from Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, Apr. 1, 1944, and are now operated by the United States, toll free, 24 hours per day. At Morgan City, on Atchafalaya River, there are two large and three small wharves open to all without charge. Otherwise, facilities are confined to privatelyowned piers, wharves, or oil docks, Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Real estate activities, condition and operation studies, condition surveys, stream gaging, and channel patrol. Locks, bridges, and waterways were operated and maintained. Fender systems were repaired at Algiers, Calcasieu, Harvey, Port Allen, and Vermilion Locks. Work by hired labor consisted of major repairs to the Algiers Lock. Miscellaneous repairs were made to the Florida Avenue Bridge, Vermilion, Harvey, and Port Allen Locks. Maintenance by contract: Dredging under three contracts included removing 246,080 cubic yards of shoal in Port Allen Lock forebay and below Bayou Sorrel Lock. Shoreline protection, along both banks of the GIWW, Algiers Navigation Canal at specified marine locations, was completed Feb. 14, 1980, with 50,231 tons of stone placed. Dredge operations in the New Orleans Harbor and GIWW included removing 6,539,065 cubic yards of material. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated July 1929 and project, as modified, is 55 percent complete. For information on completion of segments of waterway, see 1965 Annual Report, pages 523 and 524. Work remaining to complete the project consists of enlarging waterway as provided by 1962 River and Harbor Act, and replacement of Vermilion Lock. Construction of bulkheads at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur are inactive features as this work has not been necessary. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site of the proposed new shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT recommended that the existing lock be replaced and expanded at the existing site. This is a new concept and requires reinstitution of General Design planning with attendant slips in the schedule components. 12. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA. Location. Extends from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at mile 59.5 west of Harvey Lock southerly about 16 miles, thence southeasterly 10.5 miles to Terrebonne Bay, and 9.5 miles across bay to deep water in Cat Island Pass. At mile 11.3 above Cat Island Pass, Houma Navigation Canal crosses Bayou Petit Caillou, and 20 miles above Cat Island Pass it crosses Bayou Grand Caillou. No other major waterways are crossed by Houma Navigation Canal. (See Army Engineer and Geological Survey quadrangle maps; NOS 11352 and 11340 Sailing Charts; and NOS 11357 and 11356 Small-Craft Charts on the Intracoastal Waterway. Existing project. Provides that United States assume maintenance and operation of Houma Navigation Canal, constructed by Parish of Terrebonne, to dimensions of 15 by 150 feet. Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth and 4 inches at Houma; extreme range is 14 inches at mouth and 6 inches at Houma; wind and tide, 1 to 3 feet at mouth; flood, 3 to 4 feet in upper section. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for maintenance of canal and for establishment and maintenance of aids to navigation; furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas; provide alterations to facilities; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate all bridges under construction or to be constructed across the canal. Local interests (under Chief of Engineers' interpretation of H. Doc. 583, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) will not be required to convey title of canal to United States. Assurances were furnished and accepted Apr. 12, 1963. Local cooperating body has furnished temporary disposal areas as required for maintenance dredging of canal. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned and operated facilities are adequate for existing commerce which is mainly seafood plants; oil comp~anies and oil company supplies; sugar refining; and marine repair shops and towing. Southern Pacific Lines has dock facilities in Iouma, La. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities, or for the construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal yea: Hired labor work consisted of reconnaissance surveys, stream gaging, and condition and operation studies. Maintenance dredging under contract, stations, 36+23.4 to 1239+00, began Feb. 21, and completed Apr. 21, 1980, with a total of 1,265,976 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Maintenance by the United States commenced in November 1964. 13. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA. Location. Work covered by this project is 35 to 70 miles southeast of Lake Charles, La., along lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25, to Gulf of Mexico; Inland Waterway from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, White Lake to Grand Lake, and from Schooner Bayou to Intracoastal Waterway-Gulf section (Schooner Bayou Cutoff); North Prong of Schooner Bayou; and waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La., and artificial canal, extending from 5-footdepth contour in White Lake, almost due south for about 1.8 miles to Pecan Island. (See NOS Coast Charts 11344 and 11349, NOS Small-Craft Chart 11348 on the Intracoastal Waterway, Geological Survey maps, Sweet Lake, Hog Bayou. Grand Lake West, Grand Lake East, Constance Bayou, Forked Island, Pecan Island, and Abbeville Quadrangles.) Existing project. Flood control, navigation irrigation, and salinity control in coastal marsh of lower Mermentau River Basin and channel enlargement of lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25, to a minimum section of 3,000 square feet below mean low gulf level for discharge of flood flows; construction of a sectorgated control structure at Catfish Point, mile 24 above mouth of Mermentau River, for discharge of flood flows and control of tidal flows and saltwater intrusion in Mermentau River; channel enlargement and realinement of Inland Waterway from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, 12.04 miles, and from White Lake to Grand Lake, 6.14 miles, to a minimum section of 3,000 square feet below mean low gulf level or interflow between lakes and discharge of flood flows; construction of a sector-gated control structure in enlarged channel immediately north of abandoned Schooner Bayou Lock reservation for discharge of flood flows and control of tidal flows and saltwater intrusion; channel enlargement of North Prong of Schooner Bayou and Schooner Bayou Cutoff, 6.69 miles, to 6 by 60 feet, mean low gulf level, for navigation purposes; and maintenance of existing 5- by 40-foot, mean low gulf level, waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La., 1.8 miles long, for navigation. In addition, project provides for incorporation of that section of project, "Inland Waterway from Franklin, La., to Mermentau River," west of Vermilion Bay, a waterway that includes Schooner Bayou Lock. Project was reclassified as 11-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 an "Operation and Maintenance, General" project under category, "Navigation (Locks, Dams, Reservoirs, and Canals)" by authority of Chief of Engineers, Apr. 23, 1956. Because of failure of both east and west gates, Schooner Bayou Lock was closed by a dike across east approach channel and traffic routed through new control structure. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide on Mermentau River near mouth is 1.6 feet and near head about 3 inches. Variation of water surface near the mouth may be as much as 7 or 8 feet, due to hurricanes on the gulf, and near head from 8 to 12 feet, due to freshets. New work was completed in 1956. Estimated cost for new work (October 1979) is $5,350,000 Federal and $471,000 non- Federal, including $190,000 contributed funds. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $51,000.' Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned and operated facilities are adequate along the Mermentau River and Bayous Nezpique and des Cannes for the principal commodities transported, which are petroleum and its products. A public wharf is located at Lake Arthur, La., but due to insufficient use it has not been maintained and in its present condition is not usable. Sites for future expansion of these facilities are available and will be provided by non-Federal interests as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of Schooner Bayou and Catfish Point Control Structures, condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, channel patrol, and water quality studies. Other work by hired labor forces during the fiscal year: Catfish Point Control Strictu res; construction of a new boat landing, placement of 2,400 tons of stone in needed areas, and maintenance repairs to the guidewalls. Schooner Bayou Control Structur ;: dredging in the boat slip and old lock channel with removal of 2,000 cubic yards of material. Conditio)nl (iosf Sep. .(L Construction of project began April 1974 and completed July 1952. New work dredging was accomplished from April 1947 to June 1952. Catfish Point Control Structure was constructed from November 1948 to August 1951. Reservation comprises 9.7 acres. Schooner Bayou Lock and Control Sturctures: Schooner Bayou Lock and Dam were completed in 1913 and 1914, respectively, and the Lockmaster's house in 1917. Lock was closed to navigation May 7, 1951, and abandoned by authority of Chief of Engineers on Oct. 9, 1951. Permanent closure of lock channel and tie-in dikes was completed September 1951. Construction of control structures was accomplished from August 1949 to May 1951. Reservation comprises 6.9 acres. 14. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA. Lo)cation. This reach of the river flows southeasterly through southeastern portion of Louisiana. At Head of Passes, approximately 233.1 miles below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge, river branches into three main passes: Southwest Pass, South Pass, and Pass a Loutre, two of which, Southwest Pass and South Pass, are improved under existing project. Head of Passes to mouths of Southwest and South Passes are 20.1 and 13.5 miles, respectively. Mouth of Southwest Pass is 141 miles west of Mobile, Ala., and 349 miles east of Galveston, Tex. Mouth of South Pass is 18.5 miles northeast of mouth of Southwest PIass. (See NOS Coast Charts 11361, 11364, and 11369; MRC alluvial valley map, and Zachary, Baton Rouge, White Castle, Donaldsonville, Thibodaux, Mount Airy, Bonnet Carre', Hahnville, New Orleans, St. Bernard, Barataria, Pointe a la Hache, Black Bay, Empire, Forts, West Delta, East Delta, and Southwest Pass quadrangles and 1979 (47th edition) folio of flood control and navigation maps, Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, La., published by the MRC.) -- Precious projects. For details see page 552 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions as follows: Between a line one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge 129.3 miles to upper port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet mean low water; within limits of port of New Orleans, where that authority has jurisdiction over both banks of river, a distance of 17.8 miles, 35 by 1,500 feet, measured from a line generally 100 feet from face of left bank wharves, but not closer than 100 feet to wharves on right bank; within 35-by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet; from lower limits of port of New Orleans 86.7 miles to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest PIass, 17.5 miles from Head of Passes to jetty channel, 40 by 800 feet; 4.1 miles in the Southwest Pass bar and jetty channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass from Head of Passes to outer ends of jetties, 13.5 miles, 30 by 450 feet; and 1.2 miles in the South Pass bar channel, 30 by 600 feet. Plane of reference through New Orleans and below is mean low gulf. Plane of reference above New Orleans is low water reference plane. General plan of improvement of Southwest Pass provides for contracting pass to uniform cross section with about 1,420-foot surface width by means of jetties, spur dikes, and bulkheads; for 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT channel maintenance by dredging from Cubits Gap, mile 3.5 AHP through the gulf entrance channel, mile 21.5 BHP; for construction of small revetted openings through narrow portions of banks of pass for purpose of strengthening and nourishment of banks; for closure of minor outlets not required for maintenance of banks; for construction of sills to prevent enlargement of the Venice Jump and Cubits Gap; for repairs to sill across Pass a Loutre and bank revetment at Head of Passes; for construction of dikes with a view to reducing width of river above Head of Passes; for construction of a submerged deflecting dike above Head of Passes; and for other minor work. East jetty is about 24,950 feet long and west jetty 19,699 feet. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses, orginally built to about elevation of mean low gulf, surmounted with a superstructure of concrete blocks and large riprap and for stone rubble mound of core and cover stone. Spur dikes are composed of cribwork of round piling filled with willows and stone, or with a curtain of round piles along upstream face. General plan of improvement of South Pass provides for construction and maintenance of jetties and spur dikes; for channel maintenance by dredging from Head of Passes through the Gulf Entrance Channel beyond mile 13.5 BHP; maintenance of a sill across Pass a Loutre, and for seaward extension of east jetty at mouth of pass; removal of west dike and construction of spur dikes and bank revetment at Head of Passes; removal of false point at head of South Pass to bottom elevation of minus 45 feet and revetment of new bank line and construction and maintenance of east and west headland structure at Head of Passes. East Jetty foundation is 12,070 feet long; inner east jetty is 11,170 feet long; west jetty is 7,820 feet long; and inner west jetty is 4,710 feet long. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses surmounted by a superstructure of stone and/or concrete blocks and large riprap. Spur dikes are composed of cribwork of round piling filled with willows and stone. Plane of reference is mean low gulf. Variation of water surface is 16 inches at mouths and 10 inches at head of the passes, due to tides. Extreme range of tides at mouths of passes due to hurricanes is about 10 feet. At New Orleans extreme range of water surface is about 20 feet due to floods. At Baton Rouge extreme range is about 45 feet due to floods. Estimated cost of existing project (October 1980) is $142,000,000 Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $29,000. Local cooperation. None required, except for modification of project in connection with Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, or docks serve the Port of New Orleans. Most wharves on east or left bank parallel riverbank forming nearly a continuous covered quay about 10 miles long. Public wharves controlled by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans (the Dock Board), cover 62 percent of improved waterfront. These facilities include a shipside grain elevator, general cargo and cotton wharves, fruit landings, bunkering facilities, terminal warehouses, railroad terminals, marine railways, and drydocks. (For further details see Port Series No. 20, "The Port of New Orleans, La." revised 1970.) A foreign trade zone is located in Port of New Orleans. City of Baton Rouge has a reinforced concrete dock for deep-sea vessels with mechanical-handling facility. Attached to downstream end of wharf is a floating wharf boat 231 by 40.5 feet, of 2,000-ton capacity. Facilities are served by a transfer boat and municipal terminal having a capacity of 40 cars per day. Private terminals for handling oil, grain, bauxite ore, and other products are at points on both sides of river between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details, see "Port Facilities" included in "Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to the Gulf of Mexico, La.," published annually by the MRC, and Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, Fla., Pensacola, Fla., Baton Rouge, La., Panama City, Fla., Pascagoula, Miss., Lake Charles, La., Gulfport, Miss.," revised 1957.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor continued on preparation of a supplement to the GDM. It is tentatively scheduled for completion in February 1982. Maintenance: (a) Baton Rouge to New Orleans: The U.S. dustpan dredge Jadwin and hopper dredge Langfitt removed 5,226,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $2,978,500. (b) New Orleans Harbor: Two leased dredge contracts removed 2,792,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,948,000. (c) Head of Passes and Southwest Pass: The U.S. Hopper dredges Langfitt and Goethals, removed 4,913,000 cubic yards of material from the lower jetty and bar channels at a cost of $4,879,400. Two cutterhead dredges, under one unit price contract, removed 7,351,000 cubic yards between mile 1.0 AHP and mile 18.8 BHP at a cost of $7,218,700. (d) South and Southwest Pass: Work under one contract was completed as follows: West jetty 11-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 repairs, stations 20+00 to 142+42, total cost of $1,014,400. (e) South and Southwest Pass: Hired labor repairs were made to parallel stone dikes, outlets, and miscellaneous pile dike structures at a cost of $1,010,200. (f) Langfitt wharf: Repairs made to wharf at a cost of $96,700. (g) Other items of expense were: Condition surveys, Passes, $766,600; reconnaissance surveys, $180,500; supervision and administration, $568,000; engineering and design, $323,500, and water control management, $305,700. Condition as of Sep. 30. The existing project is 38 percent complete. Deepening Southwest Pass to 40 feet mean low gulf, as authorized by the modification of Mar. 2, 1945, was completed in September 1963. Deepening the channel to 40 feet mean low water from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and to 40 feet mean low gulf in New Orleans Harbor, as authorized by the modifications of Oct. 23, 1962, was completed in August 1963. Work on the permeable pile dikes from mile 1.8 to 2.8 on east bank has been placed in a deferred status. Contact for the repairs to permeable pile dikes from mile 10.87R to 20.14R was initiated May 15, 1980. 15. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA. Location. In State of Louisiana and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, La., and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, La., southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (See NOS Coast Charts 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1978 (46th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, La.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending westerly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. PIlan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $431,280,000 Federal and $170,000,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $69,000,000. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. Local cooperation. Original assurances furnished and accepted. Local agency has furnished Supplemental Assurance covering Public Law 91-646. Rights-of-entry for entire project were furnished by local agency which is in process of actively conveying to the United States title to remaining tracts. Supplemental assurances reflecting the changes made necessary by enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 were requested on Jan. 12, 1977. The Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, by letter dated Sep. 18, 1978, stated that they are unable to provide the required supplemental assurances at this time. They are concerned about the possible effects of the proposed new Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock on this project and pending legislation concerning local assurances for the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal project. Local interests have provided right of entry for construction for the Baptiste Collette Bayou portion of this project. Terminal facilities. The only facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at mile 63. Two new-container ship berths have begun operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering studies, stream gaging, surveys, and field investigations continued. Maintenance by hired labor: The hopper dredge Goethals removed intermittently a total of 1,100,000 cubic yards of material from the Gulf Entrance Channel during the period Mar. 8 through Apr. 20, 1980. Maintenance dredging under one contract for the Bayou Dupre Control Structure, 1980 scour repairs, was awarded Sep. 30, 1980 but was not initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958 and entire project is 59 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, ILA., DISTRICT percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. Principal work required to complete project is construction of new ship lock, raising and extending dikes, and construction of foreshore protection. The site for the lock remained the major problem. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site for the proposed shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that, if justified, the existing lock should be replaced and expanded in place and that care should be taken to minimize dislocation of residents living adjacent to the site. 16. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA. Location. In the coastal marsh area and in the vicinity of the Mississippi River at about miles 10 to 11 above the Hlead of Passes. (See NOS Coast Chart 11361.) Existing project. Provides for additional navigation outlets in the vicinity of Venice, La., by enlargement of the existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with entrance channels in open water 16 by 250 feet and jetties to the 6-foot-depth contour, if and when justified, to reduce cost of maintenance dredging. Estimated cost of new work (October 1980) is $12,000,000 Federal and $1,512,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $120,000. Local cooperation. Provides without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankment therefor or the costs of such retaining works; accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations as required in pipelines, cables, and other improvements, as well as their maintenance; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project, including but not limited to erosion beyond the rights-of-way furnished, and damages to oyster beds and other fisheries. Local interests have provided right of entry for construction for the Baptiste Collette Bayou portion of this project. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Basic assurances for the projc(.t have been furnished. Amended assurances covering Public Laws 91-646 and 91-611 were received on Aug. 5, 1977. Terminal facilities. In the Venice area, each operator of a construction, repair, or supply facility provides dock and transfer facilities to meet his own needs or arranges to use those of another. These facilities are considered adequate for the anticipated traffic. If new industry or supply facilities are established, they would provide any needed terminal facilities for their use. Ample areas for future expansion are available. Opera(tionas (n d res4ilts duringfiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaisance surveys, condition and operation, stream gaging and engineering studies. Contract work for maintenance dredging at Baptiste Collette Bar Channel, began Dec. 1, 1979 and completed Jan. 4, 1980, with a total of 830,484 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 87 percent complete. 17. OVERTON-RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA. Location. In State of Louisiana between junction of the Old and Mississippi Rivers and Shreveport, La., along the Old and Red Rivers, through land cuts and natural channels on the south bank of Red River. (See Geological Survey State maps and the MRC alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Existing project. Provides for a navigation route from the Mississippi River at its junction with Old River, through Old River to mile 31 of the Red River; developing a channel about 31 miles long, 200 feet wide, and 9 feet deep. Improvements consist of revetments, dikes, and dredging designed to preserve favorable and correct unfavorable channel alinement and depth. In addition to the existing project, the authorized work included a navigation route from mile 31 of the Red River to Shreveport, La., via a lateral canal excavated along the south bank of the Red River. However, the portion of the authorized project above mile 31 was reclassified to inactive status as approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers, letter dated Oct. 18, 1971. Estimated cost for new work (lower 31 miles only) (October 1980) is $27,500,000 Federal and $110,000 non- Federal. 11-17 REPOR()T OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Local cooperation. Furnish all necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for new work and subsequent maintenance when and as required; make all necessary changes in existing highways and highway bridges and approaches thereto, and all necessary changes in public utilities except railroad facilities; take such measures as are necessary to insure that non- Federal interests will maintain parts of all railroads, highways, bridges and utilities affected by the improvement; establish, maintain, and operate adequate terminal and transfer facilities; and hold and save the United States free from damages incident to construction, maintenance, and operation of the improvement. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished for the lower 31 miles by Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, on Mar. 9, 1967, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Oct. 6, 1967. The Commission executed supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 on Sep. 20, 1973, which were accepted by the United States on Qct. 11, 1973. Terminal facilities. None. Will be furnished if necessary. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of investigations, and surveys. Dredging under one contract included removing 256,430 cubic yards of shoal in Upper Sunk Lake during the period Nov. 3 and Nov. 19, 1979, and removing 152,363 cubic yards at Alligator Bayou during the period Nov. 20 and Nov. 29, 1979. Contract work for stone bank paving, initiated Nov. 27, 1979 and completed Jan. 25, 1980, with placement of 24,462 tons of stone at Upper Sunk Lake revetment and 17,331 tons at Alligator Bayou revetment. Condition as of Sep. .30. Construction of the lower 31 miles was initiated Nov. 12, 1968, and is 68 percent complete with 47,010 linear feet of bank protected. 18. PETIT ANSE, TIGRE, AND CARLIN BAYOUS, LA. Location. The project is located in the coastal area of south central Louisiana, in Iberia and Vermilion Parishes, about 22 miles south of Lafayette, La. The plan of improvement involves replacement of the railroad bridge over Bayou Carlin and enlargement of Bayou Petit Anse from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the Avery Island salt mine canal and Bayou Carlin from its mouth to Lake Peigneur to 12 by 125 feet, except through the developed area of Deleambre where the bottom width will be 80 feet. The replacement railroad bridge will provide a minimum horizontal clearance of 80 feet and vertical clearance of about 73 feet. The restrictive highway bridge at Delcambre will be replaced by the Louisiana Department of Highways. The new replacement bridge will provide the same clearance as the railroad bridge. Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge at Delcambre, dredging a channel in Bayou Petit Anse 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to north end of Avery Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway via McIlhenny Canal (Avery Canal) to deep water in Vermilion Bay; and a channel 9 feet deep over a bottom width of 80 feet in Bayou Carlin from Bayou Petit Anse to Lake Peigneur. Total length of improvement is 16.1 miles. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide is about 10 inches. All work under existing project was completed in 1962 at a cost of $344,389. In addition, $47,858 was expended from public works funds. Estimated cost of new work (October 1980) is $3,830,000 Federal and $2,080,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $240,000. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the cost of such retaining works; accomplish and maintain without cost to the United States such alterations as are required in pipelines, drainages, wharves, bulkheads, cables, other utility facilities and other improvements (except the railroad bridge, separately covered below) necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the Federal project; provide and maintain at local expense adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers: establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of pollutants in the channel by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with the applicable laws or regulations of Federal, state, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; and comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-646, the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; and provided further that, prior to initiation of the replacement 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT of the railroad bridge at Delcambre, the owner of the bridge agrees to: Furnish without cost to the United States all necessary rights-of-way and easements required for replacing the railroad bridge at Delcambre and contribute, in cash, a share of the construction costs of the replacement computed in accordance with the principles of Section 6 of the Bridge Alteration Act of Jun. 21, 1940 as amended, a sum presently estimated at $220,000; assume all obligations of ownership, operation, maintenance, and future replacement of the new railroad bridge at Delcambre upon its completion. PL 91-611: Local interests are legally qualified to execute the assurance. PL 91-646: A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972, allowing local interests to comply. No cost to local interest is anticipated. Formal assurances have not been requested. When formal acts of assurances are requested, the provisions of PL 91-611 and PL 91- 646 will be included as a requirement of those assurances. On Sep. 22, 1978 the Police Jury of Iberia Parish provided an oral expression of their intent to provide the required assurances of local cooperation. No action has been taken to secure clearances for relocations at this time. Terminal facilities. There is a large oil terminal at head of improvement on Bayou Petit Anse and several private docks and crane hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of the GDM, Phase I, was initiated and is scheduled for completion in 1981. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not begun. 19. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, Tex. Existing project. Provides for realining the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $51,400,000 Federal and $2,180,000 non- Federal, including cash contribution of $23,000. Local cooperation. Navigation: Local interests are required to: Provide without cost to the United States all land, easements, and right-or-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and provide necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works, and also including all additional lands, or rights in land, required to insure public control of the recreation development; Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent operation and maintenance, including but not limited to those resulting from dredging, changes in ground-water level, and wave action; Provide a proportionate share of the cost of bridge alterations over existing channels in accordance with the principles of Section 6 of the Bridge Alteration Act (Truman-Hobbs) of Jun. 21, 1940, as amended by the Act of Jul. 16, 1952; Assume all obligations of owning, maintaining, and operating all railway and highway bridges altered or constructed as part of the navigation project, with such obligation for each bridge to be assumed by local interests upon final completion of alteration or construction of that bridge; Provide without cost to the United States such alterations as required in pipelines, and in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, as well as their maintenance; Proved and maintain at local expense adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; and provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project area: Obtain without cost to the United States any water rights that may be found necessary for operation of the project in the interest of navigation; Where the appraised value of the land provided for recreational development amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreational development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to at least that level, which additional contribution may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed upon portion of the development or a cash contribution, or a combination of both; Operate and maintain for the life of the Federal project the recreational areas and all facilities installed pursuant to the agreement, except that facilities which are integral parts of a structure operated and maintained by the Federal Government shall be operated and maintained 11-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 under whatever cost-sharing arrangement applies to the operation and maintenance of the basic structure; and Assure access to recreational development to all on equal terms and comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-611. Bank stabilization: Local interests are required to: Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for disposal of spoil, and provide necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works, and also including all additional lands, or rights in land, required to insure public control of the recreational development; Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project within the state of Louisiana; Maintain all the project works upstream of the navigation improvements at Shreveport, La., after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; Provide without cost to the United States all relocations of utilities, bridges (except railroad), sewers, pipelines, and any other alterations of existing improvements which may be required, within the state of Louisiana, for construction of the project; Where the appraised value of the land provided for recreational development amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreational development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to at least that level, which additional contribution may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed-upon portion of the development or a cash contribution, or a combination of both; Operate and maintain for the life of the Federal project the recreational areas and all facilities installed pursuant to the agreement, except that facilities which are integral parts of a structure operated and maintained by the Federal Government shall be operated and maintained under whatever cost-sharing arrangement applies to the operation and maintenance of the basic structure; and Assure access to recreational developments within the state of Louisiana to all on equal terms. Section 187 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) modifies the requirements of local cooperation to provide that non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percent of the construction costs of retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments required for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1979. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of PL 91-646 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana which were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Assurances for work in Arkansas are being obtained for individual levee districts on an item by item basis. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Work continued from last fiscal year and was completed on four contracts: Bank stabilization at Missionary, La., mile 326.4-R, completed Dec. 3, 1979; Bushy, Ark., mile 397.0-R completed Jul. 31, 1980; Spirit Lake, Ark., mile 362.0-L, completed Aug. 4, 1980; and Coushatta Closure, mile 222, completed Jul. 11, 1980. Contract work continued at two locations: Hosston, La., mile 318.5-R, 98 percent complete; and Field, Ark., mile 362.0-L, 77 percent complete. Contract work began at two locations: Mays Lake, La., mile 377 to 381.5, initiated Sep. 9, 1980, 15 percent complete and Kenny, Ark., mile 374, initiated Sep. 22, 1980, 1 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. J30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 68 percent complete. 20. RED RIVER WATERWAYMISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA. Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, La. Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, La., developing a channel approximately 210 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realinement and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $1,270,000,000 Federal and $60,500,000 non-Federal, including $29,300,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost excludes $4,132,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Local interests are to participate in the navigation element of the project, to the extent that it will provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway required within the State of Louisiana for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and provide necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works, and also including all additional lands, or rights in land, required to insure public control of the recreation development. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent operation and maintenance, including but not limited to those resulting from dredging, changes in ground-water level, and wave action; provide a proportionate share of the cost of bridge alterations over existing channels in accordance with principles of Section 6 of the Bridge Alteration Act (Truman-Hobbs) of Jun. 21, 1940, as amended by the Act of Jul. 16, 1952; assume all obligations of owning, maintaining, and operating all railway and highway bridges altered or constructed as part of the navigation project; with such obligation for each bridge to be assumed by local interests upon final completion of alteration or construction of that bridge; provide without cost to the United States such alterations as required in pipelines, and in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, as well as their maintenance. Provide and maintain at local expense adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. Provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project area. Obtain without cost to the United States any water rights that may be found necessary for operation of the project in the interest of navigation. Make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to at least 50 percent when the appraised value of the land provided for recreational development amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreational development; which additional contribution may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed-upon portion of the development or a cash contribution, or a combination of both; operate and maintain for the life of the Federal project the recreational areas and all facilities installed pursuant to the agreement, except that facilities which are integral parts of a structure operated and maintained by the Federal Government shall be operated and maintained under whatever costsharing arrangement applies to the operation and maintenance of the basic structure; and assure access to recreational developments to all on equal terms. Section 187 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) modifies the requirements of local cooperation to provide that non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percent of the construction costs of retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments required for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of PL 91-646 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana which were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Adequate facilities are to be provided and maintained by local interest. Operations and results during fiscal yeatr. Work by hired labor consisted of planning and preparing design memorandum, preparing plans and specifications, surveys, general engineering and model studies. Bank stabilization was completed at eight locations: Vick, La., rr'e 62-L; Maria, La., mile 100.3 to 102.4; Nantacnie, La., Phase Two, mile 148-L; Wiggins, La., Phase One, mile 91.4-L; Dunn Lake, La., mile 163.5-L; Nantachie, La., Phase One, mile 148.1-L; Red Bayou, La., mile 146.5-R; and Williams, La., upstream, mile 240.8-R. Construction continued at seven locations: Larto, La., mile 40.5-L, 46 percent complete; Hudson, La., mile 98 to 99, 98 percent complete; Grand Bend, La., mile 94 to 98, 99 percent complete; Grappe, La., mile 145, 94 percent complete; Moreau, La., mile 142.5-R, 77 percent complete; Odra, La., mile 151.2-R, 94 percent complete; and Phase Two Construction, Lock and Dam at Marksville, La., 99 percent complete. Four construction contracts awarded were: Phase Three Construction, Lock and Dam at Marksville, La., initiated Feb. 5, 1980, 22 11-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 percent complete; Choctaw Bayou Closure, La., mile 71.8, initiated Sep. 17, 1980, 14 percent complete; and Hadden-Fort DeRussy Closure, La., mile 60, initiated Sep. 8, 1980, 16 percent complete; and Montgomery, La., mile 156.5 to 158.3, initiated Feb. 11, 1980, 85 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 12 percent complete. 21. LRAE.MOVING WATER-HYACINTH, Location. Lakes and streams tributary to the gulf coast. Existing project. Removal of plants from navigable waters of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, so far as they are or may become an obstruction to navigation, by any mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever; for construction and operation of boats equipped with suitable machinery for such removal; and construction and operation of booms to prevent plants drifting from one stream to another. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Maximum use of funds available was made by using chemical methods of destruction. Maintenance continued in main waterways and principal tributaries to prevent water-hyacinth obstructions and damage to navigation. Preventive maintenance work was carried out in secondary streams and feeder areas whenever possible. In some cases where alligatorweed has previously kept waterhyacinth fringes confined along the banks, attack of the alligatorweed flea beetles (agasicles) has reduced its competitiveness and water-hyacinths are multiplying and spreading in the waterways. A total of 10,378 acres of water-hyacinth were treated by chemical and mechanical methods in Bayou Black, Lake Cataouatche and feeder streams, Lake des Allemands area, the Port Allen-Morgan City Route and Alternate Route of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Lake Dauterive and Grand Lake areas, Bayou Penchant-Bayou Copasaw area, the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Bayou Lafourche, Bayou Lacassine, and Bayou Teche. Lower water levels in the Mississippi River and all along the coastal area combined with a colder than normal winter have allowed some additional areas to be placed in a maintenance status. The introduction of the waterhyacinth weevil (neachetina eichhorniae) has been made and populations are increasing. A large scale operations management test using the water-hyacinth weevil and the most promising plant pathogen (cercospora rodmanii) has begun and will be monitored for effectiveness of control. A moth (samoedes albiguttalis) has recently been introduced to assist in the control of waterhyacinth. Condition as of Sep. 30. From 1900 to 1902 a boat with suitable machinery for destroying hyacinth by crushing was operated. From that time until 1937 hyacinths were destroyed through use of a solution of arsenic and caustic soda which was sprayed on vegetation. The vegetation was removed by hand crews, and vegetation movement was controlled by booms and barricades. Use of arsenic was discontinued and hand removal supplanted by use of mechanical equipment in conjunction with chemical spray (2,4-dichlorophenoxy- acetic acid). Use of booms and barricades has been discontinued. Present methods of control are by means of chemical spraying supplemented by the use of insects and pathogens for biological control. Waterways Experiment Station is conducting a large-scale operations management test of insects and pathogens for control of water-hyacinth in Louisiana. 22. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA. Location. The river originates in the State of Mississippi and flows southerly to Lake Pontchartrain, La., about 119 miles. (See NOS Coast Chart 11369 and MRC alluvial valley map, Ponchatoula quadrangle.) Existing project. Improvement by removing overhanging trees, snags, and obstructions to navigation for 53.5 miles above mouth, and provide an 8- by 100-foot entrance channel from the 8-foot depth contour in the lake to the 8-foot depth in the river. Variation in water surface is from 3 to 20 feet in the upper reaches due to freshets and from 2 to 5 feet in the lower reach due to winds and tides. The cost of existing project was $61,211, Federal (including $11,500 for previously completed portion and $49,711 for preauthorization studies and modification adopted under Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended) and $29,346 contributed funds for the modification. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces conducted reconnaissance surveys and prepared plans and specifications. 23. VERMILION LOCK, LA. (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) Location. In the Louisiana section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway near Abbeville, Vermil- 11-22 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT ion Parish, La., about 163 miles west of Harvey Lock. Existing project. The present Vermilion Lock, located in the most heavily utilized section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is the controlling structure in both width and depth. The lock is used for navigation and flood control (prevention of salt water intrusion). The tumbler-type gates are unsatisfactory for the dual purpose (Flood Control-Navigation) operation required, since once the gates are lowered to pass flood flows, they cannot be safely raised until the differential stage across the lock is reduced to about 0.5 foot. The replacement lock also will provide a larger and more efficient outlet for floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $28,200,000 Federal, and $110,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance works. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury furnished assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including PL 91-611 and PL 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-footwide lock. Amended assurances of local cooperation were accepted on behalf of the United States by the Secretary of the Army on Jul. 5, 1977. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed for Phase I construction. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of Phase I is scheduled for January 1981. 24. WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE, LA., TO GULF OF MEXICO Location. Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico via Bayous Long and Fontanelle. (See Geological Survey, Empire quadrangle.) Existing project. Improvement provides for construction and maintenance of a waterway, 10 miles long, from State-owned canal and lock at Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico, to provide a channel 9 by 80 feet, and for initial construction of rubblestone jetties inshore of 6-foot-depth contour, with landward extensions thereof as required to prevent flanking, and for seaward extensions to 9-foot-depth contour if and when it becomes apparent that such extensions will be more economical than maintenance dredging of entrance channel. Normal range of tide is from 16 to 40 inches; hurricane tides may exceed 6 feet. Construction was completed at a cost of $1,068,142; except for an estimated $1,573,000 for extension of jetties to 9-foot-depth contour to be constructed if necessary. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaissance surveys and environmental studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is physically complete, unless at a later date it is found necessary to extend jetties to 9-foot-depth contour. Project construction was initiated in July 1948 and completed in Jun. 1950, during which period the 9- by 80-foot channel from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico, 10 miles, was excavated by contract. A total of 4,061 linear feet of jetties was constructed by contract to 6-foot-depth contour, 1,818 linear feet on east jetty and 2,243 linear feet on west jetty, from Jun. 23, 1949, to Feb. 18, 1950, and Feb. 2 to Mar. 1, 1971. 25. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) Location. Bayou LeCarpe is a tidal stream which rises about 1.5 miles southeast of Houma in Terrebonne Parish and flows southerly into Bayou Pelton, thence into Bayou Grand Caillou, which flows southwesterly into Caillou Bay, a total distance of about 40 miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1116 and Geological Survey maps of Houma, Dulac, Bayou DuLarge, and Dog Lake quadrangles.) Existing project. As modified, provides for a 10- by 45-foot channel in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 2.6 miles to Houma navigation canal; a 5- by 40-foot channel through Bayou Pelton and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, a distance of about 13.7 miles. Between miles 2.6 and 5, this project coincides with or is adjacent to 15- by 150-foot Houma navigation canal. Normal range of tide is 3 to 10 inches; from winds, 1 to 3 feet. Cost of new work, completed in August 1964, was $129,662. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for enlargement and subsequent maintenance of Bayou LeCarpe and of aids to navigation, and provide alterations to facilities, and hold the United States free from damage. Assurances were furnished and accepted. Local agency made available spoil areas for maintenance dredging of Bayou LeCarpe. None of these areas will be transferred to the United States. Meetings are continuing with local interests to resolve problems with 11-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 their required cash contribution on total project cost. Terminalfacilities. Many terminal and transfer facilities are in Houma and along waterways which flow through area between Houma and Gulf of Mexico. All facilities are privately owned and operated. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce and for reasonably prospective commerce. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities or for construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor new work consisted of real estate activities, reconnaissance surveys, and water quality studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 5- by 40-foot channel was constructed from January 1938 to August 1938, and modification of October 23, 1962, for enlargement of 2.54 miles of Bayou LeCarpe to 10 feet by 45 feet was initiated in May and completed August 1964. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 11-E. 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec.. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization.) Preauthorization studies cost for fiscal year was $21,148 for Simmesport Harbor. Flood Control 28. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. Location. In left bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, Ark., and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat Lake, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, La. Existing project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, La., proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates on Red Chute Bayou; construct cutoff on Red Chute Bayou just south of Louisiana Highway 527; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, La., along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alinement of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $22,000,000 Federal and $4,500,000 non-Federal. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President's request. As a result of this review, the President recommended to deauthorize this project. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Work on correcting some design deficiencies, induced flood plan and the project modification studies has been initiated. The induced flood plan will be advertised for award in March 1982, if construction funds are made available. The project modification studies are expected to be completed in Dec. 1982. Local cooperation. Provide,without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction, including flowage easements over 10,900 acres of bottom lands above U. S. Highway 80 that will be adversely affected by the levee; provide, without cost to the United States, all relocation of pipelines, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities necessary for the con- 11-24 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT struction of the work; hold and save the United States free from damages; provide assurances that encroachment on improved channels or on ponding areas will not be permitted, and that, if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity will be provided promptly without cost to the United States; and maintain and operate each useable element of the works after completion of the element and all works after completion. Accomplish the associated drainage works necessary to insure effective use and realization of the benefits of the improvement and comply with the provisions of Public Laws 91-611 and 91-646. Assuring agency: Bossier Levee District and Nineteenth Louisiana Levee District. Acts of Assurance were accepted from the Nineteenth Louisiana Levee District on Oct. 26, 1967, and from the Bossier Levee District on Feb. 19, 1968. The levee districts were again requested to furnish assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation. The Bossier Levee District executed an Agreement of local cooperation on Apr. 11, 1973, covering all the requirements of local cooperation for the project. The Nineteenth Louisiana Levee and Drainage District executed an Agreement of local cooperation on Jun. 20, 1973, covering all the requirements of local cooperation for the project. Both Agreements of Assurance were accepted on Apr. 1, 1974. The local cooperation rights and obligations of that portion of the Nineteenth Louisiana Levee District in Red River Parish, La., as they apply to the United States of America were assumed by the Red River Levee and Drainage District on Apr. 20, 1977. On Aug. 20, 1980, the Bossier Levee District executed a letter of intent in order that we could initiate work on a design memorandum to prevent induced flooding caused by that portion of the project already constructed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor forces consisted of preparation of plans and specifications, real estate activities, and engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. 29. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA. Location. In Red River Basin on Bayou Bodcau in Bossier Parish, La., 72 miles above mouth of Loggy Bayou and 35 miles northeast of Shreveport, La. (See Geological Survey State map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. An earth-fill dam rising 76 feet above streambed with a reservoir providing a flood control storage capacity of 357,000 acrefeet. Outlet works are in south abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway is on north abutment. Reservoir controls 656 square miles, or 53 percent, of entire drainage area of Bayou Bodcau. Construction of a floodway for diversion of Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou to improve flood protection was authorized by 1936 Flood Control Act. This authorization was modified by 1938 Flood Control Act, which authorized construction of a reservoir and other flood control works in lieu of construction of a floodway for diversion of Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou, La. to improve protection, and further modified by War Department Civil Appropriation Act of 1939 which provided that reservoir and other flood control works on Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou, La.,authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938 shall be constructed in accordance with revised plans and cost estimates in Office, Chief of Engineers. New Work was completed in 1961, except construction under Code 711, was $4,098,740. Estimated cost for Code 711 (October 1979) is $1,027,000. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam and reservoir, real estate activities, stream gaging, surveys and economic studies. Number of visitor-days of recreational use, 325,800 (Calendar Year 1979). (See Table 11-F for reservoir operations.) Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated April 1947 and completed April 1961, except construction under Code 711. 30. BAYOU PIERRE, LA. Location. In Red River Basin below Shreveport, La., along channel of Bayou Pierre from its mouth at Grand Ecore, La., upstream 30 miles to its confluence with Bayou Wincy. (See Geological Survey State map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Proides for widening channel at intervals, totaling 12.9 miles, and snagging of 29.7 miles, to reduce flood damage and improve sanitary and living conditions over a wide area. Cost of new work, completed in 1939, was $299,529. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued condition and operations studies as required. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in Fiscal Year 1938 and completed in Fiscal Year 1939. 11-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 31. BRUSH BAYOU, LA. Location. Rises in the southwestern portion of Shreveport, La., in Caddo Parish. The stream flows in a generally southerly direction approximately 9 miles to a junction with Boggy.Bayou. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of the enlargment and realinement of the channel between miles 1.20 and 7.42. Between miles 1.20 and 2.18 the channel would be radically realined, and above the point, the enlarged channel would generally follow the existing alinement. Bottom widths for the improved channel vary from 100 feet at mile 1.20 to 20 feet at mile 7.42. Construction of the project would require modification of two highway bridges, one railway bridge, and numerous pipelines and power lines. Estimated cost of new work (October 1977) is $1,000,000 Federal and $2,480,000 non-Federal, including $1,120,000 contributed funds. Includes $80,500 preauthorization study cost. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from claim for damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works, including measures for beautification, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; bear all cost for the project in excess of the Federal limitation of $100,000; provide without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of all drains, bridges (except railroad bridges) and roads, pipelines, sewers, utility lines, and other facilities made necessary by the project; prevent encroachment on improved channels, and adopt and enforce flood plain regulations to restrict development of areas lying below the elevation of the 100-year-frequency flood under project conditions; comply with the provisions of Public Laws 91-611 and 91-646. Caddo Parish Police Jury is assuring agency. Assurances have been received and accepted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of real estate activities and advance engineering work. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed in October 1976. 32. CADDO LAKE, LA. Location. In Caddo Parish, about 19 miles northwest of Shreveport, La., at the foot of Caddo lake and at head of Twelve Mile Bayou. Existing project. Replacement of the original dam was completed in Jun. 1971, having same flow characteristics and located as near as practicable downstream of the old dam, built under navigation project "Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La." New dam will be capable of being raised in the future if desirable and justified. Estimated cost of new work (October 1976) was $3,587,800 Federal and $28,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. 33. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA. Location. In south Jefferson Parish, La., along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of southwest pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet mean sea level, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet mean sea level at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet mean sea level and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 2,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1980) is $8,310,000 Federal and $5,490,000 non-Federal, including $2,110,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction of the project, currently estimated to cost $2,380,000; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, streets, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages due to the construction works; assure maintenance, repairs, and periodic beach nourishment of the project after completion as may be required to serve the intended purposes in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, except that the Federal Government will contribute, for an initial period of 15 years, a sum currently estimated at $33,000 annually toward the cost of beach nourishment 11-26 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT associated with beach erosion prevention, subject to a final determination on the basis of conditions of public use and ownership at the time of construction; provide a cash contribution for the hurricane protection function in an amount sufficient to insure that local investment in cash, equivalent work, and fair market value of lands and relocations are at least equal to 30 percent of all first costs allocated to that function, which cash contribution is presently estimated at zero; contribute cash or equivalent work an amount sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of construction costs allocated to beach erosion control, that amount presently estimated at $5,490,000 less $1,000,000 credit for completed work, west end jetty, or $4,490,000, the final amount to be determined at the time of project construction in accordance with cost-sharing procedures for beach erosion control as defined in the report; obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of any work on shore and beach protection phases of the project if undertaken separately from the recommended combined project, of detailed plans and specifications for the work contemplated and also the arrangements of prosecuting such work, excluding the preauthorization jetty construction; assure continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation in the beach protection phase is based, and its administration for public use during the life of the project, and assure continued availability for public use of privately owned shores; assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted; adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for the preservation of the improvement and its protective vegetation; at least annually, inform interests affected that the project will not provide any substantial protection from hurricane flooding on the bay side, or from hurricane surges higher in elevation than those of Hurricane Betsy of Sep. 9, 1965; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies of 1970, Public Law 91-646; agree to the requirements of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611. Formal assurances have not been requested. When formal acts of assurances are requested, the provision of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646 will be included as a requirement. On Sep. 6, 1973, the Louisiana Office of Public Works furnished a statement of willingness to provide all necessary items of local cooperation on the behalf of the town of Grand Isle, La. The Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the town of Grand Isle, by resolution dated Sep. 26, 1978, stated that the alinement for the hurricane protection levee as proposed by the U.S. Corps of Engineers is hereby accepted by the town of Grand Isle with the provision that every effort be made to minimize the necessity of relocating buildings and other structures and that alternative alinements or proposals which would not necessitate relocation of buildings or structures be considered. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was not initiated. 34. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA. (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow landlocked tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (See Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1115 and 1116.) Existing project. Provides for control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units; the Lake Pontchartrain barrier plan involves construction of a barrier levee along eastern boundary of the lake with navigation and hurricane flood control structures in Chef Menteur Pass, the Rigolets, and at Seabrook. These protective works, together with strengthening and extension of existing protective works and the construction of the Seabrook Lock, will afford full protection to the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain from Bonnet Carre' Spillway to the eastern limit of Orleans Parish levee along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. The Chalmette area plan consists of improving existing protection along east bank Inner Harbor Navigation Canal from the lock to Florida Avenue, then constructing a new levee to Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, 11-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 thence along south bank of gulf outlet to Bayou Lawler, then turning south and tieing into Mississippi River levee at Violet, La. The approved Chalmette area plan was modified, under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, to provide for enlargement of the protected area by construction of a levee from the Mississippi River levee near Caernarvon, La., to the vicinity of Verret, La., thence to and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet to a junction with the approved levee at the Bayou Lawler crossing of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, and elimination of the levee in the approved plan from the Bayou Lawler and Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet to Violet, La. Navigable drainage structures will be provided at Bayous Bienvenue and Dupre. Strengthening existing seawall at Mandeville on the north shore will insure that future hurricanes will not seriously damage this resort community. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $394,000,000 Federal and $120,000,000 non- Federal, including cash contribution of $80,409,000, which includes $14,310,000 estimated to be capitalized value of operation and maintenance of Rigolets navigation lock and appurtenant channel. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette area plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the barrier plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette area plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Approval of Pontchartrain's supplemental assurance is being delayed pending receipt of supporting documents. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury have executed the supplemental assurance. The Governor of Louisiana executed an assurance containing all required provisions of local cooperation, including Public Law 91-646, for and on behalf of St. Tammany Parish. Approval of this assurance is being delayed pending receipt of supporting documents. Louisiana Office of Public Works is assisting in obtaining the required documents. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. One design memorandum was completed and submitted for review to LMVD and preparation of another continued. Contract work was completed during the fiscal year for a third design memorandum. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 25 percent complete, with 12.2 miles of reinforced concrete floodwalls, 25.7 miles of first-lift levees completed in the New Orleans east area, 1.3 miles of floodwall and 27.9 miles of first-lift levees, 9.1 miles of second-lift levees, 4.5 miles of first-lift levee enlargement, and two control structures completed in the Chalmette area. Contract work continued on three contracts. Citrus Back levee second-lift, construction of 5.5 miles of new levee work; Citrus Lakefront levee, IHNC to Paris Road, with construction of 5.4 miles of new levee; and Citrus Lakefront barrier plan, construction of 6.1 miles of floodwall, were accomplished. 35. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA. (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (See Geological survey quadrangles Cut-off, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Pointe-a-la- Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1115 and 1116.) Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $55,920,000 Federal and $23,900,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $15,500,000. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including borrow areas and spoil disposal 11-28 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for construction of the project, all at an estimated cost of $8,280,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $21,500,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $13,220,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13, 1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. 10, 1973 and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract work was completed Jun. 15, 1979, on Section B South, first-lift levee, with construction of 11,000 linear feet of levee embankment and incidental work. Construction for a Hurricane Protection Levee, Section C South, first-lift, initiated Nov. 8, 1979, with construction of 3.4 miles of levee embankment and incidental work. Contract is 90 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1975 and is 25 percent complete. 36. MCKINNEY BAYOU, ARK. AND TEX. Location. The McKinney Bayou watershed covers approximately 360 square miles and is located in southwestern Arkansas and northeastern Texas in the vicinity of the city of Texarkana, Ark. and Tex., within the flood plain of the Red River. Existing project. Provides improvements for three major elements; improvement of the McKinney Bayou channel, construction of a diversion channel into Red River and control structure at Buzzard Bluff, and construction of a diversion channel into Red River and control structure about one-half mile west of the Arkansas-Texas state line. Mitigation of projectinduced wildlife losses are included in the project. Estimated cost of new work (October 1980) is $6,350,000 Federal and $1,800,000 non-Federal, including cash cotribution of $555,000. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, with the exception of lands required for mitigation, all lands, easements, rights-ofway and spoil disposal areas, and the relocation of buildings, bridges (except railroad bridges) and roads, pipelines, and utilities which may be required for the construction of the project, such relocations to be made in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 646; hold and save the United States free from any claims for damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide a cash contribution of 3.3 percent of the construction cost for the McKinney Bayou channel element, 6.3 percent for the Buzzard Bluff diversion element, and 5.6 percent for the State Line diversion element, presently estimated at $67,000, $127,000 and $92,000, respectively, or construct such items of work as may be agreed to be equivalent to the specified cash contribution. (Local interests have agreed to percentages of 3.0 percent for McKinney Bayou Channel, 5.5 percent for Buzzard Bluff Diversion, and 5.4 percent for State Line Diversion. The higher percentages were presented in the reevaluation tables printed in H. Doc 94-647. The differences will be settled during Phase I study.); prevent any permanent encroachment on improved channels or on ponding areas unless such encroachment is offset promptly by alternative means at no cost to the United States; notify all interested parties at least annually that the project will not provide complete flood protection; provide guidance and leadership and develop plans to prevent unwise use of the flood plain, particularly adjacent to major drainage channels and diversion structures, by use of appropriate flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses; and provide as a cash contribution, or as value as may be agreed to be equivalent to the specified cash contribution, 23.6 percent of the cost of construction, lands, easements and rightsof- way required for mitigation measures presently 11-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 estimated at $224,000 for lands and $40,000 for construction. The estimated cost to local interests for Public Law 91-646 in both states is $14,000. Formal assurances have not been requested. When formal acts of assurance are requested, the provisions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646 will be included as a requirement of those assurances. The Miller County Improvement and Drainage District, the McKinney Bayou Drainage District, and Bowie County, Texas, furnished letters of intent on Feb. 16, 1978, Mar. 15, 1978, and June 30, 1978, respectively. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of planning for the project, investigations, environmental studies, and surveys. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. 37. MISSISSIPPI RIVER DELTA AT AND BELOW NEW ORLEANS, LA. (NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA., HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, La. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, La., for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and construction of a barrier levee on the east bank of the Mississippi River from Bohemia to mile 10 AHP with enlargement of the west bank Mississippi River levee from Fort Jackson to Venice. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, La., as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1980) is $110,000,000 Federal and $47,000,000 non- Federal, including $37,220,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local Cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $4,872,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $7,104,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $59,000,000, and cash contribution presently estimated at $47,024,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal flooding and that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91-646), in acquiring real property. PL 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. PL 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972 allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B-1, B-2 and C, requested on Jan. 7, 1963, were furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on Mar. 6, 1964. Required supporting papers were furnished on Mar. 16, 1965 and accepted. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of PL 91-646 were received from Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on May 23, 1973 and accepted on Jun. 20, 1973. Assurances for the entire project have been furnished and accepted, although they do not specifically mention the East Bank Barrier Levee Plan. The scope of the project has not changed; however, local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee on Jun. 10, 1975 and Feb. 23, 1976. These assurances have not yet been received. There was a delay of approximately 26 months in the furnishing of assurances by local interests 11-30 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT primarily because they desired that agreement on levee alinement be consummated as fully as possible before giving their assurance. Problems of assurance of local cooperation have been resolved and rights-of-way were furnished for the first two Reach B-l items of work on Aug. 23,1968 and May 20, 1970, respectively. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee configuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so that the owners of the pipelines can be advised. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. All assurances required for the project have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Planning for this project and engineering studies continued. A contract for Reach B-1, Hurricane Protection Levee, first enlargement, was awarded Aug. 15, 1980, but was not initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 .and the total project is approximately 53 percent complete. First lift construction is complete on Reaches B-1 and B-2 and the first enlargement is completed for a portion of Reach B-1. Second lift construction is complete on Reach C. Initial construction on Reach A is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 1981. Initial construction on the East Bank Barrier is not scheduled, pending the furnishing of assurances by local interest. 38. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (See Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River"-1958 edition.) apEprxoivsetidn gg epnreorjaelc tp. laFnlo ofodr Cflooondtr oclo nAtrcotl of 1946 on Red River below Denison Dam, Tex. and Okla., which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood control along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83d Cong., 2d sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in New Orleans District. (See Table 11-G for new projects and Table 11-H for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 39. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, Ark., through the southwest corner or Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, La., on the right bank, and Pineville, La., on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $53,000,000 Federal and $1,290,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Local interests have been prompt in furnishing levee rights-of-way upon request, except for the following three items of low priority: McKinney Bayou Drainage District, enlargement of approximately 4 miles of intermittently low levee; Garland Levee District, enlargement of approximately 1.3 miles of levee; and Red River Levee District No. 1, enlargement of approximately 4.3 miles of levee. The local agencies are convinced that the flow line lowering produced by completed reservoirs has made this work unnecessary. Assuring Agencies: Red River Levee and Drainage District, North Bossier Levee District, Red River Water Commission, Bossier Levee District, Caddo Levee District, Cane River Levee and Drainage District, Garland Levee District, 11-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Miller County Levee District No. 2, Red River Levee District No. 1, Nineteenth Louisiana Levee District, and Long Prairie Levee District. All basic assurances received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from all agencies except the North Bossier Levee District. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Bank stabilization was completed at two locations: Bushy, Ark., mile 397.0-R, completed Jul. 31, 1980 and Spirit Lake, Ark., mile 362.0-L, completed Aug. 4, 1980. A pedestrian bridge at Bayou Rigolette Floodgate, Rapides Parish, La., was completed Feb. 15, 1980. One construction contract was initiated; Field, Ark., mile 362.0-L, initiated Nov. 1, 1979, 99 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the project is 83 percent complete. 40. RED RIVER WATERWAYSHREVEPORT, LA., TO INDEX, ARK. Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, La., and Index, Ark. Existing project. To provide for realining the channels of Red River from Shreveport, La., to the levee system near Index, Ark., by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $171,000,000 Federal and $21,900,000 non-Federal, including $2,550,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Provide prior to construction and without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for disposal of spoil, and provide necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works and also including all additional lands, or rights in land, required to insure public control of the recreational development; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; maintain all the project works upstream of the navigation improvement at Shreveport, La., after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Provide without cost to the United States all relocations of utilities, bridges (except railroads), sewers, pipelines, and any other alterations of existing improvements which may be required for construction of the project; where the appraised value of the land provided for recreation development amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of recreational development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to at least that level; which additional contribution may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed-upon portion of the development, or a cash contribution, or a combination of both; operate and maintain for the life of the Federal project the recreational areas and all facilities installed pursuant to the agreement, except that facilities which are integral parts of a structure operated and maintained by the Federal Government shall be operated and maintained under whatever cost-sharing arrangement applies to the operation and maintenance of the basic structure; and assure access to recreational developments to all on equal terms. Local interests are required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Sec. 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611), in acquiring real property. Section 187 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-587) modifies the requirement of local cooperation to provide that non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percent of the construction costs of retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments required for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material. Assuring Agencies: Louisiana: Formal assurances for the project in Louisiana were executed by the Red River Waterway Commission on Feb. 26, 1969, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. Amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 were executed by the commission on May 23, 1973, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. The Red River Waterway Commission was formed expressly to provide the local cooperation for the project and has an adequate tax base to fulfill its objectives. Arkansas: On Oct. 16, 1969, the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission furnished a statement of willingness to provide local cooperation on the proposed plan. In July 1976, the Soil 11-32 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT and Water Resources Division of the Arkansas Department of Commerce stated that they would approach the Arkansas Legislature to obtain funds on a recurring yearly basis sufficient to insure its portion of the project funds by start of construction in A rkansas. By letter dated Jun. 20, 1977, the Director of the Soil and Water Resources Division advised that the Arkansas General Assembly appropriated $750,000 in the 1977 session to be held as a trust fund for payment of local cost sharing on this project. Further, they anticipated that additional funding will be added in future years to enable them to have on hand the required funds at the time construction begins. Texas: On Dec. 17, 1969, the Governor of Texas furnished a statement of willingness to provide local cooperation for bank stabilization. A meeting was held in Austin, Tex., on Mar. 1, 1977, concerning sponsors of the Texas portion of the project. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status of the waterway project and the type of organization needed to accomplish project assurances, the powers required by such an organization may be established. The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) stated that they would take the lead in obtaining an organization with the ability to provide the local cooperation requirements. In the third quarter of 1980 the State of Texas moved closer to achieving that goal by action taken by the three Texas counties of Bowie, Lamar, and Red River, who have petitioned the State to enact legislation permitting them to join the Red River Authority of Texas. By this action, the Red River Authority of Texas will become legally empowered to act as sponsor for the Waterway. Terminal facilities. Adequate facilities are to be provided and maintained by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. Advanced engineering and design work was accomplished by hired labor forces. Preparation of Phase 1 of the GDM is approximately 43 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. 41. WALLACE LAKE, LA. Location. In Red River Basin on Cypress Bayou, Caddo and De Soto Parishes, La., 66 miles above mouth of Bayou Pierre and about 14 miles southeast of Shreveport, La. (See Geological Survey map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. An earth-fill dam 4,940 feet long at top, including 644 feet of spillway and outlet works, rising 48 feet above streambed, with a reservoir providing storage of 96,100 acrefeet, including a conservation pool of 7,800 acrefeet. Outlet works and uncontrolled spillway are centered about 1,250 feet north of south abutment. Reservoir controls 260 square miles, or about 20 percent of total drainage area of Bayou Pierre, Cypress Bayou, and tributaries combined, and affords protection against floods for an area of about 90,000 acres of valley below dam. Cost for new work completed in 1946 was $1,219,371, including $17,164 for Code 711. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and operation and maintenance of the dam as required. (See Table 11-F for reservoir operations.) Condition as of Sep. 30. All construction work on project was completed in December 1946. Main portion of dam was constructed during Fiscal Year 1943; stabilization of railroad embankment was accomplished from June to November 1946; and placing of fill in closure section of dam was accomplished from November to December 1946. Recreational facilities at the lake were closed in May 1972. 42. WEST AGURS, LA. Location. The project area is located in Caddo Parish in northwest Louisiana, immediately adjacent to the northern corporate limits of the City of Shreveport, Louisiana. Existing project. Provides for the installation of 232 relief wells excavated on centers 50 feet apart along the bottom for the entire length of the existing drainage canal on the landside of West Agurs Levee. The wells would extend from the thalweg of the borrow pit about 22 feet into the pervious sand stratum underlying the area. The wells would be 2 feet in diameter and backfilled with clean gravel. Disposal from the well excavation will be spread on the landside of the levee. No relocations will be required. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including all borrow areas, and the relocation of buildings, roads, pipelines and utilities necessary for construction of the project, such as relocations to be made in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; hold and save the United States free from any claims for damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works, including the well system, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and provide and operate and maintain all interior drainage 11-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 works, including pumping stations, which may be required for the development of the protected area. Formal assurances have not been requested. The provisions of PL 91-611 and PL 91-646 will be included as a requirement when formal acts of assurances are requested. By letter dated Nov. 19, 1971 and Mar. 20, 1972, the Board of Commissioners of the Caddo Levee District indicated its ability and willingness to comply with the terms of local cooperation. On Feb. 16, 1979, the Board of Commissioners of the Caddo Levee District reaffirmed their willingness to furnish the items of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of engineering and design studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not begun. 43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control projects along the Red River from the northern boundary of the District to Alexandria, La., was included in the joint annual inspection with local interests during the months of September and October 1980. Flood-fight sectors included in this area are the Arkansas, Shreveport, and Middle Red which contain a total of 438 miles of levee. In addition, spot inspections of these projects were made at various times during the year on an as-needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $117,259. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1980, were $672,665. 44. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 11-I. 45. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 11-J. General Investigations 46. SURVEYS See Table 11-K. 47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA See Table 11-K. 11-34 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 1. Aquatic Plant Control Program, La. 2. Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, La. (Contrib. Funds) 3. Atchafalaya River, Morgan City of Gulf of Mexico, La. 4. Barataria Bay 5. Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche- Jump Waterway, La. 6. Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, La 7. Bayou Teche, La. 8. Calcasieu River and Pass, La. (Contrib. Funds) 9. Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost $ 335,000 $ 430,000 $ 350,000 $ 445,000 $ 8,132,460' 287,806 480,366 251,882 549,853 8,130,096' 2,000,000 3,550,000 -148,000 550,000 14,200,000 1,897,426 5,399,844 557,845 351,901 13,929,195" 567,062 - 140,000 496,632 13,183 53,756 138,866 707,062' 702,4375 ... 501,963 ... 501,963 1,131,500 186,100 4,399,847 1,202,100 18,656,981 2,327,767 333,474 3,285,162 2,299,847 18,637,830 ... 1,572,6856 ... 1,572,6856 168,000 1,955,000 3,745,000 184,220 10,721,8567 200,798 1,962,048 3,728,252 183,149 10,672,0357 6,118 4,865 1,416 -30,600 1,624,424" 199 1,621,607 ... 829,7569 ... 829,7569 ..- 2,891,922 ... 2,891,922 94,000 10,000 75,000 125,970 1,548,724 66,710 43,420 56,227 131,865 1,532,936 ... 754,3301o ... 754,330" 258,000 92,000 80,000 116,910 3,260,585" 248,994 96,441 79,905 123,167 3,254,562" - - - - 27,807,31012 - - - - 27,807,31012 2,795,600 785,000 7,133,700 10,552,980 55,276,74913 2,894,291 790,760 6,000,937 8,699,203 52,229,099'3 282,774 100,000 800,000 4,491,738 1,141,513 250,000 65,000 66,300 315,000 -100,000 757 282,774 -3,800 5,856,200 1,746 5,852,990 798,000 798,000 11-35 TABLE 11-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT S e e - Section Total Cost to in Text Plroject Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 10. Freshwater Bayou, La. 11. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. & Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) 12. Houma Navigation Canal, La. 13. Mermentau River, La. 14. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, La. 15. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La. 17. Overton-Red River Waterway, La. 18. Petit Anse, Tigre & Carlin Bayous, La. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,320,000 1,655,000 1,130,404 1,844,493 - 124,610 73,427 68,448 7,640,000 5,669,009 15,000 129,234 1,290,000 1,229,174 14,745,000 15,311,436 -285,000 1,042,750 7,715,000 9,741,813 1,337,000 1,343,714 666,000 671,115 1,900,000 609,017 21,829,762 22,192,814 800,000 950,840 -- 7,116,224 - 7,116,224 535,750 2,665,265 9,709,765 516,166 1,825,010 8,829,202 - - 63,654,535"'- 1 S- 63,284,470'-," 9,125,000 7,932,967 187,000 198,625 -70,000 7,699 568,000 577,079 600,000 1,824,884 24,220,000 23,982,648 1,235,000 1,810,701 7,660,000 7,122,203 1,350,000 1,344,029 29,204 501,250 623,433 910,000 658,241 27,363,000 27,449,447 1,300,000 901,609 4,060,000 4,453,000 7,090,000 1,572,500 4,320,969 4,419,158 7,142,983 1,522,856 3,370,000 4,230,000 1,071,000 302,040 4,918,214 4,317,998 - - 185,000 - - 69,814 1,891,000 1,350,000 1,320,000 1,813,549 637,591 2,061,382 - - 50,000 - - 29,158 -14,000 36,320 892,800 1,004,548 5,600,000 5,763,945 100,000 108,118 116,787,146"' 'R 114,734,023 14,20 8,293,734 8,281,963 4,561,910' 4,668,8132 10,028,4122 9,973,895 38,326,9973 38,009,13923 255,495,0642. 26 254,864,590" 2 2 73,620,000 73,173,395 54,605,380 54,544,355 1,118,9777 1,118,977 7 10,010,993 9,991,438 1,077,800 1,074,362 19,033,522 19,004,917 542,2472" 529,52321 811,172 811,172 11-36 TABLE 11-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project 19. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contib. Funds) 20. Red River Waterway- Mississippi River to Shreveport, La. (Contrib. Funds) 21. Removing Water- Hlyancinth, La. 22. Tangipahoa River, La. 23. Vermilion Lock, La. (Replacement of lock) 24. Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico 25. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterways to Bayou Dulac, La (Bayou Grand Caillou & LeCarpe, La.) 28. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, Ark. & La. 29. Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. 30. Bayou Pierre, La. NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work ' Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 3,700,000 1,970,000 3,045,002 2,224,233 - 6,500 - 6,500 15,300,000 28,250,000 23,984,985 32,695,354 1,145,300 547,000 1,102,415 587,260 - 194,887 - 194,887 730,000 1,125,000 739,774 1,116,042 117,000 20,000 116,701 18,855 - 124,610 73,427 68,448 - 113,000 - 93,353 1,600,000 2,972,625 325 325 51,000,000 51,787,486 629,350 62,595 71,854 70,631 1,200,000 1,237,031 190,103 191,547 800,000 108,708 164,497 182,576 - - 34,250 - - 22,639 1,000,000 - -1,000,000 784,134 147,242 91,593 5,000,000 35,058,000 5,037,194 34,873,209 - 6,825 - 6,825 66,700,000 207,188,000 66,088,853 205,071,458 36,497 210,986 216,720 217,943 1,163,000 984,300 20,840 20,833 50,000 389,709 -3,352 -1,783 190,000 39,613 300,000 129,196 242,850 274,000 205,600 275,050 227,089 335,954 195,945 265,025 - - - 18,500 15,000 15,000 15,319 29,041 10,858 9,370 14,142 2,358,147 1,963,256 483,461 483,461 15,601,608 15,399,096 409,154 409,147 1,350,01029 1,228,36229 1,068,142 1,068,142 835,251 835,252 129,622 129,622 553,762 391,764 3,787,000 3,531,024 4,208,41730 4,208,4173 2,287,807 2,262,936 299,529"' 299,52931 519,080 519,080 11-37 TABLE 11-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 31. Brush Bayou, La (Contrib..Funds) 32. Caddo Lake, La. 33. Grand Isle and Vicinity, La. 34. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, La. (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Larose to Golden Meadow, La. (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) 36. McKinney Bayou., Ark., and Tex. 37. Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La. (New Orleans to Venice. La., Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 39. Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization (New Orleans Dist.) 40. Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. 41. Wallace Lake, La. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 185,000 -65,000 496,131 17,887 35,853 370,200 - - 281,800 - - - - -. - 117,000 80,000 - 96,987 69,662 - 162,500 200,000 - 161,471 186,352 -120,000 20,177 49,424 91,860 115,636 182,000 174,535 814,600 745,8973' 370,200 331,224 3,587,143 3,587,143 288,860 282,285 544,500 522,364 10,575,000 7,500,000 230,000 13,320,000 105,764,000 8,562,892 4,857,441 7,363,786 12,672,174 104,538,432 370,000 275,000 165,710 369,595 55,405 385,710 209,400 2,670.110 122,400 2.583.110 1,800,000 2,700,000 1,570,000 2,885,000 1,801,821 3,020,358 1,464,274 2,931,867 300,000 390,000 300,000 390,000 - 100,000 100,000 - 93,190 101,081 298,721 218,191 155,000 118,085 13,617,000 13.319,166"" 988,721 908.191 1,367,263 1,333,619 4,663,000 1,940,000 200,000 638,000 41,824,000 6,495,879 2,558,475 334,797 534,233 41,283,531 86,569 366.430 366,430 2,385,000 3,260,000 2,000,000 4,365,000 46,010,000" 3,664,127 2,483,689 1,026,898 5,568,162 45,948.944" 110,000 185,000 220,000 39,511 224,347 212,351 221,300 108,000 80,000 182,909 166,683 82,129 150,000 112,393 160,740 162,454 665,000 589,602 1,219,371 1,219.371 1,306.440 1.294,546 11-38 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 42. West Agurs, La. New Work Approp. - - - 50,000 50,000 Cost - - - 48,939 48,939 1. Includes $3,851,660 for Code 740. 2. Includes $3,852,356 for Code 740. 3. Includes $37,348 for advance engineering and design. 4. Includes allotment of $340,000 for Code 300. 5. Includes expenditures of $335,375 for Code 300. 6. Includes $73,037 for previous project. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds expended. 7. Includes $47,551 for previous project. 8. Includes $252,935 for previous projects; excludes $75,563 expended for rehabilitation (Code 820) in Fiscal Year 1961. 9. Includes $15,445 for previous projects. 10. Includes $45,704 for previous projects. 11. Includes $91,389 permanent indefinite appropriation. 12. Includes $495,914 for previous project; excludes $107,837 expended for minor rehabilitation in Fiscal Year 1963. 13. Includes $194,851 for previous project. 14. Excludes $16,060 contributed funds. 15. Includes $4,320,698 for new work on previous project. Included in these totals are $353,541 N.I.R.A. funds (new work); and $1,070,433 permanent indefinite appropriation. Included is repayment of advance funds for construction of Franklin Canal in the amount of $35,103. In addition, $1,413,133 was expended for transfer to drainage district of ownership of Plaquemines Parish pumping station. and drainage canals and all drainage responsibility and obligations vested in the United States by Public Law 14, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 16. Excludes contributed funds of $340,159. 17. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock was constructed at a cost of $8,648,492 (non-Federal). 18. Does not include allotment of $60,000 (9613123). 19. Does not include expenditures of $36,630 (9613123). 20. Includes $454,259 for maintenance and $548,948 for operation and care for previous project, including $75,000 from appropriation for maintenance and operation of dam and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $7,005 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $10,904 for new work on White Lake to Pecan Island section of existing project. 22. Excludes $10,742 for maintenance on White Lake to Pecan Island section of existing project. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds. Includes $13,163 of R&H funds and $109,714 accelerated Public Works Act funds. 23. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 24. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 25. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 26. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 27. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 28. Includes $47,858 accelerated Public Works Act funds. 29. Includes AE&D funds for replacement of Vermilion Lock. 30. Includes $109,677 for Code 711. 31. Includes $38,529 from emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $80,500 for preauthorized studies. 33. Includes $67,823 for advance engineering and design. 34. Includes $212,105 expended by Tulsa District for cost of Index, Ark., Tex. unit. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds expended. 35. Includes $17,164 for Code 711. 11-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGLISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13,1968 Water Resources Development Act, Mar.7, 1974 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 22, 1967 Aug. 18, 1941 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM, LA. (See Sec. 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth alligatorweed, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growth from navigable waters in tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in southeastern United States. Research and planning costs prior to construction to be borne fully by the United States and not included in costs shared by local interests. Provides for comprehensive program for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious plant growths from navigable waterways, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA. (See Sec. 2 of Text) 20- by 400-foot navigation channels connecting Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Gulf of Mexico, and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black. The non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percentum of the costs of areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and of necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor. This requirement shall be waived if applicable waste treatment facilities are constructed and water quality standards are not being violated. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, MORGAN CITY TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA.(See Sec. 3 of Text) A 20- by 200-foot channel from 20-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA. (See Sec. 4 of Text) A channel about 37 miles long with a 12-foot depth and 125-foot width from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Grand Isle, La., to mile 15.5 in Bayou St. Denis; a channel along western shore of Barataria Bay and through Barataria Pass to 12-foot depth contour in the gulf, with an extension of project to include westerly 4.3 miles of Bayou Rigaud. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA. (See Sec. 5 of Text) Permanent closure of head of bayou, without a lock; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Larose to Gulf of Mexico by Belle Pass; closure of Pass Fourchon; and a jettied entrance at mouth of Bell Pass. Auxiliary channel 12 by 125 feet from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (mile 37.2) to Bayou Lafourche vicinity Leeville 12- by 125-foot channel improvement in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico; 9- by 100-foot channel improvement in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to Golden Meadow; 12- by 125-foot channel from Leeville through Southwestern Louisiana Canal to and through Bayou Rigaud; and restore and extend jetties from 6- 12-foot contour when justified to effect reduction in maintenance dredging. Bayou Lafourche, between Canal Boulevard in Thibodaux, Lafourche Parish, La., and the head of the bayou at its junction with the Mississippi River levee at Donaldsonville, Ascension Parish, La., is declared nonnavigable. BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA. (See Sec. 6 of Text) A navigable channel 51 miles long and 8 by 80 feet from 8-foot-depth contour in Vermilion Bay to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, thence 9 by 100 feet to head of navigation (mile 52) at Lafayette, La., with additional enlargment below Abbeville necessary to provide adequate capacity for flood flows. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 874, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 298, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 155, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 93-251. Sec. 58, 93rd Cong., 2d sess. 11. Doc. 669, 61st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 82, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong. 1st sess.2 Public Law 90-149. S. Doc. 93, 77th Cong., 1st sess.2 11-40 TABLE 11-B (Continued) NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jun. 26, 19344 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 14, 1960 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Dec,, 15, 1970, and Dec'. 17, 19705 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 BAYOU TECHIIE, LA. (See Sec. 7 of Text) Improve stream from its mouth to St. Martinville by removing obstructions and dredging. Construct lock and dam and extend improvement to Arnaudville, La. Increase channel dimensions from mouth to Keystone Lock. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA. (See Sec. 8 of Text) Channel 30 by 250 feet from Lake Charles docks to gulf, repair and extend existing jetties to about 10-foot-depth contour, with a channel 30 by 250 feet between jetties; dredging approach channel 32 by 400 feet in gulf from sea ends of jetties to 32-foot-depth contour; and provision for extension of jetties to 15-foot-depth contour, if such action would be more economical than maintenance of approach channel by dredging. Channel 30 by 250 feet around Clooney Island. Channel depth of 35 feet from wharves of Lake Charles Harbor and terminal district, including Clooney Island Loop, to jetty channel, a uniformly increasing depth of 35 to 37 feet in jetty channel, and a depth of 37 feet in approach channel in Gulf of Mexico. An approach channel 42 by 800 feet from end of jetty to 42-foot contour in gulf; a jetty channel 400 feet wide, varying from 40 feet deep at shoreline to 42 feet deep at seaward end of jetty; a channel 40 by 400 feet from shoreline (mile 0) to Port of Lake Charles (mile 34.4); enlarge existing turning basin at mile 29.6 to 40 feet deep; a mooring basin (mile 3) 350 by 2,000 by 40 feet; a 35- by 250-foot extension of existing ship channel from Port of Lake Charles (mile 34.4) to vicinity of U. S. Highway 90 Bridge; a turning basin at upper terminus, 750 by 1,000 by 35 feet; and maintenance of 12- by 200-foot channel from ship channel to Cameron, La. CALCASIEU RIVER AT DEVIL'S ELBOW, LA. (See Sec. 9 of Text) A channel 40 by 400 feet for 2.8 miles and a turning basin at the head 40 by 1,000 feet and 1,000 feet long. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA. (See Sec. 10 of Text) A new 12- by 125-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou; construction of an 84- by 600-foot lock with a depth of 16 feet over sill near Gulf of Mexico; and construction of jetties from shoreline to 6-foot-depth contour in Gulf of Mexico, if maintenance dredging of channel without jetties proves to be more expensive than construction and maintenance of jetties. Until such determination has been made, offshore channel should be dredged and maintained to provide a 12- by 250-foot channel. In event jetties are provided, offshore section should then be maintained to 12- by 125-foot project in jettied reach, and 250 feet beyond. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT) (See Sec. 11 of Text) Construct waterway from New Orleans, La., to Galveston Bay, Tex. Extension of waterway to Corpus Christi, Tex. Annual Report, 1889, p. 1532. H. Doc. 527, 59th Cong.. 1st sess. H. Doc. 1329, 62d Cong.. 3d sess.3 H. Doc. 299, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 465, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 190, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 86th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 111, 91st Cong., 2d sess.2 H. Doc. 435, 86th Cong., 2d sess.2 H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. 11-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 19344 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 A channel 9 by 100 feet from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Enlarge waterway from 9 by 100 feet to 12 by 125 feet from Apalachee Bay, Fla., to Corpus Christi, Tex., and its extension to vicinity of Mexican border, except between Mobile Bay, Ala., and New Orleans, La., where width shall be 150 feet; and rental of Inner Harbor Navigation Canal facilities. Alternative connection with Mississippi River in vicinity of Algiers at New Orleans. Enlarge and extend Plaquemine-Morgan City route from Mississippi-Atchafalaya section of waterway, in vicinity of Morgan City, to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River in vicinity of Port Allen, opposite lower limit of Port of Baton Rouge. Restore, improve, and maintain Franklin Canal as a terminal branch channel, 8 by 60 feet, from its confluence with Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Franklin, La. A salt-water guard lock in waterway at mile 238 west of Harvey Lock. Enlarge waterway to 16 by 150 feet from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, except in vicinity of Houma (mile 50.5 to 63.5); of Houma bypass (mile 50.5 to 63.5) and of Algiers alternative canal; and enlarge waterway from Atchafalaya River to Sabine River to 16 by 200 feet. Replacement of Vermilion Lock, in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in the report dated Aug. 3, 1976, recommending a lock size of 110 feet wide by 1,200 feet long by 15 feet deep. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA. (See Sec. 12 of Text) Assumption of maintenance and operation of Houma Navigation Canal, constructed by Terrebonne Parish, to dimensions of 15 by 150 feet. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA. (See Sec. 13 of Text) Channel enlargment, lower Mermentau River, from mile 15 to Gulf of Mexico, and construction of a lock and control spillway at Catfish Point, mile 24. Channel enlargement; lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25; construct a gated-control structure at or near Grand Cheniere, mile 7; enlarge and realine Inland Waterway from Franklin, La., to Mermentau River, La., from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, via new channel, and from White Lake to Grand Lake; enlarge-channel of North Prong of Schooner Bayou; construct a gated-control structure in new channel near Schooner Bayou lock; and include project "Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La.," and portion of project "Inland Waterway from Franklin, La., to Mermentau River," west of Vermilion Bay in modified project "Mermentau River, La." MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA. (See Sec. 14 of Text) Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass. and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet, Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. 11-42 H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st sess.; H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess.-6 S. Doc. 188, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 242, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 189, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 231, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong.. 2d sess. Sec. 114 Water Resources Develop)ment Act of 1976 (PL 94- 587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 583, 87th Cong., 2d sess.2 S. Doc. 94, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 231, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess.2 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 30, 19358 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23 and Oct. 1, 19765 Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA. (See Sec. 15 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, La. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA. (See Sec. 16 of Text) Enlargement of existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with 16 by 250-foot entrance channels in open water and jetties, if justified. OVERTON-RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA. (See Sec. 17 of Text) Construct 9- by 100-foot channel for 206 miles from Mississippi River, mile 301 AHP, through Old and Red Rivers to mile 31, thence by lateral canal through land cuts and existing waterways across Mississippi-Red River backwater area along south bank of Red River floodplain to Shreveport, and construct nine locks and pumping plant on Red River near Shreveport. Extend Overton-Red River Waterway 9- by 100-foot channel from Mississippi River to north bank of Black River, mile 35.5. Provides for the navigation channel to be 200 feet wide. PETIT ANSE, TIGRE, AND CARLIN BAYOUS, LA. (See Sec. 18 of Text) A channel in Bayou Petit Anse 60 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Intracoastal Waterway to a point 3.2 miles upstream, thence 40 feet wide and 5 feet deep to highway bridge at head of Avery Island; and a channel in Bayou Carlin 40 feet wide and 5 feet deep from Bayou Petit Anse to Lake Peigneur. A channel in Bayou Petit Anse 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to north end of Avery Island and a channel 5 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Vermilion Bay by way of McIlhenny Canal (Avery Canal). A channel in Bayou Carlin 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide from Bayou Petit Anse to Lake Peigneur. Protecting piers of railway bridge crossing Bayou Carlin at Delcambre, La. A harbor of refuge at Delcambre and a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway via McIlhenny Canal (Avery Canal) to deep water in Vermilion Bay. A new vertical lift railroad bridge over Bayou Carlin and channel improvements in Bayous Petit Anse and Carlin. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 361, 90th Cong., 2d sess.2 H. Doc. 320, 80th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess.7 H. Doc. 225, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 40, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 594, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 2 Public Law 858, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 70, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 480, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 11-43 TABLE 11-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Jul. 25, 1912 Jun. 10, 1872 Jun 14, 1880 Jul. 14, 1960 WRD Act of 1976, dated Oct. 22, 1976 (PL 94-587) Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23. 1962 RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Sec. 19 of Text) Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA. (See Sec. 20 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet. approximately 210 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, La., consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction of five locks and dams. REMOVING WATER-HYACINTH, LA. (See Sec. 21 of Text) Appropriations for Florida and Louisiana for extermination or removal of plants, building of boats, and establishment of booms. Authorized use of mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever. Made appropriation available for State of Mississippi and also made available for use in that State operating plant pertaining to work in Louisiana. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA. (See Sec. 22 of Text) Improvement, without dredging, by removing overhanging trees, snags, and obstructions to navigation from Wells to mouth. Present project above entrance channel. 8- by 100-foot entrance channel from 8-foot depth contour in Lake Pontchartrain to 8-foot depth in River. VERMILION LOCK, LA. (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (See Sec. 23 of Text) A replacement lock, 110 feet wide and 1,200 feet long, to accommodate present and projected marine traffic. WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE, LA., TO GULF OF MEXICO (See Sec. 24 of Text) Construction and maintenance of a waterway 10 miles long from State-owned canal and lock at Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico, to provide a channel 9 by 80 feet and for initial construction of rubblestone jetties inshore of 6-footdepth contour, with landward extensions thereof as required to prevent flanking, and for seaward extensions to 9-foot-depth contour if and when it becomes apparent that such extensions will be more economical than maintenance dredging of entrance channel. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) (See Sec. 25 of Text) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Ilouma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to HTouma navigation canal. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91, 55th Cong., 3d sess. I. Ex. Doc. 54, 416th Cong.. 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1871, 1). 553. Annual Report, 1879, p. 946. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul. 28, 1967, under Sec. 107 of 1960 River and Harbor, Act, as amended. Approved by Secretary of the Army, May 1967, under authority of the R&lH Act of 1909. H. Doc. 697, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 11. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. II. Doc. 583, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 11-44 TABLE 11-B (Continued) Act Documents NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 28, 1938 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 30, 1948 Oct. 27, 1965 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19765 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. (See Sec. 28 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou, and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA. (See Sec. 29 of Text) Provides for construction of a reservoir and other flood control works. BAYOU PIERRE, LA. (See Sec. 30 of Text) Widening channel at intervals totaling 12.9 miles, and snagging of 29.7 miles. BRUSII BAYOU, LA. (See Sec. 31 of Text) Enlargement and alinement of existing channel between (mile 1.20) and (mile 7.42), a distance of 6.22 miles. Bottom widths for the improved channel vary from 100 feet at mile 1.20 to 20 feet at mile 7.42. CADDO LAKE, LA. (See Sec. 32 of Text) Maintenance work. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA. (See Sec. 33 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHIARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA. (HURRICANE PIROTECTION) (See Sec. 34 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. LAROSE TO GOLI)EN MEADOW, LA. (HURRICANE PIROTECTION) (See Sec. 35 of Text) A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MCKINNEY BAYOU, ARK. AND TEX. (See Sec. 36 of Text) Provides: channel enlargement of McKinney Bayou; outlet channels to Red River; interior drainage channels; and four flood flow structures by USDA. MISSISSIPPI RIVER I)ELTA AT AND BELOW NEW ORLEANS, LA. (NEW ORLIEANS TO VENICE, LA., HURRICANE PIROTECTION) (See Sec. 37 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, La., for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong.. 2d sess. Approved Sep. 6, 1973, under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as ammended. S. Doc. 39, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 89th Cong., 1st sess. IH. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 647, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 11-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION . Acts Work Authorized Documents RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) (See Sec. 39 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Levee and bank stabilization. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the 2d sess. Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, Okla. and Tex. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA., TO INDEX, ARK. (See Sec. 40 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., from Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. 2d sess. WALLACE LAKE, LA. (See Sec. 41 of Text) Jun. 22, 1936 Construction of an earth-fill dam and a reservoir. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., WEST AGURS, LA. (See Sec. 42 of Text) 2d sess. Oct. 18, 1976 Provides for the installation of 232 relief wells excavated on H. Doc. 647, 94th Cong., centers 50 feet apart along the bottom for the entire 2d sess. length of the existing drainage canal on the landside of West Agurs Levee. 1. For latest published map, see H. Doc. 410, 56th Cong., 1st sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. For latest published map, see H. Doc. 288,66th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 6. Not mentioned in authorizing act. 7. Portion of existing project above mile 31 was reclassified to inactive status as approved by Office, Chief of Engineers, letter dated Oct. 18, 1971. 8. Included in Public Works Administration Program, Sep. 6,1933. 11-46 TABLE 11-C NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT BAYOU TECHE, LA., LOCKS (See Sec. 7 of Text) Pertinent Data Keystone Lock Berwick Lock Miles from 18 (New Iberia) 1.7 (Berwick, La.) Miles from 82.5 (Intracoastal Waterway) 9 (Below mouth of Bayou Teche) Width of chamber , 36 feet 45 feet Length available for full width 160 feet 300 feet Lift 8 feet 0-14.5 feet Depth on miter sill at mean low gulf level 8 feet 9 Character of foundation Timber piles Timber piles Kind of dam Timber, rockfill Type of construction Concrete Reinforced concrete Completed 1913 September 1951 Open to navigation - November 1950 Cost $257,720 $2,100,000 11-47 TABLE 11-D GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DIST.)-LOCKS (See Sec. 11 of Text) Pertinent Data Pertinent Data Inner Bayou Bayou Harbor Plaque- Algiers Boeuf Sorrel Calcasieu Harvey Navigation mine Port Allen Vermilion Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Canal Lock Lock Lock Lock Miles from New Orleans, La. (Canal St.) Miles below Lake Charles, La. Miles from Abbeville, La. Miles from Mississippi River Miles from Calcasieu River Miles from Vermilion River Width of chamber Width between abutments Length available for full width Lift Depth on gill at mean low gulf level- Character of foundation Type of construction 96.6 (via Harvey Lock) 135 (via Har- 3.3 vey Lock) 2.9 132.5 16.6 26 0.38 56.7 (via Plaquemine Lock) 18 (via Plaquemine Lock) 0.13 0.6 - 0.23 0.5 1.75 75 feet 75 feet 800 feet 1,156 feet 0-18 feet 0-11.3 feet 13 feet 13 feet Timber Concrete slab piles on medium of stiff clay Reinforced Reinforced concrete concrete gate bays and earth chamber 56 feet 797 feet 0-21 feet 14 feet 75 feet 75 feet 1,206 feet 425 feet 75 feet 640 feet 0-4 feet 0-19.6 feet 0-17.4 feet 13 feet Timber piles Concrete slab on preconstructed stiff clay Reinforced Reinforced concrete gate concrete bays and earth gate bays chamber and earth chamber 12 feet 13.5 feet (miter sill) (miter sill) Timber piles Timber piles Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete 84 feet 56 feet - 1,202 feet - 0-45 feet - 13.75 feet (miter sill) - Concrete slab on clay 1,182 feet 0-5 feet (either direction) 11.3 feet Timber piles 0 Reinforced Reinforced concrete concrete C :z z Cl) September June 1954 1951 $2,754,000 $4,700,948 (Flood Control (Flood Control MR&T Funds) MR&T Funds) - October 1952 December 1950 $2,133,527 1934 February 1923 $1,775,132 $8,648,492 (non-Federal) - 1935 19091 July 1961 $1,302,006 $13,902,222 1909 July 1961 1. Closed permanently September 29, 1961. 2. Replacement of lock approved by the Secretary of Army, May 16, 1967; estimated Federal cost $25,900,000. 3. Transferred to project status. Construction of replacement lock, scheduled for January 1980. z 0 z C12 yH5 n- Kind of dam Opened to navigation Cost Completed April 1956 $5,215,700 Reinforced concrete spillway dam, vertical cast steel gates, timber pile foundation 1933 $330,7652 19343 ! , TABLE 11-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge' Amite River and Bayou Manchac, La.2, 3 j4 Bayou Bonfouca, La..' Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou, and Lake Bisteneau, La.3 M~0 Bayou Dupre, La.2 .3 Bayou Grosse Tete, La.2;9 Bayou Lacombe, La.- 1967 1978 1974 1887 1968 1969 1967 Bayou La Loutre, St. Malo, and Yscloskey, La.2,3 1970 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, La.3 1950 Bayou Queue de Tortue, La.3 1970 Bayou Segnette Waterway, La. 1958 Bayou Terrebonne, La.3 ,4 ,'o 1961 Bayou Vermilion, La.3,4. 1947 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, La.35 1936 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, La. 1976 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, La.3,12 1973 Cane River, La., 5, 1910 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, La.2', 1967 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La. 1971 Grand Bayou Pass, La.3 1950 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, La.3 .1960 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La."1 1956 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, La.'5 1950 Little Caillou Bayou. La.3 1973 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, La. 1977 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, La. 1976 Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, La.)' 7 1957 Pass Manchac, La.: 1950 Red River below Fulton, Ark. 1978 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex."' 1969 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Daingerfield, Tex. 1976 Sulphur River, Ark. and Tex.3,5, 1919 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, La.2,:, j4 1973 Vinton Waterway, La.2' 1950 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La.2' 1948 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. 2. Channel adequate for commerce. 3. Completed. 4. Includes previous project costs. 5. Inactive. 6. No commerce reported. 7. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong.. 1st sess. 8. Includes $56 cost incurred in 1969. 9. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. 10. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. 11. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. 12. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass. La." 13. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 14. Not completed; superseded for most of its length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. 15. Maintenance project: no future work schedules. 16. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous l)pro)ect. 17. Work is under continuing authority. 18. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 19. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La.." and "Red River Waterway- Shreveport, La., D)aingerfield, Tex.," are also reportel separately. 20. No work performed; local interests have not I)provi(ledl rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 21. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, La." 11-50 $. 28,234 30,997 5,000 38,915 29,392 4,716 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 120,089 34,900 1,015,81411 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,676 249,052 77,761 5,197,975 " 2,499,555 1,374 1,963,806 70,000 45,989 8,115 10,904 $ - 69,087 290,192 104,187" 123,454 92,276 223,616 36,780 28,315 213,455 251,691 200,169 37,169 2,000 192.011 452,6111:1 14,480 552,780 11,669 241,896 751,485 114,519 139.755 10.039 2,147.890 92,163 10.742 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT RESERVOIR OPERATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1980 TABLE 11-F See Section Storage in Text Project (acre feet) Inflow' Outflow, 29. Bayou Bodcau Oct. 1, 1979 704 Reservoir, La. Sep. 30, 1980 320 Apr. 27, 1980 (Max) 53,385 Mar. 30, 1980 (Max) 4,227 Apr. 27, 1980 (Max) 2,013 41. Wallace Lake, La. Oct. 1, 1979 8,260 Sep. 30, 19802 Apr. 15, 1980 (Max) 31,972 Apr. 14, 1980 (Max) 7,497 Apr. 15, 1980 (Max) 1,830 1. Cubic feet per second. 2. No record from Aug.25 to Sep.30, 1980, Water surface below limits of automatic and staff gages, 11-51 TABLE 11-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 38 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, Ark.1 2 - 1,158 - - $ 20,400,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, La. - - - - 70,717' Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, La.' . 243,3363 Caddo Lake, La.' Caddo Lake - - - 3,587,8002 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. Red River - - - 1,950,000 Garland City, Ark. " 6 - - - - 1,336,0003 Maniece Bayou, Ark. - - - - 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, Ark.7" - - - - 5,700,0003 Posten Bayou, Ark. and La. 2 6. 9560,000 - - - - .Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, Tex., Ark., and La. (New Orleans District)1" 52,600,0003 Total 87,417,885 1. Details presented in individual report herein. 2. Construction on this project not started. 3. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, Ark. and La ....... ................ ....................... $4,100,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, La. (cash contribution) ................................... 89,047 Caddo Lake, La . ................................................................................. 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La............................................... 480,000 East Point ..................................................................................... 67,000 Garland City, Ark ....................................... ........................................ 6,000 Maniece Bayou, Ark. (cash contribution) ........................................................ 39,293 McKinney Bayou, Ark. (cash contribution) ........................................................ 500,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, Tex., Ark., and La .................. 1,270,000 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. 6. Inactive. 7. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. 8. Joint-use pool (sediment). 9. Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, Ark.," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 11-52 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-H RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 38 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,237' 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,740'2 (:) Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. Channel improvement 1941 319,200' 1948 Bayou Pierre, La. Channel enlargement 1936 299,529' (93) Black Bayou Lake, La. 4,5 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, La. Cutoff 1938 70,348',6 1938 (Grant Parish, below Colfax, La. Levees 1938 38,809' 1941 Hempstead County levee district No. 1, Ark. Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, La. Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,927"' 1956 Pineville, Red River, La. Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,426' 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, La. Bank protection 1944 3,908,000' 1953 Red River Parish, La. Levee enlargement 1936 149,435' 1939 Saline Point, La. Cutoff 1936 124,111 1945 Wallace Lake, La. Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711,2 (3) Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La., $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, La., $17,164. 3. Included in this report. 4. Work not started. 5. Inactive. 6. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 7. In addition, $250,000 was expended from contributed funds. 11-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Sec. 44 of Text) -1Project Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La.' 2 Amite River and Tributaries, La.2 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. 2 Bayou Choupique, La.2 ' Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, La.2 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, La.1 2 Bayou Rapides, La.2 ' Black Bayou Reservoir, La.'" Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, La.2 ' Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La.2 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La.7 Colfax, Grant Parishes, La.' - Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex.' East Point, La.2 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' the Pines, Tex.' Garland City, Ark. Grant Parish below Colfax, La.' 2 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La. Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Ark. 1' . Maniece Bayou, Ark."' Morgan City and vicinity, La. Natchitoches Parish, La." 2 Pineville, Red River, La. ' Posten Bayou, Ark."o Red River Parish, La. ' Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, La." 2 Saline Point, La.' 2 Twelvemile Bayou, La. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex.' For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1956 1964 1948 1954 1964 1951 1952 1945 1963 1978 1977 1938 1979 1969 1979 1976 1941 1979 1941 1970 1976 1956 1953 1973 1939 1953 1945 1966 1979 Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Operation and Maintenance $ - r--..r.__.. 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. Completed. 3. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ........... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, La ...................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La.... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La ........................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, Ark .................. 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, La............... 250,000 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended.) 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Includes $92,000 for preauthorization studies. 8. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 9. These projects transferred to the Fort Worth District, Southwestern Division, during Fiscal Year 1979. 10. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 11-54 TABLE 11-I Construction $ 1,653,189 3,034,255:' 319,200 129,930 70,717 243,336' 95,179 336,063 1,655,700 741,892 70,348 20,839,300 . 486,069 14,175,197 1,335,842 38,809 985,598 88,006 970,932" 554,192 1,529,478' 232,426 149,435 3,908,000 124,111 335,433 35,659,176 8,301,021 11,195,021 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT TABLE 11-J EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84th CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) (See Sec. 45 of Text) Federal Cost Project and Location FY 80 Disaster preparedness $ 390,844 Emergency Operations: Public Law 84-99-1979 Flood 340,991 Total $ 731,835 11-55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 11-K ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Item and CWIS Number FY 80 SURVEYS (100) Navigation (110) Barataria Bay Waterway-Dupre Cut Section, La. -10002 $ 2,318 Barataria Bay W. Entrance Channel, La. -10017 1,188 Bayou Manchac & Amite River, La. -80006 418 GIWW Louisiana Section, High Level Highway Crossings -79030' 0 GIWW La. & Tex. Section -10032 409,279 Miss. River-Gulf Outlet, La. -55270 44,173 457,376 Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Aloha-Rigolette Area, La. -12123 97,404 Lake Pontchartrain, West Shore, La. -79700 617 Louisiana Coastal Area, La. -61610 109,947 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, La. -34014 55,075 New Orleans, Baton Rouge Metro Area, La. -12035 138,226 West Bank of Miss. River in vicinity of New Orleans, La. -59360 460 401,729 Comprehensive Basin Studies (150) Red River Authorization Report -81129 152,179 1,011,284 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Review for Deauthorization of Review Program (163) -77000 0 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Army, Soil Conservation Services (181) -51840 3,215 Water Quality Management (184) -51860 15,335 Coastal Zone Management (185) -51880 7,709 Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 31,682 Tech. & Engr. Assist. Shore & Streambank Erosion (188) -51731 2,989 60,930 Collection and Study of Basic Data (200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams (236) -53843 and -53842 26,222 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 185,481 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies -53820 0 272,633 Gross Total $1,283,917 1. Report forwarded to higher authority Sep. 12, 1979. 11-56 1980 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT* This district comprises western Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northeastern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; western tributaries between White and Red Rivers, including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from, Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, Ark.; and Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Lake Providence Harbor, La ...... 2. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark ...................... 3. Yazoo River, Miss ................ 4. Other authorized navigation projects ............................ 5. Navigation work under special authorization ...................... Flood Control 6. Ouachita River and Tributaries, Ark. and La ....................... 6A. Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, Ark ... 6B. DeGray Lake, Caddo River, A rk ................................ Page Flood Control (cont.) 12-1 6C. Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, Ark .............. 12-2 6D. Bayou Bartholomew and 12-3 Tributaries, Ark. and La ......... 6E. Monroe Floodwall, La ............ 12-3 6F. Ouachita River Levees, La ........ 7. Inspection of completed flood 12-4 control projects ................... 8. Other authorized flood control projects ..................... 9. Flood control work under special 12-4 authorization ..................... 12-4 10. 12-4 11. General Investigations Surveys ........................... Collection and study of basic data . Navigation 1. LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA. Location. In Hagaman Chute, a secondary channel of the Mississippi River at mile 483.4 above Head of Passes, and about 3 miles south of Lake Providence, La. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 0.7 mile long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet in Hagaman Chute from the Mississippi River. Channel was widened to 400 feet in front of and upstream from port area, a distance of 800 feet, to provide a turning basin. Local interests constructed retaining dikes to provide the disposal area for material excavated from channel and turning basin. Resulting hydraulic fill provides a raised port area. Federal cost of completed work was $198,859, excluding preauthorization study costs of $9,678. Total non- Federal cost was $233,400, including cost of retaining dikes, and a cash contribution of $35,000. In addition, local interests have spent $1,022,000 for port facilities. Restudy of port for expansion scheduled under continuing authority program. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Local interests provided port facilities. 12-1 Page 12-5 12-5 12-6 12-6 12-6 12-7 12-7 12-7 12-7 * All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge Paul F. Jahncke dredged 553,000 cubic yards of material for maintenance in harbor channel and turning basin in August-September 1979. Local interests have provided a diked disposal area for maintenance dredging in the harbor. Condition as of Sep. 30. No problems were experienced with navigation during the fiscal year. The leased dredge Paul F. Jahncke worked in the harbor and connecting channel from Aug. 29 to Sep. 17. Part of the dredged material from the maintenance operation was deposited in the diked disposal area furnished by the Lake Providence Port Commission. 2. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, ARK. Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, Ark., and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, La., it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Precious projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of existing 6.5-foot navigation project. New work for completed project costs $4,574,551, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, Ark., provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, Ark. This is being accomplished by construction of four new locks, 84 feet by 600 feet; new dams; channel realinement; and measures to preserve Catahoula Lake for migratory waterfowl. Jonesville Lock and Dam replaced existing Lock and Dam No.2; Columbia Lock and Dam replaced existing Lock and Dams Nos. 3, 4, and 5; Felsenthal Lock and Dam will replace existing Lock and Dam No. 6; and Calion Lock and Dam will replace existing Lock and Dam No. 8. The Felsenthal Canal was deauthorized as of Aug. 5, 1977, in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The River and Harbor Actof 1970 authorized establishment of wildlife refuges along Bayou D'Arbonne (14,700 acres) in connection with Columbia Lock and Dam and at Felsenthal Lock and Dam (65,000 acres). The Bayou D'Arbonne refuge was increased to 18,000 acres at the request of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Approved (1980) estimated cost for new work for 9-foot navigation project is $222,553,000, including $215,000,000 Federal and $7,553,000 non-Federal for lands, damages, and relocations. Local cooperation. Local cooperation for all completed work in Louisiana has been furnished in a timely manner. It is anticipated that local interests in Louisiana will be able to supply the necessary rights-of-way for construction of the cutoffs and bend widenings. Local interests in Arkansas have furnished the rights-of-way for the Felsenthal access road, lock, dam, disposal area, and the Calion access road and it is anticipated that the remaining rights-of-way will be furnished when needed. The city of Camden, Ark., has furnished land for the Sandy Beach recreation area. All assurances from local interests in Arkansas including supplemental assurances (Public Law 91-646) have been accepted. The State of Louisiana has not furnished supplemental assurances; however, they are anticipated in the near future. Terminalfacilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, La., and Camden, Ark. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, La., and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, Ark. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity ofJonesville, La., and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, La. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded for construction of Calion Lock and Dam in February 1979. Construction of Felsenthal Lock and Dam is continuing as scheduled. The Calion access road and Sandy Beach recreation area at Camden were completed. Design for the navigation channel cutoffs and bend widenings in the Jonesville and Columbia pools are in progress; completion is scheduled this fiscal year. Design for cutoffs and bend widenings in Calion and Felesenthal pools has been initiated and completion is scheduled for next fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 6.5-foot project is complete and is being maintained. Planning and design for the 9-foot navigation project started in Fiscal Year 1962 and are continuing. Construction at Columbia Lock and Dam started in February 1964. The dam was completed in November 1968, and the lock was completed in January 1970 and was placed in service in May 1972. Construction at Jonesville Lock and Dam started in May 1967. The lock and dam were completed in January 1972 and were placed in service in March 1972. A 9-foot navigation channel to Lock and Dam No. 5 at Sterlington, La., was established in June 1972. (See Table 12-C on locks and dams, Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La.) The contract for removal of four abandoned 12-2 VICKSBURG, MISS., I)ISTRICT locks and dams which proved hazardous to navigation in the Columbia and Jonesville pools is completed. A contract for design and preparation of plans and specifications for cutoffs and bend widenings in the Jonesville and Columbia pools was awarded in Fiscal Year 1978. Construction of Felsenthal Lock and Dam is continuing and excavation at Calion Lock and Dam is under way. Calion access road and Sandy Beach recreation area are completed. There have been 17,380 acres acquired for the Bayou D'Arbonne Wildlife Refuge and 64,394 acres acquired for the Felsenthal Wildlife Refuge. Acquisition of the remaining lands for both refuges is continuing. 3. YAZOO RIVER, MISS. Location. Formed by junction of Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers in Leflore County, Miss., flows about 169 miles southerly and southwesterly, and enters Mississippi River at Vicksburg, Miss. (See Mississippi River alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Previous projects. See page 681 of Annual Report for 1961 for details. Authorized project. The Yazoo River Navigation project consists of a 9-foot channel from its mouth to Greenwood, Miss., mile 164.9 (present mileage), with a minimum width of 150 feet. The project includes a single lock (84 feet by 600 feet) and a dam located near Vicksburg, dredging and channel realinement; 600,000 acre-feet of additional storage in Sardis Lake to augment low flows in the Yazoo River, and recreation features. Total estimated (1980) Federal cost of 9-foot project is $181,000,000 which includes $342,000 for the U. S. Coast Guard. Total estimated non- Federal cost is $2,203,000. These figures do not include the total estimated (1980) Federal cost of Belzoni Bridge relocation which is $10,200,000 and the total estimated non-Federal cost which is $237,000. Local cooperation. None required on previous project. In connection with the 9-foot navigation project, local interests will be required to: a. Provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and flowage rights in overflow areas required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, except at Sardis Lake; b. Provide land for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers; c. Provide suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; d. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent operation and maintenance, including but not limited to those resulting from dredging, change in groundwater level, and wave action; e. Provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, including berths and access channels, open to all on equal terms; f. Accomplish alterations and relocations as required, except for those required for increasing capacity of Sardis Lake, including a portion of the cost of alteration of the State highway bridge at Belzoni, to be determined subsequent to authorization in accordance with the principles of Sec. 6 of the Bridge Alteration Act of Jun. 21, 1940, as amended; g. Contribute or repay to the United States an amount equal to one-half the separable cost of recreation features and assume responsibility for operation and maintenance of these facilities to be provided as a part of this project; and h. Comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and Sec. 221 of Public Law 91-611. Assurances for the relocation of the Belzoni Bridge were furnished on Jan. 25, 1978, and accepted on Feb. 16, 1978. Terminal facilities. At Greenwood there is a privately owned dock and a grain-loading facility. There are privately owned facilities for loading grain at Belzoni and Satartia. At Yazoo City there is a privately owned, grain-loading facility, a private log-loading facility, a private dock to handle dry and liquid fertilizer, and a public terminal. Operations and results (lduring fiscal year. Preliminary engineering work was completed and a contract was awarded to the Mississippi State Highway Department for design and construction of the Belzoni Bridge relocation. Maintenance clearing and snagging was performed. Phase I AE&D studies of authorized project and other alternative plans are being conducted. Condition as of Sep. 30. Entire river is navigable. No work done on new authorization, except for design work connected with the relocation of State Highway No. 12 Bridge at Belzoni, Miss. Phase I studies are continuing on the 9-foot project. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 12-D. 12-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Na rigation actir'ities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public La u' 87-645, as amended (preauthorization). A detailed project report was initiated on Madison Parish Port, La., in September 1977. A public meeting was held Jun. 1, 1978, and the final report was submitted August 1978. Construction was initiated in August 1979. The Paul F. Jahncke dredged approximately 690,000 cubic yards at the Madison Parish Port and will complete work in Fiscal Year 1981. Detailed studies were initiated for Port Gibson Port, Miss., in January 1979. A public meeting will be held in December 1980 with the Final Report scheduled for submission in January 1981. A final post authorization change report on Crossett Harbor, Ark., was submitted to LMVD in May 1980. The project was approved for construction by the Division Engineer and preparation of plans and specifications is now under way. Flood Control 6. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive project are on main stem Ouachita River, Ark. and La., on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, Ark. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La., project to include ten waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations an( results (luring fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Monroe Flood wall, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports herein. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the following individual reports. 6A. BLAKELY MOUNTAIN DAM-LAKE OUACHITA, OUACHITA RIVER, ARK. Location. This project is on Ouachita River, Ark., at head of Lake Hamilton (pool of Carpenter Dam), 486 miles above mouth of Black River, and approximately 10 miles northwest of Hot Springs, Ark. Prerious project. See page 693 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. A iake of 2,768,500 acre-feet storage capacity for flood control and other purposes with an installed power capacity of 75,000 kilowatts. Remaining work consists of completion of public-use facilities. Latest approved (1980) estimated project cost is $40,200,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations a nd results duringfiscal year. Power production totaled 107,479,000 kilowatt-hours, of which 106,148,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Arkansas Power and Light Co., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 578.3 feet above NGVD, or 1.8 feet below the maximum power pool, occurred on May 19,1980. Storage in the power pool at this time amounted to 2,163,200 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 14,324 cubic feet per second occurred on May 16, 1980. On Sep. 30, 1980, the pool elevation was 571.9 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 1,917,100 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was started in August 1947 and was completed for beneficial use in October 1955, except for public-use facilities. Generation of power and operation and maintenance activities are continuing. Remote control equipment has been installed to operate the power plants at DeGray Lake and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson. 6B. )EGRAY LAKE, CA)DO RIVER, ARK. Location. On Caddo River (mile 8), a tributary of Ouachita River, in a narrow, rocky gorge in Clark and Hot Springs Counties, approximately 7 miles north of Arkadelphia, Ark. Existing project. Provides for a lake of 881,90() acre-feet storage capacity for flood control, water supply, pollution abatement, and power with an 12-4 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT installed power capacity of 68,000 kilowatts (one conventional 40,000-kilowatt generating unit and one 28,000-kilowatt generating unit with reversible pump-type turbine). Latest approved (1980) estimated first cost is $72,034,000, including $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed by local interests, exclusive of interest. Local cooperation. None required for flood control and power features. Fully complied with for water supply feature. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled 59,242,000 kilowatt-hours, of which 57,960,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Arkansas Power and Light Co., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 408.0 feet above NGVD, which is the maximum power pool, occurred on May 17,1980. Storage in the power pool at this time amounted to 654,700 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 4,849 cubic feet per second occurred on May 16,1980. On Sep. 30, 1980, the pool elevation was 402.5 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 584,200 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started in June 1962 and was essentially complete in December 1971. All major construction is complete including the remote control for the power plant from Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita. Generation of power, operation, and maintenance is continuing. 6C. NARROWS DAM-LAKE GREESON, LITTLE MISSOURI RIVER, ARK. Locationt. Narrows Dam is on the Little Missouri River, Ark., 105 miles above the mouth and 5 miles northwest of Murfreesboro, Ark. Existing project. Provides a lake of 407,900 acre-feet storage capacity for flood control and other purposes with power installation of 25,500 kilowatts in three units of 8,500 kilowatts each. Remaining work consists of completion of publicuse facilities. Latest approved (1980) estimated cost is $17,187,000, excluding $1,738,700 for third generating unit and remote control equipment. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results dui ring fiscal year. Power production totaled 25,678,100 kilowatt-hours, of which 25,044,900 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Texas-Louisiana Electric Cooperative, Inc., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 548.5 feet above NGVD, or 0.5 foot above the maximum power pool, occurred on May 19, 1980. Storage in the flood control pool at this time amounted to 35,100 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow of 3,527 cubic feet per second occurred on May 16, 1980. On Sep. 30, 1980, the pool elevation was 539.7 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 224,500 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was started in May 1947 and was completed for beneficial use in May 1950. The third power generating unit was completed in January 1970. Installation of remote control equipment was completed in June 1972. Generation of power, operation, and maintenance is continuing. Remote control equipment has been installed for operation of the power plant from Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita. 6D. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. Location. Bayou Bartholomew rises in Jefferson County, Ark., about 10 miles northwest of Pine Bluff and flows southerly about 370 miles to join the Ouachita River upstream from Sterlington, La. Authorized project. Project includes ten waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of Bayou Bartholomew in Louisiana. However, because of public opposition to construction of the loop levees, preconstruction planning of the six loop levees has been deferred until such time as there is sufficient support for such levees by local interests. Channel improvements previously authorized are deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. Latest approved (1979) estimated cost of new work is $46,913,000 including $44,800,000 Federal and $2,113,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to: a. Furnish free of cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the improvements, with the exception of lands for the 10 lakes along the west escarpment of the Bayou Bartholomew Basin; b. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; c. Maintain and operate the levee works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; d. Agree not to construct permanent irrigation dams in Bayou Bartholomew with crest elevations more than 5 feet above the thalweg of the stream; and e. Comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acqui- 12-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 sition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and Sec. 221 of Public Law 91-611. Also, local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that, in accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, they will: a. Administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; b. Pay, contribute in kind, or repay, which may be through user fees, with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the lake projects allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and c. Bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and design have been deferred pending favorable benefit-cost ratios. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of general design memorandum has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. 6E. MONROE FLOODWALL, LA. Location. Monroe, La., lies within the alluvial valley of the Mississippi River and on the east bank of the Ouachita river. The city is located in the north-central part of Louisiana, in Ouachita Parish. Existing project. Provides for construction of floodwall to close the 1,750-foot opening extending from Bry Avenue to Grammont Street. Floodwall will provide complete flood protection to the city of Monroe. Approved (1977) estimated Federal cost of new work is $2,671,000. Non-Federal cost is $206,000. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation have been furnished by the Tensas Basin Levee District, agreeing to furnish all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; accomplish all relocations and alterations of streets, buildings, equipment, utilities, and other obstructions made necessary by the construction works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all of the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and Sec. 221 of Public Law 91-611. Condition as of Sep. 30. Work on the floodwall is complete. 6F. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA. Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, La., and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.9 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A letter report, approved by the Chief of Engineers, authorized gravel surfacing 37.8 miles of levee, enlargement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7-mile southward extension of the east bank levee. Approved (1979) estimated Federal cost is $9,400,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $25,000. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished assurances that they will: a. Furnish all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for construction of the project; b. Accomplish all relocations and alterations of streets, buildings, equipment, utilities, and other obstructions made necessary by the construction works; c. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; d. Maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and e. Comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Condition as of Sep. 30. Completion of the authorized work would not correct all project deficiencies. Enlargement of the Bawcomville levee, enlargement of the east bank levee above Monroe, and replacement of numerous drainage structures are not authorized. Therefore the construction of the present Ouachita River levee project has been deferred. A complete study of the Ouachita River levee system is being accomplished as an interim study of the ongoing comprehensive Ouachita River Basin study. Item I of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978; additional work is being deferred. Restorations are in progress on West Monroe Floodgate monoliths 101-105 (222.5 feet) which were damaged by fire at Union Oil Mill, scheduled for completion Jan. 1, 1981. 7. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $57,599 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1980, is $914,634. VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 12-F. 9. FLOOD CONTROL WORK'UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Laiw 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Emergency repairs to local interest levees along Abiaca, Ascalmore, and Tillatoba Creeks have been approved and scheduled for construction in Fiscal Year 1981 at an estimated cost of $122,000. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributa ries in the interest offlood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Lat 780, 83d Cong.). No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). A request for protection for a Coahoma County road at mile 175.8 on the Big Sunflower River was received in August 1977. The reconnaissance report was completed and did not recommend Federal participation. A project to stabilize the banks of the Homochitto River to protect the U. S. Highway 98 bridge was approved in June 1975. Construction is complete. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (prea uthorization). A final detailed project report on Lead Bayou, Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, Miss., was submitted in January 1980 and approved in June 1980. Plans and Specifications were initiated during Fiscal Year 1980. No funds have been made available to initiate construction. Total expenditure, as of Sep. 30, 1980, was $149,114. Detailed studies were continued on Porter Bayou, Miss. A draft detailed project report will be submitted in 1980. Construction is scheduled to be initiated in 1982. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1980, was $175,238. Detailed studies are continuing on Woodruff Creek, Ark. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1980, was $111,634. Detailed studies are continuing on Salt Creek, Ark. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1980, was $87,402. General Investigations 10. SURVEYS See Table 12-H. 11. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA See Table 12-H. Detailed studies on Willow Depot Creek, Ark., were initiated during 1980, and 90 percent of all fieldwork was completed. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1980, was $77,193. Detailed studies were initiated on Dowling Bayou, Miss., in January 1980. Field and hydrologic work was completed Sep. 30, 1980. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1980, was $98,537. Detailed studies on Whiting Bayou, Miss., were initiated in November 1979. Fieldwork is complete. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1980, was $81,125. 12-7 TABLE 12-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY, 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 1. Lake Providence Harbor, La. 2. Ouachita and Black .Rivers below Camden, Ark. (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (9-foot navigation project) 3. Yazoo River, Miss. 6A. Blakely Mt. Dam- Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, Ark. Code 713 Funds 6B. DeGray Lake, Caddo River. Ark. 6C. Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, Ark. Code 713 Funds 6D. Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. 6E. Monroe Floodwall, La. 6F. Ouachita River Levees. La. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - $ - 96,000 95,933 87,800 225,000 163,60() 87,867 224,985 65.19() 2,393.800 3.521,700 4,065.581 3.494,400 2,479,274 3,443,295 3,972.063 3.110.838 6,600,000 10,710,000 14,400.000 19.900,00()0 6,058,264 7,465,608 18,588,719 17.157.320 1,000 13,484 32,100 32,129 0 83 500,000 590,000 164.000 163,303 580.667 317,050 38,500 38,500 50,000 50.000 54,500 52,996 455,000 254,000 0 52,249 420,474 186,919 1,268,800 2,293,800 2,715.300 3,983,000 1,262,052 2,208,110 2,276,653 3,231,158 -5,000 -5,636 9,400 106,353 7,500 13,318 0 7,920 2,368,000 2,735,000 1,624,000 835,000 2,662,424 2,173,260 2,212,130 1,164,447 1,162,800 1,848,000 2,656,600 2,506,400 1,160,285 1,797,665 2,470.718 2,470,062 235,000 234,000 63,067 325,107 0 76,029 995,400 1,322,400 2,357,100 1,941,300 1,008,674 1,276,437 2,170,495 1,813,572 -75,000 -103,202 -368.000 130,628 -1,000 530,919 -1,800 21,315 -110,000 6,464 0 119,767 12,500 62,200 1,189 10,000 26,287 0 77,783 10,272 999 1. Actual costs include $198,859 Public Works Acceleration Act funds and $9,678 expended for planning and design; excludes $35,000 contributed funds, $198,400 costof retaining dikes, and $1,022,000 local interests' costs for port facilities. 2. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 3. Includes $359,661 for previous projects. Present appropriations include funds for Advance Participation on Belzoni Bridge. 12-8 $ 208.537' 208.537' 1.302.700 1.204..275 5.248.6192 5.248.619 2 45.870.707 45.286.264 136.007,)000 132.671.043 2.013.,661' 1.582.411:1 1.062,315 1,060.811 33.029.944 32.978.492 24.895.092 23.566.521 471.90() 446.992 72,033.992 71.876,902 13.008,683 12,697.789 15.763.229 15.756,917 18,435,737 18,040.704 333,700 304,180 974,000 974.000 2,560.500 2,560,500 2,634,000 2,634,000 VICKSBURG, MISS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960. as amended May 17. 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 3 1, 1970 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 13, 1968 LAKE PROVII)ENCE HAIRBOR, LA. (See Section 1 of Text) Dredging 0.7-mile channel and turning basin in an old chute of the Mississippi River, with the dredged material used to fill in a port area provided by local interests. OUACIHITA AND) BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDI)EN, ARK. (See Section 2 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, Ark. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. YAZOO RIVER, MISS. (See Section 3 of Text) Removal of obstructions to navigation from mouth to Greenwood, Miss., 189 miles. Nine-foot channel from mouth to Greenwood, mile 154.9 (present mileage), with a lock and dam near Vicksburg, channel improvements, alteration of bridges, additional storage space in Sardis Lake to augment low river flows, and recreation features. OUACHITA RIVER AND) TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND) LA. (See Section 6 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, La. (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, Ark.; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW, ARK. ANDI) LA. (See Section 6D of Text) Authorized channel improvements on Bayou and Tributaries (see above) Modified 1950 authorization to include 10 lakes in the west escarpment in Arkansas and 6 local levees in Louisiana, and acquisition of lands for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. The previously authorized channel improvement was deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. MONROE FLOOD)WALL, LA. (See Section 6E of Text) Partial closure of gap in floodwall Closure of gap in floodwall (Plan C) Closure of gap in floodwall (Plan B) S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H1. Doc. 506, 89th Cong., 2d sess. S. D)oc. 117, 81st Cong., 2d sess. 11. Doc. 328, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 11. I)oc. 328, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 12-9 Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and HIarbor Act of 1960, as amended. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and II. Doc. 92-109. 92d Cong., 1st sess. 11. D)oc. 342, 90th Cong., 2d sess. May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7. 1966 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27. 1965 Nov. 7, 1966 _ TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, ARK. AND LA. (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Sill at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Perfrom of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Com- Estimated Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Type of Construction plete Cost Jonesville, La. 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Movable Tainter gated dam; bascule gated 100 $ 47,413,00( navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, La. 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; fixed crest navi- 99 36,349,00( gation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, Ark. 1 243 84 600 18 65 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; navigation pass 72 73,233,00( with fiberdam on crest; steel mitering lock gates Calion, Ark. 7 298 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; bascule gated 22 59,005,000 navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Total $216,000,000 1. Includes $6,113,700 for Catahoula Lake diversion channel and control structure. C C z CF2 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for: Construction Maintenance Bayou Bartholomew, La. and Ark.;2,a,4 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, La.1,2, 4 1941 19,000 37,804 Big Black River, Miss.1 ,4 ,5 1895 15,000 - Big Sunflower River, Miss.",4 ,6 ,7 1942 560,027 459,328 Boeuf River, La. 1,3 ,4,7,8 ,9 1949 30,000 103,737 Homochitto River, Miss.4 1910 15,482 8,518 Little Missouri River, Ark.1,4 ,5 1873 19,992 - Little River, La.1, 4, 10 1890 1,500 - Little Tallahatchie River, Miss.",7 1913 19,000 - Mouth of Yazoo River, Miss.",7 , 1 1953 1,179,211 145,217 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers" 1948 - 272,500 Saline River, Ark.13 ,4 ,5 1931 26,900 12,792 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, Miss.' ,, 5, 1939 43,481 173,066 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, La.",8 12 1949 38,367 85,352 Yalobusha River, Miss." ,4 ,5 , a 1937 7,000 15,936 1. Completed. 2. Abandonment recommended in I. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong.,1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonmentof entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, La. (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 13. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 12-11 TABLE 12-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ark. (1) $ 40,200,000 DeGray Lake, Ark. (1) 72,034,000()(2 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Ark. (') 17,187,000 Calion, Ark. 1960 970,996; Columbia, La. 1941 204,740:1 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, La., to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, La. 1961 3,025,181: Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, Ark. 1957 354,802:1 Ozan Creek. Ark. 1957 57,742:1 Terre Noire Creek, Ark. 1948 123,700:1 Pine Bluff, Ark., local protection 1954 172,582:1 Monroe, La., floodwall extension (Plan B) (') 2,600,000 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (') 44,800,000 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (') 9,400,000 Total $184,441,743 1. See individual reports herein. 4, Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, Ark., 2. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) was by local interests. $4,190,000. 3. Actual cost of completed project. TABLE 12-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 3 0, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for: Construction Maintenance Big Black River. Miss.' 1956 $910,185 $670,750 Big Choctaw Bayou, La.2 1966 248,823 - Buffalo River, Miss.: 1940 - Homochitto River. Miss.' 1956 205,000 144,650 Natchez Port Area, Miss.2 1969 538,000 - Murfreesboro Dam and Lake' 1951 - - 1. Completed. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, and is complete. 3. Deferred indefinitely becauseof insufficient justification under present con(litions. 12-12 VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT TABLE 12-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Emergency Flood Control Activities) (See Section 9 of Text) Accumulated Project Federal Cost FY 80 Advance preparation $ 60,016 Emergency operations 825,881 Rehabilitation: Yazoo Basin, non-Federal, Carroll County 17,494 Yazoo Basin, non-Federal, Leflore County 58,200 Total $961,591 TABLE 12-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number Federal Cost FY 80 SURVEYS (100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Ouachita River Basin, Ark. & La. -12046 1.202.168 Pine Bluff Metro Area, Ark. -12015 103,945 1,.06, 113 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) I)ept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (181) -51840 3.833 Water Quality Management (184) -51860 0 l)lanning Assistance to States (186) -51850 9,832 13.665 ('ollection and Study of Basic I)ata (200) Inspection and Inventory of D)ams (230) -53843 and -53842 369118 Flood lain Management Services (250) F"lood liain Management Services 282.168 Ilydrologic Studies (260) Slydrologic Studies (260) -53820 3.416 651.702 G;ros Total $1.974.480) 12-13 1980 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, Mo., including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, Ark., on the right bank and below Augusta, Ark., on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, Mo., to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Helena Harbor, Ark............... 13-1 2. Hickman Harbor, Ky .............. 13-2 3. New Madrid Harbor, Mo............ 13-2 4. Osceola Harbor, Ark.............. 13-2 5. White River, Ark. (below Newport) ........................... 13-3 6. Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn............................. 13-3 7. Other authorized navigation projects .......................... 13-3 8. Navigation work under special authorization ........................ 13-3 Flood Control 9. Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) ....... 13-4 10. Treasure Island, Mo............... 13-4 Flood Control (cont.) Page 11. West Hickman area, Hickman, Ky .. 13-4 12. Long Lake area, Helena, Ark......... 13-5 13. Huntingdon, Tenn.................13-5 14. Drinkwater Sewer, Mo.............. 13-6 15. North Second Street, Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge) ................. 13-6 16. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... 13-6 17. Other authorized flood control projects ............................ 13-6 18. Flood control work under special authorization ....................... 13-6 General Investigations 19. Surveys ........................... 13-6 20. Collection and study of basic data .... 13-6 Navigation 1. HELENA HARBOR, ARK. Location. In Phillips County, Ark., on right bank of Mississippi River about 663 miles above Head of Passes, La. Existing project. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sep. 20, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Provides for maintenance of access channel with a depth 9 feet below low water, between miles 659 and 663 above Head of Passes, La., by dredging, and for enlarging the upstream 0.6 mile to dimensions of 9 feet deep by approximately 450 feet wide. Remainder of channel conforms to project width of the main channel of Mississippi River. River stages recorded at Helena gage (zero is 141.70 feet msl) since 1871 have ranged between minus 3.0 and plus 60.21 feet with an average annual fluctuation of 40.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are ten terminals within the harbor, two of which are publicly 13-1 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 owned. Others are a rail incline, a small boat dock, grain terminals, a petroleum products terminal, a midstream grocery and refueling service, a fuel unloading facility, and a fertilizerloading facility. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge Arkansas removed 166,165 cubic yards of material in October 1979 in maintaining project channel. Expenditure was $199,782. Expended $28,500 for dredge Natchez mobilization cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is incomplete as dredging will be required in November 1980, to maintain project dimensions. 2. HICKMAN HARBOR, KY. Location. In Fulton County, Ky., on left bank of Mississippi River about 922 miles above Head of Passes, La. Existing project. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Jul. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Provides for dredging and maintaining harbor channel 250 feet wide with depth of 9 feet below low water, from main channel of Mississippi River at mile 922 AHP along former city waterfront about 1.1 miles, with the upper 600 feet forming a turning basin 500 feet wide. New work was completed in Fiscal Year 1963. River stages recorded since 1929 at Hickman gage (zero is 264.73 feet msl) have ranged between minus 0.4 and plus 51.5 feet with average annual fluctuation of 38 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Within harbor are terminals for handling petroleum products, sand and gravel, timber and grain, which are publicly and privately owned; there is about 0.2 mile of surfaced, public mooring and launching area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, i noved 367,251 cubic yards of material in July 1980 in maintaining project channel. Expenditure was $347,859. Expended $19,200 for dredge Arkansas demobilization cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is complete and maintained to project dimensions. 3. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO. Location. New Madrid County, Mo., on right bank of the Mississippi River about 889 miles above Head of Passes, La. Existing project. Construction and subsequent maintenance of a harbor channel 150 feet wide with a depth of 9 feet below low water from the head of New Madrid Bar, about mile 889 AHP, along the city waterfront downstream for a distance of about 9,400 feet, with a 250-footradius turning basin at the downstream end. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Feb. 21, 1968, under Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Within the harbor are privately owned terminals for handling petroleum products, logs and lumber, and soybeans and grain. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for present and immediately foreseeable commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is complete and maintained to project dimensions. 4. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARK. Location. Mississippi County, Ark., on the right bank of the Mississippi River at about 784 miles above Head of Passes, La. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Sep. 30, 1971, under Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Harbor channel construction consisted of removal of 689,705 cubic yards of material from the harbor channel to provide a navigation channel 250 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the Mississippi River navigation channel at the downstream end of the old chute of Island 30, upstream along the old bendway channel for a line distance of 6,500 feet. A 250-foot-radius turning basin is provided at the upstream end of the harbor channel. The excavated material removed from the channel was placed on the top bank between the old bendway channel and the main line Mississippi River levee to form a flood-free industrial park to be developed by local interests. Latest published map is in 1979/47th edition, Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, prepared under the direction of President, Mississippi River Commission. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public terminal facilities have been provided by Osceola Riverport Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Arkansas, removed 184,496 cubic yards of material in October 1979 and leased dredge Natchez removed 218,994 cubic yards of material in September 1980 in maintaining project channel. Bank repairs were made inside the harbor at a cost of $2,100 for hired labor and $170,300 for contractors earnings. Total expenditure was $570,780. 13-2 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is incomplete as further dredging will be required in October 1980. 5. WHITE RIVER, ARK. (BELOW NEWPORT) Location. Rises in northwestern Arkansas and flows 686 miles first north into Missouri, thence southeasterly through Arkansas to the Mississippi River 64 miles below Helena, Ark. (See Mississippi River Commission alluvial valley maps, scales 1:62,500 and 1:500,000, and map folio, May 1973, of White River, vicinity of Batesville, Ark., to Mississippi River, scale 1:24,000.) White River enters Memphis District at foot of Peach Orchard Bluff, Ark., 165 miles above its mouth; but Memphis District is responsible for maintenance of navigation channel from mile 10.0 to mile 254.0, Newport, Ark. Previous projects. For details, see page 1874, Annual Report for 1915, and page 938, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Maintenance of a channel 4.5 feet deep by 100 feet wide between mouth of river and Batesville, 296 miles, by snagging, dredging, and contraction works. Maintenance discontinued after Fiscal Year 1951 due to negligible traffic; dredging and snagging resumed in 1962. White River channel from mouth to mile 10 has been improved and is being maintained as part of the Arkansas River Project. The existing project was modified by OCE, Mar. 11, 1968, under authority of Sec. 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, to provide a 125-foot-wide channel with minimum depth of 5 feet and a depth of 8 feet at a stage of 12 feet on the Clarendon gage. This modification has been completed and increased dimensions extend from the mouth to Augusta, at mile 199. In February 1971, OCE authorized resumption of maintenance from Augusta to Newport. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of terminals for handling riprap stone, sand and gravel, logs, soybeans, wheat, and rice at Augusta (mile 198); logs, soybeans, wheat, and rice at Des Arc (mile 143); logs, lumber, soybeans, and rice at Clarendon (mile 99); soybeans at Crocketts Bluff (mile 68); soybeans, rice, sand, gravel, and crushed stone at St. Charles (mile 57); riprap stone at Benzal (mile 7.5), and public launching ramp at 1-40 bridge. Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging was performed at various locations between mile 10 and mile 255 to provide project width and depth. Leased dredge, Dredge II, moved 273,765 cubic yards of material and leased dredge Andy moved 130,467 cubic yards of material in maintaining project channel. Snagging operations were performed by hired labor. Total project Fiscal Year 1980 cost was $674,208. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is incomplete as additional dredging is needed in October and November 1980. 6. WOLF RIVER (MEMPHIS HARBOR), TENN. Location. Rises near western edge of Tippah County, Miss., and flows generally northwesterly through Shelby County, Tenn., entering the Mississippi River above Memphis, Tenn. (mile 738.7 AHP). The lower 3.5 miles of channel, parallel to the Mississippi River along the Memphis waterfront, became a slack-water harbor when Wolf River was diverted through Mud Island to the Mississippi River by a flood control project, Wolf River and tributaries, under the Flood Control Act of 1958. (See Mississippi River Commission alluvial valley maps, scales 1:62,500 and 1:500,000, and folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, scale 1:62,500, revised annually.) Previous projects. For details see pages 701 and 702, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The project provides a channel 9 feet deep at low water from mouth to mile 3, with bottom widths of 250 feet from mouth to Keel Avenue (mile 1.75) and 200 feet from Keel Avenue to mile 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty terminals along project channel. One terminal is operated by Coast Guard, two by contract carriers, and 17 are operated privately. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge Arkansas was paid $19,200 for demobilization cost related to fiscal year dredging and leased dredge Natchez was paid $28,500 mobilization cost related to Fiscal Year 1980 dredging. Due to delay in contract start dates, harbor was not dredged in Fiscal Year 1980. Total Fiscal Year 1980 expenditure was $59,473. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is incomplete as dredging will be required in October 1980. 7. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 13-C. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). 13-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 During the period $163,000 was expended for a study of Caruthersville Harbor, Mo., $61,000 on Wickliffe Harbor, Ky., and $4,316 on Lake County Harbor Reconnaissance report. Flood Control 9. DYERSBURG, TENN. (SOUTHWEST) Location. The city is situated on the bank of the North Fork of the Forked Deer River 5 miles upstream from the confluence of the North Fork and Forked Deer River. The project is located in the Finley Street area in the southwestern section of Dyersburg north of the river in the low area between U.S. Highway 51 and U.S. Highway 51 Bypass. Existing project. Authorized Jun. 27, 1972, under authority of Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Construction of a levee beginning at the Highway 51 Bypass and extending 2,000 feet northeast, then 2,200 feet east to the levee around the sewage treatment plant on the south and east sides, and construction of a levee from the northeast corner of the treatment plant northeasterly to high ground just south of the Illinois Central Railroad. Excavation of 23 acres on the landside of the levee to elevation 254.0 feet msl for providing additional storage and construction of a 100-cfs pumping station and an 8- by 8-foot concrete box culvert with sluice gate to evacuate interior drainage from the excavated sump. Construct an 84-inch corrugated metal culvert with flap gate to evacuate interior drainage from an area northeast of the sewage treatment plant. Construction of landside drainage ditches along the levee to divert drainage to excavated area and transition existing ditches into excavated sump to insure proper operation of the project as designed. Construct an outlet channel into North Fork, Forked Deer River. Construction scars and waste areas will be graded to blend into the existing terrain. The levees and excavated areas will be seeded and/or sodded and fertilized to provide erosion protection and improve the appearance of the area. After completion of the final grading, the entire sump area will be landscaped with water-tolerant trees. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway bridge construction and alterations necessary for project construction. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works. Maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Bear all costs of project construction in excess of the $2,000,000 Federal cost limitation. Prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control. Restrict fills on lands below elevation 269 feet on landside of the levee outside of the proposed renewal area and future sewage treatment plant, and adopt flood plain regulations necessary to insure compatibility between future development and the degree of flood protection afforded in the project area. Comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 646. Accept the responsibility and liability to fully comply with the provisions of Sec. 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611. The city of Dyersburg, Tenn., has provided the necessary assurances of local cooperation requirements. Operation and results during fiscal year. A contract for construction was awarded in Fiscal Year 1974. Actual construction began in Fiscal Year 1975. Contract was completed in October 1976. Total cost of the project is $1,817,906. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete. 10. TREASURE ISLAND, MO. Location. In Dunklin County, Mo., in the Little River Drainage District of the St. Francis River Basin near Hornersville, Mo. Existing project. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Feb. 21, 1973, under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Provides for the installation of a 150-cfs electrically powered pumping plant. The new pumping units, combined with the existing 25-cfs pump, will have a total capacity of 175 cfs. Provides flood protection for 7,800 acres of land, of which 7,100 are cleared. Construction was completed Oct. 15, 1976, at a total Federal cost of $852,600, and local interests assumed operation of the facility on tnat date. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed project. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete. 11. WEST HICKMAN AREA, HICKMAN, KY. Location. The project is located in the western section of the city of Hickman, Fulton County, Ky. The area is protected from flooding by the Mississippi River by a levee and floodwall on the west. Existing project. Authorized Nov. 9, 1973, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of installing a flap gate on the 13-4 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT existing box culvert through the old levee to prevent backwater flooding from Bayou du Chien, excavation of a 3.8-acre sump area, and construction of a 190-cfs pumping plant to reduce flooding from interior runoff. About 800 feet of interior channel will be reshaped through the excavated sump area, 190 feet of new outlet ditch will be built from the pump discharge to the existing outlet ditch, and 300 feet of the existing ditch is to be cleaned out and/or enlarged. 0 Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway bridge construction and alterations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and adjust all claims concerning water rights; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control; provide a contribution toward construction costs where special local benefits will accrue in accordance with existing policies for,regularly authorized projects; provide a cash contribution for project costs assigned to project features other than flood control; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; and accept the responsibility and liability to fully comply with the provisions of Sec. 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611. The city of Hickman has furnished the required local cooperation assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed plans and specifications for modification of the project, and awarded construction contract in the third quarter of Fiscal Year 1979. Condition as of Sep. 30. Temperature probes are being replaced. 12. LONG LAKE AREA, HELENA, ARK. Location. The project is located immediately south of Helena, Phillips County, Ark. The area is protected from flooding by the Mississippi River by the project levee, and primary drainage of the area is through Long Lake Bayou. Existing project. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The authorized improvements consist of enlargement and cleanout of Long Lake Bayou, extending from the culvert upstream 5.6 miles to a point about 3/4 mile below Rabb Lake or some 10 miles below Helena. The plan also provides for revegetation of rights-ofway (about 100 acres) not required to remain open for channel maintenance purposes; and the project sponsor will be required to maintain the revegetated area after project construction. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocation and alterations, and highway or highway bridge construction and alterations necessary for project construction; hold and.save the United States free from damages due to the construction works except those damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors and adjust all claims concerning water rights; maintain and operate the project after completion, including maintenance of wildlife habitat within construction right-of-way without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent future encroachments which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control after project construction; assume full responsibility for all project cost in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; comply with the provision of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; 84 Stat. 1894); accept the responsibility and liability to fully comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611. The Cottonbelt Levee District No. 1 has furnished the required local cooperation assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. Implementation of this project has been delayed pending further notification from project sponsors on rights-of-way. 13. HUNTINGDON, TENN. Location. In Carroll County, Tenn. Existing project. Authorized Aug. 11, 1976, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The plan consists of 1,110 feet of channel enlargement, 1,870 feet of vertical wall concrete channel and 3,320 feet of grouted riprap channel. Estimated first cost is $1,837,000. Protection to approximately 90 acres of highly developed urban lands will be provided and no significant adverse environmental effects will result. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, and all necessary modifications or relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and all other existing structures or utilities except for railroad facilities; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed work, except those damages due to the 13-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate at their own expense the completed works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; Prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control after project construction; assume full responsibility for all project cost in excess of the $3,000,000 Federal cost limitation; comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646, 84 Stat. 1894); accept the responsibility and liability to fully comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611); at least annually, inform affected interests that the project does not provide complete protection from all floods; adopt, enforce and adhere to a sound comprehensive plan for flood plain management for overflow areas of communities involved. The City of Huntingdon has furnished the required local cooperation assurances which were accepted as of 1 Mar. 1978. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract has been awarded. Project completion is scheduled for Fiscal Year 1981. 14. DRINKWATER SEWER, MO. Location. The Big Lake Basin is located immediately north of Charleston in Scott and Mississippi Counties, Mo., and approximately 4.5 miles west of Cairo, Ill. Existing project. Authorized under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Construction of a 150-cubic-feet-persecond pumping plant just north of the existing gravity outlet, with an 855-foot inlet channel to connect the pumping plant with the existing Big Lake Ditch, and an energy dissipator (baffled outlet) at the pumping plant outfall. This will provide relief during the Mississippi River flood stages, for 8.5 square miles of agricultural land from a watershed totaling 27.6 square miles. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete. 15. NORTH SECOND STREET, MEMPHIS, TENN. (WOLF RIVER BRIDGE) Location. The project site is on the left bank of the Wolf River approximately one mile above its confluence with the Mississippi River, at the North Second Street Bridge in Shelby County, Memphis, Tenn. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This project provides protection for the North Second Street Bridge from streambank caving. The improvements consist of grading and placing riprap on the eroding river bank, approximately 250 feet downstream and 800 feet upstream from the bridge. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. Virtually complete, pending approval and acceptance of construction by the city. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $28,722 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1980, was $552,147. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 13-D. 18. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization (detailed project) studies was $60,348 and total construction cost was $577,500. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost was $96,552 for disaster preparedness. Expended $2,145 initial Rehabilitation Report for Mississippi River, Big Island Levee Association, Commerce, Mo. A total of $644 was expended for damage survey work in the State of Missouri at the request of FEMA, under authority of PL93-288. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS See Table 13-E 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA See Table 13-E. 13-6 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 1. Helena Harbor, Ark. 2. Hickman Harbor, Ky. 3. New Madrid Harbor, Mo. 4. Osceola Harbor Ark. 5. White River, Ark. (below Newport) 6. Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. 9. Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) 10. Treasure Island, Mo. 11. West Hickman area, Hickman, Ky. 12. Long Lake area, Helena, Ark. 13. Huntingdon, Tenn. 14. Drinkwater Sewer, Mo. 15. North Second Street, Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 13,000 90,134 -5,100 197 -21,500 2,028 141,200 126,208 347,900 534,258 325,000 447,369 20,000 -39,000 23,550 19,000 59,212 10,000 20,521 75,000 56,177 850,000 104,582 $ -. 107,300 111,095 91,300 105,984 -4,700 2,161 256,900 290,211 255,900 527,664 245,600 254,658 5,900 3,381 Q Q(0 303,000 164,409 407,000 261,392 445 1,182,000 728,340 1,330,000 882,348 527,000 520,408 3,550 (J,,J,JU- 1,617 7,901 55,700 20,000 9,447 62,545 47,000 1,872 4,455 25,000 370,000 41,914 104,863 - 1,022,000 357,204 905,296 - 31,0001 - 19,1805 - $ 90,847 90,847 66,400 1,366,400 199,782 1,360,062 - 149,827 - 149,827 200,900 1,244,748 347,859 1,244,534 - 196,373 - 196,373 1,000 366,500 451 365,932 - 269,115 - 269,115 274,900 1,875,000 570,780 1,715,539 - 169,9941 - 169,9942 917,000 8,478,403 674,208 7,782,688 - 586,500 - 586,500 213,000 4,931,488 59,473 4,766,787 -5,000 1,820,871 5,516 1,820,869 - 861,529:1 43 861,5283 42,000 1,656,6921 24,410 1,632,9551 -39,000 62,000 3,629 61,281 1,395,000 1,865,000 1,651,613 1,855,350 35,000 1,907,000 535 1,367,617 219,000 250,000 220,105 239,285 1. Excludes $25,000 expenditures for early construction; includes $20,245 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 107 Project. 2. Excludes $17,500 contributed funds expended. 3. Includes $9,829 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 205 Project. 4. Includes $40,992 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 205 Project. 5. Inadvertently omitted in FY 1979. 13-7 _ __ __ ___ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 14, 1960, Sas amended Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended June. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jul. 24, 1946, as amended HELENA HARBOR, ARK. (See Sec. 1 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water between miles 659 and 663 AHP. HICKMAN HARBOR, KY. (See Sec. 2 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide at mile 922 AHP along former city waterfront 1.1 miles, with upper 600 feet forming turning basin 500 feet wide. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO. (See Sec. 3 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 150 feet wide at mile 889 AHP, along city waterfront 9,400 feet with a turning basin 250 feet wide. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARK. (See Sec. 4 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide, 6,500 feet upstream along the old bendway channel. WHITE RIVER, ARK. (below Newport) (See Sec. 5 of Text) Open channel work, mouth to Batesville. Channel enlargement, mile 10 to Augusta. WOLF RIVER (Memphis Harbor), TENN. (See Sec. 6 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide to mile 1.75; 200 feet wide to mile 3.5; thence 125 feet wide to mile 5.5. Flood control work in lieu of navigation improvements above mile 3. DYERSBURG, TENN. (SOUTHWEST) (See Sec. 9 of Text) Levee and pumping station. Approved Sep. 20, 1962.1 Approved Jul. 12, 1962.1 Approved Feb. 21, 1968.1 Approved Sep. 30, 1971.1 Annual Report, 1893, page 2112. Approved Mar. 11, 1968.' H. Docs. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess., and 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Approved Jun. 27, 1972.23 TREASURE ISLAND, MO. (See Sec. 10 of Text) Installation of a 150-cfs pumping plant. Approved Feb. 21, 1973.2 WEST HICKMAN AREA, HICKMAN, KY. (See Sec. 11 of Text) Installation of flap gate on existing culvert; 190-cfs Approved Nov. 9, 1973.2 pumping station; and minor channel work. LONG LAKE AREA, HELENA, ARK. (See Sec. 12 of Text) Approximately 5 miles of channel improvement on Long Approved Dec. 16, 1975.2 Lake Bayou. HUNTINGDON, TENN. (See Sec. 13 of Text) Channel improvement within the city of Huntingdon. Approved Aug. 11, 1976.2 DRINKWATER SEWER, MO. (See Sec. 14 of Text) Pumping station. Approved Jan. 5, 1977.2 NO. SECOND ST, MEMPHIS, TENN. (WOLF RIVER BRIDGE). (See Sec. 15 of Text) tabilization-Stream bank caving. Approved Jul. 23, 19794 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3. Contains latest published map. 4. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. 13-8 MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Forked Deer River, Tenn., including South Fork'*2 1912 $ 25,000 $ 12,818 Obion River, Tenn.1'.3 1911 28,716- Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers 4.5 k11948 - 318,833 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, Ark.' ,2 1942 92,000 300,449 1. No commerce. 4. Completed. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi 69th Cong., 1st sess. River and tributaries." TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Big Creek Canal, Millington, Tenn. 1977 $ 70,363 $ Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, Ark.' 1937- Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, Ark.' 1937 - Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, Ill.2,3 1964 147,000 Dyersburg, Tenn.2, 1962 229,6494 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, Tenn.3 1960 11,141,199 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, Ill.5 1955 1,132,704 Nixon Creek, Tenn. 2.3 1952 62,821 1. Inactive, awaiting local cooperation. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Completed. 4. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 5. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 13-9 TABLE 13-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number Federal Cost FY 80 SURVEYS (100) Navigation (110) St. Francis River Navigation, Ark. -10036 $ 47,505 White River Navigation to Batesville, Ark. -60740 26,275 73,780 Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Memphis Metropolitan Area, Ark., Tenn., & Miss. -12135 181,290 255,070 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Water Quality Management (184) -51860 .. Tech. & Engr. Assist. Shore & Streambank Erosion (188) -51731 7,777 7,777 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 183,338 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 1,250 Research and Development (300) Flood Plain Mgt. (355) Wolf River Basin, Tenn. -83240 10,704 203,069 Gross Total $458,139 13-10 1980 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT* This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Illinois Waterway, Ill. (St. Louis Dist) .................. 2. Kaskaskia River, Ill ............ 3. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, Minn. (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes L&D 26 Replacement) .................... 4. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Mo. and Ill. ............................. . 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... Flood control 6. Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, Ill. ................ 7. East St. Louis and vicinity, Ill. ... 8. Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill ............... 9. Harrisonville Drainage and Levee District, Ill ...................... 10. Hartwell Drainage and Levee D istrict, Ill ...................... 11. Hillview Drainage and Levee D istrict, Ill ...................... 12. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill ............... 13. Kaskaskia River, Ill ............ 13A. Carlyle Lake, Ill. ................ 13B. Lake Shelbyville, Ill ............ Page 14-2 14-2 14-2 14-2 14-3 14-3 14-4 14-4 14-5 14-5 14-6 14-6 14-6 14-7 14-7 Flood Control (cont.) 13C. Village of New Athens, Ill ....... 14. Meramec River Basin, Mo ....... 14A. Meramec Park Lake, Mo ........ 14B. Pine Ford Lake, Mo ............ 15. McGee Creek Drainage and Levee D istrict, Ill ...................... 16. Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee Districts, Ill ................................ 17. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill . .............................. 18. Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, M o ...................... 19. Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo. ...................... ........ 20. Nutwood Drainage and Levee D istrict, Ill ...................... 21. Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Mo .... 22. Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, Ill.............................. 23. Upper Mississippi River Basin (St. Louis Dist.) ...................... 24. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 25. Other authorized flood control projects .......................... 26. Flood control work under special authorization .................... 14-1 Page 14-7 14-8 14-8 14-8 14-9 14-9 14-9 14-10 14-10 14-11 14-11 14-12 14-12 14-12 14-12 14-13 *AIll costs and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referred in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 27. Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Salt River, Mo ........ 14-13 28. 29. General Investigations Surveys ........ ................... 14-13 Collection and study of basic data ........ ....................... 14-13 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind., under Chicago District. 2. KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. Location. The river rises in Champaign County, Ill., about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in east-central part of State. It flows southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, Ill., or about 118 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1896, page 171. Existing project. Improvement for navigation provides a channel 9 feet deep and 225 feet wide from mouth to Fayetteville, Ill. Improvement consists of enlarging present channel where required, making overbank cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, and construction of a dam at mile 0.8 with a single lock 84 feet wide and 600 feet long, at an estimated total Federal project cost (1980) of $154,100,000. Non-Federal cost is $7,665,000, of which $1,500,000 is local contribution. Local cooperation. State of Illinois passed legislation authorizing Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings to enter into assurances of local cooperation with the United States. These assurances have been furnished and were accepted Nov. 23, 1965. The State is continuing with land acquisition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work was continued on railroad relocation. Engineering and design was continued on remaining construction items. Maintenance. Hired labor performed operation and maintenance of the project. Condition as of Sep 30. Project is about 75 percent complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. (ST. LOUIS DIST.)(INCLUDES L&D REPLACEMENT) See section of this annual report entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn." 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO. AND ILL. Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, Minn., and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts. Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Minneapolis, Minn. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (1980) of $164,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of 14-2 __ ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixedcrest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $228,073,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, Ill., was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3d sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works:Contract work was continued on stone dike and revetment construction as was engineering and design and supervision and administration. Maintenance. Work consisted of 900 feet of dike and 30,924 feet of revetment repair. U. S. plant and hired labor performed channel dredging at 39 locations, removing 6,116,000 cubic yards of material from main channel. Channels dredged had a combined length of 18 miles, an average width of 290 feet, and an average gain in depth of 6.0 feet. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 69 percent complete. Work required to complete the project includes construction of 126,010 linear feet of dikes; 129,160 linear feet of revetment; removal of 100,000 cubic yards of rock; and removal of 100,000 cubic yards by dredging. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. Navigation season formerly extended from mid-February to mid- December, the river is generally closed by ice the remainder of year. However, in recent years increased demands of commerce and use of steelhull boats have combined to extend navigation season throughout the year except when blocked by heavy ice or gorges. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. Mean stage of river, St. Louis gage, was 13.68 feet for Fiscal Year 1979 and 8.61 feet for Fiscal Year 1980. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 14-C. Flood Control 6. COLUMBIA DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 3, ILL. Location. In Monroe County, Ill., on left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 156 and 166 above mouth of the Ohio River. (See St. Louis, Mo., map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 653 of Annual Report for 1959. Existing project. Project area contains about 13,600 acres protected from major floods of the Mississippi River, Columbia Creek, and Fountain Creek by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 20 feet on the St. Louis, Mo., gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation which falls on the area, runoff from adjacent hill land, and Mississippi River seepage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 543, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for construction of two pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Estimated cost (1980) is $2,826,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project, including pumping plants, after completion; prevent encroachment onimproved channels and ponding areas and, if ponding area and capacities are impaired, provide substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity promptly without cost to the United States and comply with applicable provisions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. The proposed sponsors, the Commissioners of the Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, have furnished assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning is complete. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Project constructed under authority of Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. Construction is complete on the 30 cubic feet and the 200 cubic feet per second 14-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 pumping stations. These modifications were authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. 7. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILL. Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottomlands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Minneapolis, Minn.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Estimated cost (1980) of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $59,600,000 (1980), $27,030,000 for Cahokia Creek Dam, and $32,570,000 for Interior Flood Control. Non-Federal cost is $18,230,000. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with the requirements of local cooperation for work under the 1936 authorization. For work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965, local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; make relocation of and modifications to highway bridges, streets, roads, sewers, and utilities; maintain and operate all the works after completion including removal of silt and debris from impoundment areas and channels in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent encroachment on improved channels, ponding areas, and detention areas including the reservoir, and if encroachment occurs or capacities are impaired, provide substitute storage or equivalent pumping capacity promptly without cost to the United States; and at least annually notify interests affected that the project provides partial protection from the larger floods. The State of Illinois has agreed to sponsor the interior drainage project but has indicated no interest in sponsoring the Cahokia Creek Dam. In addition to requirements listed above, the sponsor would have to comply with the applicable provisions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. In addition it has been determined that a cash contribution for channel improvements equal to 50 percent of channel construction costs will be required by the local sponsor for the Blue Waters Ditch portion of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning was continued on project modifications authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Condition as of Sep 30. Work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. Construction has not begun on work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 8. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE, AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Greene County, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 23.8 and 32.3 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, Ill.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 15.9 miles of levees, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of two highway closure structures and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,470 acres of land, 9,735 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $10,600,000. Non- Federal cost is $1,190,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and ponding and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT the United States free from damages due to the construction works; bear the expense of relocating and altering highways, highway bridges (except underpinning), utilities, buildings, interior drainage facilites, pipeline, and other structures, except railroad bridges and approaches; prescribe and enforce regulations satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army to prevent encroachment on the improved channels and ponding areas; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and comply with the applicable portions of Public Law 91- 611 and Public Law 91-646. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 9. HARRISONVILLE LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The district is in Monroe County, Ill., on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 141 and 156 above the mouth of Ohio River. (See St. Louis, Mo., map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 676 of Annual Report for 1957. Existing project. Project area contains about 27,800 acres protected from floods of the Mississippi River and Fountain Creek by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 15 feet on the St. Louis, Mo., gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation which falls on the area, runoff from adjacent hill land, and Mississippi River seepage. The Flood Control Act of 1962 provides for construction of two pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $5,829,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project, including pumping plants, after completion; prevent encroachment on improved channel and ponding areas and, if ponding areas and capacity are impaired, provide substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity promptly without cost to the United States and comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. The sponsors have furnished assurances of necessary operation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning is complete. Condition as of Sep 30. Project constructed under authority of Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. On modifications authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962, construction is complete on the 40 cubic feet and the 600 cubic feet per second pumping stations. Minor items of work are required to complete the project. 10. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Greene County on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 38.2 and 43.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, Ill.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 12.3 miles of new or enlarged levees, altering discharge line of pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 9,630 acres of land, 8,955 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $9,780,000. Non-Federal cost is $926,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and ponding and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear the expense of relocating and altering highways, bridges (except underpinning), utilities, buildings, interior drainage facilities, pipeline, and other structures, except railroad bridges and approaches; prescribe and enforce regulations satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army to prevent encroachment on the improved channels and ponding areas; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and comply with the applicable portions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 14-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 11. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Greene and Scott Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 43.2 and 50.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, Ill.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 14.3 miles of levee, alteration of discharge lines for three existing pumping stations, construction of a railroad closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to the Village of Hillview and to 13,070 acres of agricultural land against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $9,830,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,004,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and ponding and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; bear the expense of relocating and altering highways, highway bridges (except underpinning), utilities, buildings, interior drainage facilities, pipeline, and other structures, except railroad bridges and approaches; prescribe and enforce regulations satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army to prevent encroachment on the improved channels and ponding areas; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and comply with the applicable portions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 12. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. In Randolph County, Ill., on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, Ky., Ill., Mo., Ind., map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, Ill., gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $12,800,000. Non- Federal cost is $1,860,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project after completion and comply with provisions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Local interests have certified that assurances of local cooperation will be executed at the appropriate time and have reaffirmed their willingness to comply with the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and work is proceeding on plans and specifications. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 13. KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. Location. The river rises in Champaign County, Ill., about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in eastcentral part of the State. It flows generally southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into the Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, Ill., or 118 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Nashville and Cincinnati sheets of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000; also Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act provides for construction of a dam at Carlyle. The 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of a dam at Shelbyville; a levee project at Vandalia, presently inactive; a levee project at Dively; and a local protection project at New Athens. Under the plan, Carlyle Lake and Lake Shelbyville would be operated as a multiplepurpose project for local and Missisippi River flood control, domestic and industrial water supply, releases in the interest of navigation on the Mississippi River, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation items with 711 funds. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction continued on Carlyle Lake and Lake Shelbyville. Maintenance. Continued on Carlyle and Shelbyville. 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT Condition as of Sep. 30. See individual reports for Carlyle Lake, Lake Shelbyville, and Village of New Athens. Due to lack of local interest Levee Districts Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13, 22, 27, 28, and 28A have been deauthorized under the provisions of Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251. 13A. CARLYLE LAKE, ILL. Location. Dam is on Kaskaskia River at mile 107, about 1 mile upstream from Carlyle, Ill. Reservoir extends northeastward through Clinton, Marion, Bond, and Fayette Counties, Ill., to river mile 153. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000. Also see Geological Survey quadrangle maps, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project consists of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete spillway section. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 38- by 39- foot tainter gates. Dam crest is 67 feet above streambed and 6,570 feet long. Because of topography near dam, it was necessary to construct two earth-fill saddle dams east of Carlyle, in order to contain maximum pool level proposed for reservoir. A loop levee was constructed for protection of Keyesport, Ill. Relocation or alterations were required to Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy Railroad, highways, pipelines, oil field facilities, water supply facilities, power and telephone lines, and cemeteries. Maximum reservoir area is 57,500 acres and maximum storage capacity is 983,000 acre-feet; permanent pool area is 26,000 acres. Estimated total Federal project cost (1979) is $42,819,400 of which $8,842,500 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution toward cost of project is $3,638,900 for water supply. Estimated Federal cost for Code 711 recreation facilities is $854,000. Local cooperation. In accordance with provisions of authorizing act, cost of storage to be allocated to water supply in Carlyle Lake and annual cost of operation and maintainance of such storage would be reimbursed by the users. State of Illinois executed a contract with the United States providing for payment of 7.85 percent of cost of project and 8.62 percent of actual Federal costs for operation and maintenance. Precentages set forth were determined by separable cost-remaining benefits methods. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. All major items of work are essentially complete. Construction was continued on recreation facilities. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Carlyle Lake. Condition as of Sep 30. To date, 37,470 acres of land have been acquired in fee, and an additional 25,339 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. 13B. LAKE SHELBYVILLE, ILL. Location. Dam is on the Kaskaskia River at mile 221.8, about one-half mile upstream ,from Shelbyville, Ill. Lake will extend northeastward through Shelby, Moultrie, and Coles Counties, Ill., to approximate river mile 275. (See Decatur sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project consists of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete spillway section. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by three 45- by 37-foot tainter gates. Dam crest is 108 feet above streambed and 3,000 feet long. Relocations or alterations were required to railroads, highways, cemeteries, and miscellaneous utilities. Maximum storage capacity is 684,000 acre-feet. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $44,000,000, of which $12,115,000 is for lands and damages. Local contribution toward cost of project is $17,054,900, of which $4,300,000 is for water supply. Estimated Federal cost for Code 711 recreation facilities is $5,050,000, and non-Federal cost is $3,389,000. Local cooperation. Local interests have contributed toward cost of this project 7.06 percent of total cost for water-supply benefits provided, 6.86 percent of total cost for land enhancement, and 9.65 percent of total cost plus 5.75 percent of total cost of Carlyle Lake for recreation and fish and wildlife benefits. Operations and results during fiscal year. All major items of work are complete. Construction was continued on recreation facilities. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Lake Shelbyville. Condition as of Sep 30. Project is essentially complete. Lands acquired to date are 34,339 acres in fee and 6,144 acres in easements. 13C. VILLAGE OF NEW ATHENS, ILL. Location. New Athens is in St. Clair County, Ill., on Kaskaskia River at mile 4.1 (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 6,875 feet of earth levee, a pumping station, 14-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 drainage structures, and sewer alterations. Estimated total Federal project cost (1979) is $2,230,000. Non-Federal cost is $134,000. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Costs incurred were for planning and design of closing levee at existing State Highway. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for closing of levee at State Highway crossing that will be abandoned in the near future. 14. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO. Location. The basin lies within the State of Missouri and comprises 3,980 square miles. The river is a west bank tributary of the Mississippi River at mile 161 above mouth of Ohio River. Major streams in the basin include the Meremec, Big, and Bourbeuse Rivers. The basin extends about 100 miles southwesterly from St. Louis into the Ozark Highlands. (See St. Louis, Mo., and Rolla sheets of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The project provides for the construction of Meramec Park and Union Lakes, authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act; and Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 Lake projects, and 19 angler-use sites, authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. Under the plan, Irondale and 1-38 Lakes will reduce flood damages in the upper Big and Bourbeuse Rivers. Meramec Park, Union, and Pine Ford Lakes will substantially reduce flooding in the lower basin area and will lower flood crests on the Mississippi River. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife conservation. (See Table 14-D for additional data on this comprehensive project.) 14A. MERAMEC PARK LAKE, MO. Location. Dam will be at mile 108.7 on Meramec River in Franklin County near Sullivan, Mo. Reservoir will be mainly in Crawford, Franklin, and Washington counties, Mo. (See St. Louis, Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project as authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act provides for construction of an earth dam about 167 feet high with a crest length of 3,000 feet. Reservoir will provide 1 million acre-feet of storage and provide flood protection for 11,862 acres of flood plain in the Meramec River valley above the mouth of Bourbeuse River, and partial protection for 20,209 acres of land below the Bourbeuse. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, storage, and recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Estimated total project cost (1980) is $205,000,000, including $20,971,500 local reimbursement for water supply. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. State of Missouri, acting through its State Water Resources Board and under authority of the General Assembly of State of Missouri, executed assurances for water supply on Aug 23, 1967. The assurances were reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General, State of Missouri, and it is his opinion that the State of Missouri has the legal authority and financial capability to execute said assurances. These assurances have been approved by the Chief of Engineers. A water-supply contract will be entered into with the sponsor before any use of the water-supply storage provided under this contract. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is complete on an administration visitor center building, overlook area, sewage treatment system, and access road. Construction was completed on Phase I Spillway. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of existing facilities. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction and planning have ceased due to lack of funding. To date 25,944 acres have been acquired in fee and an additional 2,119 acres in easements. 14B. PINE FORD LAKE, MO. Location. Dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake will extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1980) is $122,000,000, of which $6,783,200 and $19,080,800 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocated to water supply in accordance with the 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT Water Supply Act of 1958. The State of Missouri demonstrated sufficient interest and approval of the basin plan to warrant the assumption at this time that necessary local cooperation will be forthcoming. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not started. 15. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Brown and Pike Counties, Ill., on the right bank of Illinois River between miles 67.2 and 75.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Kansas City sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Project provides for reconstruction of 14.7 miles of levee, construction of a new pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to about 12,080 acres of agricultural land against a flood of about 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $18,300,000. Non-Federal cost is $860,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and ponding and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; bear the expense of relocating and altering highways, highway bridges (except underpinning), utilities, buildings, interior drainage facilities, pipelines, and other structures, except railroad bridges and approaches; prescribe and enforce regulations satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army to prevent encroachment on the improved channels and ponding areas; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Local interests have executed assurances in compliance with Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed on the upper flank levee. A contract was awarded for the lower flank levee. Planning continued on other project features. 16. MEREDOSIA, ILLINOIS, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK, AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Morgan and Scott Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 67.0 and 72.2 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, Ill.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 11.0 miles of new or enlarged levee, a pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 8,215 acres of land, 7,640 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 575 acres of noncrop and farmsteads against a flood of 50- year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $9,240,000. Non-Federal cost is $891,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and ponding and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; bear the expense of relocating and altering highways, highway bridges (except underpinning), utilities, buildings, interior drainage facilities, pipeline, and other structures, except railroad bridges and approaches; prescribe and enforce regulations satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army to prevent encroachment on the improved channels and ponding areas; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and comply with the applicable portions of Public Law 91- 611 and Public Law 91-646. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 17: MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The project is in Cass and Morgan Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 72.2 and 79.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Qunicy, Ill.-Mo. sheet of maps of the 14-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 United States, published by Army Maps Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 15.9 miles of new or enlarged levee, closure structure, drainage facilities, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 7,510 acres of land, 6,980 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 530 acres of non-crop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $7,860,000. Non-Federal cost is $460,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act(H. Doc. 472,87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and ponding and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; bear the expense of relocating and altering highways, highway bridges (except underpinning), utilities, buildings, interior drainage facilities, pipeline, and other structures, except railroad bridges and approaches; prescribe and enforce regulations satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army to prevent encroachment on the improved channels and ponding areas; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and comply with the applicable portions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep 30. Construction has not begun. 18. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO. Location. Area 8 is in Lincoln and Pike Counties, Mo., on west bank of Mississippi River between river miles 249 and 261 above the Ohio River. Small community of Elsberry lies within the area. (See Quincy sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The 1966 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 510. 89th Cong., 2d sess.) authorized the raising and enlarging of existing levees to provide 24.4 miles of riverfront, flank, and back levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of drainage structure, highway and railroad closure structures, and alterations to existing pumping plants. The project has been reduced in scope to consist of replacing one existing drainage structure, replacing an obsolete stream driven pump unit with a new one of 150 cubic feet per second capacity, and rehabilitation of the pump station. Project will afford protection to the area against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $2,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $20,000. Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; accomplish, without expense to the United States, alterations and relocations to all utilities, roads, highways, and interior ditching as required; and prohibit encroachment on improved channels or on ponding areas; and that if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity will be provided promptly, without cost to the United States. In addition, local interest must comply with the applicable provisions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. The Elsberry Drainage District has indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation for Area 8, upon request. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Condition as of Sep 30. Local interests have been reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483, for cost they incurred for pumping plant improvement. A contract has been awarded for the gravity drain structures. 19. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT ST. LOUIS, MO. Location. Protective works are on right bank of Mississippi River from Maline Creek to Carr Street, between miles 187.2 and 180.2; and from Poplar Street to Chippewa Street, between miles 179.2 and 176.3. Area protected includes lowlying lands along riverfront of St. Louis between river and higher ground. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Minneapolis, Minn.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 21,200 feet of earth levee, 34,400 feet of reinforced concrete floodwall, closure structures, underseepage relief measures, 28 pumping stations, and alterations to 44 sewer 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT systems. Project provides protection to heavily industrialized area along riverfront from Maline Creek to Carr Street and from Poplar Street to Chippewa Street against a flood of about 200-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $77,665,000. Non-Federal cost is $7,740,000 which includes $1,840,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Formal assurances as required by authorizing act were received from city of St. Louis. The assurances are applicable to Reaches 3 and 4 of project and supplemented by assurances of Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Assurances by Sewer District are applicable to maintenance and operation of sewerage, drainage, and pumping facilities constructed as part of project, and to local cooperation requirement that new drainage and sewage facilities constructed within limits of protected flood plains will function at all river stages up to design flood, without cost to the United States. Included in local cooperation requirements is a required contribution equal to 3.6 percent of first cost of construction of Reach 3. Assurances were accepted by the District Engineer, Oct. 22, 1958. City furnished rights-ofway required for all work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is complete on floodwalls and pumping plants. Minor alterations were made to pumping plants. Conditiona s of Sep. SO3C0on.s truction of Reach 3 was initiated in March 1959 and Reach 4 in August 1963. Project is complete. 20. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. Location. The levee district is in Greene and Jersey Counties, Ill., on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, Ill.-Mo., sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 mile of new levee, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,635 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $7,700,000. Non-Federal cost is $728,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and ponding and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear the expense of relocating and altering highways, highway bridges (except underpinning), utilities, buildings, interior drainage facilities, pipeline, and other structures, except railroad bridges and approaches; prescribe and enforce regulations satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army to prevent encroachment on the improved channels and ponding areas; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and comply with the applicable portions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not begun. 21. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO. Location. Districts are in Perry County, Mo., and Randolph County, Ill., on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 95 and 111 above the. mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, Ky., Ill., Mo., Ind., map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 475 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project area contains about 26,881 acres protected from floods of the Mississippi River by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 13 feet on the Chester, Ill., gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation or seepage, or a combination thereof. Authorized project provides for construction of four pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $8,040,000. Non- Federal cost is $52,000. Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project, including pumping stations, after 14-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; clean silt and debris from the ditches to provide an unrestricted flow to the pumping stations; prevent obstruction or encroachment of the channels; comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646; at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide absolute protection against flood damage. Assurances were furnished by local interests (presently, Bois Brule Levee District, Mo.), on Nov. 16, 1978, and were accepted Nov. 27, 1978, by the District Engineer under delegated authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded for Cinque Hommes and Jones Cutoff pumping stations. Planning continued on other project features. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated. 22. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, ILL. Location. The lake is in Franklin and Jefferson Counties in southern Illinois. The dam is on Big Muddy River, 103.7 miles upstream from its confluence with the Mississippi River, and about 3 miles northwest of Benton, Ill. (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth dam, ungated concrete spillway, relocation of roads and utilities, recreational facilities, access roads, and service facilities. In addition, two subimpoundment dams were constructed on upper arms of reservoir to enhance fish and wildlife value of project. Reservoir has an area of 24,800 acres, and a storage capacity of 294,000 acre-feet. Project provides flood control, water supply, low-flow regulations, conservation of fish and wildlife, recreation, and area redevelopment. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $43,490,800, of which $12,197,700 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution for water supply is $9,941,300. Estimated Federal cost for code 711 recreation facilities is $1,170,000. Non- Federal cost is $55,000. Local cooperation. Agreement was reached among State of Illinois, Rend Lake Conservancy District, and the Corps that: (1) State of Illinois and Rend Lake Conservancy District jointly and severally sponsor this project, (2) State of Illinois enters into a contract with the Corps to pay $10,000,000 for water supply features of the project, and (3) State of Illinois and Rend Lake Conservancy District enter into contract by which the Conservancy District will be granted authority to distribute water from the water suipply storage in this project. Legislation to implement the above agreements was passed by the Illinois General Assembly and approved by the Governor. Assurances of local cooperation and water supply contract have been executed and approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction continued on recreation facilities. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Rend Lake Reservoir. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is essentially complete. Lands acquired to date are 39,857 acres in fee and 906 acres in easements. 23. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN (ST. LOUIS DIST.) Location. Area is in the Mississippi River Basin above Ohio River, exclusive of Missouri River Basin, St. Louis District. (See Geological Survey state maps for Illinois and Missouri and quadrangle maps; also, St. Louis, Quincy, Rolla, and Paducah sheets of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Upper Mississippi River Basin described in Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess., with such modifications thereof as in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers may be advisable. Individual projects in St. Louis District considered in comprehensive plan are listed in Table 14-E. Operations and results during fiscal year. See individual reports for details of projects. Conditions as of Sep 30. Total cost for St. Louis District projects under this authorization is $22,142,802. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $339,060 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of end of fiscal period is $3,419,362. 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 14-F. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Cost for the fiscal year for Grand Tower, Ill., was $88, total to date, $50,760; for Ash and Loop Creek, Ill., $23, total to date $16,400. Arnold, Mo., St. Peters, Mo., and Valley Park, Mo., each had initial cost of $5,000. Rock Creek Quarry, Mo., had initial cost of $4,851. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Work was completed on bank protection at Meadows School (formerly Blackjack Creek), Mo.; cost for fiscal year was $64; total cost is $222,000. Emergency flood control activities-repairf,l ood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $115,590 for disaster preparedness, $25,574 for emergency operations, $771,547 for rehabilitation, and $138,254 for advance measures. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 27. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO. Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, Mo., or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000 and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acre-feet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project document plan provides for installation of two 27,000 kilowatt units, one conventional and one reversible, to be used for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1980) is $251,600,000 of which $20,702,000 is for lands and damages, and $10,600,000 is for water supply. Local cooperation. In accordance with provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, the cost of storage allocated to water supply would be reimbursed by the local sponsor. State of Missouri, acting through its State Water Resources Board and under authority of the General Assembly of State of Missouri by legislation passed in 1965, will sponsor this project. This legislation provides that the Water Resources Board is authorized to make reasonable assurances and enter into contracts with appropriate Federal departments for purposes of discharging non-Federal responsibilities relating to municipal and industrial water supply storage as permitted by applicable Federal legislation on water resources projects. Assurances were executed by State Board on Apr. 8, 1965. Assurances were reviewed by Office of the Attorney General, State of Missouri, and it is his opinion that the State of Missouri has the legal authority and financial capability to execute said assurances. These assurances have been approved by Chief of Engineers. A water supply contract will be entered into with the sponsor before any use of the water supply storage is provided under this project. No local contribution for recreation, including recreation aspects of fish and wildlife, is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contracts for the generators, main dam and spillway, power plant, state highway relocations, reservoir clearing, visitor center, and nine access areas are under way. Contracts for the powerhouse equipment have been awarded and virtually all powerhouse equipment is in storage at the project site. The Phase I main dam and abutment exploration, the Norfolk and Western Railroad relocation, the Ray Behrens access area, the Indian Creek access area, the reregulation dam, the administration building, and overlook area contracts are complete. Planning on additional project features is continuing. Condition as of Sep 30. Project is 87 percent complete. Lands acquired to date are 54,660 acres in fee and 9,921 acres in easements. General Investigations 28. SURVEYS See Table 14-G. 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA See Table 14-G. 14-13 TABLE 14-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY, 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 2. Kaskaskia River Ill. (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 6. Columbia Drainage & Levee District No. 3, Ill. 7. East St. Louis and Vicinity, Ill. 8. Eldred & Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. 9. Harrisonville Levee & Drainage District, Ill. 10. Hartwell Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 11. Hillview Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 12. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 13A. Carlyle Lake, Ill. (Regular Funds) Code 711 Funds (Contrib. Funds) 13B. Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (Regular Funds) Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Total Cost to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 $ 5,355,000 3,810,337 630,000 640,994 0 68,463 4,685,600 4,379,848 13,067,700 12,947,165 900,000 885,438 0 591,509 115,000 88,865 2,729,000 2,660,527 00 00 240,000 195,406 99,400 159,142 2,005,000 1,972,429 354,698 103,196 0 11,321 0 90 75,600 118,716 $ 2,800,000 3,872,754 890,000 883,878 00 3,000,000 2,381,784 9,807,000 9,626,398 1,200,000 634,279 1,200,000 848,613 135,000 119,452 0 151,454 75,000 51,229 00 223,000 92,499 0 12,286 2,182,000 2,215,623 74,000 351,982 144,207 134,384 233,509 233,266 0 313,291 $ 7,600,000 8,289,750 975,400 941,353 0 12,535 2,940,000 3,640,376 7,221,300 5,381,847 -195,000 411,830 520,000 892,564 120,000 132,191 0 .48,983 67,000 76,528 60,000 32,709 130,000 257,533 0 450 3,993,600 3,052,099 25,000 67,134 0 12,036 0 243 0 10,239 $ 5,000,000 5,009,434 779,400 710,908 00 3,450,000 3,838,008 9,017,900 9,675,719 -45,000 70,079 580,000 699,638 105,000 100,453 0 28,073 230,000 156,347 190,000 193,215 400,000 366,150 00 2,403,800 3,150,180 0 24,582 00 00 0 8,414 $116,756,0001 116,729,998' 5,141,400 5,015,450 1,244,078 1,076,160 156,644,6002 156,453,3082 159,256,4773 157,760,5521 2,826,0001 2,797,307 29,622,3885 29,523,7396 475,000 440,961 5,829,0007 5,801,6717 372,000 284,104 250,000 225,924 1,355,000 1,229,219 42,819,400 42,819,400 21,313,200 21,096,136 813,535 813,535 3,638,868 3,638,868 1,092,913 1,092,913 44,000,000 43,999,689 Approp. 2,039,000 2,842,840 3,377,400 2,656,800 18,621,040 Cost 1,933,202 2,698,334 3,132,474 2,715,339 18,138,771 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 13B. Code 711 Funds Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (Contrib. Funds) 13C. Village of New Athens, Ill. 14A. Meramec Park Lake, Mo. 14B. Pine Ford Lake, Mo. 15. McGee Creek Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 16. Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek and Coon Run Drainage & Levee Districts, Ill. 17. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 18. Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, Ill. 19. Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo. (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Nutwood Drainage & Levee District, Ill. 21. Perry County Drainage & Levee District Nos 1, 2, & 3, Mo. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 200,500 328,638 0 115,881 0 2,213 4,765,000 4,797,073 303,600 301,855 575,001 635,044 00 00 00 0 6,743 120,000 291,085 $ 734,000 $ 245,000 220,655 645,997 16 )8 220, 33 457,79 197,13 190,28 0 -89,819 0 8,704 14 0 18 6,847 0 50,000 0 11,122 0 93,743 $ 0 96,718 0 12,902 0 0 0 5,607 0 63,716 324,000 123,000 185,000 287,105 147,429 178,516 865,000 600,000 550,000 807,473 662,744 447,699 0 500,000 975,000 0 496,207 746,149 0 40,000 150,000 0 22,456 124,026 0 50,000 170,000 0 32,508 122,351 0 424,000 106,000 1,468 413,636 95,295 0 -10,020 0 110,000 0 97,251 500,000 100,000 143,786 327,129 0 59,072 0 594 85,000 86,592 841,000 613,596 0 4,835 0 7,038 180,000 159,354 1,347,000 1,551,162 $ 1,584,600 1,563,446 17,054,898 17,052,527 689,053 689,053 1,978,000 1,944,729 30,568,0008 30,412,9088 935,600 914,905 3,120,001 3,006,512 1,822,400 1,589,755 190,000 146,481 220,000 154,859 1,205,000 1,183,932 77,665,000 77,665,000 1,600,1669 1,600,1669 375,000 343,198 3,218,00010 3,058,29110 14-15 TABLE 14-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 22. Rend Lake, Big New Work Muddy, Ill. Approp. $ 20,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 43,700,90011 (Regular Funds) Cost 24,025 2,592 -179,896 -18,714 43,490,76811 Maint. Approp. 1,510,300 2,184,000 1,959,200 1,861,000 11,755,800 Cost 1,505,098 2,164,830 1,672,800 1,904,092 11,472,572 Code 711 Funds New Work Approp. 39,500 191,000 366,000 318,000 1,060,900 Cost 127,050 153,907 292,546 412,636 1,044,525 (Contrib Funds) New Work Contrib. 0 6,928 0 0 9,941,27812 Cost 265,296 38,365 5,998 2 9,941,27812 Maint. Contrib. 131,325 361,475 350,000 400,000 2,181,955 Cost 153,101 362,930 351,410 385,879 2,165,159 27. Clarence Cannon New Work Dam and Reservoir, Approp. 40,564,000 36,090,000 18,450,000 23,123,000 219,037,02813 Salt River, Mo. Cost 26,851,438 36,864,666 30,932,991 23,758,152 218,307,64313 Maint. Approp. 138,800 560,160 655,000 1,228,500 2,582,460 Cost 133,661 533,028 633,023 1,032,809 2,332,521 1. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 2. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416.620. 3. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 4. Excludes $2,828,200 for previous project. 5. Includes $7,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 6. Includes $6,973,677 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 7. Excludes $4,375,400 for previous project. 8. Includes $200,000 for definite project under 1938 Flood Control Act. 9. Excludes $240,000 Contributed Funds Other and $240,000 actual cost. 10. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. 11. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Admininstration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. 12. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. 13. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-16 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910, Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19543 Jul. 3, 19584 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. (See Section 2 of Text) Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, Ill. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 4 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, Ill. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. COLUMBIA DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 3, ILL.(See Section 6 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILL. (See Section 7 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. IIARRISONVILLE LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 9 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE I)ISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 10 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE I)ISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 11 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. 14-17 S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. H. Doc. 50, 61st Cong., 1st sess., and H. Doc. 168, 58th Cong., 2d sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 7, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 543, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc. 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 542, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 14-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 12 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Aug. 9, 1955 Oct. 23, 1962 Adopted by Senate and House Committe resolutions, Oct. 12, 19725 Raise and enlarge existing levee. KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. (See Section 13 of Text) Deletes Carlyle Reservoir and levees from New Athens to Carlyle from Upper Mississippi River Basin Plan and reauthorizes them as a part of the Kaskaskia River Plan. Construct dam at Shelbyville and six levee projects between Cowden and Vandalia and a local protection project at New Athens. Deleted requirement that local interests make a cash contribution to cost of levees between Cowden and Vandalia. Requires that local interests make a cash contribution equal to full cost of acquisition of flowage easements in those lands acquired by the United States which, upon completion of the levee in District No. 22, will not be required for construction, operation, and maintenance of Carlyle Lake. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO. (See Section 14 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 15 of Text) Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA, ILL., AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, ILL. (See Section 16 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 17 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO. (See Section 18 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and alter pumping plant to reduce flooding. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AT ST. LOUIS, MO. (See Section 19 of Text) Construct floodwall and appurtenant structures to afford protection to city of St. Louis. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (See Section 20 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO. (See Section 21 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 232, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 351, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 510, 89th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 360, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. 14-18 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, ILL. (See Section 22 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Construct dam at Benton, Ill., and subimpound- H. Doc. 541, 87th Cong., ment dams on upper arms of reservoir. 2d sess. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN (See Section 23 of Text) Jun. 28, 1938 Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO. (See Section 27 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Modified act of 28 Jun. 1938 by deleting the reser- H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., voir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate 2d sess. multiple-purpose project. Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to Public Law 89-298, present designation. 89th Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 4. All work completed. 2. Contains latest published map. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of the Flood Con- 3. Inactive. trol Act of 1965. TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Cuivre River, Mo.1 1883 $ 12,000 $ Moccasin Springs, Mo. 1969 76,4362 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, Ill.s 1961 2,653,194 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 2. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 3. Completed. 14-19 TABLE 14-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 LAKES, LEVEES, AND RECREATION FACILITIES Estimated See Required Total Estimated Section Estimated Non-Federal Cost (Date to in Text Project Name Federal Cost Cost Revision) 13. Kaskaskia River, Ill. Lakes: Carlyle' $ 42,819,400 $ 3,638,900 $ 46,458,300 (1979) Shelbyville' 44,000,000 17,054,900 61,054,900 (1980) Levees: Village of New Athens' 2,230,000 134,000 2,354,000 (1979) District No. 21 13,600,000 2,420,000 16,020,000 (1977) (Vandalia District)2 District No. 23 1,720,000 100,000 1,820,000 (1976) (Dively District)3 District Nos 22, 27, 3,620,000 450,000 4,070,000 (1963) 28, and 28A (Cowden to Vandalia)2,4 District No. 3, 4, 8, 7,590,000 853,000 8,443,000 (1959) 10, and 13 (Carlyle to New Athens)2. 4 14. Meramec River Basin, Mo. Lakes: Meramec Park' 184,028,500 20,971,5005 205,000,000(1980) Union' 83,643,4006 9,656,6005 93,300,000(1980) Pine Ford' 96,136,000 25,864,0005 122,000,000(1980) Irondale' 48,659,940 8,040,0601 56,700,000(1980) I-387 23,236,900 1,963,1006 25,200,000(1980) Recreation facilities: Angler-use sites7 1,830,000 1,830,000 3,660,000(1980) 1. Separate reports are included herein. 6. Includes $2,714,400 for Highway 185 relocation and 2. Inactive. $141,200 for Code 760 land acquisition funds. 3. See 1976 Annual Report for details. 7. See 1967 Annual Report for details. 4. Deauthorized, Sec. 12, PL93-251. 5. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government over a period not to exceed 50 years. TABLE 14-E LEVEES For Last Full Report Total Cost to Date See Annual Report Under This Projects' for Authorization Mississippi River: Wood River Levee Project, Ill.2 1968 $14,629,821 Stringtown Fort/Chartres and Ivy Landing, Ill. 1957 2,123,700 Kaskaskia Island Levee Project, Ill. 1949 297,460 Grand Tower Levee Project, Ill. 1959 4,677,900 Miller Pond Levee Project, Ill. 1955 164,183 Illinois River: Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Levee, Ill. 1944 249,738 Total $22,142,802 1. All work under 1938 basin plan authorization completed or superseded by 1962 or 1965 Flood Control Act. 2. Excludes $23,000 local contribution. 14-20 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 14-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, Mo. Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, Ill.1 Cache River Diversion, Ill. Cape Girardeau, Mo., reaches Nos. 1, 3, and 42 Cape Girardeau, Mo., No. 23 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, Ill. 3 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. 4 Degonia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, Ill.3 Dively Drainage & Levee District, Ill. East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, Ill.4 Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, Mo. (see Flood Control Act of 1944)5 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)5 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, Ill., bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 3 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, Ill. Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, Ill. Indian Creek area, Illinois River, Ill.' Keach Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, Ill.' Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, Mo. Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, Mo. Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, Ill., underseepage measures North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, Ill. Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, Ill. Preston Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Richland Creek, Ill. Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, Ill.' Union Lake, Mo.7 Urban areas at Alton, Ill. Valley City Drainage & Levee District, Ill.3,8 Vandalia Drainage and Levee District, No. 21,111 .2 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Ill.2 1. Projects authorized or modified by Flood Control Act of Oct. 23, 1962 (see H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for details). 2. Inactive project. 3. Completed. 4. Completed except for seepage control measures, which are inactive. 5. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. 6. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. 7. Includes $183,638 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. Includes Highway 185 funds. 8. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). 9. Includes $14,629,821 for previous project. 14-21 1967 1953 1959 1965 1955 1964 1959 1976 1963 1950 1953 1952 1946 1970 1971 1967 1967 1957 1970 1959 1959 1969 1979 1960 1967 1978 1978 $ 2,837,114 22,000 5,157,805 185,700 4,984,500 5,889,500 1,720,000 1,920,600 50,000 1,033,279 50,000 25,000 1,154,800 85,422 939,569 6,005,1276 3,882,600 1,866,910 401,000 4,917,359 192,000 $ 91,952 496,000 14,879,8229 . TABLE 14-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number Federal Cost FY 80 SURVEYS (100) Navigation(110) St. Louis Harbor, Mo. & Ill.-58330 Miss. R. Mooring Facilities - 81181 Sub-Total Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Cape Girardeau-Jackson Metropolitan Area, Mo.-12053 Degognia & Fountain Bluff D&LD & Grand Tower D&LD, 11.-52140 East Cape Girardeau, Clear Creek, etc. (Big Five)-35035 Plattin Creek, Mo.-12137 12 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, Mo. & Ill.-55040. Ste. Genevieve, Mo.-80061 Richland Creek, Ill.-12174 Sub-total Special Studies(140) Great River Resource Mgmt Study-14028 Carlyle Lake - Shelbyville Lake, Ill.-12160 Sub-total Review of Authorized Projects(160) Review of Deauthorization - 77000 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service(181)-51840 Water Quality Management(184)-51860 Upper Miss. R. Basin Comm.(183)-50616 Planning Assistance to States(186) - 51850 Sub-total Collection and Study of Basic Data(200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams(236)-53843 and -53842 Flood Plain Management Services(250) Flood Plain Management Services Hydrologic Studies(260) Hydrologic Studies - 53820 Transportation Systems(290) Transportation Systems(290)-53 8 4 1 Total 1. St. Louis Metropolitan "Overview Report" was forwarded to Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors on Mar. 3, 1978, to 0MB Apr. 8,80, to Sec'y of Army May 29,80, to Congress Jun. 9, 80. 2. St. Louis Metropolitan Maline Creek interim report to LMVD Sep. 29, 80. 14-22 $ 125,148 59,834 184,982 274,979 138,684 172,543 127,335 542,177 3,847 120,467 1,380,032 535,254 48,011 583,265 1,091 1,887 52,247 5,844 29,961 89,939 2,287,950 176,084 803 3,039 $ 4,707,185 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT* Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short steams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into Gulf of Mexico, including entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Tex. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Tex. and La., downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Tex.; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Tex.; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin, Tex.; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) ......... 2. Brazos Island Harbor, Tex........ 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, Tex ...... 4. Clear Creek and Clear Lake, Tex... 5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex... 6. Double Bayou, Tex.............. 7. Freeport Harbor, Tex.......... 8. Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex. 9. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and the Mexican Border ............ 10. Houston Ship Channel, Tex ....... 11. Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex...... 12. Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Tex. . . 13. Sabine-Neches Waterway, Tex.. . . . 14. Texas City Channel, Tex........ 15. Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex.. 15A. Anahuac Channel, Tex........... 15B. Channel to Liberty, Tex......... 15C. Wallisville Lake, Tex............ 16. Other Authorized Naviation Projects Page 15- 2 15- 2 15- 2 15- 3 15- 3 15- 4 15- 4 15- 5 15- 6 15- 7 15- 8 15- 8 15- 9 15- 9 15-10 15-10 15-10 15-11 15-11 Beach Erosion Control 17. Corpus Christi Beach, Tex. (Restoration Project) ........... 18. Shoreline Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization .... o... .. .... .............. Flood Control 19. Baytown,Tex.................. 20. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex.. 21. Clear Creek, Tex .............. 22. Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection ...... 23. Highland Bayou, Tex............ 24. Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection ...... 25. Taylors Bayou, Tex.............. 26. Texas City and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection ...... 27. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. 28. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works................. 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................... 30. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................. General Investigations 31. Surveys ......... . ......... 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data. Page 15-12 15-12 15-12 15-12 15-13 15-13 15-14 15-14 15-14 15-15 15-15 15-15 15-15 15-16 15-16 15-16 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 15-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas and the Sabine River Watershed of Louisiana. Previous project.For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects paragraph for completed project authorized by 1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts.) (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $2,019,000 and non-Federal $693,000. Local Cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, applies. Non-Federal work contribution estimated at $693,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $106,097 and $7,575. Reimbursement to State for Government's share of cost of $29,509 for eradication was made. In addition, the State performed $16,036 of earadication for which credit as work-in-kind was given. Condition at end offiscal year. Aquatic plant control work continued in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River and Rio Grande Basins. Planning, to include hydrilla control in the existing program, is underway. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TEX. Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1969). Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $281,961 and $36,981. Dredging of Brownsville Channel cost $634,421. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $10,309 and (-) $92,027 (adjustment of prior year hopper dredging cost). Condition and operation studies and real estate activities cost $81,399. Cost for repairs to North Jetty was $2,108,135. Cost for project condition surveys and reconnaissance report was $8,716. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was placed in the inactive category in 1980. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980.) 3. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TEX. Location. Port Bolivar is at end of Bolivar Peninsula and 4 miles north of city of Galveston. Channel connects the port with channel in Galveston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey chart 11324.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Appendix to Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for channel are shown in Table 15-F. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation). Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Enlargement of turning basin from 1,000 to 1,600 feet is inactive. A channel 14 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and approximately 950 15-2 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT feet long is maintained across the east end of the turning basin to accommodate the Galveston-Port Bolivar ferry. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals are privately owned and consist of 2 slips and 2 piers. The piers, 400 feet wide by 1,200 feet long and 210 feet wide by 1,200 feet long, are badly deteriorated and not in use. The slips are used as anchorage by shallowdraft vessels. A highway ferry landing owned by State of Texas is located at south end of turning basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $413 and $342, respectively. Project condition surveys cost $3. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for inactive portion. Project dimensions have not been maintained in the completed part since lesser dimensions are adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980.) 4. CLEAR CREEK AND CLEAR LAKE, TEX. Location. Clear Creek has its source about 13 miles south of Houston, Tex., and flows southeast for about 25 miles, emptying into west side of upper Galveston Bay at a point 24 miles northwest of Galveston, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Existing project. (See Table 15-F for existing project dimensions provided for in this waterway.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.8 foot and extreme range is 1.4 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of small privately owned wharves, several ship repair yards and marinas which accommodate light commercial vessels and pleasure yachts. These are along lake shore and at towns of Seabrook and Kemah at mouth of creek. A commercial shell loading dock is located near League City at the head of the project, and NASA-Manned Spacecraft Center has a barge dock along lake shore near their property. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $379 and $1,979, respectively. Condition and operation studies, project condition surveys, and reconnaissance report cost $13,300. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed June 1950. 5. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Tex., was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Tex., and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Tex. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay and Aransas Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous Project.Ford etails see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 15-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below 15-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $88,124,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects; and non- Federal $19,790,068 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $8,410,840 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $620,228 lands, $8,774,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Sec. 101 of 1968 River and Harbor Act and Sec. 124 of Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Non-Federal contributions estimated at $8,410,840. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1968, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year.New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration for the 45-foot project cost $246,624 and $22,923, respectively. Real estate administrative costs were $2,202. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $63,411 and $195,854, respectively. Conditions and operation studies and real estate activities cost $110,651. Miscellaneous maintenance cost was $10,930. Construction of levees for Tule Lake Disposal Area cost $1,438,838. Mobilization and pipelines for dredging Main Turning Basin to Viola Turning Basin cost $492,560. Mobilization for dredging Jewel Fulton Canal cost $100,000. Mobilization for dredging La Quinta Channel cost $25,000. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end offiscal year. The project is about 60 percent complete exclusive of inactive portions. The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was initiated in 1963 and completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was initiated in 1962 and completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. The work remaining consists of deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Beacon 82 through Viola Turning Basin; widening of channels and basins; and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to Beacon 82 at 45-foot depth has been completed. Construction of initial mooring dolphins was completed in May 1979. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980). 6. DOUBLE BAYOU, TEX. Location. Existing project dimensions for waterway are shown in Table 15-F. (Also see Table 15-B authorizing legislation.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.5 feet and extreme range is about 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on winds, and during strong north winds in the winter season, water surface may be depressed 1.5 feet below mean low tide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are privately owned. At the mouth of the bayou is a timber wharf for loading oil barges. Between miles 1 and 1.5 above the mouth are timber wharf, a boat slip, and a marine railway owned by the Brown and Root Corporation. At mile 3 above the mouth is a small depot for handling oystershell. The facility consists of a timber bulkhead and hoppers for loading trucks. One half mile above the mouth are several fishing vessel docks. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design supervision and administration cost $15,169 and $2,683, respectively. Condition and operation studies and a reconnaissance report cost $8,858. Condition at end offiscal year. The 6-foot project was completed in 1941. The 7-foot project was completed in 1971. 7. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEX. Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Tex., from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322. Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 15-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. (See also Table 15-B authorizing legislation.) Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, includ- 15-4 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT ing the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $65,727,000 Federal (Corps); and $8,944,000 non-Federal, including $1,039,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $5,037,448 lands, $2,090,000 levees and spillways, and $417,000 relocations. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970. River and Harbor Act of 1970 requires local interests provide necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for public use facilities; and when the appraised value of land,'easements, and rights-of-way amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of the development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non- Federal share to at least that level. The cash contribution is presently estimated at $281,000 which combined with land, estimated $544,000 is 50 percent of the cost of public use facilities. Cash contribution at time of authorization estimated at $95,000 in addition to providing land estimated at $70,000. Total contribution estimated at $1,399,552. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting allweather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1969, for additional facilities.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued on the 45-foot project at a cost of $39,710. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $25,324 and $354,030. Condition and operation studies, real estate activities, and inspections and reports cost $53,506. Miscellaneous maintenance by hired labor totaled $1,471. (See table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is 6 percent complete. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin. Preconstruction planning on this remaining work is complete except for archeological investigations which are underway. The 38-36 foot project was initiated in 1961 and completed in 1962. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980.) 8. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TEX. Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Tex., which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Tex.; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front of Galveston, Tex., and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean tidal range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet'under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None 'on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1969). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three 15-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $47,884 and $97,522. Condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, and real estate activities, cost $114,225. Miscellaneous maintenance totaled $47,593. (See Table 15-H. for dredging operations.) Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36' depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1, 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980.) 9. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (GALVESTON DIST.) Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Tex., to Brownsville, Tex., about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Tex., to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5. miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Tex.; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Tex.; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Tex., to town of Aransas Pass, Tex.; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Tex., into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Tex.; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Tex., about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Tex., about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Tex., and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Tex., and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322,11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Tex.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, Railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and the 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide channel from mile 8.2 to mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou are inactive. (See Table 15-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels; also Table 15-B on authorizing legislation.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $73,359,053, Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non-Federal $16,255,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 15-6 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $2,392,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $5,647,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and $3,124,000 other costs Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for inactive portions, and provisions of section 101, 1962 River Harbor Act; section 301, 1965 River and Harbor Act; and section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Tex., $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Tex., $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Tex., and $2,392,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Tex. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1969), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1969), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1968) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1969), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle has recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $38,281 and $85,621, respectively, on Chocolate Bayou. Dredging of Chocolate Bayou channel cost $1,348,000. Construction of a salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou channel cost $281,940. Planning continued on Mouth of Colorado River at a cost of $405,905. Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates and the Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $290,059 and $314,700, respectively. Engineering and design for the above structures cost $53,042 and $15,095. In addition, supervision and administration for the above structures cost $146,941 and $59,245. Condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, real estate activities, water control management and project condition surveys on the Main Channel and Tributaries cost $430,159. Engineering and design and supervision and administration for the Main Channel and Tributaries cost $377,345 and $642,844. Repairs by hired labor to levee slopes and drainage structures along Channel to Victoria totaled $13,813. Cost for dredging contracts physically completed in Fiscal Year 1979 financially completed in Fiscal Year 1980 was $83,091. Rehabilitation of tide gage cost $33,277. Construction of levees cost $111,603. Adjustment of prior year cost for repairing damages at the Colorado River Locks resulted in a decrease of cost of $13,200. Rehabilitation of sector gates at Brazos River Floodgates cost $701,778. Electrical repairs at Colorado River Locks cost $32,770. Sanitary facilities at the Brazos River Floodgates and Colorado River Locks cost $17,110 and $7,490. Parking facilities at Brazos River Floodgates cost $27,724. Mobilization for dredging Freeport Harbor to Cedar Lakes was $200,000. Claims receivable from barge owners for damages to Brazos River Floodgates were $134,287 and Colorado River Locks were $9,314. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is about 75 percent complete, exclusive of inactive portions. Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972. Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 footeby 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dreging Chocolate Bayou Channel was initiated in December 1979 and construction of a salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou was initiated in March 1980. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been placed in the inactive category. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River; dredging a navigation channel from gulf to the GIWW; and constructing a turning basin at Matagorda, Tex. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980.) 10. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Tex., extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 7 miles long from turning basin to Main Street, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for construction of certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, for construction of an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, for the construction of 26,000 lineal feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay (which was deauthorized by Sec. 12 15-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 of P.L. 93-251), for construction of such off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers, and for dimensions in various channels and basins of the Waterways. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet, and 1 foot respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for Flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions of Greens Bayou. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (dated 1959) Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year.Maintenance: Engineering and design (including model studies) and supervision and administration cost $144,524 and $165,208. Condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, cost $81,819. Miscellaneous maintenance by hired labor was $357. Mobilization for dredging Morgan Point to Carpenter Bayou cost $200,000. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is complete, exclusive of inactive portion of Greens Bayou. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou was completed October 1970. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30,1980.) 11. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cayallo to Port Lavaca, Tex., and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24- foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 nonfederal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests have contributed $12,259,619. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Tex. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Co. of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $16,983 and $140,425. Condition and operation studies cost $72,565. Miscellaneous maintenance totaled $231. Adjustment of prior year cost for dredging Entrance Channel resulted in a decrease of $9,555. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at the end offiscal year. The project is complete. The 36-foot project was initiated in 1962 and completed in March 1967. 12. NECHES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SALT WATER BARRIER AT BEAUMONT, TEXAS Location. The project would be located on Neches River at Beaumont, Texas, in Jefferson and Orange Counties on the upper coast of Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11343.) Existing project. The project will provide a gated salt water barrier in the Neches River at Beaumont consisting of seven 40 x 24.5 foot tainter gates; a gated navigation by-pass channel with a clear opening of 56 feet and a depth of 16 feet; an access road and levee; and an auxiliary dam across a canal which drains an adjacent bayou. Estimated cost for new work is: $20,300,000 Federal (Corps) and non- Federal $2,100,000, consisting of $2,010,000 cash and $90,000 for lands. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) 15-8 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Sec. 102, 1976 Water Resources Development Act applies. Local cash contribution estimated at $2,010,000 Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $442,090 Condition at end of Fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 13. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TEX. Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "'Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Tex." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical distrubances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1969), Corps of Engineers. There are 3 wharves and piers in addition to the facilities included in the referenced Port Series. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $34,089 and (-) $16,149 (adjustment of prior year hopper dredging cost). Condition and operation studies, water control management, and real estate activities cost $69,831. Miscellaneous maintenance totaled $6,123. Construction of levees for dredging Upper Reach, Neches River Channel cost $450,000. Removal of damaged dredging range tower cost $24,250. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end offiscal year Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 28, 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 9, 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed on April 10, 1972. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980.) 14. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEX. Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel, and a rubblemound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is Federal (Corps) $15,001,000, excluding expenditures on previous projects, and non-Federal $1,793,700, including $127,741 contributed funds $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $984,000 levees and spillways and $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Snake Island. Local cooperation.Fully complied with, except for Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 and H. D. 92-199. Non-Federal contributions $375,741. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft canal and turning basin extending about 1.9 miles southwestward from 15-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1969), Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $67,595 and $14,799, respectively. Contract for dredging Texas City Industrial Canal and turning basin, and construction of levees cost $310,000. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $6,387 and $6,089. Condition and operation studies cost $3,931. Cost for contract physically completed in Fiscal Year 1979 and financially completed in Fiscal Year 1980 were $20,463. Mobilization and construction of levees for dredging Texas City Industrial Canal and Turning Basin cost $300,000. Condition at end offiscal year. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin from 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening to 40 feet of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980.) 15. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TEX. Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5 The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Not Applicable. Condition at end of fiscal year. The restudy of the navigation benefits is complete. (See Table 15- E for total cost of existing project to 30 September, 1980.) 15A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TEX. Location. Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Tex., opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6-by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $10,100 and $14,500. Condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, cost $14,700. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in 1911. 15.B CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TEX. Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas., as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as 15-10 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-of-way and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Tex., are adequate for existing commerce. . Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and Design and Supervision and administration cost $10,149 and $15,222. Condition and operation studies, water control management, inspections and reports, and project condition surveys cost $14,781. Condition at end offiscal year. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. 15C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Tex. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 39,200-foot dam to store water to elevation 4 feet above mean sea level, with an 84- by 600-foot navigation lock in a cutoff channel; and extension of authorized channel to Liberty from its present terminus at channel mile 23.2 to Texas Gulf Sulphur channel at channel mile 33.6. Dam is composed of a nonoverflow section 16,820 feet long with a crest elevation varying from 13.0 to 10.0 feet above mean sea level, and an overflow section 22,400 feet long. All but 1,500 feet of overflow section has a crest elevation of 5.5 feet above mean sea level. The two remaining portions of overflow section have crest elevations of 4.0 feet above mean sea level. Both the overflow and nonoverflow sections basically are earthen levees with full or partially riprapped side slopes and paved roadways on their crest. Lock is at channel mile 28.3, has a sill depth of minus 16.17 feet below mean sea level, a normal lift of 4 feet and is founded in piles of clay. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 58,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of project is $28,800,000 Federal (Corps) and $18,000 non-Federal for lands for construction of portion of channel to Liberty. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest contribution is estimated at $4,956,000. For improvement of the navigation channel, exclusive of reservoir features, local interest must provide lands, disposal areas, and adequate terminal and transfer facilities, make necessary relocations of utilities crossing natural river channel and give assurances that they will hold and save the United States free from claims for damages, including but not limited to damages due to salt water instrusions, that may result from construction and operation of the navigation improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $111,846 and $20,206. Deficiency judgment cost was $138,963. Administration cost for Federal purchase of land totaled $2,700. Hired labor activities performed on the locks cost $3,120. Construction of a fence across the entrance road cost $7,462. Condition at end offiscal year. The project is 75 percent complete. A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started July 8, 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work on this contract was suspended on February 26, 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed on April 15, 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed on 26 April 1973. On 26 August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgement and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. The draft Post Authorization Change report and Environmental Impact Statement have been coordinated with other agencies and reviewed by the public. Comments resulting from the review process are now being addressed in the final document. When the new statement has been filed with the EPA it will be submitted to the District Court. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 15-C. 15-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Beach Erosion 17. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TEX. (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Estimated cost of new work is: Federal (Corps) $1,556,000 and non-Federal $1,670,975, ($1,556,000 contributed funds, $42,545 relocations, and $72,430 lands). (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for periodic nourishment. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Monitoring of beach erosion cost $9,296. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was completed in March 1978; however, erosion and/or littoral movement of the beach will be monitored during the ten years following completion to determine periodic nourishment requirements. 18. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration pursuant to Section 54, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress. Cost for littoral environmental observations (LEO), quarterly beach profiles, monthly monitoring visits, and periodic visits after storm events was $19,179 for the two existing sites selected for monitoring. The sites were Shoreacres and Beach City, both located in the Galveston Bay complex. Flood Control 19. BAYTOWN, TEXAS Location. Burnett, Crystal and Scott Bays are inland bays located in the delta area of the San Jacinto River and border on the west side of Baytown, Texas. The area is about twenty miles east of Houston, Texas. Existing project. Provides for evacuation of all residents from projected 50-year flood plain, assistance in their relocation at project expense, removal of vacated structures from the flood plain, and deeding the land to local sponsor for management as nature areas or for uses consistent with the flood damage prevention objectives of the project. Estimated cost for the new work is: $34,330,000 Federal (Corps) (full funding) and $8,582,000 non- Federal. (full funding) (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Sec. 191, 1976 Water Resources Development Act applies. Non-Federal cash contribution estimated at $8,582,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning was completed at a fiscal year cost of $2,973. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete, except for submission of plans and specifications for demolition and removal of structures. As local sponsor was unable to provide local cooperation, the project was placed in the inactive catagory in fiscal year 1980. 20. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TEX. Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Tex. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin (Houston) of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Estimated cost for new work is. Federal (Corps) $121,500,000, including $9,200,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code-713) funds, and non-Federal $83,143,000, consisting of $73,943,000 for lands and relocations, and $9,200,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (See Table 15-I on Buffalo Bayou and tributaries.) (Also Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required utility relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Co. for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterments. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal 15-12 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost sharing contract covering the work proposed is presently being negotiated. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Buffalo Bayou: Engineering and Design and Supervision and Administration cost $156,903 and $20,903 Maintenance: Cost at Addicks and Barker Dams for locks, dams and reservoirs, service facilities, natural resource management, and updating master plan totaled $87,317 and $79,537. Cost for Condition and Operation Studies, Water Control Management and inspections and reports was $86,320 and $67,144. Miscellaneous repairs and work by hired labor totaled $912 for Addicks Dam and $982 for Barker Dam. Engineering and design cost was $7,464 for Addicks Dam and $21,215 for Barker Dam. Supervision and administration and real estate activities at Addicks Dam cost $21,476 and for Barker Dam $19,602. Cost for materials and supplies for fencing contracts on Barker Dam was $91,979. Rehabilitation: Work accomplished on Addicks and Barker Dams cost $851,115 Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is about 56 percent complete. Construction of Barker Dam was completed in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was completed in fiscal year 1963. Channel rectification on Brays Bayou was completed in fiscal year 1969. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in fiscal year 1976. A study to consider alternative flood control measures for Buffalo Bayou is in progress. Negotiations are in progress with the City of Houston for construction of the recreation facilities. 21. CLEAR CREEK, TEX. Location. Lies about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south. The stream forms the boundary between Harris and Brazoria Counties, and between Harris and Galveston Counties. It empties into Clear Lake and then flows into the west side of Galveston Bay. The watershed, with an area of about 250 square miles, is about 45 miles long and varies in width from about 2.0 miles at its upper end to a maximum of about 13.5 miles near its midpoint, and is located in Fort Bend, Brazoria, Harris, and Galveston Counties. Existing project. Project provides for enlargement and rectification of the existing Clear Creek channel and from the upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8, a distance of 31 miles. A number of bridges, pipelines, and other structures which now obstruct flood flows will require relocation or alteration. Estimated cost of new work is: Federal (Corps) $41,800,000 and non- Federal $20,695,000, consisting of $12,940,000 lands and $7,755,000 for relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 201 of 1968 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $395,609 Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. 22. FREEPORT AND VICINITY, TEX. (HURRICANE- FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Freeport is in southern part of Brazoria County on Gulf of Mexico at mouth of Brazos River, about 43 miles southwest of Galveston, Tex. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for hurricane-flood protection for a highly industrialized area and community of about 39,000 persons. Major features of project consist of improvements to 42.8 miles of existing levees, two interior drainage pumping plants and 2.1 miles of new levee. Estimated cost for new work is: $29,230,000 Federal (Corps) and non-Federal $12,527,000 consisting of $8,675,000 cash, $1,127,000 lands, and $2,725,000 relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Sec. 203, 1962 Flood Control Act applies. Bond issues have been passed to finance local interests share of the project. Local interests have acquired all land required. Non-Federal contribution estimated at $12,527,000 is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $106,733 and $221,124, respectively. Construction continued on Old River and Freeport Harbor Levee (Sta 132 + 00 to 139 + 00) South, (Sta 126 + 00 to 137 + 00) North and Tidal Gate at a cost of $119,910. Contract for East Bank Brazos River Levee and Dow A Waste Water Gate (Sta 125 + 00 to 133 + 89) was completed at a fiscal year cost of $144. Contract for erosion protection at the Tide Gate cost $166,846. A contract for Dow Barge Turning Basin Levee was continued at a cost of $574,660. Contract for Dow Barge Canal and Ethyl Dow Intake Structure was continued at a cost of $831,740. Contract for Highway 36 Vehicular Closure Structure, East Bank Brazos River (Sta 220+00 to 224+00) was continued at a cost of $194,210. In addition, local interests performed $390,000 of relocation work. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is approximately 99 percent complete. 15-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 23. HIGHLAND BAYOU, TEX. Location. Rises near Arcadia, in Galveston County, Tex., and flows into Jones Bay, an arm of West Bay. The watershed, with an area of about 38 square miles lies entirely within Galveston County and is about 14 miles long and varies in width from about 0.3 miles at its lower end to a maximum of about 5 miles near its midpoint. Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification of Highland Bayou Channel and construction of a diversion dam in Highland Bayou, with a diversion channel extending southerly from the diversion dam and emptying into Jones Bay, which lies on the north side of West Bay. Estimated cost of new work is: Federal (Corps) $16,200,000 and non-federal $3,630,000 consisting of $2,012,000 lands and $1,618,000 for relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $315,887 and $47,041, respectively. A contract for construction of a railroad bridge crossing Highland Bayou at Mile 7.8 was continued at a cost of $358,171. A contract for removal of plug from the Diversion Channel and construction of a dam in Highland Bayou was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $89,560. Value engineering cost was $8,931. Condition at end offiscal year. Initial construction contract was awarded in June 1974. Project is 50 percent complete. 24. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TEX. (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffing Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for: Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; construction 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $62,400,000 and non-Federal $26,743,000 consisting of $10,384,000 cash contributions, $3,437,000 for lands and $12,922,000 for relocations. Additional non-Federal cost for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments is $449,000. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 203, 1962 Flood Control Act applies. Non-Federal contributions estimated at $26,743,000 are required. An additional $449,000 was contributed for project betterments requested by local interests. Operation and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $269,657 and $227,259, respectively. Repair of slides by hired labor cost $73,213. Contract for floodwall, Gulf Dock Area (Sta 762+37 to '859+ 60) was completed at a fiscal year cost of $26,540. Supply contract for purchasing pumps for Star Lake Pumping Plant was completed at a fiscal year cost of $8,954. Star Lake Pumping Plant was continued at a cost of $264,930. Final adjustment of cost for Alligator Bayou Pumping Plant supply contract resulted in a decrease of contract cost of $1,456. Contract for construction of levees, final stage, Sabine Tank Farm and Taylors Bayou Area (Sta 936+00 to 1211+ 30) was continued at a cost of $929,803. Construction of levees, Pleasure Island Barrier was continued at a cost of $516,005. In addition, local interests performed $322,575 in relocation work and contributed $2,300 in lands. Condition at the end offiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1966. The project is approximately 90 percent complete. 25. TAYLORS BAYOU, TEX. Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement of Taylors Bayou by enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses; the construction of a diversion channel, 2.9 miles long, from Mile 2.1 on Taylors Bayou to Taylors Bayou Outfall Canal at Mile 0.9; a salt water gate across the diversion channel to prevent the intrusion of salt water into Taylors Bayou; and enlargement of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from the Outfall Canal to Port Arthur Canal, a distance of approximately 1.3 miles. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $64,600,000 and non-Federal $31,611,000 including $21,995,000 cash contribution, $5,862,000 lands, and $3,754,000 for relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Non-Federal contributions estimated at $21,995,000 are required. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning continued at a cost of $93,786. 15-14 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT Condition at end o'f fiscal year. The General Design Memorandum, which included the reevaluation of benefits, was approved October 31, 1969. Planning is in progress, 26. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TEX. (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements at Texas City and Vicinity, Texas, for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $36,800,000 and non-Federal $15,772,000 for seawall with closure structures, including $13,280,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,421,000 for lands. Additional non- Federal cost for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Station totals $248,000. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are in Sec. 203, 1958 Flood Control Act. Local interests must contribute $15,772,000 toward the project, and, at their option, an additional $248,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity. for La Marque Pumping Station. Local interests have acquired 98 percent of all lands required. Operation and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $365,216 and $214,857, respectively. A contract for a gated drainage structure on the Southwest Leg levee cost $924,904. Contract for semi-compacted berm, Southwest Leg levee completed at a fiscal year cost of $1,736. Contract for structures North of Texas City cost $385,820. Contract for construction of levee and closure structures, Southwest Leg, was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $130,000. Repairs to Texas City Pumping Plant were completed at a fiscal year cost of $7,427. Relocation work cost $11,086. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is about 75 percent complete. 27. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TEX. Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $13,600,000 and non-Federal $7,149,000, consisting of $3,318,000 for lands and $3,831,000 for relocations. (See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Sec. 203, 1962 Flood Control Act, applies. Local interests have acquired all real estate for Vince Bayou channel rectification and accomplished all required relocations. On Little Vince Bayou, local interests have acquired 80 percent of the real estate and accomplished 3 percent of the required relocations. Operations and results druing fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $171,635 and $99,696. Contract cost for channel rectification on Vince Bayou. Mile 3.8 to 7.29 was $734,310. Condition at end of fiscal year. Two railroad bridges on Vince Bayou have been relocated, work on channel rectification on Vince Bayou between Mile 1.9 and 3.8 was completed Oct. 70 and a contract for channel rectification on Vince Bayou between Mile 3.8 to 7.29 was initiated in August 1978. The entire project is about 46 percent complete. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed flood control protection projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas (September 1980); Hurricane Flood Protection at Freeport and Vicinity, Texas (January 1980); Lavaca-Navidad Rivers, Hallettsville, Texas (September 1980); Little Cypress Bayou, Orange, Texas (September 1980); Galveston Seawall at Galveston, Texas (January 1980); Channel to Victoria, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Access Road and Missouri Pacific railroad bridge (September 1980); Hurricane Flood Protection at Port Arthur and Vicinity, Texas (January 1980); and Hurricane Flood Protection at Texas City and Vicinity, Texas (January 1980) at a total cost of $25,748. , 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 5-D. 15-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation) Federal cost were $15,974 for disaster preparedness, $61,014 for emergency operations, and $10,844 for rehabilitation work in Harris County. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) A project for bank protection to protect F.M. 162 bridge on Trinity River in the vicinity of Moss Hill, Texas, was completed in June 1978 at a cost of $170,739. The project will be monitored during the next few years to determine the effectiveness of the riprap bank and pier protection. Cost incurred in fiscal year 1980 was $362. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Cost for preauthorization studies were $4,336 for reconnaissance study of flood problems at Kirbyville, Texas. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Cost of surveys during fiscal year: navigation, $446,877; flood damage prevention, $765,497; shoreline protection $326,923; coordination with other agencies - Soil Conservation Service, $3,554 and Bureau of Reclamation, $2,974; Technical and Engineering Assistance on Shore and Streambank Erosion, $690; Water Quality Management, $16,467; Coastal Zone Management, $6,676; and Preauthorization studies Phase I (Lower Rio Grande Basin), $21,069. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management and technical services were performed at a cost of $70,884 and $140,959, respectively. Cost was $3,005 for hydrologic studies. 15-16 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, Texas (Contributed Funds) 3. Qhannel to Port Bolivar, Tex. 4. Clear Creek and Clear Lake, Tex. 5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Double Bayou, Tex. 7. Freeport Harbor, Texas 8. Galveston Harbor and Channel, Texas Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost FY 77 65,000 51,679 FY 78 95,000 72,138 998,170 2,969,710 989,742 2,977,291 FY 79 86,000 59,793 504,950 445,589 4,391,000 4,382,009 13,023 3,921 28 28 68,613 68,613 1,000,000 272,671 1,475,210 1,840,400 171,486 171,486 121.000 89,881 1,322,830 1,327,287 1,900,040 1,897,086 1,403 1,403 2,270 2,270 1,220,000 1,997,302 4,109,109 4,083,358 31,270 91,599 2,967,381 2,994,993 2,950,660 2,953,533 11,974 11,974 1,380,000 1,521,314 3,316,000 7,658,074 1,957,255 8,400,775 3,359 3,359 90,000 86,437 581,000 379,065 7,346,594 7,304,738 15-17 FY 80 125,000 143,181 884,900 944,261 3,979,516 3,988,198 9,102 174,128 174,043 15,658 15,658 285,000 271,749 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 817,1001 770,4571 11,861,3792 11,861,3792 26,243,0813 26,241,9253, 4 2,170,080 2,170,080 1,819,6425 1,819,6425 133,9256 133,9256 1,033,8997 1,033,8147 66,934 66,934 553,5458 553,5458 40,580,8689 40,562,4749, o10 50,877,80011 50,197,29011,12 3,576,684 3,576,684 1,619,521 1,619,521 226,558 226,558 760,90913 760,69613 2,742,15214 2,693,10614,15 24,959,44616 24,947,43016.,17 8,935 8,935 29,096,39218 29,096,3921s. 19 52,221,87920 51,445,98620,21 7,969,329 7,969,329 26,923 26,710 85,000 39,710 4,258,500 4,451,698 4,141,100 3,407,144 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 15-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 9. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay Fla. and the Mexican Border (Galv. Dist.) 10. Houston Ship Channel, Texas (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas (Regular Funds) 12. Neches River and Tributaries, Texas Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont 13. Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Texas City Channel, Texas (Contributed Funds - Mitigation measures) 15. Trinity River and Tributaries, Texas Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 119,741 148,520 7,297,374 8,029,543 547,050 468,261 8,568,206 7,954,510 101,629 226,220 10,181,876 9,827,149 2,752,952 2,644,378 2,593,370 2,591,632 1,826,945 1,828,678 - 120,000 - 119,727 4,480,216 6,656,860 4,771,886 6,693,841 25,000 21,715 836,440 836,440 250,000 233,411 821,740 752,918 150,000 113,481 2,367,000 1,838,831 - 290,000 284,675 7,466,000 7,390,897 275,000 36,051 30,740 1,384,016 30,740 1,339,561 210,000 264,684 -12,800 55,953 630,000 390,980 17,157 17.058 15-18 FY 77 FY 78 Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 2,103,500 2,156,246 7,523,780 7,445,359 - 48,459,79422 48,432,87322.23 118,258,29124 117,474,37024, 25 434,638 434,638 835,873 835,873 35,760,38226 35,760,38226 69,562,45627 68,891,99027 2,591,93928 2,591,93928 18,058,777 18,058,777 22,305,96829 22,294,59629 12,259,61930 12,259,61930 850,000 846,491 56,136,81531 56,136,81531 86,592,70932 86,521,58832,33 2,680,94234 2,680,94234 6,168,47235 6,160,83935.36 99,000 10,000 12,242,059 37 12,241,47437 726,158 726,158 27,434,67638 27,427,48338,39 5,851,82640 5,851,04240 3,336,300 3,853,102 440,000 442,089 635,625 735,933 111,100 382,394 99,000 10,000 293,000 336,870 284,297 386,550 385,934 3,015,0 386000 3,860,0003 ,683,747 3,122,269 2,917,824 3,970,774 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT See Section in Text Project 17. Corpus Christi Beach, Texas (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 19. Baytown, Texas 20. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Texas 21. Clear Creek, Texas 22. Freeport and Vicinity, Texas Hurricane Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Highland Bayou, Texas 24. Port Arthur and Vicinity, Texas Hurricane Flood protection Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 25. Taylors Bayou, Texas 26. Texas Cit and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 27. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Texas Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Recreation Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 77 FY 78 1,285,041 -110,000 386,033 1,008,508 650,000 900,000 534,837 1,008,508 - 130,400 - 130,392 -4,670 350,000 59,157 461,071 7,000 300,000 6,284 - 1,450,400 1,272,000 1,367,726 1,366,140 - 5,300,000 - 5,018,851 165,100 284,590 160,089 309,230 3,300,000 1,460,000 3,195,271 2,756,458 600,000 421,239 652,000 317,326 2,699,000 2,895,207 650,000 823,513 -100,000 97,623 374,000 211,227 -63,499 49,000 64,403 1,000,000 1,181,217 -124,100 274,083 4,629,000 5,871,494 2,196,975 1,806,461 6,800 38,746 71,000 297,010 127,290 815,000 368,358 FY 79 4,117 23,345 4,117 115,000 112,035 315,000 294,851 1,100,000 2,225 716,000 643,150 6,300,000 6,199,598 220,000 218,254 2,525,000 2,471,688 875,000 1,040,160 525,000 224,482 4,830,000 3,991,728 1,150,000ooo 999,300 100,000 50,389 1,305,000 1,226,295 600,000 432,810 1,305,000 1,429,401 FY 80 4,648 4,648 2,973 150,000 177,806 (-)610,000 433,700 483,948 825,000 851,116 405,000 395,609 1,458,000 1,823,689 600,000 391,679 460,000 819,590 985,000 1,847,566 467,340 11,500 93,786 2,050,000 2,094,828 400,000 (-)53,782 712,000 1,005,641 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 1,555,641 1,552,109 1,573,345 1,552,110 245,400 245,400 57,006,32441 57,002,91541,42 797,000 8,509 8,679,513 . 8,626,247 12,425,000 12,069,565 1,818,204 1,806,663 29,130,042 28,991,409 9,045,000 8,607,65243 7,834,513 7,815,194 56,148,509 55,947,645 15,181,975 14,875,64044 1,453,198 1,449,528 27,547,400 27,475,329 10,285,100 9,652,34945 6,301,000 6,269,600 15-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 15-A (Footnotes) 1. Excludes $200,118 credit for contributed work. 2. Includes $675,855 for previous projects. . 3. Includes $57,734 for reconnaissance surveys. 4. In addition $16,977 expended from contributed funds. 5. Includes $123,361 for previous projects. 6. Includes $48,711 for previous projects. 7. Includes $46,101 for previous projects and $3,717 for reconnaissance surveys. 8. Includes $36,306 for reconnaissance surveys. 9. Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 10: In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 11. Includes $62,452 for previous projects. Includes $49,072 for reconnaissance surveys. 12. In addition $159,988 expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $22,931 for reconnaissance surveys. In addition $3,022 expended from contributed funds. 14. Includes $147,098 for previous projects. 15. In addition $758,303 expended from contributed funds. 16. Includes $5,181 for reconnaissance surveys. 17. In addition $229,311 expended from contributed funds. 18. Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. 19. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 20. Includes $86,126 for previous projects and $13,876 for reconnaissance surveys. 21. In addition $664,427 expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and ' Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). 23. In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); and Chocolate Bayou ($379,362). 24. Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects and $236,817 for reconnaissance surveys. 25. In addition, $23,359 expended from contributed funds. 26. Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. 27. Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects and $40,213 for reconnaissance surveys. Excludes $200,000 from contributed funds on previous projects. In addition, $165,260 expended from contributed funds. 28. Includes $1,209,179 for previous projects. 29. Includes $38,725 for reconnaissance surveys. 30. Excludes $182,800 for contributed lands. 31. Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. 32. Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects and $23,489 for reconnaissance surveys. 33. In addition, $1,121,516 expended from contributed funds. 34. Includes $577,507 for previous projects. 35. Includes $366,823 for previous projects. 36. In addition, $68,741 expended from contributed funds. 37. Includes $195,083 for previous projects and $20,398 for reconnaissance surveys. 38. Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. 39. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 40. Includes $543,662 for previous projects and $12,983 for reconnaissance surveys. 41. Federal funds of $4,400,000 repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. Cost and financial data formerly reported under advanced funds transferred to Federal funds and are included herein. 42. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou Channel and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 43. Excludes $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands and $2,690,333 for relocations. 44. Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands and $5,930,070 for relocations. 45. Excludes $1,224,219 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for work-inkind. 15-20 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2,1945 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 June 25, 1910 May 4, 1919 June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TEXAS (See Section 2 of Text) Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.27 CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR (See Section 3 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Galveston Harbor extending to a turning basin 1,000 feet square and 30 feet deep. Enlargement, extension, and protection of turning basin. CLEAR CREEK AND CLEAR LAKE, TEXAS (See Section 4 of Text) A channel 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide. Enlargement of channel to 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide. Realinement, enlargement, and extension of channel to highway bridge near League City. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TEXAS (see Section 5 of Text) Acquisition of old curved portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. 15-21 TABLE 15-B H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Dec. 16, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd sess.1 H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1122, 65th Cong., 2d sess.i H. Doc. 449, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 264, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 319, 77th Cong., 1st sess.1 Specified in act. Specified in acts. Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Feb.,27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sept. 23, 1922 July 3, 19303 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 19545 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area ut greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredged by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of La Quinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alinement from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus. Christi breakwater, to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Canal to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. 15-22 H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 35, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and 40, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 130, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2d sess. TABLE 15-B (continued) GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 3, 1899 July 14, 1960 (As amended by Oct. 25, 1965) , Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913' Aug. 8,1917 Mar. 3, 19256 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 Oct. 5, 1961 Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100 foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deepdraft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deepdraft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent Non-Federal responsibility. DOUBLE BAYOU, TEXAS (See Section 6 of Text) A channel 6-foot deep and 100-feet wide through the bar at mouth of Double Bayou. 7-foot by 125-foot channel from the 7-foot depth in Trinity Bay to the intersection of Double Bayou Channel with the channel to Liberty; and thence a 7- by 100-foot channel upstream for 2.0 miles. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS (See Section 7 of Text) Dredging and other work necessary in judgement of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation for 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge onehalf time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2d sess.' Sec. 124, P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 387, 55th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645 Specified in act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in act. Specified in act. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72d Cong., 1st sess., and 29, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 195, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 394, 87th Cong. 15-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 31, 1970 H. Doc 289, 93d Cong., 2d sess.' Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to,45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Sec. 8 of Text) Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) to 51st St. 8 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St. and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett:reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep on inner bar.'0 Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43d St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet, deep from Bolivar Roads to 43d St. Construct extension of Galveston Seawall from 61st St., southwesterly 16,300 feet along gulf shore. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 42 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty and 40 feet thence to Bolivar Roads. Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to 43d St. Aug. 5, 1886 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 19109 July 27, 1916 July 18, 1918 Sept. 22,1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 April 4, 1938 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 June 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Sen. Res.) 15-24 H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2d S sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong. 2d sess. SH. Doc 768, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3d sess. S H. Doc. 758, 65th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st S sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 400, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th S Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 463, 75th Cong. S H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 173, 81st Cong., 1st S sess. SH. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S H. Doc. 121, 92d Cong., 1st sess. S(Sec. 201, PL 89-298) TABLE 15-B (Continued) GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 193813 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 July 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 194514 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 July 12, 1952 Sept. 3, 19541 ", Sept. 3, 1954 Work Authorized GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA. AND MEXICAN BORDER (GALV. DIST.) (See Section 9 of Text)12 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4. feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Channel 9 by 100 feet Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch ipeline dredge. Such passing places widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9 foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Tex. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Tex., into Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Tex. providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Tex., with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Tex., via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12 foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Tex. 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Tex." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Tex., authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Tex., to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Documents H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S. Committee print, 75th Congress, 1st sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 383,77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 248, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st sess. (See Public Law 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 516, 81st Cong. P.L. 527, 82nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 376, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 15-25 _ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 9, 1959 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) July 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) July 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965t7 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Improve channels and basins compromising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Tex., an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri- Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Tex. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2 thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Chan. protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facil., a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Section 10 of Text) Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.1s A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. 15-26 S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645 Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3d sess. TABLE 15-B (Continued) GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 July 3, 195820 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou. 19 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.21 MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Section 11 of Text) Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 2) miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge: deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. NECIIES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SALT WATER BARRIER AT BEAUMONT, TEXAS (See Section 12 of Text) Construct gated salt water barrier in Neches River consisting of seven 40 x 24.5 foot tainter gates; gated navigation by-pass channel with clear opening of 56 feet and depth of 16 feet; access road and levee; and auxiliary dam across canal which drains adjacent bayou. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 256, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2d sess.1 Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645 R. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2d sess.1 Sec. 102, P.L. 94-587 15-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25- 1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 194623 .0 15-28 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TEXAS (See Section 13 of Text) Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine- Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3d sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 287, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3d sess. S. Doc. 14, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3d sess. S. Doc. 60, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 158, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2d sess. GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24. 19462' July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Sen. Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Dauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning asin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrace channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS" Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; provding a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 80, 83d Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 1390, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2d sess.I H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 92d Cong., 2d sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298), 15-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Sen. Res.) Oct. 22, 197615 June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 23, 1962 TRINITY RIVER AND 'TRIBUTARIESI, 'IEXAS (See Section 15 of Text) Anahuac Channel. 6-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a naviagable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River Projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TEXAS (RESTORATION PROJECT) (See Section 17 of Text) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BAYTOWN, TEXAS (See Section 19 of Text) Evacuation of all residents, assistance in their relocation, removal of vacated structures, and deeding of land to local sponsor for management as nature area. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TEXAS (See Section 20 of Text) Barker & Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo Bayou, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. CLEAR CREEK TEXAS (See Section 21 of Text) Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8. FREEPORT AND VICINITY, TEXAS (HURRICANE. FLOOD PROTECTION) (See Section 22 of Text) Improvements to 42.8 miles of existing levees, 2.1 miles of new levees and 2 interior drainage pumping plants.. 15-30 H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2d sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 191, P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 250, 83d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 495,87th Cong., 2d sess. TABLE 15-B (Continued) Acts Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized HIGHLAND BAYOU, TEXAS (See Section 23 of Text) Enlargement and rectification of Highland Bayou Channel, construction of Diversion dam, and diversion channel. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TEXAS (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) (See Section 24 of Text) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. TAYLORS BAYOU, TEXAS (See Section 25 of Text) Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TEXAS (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) (See Section 26 of Text) Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TEXAS (See Section 27 of Text) Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles for both streams. Documents H. Doc. 168, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2d sess.I H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc 347, 85th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 3. Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933 and Feb. 16, 1935. 5. West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. 7. Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.. 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6,1933. 8. Dredging 43rd to 51st Sts. was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 9. Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 10. Deepening 43rd to 57th Sts. was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 11. Previously authorized Sept. 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13. Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 14. Dredging upper 5 miles is inactive. 15. Inactive. 16. Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay are in inactive category. 17. The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou is inactive. 18. Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 19. Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 20. Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 21. The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 is inactive. 22. Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin authorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23. Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24. Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 25. Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26. The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas is inactive. 27. Jetty extension inactive. 15-31 TABLE 15-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and 1967 38,252 Harbor Acts)' Bastrop Bayou, Tex. 2.3 1931 9,920 35,371' Brazos River, Tex., Velasco to Old Washington 1924 216,9895 228,4067 Cedar Bayou, Tex. 1975 681,263 967,080' Corpus Christi, Tex., Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula' 1968 1,194,344 35,4330 Dickinson Bayou, Texas" 1954 33,942 76,185" East Bay (Hanna Reef), Tex.'" 1922 2,476 873 ' Johnson Bayou, La.6 . 14 1933 2,261 54,065'" Little Bay, Tex." 1979 - 254,474 7 Oyster Creek, Tex.6 . is 1922 6,942 7,585' Sabine River and Tribs., Tex. (Echo to Morgan Bluff)' 1971- 'Excludes $1,672 work contributions. 'Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. :Inactive. 'Includes $8,242 for reconnaissance surveys. 'Includes $123,676 for previous project. 'Completed. 7Includes $5,396 for reconnaissance surveys. 'Includes $39,087 for previous project. Excludes $25,000 expended from contributed funds. "Includes $69,784 for previous projects and $19,464 for reconnaissance surveys. '"Includes $8,966 for reconnaissance surveys. "Includes $18,632 for reconnaissance surveys. "'In inactive category for maintenance. '"Includes $26 for reconnaissance surveys. "Channel adequate for existing commerce. '"Includes $23 for reconnaissance surveys. "Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, Tex. constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 114, 81st Cong. 1st sess.) in 1955 under Department of Army permit. "Includes $1,746 for reconnaissance surveys. "No commerce reported. "Includes $29 for reconnaissance surveys. 15-32 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 15-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Colorado River. Matagorda. Texas' 1963 273,757 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas' Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project General channel project Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas' Mill Creek, Texas' Peyton Creek, Texas' San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas' Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas' 1. Inactive. 2. Completed. 15-33 1978 1961 1952 1971 1952 1975 1963 1956 505,749 256,043 21,086 98,517 24,753 66,377 135,175 130,239 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 15-E TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total 2. Brazos Island Harbor, Texas 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, Texas 5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas 7. Freeport Harbor, Texas Regular $ 8,336,964 Public works 2,848,560 Contributed 1,696,281 Total cost of project 12,881,805 Regular 85,214 Total cost of project 85,214 Regular 38,865,653 Public works 324,287 Contributed 1,620,289 Total 40,810,229 Value of useful work performed 1,716,695 Contributed land 276,720 Total cost of project 42,803,644 Regular 2,429,433 Public works 116,575 Contributed 758,303 Total 3,304,311 Value of useful work performed 360,249 Total cost of project 3,664,560 8. Galveston Harbor and Channel, Regular: Texas Channel 11,920,187 Seawall 8,754,209 Public works- Contributed 3,648,932 Total cost of project 24,323,328 9. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Regular 47,259,687 between Apalachee Bay, Fla. Public works 466,477 and the Mexican Border Contributed 823,536 (Galveston District) Total 48,549,700 Value of useful work performed 395,000 Contributed land 139,776 Total cost of project 49,084,476 10. Houston Ship Channel, Texas Regular 29,042,293 Public works 2,612,932 Contributed 1,382,760 Total cost of project 33,037,985 13. Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas Regular 49,592,331 Public works 1,363,652 Contributed 2,103,435 Total 53,059,418 Value of useful work performed 32,000 Contributed land 116,760 Total cost of project 53,208,178 14. Texas City Channel, Texas Regular 5,657,720 Public works 136,296 Contributed 78,741 Total cost of project 5,872,757 15. Trinity River and Tributaries, Regular 25,461,177 Texas Contributed 66,000 Total cost of project 25,527,177 $ 26,241,925 16,977 26,258,902 987,713 987,713 50,134,838 159,988 50,294,826 50,294,826 24,497,430 229,311 24,726,741 24,726,741 51,180,352 166,387 13,121 664,427 52,024,287 115,947,806 23,359 115,971,165 115,971,165 67,678,848 165,260 67,844,108 84,141,911 1,121,516 85,263,427 85,263,427 12,046,391 12,046,391 5,307,380 5,307,380 $ 2,170,080 $ 36,748,969 - 2,848,560 - 1,713,258 2,170,080 41,310,787 - 1,072,927 - 1,072,927 3,576,684 92,577,175 - 324,287 - 1,780,277 3,576,684 94,681,739 - 1,716,695 - 276,720 3,576,684 96,675,154 8,935 26,935,798 - 116,575 - 987,614 8,935 28,039,987 - 360,249 8,935 28,400,236 7,373,356 70,473,895 595,973 9,516,569 - 13,121 - 4,313,359 7,969,329 84,316,944 1,270,511 164,478,004 - 466,477 - 846,895 1,270,511 165,791,376 - 395,000 - 139,776 1,270,511 166,326,152 - 96,721,141 - 2,612,932 - 1,548,020 - 100,882,093 - 133,734,242 - 1,363,652 - 3,224,951 - 138,322,845 - 32,000 - 116,760 - 138,471,605 726,158 18,430,269 - 136,296 - 78,741 726,158 18,645,306 - 30,768,557 - 66,000 - 30,834,557 15-34 CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Harbor, Texas 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, Texas 4. Clear Creek and Clear Lake, Texas 5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas caJ Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel Port Bolivar Channel Turning Basin Galveston Bay to Clear Creek North Fork Channel Channel through Clear Creek and Clear Lake Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta' LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at La Quinta Channel Junction Jewell Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) 38-3366 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 30 30 77 7 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 300 200 200 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 200 7501 75 60 60 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,2005 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 30 14 77 7 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 300 200 200 200 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 200 200 75 60 60 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,0505 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 2,670 1,300 1,470 1,200 1,470 1,230 770 900 1,550 200 900 5,423 1,150 1,690 1,000 1,000 800 1,250 400 2.5 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 0.5 1.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.5 0.7 7.7 1.8 1.0 0.1 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 1.0 1.1 0.2 0.6 0.3 3.1 0.2 1.8 0.2 5.6 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.1 45 150 45 150 - 0.8 45 150 C,' H TABLE 15-F Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 6. Double Bayou, Texas 7. Freeport Harbor, Texas 8. Galveston Harbor and Channel, Texas 10. Houston Ship Channel, Texas C. SI' Double Bayou Channel: Mouth to 7-foot Contour in Trinity Bay West Fork Outer Bar Channel Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Galveston Channel: Bolivar Roads Channel To 43rd St. Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clintonisland Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin U per Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 7 7 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 36 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 125 100 400 400 7504 400 1,0004 375 1,2004 200 500 200 7504 800 800 800 2,8751 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 900-1,00012 8012 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 60 60 175 100 77 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 30 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 125 100 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 948-1,00012 965-1,07012 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 60 60 175 100 3.9 2.0 3.0 0.8 1.2 0.1 1.4 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 4.7 1.7 3.2 1.81 1.0 3.9 26.2 12.8 2.4 5.3 0.6 2.9 0.6 0.2 0.9 1.5 0.2 1.9 667 600 500 675 1,375 1,592 3,100 1,000 1,000 0 -m' 0< - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 TABLE 15-F(Cniud CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 11. Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas 13. Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas C1A Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin : Channel to Red Bluff - Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin Port Arthur West Turning Basin Channel connecting Port Arthur West Turning Basin and Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River Turning Point at Mile 19.5 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Turning Point, Mile 31.1 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 SChannel Extension, Mile 40.3 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Extension Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. Orange Turning Basin Orange Municipal Slip Old Channel Around Harbor Island Channel to Echo7 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 600 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 200-250 40 150-1,000 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 30 30 30 25 12 400 9004 400 1,0004 1,0004 1,0004 S 350 Irregular 500 350 200 200 200 Irregular 200 150-200 125 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 350-550 1,000 532 1,682 1,750 3,0 1,7 1,6 3,4 40 200-250 40 90-1,233 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 30 30 30 25 400 9004 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 Irregular 160-535 300 200 200 200 Irregular 150-200 150-200 3.2 20.9 1.1 0.2 4.1 0.1 1.9 0.3 0.3 20.2 14.7 3.4 00 41- 00- 5.6 - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 65 0.3 10 0.3 - 0.6 70 0.7 - 11.2 - 9 700 930 1,530 1,265 1,300 1,500 18.3 9 9 9 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 - 4.4 1,550 2,435 9.5 0.3 0.5 2.4 TABLE 15-F(Cniud CHANNEL DIMENSIONS TABLE 15-F (Continued) CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas (Cont'd) 14. Texas City Channel, Texas 15. Trinity River and Tributaries, Texas Adams Bayou Cow Bayou Orangefield Turning Basin Texas City Channel Turning Basin Industrial Barge Canals Channel from Texas City Turning Basin to Mile 1.7 Turning Basin Multiple Purpose Channel to Fort Worth o10 Channel to Liberty 11 Anahuac Channel 1. Average 2. Includes 100-foot channel width. 3. Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4. Diameter. 5. Includes 350-foot channel width. 6. 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 7. Inactive Category. 8. Channel dredged 34 feet deep by 250-200 feet wide by 9,908 feet long and basin '14 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide by 1,150 12 13 13 40 40 100 100 300 400 1,000-1,200 12 13 13 40 40 100 100 300 400 1,000 500 4253 40 300-400 40 1,000 12 96 200 150 100 66 100 100 feet long by local interests. 9. Included in channel length. 10. Not constructed. 11. 9-foot x 150-foot channel completed from Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, a distance of 23.2 miles. Upper end not connected to river channel to prevent salt intrusion into river. 12. Includes 300-foot channel width. 1.7 7.0 0.1 6.8 0.8 - 41.4 - 5.8 0 zo 0o - GALVESTON, TEX, DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS TABLE 15-G (See Section 9 of Text) Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth Tributary Channel (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Length Mean Width Mean Width Miles Feet Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Offats Bayou Main Channel 12 125 12 125 2.3 - West Wye 12 125 12 125 0.4 2,200 Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout 2 12 125 10 100 8.2 - West Turnout 3 12 125 10 125 0.8 - 9-Foot Channel 4 9 100 - - Turning Basin 9 600 - - San Bernard River Channel 5 9 100 9 100 26.0 - Colorado River Channel 6 9 100 9 100 15.5 - TurninBasin 9 400 9 400 0.1 500 Silting Basin 9 150 9 150 1.0 - Mouth of Colorado River7 Navigation Channel GIWW to Gulf 15-12 200-100 - . Turning basin at Matagorda 12 350 - -- Channel to Palacios 8 12 125 12 125 16.1 - Turning Basin No. 1 12 200 12 200 0.1 635 Turning Basin No. 2 12 300 12 300 0.2 1,130 Connecting Channel 12 150-480 12 130-400 0.1 - Channel to Barroom Bay 96 60 - -- Channel to Victoria4 Main Channel via east Turnout 9 100 9 100 34.8 - Turning Basin 9 600(avg) 9 500(avg) 0.1 800(avg) West Turnout Channel 9 100 9 100 0.8 - Channel to Seadrift via South 9 Turnout 9 100 100 2.0 - Turning Basin 9 250 9 200 - 230 North Turnout from 9 0.5 Channel to Victoria 9 100 100 Harbor of Refuge at 9 Seadrift Channel 9 100 - Basin 9 200 - - Channel to Rockport 9 200 9 200 2.1 - Turning Basin 9 475 9 342(avg) 0.2 1,225 Channel to Aransas Pass 14 175 14 125-175 6.1 - Turning Basin 14 300 14 300 0.4 2,212 Channe to Conn Brown Harbor 14 125 14 125 0.2 - Conn Brown Harbor 14 300 14 300 0.3 1,800 Channel to Port Mansfield 10 Entrance Channel 16 250 2613 250 0.8 - Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin 16 100 2613 100 0.4 - Hopper Dredge Turning Basin 16 300 2613 300 0.1 300 Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre 14 100 14 100 7.7 - Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout 12 100 12 100 0.6 - South Turnout 12 100 12 100 0.6 - Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels 14 100 14 100 0.3 - Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout 12 200 12 200 0.6 - South Turnout 12 200 12 200 0.6 - 15-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY (See Section 9 of Text) Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth Tributary Channel (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Length Mean Width Mean Width Miles Feet Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin 14 125 14 125 0.6 - Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin 14 200 14 200 0.3 - Main Turning Basin 14 400 14 400 0.2 1,250 Turning Basin Extension 14 1,000 14 1,000 0.1 580 Small Craft Basin 8 160 8 160 0.2 860 Shrimp Basin 12 350 12 350 0.3 1,450 Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout From Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 12511 25.812 - Turning Basin Near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 0.1 500 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 0.7 - Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 0.6 - Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 0.' - South Leg 12 125 12 125 0.2 - Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 1.4 - Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 0.3 - Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 0.2 1,308 1 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to mile 13.2 is in inactive category. 5 Authorized to mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of P.L. 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7 Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to Za3-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East Jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. 8 Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. 10 Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 11 South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to mile 31 is in inactive category. 13 Dredged 26 feet deep to accommodate U.S. Hopper Dredge A. MACKENZIE. 15-40 GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT DREDGING OPERATIONS TABLE 15-H Brazos Island Harbor, Texas (maintenance) Brownsville Channel October 1, 1979 - April 12, 1980 983,069 824,984 Entrance Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge GERIG) October 4 - December 8, 1979 834,336 1,046,682 Channel to Port Bolivar, Texas (Maintenance) Port Bolivar Turning Basin (Highway Ferry Slip) June 23 - September9, 1980 64,114 173,285 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas Bay Channel and Main Turning Basin October 1, 1979 - April 1, 1980 3,229,801 4,253,611 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge McFARLAND) September 6- 30, 1980 181,537 562,860 Outer Bar Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge LANGFITT) August 14 - September 30, 1980 924,722 1,147,060 Freeport Harbor, Texas Outer Bar and Jetty Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge GERIG) December 8, 1979 - February 2, 1980 1,101,208 997,527 Inside Channels and Basins October 16, 1979 - May 16, 1980 1,457,380 1,829,937 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge McFARLAND) August 14 - September 30, 1980 544,285 708,028 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge DAVISON) August 29 - September 30, 1980 60,475 481,875 Galveston Harbor and Channel, Texas Entrance channels May 20 - September 30, 1980 1,537,612 3,099,920 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay Fla., and Mexican Border (Galveston District) Live Oak Point to Rattlesnake Island April 18 - Septemver 30, 1980 990,000 754,000 High Island to Port Bolivar June 23 - September 9, 1980 1,397,745 1,181,219 Port Isabel to Mile 605 and tributary channels July 10 - September 30, 1980 673,000 840,120 Channel to Palacios October 4 - December 11, 1979 2,274,094 540,436 Channel to Victoria and Channel to Seadrift October 5, 1979 - January 18, 1980 1,047,931 441,097 Houston Chip Channel,Texas Sims Bayou to and including Houston Turning Basin October 1, 1979 - May 30, 1980 838,456 1,346,266 Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou April 7 - September 30, 1980 719,310 1,251,600 Redfish Reef to Morgan Point September 13 - 30, 1980 1,301,600 781,000 Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort October 1, 1979 - February 19, 1980 5,387,428 2,323,263 Entrance Channel August 28 - September 30, 1980 623,423 1,309,190 Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel and Sabine Bank Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge GERIG) October 1 -4 , 1979 58,080 48,006 Lower and Middle Reaches of Neches River Channel October 1 - November 26, 1979 567,926 119,783 Trinity River and Tributaries, Texas Anahuac Channel November 16, 1979 - January 7, 1980 339,840 306,482 TABLE 15-1 Name Addicks Dam Barker Dam Nearest City Houston, Tex. Houston, Tex. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TEX. (See Section 20 of Text) Height of Reservoir Estimated Height of Dam (feet) 49 37 Type of Structure Earthfill detention Earthfill detention Reservoir Capacity 205,500 acre-feet 207,000 acre-feet Estimated Cost $5,248,000 4,530,000 15-42 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT* District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Tex. and La., downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Tex.; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Tex.; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio-and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffins Bay and coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and east of western boundary of Starr County, Tex. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Tex.; and the portion of eastern New Mexico included in drainage basins of Brazos and Colorado Rivers. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Trinity River Project, Tex........ Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, Tex .............. 3. Aubrey Lake, Tex .............. 4. Bardwell Lake, Tex ............. 5. Belton Lake, Tex ............... 6. Benbrook Lake, Tex.............. 7. Big Sandy Lake, Tex.............. 8. Canyon Lake, Tex................. 9. Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex . ........................... 10. Duck Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. ............................ 11. Elm Fork Floodway, Tex ....... 12. Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex ..................... 13. Grapevine Lake, Tex ............ 14. Greenville, Tex ................ 15. Hords Creek Lake, Tex......... 16. Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex ............................. 17. Lakeview Lake, Tex ............. 18. Lavon Lake Tex ................ Page Flood Control (cont.) Page 16-2 19. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex. 16-9 20. Lewisville Dam, Tex. ............ 16-10 16-3 21. Millican Lake, Tex................ 16-10 16-3 22. Navarro Mills Lake, Tex ......... 16-10 16-3 23. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, Tex. 16-11 16-4 24. Proctor Lake, Tex .............. 16-11 16-4 25. San Antonio Channel Improvement, 16-4 Tex ............................ 16-11 16-5 26. San Gabriel River, Tex.......... 16-12 27. Somerville Lake, Tex............ 16-13 16-5 28. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex ...... 16-13 29. Three Rivers, Tex .............. 16-13 16-6 30. Waco Lake, Tex................ 16-14 16-6 31. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex ............................. 16-14 16-7 32. Inspection of completed flood 16-7 control projects ................... 16-14 16-7 33. Scheduling flood control reservoir 16-8 operations ......................... 16-14 34. Other authorized flood control 16-8 projects ........................ 16-15 16-8 35. Flood control work under special 16-9 authorization ................... 16-15 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 16-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 36. Belton Lake Modification, Tex ... 37. Dam "A" Lake, Tex ............ 38. Rockland Lake, Tex ............ 39. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex .............................. 40. Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex ...................... Page 16-15 16-15 16-15 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power (cont.) 41. Whitney Lake, Tex............. General Investigations 16-15 42. Surveys ........................... 43. Collection and study of basic data. 16-16 44. Research and Development ....... Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TEX. The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and a Multiple-Purpose Channel in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,003,000,000 including $63,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. MULTIPLE-PURPOSE CHANNEL: Location. The Multiple-Purpose Channel begins at the Houston ship channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to 4-1/2 miles above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston ship channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 320 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to 4-1/2 miles above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $160,000,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel- upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $194,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at river miles 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake extends into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acrefeet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $726,000,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $368,876,000 for water supply and $6,054,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $374,930,000, exclusive of interest. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION: Location. Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the city of 16-2 Page 16-16 16-16 16-16 16-16 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for enlargement and realignment of the Trinity River from the existing Dallas Floodway downstream approximately 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The enlargement and realignment of three tributary channels for a total distance of about 10.5 miles through the leveed areas. Construction of a parallel levee system through the lower areas consisting of about 10.2 miles along the left bank, 14.6 miles along the right bank of the main and diversion channels with a minimum distance of 2,000 feet between levees along the main channel. The estimated Federal cost is $54,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $47,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $101,000,000 for the improvement. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all alterations to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the project after completion, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $1,530,000 (excluding future recreation) exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TEX. Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Tex., with the dam at river mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Tex., and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Tex. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps, Aquilla and Peoria, Tex., quadrangle scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam 104.5 feet high and 11,800 feet long with an uncontrolled concrete spillway 1,200 feet long on the left abutment, creating a lake with a total storage capacity of 146,000 acre-feet, including 86,700 acre-feet for flood control, 33,600 acre-feet for water supply, and 25,700 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Drainage area above damsite is 294 square miles. Estimated cost is $56,700,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control. Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, 29 June 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. Acquisition of real estate and construction continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started March 1977, with award of contract for relocation of FM Road 310. Contract for Initial Embankment, Partial Spillway Excavation, and Outlet Works was awarded 5 June 1978, and is continued. Contract for relocation of FM Road 1947 was awarded 11 September 1980. 3. AUBREY LAKE, TEX. Location. Damsite is located at river mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $242,000,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army 16 September 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Acquisition of real estate was initiated. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real estate acquisition was initiated in September 1980. 4. BARDWELL LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Tex. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of 16-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958.. In Contract approved by the Secretary of the Army on 24 June 1963 the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $102,409 toward principal and $190,087 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Bardwell project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $7,011,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 5. BELTON LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Tex. (See Geological Survey base map, scale 1:500,000 and Geological Survey, Belton sheet, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on 15 January 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $679,976 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To dafe $645,171 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on 2 January 1957. Amount of $152,435 paid by authority on 21 March 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were constructed. Benefits accrued to Belton project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $100,937,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 6. BENBROOK LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Tex., on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 continued including recreation facilities under a cost-sharing contract with the City of Benbrook, Texas. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake and Fort Worth Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 are estimated at $40,603,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 7. BIG SANDY LAKE, TEX. Location. The project is located on Big Sandy Creek, a tributary of the Sabine River, and is virtually contained in Wood County, with a small area extending into Upshur County. The damsite is located at river mile 15.3 about 6 miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth and rock fill dam with a maximum height of 94.5 feet above streambed and a total length of" 6,200 feet, including the concrete spillway. Big Sandy Lake would have a total controlled storage of 418,200 acre-feet and a water surface area of 16,580 acres at elevation 382.0, top of flood control pool. At elevation 367.5, top of conservation pool, the lake would have an area of 10,810 acres and a storage capacity of 221,200 acre-feet. Project was authorized by the 16-4 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL 91-611) substantially in accordance with recommendations as outlined in House Document No. 91-429 (91st Congress) and is a unit in the comprehensive basin-wide plan of water resource development. Estimated cost of project is $90,900,000. Local cooperation. Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. The Sabine River Authority of Texas and the Texas Water Development Board are the local project sponsors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning studies were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is 16 percent complete. 8. CANYON LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Tex. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on 24 October 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $652,200 has been paid. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Canyon project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $47,122,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 9. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TEX. Location. Cooper Dam and Reservoir is about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13 miles north of Sulphur Springs, Tex., and is at mile 23.2 on South Sulphur River, which rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with North Sulphur River to form Sulphur River. Existing project. Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam with maximum height of about 73 feet, 15,882 feet long at its crest, one controlled (service) spillway, and an emergency uncontrolled spillway. Reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at top of flood control pool, 5,084 acres at top of sediment pool, and 19,305 acres at top of water supply pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage space, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply space, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Also provides for channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; and construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenanit drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, mile 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8 channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between mile 1 and 5. Estimated Federal cost foi new work (October 1980) is $97,300,000, which includes $37,351,000 to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50- year period and $350,000 non-Federal cost for lands for the levees. Local cooperation. Except for Cooper Reservoir, local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way, and alter and relocate highways and related facilities and utilities, except railroads, for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion, and preserve channel capacities by preventing encroachment. Local agencies furnished rightsof- way for first two phases of work on levees and channels downstream from Cooper Dam. Right-of-way acquisition for part II, for channels and levees downstream from Cooper Dam is essentially complete, except for that required below mile 140.4, Sulphur River (Magnolia Pipeline Crossing). Right-of-way acquisition for this portion of project is inactive pending resolution of a controversy among local 16-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 interests as to the responsibility for relocation of the pipeline. Assuring Agencies are the following counties in Texas: Delta, Hunt, Franklin, Lamar, Morris, Hopkins, Titus, and Red River. Basic assurances have been received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have not been received from Delta, Lamar, Morris, or Hunt Counties. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, real estate administration within the reservoir, and negotiations with cooperating agencies were continued by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began July 1958 and is 27 percent complete, with 14.8 miles of South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of Middle Sulphur River channels excavated; and 3.4 miles of levee embankment on South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles of levee embankment constructed on Middle Sulphur River, all upstream from Cooper Reservoir. About 10.5 miles of levee on North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Reservoir. Modification of Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company's trestle 93.77, Middle Sulphur River, was completed August 1959, and modification of St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company's trestles 533.74 and 542.61, South Sulphur River, January 1960. Approximately 98 percent of the lands for the reservoir have been acquired. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel between April 1964 and February 1971. On 10 February 1971, a contract was awarded for construction and rectification of approximately 23 miles of levee and 33 miles of channel improvement and realignment of the Sulphur River. In May 1971, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, acting on a motion for preliminary injunction halted further construction until an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared. A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was filed on 24 June 1977. The plan recommended in the FEIS minimized further construction of the authorized channels, and provided for construction of the reservoir and downstream levees. In November 1977, a trial brief was filed in the United States District Court challenging the sufficiency of the FEIS. On 8 December 1978, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas cited 5 deficiencies in the FEIS and halted all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with Court's decision is being prepared. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of the fiscal year 1979. 10. DUCK CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. Location. In Garland, Dallas County, Texas on Duck Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River between river mile 10.4 and 17.5. Existing project. Provides for realignment and enlargement of 6.6 miles of channel improvement consisting of concrete walls, modification of drainage facilities, 2 railroad bridges, 9 street bridges and relocation of all utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $9,000,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $6,500,000, a total of $15,500,000. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 in House Document 276, 89th Congress, 1st Session. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, and all alterations and relocations of existing buildings, utilities, bridges (except railroad bridges), sewers, pipelines, and any other existing improvements; hold the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all features after completion of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. No construction was accomplished. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1972, and the project is 4 percent complete. Construction has been suspended pending local interests providing items required for local cooperation. 11. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TEX. Location. The project is located in Dallas and Denton Counties, Texas. A portion of the improvement will be in and adjacent to the cities of Dallas, Irving and Farmers Branch, Texas. Existing project. Improvement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth to Lewisville Dam and along Denton Creek, a tributary of the Elm Fork to Grapevine Dam. . The plan of improvement provides for enlargement and realignment of about 22 miles of the Elm Fork, enlargement and realignment of about 20 miles of tributary channels, construction of about 39 miles of new levee, 16-6 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT rehabilitation of about 2 miles of existing levees, modification of 14 street and highway bridges, 4 railroad bridges and alteration of utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $57,700,000, and non-Federal estimated cost is $42,300,000, a total of $100,000,000. Project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong. 1st Sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide (without cost to the Federal Government) except for the main channel thereof, all lands, easements, utilities and bridge relocations (except railroad bridges) necessary for construction and operation of the project. Assurances were signed 20 March 1969 by the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, that they would provide items required of local interests.. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was suspended in 1973. Further studies have been delayed until a definite plan has been accepted by local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is suspended. 12. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TEX. Location. On Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Tex., 8 miles west of Jefferson, Tex. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,100 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Estimated cost of project is $17,231,700 Federal. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed in June 1960. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular remain. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of fiscal year 1979. 13. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Tex., on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing.act see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on 21 March 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with city of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the. Army on 17 March 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A Contract with city of Grapevine, Tex., for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on 14 September 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. To date Grapevine has paid $22,654. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $84,939, Dallas $346,699, and Grapevine $1,591. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $416,797,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for benefical use in July 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 14. GREENVILLE, TEX. Location. In Greenville, Hunt County, Tex. on 16-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Long Branch of the Sabine River. Existing project. Provides for realignment and enlargement of 3.34 miles of improved channel along Long Branch. Estimated Federal cost is $848,000, and estimated cost to local interests was $259,000, a total of $1,107,000. Existing project was authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1970 in House Document 91-429, 91st Congress, 2nd Session. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, and all alterations and relocations of existing buildings, utilities, bridges (except railroad), sewers, pipelines and any other existing improvements; hold the United States free from damages due to construction work; and operate and maintain all features after completion of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local interests acquired necessary items of local cooperation. The construction of the improved channel was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the improved channel is complete. Recreation facilities remain. 15. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TEX. Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Tex., and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. (See Geological Survey sheets, Grosvenor and Zephyr, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $937,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 16. LAKE BROWNWOOD MODIFICATION, TEX. Location. The dam will be located at river mile 57 on Pecan Bayou, a tributary of the Colorado River, eight miles north of Brownwood, Texas. The lake will be located in Brown and Coleman counties. Existing project. The project will insure the safety of the existing non-Federal Lake Brownwood and preserve its flood control, water supply, and related values. Modification measures consist of a new embankment 130 feet high and 1,870 feet long, new outlet works, and erosion control measures in the spillway channel. The total controlled storage of the existing lake is 118,900 acre-feet including 85,900 acre-feet for water supply and 33,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Storage capacity will not be altered by this project. The modification project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-483) substantially in accordance with recommendations of the Chief of Engineers as contained in House Document No. 90-350. Estimated cost of project is $29,480,000 including $20,000,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Water Supply Act of 1958 and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Brown County Water Improvement No. 1 is the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning suspended pending proposed legislation prepared by the Department of the Army to deauthorize the project. Condition at end of fiscal year.- Preconstruction planning is complete. 17. LAKEVIEW LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam site is located at river mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapidly growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 24,200 feet, including a 50-foot uncontrolled ogee type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $235,000,000 including $6,000,000 non-Federal cost for recreational development. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.), and is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River basin. 16-8 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority was approved by the Secretary of the Army, 15 June 1977. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $60,965,000 for supply and $7,582,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $68,547,000 exclusive of interest. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real Estate acquisition and construction continue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate acquisition was initiated in August 1977. Construction was started in December 1978 with award of contract for relocation of FM Road 1382. A construction contract for outlet works and initial embankment was awarded 19 November 1979. Real Estate acquisition, construction of FM Road 1382, and engineering and design continued. 18. LAVON LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is in Collin County, Tex., on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. For information concerning Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement project, see individual project. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army 8 July 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date the district has paid $522,490. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the district has paid $387,227. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $52,440,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. 19. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Tex., on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Tex. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to river mile 31.8. Existing project. Reservoir modification provides for raising top of existing dam from elevation 502.0 to 514.0 and lengthening existing dam from about 9,499 feet to about 19,493 feet; modification of existing concrete spillway structure; enlargement of existing reservoir area, involving acquisition of additional rights-of-way; relocation and alteration of highways, county roads, railroads and utilities; and provision of recreational facilities. East Fork Channel and floodway improvements consist of 25 miles of channel enlargement and straightening of the East Fork between river mile 0.0 and 31.8; replacement of inadequate levee-sluice structures; rehabilitation of existing levees; acquisition and clearing of land areas as required for rights-of-way along improved channel and existing levees; alteration of existing railroad, highway and county rbad bridges crossing the improved channel as well as relocation of existing utility lines; and strengthening and raising about 202,400 linear feet of levees of seven existing levee districts. Reservoir will provide a total storage capacity of 748,200 acre-feet (275,600 are for flood control, 380,000 for water supply storage, and 92,600 for sedimentation reserve.) Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $70,000,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $220,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $70,220,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved 22 September 1967 by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $660,072 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurances to contract for the 57 percent for future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated 16-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 at $31,766,000. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on 28 January 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On 8 December 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract for improving the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel was awarded 30 March 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel is 96 percent complete. 20. LEWISVILLE DAM, TEX. Location. In Denton County, Tex. on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Tex. at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $27,527,000 including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with city of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage and rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 16 July 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Tex., for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 20 May 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. To date Denton has paid $250,064. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denton must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $1,034,473 and Denton $45,765. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation of the existing embankment continued. Rehabilitation consists of upstream and downstream stability berms. Estimated Federal cost is $6,580,000. A construction contract for the upstream berm was awarded 12 June 1979. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake, and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $416,797,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for benefical use in November 1954. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. The construction contract for the upstream berm is 99 percent complete. 21. MILLICAN LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on the Navasota River at mile 24.1, approximately 7 miles north of Navasota, Texas in Grimes and Brazos Counties, Texas. This project would be the first of a two-stage development consisting of Millican and Navasota Dams, both of which would be units in the overall plan of improvement for the Brazos River Basin. Existing Project. The project provides for construction of a concrete and earthfill dam 25,300 feet long including a 472-foot gatecontrolled spillway. Without Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control pool (elevation 234.0) would provide 1,557,400 acre-feet of storage space and cover a surface area of 66,000 acres. There would be 784,800 acre-feet of flood control; 680,200 acre-feet for water supply (surface area 42,400 acres), and 92,400 acre-feet for sediment reserve. With Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control elevation and total storage would remain the same. The flood control pool would be 359,600 acre-feet, water supply storage would be 1,125,800 acre-feet (surface area 55,500 acres) and sediment reserve would be 72,000 acre-feet. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $244,000,000. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1968, Public Law 90-483, House Document 341, 90th Congress, 2nd Session. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. By letter dated December 9, 1974, the Brazos River Authority stated that they would be the state agency to cost share for both water supply and recreation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning 53 percent complete. 22. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Tex., at river mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary 16-10 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT of Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,504,000 including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved 3 March 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $421,122 for water supply and $464,206 for operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were constructed. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $23,261,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Preconstructionri planning for Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Woolf Creek Park was completed December 1973, construction awaiting allocation of funds. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 23. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Tex. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000, and sheet Wall, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir 3 January 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on 11 October 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,324 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional consideration of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning 1 January 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to 0. C. Fisher Dam & Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $2,375,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 24. PROCTOR LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is at river mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, 1 July 1960, and was modified and was approved 9 May 1966, at an" estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $221,161 for water supply and $152,734 for operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Benefits accrued to Proctor project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $5,166,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 25. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Tex., on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, and Martinez Creeks. Existing project. Provides for clearing, widening, deepening, and straightening about 31 miles of river and creek channels to carry standard project flood discharges, construction of channel walls, and paving, conduit, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $60,100,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $123,600,000 which includes $1,600,000 cash contributions and $122,000,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $183,700,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 344, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.). Latest published map is in 16-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 project document. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Acequia Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams, where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on 15 April 1957. To date $689,750 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for Espada Aqueduct Flood Protection Unit 9-1, Six Mile Creek, was awarded 10 July 1979 and continues. Construction of Martinez Creek Channel Improvement, Unit 6-1 was completed. Engineering and design studies continued. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $44,055,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 50 percent complete. 26. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TEX. Location. System of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin. Granger Dam at river mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7 miles east of Granger, Tex.; North Fork Dam at river mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Tex.; and South Fork Dam at river mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Tex. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $141,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $60,600,000. North Fork: A rockfill dam 5,950 feet long with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet, of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,300,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $42,100,000. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, North Fork, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $12,824,000 for Granger, $6,256,000 for North Fork, and $12,466,000 for South Fork, for a total of $31,546,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated 18 April 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and North Fork Lakes were approved 24 May 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction, real estate activities and engineering and design continued at Granger and North Fork. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and North Fork Lakes on 21 January 1980 and 3 March 1980, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in October 1972. Granger and North Fork Lakes are about 96 percent complete. Granger and North Fork Lakes were ready for beneficial use in January 1980 and March 1980, respectively. 16-12 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT 27. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved 10 May 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $4,871,815. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Construction of recreation facilities under a contract with the State of Texas, under Code 710 cost-sharing continued. Benefits accrued to Somerville project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $28,696,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 28. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TEX. Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved 13 April 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $480,167. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $178,592. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were constructed. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 is $18,085,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 29. THREE RIVERS, TEX. Location. The project is located in and adjacent to the city of Three Rivers, Live Oak County, Texas, midway between San Antonio and Corpus Christi, Texas, on the left bank of the Frio River, two miles below the mouth of the Atascosa River and two miles above the confluence with the Nueces River. Existing project. The local flood protection project consists of an earthfill levee 4.5 miles in length and appurtenant water control measures. The project was authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers as contained in House Document 92-153. Estimated cost of the project is $6,940,000 including $1,280,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The city of Three Rivers, Texas, gave assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow areas necessary for construction, maintenance, and operation of the project; (b) Provide without cost to the United States all bridge relocations, except railroad bridges, and all buildings, structures, and any other alterations of existing structures or improvements which may be required for construction of the project; (c) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; (d) Acquire without cost to the United States, easements on lands adjacent to the city to allow flooding on some lands not now in the flood plain, and hold and save the United States free from claims as a result of this additional flooding; (e) Provide assurances that encroachment on interior and exterior drainage and ponding areas will not be permitted without offsetting the encroachment by substitute storage or equivalent pumping capacity, without cost to the United States; (f) agree to publicize flood plain information in the area concerned and to provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies and public information media for their guidance and appropriate action, including adoption of such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future developments and protection levels provided by the project; and 16-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 (g) Maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The assurances were accepted by the Federal Government 26 July 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. Land acquisition, utility relocations, and engineering and design continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and relocations by local sponsor continues. Approximately 90 percent of the land has been acquired. 30. WACO LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at city of Waco, McLennan County, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the city of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water supply storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 15 April 1958. To date the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $1,064,353. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.607 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $416,349 and the City has paid $71,344. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operations and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Waco project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $53,199,600. Condition at end of fiscal year.Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 31. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TEX. Location. On Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Tex. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Tex. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 18,500 feet long and 100 feet high, including a spillway 200 feet wide and outlet works with a capacity of 27,600 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 3,400 square miles of drainage area, and has a storage capacity of 2,654,300 acre-feet, of which 145,300 acre-feet are for conservation and remainder for flood control. Estimated cost for new work (October 1978) is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $1,997,604 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $13,697,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular continue. This project transferrred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of fiscal year 1979. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with section 208.10 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in section 3, Flood Control Act of 22 June 1936. See Table 16-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $53,589. Total costs to 30 September 1980 were $381,608. 33. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944 expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near city of 16-14 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT Austin, Tex., and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near city of San Angelo, Tex. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during fiscal year 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started 23 January 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through fiscal year 1980 were $104,258,600. During filling stage Twin Buttes Reservoir will consist of two spearate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $56,699. 34. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 16-C.) 35. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Fiscal year costs were: Banita-Lanana Creeks, $178,947; Dry Devils Draw, $134,271; Parker Creek, $74,786; Post Oak Creek, (-)68; Walnut Creek, $363; West Mud Creek, $40,492; Cibolo Creek, $1,270; Dry Creek, $67; Zacate Creek, $221,342; Nolan Creek, $5,664; Waco Creek, $3,871; Pecan and Cooper Creeks, $62,324. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Fiscal year costs were $851 for advance preparation and $2,240 for repair and restoration. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 36. BELTON LAKE MODIFICATION, TEX. Location. For location of completed dam see Belton Lake, Tex. in this chapter. Existing project. The modification of Belton Lake to provide installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1954 (H.Doc. 535, 81 st Cong., 2nd Sess.). The plan of improvement provides for reallocation of the gross storage capacity in Belton Lake to provide a power pool and the installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The modification is classified as deferred until the Chief of Engineers determines it is advisable. 37. DAM A LAKE, TEX. Location. The dam would be located approximately 18 miles west of Jasper and about 4 miles west of Horger, Tex. Existing project. The project is designed to be used as a run-of-river plant for the generation of power and to re-regulate power surges from the proposed Rockland Lake. The last estimate of project cost was $3,220,000 in 1954. For last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is classified as deferred. 38. ROCKLAND LAKE, TEX. Location. The dam would be located approximately 3 miles west of Rockland, Texas, on the Neches River. Existing project. The project would control floods, generate hydroelectric power, and provide water supply for various uses. The last estimate of project cost was $46,300,000 in 1954. For the last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is classified as deferred. 39. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TEX. Location. Darh is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report 1969. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by 16-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 the Secretary of the Army on 22 January 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $3,000,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved 27 May 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $62,955. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $43,621. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 were constructed. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $44,008,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 40. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Tex., and 93 river miles north of Beaumont, Tex. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2 million contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 41. WHITNEY LAKE, TEX. Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Tex., and about 38 miles upstream from city of Waco, Tex. (See Geological Survey sheets: Waco, Cleburne and Granbury scale 1:125,000, and Whitney, Blum, and Morgan, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 were constructed. Benefits accrued to. Whitney project: Accumulated damages prevented through fiscal year 1980 were $117,487,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $298,474 for navigation studies, $562,482 for flood damage prevention studies, $185,025 for coordination with other agencies, and $330,073 for preauthorization studies Phase I (Brazos Natural Salt $330,061, and Clopton Crossing Lake, $12) for a total of $1,376,054. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $292,214. (See Table 16-E on completed flood plain studies.) Fiscal year costs were $10,966 for hydrologic studies. The national program of inspection of dams, authorized by Public Law 92-367, was continued in Fiscal Year 1980. Expenditures under this program for inspection of dams were $1,329,105 and for inventory of dams were $225,622, comprising a total of $1,554,727. 44. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year costs were $68,865. 16-16 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Tivt Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Total Cost To Sept. 30, 1980 1. Trinity River Project, Tex. 2. Aquilla Lake, Tex. 3. Aubrey Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. 1,086,654 Cost 1,669,007 New Work: Approp. 3,000,000 Cost 3,950,714 New Work: Approp. (-)1,000,000 Cost 190,475 4. Bardwell Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Belton Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Benbrook Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Big Sandy Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. Cost 8. Canyon Lake, Tex. New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Cooper Lake and New Work: Channels, Tex. Approp. Cost 10. Duck Creek Channel New Work: Improvement, Tex. Approp. Cost 11. Elm Fork Floodway, New Work: Tex. Approp. Cost 12. Ferrells Bridge Dam New Work: Lake 0' The Pines, Tex. Approp. Cost 13. Grapevine Lake, Tex. 14. Greenville, Tex. 15. Hords Creek Lake, Tex. 467,500 446,982 424,620 518,817 681,100 685,787 178,503 52,864 610,200 681,313 100,000 27,102 612,500 607,456 1,385,000 1,639,327 (-)22,803 226,000 67,232 Maint. Approp. 890,000 Cost 803,124 New Work: Approp. 109,000 Cost 12,410 Maint. Approp. 714,100 Cost 848,461 New Work: Approp. Cost 10,875 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 300,800 295,402 1,250,000 1,000,000 840,000 1,456,999 1,016,390 516,712 3,055,000 4,875,000 6,242,000 2,966,426 5,418,361 5,731,069 600,000 (-)1,000,000 (-)425,000 133,022 60,523 667,048 738,700 968,200 515,900 737,154 927,136 515,502 60,600 162,000 2,563 151,817 193,499 3,345 829,600 1,244,600 686,700 838,691 1,048,737 828,738 100,000 239,300 1,531 183,345 131,436 147,789 688,300 1,125,600 487,500 680,883 839,385 781,720 - 75,000 350,000 - 74,910 311,826 - - (-)3,600 72,898 - (-)3,600 608,800 679,300 585,900 606,486 669,616 613,781 3,400,000 (-)561,000 350,000 1,836,502 680,192 677,824 - - (-)44,000 - (-)17,073 (-)27,550 - (-)2,192 (-)2,165 141,552 13,014 - 1,048,000 1,230,000 1,066,900 1,186,532 857,672 1,023,979 32,000 17,410 - 127,031 18,968 - 824,300 1,176,204 774,900 825,892 959,222 1,011,242 541,000 - - 700,682 42,202 1,297 - 109,250 (-)528 - 108,407 315 332,800 443,900 376,300 320,462 430,224 388,095 16-17 20,739,866 20,416,287 20,732,300 20,171,297 4,294,700 3,952,954 10,934,505 10,934,505 5,368,287 5,288,611 16,824,635 16,824,6351 8,078,903 8,005,097 13,044,286 13,020,4252 7,808,955 7,781,397 425,000 386,736 19,088,5243 19,088,524 6,102,284 6,098,734 21,553,000 21,517,124 566,295 565,672 662,400 662,400 14,175,1974 14,175,1971 6 9,774,267 9,325,000 9,967,790 9,967,7901 9,131,918 9,116,542 847,900 829,467 2,711,089* 2,711,089 3,961,959 3,924,515 11 V & aa v REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text. Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 16. Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex. 17. Lakeview Lake, Tex. 18. Lavon Lake, Tex. 19. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex. 20. Lewisville Dam, Tex. 21. Millican Lake, Tex. 22. Navarro Mills Lake, Tex. 23. O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, Tex. 24. Proctor Lake, Tex. 39. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex. 25. San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26. San Gabriel River, Tex. Granger North Fork New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 25,000 55,790 1,000,000 958,746 870,700 834,685 1,600,000 1,012,486 1,020 (-)15,033 742,900 689,201 289,000 337,175 341,690 556,300 536,876 125,380 20,398 411,300 401,294 494,500 454,134 113,994 1,441,000 1,272,010 1,700,000 515,297 45,100 54,700 20,175,000 16,014,838 15,000 10,541 16,930,000 19,521,996 952,000 992,668 (-)1,500,ooo 175,562 198,400 200,391 1,043,400 1,062,309 67,000 195,220 131 678,700 689,820 104,461 380,600 422,011 1 1 1 13,667 18,145,000 18,178,789 936,900 969,655 1,165,500 1,401,220 724,900 732,522 1,374,150 1,082,487 1,581 (-)5,660 (-)5,660 754,500 678,118 (-)7,600 (-)7,079 664,600 618,743 466,600 616,500 489,770 568,837 - 112,000 2,061 103,578 ,350,600 1,660,500 ,505,864 1,591,894 300,000 920,000 ,444,848 1,080,730 11,9 14,7 34,450 - 34,450 - 21,000 8,000,000 25,545 9,524,145 - 102,896 - 89,596 8 19,785,000 19,460,419 904,800 902,713 6,900,000 6,729,155 840,000 840,000 60,275,000 59,862,668 12,528,700 12,528,700 8,702,609 8,686,435 64,486,862 64,313,950 2,300,000 21,589,579 2,059,628 21,341,788* 1,017,000 10,962,141 1,187,391 10,765,45810 300,000 2,520,000 294,536 2,514,534 24,000 9,840,088 23,947 9,840,03511 577,100 5,703,605 630,573 5,651,852 - 16,027,467 - 16,027,467 617,300 5,854,355 617,011 5,799,925 - 14,409,585 - 14,409,585 507,600 5,112,972 578,781 5,098,644 (-)5,813 60,580,256 2,608 60,580,25612 1,471,700 15,500,494 1,524,529 15,451,357 2,570,000 28,518,045 2,563,224 28,487,063 - 689,750 - 689,750 12,826,000 95,565,100 12,372,988 95,032,547 319,700 422,596 406,430 406,430 274,200 363,796 353,927 353,927 16-18 FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SSeecet ion Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 27. Somerville Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. (-)151,350 200,000 576,400 6,566 27,380,785 Cost (-)421,871 283,463 567,830 202,076 27,341,890 Maint. Approp. 675,200 663,600 1,746,100 837,700 7,405,847 Cost 662,889 673,776 1,310,493 1,291,207 7,401,334 28. SDtailmlh,o uTseex . Hollow NewA pWproorpk.: (-)1,020 341,000 (-)5,000 (-)220 20,504,044's Damex.Cost 13,758 331,973 3,807 - 20,504,044 Maint. Approp. 580,300 591,500 871,600 650,300 5,182,926 Cost 505,063 678,798 734,091 718,939 5,097,687 29. Three Rivers, Tex. New Work: Approp. 234,000 - 112,500 115,000 721,500 Cost 191,076 83,162 78,092 - 571,967 40. Town Bluff Dam- New Work: B. A. Steinhagen Approp. - - - - 6,602,737 Lake, Tex. Cost .... 6,602,73714 Maint. Approp. 529,500 482,300 472,700 472,500 6,572,214 Cost 439,834 588,469 466,637 470,173 6,553,352 30. Waco Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. - 248,000 16,000 - 49,521,1215 Cost - 243,824 20,176 - 49,521,121 Maint. Approp. 574,000 741,000 768,000 820,400 7,159,226 Cost 547,669 730,575 812,154 817,001 7,147,008 41. Whitney Lake, Tex. New Work: Approp. - - 110,000 14,813 42,843,349 Cost - - 15,193 108,737 42,842,46616 Maint. Approp. 1,517,000 1,377,700 1,725,604 1,494,000 16,678,680 Cost 1,474,265 1,424,696 1,797,633 1,425,105 16,578,867 31. Wright Patman Dam New Work: and Lake, Tex. Approp. 151,000 350,000 (-)1,094 (-)1,146 35,690,626 Cost 95,390 127,423 250,168 31,450 35,690,626 Maint. Approp. 1,082,150 1,066,000 1,145,000 884,700 12,359,790 Cost 1,629,472 1,124,252 979,843 988,791 12,183,953 1Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land, deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. S Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. S Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes 1,711,200 contributed funds. 'Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal dYear 1973. *Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total o $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 7Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 'Excludes $105.079 expended from contributed funds. *Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. eIncludes $130,00D under appropriation 96X5125. 1 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. "2Excludes $3 million expended from contributed funds. "Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. IGExcludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 1*Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 16-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 13 August 1968 27 October 1965 31 March 1960 24 July 1946 3 September 1954 2 March 1945 31 December 1970 2 March 1945 3 September 1954 3 August 1955 2 March 1945 27 October 1975 27 October 1965 24 July 1946 2 March 1945 31 December 1970 AQUILLA LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 2 of Text) Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. AUBREY LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 3 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. BARDWELL LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 4 of Text) Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 5 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification (see Sec. 36 of Text) of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 6 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BIG SANDY LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 7 of Text) Construction of a dam on Big Sandy Creek about six miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. CANYON LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 8 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TEXAS (See Sec. 9 of Text) Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realinement, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. DAM "A" LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 37 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Neches River about 18 miles west of Jasper, Texas. DUCK CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEXAS (See Sec. 10 of Text) Realignment and enlargement of about 7 miles of Duck Creek in the urban area of Garland, Texas. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TEXAS (See Sec. 11 of Text) Realignment and enlargement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River and Denton Creek, and a parallel levee system from the existing Dallas levee system upstream to near the Dallas and Denton county lines. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TEXAS (See Sec. 12 of Text) Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 13 of Text) Construction of a dam on Denton, Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. GREENVILLE LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION (See Sec. 14 of Text) Realignment and enlargement of Long Branch, a tributary of the Sabine River, in the city of Greenville, Texas. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd. Cong, 2nd sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 429, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 488, 83d Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 91-429, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 91-429, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. 16-20 FORT WORTH TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized 18 August 1941 13 August 1968 27 October 1965 2 March 1945 23 October 1962 7 March 1974 2 March 1945 13 August 1968 3 September 1954 31 December 1970 18 August 1941 3 September 1954 2 March 1945 2 March 1945 3 September 1954 3 September 1954 3 January 1975 3 September 1954 HORDS CREEK LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 15 of Text) Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. LAKE BROWNWOOD MODIFICATION, TEXAS (See Sec. 16 of Text) Modification of the existing Lake Brownwood located on Pecan Bayou about 8 miles north of Brownwood, Texas. LAKEVIEW LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 17 of Text) Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 18 of Text) Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEXAS (See Sec. 19 of Text) Enlarge Lavon dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TEXAS (See Sec. 20 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. MILLICAN LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 21 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Navasota River about 7 miles north of Navasota, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 22 of Text) Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 23 of Text) Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 24 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. ROCKLAND LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 38 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Neches River approximately three miles west of Rockland. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TEXAS (See Sec. 39 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEXAS (See Sec. 25 of Text) Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TEXAS (See Sec. 26 of Text) Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the North Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 27 of Text) Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. H.Dc 7,7t CHo. nDg.o, c.1 s3t 70se, ss7.6th H. Doc. 350, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc 403, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 341, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess., and H. Doc. 591, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. 16-21 Acts Documents Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 3 September 1954 29 July 1971 2 March 1945 27 October 1965 3 September 1954 18 August 1941 24 July 1946 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TEXAS (See Sec. 28 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. THREE RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, TEXAS (See Sec. 29 of Text) Construction of a levee to provide flood protection to the city of Three Rivers, Texas, on the Frio River. TOWN BLUFF DAM- B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 40 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TEXAS (See Sec. 1 of Text) Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 30 of Text) Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 41 of Text) Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TEXAS (See Sec. 31 of Text) Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. 16-22 H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 92-153, 92nd Cong. S. Doc. 98,76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 34 of Text) PROJECTS Project Big Fossil Creek Big Spring, Tex. Brownwood Chan Carl L. Estes Da Fort Worth Floo Fort Worth Floo Lake Fork Lake, Navasota Lake, Pecan Bayou Lai Plainview Local Roanoak Lake, T Rutledge Hollow 'Awaiting av 2Inactive. 3Completed. , Tex. 1969 - - 2 1979 - - nel Improvement, Tex. .-< am and Lake, Tex.2 1979 - - dway (Clear Fork), Tex. s 1971 - - dway (West Fork), Tex. s 1971 - - Sabine River, Tex.- Navasota River, Tex.' ke, Pecan Bayou, Tex.'- Flood Protection Project 2 1979 - ex.3 1979 - Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex.3 1969 - railability of funds. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 16-D (See Section 32 of Text) Location Dallas Floodway 25 Mar 80 San Antonio Floodway 17 Jun 80-18 Jun 80 Munday Floodway 27 Sep 79 Pleasantown 29 Nov 79 Poteet 29 Nov 79 FLOOD PLAIN INFORMATION STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR TABLE 16-E Location Requesting Agency Date Completed Federal Cost Walnut and Williamson City of Austin, Texas, May 1980 $405,000 Creeks Expanded Flood Department of Water Resources Plain Information Study. and the Capitol Area Planning Council. 16-23 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Cost To September 30, 1980 Cost To September 30, 1980 OQperation and Construction Maintenance Dates of Inspection ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT* The district comprises watershed of Canadian River and tributaries entering river west of Texas- New Mexico State line; watershed of Arkansas River and tributaries entering river west of and including Walnut Creek, Kans.; watershed of Rio Grande and tributaries entering river west of and including Pecos River and its tributaries; and watershed of Mimbres River and its tributaries in New Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control Page 1. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex ......................... 17-1 2. Conchas Lake, N. Mex. ............. 17-2 3. Dodge City, Kansas................. 17-2 4. El Paso, Tex ...................... 17-3 5. John Martin Reservoir, Colo. ........ 17-3 6. Las Animas, Colo. .................. 17-4 7. Las Cruces, N. Mex................ 17-4 8. Los Esteros Lake, N. Mex .......... 17-5 9. Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex .......... 17-6 9A. Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex.............. 17-6 9B. Cochiti Lake, N. Mex .............. 17-6 9C. Galisteo Dam, N. Mex .............. 17-7 9D. Jemez Canyon Dam, N. Mex ......... 17-7 9E. Rio Grande Floodway, N. Mex........ 17-7 9F. Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, N. Mex ......... 17-8 Flood Control (cont.) Page 10. Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, N. Mex .................. 17-9 11. Trinidad Lake, Colo ................ 17-9 12. Two Rivers Dam, N. Mex.............17-10 13. Inspection of completed flood control projects..................... 17-10 14. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations................ 17-10 15. Other authorized flood control projects.................... 17-11 16. Flood control work under special authorizations............... 17-11 General Investigations 17. 18. 19. Surveys... ...................... Collection and study of basic data .... Inspection of dams................. 17-11 17-11 17-11 Flood Control 1. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, N. MEX. Location. In an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, N. Mex., and vicinity. Combined drainage area of tributaries is about 276 square miles. Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of Rio Grande, forms eastern border of watersheds. Crest of mountain range rises more than a mile over river to elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, N. Mex., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. For description of complete improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $17,300,000. Non- Federal cost, including required cash contribution of $530,000 was $11,060,000. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements see Annual Report for 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North and South Diversion Channels prevented an estimated $25,669,200 annual flood damages during FY. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented were $36,073,200. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1980 were North Diversion Chan- *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 17-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 nel near Alameda, 11,000 c.f.s. on August 4, 1980, and for South Diversion Channel 1,100 c.f.s. on August 4, 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the north and south diversion channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. Channels are in good condition and well maintained by local interests. 2. CONCHAS LAKE, N. MEX. Location. Dam is in San Miguel County, N. Mex., on Canadian River, about one-fourth mile downstream from confluence of Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map. Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1: 125,000). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $16,095,113, including $2,279,326 for initiating construction of project under authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of reservoir continued. Reservoir was operated for storage of floodwaters and releases for irrigation purposes. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1980; however, $98,700 sediment damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1980 were $1,545,700. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1980 were $276,200. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1980 were $7,541,400. Pool elevation at start of FY 1980 was 4,178.32 feet with corresponding storage of 164,838 acre-feet. Total releases for reporting period were 85,447 acre-feet. Releases of 76,547 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,379 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. Pool elevation on September 30, 1980, was 4,171.14 feet with corresponding storage of 130,098 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 881 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was essentially complete in 1940. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. Irrigation of some lands under project was begun in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was approved in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of these recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978. The facilities are approximately 65 percent complete. 3. DODGE CITY, KANSAS Location. At Dodge City, Ford County, Kans., on Arkansas River about 130 miles downstream from Colorado-Kansas State line. (See Geological Survey map for Dodge quadrangle, scale 1:125,000). Existing project. About 7 miles of levees of about 8.3 feet average height on both banks of Arkansas River (4.3 miles on left bank and 2.6 miles on right bank) and enlargement of river channel to form a floodway about 470 feet wide which will convey a flow of 40,000 c.f.s. through city. Levees are protected by flexible-type steel jetties. Four reaches of floodwalls about 100 feet long are provided to insure continuity between levees and bridge abutments. Project also includes relocation of railroad bridge and grade raise. Appurtenant works include interior drainage structures, ponding areas, alterations to local roads and utilities. As a result of the very damaging flood of June 1965 on the Arkansas River, which peaked at about 82,000 c.f.s. at Dodge City, consideration was given to modification of project design to increase protection to maximum extent practicable without causing substantial increase in Federal and non-Federal costs. Plan adopted is based on a design flow of 40,000 c.f.s. with the added requirement that top of levees would not be lower than the profile for 60,000 c.f.s. flow. The top of levee profile for 60,000 c.f.s. would increase the floodway capacity so it would not be necessary to raise the bridges on Second Street and 14th Avenue. The bridge crossings would require sandbagging during floods of 60,000 c.f.s. magnitude. Revised frequency curves prepared since 1965 flood indicate 40,000 c.f.s. flow would occur once in 60 years. These frequency curves also show that a 90-year frequency has a discharge of about 48,000 c.f.s., and such a flow could be safely passed through the floodway as presently designed (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, the local sponsor, city of Dodge City, must acquire easement for flood-zoning purposes in areas that would be used for ponding of interior drainage waters and hold United States free from claims as a result of flooding from residual interior drainage during operation of project; alter existing improvements, other than railroads, inform all individuals concerned about residual flooding problem involved owing to temporary ponding; and provide assurances that encroachment on improved river channels, interior drains, and ponding areas will not be permitted; 17-2 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT and if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, provide substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity. A bond issue for flood control purposes was approved by the voters October 12, 1965. Formal assurances were received March 25, 1970. Local interests executed an agreement on May 21, 1973, in compliance with Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocations Assistance Act of 1970. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed for full operation in April 1977. Floodflows during fiscal year were minimal and no flood damages were prevented. Condition at end offiscal year. Project construction was initiated by relocating railroad bridge and grade raise in late 1974. Construction of the channels, levees, and floodwalls began in April 1975 and was completed in April 1977. Federal cost was $6,323,420. Non-Federal cost was $1,030,000. Project features are in good condition and well maintained by local interests. No flood control damages have been prevented as of FY 1980. 4. EL PASO, TEX. Location. At El Paso, El Paso County, Tex., which is on left bank of Rio Grande in reach that forms part of international boundary between United States and Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, Tex.; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into Rio Grande. Runoff from tributary arroyos on eastern, southern, and western slopes of adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of city and its outlying suburban developments. Project is divided into four independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and two units (Copper System and Bluff Channel) in Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. Estimated Federal cost is $60,800,000. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local sponsor, the city of El Paso, must alter existing improvements, other than railroads or improvements constructed and maintained by United States; prevent encroachment on all of project works which would reduce their design capacities; take steps to prevent encroachment upon existing defined waterways tributary to project by zoning or other means such as enlargements, or other modifications, of existing waterway facilities to prevent minor flood problems in these tributary waterways from developing into problems of serious proportions; and inform all concerned that project is designed to control floods originating above structures and that some residual flooding may be expected from precipitation occurring below structures. Estimated non-Federal cost is $15,800,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1980 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel was completed in November 1978. During FY 1980 floodflows and flood control storage were minimal; however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. The estimated total flood damages prevented since completion of Northgate and Range Dams in 1973 through FY 1980 were $22,700. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction continued in the Central Area with all elements completed except for the McKelligon-Fillmore-Van Buren Dams System. The Central Area of the project is about 85 percent complete. In the Northwest Area, Oxidation Pond Dam, Buena Vista Division and Oxidation Pond Dam Outlet Conduit have been completed. Construction has been initiated on Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams. All DMs have been completed. The NW Area of the project is about 30% complete. Preliminary Phase I planning on the Southeast Area has been initiated. 5. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, COLO. Location. On Arkansas River 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, in Bent County, about 18 miles upstream from city of Lamar, Colo. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, Colo. quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $15,409,357. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of Arkansas River Compact. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1980; however, 17-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 $368,400 sediment damages were prevented. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1980 were $74,335,500. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1980 were $504,400. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $19,920,400. Maximum pool elevation of 3,832.79 feet with corresponding storage of 178,662 acre-feet occurred on June 24, 1980. Total releases for FY 1980 were 248,409 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 128,358 acre-feet. Sediment depositions was 128,358. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. A 10,000 acre-foot pool was purchased by the State of Colorado and impoundment began in June 1979. This water is stored for recreational purposes. 6. LAS ANIMAS, COLO. Location. At Las Animas, Bent County, Colo, at river mile 1,175 on Arkansas River, just upstream from its confluence with Purgatoire River, a major tributary that enters Arkansas River from south. (See Geological Survey map, Lamar, Colo.; Kans. quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a levee 9.3 miles long on south bank of Arkansas River and a levee about 1 mile long on north bank. Appurtenant works include levee protection measures; an interior drainage system consisting of outlet structures, ditches, and ponding areas; structure for irrigation canal; and stop-log structure where levee crosses railroad. Design flood is 140,000 c.f.s., which is equivalent to flood of record (June 1921) flood with peak drainage of 187,000 c.f.s., reduced by regulatory effect of Pueblo Dam near Pueblo, Colo. Federal cost was $4,933,428. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local interests must at least annually inform individuals concerned about residual flood problem involved owing to temporary ponding; prevent encroachment on river channel; which would reduce design flow capacity through leveed section and on ponding areas and interior drains; and if ponding area is impaired, provide substitute storage or equivalent pumping capacity promptly without cost to United States; and alter existing improvements, other than railroad bridges and approaches in connection therewith. Local interests will also be required to comply with Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91;646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Inasmuch as the flood control project extends beyond the corporate city limits of Las Animas, Colorado, the Arkansas River Conservancy District, Las Animas, Colorado, a political subdivision duly constituted and organized under the laws of the State of Colorado, is the sponsoring agency which furnished required local cooperation. Conservancy District has jurisdiction and power to levy taxes both in the city and in those areas outside city limits affected by the project. Prior to authorization of project, the Conservancy District pledged in writing that it favored project and would furnish required local cooperation. Estimated non-Federal cost is $150,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project completed. No flood control benefits accrued during FY 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the project was awarded in January 1977 and was completed in 1978. Stop logs were replaced in FY 1979. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 7. LAS CRUCES, N. MEX. Location. On tributaries of Rio Grande at Las Cruces, Dona County, N. Mex., about 87 miles downstream from Elephant Butte Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Las Cruces, N. Mex., quadrangle scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Consists of Las Cruces Dam which extends across Alameda and Las Cruces Arroyos. The dam provides an uncontrolled outlet and spillway. The Las Cruces Dam, about 1,000 feet east of Las Cruces city limits, is earthfill construction 15, 570 feet long and 67 feet high with both slopes protected. Discharges from dam are conveyed downstream in an outlet channel to the Dona Ana Drain and thence to Rio Grande by extension of the outlet channel. Reservoir capacity is 8,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. Controlled drainage area is 28.9 square miles. Federal cost was $4,752,310. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local sponsor, the city of Las Cruces, must alter existing improvements, other than railroads; prevent encroachments upon the outlet channel from Las Cruces Dam to Dona Ana Drain and from Dona Ana Drain to Rio Grande to maintain a 290 c.f.s. channel capacity; inform citizens that residual flooding may occur downstream of the dam; and prevent encroachment on the reservoir area that would reduce its storage. The estimated non-Federal cost is $1,760,000. Local interests signed an agreement satisfying all requirements on December 15, 1972. The City of Las Cruces requested the Campus Dam portion be deleted from the project. The New Mexico State University plans to solve the Campus Arroyo flood problem. 17-4 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Although the dam was physically completed in May 1975, there were no flood control or accrued benefits through FY 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the dam, outlet works, spillway, and portion of outlet channel on the project was initiated in June 1973 and completed in May 1975. Construction contract for the outlet channel extension was awarded in October 1977 and completed in January 1979. The dam and channel portion are in good condition and in operation. 8. LOS ESTEROS LAKE, N. MEX. Location. Lake is in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, N. Mex. (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, N. Mex., sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Project operation began in November 1979. Authorized plan of improvement consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. Project purposes are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention.. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipater. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 449,000 acre-feet which includes 82,000 acrefeet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. Surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,740 acres. Contributing drainage area at the damsite is 2,434 square miles. Authorized project also includes modification of the existing Sumner Lake (formerly Alamogordo Dam and Reservoir) on the Pecos River (river mile 710.8), about 56 miles downstream from Los Esteros Lake. This modification provided for a reservoir capacity of 210,000 acre-feet by raising the dam embankment 10.5 feet and constructing an emergency spillway through the ridge on the right abutment. Changes to the service spillway were to limit the discharge to the capacity of the existing chute spillway and tainters. Project document also reallocated the storage in Sumner Lake to exclusive flood control use. Subsequent to project authorization, the Bureau of Reclamation modified the existing structure to its feasible limit without major reconstruction. This modification consisted of raising the dam height 16 feet, altering the existing service spillway to limit the discharge to 56,000 c.f.s., and constructing an uncontrolled emergency spillway in the left abutment. The spillway capacity is 206,000 c.f.s. Storage allocation studies in response to authorizing document provides for transfer of all but 20,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage to Los Esteros Lake with remainder of storage in Sumner Lake reserved for flood control purpose. This transfer will be done under the terms of the Pecos River Compact and the Carlsbad Irrigation District. The Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost for Los Esteros Lake is $43,000,000. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs will be responsibility of Federal Government; however, Carlsbad Irrigation District will be required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an annual amount equal to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. Carlsbad Irrigation District also will be required to agree to use of Sumner Lake for floodcontrol purposes. Because they will realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Los Esteros Lake, they will be required to continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks to manage Los Esteros State Park. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. Project was authorized subject to the provision that "no appropriation shall be made for construction of Los Esteros Lake until satisfactory arrangements have been made by the State of New Mexico for the transfer of irrigation storage from the Alamogordo Reservoir." Engineer advisors to Pecos River Compact Commission have completed water studies to determine the effects of project on water supply in Pecos River basin. Corps, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Carlsbad Irrigation District, and engineer advisors to Texas and New Mexico commissioners participated in studies. Completed studies have been approved and accepted by Pecos River Compact Commission and State Engineer of New Mexico. A memorandum of agreement has been executed between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation who has executed an agreement with the Carlsbad Irrigation District for transfer of this irrigation storage from the Sumner Lake to Los Esteros Lake. Ft. Sumner Irrigation District submitted a formal protest of the agreement between U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and Carlsbad Irrigation District. The State Engineer approved the transfer of irrigation storage. After lower court decisions, the New Mexico Supreme Court upheld State Engineer approval of transfer of irrigation storage on October 18, 1974. Operations and results during fiscal year. Los 17-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Esteros was completed in late 1979 and operation for flood control began in October 1979. Problems with the observation wells delayed storage for irrigation until March 1980. Irrigation storage began on 21 April and maximum storage was reached on 25 June 1980. (Elev. 4715.83, Storage 28,232 acrefeet). Release from storage began on 7 July with the reservoir empty by 18 July 1980. Irrigation storage was begun again on 11 September with a maximum storage on 30 September, 1980 of 2,483 acre-feet. (Elev. 4671.70 acre-feet). There was no flood control operation during the year. Irrigation benefits totaled $98,700 for Fiscal Year 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the recreation area was awarded in September 1979 and completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979. 9. RIO GRANDE BASIN, N. MEX. Location. Improvements are on Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized flood control phase of comprehensive plan of development of water resources of Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from authorized plan, it was excluded without prejudice to future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by States of Colorado and Texas, that project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By same act, Congress also authorized for construction irrigation phase of comprehensive plan as recommended by Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with joint agreement approved by Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of unified plan of improvement. Authority for Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation and Table 17-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects in authorized plan are in individual reports on the following pages. 9A. ABIQUIU DAM, N. MEX. Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan for Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on Rio Chama near town of Abiquiu, N. Mex., about 32 miles upstream from confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, N. Mex., from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, N. Mex.; Colorado NJ 13-10, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. for description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $21,275,004. A major rehabilitation program for supplemental grouting and drainage system was approved on June 1, 1977. Federal cost was $5,017,558. The initial increment of the work was started in July 1978. And the work was completed in September, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with regulations prescribed by Rio Grande Compact Commission. On October 1, 1979, the pool elevation was 6,196.76 acre-feet. The maximum pool (6,219.63 feet) and storage (198.320 acre-feet) occurred on June 14, 1980. On September 30, 1980, the pool elevation was 6,206.36 feet with a corresponding storage of 133.350 acre-feet. There was 1,902 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year. There were $16,265,800 in flood damages prevented during FY 1980. Sediment damages prevented were $213,000. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $32,806,400 through FY 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in February 1963. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 9B. COCHITI LAKE, N. MEX. Location. Dam is at river mile 340 on Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico- Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, Tex.), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, N. Mex. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, N. Mex., quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, N. Mex., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. Project extends generally in an east-west line across Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of Rio Grande and then southward across 17-6 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is at the embankment on south side of Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in left abutment on Rio Grande. No outlet was provided on Santa Fe River. Dead storage in Santa Fe River and Canada de Cochiti arms of reservoir was eliminated by means of a conveyance channel. Construction required relocation of NM State Road No. 22, UP Road 90 and irrigation facilities. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 482,200 acre-feet for flood control, 57,580 acre-feet for sediment and 46,220 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 586,000 acre-feet. Storage capacity for permanent pool was provided by modifying the operating procedures. Modification of project structures, except for specific recreation facilities, was not necessary because of permanent pool. The project was modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) to provide for an access road from U.S. Highway 85 to the Cochiti Lake recreation area. This road was funded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in FY 1977. The State of New Mexico and the Bureau of Indian Affairs agreed to cooperate in construction of the road. A construction contract was awarded in the summer of 1977 for the work. The road was completed to the Cochiti Pueblo southern boundary in 1978. Estimated Federal cost is $96,900,000. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Operations and results during fiscal year. With the construction complete on the embankment and allied facilities the project was reclassified from a construction to an operational project in June 1975. On October 1, 1979, the pool elevation was 5,320.95 feet with a corresponding storage of 45,620 acrefeet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,339.99 feet with a storage of 71,884 acre-feet on May 7, 1980. There was 1,432 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1980. There were $333,800 in flood damages prevented during FY 1980. Sediment damages prevented were $160,400. Accrued total damages prevented are $34,286,700. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction of the dam, outlet works, spillway, operations area operator's quarters, overlook and all relocations have been completed. Construction of the Cochiti Recreation Area facilities was completed in August 1976, the Restoration work in August 1977, and the Visitors Center in August 1977. Construction contract for the Tetilla Peak Recreation Area was awarded in January 1976 and terminated in November 1978. Surety was defaulted in December 1978 and the contract was readvertised and awarded in FY 80. The Tetilla Peak Recreation Area is about 88 percent complete. The overall project is 99 percent complete. 9C. GALISTEO DAM, N. MEX. Location. Dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of Rio Grande. Definite project site is about 8 miles upstream of project document site. Reservoir will extend upstream from dam for about 4 miles to near village of Waldo, N. Mex. (See Geo.- logical Survey Map, San Pedro 1, N. Mex. quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $14,220,053. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1979. Outflow from the project ranged from zero to the maximum inflow and discharge of 314 c.f.s. on August 7, 1980. There was 55 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1980. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1980 were $6,200 totaling $47,300 through FY 1980. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1970. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 9D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, N. MEX. Location. in Sandoval County, N. Mex., on Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from confluence of Jemez River and Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, N. Mex. (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost to date is $4,213,147. Operations and results during fiscal year. A 2,000 acre-foot sediment pool was impounded in March 1979. On October 1, 1979, the pool elevation was 5,160.05 feet with a corresponding storage of 2,000 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,171.37 feet with a storage of 7,026 acre-feet on 25 April 1980. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during Fiscal Year 1980. Sediment deposition during the year was 870 acre-feet. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1980. Sediment benefits during FY 1980 were $97,400. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1980 were $3,895,900. 17-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end offiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 9E: RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, N. MEX. Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan of improvement for Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on Rio Grande and covers section of river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream from Espanola, N. Mex., about river mile 394. (See Table 17-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. Consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect levees. Construction of project is a joint undertaking by Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channel- rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist through reach of river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by meandering river. (See Table 17-D on existing project and Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with construction of Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. Espanola Valley unit was inactive for several years; however, in December 1963, local interests reaffirmed need for flood protection for city of Espanola, and indicated in writing that they were willing and able to provide necessary rights-ofway for levees and make utility relocations required in construction of project. Project was reclassified to active category, and funds were appropriated for initial preconstruction planning in fiscal year 1966. Right-of-entry was obtained on May 15, 1967, from the Indian Pueblo of Santa Clara, the principal landowner affected by the project. The negotiations between the city and Santa Clara Pueblo to obtain formal assurances failed to materialize. The city was notified that the five-year period in which to comply with their requirements had begun on August 2, 1973. The city has not given indication they plan positive action to resolve the problem. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning for the Espanola Valley unit of the floodway is completed. The failure to obtain formal assurances resulted in the District reporting on November 2, 1972, funds available for construction to be excess. There were $3,746,900 in flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1980. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1980 amounted to $34,287,800. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 7,500 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on May 25, 1980. The peak at San Acacia was 14,000 c.f.s. on June 9, 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Albuquerque unit and Cochiti to Rio Puerco units of Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit is deferred for restudy. The Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) unit was reclassified to the active category on July 18, 1973, based on a letter of intent to cooperate from the city of Truth or Consequences dated May 31, 1973. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 9F. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, N. MEX. Location. Vicinity City of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Existing project. Plan of improvement will include 4 miles of 20-foot-high levees with positive seepage control, an interior drainage system, and 5 miles of diversion channels. The diversion channels would be required for control of floods on tributary arroyos at and in the vicinity of Truth or Consequences. Estimated Federal cost is not available pending project reformulation. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Location cooperation. Prior to construction local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will (1) acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and operation of the project; (2) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and free from claims as a result of flooding from residual interior drainage during operation of the project; (3) maintain and operate the works after completion; (4) make any 17-8 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT alteration to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges and approaches connected therewith, which may be required because of the construction works; (5) provide guidance and leadership by encouraging prudent use of flood proofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce the flood losses. Letters of intent have been received from the City of Truth or Consequences (dated July 7,.1977) and the County of Sierra (dated July 6, 1977). Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in FY 1979 and continued during FY 1980. 10. SANTA FE RIVER AND ARROYO MASCARAS, N. MEX. Location. Santa Fe, New Mexico, and Vicinity, within Santa Fe County, First Congressional District. (See Geological Survey map, Santa Fe South and McClure Reservoir quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan is located in Santa Fe, capital of New Mexico. The city of Santa Fe is experiencing new growth and development throughout the city. The confluence of Arroyo Mascaras with the Santa Fe River is near the downtown area of Santa Fe. The authorized plan of improvement consists of both structural and nonstructural elements. The structural plan consists of (a) improvements on the Santa Fe River for flood control provided that no improvements be considered east of the existing Nichols Dam, (b) raising the Apartment Drive Bridge and replacing the College Street Bridge, both located within the urban area of Santa Fe, and (c) 1.2 miles of improved channel on Arroyo Mascaras. The nonstructural portion is to floodproof new properties in the 100-year floodway in two reaches as follows: (1) west city limits to Arroyo Mascaras and (b) Camino Cabre to Two-mile Reservoir. Estimated Federal cost is not available pending project reformulation. (See Table 17-B authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) Provide without cost to the United States all land, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; (2) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; (3) administer, maintain and operate the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (4) make any alterations to existing improvements other than railroad bridges and approaches connected therewith, which may be required because of the constructions works; (5) prevent encroachments in the existing Santa Fe River channel below any dam project and maintain a minimum channel capacity of 5,000 c.f.s.: (6) bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the flood control works presently estimated at $5,500 on an average annual basis; (7) adopt and enforce flood plain regulations appropriate to the nonstructural measures of the plan of improvement which, combined with the structural measures, would minimize damages to future development in the project area that would be inundated from a flood that could be expected to occur once in 100 years; (8) consider the adoption of flood plain regulations for areas other than those covered by the plan of improvement as necessary to assure compatibility between future developments within the flood plains and the protection afforded compatibility by the improvements; (9) publicize the flood plain information contained in a Flood Plain Information Report to be provided, and make it readily available to all interested persons; and (10) periodically inform all concerned in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, that some flooding will continue to occur due to flows greater than design magnitude. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plan of action and hydrology design memorandum were completed in FY 1979. Studies continued during FY 1980. 11. TRINIDAD LAKE, COLO. Location. On Purgatoire River about 161 miles above its junction with Arkansas River. Project is about 4 miles upstream from city of Trinidad, Colo. (See Geological Survey map. Trinidad, Colo., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long, with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,870 c.f.s. with water surface at top of flood control pool. Reservoir provides for storage of 51,000 acre-feet for flood control, 39,000 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 114,500 acre-feet. Reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and will be operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. Estimated Federal cost is $50,900,00 (CE) and $160,000 (USBR). (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Requirements based on approved general design memorandum studies and exe- 17-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 cuted irrigation repayment contract: Repayment by Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District of first cost allocated to irrigation established as 29.28 percent of total project cost generally in accordance with Federal reclamation law procedures, but not to exceed $6,435,600, except that repayment of irrigation first cost may extend over a period not to exceed 75 years including a 5-year development period which results in an actual amortization period of 70 years; contribution of $21,400 annually by State of Colorado for replacement of evaporation and seepage losses from permanent fishery pool; Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District (representing the irrigators) is required to bear not more than 19.82 percent of annual joint-use operation and maintenance costs and not more than 2.52 percent of major replacement costs; in addition, estimated annual cost to city of Trinidad for maintenance of channel of Purgatoire River through city is $1,100. In addition, conservancy district must make arrangements for transfer of Model Land and Irrigation Co.'s storage rights from existing Model Reservoir to Trinidad Reservoir. Storage for recreation purposes not included in authorized project plan; however, project document noted that substantial benefits would be derived from such use and that there was strong local support for such storage. Provision was made in project plan for 4,500 acre-feet of permanent storage for recreation; however, since flows of Purgatoire River are fully appropriated, water rights were acquired by non-Federal interests. Estimated cost of initial filling of pool was $250,000 and replacement of evaporation losses will cost an estimated $21,400 per year. Lands and facilities for recreation was provided at Federal expense, but cost of water rights will be borne by the State of Colorado. Non-Federal cost is $6,686,000. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. Stipulated decree changing place of storage of water rights decreed to existing Model Reservoir from that reservoir to proposed Trinidad Reservoir was conditionally approved by Las Animas County, Colorado, District Court April 15, 1965, subject to ultimate execution and approval of irrigation repayment contract, which qualifying condition is now removed. Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District, representing water users, signed prime irrigation repayment contract January 21, 1967. Prime contract was then signed by Regional Director, Region 7, Bureau of Reclamation February 10, 1967. Irrigation repayment contract was confirmed by decree of Las Animas County, Colorado, District Court entered into March 21, 1967, and 30-day period of appeal required by Colorado statutes expired with no appeals being filed. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1979 the pool elevation was 6,179.30 feet with a corresponding storage of 18,290 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,222.45 feet with a corresponding storage of 58,165 acre-feet on June 26, 1980. On September 30, 1980, the pool elevation was 6,209.04 feet with a corresponding storage of 40,244 acre-feet. There was no flood control regulation during FY 1980. Sediment deposition during FY 1980 was 790 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1980 was $296,500. Accrued sediment benefits are $448,100. Irrigation benefits for FY 1980 were $62,700. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1980 are $332,700. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Relocations of cemeteries, county road, water storage tank, and state highway completed; construction of outlet works completed; construction of dam, spillway, railroad relocation, water line relocation, and operations area was completed in February 1977. Construction contract for recreation facilities was completed in September 1980. The total project is about 98 percent complete. The project was classified operational in February 1979. 12. TWO RIVERS DAM, N. MEX. Location. About 14 miles southwest of Roswell, N. Mex., on Rio Hondo and Rocky Arroyo. Rio Hondo is formed at confluence of Rio Ruidoso and Rio Bonito, near village of Hondo, N. Mex., in foothills region of Sierra Blanca in southeastern part of Lincoln County, N. Mex., and flows generally easterly to its confluence with Pecos River near Roswell, N. Mex. (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Federal cost was $4,832,725. Local cooperation. Complied with. Total cost to local interests was $144,000, of which $60,000 was for construction of access road and $84,000 for lands and rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1979, through December 9, 1980. The maximum pool elevation was 3,984.00 with a corresponding storage of 581 acrefeet on September 9, 1980. There were no flood damages prevented during 1980. Sediment damages prevented were $31,000. Estimated total accumulated 17-10 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1980 were $3,336,300. There were 277 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Kansas, Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. FY 1980 cost was $53,587 and total cost to September 30, 1980 was $263,818. 14. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, three projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, and Sumner. Platoro Dam on Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, Colo. controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. Authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 60,000 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet for flood control. The 54,000 acre-feet is dual purpose storage with flood-control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by Interior Appropriation Act of 1941, (see H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of project was completed by Water and Power Resources Service (Bureau of Reclamation) in Fiscal Year 1952. On October 1, 1979, storage in Platoro reservoir was 30,480 acre-feet; elevation 9,999.3 feet. Platoro was operated for flood control during 1980 spring runoff. Maximum storage of 42,950 acre-feet, elevation 10,015.5 feet, occurred on July 29, 1980. On September 30, 1980, storage was 19,650 acre-feet, elevation 9,965.0 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,778 c.f.s. on June 10, 1980. Flood damages prevented by the project during fiscal year 1980 were $243,900. Total flood damages prevented to date are $2,676,700. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87- 590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Water and Power Resources Services and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County Colorado. Pueblo reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1979 was 46,017 acre-feet, elev. 4807.56 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 165,483 acre-feet, elev. 4835.60 feet on May 19, 1980. Storage on September 30, 1980 was 34,705 acre-feet, elev. 4799.96 feet. There were $86,300 in flood damages prevented in FY 1980. Total flood damages prevented to date are $496,600. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1979 was 98,491 acre-feet, elevation 4,274.3 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1980 was 91,155 acre-feet, elevation 4,272.6 feet on March 5. Storage on September 30, 1980 was 12,196 acre-feet, elevation 4,239.8 feet. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1980. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 17-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Construction was completed during the fiscal year on projects at Holly and Granada, Colorado. Plans and specifications were completed for the project at Larned, Kansas. Costs during FY 1980 were: Granada, Colorado, $742,801, Holly, Colorado, $1,406,623, Lamrned, Kansas, $54,040, Kinsley, Kansas, $24,491; Presidio, Texas, $2,170; Public School de los Chamiso $43,555; Cameron Creek, New Mexico, $5,000 and San Vicente, New Mexico, $25,591. Emergency flood control activities repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year 1980 were $118,719 for advance preparation, and $1,287,294 for flood emergency operations, and $975,899 for repair and restoration. 17-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs for the fiscal year were $21,514. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interests offlood control (Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, PL 780, 83d Congress.) Federal costs for the fiscal year were $19,583. General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $700,357 for flood control studies, $63,087 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies), and $820,746 for pre-authorization studies, Phase I (Arkansas River and Tributaries above John Martin Dam, Colorado, $293,187 and Rio Grande and Tributaries (Rio Puerco/Rio Salado), New Mexico, $527,559). 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $165,681 for flood plain management and technical services, and $41, 812 for three special flood hazard information studies. A new flood insurance study was initiated for Alamogordo, New Mexico, and two studies were initiated to update flood insurance studies for Las Cruces, New Mexico and the northwest portion of El Paso, Texas. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, hydrometeorological studies, and sedimentation studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $7,310. 19. INSPECTION OF DAMS Included under this heading is the program of inventory of dams enacted into law (HR 15951) August 9, 1972. The area of responsibility for the District is the state of New Mexico. Federal costs for the fiscal year were $297,674 for both programs. 17-12 ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 Albuquerque New Work - -28,372 - 17,268,450 Diversion Channels Approp. - -28,372 - 17,268,450 Project, N. Mex. Cost -28,37217268,450 (Federal Funds) (Contributed . New Work - -30,000 -- 5 Funds) Approp. -- 30,000518,356 Cost - - - 545,237 (Other Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. -- - - 854,644 Cost - - - 854,644 2. Conchas Lake, New Work N. Mex. Approp. 240,000 200,000 5,000 68,130 13,823,306 Cost 2,908 234,221 123,980 68,571 13,738,846 Maiont. 423,000 418,500 506,000 532,000 7,489,972 Cost 423,225 390,755 397,494 545,723 7,361,512 3. Dodge City, Kans. New Work Approp. -251,000 -22,000 22,278 - 6,323,420 Cost 550,822 2,525 34,831 - 6,323,420 (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. 54,351 - -0- - 147,999 Funds) Approp. 66,500 - 6,665 - 147999 Cost 665 4,9 4. El Paso, Tex. New Work Approp. 2,200,000 3,300,000 2,853,094 3,931,000 25,438,294 Cost 1,450,574 4,146,919 3,184,758 3,315,190 24,699,936 5. John Martin New Work - 21,000 192,000 29,610 15,424,990 Reservoi r, Colo. A pprop. - 21,000 192,000 299610 i5,424,990 Co. CAopsptrRoeps. ervoir, - 15,155 119,424 92,398 15,409,357 Mainto. 470,000 633,200 1,084,000 1,187,000 9,486,500 Cost 559,927 567,951 965,929 964,294 9,072,987 6. Las Animas, Colo. New Work Approp. 2,040,000 2,429,000 -8,000 - 4,956,000 Cost 2,048,340 2,370,523 51,037 -17,495 4,933,428 7. Las Cruces, N. Mex. New Work Approp. 95,000 238,000 18,000 - 4,762,715 Cost 79,966 238,198 39,682 1,667 4,752,310 (Other Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. 4,000 582,283 - 699,383 FCost 17,309 571,526 -- - 687,353 8. Los Esteros Lake, New Work N. Mex. Approp. 7,900,000 6,505,000 7,041,000 4,772,000 37,123,562 Cost 7,047,399 7,363,338 7,619,618 4,522,362 36,333,036 Maint. Approp. 15,000 278,000 293,000 Cost 2,742 226,714 229,456 9. Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex. 9A. Abiquiu Dam, New Work N. Mex. Approp. 30,000 250,000 2,737,000 2,453,000 26,742,499 Cost 3,263 40,955 2,808,747 2,168,642 26,293,348 Maint. Approp. 459,000 624,000 1,456,200 534,000 5,791,106 Cost 405,931 640,267 1,386,693 481,865 5,608,891 98. Cochiti Lake, New Work N. Mex. Approp. 3,560,000 397,000 69,000 2,380,000 96,900,259 Cost 2,939,099 675,590 542,208 739,072 94,549,641 Maint. Approp. 318,000 549,500 1,123,000 1,035,800 3,501,300 Cost 337,761 530,834 797,977 1,259,753 3,381,830 9C. Galisteo Dam, New Work N. Mex. Approp. - - - - 14,220,053 Cost - - - 14,220,053 Maint. Ap prop. 136,000 75,000 105,000 87,000 811,477 Cost 137,482 74,452 58,738 119,943 796,821 17-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 17-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30., 1980 9D. Jemez Canyon New Work Dam, N. Mex. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9E. Rio Grande New Work Floodway, N. Mex. Approp. Cost 10. Santa Fe River New Work and Arroyo Mascaras Approp. Cost 11. . Trinidad Lake, Colo. 12. Two Rivers Dam, N. Mex. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 663,000 605,761 31,000 6,785 358,000 468,050 100,000 99,224 24,175 695,000 180,980 218,500 212,090 1,600,000 6,660,000 1,700,000 1,714,417 6,086,578 1,619,304 93,000 92,853 82,000 82,306 1. Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. 2. Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. Includes $30,000 for Code 710. 3. Includes funds appropriated for completed Albuquerque and Cochiti to Rio Puerco units and for preconstruction planning of Table 17-B AUTHORIZIN 195,000 181,003 44,100 41,956 85,500 85,324 412,000 184,769 -2,000 102,000 86,372 4,730 4,770 445,000 921,243 260,000 238,817 1,447,000 1,789,677 315,000 420,326 -70 73 167,000 140,381 4,213,147 4,213,147 3,735,351 3,684,525 4,899,868 4,899,868 578,500 550,131 50,606,758 49,715,664 1,028,500 942,048 4,832,869 4,832,867 1,154,912 1,110,561 Espanola Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,041 transferred to Bureau of Reclamation under memorandum agreement between that agency and the Corps. Does not include funds referenced in footnote 3. 4. Includes cost for completed Albuquerque and Cochiti to Rio Puerco units and for preconstruction planning of Espanola Valley unit. Excludes costs incurred by Bureau of Reclamation from funds transferred to that agency under the memorandum agreement covering construction of Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit. JG LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents DODGE CITY, KANS. (See Section 3 of Text) 7 miles of levees and enlargement of river channel to 470 foot wide floodway through city. Based on design flow of 40,000 c.f.s. with added requirements for top of levees to not be lower than profile of 60,000 c.f.s. flow. EL PASO, TEX. (See Section 4 of Text) A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) LAS ANIMAS, COLO. (See Section 6 of Text) About 10.6 miles of levees on both banks of Arkansas River including interior drainage system to protect the city from floodflows up to 140,000 c.f.s. LAS CRUCES, N. MEX. (See Section 7 of Text) H. Doc. 498, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1stsess. H. Doc. 165,89th Cong., 1st sess.' Two earthfill dams, one 15,570 ft. long and the other 1,790 ft. long with uncon- S. Doc. 117, 87th Cong., 2d. sess. trolled outlets and spillways located east of city to intercept floodflows from Alameda, Las Cruces and Campus Arroyos. Discharges from dams to be conveyed through city to Rio Grande by an unlined trapezoidal channel. 17-14 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1965 Oct. 23,1962 - ---- ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., I)ISTRICT Table 17-B (Continued) Acts Sept. 3, 1954 June 30, 1948 May 17. 1950 July 14. 1960 July 14, 1960 March 26, 1964 Oct. 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 and May 17. 1950 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Oct. 22, 1976 July 3, 1958 and Dec. 11, 1944 Oct. 27, 1965 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized LOS ESTEROS IAKE, N. MEX. (See Section 8 of Text) An earthfill dam with maximum height of 218 ft. and 1,865 ft. long for the H. Doc. 339. 84th Cong., 2d sess.' purpose of flood control, irrigation and sedimentation storage located on Sec. 203, Public Law 780, 83d Pecos River 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, N. Mex. Includes modification of Cong.. 2nd sess. existing Alamogordo Dam (USBR project) 29 miles southeast of Santa Rosa, N. Mex., on Pecos River. RIO GRANI)E BASIN, N. MEX. (See Section 9 of Text) Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the H. Doc. 243. 81st Cong., 1st sess. Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in N. Mex. and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Dept. of the Public Law 516. 81st Cong., 2d Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. sess. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58.300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. COCHIITI LAKE, N. MEX. (See Section 9 of Text) Earthfill dam 5.1 miles in length and maximum of 251 ft. in height with Substitute Plan - S. Doc. 94, controlled outlet and uncontrolled spillway, located on Rio Grande and across 86th Cong., 2d sess.' Santa Fe River. For flood control, sediment storage and irrigation release purposes. Authority for Low Chamita Dam on Rio Chama was abrogated when Cochiti Dam was authorized. Project was modified for conservation and development of fish and wildlife Public Law 293. 88th Cong. resources and recreation, about 50,000 acre-feet of water for initial filling of a permanent pool of 1,200 surface acres in the reservoir, and thereafter sufficient water annually to offset evaporation from such area. Project was modified to direct the Secretary of the Army, acting through Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Chief of Engineers, to construct for public recreation purposes an access road from United States Highway 85 to Cochiti Lake. RIO GRANI)E FLOODWAY, N. MEX. (See Section 9 of Text) Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabiliza- H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' tion on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (See Table 17D.) and Public Law 516. 81st Cong. 2d sess. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES (HOT SPRINGS), N. MEX. Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth in the Report H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong.. 1st sess. of the Chief of Engineers dated April 5, 1948, for flood control of Rio Grande Basin. In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan approved in H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong.. 1st sess. the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande Basin, at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. SANTA FE RIVER AND ARROYO MASCARAS, N. MEX. (See Section 10 of Text) Consists of flood control improvements on the Santa Fe River, excluding any PL 94-587. 94th Cong. impoundment east of the existing Nichols Dam, and channel improvement on Arroyo Mascaras, and non-structural measures. TRINIDAD) LAKE, COLO. (See Section 11 of Text) Earthfill dam 6.610 feet long and maximum of 200 feet in height with controlled outlet and uncontrolled spillway for flood control, sediment storage, irrigation and recreation purposes on Purgatoire River. Authorization of Trinidad Dam provides for abrogation of channel improvement project through city of Trinidad, Colo., at time construction of dam is initiated. Relieved city of Trinidad of responsibility for cash contribution toward cost of constructing Trinidad Dam. H. Doc. 325, 84th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc 387, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-298. 89th Cong.. Sec. 201. 'Contains latest published maps. 17-15 I)ocuments TABLE 17-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RIO GRANDE BASIN, N. MEX. RIO GRANDE BASIN, N. MEX.: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9 of Text) Drainage Miles Area Total Above Nearest (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) l)escription Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 30 Espanola 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 24.289,299 1.217,0() acre-feet capacity Jemez Canyon Dam Jemez 2 Bernalillo, 1.034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 4,208,417 N. Mex. 110.750 acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Floodway Rio Grande 123 to 394' - - Channel rectification, 25.744.0002 levee enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 3401 Cochiti, 8,491 Earthfill 251 feet high, 94.520,259 N. Mex. 602.000 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 12 Waldo, 596 Earthfill. 158 feet high. 14,220.053 N. Mex. 89,000 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso. Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. TABLE 17-D RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, N. MEX.: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9E of Text) Location Estimated Reach (river miles)' Cost Truth or Consequences unit (formerly Hot Springs) 123 to 129 $14,200,000 San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit 155 to 226 6,200,000 (1960Y Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit (not including Albuquerque unit) 236 to 340 2,658,000" Albuquerque unit 286 to 305 3,130,000(X)' Espanola Valley unit 366 to 394 (1970)Y 456,0002 'River mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Deferred for restudy. 31n addition, $1.650,000 incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation in this reach. 41n addition, $75,000 incurred by local interests in this reach. 51n addition, estimated cost to local interests is $69,000 (1970). TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance2 Alamogordo diversion channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico4 1966 189,356 - Alpine, Texas' 1977 130,488 - Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colo. (Templeton Gap Floodway)' 1959 881,262 Creede, Willow Creek, Colo. (floodway)' 1952 219.789 Great Bend, Kansas2 1977 883,972 Pecos, Texas' 1977 480,273 - Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colo. (Sec. 212)' 130,678 Pueblo Arkansas River, Colo. (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958 Socorro diversion channel, tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 1965 2,259,328 'Completed. zResponsibility of local interests. :Inactive. 4Deferred. 17-16 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT* This District comprises northern and western portions of Arkansas, a portion of southern Missouri, and a small portion of eastern Oklahoma embraced in drainage basins of Arkansas River and tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, Ark., and below mouth of Poteau River, near Fort Smith, Ark., and drainage basins of White River and tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, Ark. In addition, Little Rock District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of that portion of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System below Pine Bluff. Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on White River below Newport, Ark., and mouth of Wild Goose Bayou. White River downstream from mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans.......................18-2 2. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification Ark..............18-2 3. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Ark.. . ....... . .. . . ..... 18-3 4. Lock and Dam No.2, Ark. ....... 18-3 5. Lock and Dam No.3, Ark. ........ 18-3 6. Lock and Dam No.4, Ark..........18-3 7. Lock and Dam No.5, Ark. ....... 18-3 8. Lock and Dam No.9, Ark ...... .18-3 9. Lock and Dam No. 13, Ark.........18-3 10. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark............ 18-3 11. Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Ark.............. 18-3 12. Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, Ark............ 18-4 13. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Ark...................18-4 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 18-4 Flood Control 15. 16. Blue Mountain Lake, Ark.........18-4 Clearwater Lake, Mo...... ..... 18-4 Flood Control (cont) 17. Nimrod Lake, Ark.................18-5 18. Pine Mountain Lake, Ark.......... 18-5 19. White River Basin (Little Rock District) ........................ 18-6 20. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 18-7 21. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 18-7 22. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ................... 18-7 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 23. Beaver Lake, Ark................. 18-7 24. Bull Shoals Lake, Ark..............18-8 25. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Ark.... ...................... 18-8 26. Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. ....... 18-8 27. Norfork Lake, Ark................ 18-8 28. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Ark ................... 18-9 29. Table Rock Lake, Mo.............18-9 General Investigations 30. Surveys ........................ 18-9 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data.. 18-9 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed in table 18-A at end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at end of this chapter. 18-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., AND KANS. Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, Colo., and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 559 miles above Head of Passes, La. (See Geological Survey state maps, scale 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel of 9 feet deep and 445.2 miles long, beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, La., thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 50.3 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, Okla. Waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark- Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 18-C and 18-D, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation/Lakes. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities were in operation at Pine Bluff-Jefferson County, Little Rock, Dardanelle, and Fort Smith, Ark., and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa-Rogers County), Okla. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark and Van Buren, Ark., and Sallisaw, Okla. Private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at seven locations in Arkansas and at eight locations in Oklahoma. 35 additional private port facilities are being developed along improved waterways in the State of Arkansas and one in Oklahoma. Operations and results during fiscal year. Blue Mountain, Canton, Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Dardanelle Marine Terminal, David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Elk City, Eufaula, Fall River, Fort Gibson, Keystone, W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14), Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17), Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18), Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir (No. 15), Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16), and Oologah; Locks and Dams Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 13, Markham Ferry, Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Nimrod, Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1), Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Pensacola, Pine Bluff Marine Terminal, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Tenkiller Ferry, Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (N6. 8), Toronto, and Wister were in operation. Construction is complete on bank stabilization. For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see report of Tulsa District. Details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Tables 18-C and 18-D, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation/Lakes for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan. 2. BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, ARK. Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas- White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White Rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. See table 18-E for reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project. Estimated cost is $119,300,000 for existing project in Little Rock District. For authorization see Table 18-B, 18-2 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. See requirements for entire project under Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Inspection was made of all existing works, and surveys made of damaged portions. Engineering and design studies continued for repairs to damaged works. Operations by reaches are summarized in table 18-F. Condition at end of fiscal year. Emergency bank stabilization and channel rectification work on Arkansas River in Little Rock District was begun in March 1950 and completed in August 1961. Remaining bank stabilization and channel rectification work proposed for existing project was begun in February 1961 and completed in 1979. Completed work is 100 percent of that proposed for existing project in Little Rock District. Condition of each reach is summarized in table 18-G. 3. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condtion at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in August 1968. 4. LOCK AND DAM NO. 2, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Lock was unwatered; inspected and repaired in September 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in April 1967 and dam was placed in operation in March 1968. 5. LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 6. LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of safe mooring facilities near Lake Langhofer and Pine Bluff were completed. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 7. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 8. LOCK AND DAM NO. 9, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1978. 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and it was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. 11. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. 18-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreation facilities are complete except for cost sharing items under the 710 program. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. 12. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, ARK. Location, previous project, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Lock was unwatered, inspected and repaired in September 1980. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in June 1967. 13. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in June 1980 (and is 12 percent complete) for construction of the dam spillway, and outlet works for a reservoir to provide a source of water supply for the city of Conway, Arkansas, which will replace existing source adversely affected by construction of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Estimated cost of the reservoir is $36,022,000. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-H, Other Authorized Navigation Projects. Flood Control 15. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-D, Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $5,322,000, of which $551,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Three notable rises occurred on Petit Jean River during fiscal year. Flooding was prevented on an average of 6,866 acres of improved land. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Blue Mountain Lake for prevention of flood damages were $468,000, a total of $10,300,000 to September 30, 1980. Pool elevation at start of fiscal year was 384.18 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 25,190 acre-feet of total storage. At end of fiscal year pool elevation was 384.51 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 26,200 acre-feet of total storage. Maximum pool level during fiscal year was 393.34 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 58,660 acre-feet of total storage. The minimum pool elevation during the fiscal year was 383.4 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 24,200 acre-feet of total storage. Inflows into Blue Mountain Lake were below normal for most of the year. The lake level was above the conservation pool from 1 January 1980 to 20 August 1980 when the pool returned to its seasonal pool level. A special operation was performed between 23 March and 1 May. The inflows into the pool were stored until the pool elevation reached 390.00 which is 6 feet above the conservation pool. The stored water (20,000 acrefeet) was used to insure a sustained stage on the Danville gage of 14 feet. The sustained stage allowed time for the Little Rock District personnel to inspect the downstream valley conditions which generate flood complaints. The project was returned to the normal regulation criteria 1 May 1980. A study of the regulation procedures is under way. Sufficient releases were made from lake during low-water periods to meet water requirements downstream. �. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in May 1940, and it was ready for beneficial use in March 1947. 16. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO. Location. See Table 18-1. White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $11,404,000, of which $1,666,000 is Code 710 funds. A reconnaisance report submitted in August 1979 recommends a major rehabilitation of the project by increasing the spillway capacity at an additional estimated cost of $21,460,000. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. 18-4 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. One notable rise occurred on Black River above Clearwater Lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 0 acres of cultivated land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Clearwater Lake for prevention of flood damages were $0, a total of $23,598,000 to September 30, 1980. Pool elevation at start of fiscal year was 494.41 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 22,590 acre-feet of total storage. At end of fiscal year pool elevation was 497.63 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 28,190 acre-feet of total storage. Maximum pool elevation was 504.08 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 41,670 acre-feet of total storage. Minimum pool level was 493.61 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 21,280 acre-feet of total storage. Inflows into Clearwater Lake were below normal for most of the year and the lake level was at or near the top of conservation pool from 22 October 1979 until 30 September 1980. The seasonal conservation pool elevation 498.0 was used from 14 May to 30 May 1980. The drawdown of Clearwater Lake pool is being delayed by a special operation. The pool will be held near elevation 496.5 beginning 15 September to 15 October 1980 then it will be lowered to 494.0 within 7 to 10 days subject to intervening flow conditions. The delay in drawing the pool down to 494.0 is to provide an additional period of low flow conditions needed by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission to complete construction work in low-lying areas of their wildlife refuge near Corning, Arkansas, and to provide an opportunity for gaging downstream spring flows under extended low flow conditions. Releases made from lake during low-water periods were sufficient to supply municipal water for Poplar Bluff and other usages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreational facilities. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 17. NIMROD LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-D, Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,330,000, of which $558,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities were continued. Two notable rises occurred on Fourche La Fave River during fiscal year. Flooding was prevented on an average of 1,245 acres of improved land. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year-attributed to Nimrod Lake for prevention of flood damages were $93,000 making a total of $6,037,000 to September 1980. Pool elevation at start of fiscal year of 339.02 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 19,720 acre-feet of total storage. At end of fiscal year pool elevation was 342.85 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 32,030 acre-feet of total storage. Maximum pool level for the project and during fisc4l year was 351.02 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 75,140 acre-feet of storage. Mimimum pool level during fiscal year was 338.76 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 19,100 acre-feet of total storage. Inflows into Nimrod Lake were below normal for much of the year. The lake was lowered for repair work on the Plainview, Arkansas water supply intake structure. This drawdown of the conservation pool was started 11 September and was completed 29 September 1979. Work was completed on 1 October and refilling operations then began; however, due to lack of rain, the pool stayed below the conservation pool until 23 December 1979. Thereafter the lake was at conservation pool except for minor rises. The seasonal conservation pool elevation 345.0 was used from 1 May to 15 May 1980. The seasonal pool elevation 345.0 was gradually lowered during the summer months to the conservation pool elevation 342.0. Sufficient releases were made from the lake during low water periods to meet water requirements downstream. Twenty two million gallons of water were withdrawn by the city of Plainview, Ark. from Nimrod Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreation facilities. Construction of project began in January 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 18. PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, ARK. Location. Damsite is at mile 35.7 on Lee Creek and 12 miles north of Van Buren, Ark. (See Geological Survey map "Rudy NE, Ark.," scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a lake for flood control, water supply, and recreation. The lake would control runoff from 168 square miles. Capacity would be 261,000 acre-feet, of which 93,100 would be for flood control, 168,000 18-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 for water supply, fish and wildlife mitigation and recreation. Estimated cost is $57,800,000, of which local interests will repay $41,500,000 for water supply storage. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Federal Water Project Recreation Act apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is 98 percent complete. Project is 3 percent complete. 19. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) Location. Improvements are on White River and - tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-I, White River Basin. . Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. Plan.now includes seven lakes, of which two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry, and Bell Foley Lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. Bell Foley Lake was reclassified to inactive in June 1977. Lakes in plan are listed in Table 18-I, White River Basin. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork. Operations and results during fiscal year. Inflows into the lakes were below normal for much of the year, and nine notable rises occurred above Beaver, Table Rock, and Bull Shoals Dams on upper White River, above Norfork Dam on North Fork River, and above Greers Ferry Dam on Little Red River during fiscal year. Regulation of flow on Little Red River in Greers Ferry Lake, on North Fork River in Norfork Lake and on upper White River in Beaver-Table Rock-Bull Shoals Lake system during fiscal year prevented flooding on an average of 27,950 acres of improved land for each rise, of which 16,750, 6,150 and 5,050 was credited to Beaver-Table Rock-Bull Shoals system and Norfork, and Greers Ferry respectively. Estimated monetary flood control benefits for fiscal year attributed to Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, and Greers Ferry Lakes for prevention of flood damages were $137,000, $320,000, $947,000, $423,000 and $596,000 respectively, a total of $2,423,000. Total flood damages prevented by lakes through September 30, 1980 amounted to $79,204,000 of which $8,810,000 accrues to Beaver, $24,217,000 to Table Rock, $30,660,000 to Bull Shoals, $10,863,000 to Norfork and $4,654,000 to Greers Ferry. Pool elevation at Beaver Lake at start of fiscal year was 1,114.77 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,509,000 acre-feet of total storage. At end of fiscal year pool elevation was 1,107.72 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,330,700 acre-feet of total storage. Maximum pool elevation was 1,116.53 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,556,100 acre-feet of total storage. Minimum pool elevation was 1,107.74 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,330,700 acre-feet of total storage. Pool elevation of Table Rock at start of fiscal year was 912.10 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 2,579,200 acre-feet of total storage; and at end of fiscal year was 898.71 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 2,068,800 acre-feet of total storage. Maximum pool elevation during fiscal year was 913.39 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 2,633,400 acre-feet of total storage. Minimum pool elevation during fiscal year was 898.71 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 2,068,800 acre-feet of total storage. Pool elevation of Bull Shoals Lake at start of fiscal year was 656.78 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 3,175,700 acre-feet of total storage; and at end of fiscal year was 648.76 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 2,816,700 acre-feet of total storage. Maximum pool elevation was 656,78 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 3,175,700 acre-feet of total storage. Minimum pool elevation was 645.76 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 2,690,200 acre-feet of total storage. Pool elevation of Norfork Lake at start of fiscal year was 550.84 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,225,776 acre-feet of total storage. At end of fiscal year the pool elevation was 540.49 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,015,900 acre-feet of total storage. Maximum pool elevation was 553.12 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,275,900 acre-feet of total storage. Minimum pool elevation was 540.36 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,013,500 acre-feet of total storage. Pool elevation of Greers Ferry Lake at start of fiscal year was 459.76 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,871,600 acre-feet of total storage. At end of fiscal year pool elevation was 450.13 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,586,600 acre-feet of total storage. Maximum pool elevation was was 462.15 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,946,800 acre-feet of total storage. Minimum pool 18-6 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT elevation was 449.99 feet above mean sea level, corresponding to 1,582,700 acre-feet of total storage. Delivered 139,705,900 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing, of which 58,442,300; 311,983,000; 466,893,000; 166,506,100; and 135,881,500 kilowatt-hours were generated at Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, and Greers Ferry powerplants, respectively. Peak demands of 123,000 kilowatts occurred June 27, 1980 at Beaver; 231,000 kilowatts on June 2, 1980 at Table Rock; 363,000 kilowatts on October 18, 1980 at Bull Shoals; 87,000 kilowatts on April 22, 1980 at Norfork; and 110,000 kilowatts on April 22, 1980 at Greers Ferry. There was sufficient power storage at all times to supply scheduled loads. Installed capacities of plants are 112,000; 200,000; 340,000; 80,550 and 96,000 kilowatts at Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, and Greers Ferry, respectively. During the fiscal year 372,510; 1, 728,120; 2,693,670; 1,105,020; and 845,020 acre-feet of water was released through turbines at Beaver, Table Rqck, Bull Shoals, and Norfork, respectively. At the start of fiscal year there were 146,500; 116,400; 33,400; 124,500 and 42,900 acre-feet of available storage space in the power pools at Beaver, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Table Rock, and Greers Ferry Lakes, respectively. At the end of fiscal year there were 95,800; 231,300; 240,700; 633,700; and 323,900 acrefeet of available storage capacity in the power pools at Beaver, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Table Rock, and Greers Ferry Lakes respectively. This storage capacity was available for storage of flood flows in the power pools. During the fiscal year 28,960 acre-feet of water were released from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,600 acre-feet were released from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; 14,600 acre-feet of water were released from Greers Ferry Lake for US Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Beaver Water District withdrew 8,609 million gallons from Beaver Lake; and Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, Ark., withdrew 800 million gallons from Norfork Lake; the Community Water System, Cleburne County, Ark., withdrew 194.2 million gallons; and the city of Clinton, Ark., withdrew 291 million gallons from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry Lakes are complete and in operation. Preconstruction planning is discontinued on Bell Foley. Progress on these lakes is in individual reports. Water Valley and Lone Rock Lakes have been deauthorized. The White River Fish Hatchery authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 would be located on White River in Carroll County, Arkansas about 9 miles northwest of the city of Eureka Springs to provide a plan of improvement for construction of trout production facilities including a fish hatchery downstream from Beaver dam. Total estimated cost is $6,000,000. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects, shown in Section 21 as completed projects, were made September-November to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Cost for fiscal year was $54,094. Total cost to September 30 was $667,808. 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-J, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost of advance preparation for fiscal year was $0. Emergency bank protection on White River at Oil Trough, Arkansas, local cooperation, (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Estimated cost is $243,000 (Contract amount is $178,900). Cost for fiscal year was $49,242. Reimbursable Federal disaster work for the Little Rock, Arkansas flood disaster of September 13-14, 1978. Cost for fiscal year was $527. Emergency flood operations for the Arkansas, Black and White River Basins during FY 80. Federal cost for fiscal year was $0. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 23. BEAVER LAKE, ARK. 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,860,000, of which $5,799,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Results of operation of Beaver Lake are shown in Section 19. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. 24. BULL SHOALS LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating units is $96,612,000, of which $10,886,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Results of operation of Bull Shoals Lake are shown in Section 19. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. 25. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), ARK. Location See Table 18-C, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $85,133,522, of which $1,708,000 is Code 710 funds. For authorization see Table 18-B. Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Pool fluctuated within 2-foot power pondage, elevation 336.00 to 338.00. Power generation continued. Installed capacity is 124,000 kilowatts. Delivered 589,240,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Peak demand of 140,000 kilowatts occurred October 2, 1979. Released 14,508,770 acre-feet of water through turbines. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Operation and maintenance continued at cost of $2,541,162. A new visitor's center and resident office is planned; the estimated cost is $1,169,385. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock was placed in operation in December 1969. 26. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000, of which $8,080,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. A visitor's center is planned; the estimated cost is $500,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in June 1957, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in January 1962, and power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in March and May 1964, and water supply was placed in operation in April 1971. 27. NORFORK LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $107,547,000, of which $4,1254)00 is Code 710 funds, $33,000,000 is for addition of power units 3 and 4, and $41,700,000 is for highway bridge 18-8 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT construction. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Results of operation of Norfork Lake are shown in Section 19. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, highway bridges, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. A construction contract was awarded on 17 April 1979 for construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries. The work is 34 percent complete. Preconstruction planning for addition of power units 3 and 4 was continued and is 60 percent complete. 28. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), ARK. Location. See Table 18-C, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed. It has a spillway with 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is provided in Pool No. 13 between elevations 391.00 and 392.00. Estimated cost is $86,019,865 of which $400,000 is Code 710 funds. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Delivered 320,153,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Peak demand of 88,000 kilowatts occurred May 1980. There was 12,235,540 acrefeet of water released through the turbines. Continued operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964 and is complete. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: Unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973, and unit 5, May 1974. Work remaining consists principally of modifications to powerplant. 29. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO. Location. See Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000, of which $5,793,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Results of operation of Table Rock Lake are shown in Section 19. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Cost for the fiscal year was $1,092,619, of which $328,760 was for navigation studies, $589,927 was for flood damage prevention studies, $59,491 was for review of authorized projects, $88,076 was for comprehensive studies and $26,365 was for coordination studies with other agencies. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Six flood insurance studies were completed for cities in Ark. and Mo. Flood Plain data and technical services and guidance were furnished to other Federal, state and local agencies and individuals. Cost for the fiscal year was $189,003. See Table 18-K, Flood Insurance Studies Completed During Fiscal Year. Cost for Inspection of Dams for the fiscal year was $402,782, of which $325,143 was for the National Program. During the fiscal year, 83 stream gaging stations were operated, of which 54 were operated cooperatively by Geological Survey and Corps, and the remaining 29 by the Corps. Suspended sediment samples were collected at 17 stations during the fiscal year in cooperation with Geological Survey, and suspended loads were 18-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 determihed at certain stations. One hundred and twelve rainfall and/or river reporting stations were operated in a cooperative program by National Weather Service and Corps for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records also were collected at certain hydroclimatic rainfall stations under a cooperative program of the two agencies. General hydrologic studies relating to streamflow frequency and distribution were continued. Cost for the fiscal year was $1,816. 18-10 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 BAarskiann, sAasr kR., iver NAewpp rWopo.r k $ 2,977,782 $ 4,315,125 $ 3,977,900 OkBas&in K., ans. Dams 114,560 -279 562,800 O&k Klaa.,n s. Navigation 2,863,222 4,315,404 3,415,100 Cost 5,356,075 4,907,070 3,699,197 Dams 182,732 1,467 423,158 Navigation 5,173,343 4,905,603 3,276,039 Maint. A prop. 29,004,959 32,078,724 36,165,433 Dams * 5,588,911 6,825,800 7,828,820 Navigation 23,416,048 25,252,924 28,336,613 Cost 30,083,492 32,260,081 32,667,064 Dams 5,565,064 6,820,150 6,915,709 Navigation 24,518,428 25,431,931 25,715,355 Rehab. Approp. - - - Cost - - - New Work Contrib. - - - Cost - - - Special Funds - - - ost - - - Other Contrib. - - - Cost - - - 2. Bank Stabili- New Work zation & Channel Approp. 0 0 0 Rectification, Ark. Cost 510,856 8,705 12,752 3-13. Navigation Locks & Dams, Ark. 15. Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. 16. Clearwater Lake, Mo. 17. Nimrod Lake, Ark. 18. Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,747,000 4,174,095 9,300,800 9,766,682 0 96 371,800 403,206 143,000 21,035 900,200 922,546 -2,802 0 523,100 515,039 365,000 224,205 4,173,000 4,159,272 9,356,000 9,188,411 0 410,900 393,512 96,000 139,216 847,400 840,511 0 1,591 493,800 497,060 20,175 210,356 4,173,000 2,067,637 11,197,281 10,646,597 2,200 959 560,400 527,727 16,400 86,581 1,692,667 1,246,855 -2,802 1,985 641,900 637,677 166,000 119,846 Total to FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 $ 5,672,433 $1,433,332,574 342,322 149,797,980 5,330,111 1,283,534,594 6,169,941 1,432,925,302 266,723 149,538,311 5,903,218 1,283,386,991 32,863,209 343,480,375 6,159,147 76,423,064 26,704,062 267,057,311 32,725,494 336,330,937 6,471,861 75,592,672 26,253,633 260,738,265 - 291,106 - 291,106 - 1,609,842 - 1,609,842 - 19,926,755 - 19,926,755 - 531,336 - 531,336 0 119,300,184 - 119,300,184 - 4,561,666 - 4,561,666 4,230,000 389,457,473' 4,626,391 393,350,059' 11,058,300 109,806,187 9,939,392 105,653,748 - 973,385 - 963,567 - 531,336 - 531,336 - 5,069,974 1,221 5,069,954 467,092 5,902,586 514,307 5,894,261 2,000 10,340,403' 10,982 10,340,404' 2,002,000 11,155,622 1,863,180 10,522,948 - 3,980,627 11,146 3,980,558 530,067 6,995,845 569,606 6,981,673 - 1,432,330 61,920 1,432,513 18-11 TABLE 18-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 19. White River New Work 23. Beaver Lake, Ark. 24. Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. 25. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10), Ark. 26. Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. 27. Norfork Lake, Ark. 28. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam (No. 12), Ark. 29. Table Rock Lake, Mo. Basin (Little Rock District) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1. Includes $77,762 prior to 1952 and $1,552,416 for general studies. 2. Includes $47,103 Public Works acceleration funds. 3. Includes $491,928 Public Works acceleration funds. Does not include $257,491 appropriation and $190,472 cost for Jacksonport State Park, Ark., including $107,267 contributed funds. 4. Includes $259,812 Public Works acceleration funds. 5. Includes $402,162 for general studies. 6. Includes $168,012 for general studies. 7. Includes $185,513 Public Works acceleration funds. 18-12 502,000 1,182,207 697,300 291,453 941,168 672,942 11,168,900 11,421,500 13,545,367 11,134,589 11,333,981 12,998,872 0 158,000 59%600 63,715 116,643 48,838 1,365,800 1,416,400 1,949,000 1,274,700 1,411,515 1,715,989 42,000 114,500 28,000 14,753, 91,062 29,542 2,449,900 2,605,000 2,757,000 2,541,680 2,408,250 2,702,649 2,802 0 61,000 57,822 0 6,110 2,239,600 2,046,100 2,447,681 2,244,116 2,058,623 2,312,381 162,000 293,000 115,000 108,157 207,842 135,809 2,038,900 1,932,700 2,560,500 594,574 2,051,869 2,352,224 106,000 100,000 200,206 44,055 127,140 263,349 1,855,100 2,133,000 2,382,800 1,847,562 2,274,585 2,231,832 770,000 -166,000 26,100 230,057 375,176 976 1,704,000 1,888,700 2,611,281 1,699,022 1,746,122 2,225,256 58,000 425,000 97,300 39,062 259,265 108,9823 2,559,000 2,377,000 3,203,400 2,598,908 2,347,251 2,749,323 10,721,700 306,434,672' 11,711,320 306,921,049' 12,217,000 135,690,769 12,759,439 133,925,148 - 46,085,833 62,399 46,085,641 1,397,000 16,817,959 1,702,171 16,767,335 - 88,827,611' - 88,822,848' 2,803,000 30,558,073 2,448,917 29,865,267 1,127,000 84,270,124' 1,173,061 84,261,240' 2,470,000 24,173,513 2,549,462 24,048,010 -156,900 48,788,512 3,698 48,788,409 2,364,000 22,160,718 2,521,094 22,027,381 11,074,000 44,705,929 11,627,263 44,695,368 1,749,000 24,645,791 1,826,434 24,488,414 - 85,627,412' - 85,620,964' 1,906,000 15,580,842 2,281,417 15,356,342 -197,400 67,244,388' 6,978 67,224,388' 1,902,000 30,352,606 2,397,643 30,253,803 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., & KANS. (See Section 1 of Text) June 28, 1938 Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, Okla. Oologah Lake, Okla. Canton Lake, Okla. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. Wister Lake, Okla. Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. Nimrod Lake, Ark. August 18, 1941 Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla., and Mo., and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, Okla. Fall River Lake, Kans. Elk City Lake, Kans. Toronto Lake, Kans. Neodosha Lake, Kans. July 24, 1946 Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. July 24, 1946 Ap proved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, Okla. Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. Blackburn Reservoir, Okla. Mannford Reservoir, Okla. Taft Reservoir, Okla. Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, Ark. Eufaula Lake, Okla. Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, Ark. Short Mountain Lock and Dam, Okla. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. June 30, 1948 Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, Oa. May 17, 1950 Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn, and Taft Reservoirs. July 14, 1960 Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all previous authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. 1965 Pine Mountain Dam and Lake authorized for construction. June 22, 1936 l)December 22, 1944 October 27, 1965 June 28, 1938 LITTLE ROCK LEVEE, ARK. (EAST END-FOURCHE BAYOU) Levees to provide flood protection to people and city property. Modified local flood protection project to raise grade and protect additional areas. Authorized 45,000 g.p.m. pump station and excavated storage area. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 23 of Text) Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, Ark., Norfork Lake, Ark., Clearwater Lake, Mo., Water Valley Lake, Ark., Bell Foley Lake, Ark., Greers Ferry Lake, Ark., and White River emergency. Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H2.d D soecs.s .758, 79th Cong., S. Doc. 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 270, 89th Cong., Flood Control Act of 1965 (Title II, Public Law 89-298) H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 11. l)oc. 447, 78th Cong.. 2d secss. S. Doc. 55, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 18-13 Work Authorized Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 18-b (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 1960 October 23, 1962 March 1, 1974 October 22, 1976 June 22, 1936 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, Ark., and Mo., Table Rock Lake, Mo., and Ark., and Norfork Lake, Ark., and Mo. (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Jacksonport State Park in Jackson County, Arkansas. Improvements along the White River for recreation and navigation and the protection of the park which is historically significant. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake. White River Fish-Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. VILLAGE CREEK, WHITE RIVER, AND MAYBERRY LEVEE DISTRICT, ARK. Approved levee protection. Modified existing project to add interior drainage in accordance with plan I, and directed study of plan III. Modified project to provide a pumping plant. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 2d sess. River and Harbor Act of 1960 as amended Section 107 H. Doc. 352, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105 H. Doc. 102, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 225, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 577, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 18-14 TABLE 18-C ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK, OKLA., AND KANS.: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) M U stre fri Feature Mo LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell L&D No. 1 Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 L&D No. 3 L&D No. 4 L&D No. 5 David D. Terry L&D No. 6 Murray L&D No. 7 Toad Suck Ferry L&D No. 8 L&D No. 9 Dardanelle L&D No. 10 L&D No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D (No. 12) iles Elevation Char- Year p Upper Depth on Miter acter Opened eam am LLoocckk PPooooll SSiillll ooff of Type of Ntaov i- EstiTmoatateld Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- Dam Construction gation Cost uth' Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion 10.3 8 east of Arkansas 110 by 600 Post, Ark. 13.3 6 east of Arkansas 110 by 600 Post, Ark. 40.5 3 southeast Arkansas - Post, Ark. 502 5 north of Grady, Ark. 110 by 600 66.0 7 east of Pine Bluff, 110 by 600 Ark. 86.3 4 southeast of 110 by 600 Redfield, Ark. 108.1 12 southeast of Little 110 by 600 Rock, Ark. 125.4 6 northwest of Little 110 by 600 Rock, Ark. 155.9 6 west of Conway, Ark. 110 by 600 176.9 3 southwest of 110 by 600 Morrilton, Ark. 205.5 2 northwest of 110 by 600 Dardanelle, Ark. - Deleted 256.8 1 east of Ozark, Ark. 110 by 60 30 max. 20 nom. 28 max. 20 14 17 18 18 16 19 54 142 162 182 196 213 231 249 265 284 338 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 34 370 18 15 Piles in Fixed Concrete sand overflow 14 Piles in - - sand - Piles in Movable Gated concrete sand spillway with embankment ends 14 Piles in Movable Gated concrete sand spillway with embankment ends 14 Piles in Movable Gated concrete sand spillway with embankment ends 14 Clay Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 14 Piles in Movable Gated concrete sand spillway with embankment ends 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 14 Sandstone Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 17 Sandstone Movable Gated concrete and shale spillway with embankment ends 1967 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 $32,463,0002 40,317,000 33,848,000 40,875,000 29,641,000 61,648,000 33,120,000 72,051,000 33,117,000 85,133,522 86,019,865 r14 0 0 0-3 01 01 TABLE 18-C (Continued) Miles Upstream from Feature L&D No. 13 TULSA DISTRICT' L&D No. 13 (part) W. D. Mayo L&D No. 14 Robert S. Kerr L&D No. 15 Webbers Falls L&D No. 16 Chouteau L&D No. 17 Newt Graham L&D No. 18 [outh' 292.8 319.6 336.2 366.6 401.5 421.6 A Nei 7 east o Ark. 4 east o Okla. 1 north ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Elevation Char- Upper Depth on Miter acter Lock Pool Sill of Kin( ,iles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- of arest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dan f Fort Smith, 110 by 600 21 391 18 14 Sandstone Mov and shale f Redland, 110 by 600 21 412 14 15 Rock Mov . ...... o.. f C. o..wV...V. l in-gto- n.7 110 by 600 46 458 18 14 Rock Mov Okla. 1 northwest of Gore, Okla. 4 northwest of Okay, Okla. 8 southwest of Inola, Okla. 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 29 24 21 487 511 532 19 15 15 16 14 14 Rock Rock Rock Mov Mov Mov Year Opened d to Type of Navi- S Construction gation able Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends - 1970 able Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends able Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends vable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends vable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends able Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends Total Estimated Cost $47,993,000 6,858,000 32,655,000 94,578,250 83,738,227 31,619,000 44,355,000 ~Ti 0 C C ~Tj 0 z 0 TABLE 18-C (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete .................... $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, 99 percent complete ........ .................................. 7,527,000 Total, Little Rock District ................................... 723,053,5713 Navigation aids (US Coast Guard) ............................... 2,268,000 Tulsa District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete...................................... 12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete....................................... ............ 2,750,000 Subtotal........................................$309,253,515' 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River except Dam No. 2 is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Includes cost of entrance channel. 3. Includes $3,217,000 Code 710 funds. 4. Detail report of individual features in Tulsa District Report. Upstream Lakes: Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River com plete ................................................... $ 46,695,4225 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete .................................................. 123,126,205' Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete ................................................... 121,802,048' Subtotal................................................. 291,623,675 Total, Tulsa District....................................... 600,877,190' Total Project Cost 99.8 percent complete .................... $1,326,198,761 5. Includes $10,065,000 for added water supply facilities, and $8,000 Code 710 funds. 6. Includes $3,800,605 Code 710 funds. 7. Includes $23,000 Code 710 funds. 8. Includes $448,060 Code 710 funds. 9. Includes $550,547 Code 710 funds. 00 I-a t-4 0 b-3 b TABLE 18-D ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or Total Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Estimated Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Cost Blue Mountain, Ark. Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, Ark. 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 - 1947 $ 5,322,000 Canton, Okla. North Canadian 384.3 Canton, Okla. 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 - 1948 10,915,727 Elk City, Kans. Elk 8.7 Independence, Kans. 634 (Table Mound) 107 Earthfill 284,300 - 1966 19,042,990 Eufaula, Okla.' * Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, Okla. 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 121,802,048 Fall River, Kans. Fall 542 Fall River, Kans. 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 - 1949 10,506,393 Fort Gibson, Okla.' ' Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, Okla. 12,492 110 Concrete gravity 1,284,400 45,000 1953 63,402,602 Keystone, Okla.' * *' Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, Okla. 74,506 121 Earthfill 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,126205 Markham Ferry, Okla.' Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, Okla. 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,908,756 Neodesha, Kans.' Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, Kans. 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 - 0 18,100,000 Nimrod, Ark. Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, Ark. 680 103 Concrete gravity 336,010 - 1942 4,330,000 Oologah, Okla.2 Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, Okla. 4,339 137 Earthfill 1,519,000 - 1974 46,695,422 Pensacola, Okla.' * Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, Okla. 10,298 147 Concrete arch 2,197,000 86,400 1940 52,126 Tenkiller Ferry, Okla. * Illinois 12.8 Gore, Okla. 1,610 197 Earthfill 1,230,800 34,000 1953 23,990,995 Toronto, Kans. Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, Kans. 730 90 Earthfill 199,700 - 1960 13,896,324 Wister, Okla. Poteau 60.9 Wister, Okla. 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 - 1949 10,501,226 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah, 93 percent complete 186,969,139 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 98 percent complete 1,516,167,900 M- 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Estimate includes Code 710 funds. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Damn (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O' The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 7. Estimate includes Code 710 funds and present estimate cost of power units. :0 0 zv LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION: REACH AND LOCATION (See Section 2 of Text) Reach Fort Smith to Mill Creek Mountain Mill Creek Mountain to Morrisons Bluff Dardanelle Rock to Morrilton Bridge Morrilton Bridge to Fourche La Fave Fourche La Fave to Little Rock Little Rock to Jefferson County Free Bridge Jefferson County Free Bridge to Rob Roy Bridge Rob Roy Bridge to Arkansas Post Arkansas Post to Mile 33.7 Arkansas-White Cutoff Miles 362.0 to 327.0 Miles 362.0 to 327.0 Miles 327.0 to 285.0 Miles 257.0 to 221.0 Miles 221.0 to 192.0 Miles 192.0 to 165.5 Miles 165.5 to 115.6 Miles 101.7 to 89.0 Miles 89.0 to 42.0 Miles 42.0 to 33.7 Miles 5.0 to 0 1. River mileage from 1943 survey. 2. Arkansas-White Cutoff mileage from 1949 survey. TABLE 18-F BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION: FY 80 OPERATIONS (See Section 2 of Text) New Work (Contract) Completed Pilot Revet- Channel Reach ments Dikes Excavation (river miles) (lin. ft) (lin. ft) (cu. yd.) Revetments (lin. ft) Initate.orCon Initiated or Con. Pilot Channel Dikes Excavation (lin. ft) (cu. yd.) Rofe mDoikveasl (Un. ft) 362.0 to 327.0 - 327.0 to 285.0 - 257.0 to 221.0 - 221.0 to 192.0 - 192.0 to 165.5 - 165.5 to 115.6 - - 101.7 to 89.0' - 89.0 to 42.0' - 42.0 to 33.7' - -5 to0' - Lands and damages - 1. River mileage from 1943 survey. 2. Arkansas-White Cutoff mileage from 1949 surveycontract work was completed for capping out the Arkansas- White River Cutoff closure structure in FY 65. 18-19 Coofst Work Location of Reach TABLE 18-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION: CONDITION - SEPT. 30, 1980 (See Section 2 of Text) Completed Work Work Underway Pilot Pilot Channel Revet- Channel Revet- Reach Excavation Dike ments Excavation Dike ments Date Percent (river miles) (cu. yd.) (lin. ft) (lin. ft) (cu. yd.) (lin. ft) (lin. ft) Begun Complete 362.0 to 327.0 4,013,769 106,335 171,350 - - - Jan 54 100 327.0 to 285.0 1.619,065 68,605 112,891 - - - Sep 54 100 257.0 to 221.0 12,532,782 100,746 151,780 - - - May 50 100 221.0 to 192.0 2,087,889 96,241 130,719 - - - Mar 50 100 192.0 to 165.5 450,000 84,101 111,058 - - - Mar 60 100 165.5 to 115.6 9,860,931 146,335 255,268 - - - Jun 50 100 101.7 to 01 19,340,832 244,760 391,218 - - - 1950 100 Land and damages - - - - - - - 100 1. River mileage from 1943 survey. Includes Arkansas- White River closure structure. TABLE 18-H OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Black River, Ark., and Mo.' 1950 $ 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, Ark., and Mo.' 1964 17,0002 132,178 Upper White River, Ark. ' 1952 813,197 1,788,374 White River, Ark., (above Peach Orchard Bluff)' 1950 - 785,666 1. Channel adequate for existing commerce. Completion not contemplated. 2. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 3. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1, 2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Cong. 4. Completed. 5. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, Ark., transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 18-20 TABLE 18-I WHITE RIVER BASIN (See Section 19 of Text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power Total Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estimated Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost Beaver' White 609.0 Eureka Springs, Ark. 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 50,860,000 Bell Foley' Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, Ark. 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 () 60,000,000 Bull Shoals2 White 418.6 Mountain Home, Ark. 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,612,000 Clearwater2 Black 257.4 Piedmont, Mo. 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 () 11,404,000 Greers Ferry2 Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, Ark. 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,000 Norfork2 North Fork 4.8 Norfork, Ark. 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 107,547,000 Table Rock' White . 528.8 Branson, Mo. 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,000 Village Creek, () $9,580,000 Jackson and Village Creek, Lawrence Tributary of Counties, Ark.' White River 0-61.2 Walnut Ridge, Ark. 283 White River Fish Hatchery White 608.3 Eureka Springs, Ark. - - (3) 6,000,000 Total 1,580,000 828,550 468,361,000 1. Current FY price levels unless otherwise noted. 2. For details of this project, see individual report. 3. None. 4. Inactive-reclassified June 1977. 5. Based on October 1976 price levels including $4,960,000 Non-Federal cost. 0 , P-4 TABLE 18-J REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, Ark.' Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark.' Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark.' Clarksville, Ark.2 Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark.2 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, Ark.2 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark."2 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark.2 Crooked Creek, Lake and Levee, Ark.' East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, Mo.' Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark.2 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark.2 From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (above Plum Bayou)2 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Ark. Little Rock Levee, Ark., East End Fourche Bayou McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark.2 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark.' Newport, White River, Ark.2 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark.' Petit Jean River, Ark.' * Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark.' Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark.' South Bank Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark.' South Bank Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, Ark., Tucker Lakes'2 Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark.' Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, Ark.' Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, Ark.' West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark.' 1975 $ 1,407,116 1958 1951 1962 1959 1952 1952 1954 1969 1958 1941 1951 1954 1973 1975 1950 1953 1941 1958 1966 1950 1941 1964 1961 1952 1972 1977 1962 584,315 919,955 271,717 187,440 1,018,840 390,952 2,001,820 304,699 99,511 1,077,546 845,300 22,890 1,823,693 422,549 198,069 314,276 512,001 84,350 269,907 81,023 1,404,852 409,115 438,222 1,567,156 510,217 1,269,959 1. Reclassified as inactive in June 1977. 2. Completed. 3. Recommended to continue in deferred category in August 1977. 4. See H Doc. 577, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for description of project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 18-22 --- --- LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-K FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 31 of Text) Estimated Location Requesting Agency Date Completed C of E Cost Alexander, Ark. Pulaski County, Ark. Amagon, Ark. Jackson County, Ark. Grubbss, Ark. Jackson County, Ark. Newport, Ark. Jackson County, Ark. Butler County, Mo. Greene County, Mo. Total City of Alexander, Ark. City of Amagon, Ark. City of Grubbs, Ark. City of Newport, Ark. County of Butler, Mo. County of Greene, Mo. 18-23 Sep 80 Nov 79 Nov 79 Sep 80 Jan 80 Jun 80 $ 4,000 5,200 5,550 17,100 160,400 126,000 $316,250 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT* This District comprises southern Kansas, small portions of southwestern Missouri and western Arkansas, northern Oklahoma, northern portion of Texas Panhandle, and small portions of northeastern New Mexico and southeastern Colorado, embraced in drainage basin of Arkansas River and tributaries above mouth of Poteau River, inclusive, and below mouth of Walnut Creek near Great Bend, Kans., exclusive of that portion of watershed of South Canadian River and its tributaries west of Texas-New Mexico State line; and a portion of western Arkansas, northern portion of Texas, and southern portion of Oklahoma embraced in drainage basin of Red River and its tributaries above Fulton, Ark. In addition, Tulsa District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of that portion of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in Oklahoma. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project, Okla........19-3 2. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans........ ... 19-3 3. Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River River, Ark. and Okla..... .... 19-4 4. Lock and Dam No. 13, (pool) Channel Improvement, Arkansas River Basin, Okla...............19-4 5. Low Head Locks and Dams, Okla.....19-4 5 A. W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.........19-4 5 B. Chouteau Lock and Dam, Verdigris River Basin, Okla.........19-4 5 C. Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Verdigris River Basin, Okla.........19-5 6. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Okla...... .19-5 7. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 19-5 8. Navigation Work under Special Authorization (Poteau River) ... 19-5 Flood Control 9. Arcadia Lake, Deep Fork River Basin, Okla...........19-5 10. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control ............... ........ 19-6 10 A. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Supplemental Studies ...... 19-5 10 B. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Wichita River, Tex.........19-6 Flood Control (cont) Page 10 C. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Okla., Tex............ ..... . 19-6 11. Big Hill Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans....................19-7 12. Big Pine Lake, Red River Basin, Tex.............................19-7 13. Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla.........................19-8 14. Candy Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla........................19-8 15. Canton Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla...................19-8 16. Cedar Point Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans.................19-9 17. Clayton Lake, Little River Basin, O kla.............................19-9 18. Copan Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla......... .... ......... . 19-9 19. Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans......19-10 20. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, Ark.......................... 19-10 21. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark................ ............ 19-10 22. El Dorado Lake, Walnut River Basin, Kans.... .............. 19-11 23. Elk City Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans.................. 19-11 24. Fall River Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans.....................19-11 25. Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla.................19-12 26. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, Ark..........................19-12 *All costs and financial statements (table 19-A) for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 19-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Flood Control (cont) Page 27. Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla................19-12 28. Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.....................19-12 29.. Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Okla........... .. ... .. 19-13 30. Hulah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla............. ... 19-13 31. Joe Creek, Tulsa, Okla.............19-13 32. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans................ 19-14 33. Kaw Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla..................... 19-14 34. Lake Kemp, Wichita River Basin, Tex................ .... 19-14 35. Lukfata Lake, Little River Basin, Okla....................19-14 36. Marion, Kans....................19-15 37. Marion Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans................19-15 38. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark.......................19-15 39. Oologah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla.................. .. 19-16 40. Optima Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla............ ..... 19-16 41. Pat Mayse Lake, Red River Basin, Tex............ ....... 19-16 42. Pine Creek Lake, Little River Basin, Tex.............. ........ 19-16 43. Red River Below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)..................19-17 44. Shidler Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla................19-17 45. Skiatook Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla......................19-17 46. Toronto Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans...................19-18 47. Towanda Lake, Walnut River Basin, Kans....................19-18 48. Waurika Lake, Red River Basin, Okla............................19-18 49. Wister Lake, Poteau River Basin, Okla......................19-19 50. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects................19-19 51. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations............19-19 51 A. Altus Reservoir, Red River Basin, Okla..................... 19-19 Flood Control (cont) Page 51 B. Arbuckle Reservoir, Red River Basin, Okla.................... 19-19 51 C. Cheney Reservoir, Ninnescah River Basin, Kans...............19-19 51 D. Fort Cobb Reservoir, Washita River Basin, Okla.................19-19 51 E. Foss Reservoir, Washita River Basin, Okla......................19-19 51 F. Mountain Park (Tom Steed Lake), Red River Basin, O kla................... ......... 19-19 51 G. Norman Lake (Lake Thunderbird), Little River Basin, Okla......................... 19-20 51 H. Sanford Reservoir (Lake Meredith), Canadian River Basin, Okla......................19-20 52. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.......................19-20 53. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization............ 19-20 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Broken Bow Lake, Little River Basin, Okla................. 19-20 Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Red River Basin, Tex. and Okla.........19-21 Eufaula Lake, Canadian River Basin, Okla.................. .19-21 Fort Gibson Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla.........19-21 Keystone Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla..................19-22 Markham Ferry Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla......................... 19-22 Pensacola Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla.................19-22 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.........................,.19-23 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Illinois River Basin, Okla.... :. ........... 19-23 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Arkansas River Basin, Okla........19-23 General Investigations Surveys.......................19-24 Collection and Study of Basic Data.. 19-24 19-2 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Navigation 1. BIG AND LITTLE SALLISAW CREEKS, OKLA. Location. About 3 miles southwest of Sallisaw, Sequoyah County, Okla., approximately 10 miles from the existing navigation sailing line upstream on Big Sallisaw Creek and Little Sallisaw Creek (about navigation mile 341.6). Existing project. Plan of improvement consists of a 9-foot-deep, 100-foot-wide navigation channel extending from near Sallisaw, Okla., to the existing McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and of a 400- by 500-foot turning basin. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated Federal cost is $3,400,000. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Not applicable. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is underway. 2. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., AND KANS. Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, Colo., and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, La. (See Geological Survey state maps, scale 1:500,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel 9 feet deep and 445.2 miles long beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599.0 miles above Head of Passes, La.; thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42.0 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 50.3 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, Okla. Waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark- Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for Sans Bois, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District, Arkansas. The authorized features of the multiple-purpose plan within the Tulsa District are listed in table 19-C. Federal costs for combined comprehensive and multiplepurpose plan total $1,531,174,163. Local cooperation. For the navigation system, local interest must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities were in operation at Pine Bluff, Little Rock, Dardanelle and Fort Smith, Ark., and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa), Okla. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Clarksville, Van Buren, Ark., and Sallisaw, Okla. Private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at seven locations in Arkansas and at eight locations in Oklahoma. Ten additional private port facilities are being developed along improved waterways in the State of Arkansas and one in Oklahoma. Operations and results during fiscal year. Blue Mountain, Canton, Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Dardanelle Marine Terminal, David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Elk City, Eufaula, Fall River, Fort Gibson, Keystone, W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14), Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17), Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18), Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir (No. 15), Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16), and Oologah; Locks and Dams Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 13, Markham Ferry, Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Nimrod, Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1), Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Pensacola, Pine Bluff Marine Terminal, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Tenkiller Ferry, Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Toronto, and Wister were in operation. For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas see report for Little Rock District. Details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas are shown on following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Status of individual items are reported separately in this chapter. 19-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 3. BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. AND OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River between Robert S. Kerr Damsite and Fort Smith, Ark., river miles 336.2 and 308.0, respectively. (See Geological Survey maps for Sans Bois, Okla., Sallisaw, Okla., and Fort Smith, Ark.-Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost was $12,700,038 for existing project located in Tulsa District. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Operation and maintenance of project structures is reported and under appropriate navigation locks and dams. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1952 and completed December 1969. 4. LOCK AND DAM NO. 13 (POOL) CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Fort Smith, Ark., to W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam. Existing project. Consists of channel cutoffs and enlargement work to provide a navigable channel 9 feet deep with a minimum width of 250 feet from Fort Smith, Ark., to W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam., Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project located in Tulsa District is complete. 5. LOW HEAD LOCKS AND DAMS, OKLA. There are three lock and dam units on the Arkansas and Verdigris Rivers in addition to Robert S. Kerr and Webbers Falls. With some channel cutoffs and enlargement work they provide a navigable channel 9 feet deep from Fort Smith, Ark., to vicinity of Catoosa, Okla., where a turning basin is provided. Total Federal cost, including turning basin and channel cutoffs and enlargement is $118,233,399. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) 5A. W. D. MAYO LOCK AND DAM, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Arkansas River at navigation mile 319.6, about 9 miles southwest of Fort Smith, Ark. Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see Annual Report for 1972. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1966 and the project placed in useful operation in October 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation December 1970. 5B. CHOUTEAU LOCK AND DAM, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Verdigris River at McClellan-Kerr navigation mile 401.5, about 7 miles north of Muskogee in Wagoner County, Okla. Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see Annual Report for 1972. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. A barge fleeting area and a grain loading facility are adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreation facilities and beautification completed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1966 and the project placed in useful operation in November 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. 5 C. NEWT GRAHAM LOCK AND DAM, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Verdigris River at McClellan-Kerr navigation mile 421.6, about 8 miles southwest of Inola in Wagoner County, Okla. Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see Annual Report for 1972. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Catoosa offers 19-4 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT storage and loading facilities consisting of cargo wharf, warehouse, terminal building, liquid loading facility, and fertilizer (dry bulk) facility. Two private facilities are in operation and a third is under construction. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1966 and the project placed in useful operation in September 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. 6. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, OKLA. Includes two terminals in the Little Rock District, and one terminal in the Tulsa District located near Sallisaw, Okla. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Information on this project follows: ROBERT S. KERR MARINE TERMINAL, OKLA. Location. Five miles south of Sallisaw, Okla., on the left side of Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir. Existing project. Consists of wharf, office and storage building, storage space, and operating areas for servicing of floating plant and storage of machinery, equipment, and supplies to maintain the navigation facilities. Federal cost was $2,760,000 excluding cost of facilities to be provided for the US Coast Guard on a reimbursable basis. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1967 and the terminal became operational in October 1970. 7. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Red River from Fulton, Ark., to mouth of Washita River. For description of completed improvement and authorization see Annual Report for 1924. Cost for construction was $378,574 and operation and maintenance $182,157. Curtailment of project was recommended in H. Doc. 947, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Poteau River, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Location. The Poteau River Small Navigation Project is located at Fort Smith, Arkansas. Existing project. The project provides for a 130-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel on the Poteau River extending from its confluence with the Arkansas River 1.7 miles upstream to the Port of Fort Smith. A turning basin is provided a short distance upstream of the port. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Cost for project was: $535,897 Federal and $25,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960 applies. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities are owned by the Fort Smith Port Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year, Contract was completed in October, 1979 in the amount of $434,740. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed and placed in operation in November 1979. Flood Control 9. ARCADIA LAKE, DEEP FORK RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Deep Fork River, mile 213.8 in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, Okla., about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Arcadia, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 104 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works will consist of gate tower and conduit. The lake will have a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation and 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and control a drainage area of 105 square miles. Estimated cost is $69,100,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for the outlet works was awarded in September 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work will be begin in October 1980. 19-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 10. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE supplemental studies program have been CONTROL completed. Location. On certain tributary streams of Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of Tulsa District. Existing project. Provides for construction of two experimental water quality study projects; supplemental planning studies of the Great Salt Plains area on Salt Fork of the Arkansas River and along Jonah Creek of Red River; construction of four low-flow dams, and two brine storage lakes, together with necessary pumping plants and pipelines in the Wichita River basin; and construction of three fresh water lakes with outlet diversion channels, two low-flow dams, four brine storage lakes and subsurface cutoff walls, collection conduits, pipeline, and pumping facilities in the Arkansas and Red River Basins. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Project features on which preconstruction planning, construction, or maintenance and operation has been initiated and are reported below. 10A. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES Location. On Salt Fork of Arkansas River about 12 miles east of Cherokee, Alfalfa County, Okla. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Also, on Jonah Creek of Red River about 12 miles northwest of Childress, Childress County, Tex. (See Geological Survey map for Estelline, Tex., 1961, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Provided for field investigations required to fully substantiate the effectiveness of proposed chloride control structures including a fresh water impoundment dike at Great Salt Plains on Salt Fork of the Arkansas River and a brine collection system, evaporation pond, and deep well injection tests on Jonah Creek of Red River. Additional water quality monitoring stations in the two basins together with field tests were required to develop engineering data needed for selection and design of efficient control plans. Upon completion of the supplemental studies, the experimental facilities were dismantled. Federal cost was $2,863,895. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Investigations began in January 1968 and were completed in February 1974. Investigations for the 10B. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, WICHITA RIVER, TEX. Location. On headwater tributaries of Wichita River in King, Knox, Foard, and Cottle Counties, and on the Canal Creek tributary of Pease River, Foard County, Tex. Existing project. Provides for a system of four low-flow dams with attendant pumping and pipeline facilities discharging into two off-channel brine storage reservoirs. Each low-flow dam will be equipped with an inflatable fabric-type weir located in the spillway section which would be deflated to pass relatively good quality high flows downstream. Total estimated Federal cost is $125,200,000. (See table 19-D on Wichita River Control Plan, Tex.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is essentially complete. Area VIII is under construction. The Bateman Pump Station and pipeline were completed at costs of $612,000 and $6,200,000, respectively. Construction of the Truscott Brine Lake is underway at a cost of $23,216,525. 10C. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, OKLA., AND TEX. Location. On tributaries of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in Texas, and Oklahoma: Area I, Great Salt Plains, Salt Fork of the Arkansas River in Alfalfa County, Okla.; Area II-III, Big and Little Salt Plains of the Cimarron River in parts of Woods, Woodward, and Harper Counties, Okla.; Area IV, Salt Creek of the Cimarron River in Blaine County, Okla.; Area VI, Elm Fork of Red River, Harmon County, Okla.; Area IX, North and Middle Pease Rivers, Cottle County, Tex.; Area XIII-XIV, Jonah and Salt Creeks of Prairie Dog Town Fork of Red River, Hall County, Tex. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of nine fresh water lakes with outlet channels to divert fresh water, one low-flow dam with attendant pumping facilities, three brine lakes and a brine dike, and modification of the existing Great Salt Plains Lake by dividing the lake into brine and fresh water portions to control salt pollution from four major sources in the Arkansas River Basin. The plan of improvement in the Red River Basin would consist of one brine lake and three collection systems with attendant pumping facilities to control salt pollution from 19-6 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT five major sources in the Red River Basin. Estimated Federal cost is $778,000,000. (See table 19-E on Ark-Red River chloride control plan.) Local cooperation. Prior to construction of the chloride control projects and pending establishment of a public policy on division of responsibility between Federal and non-Federal interests, assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army will be furnished by responsible non-Federal interests to provide that these interests will continue and strengthen efforts to reduce manmade salt pollution, hold and save the United States free from damages due to water rights claims and to construction and operation of the project works, and participate in the cost of recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement in accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the General Design Memo for the Red River is complete. Supplemental information for project justification is being prepared by the District. The draft of the General Design Memorandum Phase I studies for Areas I, II-III, and IV was submitted in July 1980. 11. BIG HILL LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Big Hill Creek, river mile 33.3, about 5 miles east of Cherryvale, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Mound Valley and Parsons, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam about 3,900 feet long, 83 feet above streambed. The 400-foot uncontrolled spillway will be located in the right abutment. Outlet works will include a drop inlet intake structure, a 5-foot 8-inchdiameter conduit, and a stilling basin. A 30-inchdiameter pipe will be provided for water supply releases along with a 2- by 5-foot low flow opening. The lake will have a total capacity of 40,600 acre-feet, (13,100 for flood control and 27,500 for conservation and sedimentation reserve), and will control runoff from a drainage area of 37 square miles. Big Hill Lake will be operated as a unit of a five-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Kansas, with a seven-lake system in Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Estimated cost is $16,700,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineeering studies, land acquisition complete. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Embankment, spillway, and outlet works $2,775,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1974. The project is 66 percent complete. 12. BIG PINE LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, TEX. Location. On Big Pine Creek (mile 16.5) approximately 25 miles northwest of Clarksville, Red River County, Tex. (See Geological Survey maps for Woodland, Manchester, and Kiomatia, Tex., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Texarkana, Tex., scale 1:25,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam 10,190 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete chute spillway. Dam will rise to a height of 80.0 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a 6-foot-diameter inlet conduit and a stilling basin. A 30-inch water supply pipe and a 24-inch lowflow pipe will be constructed through the dam. The lake will have a total capacity of 174,400 acrefeet, of which 73,400 acre-feet will be allocated for flood control and 101,000 acre-feet for conservation and sedimentation reserve. Channel downstream will be improved by clearing and snagging to increase its capacity. The lake will control a drainage area of 95 square miles. Estimated cost is $48,200,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase II of the General Design Memo is complete. 13. BIRCH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Birch Creek, river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Barnsdall, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1979. Federal cost is $13,539,680. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. 19-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operation of the lake prevented flooding on 1,600 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Birch Lake operations for the prevention of flood damages total $367,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1973. Project placed in useful operation in March 1977. 14. CANDY LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Candy Creek, river mile 1.9, a tributary of Bird Creek in Verdigris River Basin. Damsite is about 1 mile northeast of Avant, Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Avant, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 102 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10- by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18-inch by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acrefeet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). Drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Estimated cost of project is $29,900,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1976. The project is about 15 percent complete. Construction has been delayed because of the US Justice Department decision to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. 15. CANTON LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On North Canadian River, about 394 miles above its mouth and about 2 miles north of Canton, Blaine County, Okla. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 590 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $10,905,434, of which $509,096 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Operation of Canton Lake prevented downstream flooding on 1,900 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Canton Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $6,047,000 to September 30, 1980. Hydraulic studies are continuing under the Dam Modernization Program to determine feasibility of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. A total of 24,110 acre-feet was released for water supply. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1940 and project placed in useful operation in April 1948. 16. CEDAR POINT LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Cedar Creek, mile 4.2, a tributary of Cottonwood River, about 1.5 miles south of Cedar Point in Chase County, Kans. (See Geological Survey map for Cottonwood Falls, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control and water quality control by construction of an earthfill dam 7,120 feet long, including an uncontrolled spillway section 300 feet wide, rising 117 feet above streambed. Outlet works would consist of a gated intake structure, a 12-foot conduit, and two 24-inch-diameter intakes, one for low flow and one for water supply. The lake would have a total capacity of 108,600 acre-feet (37,100 for flood control and 71,500 in conservation pool), and control a drainage area of 119 square miles. Cedar Point Lake would be operated as the final unit of a four-lake system for flood control in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, consisting of this project and the completed John Redmond Reservoir, Council Grove and Marion Lakes. Estimated Federal cost is $38,100,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the General Design Memo is 90 percent complete. 17. CLAYTON LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Jackfork Creek, river mile 2.8, a tributary of Kiamichi River, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton, Pushmataha County, Okla. (See 19-8 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Geological Survey map for Tuskahoma, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, McAlester, Okla., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Provides for a rolled earthfill dam about 14,138 feet long, with a maximum height of 101 feet above the streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 215 feet wide will be constructed near the right abutment. Outlet works will consist of an oblong conduit, 9 by 12.25 feet, and a 2.5- by 5.25-foot pipe will be installed for low-flow regulation. The lake will provide 128,200 acre-feet of storage for flood control and 302,400 acre-feet for conservation and sediment reserve, a total of 430,600 acre-feet, and control a drainage area of 275 square miles. Clayton Lake will be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin, including Hugo and Tuskahoma Lakes thereby reducing Red River floodflows. Estimated cost of project is $52,800,000. (See table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: land acquisition and damages $2,215,000; embankment and outlet works $2,700,000; and relocations $6,980,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1975 and the project is 75 percent complete. 18. COPAN LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Little Caney River, river mile 7.4, a tributary of Caney River in Verdigris River watershed, about 2 miles west of Copan, Washington County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps of Nowata, Okla., and Sedan and Independence, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000 and Defense Mapping Agency maps, Tulsa, Okla., Wichita, Kans., and Joplin, Mo., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 7,730 feet long, including a gated spillway section; a levee 17,000 feet long, for protection of Caney, Kans. Maximum height of dam above streambed will be 73 feet. A concrete spillway, controlled by four 50- by 35.5-foot tainter gates, will provide for operation of lake for flood control. Outlet works will include a 36-inch low-flow pipe and a 12-inch future water supply pipe. The lake will have a total capacity of 227,700 acre-feet (43,400 for conservation and sediment reserve, and 184,300 for flood control). Drainage area above damsite is 505 square miles. Copan Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Relocated Oklahoma State Highway 10 will cross the top of the dam. Estimated cost is $71,100,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: road relocations $2,180,000; 2nd stage embankment $2,745,000; utility relocations $1,820,000; railroad relocations $2,700,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1972. The project is 79 percent complete. 19. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. GRAND Location. On Grand (Neosho) River about 450 miles above mouth and about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove, Morris County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Parkerville and Eskridge, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 519 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $11,598,608, of which $151,608 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. One noteworthy rise occurred on Grand (Neosho) River above the lake. Operation of Council Grove Lake prevented downstream flooding on 27,800 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Council Grove Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $7,519,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1960 and project placed in useful operation in October 1964. 20. DEQUEEN LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARK. Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 6 miles northwest of DeQueen, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for DeQueen, Ark., quadrangle, and Defense Mapping Agency map, McAlester, Okla., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of existing improvement, see Annual Report for 1979. Federal cost of project is $19,527,854. (See table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)-for authorizing legislation.) 19-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Seven noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. The structure reduced downstream flooding on an average of 4,000 acres. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $2,688,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966 and project placed in useful operation in August, 1977. 21. DIERKS LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARK. Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for DeQueen, Ark., quadrangle, and Defense Mapping Agency map, McAlester, Okla., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1979. Federal cost of project is $15,942,013. (See table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 202 acre-feet was withdrawn for water supply. Seven noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. The structure in place reduced flooding on an average of 1,150 acres of land. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $1,515,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The project was placed in useful operation in May 1975. 22. EL DORADO LAKE, WALNUT RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Walnut River, river mile 100.2, a tributary of Arkansas River, about 2 miles northeast of El Dorado, Butler County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for El Dorado and DeGraff, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 21,000 feet long, including a 350 foot uncontrolled spillway. Dam will be 99 feet above streambed. The lake will control 234 square miles of drainage area and provide a total storage of 236,200 acrefeet (79,200 for flood control storage, 154,100 for conservation, and 2,900 for sedimentation reserve). Outlet works will consist of an oblong conduit, 11.5- by 15.75-foot, 24-inch by 36-inch lowflow sluice and a 36-inch water supply pipe. El Dorado Lake will be operated as a unit of a threelake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Estimated Federal cost of project is $79,000,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,600,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, Federal Water Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: road relocations $3,115,000; railroad relocations $3,485,000; Stage II embankment $975,000; Stage III embankment $3,525,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1973. The project is 85 percent complete. 23. ELK CITY LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Elk River, river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence, Montgomery County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Caney-NE, NW, and SW, and Benton, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 593 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $19,042,990. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented downstream flooding on an average of 8,750 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Elk City Lake for prevention of flood damages total $36,241,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in February 1962 and project placed in useful operation in March 1966. 24. FALL RIVER LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Fall River about 54 miles above its confluence with Verdigris River and about 4 miles northwest of Fall River, Greenwood 19-10 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT County, Kans. (See Geological Survey map for Eureka, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Severy, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 953 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $10,506,393, of which $2,000 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented downstream flooding on an average of 4,500 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fall River Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $26,523,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Hydraulic studies are continuing under the Dam Modernization Program to determine feasibility, of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam began in May 1946 and project placed in full operation in April 1949. 25. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, NORTH CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Wolf Creek, river mile 5.5, a tributary of North Canadian River, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward, Woodward County, Okla. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 594 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $7,718,093, of which $122,869 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 242 acre-feet was withdrawn for water supply. No noteworthy rise occurred above the lake.Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fort Supply Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,055,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and satroer acgoens tinduuirningg ufnisdcearl ytheea r.D) aHmy draulic studies Modernization Program to determine feasibility of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. 26. GILLHAM LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARK. Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham, Sevier County, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for DeQueen, Ark.-Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Atimony, Gillham NE, Vandervoort, and Empire, Ark., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1977. Federal cost of project is $17,813,508. (See Table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Eight noteworthy rises occurred above the lake reducing flood damages on an average of 1,700 acres of land. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $2,818,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1963. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 27. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Salt Fork of Arkansas River, mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee, Alfalfa County, Okla. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 594 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $4,626,270. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Flood damages were reduced on 20 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Great Salt Plains Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $13,239,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam was initiated September 1938 and completed July 1941. Project placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. 19-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 28. HEYBURN LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary to Arkansas River near Sapulpa, Creek County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Nuyaka, Hominy, and Claremore, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:250,000; and Bristow and Kiefer, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 599 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $2,516,405 (including $135,300 for construction of channel improvement on Polecat and Rock Creeks and $146,944 Code 710 funds). Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Rural Water District No. 1, Creek County, Okla., used 895 acre-feet of water from the lake. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on 1,000 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,259,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in September 1950. Channel improvements below lake were completed in September 1952. 29. HUGO LAKE, KIAMICHI RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Kiamichi River, river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo, Choctaw County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Alikchi, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1977. Federal cost is $37,643,172, of which $2,171 is Code 710 funds. (See Table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. State of Oklahoma through its Water Resources Board and local interests furnished resolutions of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 2,194 acre-feet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. One noteworthy rise occurred on the Kiamichi River above the lake. The project reduced the damaging effects of floods on 500 acres of land below the damsite. Flood damages prevented total $3,503,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. 30. HULAH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Caney River, river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Pawhuska, Okla., and Sedan, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $11,132,373, of which $263,388 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Three noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented downstream flooding on an average of 33,550 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Hulah Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $59,490,000 to September 30, 1980. A total of 4,868 acre-feet of water was withdrawn by city of Bartlesville, Okla. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1946 and completed in June 1950. Project placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. 31, JOE CREEK, TULSA, OKLA. Location. Joe Creek, a left bank tributary of the Arkansas River, Tulsa County, Okla. (See Geological Survey Map for Jenks, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement is to provide 11,000 feet of improved channel along Joe Creek and stub entrance for Little Joe Creek and South Fork of Little Joe Creek. The upstream 8,950 feet of improved channel will be concrete lined, and the remainder of the channel will have stone side-slope protection. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated Federal cost is $3,000,000 and the non-Federal cost is $6,500,000. Local cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Channel work is essentially complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction 19-12 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT began in February, 1978. The project is 9, percent complete. 32. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. Dam is on Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington, Coffey County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Burlington and Emporia, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $28,151,515, of which $170,651 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Water supply usage totaled 315 acre-feet. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the reservoir. Flooding was prevented on an average of 31,600 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to reservoir operations for prevention of flood damages total $38,274,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and completed in December 1965. Project placed in flood control operation in July 1964. 33. KAW LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River, river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City, Kay County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Charley Creek, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Estimated cost is $111,600,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Public-use areas $1,100,000. Three noteworthy rises occurred above the structure. Flooding was' prevented on an average of 7,750 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $5,746,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1966 and project placed in 5 operation in May 1976. Project is complete except for reservoir fencing and a county road relocation. 34. LAKE KEMP, WICHITA RIVER BASIN, TEX. Location. On Wichita River, river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, Tex. (See aeronautical chart, Dallas, Tex., scale 1:500,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Wichita Fall-', Tex., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Cost of completed project was $7,637,702 Federal and $3,130,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 80,102 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to reservoir operations for prevention of flood damages total $2,848,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1970 and the project placed in useful operation in October 1972. 35. LUKFATA LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. AND ARK. Location. On Glover Creek at mile 24.5 about 11.5 miles north of Glover, McCurtain County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Lukfata, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Bethel, Smithville, Golden, and Broken Bow, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a rockfill dam about 2,600 feet long, rising 176 feet above the original streambed. An uncontrolled 600-foot saddle spillway will be near the left end of the embankment. Outlet works will provide for a 12-foot conduit and a stilling basin. The lake will provide a total storage of 252,100 acre-feet (208,630 for flood control, 43,470 for conservation and sedimentation reserve), and will control a drainage area of 252 square miles. Lukfata Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in Little River watershed, thereby reducing Red River floodflows. Estimated cost (1979 price levels) of project is $39,900,000. (See table 19-B-Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)- for authorizing legislation.) 19-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not started. 36. MARION, KANS. Location. On Mud Creek at Marion, the county seat of Marion County, Kans. Existing project. Provides for construction of a diversion channel 9,026 feet in length, an overflow protection levee 17,875 feet in length, and. structures to control interior drainage and low streamflow. Railroad and highway bridges would be altered or relocated as required. Estimated Federal cost is $5,395,546 and $900,000 non-Federal cost. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; perform all relocations except railroads; acquire fee title to lands for borrow and ponding purposes and flowage easements over lands for ponding only; and prevent encroachment on existing and improved channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Completion of channel, structures, and railroad relocations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1975 and was completed in April 1980. 37. MARION LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Cottonwood River, river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion, Marion County, Kans. (See Geological Survey map for Newton, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost of project is $13,322,538 of which $5,000 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 6,700 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Marion Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $26,126,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1964 and the project placed in flood control operation February 1968. 38. MILLWOOD LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARK. Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, Ark., and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, Ark. (See Geological Survey maps NI-8 and 15-4 for El Dorado, Ark., and McAlester, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost of project is $46,017,752, of which $1,791,871 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 49,724 acre-feet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. Eight noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 5,750 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Millwood Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $4,060,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in August 1966. Work required to complete project consists of additional recreation facilities under cost sharing program. 39. OOLOGAH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Verdigris River about 10 miles northwest of Claremore, Rogers County, Okla., and about 2 miles southeast of Oologah, Rogers County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Claremore and Nowata, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see Annual Report for 1972. Federal cost of project is $46,683,384 of which $1,912 is Code 710 funds. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 44,014 acre-feet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was 19-14 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT prevented on an average of 34,150 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Oologah Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $38,444,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. After construction of right abutment access road, project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction was resumed in December 1955 and completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate development was initiated July 1967. The project for ultimate development is complete. 40. OPTIMA LAKE, NORTH CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On North Canadian River, river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty, Texas County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Optima Dam, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of existing improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1979. Federal cost is $46,865,164. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance began. No noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Optima Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $7,000 to September 30, 1980. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Public-use areas $415,000. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966. Impoundment was started in October, 1978. The project is 99 percent complete. Remaining work consists of completing the public use water system. 41. PAT MAYSE LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, TEX. Location. On Sanders Creek, mile 4.6, a tributary of Red River, about 12 miles north of PSaurrivse, y Lmaampa rf or CGouranntyt,, TTeexx.,. qu(Saeder anGgleeo,l ogical scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Texarkana, Tex., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost of project is $9,309,311, of which $816,675 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Three noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 800 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pat Mayse Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $2,476,000 to September 30, 1980. A total of 12,112 acre-feet of water was released for water supply to city of Paris, Tex. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1965 and project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. 42. PINE CREEK LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Little River, river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City, McCurtain County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Alikchi, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Wright City and Pickens, Okla., quadrangles NE, NW, SE, and SW, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost of project is $20,304,909 of which $3,500 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 34,159 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. Eight noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 6,700 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pine Creek Lake operation for prevention of flood damages total $6,478,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. 43. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (TULSA DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (See Geological Survey State maps and folio maps of Red River-1958 edition.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 11 flood control lakes in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. (See 19-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 table 19-G for water control projects included in general flood control plan for Red River below Denison Dam within Tulsa District.) Total Federal cost in Tulsa District is $735,411,680 for construction, lands, and damages. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See individual reports. 44. SHIDLER LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Salt Creek, mile 39.2, a tributary of Arkansas River, about 1 mile east of Shidler, Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Fairfax, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 6,050 feet long, with a maximum height of 117 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 200 feet wide will be east of dam. Outlet works will include a gate tower with gated wet well inlet with a 10.5 by 11.5 foot controlled conduit. A 30-inch low-flow bypass and a 24-inch water supply line will be provided. A roadway will be located along crest of dam. The total lake capacity of 108,100 acre-feet will be allocated, 49,900 acrefeet for flood control and 58,200 acre-feet for conservation, and will control runoff from 99 square miles. Shidler Lake will be operated as a unit of the coordinated lake system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Estimated cost of the project is $28,400,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning completed. 45. SKIATOOK LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Hominy Creek, mile 14.3, a tributary of Bird Creek, in Verdigris River Basin about 5 miles west of Skiatook, Osage County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Avant, Okla., quadrangle, SE, scale 1:24,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Enid, Okla., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 3,590 feet long, 143 feet high with a crown width of 32 feet. The uncontrolled 100-foot spillway will be located in the right abutment. Outlet works will consist of a controlled intake structure, 10.5-foot diameter tunnel, stilling basin, 2.5-by 5-foot low-flow sluice, and a 36-inch water supply pipe. The lake will provide a total storage of 513,500 acre-feet (319,400 for conservation storage, 182,300 for flood control, and 11,800 for sedimentation reserve), and will control a drainage area of 354 square miles. Skiatook Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Estimated cost of project is $103,300,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: 2nd stage embankment, spillway, and outlet works $8,560,000; relocations $5,100,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1974. The project is 45 percent complete. 46. TORONTO LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. Location. On Verdigris River about 271.5 miles above its mouth and 4 miles south and east of Toronto, Woodson County, Kans. (See Geological Survey map for Fredonia, Kans., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $13,896,220 of which $2,218 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. The city of Toronto, Kans., used 93 acre-feet of water from the lake. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 14,000 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to operation of Toronto Lake for prevention of flood damages total $22,231,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began November 1954 and project placed in full operation March 1960. 47. TOWANDA LAKE, WHITEWATER RIVER, KANS. Location. On Whitewater River, mile 18.5, a tributary of Walnut River, about 0.75 mile northwest of Towanda, Kans., in Butler County, Kans. (See Geological Survey maps for Benton and El Dorado SW, Kans., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) 19-16 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill embankment and a gated concrete spillway. The dam would be 11,460 feet long and would have a maximum height of 82 feet above the streambed. The spillway would be 184 feet long and have four tainter gates. Two 24-inch pipes in the spillway would provide for low flow and water supply. Total storage in the lake would be 208,000 acre-feet including 133,500 acre-feet for flood control, 46,500 acre-feet for water conservation, and 28,000 acre-feet for sediment. Towanda Lake would be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. The estimated cost (1979 price levels) of the project is $65,100,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I studies are complete. A Stage 2 documentation was submitted to Southwestern Division in May 1979 that this study be discontinued because of the lack of economic feasibility and the project be placed in inactive status. The report was forwarded to the Chief of Engineers in February 1980. 48. WAURIKA LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. Beaver Creek, mile 27.0, a tributary of Red River, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika, Jefferson County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Hastings, Okla.-Tex., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Plan provides for an earthfill dam 16,600 feet long, including an uncontrolled spillway 300 feet wide, and 106 feet above streambed. Outlet works will include a gated conduit 13.5 feet in diameter, a 14-inch water supply pipe, and a 12-inch low-flow pipe. The lake will provide a total storage of 343,500 acre-feet (199,700 for conservation storage, 140,400 for flood control, and 3,400 for sedimentation reserve), and will control a drainage area of 562 square miles. Waurika Lake will be operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in Red River Basin. Estimated cost is $67,030,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperdtion. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance began. A total of 87 acre-feet was withdrawn for water supply. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Public-use areas $740,000, and pipelines $640,000. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on 800 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Waurika Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $1,984,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1971. Impoundment began in August, 1977. Project is complete with the exception of water conveyance facilities. Project is 97 percent complete. 49. WISTER LAKE, POTEAU RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Poteau River, river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister, LeFlore County, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Winding Stair, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 601 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $10,501,226. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on 16,000 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Wister Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $49,156,000 to September 30, 1980. A total of 2,258 acre-feet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1946 and was completed May 1949. Project placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. 50. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Semiannual inspection of completed local flood protection projects operated and maintained by local interests are made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for operation and maintenance. (See table 19-H for inspection of local flood control projects.) Fiscal year cost was $98,666. Total cost to September 30, 1980 was $627,930. 51. SCHEDULING FLOOD RESERVOIR OPERATIONS CONTROL Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized the Secretary of War to prescribe regulations for use 19-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 of storage allocated for flood control or navigation at all reservoirs constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Under the purview of this act, operation of the flood control storage included in reservoirs shown below in items 51A through 51H is prescribed by the Corps. Work accomplished consists of operating activities necessary in basin-wide coordination of functional scheduling of releases from reservoirs operated by other agencies and preparation of flood control operation and maintenance manuals for projects underway. Fiscal year cost from regular funds for maintenance was $143,775. 51A. ALTUS RESERVOIR Located on the North Fork of the Red River, 16 miles north of Altus, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1948 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service), (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented total $2,335,000 through September 30, 1980. 51B. ARBUCKLE RESERVOIR Located on Rock Creek, a Red River tributary 6 miles southwest of Sulphur, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1967 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service), (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented total $215,000 through September 30, 1980. 51C. CHENEY RESERVOIR Located on the Ninnescah River, about 23 miles west of Wichita, Kansas, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented total $6,876,000 through September 30, 1980. 51D. FORT COBB RESERVOIR Located on Cobb (Pond) Creek, a tributary of the Washita River, in Caddo County, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1959 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented total $246,000 through September 30, 1980. 51E. FOSS RESERVOIR Located on the Washita River, about 7 miles north of Foss, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1961 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1980 total $621,000. 51F. MOUNTAIN PARK (TOM STEED LAKE) Located on Otter Creek, a tributary of the North Fork of the Red River, about 6 miles north of Snyder, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1977 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1980 total $328,000. 51G. NORMAN LAKE (LAKE THUNDERBIRD) Located on the Little River, about 12 miles east of Norman, Oklahoma, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1980 total $2,256,000. 51H,. SANFORD MEREDITH) RESERVOIR (LAKE Located on the Canadian River about 8 miles northwest of Borger, Texas, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1980 total $6,000. 52. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 19-I. 53. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small flood control projects not specifically authorized by Congress (Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended Public Law 858, 80th Cong.), (preauthorization). See table 19-J. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $260,872, of which $90,194 was for advance preparation, $22,383 for emergency operations and $148,295 for repair and restoration. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams 19-18 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954. Public Law 780, 83d Cong.) None. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $614,077 as follows: Cottonwood River, Chase and Lyons Counties, Kans., $29,029; Neosho River, Crawford County, Kansas, $103,016; Red River, Clay County, Texas, $51,764; Red River, Little River County, Arkansas, $49,417; Washita River, Carter County, Oklahoma, $216,314; Salt Fork of Red River, Jackson County, Oklahoma, $118,962; Wildhorse Creek, Carter County, Oklahoma, $1,526; Double Creek, Washington County, Oklahoma, $30,893; Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, Arkansas, $6,563; and Walnut River, Cowley County, Kansas, $6,593. Flood insurance activities (Section 1301-1377, Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448, as amended.) In coordination with flood control activities, 12 flood insurance studies were in progress in accordance with various Interagency Agreements at a fiscal year cost of $370,234 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable orders. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 54. BROKEN BOW LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Mountain Fork River, river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow, McCurtain County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Broken Bow and Smithville, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1971. Federal cost was $41,222,692. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Eight noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented downstream flooding on an average of 6,800 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Broken Bow Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $8,066,000 to September 30, 1980. During low-flow water periods, releases totaling 4,344 acre-feet were made to supplement water for a State park. Other low flow requirements met by power releases. Delivered 122,069,600 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 711,099 acrefeet of water through turbines. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1961 and project placed in useful operation in October 1968. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. 55. DENISON DAM-LAKE TEXOMA, RED RIVER BASIN, TEX. AND OKLA. Location. On Red River, river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, Tex. (See Geological Survey maps for Denison, Tex., and Tishomingo, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Denison Dam and Gordonville, Tex., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Hydroelectric development consists of two units having an installed capacity of 70,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installation planned is for five units with a total of 175,000 kilowatts. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Federal cost is $67,804,524 of which $3,536,829 are Code 710 funds. Non-Federal cost was $1,256,068. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Denison Dam-Lake Texoma operation for prevention of flood damages downstream to Fulton, Ark., total $40,611,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) A total of 9,183 acrefeet was withdrawn for water supply. Delivered 123,261,000 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 1,357,138 acrefeet of water through tubrines. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in August 1939 and was completed for the dam, spillway, and outlet works in February 1944. Impoundment of power pool began January 1944 and commercial power generation was started March 1945 with first unit operating. Authorized work is complete except for installation of third and fourth power units, and additional perimeter access roads. 19-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 56. EUFAULA LAKE, CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Canadian River, at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula, McIntosh County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Okmulgee, Canadian, McAlester, and Sans Bois, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $121,800,394, of which $548,893 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Three noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Eufaula Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $34,629,000 to September 30, 1980. A total of 1,641 acre-feet of water was withdrawn for water supply. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Delivered 137,879,000 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 1,695,977 acre-feet of water through turbines. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1956 and project placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Project is complete except for additional recreation facilities. Commercial power was generated on unit 1 July 1964, on unit 2 September 1964, and on unit 3 August 1964. 57. FORT GIBSON LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north and east of Fort Gibson, Muskogee County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Muskogee and Pryor, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Wagoner, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $43,528,985, of which $1,114,682 is Code 710 funds. The estimated cost for the addition of power units 5 and 6 is $20,200,000. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 700 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fort Gibson Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $27,741,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) A total of 15,837 acre-feet were released to the city of Muskogee, Okla. for water supply. Delivered 155,774,100 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 2,904,472 acrefeet of water through turbines. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1942 with construction of temporary field office buildings, but further construction at project was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction of concrete dam and spillway, largest single feature of project, started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. Fourth generator installed and project placed in full operation in September 1953. Additional studies are being conducted to determine the feasibility of adding additional hydro-power units and water supply storage. 58. KEYSTONE LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River, river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, Okla., and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, Okla. (See Geological Survey map for Hominy, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; Skedee and Yale, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500; and Keystone Dam, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $123,125,579, of which $531,776 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Delivered 296,514,800 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 4,118,845 acre-feet of water through turbines. Four noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 12,000 acres of land. Water supply usage totaled 7,902 acre-feet. Low-flow release requirements were met by power releases. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to operation of Keystone Lake for prevention of flood damages total $81,889,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1957 and the project placed in flood control operation in September 1964. No. 1 generating unit became operational on May 21, 1968 and No. 2 on May 2, 1968. 19-20 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT 59. MARKHAM FERRY RESERVOIR, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 47.4, about 8 miles southeast of city of Pryor, Mayes County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Pryor and Vinita, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 605 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $6,908,756. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control storage in the project was operated by the Grand River Dam Authority (an agency of the State of Okla.) under the direction of the Corps of Engineers. One noteworthy rise occurred above the reservoir. Flood damages were prevented on 300 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to the operation of Markham Ferry Reservoir for flood damage prevention total $5,466,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal participation in project is complete. 60. PENSACOLA LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 77.0, next to town of Disney, Mayes County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Pryor, Wyandotte, and Vinita, Okla., and Siloam Springs, Ark., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $52,126. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control storage in project was operated by Grand River Dam Authority (an agency of State of Oklahoma) under direction of the Corps of Engineers. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 6,400 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pensacola Lake operations tfoo r Sperpevteemntbioern 3o0f , fl1o9o8d0 .d a(mSeaeg etasb tloe ta1l9 $-F3 6,f7o8r 7,p0o0o0l elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 61. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw, LeFlore County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Robert S. Kerr Dam, Keota, Vian, Sallisaw, Stigler NE, and Webbers Falls, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:24,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Fort Smith, Ark., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1972. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Federal cost is $94,573,399 of which $12,983 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. Seven sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Delivered 482,288,200 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 12,048,331 acre-feet of water through turbines. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Power units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. 62. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Illinois River, river mile 12.8, about 7 miles northwest of Vian and 7 miles northeast of Gore, Sequoyah County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Muskogee and Tahlequah, Okla., and Ark., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Webbers Falls, Okla., quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $23,779,854, of which $902,317 is Code 710 funds. 19-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Additional recreation facilities were constructed. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented downstream flooding on an average of 300 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Tenkiller Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $10,524,000 to September 30, 1980. (See table 19-F for pool elevations and storages during fiscal year.) Delivered 47,989,100 kilowatthours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 374,959 acre-feet of water through turbines. A total of 4,889 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1947 and completed in July 1953. Commercial sale of power started November 1953, with unit no. 2. Unit no. 1 installed December 1953. Work on repair and extension of spillway apron began in July 1960 and was completed in August 1961. 63. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. Location. On Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls, Muskogee County, Okla. (See Geological Survey maps for Webbers Falls, Keefeton, and Wagoner, Okla., quadrangles, scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Fort Smith, Ark., scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Federal cost is $83,736,701. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. Cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by Muskogee City-County Port Authority; liquid cargo loading facility and steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company, provide facilities adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Generating units wereremoved from service because of cracked turbine shaft welds (unit 1 on 21 April, unit 3 on 9 June, and unit 2 on 23 June.) The units are still out of service for engineering study, determination of repair method, and contracting for actual repair. Delivered 186,414,100 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 7,243,795 acre-feet of water through turbines. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Power units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. The project is complete. General Investigations 64. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $2,344,996, of which $185,510 was for special studies (Arkansas River and Tributaries Hydropower), $1,875,290 was for flood damage prevention, $137,795 for coordination with other agencies, and $146,400 for preauthorization studies (Phase 1 Prosperity Lake.) 65. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $925,318 of which $725,430 was for inspection of dams, $197,925 for flood plain management services, and $1,963 for hydrologic studies. 19-22 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation, Arkansas River Basin, Okla.' 3. Bank Stabilization &Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, Ark. & Okla. 5. Low Head Locks & Dams, Okla. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Poteau River Navigation, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 9. Arcadia Lake, Deep Fork River Basin, Okla. 10A. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Supplemental Studies 10B. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Wichita River, Tex. (AREA VIII) 11. Big Hill Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 12. Big Pine Lake, Red River Basin, Tex. 13. Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 15. Canton Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 16. Cedar Point Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. 17. Clayton Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 $ 75,000 $ 85,000 71,348 67,816 150,000 4,913 168,700 17,438 167,897 168,325 450,581 2,745,200 2,354,000 870,393 3,208,356 2,243,403 7,000 40,000 552,000 7,999 35,947 428,999 357,009 - 872,900 178,619 247,418 816,218 3,003,003 5,185,000 6,012,000 3,610,779 5,196,394 5,738,506 414,000 412,600 30,000 413,842 420,540 21,110 5,300,000 995,000 3,426,000 921,284 4,201,879 4,537,974 1,060,000 1,300,000 3,170,000 1,115,028 1,235,008 3,089,379 313,000 -11,130 316,500 291,487 38,766 252,742 2,450,000 706,000 59,000 1,250,481 1,014,646 1,070,200 105,005 258,800 526,200 1,302,270 945,663 1,315,346 40,800 -244 46,000 86,933 -123 21,846 705,000 1,196,900 833,600 692,089 1,224,134 630,011 - - -. - -49,826 - 86,535 28,413 - 2,126,180 7,795,000 8,535,000 3,184,559 7,801,706 8,970,795 Total to FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 $ 75,000 $ 270,509 89,746 264,419 - 12,700,038 - 12,700,038 - 2,689,734 - 2,689,734 - 118,326,600 -598 118,233,390 2,874,000 28,372,165' 2,777,778 27,998,283' - 119,330 - 119,330 -76,000 581,314 50,451 586,348 3,122,000 5,545,509 2,317,627 4,645,957 - 2,863,895 - 2,863,895 2,140,000 23,805,208 1,826,999 23,086,228 125,880 3,445,922 127,625 3,435,492 9,310,000 19,331,000 9,425,096 19,158,718 3,900,000 11,787,116 3,837,763 11,485,817 25,000 1,701,670 101,778 1,700,379 - 13,549,170 154,507 13,539,680 467,396 1,357,401 112,962 4,529,903 113,000 10,915,727 126,861 10,905,434 709,876 9,043,273' 774,757 8,896,342' - 291,106 - 291,106 - 899,774 - 899,774 14,132,000 39,737,479 13,900,317 39,406,568 19-23 TABLE 19-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 18: Copan Lake, New Work Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 19. Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. 20. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 21. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 22. El Dorado Lake, Walnut River Basin, Kans. 23. Elk City Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 24. Fall River Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 25. Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla. 26. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 27. Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 28. Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 29. Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Okla. $ 7,000,000 $ 9,953,000 $ 7,796,000 $10,405,000 $ 56,821,999 10,852,167 12,902,005 7,746,100 11,308,037 56,246,647 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 371,018 365,493 1,438,000 1,237,610 20,000 7,465 -9,419 44,107 394,685 332,672 11,300,000 11,083,669 325,888 316,835 265,243 272,251 309,866 305,549 794,000 238,721 214,022 182,624 102,153 107,319 263,200 189,892 -5,000 307,072 639,251 609,856 25,000 - 13,106 11,894 412,500 732,000 413,812 381,161 1,309,000 60,000 1,611,066 338,827 497,200 409,900 478,154 406,168 1,000 - 3,888 - 369,000 717,500 410,778 663,505 9,329,000 9,185,000 7,334,092 12,542,560 485,500 1,000,120 487,766 891,053 - 2,000 - 1,969 347,700 775,800 320,459 427,977 - 85,000 - 8,193 477,600 428,000 488,987 328,263 25,000 26,000 503,069 232,920 253,700 322,000 274,740 279,230 - - 158,000 257,100 152,608 211,640 - 16,000 - 1,342 368,400 591,000 438,160 279,557 -8,500 -329 -23,991 -38,262 771,500 659,100 795,580 641,770 19-24 - 11,598,608 - 11,598,608 459,607 4,671,776' 575,342 4,424,306' 35,000 19,533,853 36,462 19,527,854 365,550 1,292,650' 377,116 1,268,903' - 15,943,904 184 15,942,013 345,592 2,042,683' 416,151 2,027,801' 13,060,000 67,747,149 13,682,428 67,256,752 - 19,042,990 - 19,042,990 528,000 4,541,832 633,308 4,526,973 - 10,506,393 31 10,506,393 321,158 4,853,376 441,332 4,592,120 43,000 7,723,224 114,676 7,718,093 371,984 4,862,974' 438,546 4,824,204' - 17,824,711 3,815 17,813,508 275,941 1,124,525 319,598 1,210,890 - 4,626,270 - 4,626,270 215,828 3,032,207 246,614 3,011,379 - 2,518,694 12,369 2,516,405 384,411 3,801,405' 673,450 3,770,305' 232,000 37,684,742 296,684 37,643,172 716,000 3,828,225' 681,381 3,743,436' TABLE 19-A (Continued) TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See SectionFunding in Text Project Funding 30. Hulah Lake, New Work Verdigris River Approp. Basin, Okla. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost 31. Joe Creek, Arkansas New Work River Basin, Okla. Approp. Cost 32. John Redmond Dam & New Work Reservoir, Grand Approp. (Neosho) River, Kans. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 33. Kaw Lake, Arkansas New Work River Basin, Okla. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 34. Lake Kemp, Wichita New Work River Basin, Tex. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35. Lukfata Lake, New Work Little River Basin, Approp. Okla. Cost 36. Marion, Kans. New Work Approp. Cost 37. Marion Lake, Grand New Work (Neosho) River Approp. Basin, Kans. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 38. Millwood Lake, New Work Little River Approp. Basin, Ark. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 39. Oologah Lake, New Work Verdigris River Approp. Basin, Okla. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 40. Optima Lake, North New Work Canadian River Approp. Basin, Okla. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 41. Pat Mase Lake, New Work TReexd. River Basin, CAopsptrop. Maint. Approp. Cost FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 21,700 21,400 629,725 458,028 85,000 62,788 -22,000 36,237 651,450 549,828 2,080,000 2,129,126 584,238 607,631 -578 1 103,474 101,661 54,653 2,168,000 891,588 525,072 454,142 -1,162 556,359 802,923 1,189,336 -1,180 34 768,364 942,962 5,750,000 5,253,039 -9,500 68,392 328,693 355,570 -125 31,000 135 1,300 301,700 583,000 466,861 514,466 -. -. 1,000,000 940,000 975,744 1,005,442 9,978 -1,000 2,892 6,107 636,900 771,100 756,422 697,055 2,901,000 550,000 1,424,414 1,574,727 779,800 1,414,100 775,486 1,398,777 81,400 102,000 82,820 93,778 -25,000 - 283 -180 - 1,475,000 1,217,082 2,526,815 - 5,000 - 4,335 449,600 974,700 544,805 453,167 -27,300 10,100 15,741 12,711 844,700 1,111,880 874,059 743,942 - 2,000 - 1,360 829,100 864,300 751,369 829,451 4,700,000 2,759,000 4,945,015 2,640,755 - 219,000 - 168,155 -215 20,500 2,141 19,121 545,000 538,000 543,031 459,415 FY 80 SeptT. o3t0a,l 1to980 -16,300 11,132,752 13,021 11,132,373 460,799 5,615,193 446,663 5,516,248 - 135,718 - 135,718 699,270 3,000,000 707,707 2,996,934' - 28,151,515 688 28,151,515 980,475 6,456,053' 619,647 6,017,411' 780,000 109,012,650 1,525,126 108,390,343 1,703,498 4,701,608 1,362,054 4,280,295 - 7,637,702 - 7,637,702 88,964 765,034 90,348 755,983 - 1,424,685 - 1,424,451 -450,000 5,525,200 -370,778 5,395,546 - 13,322,538 665 13,322,538 440,064 5,036,3328 528,212 4,586,579" 15,850 46,055,082 63 46,017,752 911,751 9,694,102' 1,219,645 9,599,0821 6,000 46,689,4221 552 46,683,334' 961,983 9,091,611' 989,024 8,997,825' 210,000 47,160,438 754,067 46,965,164 243,054 462,054 268,568 436,723 - 9,310,690 - 9,309,311 618,000 3,958,883* 599,608 3,842,477' 19-25 TABLE 19-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 42.. Pine Creek Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. 44. Shidler Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 45. Skiatook Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 46. Toronto Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 47. Towanda Lake, Whitewater River Basin, Kans. 48. Waurika Lake, Red River Basin, Okla. 49. Wister Lake, Poteau River Basin, Okla. 54. Broken Bow Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. 55. Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Red River Basin, Tex. & Okla. 56. Eufaula Lake, Canadian River Basin, Okla. 57. Fort Gibson Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. 58. Keystone Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -3 10 454,543 466,500 -6 5,163,000 7,938,391 1,000 866 208,652 180,888 122,400 82,425 15,075,000 11,964,013 20,000 15,465 486,592 498,155 -20,000 210 593,392 610,546 105,000 50,201 2,717,630 2,731,145 - 98,600 71,694 1,961,079 2,028,019 35,872 422,076 1,503,339 1,519,211 5,000 2,331 1,131,678 1,133,982 - 3,500 - 3,107 478,600 493,300 455,507 493,851 - 10,000 - 3,032 6,955,000 7,944,000 6,381,955 8,303,830 - 6,400 - 409 169,900 237,400 199,067 205,501 170,000 100,000 195,710 106,201 7,900,000 3,439,000 9,404,004 5,063,042 184,200 264,900 175,065 248,562 388,300 384,700 393,731 336,423 -413 - 50 - 623,200 712,000 631,453 671,990 -226,350 51,829 68,793 48,714 2,460,600 3,799,900 2,513,570 3,107,684 153 163,000 34,590 18,972 2,166,400 2,513,200 2,151,687 1,912,989 149,965 274,000 165,886 265,131 1,809,400 1,847,800 1,818,537 1,749,462 -162 10,000 2,538 9,372 1,396,200 1,654,900 1,394,959 1,324,332 - 20,304,909 393 20,304,909 463,918 3,917,058' 455,755 3,880,267' 25,000 568,190 20,526 556,748 15,187,000 48,186,282 14,715,818 47,077,181 -5,078 13,896,324 943 13,896,220 178,627 2,745,403 186,032 2,718,668 - 392,400 2,749 387,085 1,611,000 65,671,050 2,194,211 65,111,687 691,514 1,160,614 513,241 952,423 - 10,501,226 - 10,501,226 337,164 5,217,045 334,963 5,156,471 - 41,222,692 - 41,222,692 781,343 5,875,856 806,147 5,841,742 76,000 67,869,901' 71,571 67,804,5242 2,990,716 37,792,487' 3,396,576 37,463,082' - 46,237 - 46,237 300 121,802,0483 142,674 121,800,394' 2,161,112 22,811,373' 2,308,543 22,286,260' 257,400 43,632,602' 181,363 43,528,985' 1,713,098 21,560,285' 1,697,614 21,404,067' - 123,126,205' - 123,125,579' 1,797,605 16,215,386' 2,027,357 16,073,273' 19-26 TABLE 19-A (Continued) TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 78 FY 79 Total to FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 60. Pensacola Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. 61. Robert S. Kerr Lock & Dam & Reservoir, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 62. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Illinois River Basin, Okla. 63. Webbers Falls Lock & Dam, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,342 3,169 86,000 1 74,623 1 1,952,927 1,9 2,389,781 2,0( 1,190 6,998 1,196,954 1,5 1,164,221 1,4l 5,000 34,393 1,332,500 1,9 1,322,714 2,0 4,100 5,000 4,950 3,891 4,356 5,593 41,000 1,000,000 -35,800 43,374 990,351 7,199 89,100 2,446,000 1,764,802 62,986 2,015,673 2,198,796 - 63,000 207,000 - 11,013 47,846 19,300 1,542,100 1,374,064 82,173 1,541,972 1,319,942 2,500 - 14,051 183 - 93,500 2,248,000 1,710,260 34,794 2,205,273 1,681,864 1. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 2. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief funds. Excludes $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 3. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. 4. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works acceleration funds. 5. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 6. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acceleration funds. 7. Excludes $3,760,000 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $1,404,100 special recreation use fees funds as follows: 106,800 Canton Lake 106,900 Council Grove Lake 23,900 Eufaula Lake 227,200 Fort Gibson Lake 197352,600 Lake Texoma352600 Low Head L&D Marion Lake Millwood Lake Oologah Lake Pat Mayse Lake Robert S. Kerr Res. Tenkiller Lake Heyburn Lake Pine Creek Lake Webbers Falls Kaw Lake Dierks Lake DeQueen Lake Fort Supply Lake Hugo Lake John Redmond Res. Keystone Lake 19-27 See Section in Text Project Funding FY 77 52,126 52,126 191,808 191,598 94,578,250 94,573,399 18,711,823' 18,615,648' 23,990,995' 23,779,854' 15,376,561' 15,237,089' 83,738,277 83,736,701 14,593,041' 14,457,477' 600 600 29,400 26,400 72,400 61,400 19,900 424,600 3,700 5,000 10,000 40,500 10,000 5,000 43,000 44,000 35,200 135,400 I TABLE 19-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 October 22, 1976 July 24, 1946 and October 22, 1976 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 October 23, 1962 October 27, 1965 June 30, 1948 (as amended through 1976) ARCADIA LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation purposes. Delete water quality benefits and include water supply benefits. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of experimental water quality study projects near Estelline and Guthrie, Tex. .. Project for water quality control, designated as Part I. Project for water quality control, designated as Part II. Modify 1966 and 1970 Acts-Initiated construction of Area VIII features of the project consisting of low-flow dam, pumping station, pipeline, and brine am. Modify 1970 Act- Gave construction approval to the Secretary of the Army. BIG AND LITTLE SALLISAW CREEKS NAVIGATION, OKLA. (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of navigation channel 9 feet deep with a minimum width of 100 feet from Robert S. Kerr Lock & Dam & Reservoir to near Sallisaw, Okla., and a 400- by 500-foot turning basin. BIG HILL LAKE, KANS. (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, and recreation purposes. BIG PINE LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 12 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. CANDY LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 14 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. CEDAR POINT LAKE, KANS. (See Section 16 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control and conservation purposes. COPAN LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 18 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. EL DORADO LAKE, KANS. (See Section 22 of Text) Construction of reservoir to provide flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. JOE CREEK, TULSA, OKLA. (See Section 31 of Text) Channel improvement for local protection. H. Doc. 229, 91st Cong., 2d sess., PL 44-587 S. Doc. 105, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 110, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Chief of Engineers Report, May 6, 1970 PL 91-611 PL 93-251 PL 94-587 H. Doc. 6407, 79th Cong., 2d sess. PL 525, 79th Cong., as amended by PL 94-587 H. Doc. 572, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 71, 88th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 442, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 232, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Section 205, PL 858-80. 19-28 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT TABLE 19-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized LOW HEAD LOCKS & DAMS (See Section 5 of Text) July 24, 1946 Construction of three lock & dam units, including turning basin, channel cutoffs and enlargement to provide a navigable channel 9 feet deep with a minimum width of 250 feet from Ft. Smith, Ark., to vicinity of Catoosa, Okla. MARION, KANS. (See Section 36 of Text) December 12, 1970 Local protection works for flood control, diversion channel, levee, and appurtenant structures. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR FLEET & MARINE TERMINALS (See Section 6 of Text) July 24, 1946 Wharf, office and storage building, storage space, and operating areas for floating maintenance and repair fleet. OOLOGAH LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 39 of Text) June 28, 1938 Construction of reservoir for flood control, navigation, and water supply purposes. July 24, 1946 Installation of hydroelectric power facilities. March 7, 1974 Reassigns the storage provided for hydroelectric power production to municipal and industrial water supply. POTEAU RIVER NAVIGATION, ARK. & OKLA. (See Section 8 of Text) July 4, 1960 Construction of navigation channel 9 feet deep (as amended and 130 feet wide from the confluence of the Dec. 31, 1970) Poteau River and the Arkansas River upstream on the Poteau 1.7 miles to Fort Smith, Ark., with a turning basin just upstream from Fort Smith. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (TULSA DISTRICT) (See Section 43 of Text) July 24, 1946 Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. August 3, 1955 Walnut Bayou Channel Improvements. July 3, 1958 Modify Millwood; construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, tGillham, and Dierks Lakes. October 23, 1962 Construct Clayton and Tuskahoma Lakes. August 13, 1968 Modify 1946 Act-Construct bank stabilization, Index, Ark., to Denison Dam. SHIDLER LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 44 of Text) October 27, 1965 Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation purposes. SKIATOOK LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 45 of Text) October 23, 1962 Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. TOWANDA LAKE, KANS. (See Section 47 of Text) October 27, 1965 Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation purposes. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLA. (See Section 48 of Text) December 30, 1963 Construction of reservoir for flood control, irrigation, and conservation purposes. Documents H2.d D oc. 758, 79th Cong., sess. H. Doc. 256, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H2.d D soecs.s .758, 79th Cong., PL 93-251, 93rd Cong., 2d sess. Section 107, PL 86-645. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H2. d Dsoecs.s .488, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S2. dD soecs. s.145, 87th Cong., H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 242, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 232, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 33, 88th Cong., 1st sess. 19-29 TABLE 19-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN: MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 2 of Text) Feature River River Mile Nearest Town Locks and Dams: W.D. Mayo, No. 14 Robert S. Kerr, No. 15 Webbers Falls, No. 16 Chouteau, No. 17 Newt Graham, No. 18 Appurtenant Navigation Features: Channel cutoffs and enlargements Dredging Bank stabilization and channel rectification Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal Lakes: Canton Elk City Eufaula Fall River Fort Gibson Keystone Markham Ferry Neodesha s Oologah Pensacola Tenkiller Toronto Wister Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Verdigris Verdigris Verdigris Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas North Canadian Elk River Canadian Fall River Grand (Neosho) Arkansas Grand (Neosho) Verdigris Verdigris Grand (Neosho) Illinois Verdigris Poteau 319.61 336.21 366.61 401.5' 421.6' (2) (2) 295.4 to 336.2 339.0' 394.3 8.7 27.0 54.2 7.7 538.8 47.4 222.8 90.2 77.0 12.8 271.5 60.9 Redland, Okla. Cowlington, Okla. Gore, Okla. Okay, Okla. Inola, Okla. Muskogee to Catoosa, Okla Fort Smith, Ark., to Robert S. Kerr Lock & Da Sallisaw, Okla. Canton, Okla. Elk City, Kans. Eufaula, Okla. Fall River, Kans. Fort Gibson, Okla. Sand Springs, Okla. Locust Grove, Okla. Neodesha, Kans. Oologah, Okla. Disney, Okla. Gore, Okla. Toronto, Kans. Wister, Okla. 1. Navigation miles-McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. 2. As required for channel 9 feet deep. 3. See Table 19-I, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." 19-30 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL WICHITA RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL PLAN (See Section 10B of Text) Low Flow Brine Lake Lake Feature (Area VII) (Area VII) Low Flow Lake (Area VIII) Low Brine Lake (Area X) Brine Lake (Areas VIII & X) Stream North Fork Canal Wichita Riv Creek Ri i 213.0 "Aver m e County Nearest town Drainage area, sq mi Dam: Height, ft length, ft Uncontrolled spillway, width, ft Deflatable dam, height, ft Base width Outlet works Storage, acre-feet: Maximum pool Top of deflatable dam Brine storage AMreaax,i macurmes :pool Top of deflatable dam Brine storage Pumping facility: Capacity, g.p.m. Pi'eline, Size, in. Length, mi. Cottle Paducah 492.0 None 5 80 22 14 12,800 33 11.7 1.6 Foard Crowell 46.0 South Fork Wichita Riv 74.9 King Guthrie Middle Fork Wichita Riv 19.7 Foard Truscott 221.0 157.5 23,530 1,000 None 405,600' 329,700 7,7901 3,3302 None 5 40 None 20 12 6,720 24-36 21.0 Trib to N. Fork Trib to N. Fork Wichita Riv Knox Truscott 61.0 5 30 10 6 3.2 26.2 1410,714.05 1,000 None 116,200' 107,000' 3,295' 2,9802 4,488 21-24 7.7 1. At spillway crest. 2. Includes 100-year event after 100 year accumulation of brine. 19-31 TABLE 19-D TABLE 19-E ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL OKLA., TEX., AND KANS.-ARKANSAS RIVER PLAN (See Section 10C of Text) Fresh Fresh Brine Fresh Water Brine Water Lake Water Lake Lake' Lake (Area Lake Low Flow' Brine' Feature (Area I) (Area I) (Area II) 11-III) (Area III) Feature (Area IV) (Area IV) Stream Salt Fork, Salt Fork, Buffalo Cr., Cimarron Cimarron Stream Salt Cr. Offsite Arkansas Arkansas Cimarron River River Cimarron River River River River mile 112.7 103.3 4.0 279.1 301.5 River mile 21.7 - County Alfalfa Alfalfa Woods & Woodward Comanche, Clark County Blaine Blaine Woodward & Harper & Woods Nearest town Cherokee, Jet, Freedom, Freedom, Protection, Nearest town Southard, Southard, Okla. Okla. Okla. Okla. Kans. Okla. Okla. Drainage area, Drainage area, Sq mi 2,904.0 296.0 455.0 130.0 7,000.0 Sq mi 4.3 13.7 Dam: Dam: Height, ft 46.0 - 95.0 90.0 101.0 Heigth, ft 13.0 46.0 Length, ft 55,400 - 8,000 8,450 22,100 Length, ft 1,860 6,495 Spillway: Uncontrolled spillway, ocation Valley - - Abutment Abutment Width, ft 200 400 Type Fuse Plug Ogee Weir - Ogee Weir Ogee Weir Deflatable dam, Width, ft 500 290 - 1,000 1,200 Height, ft 5 - Outlet works: Base, Type Uncon- Width, ft 40 - tWroelilre d - Conduit Gated Outlet works None Conduit Conduit Outlet works None None Size - - 11' dia. 36" dia. 20' dia. Storage, acre-feet: Diversion channel: Maximum pool - 9,540 Length, mi 7.2 - 7.0 - 19.2 Top of deflatable dam 60 - Depth, ft 11.0 - 15.0 - 21.0-25.0 Brine storage - 7,418 Bottom width, ft 87.0 - 20.0 - 25.0-60.0 Storage, acre-feet: Area, acres: Max pool - - 228,000 617,000 1,740,000 Maximum pool - 570 Brine storage - 278,000 - 285,000 - Top of deflatable dam 23 - Area, acres: Area, acres: Brine storage - 494 Max pool - - 5,820 16,800 42,000 Brine storage - 30,500 - 10,400 - Pumping facility: Pumping facility: Capacity, g.p.m. 315 Capacity, g.p.m. - - - - - Pipeline Pipeline, in. - - - - - Size, in. 10 & 12 - Length, ft. - - - - - Length, mi 3.2 - 1. Features of the modified project are the same as for the existing project, unless noted. 2. Based on Phase II GDM Plan. tI. 0 0 oti TABLE 19-E (Continued) TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL OKLA., TEX., AND KANS.-RED RIVER PLAN (See Section 10C of Text) Feature Brine Lake (Area VI) Stream ream EFlimsh FCorr,k River River mile County Nearest town Drainage area, Sq mi Dam: Height, ft Length, ft S illway: ocation Type Width, ft Outlet works: Type Size Diversion channel: Length, mi Depth, ft Bottom width, ft Storage, acre-feet: Max pool Brine storage Area, acres: Max pool Brine storage Pumping facility: Capacity, g.p.m. 1.6 Harmon Erick, Okla. 33.6 154.0 3,500 Saddle Uncontrolled 100 None 169,300 120,680 2,620 2,320 2,01~0)" Pipeline: (1142 &pu 2m0ps1 Size, in. 14 & 20 Length, ft 20,300 Brine Lake (Area IX) Canal SPease River Foard Crow Tex. Brine Lake (Areas XIII and XIV) I Cr, Canal Cr, Pease River 1.6 1.6 Foard ell, Crowell, Tex. 46.0 157.5 23,530 Saddle Uncontrolled 1,000 None 46.0 157.5 23,530 Saddle Uncontrolled 1,000 None 405,600 405,600 329,700 329,700 7,790 7,790 7,210 7,210 8,803 6,158 (86 pumps) (97 pumps) 2, 16, 24, 2, 6, 8, 10 27, & 33 14, 21, & 24 167,300 252,300 19-33 Brine Lake (Area XV and Future) Canal Cr, Pease River 1.6 Foard Crowell, Tex. 46.0 157.5 23,530 Saddle Uncontrolled 1,000 None 405,600 329,700 7,790 7,210 TABLE 19-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 POOL ELEVATIONS AND STORAGES DURING FISCAL YEAR See Section in Text Project Start End Maximum Minimum SA. W. D. Mayo L&D, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 5B. Chouteau L&D, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 5C. Newt Graham L&D, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 13. Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 15. Canton Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 19. Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. 20. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 21. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 23. Elk City Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 24. Fall River Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. 25. Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, Okla. 26. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 27. Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 28. Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 29. Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Okla. 30. Hulah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 32. John Redmond Dam & Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kans. 33. Kaw Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 34. Lake Kemp, Wichita River Basin, Tex. 37. Marion Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Kansas 38. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 39. Oologah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Okla. 40. Optima Lake, N. Canadian River Basin, Okla. 41. Pat Mayse Lake, Red River Basin, Tex. 42. Pine Creek Lake, Little River Basin, Okla. 46. Toronto Lake, Verdigris River Basin, Kans. Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) Elevation (feet, MSL) Storage (acre-feet) 412.89 412.79 15,595 15,436 511.17 511.28 22,955 23,205 532.35 532.30 24,028 23,951 749.58 748.79 18,153 17,283 1614.43 1613.67 110,111 98,101 1269.38 1268.09 34,576 31,048 436.10 446.79 33,415 53,948 525.71 529.81 29,261 35,161 790.03 793.00 25,776 32,592 948.85 944.59 22,748 13,877 2003.70 2002.34 13,346 10,990 502.38 507.53 33,558 41,146 1124.65 1123.75 28,571 21,480 413.22 16,128 511.56 23,841 532.61 24,429 754.29 23,718 1618.09 133,829 1279.75 69,351 446.79 53,948 531.02 37,042 801.26 71,578 958.91 57,525 2005.89 17,663 515.94 55,528 1127.76 60,117 761.16 759.35 764.59 6,327 4,983 9,943 404.41 405.39 407.37 156,334 169,603 198,213 731.32 729.30 747.70 25,457 19,447 110,381 1038.92 1037.41 1055.38 70,575 57,554 306,969 1009.49 1009.75 1020.28 434,032 424,400 630,271 1133.60 1129.13 1137.18 145,779 114,918 177,926 1349.37 1347.93 1353.35 76,917 68,710 X02,625 259.28 258.09 263.00 207,530 153,926 330,980 637.37 635.77 642.87 535,307 490,103 707,867 2720.20 2720.20 2722.90 4,917 4,917 7,613 450.15 450.70 451.90 119,484 122,730 129,989 441.95 451.65 451.65 70,264 126,891 126,891 901.84 897.77 916.73 22,787 12,952 86,526 19-34 411.96 14,123 510.91 22,365 531.50 22,770 748.64 17,121 1613.30 101,620 1268.09 31,048 433.38 29,179 521.78 24,280 789.98 22,449 944.59 13,877 2002.34 10,990 497.47 27,188 1123.63 20,615 759.31 4,956 400.00 103,900 729.30 19,447 1037.41 57,554 1008.97 411,311 1126.23 97,618 1347.93 68,710 254.92 99,859 635.77 490,103 2719.60 4,386 448.65 110,874 439.50 59,645 897.77 12,952 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT POOL ELEVATIONS AND STORAGES DURING FISCAL YEAR See Section in Text Project 48. Waurika Lake, Red Elevation (feet, MSL) River Basin, Okla. Storage (acre-feet) 49. Wister Lake, Poteau Elevation (feet, MSL) River Basin, Okla. Storage (acre-feet) 51A. Altus Lake, North Elevation (feet, MSL) Fork of Red River, Storage (acre-feet) Okla. (B.R.) 51B. Arbuckle Reservoir, Elevation (feet, MSL) Rock Cr., Okla. (B.R.) Storage (acre-feet) 51C. Cheney Reservoir, North Elevation (feet, MSL) Fork of Ninnescah River, Storage (acre-feet) Kans. (B.R.) 51D. Fort Cobb Reservoir, Elevation (feet, MSL) Pond Cr., Okla. (B.R.) Storage (acre-feet) 51E. Foss Reservoir, Elevation (feet, MSL) Washita River, Okla. Storage (acre-feet) (B.R.) Elevation (feetMS 51F. Mountain Park (Tom Steed Elevationr(aacgree- feMetS, L) Lake), Otter Cr., Storage (acre-feet) Okla. (B.R.) 51G. Norman Res. (Lake Thun- Elevation (feet, MSL) derbird), Little River, Storage (acre-feet) Okla. (B.R.) 51H. Sanford Res. (Lake Mere- Elevation (feet, MSL) dith), Canadian River Storage (acre-feet) Tex., (B.R.) 54. Broken Bow Lake, Elevation (feet, MSL) Little River Basin, Storage (acre-feet) Okla. 55. Denison Dam-Lake Elevation (feet, MSL) Texoma, Red River Storage (acre-feet) Basin, Tex. & Okla. 56. Eufaula Lake, Canadian Elevation (feet, MSL) River Basin, Okla. Storage (acre-feet) 57. Fort Gibson Lake, Elevation (feet, MSL) Grand (Neosho) River Storage (acre-feet) Basin, Okla. 58. Keystone Lake, Arkansas Elevation (feet, MSL) River Basin, Okla. Storage (acre-feet) 59. Markham Ferry Elevation (feet, MSL) Reservoir, Grand Storage (acre-feet) (Neosho) River Basin, Okla. (G.R.D.A.) 60. Pensacola Lake, Grand Elevation (feet, MSL) (Neosho) River Basin, Storage (acre-feet) Okla. (G.R.D.A.) 61. Robert S. Kerr L&D & Elevation (feet, MSL) Reservoir, Arkansas Storage (acre-feet) River Basin, Okla. 62. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Elevation (feet, MSL) Illinois River Basin, Storage (acre-feet) Okla. Elevation (feet, MSL) 63. Webbers Falls L&D, Elevation (feet, MSL) Arkansas River Basin, Storage (acre-feet) Okla. Start 942.79 941.62 944.11 941.35 192452,9.7295 477.73 60,469 1550.48 87,828 870.62 69,213 1420.49 156,705 1339.33 69,547 1641.20 172,555 1407.58 68,805 1038.28 115,279 2891.48 290,358 597.90 895,558 616.02 2,558,530 584.33 2,261,896 553.88 362,956 721.64 583,471 619.30 203,614 735.82 1,287,339 459.40 469,917 630.96 640,507 488.94 153,994 End Maximum Minimum 11974,13.7672 475.12 43,933 1534.39 30,413 869.20 66,024 1419.45 147,380 1339.40 69,812 1639.33 160,512 1408.08 71,559 1036.35 104,224 2883.59 223,860 589.29 780,206 612.88 2,313,684 579.43 1,809,165 554.17 368,480 717.33 484,396 619.62 207,150 734.20 1,228,200 459.73 482,853 621.43 527,687 489.58 160,747 13954,48.9111 478.88 69,074 1557.85 127,481 872.53 73,661 1429.20 250,456 1343.78 87,523 1643.40 187,644 1412.81 100,977 1040.97 132,005 2891.48 290,358 602.94 967,722 619.30 2,853,939 586.44 2,480,063 556.80 421,219 732.65 907,015 621.29 226,147 746.47 1,741,560 460.74 526,233 632.87 655,496 490.61 172,032 191451,5.3154 471.40 26,307 1534.36 30,336 868.49 64,468 1419.42 7,116 1338.30 65,745 1639.33 160,512 1406.40 62,476 1036.29 103,895 2883.59 223,860 584.09 715,141 611.11 2,183,775 579.24 1,792,920 552.46 336,779 717.25 482,700 618.20 191,732 734.16 1,226,759 458.05 416,084 621.40 527,360 487.33 138,067 19-35 TABLE 19-F (Continued) TABLE 19-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM FLOOD CONTROL PLAN (TULSA DISTRICT) (See Section 43 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town Boswell Lake2 Boggy Creek 18.9 Boswell Okla. Tuskahoma Lake2 Kiamichi River 118.5 Tuskahoma, Okla. Clayton Lake2 Jackford Creek 2.8 Claytan, Okla. Hugo Lake2 Kiamichi River 17.6 Hugo, Okla. Pine Creek Lake2 Little River 145.3 Wright City, Okla. Lukfata Lake2 Glover Creek 24.5 Glover, Okla. Broken Bow Lake3 Mountain Fork River 20.3 Broken Bow, Okla. DeQueen Lake2 Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, Ark. Gillham Lake2 Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, Ark. Dierks Lake2 Saline River 56.6 Dierks, Ark. Millwood Lakes Little River 16.0 Millwood, Ark. Bank Stabilization2 Red River 485.3 Index, Ark. Bank Stabilization' Red River 330.4 Index, Ark. Walnut Bayou Red River 509.2 Foreman, Ark. 1. River mile above mouth. 2. See Table 19-I "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." 3. Project is reported separately herein. 4. Project transferred to New Orleans District for operation and maintenance. TABLE 19-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 50 of Text) Inspection Date Project 1979 1980 Jenks Levee, Okla. November April Tulsa-West Tulsa Levees, Okla. December April Carthage Levee, Mo. July January Enid Diversion Canal and Levee, Okla. November May Hutchinson Levee, Kans. March March Wichita and Valley Center, Kans. March March South Deer Creek Levee, Okla. October April Polecat Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. November April Florence Levee, Kans. - March Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. August March Walnut Bayou Channel Improvement, Ark. November May Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla. October May Cherry and Red Fork Creeks, Okla. December April Flat Rock Creek, Okla. November April Springdale Levee, Ark. July January Deep Fork Channel Improvement, Okla. October April Iola Levee, Kans. - May Marion Diversion Channel and Levee, Kans. 19-36 TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 52 of Text) Project August Levee, Kans.' ' Bank Stabilization, Index, Ark., to Denison Dam, Tex., (Red River Waterway) Bank Stabilization, Red River Below Denison' Boswell Lake, Okla.5 Carthage Levee, Mo.3 Cherry & Red Fork Creeks Channel Improvement, Okla.' Cow Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. s Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, Okla.' Douglass Lake, Kans.' El Dorado, Kans. W. Br., Walnut Riv., Channel Improvement.' ' Enid Levee Floodway, Okla.' Experimental Chloride Control Project, Red River Basin, Estelline & Guthrie, Tex.' Flat Rock Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, Okla." ' Florence Levee, Kans.s Hutchinson Levee and Channel, Kans.3 Iola Levee, Kans.' Jenks Levee, Okla.o John Redmond Wildlife Refuge, Kans.' Lost & Little Lost Cr., Channel Improvement, Mo.' " Mud Creek Channel Improvement, Okla.' Neodesha Lake, Kans.' Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla.' Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans.3 Sand Lake, Okla.' Spring Creek Channel Improvement, Springdale, Ark." Stillwater Creek & Tributaries Channel Improvement, Okla.' Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, Okla.3 Turkey Creek Channel Improvement, Okla." Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, Okla."' Tuskahoma Lake, Okla." Walnut Bayou Channel Improvement, Ark. West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, Kans.' Wichita and Valley Center Channel Improvement, Kans.' Winfield Levee, Kans.' Winfield Levee Modification, Kans.' For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1938 1970 1953 1952 1958 1970 1971 1972 1966 1977 1963 1975 1975 1965 1956 1939 1950 1970 1977 1952 1960 1968 1963 1975 1974 1954 1968 1975 1963 1963 1965 1960 1937 1977 Cost to September 30, 1980 Operation and Construction Maintenance 84,217 222,105 - 346,416 261,448 363,720 213,016 92,319 743,612 300,028 1,741,000 369,782 3,497,718 22,290 344,797 158,406 173,020 97,910 8,047,512 545,996 1,371,000 264,916 2,785,070 65,556 144,853 - 317,675 364,200 12,247,379 98,897 - 14,599 123,006 1. Reported by Memphis District in 1937; by Little Rock District 1938 and 1939. 2. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 3. Completed. 4. Inactive. 5. Awaiting appropriation of funds. 6. Stage I, notice of expiration of authorization after 5 years issued 20 Feb. 1976. Stage II, limitation expired. 7. Not economically justified at this time. 8. Local assurances leceived but not economically 8. Local assurances Oeceived but not economically justified at this time. 9. Deauthorized 20 July 1980. 10. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 11. Notice of expiration of authorization after 5 years issued 24 August 1976. 12. Notice of expiration of authorization after 5 years issued 20 July 1977. 13. Notice of expiration of authorization after 5 years issued 20 February 1976. 19-37 TABLE 19-I 84,217 TABLE 19-J TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Section 205, PL 858, 80th Cong., as amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 53 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost $ Labette Creek, Parsons, Kans.1 46,958 Arkansas & Walnut Rivers, Kans.1 4,407 Arkansas River & Bull Creek, Nickerson, Kans.' 161,426 Haikey Creek, Tulsa, Okla.1 48,350 Little Arkansas River & Sand Creek, Kans.' 4,598 Main Branch Chisholm Creek, Park City, Kans.' 109,422 Center and Swifty, Sarcoxie, Mo.2 4,9993 North Canadian Wastewater Treatment Plant, Oklahoma City, Okla.' 2,2543 Covington Creek, Wagoner Co., Okla. 1,8238 (1) Detailed Project Report (2) Reconnaissance Report (3) Revolving Fund to be Reimbursed 19-38 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT* The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Kansas River Navigation, Kansas ...... Z-Z 2. Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) ........ *20-2 3. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................... ... 20-3 Flood Control 4. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, Mo... 20-3 5. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, Kansas. 20-3 6. Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, Kans ......... 20-3 7. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebr..................... 20-3 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kans ... 20-4 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kans.......................... 20-4 10. Kansas Citys on Mo. & Kans. Rivers, Mo. & Kans.................. 20-4 11. Kansas City, Kansas River, Kans. (1962 M od.) ........... ............ 20-5 12. Lawrence, Kanss River, Kans. ....... 20-5 13. Little Blue River Channel, Mo......... 20-5 14. Little Blue River Lakes, Mo ........... 20-6 15. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, M o .......................... 20-6 16. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, Kans................. 20-7 17. Milford Lake, Republican River, Kans.......................... 20-7 18. Missouri River Levee System, Iowa. Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Rulo, Nebr. to M.u.t.h. ....................... P-7 to Mouth) .......... *e*em*ie,.K 20-7 19. Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, Kans. .. .p20-8 Flood Control (cont.) Page 20. Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), Kansas .............. 20-8 21. Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kans .... 20-8 22. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) ................ . 20-9 23. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Mo .................... 20-9 24. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, Kans.................. . 20-9 25. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, Iowa ... 20-10 26. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, M o....................... .. 20-10 27. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, Kans ....................... 20-10 28. Wilson Lake, Saline River, Kans ....... 20-11 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. . 20-11 30. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... . 20-11 31. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 20-11 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 32. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, Mo.......... 20-12 33. Stockton Lake, Sac River, Mo ......... 20-12 General Investigations 34. Surveys .......................... 20-13 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 20-13 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 20-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. KANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION, KANSAS Location. Project is located on the Kansas River in Kansas City, Wyandotte County, Kansas and extends 9.33 miles upstream from the mouth to the Turner Bridge. Existing project. The proposed improvements will provide a navigable waterway 150 feet wide and 9 feet deep for a distance of 9.33 miles upstream from the confluence of the Kansas and Missouri Rivers. Project was authorized under provisions of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L.89-298, in accordance with House of Representatives resolution (H. Doc. 93-160) dated 11 April 1974. Estimated Federal cost of construction (1979) is $6,350,000 and estimated non- Federal cost is $27,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation were described in the resolution authorizing the project. The City Commission of Kansas City, Kansas, has furnished a letter of intent for sponsorship. The Kansas City, Kansas, Wyandotte County Port Authority, Inc., was authorized with power to act as sponsor of this project by the Kansas Legislature in 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: The project was reclassified to inactive status following sponsor's noninterest. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is inactive. 2. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Mont., to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven States to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, to be obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. Improved section (mouth to upper end of Rulo Bend) is 498.4 miles (1960 mileage) long. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of stage are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. (See table 20-C for authorizing legislation and table 20-B for total cost of existing projects). Local cooperation. Project provides that cooperation from benefited localities may be required, where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended with Government funds upon authorized work where such would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,633, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $164,185 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. Facilities for transferring grain, petroleum products, and other commodities are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. Present facilities, listed in Table 20-D, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. The 1974 Base Line Study of the reach of the Missouri River in the Kansas City District estimated recreation use on the river at 1,250,000 recreation days annually. Regular funds, new work: Construction consisted of dikes, dike extensions, and revetments. The projected tonnage on the river for FY 1980 is approximately 2.9 million. Maintenance: Repair by contract to dikes and revetments. In addition, following work was accomplished by hired labor: Construction of environmental gaps and dike and revetment repair, maintenance of U.S. Government dredges in standby status, real estate management, surveys and mapping, stream gaging, environmental studies and special working data, engineering and design, surveys and layout of construction, and supervision and administration. There was no dredging because no significant bars or shoals developed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Bank Stabilization work on this section of the project (Rulo, Nebr., to mouth) is essentially complete. River access sites have been completed at eleven locations. 20-2 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT 3. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 20-E. Flood Control 4. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO. Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act, P.L. 96-611 (H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.). Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project is $141,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $25,300,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on 9 December 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Stage I channelization plans and specs were 90 percent complete. Stage II channelization contract plans and specifications were initiated and are 5 percent complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was complete and preparation of Stage I, and II, plans and specs is underway. 5. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KANS. Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, Kansas, in Douglas County. Lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a maximum height of about 114 feet above riverbed, with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial water supply and recreation). In 1980 the estimated Federal cost through construction of the project is $57,300,000. Project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. P.L. 87-874 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,039,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on 6 September 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 30 October 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visition for FY 1980 was 800,400 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Development of public use facilities was advanced to 92 percent completion. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in January 1972 and is 96 percent complete. Work remaining consists of recreation facilities, administrative buildings and interpretive program. 6. GYPSUM, GYPSUM CREEK, KANS. Location. At Gypsum, Saline County, Kansas, on the left bank of Gypsum Creek, 10 miles south of its confluence with Smoky Hill River, 15 miles southeast of Salina, Kansas. Existing project. Plan consists of a levee around the city, a diversion channel, and channel improvement work. Project was selected for construction under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, P.L. 858, as amended. Estimated Federal cost of construction (1979) is $2,580,000, and estimated non- Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $278,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. A section 221 agreement was signed by the City of Gypsum on 14 June 1976 and by the Secretary of the Army on 31 August 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed in May 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was complete except for minor deficiencies consisting of a drainage problem created by the project and a need for reseeding of a portion of the project which will be corrected by the end of FY 82. 7. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NEBR. Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, about 3 miles east of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed and a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near center of dam Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin 20-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act, P.L. 761, as modified by 1941 Flood Control Act, P.L. 228, and expanded by 1944 Flood Control Act, P.L. 534. Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1980), including $1,107,623 for major rehabilitation work and $4,892,000 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $51,189,155. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 852,600 visitor days. Regular funds, .new work: Supplemental recreational development activity during the year consisted of near completion of Methodist Cove shower building. Maintenance: Activities included continuation of cultural resource survey, forestation by contract, and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was initiated in August 1946 and completed in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 8. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KANS. Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 15 miles southwest of the Kansas City metropolitan area in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. Plans provide for an earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) and about 75 feet above valley flood plain. A gravity type uncontrolled spillway section is planned. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 In 1980 the estimated Federal cost through construction of the project is $61,000,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $20,260,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. Local interests have shown no interest in sponsoring recreational development at this time. Therefore, only minimum recreational facilities will be built. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular Funds, new work: Land acquisition relocations and construction of project features continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in December 1974 and advanced to 83 percent complete. 9. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KANS. Location. Dam is on Smoky Hill River about 19 miles west and 16 miles south of Salina, Kansas, and about 205 river miles above mouth of stream. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed and a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act, P.L. 761, as modified by 1941 Flood Control Act, P.L. 228, and expanded by 1944 Flood Control Act, P.L. 534. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project including $210,492, (1970) supplemental recreational development (Code 710) is $12,538,227. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 665,200 visitor days. Regular funds. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1940 and the project was placed in operation in May 1948. No additional recreation facilities are being considered. 10. KANSAS CITYS ON MISSOURI AND KANSAS RIVER, MO. AND KANS. Location. From mouth of Kansas River about 6.5 miles up and 9.5 miles down Missouri River and 9.5 miles up Kansas River. Existing project. Plan of improvement provided protection works consisting principally of levees and floodwalls, for 13 separate project units, which are: Argentine; Armourdale; Central Industrial; Fairfax-Jersey Creek; North Kansas City; East Bottoms; channel improvement, Kansas River; bridge and approach alterations, Kansas River; channel improvement, Missouri River; floodway 20-4 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT improvement, Missouri River; Birmingham; Blue Valley Industrial; and Liberty Bend Cutoff. See Annual Report of 1964 for detailed description. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $42,669,000, of which $41,814,410 is for completed work and $854,590 (1971) for Turkey Creek facilities in the Central Industrial unit. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,120,000, of which $619,800 is for work done with funds contributed by local interests, and $4,500,200 for lands, damages, and relocation to be borne by local interests. (See table 20-C for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See Annual Report for 1964 for details. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: North Kansas City unit completed with minor administrative costs. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in April 1940 and all work proposed has been completed except for Turkey Creek facilities required for Central Industrial unit. It is anticipated that local interests will seek authorization of a review study to consider improvements for flood control along Turkey Creek as a separate authorization. See Annual Report for 1964 for detailed description. 11. KANSAS CITY, KANSAS RIVER, KANS. (1962 MOD.) Location. Along the Kansas River at Kansas City, Kansas. Existing project. Provides for raising existing levees and floodwall protection in Argentine, Armourdale, and Central Industrial units, and includes necessary bridge alterations and modification of appurtenant facilities. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act, P.L. 87-874 (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The downstream section of the Argentine unit has been assigned to inactive status based on recent studies. Estimated Federal cost of construction (1980) is $28,300,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $7,090,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Assurances of local cooperation were received December 4, 1968. Rights-of-way for the Argentine unit upstream section, the Armourdale unit and Central Industrial unit have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contracts for construction of the Central Industrial unit were physically completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the upstream portion of Argentine unit was initiated in May 1971 and completed in February 1974. The Armourdale unit was initiated in November 1973 and completed in September 1976. Construction of the Central Industrial unit was initiated in April 1977 and completed in October 1979. 12. LAWRENCE, KANSAS RIVER, KANS. Location. On Kansas River about 50 miles above its mouth at Lawrence, Douglas County, Kansas. Existing project. Levees along both banks of Kansas River and right bank of Mud Creek, channel improvement for Mud Creek, bank protection, and appurtenant facilities for protection of North Lawrence, Kansas. Project was authorized by 1954 Flood Cintrol Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 642, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Since the city of Lawrence is no longer interested in sponsoring the South Lawrence unit, this unit was deleted from the project cost estimate and reclassified to an inactive status. By letter dated 9 January 1970, the city of Lawrence indicated an interest in developing a recreational facility on lands obtained for the Lawrence 'Flood Protection Project. Estimated Federal cost of construction (1980) is $8,870,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $2,130,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, Board of Commissioners of city of Lawrence furnished required assurances June 8, 1965. All required rights-of-way for construction have been furnished. Right-of-way for the recreational facility is available and the city of Lawrence signed a Section 221 agreement on 13 September 1979. The agreement stated Government costs to be $204,305 and city costs to be $88,901 for construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were prepared and a contract was awarded for construction of riverfront recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated July 31, 1967. The Kansas River portion was completed in March 1972 and the Mud Creek portion in July 1978. Construction of the riverfront recreation facilities is underway. 13. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, LITTLE BLUE RIVER, MO. Location. The project is located along the Little Blue River and extends from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351 22 miles upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. The proposed improvements will consist of straightening and enlarging the Little Blue River channel from the head of Missouri 20-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 River Levee Unit R 351, near Blue Mills Road, upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek, reducing the length of this section from 20.4 to about 15 miles. Alteration of six highway bridges and construction of five new highway bridges and one railroad bridge will be required. Improvements in the vicinity of Lake City will consist of diversion of West Fire Prairie Creek into the Little Blue River and construction of a levee. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act approved August 13, 1968, P.L. 90-483. In 1980 the estimated Federal cost through construction of the project is $31,700,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,390,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies to the Little Blue River channel improvement works. Jackson County, Missouri, passed a bond issue for sponsorship of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished July 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Stage III, rechannelization, was awarded in September 1977 and is 92 percent complete. Stage IV was awarded in October 1978 and is 72 percent complete. A contract for Stage V, Phase I was awarded in September 1980. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in December 1974 and is 48 percent complete. 14. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO. Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about one-half mile south of U.S. Highway 40 and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam will be an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 26,600 acre feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam will be an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation and 2,000 for sedimentation). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act approved August 13, 1968, P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong., 1st sess.). In 1980 the estimated Federal cost through construction of the project is $173,000,000. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on 5 July 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 24 June 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on 5 June 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army 10 January 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Estimated reimbursement for recreation is $17,056,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued land acquisition. Contracts were underway for relocation of Longview county roads, utility, and outlet works contracts. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition was approximately 98 percent complete and overall project was 24 percent complete. 15. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO. Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 1 miles west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity will be 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). Estimated Federal cost (1980) is $19,500,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,100,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,460,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,100,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On 15 September 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the city of Macon, Mo. for water supply and recreation development. Missouri State agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on 17 Juno 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of city of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state sign- 20-6 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT ed the contract in December 1979 and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on 18 April 1980. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 222,000 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Activities included repayment for recreation facilities by the state of previous expenditures, including interest during construction. This was partially offset by expenditures to continue boundary marking, procurement of permanent operating equipment, establishment of sediment ranges and design activities. The Stage I Recreation Facilities contract will be awarded early in FY 1981. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end offiscal year. All land has been acquired. Construction was initiated in March 1973. Project was placed in useful operation for flood control on 1 September 1980. Recreation facilities remain to be completed. Project is 74 percent complete. 16. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KANS. Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 2 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control and recreation). Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 1,020,600 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: The project is complete and in operational status. Maintenance: Activity included installation of cathodic protection and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was initiated July 13, 1967 and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. 17. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KANS. Location. Damsite is on Republican River near village of Alida and about 8 miles downstream from Milford, Geary County, Kansas, and about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River near Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 125 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control,. and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project at request of Governor of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 83-780 (H. Doc. 642, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1980) including $2,138,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710) is $50,406,843. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $13,467,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 1,340,000 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreational development included completion of Rolling Hills shower building construction, and award of Curtis Creek shower building. Maintenance: Activities included continuation of seismic reevaluation, boundary marking, and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in July 1961 and was completed in June 1965. Construction of supplemental recreation facilities is underway. 18. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBR., KANS., AND MO. (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. In 1980 the estimated Federal cost for the active portion through construction of the protection from Rulo, Nebraska to mouth is $239,600,000 and $28,152,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Remaining 20-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Cost estimate for deferred and inactive portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $298,082,500 (1964 price level except Unit L 15 which is 1975 price level) of which $274,098,000 is Federal cost for construction and $23,984,500 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. (See table 20-C for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Sponsor for Unit L 246 has purchased all rights-of-way. Sponsor for Unit L 345-330 has optioned the major part of lands for rights-of-way. Because of anticipated changes as a result of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the District advised the sponsor to suspend condemnation proceedings for remaining requirements pending development of an alternate plan. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contracts for Stage I, Stage II and Stage III levee work and pipeline relocation for Unit L 246 were advanced to 96, 86 and 77 percent complete, respectively. Planning on remaining active units continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was initiated in June 1948. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in table 20-F on Missouri River levee system. 19. ONAGA LAKE, VERMILLION CREEK, KANS. Location. The project is located on Vermillion Creek in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, about 35 miles northwest of Topeka, Kansas. Existing project. Preliminary plans provide for an earthfill dam about 8,600 feet long and about 90 feet high above valley floor with an uncontrolled service spillway. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 328,000 acre-feet (217,000 for flood control, 21,000 for sediment reserve, and 90,000 multipurpose storage for water supply and recreation). Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act, P.L. 87-874 (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Estimated Federal cost of construction (1980) is $87,800,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Reimbursement of $23,820,000 will be required by local interests for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Preconstruction planning continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is completed except for seismic investigation of the embankment foundation. 20. PERRY LAKE AREA (ROAD IMPROVEMENTS), KANS. Location. The proposed road improvements are in three segments at different locations in Jefferson County, Kansas, around the Perry Lake area. Segment A extends from U. S. Highway 24 at Perry, Kansas, 2.5 miles north and west to the east end of the Perry damsite access road. Segment B extends from the north side of the Jefferson Point Park north and west about 5.5 miles to highway K-92 about 2 miles west of Ozawakie, Kansas. Segment C extends from K-92, about 2 miles east of Ozawkie, north about 8.1 miles to highway K-4, K-16, about 2 miles east of Valley Falls, Kansas. Total improvement length is about 16.1 miles. Existing project. Plans call for improving all segments to existing Kansas State Highway Commission secondary road standards. Additional rights-of-way required for this project was authorized to be acquired at Federal expense. Project was authorized by River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1971 (Public Law 92-222). Estimated Federal cost of construction (1979) is $5,404,000. Local cooperation. County to maintain roads after completion. Operations and results durign fiscal year. Relocations contracts were completed. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated March 1977 and is 100 percent complete. 21. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KANS. Location. Damsite is on Delaware River about 5 miles above mouth in Jefferson County, Kansas, and about 3 miles north of Perry, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acre-feet (480,000 for flood control, 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project plan at request of State of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Project is a unit of the Pick- Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 642, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project including $744,212 20-8 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT (1980) supplemental recreational development (Code 710) is $49,115,918. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $8,290,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 1,695,600 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreation development consisted of completion of the contract for water supply for several recreation areas. Maintenance: Activity included seismic reevaluation and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in March 1964 and completed in January 1969. Deferred maintenance for the railroad relocation is complete. No additional recreation facilities are being considered. 22. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along Missouri River and several principal tributaries of Missouri River and in States comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of floodflows at damsite. (See table 20-C for authorizing legislation and table 20-G on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Operations for those projects expenditures, on which plans were in preparation or construction was initiated, are shown in individual reports. Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations of storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Water and Power Resources Service as well as those constructed by the Corps. Maintenance: Consisted of scheduling of flood control reservoir operation. Condition at end of fiscal year. See individual reports. 23. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO. Location. Dam is on main stem of Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above mouth of stream in Hickory County, Missouri, lake extending upstream into Polk County, Missouri. Site is about 3 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, impound floodwater within reservoir which provides storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multi-purpose). Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act, P.L. 761 (Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as modified by Flood Control Acts of December 22, 1944, P.L. 534 and September 3, 1954, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1980) including $329,140 area redevelopment and $3,873,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710) is $19,148,924. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 1,581,300 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Supplemental recreation facilities consisted of completion of Quarry Point shower building. Maintenance: Activities included boundary marking, water supply in the Wheatland area, and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in January 1957 and the project was placed in operation in October 1961. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 24. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KANS. Location. Dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 7 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chute-type spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acrefeet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control and recreation). This project is a unit of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River 20-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Basin, authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1980) including supplemental recreational development $997,000 (Code 710) is $14,269,108. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 696,400 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began July 1959 and project was placed in operation in October 1963. No additional recreation facilities being considered. 25. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IOWA Location. Damsite is on Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of town of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Project authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 561, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1980) including $2,001,000 supplemental recreation development (Code 710) is $29,034,210. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 1,182,700 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included a cultural resource survey and ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated September 26, 1964 and completed November 1969. Future recreation facilities remained to be designed and constructed. 26. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO. Location. Damsite is on Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Plans provide for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,000 feet long would be constructed across a saddle in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity would be 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). In 1980 the estimated Federal cost through construction of the project was $88,300,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Reimbursement of $24,480,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and reimbursement of $7,740,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Addition non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $590,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on 27 November 1972. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 1,148,000 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Land acquisition, relocations and construction of project features continued. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in November 1973 and is 90 percent complete. 27. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KANS. Location. Dam is on main stem of Big Blue River, about 12 miles above mouth of stream in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 12 miles northwest of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. A dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Project is unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act, P.L. 761 (Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as modified by 1941 Flood Control Act, P.L. 228, and expanded by Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, P.L. 534 (H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage for low flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1980) including $1,025,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710) is $81,076,031. 20-10 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 1,021,400 visitor days. Maintenance: Activity included seismic reevaluation, emergency gate repair, and ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in October 1952 and the project was placed in operation in July 1962. Future recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 28. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KANS. Location. Dam is on Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, and structural provision for irrigation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low flow regulation). Project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act, P.L. 534 (H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645, 86th Cong.). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1980) including $631,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710) is $20,015,023. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 720,900 visitor days. Maintenance: Activity consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1961, and project was placed in operation in December 1964. Future recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1963, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See table 20-H on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS All construction costs to date for other authorized flood control projects are shown in table 20-I. 31. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repairf,l ood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for period October 1, 1979 thru September 30, 1980 were $250,415 for disaster preparedness, and $163,620 for rehabilitation. Expenditures were incurred under emergency operations, $3,576. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Operations during this period under this heading were as follows: Big Blue River, Kansas-Construction was completed on an authorized project to provide protection for a county road in Marshall County, Kansas. Costs for the period were $44,560. 102 River, Missouri-Construction was completed on an authorized project to provide protection for a county road in Andrew County, Missouri. Costs for the period were $20,513. Nodaway River, Missouri-Construction was completed on an authorized project to provide protection for a county bridge in Andrew County, Missouri. Costs for the period were $20,083. Platte River, Missouri-Construction was completed on an authorized project to provide protection for a county bridge in Andrew County, Missouri. Costs. for the period were $17,614. West Fork, Grand River, Missouri-Construction was initiated on an authorized project to provide protection for a county bridge in Gentry County, Missouri. Costs for the period were $37,041. 102 River, Pickering, Missouri-Construction was continued on an authorized project to provide protection for a county bridge in Nodaway County, Missouri. Costs for the period were $76,011. Snagging and Clearing (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.) 3 September 1954, as amended. No operations during this period under this heading. 20-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948) as amended. See detailed report for operation at Gypsum, Kansas. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 32. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO. Location. Damsite is on main stem of Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway section and a power installation consisting of six inclined pump-generating units with total capacity of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). This project is a unit of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River basin. Project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (II. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.), as modified by 1962 Flood Control Act, P.L. 87-874 (H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. In 1980 the estimated cost through construction of the project is $525 million. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 655,500 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: Acquisition of land and rights-ofway; relocation of roads, railroads, cemeteries, utilities and municipal facilities; reservoir clearing and boundary surveying and marking; construction of the dam and powerplant; and construction of public use facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of relocation of Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964 and the entire project is 84 percent complete. The embankment has been completed included paving the top of the dam roadway. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Admimistration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on 22 December 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearing has necessitated remedial design on the bearing. Commercial power production is now expected to begin early in 1981. Work remaining to be constructed includes measures to protect downstream areas from power operation. 33. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO. Location. Damsite is on Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with Osage River, and about 2 miles east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri, lake extending into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Project is a unit of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,628,300. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1979) including $1,400,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710) is $77,530,357. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Visitation for FY 1980 was 1,713,700 visitor days. Regular funds, new work: The project is complete and in operational status. No construction work is underway. Resumption is dependent upon resolution of downstream capacity problem. The net amount of power marketed with Southwestern Power Administration was 34,109,700 kilowatts. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. $ Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in October 1963 and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. It has been necessary therefore, to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level pending resolution of the downstream capacity problem. Remaining work consists of a proposed solution to protect downstream areas from power operation. This plan consists of proposal to acquire flowage easements on land and to construct a 20-12 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT channel cutoff at Horseshoe Bend downstream from the dam to assure downstream channel capacity of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. On 22 March 1978, the state of Missouri and ten landowners on the Sac River filed suit in United States District Court seeking to enjoin the Corps from implementing the proposed solution. On 29 March 1978, the Court denied plantiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and the Corps agreed that it would not acquire any easements pending the Court's decision on the merits of the case. A trial was held 14 April 1980. Implementation of the proposed plan is being held in abeyance until the Court arrives at a decision. No additional recreation facilities are being considered at this time. General Investigations 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,044,033 for flood damage prevention studies, $75,030 for review of authorized projects, $157,434 for coordination studies with other agencies, and $16,409 for Phase I AE & D (Wears Creek, Mo.). 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Inspection of Dams) National Dam Safety Program Inspection of Dams-During FY 1980, 45 non- Federal dams were inspected in the state of Kansas assigned to the Kansas City District. The cost for FY 1980 was $288,712. Inventory of Dams-During FY 1980 considerable field work on the inventory of dams was accomplished. The total cost of this work was $216,249. There are approximately 5,030 dams in the state of Kansas assigned to the Kansas City District. (Flood Plain Management Services) Flood Hazard Information Reports A special flood hazard information report was underway for the Missouri River from its mouth to Rulo, Nebraska at a cost of $58,628. Flood Plain Management Services Unit cost was $99,994. Technical Services. The Flood Plain Reports section provided site investigations and flood hazard evaluations to military and non-military Federal agencies, State and local governmental agencies, and to individuals and businesses comprising over 535 separate inquiries. Costs were $98,753 during FY 1980. Flood Plain Management Planning assistance was provided to Kansas City, Missouri; Jackson County, Missouri; Olathe, Kansas; Leavenworth, Kansas and Leavenworth County, Kansas at a cost of $29,681. 20-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Kansas River Navigation, Kans. 2. Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated ummary) 4. Blue River Channel Kansas City, Mo. 5. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, Kans. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, Kans. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 7. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebr. 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kans. 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kans. 10. Kansas Citys on Mo. & Kans. Rivers Mo. & Kans. Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 160,000 100,345 2,080,000 1,465,928 8,374,000 6,873,144 7,574 18 2,087,574 1,465,946 8,374,000 6,873,144 480,000 424,402 5,000,000 3,643,134 59,414 3,030,000 2,084,903 4,109,300 5,223,213 3,030,000 2,084,902 4,109,300 5,223,213 57,000 132,676 5,400,000 4,895,292 6,412 1,139 5,000,000 5,400,000 3,649,546 4,896,431 - 1,181,000 39,072 47,047 - - 39,072 22,085 1,010,000 759,411 1,181,000 47,047 975,000 976,677 867,000 1,117,294 42,264 2,350,000 3,538,664 4,641,00010 5,223,80010o 2,350,000 3,538,646 4,641,00010 5,223,80010 500,000 437,637 2,350,000 3,945,287 336,700 333,194 -243 2,349,757 3,945,287 746,000 1,452,959 130,841 876,841 1,452,959 286,742 42,756 845,1000 847,33110 19,900 19,963 1,348,000 1,909,672 5,841,500 5,897,687 1,348,000 1,909,672 5,841,500 5,897,687 695,000 710,532 923,033 1,916,752 574,500 574,381 923,033 1,916,752 310,000 678,681 125,574 310,000 804,255 15,984 274,019 876,000 849,000 8,570,000 8,400,000 12,800,000 12,550,000 7,302,604 8,386,752 13,353,283 13,339,102 -75 534,800 480,591 180,000 12,158 75 483,000 500,545 8,101 570,30010 548,000 612,02710 538,020 - -11,000 147,954 787 259,900 259,900 237,942,1901 237,940,8561 234,033,3142. o10 234,004,9912 . 10 816,190 783,937 22,642 22,642 238,758,3803 238,724,7934 234,055,9565. o10 234,027,6336. o10 2,606,171 2,554,862 55,120,533 55,095,197 911,200 907,575 118,805 118,805 55,239,338 55,214,002 2,639,952 2,517,806 130,841 125,574 2,770,793 2,643,380 46,971,0266 46,961,752 9,613,26110 9,573,86210 1,017,623 1,017,623 50,835,800 50,747,518 12,538,227' 12,538,2277 6,548,81010 6,531,762o 42,434,1972 42,434,1972 20-14 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 11. Kansas City, Kansas River, Kans. (62 Mod.) 12. Lawrence, Kansas River, Kans. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated ummary) 13. Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, Mo. 14. Little Blue River Lakes, Little River, Mo. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated ummary) 15. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, Mo. 16. Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kans. 17. Milford Lake, Republican River, Kans. 18. Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. 19. Onaga Lake, Kans. 20. Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), Kans. 21. Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kans. 22. Pick-Sloan Mo. Basin Program "lGT_ LAUR Total Cost to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 2,820,000 1,086,723 2,250,000 2,273,386 75,000 46,150 2,325,000 2,319,536 4,600,000 3,105,088 4,300,000 5,337,893 186,000 555,819 29,800 186,000 585,619 2,750,000 2,513,650 700,000 1,589,682 -23,312 37,795 -23,312 37,795 1,650,000 2,579,074 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,731,000 4,542,070 700,000 1,095,914 122,900 122,359 42,000 38 782,20010 742,171l o 566,000. 466,861 869,300 o0 985,91710 3,812,570 5,332,041 94,452 1,038,000 1,429,652 -10,688 386,995 992,80010o 999,99810 150,000 148,070 78,000 438,092 135,000 101,847 11,381 11,722 146,381 113,569 2,429,967 3,341,757 11,557,000 10,893,293 225,000 11,557,000 11,118,293 -158,000 -141,460 255,500 253,633 -24,280 26,019 682,500 676,941 311,000 89,926 1,329,000 1,302,600 4,552,000 3,907,735 275,000 108,564 -16,000 114,473 75,408 944,000 938,548 140,500 142,302 24,946,600 24,910,221 8,511,988 8,413,369 90,572 90,572 8,602,560 8,503,941 15,444,083 15,200,633 41,485,200 40,695,473 295,000 225,000 41,780,200 40,920,473 17,160,577 16,455,818 378,400 375,993 37,436,530 37,436,030 4,549,26010 4,535,23610o 49,637,392 49,232,802 7,738,02410 7,697,17710 52,871,851 52,177,827 2,170,261 1,987,065 5,388,168 5,379,087 49,132,918 49,115,750 7,423,48410 7,411,01110 55,5698 55,5698 4,026,6239 4,023,0229 20-15 5,100,000 3,000,000 1,436,000 2,889,891 2,037,978 4,542,070 O90r AAA 5,100,000 2,889,891 3,880,000 3,167,168 85,967 640,600 617,283 106,000 7,470 699,200 596,591 2,550,000 544,855 207,000 181,460 1,358,168 1,160,698 698,000 418,101 843,500 757,758 200,000 198,623 3,000,000 2,037,978 1,500,000 1,143,111 15,000 111,093 692,000 703,970 110,823 127,361 871,700 871,000 2,012,000 2,540,510 125,000 39,419 1,962,000 2,148,231 319,967 184,435 895,000 978,515 165,000 166,260 'rZ z),uuu REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 23. Pomme de Terre New Work: Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Mo. 24. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, Kans. 25. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, Iowa 26. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, Mo. 27. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, Kans. 28. Wilson Lake, Saline River, Kans. 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 32. Harry S.Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, Mo. 33. Stockton Lake, Sac River, Mo. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 276,032 276,082 781,000 720,887 81,800 5,217 800,000 704,146 4,321 64,648 876,000 787,438 16,243,733 8,095,253 678,100 629,959 461,500 436,270 171,300 152,029 72,400,000 54,339,503 765,000 470,966 1,224,000 1,196,433 92,205 706,000 744,219 7,000 27,332 691,000 748,943 -1,968 802,000 784,210 7,600,000 8,828,700 785,000 724,767 4,000 495,000 526,553 226,300 245,866 48,767,000 51,855,034 63,177 318,543 1,121,000 1,132,400 415,000 227,092 1,008,70010 1,038,582 o0 59,571 798,9001o0 854,05510, x11 883,50010 994,01710 8,850,000 15,337,162 208,800 208,282 - , 838,30010 937,13110 -1,622 2,378 686,50010 694,70110 210,600 212,033 38,000,000 52,666,915 681,900 678,919 1,757,880 1,052,292 1,422,3000 1,478,70310 -13,000 190,195 1,125,000 1,121,864 -2,984 705,000 705,797 830,000 811,000 8,965,000 9,649,068 361,000 359,141 862,500 815,593 553,500 555,558 228,500 228,456 34,048,000 34,374,314 1,785,500 1,761,331 -960,000 50,990 1,478,500 1,478,509 17,295,035 17,286,990 8,221,61210 8,213,49010 13,997,238 13,997,238 6,910,13310 6,902,7111o, 11 27,127,159 27,127,159 6,174,41810 6,152,01810 79,557,438 79,272,780 569,800 567,423 80,377,468 80,377,468 8,700,47910 8,628,39010 20,109,395 20,109,395 5,585,14610 5,581,45010 2,090,975 2,090,647 441,471,900 440,299,550 2,467,400 2,440,249 76,570,357 76,557,941 9,675,40010 9,657,74910 1. Includes $8,665,594 costs of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes $8,665,594 for new work for previous project and $808,616 from contributed funds. 4. Includes $8,665,594 for new work for previous project and $755,570 from contributed funds. 5. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project $22,642 from contributed funds and $200,000 Fiscal Year 1968 Supplemental Appropriation Funds. 6. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $24,198. 7. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $7,885. 8. Covers 96X3122 construction, general, funds allotted to the 'Republican River Basin Reservoirs (Medicine Creek Reservoir), Colo., Nebraska, and Kansas.' 9. Covers 96X3123 operation and maintenance, general, funds allotted to 'Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations.' 10. Includes funds from Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters appropriation. 11. Reflects $10 expenditure of undelivered order after close of 1978 cost records. 12. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. 20-16 ____ __ KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY IOWA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 (See Section 2 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $209,731,517 $231,767,540 $441,499,057 Emergency4 2,362,599 190,401 2,553,000 Public works 17,181,146 114,180 17,295,326 Accelerated public works 393,261 393,261 Maintenance and operation of dams and other improve-801500 ments of navigable waters 801,500 880011 ,550000 Total $229,275,262 $233,266,882 $462,542,144 TABLE 20-C AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents %ArTCICrT EDTRTS'DU nTTY 'TTV TOWA AT O MOUTH MISSOURIR g, ;1LU ' 1 , %vMAwIA-uI (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) (See Section 2 of Text) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, Mo. to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a minimum width of 200 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for existing project. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1938, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, Iowa. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. BLUE RIVER BASIN (KANSAS CITY DISTRICT) Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. KANSAS CITYS ON MISSOURI AND KANSAS RIVERS, MO. AND KANS. Levees and floodwalls for protection of Kansas Citys, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $10 million, estimated cost of lands and damages $8 million. Modified and extended project to provide construction of cutoffs and protection for additional areas at an estimated additional cost of $8,445,000. H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., 3d sess. (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62 H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68 H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 560-70. H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., 2d sess. (contains latest published map). H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) P.L. 14-79. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 195, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 342, 78th Cong., 1st sess. 20-17 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 20-C (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 Authorized Chief of Engineers to include necessary railroad bridge and approach alterations as a Federal responsibility. Alternate plan of improvement proposed by local interests for Armourdale unit (downstream section). MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBR., KANS., AND MO. (See Section 18 of Text) Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth provided for increased protection. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) (See Section 22 of Text) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, Nebr., other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, Nebr., and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, Kans. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 20-18 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 347, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Docs. 642 and 5491 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-D MISSOURI RIVER SIOUX CITY TO MOUTH: TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 2 of Text) Miles Description of Facility' Above Bank Nearest Town Mouth 2 Existing facilities: Grain & soybean loading, ferlilizer unloading Transfer of sand and gravel Grain & soybean loadingl Soybean meal & oil loading Grain loading Fertilizer and molasses unloading Grain & soybean loading Fertilizer unloading Shipyard and ways for construction, repairing, and launching floating equipment Grain loading Molasses unloading Transfer of Machinery Transfer of sand and gravel Grain & soybean loading Fertilizer unloading Grain & soybean loading Coke loading conveyor Warehouse, bulk handling dock, and unloading platform Grain loading Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel Grain loading Grain & soybean loading Grain loading Chemical unloading, soybean oil loading Rock loading Transfer of sand and gravel Loading & unloading steel products Oil unloading and vessel refueling, pet, coke Cement loading Dock (Company) Grain & soybean loading Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel Grain & soybean loading Grain & soybean loading Transfer of sand and gravel Stone loading Grain loading Grain & soybean loading Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel Fertilizer, salt & molasses unloading Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel Oil unloading and gasoline Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel. Transfer of sand and gravel Fertilizer and molasses unloading Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel and bulk cargo dock Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel Transfer of sand and gravel 488.0 447.5 446.6 446.0 423.1 422.9 421.1 396.05 395.7 386.5 386.2 384.9 377.5 373.0 368.2 367.7 367.2 367.1 367.0 365.6 365.4 364.2 361.6 361.0 360.6 360.05 360.0 357.6 356.6 354.8 345.3 318.2 318.1 317.2 293.3 293.0 286.9 263.1 262.7 226.4 226.2 197.0 196.4 186.3 181.4 148.6 143.7 143.2 124.6 96.9 81.8 68.2 43.8 27.9 27.8 16.8 8.5 Right Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Left Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Left Right Right Left Right Right Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Left Left Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Right White Cloud, KS St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Leavenworth, KS S. Leavenworth, KS Wolcott, KS Wolcott, KS Waldron, MO Parkville, MO Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Missouri City, MO Lexington, MO Lexington, MO Lexington, MO Waverly, MO Waverly, MO Carrollton, MO Miami, MO Miami, MO Glasgow, MO Glasgow, MO Boonville, MO Boonville, MO Rocheport, MO Huntsdale, MO Jefferson City, MO Jefferson City, MO Jefferson City, MO Mokane, MO Hermann, MO New Haven, MO Washington, MO Chesterfield, MO St. Charles, MO St. Charles, MO Musicks Ferry, MO Ruegg, MO 1. Privately owned and operated unless indicated. 2. 1960 adjusted mileage. 20-19 TABLE 20-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 3 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, Mo.'. 2 1931 139,003 85,077 Osage River, Mo., lock and dam3 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status. for maintenance only. 2. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 20-F MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 18 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R 513-512 Richardson Co. D. D. #7 19.1 Complete R 500 Iowa Point D. D. #4. 4.1 Complete Kimsey Holly Creek 1.7 Complete L 497 Forest City L. D. 13.4 Complete L 488 Holt Co. D. D. #7 11.5 Complete R 482 Burr Oak D. D. #3 8.3 Complete L 476 Amazonia L. D. 5.7 Complete R 471-460 Elwood-Gladden L. D. 14.5 Complete L 455 S. St. Joseph L. D. 15.6 Complete L 448-443 Halls L. D. 16.8 Complete R 440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. 10.6 Complete L 408 Farley-Beverly D. D. 12.5 Complete (Levee raise modification) L 400 Waldron L. D. 7.4 Complete L 385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. 6.5 Planning underway R 351 Atherton L. D. 13.4 Complete L 345-330 Orrick L. D. 43.4 Planning underway L 325-319 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. 35.0 Planning underway L 246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. 20.0 Under construction Remaining units Detailed planning not initiated 20-20 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-G KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Non-Federal Cost Cost Abilene, Smoky Hill River, Kansas $ 1,099,350 $ 287,000 Bartley, Republican River, Nebraska 118,269 9,500 Beatrice, Big Blue River, Nebraska' ,685,000 524,000 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, Kansas5 56,000,000 1,870,000 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, Kansas3 38,600 - Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebraska 51,189,155 - Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, Missouri 507,000,000 104,324,000 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kansas 61,100,000 20,290,000 Indianola, Republican River, Nebraska 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kansas 12,538,227 Lawrence, Kansas River, Kansas" 8,702,000 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, Kansas 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 37,460,810 - Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), Kansas (1974 Authorization) 500,000 214,300 Milford Lake, Republican River, Kansas 50,406,843 - Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth2 150,800,000 16,698,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kansas 49,115,918 - Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Missouri4 19,148,924 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, Kansas 13,997,238 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, Kansas 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, Missouri 77,530,357 17,381,000 Topeka, Kansas River, Kansas 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, Kansas 81,076,031 - Tuttle Creek Lake, Kansas-Road and Bridge (1976 Act) 630,000 310,000 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kansas (1974 Modification) 500,000 214,300 Wilson Lake, Saline River, Kansas .20,646,023 - 1. 1960 estimate. 3. 1969 estimate. 2. Active portion of project. Deferred portion of proj- 4. Active portion of project. Inactive portion of the ect is currently estimated to cost (1964) $1,690,000 Federal project for power modification is currently estimated to cost and $122,000 non-Federal. Inactive portion of project is (1954) $7,300,000. currently estimated to cost (1964) $272,408,000 Federal and 5. 1977 estimate. $23,862,500 non-Federal. 6. 1978 estimate. TABLE 20-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R 513-512, R 500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L 497, L 488, Sep 80 R 482, L 476, R 471-460, L 455, L 448-443, R 440, L 408, L 400 and R 351 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Apr & May 80 Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Apr 80 Osawatomie, Kansas May 80 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier May 80 Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Jun 80 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas May 80 20-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 20-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, Kans.' 1965 1,099,350 - Arlington Lake, Mo.5 1948 8,651 - Atchison, Kans.' 1973 4,099,590 - Barnard, Kans.' - 127,860 - Bartley, Nebr.' 1953 118,269 - Beatrice, Big Blue River, Nebr.3 1965 16,317 - Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, Iowa 1974 649,418 - Big Blue River, Seward, Nebr.', 4 - 126,887 - Big Stranger Creek, Kans.' , 4 - 337,131 - Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, Mo.2 1966 - Brookfield Lke, Yellow Creek, Mo.2 1976 451,400 - Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, Mo. (1965 Act) 1977 692,7066 - Chariton River, Mo. (1944 Act)' 1973 8,052,990 - Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, Mo.2 1974 51,989 - East Muddy Creek, Mo.2 1966 -, Elk Creek, Clyde, Kans.' 1975 881,415 - Fairbury, Little Blue River, Nebr.' 1973 726,966 - Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, Kans.s 1976 757,500 - Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, Kans.' 1966 1,271,025 - Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, Kans.2 1973 71,466 - Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, Kans.2 1977 1,754,019 - Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, Mo.6 - Hays, Big Creek, Kans.2 1974 499,200 - Indian Lake, Blue River, Kans.2 1976 127,297 Indianola, Nebr.' 1950 67,275 - Lower Grand River, Mo. 1966 - Manhattan, Kansas River, Kans.' 1967 2,488,585 - Marysville, Kans.' - 133,682 - Mercer Lake, Weldon River, Mo. 1976 432,245 - Merriam, Turkey Creek, Kans.' 1970 39,708 - Mill Lake, Blue River, Mo. 1971 - - Missouri River at New Haven, Mo.' , 4 - 139,883 - Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, Kans.' 1973 2,036,624 - Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kans.' 1966 4,462,661 - Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, Mo.2 1976 - - Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, Mo. (Advance Highway Relocation)2 1976 390,082- Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, Mo. (Advance Town Relocation)' 1976 91,929 - Pioneer Lake, Kans.6 1952 95,692 - Platte River, Mo., Channel Improvement2 1973 222,193 - Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery' 1975 700,000 - Richland Lake, Mo.5 1948 8,548 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, Kans.' 1967 3,878,668 - Salt Creek, Barnard, Kans. , 4 - 127,860 - Seward, Nebr.' - 126,887 - Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, Mo.3 1973 6,896 - Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., Kans.', 4 1972 246,995 - Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, Kans.2 1976 77,189 - Topeka, Kansas River, Kans.' 1974 21,174,593 - Trenton Lake, Thompson River, Mo.2 1966 Upper Grand River, Mo.2 1966 - - Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, Kans.2 1976 1,095,019 - 1. Completed. 5. Deauthorized. 2. Inactive. 6. Includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek 3. Deferred for restudy. Unit and $211,600 cost for inactive units, Little Chariton 4. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under section River and Mussel Fork. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 20-22 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Minnesota, all embraced in drainage basin of Missouiri River along' main stem and tributaries to Rulo, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Fort Peck Lake, MT...............21-2 2. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE .................... 21-2 3. Other Authorized Navigation Projects........................21-2 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............... 21-3 Flood Control 5. Bear Creek Lake, CO................ . 21-3 6. Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA and SD ................. ... 21-3 7. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND ........... 21-4 8. Chatfield Lake, CO ................. 21-4 9. Cherry Creek Lake, CO ............. 21-4 10. Fall River Basin, SD.... . .... 21-5 11. Frazer-Wolf Point, MT .............. 21-5 12. Great Falls, MT ... ............. .21-5 13. Miles City, MT ......... .. 21-6 14. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD ................... 21-6 15. Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND .................. 21-6 16. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA.................21-6 17. Missouri River Levee System, SiouxCity, IAtoMouth..............21-7 18. Papillion Creek and Tributaries, Lakes,NE ...................... 21-7 19. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist) .............. .21-8 20. PipestemLake,ND..................21-8 21. Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD .......... 21-8 22. Sturgis,SD ........................ 21-8 23. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE .......... 21-8 Flood Control (cont.) 24. South Platte River Basin, CO ...... 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works................ 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........... 27. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects......... 28. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization . ........ Page .... 21-9 .... 21-9 .... 21-9 . ... 21-9 .... 21-9 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 29. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD ............ 21-10 30. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD...........21-10 31. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND............ 21-10 32. Williston, ND Water Intake ......... 21-11 33. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD ......... .................. 21-11 34. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake-Relocation of Niobrara, NE ...... 21-11 35. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND ............ 21-11 Miscellaneous 36. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project.............. ............... 21-12 General Investigations 37. Surveys ......................... 21-12 38. Collection & Study of Basic Data......21-12 39. Transportation Systems ............ 21-13 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 21-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Location. Reservoir is in Missouri River Valley in McCone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.5 miles above mouth of Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest, and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 250.5 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,900,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,300 KW, 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,300 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of overall project (1980) is $158,570,- 425 including $2,019,000 Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Design studies continued for powerhouse improvements. Contracts for the Centralization of Controls and Modernization of the Power Plant are essentially complete. Fort Peck Lake was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multi-purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 1,231,422,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. Total cost of Operation and Maintenance during the period was 4,084,500 however, reimbursement from the Western Area Power Administration for the prorata share of Operation and Maintenance cost of the power plant, reimbursement for furnishing operator's village facilities, and property disposals reduced net cost to $1,834,823. Annual project visitation was estimated at 788,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work started on original project in October 1933 and on second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. On September 30, 1980, the pool was at elevation 2237.3 and 15,928,000 acrefeet of water was impounded in the reservoir. 2. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Estimated cost of new work Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (1980) is $190,500,000, through construction, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed for cost sharing on construction of recreation by constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. These terminals are listed in Table 21-E and are adequate for the current demands. Sites are available for construction of additional wharfage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, New work: Continued design on Snyder Winnebago. Contract maintenance work consisted of revetment and dike repair. Work by hired labor forces included removal of debris from environmental notches, repairing dikes and revetments. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in fiscal year 1928, and the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979. Work remaining to complete this section of the project consists of construction of fish and wildlife facilities. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 81/2 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. Local interests have assumed operation and maintenance of the recreation sites. (See Table 21-B for total cost of work under existing project to September 1980). 3. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-D. 21-2 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). Operation and results during fiscal year. Preliminary studies of the detailed investigation on the Omaha Marina were completed. In addition to investigating the downtown Omaha site, three alternative sites were investigated. These alternative sites which are located at Council Bluffs, IA, Bellevue, NE, and Dodge Park above Omaha, do not have the unique problems as those associated with the Omaha sites and would possibly be economically feasible with further studies. These areas could be investigated further if local interest is shown. Designs, cost estimate and benefit evaluations were completed. These studies indicated a lack of economic feasibility for the downtown Omaha site. Further studies under Section 107 authority do not appear warranted for the downtown site. Flood Control 5. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 170 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,120 feet, and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 80 feet and a crest length of 1,930 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake will provide storage capacity of 26,290 acre-feet for flood control and 2,000 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (Senate Document 87, 90th Congress). Estimated cost through construction is $61,700,000 (1980). Local cooperation. Local interest will be required to: a. In accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act: (1) administer land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; (2) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; (3) bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities including water replacement; (4) provide the water required for initial filling and replenishment of evaporation losses of the recreation pool by purchase or other means consistent with Federal and State laws, to assure effective operation of the project for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; b. hold and save the United States free from damages due to water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project; c. prevent encroachment on the flow-carrying capacity of the channel below the reservoir to the extent necessary to provide for effective reservoir operation in the interest of flood control; d. adequately inform affected interests, at least annually, that the project will not provide complete flood protection; and e. provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical future development of the flood plain areas by encouraging prudent management techniques to reduce future flood losses. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design studies continued by hired labor. Land acquisition for recreation facilities and construction of relocations continued. The embankment and spillway were completed. Recreation pool level was initially filled on 10 May 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and advanced to 98 percent complete. Land acquisition was complete. Relocations were 98 percent complete. Construction of the dam was 99 percent complete. Planning was underway on public use facilities. 6. BIG SIOUX RIVER AT SIOUX CITY, IA AND SD Location. Near mouth of the Big Sioux River in the vicinity of Sioux City, Woodbury County, IA and North Sioux City, Union County, SD. Existing project. Channel improvement by enlargement and minor realignment along the existing channel upstream from the Interstate Highway 29 bridge to a point approximately 1,300 feet upstream of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Bridge. Levees will provide a high degree of protection to North Sioux City, SD and the Riverside Area of Sioux City, IA. Stone revetment will be placed along the improved channel at locations of potential erosion. Estimated cost is $8,084,000 (1980) of which $7,759,000 is Federal and $525,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved June 22, 1936 applies. Contracts required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 to provide local cooperation were executed July 13, 1976. Operation and results during fiscal year. Design studies continued by hired labor. Construction of levees and channel improvements were completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in September 1976 and was 99 percent complete. 21-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 7. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing project. A dam and reservoir with a storage capacity of about 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. The project, as authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act, also provided 73,200 acre-feet of exclusive flood control storage. Final cost is $4,372,174 (1973) of which $3,572,447 is ultimate Federal cost and $799,727 future non-Federal reimbursement for water supply. Supplemental cost sharing recreational facilities are proposed using Code 710 funds at an additional cost of $290,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on capacity of North Fork channel below reservoir; obtain water rights for storage; pay the United States for costs allocated to water supply; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved June 19, 1964. With respect to water rights, requirements have been complied with. Negotiation of a contract for future water supply is continuing. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance activities included sedimentation and reservoir regulation studies and intermittent inspections of the dam and structures. Annual project visitation was estimated at 26,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. 8. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet and a reservoir with flood control capacity of 215,000 acrefeet and sediment capacity of 20,000 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation, and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. Project was authorized by 1950 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1974 (PL 93-251) authorized participation with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $102,155,000 of which $92,900,000 (1980) is Federal cost for construction, $6,355,000 local cost in connection with the downstream channel improvement, and $2,900,000 local cost for acquisition of water for the recreation pool. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies to the downstream channel improvement. The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided assurances of local cooperation for the downstream improvement on December 13, 1967. Local interests must provide water for filling the sediment reserve pool for recreation use which the state agreed to on April 25, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued design by hired labor. Continued construction of the visitor center. Initiated rehabilitation of the outlet works. Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation was estimated at 789,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and is 93 percent complete, with a scheduled completion date in FY 1985. Acquisition of land is complete and relocations are essentially complete. Construction of the spillway and the final earthwork contract are complete. Construction of recreation facilities is 95 percent complete. Planning is underway for remaining dam facilities, downstream channel and public use facilities. 9. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO. just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and 14,300 feet long. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek, thus by-passing the city of Denver. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage, 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes, and surcharge for flood control purposes. Estimated cost of project is $15,053,364 (1978) including $383,450 Code 710 funds. (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing under the Code 710 program. 21-4 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance activities include administration of project area, continuation of sediment studies, stream gaging activities, embankment instrumentation and analysis, and miscellaneous items of ordinary repair and maintenance. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,304,- 300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in fiscal year 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. 10. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. Project as authorized by 1941 Flood Control Act, is a plan of flood protection on Fall River and Tributaries, SD, substantially in accordance with recommendations of Chief of Engineers in House Document 655, 76th Congress, 3d session. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Final cost is $5,679,932 (1980), of which $5,537,432 is Federal cost for construction and $142,500 is local cost for lands and relocations. Project cost also includes $19,000 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Cold Brook Lake. Local cooperation. Local cooperation was required only for the Hot Springs Channel Improvement. These requirements have been fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction is complete. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. Annual project visitation was estimated for Cold Brook Lake and Cottonwood Springs Lake at 43,600 and 11,600 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during fiscal year 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in fiscal year 1953 with exception of a road and parking area which were completed in fiscal year 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs unit dam was completed in fiscal year 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities which were completed in fiscal year 1972. 11. FRAZER-WOLF POINT, MT Location. Along the Missouri River approximately 4 miles southwest of Frazer, MT. Existing project. The project consists of stonefill dike construction on the right bank and stonefill revetment protection on the left bank upstream and downstream of the Frazer-Wolf Point Irrigation Unit intake structure. The estimated cost of the project (1980) is $465,000. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved 22 June 1936 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract was awarded in September 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was scheduled to start in October 1980. 12. GREAT FALLS, MT Location. In Great Falls, Cascade County, MT at confluence of the Sun and Missouri Rivers. Existing project. Provides for levees along the left bank of the Sun River and an interceptor ditch and closed conduit to collect and convey side-hill runoff to the Sun River. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act and amended by the 1965 Flood Control Act to waive the requirement that local interests contribute in cash a percentage of the construction costs of all items of work provided by the United States. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $12,752,000 (1980) of which $10,700,000 is Federal cost of construction and $2,052,000 is local cost for lands, relocations and a cash contribution for replacement of a storm sewer conduit desired by local interests. Local cooperation. Section 3. Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition local interests must zone the unleveed portion of the flood channel through the damage area to preserve its capacity and to prevent further encroachments and contribute in cash $179,000 representing the estimated cost of replaced storm drainage facilities which will be incorporated into the closed conduit of the Watson Coulee Interceptor. West Great Falls Flood Control and Drainage District provided assurances on 17 January 1968. State Supreme Court decision on assessments required a change in state law which 21-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 was enacted in 1973. Local interests are in the process of complying with the new law. Operations and results during fiscal year. All suspended pending completion of local cooperation requirements. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was not started. 13. MILES CITY, MT Location. On the right banks of the Tongue and Yellowstone Rivers at Miles City, MT. Existing project. The plan authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950 provides for construction of levees along the right banks of the Tongue and Yellowstone Rivers starting about 1,000 feet upstream from the Interstate 94 embankment and extending approximately five miles downstream. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $8,300,000 (1980) of which $6,300,- 000 is Federal cost and $2,000,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved 22 June 1936 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Phase II General Design Memorandum was initiated. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Phase I General Design Memorandum is complete. 14. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE, AND SD Location. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam, NE and SD and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The project was authorized by Section 707 of the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Federal cost of the project is limited by the authorization to $21,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate planning were appropriated in FY 1980. The Cooperative Agreement between the U.S. Department of the Interior and the U.S. Department of the Army for implementation of this project was signed on 1 February 1980. Under the cooperative agreement the Corps is responsible for: (a) Acquisition of land and interests in land; (b) Construction of bank stabilization measures; (c) Construction of recreation facilities; (d) Establish criteria for irrigation pumps and associated pipelines in the designated corridor; (e) Project planning, construction and operation and maintenance. A notice of availability for both the cooperative agreement and the management plan developed by the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service appeared in the Federal Register on 26 March 1980. During August 1980 the General Design Memorandum was completed. A Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on 12 August 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Corridor-wide management plans for cultural resources, visual resources, wildlife resource values, and mineral resources are underway. 15. MISSOURI RIVER, GARRISON DAM TO LAKE OAHE, ND Location. Along the channel of Missouri River between Garrison Dam and headwaters of Oahe Reservoir in North Dakota. Existing project. Consists of bank stabilization and rectification works required to stabilize banks of Missouri River in specific areas and prevent further loss of agricultural lands through erosion. Estimated total cost (1980) is $9,670,000 of which $9,400,000 is Federal and $270,000 non- Federal. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1963 and 1968. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Sponsorship of project is being provided by North Dakota State Water Commission. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project was essentially completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated January 1965 and project is 99 percent complete. 16. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Authorized by 1941 Flood Control Act and modified by 1948 Flood Control Act provides for construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Federal cost of new work under project is $11,294,414. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 21-6 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT Operation and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance consisted of revetment repair and rehabilitation of environmental notches. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. 17. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBRASKA, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA to St. Louis, MO. Active portion of the project in Omaha District extends from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Cost estimate for active portion of project from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. (1980) is $42,000,000 through construction of the project, of which $37,400,000 is Federal cost for construction and $4,600,000 local costs for lands and damages. (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units. Local interests have furnished assurances of their willingness and ability to fulfill local cooperation requirements for the remaining active units. Operation and results during fiscal year. Completed detailed design of Stage 2 on unit L-611- 614 and initiated construction of Stage 1. Construction of unit R-616 is being delayed by a temporary restraining order. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated June 1948. Levee Units L-627-624; L-594; R-580; L-575; R-573; R-562; L-561-550; R-548; L-536; R-520; L-601 and R-613 are complete. Construction was initiated on Levee Unit L-611-614 Stage 1 in September 1980. 18. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair, flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha area where it is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of six dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Project for flood control, recreation, and water quality control was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act. (House Document 349, 90th Congress). The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 conditionally authorized a Phase I General Design Memorandum for proposed Dam 3A as an alternative to nine proposed dams in the inactive program. Estimated Federal appropriation requirement through construction of the project is $83,600,000. Estimated non-Federal cost sharing for recreation facilities is $4,753,000 which includes Federal reimbursement of $4,416,000. Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to: (a) maintain the Papillion Creek channels downstream from the damsites free of obstructions and available to accommodate reservoir releases and uncontrolled flow; (b) insure that all new bridge construction, and future modification of existing bridges, downstream from reservoirs of the proposed system, shall have hydraulic capacity acceptable to the Chief of Engineers; (c) provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical future development of the flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of flood proofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses; (d) hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from waterrights claims resulting from the construction and operation of the reservoirs; (e) exercise, to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and (f) in accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act: (1) administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; (2) pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and (3) bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design studies continued by hired labor. Construction on Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11) and Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) was completed. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 449,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1972. Construction was completed on Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) in December 1978, Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11) in December 1979. 21-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 19. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising Missouri River Basin. Existing project. General comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and tributaries for control of floodflows at damsites (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation, see Table 21-F on projects in Omaha District included in comprehensive plan, and individual reports). 20. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. Authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, the project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Final Federal cost (1977) is $9,277,- 545, non-Federal cost for recreation facilities cost sharing is $141,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement and to bear the first cost of associated improvements in the wildlife management area; pay, contribute in kind, or repay, with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities. Operation and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 121,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. 21. RAPID CREEK, RAPID CITY, SD Location. On Rapid Creek on the west side of Rapid City in Pennington County, SD. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 1 May 1976, under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The estimated cost of construction is $1,350,000 of which $1,001,000 is Federal and $349,000 non-Federal. This project provides levee and channel improvements through the west side of Rapid City's residential and commercial areas and modifications to a railroad bridge across Rapid Creek. Local cooperation. A contract with the City of Rapid City to sponsor the project was approved on 21 March 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contracts on levee and channel improvements for the project are complete. The channel mitigation was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project beautification is in progress and scheduled for completion in FY 1981. 22. STURGIS, SD Location. On Deadman Gulch through the City of Sturgis, in Meade County, SD. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 1 June 1976 under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The estimated cost of construction is $4,089,000 of which $3,000,000 is Federal and $1,089,000 non-Federal. This project provides a concrete lined channel through Sturgis' residential and commercial areas, training dikes upstream of the lined channel, a debris basin upstream of Interstate 90, and a railroad bridge span at the lined channel crossing. Local cooperation. The City of Sturgis signed a 221 contract on 18 August 1975 to sponsor the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was started on 16 April 1979 with completion scheduled in FY 1981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction is 98% complete. 23. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alterations. Project for flood protection was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, as recommended by Chief of Engineers in House Document 396, 84th Congress, 2d session. Final cost of improvements for the active 21-8 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT program is $12,245,621 (1980), of which $12,074,- 621 is Federal cost and $171,000 non-Federal cost. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of Salt Creek survey report, remaining units were placed in "inactive" classification. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were to be used to correct a dispersive clay problem found in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the completed levee and channel improvement part of the project. For the dams, local interests are required to operate and maintain the permanent pools for fish and wildlife conservation and assume all costs related to utilization of the permanent pools for recreational purposes and insure public access to the pools. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction is complete. Corrective construction on the levees thru Lincoln was initiated in July 1980. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance activities included sedimentation and reservoir regulation studies, intermittent inspections of the dams and structures, and rehabilitation of the outlet works. Annual visitation to the system of dams was estimated at 2,469,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Corrective construction on the levee is 66% complete. 24. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See Table 21-C for authorizing legislation and individual reports). 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the fiscal year are set forth in Table 21-G on Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. Fiscal year costs were $178,883. 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations of storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1980 were $204,426 and total costs to September 30, 1980 were $3,406,- 434. 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For status and cost of other authorized Flood Control Projects in the Omaha District see Table 21-H. 28. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for FY 1980 were $129,876 for advance preparation, $285 for emergency operations, and $538,917 for repair and restoration, and $28,857 for advance measures. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). See detailed report for operations on Rapid City and Sturgis, SD. See Table 21-I for preauthorization studies on potential projects. Plans and specifications were prepared on Pender, NE at a Fiscal Year cost of $4,179. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946). Operations under this heading were as follows: Negative reconnaissance reports were made on four projects at a cost of $33,551. 21-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 29. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD -Location. On Missouri River, 987.4 miles above mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam in the upstream reach of Fort Randall Reservoir and reservoir extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 95 feet high, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of eight 58,500 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,907,000 acre-feet. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin. Estimated cost (1980) is $107,259,597 including $139,000 Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple uses. During the period, 1,107,- 894,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. Annual project visitation was estimated at 860,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. On September 30, 1980, reservoir pool was at elevation 1419.6 feet mean sea level and a total volume of 1,697,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. 30. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River in Charles, Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above mouth of Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,600,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin. Estimated cost of project is $198,- 785,140 (1980), of which $197,402,140 is Federal cost for construction, $663,000 Code 710 funds, and $720,000 local cost for approaches to Platte- Winner Bridge. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple uses. Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Generating facilities produced 1,909,939,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,626,- 400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. On September 30, 1980, reservoir pool was at elevation 1352.9 feet mean sea level and 3,512,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. 31. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSORI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, JND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,889.9 miles above mouth of river and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 24,200,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units, three units rated at 80,000 kilowatts each, and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each, three flood control tunnels and a gated spillway. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin, and by Public Works Appropriation Act, 1968. Estimated Federal cost (1980) is $300,102,341 including $750,000 Code 710 funds and $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Local cooperation. None required except cost sharing with the State of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the Fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 2,359,919,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,340,700. 21-10 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development utilizing Code 710 funds. Planning was in progress for remaining recreational facilities and minor remaining items. On September 30, 1980, pool elevation was 1837.9 and 18,410,000 acrefeet of water was impounded. 32. WILLISTON, ND WATER INTAKE Location. The water intake for the City of Williston is located on abandoned bridge piers adjacent to the Lewis and Clark Bridge, in the Missouri River, Williams County, ND. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1976 and consists of relocation of the water intake to an area in the channel not affected by fluctuating reservoir conditions, thus providing a constant supply of water to the City of Williston, ND. The estimated cost of the project is $1,130,000. The authorization act limited Federal cost to $1,000,- 000. Locals will pay remaining estimated costs of $130,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design studies were completed and construction was initiated in August 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is 2% complete. 33. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A concrete and rolled-earthfill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 517,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 33,333 kilowatts each. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin. Cost estimate (1980) is $49,231,550, including $1,175,000 Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating units produced 810,765,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during fiscal year. Recreational areas were extensively used by the public. Annual project visitation was estimated at 3,409,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of original project was initiated in March 1952 and was completed in 1964. Project is providing its multiple purpose benefits for flood control, navigation, power, and other uses. On September 30, 1980, pool elevation was 1207.8 and 449,000 acrefeet of water was impounded. 34. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE-RELOCATION OF NIOBRARA, NE Location. On the Missouri River in Knox County, NE. Existing project. Alleviation of seepage and groundwater problems in the vicinity of Niobrara, NE by relocation of the town and acquisition of the Niobrara State Park. Authorized by the 1970 Flood Control Act and amended by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Total cost of the project is $13,516,459 (1980). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project is complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated under a cost reimburseable contract with the Village of Niobrara, awarded 28 November 1972. Development of the new town and land acquisition in the existing town is complete. 35. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 245 feet and reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 23,500,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 85,000 kilowatts each. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act as part of general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin. Estimated cost (1980) is $344,857,204 including $681,- 000 Code 710 funds. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction was complete except for recreation facilities constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Project was operated in con- 21-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 junction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 2,980,962,000 net kilowatthours of electricity. Annual project visitation was estimated at 2,224,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated August 1943 and project placed in operation June 1963. Land acquisition is 97 percent complete. All power units are on line and producing power. Design studies are in progress for centralization of controls. On September 30, 1980, pool elevation was 1598.0 and 16,370,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. 36. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Location. Along the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe, ND and between Fort Randall Dam and Sioux City, IA; along the Yellowstone River in Montana and North Dakota; and along undesignated rivers and streams in the Omaha District. Existing project. The project provides for development of new methods and techniques for bank protection. It consists of various experimental bank stabilization structures designed to stabilize the river banks and prevent further loss of land through erosion. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. The sponsor is the North Dakota State Water Commission for the North Dakota portion of the Yellowstone River as well as the Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe portion. The sponsors for the Missouri River, Fort Randall Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake portion are the Lower Niobrara Natural Resources District, NE and the Charles Mix County Conservation District, SD. The sponsors for the Missouri River, Gavins Point Dam-Sioux City, IA portion are the Lewis and Clark Natural Resource District, NE, and Clay, Union, and Yankton Counties, SD. The sponsors for the Montana portion of the Yellowstone River are the Richland County Commissioners. The sponsor for the Powder River at Arvada, WY, is the Sheridan County Board of County Commissioners. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction continued along the Missouri River in the 1-94 Area, ND; Burnt Creek Area, ND; Price Area (Part 1-Phase I) ND; Pretty Point Area, ND; Sanger Area, ND; Cedar County Park Area (Phase I) NE; and Elk Point Area (Phase I), SD. New work was performed along the Missouri River in the Cedar County Park Area (Phase II), NE; and the Elk Point Area (Phase II), SD. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in November 1976 on the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe and between Gavins Point Dam and Sioux City, IA. Construction was initiated in August 1978 on the Missouri River between Fort Randall Dam and Lewis & Clark Lake. Construction will be initiated in October 1980 on the Yellowstone River between Intake, MT and the mouth. Design studies are in progress for other sites. General Investigations 37. SURVEYS Costs for FY 1980 amounted to $1,625,263 of which $1,332,132 was for flood control studies, $58,641 review of authorized projects, and $234,490 for coordination studies with other agencies. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Precipitation Studies) No work during the period. (Inspection of Dams) National Dam Safety Program Inspection of Dams - During FY 1980 - 141 non-Federal dams were inspected in the five state area of Colorado, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming, assigned to the Omaha District. The cost for FY 1980 was $1,072,483. Inventory of Dams - During FY 1980 considerable field work on the inventory of dams was accomplished. The total cost of this work was $318,883. There are approximately 7,375 dams in the five state area assigned to the Omaha District. (Flood Plain Management Services) Flood Plain Information Reports - None. A study was completed for Missouri River, Gavins Point Dam to Rulo, NE, Volume III, River Mile 581.8 - 498.0. This study was distributed in FY 80 as part of four volumes to be completed by the Omaha District. Volume IV River Mile 811.0 - 746.3 will be completed in FY 81. Cost during FY 80 was $12,868 for these volumes. Work is continuing on the Cache la Poudre River Special Study. This study will be completed in FY 81. Cost during FY 80 was $18,491. Flood Plain Management Flood plain management service costs for the Omaha District were $69,399 and the costs for the Missouri River Division office were $40,922 during the fiscal year. 21-12 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT Technical Services The costs for providing site investigations and flood hazard evaluations to military and non-military Federal agencies, state and local government agencies, and to individuals and businesses were $188,567. Hydrologic Studies Costs for hydrologic studies for the fiscal year were $46,117. 39. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS The Corps of Engineers is the lead agency in the ongoing National Waterways Study. This Study examines the characteristics of the National Waterways System, its past and present role in commerce and in meeting national needs, along with projections and recommendations for future development, and its relationship to other modes of transportation. In FY 1980 extensive data on the Missouri River Waterway was furnished the study contractors and a final work' plan was established. Cost for FY 1980 was $73,923. 21-13 TABLE 21-A See Section in Text Project 1. Fort Peck, Lake Mont. 2. Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa to Rulo, Nebr. 5. Bear Creek Lake, Colo. 6. Big Sioux River at Sioux City, Iowa 7. Bowman-Haley Lake, N. Dak. 8. Chatfield Lake, Colo. 9. Cherry Creek Lake, Colo. 10. Fall River Basin, S. Dak. 11. Frazer-Wolf Point, Mont. 12. Great Falls, Mont. 13. Miles City, Mont. 14. Missouri National Recreational River Nebr. & S. Dak. 15. Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, N. Dak. 16. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, Nebr., to Sioux City, Iowa REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Thru FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept 30, 1980 25,000 975,000 107.000 - 1,755,000 2,096,718 445,000 378,158 1,775,000 1,694,110 10,665,000 10,465,172 1,400,000 1,357,692 115,000 83,026 4,050,000 5,249,698 131,800 104,635 124,000 133,763 141,000 120,022 8,270 30,000 21,976 85,000 63,306 -. 650,000 221,969 110,000 30,771 -, 459 2,286 1,957 -15 119 2,315 2,320 4,442 4,522 647,330 1,417,006 1,410,631 237,000 321,962 1,531,000 1,636,549 5,560,000 7,118,458 3,128,000 656,673 112,000 142,917 1,530,000 1,779,401 43,000 44,862 =- 222,000 232,939 283,000 289,298 10,251 400,000 111,817 38,000 62,236 691,600 774,091 385,000 420,738 },670- ,000 1,52 T,973 1,83 ,000 21 ),709 19 ,000 2,64 ),798 2,42 ,000 1,15 ,765 79 - 10 - 9 ,000 -29 )9,213 1,90 60,500 63,448 1,385,000 399,622 174,000 173,474 246,000 225,347 18,000 17,500 429,000 455,479 -330,000 10,220 155,000 98,267 40,000 25,668 324,000 507,543 -30,000 19,82L5 4,344 158,341,080 4,344 158,341,080 7,000 31,574,670 4,824 31,456,448 8,000 189,205,9911 3,201 189,173,9841 5,000 91,518,4192 6,596 91,030,7732 8,000 60,707,600 1,523 60,291,686 7,000 107,000 6,470 96,470 9,000 7,458,934 6,110 7,349,770 - 4,372,174 - 4,372,174 8,000 711,043 3,757 705,508 2,000 85,180,700 8,085 85,026,998 5,000 620,800 0,579 609,881 . - 15,053,364 - 15,053,364 8,000 2,516,511 5,230 2,510,550 1,000 5,538,432 1,500 5,538,432 7,000 1,530,141 7,287 1,514,669 1,000 181,000 9,360 73,810 6,000 664,112 3,772 649,155 0,000 283,0005 8,859 253,4045 0,000 500,000 1,189 391,189 0,000 9,261,000 8,994 9,146,367 - 11,294,414 - 11,294,414 33,000 4,144,000 38,533 4,140,264 77 77 1,67 15 18 23 25 12 11 11 -26 7 65 50 39 6 26 21-14 2,335 2,976 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 17. Missouri River, Levees, Iowa, Nebr., Kans. & Mo. 18. Papillion Creek and Tributaries, Lakes, Nebr. 20. Pipestem Lake, N. Dak. 21. Rapid Creek, Rapid City, S. Dak. 22. Sturgis, S. Dak. 23. Salt Creek and Tributaries, Nebr. 29. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, S. Dak. 30. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, S. Dak. 31. Garrison Dam- Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, N. Dak. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Williston, N. Dak. Water Intake 33. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, S. Dak. and Nebr. 34. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Nebr. & S. Dak.-Relocation of Niobrara, Nebr. SSeeection Total Thru Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept 30, 1980 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Major Rehab Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost %^i- Q1 A 9 117,429 300,000 226,583 72,000 72,578 5b,UUU 101,027 135,000 1,641,795 50,000 43,514 -7,055 1,259 95,000 103,569 240,000 69,433 70,061 80.554 - 120,000 - 50,257 47,184 113,000 44,635 52,806 2,475,000 2,868,000 2,231,909 2,896,060 -522,945 4,620 1,940,522 358,332 -46 1 ,uuu 130,628 100,000 115,903 139,000 143,547 189 206 178 248 1,775 1,737 zsot 27c -7( 131 13( ,000 20( ,678 201 ,000 -1( ,905 61 000 981 ,312 1,02( - 28( - 201 316,000 304,429 529,000 568,237 65,000 64,875 369,000 455,471 38,574 30,145 2,469,000 2,507,863 60,000 2,048 3,538,000 3,608,901 308,000 651,952 4,887,000 5,069,641 92 91: 2,53( 2,52 3,79( 3,71 181 4,35c 4,45t 88( 81 -1 2,963 2,929 -5 6,000 22,527,388 9,727 22,482,974 0,000 24,632,100 6,720 24,608,081 5,000 396,000 0,749 390,388 - 9,277,545 - 9,277,545 3,000 950,000 1,530 944,527 0,000 1,004,000 8,747 997,358 2,939 3,000,000 0,201 2,996,523 0,000 12,127,6213 1,244 12,048,8653 4,000 3,816,475 1,943 3,703,880 - 107,156,597 - 107,156,597 0,000 23,179,974 4,990 23,055,068 - 198,065,883 1,604 198,065,819 9,000 44,014,292 7,013 43,746,011 - 294,897,613 5,206 294,896,376 9,000 50,700,120 5,665 50,535,049 - 4,208,310 - 4,208,310 - 686,961 - 686,961 ),000 1,000,000 1,911 143,927 1,000 49,231,239 6 49,231,239 3,000 34,725,415 ),868 34,625,204 5,406 13,516,4594 - 13,516,4594 21-15 574,000 529,665 243,000 254,198 2,954,000 2,918,494 13,000 69,348 4,016,000 3,951,419 729,000 615,762 4,535,500 4,577,923 11,759 2,000 63,737 3,089,000 3,338,313 80,000 253,531 603,000 468,169 2,023 26,693 1,870,900 1,812,496 721 1,406 3,300,000 3,673,982 817,695 579,380 4,526,000 4,366,518 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept 30, 1980 35. Oahe Dam-Lake New Work: Oahe, Missouri Approp. -3,623 266,826 128,000 - 344,581,603 River Basin, Cost 48,924 169,534 212,401 49,479 344,528,986 S. Dak. & N. Dak. Maint. Approp. 3,300,000 4,271,000 5,228,354 4,735,000 41,510,179 Cost 3,264,530 4,328,480 4,623,949 5,281,687 41,338,195 36. Evaluation and New Work: Demonstration Approp. 1,000,000 2,730,000 4,575,000 5,049,000 14,729,000 Project Cost 1,045,372 2,898,267 4,096,407 4,296,517 12,469,562 1. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery 4. Does not include $200,000 allotted to Special Studies, Act funds, $8,625,718 emergency relief funds, and $1,181,125 General Investigations for study on relocation of Niobrara, for previous project. Nebraska. 2. Includes $325,122 for previous project and $200,000 5. Does not include $79,700 allocated for restudy of the fiscal year 1968 supplemental appropriation funds. project. 3. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currenlty being carried in a deferred status. TABLE 21-B MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA TO RULO, NEBRASKA TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 (See Section 2 of Text) Cost Funding New Work Maintenance Total Regular Funds $162,222,685 $91,030,773 $253,253,485 Public Works Funds 18,325,581 0 18,325,581 Emergency Relief Funds 8,625,718 0 8,625,718 Total Funds 189,173,984 91,030,773 280,204,757 TABLE 21-C AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA TO RULO, NEBR. (See Section 2 of Text) Appropriation of $12 million authorized for existing project. Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1938, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, Iowa. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, COLO. (See Section 9 of Text) Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug. 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., 1st Sess H. Doc 426, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 426, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) (See Section 19 of Text) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, and authorized $9 million for imnitiation and partial 75th Cong., 1st Sess. accomplishment 21-16 Jan. 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 June 28, 1938 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT TABLE 21-C (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov. 16, 1977 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov. 16, 1977 Work Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBR., KANS., AND MO. (See Section 17 of Text) Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong., 3d Kansas City. Sess. Extended project from Kansas City to mouth and provided for H. Doc. 475, 78th Cong., 2d increased protection. Sess. S. Does, 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLO. (See Section 24 of Text) Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin H. Doc. 669 80th Cong., 2d and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial Sess. accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan and Bear Creek Lake. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. 21-17 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, Nebr., and authorized additional $7 million Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, Nebr., and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, Kans. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouiri Basin Program Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247,78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Docs. 549 and 642, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 91-748. S. Doc. 91-895. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. - -- -- -- TABLE 21-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1980 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Big Sioux River, S. Dak., and Iowa1 1952 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa to Fort Benton, Mont.2 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, Iowa2 1970 129,500 46,100 1. Deferred 2. Complete TABLE 21-E MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA TO RULO, NEBR. TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 2 of Text) As of September 30, 1980 Miles Above Description of Facility Mouth Bank Nearest Town Sioux City Municipal Dock 731.4 Left Sioux City, Iowa Kay Dee Feed Co. 731.2 Left Sioux City, Iowa Big Soo Terminal Dock 727.8 Left Sioux City, Iowa Jebro Inc. 727.5 Left Sioux City, Iowa Flavorland Industries 727.0 Left Sioux City, Iowa Terra Chemical International 718.7 Left Sioux City, Iowa Farmland Soya Processing 717.0 Left Sioux City, Iowa Pilus Transfer Point 680.6 Left Blenco, Iowa Consolidated Blenders Inc. 648.2 Right Blair, Nebraska Agrico Chemical Co. 647.7 Right Blair, Nebraska Far-Mar-Co. 624.8 Right Omaha, Nebraska Penzien, Inc. 624.5 Right Omaha, Nebraska Missouri Portland Cement Co. 624.2 Right Omaha, Nebraska Cargo Carriers, Inc. 624.0 Right Omaha, Nebraska Greater Omaha Marina 617.9 Right Omaha, Nebraska Omaha Municipal Dock, Sioux City & New Orleans (Cargill Molasses) 616.3 Right Omaha, Nebraska Farmland Industries 614.5 Left Council Bluffs, Iowa Cargill Inc. 614.4 Left Council Bluffs, Iowa Terminal Packaging Corp. 614.1 Left Council Bluffs, Iowa National Molasses 612.2 Right Omaha, Nebraska Allied Chemical Corp. 595.3 Right LaPlatte, Nebraska Plattsmouth Municipal Dock 591.6 Right Plattsmouth, Nebraska Far-Mar-Co. 584.5 Right Rock Bluff, Nebraska Steinhart Terminal 562.6 Right Nebraska City, Nebraska Nebraska City Municipal Dock 562.4 Right Nebraska City, Nebraska Bartlett Grain Co. 562.4 Right Nebraska City, Nebraska Nebco, Inc. Terminal Dock 562.3 Right Nebraska City, Nebraska Consolidated Blenders Inc. 561.8 Right Nebraska City, Nebraska Continental Grain Co. 535.5 Right Brownville, Nebraska Kentopp Grain Co. Terminal 535.2 Right Brownville, Nebraska Quad State Terminal Inc. 503.0 Left Mound City, Missouri 21-18 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT TABLE 21-F PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 19 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak.1 $300,102,341 $687,000 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kansas and 4issouri (Sioux City, Iowa to 37,400,0004600,000 Rulo, Nebr.)7 0 4,600,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe S. Dak., & N. Dak. 1 344,857,204 - Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, S. Dak.1, 2 107,259,597 - Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. 1,2 198,785,140 720,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, S. Dak. & Nebr.1, 49,231,550- Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, S. Dak. & Nebr.-Relocation of Niobrara, Nebr. 1,2 13,516,459 - Omaha, Nebraska2 5,903,640 362,000 Council Bluffs, Iowa2 2,557,680 145,800 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, N. Dak1 9,400,000 270,000 1Details presented on individual report. 2 Completed. 3 Active portion of project. TABLE 21-G INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Saco, Beaver Creek Havre, Milk River Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Clyde Park, Shields River Three Forks, Lower Madison River Forsythe, Yellowstone River West Glendive, Yellowstone River Vaughn, Sun River *Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston *Yellowstone River, Hiway 23 Bridge, Near Sidney *Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge *Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge *Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge *Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon *Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings *Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, Near Billings *Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, Near Big Timber *Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks *Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo *Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges *Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges *Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin *Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton Apr 80 Apr 80 Apr 80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr 80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Apr 80 Apr80 Apr 80 Wyoming Greybull, Big Horn River Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks *Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell 21-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-G (Continued) (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected North Dakota Williston May 80 Mandan, Lower Heart River Aug 79 Marmarth, Little Missouri River Aug 80 Scranton, Buffalo Aug 80 South Dakota Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Sep 79 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Sep 80 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 80 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Sep 80 Herreid, Spring Creek \ Aug 80 *Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Jun 80 *Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre May 80 *Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 77 *Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 77 Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 80 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton May 80 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Sep 80 *Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora Apr 80 *South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver Sep 80 *Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins Sep 80 Nebraska Omaha, Missouri River May 80 Waterloo, Elkhorn River Aug 79 West Point, Elkhorn River Apr 80 Pierce, Elkhorn River Apr 80 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Apr 80 Hooper, Elkhorn River Apr 80 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Apr 80 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Apr 80 *Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island May 80 *Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville May 80 *Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Apr 80 *Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Apr 80 *North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare May 80 *Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft Apr 80 *Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Apr 80 Schuyler, Platte River Apr 80 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Apr 80 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Aug 79 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries May 80 Macy, Blackbird Creek Apr 80 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Sep 79 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek Apr 80 Columbus, Loup River Apr 80 Broken Bow, Mud Creek May 80 *Tangeman, Little Nemaha River May 80 *Julian, Rock Creek Apr 80 21-20 OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-G (Continued) (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Jun 80 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Jun 80 Sioux City, Floyd River Aug 80 Hawarden, Dry Creek Sep 79 Red Oak, Nishnabotna River Apr 80 Hamburg L-575, Nishnabotna River May 80 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Aug 80 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Aug 80 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Aug 80 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Malvern Mar 80 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Hastings Mar 80 *East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex Apr 80 *Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Jul80 *West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock Mar 80 Missouri River Levees L-624 & L-627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Dec 77 L-601, Watkins Levee District May 80 L-601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Apr 80 L-601, Missouri River Levee District #1 Apr 80 L-594, Waubansie Drainage District Jun 80 L-594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Jun 80 L-575, Benton-Washington Levee District Mar 80 L-575, Northwest Atchison Levee District May 80 L-575, McKissock Island Levee District May 80 L-575, Buchannan Levee District May 80 L-561, L-550, L-536, Atchison County Levee District Jul79 R-613, Sarpy Co. Soil & Water Cons. D. Sep 77 R-562, Peru Levee District Aug 80 R-548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District Jul 80 R-548, Little Nemaha Levee District Jul80 R-520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 Jul 79 R-573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Aug 80 *Denotes Section 14 Projects TABLE 21-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1980 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, S. Dak.1 1940 37,410 - Billings, Montana3 1976 25,310 - Blackbird Creek Near Macy, Nebr.2 1970 262,479 - Boulder Creek, Boulder, Colo. 3 1976 142.866 - Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Nebr.2 1974 293,016 - Buffalo Creek, Scranton, N. Dak.5 1960 102,980 - Castlewood Lake, (herry Creek and Tributaries, Colo.3 1943 - - City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, Colo. 2 1955 150,000 - Clarkson, Nebraska, Maple Creek 2 1967 191,282 - 21-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 21-H (Continued) (See Section 27 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1980 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Council Bluffs, Iowa (Act of 1936) Council Bluffs, Iowa (Act of 1944)2 Davids Creek Lake, Iowa (Act of 1968)3 Dayton, Wyo.5 Dry Creek, Hawarden, Iowa 2 Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N.D. 3 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, Iowa 2 Floyd River, Sioux City, Iowa 2 Forsyth, Mont.2 Gering Valley, Nebr.2 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, Nebr.5 Glasgow, Mont.2 Greybull, Wyo. 2 Havre, Mont.2 Herreid, Spring Creek, S. Dak.2 Hooper, Nebr.2 Ida Grove, Iowa 2 Jamestown Reservoir, N. Dak.2 Linton, N. Dak.3 Little Papillion Creek, Nebr.2 Little Nemaha River, Nebr.3 Little Sioux River and Tributaries, Iowa2 Loup River, Columbus, Nebr.2 Lower Big Sioux River, Iowa and S. Dak.3 Lower Heart River, N. Dak2 McCook Lake, S. Dak.2 Madison, Nebr. Union and Taylor Creeks 2 Mandan, Heart River, N. Dak. 2 Marmarth, N. Dak.2 Miles City, Mont. Missouri River, Aten, Nebr. 2 Missouri River, Niobrara, Nebr.2 Morrison, Bear Creek, Colo. 5 Mott, N. Dak.4 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, Nebr.2 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, Iowa 2 Norfolk, Nebr.2 Omaha, Nebr. 2 Pierce, Nebr.2 Platte River Near Schuyler, Nebr. 2 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, Nebr.2 Red Dale Gulch, Rapid City, S. Dak.2 Saco, Mont.2 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, S. Dak.2 Shell Creek, Nebr. 5 Sheridan, Wyo.2 ,3 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, Mont. 2 Shoshone River, Lovell, Wyo. 2 Sioux Falls, S. Dak.2 Vaughn, Mont. Sun River 2 South Platte River Levees an' Channel Improvements, Clatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, Colo. Waterloo, Nebr.2 West Point, Nebr.2 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, Mont. 2 1. Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2. Project Complete. 3. Inactive. 1939 1954 1972 1956 1964 1978 1963 1970 1950 1971 1952 1939 1960 1958 1954 1968 1972 1950 1973 1976 1973 1970 1973 1966 1964 1958 1967 1960 1960 1956 1951 1945 1950 1976 1948 1971 1954 1967 1948 1971 1960 1958 1978 1962 1976 1951 1963 1966 1971 1957 1970 1966 1960 4. Deferred. 5. Deauthorized. 21.22 2,557,680 400,000 616,639 400,000 11,556,667 255,177 5,989,663 16,832 248,507 1,825,881 50,216 326,667 522,344 - 3,643,111 15,482,920 1,000,000 1,961,173 147,627 234,839 676,916 169,498 578,791 99,370 1,000,000 236,000 3,400,504 5,903,640 296,597 74,940 257,398 120,482 67,793 184,380 1,966,809 25,747 14,350 5,288,707 451,582 237,883 149,596 230,294 5,633 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5,3 Innn OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT TABLE 21-I FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 28 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Cost (Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended) (Preauthorization) Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebr. $50,310 Main Ditch #6, Hamburg, Ia. 5,000 Red Oak, Ia.-West Nishnabotna River 22,863 Pender, Nebr.-Logan Creek 4,179 Pebble Creek, Scribner, Nebr. 73,741 Prairie and Silver Creek, Grand Island, Nebr. 44,648 TOTAL $200,741 21-23 OHIO RIVER* For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of district engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va., and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island and Hannibal locks and dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, Ky., and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Gallipolis, Greenup and Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine locks and dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh and Uniontown locks and dams and locks and dams 50 to 53 inclusive. The design and construction of Smithland locks and dam, located in the Louisville District, was assigned to the Nashville District during the period November 4, 1965 through September 30, 1977. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ...................... 22-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River. 22-4 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at end of this chapter. 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, Pa., and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, Ill. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide a channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, Ky. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine locks and dams with an auxiliary lock at Gallipolis being 110 by 360 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Gallipolis are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine locks and dam a canal (Louisville, and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh and Uniontown, two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland, 110 by 1,200 foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at locks and dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110 by 1,200 foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine locks and dam, widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Rehabilitation of existing locks and dams 52 and 53 was started in 22-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project) (1980), exclusive of Gallipolis locks and dam reported under Kanawha River project is $1,362,657,969, estimated non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968 for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; locks and dams 40 and 42 eliminated; locks and dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth locks and dam; lock and dam 3 replaced by Dashields locks and dam; and locks and dams 4, 5 and 6 replaced by Montgomery locks and dam. Locks and dams 24, 25 and 26 were replaced by Gallipolis locks and dam authorized by August 30, 1935 Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland locks and dam, locks and dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island locks and dam, locks and dams 12, 13 and 14 were replaced by Hannibal locks and dam, locks and dams 15,16 and 17 were replaced by Willow Island locks and dam, locks and dams 18, 19 and 20 were replaced by Belleville locks and dam, locks and dams 21,22 and 23 were replaced by Racine locks and dam, locks and dams 27,28,29 and 30 were replaced by Greenup locks and dam, locks and dams 31,32,33 and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dam, locks and dams 35,36,37, 38 and 39 were replaced by Markland locks and dam, the Louisville and Portland Canal widened to 500 feet, and locks and dams 43,44 and 45 were replaced by Cannelton locks and dam, presently under construction, locks and dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh locks and dam presently under construction, locks and dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown locks and dam, presently under construction, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 21. Table 22-D contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, Pa., see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 22-C for licenses. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been ,onstructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Emsworth locks and dams (rehabilitation): $1,023,181 was expended during fiscal year 1980 for initiation of major rehabilitation of this project. A contract was awarded in February 1980 in the amount of $1,489,800 for fabrication of upper and lower lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber, and construction progressed to about 48 percent complete. Preparation of plans and specifications for major rehabilitation of the locks were initiated and continued during this period. Dashields locks and dam: All construction work complete. $1,173 was expended during this period for recreation at completed project. Hannibal locks and dam: All construction work complete. Total expenditures for new work during this period was $22,564 which included $4,315 for emergency repairs to the Wheeling Island interceptor sewer and $16,369 for the preparation of plans and specifications for recreation facilities at the Fisherman Access Area, at the dam abutment. Willow Island locks and dam: Construction initiated in January 1967 is complete except for recreation facilities and visitors center at the locks site. A total of $430,622 was expended during the fiscal year for construction of fishing access at the abutment site, channel dredging, and engineering studies. Belleville locks and dam: Construction work complete except for additional recreation facilities under the completed projects program. During the period $12,979 was expended under recreation at completed projects. Racine locks and dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete except for additional recreation facilities under the completed projects program. During the period $6,121 was expended under recreation at completed projects. Gallipolis locks and dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing lock chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. 22-2 OHIO RIVER T'he Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I AE&D studies for a single 1,200 foot lock in a by-pass canal. These studies are underway. Greenup locks and dam: Construction work complete except for additional recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dam: Construction work complete except for additional recreation facilities under the completed projects program. During the period $10 was expended under recreation at completed projects. Markland locks and dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. McAlpine locks and dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland canal which work is presently deferred. Cannelton locks and dam: Project remained at 99 percent complete. Land acquisition complete except for continuing action of Declaration of Taking on one tract. Two contracts for upgrading a portion of Indiana Highway 66 for access to the operation area and for remedial work on signs, air and water lines, and hand railings on the dam were completed. Contract for rehabilitation of a boat ramp advanced to 65 percent completion. Contract for addition to the service building was awarded in September 1980. Engineering and design of remaining project features, including further archeological investigations of a recreation site, continued; $456,859. Newburgh locks and dam: The Newburgh ank Protection Works project was combined with the locks and dam project by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Project is 99 percent complete. Two contracts for remedial work on signs, air and water lines and hand railings on the dam and guard chain on the locks, and landscaping a recreation site were completed. Contract for remote control building advanced to 99 percent completion. Contract for centralized control and surveillance system, awarded in December 1979, advanced to 95 percent completion. Contract for addition to the service building was awarded in September 1980. Engineering and design of remaining project features continued: $1,125,869. Uniontown locks and dam: Project is 97 percent complete. Land acquisition remained at 97 percent completion while boundary line marking advanced to 94 percent complete. Two contracts for remedial work on signs, air and water lines and hand railing on the dam and security lights at a recreation site were completed. Two contracts for boat ramps, roads and parking at two recreation sites advanced to 88 percent completion. Contract for addition to the service building was awarded in September 1980. Engineering and design of remaining project features continued; $1,235,693. 693. Smithland locks and dam: Project is 93 percent complete. Land acquisition continued and advanced to 85 percent completion. Five contracts for remainder of dredging, relocation of Illinois state highways, relocation of Kentucky state and county roads, modification of floating mooring bitts and construction of service building were completed. No progress was made on two utility relocation contracts. However, work continued on two utility and one railroad relocation contracts and advanced to 73,87 and 91 percent completion, respectively. Two contracts for the dam and relocation of Illinois county roads continued and advanced to 98 and 97 percent completion, respectively. Four supply contracts for purchase of pusher boat, mooring buoys, anchor chains and attachments for the buoys, and displays for the interpretive center were completed. Supply contract for maintenance bulkheads continued and advanced to 30 percent completion. Two contracts for rental of towboats to assist boat traffic in the upper approach to the locks during construction of the fixed weir were awarded in March and May 1980 and were completed in August 1980. Two contracts for alteration of Millstone, Illinois water district facilities and for remedial work on access road to Golconda, Illinois water intake structure were awarded in June and September 1980. Dedication ceremony was on 29 October 1979. Engineering and design of remaining project features continued; $11,897,039. Lock and Dam No.53 (Temporary Lock): Project is 98 percent complete. Contract for construction of the temporary lock including work at the old dam and channel dredging was advanced to 98 percent completion. Engineering and design related to construction continued; $591,675. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Two supply contracts for miter gate machinery and for filling and emptying valves and equipment were awarded in September 1979 and advanced to 74 and 70 percent completion, respectively. Two contracts for restoring lockwall rails and modification of wastewater disposal system were awarded in September 1980. Engineering and design of remaining project features continued; $184,037. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Two supply contracts for miter gate machinery and for filling and emptying valves and equipment were awarded in September 1979 and advanced to 74 and 70 percent completion, respectively. 22-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Engineering and design of remaining project features continued; $118,337. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $6,748,541 for Pittsburgh District, $8,262,327 for Huntington District and $8,826,663 for Louisville District. Condition at end of fiscal year. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9- foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 22-D shows cost and year of completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present-day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in fiscal year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh and Uniontown replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 37 old low-lift locks and dams. Smithland locks and dam to replace locks and dams 50 and 51 was initiated in fiscal year 1971. For total cost of existing project, see Table 22-B. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district the work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, Ill.). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing project. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work, but in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of from 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending.upon difficulty of running channel, of from 400-600 feet; also to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide; open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice pierst as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, Pa., to 80 feet at Cincinnati, Ohio, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, Ky. (head of falls), 53.8 feet at Evansville, Ind., and 59.5 feet at Cairo, Ill. (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16,160,000, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, Ind., authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen chainel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954) is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 22-E for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvement at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool condition. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hyd'ographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,835,649. Dredging, by hired labor: Pittsburgh District 900 cubic yards at $6,900; 22-4 OHIO RIVER Huntington District 1,850 cubic yards at $7,075. Dredging by contract: Huntington District 912,137 cubic yards at $1,683,591; and Louisville District 956,563 cubic yards at $1,121,437. Condition at end offiscal year. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is TABLE 22-A not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. See Total Cost to Section Sept 30, In Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 18 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 1. Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2. Includes $36 943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 3. Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4. Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 5. Excludes $251,785 contributed funds for new work. 6. Excludes $250,118 contributed funds for new work. 7. Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefipite appropriation 50,987,109 47,692,862 20,312,781 19,654,555 31,367,380 16,796,138 12,511,848 1,356,121,6181 3 5 10 35,242,317 25,875,100 15,780,604 1,352,052,793 1 3 6 11 1 18,808,189 23,462,979 24,895,869 412,194,7702 4 19,172,349 22,980,630 24,027,531 410,022,8692 13 . - 640,000 1,924,000 3,847,510 - - 10,293 1,325,554 2,619,357 .-. 15,962,2608 ..- 15,962,2608 3,494,120 4,179,587 4,790,351 4,252,076 79,790,043 7 9 3,025,367 4,386,370 4,217,049 4,654,652 79,266,628 9 ... 944,649 ... 944,649 for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8. Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9. Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 10. Includes $100,000 placed in FY 1971 Budget Reserve. 11. Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 12. Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13. Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. 22-5 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 TABLE 22-B (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $1,529,152,333 $449,770,944 $2,619,357 $1,981,542,634 Public Works 3,258,368 - 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 1,217,837 Maintenance and Operation 2,484,683 2,484,683 Public Works Acceleration, 215,812 38,766 254,578 Executive 1963 Total $1,533,825,350' 1 $452,313,3932 4 6 $2,619,357 $1,988,758,100 1. Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. 2. Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. 3. Excludes $250,118 contributed funds for new work. 4. Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under permanent indefinite appropriation. 5. Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 6. Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSES TABLE 22-C AT LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER Markland Dam McAlpine Dam F.E.R.C. License 2,211 289:1,000 License Public Service Co. Louisville Gas and of Indiana Electric Co. Annual Charge $45,950.00 $95,000.00 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1980 $595,461.64 $4,940,311.20 22-6 TABLE 22-D OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Ele- Width Length vation Depth on Miles of Available (feet, Miter Sills Year Actual Cost Lock Below Chamn- For Full mean Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Date of and Pitts- Distance From ber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Com- to Navi- Each Lock Dam burgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam plete gation and Dam 1. - Replaced 6.2 Emsworth locks and dam. 110 Emsworth, Pa. 56 2. - Replaced- 3. Replaced 13.3 Dashields locks and dam., 1.6 miles below Sewickley, Pa. 4. - Replaced 5. - Replaced 6. - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery locks and dam, 1.4 miles above Industry. Pa. 110 56 110 56 7. - Replaced 8. - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland locks and 110 dam. Stratton. Ohio 110 9. - Replaced 10. - Replaced - 11. - Replaced- 84.3 Pike Island locks and dam, 110 2 miles upstream from 110 Warwood, W. Va. 12. - Replaced- 13. - Replaced 14. - Replacedl 126.4 Hannibal locks and dam, 1.6 miles upstream from 110 New Martinsville, W. Va. 110 15. - Replaced- 16. - Replaced- 161.7 Willow Island locks and dam, 2.7 miles above 110 Waverly, W. Va. 110 600 360 18.0 710.0 17.01 4 15.51 5 600 360 10.0 692.0 13.41 600 360 17.5 682.0 16.01 1200 600 20.5 664.5 7.01 1,200 600 17.8 644.0 17.01 12.93 12.93 Rockk .RRoocckk aanndd ppiilleess - - $ 870,034 100 1921 6,884,946 976,767 1.144.588 17.53 Rock Rock 14.6 Rock and piles Rock and piles - _ 14.63 Rock and piles Rock and piles 14.83 18.03 Rock Rock Rock Rock 100 1929 3,533,076 - 1,071,472 - 1,080,132 - 1,123,442 100 1936 5,737,611 - - 1,075,000 -- 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 - - 1,177,100 - - 1,138,000 - - 1,162,165 100 1968 56,623,946 1,166,104 1222,389 1,133,371 1200 600 21.0 623.0 38.0 17.0 Rock Rock 1200 600 20.0 602.0 35.0 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 99 1972 87286248 - - 1,180,478 - - 1,275,532 98 1972 76,053,754 TABLE 22-D OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAM (Continued) (See Section I of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Ele- Width Length vation Depth on Miles of Available (feet, Miter Sills Year Actual Cost Lock Below Chainm- For Full mean Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Date of and Pitt- Distance From ber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Com- to Navi- Each Lock Dam burgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam plete gation and Dam 17. - Replaced 18. - Replaced 19. - Replaced 20. - Replaced 103.9 Belleville locks and dam, 0.3 110 mile below Reedsville, 110 Ohio 21. - Replaced 22. - Replaced 23. - Replaced 237.5 Racine locks and dam, 1.5 110 miles below Letart Falls, Ohio 110 24. - Replaced 25. - Replaced 26. - Replaced 279.2 Gallipolis locks and dam, 0.7 110 mile below Hogsett, W. Va. 110 27. - Replaced 28. - Replaced 29. - Replaced 30. - Replaced 341.0 Greenup locks and dam, 4.9 110 miles below Greenup, Ky. 110 31. - Replaced 32. - Replaced 33. - Replaced 34. - Replaced 4362 Captain Anthony Meldahl 110 locks and dam, 2.2 miles 110 above Foster. Ky. 1,200 600 1,200 600 22.0 582.0 37.0 22.0 560.0 18.0 600 360 26.0 538.0 18.0 1,200 600 30.0 515.0 18.0' 1,200 600 30.0 485.0 18.0' 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 12.0 Rock 13.0 Rock Rock Rock 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1968 $ 1,362,591 927,091 1213,848 936,696 62,286,647 -- 1,484,562 -- 1218,798 - - 1,851,488 98 1971 64,893,232 - - 1,187,542 1,925,205 -- 1,307,241 100 1937 -� 2,015,601 1,063,133 1,088,802 1,579,618 100 1959 56,447,191 - - 1,359,231 - - 2,951,216 - - 1,937,166 - - 3,437,057 100 1962 74,188216 N00 h3 0 O Old y 0q 0 o 00 INA w TABLE 22-D OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (Continued) (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Ele- Width Length vation Depth on Miles of Available (feet, Miter Sills Year Actual Cost Lpck Below Chain- For Full mean Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Date of and Pitts- Distance From her Width Lift sea Upper Lower Com- to Navi- Each Lock Dam burgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) Level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam plete gation and Dam 35. - Replaced 36. - Replaced 37. - Replaced 38. - Replaced 531.5 Markland locks and dam, 1 110 mile above Markland, Ind. 110 39. - Replaced 40. 41. - Eliminated 604.0 McAlpine locks and dams 110 (Reconstruction of locks 110 and dam 41.) 56 43. - eplaced 44. - Replaced 45. - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton locks and dam, 3 110 miles above Cannelton, Ind. 110 46. - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh locks and dam, 110 16 miles above Evansville, 110 Ind. 47. - Replaced 48. - Replaced 49. - Replaced 846.0 Uniontown locks and dam 110 3.5 miles below Union- 110 town, Ky. 50. - Replaced 51. - Replaced 918.5 Smithland locks and dam, 2 110 miles above Smithland, Ky. 110 52. 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, 110 Ill. 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, 110 Ill. (New Lock) 1,200 600 35.0 455.0 50.0 - - - - -� - 1,200 49.0 600 37.0 420.0 19.0 360 19.0 1,200 25.0 383.0 38.0 600 1,200 600 16.0 358.0 32.0 1,200 600 22.0 342.0 34.0 1,200 1,200 22.0 324.0 34.0 600 12.0 302.0 15.4 15.0 Rock - - 12.0 11.0 11.0 Piles -. -- 1,894,942 - - 3,704,535 - - 1,297,924 - - 2,857,040 100 1963 63,019,403 - - 2,222,448 - 7,658,134' Rock Rock - - 13.0 Rock 16.0 Rock 12.0 Rock 12.0 Rock 11.0 Pile Rock 1008 1961 45,726,189 -- 2,592,242 - - 2,819,930 - - 3,202890 99 1972 97,859,92710 3,129,028 Pile 99 1975 103,830M517 4,415,526 3,062,710 3,325,964 Rock Rock Pile 97 1975 98,306,578 - - 3,751,762 - - 4,370.566 93 - 249,529,275 100 1928 5,018,74711 1,200 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile 0 0 - - d Pile - 100 1969 10,197,518 TABLE 22-D (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Ele- Width Length vation Depth on Miles of Available (feet, Miter Sills Year Actual Cost Lock Below Chain- For Full mean Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Date of and Pitte- Distance From ber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Com- to Navi- Each Lock Dam burgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam plete gation and Dam 53. 962.6 10.8 miles above Mound 110 600 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.610 Pile Pile 100 1929 $ 5,817,668" City, Ill. 962.6 10.8 miles above Mound 110 1,200 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6 Pile - 98 - 36,832,888 City, Ill. (New Lock) 974.2 Mound City locks and dam, 1 mile below Mound City - - - - - - - - - 1,539,470 Ill. 54. 9742 Mound City, Ill. - - TOTAL $1347,829,292 ' 1. Depths are on emergency dam foundation and are controlling depths. 2. Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. 3. Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. 4. Iand chamber. 5. River chamber. 6. Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. 7. Lock and dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock walls in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine locks and dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. 8. Completed except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. 9. Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. 10. Reflects reduction of $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. 11. Includes $557,000 for major rehabilitation project. 12. Includes $407,000 for major rehabilitation project. 13. For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. See Section 1 of text. 14. Exclusive of $7,174,235, details below. Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute (under previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants and miscellaneous Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis locks and dams TOTAL GRAND TOTAL $ 5,359,203 966,232 668,800 7,174.235 $1,355,003,527 Fto-+ r co 0 to 0 O CTj 0 0z fTj Cf 06 OHIO RIVER TABLE 22-E AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) March 3, 1827 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Jan. 21, 1927 Construct ice piers as a part of project, with funds allotted H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. from appropriations for general open channel work. July 3, 1930 Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Evansville, Ind., and a 200-foot strip along upstream bank and for bank protection, at an estimated costof $200,000. July 3, 1958 Act of Mar. 3, 1827 modified to include maintenance of ex- H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. isting Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of River slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. 22-11 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tributaries. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky... 23-1 2. Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala., and Ky. ....................................... 23-3 3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama and Mississippi ............. 23-4 4. Other authorized navigation projects ........... .................... . 23-5 5. Navigation work under special authorization ................................... 23-5 Alteration of Bridges 6. Authorized Alteration of Bridges.. 23-5 Flood Control 7. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn ..................................... ... 23-5 8. Martins Fork Lake, Ky ............. 23-5 9. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, Ky. ................................. 23-6 10. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) ........................................ 23-6 11. Inspection of completed flood control projects ........................... .. 23-6 12. Other authorized flood control projects .................. ..................... 23-6 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TENN. AND KY. Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, Ky., about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, Ky., from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, Ky. (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous pr-ojects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938. Flood Control (Cont) Page 13. Flood control work under special authorization ........................ 23-6 14. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 .................................. . 23-7 Multiple-Purpose Power Projects 15.' Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn . ................................ . 23-7 16. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky ................. 23-7 17. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn . ..................... ............. ............ 23-8 18. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky ..................... 23-8 19. Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky ......................... .......... 23-9 20. Other authorized multiplepurpose power projects .................. 23-9 General Investigations 21. Surveys ......... .... .......... 23-9 22. Collection and study of basic data.. 23-9 Existing project. Below'Nashville: For information concerning construction of locks and dams A, B, C, D, E and F, required dredging and related costs to secure 6 foot navigation, see pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provided for construction of hydro- *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 23-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 electric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, river mile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky., to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple- purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Estimated cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,408,500 Federal funds and $85,362 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program (October 1980). (See table 23-C for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, Tenn., varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23- B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, Tenn., has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is estimated as $136,673,100 (October 1980). Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1959) is $39,100,000. (See table 23-C at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, Tenn. (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tailwater at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville are shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for 6- foot navigation project. Under modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 48 terminals on the Cumberland River (1 municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 42 privately owned facilities). A total of 28 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals, grain, and miscellaneous. Nineteen terminals are set up to handle various types of commodities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Below Nashville: Recreation facilities provided at Barkley and Cheatham projects under (Code 711) cost $263,212, $38,708; respectively, and Barkley (Code 713) cost $86,378. State of Kentucky contributed $82,168 to riprap shoreline at Barkley State Park. Above Nashville: Work under Cordell Hull regular construction funds was completed. Recreation facilities provided at Cordell Hull and Old Hickory under (Code 711) cost $82,454, $110,844; respectively, and Old Hickory under (Code 713) cost $90. Operation and Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements at Barkley in- 23-2 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT cluded an earthquake study, paving roads, replacing crane, improving storage yard on left bank, dredging mile 2-30.6, and water supply contract completed. Contract awarded for Devils Elbow recreation area. Cheatham contract to strengthen parapet walls and upper guide walls essentially complete, and equipment storage building completed. Work at Cordell Hull included unwatering lock and painting intake and draft tube cranes. Contract 'awarded for right bank stabilization. Work at Old Hickory continued on contracts for boundary line survey, additional power line lock side, and rehab Nashville Repair Station. A-E contract awarded to survey within the civil boundaries of Nashville District. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (837,326,400 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hoosier Energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (199,200,700 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (440,063,244 kw-hr) and Old Hickory (593,208,420 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Power revenues were $1,737,900; $892,700; $2,054,300 and $1,669,000 respectively. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Below Nashville: Construction of Cheatham lock and dam was completed in November 1960. See page 1078 of 1962 Annual Report for chronology of construction. Acquisition for Barkley project includes 69,750.7 acres in fee 24,277.6 acres in easements and 2,926 acres under use permit with exception of permanent transfer of about 5,032 acres in fee (Land between the Lakes Project) and a use permit (flowage rights) over about 537 acres (Cumberland Steam Plant) from T.V.A., all land and land rights for the project have been procured. Project considered complete during FY 1974 and in full operation. Lock was opened to navigation on July 8, 1964. The four power units were placed in commercial operation January 21, February 4, March 7, and March 30, 1966. Total new work costs for this section to September 30, 1980 were $181,769,607 including $685,000 public works funds. Above Nashville: Old Hickory project provides a through channel for 9-foot navigation on the Cumberland above Nashville to vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., at river mile 313.5. Lock and dam 8, placed in an inoperative status November 30, 1951, was inundated with partial impoundment of Cordell Hull Reservoir. Full impoundment during FY 1973 extends the 9- foot waterway to Celina, river mile 380.8 Old Hickory project was completed for full beneficial use December 1957 with placement of last power unit in. commercial operation. Further details are given on page 1080 of Annual Report for 1962. Construction of Cordell Hull project, started May 1963, was completed September 1980. Total lands acquired 27,176 acres (26,708 in fee and 468 acres in easements). Total new work costs for this section to September 30, 1980 were $135,583,178. Operation and maintenance of structures: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks were in operation at end of period; structures, channels, and appurtenances were maintained in serviceable condition. Total costs of existing project for entire stream were $406,698,397 of which $317,352,785 (including $685,000 from public works funds) were for new work and $89,345,612 for operation and maintenance. Surplus property valued at $237,019 was transferred to project without reimbursement. Benefits attributable to reduction of flood flows by the Barkley project to date amount to $21,679,000. Power revenues received to date; Barkley, $27,263,164; Cheatham, $16,863,244; Cordell Hull, $13,628,817; and Old Hickory, $35,510,986. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TENN., ALA., AND KY. Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902- 1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tenn. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority pro- 23-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 gram provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by that agency of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, Tenn. (See table 23-D on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 164 terminals on the Tennessee River (7 municipally owned, 26 government owned facilities and 131 privately owned facilities). A total of 78 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, steel, and miscellaneous. Seventy two terminals handle various types of commodities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $264,992. Operation and maintenance of structures: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance work items were to provide support rollers for Melton Hill Lock, install gratings and support at Kentucky Lock, unwater lock gates and valves at Wheeler Lock, replace valve top seal assembly at Chickamauga Lock, and repair Watts Bar Lock during unwatering. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Construction under the project was commenced January 1933 and completed September 1944. Additional work includes construction of Melton Hill project (mile 23.1 Clinch River) completed in FY 1963, added 61 miles of 9 foot channel to the Tennessee River system for a total of about 711 miles of nine foot navigation channel. Construction of additional and modified navigation features by TVA, completion and operation dates are shown on pages 698 and 699 of Annual Report for FY 1969. See table 23-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 232 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110x600 feet. Construction of the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $712,000,000 (October 1980). Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Initial Bay Springs Lock excavation contract completed. 23-4 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT Construction continued on Bay Springs Lock and Dam contract, and cultural resources contracts. Acquired 299 acres fee and 1 acre easement. Work continued on excavation contracts 4A, 3A, 2, 4B and 1, and 4/2A/Plug in the Divide Cut. Work continued on the ICGR Waterway Bridge and Roadway with By-Pass (South End) contracts. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total lands acquired 28,880 acres (28,670 in fee and 210 acres in easements). The project is 54 percent complete. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 23-F. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization) . During the period $45,370 was expended for a study of New Johnsonville Port, Tenn. Alteration of Bridges 6. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman-Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 7. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA, KENTUCKY AND TENNESSEE Location. The proposed project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area will be established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage is not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically establishes the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archaeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The area is divided into two categories, gorge and adjacent areas, with no construction permitted except limited clearing for establishment of day-use facilities, historical sites, primitive campgrounds and access roads. Lodges and other facilities will be .provided in the adjacent areas. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of ,1974 as amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The present authorized cost (ceiling) for the project is $103,522,000. Estimated cost for full development is $222,000,000. The National Park Service will operate and maintain the useable units of the area upon completion of land acquisition and construction of basic facilities by the Corps of Engineers. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Several A-E contracts were awarded. Acquired 3,067 acres fee and 26.06 acres in easements. Condition at end of fiscal year. Acquisition has been completed on 44,957.26 acres fee and 26.06 acres easements. Master plan studies are complete. Federal environmental impact statement submitted to CEQ May 24, 1977. 8. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY. Location. Dam planned at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Danm will be concrete type, about 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acrefeet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in vinter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, will thus be provided during potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the 23-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 lake is to be operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and to provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project will pervent major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and result in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and at other urban areas downstream. Estimated cost of project, including $690,200 code 710 funds is $21,090,000 (October 1980). Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. At this time, assurances have not been received for any non- Federal participation in the recreational development on this project as required under P.I,. 89-72. Therefore, initially recreation will not be developed to the full potential and only minimum facilities will be provided. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: All relocation work completed except agreement with L&N Railroad. Construction of resource managers facilities is 99 percent complete. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances operated as required. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is essentially complete except for some minor hired labor. Total acquisition to date involves 1,764 acres fee and 38 acres easements. Two cemetery tracts remain unacquired. Completion of the project is scheduled in fiscal year 1981. 9. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY. Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away from present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. Flood damages amounted to $4,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work under existing project was completed in March 1945. Construction of canal and levee system, initiated in May 1938, was completed and improvement placed in operation in December 1939. Relocation work was completed in September 1940. Flood damages prevented to date amount to $19,175,000. 10. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-G. 11. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $19,209. Total cost to September 30, 1980 was $125,590. For project inspection data see table 23-H. 12. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 23-I. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal costs for fiscal year were $141,237 for disaster preparedness. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). 23-6 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT Fiscal year costs for reconnaissance reports were $17,892 for Cumberland River, Clarksville, Tenn.; $15,245 for Cumberland River, River Road, Cheatham County, Tenn.; and $2,156 for Soddy-Daisy, Tenn. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $26,180 for preparation of reconnaissance report for White Oak Creek, Sunbright, Tenn. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Fiscal year costs were $1,059 for preparation of negative report on Elk Creek, Newcomb, Tenn. 14. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION ACT OF 1974 Preliminary investigation of sites at Tennessee State University campus and Lower Cumberland below Barkley were made at a cost of $524. Multiple-purpose Power Projects 15. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, Tenn. It is in DeKalb County, Tenn., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Estimated cost of project including $9,431,300 code 710 funds is $53,902,700 (October 1980). Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities provided under (Code 711) cost $72,596; (Code 713) cost $70,047. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated 418,004,900 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program, comprising shoreline sanitation, upgrading recreation facilities, improving wildlife habitat, providing hiking trails, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. A seepage study was made of the left bank, and the powerhouse roof was replaced. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed for full beneficial use April 1951. For chronology of construction and major items of work performed, see page 1101 of Annual Report for 1962. Flood damage reductions to date amount to $62,223,000. Power revenues total $37,103,212. 16. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. AND KY. Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, Tenn. It is in Clay County, Tenn., and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, Tenn., 28 miles north of Cookeville, Tenn., and 3 miles east of Celina, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, Ky., and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of project including $13,183,400 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $39,305,800 (October 1980). Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Operation and maintenance: 23.7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (152,697,820 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved shoreline sanitation, malaria control, conservation, land management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Contract awarded for paving service area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in March 1942 and completed for flood control operation in October 1943. Powerplant (initial 2-unit development) was completed April 1949 and third unit installed and placed in operation December 1953. For further details and information on other major items of work, see page 1098 of Annual Report for 1962. Contracts have been awarded for paving at Lillydale recreation site, and for rehabilitation of turbine and generator modification. Flood damage reductions to date amount to $38,793,000. Power revenues total $28,204,914. 17. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, Tenn.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, Tenn. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Estimated cost of project includ-. ing $4,164,300 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $57,- 818,000 October 1980). Local cooperation. Recreation subject to certain conditions of cost-sharing under Federal Water reation Act of 1965. development non-Federal Project Rec- Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities provided under (Code 711) cost $101,101; and (Code 713) cost $102,487. Metropolitan Nashville contributed $10,381 to Hamilton Creek activities building. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (93,436,100 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved shoreline sanitation, malaria control, conservation, land management and maintenance of public-use facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Substructure, initiated in 1963, was completed in 1968. Closure of dam was completed in December 1967, with project effective for flood control. Completion of the powerplant was accomplished in February 1970. Initial recreation completed. Total reservoir lands acquired from private interests is 33,351.00 acres in fee and 589.00 acres in easement including flowage rights reserved over 229 acres in fee disposal of Sewart Air Force Base. With exception of recreation facilities under code 710 this project was considered complete June 30, 1976. Flood damage reductions to date amount to $39,710,000. Power revenues total $12,748,770. 18. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY. Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir will extend 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, Ky., water-supply dam and lie within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of a net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity 23-8 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT of Laurel River Reservoir for power. As modified within discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, the project is under construction in primary interest of power production and (recreation, at an estimated cost of $59,200,000 (October 1980). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued on Holly Bay Recreation Area and Flat Woods Day Use Area contract. Gibson Test contract awarded for Hydraulic Turbine. Forest Service continued work on recreation sites under agreement. Operations and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Contract awarded to pave power plant access road. Total net energy generated (71,675,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of right bank access road, initiated in December 1964, completed in August 1965. Contract for construction of diversion and power tunnels, started in April 1966, was completed in December 1967. Stage 1 Dam construction was initiated in April 1968 and completed in June 1969. Stage II Dam construction commenced in August 1969 and completed in September 1972. Lands acquired for project purposes total 8,599 acres. Project as a whole is about 98 percent complete. Powerhouse contract completed in December 1979. Power plant placed in commercial use in October 1977. Power revenues total $83,904,540. 19. WOLF CREEK DAM-LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY. Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.9 (above mouth) in Russell County, Ky., about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, Ky. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, Mc- Creary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, Ky. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public-use and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of project is $191,466,700 (October 1980). This estimate includes $3,979,800 code 710 funds $880,000 non- Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $107,000,000 for major rehabilitation. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment.. Contract for the concrete diaphragm wall, increments 2 and 4 and concrete diaphragm wall, increments 1 and 3 is 99 percent complete. Recreation facilities provided under (Code 711) cost $110,275; and (Code 713) cost $886,070. State of Kentucky. contributed $730,900 for Wright Hollow launching ramp. Operation and maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Contract awarded for rehab of Nashville Repair Station buildings. Total net energy generated (978,- 628,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved shoreline sanitation, malaria control, land management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project commenced August 1941 and was completed for full beneficial use August 1952. For chronology of construction and major items of work performed see page 1095 of 1962 Annual Report. Project as a whole is about 98 percent complete. Flood damage reductions to date amount to $161,611,000. Power revenues total $83,904,540. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLEPURPOSE POWER PROJECTS (See table 23-J.) General Investigations 21. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $743,435 for which $70,627 was for navigation, $615,942 for flood damage prevention studies, $13,695 for review of authorized projects, and $43,171 for coordination studies with other agencies, 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $5,630 for flood plain management programs, $46,098 for technical services to others, $53,668 for flood plain management services, $234 for Barbourville, Ky. evacuation plan, and $873 for Cumberland, Ky. evacuation plan, totalling $106,503. 23-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 23-A See Section in Text Project 2. Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky.1 3. Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala. and Ky." 4. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama & Mississippi 7. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area Ky. and Tenn. 8. Martins Fork Lake, Ky. 9. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, Ky. 10. Cumberland, Ky. 14. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. 15. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. & Ky. 16. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir Ohio River Basin, Tenn. 17. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. 18. Wolf Creek Dam and Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 77 FY 78 2,459,557 466,302 2,026,599 1,269,985 8,527,300 8,258,739 7,883,217 8,794,136 3,140,000 3,919,000 3,068,926 3,970,633 Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 70,000,000 69,667,735 1,600,000 1,084,166 1,813,000 3,679,989 -_ - 115,000 276,000 94,588 236,625 50,000 - 2,600 1,506,527 189,889 1,697,000 1,668,000 1,587,388 1,789,719 239,500 17,000 401,734 84,243 1,739,000 1,604,200 1,891,764 1,726,284 72,216 417,800 102,947 62,057 1,232,000 1,272,000 1,126,309 1,387,220 3,055,000 2,081,813 2,620,017 2,156,244 -- 301,000 - 281,176 649,000 221,300 52,126 383,707 2,413,200 1,945,000 2,061,113 2,375,703 33,804,000 29,666,000 34,767,086 29,323,130 FY 79 506,000 750,582 8,823,997 9,346,673 4,263,000 4,197,111 117,579,000 123,161,567 19,200,000 19,043,168 550,000 436,809 241,000 231,237 150,000 211,875 154,000 639,254 1,762,000 1,777,065 111,000 208,110 1,681,000 1,696,333 189,000 533,979 1,593,000 1,598,694 1,450,000 2,408,671 420,000 397,297 990,000 592,105 2,135,000 2,079,743 18,700,000 19,158.515 FY 80 430,500 705,904 9,900,000 9,708,780 4,750,000 4,755,596 133,300,000 133,493,093 4,440,900 4,438,717 30,000,000 29,175,049 350,000 481,422 7,400,000 5,328,127 23-10 momomm Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 $318,386,781 ' 318,179,038 107,389,448' 106,623,973 16,251,428 16,251,428 65,349,451 65,151,763 ' 400,000 400,000 388,329,050 387,134,108 " 26,650,900 25,762,841 1 2,2 2,1 2,3 1,8 12 1,3 2,1 2,2 2,1 2,1 3,8 3,3 -- 20,399,800 i37,851 20,212,302 " 355,000 596,000 343,729 574,946 - 817,830 " - 817,830 " 41,000 1,384,844 26,488 1,368,850 " -- 66,642 - 66,642 88,805 53,334,875 " L42,642 53,227,799 " ?35,000 22,312,087 " L16,901 22,168,843 " - 3,923 27,940,004 ' - 27,940,004 , 335,000 22,809,927 "O 327,710 22,253,561 " [40,618 56,812,947 " 213,969 56,781,375 P" 390,000 12,184,206 " 376,104 12,113,821 " 140,000 48,224,231 231,740 47,394,278 2 340,000 1,361,000 305,855 1,284,328 170,000 82,921,398 "9 727,245 82,611,256 27 103,000 33,557,561 '" 145,076 33,484,290 " 334,000 104,204,237 344,381 103,388,413 " 23.10 5 3 3 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,- 706 for maintenance on previous projects.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $85,362 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 3. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $82,168 contributed by the State of Kentucky. In addition, surplus property valued at $133,550 transferred from project without reimbursement. 4. Includes $443,300 for special recreation use fees and $859,303 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 5. Includes $441,275 for special recreations use fees and $859,303 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. In addition surplus property valued at $103,469 transferred to project without reimbursement. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,- 175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $152,719 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 8. Includes $152,719 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. In addition, surplus property valued at $50,323 transferred from project without reimbursement. 9. Surplus property valued at $9,906 transferred to project without reimbursement. 10. Surplus property valued at $9,606 transferred to project without reimbursement. 11. Includes $38,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. In addition, surplus property valued at $4 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds. In addition surplus property valued at $55,528 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15. Includes $140,000 funds for special recreation use fees. 16. Includes $137,141 funds for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $56,549 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17. Includes $51,789 public works acceleration funds, and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee. 18. Includes $51,789 public works acceleration funds, and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee. In addition, surplus property valued at $28,223 transferred to project without reimbursement. 19. Includes $158,600 funds for special recreation use fees. 20. Includes $158,543 funds for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $26,723 transferred to project without reimbursement. 21. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, Tenn. 22. Includes $41,225 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, Tenn. In addition, surplus property valued at $386,000 transferred to project without reimbursement. 23. Includes $107,800 for special recreation use fees. 24. Includes $107,672 for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $384,777 transferred to project without reimbursement. 25. In addition, surplus property valued at $14,995 transferred to project without reimbursement. 26. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $739,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. In addition, surplus property valued at $46,488 transferred to project without reimbursement. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds and $120,900 funds for special recreation use fees. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds and $120,265 funds for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $45,923 transferred to project without reimbursement. 30. Includes surplus property valued at $1,487 transferred to project without reimbursement. 23-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents A %--9%"re"IrTI-rA 4Tr"VIr- r - July 13, 1892 June 25, 1910 August 30, 1935 July 24, 1946 June 19, 1952 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 August 5, 1886 March 2, 1907 March 2, 1919 June 5, 1920 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934 ' July 24, 1946 July 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Provision made for lock A Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests. Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville; via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17 Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Docs. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663. Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H, Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 23-12 TABLE 23.B (Continued) NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 28, 1937 June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 December 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 December 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 August 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 March 7, 1974 March 7, 1974 July 24, 1946 OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300, for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, Authorized establishing Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of Comprehensive Plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 8300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H.R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H.R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings. 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 23-13 -- -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 23-C CUMBERLAND RIVER, TENN. AND KY.: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 2 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham . Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet) ' Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guardsills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level): Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet) : Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canal: Length (miles) Bottom width (feet) Depth at minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Kuttawa, Ky., 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 50 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,000 .' 259,000 610,000 2,082,000 Ashland City, Tenn., 9 miles. 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 Old Hickory, Tenn., 3 miles. 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity-and earthfill 98 3,605 2 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 450 S 385 382 0- 1 7,450 19,800 84,200 104,000 442 27,450 125,000 63,000 357,000 545,000 Carthage, Tenn., Celina, Tenn., 5 5 miles. miles. 313.5 385.4 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,138 2 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 508 " 508 501 499 13,920 85,600 *6* 20,500 204,800 310,900 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 555 S 550 549 13,150 59,000 6 10,000 179,000 248,000 1.75 400 11 32,500 130,000 12,000 36,000 25,000 100,000 33,333 100,000 3 23,000 69,000 23-14 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 23-C (Continued) CUMBERLAND RIVER, TENN. AND KY.: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 2 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina Precent of project completion 6 * 6 100 Year opened to navigation 1964 1952 1954 1973 Estimated cost' $146,846,500 $31,562,000 $52,573,000 $84,100,100 $39,100,000 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage. 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during nonflood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 23.15 TABLE 23-D TENNESSEE RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Lock Dimensions Length Minimum Depth Width Avail. Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Miles Chamin Full Nor. Maxi- Opened Cost of Above Miles from ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Character Navi- Kind Type of Each Lock Project 1 Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) of Foundation gation of Dam Construction and Dam Kentucky 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed Concrete and Ky. earthfill Pickwick Landing 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed Concrete and Tenn. earthfill Wilson: Auxiliary lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 60 292 94 100.0 11.0 ' 11.2 Limestone 1927 Fixed Concrete and $46,973,540 ' Ala. 300 earthfill Main lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1959 - Ala. General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence, 60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 Limestone 1934 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,295 6 Ala. earthfill Main lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence, 110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete and Ala. earthfill Guntersville: Auxiliary lock 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 60 360 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed - sa Ala. Main lock 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 110 600 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 1965 Fixed Concrete and Ala. earthfill Nickajack: Auxiliary lock 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 600 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1967 Fixed Concrete nooga, Tenn. Main lock 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 800 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone Fixed Concrete nooga, Tenn. Chickamauga 471.0 6.9 above Chatta- 60 360 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 Limestone 1939 Fixed s nooga, Tenn. Watts Bar 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, 60 360 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 Shale 1941 Fixed Concrete and Tenn. earthfill Fort Loudon 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 Limestone 1943 Fixed Concrete and Tenn. earthfill Melton Hill 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete (Clinch R.) Tenn. 1. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess., contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, i916 (H. Doc. 1262, 64th Cong., 1st sess.). Actual cost of lock and dam. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. t5zld Cd 5Q6 c3 O 3c13 m 31 m OCz~ Zm 5~d1 UI d 56 CC I 1 CO rs CA " N NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 23-E TENNESSEE RIVER, TENN., ALA., AND KY. TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO (See Section 3 of Text) SEPT. 30, 1980 Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $5,402,728 $55,591,139 $63,238,103 ' Maintenance - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compensation, 5 - 5 rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $5,402,733 $55,602,804 $63,249,773' 1. In addition, surplus property valued at $50,178 June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of imwas transferred from the project without reimburse- provement under provisions of appropriation for such ment. Excludes $2,889,149 expended between 1890 and purposes. TABLE 23-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Caney Fork River, Tenn.' 1895 27,828 Clinch River, Tenn., and Va.2' .3 1923 53,949 7,873 Duck River, Tenn.'-' 1887 13,000 Elk River, Ala. and Tenn. ' -' 1904 4,000 - French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, Tenn. ' , 1931 249,605 33,554 Hiwassee River, Tenn.'. 1923 113,311 9,754 Holston River, Tenn.'' 1911 5,714 Little Tennessee River, Tenn.' 1888 5,510 Obey River, Tenn.' 1887 11,500 Red River, Tenn.' 1884 5,000 South Fork of Cumberland River, Ky.' 1892 11,967 1. Completed. 4. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 2. Inactive. 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 532, 5. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 428 64th Cong., 1st Sess. and 489, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. TABLE 23-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Estimated Cost Type of Federal Non-Federal Total Location Protection Middlesboro Levees $581,000 $161,000 $742,000 (Yellow Creek, Ky.) 1,3 Cumberland, Ky.' Channel 520,000 240,000 760,000 Improvement 23-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RESERVOIRS Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Center Hill Lake, Tenn." Caney Fork River $53,902,700 Dale Hollow Lake, Tenn. and Ky.3 Obey River 39,155,800 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, Tenn.'' Stones River 57,772,000 Laurel River Lake, Ky." Laurel River 59,200,000 Martins Fork Lake, Ky. Martins Fork 21,090,000 Rossview, Tenn. and Ky.'.' Red River 12,590,000" Three Islands, Tenn.' Harpeth River 19,900,000 Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ky.' Cumberland River 83,586,700 1. See "Other authorized flood control projects." 5. Last revised in 1958. 2. Deferred. 6. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose pro- 3. Details of this project are in individual report. jects." 4. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 7. Deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 11 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, Ky. Oct. 1979 and Apr. 1980 Corbin, Ky. Oct. 1979 and Apr. 1980 Lake City, Tenn. Nov. 1979 and Mar. 1980 Middlesboro, Ky. (Yellow Creek) Oct. 1979 and Apr. 1980 Middlesboro, Ky. (Diversion Canal) Oct. 1979 and Apr. 1980 Paint Rock River, Ala. Nov. 1979 and Jun. 1980 Pineville, Ky. Oct. 1979 and Apr. 1980 Spring City, Tenn. Nov. 1979 and Apr. 1980 TABLE 23-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Barbourville, Ky.: 1963 2,088,147 - Chattanooga, Tenn. and Rossville, Ga.' 1949 180,997 - Coal Creek and tributaries (Lake City), Tenn." 1962 460,134 - Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), Ky. 1969 567,703 - Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), Ky.' 1949 26,309 - Paint Rock River, Ala." 1967 544,173 - Pineville, Ky." 1963 1,669,176' - Rossview Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky.'. - 6,779 - 1. Authorization expired Dec. 31, 1953 (Public Law 314, 82d Cong.) 2. Deferred. 3. Completed. 4. Exclusion of $9,950 contributed funds. 23-18 NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT TABLE 23-J OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS Project Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, Ky. and Tenn. 1.' Celina Dam, Ky. 1' Cheatham lock and dam, Tenn.', 8 Cordell Hull lock and dam, Tenn.1 Laurel River Lake, Ky. Old Hickory lock and dam, Tenn.'," Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn.' For Last. Full Report See Annual Report For Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Operation and Construction Maintenance $145,949,084 222,575 * 30,700,022 79,673,899 47,394,278 51,926,104 111,855 ' $29,611,523 21,822,948 11,177,675 1,284,328 26,733,466 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky." 2. Engineering and design. TABLE 23-K 3. Completed for beneficial use. 4. Deauthorized. FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 22 of Text) Location Davidson County, Tenn. Hartsville, Tenn. Mt. Juliet, Tenn. Lebanon, Tenn. Requesting Agency Date Complete Federal Insurance Administration, Atlanta, Ga. Oct. 1979 $29,970 Federal Insurance Administration, Atlanta, Ga. Jun. 1980 12,200 Federal Insurance Administration, Atlanta, Ga. Sep. 1980 12,150 Federal Insurance Administration, Atlanta, Ga. Sep. 1980 21,300 23-19 -- Federal Cost LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY, to mouth. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River........................24-2 2. Green and Barren Rivers, KY ....... 24-2 3. Kentucky River, KY.................24-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River ..... 24-3 5. Other authorized navigation projects ............................ 24-3 6. Navigation work under special authorization ............. 24-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Dayton, KY ....... .................. 24-3 8. Evansville, IN .................... 24-3 9. Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN .................. 24-4 10. Mason J. Niblack Levee, Wabash River, IN..................24-4 11. Mill Creek, OH ................. 24-5 12. Newport-Wilders, KY...............24-5 13. Saline River and Tributaries, IL ..................... 24-6 14. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ......................... 24-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. Barren River Lake, KY.............24-7 Big Blue Lake, IN.................. 24-7 Big Walnut Lake, IN............... 24-7 Brookville Lake, IN.................24-8 Buckhorn Lake, KY................24-8 Caesar Creek Lake, OH ............ 24-9 Cagles Mill Lake, IN...............24-9 Camp Ground Lake, KY...........24-10 Carr Fork Lake, KY...............24-10 Cave Run Lake, KY...............24-11 Flood Control - Reservoirs (Continued) Page 25. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN.......... 24-11 26. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH .. ..... 24-12 27. East Fork Lake, OH .............. 24-12 28. Falmouth Lake, KY ....... ...2.4..-1 3 29. Green River Lake, KY.............. 24-13 30. Huntington Lake, IN............... 24-13 31. Louisville Lake, IL.................24-14 32. Mississinewa Lake, IN.............24-14 33. Monroe Lake, IN................ 24-15 34. Nolin Lake, KY...................24-15 35. Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) ................... 26-16 36. Patoka Lake, IN ............ .. 24-16 37. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, KY........24-17 38. Salamonie Lake, IN................ 24-17 39. Taylorsville Lake, KY.............. 24-18 40. Wabash River Basin ............... 24-18 41. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ....................... 24-19 42. Inspection of completed flood control projects ..................... 24-19 43. Other authorized flood control projects ............................ 24-19 44. Flood control work under special authorization ............... 24-19 45. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 ....................... 24-20 General Investigations 46. Surveys ......................... 24-20 47. Collection and study of basic data ...................... 24-20 48. Research and development ......... 24-20 24-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND .DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 2. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River Mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1 Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-C for principal data concerning locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 24-D on terminal facilities.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and dams, 1 to 3, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River and Dam 3 at Mile 108.5 Green River. Maintenance: Contract for service building at Locks and Dams 1 and 2 on the Green River was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, were in fair condition and Lock 4, Green River is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs are deferred pending completion of survey report for navigation on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at both locations were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot depth to coal loading terminal at mile 105.7. Channel of Green River from mouth of Barren River at mile 149.5 to Mammoth Cave, KY, at mile 197.8, is no longer maintained and is blocked by deactivated Locks and Dams 5 and 6. 3. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, Pa. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6- foot-depth project on main system of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5. feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. On December 19, 1976 the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recrea- 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT tional craft on the Kentucky River system were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10 and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. On April 9, 1980 the schedules for Locks 5 through 14 were further reduced for commercial traffic and recreational craft to provide for operation of Locks 5 through 10 on Monday through Thursday between noon and 8 p.m. and on Friday, Saturday and Sunday between 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. and operation of Locks 11 through 14 on Monday, and Thursday, through Sunday between noon and 8 p.m., local times. Operation of Locks 5 through 14 for commercial traffic at other than the previously noted time is by appointment only, with 48-hour advance notice. Licenses. Department of Energy License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,708; total collections through September 30, 1979, $234,773. (Collection amount for fiscal year 1980 not available from Department of Energy.) Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are at various points and considered adequate for existing traffic. List appears on page 1110, Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 24-E on locks and dams, Kentucky River, KY.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of the 14 locks and dams, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Beattyville, KY, in pool of Dam No. 14. Maintenance items accomplished were repairs to dam and construction of upper guide wall exterior at Lock and Dam 2 and construction of new shop and office building at Lock and Dam 4. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Canalization system of Kentucky River is in poor condition. Repairs were made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964 and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to relieve critical hardship conditions for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-F. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. DAYTON, KY Location. In Campbell County, Kentucky on left bank of Ohio River from mile 467.0 to mile 469.2 and across the river from Cincinnati, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Newport, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 8,170 feet of levee, two pumping stations with gravity drainage structures and major relocations of storm and sanitary sewers serving the community. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $12,900,000 Federal and $2,043,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Preliminary assurances of cooperation were received from City of Dayton, Kentucky on May 3, 1966. City has acquired all rights-of-way for the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Contract for sewer relocations is 99 percent completed. Contracts for construction of access roads and levees and floodwall and purchase of pumps and motors advanced to 83 percent and 6 percent completion, respectively. Contract for pumping plant structures at Main and McKinney Streets were awarded in January 1980 and is 53 percent complete. Condition of end of fiscal year. Contract for demolition of existing buildings and structures in the levee area is complete. Project is about 62 percent complete overall. 8. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, Pa. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system 24-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville,, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3- foot freeboard. Estimated total cost of new work (1980) is $54,700,000 Federal, including $7,900,000 (Oct 1977) for Howell Section, Unit 2 that is in "inactive" category, and $7,982,000 non-Federal, including $352,000 (Oct 1977) for the said Howell Section, Unit 2. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1937 Flood Control Act. Howell Section, Unit 2 was reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on current studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1 and Knight Township sections. Assurances for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1 were executed February 11, 1963. Authorization-of-entry for Part 1 of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Plans and specifications for levee and floodwall, Cedar Street to Stringtown Road, remained at about 75 percent completion. Design Memorandum for North 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue, and Stringtown Road pumping plants remained at about 30 percent completion. Construction contracts for gatewells at existing drainage structures, Knight Township and Howell Section, Unit 1, and Dresden and North 6th Avenue pumping plants were completed. Construction contract for Delaware Street pumping plant advanced to about 45 percent completion. Condition at end of fiscal year. Knight Township, Howell, Unit 1, and Pigeon Creek, Unit 1 Sections are complete. Howell Section, Unit 2, is in the "inactive" category. Construction of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2 was started in April 1974 and is about 22 percent complete. General Design Memorandum and Supplement on Pigeon Creek Unit 2, and Design Memorandum and plans and specifications for Delaware, Dresden and North 6th Avenue pumping plants are approved. Project is about 37 percent complete overall. 9. LEVEE UNIT NO. 5, WABASH RIVER, IN Location. In Gibson and Posey Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, from 58 to 94.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. Provides for construction of 41.9 miles of earth levee, drainage structures, pumping plants, together with alterations to three railroad bridges crossing Wabash River. Project provides protection for 44,000 acres of farm land and towns of Lyle, Skelton, and Griffin, IN, against a flood equal to that expected on an average of 7 times in each 100-year period. Estimated total cost of new work (1980) is $9,105,000, of which $905,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and road and utility relocations. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1946. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Levee District on January 8, 1962. Completed portions of project (levees) were transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance October 15, 1969. Emerson Ditch pumping plant was transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance November 24, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Flood damages estimated at $481,000 were prevented during the 1980 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. All sections of levee, Emerson Ditch pumping plant, and required alterations of the Penn Central Railroad, Southern Railroad, and Illinois Central Railroad are complete. Design Memorandum Pumping Plant, Coffee Bayou, is complete. 10. MASON J. NIBLACK LEVEE, WABASH RIVER, IN Location. In Knox and Sullivan Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, between miles 134.8 and 151.8 above mouth. Existing project. Construction of two sections of earth levee totaling 18 miles in length, three pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, and other necessary appurtenances. Length of protection, including high ground between the two levee sections, is 18.9 miles long. Project protects 15,900 acres of agricultural land against a flood equal to that expected to occur 7 times in a 100-year period. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $2,774,000. Cost of the completed levee was $1,663,200, of which $109,200 was non-Federal cost and $1,554,000 was Federal cost. The levee project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act; pumping facilities were authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act. 24-4 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for levees and pumping plants. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for remedial work to pumping plants completed. Operation by local interests for flood control prevented damages estimated at $1,722,000 during 1980 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of levees complete and transferred to Mason J. Niblack Levee District in January 1965 for operation and maintenance. Construction of the pumping facilities and channel improvements complete and transferred to the local sponsor in May 1980. 11. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Proposed project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and threefourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, Ohio. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, four pumping plants, modification of 30 bridges, and the addition of three pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $181,466,000, of which $33,466,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first-cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost-sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975 and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preconstruction planning. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design Memoranda, Hydrology & Hydraulics, Concrete Aggregate and Stone Protection Sources, and Railroad Relocations General Design Memoranda, Phase I and Phase II, Design of Channel - Section 5 are complete. 12. NEWPORT-WILDERS, KY Location. City of Wilders, KY is immediately upstream from Newport, KY, on the right bank of the Licking River about 2.3 miles above its confluence with the Ohio River in Campbell County. Newport and Wilders are in the metropolitan area of Cincinnati, Ohio. Existing project. Construction of the Newport local protection project was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance in September 1951. The proposed project at Wilders consists of construction of earth levee and floodwall, five pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Estimated cost of new construction (1978) is $10,800,000 Federal and $959,000 non-Federal. Project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended applies. Fully complied with for the Newport local protection project. The city of Wilders will be the responsible cooperating agency for the Wilders project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Letter Report on Economic Feasibility was submitted December 8, 1978 with the proposal that project be reclassified to the "inactive" status. Project was reclassified from 24-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 the "active" to "inactive" category January 22, 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests' have expressed no contemporary desires for construction of the project. Project is classified in the "inactive" category. 13. SALINE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, IL Location. Saline River, which flows into the Ohio River at mile 867.4 below Pittsburgh, PA, and 10 miles below Shawneetown, IL, is formed by confluence of its South and Middle Forks 27 miles above its mouth. North Fork joins main stream at stream mile 17.2. Project area is in Gallatin, Hamilton, and Saline Counties in southeastern Illinois. Existing project. Provides for 9.9 miles of channel enlargement on Saline River, 1.2 miles of clearing and cleaning, and 29.8 miles of channel enlargement on North Fork, 12.2 miles of channel enlargement on Middle Fork, and 14.2 miles of clearing and cleaning on South Fork. Project will protect agricultural areas along 67.3 miles of improved channel from headwater floods with an expected frequency of once in 2 years, and lesser floods occurring more frequently. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, and deletion of cash contributions by local interests was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total cost of new work (1980) is $8,821,000, of which $991,000 is non- Federal cost for lands and damages, and bridge and utility relocations. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 as amended, applies. Saline Valley Conservancy District furnished assurances of cooperation on March 2, 1966. Authorizations-of-entry for all sections of project have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for additional South Fork clearing completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is 100 percent complete. South Fork Saline River, Section 6 (the first item of construction) is scheduled for transfer to the Saline Valley Conservancy District for maintenance in early FY 1981. 14. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Provides for the construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project will provide protection to 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $69,775,000, of which $60,185,000 is Federal, $9,590,000 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirement by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project were executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorizationof- entry for levee and floodwall sections 1, 2, 3 and 4A have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Supply contract for pumps and motors for Riverport, Lower Mill Creek, and Upper Mill Creek pumping plants advanced to 38 percent completion. Contracts for construction of levee and floodwall Section 3, Riverport and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants and relocation of Texas Gas pipeline advanced to 75 percent, 80 percent and 34 percent complete, respectively. Contracts for relocation of Louisville Gas and Electric pipeline and power service for Riverport and Lower Mill Creek pump plants were awarded in July 1980 and June 1980, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and engineering studies are about 68 percent complete. Construction of levee and floodwall Sections 1 and 2 and alteration of waterline at levee and floodwall Section 1 are complete, and.project is 26 percent complete overall. 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT Flood Controls - Reservoirs 15. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,600 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $28,213,300 including $2,653,000 Federal funds and $523,800 non- Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing categQry of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of water pollution control facilities at Site 6, The Narrows, was awarded September 4, 1979 and advanced to 82 percent completion under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Road resurfacing contract at Baileys Point was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages of $1,547,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition complete. 16. BIG BLUE LAKE, IN Location. The damsite is on the Big Blue River 43.4 miles above the mouth, and about 6 miles downstream from Carthage, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Morristown, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be concrete and earthfill 63 feet high and with 6,998 feet earth and 552 feet of concrete having five tainter gates and four gated sluices for water control. Total storage capacity will be 108,559 acrefeet of which 68,639 feet will be for flood control. A levee of 12,200 feet and "T" wall of 400 feet will provide protection for the town of Carthage, IN. Estimated cost of new work (1979) is $87,200,000 Federal and $53,846,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest (which may be through user fees) one half of separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; bear all costs of recreation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife linds and facilities. Local interests must agree to prevent encroachments on channel between dam and mouth of Big Blue River. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design studies continued. Design Memorandum, Hydrology and Hydraulics was completed and submitted June 19, 1979. General Design Memorandum, Final Phase I, Plan Formulation with Appendices and Final Environmental Impact Statement were completed and submitted July 3, 1979 for review. Project was reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category May 14, 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design Memorandum, Hydrology and Hydraulics, General Design Memorandum, Final Phase I, Plan Formulation and Final Environmental Impact Statement are complete. Construction has not started. Project is classified in the "inactive"'" category. 17. BIG WALNUT LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Big Walnut Creek, a tributary of the Eel River 22.4 miles above the mouth of Big Walnut Creek and 1 mile north of Greencastle, IN. The lake will lie in Putnam County. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Greencastle, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will consist of earth and rockfill embankment about 17,000 24-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 feet total length and 112 feet maximum height and will have a concrete overflow spillway located in left abutment with two gate controlled sluices through the base of the concrete section. Total storage capacity will be 228,400 acre' feet of which 112,340 feet is allocated for flood control. Estimated cost of new work (1979) is $144,601,000 of which $90,666,000 is Federal including $8,866,000 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program and $53,935,000 is non-Federal contribution. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood .Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest (which may be through user fees) one-half of separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities.. Local interest must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel between dam and mouth of Big Walnut Creek and Eel Rivers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design studies have been suspended due to the State of Indiana's inability under its constitution to execute acceptable agreements of local cooperation relative to the cost sharing aspects of the project as required by Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act (Public Law 91- 611). Project was reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category May 14, 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Special study, General Design Memorandum, Phase I, environmental study, and Design Memorandum, Real Estate Interests in Natural Area, are complete. Construction has not started. Project is classified in the "inactive" category. 18. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gatecontrolled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $67,384,000 of which $38,863,000 is Federal cost and $7,411,000 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and $21,110,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering studies continued. Contract for sewage force mains awarded in January 1980 and advanced to 94 percent completion. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages estimated at $3,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1965 is about 97 percent complete, overall. All major construction and relocation items are complete except connection of recreation facilities to a regional sewer system. Land acquisition is complete and the project was placed in operation January 1974. 19. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, ,Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $11,766,200 including $386,700 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities is accordance with license granted by Secretary of Army on June 29, 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT New work: None. Maintenance: Contract to paint service bridge was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages estimated at $65,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All major construction and relocation items have been completed. Land acquisition is complete. 20. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, Ohio, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, Ohio, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, Ohio. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, Ohio (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $77,890,000 including $4,938,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage and $14,390,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under the terms of con. tract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continue. Final condemnation actions for land acquisition on two tracts continued. Four contracts for landscaping Highway 73, saddle dam repairs and access facilities; fisherman access ramp; and power service - Furnas Shores were completed. Relocation contract for Allegheny Pipeline Co. facilities was advanced to 99 percent completion. Three contracts for construction of recreation facilities consisting of Furnas Shores beach house and shelters; Mounds Ridge camp area buildings and utilities and O'Neal Gorge access road were advanced to 99 percent, 97 percent and 94 percent completion, respectively. Contract for dam area recreation and outlet channel improvements was advanced to 92 percent. Three contracts were awarded in September 1980 for construction of service/maintenance center; power service to Wellman Meadows; and regional visitors center. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages of $2,099,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering studies are 94 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired except final condemnation actions on two tracts. Completed items include outlet works, dam, spillway and access roads; saddle dams; road relocations contracts; utility relocations contracts; cemetery relocations; office, shop building and site development for operations area; fisherman access ramp; modular sanitary buildings at recreation sites; recreation roads, parking areas and boat ramps; and reservoir clearing and boundary line marking. Project is about 87 percent completed overall. Permanent impoundment was started and project was placed in operation in January 1978. 21. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Estimated cost of new work (1979) is $4,238,581 including $83,314 Federal funds and $47,500 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of 24-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A draft contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park under the costsharing category of the completed projects program has been submitted for approval. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages of $1,100,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. 22. CAMP GROUND LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is in central Kentucky on Beech Fork, about 49.1 miles above its confluence with Rolling Fork, which stream is a tributary to Salt River, in Washington County about 11 miles northeast of Bardstown and about 34 miles southeast of Louisville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Maud, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. The project consists of a rolled-earth dam with an uncontrolled open-cut spillway through the left abutment, and a gate controlled outlet conduit. A detached dam is required in a saddle between the main dam and the spillway. Total storage capacity will be 360,740 acre-feet for flood control, water supply, water quality and recreation. Estimated cost of new work (1975) is $65,500,000 of which $10,658,400 would be reimbursed by non-Federal interests. Project was authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Section 1). Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project lands, facilities, and water areas for recreation, including fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, no less than one-half of the separable first costs allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of fish and wildlife and recreation use lands and facilities; repay all cost allocated to water supply; effect proper measures for control of pollution at the source to assure the effectiveness of the water quality storage provided; exercise, to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of stream-flow resulting from the reservoir storage provide for water quality control; prevent encroachment of flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operations; and periodically (at least annually) notify interests affected that the project will not provide complete flood protection and that backwater floods from the Ohio River will not be substantially reduced by the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Brief Report on Economics recommending continuation of Phase I studies was completed and approved May 29, 1979. This project is no longer funded under the Construction General appropriation category. The supplemental preauthorization study has been assigned to the General Investigation appropriation category. Construction has not started. 23. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, Kentucky. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700' acrefeet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1980) is $49,340,100 including $2,643,000 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Real estate administrative action required for acquisition of remaining tracts was continued. Contract for Littcarr Silt Detention Dam was completed. Multi-component contract for relocation of Sassafras Bridge, Knott County Road 1089, construction of spillway access road and remedial work at recreation sites was awarded July 2, 1980 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT and is 10 percent complete. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages of $22,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Relocations of State Highway 15, Site S-1, Parts 1 and 2; State Highway 1231, Knott County Roads Sites K-l, -2, -3A, -3B, and 4; Kentucky Highways 160, Part 2, 582 and Knott County Road 1410, Sites K-4A & B; Knott County Roads, Sites K-5, -6 and -7; Kentucky Highway 160, Site S-2; cemeteries, Inland Gas Company pipeline, Thacker and Grigsby Telephone Company lines, Kentucky Power Company facilities, construction of outlet works, dedication facilities, storage building, operators' quarters, Defeated Creek, Shingle Branch and Littcar silt detention dams, dam and spillway, recreation roads, boat ramps, beach, building and utilities at Irishman Creek site shop building, additional recreation facilities at Irishman Creek, Littcarr and Dam Sites, and repairs to Smithboro Bridge, spillway and to the retreat channel are complete. All land required for project has been acquired. Project is about 98 percent complete overall. 24. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U. S. Highway 60 near Farmers, Kentucky, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, Kentucky. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,000 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1980) is $106,256,000 of which $30,256,000 is U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936, and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Real estate administrative action required for acquisition of remaining tracts, was continued. Contracts for construction of sanitary facilities at Zilpo and Twin Knobs and tailwater bank protection were completed. Contracts for construction of recreation roads and utilities at Zilpo, and repairs to Kentucky Highway 772 bridge were advanced to 95 percent and 98 percent, respectively. Contracts for tailwater landscaping and construction of Highway 801 recreation facilities were awarded in March 1980 and September 1980, respectively. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages of $6,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. 1,443 tracts of land of estimated 1,444 required have been acquired. Contracts for all road relocations, cemetery relocations and utility relocations are complete. Other completed items are boundary line markers, pool clearing, outlet works, dam, access roads, operators quarters, shop and utilities. Project has been in operation since February 1974 and is about 80 percent complete overall. 25. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acrefeet of which 116,600 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1979) is $6,845,057 including $302,303 Federal funds and $282,620 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of additional costshared recreation development at Raccoon State site under the completed projects program was completed. Maintenance: Boundary monumentation continued and repairs to toe drain were completed. Routine maintenance 24-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 was performed. Flood damages of $1,152,000 were prevented during the 1980 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of all major items of work completed December 1961. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Land acquisition is complete. 26. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, Ohio, at Mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, .a tributary of Mad River. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acre-feet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1979) is $22,094,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Contract for landscaping at Fisherman's site parking area completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major project features are complete. The project was placed in operation January 1974. 27. EAST FORK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, Ohio, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $73,696,000 including $3,548,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage and $19,696,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Final condemnation actions for land acquisition on one tract continued. Five contracts for relocation of Ohio Valley Electric Corporation facilities; construction of roads, ramps, beach and parking; damsite parking; utilities for shop; shop/office, and overlook facilities were completed. Three contracts for shop landscaping and construction of Tate and Greenbrier recreation buildings and outlet channel improvements were advanced to 81 percent, 98 percent, and 94 percent completion, respectively. Water service contract with Tate- Monroe Association was advanced to 98 percent completion. Three Contracts for construction of Tunnel Mill road, horizontal drains, and remaining work at North Shore boat ramp were awarded in November 1979 and June and July 1980, respectively, and advanced to 18 percent, 44 percent and 1 percent completion. Contract for service maintenance center was awarded in September 1980. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1980 flood season prevented damages of $4,561,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering studies are 88 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired except final condemnation actions on one tract. Cemetery and utility relocations; pool clearing, boundary line marking, construction of outlet works, dam, saddle dam, spillway and access road, damsite parking; Bethel access road, ramp and fisherman access facilities, roads, ramps, beaches and parking and modular sanitary buildings at recreation sites, shop, 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT office, utilities and overlook facilities are complete. Project is about 86 percent complete overall and was placed in operation in February 1978. 28. FALMOUTH LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is on the Licking River, about 60.6 miles upstream from its confluence with the Ohio River. This site, in Pendleton County, is about 9 miles above Falmouth, KY, about 35 miles south of Cincinnati, Ohio, and about 50 miles north of Lexington, KY. The lake area lies in Pendleton, Bath, Bracken, Fleming, Harrison, Nicholas and Robertson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Kelat, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be earth and rock-fill about 1,320 feet long and 147 feet maximum height with an uncontrolled open-cut spillway through the right abutment and a gate controlled outlet conduit through the base of the dam. Total storage capacity will be 898,300 acre-feet, of which 648,600 acre-feet will be for flood control. Estimated cost of new work (1979) is $131,000,000, all Federal cost. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project lands and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities provided the sizing and responsibility for development, operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation features of the reservoir may be modified in accordance with the alternatives cited in the Federal Project Recreation Act, dependent on the intentions of non-Federal interests regarding participation in costs of this feature at the time of construction and subsequent thereto. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Preconstruction engineering and design studies were resumed in October 1977. An Architect Engineer contract for hydropower study that was awarded in September 1978 was terminated. Schedule indefinite pending State decision on participation in recreation. Letter from Governor requested delay until 1980 General Assembly could consider. Condition at end of fiscal year. Special Report and Design Memorandum, Hydrology & Hydraulics are complete. 29. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock-fill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $33,526,300, including $237,300 Federal funds and $183,800 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the leases was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1980, $14,436. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $1,444,000 during the 1980 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. 30. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 24-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1978) is $19,650,800, of which $19,364,600 is Federal cost and $286,200 non-Federal contribution, including recreation facilities under completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost-shared category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate condemnation actions completed. Planning for additional cost-shared recreation development under the completed projects program was continued. Indiana Department of Natural Resources continued construction of additional cost-shared development under the same program at Little Turtle and Kil-So-Quah recreation areas. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $3,581,000 during the 1980 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. 31. LOUISVILLE LAKE, IL Location. Damsite is on the Little Wabash River 164.8 miles above the mouth and about 3.5 miles northwest of Louisville, and 23 miles south of Effingham, IL. The lake area lies in Clay and Effingham Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Edgewood, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. The project will consist of a gate-controlled concrete overflow spillway section located at the face of the right abutment flanked by random rock and earth fill embankment with impervious center core extending across the valley to the left abutment. A small dike along the right abutment parallels the existing railroad. Total length of dam is about 21,400 feet with a maximum height of 69 feet. Total storage capacity is 230,769 acre-feet, of which 168,531 acre-feet will be for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1980) is $105,510,000, including $2,255,000 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program, and $15,126,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and recreation. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest (which may be through user fees) one-half the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enchancement; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities; reimburse the allocated construction costs allocated to water supply storage; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of water supply storage facilities; prevent channel encroachments tending to reduce present channel capacities; hold and save the United States free from damages from water rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the reservoir; exercise, to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal from stream flow made available by reservoir storage for water quality control purposes; and contribute to the control of pollution of the stream subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The State of Illinois will be the responsible cooperating agency for all required assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design Memoranda, Hydrology and Hydraulics, Draft and Final General Design Memorandum, Phase I, Plan Formulation and Appendices and Final Environmental Impact Statement are complete. Relocation of U.S. Route 45 (Advance Participation) is complete. 32. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into 24-14 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1978) is $24,869,600, of which $24,112,100 is Federal cost and $757,500 non-Federal contribution including recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate condemnation actions completed. Continued construction of additional cost-shared recreation development at Miami, Peoria, Red Bridge, Pearson Mill, and Frances Slocum sites under the completed projects program. Maintenance: . Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $8,617,000 during 1980 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. 33. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles east of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 is for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation). Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $16,619,473, of which $8,909,423 is non-Federal contribution for low-flow regulation storage and $895,285 Federal funds and $894,100 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this costsharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the costsharing category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continued construction of additional cost-shared recreation development at Fairfax, Paynetown, and Moores Creek sites under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $400,000 during 1980 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete, and was placed in operation in February 1965. 34. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, .KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1980) is $17,875,200 including $3,278,100 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was 24-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized, project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract for water pollution control facilities at Wax site was completed under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages estimated at $1,310. Condition at end of fiscal year. All major construction items have been completed and the project was placed in operation in March 1963. Acquisition of mineral tracts complete. 35. 'OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation, Table 24-G for local protection projects, and Table 24-H for reservoir projects.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Only minor costs were incurred except for those projects for which individual reports are given. Economic studies for Russell and Allison Levee, Wabash River, IL, and Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River Basin) were completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Surveys, explorations, engineering studies, and preparation of detailed plans were well advanced for those units in general comprehensive plan for flood control in Ohio River Basin which are under consideration, for construction in the near future. Status of projects selected for construction is given in individual reports. Economic reports on Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River Basin) and Russell and Allison Levee, Wabash River, IL are complete under Restudy of Deferred Projects, General Investigations Appropriation. 36. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles west-northwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange and Crawford Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $79,062,000, of which $53,077,000 is Federal cost for construction of recreation facilities under 'completed projects program, and $25,985,000 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations and, results during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Acquired 4 tracts of land. Three contracts for construction of additional recreation facilities (Newton- Stewart and Fisherman access sites), recreation utilities at the dam and overlook site and Wickliffe Road to Newton-Stewart site were completed. Three utility relocation contracts for Orange County REMC, Indiana Telephone Corporation, and Public Service of Indiana are in progress. At Newton-Stewart site, three contracts for construction of access facilities, 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT utilities and recreation buildings (beachouse and shelters) were advanced to 96 percent, 93 percent and 91 percent completion, respectively. Three contracts for relocation of Dubois County, Road, D-1, part 2, Jackson access road, and landscaping access facilities were advanced to 96 percent, 87 percent and 87 percent completion, respectively. A contract for construction of recreation roads at the dam and overlook site was awarded in March 1980 and advanced to 71 percent completion. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages estimated at $1,339,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering studies are about 98 percent complete. 503 tracts of land of an estimated 512 required for the project have been acquired. Contracts for all road relocations, cemetery relocations and utility relocations are completed, except minor remedial repairs to the relocated roads. All other major features with the exception of recreation facilities are also complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 96 percent complete overall. 37. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gate-controlled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $11,188,800 including $1,458,400 Federal funds and $22,600 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for resurfacing roads at various sites was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1980 flood season prevented damages estimated at $893,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 38. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and a length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acrefeet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1978) is $17,064,600, of which $492,400 is non-Federal contribution and $16,572,200 Federal cost including recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the 24-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continued construction of additional cost-shared recreation development at the Dora-New Holland and Lost Bridge sites under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1980 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $3,706,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Contract with the State of Indiana for additional cost-shared recreation development under the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974. 39. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1980) is $98,155,000, of which $4,855,000 is for recreation facilities under the completed projects program, and $18,027,000 is non-Federal responsibility for recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost-sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation costsharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980 the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost-sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Acquired 78 tracts of land. Contracts for construction of the shop and office building and relocation of log cabins were completed. Contracts for relocation of Spencer County road, S-1, S-3A and S-3B, construction of dam and spillway, and relocation of Salt River RECC advanced to 95 percent, 39 percent, and 52 percent, respectively. Contract for landscaping shop and office area was awarded and advanced to 5 percent completion. Contracts for relocation of Kentucky Highway 248, Site B-2 and Fox Creek RECC were awarded in September 1980 and July 1980, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. General Design Memorandum and other preconstruction planning items are complete. Engineering and design studies are about 72 percent complete. 551 tracts of land of an estimated 675 required for project have been acquired. Construction was started in June 1974 and construction on North, South and Tailwater access roads, outlet works, shop and office building, relocation of cemeteries, log cabins and boundary line marking are complete. Project is about 35 percent complete overall. 40. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a 24-18 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois and Ohio. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-I for projects.) Operations and results during fiscal year. See individual listing for Louisville Lake, IL. Condition at end of fiscal year. See individual listing for Louisville Lake, IL. 41. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Healthy, Ohio, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acrefeet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1980) is $5,475,700, including non-Federal cost of $520,800 for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contribution in fulfillment of project authorization and $891,000 Federal funds and $891,000 non- Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute one-half additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid onehalf cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost-shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued for additional cost-shared recreation development under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1980 flood season prevented damages estimated at $4,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. 42. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-J for local protection projects and channel improvements inspected.) Fiscal year costs were $231,860. Total costs to September 30, 1980 were $1,833,875. 43. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-K. 44. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Cost for fiscal year were $68,047 for disaster preparedness, $59,531 for flood emergency operations and $104,475 for repair work on Brevoort Levee, IN ($11,864), Erie Canel Levee, IN ($19,685), Greenbriar Levee, 24-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 IL ($14,876), Honey Creek Levee, IN ($36,277), Sainte Marie Levee, IL ($11,117), and Tri- County Levee, IL ($10,656). Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th, Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 24-L. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). See Table 24-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th *Congress). See Table 24-L. 45. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION ACT OF 1974 Costs for the fiscal year were $177,097 for the three demonstration projects approved for construction with following operations and results. Moscow, Ohio, Ohio River Mile 443. Construction contract for streambank erosion control demonstration project was awarded in June 1979 and advanced to 70 percent completion. Milford, Ohio, Little Miami River. Contract for streambank erosion control demonstration project was completed. Mt. Vernon, Indiana, Ohio River Mile 830. Contract for remedial repairs awarded in October 1979 was completed in December 1979. Evaluation Extent Streambank Erosion Nationwide. Evaluation complete. General Investigations 46. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,420,650, of which $17,380 was for one navigation study, $824,902 for five flood damage prevention studies, $106,441 for the Wabash River Basin Authorization Report, $2,343 for review of two authorized projects and review for deauthorization, $9,965 for coordination with the Soil Conservation Service, $73,152 for coordination with the Ohio River Basin Commission, $7,821 for Water Quality Management, $1,417 for technical and engineering assistance on shore and streambank erosion, $210,818 for planning assistance to states, and $166,411 for supplemental preauthorization studies (Phase I) on Camp Ground Lake, KY. 47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year. costs were $2,487,017 for inspection for dams and $283,266 for flood plain management services. Flood plain studies completed are listed in Table 24-M. 48. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 24-20 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Fiscal Year Project Name Navigation - Locks and Dams 2 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3 Kentucky River, KY. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 7 Dayton, KY. 8 Evansville, IN. 9 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN. 10 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN. 11 Mill Creek, OH. 12 Newport-Wilders, KY. 13 Saline River & Tributaries, IL. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 14 Southwestern New Work Jefferson County, KY. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 15 Barren River Lake, New Work KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 16 Big Blue Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost 17 Big Walnut Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost 18 Brookville Lake, New Work IN. (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 1977 1978 1,140,900 1,129,572 5,373,797 4,358,506 103,000 121,422 550,000 891,747 -6,900 17,035 -180,400 749,311 424,500 309,272 -1,100 253,300 3,250,000 3,057,747 29,500 18,297 809,915 791,259 300,000 319,045 432,786 85,092 1,656,000 1,232,744 262,989 245,570 -388,017 720,500 748,872' 2,336,975 3,087,188 1,951,000 387,178 3,079,900 1,313,916 300,000 21,258 -12,000 18,603 250,000 236,361 2,480 45,000 23,271 2,800,000 2,538,047 485,000 139,795 710,900 731,050 210,000 216,279 -114,000 23,918 236,000 722,116 235,900 252,007 51,760 1979 880,600 778,726 2,181,100 2,446,462 2,415,000 3,329,507 600,000 2,134,535 -326,600 26,718 55,000 16,093 -987,000 36,450 29 38,000 36,741 2,418,000 3,267,914 627,000 126,230 884,000 888,778 185,040 184,750 -617,900 7,279 -177,000 251,050 265,200 264,246 16,782 Total to 1980 Sep. 30, 1980 1,127,000 1,212,991 2,592,000 2,194,532 4,885,000 3,972,216 1,925,000 1,384,776 -100 16,394 41,000 97,460 50,400 202,163 695,000 145,536 6,050,000 4,860,517 $13,808,2221 13,808,2221 18,840,8482 18,823,3182 4,176,749 4,176,749 39,798,0893 39,365,2043 556,956 556,956 9,599,2454 7,984,6844 18,768,8565 17,342,895 , 6,276,287 6,187,020 4,328,712 4,299,348 2,209,242 2,199,338 11,1656 11,1656 7,827,580 7,820,661 19,987,473 17,574,407 24-21 -173,712 27,356,5317 603,710 27,182,4618 655,000 7,118,6269 1o 635,202 7,061,466911 15,000 1,089,867 5,775 1,078,954 -7,198 1,009,188 -1,009,188 -427,000 37,795,692 275,178 37,511,338 411,000 1,657,189 260,441 1,502,903 7,592,000 24,841 7,551,710 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Fiscal Year 1977 1978 1979 1980 Sep. 30, 1980 Project Name 19 Buckhorn Lake, KY. New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20 ...Caesar Creek Lake, New Work OH. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21 Cagles Mill Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22 Camp Ground Lake, New Work KY. Approp. Cost 23 Carr Fork Lake, KY. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 24 Cave Run Lake, KY. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 25 Cecil M. Harden New Work Lake, IN. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 26 Clarence J. Brown New Work Dam & Reservoir, OH. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 27 East Fork Lake, OH. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 28 Falmouth Lake, KY. New Work Approp. Cost 29 Green River Lake, New Work KY. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 30 Huntington Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 408,958 379,840 4,341,422 7,856,515 98,763 98,345 223,107 223,659 8,174 169,600 1,524,596 371,146 356,270 2,250,000 2,144,406 220,646 225,119 -2,360 -3 286,800 281,839 25,000 -89,180 238,547 234,492 4,800,000 4,423,535 58,366 56,214 16,500 180,540 535,198 530,347 800 69,461 251,046 234,070 484,600 508,601 5,150,000 4,203,844 192,100 188,975 209,500 195,099 35,000 31,307 718,957 687,598 483,900 490,007 2,981,606 1,432,148 235,500 234,119 101,750 1,043 263,300 261,729 109,684 260,600 258,410 3,900,000 4,973,060 197,400 197,581 170,000 93,416 500 275 713,200 705,835 127,600 4,491 274,500 290,466 12,86 12,86 512,70( 491,28 5,344,00( 7,097,07 ( 228,70( 224,96 47,50( 218,00( 230,80 -1t 7,56; 81,601 383,05, 534,301 538,06 2,006,00 2,978,27 252,60 252,32 700,00 689,56 -63,00 100,77 238,60 244,40 2,775,00 2,862,24 222,60 210,72 170,00 118,33 1,98 722,00 749,04 24-22 8 11,766,20612 8 11,766,20612 0 482,000 4,961,170'3 6 494,837 4,938,30814 0 3,613,800 57,177,582 9 2,910,844 55,381,061 0 245,000 878,463 8 242,822 868,813 0 -10,200 4,180,88215 942 4,144,52416 0 262,000 2,934,506 5 243,482 2,910,061 5 160,773 3 160,773 0 805,500 46,202,157 4 773,220 45,950,182 0 541,000 2,292,74617 6 522,064 2,263,28018 0 2,826,300 62,893,621 9 3,607,628 62,124,204 0 305,000 1,535,546 0 290,995 1,514,877 98,000 6,660,43819 8,400 6,458,09620 0 472,000 3,482,396 1 387,396 3,376,713 0 2,000 22,083,700 6 17,159 22,083,526 '0 243,000 1,494,347 2 238,878 1,487,084 )0 3,738,000 49,159,17121 9 2,223,600 47,072,90821 )0 275,000 753,366 12 266,338 730,855 )0 -15,000 1,061,38622 4 -4,566 943,57022 129,300 33,422,48423 4 1,908 33,291,21224 )0 744,000 5,932,46925 13 706,572 5,882,75226 19,374,24527 4 5,405 19,283,89528 193,800 - 193,405 0 293,000 2,294,012 2 285,290 2,283,379 282,10 285,67 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Total to in Text Fiscal Year 1977 1978 1979 1980 Sep. 30, 1980 Project Name 31 Louisville Lake, IL. New Work Approp. Cost 32 Mississinewa Lake, New Work IN. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 33 Monroe Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 34 Nolin Lake, KY. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35 Ohio River Basin, New Work Louisville District Approp. Cost 36 Patoka Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 37 Rough River Lake & New Work Channel Improvement, Approp. KY. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 38 Salamonie Lake, IN. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 39 Taylorsville Lake, New Work K. Approp. Cost 40 West Fork of Mill New Work Creek Lake, OH. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 109,000 125,922 148,300 3,013 237,395 215,187 169,000 782,534 84,350 16,195 240,000 257,567 9 -10,000 44,484 257,445 333,529 1,064,613 392,360 679,085 645,453 10,000 10,080 11,513,000 9,769,998 26,231 26,050 3,515,300 2,910,016 23,387 6,292 807,772 740,325 -5,000 5,171 235,535 216,545 4,800,000 5,330,765 128,000 96,366 128,856 127,036 145,270 206,200 231,036 603,000 1,010,865 1,167,800, 1,097,196 1,221 11,700,000 10,679,283 130,700 130,681 2,973,900 2,958,963 23,000 14,509 737,100 796,448 22,873 21,395 45,837 223,500 238,695 . 5,054,000 4,405,915 150,000 114,167 141,000 141,648 515,900 345,434 3,728 261,000 257,310 -310,000 10,055 253,000 254,081 47,000 479,876 774,000 858,924 3,500,000 4,949,603 189,200 184,439 1,970,800 2,256,776 80,132 17,177 838,000 828,213 198 91,956 264,300 264,360 7,200,000 7,983,660 43,000 92,587 116718,,280306 -2,36 103,67 -40,0C 20,47 288,0C 283,0( 27,0( 39,8 280,0( 269,0 -72,5( 47,5( 728,0( 707,7 1,300,000 3,939,944 245,000 237,736 765,500 2,020,856 -39,888 33,201 877,000 857,706 1,279 74,908 262,000 262,015 j8 2,425,81229 78 2,320,22830 )0 23,985,42031 71 23,664,43532 )0 2,414,105 0 2,396,127 239,200 -3 238,064 )0 7,710,05033 22 7,362,46134 )0 2,755,365 94 2,739,478 8,015,323 8,015,323 00 17,201,17735 00 17,169,86836 00 8,578,4953738 43 8,517,0763839 1,526,142 1,526,142 49,805,920 49,148,855 591,131 578,906 19,070,100 18,782,897 10,617,82740 10,599,65441 8,601,57042 8,552,52143 22,87344 22,87244 16,559,24345 16,497,10346 2,602,313 2,595,076 170,800 164,184 7,905,998 37,439,998 7,427,796 36,058,713 3,763,9414748 37,139 3,457,3614749 175,000 2,025,889 162,642 2,009,446 24-23 --- TABLE 24-A CONTINUED REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2. Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $19,000 "Maintenance and Operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters" funds, and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to June 30, 1936, for operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purpose. 3. Includes $203,127 allotted in prior years from appropriation "Maintenance and Operation of dams and other improvements on navigable waters," and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 4. Includes $12,426 allotted to Bellevue-Dayton and used in study of that project. 5. Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds. 6. 'Includes $5,165 for cost through FY 1941 for Definite Project Report for Wilders, Ky. 7. Includes $1,959,500 Code 711 funds and $360,788 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 8. Includes $2,036,110 Code 711 funds and $110,107 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 9. Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 10. Includes $145,100 Special Recreation Use Fees. 11. Includes $144,804 Special Recreation Use Fees. 12. Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 13. Includes $24,400 Special Recreation Use Fees. 14. Includes $23,464 Special Recreation Use Fees. 15. Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds and $37,300 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 16. Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds. 17. Includes $19,700 Special Recreation Use Fees. 18. Includes $17,980 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19. Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds and $380,620 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 20. Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds and $178,278 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 21. Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 22. Includes $263,821 for preconstruction planning engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 23. Includes $133,500 Code 711 funds and $183,800 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 24. Includes $2,296 Code 711 funds and $183,732 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 25. Includes $69,500 Special Recreation Use Fees. 26. Includes $61,904 Special Recreation Use Fees. 27. Includes $209,979 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 28. Includes $50,425 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 29. Includes $685,632 advance funding for Government participation in the construction of U.S. Route 45 relocation by the State of Illinois. 30. Includes $685,629 for Government participation in the construction of U.S. Route 45 relocation by the State of Illinois. 31. Includes $398,020 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 32. Includes $87,817 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 33. Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds and $894,100 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 34. Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds and $546,511 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 35. Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, and $2,604,113 Code 711 funds. 36. Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, and $2,572,804 Code 711 funds. 37. Includes $79,500 Special Recreation Use Fees. 38. Includes $52,000 Supplemental Funds. 39. Includes $73,341 Special Recreation Use- Fees. 40. Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $864,834 Code 711 funds, and $22,612 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 41. Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $846,661 Code 711 funds, and $22,612 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 42. Includes $108,400 Special Recreation Use Fees. 43. Includes $105,365 Special Recreation Use Fees. 44. Cost-sharing for Code 713 recreation facilities. 45. Includes $315,200 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 46. Includes $253,060 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 47. Includes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 48. Includes $621,000 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 49. Includes $314,420 Code 713 funds (cost-sharing). 24-24 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 11, 1888 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY. (See Section 2 of Text) Purchase of original improvement Mar. 3, 18931 Construction of Lock 2, Green River July 13, 1892 Construction of Lock 5, Green River July 13, 1902 Construction of Lock 6, Green River Mar. 3, 19052 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion expend such portion of said amount as may be ncessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Mar. 3, 1909 Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River July 3, 19302 Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1 Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, widen bends in Bear Creek, Ky. June 26, 19343 Aug. 30, 19352 Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors. Improvement of Nolin River Sept. 3, 1954 Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River. Revocation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin kiver OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 42 of Text) Aug. 28, 1937 Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction June 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million. Aug. 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec. 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, Kentucky, at an estimated cost of $129,350 Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an estimated cost of $360,000 July 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River Basin, Illinois and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000 May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000 July 3, 1958 Flood Control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek White River Basin, Indiana, at an estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000 Oct. 23, 1962 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec. 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin H. Ex. Doc. 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Annual Report 1887, p. 1903 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2nd Session Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Session, and H. Doc. 685, 69th Congress, 2nd Session H. D. 480, 72d Cong., 2nd Session S. D. 82, 83d Cong., 2nd Session Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session H. Doc. 504, 78th Cong., 2nd Session S. D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Session H. D. 535, 78th Cong., 2nd Session H. D. 197, 80th Cong., 1st Session H. D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Session H. D. 192, 85th Cong., 1st Session H. D. 423, 87th Cong., 2nd Seession Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session 24-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 24-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of Public Law, 89-42 comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 89th Cong., 1st Session May 12, 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of Public Law 90-17 comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 90th Cong., 1st Session Aug. 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of Public Law 90-483, comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 90th Cong., 2nd Session June 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of Public Law 91-282 comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 91st Cong., 2nd Session Mar. 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of Public Law 93-251 comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 93rd Cong., 2nd gession Mar. 7, 1974 54 local protection projects and 1 reservoir project in Public Law 93-251, comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized 93rd Cong., 2nd Session August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 46 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Construction of five multiple purpose reservoirs and one S. D. 96, 90th Cong., local protection project in Wabash River Basin, Ill. & 2nd Session Ind., with proviso that construction of Big Walnut Lake, Ind. project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. 1. Deficiency act. 2. Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sept. 3, 1954. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 24-26 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-C GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY.: PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth Depth Greatest Elevation on on Length of Lower of Upper Normal Miter Miter Miles Width Lock Pool Sill at Sill at from of Available Lift at Above Normal Normal Lock Mouth Lock for Full Normal Mean Pool Pool and of Chamber Width Pool Sea Level Level Level Dam Location of Nearest Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) GREEN RIVER New 1 Spottsville, Ky. 9.1 84.0 600.0 11.81 349.1 11.3 12.1 New 2 0.3 miles below Calhoun, Ky. 63.1 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 11.7 15.0 3 0.3 miles below Rochester, Ky. 108.5 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 5.6 7.3 4 Woodbury, Ky. 149.02 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 6.5 7.1 5 0.3 miles below Glenmore, Ky. 168.13 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 9.3 12.0 6 2.8 miles above Brownsville, Ky. 181.73 36.0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.8 8.0 BARREN RIVER 1 0.3 miles above Greencastle, Ky. 15.04 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 9.3 12.0 Lock and Character of Type of Type of Year Cost of Lock Dam Foundation Dam Construction Completed and Dam GREEN RIVER New 1 Shale and coal Fixed Concrete masonry5 19566 $5,101,9787 New 2 Shale Fixed Concrete masonry 19568 4,799,2719 3 Rock Fixed Wood crib 1833-36 121,377 4 Rock Fixed2 Wood crib 1839 125,718 5 Piles and rock Fixed'o Concrete masonry 1934 1,020,868" 6 Gravel Fixed Wood crib, concrete cap 1905 168,415 BARREN RIVER 1 Gravel Fixed Wood crib, concrete cap 1841 871,56512 Piles in gravel - 1934 - 1. At normal pool Dam 48 Ohio River, Elev. 337.3 Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 dhio River datum). 2. Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, Ky. 3. Operation discontinued Aug. 1, 1951. 4. Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 5. New cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M General funds at cost of $822,000. 6. New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956; old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new dam in 1971. 7. Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Darn 1. 8. New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. 9. Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. 10. With movable A-frame crest 3 feet high. 11. Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. 12. Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. 24-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 24-D GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY.: TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 2 of Text) River Mile Purpose Nearest Town Green Green Green Green Green Green Green Barren' Barren' 81.5 85.25 85.9 97.7 99.5 105.7 108.1 29.7 29.9 Receiving coal Loading coal Loading coal Loading coal Loading coal Loading coal Loading coal Receiving gasoline Receiving gasoline South Carrollton, Ky. South Carrollton, Ky. South Carrollton, Ky. Rockport, Ky. Paradise, Ky. Rochester, Ky. Rochester, Ky. Bowling Green Ky. Bowling, Green, Ky. 1. Not active. 24-28 TABLE 24-E KENTUCKY RIVER, KY.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Lock Greatest Elevation Available of Normal Miles Length Pool Above Depth on from Clear (Full Width Lift of Mean Lower Dam Nearest Town Mouth Width of Lock) Lock Sea Level Miter Sill Foundation Completed Cost (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 1' 3.8 miles above Carrollton, KY. 4.0 38 145 8.22 430.0 4.8 Rock and clay 1839" $ 21 Lockport, KY. 31.0 38 145 13.9 443.9 6.1 Rock 18393 31 Gest, KY. 42.0 38 145 13.2 457.1 6.5 Rock 18443 1,350,3854 41 1 mile below Frankfort, KY. 65.0 38 145 13.2 470.3 6.3 Rock 18443 55 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY. 82.2 38 145 15.0 485.3 6.4 Rock 18443 61 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY. 96.2 52 147 14.0 499.3 6.4 Rock and piles 1894 314,847 71 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY. 117.0 52 147 15.3 514.6 6.8 Rock 1897 290,788 81 3.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY. 139.9 52 146 18.7 533.6 6.0 Rock 1900 275,463 96 Valley View, KY. 157.5 52 148 17.3 550.6 6.6 Rock 1907 237,646 106 1 mile below Ford, KY. 176.4 52 148 17.0 567.6 6.0 Rock 1907 221,500 116 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY. 201.0 52 148 18.0 585.6 6.0 Rock 1906 296,593 127 Ravenna, KY. 220.0 52 148 17.0 602.6 6.0 Rock 1910 425,693 137 2.2 miles below Willow, KY. 239.9 52 148 18.0 620.6 6.0 Rock 1915 461,476 146 Heidelberg, KY. 249.0 52 148 17.0 637.6 6.0 Rock 1917 392,902 1. Fixed dam, crib construction, sheet pile cutoff, concrete cap. 2. At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River elev. 421.8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). 3. Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. 4. Built by State of Kentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs of State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983; L&D 3, $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; L&D 5, $137,436. 5. Fixed dam, crib construction, concrete cap. 6. Fixed dam, concrete construction. 7. Fixed dam, concrete construction, wooden crest. 0 C: C TABLE 24-F Name of Proj Licking River, Kw Rough River, Ky. Tradewater Rivei White River, Ind. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost of Sep See Annual ect Report for - Construction y. 1901 $ 13,045 12 1952 105,500 r, Ky.23 1958 18,568 23 1909 119.312 1. Disposal of Federally-owned property authorized by Secretary of Army Sep. 1, 1959, pursuant to authorization in Public Law 996, 84th Cong. (70 Stat. 1062). 2. Completed. 3. No commerce reported. 24-30 . 30, 1980 Operation and Maintenance 101,196 33,331 v , v LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Estimated Cost2 Type of Project' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY. (Rough River Basin)3 4 Brookport, IL.5 6 Cannelton, IN. 5 7 Cincinnati, OH. 5 8 Covington, KY.5 9 Delphi, IN. (Wabash River) o England Pond Levee, IL. (Wabash River)" Golconda, IL.5 12 Harrisburg, IL.5 10 Hawesville, KY.S 13 Jackson, KY. (Kentucky River Basin)5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN. 7 Lawrenceburg, IN.5 Louisville, K. 5 14 New Albany, IN. 5 8 Newport, KY 7 Paducah KY.5 7 Reevesville, IL. (Cache River) s 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL. (Wabash River)" Rough River, KY.3 4 Sturgis, KY. (Tradewater River)" Taylorsville KY. (Salt River)5 16 Tell City, IN.5 14 Uniontown, KY.5 17 Vincennes, IN. (Wabash River)5 Active: Dayton, KY4 5 Evansville, IN. 4 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN. (Wabash River)4 5 Russell & Allison Levee, IL. (Wabash River)5 West Terre Haute, IN. (Wabash River)5 Wilders, KY. Channel improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Channel improvement Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Levee Levee Wall and levee Inactive: Adams Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Levee Bonpas Creek, IL. (Wabash River Basin)5 Channel improN Caseyville, KY.5 Levee Cloverport, KY. s Wall and levee Concordia, KY.5 Levee Frankfort, KY. (Kentucky River)5 South Frankfort Area5 Wall and levee Benson Creek Area5 Wall and levee North Frankfort Area5 Wall and levee Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN. (Wabash River)5 Levee Island Levee IN. (Wabash River)5 Levee Lewisport, Ky.5 Wall and levee Metropolis, IL.5 Wall and levee New Harmony Bridge, IL. and IN. (Wabash River)5 Bank protection Owensboro, KY.5 Wall and levee Shawneetown IL.5 Wall and levee Smithland, Ki.s Wall and levee Tolu, KY.S Levee Utica IN.5 Levee West Point, KY. s Wall and levee Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251): Alton, IN. Levee Bellevue, KY.5 Wall and levee Bromley, KY.5 Wall and levee Carrollton, KY.5 Wall and levee Cave-in-Rock, IL.- Levee Cincinnati, OH. (Unit 2)5 Wall and levee Cincinnati OH. (Unit 4)5 Wall Cleves, OH. 5 Levee Clinton, IN. (Wabash River)5 Levee vement 497,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,866,300 144,563 734,498 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,433,414 2,540,000 5,375,471 7,512,987 4,761,532 600,300 1,079,236 1,826,778 373,050 932,229 1,070,926 6,426,000 12,820,000 54,700,000 4,344,000 5,340,000 1,080,180 10,800,000 292,000 1,080,000 396,000 728,000 590,000 13,200,000 3,340,000 2,963,000 4,600,000 4,630,000 610,000 3,070,000 962,000 886,000 1,810,000 864,000 303,000 1,570,000 3,283,000 255,000 1,570,000 1,250,000 2,220,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 24-31 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 17,164 107,000 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 745,000 740,000 298,506 232,000 40,000 100,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 2,043,000 7,982,000 109,200 2,025,000 150,000 959,000 14,000 630,000 35,000 193,000 55,000 1,390,000 1,150,000 272,100 1,087,000 528,000 243,000 431,000 99,000 195,000 361,000 414,000 35,000 120,000 400,000 40,000 400,000 925,000 97,000 2,910250,,000000 621,000 67,000 9,000 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,917,402 161,727 841,498 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,718,139 3,285,000 6,115,471 7,811,493 4,993,532 640,300 1,179,236 1,919,778 436,359 964,936 1,143,079 6,711,000 14,863,00018 62,682,00018 4,453,20019 7,365,000 1,230,18020 11,759,00021 306,00022 1,710,00022 431,000 921,000 645,000 14,590,00019 4,490,000 '" 3,235,10023 5,678,00023 5,158,00023 853.00024 3,501,000 1,061,00025 1,081,000 2,171,000 1,278,000 338,000 1,690,000 3,683,00024 295,000 1,970,000 2,175,000 2,317,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 1l TABLE 24-G CONTINUED REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OHIO RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost2 Project' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN. (Wabash River)5 Derby, IN.5 Elizabethtown, IL. Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Grandview, IN.5 Honey Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River)5 Leavenworth, IN.5 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 17 IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 1, White River, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 2, White River, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 7, White River, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Ludlow, KY.5 Madison, IN. 5 Mauckport IN.5 McGinnis Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Milton, KY.5 Moscow, OH.5 New Amsterdam, IN.S New Harmony, IN. (Wabash River)5 New Richmond, OH.5 Patriot, IN. 5 Prestonville, KY.5 Raccoon Levee, In. (Wabash River)5 Rising Sun IN.5 Rockport I4. s Rome Il.5 Shuffiebarger Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin)5 Sugar Creek Levee, In. (Wabash River) Tri-Pond Levee, IL. (Wabash River) Troy, IN.5 Vevay, IN. 5 Westport, KY.5 Deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251): Aurora, IN. 5 Californai, (Cincinnati), OH.5 Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee 24-32 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 580,000 653,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,090,000 2,850,000 3,410,000 1,160,000 1,580,000 2,180,000 724,000 1,490,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 616,000 3,200,000 753,000 1,710,000 426,000 896,000 466,000 359,000 2,380,000 418,000 2,050,000 502,000 1,170,000 1,610,000 4,300,000 1,750,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 133,000 32,000 266,000 40,000 715,000 164,000 136,000 56,000 118,000 116,000 73,000 88,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 25,000 720,000 372,000 55,000 37,000 280,000 133,000 67,000 90,000 29,000 191,000 133,000 146,000 41,000 1,190,000 720,000 223,00024 620,000 712,000 574,00024 713,000 685,000 1,736,000 244,000 2,805,000 3,014,00026 3,546,00022 1,216,000 1,698,00022 2,296,00026 797,00026 1,578,00026 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 641,000 3,920,000 1,125,000 1,765,000 463,00024 1,176,000 599,000 426,000 2,470,000 447,00024 2,241,00020 635,000 1,316,000 1,651,000 5,490,000 2,470,000 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Estimated Cost2 Type of Proje Construction Federal Non-Federal WABASH RIVER BASIN LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT (See Section 40 of Text) Wall and levee 3,900,000 1. All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2. Latest cost estimate revision 1954, unless otherwise noted. 3. Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4. Details of this project are in individual report. 5. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6. See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 7. See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8. See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9. See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10. See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11. See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12. See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13. See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14. See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15. Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL., complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16. See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17. See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18. Latest cost estimate revision 1980. 19. Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 20. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 21. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 22. Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 23. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25. Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26. Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 24-33 TABLE 24-G CONTINUED Inactive: Marion, IN.5 Total 854,000 4,754,00021 ct i TABLE 24-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OHIO RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 35 of Text) Estimated Cost' Tributary Basin & Reservoirs Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN.2 East Fork of Whitewater River $49,418,000 $17,966,0003 $67,384,000 Metamora Lake, IN.4 West Fork of Whitewater River 35,300,000 35,300,0005 Green River: Barren River Lake, KY.2 Barren River 27,689,500 523,8008 28,213,300 Green River Lake, KY.2 Green River 33,342,500 183,8006 33,526,300 Mining City Lake, KY.7 Green River 69,100,000 69,100,0005 Nolin Lake, KY.2 Nolin River 17,875,200 17,875,200 Rough River Lake, KY.2 Rough River 11,188,800 22,6006 11,211,400 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY.2 7 South Fork of Kentucky River 60,700,000 60,700,0008 Buckhorn Lake, KY.2 Middle Fork of Kentucky River 11,766,200 11,766,200 Carr Fork Lake, KY.2 North Fork of Kentucky River 49,340,100 49,340,100 Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY.2 Licking River 106,356,000 106,356,0009 Falmouth Lake, KY.2 Licking River 131,000,000 131,000,00010 Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake OH.2 Caesar Creek 65,749,000 12,141,00011 77,890,000 East Fork Lake, OH.2 East Fork of Little Miami River 60,300,000 13,396,00012 73,696,000 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH.2 West Fork of Mill Creek 3,983,941 1,461,80013 5,445,741 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake IN.2 Mill Creek 4,191,081 47,5006 4,238,58110 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN.2 Raccoon Creek 6,562,437 282,6206 6,845,05710 Monroe Lake, IN.2 Salt Creek 7,710,050 8,909,423' 4 16,619,473 Patoka Lake, IN.2 Patoka River 53,077,000 25,985,00015 79,062,000 1. Latest cost estimate 1980 unless otherwise noted. 2. Details of this project given in individual report. 3. $7,411,000 cash contribution for water supply storage and $10,555,000 for future recreation development; method of payment not determined. 4. Inactive; deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251). 5. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 6. For future recreation development. 7. Inactive. 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 9. Includes $30,256,000 United States Forest Service cost. 10. Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 11. Includes $4,946,000 reimbursement for water supply storage and $7,195,000 for future recreation development. 12. Includes $3,548,000 reimbursement for water supply storage and $9,848,000 for future recreation development. 13. Includes $520 800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $891,000 for future recreation development under the cost-shared completed projects program. 14. Includes $8,015,323 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $894,100 for future recreation development under the cost-shared completed projects program. 15. Includes $13,350,000 reimbursement for water supply storage, $11,231,000 for initial recreation development, and $1,404,000 for future recreation development. 24-34 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-I WABASH RIVER BASIN (LOUISVILLE DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 40 of Text) Estimated Cost1 Tributary Basin & Reservoirs Stream Federal Non-Federal Total WBig Blue Lake, IN.2 Big Blue River $87,200,000 $53,846,0003 $141,046,000 Big Walnut Lake, IN.2 Big Walnut Creek 81,800,000 45,069,0004 126,869,000 Downeyville Lake, IN. Flatrock and Little Flat 68,748,000 60,666,000 5 129,414,000 Rock Rivers Helm Lake, IL.6 7 Skillet Fork 32,009,000 21,667,0008 53,676,000 Louisville Lake, IL.9 Little Wabash River 90,384,000 15,126,00010 105,510,000 1. Latest cost revision 1980 unless otherwise noted. 2. Inactive; latest cost estimate revision 1979; details of this project given in individual report. 3. Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 4. Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 5. Includes $45,955,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply, $7 563,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities and $7,148,000 for future recreation development. 6. Inactive; see Annual Report for 1976 for individual report. 7. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 8. Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $8,971,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 9. Details of this project given individual report. 10. Includes $7,515,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $7,611,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 24-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 24-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 42 of Text) Fall Spring Fall Local Protection Projects Inspection 1979 Inspection 1980 Inspection 1980 Brevoort Levee, IL. Brookport, IL. Cannelton, IN. Cincinnati, OH. Covington, KY. Delphi, IN. England Pond Levee, IL. Evansville, IN. Frankfort, KY. Gill Township Levee, IN. Golconda, IL. Harrisburg, IL. Hawesville, KY. Indianapolis, IN. Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN. Lawrenceburg, IN. Lebanon Junction, KY. Levee Unit No. 5, IN. Levee Unit No. 8, IN. Louisville, KY. Lyford Levee IN. Mt. Carmel, fIL. Muncie, IN. New Albany, IN. Newport KY. Niblack Levee, IN. Paducah KY. Reevesville-Cache River, IL. Rochester-McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL. Rosiclare, IL. Shawneetown, IL. Sturgis, KY. Taylorsville, KY. Tell City, IN. Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN. Uniontown, KY. Vincennes, IN. West Terre Haute, IN. Oct Oct Oct Sep Sep Aug Oct Nov Sep Aug Oct Oct Oct Aug Nov Sep Nov Oct Aug Dec Sep Oct Aug Nov Sep Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Nov Oct Sep Nov Oct Sep Jun Jun May Apr Apr Apr Jun May Apr Apr May May May Apr Jul Apr May Jun Apr Jun Apr Jun Apr Jul Apr Jun Jun Jun Jun May May Jun May May Apr May Jun Apr Channel Improvements Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY. EelRiver, Brazil Waterworks, IN. English, IN. (Little Blue River) Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN. Harrodsburg, KY. (Town Branch) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN. Jackson, KY. (North Fork Kentucky River) Mill Creek, KY. Morehead, KY. (Triplett Creek) Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN. Neon-Fleming, KY. Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY. Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY. Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY. Portland, IN. (Salamonie River) Saline River and Tributaries, IL. Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY. Whitesburg, KY. (North Fork Kentucky River) Bank Revetments Boone County, KY. (Ohio River) Cloverport, KY. (Ohio River) Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham Co., KY. Hawesville, KY. (Ohio River) Indian Hills, OH. (Little Miami River) Kentucky Peninsula, KY. (Ohio River) Merom, IN. (Wabash River) Newburg, IN. (Ohio River) Patoka River at Jasper, IN. Rockport, IN. (Ohio River) South Bank White River, Petersburg, Pike County, IN. Upper River Rd., Jefferson Co., KY. Sep Sep Sep Aug Sep Sep Aug Aug Sep Aug Sep Sep Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep Dates of Inspection Mar 1980 Sep 1980 Mar 1980 Sep 1978 Jan 1980 May 1980 Mar 1980 Jul 1980 Sep 1979 Jan 1980 Mar 1980 May 1980 Mar 1980 Jan 1980 Aug 1980 Jan 1980 Mar 1980 Mar 1980 May 1980 Oct 1979 Sep 1979 May 1980 May 1980 May 1980 Aug 1979 Nov 1979 Nov 1979 May 1980 Aug 1980 Sep 1979 24-36 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-K OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project' Report For Construction Maintenance Local Protection Projects: Completed: Boone County, Ky (Bank Protection & Repair Roads) 1977 $ 392,443 Brookport, IL. 1958 597,493 Cannelton, IN. 1959 2,068,391 Cincinnati, OH. 1957 10,150,935 Covington, KY. 1965 7,862,937 Delphi, IN. (Wabash River) 1953 144,563 England Pond Levee, IL. (Wabash River) 1972 734,498 English, IN. (Little Blue River)2 1965 372,353 Gill Township Levee Unit, IN. (Wabash River) 1948 561,200 Golconda, IL. 1960 565,333 Grassy Creek Jackson County, IN. Muscatatuck River)2 1953 70,304 Iarrisburg, IL. 1952 870,015 Hawesville, KY. 1955 969,318 Indianapolis, IN. (Fall Creek Section) (White River) 1953 1,859,363 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN.2 1964 300,143 Jackson, KY. (Kentucky River Basin) 1957 130,952 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN. 1959 4,226,361 Lawrenceburg, IN. 1953 2,433,414 Lebanon Junction, KY. (Salt River Basin)2 1967 130,417 Levee Unit 8, IN. (White River) 1952 700,534 Louisville, KY.3 1975 26,721,438 Lyford Levee Unit IN. (Wabash River) 1944 267,391 Iason J. Niblack Levee, IN. (Wabash River) 1965 1,554,712 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY.2 1973 292,710 Mount Carmel, IL. (Wabash River) 1972 1,980,675 Muncie IN. (White River) 1956 887,835 Neon-Fleming, KY. (Kentucky River) 1963 86,532 New Albany, IN. 1957 5,375,471 Newburgh, IN. 4 1974 52,061 Newport, KY. 1959 7,512,987 Paducah, KY. 1959 4,761,552 Panther Creek, KY. (Green River Basin)2 1970 254,031 Portland IN. (Salamonie River)2 1962 237,657 Reevesville IL. (Cache River) 1954 600,300 Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL. (Wabash River) 1972 1,079,236 Rosiclare IL. 1954 622,544 Sturgis, KlY. 1972 1,826,7765 Ta loreville KY. (Salt River) 1952 373,050 Te Cit , IR. 1956 932,229 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN. (Wabash River) 1965 14,913 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY.2 1967 56,505 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY. (Licking River)2 1972 893,094 Uniontown, KY. 1956 1,070,926 Vincennes, IN. (Wabash River)5 1964 3,308,940 West Terre Haute, IN. (Wabash River) 1977 1,095,704 Inactive: Anderson, IN. (White River) 1940 5,724 Bonpas Creek, IL. (Wabash River Basin) Brevoort Levee, IN. (Wabash River) 1954 1,230,873 Caseyville, KY. Cloverport, KY. Shawneetown, IL. - 27,287 Concordia, KY. 27287 Frankfort, KY. (Kentucky River) (Benson Creek, North Frankfort and South Frankfort Sections)8 1979 2,960,970 Greenfield Bayou Levee IN. (Wabash River) 1979 157,935 Indianapolis, IN. (Warffeigh Section) (White River) 1976 153,410 Island Levee, IN. (Wabash River) 1979 355,963 Levee Unit 1 IL. (Wabash River) 1973 60,000 Lewisport, KY. Marion, IN. (Wabash River) 1979 209,975 Metropolis, IL. 10,575 New Harmony Bridge, IL. & IN. (Wabash River)2 1959 297,624 Orleans, IN. 1972 13,158 Owensboro, KY. Salyersville, KY. (Licking River) 1946 12,000 Shoals, IN. (East Fork White River) 1938 Smithland, KY. 24-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 24-K OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project' Report For Construction Maintenance Tolu, KY. Utica IN. West Point, KY. 4,490 Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251): Bellevue, KY. 12,853 Bromley, KY. Carrollton, KY. 9,713 Cave-in-Rock, IL. Cincinnati, OH. (Unit 2) Cincinnati OH. (Unit 4) Cleves, OR. "6,343 Clinton, IN. (Wabash River) 6,848 Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Derby, IN. Elizabethtown, IL. Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin) 3,361 Grandview, IN. 8,497 Honey Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Leavenworth, IN. Levee Units 1 and 2, Eel River, IN. (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 2, IN. (White River) Levee Unit 3, IN. (East Fork White River) 1938 275 Levee Units 1 and 2, IL. (Wabash River) 1938 Levee Units 3 and 4, IL. (Wabash River) 1938 216 Levee Unit 6, IL. (Wabash River) 9,922 Levee Units 9 and 10, IN. (White River) 1939 Ludlow, KY. 14,503 Madison, IN. Mauckport IN. McGinnis Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin) 1950 71,049 Milton, KY. Moscow, OH. New Amsterdam, IN. New Harmony IN. (Wabash River) New Richmond, OH. 7,104 Patriot, IN. Prestonville, KY. Raccoon Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River) Rising Sun IN. Rockport, IN. Rome IN. Shufflebarger Levee IN. (Wabash River Basin) 1950 64,487 Sugar Creek Levee, IN. (Wabash River Basin) 1961 28,061 Tri-Pond Levee, IL. (Wabash River) 1972 65,510 Troy, IN. Vevay, IN. Westport, KY. Deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251): Aurora, IN. 35,420 California (Cincinnati), OH. - 16,465 Reservoirs: Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN. (Wabash River Basin) 1977 1,270,590 Booneville Lake, KY. (Kentucky River) 1976 1,038,595 Clifty Creek Lake, IN. (White River) 1979 1,016,358 Eagle Creek Lake, KY. 1975 702,471 Helm Lake, IL. (Wabash River Basin) 1976 41,616 Lafayette Lake, IN. (Wabash River Basin) 1977 1,200,920 24-38 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT TABLE 24-K OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project i Report For Construction Maintenance Lincoln Lake IL. (Wabash River Basin) 1979 1,331,844 Mining City Lake KY. (Green River) 350,474 Red River Lake, Y. (Kentucky River) 1976 1,794,308 1. All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3. Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contribution from City of Louisville. 4. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 5. Partially completed to form a useful unit. maining Re- portion of project inactive. 6. Cost includes $161,098 contributed funds. 24-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal Year Cost Flood Control: Dicks Creek, Amanda Station, OH.' $ 28,808 Bonpas Creek, IL.1 41,444 Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY.' 70,589 Chaplin River at Perryville, KY.' 40,358 Clear Creek, Franklin, OH.3 34,429 Hodges Branch, Rushville, IN. 2 4,901 Little Pigeon Creek, Warrick/Spencer Cos., IN.2 5,000 Miami River at Carlisle, OH.' 56,953 Miami River, Franklin, OH. 40 South Side Ditch, Princeton, IN.' 30,262 Stillwater River at Shiloh, OH.1 42,669 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control: Highland Creek, Henderson-Union Cos., KY.2 4,500 Town Fork, Nicholasville, KY.4 119,339 Upper Wabash River, Adams County, IN.4 10,565 Emergency Bank Protection: Falling Run, New Albany, IN.2 4,435 Licking River Covington, KY-' 5,000 Lusk Creek, dolconda, IL.2 3,609 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY.4 17,698 Ohio River, Cloverport KY.4 22,373 Ohio River, Hancock do., KY.2 4,968 Ohio River, Madison, IN.4 10,544 "Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN.3 4 30,993 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY.2 3 6,852 Patoka River at Jasper, IN. 4 67,017 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY.5 -585 White River, Brownstown, IN.2 3 5,787 1. Detailed Project Report 2. Reconnaissance Report 3. Plans and Specfications 4. Construction Funds Received 5. Construction Completed TABLE 24-M FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 47 of Text) Date Federal Location Requesting Agency Completed Cost Knox County, Indiana Knox County Planning Mar 1980 $25,000 Wabash and White Rivers Commission Sumner & Birds Illinois Illinois Division of Aug 1980 15,000 (Special Flood hazard Water Resources Information) 24-40 HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT* All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. This district comprises central and southeastern Ohio, all but northern panhandle and northeastern portion of West Virginia, eastern Kentucky. a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries from about mile 127 (below Pittsburgh. l'a. ) to mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, Ky. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page I. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ........................ 25-2 2. Kanawha River, W. Va................. 25-2 3. Open-Channel Work, Ohio River ....... 25-2 4. Other authorized navigation projects ................. ......... 25-2 Flood Control - Local Protection 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Chillicothe, Ohio ............... ....... 25-2 M artin, Ky......... ............ ... ... 25-3 Massillon, Ohio ................... 25-3 Newark, Ohio .......... *............ 25-3 Oceana, W. Va. .................... 25-4 Roseville, Ohio ........ o............ 25-4 Flood Control- Reservoirs 11. Alum Creek Lake, Ohio........... ... 25-4 12. 'Beech Fork Lake, W. Va. ............... 25-5 13. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va.......... ......... :........ 25-5 14. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va......... .... * ............. 25-6 15. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio .............. ... *.......... .. 25-6 16. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ............ *.... ........... 25-6 17. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. .... 25-7 18. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio .... 25-7 19. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va.. ....... . ................ 25-8 20. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin,........ 25-8 21. Grayson Lake, Ky. .................... 25-8 Flood Control Reservoirs (Cont d) Page 22. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Va. ............. 25-9 23. Kehoe Lake, Ky. .................... 25-9 24. Mill Creek Lake, Ohio ............... 25-10 25. Muskingum River Lakes, Ohio..........25-10 26. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio ................. .......... 25- 1 27. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Va................................. 25-11 28. Ohio River Basin (Huntington D istrict) ............................. 25-11 29. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin ....25 -11 30. Paintsville Lake, Ky. .... ............ 25-12 31. R. D. Bailey Lake, W. Va.............. 25-12 32. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va. ........................ 25-13 33. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin W. Va. .............................. 25-13 34. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ......................... 25-13 35. Yatesville Lake, Ky. .................. 25-14 36. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....................... 25-14 37. Other authorized flood control projects .............................. 25-14 38. Flood control work under special authorization ......................... 25-15 General Investigations 39. 40. 41. Surveys ........................... Collection and study of basic data ...... Research and development............. 25-15 25-15 25-15 25-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River Portion. 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The Kanawha River is 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers a short distance above Kanawha Falls, W. Va., and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, W. Va. Previous Projects. For details of previous projects see page 90-98 of the 1875 Annual Report, page 1913 of the 1915 Annual Report, and page 1309 of the 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation dams on the Kanawha River. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. One dam is located on the Ohio River near Gallipolis, Ohio. This structure has two locks, one is 110 feet by 600 feet and the other is 110 feet by 360 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of 9 feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. For authorization of the existing project see page 1152 of the 1962 Annual Report. New work for the existing project was completed at a cost of $22,- 872,770. Local cooperation. No local cooperation required. Licenses. The Kanawha Valley Power Corp., under licenses issued by the Federal Power Commission, constructed hydroelectric power plants at the three locks and dams on the Kanawha River. License fees under License No. 1175 for London and Marmet Locks and Dams are $32,000 annually and $1,472,000 cumulative through CY 1979 for each installation. License fees under License No. 1290 for Winfield Locks and Dam are $40,000 annually and $3,792,000 cumulative through CY 1979. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, W. Va. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel sheet pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further information see page 1152 of the 1962 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: The locks and dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completefin 1937. All structures are in operation with a navigable depth of nine feet through the project reach. For details of locks and dam see page 1153 of the 1962 Annual Report. See also Table 25-B for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 22-Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 25-C. 5. CHILLICOTHE, OHIO Location. The project is located in Ross County,. Ohio, along the right bank of the Scioto River, 69 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River. Evisting project. The existing project provides for the construction of 10,805 feet of earth levee, four gate openings and four pump stations. The project was authorized for construction by the 1962 Flood Control Act. The total estimated cost for new work (1980) is $18.670,000 of which $15,858,000 is to be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The Sponsor, in addition to incurring $2,390,000 in non-Federal costs, will reimburse the Federal Government $422,000() for the non-Federal share of recreational development costs. Local cooperatiotn. All local interest requirements are complete. For further details see the 1978 Annual Report. Operatiolns and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering studies continued. The contract for Local Protection Project (l'art Ill). Pump Stations, was awarded in September 1980, no work initiated. Condition at end of fical year. The contracts for construction of Local Protection,( Part 1), and local Protection,( Part I1) are complete. 25-2 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT 6. MARTIN, KENTUCKY Location. The project is located in Floyd County, Ky., approximately 5.5 miles above the mouth of' Beaver Creek, a tributary of Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project provides for construction of approximately 4.5 miles of channel improvement along Beaver Creek beginning at a point approximately 2.3 miles above the junction of the Right and Left Forks. The improved channel will have a bottom width of 75 feet, riprap will be placed along the outside of all channel bends, and both sides and channel bottom through three bridges. The project will reduce major floods at Martin by about 5.7 feet. The total estimated cost of new work (1980) is $9,735,000. Feder'al cost is $9,410,000 and non-Federal cost is $325,000 for lands and damages and utility adjustments. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 246, 89th Congress). Local cooperation. Responsible local interests are required to provide the necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way; to hold and save the United States free from damages; to maintain the project after completion; to provide necessary relocations; and to prevent any encroachments on the capacities of the channel within the limits of the project. By letter, dated October 26, 1971, The Fiscal Court of Floyd County, Ky., furnished an amendment to the resolution of assurance of local cooperation. Operations and results during fi'scal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Condition at end offiscal .ear. To date 67% of the tracts required by the project have been acquired by the Sponsor. 7. MASSILLON, OHIO Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of' channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see page 1156 of the 1962 Annual Report. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin, in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The project was constructed at a total Federal cost of $8,139,406. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. See page 1156 of the 1962 Annual Report for details of' local contributions of work beyond the scope of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. The drainage structures and appurtenances, including pressure conduits, gate openings, and pump stations. have been turned over to the city for maintenance and operation. The channels and levees maintained by the United States arc in good condition. 8. NEWARK, OHIO Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of' the North and South Forks of the Licking River, 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of 31,- 500 feet of channel improvements on the Licking River, North and South Forks of Licking River, and Raccoon Creek, and a pump station for disposal of interior drainage. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The existing Newark Local Protection Project was modified by the 1968 Flood Control Act to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion and modification of North Fork Channel. The estimated total cost of the proposed project (1980) is $8,965,000 of which $7,000,000 is Federal. Local cooperation. All local requirements for existing project have been met. Local interests, for the proposed project, are required to furnish all land, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save the United States free from damages and provide all necessary relocations. Local requirements for the Log Pond Run Diversion have been completed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: North Fork Channel; As a result of the withdrawal of State support from the proposed Utica Lake project and the interdependency of the operation of Utica Lake with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel must be reformulated. A preliminary reanalysis is underway. 25-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end of'fiscal year. The existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in Novembe. 1941. The pump facilities and levees were turned over to the city for maintenance and operation. Proposed project: The final General Design Memorandum was approved in March 1974 with respect to Log Pond Run only. Additional economic feasibility studies for the Interior Drainage portion of the project will be required. The North Fork Channel portion of the project will require reformulation. The contract for the Log Pond Run Diversion Channel was awarded in September 1980, no work was initiated. 9. OCEANA, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The project is located in Wyoming County on Clear Fork, 26 miles above the confluence of Clear Fork and the Guyandotte River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a channel modification starting at the confluence of Clear Fork and Laurel Fork extending down Clear Fork for approximately 4.7 miles. The channel modification will, generally, follow the natural stream alignment and have a floodway width of 100 feet. The total estimated cost of new work (1979) is $4,275,000 which includes $775,000 non-Federal cost for land and damages and utility adjustments and $82,000 non- Federal cost for recreation cost sharing. The project was authorized under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Approved by the Senate Public Works Committee in June 1975 and the House Committee in September 1976. Local cooperation. Local interest must agree to furnish all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction, cost share the recreation development and operate and maintain the project following construction. The Wyoming County Court and the Town Council of Oceana passed resolutions in November 1973 and December 1973 providing assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Engineering studies are continuing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Both the Town of Oceana and the Wyoming County Commission have informally indicated that they would not be able to bear the cost of the non-federal work. However, efforts to obtain letters of support or non-support of the project have been unsuccessful. Work on the final GDM has been suspended pending final statements from the Town of Oceana and Wyoming County. 10. ROSEVILLE. OHIO Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Percy Counties, an Maxahala Creek, approximately six miles above the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,290 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargement; and the necessary appurtenances for disposal of interior drainage. The project was selected for construction under the general authorization of the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the project as completed is $910,785. Local cooperation. All local requirements have been fully complied with. Total costs of all requirements under the terms of the authorized projects were $62,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, initiated in August 1959, is complete. 11. ALUM CREEK LAKE, 01i10 Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, Ohio, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, Ohio, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet high and 10,000 feet long with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 123 square miles. The reservoir is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for protection of Columbus, Ohio, lower Alum Creek and Scioto and Ohio Valleys, generally. The project was authorized for construction by the 1962 Flood Control Act. The total estimated cost of new work (1980) is $55,300,()00, which is to the appropriated and expended by the Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,815,000, exclusive of interest, for costs allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests are required to operate and maintain the proposed fish and wildlife recreation facilities; to reimburse the Federal 25-4 W.VA., DISTRICT Government for the cost of water supply feature, and to pay the cost of operation and maintenance of water supply facilities. The State of Ohio has executed a contract to operate and maitain recreation facilities. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: A landscaping contract, awarded in August 1979, is 48% complete. Engineering studies for remaining work items continued. Operations and Maintenance, general. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The flood of November 1979 resulted in a crest of 6.2 feet on the Alum Creek gage at Columbus. The project stored 11,095 acre-feet of water and reduced the flood crest by 1.2 feet. During the second rise of the flood of August 1980, Alum Creek at Columbus crested at 6.5 feet. The project stored 9,658 acre-feet of water and reduced the flood crest by 2. i feet. The project prevented an estimated $8,274,000 in flood damage during the fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. State officials have been notified that the project is operable for Phase 1(15 mgd) water supply. Payments are being received for the water supply facilities. The dam is complete and is being operated for flood control. Construction of the dam was initiated in 1970 and completed in 1975. The 397 tracts of land required by the project have been acquired. 12. BEECH FORK LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, W. Va., on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, 3.7 miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 19.6 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam approximately 86 feet high and 1,080 feet long, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet 'and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. the project is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for protection of Lavalette, W. Va., and Twelvepole and Ohio Valleys, generally. The project was authorized under the 1962 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost of the new work (1980) is $44,700,000. Location cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The Contract for Maintenance Building, awarded in October 1978, was completed. Operations and Maintenance, general. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. Condition at end oJfiscal year. The project is fully operational and the 485 tracts required have been acquired. Engineering for remaining public use facilities is continuing.. 13. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The dam is located on the New River in Summers County, W. Va., approximately 2.5 miles above Hinton, W. Va., and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, W. Va., and Giles County, Va. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam with a maximum height of 180 feet and an overall length of 2,048 feet. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam which is 790 feet in length; the stilling pool is formed by a 23 foot high weir located 364 feet downstream of the axis of the dam; the outlet works consists of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed to permit future installation of power facilities. The reservoir extends approximately 36 miles upstream and provides for a gross storage of 631,000 acre-feet. The estimated Federal cost of the project is $30,100,000, which includes future recreation under the completed project program. The existing project was authorized by the Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. For further details see page 1453 of the 1939 Annual Report and pages 1173 and 1174 of the 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. No local cooperation required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Facilities for accommodation and protection of the visiting public were maintained in good condition. 25-5 HU NTIN GTON, REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end offiscal year. The dam is complete and the reservoir is in operation as the unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the New, Kanawha, and Ohio Valleys, generally. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. Total land acquired was 338 tracts of fee acquisition and 91 tracts of flowage easements. 14. BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, W. VA. Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County, W. Va., on the Little Kanawha River 1.7 miles above Burnsville, W. Va., and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha and Ohio Rivers. Evisting project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam approximately 80 feet high and 1,000 feet long with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one lowflow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of- 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 165 square miles. The reservoir is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Burnsville and the Little Kanawha and Ohio Valleys generally. The project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost of new work (1980) is $53,900,000. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of Camping Area at Riffle Run, initiited in March 1978, is complete. Operations and Maintenance, general. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. Condition at end offiscal year. Major construction is complete except for public use facilities. The 333 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 15. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, Ohio, on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. E.isting project. The project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately 4 miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. For further project details see page 969 of the 1965 Annual Report. The project was selected for construction under general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost for new work is $25,500,000. including an estimate for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests are required to operate and maintain the fish and wildlife facilities. The State of Ohio is operating and maintaining these facilities. Operation and results duringfiscal Y'ear. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. During the flood of November 1979 the Scioto River at Higby crested at 14:4 feet. The project stored 8,847 acre-feet of water and reduced the flood crest by 0. 1 foot. During the first rise of the flood of August 1980 the Scioto River at Higby crested at 12.5 feet. The project stored 8,473 acre-feet of water and reduced the flood crest by 0.6 foot. The project prevented an estimated $451,00() in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. All major construction work is complete. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 16. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The dam is located on the Olentangy River approximately 6 miles above and north of Delaware, Ohio, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, Ohio. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion, and Morrow Counties, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled gravity ogee-type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is approximately 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for 25-6 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT storage of 132,800 acre-feet from a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. For further details see page 1160 of the 1962 Annual Report. The project was authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act. The total Federal cost of the project was $7,631,821. Local Cooperation. No local cooperation required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the flood of November 1979 the Scioto River at Columbus crested at 16.3 feet. The project stored 32,290 acre-feet of water and reduced the flood crest by 1.3 feet. During the first rise of the flood of August 1980 the Scioto River at Columbus crested at 12.3 feet. The project stored 6,591 acre-feet of water and reduced the flood crest by 0.6 foot. The project prevented and estimated $1,349,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances are complete and the reservoir is in operation as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the Olentangy, Scioto, and Ohio Valleys, generally. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1978. All construction was completed in October 1951. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. 17. DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY Location. The dam is located on Johns Creek, approximately 7 miles southeast of Paintsville, Ky., and 5.4 miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Evisting project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, an uncontrolled spillway through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earthfill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. For further project detail see page 940 of the 1965 Annual Report. The project was selected for construction under the general authorization contained in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated cost of the project is $9,000,000, including future recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation required. Operations and results duringfiscal year. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Condition at end offiscalyear. The dam is complete and is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Levisa Fork, Big Sandy and Ohio Valleys, generally. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and was completed in July 1949. Total acreage acquired for the project was 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. 18. DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, 5.8 miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of 118 feet and a maximum length of 1,400 feet, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 748 square miles. For further project details see page 1162 of the 1962 Annual Report. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost for new work is $34,- 500,000, which includes future recreation work under the completed projects program. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the flood of August 1980 the Muskingum River had three separate rises. The following table is a summary of the flood crests recorded at Zanesville and McConnelsville, Ohio, and the reductions produced by the project. Station Zanesville Mc(onnelsville 0106 3-16 ('rest 20.8' 12.8' Aug 80 16-20 Reduction (rest 2.7' 16.0' 2.2' 8.6' Aug 80 20-23 Reduction C('rest 0.1' 17.8' 0.1' 11.0' Aug 80 Reduction 1.0' 0.6' The project stored 58,688 acre-feet of water. It 25-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 prevented an estimated $4,714,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. The dam is complete and the reservoir is in operation as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Zanesville, Ohio, and the Muskingum and Ohio Valleys, generally. Construction of the project was initiated in July 1946 and completed in July 1959. Total real estate acquired for the project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. 19. EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, W. Va., on the East Fork of Twelvepole Creek, approximately 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 113 feet, a top length of 638 feet and a top width of 32 feet, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acre-feet from a drainage area of 133 square miles. The reservoir is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of East Lynn and Wayne, W. Va.; and for Twelvepole Creek and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost for new work (1979) is $34,400,- 000. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operation and results during fiscal year. All major items of construction are complete. The final recreation contract, for expansion of East Fork facilities and construction of Overlook Point, initiated in October 1979 is 84% complete. Operations and maintenance, general. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. Condition at end of fiscal year. All major construction is complete. Remaining work consists of environmental enhancement and construction of additional recreation facilities at East Fork and Overlook Point. The required 552 tracts have been acquired. 20. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located on Levisa Fork in Pike County, Ky., 2.6 miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of' a rockfill dam with a maximum height of 195 feet, an overall length of 1,100 and a width of 32 feet. An excavated spillway is located in the left abutment and is controlled by four tainter gates. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 395 square miles. The reservoir is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Levisa Fork and Big Sandy River Valleys, generally, and to a lesser degree, the Ohio River Valley. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated cost for new work is $54,500,000, which includes an estimate for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results dluring fiscal iear. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control, as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. Condition at end of fiscal yiear. Construction is co mplete. All 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 21. GRAYSON LAKE, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located on the Little Sandy River 48.5 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, Ky. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam with a maximum height of 120 feet and crest length of 1,460 feet, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 196 square miles. The reservoir is being operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Grayson, Ky., and the Little Sandy and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1960 Flood Control Act. The estimated cost of new work is $20,- 000,000, which includes an estimate for future recrea- 25-8 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT tion facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations andl results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: 'Fhe reservoir was operated for flood control, as required and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. Condition at end ofisc(al year. All major construction is complete. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 22. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located on the Pound River in Dickenson County, Va., approximately 1.8 miles above the confluence of Russell Fork and the Pound River and 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam with a maximum height of 252 feet, a top length of' 970 feet, a top width of 30 feet and a base width of 1,030 feet. An outlet tunnel located near the left abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. A spillway controlled by six tainter gates is located in a saddlejust upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 222 square miles. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authority for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The project has been modified to provide water quality control features by adding control gates to previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The estimated cost for new work is $20,400,000, which includes an estimate for future recreation under the completed projects program. Localcooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenance. Condition at end of/iscal year. All major construction is complete. T'he 382 tracts of land required for the poject have been acquired. 23. KEHOE LAKE, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located on the Greenup- Carter County line on Tygarts Creek, a tributary of the Ohio River approximately 48 miles above the mouth of Tygarts Creek and 1.7 miles above Kehoe, Ky. Existing project. The existing project provides for construction of a rockfill dam 101 feet in height and 1,265 feet in length, and uncontrolled spillway located upstream of the right abutment of the dam, and an upstream controlled outlet works with a tunnel through the left abutment. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 48,048 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 127 square miles. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Kehoe and Tygarts and Ohio Valleys, generally. The total estimated cost of new work (1978) is $43,- 300,000 which is to be appropriated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor is required to reimburse the Federal Government $4,670,000, for the non-Federal share of initial recreation development. The project was authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. (H. Doc. 517, 89 Congress). Local cooperation Local interests are required to contribute that portion of recreation costs that exceed the portion permitted to be borne by the Federal Government under Public Law 89-72. Section 221 assurances (P.L.91-611) were signed by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and approved by the Federal Government in June 1973. The recreation cost sharing contract was not signed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. The deletion of water quality control as a project purpose required project reformulation. All design work was curtailed pending approval of the Project Modification Report, which was approved in December 1975 by the Senate Committee on Public Works and the House Committee on Public Works and Transportation. Revised cost allocation data reflecting reallocation of storage to recreation, with resultant increased non- Federal cost, was fowarded to Office, Chief of Engineers, in February 1976. A letter was prepared and submitted to the Governor of Kentucky in April 1976, requesting reaffirmation of the Commonwealth's intent to participate in the development of the Kehoe Lake Project. The Governor in June 1976, stated the Commonwealth's intent to honor the cost sharing contract. The Assistant Secretary for Civil Works by letter dated October 29, 1976 requested additional commitments from Kentucky; the Governor's General Council responded by letter dated November 11, 1976 indicating that further warranties should be held in 25-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 abeyance pending resolution of a suit filed against the Commonwealth with Corps of Engineers as codefendant relative to Commonwealth's legal right to enter cost-sharing agreements. The suit was dismissed in October 1978. The Huntington District by letter of 23 May 1979, recommended reassessment following resolution of litigation on Taylorsville. Condition at end of/gisvcal year. All preconstruction activities are complete. 24. MILL CREEK LAKE, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Union and Delaware Counties, on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, 1.5 miles above the mouth of Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project provides for construction of a rolled-earthfill dam 85 feet in height and 11,800 feet in length, a gated spillway controlled by three tainter gates in the right abutment, an outlet works consisting of three multi-level intakes, three sections of earth dike, and one levee with a pump station and appurtenances for the protection of Ostrander, Ohio. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 84,694 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 181 square miles. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of' the coordinated reservoir systems for the protection of' the Scioto and Ohio River Valleys, generally, and contribute to reductions of flooding at industrial and population centers at Columbus and Chillicothe. The project was authorized for construction under the 1962 Flood Control Act. The estimated FederaLcost of the project (1977) is $72,900,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to operate and maintain the fish and wildlife facilities. Operations and results during year. Preconstruction planning is complete and engineering studies are suspended. Condition at end ofjfiscalyear. The District is in the process of reporting the project for deauthorization as a result of no state support for the project. The State of Ohio awarded a contract for the reconstruction of State Route 36 in March 1972. The reconstructed route is entirely within the proposed reservoir boundary. Total Federal cost of this reconstruction was $594,474.48. 25. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OHIO Location, The Muskingum River lies in southeast Ohio and, including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, Ohio, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, Pa. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project was originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. The project was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further details see page 1157 of the 1962 Annual Report. The estimated cost of new work is $44,000,000, which includes an estimate for future recreation under the completed projects program. L.ocal coo>peration. All rcqiliremcnts for local cooperation have been fully complied wit I. For furtller details see page 1257 of the 1942 Annual Rcport. Operations and results duringfiscal y'ear. New work: Planning of recreation facilities was continued under the completed projects program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the safety of the 14 older projects under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. The following work has been completed: Downstream Blanket at Clendening; Relief Wells at Tappan, Leesville, Beach City and Clendening; and the Dover Zoar Diversion Dam corrections; and the Leesville Abutment Grouting. The total estimated cost for Major Rehabilitation (1980) is $56,500,000. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The three separate rises occurred during the flood of August 1980. The following table is a summary of the flood crests recorded at major control points along the Muskingum River and the reductions produced by the projects: Station ('oshocton 1)resdem Zanesville Mc(onnelsville 3-16 Crest 16.10' 18.8' 20.8' 12.8' Aug 81) Reduction 1.1' 4.9' 2.8' 1.6' 16-2) Crest 13.5' 15.Y 16.0' 8.6' Aug 80 Reduction 1.5' 2.5' 1.1' 0.6' 20-23 ('rest 14.9' 16.7' 17.8' 11.11' Aug 80 Reduction 2.8' 3.2' 2.7' 1.8' Four pools of record were set during this period. On 15 August the pool at Senecaville Lake crested at an 25-10 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT elevation of 838.20 feet, which is 54.8% flood utilization. On 23 August Clendening Lake crested at 909.00 feet, or 85.8% flood utilization, and Tappan Lake crested at 905.55 feet, or 61.2% flood utilization. On 25 August Piedmont Lake crested at 921.56 feet, or 70.4% flood utilization. The system prevented as estimated $85,960,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the system of projects was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. 26. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OHIO LocAation. The damsite is located in Knox County, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and 22 miles northwest of Fredericktown, Ohio. E\istillg projec't. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam. 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, and an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 45 square miles. The reservoir is operated for protection of Fredericktown and Mount Vernon, Ohio valley of North Branch and Kokosing Rivers, and to lesser degree. the Muskingum and Ohio River Valleys. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1962 Flood Control Act. The estimated cost for new work is $6,250,000. l oal coopwration. No local cooperation is rCequired. OperatiWs nnrcel slis dduritig,/iscalyear. New work: All construction is complete. Operation and Maintenance, general. Necessary repairs were made to the st ructurcs and appurtenances. ('onlitic), ate/id/ /ijSc'a/l iear. All major construction is complete'.l he 5 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 27. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VIRGINIA Location The damsite is located in Wise County, Virginia, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately 1. 1 miles upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, with a height of 130 feet and length of 600 feet, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 17.6 square miles. The existing project was authorized under the 1960 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost of the project is $6,200,000, including estimated Code 710 requirements. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in March 1963, is complete. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 28. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. See Table 25-D for local protection projects, Table 25-E for dam and lakes, and Table 25-F for authorizing legislation. Operations and results during fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, operated and maintained by local interest, other than those for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated aggregate total of $2,516,000. 29. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, on 25-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Exisiting project. The existing project consists of a rock and random fill dam with a maximum height of 118 feet and a length of 700 feet, a gate controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides a total storage of 145,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 573 square miles. The reservoir is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of Chillicothe, Ohio, the Paint Creek Basin, and the Scioto and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost of the project is $27,000,000, including Code 710 requirements. Local cooperation Local interests are required to operate and maintain fish and wildlife facilities. The State of Ohio in FY 1976 began to operate and maintain the recreation area. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: All major construction is complete. Operation and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the flood of November 1979 the Scioto River at Higby crested at 14.4 feet. The project stored 20,097 acre-feet of water and reduced the flood crest by 1.0 feet. During the first rise of the flood of August 1980 the Scioto River at Higby crested at 12.5 feet. The project stored 8,806 acre-feet of water. The project prevented an estimated $59,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 30. PAINTSVILLE LAKE KENTUCKY Location.The damsite is located in Johnson County, on Paint Creek, a tributary of Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction ofa rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 76,462 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 93 square miles. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the Town of Paintsville, the lower Paint Creek Valley and Levisa Fork, Big Sandy and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The total estimated cost for new work (1980) is $55,200,000 which is to be appropriated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government $2,605,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (House Document 146, 89th Congress). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to contribute 50% of the recreation costs under the current policy of Public Law 89-72. The recreation cost sharing contract has been signed by officials of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and by the Secretary of the Army. Assurances required by Section 221 of Public Law 91-611 were provided by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and approved by the Government in February 1973. Operations and results during .fiscal yiear. New work: A contract for Construction of Dam and Appurtentant works initiated in November 1976 is 99% complete. A contract for Cemetery Removal (P'art 111) and Roadwork, initiated in March 1979, is 99% complete. A contract for Cemetary Removal (Part IV), Site Preparation and Roadwork for Rcinterment Site, initiated in August 1980, is 49% complete. During the fiscal year 62 tracts of land were acquired. Condition at end of'fiscal year. New work: Contracts for road locations, alterations, and adjustment have been executed with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Johnson County and Morgan County. Thus far, 423 of the 473 surface tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 31. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, on the Guyandot River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and about 1.3 miles east of Justice, West Virginia. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-rockfill dam with a concrete face having a height of 305 feet and a length of 1,330 feet, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and con- 25-12 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT trols a drainage area of 540 square miles. The reservoir operates as a unit of the coordinated system for the protection of Logan, West Virginia, and the Guyandot and Ohio River Valleys, generally. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1962 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost for new work (1980) is $185,000,000. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of Buildings, Grounds and Utilities, initiated in March 1978, is 99% complete. A contract for Clearing and Refuse Removal, initiated in September 1978 is complete. The original contract for the Dam and Spillway was terminated for default in March 1977. A contract to complete the Dam and Spillway was initiated in June 1977 and is complete. Engineering studies for the remaining activities continued. The project was dedicated during August 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is well underway. The major part of the relocations work is complete and the outlet works, abutment excavation and road work are complete and the dam is 90% complete. Thus far, 1,585 of the 1,629 surface tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 32. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New Rivers at Gauley Bridge, West Virginia. Existing prqoject. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam with a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the downstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment, and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated cost for new work is $48,500,- 000, including Code 710 requirements. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Operations and results during period. Operations and Maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. Condition at end of fiscal year. All construction work except for future recreation under the completed projects program, is complete. The 414 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. 33. SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River, in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gates sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. The existing project was selected for construction under the general authorization for the Ohio River Basin in the 1938 Flood Control Act. The estimated Federal cost for new work, including remaining recreation programmed for future years under the completed projects program, is $39,000,000. Local cooperation. No local cooperation is required. Under terms of an existing agreement, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company paid $62,800 toward the relocation of a modified slope and other betterments. Operations and results during the fiscal y'ear. New work: Planning for recreation facilities under the completed projects program continued. Operations and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the project initiated in October 1949, is complete. The 618 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. A contract for construction of a high level intake, initiated in July 1979, is complete. 34. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, Ohio and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 25-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 rolled-earthfill dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length: a controlled outlet works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment: and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The existing project was authorized under authority of the 1944 Flood Control Act. The Federal cost of completed work was $2,086, 100. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met, see also page 1165 of the 1962 Annual Report. The fiscal year 1974, contributed funds totaling $64,660 were received from the State of Ohio. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: The reservoir was operated for flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During August 1980 the Hocking River at Athens rose to a crest of 17.2 feet. The project reduced the flood crest by 0.4 foot and stored 2787 acre-feet of water. This project prevented an estimated $119,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year.. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. The reservoir provides substantial protection to Sunday Creek Valley as well as serving as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for the protection of the Hocking and Ohio River Valleys. f he reservoir also provides an assured source of w ater supply to villages, industries, and coal mining operations in the Sunday Creek Valley. 35. YATESVILLE LAKE, KENTUCKY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, Kentucky, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, Kentucky, and 18.5 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project provides for construction of an earthfill dam, 104 feet in height and 770 feet in length; and uncontrolled spillway located approximately one-half mile east of the right abutment: and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of' the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 86,95 1 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 208 square miles. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of the coordinated reser'oir system for the protection of the Ohio River Valley. The total estimated cost for new work (1978) is $62,000,000 which is to be allocated and expended by the Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government $3,725,000 for the cost sharing portion of initial recreation development. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (House Document 246, 89th Congress). Local cooperation. Local interests are req uired to contribute that portion of recreation costs which exceed the amount permitted to be borne by the Federal Government under Public law 89-72. Operatiotns atnd rc.esults duritng fiscal .'ear. A Court suit concerning Yatesville and three other Kentucky projects was filed in State court by Kentucky Ri\crs Coalition against the United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky'.T he United States had the suit removed from State court to the U. S. l)istrict Court in Frankfort, Kentucky. 'he suit was dismissed on 16 October 1979. Administration action and Congressional concurrence not to appropriate continuing funds resulted in halting normal land acquisition and termination of the dam contract. A termination letter was dated 18 August 1977. 'lie contractor completed work related to mitigation of safety ha/ards and environnental damages. Real estate acquisition and related activities have been suspended. Condlitiont at end of fi'scal y'ear. All work has been suspended. . 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOb CONTROL PROJECTS The Flood Control Act of June 22.1936 and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of' the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of' these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribid by regulations. Total cost for fiscal year 1979 were $46,06 1. Total costs to September 30, 1979 were $791,363. (See Table 25-H on inspection of flood control projects.) 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PRO JECTS See Table 25-1 for listing of all projects not covered in text. 25-14 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 853, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthoriztion). See Table 25-J. For snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress. See Table 25-J. For emergency bank protection pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 256,79th Congress See Table 25-J For stream erosion control, evaluation and demonstration pursuant to Section 22 of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 25 I, 93rd Congress See Table 25-J Flood control and coastal emergency activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for disaster preparedness were $44,212 during fiscal year 1980. 39, SURVEYS Fiscal year 1980 costs were $2,964,828 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies .................. $316,938 Flood Damage Prevention Studies ..... $798,566 Comprehensive Basin Studies .......... $379,698 Review of Authorized Projects........... $4,277 Coordination Studies ................ $17,474 Supplemental Pre-Authorization ...... 1,341,720 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year 1980 costs were $214,509. 41. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT During FY 1980 no funds were expended for Research and Development. 25-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 25-A See Section In Test Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 2 Kanawha, River, W.Va. 5. Chillicothe, Ohio 6. Martin, Ky. 7. Massillon, Ohio 8. Newark. Ohio 9. Oceana, W. Va. 10. Roseville, Ohio 11. Alum Creek Lake, Ohio 12. Beech Fork Lake. W.Va. 13. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint.. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,727,120 2,684, 117 3,680.457 2,605,608 2.860,975 3,304,675 -100,000 2,400,000 2,304,00()() 316,736 2,467,347 2,288,025 -310,000 4,747 9.022 5,525 465,000( 178,724 12,059 12,059 0 -24,000 1,355 3,547 9.862 .10.000 13,362 0 -50(),00()0 94,893 13.149 12.999 -30,000 103,753 10,000 191 0 155.000 280,000 0 137.804 296.768 3.219 174 4,650,000 4,468,093 200.860 191,130 2,610,000 2,494,223 145,035 143.554 64,157 29,943 600,657 680,0)62 6,989 10,034 3,125,000 2,71 1.811 215,236 223,618 1,325,00) 1,242,735 302,372 296,049 35,000 121 481,896 430,1 I1I1 5,000 4,970 492.101 1,259,465 273,612 263.945 983,000 1.015.287 350.785 343.891 25.000 46,667 396,709 441,164 2,511,273 2.551,368 434,000) 362,619 -2.900 3.911 10,924 20.922 381.700 320,167 9.516 19.475 280,.00 175.730 9,560 9,590) 1.470.000 1,453,947 270,715 275,565 825.000 1.001,244 438.556 435,941 120.000 72.194 487.618 586,224 25-16 FY80 Totals to 30 Sept. 80 27,167.382 ' 27.167.382 40,775.5841 40.419.729' 130.3944 130.394- 6.904.099 6,786.679 213.400 210.298 8.1 39.4065 8. I 39.4065 213.508 213.50)6 2,015.291 1,946.127 605.765 605.765 715,000 610.302 910.785 910.785 90,968 90.968 52.168.064 51.917,546 1339.065 1.332.828 34,866.5001) 34.719.307 1.329.539 1.311.247 29,468.915^ 29,356,882 6.815.078 6.781.474 _ HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) Project Funding COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 14. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W.Va. 15. [eer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio 16. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin. Ohio 17. l)wey Lake, Ohio River Basin Ohio 18. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin. Ohio 19. East Lynn Lake Ohio River Basin, W.Va. 20. Fishtrap Lake. Ohio River Basin. Ky. 21. Grayson Lake, Ky. 22. John W. Flannagan, Dl)am and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Va. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost, Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,550,001)0 4.214,507 174,059 174,243 -4.000 17,761 405,219 397,677 5,350,00 5,136,530 298,662 297,091 3,525,000() 4,483,202 332,108 327,116 -5,458 10,000 0 5,871 345,003 390(),863 351,676 354,549 297,215 287,471 222,262 293,099 272,687 231,466 9.8 19 14,60)7 542,581 555,944 74.25() 17,042 742.904 742,392 -67.70() 3,059 637,573 634.470) 147,623 212,645 277.122 145,481 205,461 273,845 4,845,0()()00 249,537 485,841 494,711 274,()0()00 59,101 658,742 639,402 13,930 5,096 408,397 416,336 8,227 8,887 524.400) 509.90)9 300,000 5,018,924 606,015 420,40)5 53,871 236,910 735,869 729,638 598.215 3,579 433,876 427,919 -1.021 29 496,342 51 0,0)20) 125,752 177,321 547,858 604.749 185,0()0 246,315 783,488 720.341 -435,000 36.930 506.527 500.538 -10,000 0 484,952 478.9(11 540.000 683.890 453,119 421,624 664 4,793 389,802 418,619 288,348 290, 102 -2,020 0 566,916 575,444 187.556 190,0)62 1,764.00()0 1,356,942 545.645 472.963 -2,384 6.409 045.198 1,020.942 336,473 45,458 513.303 523,570 0 20,311.598'7 0( 20.311,5981 452.167 4.960,652 463.08()2 4.95 1,.76 25-17 See Section In Test Totals to 30 Sept. 80 43,735.266 43,519,904 1.351,305 1,312,329 20.406,545xp 20,406.5451" 2.898,.364 2,881,786 7,631,821 7.631.821 3,103.719 3,094.604 7,845,5461" 7.845.546'2 6,398,076 6,366,370 30,2 18,135 3(.218, 135 2.286.843 2,276.561 34.125.967 33.540.055 3,881.389 3,873.561 54,566,00()411 54,561,44214 6.342,475 6,332, 107 19.280.99710 18,838.1361' 4,036,17() 4.030,513 ___ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Totals to In Test Project Funding FY77 FY78 FY79 FY80 30 Sept. 80 23. Kehoe Lake, Ky. 24. Mill Creek Lake, Ohio 25. Muskingum River, Dam and Lakes, Ohio 26. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio 27. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Va. 28. Ohio River Basin 29. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio 30. Paintsville Lake, Ky. 31. R.D. Bailey Lake, W.Va. 32. Summersville Lake, W.Va. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work 6 Approp. Cost Maint, Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -525.000 14 1.254 0 2,435 -752 9,161 0 1.272.740 0 1.272.740 1.602.702 1.602,702 1.864,796 1,839,431 500,000 392,470 25.00 1.430) 87,680 63.113 750 717 2,139,61I3 2,192,688 1,185,000 1.089,337 24.610 70,976 105,341 84,790 307,680 283,152 298,879 291,346 0 107,184 248,578 247,674 0 -4.,498 258,217 259,779 10,)(00 9,777 2,186,361 2,103,898 2.075,000 1.697,422 -1I(I) 0 143.173 164,303 392,456 347,958 -3,700 7,804 351,634 323.343 6, 10.000 6,832.524 9.123.000 5,677,474 7,()15,991 8,870,022 i2,000,000 10,147,058 87,892 87,225 -3,050) 626 509,285 514,82() 8.000,)000 10,452,557 214,588 214,458 00 55().735 543,453 1 4,7(08,1000)) 16,502.356 286.203 283,851 290,0()0 14,638 739,.609() 696,451 5,384 10.639 3,263,068 3.024326 2,20)0,0)00 2.204,626 49.000) 17,470 60,823 62,770 286,189 335,094 41.225,395 '' 41.225,39521 32.899.77 32.537.504 6,481,94521' 5,768.13921 6.270.00922 6.238.4792- 711,517 707.923 6.186.9)124 6. 186,90)124 3,151.159 3,147.400 355,8612' 355.86 1-' 9.153 26,985.5532- 2().889 26,967,6082' 353,184 1.920.7601 365,411) 1,1)1)003,896 7.298.000 37,1)56.788 7.655.776 36,382.304 4.871,000 5.101.980 372.131 359.095 -30,000 42,44 I1 520,4()9 565.337 176,622.2342' 175,945.5122' 960.814 944,629 48.335.8532x 48,132.9322" 5,511.5()2 5.489.521 25-18 HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) See Section In Test Project Funding 33. Sutton Lake, W.Va. 34. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, Ohio 35. Yatesville Lake, Ky. New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY77 FY78 -156 708.201 736,153 1,180.920 709,148 734.012 1.131,.664 117,528 134,887 145,645 114.539 134,814 142.663 3,800.00()0 340,000) -115.000 3,079.230 1.190.210 104.878 I. Includes $4.294.612 for new work for previous projects. 2. Includes $4,498,636 emergency relief funds and $9.004.800 public works funds. 3. Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects. 4. Public works acceleration funds. 5. Includes $477.813 contributed funds. 6. Includes $543,960 emergency relief funds, $9,698 public works acceleration funds, $212,310 Code 711 funds and $75,803. Code 713 funds. 7. Includes $543,960 emergency relief funds, $9,698 public works acceleration funds, $117,780 Code 711 funds and $61,700 Code 713 funds. 8. Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. 9. Includes $590,690 Code 711 funds. 10. Includes $590,690 Code 711 funds. II. Includes $23,087 public works acceleration funds. $1,.089,940 Code 711 funds and $231.105 Code 713 funds. 12. Includes $23,087 public works acceleration funds, $1.089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 13. Includes $258,615 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 14. Includes $258.615 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 15. Includes $242,459 Code 711 funds and $285,028 Code 713 funds. 16. Includes $79,469 Code 711 funds and $4.616 Codc 713 funds. 17. Includes $290,198 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $290,198 Code 711 funds. 19. Includes $27,190,0100 National Industrial Recovery Fund and $350).776 Code 711 funds. 20. Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $350,776 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 22. Includes $49,000 Code 711 funds. 23. Includes $17,470 Code 711 funds. 24. Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 25. Includes $10,.920) Emergency Relief funds. 26. Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 27. Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 28. Includes $260,000 Code 711 funds. 29. Includes $57.059 Code 711 funds. 30. Includes $1,647.713 Code 711 funds. 31. Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. 32. Excludes $639,660 contributed funds. 25-19 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY79 FY80 Totals to 30 Sept. 80 38.839.961I" 38.839,961 10.283.853 10.237,055 2.124.5671.'2 2.124.567 . 2 2.040.475 2.039.88 I 11 .244.500 S1.181.1 76 2.484.929 2.503,800 172,506 178.076 50.000 100,0 15 __ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 KANAWHA RIVER, W. VA.: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 TABLE 25-B (See Section 2 of Text) Operations & Maintenance, Project New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $ 9,369,33412 $37,415,054 $46,784.388 Public $9,004,800 $9,004,800 Emergency Relief $4,498,636 $4,498,636 Public Works $130,394 $130,394 Acceleration, Executive, 1963 Total $22,872,770 $37,415,054 $130,394 $60,418,218 1. $5,159,879 expended between July 1884 and June 30, 1936, on 2. Includes $3,883,513 expended for maintenance on previous operation and care of work improvement under provisions of per- projects. manent indefinite appropriations for such purposes, of which $1,- 3. Excludes $4,294,612 expended for new work on previous pro- 276,366 expended on existing project. jects. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 25-C (See Section 4 of Text) Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 For last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Big Sandy River, W. Va., and Ky., Including Levisa and Tug Forks. 1952 1,586,236 1,471,2991 Elk River, W. Va.-' 1903 30,259 Gauley River, W. Va.4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, W. Va.s 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River., 6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, Ohio7 1955 301,912 6,171,8978 New River, Va. and W. Va.5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, Ohio9 1953 10,951 16,593 1. Excludes $131,473 contributed by local interest for maintenance of lock I in fiscal years 1953-62, inclusive, in addition $98,512 expended from operation and maintenance funds for repair of lock and dam 3 for local water supply and recreation. In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, Ky. 2. Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 3. Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4. Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5. Work suspended. 6. Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7. Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8. Excludes $5,663 and $378, respectively, contributed funds for reconstruction of dam 10, and intermittent operation of lock I for benefit of Marietta Boat Club, Inc., subsequent to June 30, 1954. 9. Private Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 25-20 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT TABLE 25-D OHIO RIVER BASIN HUNTINGTON DISTRICT LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (Section 28 of Text) Location' 2 Aberdeen, Ohio Ashland, Ky. Athalia, Ohio' 3 Augusta, Ky. Belpre, Ohio" Brooklyn, W. Va."3 Buena Vista, Ohio'" Burlington, Ohio Catlettsburg, Ky. Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. Chambersburg, Ohio Chesapeake, Ohio Cheshire, Ohio" Chilo, Ohio '" Clifton, W. Va.' 3 Coal Grove, Ohio Columbus, Ohio Dover, Ky. Friendly, W. Va.' 3 Fullerton, Ky. Galax (New River Basin), Va. Gallipolis, Ohio' Greenup, Ky. Hlanging Rock, Ohio'3 Hlartford, W. Va." 3 Henderson, W. Va.' - lHigginsport, Ohio'5 Hiockingport, Ohio'3 Huntington, W. Va. Ironton, Ohio Letart, W. Va.' Letart Falls, Ohio'- Manchester, Ohio Mapleshade, Ohio'- Marietta, Ohio Mason, W. Va.' 3 Massillon (Muskingum River Basin), Ohios Maysville, Ky. Middleport, Ohio Miller, Ohio'3 Millwood, W. Va.' 3 Newark (Muskingum River Basin), OhioVa New Martinsville, W. Va* " New Matamoras,Ohio' 3 Newport, Ohio'3 Normal, Ky. Parkersburg, W. Va. Point Pleasant, W. Va. Pomeroy, Ohio"' Portland, Ohio'" Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio Proctorville, Ohio Racine, Ohio'3 Ravenswood, W. Va. Ripley, Ohio' s Riverview, W. Va. '3 Roseville (Muskingum River Basin), Ohio5 Type of Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Channel improvement evee Wall and levee wall and levee Channel improvement and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Channel improvement and levee Channel improvement and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Resettlement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Channel improvement Federal $ 1,430,000 $ 55,000 $ 1,485,000 $ 1,430,000 3,717,655 630,000 1,220,000 3,570,000 5,200,000 593,000 146,000 3,854,361 2,756,956 1,600,000 330,000 419,000 899,000 230,000 888,000 475,000 648,000 655,000 1,090,000 480,536 2,670,000 2,660,000 467,000 2,880,000 437,000 944,000 568,000 7,172,840 2,628,006 938,000 992,000 1,330,000 1,330,000 14,000,000 1,040,000 8,139,406 6,493,747 6,260,000 519,000 843,000 3,615,916 4,670,000 2,090,000 318,000 648,000 6,652,827 2,918,780 16,500,000 1,040,000 9,806,424 2,700,000 985,000 1,470,000 1,940,000 881,000 910,785 Estimated Cost3 Estimated Cost Non-Federal $ 55,000 313,000 187,000 620,000 448,000 226,000 197,000 117,000 300,000 265,000 53,000 139,000) 147,000 120,000 113,000 55,000 135,000 585,000 61,000 178,000 185,000 839,000 512,000 155,000 222,000 188,000 320,000 242,000 1,509,0006 669,000 123,000 126,000 377,000 298,000 822,000 238,000 477,8137 563,700" 490,000 173,000 134,000 541,000) 643,000 285,000 84,000 235,000 300,000 278,000 346,000 104,000 525,00012 120,000 106,000 810,000 115,000 62,000 25-21 Total $ 1,485,000 4,030,6551 817,00 1,840,000 4,018,000 5,426,000 790,000 263,000 4,154,361 3,021,956' 1,653,000 469,000 566,000 1,019,000 343,000 943,000 610,000 1,233,000 716,000 1,268,000 66,5364 3,509,000 3,172,000 622,000 3,102,000 625,000 1,264,000 810,000 8,682,1404 3,297,006' 1,061,000 1,118,000 1,707,000 1,628,000 14,822,000 1,278,000 8,617,2194 7,057,4474 6,750,000 692,000 977,000 4,156,916 4 'O 5,313,000 2,375,000 402,)000 883,000 6,952,8274 3,196,7804 16,846,000 1,144,000 10,331,4244 2,700,000 1,105,000 1,576,000 2,750,000 996,()000() 972,7854 ', REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 OHIO RIVER BASIN HUNTINGTON DISTRICT LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 25-D Cont'd (Section 28 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost - Location' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Sistersville, W. Va.'- Wall and levee 1,770,000 269,000 2,039,000 South Point, Ohio Wall and levee 992,000 117,000 1,109,000 South Portsmouth, Ky. Levee 370,000 137,000 507,000 Syracuse, Ohio' Levee 1,220,000 100,000 1,320,000 Vanceburg, Ky. Wall and levee 2,490,000 685,000 3,175,000" Waverly, W. Va.* t Wall and levee 3,480,000 251,000 3,731,000 Williamstown, W. Va.'6 Wall and levee 2,580,000 136,000 2,716,000 Zanesville (Muskingum River),Ohio Wall and levee 8,110,000 13,000,000 21,110,000 All projects are Ohio River, unless otherwise noted. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects," for all projects except: Massillon, Newark, and Roseville, Ohio. Latest cost estimate revised 1954, unless otherwise noted. Construction completed. For details see individual report. Includes $2,300 construction funds contributed by local interests. Construction funds contributed by Massillon Conservancy District. Includes $38,70 construction funds contributed by local interests. 9. Latest cost estimate revised, 1960. 10. Includes construction costs expended in fiscal year 1963 and 1964 on original project. 11. Includes estimate for modified project. 12. Includes $15,150 construction funds contributed by local interests. 13. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1977. 14. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1978. 15. Projects D)eauthorized in FY 1979. 16. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1980. 25-22 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) DAMS AND LAKES TABLE 25-E Tributary basin and reservoir (Section 29 of Text) Total estimated Stream Cost Big Sandy: Dewey, Ky2 Fishtrap, Ky 2 laysi, Va. 5 John W. Flannagan, Va.2 Guyandotte: Mud River, W. Va. " 16 [locking: Logan, Ohio 5 Tom Jenkins, Ohio 2 Kanawha: Big Bend, W. Va.5 '~ Birch, W. Va.5 Bluestone, W. Va.Z Clendenin, W. Va." Moores Ferry, Va. Poca, W. Va.5 Summersville, W. Va. 2 Sutton, W. Va.2 Little Kanawha: Burnsville, W. Va. 2 Leading Creek, W. Va. 1 West Fork, W. Va.5 " Muskingum: I)illon, Ohio2 Frazeysburg, Ohio 5 Millersburg, Ohio 5 Muskingum River Lakes (System of 14 reservoirs)2 Scioto: Big I)arby Creek, Ohio' Big Walnut, Ohio'4 Deer Creek, Ohio2 Delaware, Ohio2 Paint Creek, Ohio 2 Rocky Fork, Ohio ' Twelvepole Creek: 2 East Lynn, W. Va. Johns Creek Levisa Fork Russell Fork Pound River Mud River Clear Creek East Branch of Sunday Creek Greenbrier River Birch River New River Elk River New River Pocatalico River Gauley River Elk River Little Kanawha River Leading Creek West Fork Licking River Wakatomika Creek Killbuck Creek On various streams Big Darby Creek Big Walnut Creek Deer Creek Olentangy River Paint Creek Rock Fork East Fork Latest cost estimated revision 1954, unless otherwise noted. For details see individual report. Construction completed. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. Also see "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." Excludes $785,000 contributed by local interests. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. ,atest cost estimate revision 1963. See annual report for 1950 for individual report. 10. I1. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Total cost $6,349,000, additional $1,939,000 to be contributed by local interests. See Annual Report for 1974 for individual report. Latest cost estimate revision 1974. Replaced by Sutton Lake. Built by City of Columbus, Ohio (Hoover). Projects Deauthorized in FY 1977. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1980. 25-23 $ 9,000,000 54,854,000 10,100,000 22,088.0001 10.600,000 4.230,0()0 2,0(86,500' , 13,900,000 6,450,000 30,158,000. 13,000,000 25,600,000 21,600,000 48,080,00)()0 36,837,000.' 49,100.0001 40,4)0.)0001 39.700,000 1 34,518.000 7,200,00()()( 7 12,000,00(4 44,353.0001 70.300.400 20,280,000 .' 7,631,821' 26,926,0()00 4,410.000'" 34,400.000 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 25-F AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 28,1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 March 7, 1974 OHIO RIVER BASIN-HUNTINGTON DISTRICT (See Section 28 of Text) Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of Army at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of Army and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Provides Muskingum River Valley dams and reservoirs as set forth in official plan of Muskingum watershed conservancy district shall be included in flood control plan of Ohio River Basin. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of compre. hensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including Burr Oak Reservoir on Hocking River, Ohio at an estimated cost of $400,000. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including local flood protection works at Galax, Va., on Chestnut Creek, at an estimated cost of $276,125. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of compre- ,hensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-24 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT TABLE 25-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) PROJECT COSTS TO SEPT. 30, 1980 (See Section 28 of Text) New Work Total Appropriated to Sept. 30, 1978 Total Cost to Sept. 30,1979 Local Protections projects: Aberdeen, Ohio Augusta, Ky. Coal (;rove, Ohio Columbus, Ohio6 (;reenup, Ky. Manchester, Ohio Middleport, Ohio Ripley, Ohio Reservoirs and Lakes: Big Walnut, Ohio Birch, W. Va. Clendenin, W. Va. Frazeysburg, Ohio Hlaysi, Va. Leading Creek, W. Va. Rocky Fork, Ohio6 West Fork, W. Va. Total Ohio River Basin Allocation and costs for feasibility study. Includes $9,137 emergecy relief funds. Includes $1,783 emergency relief funds. Includes $10,920 emergency relief funds (Basin total). Allocation and costs for Phase I GDM Draft. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1977. $ 1,334 11,577' 3,389 11,2372 4,962 17,721' 9,783', 7,523 110,622 45,736' 33,000 5,000 2,656 272,880' 91,321 663,192' 1,291,9334 ..... 1,3.4 $ 1,334 11,577' 3,389 11,2372 4,962 17.721' 9,783 . 7,523 110,622 45,736' 33,000 5,000 2,656 272,8805 91,321 663,192' 1,291,9334 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 25-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 INSPECTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 25-H (See Section 36 of Text) Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, Ky. May. 80 Sep. 80 Athens, Ohio Oct. 80 Catlettsburg, Ky. Apr. 80 Sep. 80 Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. May 80 Sep. 80 Huntington, W. Va. May 80 Ironton, Ohio Apr. 80 Maysville, Ky. Apr. 80 Newark, Ohio Apr. 80 Parkersburg, W. Va. May 80 Sep. 80 Point Pleasant, W. Va. May 80 Sep. 80 Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio Apr.80 Sep. 80 Prestonsburg, Ky. Oct. 79 Russell, Ky. May 80 Sep. 80 South Williamson, Ky. Apr. 80 Williamson, W. Va. Apr. 80 Bramwell, W. Va. Jun. 80 Cairo, W. Va. Aug. 80 Canton (Nimishillen), Ohio Dec. 79 East Rainelle, W. Va. Jul. 80 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, W. Va. Aug. 80 Four Pole Creek, W. Va., Dec. 79 Galax, Va. Jun. 80 Grahn, Ky. Sep. 80 Griffithsville-Yawkey Dec. 79 Hitchins, Ky. Aug. 80 Inez, Ky. Sep. 80 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, W.Va. Aug. 80 Montcalm, W. Va. Jun. 80 Olive Hill, Ky. Aug. 80 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, Ohio Dec. 79 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, Ohio Jan. 80 Pax, W. Va. Jul. 80 Princeton, W. Va. Jun. 80 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, Ky. Dec. 79 Richwood and Fenwick, W. Va. Jul. 80 Ripley, W. Va. Aug. 80 Roseville, Ohio Apr. 80 Russell, Ky. Sep. 80 Smithfield, W. Va. Aug. 80 Utica, Ohio Aug. 80 West Union, Middle Island, W. Va. Aug. 80 25-26 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 25-1 (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last .Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Local Protection projects: Aberdeen, Ohio ,3139454 Ashland, Ky.- 1954 3,707,5384 Athalia, Ohio 1979 5,313,700 Athens, Ohio 1979 5 700 Augusta, Ky.' 11,577 Belpre, Ohio6 Brooklyn, W. Va.' Buena Vista, Ohio Burlington, Ohio' 1963 3,854,361 Catlettsburg, Ky.3 3 1955 2,753,551 Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. 1955 2753,551 Chamberburg, Ohio5 Chesapeake, Ohio' Cheshire, Ohio ' Chilo, Ohio- Clifton, W. Va. Coal Grove, Ohio' 4723,212398799 Coal River,W. Va.' 1979 472,229 Columbus, Ohio - 11,237 Dover, Ky.' 1962 614,598 East Rainelle, W. Va. 1962 614 Friendly, W. Va. 5 Fullerton, Ky.'953 480.536 Galax, Virginia 1953 480.536 Gallipolis, Ohio 5 Greenup, Ky.' 4,962 Hanging Rock, Ohio5 Hartford, W. Va.5 Henderson, W. Va.5 Higginsport, Ohio7 Hockingport, Ohio5 1956 7,172,8404 Huntington, W. Va. 1952 2,604,6464 Ironton, Ohio3 Letart, W. Va.5 Letart Falls, OhioW1 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, W. Va.' 17,721 Manchester, Ohio' 1975 24,101 Mapleshade, Ohio' Marietta, Ohio' Mason, W. Va. 1959 6,493,7474 Maysville, Ky. 199 6,493,747 Middleport, Ohio' 9,783 Miller, Ohio5 Millwood, W. Va.5 New Martinsville, W. Va' New Matamoras, Ohio5 Newport, Ohio s Normal, Ky.' Parkersburg, W. Va.3 1955 6,652,8274 Pt. Pleasant, W. Va." 1953 2,919,580' Pomeroy, Ohio 5 Portland, Ohio' 25-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) TABLE 25-I(Cont'd) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio. 1956 9,806,4244 Princenton, W. Va.3 1962 808,750 Proctorville, Ohio' Racine, Ohio s Ravenswood, W. Va.' Ripley, Ohio7 7,523 Riverview, W. Va.5 Russell, Ky.3 1953 237,193 St. Marys, W. Va.5 Sardis, Ohio5 Sciotoville, Ohio s Sisterville, W. Va." South Point, Ohio' South Portsmouth, Ky.' Syracuse, Ohio - Vanceburg, Ky.' Waverly, W. Va." Williamson, W. Va.3 1964 1,056,166 Williamstown, W. Va.' Zanesville, Ohio' Reservoirs and Lakes: Big Bend, W. Va. s Big Darby, Ohios 1969 3,349,568 Big Walnut, Ohio Birch, W. Va. 2 45,736 Clendenin, W. Va. Frazeysburg, Ohio' - 5,000 Haysi, Va.' - 2,656 Leading Creek, W. Va.' 1974 272,880 Logan, Ohio2 Millersburg, Ohio' Moores Ferry, Va.2 Mud River, W. Va.' Panther Creek Lake, W. Va.' 1976 22,879 Poca, W. Va.' Rocky Fork, Ohio 1950 91,321 Salt Creek Lake, Ohio8 1975 1,089,943 Utica Lake, Ohio' 1975 663,192 West Fork, W. Va.' 1974 663,192 1. Inactive 2. Deferred 3. Completed 4. Includes cost of floodwall rehabilitation 5. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1977. 6. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1978. 7. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1979. 8. Projects Deauthorized in FY 1980. 25-28 HUNTINGTON. W.VA., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 25-J (See Section 38 of Text) Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Study Identification FY 80 Cost Blacklick Creek, Reynoldsburg, Ohio $26,432 Laurel Fork, Matheny, W. Va. 24,407 Laurelville, Ohio 37,896 Upper Meadow River, W. Va. 878 Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.I,. 780 83rd Congress) Project and Location Stinson Creek, Grayson, Ky. $4,402 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.I.. 526, 79th Congress) Project and Location Marrietta College Boathouse, Marietta, Ohio $4,997 Momument Landing, Marietta, Ohio 35,492 New Haven, W. Va. 10,433 Parkersburg, W. Va. Stream Erosion Control, Evaluation and Demonstration (Section 32 of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress) Project Identification Oemonstration Projects at Undersignated Sites $36,36 Ohio River DI)emonstration Projects Evaluation of Extent of Streambank Erosion 3,299 25-29 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT* This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Allegheny River, Pa. ............. 26-2 2. Construction of locks and dams, Ohio River .................... 26-2 3. Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va........... ............. 26-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River ..... 26-3 5. Tygart Lake, W. Va................. 26-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects ....................... 26-4 F'lood Control 7. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ................. ........... 8. Chartiers Creek, Pa................. 9. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin......................... 10. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa.......... .............. ...... 11. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa............... 12. Elkins, W. Va............ ... 13. G(irty's Run, Millvale, Pa ............ 14. Johnstown, Pa. ...... .......... 15. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and N.Y........................ 16. Ioyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa..... ................ 17. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa.... ............ 26-4 26-4 26-5 26-5 26-6 26-6 26-7 26-7 26-8 26-8 26-9 Flood Control (Continiued) Page 18. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio..................... 26-10 19. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ................ 26-10 20. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) ........... . ........... 26-10 21. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, Pa...... ...................... 26-11 22. Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y............ 26-11 23. Shenarigo River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and Ohio .......... 26-11 24. Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va...... 26-12 25. Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. .... 26-13 26. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. ............. ........ 26-14 27. Union City Darn, Pa. ............ 26-14 28. Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa.......... 26-15 29. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and Md. ......... 26-15 30. Inspection of completed flood control projects................. 26-16 31. Other authorized flood control projects ......................... 26-16 32. Flood control work under special autborization .................... 26-16 Gen ral In ,'esti(ations 33. Surveys... ...................... 34. Collection and study of basic data ... 835. Research and development .......... 26-16 26-17 26-17 26-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. Location. The Allegheny River is 325 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, Pa., where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, Pa. to above East Brady, Pa. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. (See Tables 26-A, 26-B and 26-C for costs, authorizing legislation and statistics.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-torail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: A contract was awarded Sept. 9, 1980 for Resurfacing Land Wall and Esplanade and Paving Access Road, Lock and Dam 3, at an estimated cost of $290,950. Scheduled completion date is July, 1981. Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs made to structures to maintain them in serviceable condition. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing proj ect is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DI)AMS, OHIIIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA. Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, W. Va., and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, W. Va. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and damp 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, Pa., by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended.Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to pract ically full width at mouth. The proposed Grays Landing lock and dam and Point Marion replacement lock would replace existing obsolete lock and dam 7 and lock 8, respectively. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be donein 1977. Major rehabilitation was approved and work started in June 1978, to be completed in fiscal year 1981. (See Tables 26-A, 26-B and 26-D for costs, authorizing legislation and statistics.) Local coopera tion. None required. 26-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are.not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. There are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work on the locks and dam 3 major rehabilitation project progressed to about 92% completion. Study for replacement of locks and dams for lower reach of river is being conducted as part of the continuing modernization program for the entire Monongahela River. Estimate for the submittal date of the Reconnaissance Report on the Monongahela River Navigation System, Stage I Studies, is January 1981. Operation and maintenance, general: A contract was awarded Sept. 26, 1980 for Replacement of Crane, Opekiska Lock and Dam, at a cost of $129,275. A contract was also awarded on same date for purchase of Remote Control, Opekiska Lock and Dam, at a cost of $45,700. Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to maintain them in a serviceable condition. Condition at end of fiscal year. A controlling depth of 9 feet is maintained for the entire length of river, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to full width of river at mouth. Rehabilitation of. locks and dam 3 began in June 1978 and scheduled to be complete in November 1980. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 progressed to approximately 92% completion at end of fiscal year. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, W.VA. Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral W.Va. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, W.Va. and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, W.Va., and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, W.Va.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Public visitation to the project is approaching 1,000,000 recreation days annually and this upward trend in attendance indicates an increased demand for upgrading and expansion of publicuse facilities. Current estimate for construction of recreation facilities at completed project is $1,450,000 of which $600,000 are non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. This cost-sharing agreement has been executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications were initiated in August 1980 for recreation facilities at Tygart Lake State Park and Pleasant Creek Hunting and Fishing Areas. Construction is presently scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1982. A contract and lease has been negotiated with the West Virginia Dept. of Recreation for recreational development at the above designated sites under the cost-sharing program. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $1,190,500. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1980 are $222,441,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 26-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 ('n dition (aten doffiscaly ear. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.7 acres in fee simple, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. 6. )OTHER AUTHORIZEI) NAVIGATION I)I()OJ ECTS See Table 26-F on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control 7. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Locttiton. I)am is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties. Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, Ohio.) E.,1istinl project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. DI)am consistsof a partially controlleld., concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project dlescription, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate for construction of recreational and sanitary facilities at completed project is $2,876,70() of which $100,000 are non-Federal costs. LIoc' cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non- Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Opesrations (Ma d!r vsults duringtfisc(l !lar.N ew work: Plans and specifications for upgrading sanitary facilities at Mill Creek Recreation Area were initiated in fiscal year 1980 and progressed to ,90, comlpletion. An award of $7,60()() for cleaning and grouting sanitary deficiencies at above site was made in August 1980 and 100%c(o)m'p,le te. Additional awards for repair of sanitary deficiencies at Mill (.'reek pending further review and investigation of the problemsat the site. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $6,415,600; total benefits through September 30, 1980, $178,851,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of publicuse facilities continued. Contract for preparation of a Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 1 progressed to approximately 79% completion at end of fiscal year. (Con(ition tt nd of'fiscal year, Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started January 1942 and completed June 1943. Land acquired for project consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 1,098.7 acres. 8. CHARTIERS CREEK, IPA. Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, Pa.) Exristing project. Provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg-Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. I'roject was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Estimated cost for new work (1980) is $40(),100,000 of which $31,000,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non-Federal cost. oca('l coo peration. Responsible local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, an(t spoil-disposal areas for construction; bear cost of all relocations and alterations of sewer, water, gas, oil, electric powerlines. and other utility alterations; railroad track shifts; highway and street m odifications: and( construction of new o(r reco(nstruction of existing highway bridges made necessary by construction work: hold United States free from damages; establish channel limit lines within each county along entire waterway (downstream from existing im- )rovements at Washington, I'a., and prevent any encroachment which woul( reduce flood carrying caplacity of the channel so (lefined; inform affected interests at least annually that project will not provi(le complete protection from flood greater in magnitude than that which occured in September 1912: and maintain and operate proj- 26-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT ect works after completion. Board of County Commissioners, Washington County, local cooperating agency for James G. Fulton Flood. Protection Project provided formal assurances of local cooperation which were accepted by District Engineer on July 12, 1967 and November 27, 1967, respectively. Tri-party contract between Allegheny County Sanitary Authority, Chartiers Valley District Flood Control Authority and United States of America covering relocation of sanitary sewer facilities in James G. Fulton Flood Protection Project was approved April 4, 1968. Local interests completed acquisition of rights-ofentry and arrangements for utility adjustments for all 5 Units of James G. Fulton Protection Project and for Units 1 and 2A of Canonsburg- Houston reach. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,219,967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of Unit 4 of James G. Fulton Flood Protection Project progressed to about 84% completion; scheduled for completion in March 1981. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by the Chartiers Creek project through September 30, 1980, totaled $11,144,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for opera.- tion and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel. improvement is underway and approximately 84% complete. Canonsburg- Houston Reach- Construction of Unit 1 was started in December 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of this reach, are 95% complete; 57 tracts in this project; 3 tracts acquired. Acreage in project 53.91; acquired 3.01. Right-of-entry obtained from Penn Central - 4 tracts, 3.87 acres. Work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rights-of-way. 9. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, Pa., 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, Pa., and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, Pa.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Estimated cost of sanitary facilities required to upgrade area and comply with sanitary codes is $250,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $304,500; total flood control be efits through September 30, 1980 are $513,789,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. (ondition at (n(ld of fiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam and appurtenances was started in April 1949 and completed in December 1952. Furnishing and erecting of 2 gantry cranes and 14 crest gates by contract were started in November and December 1951, and completed in August and September 1953, respectively. Relocation of main line of Conemaugh division. P'ennsylvania Railroad, was started by contract in April 1946 and completed in September 1950(). Iand ac(uired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7,635.1 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 513.2 acres. 10(). CROO()()KEI) CREEK IAKE, ()HIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles 26-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, Pa., and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, Pa.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimated cost of sanitary facilities, required to upgrade area and comply with state sanitary codes, is $291,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for replacement of water treatment plant in the control tower at Crooked Creek Dam awarded August 16, 1979; $83,576, and completed March 10, 1980. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $61,100; total benefits through September 30, 1980 are $116,303,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. Condition at end offiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed October 1940. Land acquisition for project consists of 2,563.57 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 98.98 acres. 11. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is in Elk County, Pa., on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, Pa., and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Elk County, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, Pa.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Estimated cost of construction of additional sanitary facilities, required to upgrade area and comply with state sanitary codes, is $195,000; current total estimate of recreation facilities at completed project, $336,800. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications were initiated fiscal year in 1980 for a restroom and potable water supply system at the campground recreation area; approximately 30% complete at fiscal year end. Construction is presently scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1982'. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $15,400, total benefits through September 30, 1980; $28,596,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Condition at end offiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for lowwater regulation purposes in Clarion River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Land acquired for project consists of 287.2 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 1,296.7 acres. 12. ELKINS, W. VA. Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, W. Va., about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, Pa. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, W. Va.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing city of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. 26-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine inspections were made. A contract was awarded Sept. 24, 1980 for Clearing and Bar Removal and Inlet Works Intake Grating, at an estimated cost of $41,688. Scheduled completion date is December 22, 1980. Cumulative total flood damages prevented to September 30, 1980, $3,027,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was started May 1946 and completed May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 526.01 acres. 13. GIRTY'S RUN, MILLVALE, PA. Location. Girtys Run rises in the Fox Ridge area of the southern portion of McCandless Township, Allegheny County, and flows generally southeast through Ross and Shaler Townships and the Borough of Millvale to enter the Allegheny River from the right bank at River Mile 3.6 above the "Point" at Pittsburgh. (See U.S. Geological Survey Chart for Pittsburgh, Pa., East.) Existing project. To decrease flooding conditions in the Borough of Millvale area, project consists of lowering the existing channel bottom within the limits of the existing walls. The lowering was accomplished by a 16-foot average bottom width of cut in rock or overburden averaging 4 feet in depth in the lower 2,750 feet of the project and 2 2 feet in depth for the remaining portion. Existing masonry walls of the channel were replaced and/or stabilized where required. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Estimated Federal cost is $2,000,000; estimated non-Federal cost of lands, easements and rights-of-way, utility adjustments, and amount in excess of $2 million limitation established by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, is estimated at $1,836,722. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and spoil-disposal areas as necessary for construction; bear cost of all necessary relocations, removals, alterations and adjustments of buildings, highways and highway bridges, and water, sanitary sewer, and other utilities and related or special facilities; hold the United States free from damages due to the construction; establish and enforce channel limit lines to prevent encroachment on the improved channel; maintain and operate the project works after completion; at least annually notify affected interests that the project will not provide complete flood protection. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Borough of Millvale on June 17, 1975, were accepted by the District Engineer on June 20, 1975. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the County of Allegheny, Pennsylvania, have each agreed to provide to the Borough of Millvale 50% of all estimated non- Federal costs. Non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $701,722. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work on the project started July 11, 1976 with a scheduled completion date of November 22, 1977; however, by that date the contract work had progressed to only about 50% of completion and it was found necessary to terminate that contract for default due to unsatisfactory and untimely pefrformance. A formal hearing was held before the Division Engineer regarding contractor's appeal on July 26, 1978. Division Engineer confirmed decision to terminate contract. Approval was received to permit an award of a construction contract for completion of the remaining work. Contract awarded May 4, 1978, and completed June 26, 1980 at a final estimated cost of $2,092,000. Final acceptance made on September 9, 1980. A hearing was held July 8-15, 1980, inclusive, before the Engineer Board of Contract Appeals regarding the default contractor's appeal; a decision is not expected to be rendered in the near future. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project 100% complete on June 26, 1980. Final acceptance made Sept. 9, 1980. 14. JOHNSTOWN, PA. Location. In southwestern Cambria County, Pa., about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, Pa. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, Pa.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. 26-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities and routine investigations and inspections were made. Flood damages prevented by project for fiscal year were estimated to be $113,000; cumulative total to September 30, 1980 was $414,158,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. For further details see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1962. Land acquired for project consists of flowage easements over 192 acres. 15. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. AND N.Y. Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, Pa., and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, Pa., and Cattaraugus County, N.Y. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, Pa.-N.Y., and Randolph and Salamanca, N.Y.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gatecontrolled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938, and 1941. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimated cost of additional recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade area and comply with sanitary codes is $950,000. A major rehabilitation plan was approved for repairs to the dam stilling basin. Current cost estimate for this work is: $6,000,000. Local cooperlation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325- megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. ()peration and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A major rehabilitation plan was appIroved for repairs to the dam stilling basin. Current cost estimate for this work is: $6,000,000. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $292,900; total to end of this fiscal year, $282,657,000. Of 2,212 surface tracts authorized for acquisition, all have been acquired. Final judgments remain to be entered on 28 surface tracts acquired by condemnation. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960 is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a costsharing agreement with Cattaraugus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,646.6 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 22,420.4 acres. 16. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, Pa., and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimated cost of completed recreation work and a reanalysis of sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $2,302,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and restults during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Plans and specifications for the Resource Manager's Complex and Darn Picnic Area sanitary facilities were initiated in current fiscal year and about 65% complete at end of fiscal year. Construction award for this work is currently scheduled for May 1981. Contract for Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 1 was awarded April 4, 1979 for $1 10,993 and progressed to about 60% completion at end of fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $59,3()()00; total benefits to September 30, 1980, $155,391,000. Activities under reservoir manage- 26-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT ment program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,334.7 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 86.8 acres. 17. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, Pa.,21.6 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, Pa., and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, Pa.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimated cost of recreation and sanitary facilities at completed project is $1,262,000. Of this amount, $479,000 would be non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial wildlife development. On June 7, 1979 a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. G(;overnment and the Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. On September 9, 1980, a contract for camping and day-use recreational development was executed between the U.S. (;overnment and the County of Armstrong. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial camping and day-use recreational development and 50% of the costs for future development. Each cooperating authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacements without cost to the (;overnment of all facilities developed for their support. Operattions ( tnrde su lts d(r ingf iscal yea r. New work: Plans and specifications were completed for recreational development at: Hunting Access Area, and Milton Loop Launching Ramp and Fishermans Access Area. Plans and specifications were also initiated for sanitary facilities at Outflow Fishing Area and progressed to approximately 90% completion at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications for Milton Loop camping area recreation development were initiated and were approximately 80% complete at end of fiscal year. A contract was awarded July 30, 1980 for construction of Hunting Access Area at a cost of $45,312 and a contract was awarded September 24, 1980 for construction of Fishing Access Area at a cost of $225,316. Scheduled completion date for these two contracts is summer 1981. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $88,200; total to September 30, 1980, $144,592,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at en( offiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in February 1939 and completed in June 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,532.6 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 83.5 acres. 18. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO Loc ation. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls. Ohio. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, Ohio.) I<,,'istil projct. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation and recreation. I)am consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure wit-h gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolle( d side-hill spillway through left abutment. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West IBranch Reservoir. Mahoning River, ()hio). P'roject was authorized by 1958 Flood C(ontrol Act (II. Doc. 191, 85th Cong., 1st sess.), with local contribution reqtuirements modlified by Flood Control Act of 19i). Fedral cost of coml)leted project was $17,370,000)()(). Ical interests contributed$323(),()()() d(luring period of construction bringing initial project cost to $2),60,00. Current estimate for construction of 26-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 recreation facilities at completed project is $1,065,000, of which $250,000 are non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid 339,809.60 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,232,849.60 towards total of $5,200,000 non-Federal costs. Operaitions and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 8 approximately 80% complete at end of fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $2,946,700. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1980 are $6 1,013,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end( offiscal year. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 27.9 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. 19. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 9 mileg above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, Ohio, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.) Ex.risting project. A reservoir for flood control, low-water regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate of total recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $2,014,000 of which $767,500 would be non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non- Federal cost-shar ing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and lowflow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $3,797,600. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1980 are $49,669,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. Condition at end offiscal year. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.6 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. 20. 01110 RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Locatio. A series of levees, flood walls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within PIittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 26-B, 26-G and 26-H on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operaltions a lt results during fiscal !year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection 26-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $6,948,900 during this fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preliminary surveys and plans are complete for a number of projects included in comprehensive plan. Status of projects selected fbr construction under this authorization is given in individual reports. 21. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, Pa., about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (bee Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, Pa.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities and routine investigations and inspections were made. Cumulative total flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $28,278,000 to end of September 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started May 1946 and was completed June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government, have been operated and maintained by borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. 22. ROOT CREEK, BOLIVAR, N.Y. Location. The problem area is located in the southwestern portion of the State of New York in the Village of Bolivar, Allegany County, about 17 road miles east of Olean, New York. (See Geological Survey Chart for Olean, N.Y.) Existing project. Flooding of the Village of Bolivar from Root Creek causes estimated annual damages in the amount of about $53,000. The project will consists of 3,230 feet of Root Creek channel modification, including moderate widening, deepening and slope protection. The plan will provide Bolivar with protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 100 years. Total first cost of the plan is estimated to be $1,250,000. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Final EIS filed with CEQ on March 11, 1976. The Detailed Project Report was approved April 29, 1976. Plans and specifications are complete. Assurances were executed by the State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation and accepted by the Department of the Army on March 23, 1977. All interests in real estate required for project construction are available. Reliable utility adjustment schedule from New York DEC has been received. Land acquired for project consists of 7,809 acres. (See Table 26-A for cost and financial statement and Table 26-K for fiscal year costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are: Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas, necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, and comply with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), approved January 2, 1971; provide without cost to the United States all modifications, alterations or relocations of buildings, roads, streets, bridges, utilities, pipelines and related or special facilities necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damaged due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; at least annually notify interests affected that project will not provide complete flood protection; and bear and pay to the United States prior to initiation of construction, all Federal costs for the project, if any, in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000 as established by Public Law 858, 80th Congress, approved June 30, 1948, as amended. Condition at end offiscal year. Contract for construction of Bolivar Flood Protection Project was awarded September 17, 1979 for $945,077.71. Construction progressed to approximately 71% completion and current scheduled completion date is November 26, 1980. Bulk of work remaining is gabion placement which is 64% complete. 23. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. AND OHIO Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, Pa., and about 33 miles 26-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, Pa., to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, Pa., and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, Pa.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gatecontrolled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate of recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $2,243,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operitions and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and lowflow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $480,700. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1980 are $12,429,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for lowwater regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,6:32.2 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 197.7 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. 24. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, W. VA. Loc tion. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, W. Va. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, W. Va.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam would be of the concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works will consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway will be uncontrolled. Storage capacity will be 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1980) is $189,000,000 (includes $15,335,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,300,000 for construction; and $10,300 annually for operation, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $11,035,000; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $460,- 000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamrnflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the City of Westoln. West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Fedieral Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89- 72, was executed by the State of West Virginiaon March 27, 1977. ILocal cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney (;eneral of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of I.IL. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the 26-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation. relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va. project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Construction contract for relocations of W. Va. Rt. 30, Section 1, awarded May 10, 1978 and completed January 10, 1980. Estimated final contract amount: $3,788,000. Final payment estimate is being processed. Cost-reimbursable contract for relocation, rearrangement and alteration of certain gas pipeline facilities, Jarvis Farm Meter Station, Machine Shop and Warehouse, and telephone facilities awarded August 14, 1979 and progressed to approximately 35% complete. Estimated cost is $5,000,000 and scheduled completion date is February 1982. Additionally, a contract was awarded November 26, 1979 for construction of replacement compressor station at a cost of $7,735,560. Construction progressed to about 20% complete and scheduled completion date is December 31, 1981. A F.E.R.C. permit was issued to Equitable Gas Company (contractor) on September 29, 1980 for construction of the compressor station and pipeline facilities. Furthermore, four separate utility contracts were awarded in fiscal year 1980 for relocation of certain telephone/pipeline facilities to accommodate the Stonewall project - Rt. 19, Section 1. Two of the relocation contracts are scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1981 and the remaining two contracts are scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1982. Land acquisition and detailed engineering work continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Funds to initiate preconstruction planning were appropriated in FY 1968 and for land acquisition in FY 1970. The FY 1970 funds were placed in budgetary reserve and allotted in FY 1971. Funds to initiate construction were appropriated in FY 1971. Environmental impact statement (EIS) was filed with CEQon November 12, 1971. On July 11, 1974 the Upper West Fork River Watershed Association filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of W. Va. seeking an injunction against further prosecution of the project based primarily on alleged inadequacy of the project EIS. On May 3, 1976 the Federal District Court entered judgment for the Government and dismissed the action by the West Fork Watershed Association. The plaintiff appealed the decision and the appeal was argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) on January 13, 1977. On January 9, 1978 the U.S. Supreme Court denied the Association's Petition for Certiorari. A public meeting was held in Weston, W. Va. on June 13, 1977 to explain land acquisition policies and procedures. The provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) evaluation. The preliminary evaluation was completed in the third quarter FY 1979 which indicated no significant adverse impacts from the placement of fill into the waters of the United States in conjunction with the project construction. The District Engineer sent out a Public Notice and requested State Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act in August 1979. Water quality certification was received from State of W. Va. on July 21, 1980 and final Section 404(b)(1) evaluation was signed by the District Engineer on October 21, 1980. In August 1980, J.F. Allen Co. filed suit in the Federal District Court for Northern District of W. Va. against A. Weaver, SBA Administrator, et. al., seeking to enjoin award of construction contract for Rt. 19, Section 1, to SBA and its prospective subcontractor under the 8(a) program, based upon the contention that the subject program cannot be used in a geographical area where no disadvantaged firms presently exist. A hearing is scheduled to be held October 30, 1980. Land acquisition, detailed engineering work and construction progressing on schedule; a total of 436 tracts of an estimated 950 tracts required for the project have been acquired. 25. TENMIIjE CREEK AT MARIANNA, PA. Location. On Tenmile Creek in and near Marianna and vicinity, Washington County, Pa., and about 13 miles southeast of the City of Washington, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Amity, Pa.) Existing project. Flood protection along Tenmile Creek in Villages of East Marianna and West Zollarsville by channel widening, deepening and minor realignment for adistance of 7,761 feet with the lower end of improvement beginning 5,035 feet downstream of existing Jefferson Avenue highway bridge which connects the Villages of East Marianna and West Zollarsville, Pa. Improvement is designed to eliminate damages from floods up to the magnitude of that of March 1963 with slight residual damage. Proj- 26-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 ect was authorized for construction by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. (See Table 26-A for cost and financial statement and Table 26-K for fiscal year costs.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, rights-of-way and spoil disposal areas for construction; adjust utilities, hold United States free from damages; establish channel limit lines and prevent encroachment in channel so delineated; and maintain project works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Formal assurances of local cooperation provided by Bethlehem Township, the local cooperating agency, were accepted by District Engineer on May 24, 1968 and supplemented by joint agreement November 20, 1976. This modification provides that local interests will comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646), and make all relocations payments, provide all assistance and pay all expenses and/or litigation costs incidental to the transfer of such real property to the Township as required. Financial and legal ability of Township to fulfill the assurances have been provided. Agreement dated April 14, 1977 executed between the Department of Environmental Resources and the Township of West Bethlehem encumbering $30,000 to the Marianna Local Flood Protection Project. Operations a nd results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for environmental improvement awarded August 5, 1980 for $64,000. Actual construction is presently scheduled to begin in Spring 1981. All necessary rights-of-way for environmental improvement work were received from the Township of West Bethlehem on March 22, 1980 ('odition (it e(d of fiscal year. Contract for construction of channel improvement awarded October 7, 1977 and completed February 19, 1979 at a final cost of $1,168,997.48. A contract for environmental improvement awarded August 5, 1980 with construction scheduled to begin in Spring 1981. 26. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, P)A. Location. DI)am is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PIa., and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pa. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, Pa. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, Ia.) E.risting project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled salddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. P'roject was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate for construction of recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $2,582,700. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of restrooms at Kellettville camping area awarded September 7, 1979 and completed June 30, 1980. Final cost: $148,243.11. Plans and specifications for Kellettville Phase II - restroom, water tie-in, site improvement and electric service were initiated and completed in current fiscal year. Plans and specifications for restroom, water supply, electric service and site improvement at Spillway Boat Launch Area were initiated and progressed to approximately 90% complete by end of fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and lowflow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $92,700. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1980 are $152,637,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. 27. UNION CITY DAM, PA. Loc(ition. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. D)amsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, Pa., and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, Pa. - N.Y.) E.'isting project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolledl sid(e-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 26-14 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project was modified to provide for'a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the costsharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a three-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, Pa., to Pittsburgh, Pa., inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current cost estimate for sanitary facilities required to upgrade area and comply with sanitary code is $150,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part will not provide protection against maximum floods. November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to costshare the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $162,500. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1980 are $7,134,000. Condition (it end offiscal year. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of thedam wasstarted in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 465.2 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 2,154.6 acres. 28. W()OI)COCK CREEK LAKE, PA. Location. In Crawford County, northwestern P)ennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, Pa. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, Pa.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a three-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, Pa., to Pittsburgh, Pa., inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate for construction of sanitary facilities, required to comply with state sanitary codes, at completed project is $1,111,000. Local coopgration. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek Lake is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. ))Opetrio ns (Indl resUlts during fiscal tear. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $276,800, total through September 30. 1980 is $982,000. Condition at end o ffiscal / ear. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River, from Franklin, )a. to LPittsburgh, Pa., inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in ,July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,733.2 acres in fee sim le and flowage easements over 1.2 acres. 29. YOUGIIIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. AND MI). Location. I)am is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, P'a. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, Pa., and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PIa. Reservoir is in Fayctte and Somerset Counties, Pa., and Garrett 26-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 County, Md. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, Pa., Accident, Md., West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, navigation aid, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. (See Table 26-A for project costs.) Current estimate of recreation and sanitary facilities at completed project is $3,671,400. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of restrooms at the Mill Run Recreation Area was awarded September 4, 1979 and completed July 22, 1980 at a final cost of $149,087.42. Operation and maintenance, general: A contract was awarded May 22, 1980 for resurfacing area around maintenance building and road to launch facility at a cost of $10,620, and completed June 28, 1980. A contract was awarded August 27, 1980 for paving access road and parking area at Somerfirld Recreation Area - South at an estimated cost of $49,314. Construction is not anticipated to begin before Spring 1981. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $329,300. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1980 are $121,530,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. Condition at end offiscal year. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for flood control, navigation, and pollution abatement purposes. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started June 1940 and completed May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee simple and flowage easements over 0.48 acre. A license was issued Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve public needs. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 26-I for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $56,577. Total cost to September 30, 1980 was $577,527. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 26-J on other authorized flood control projects. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 26-K. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 26-K. For Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251, 93rd Cong.) See Table 26-K. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Advance preparation $ 70,730 Emergency operations 6,695 Rehabilitation work: Spangler, PA Windber, PA Total cost for fiscal year: General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Flood control studies Review of authorized projects Coordination with other agencies Supplemental preauthorization studies: Clarion River Basin, Acid Mine Drainage, Phase I Total cost for fiscal year: 91,238 6,318 $174,981 $774,232 3,201 15,598 148,844 $941,875 26-16 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 35. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BASIC DATA $64,107 was expended this fiscal year for a Costs this fiscal year were $201,860 for flood water resources planning study of Sewickley plain management services and $1,170 for Creek Watershed. hydrologic studies. (See Table 26-L Completed Flood Plain Studies.) 26-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September in Text 30, Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 1980 1. Allegheny River, Pa. 3. Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va. 5. Tygart Lake, W. Va. 7. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, Ohio 8. Chartiers Creek, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Conemaugh River Lake. Ohio River Basin, Pa. 10. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 11. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 12. Elkins, W. Va. 13. Girtys Run, Millvale, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contributed 'unds) 14. Johnstown, Pa. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 996,000 1,253,000 821,506 1,427,721 1,816,000 1,779,433 338,304 177,221 5,260,000 5,157,468 326,100 310,282 185,0oo0 57,454 734,200 651,726 3,281,000 395,765 306,919 256,600 241,085 13,000 1,081 264,400 255,719 308,400 279,008 1,000 127 459,000 694,934 302,043 1,846,642 1,859,428 2,001,758 1,995,872 5,356,200 5,355,123 336,976 345,989 3,500 114,530 697,097 783,408 -550,000 1,484,246 353,809 353,809 277,960 288,363 -4,500 288,405 294,437 342,524 354,281 9,500 10,893 861,416 70,000 323,405 3,027,900 2,923,387 6,020,000 5,293,853 5,397,300 5,468,999 394,700 400,494 25,000 4,133 955,390 948,498 -1,135,000 731,949 -123,610 355,621 357,207 114,000 18,614 382,834 379,493 409,304 418,070 8,600 8,612 1,060,000 369,181 -156,435 400,400 400,339 3,093,800 3,090,667 5,777,000 5,899,630 5,146,800 4,972,781 60,000 25,078 514,600 476,838 35,000 32,764 948,800 900,415 2,299,000 2,574,399 119,906 441,300 403,274 9,383 109,636 460,500 452,913 15,000 14,984 411,000 402,723 73,900 32,188 75,000 744,510 231,451 7,000 7,064 18,157,860 18,157,8601 36,218,8622 36,080,2192 143,000,0853 142,110,5494 98,828,2145 98,554,8006 18,491,8446 18,456,9227 4,909,039 4,857,306 8,745,3678 8,721,3879 7,871,583 7,796,596 24,983,200 24,898,074 4,219,967 4,215,795 45,684,41110 45,684,41110 3,617,113 3,568,673 4,336,77111 4,334,2191' 3,754,621 3,738,162 9,539,60113 9,539,585'14 3,483,435 3,462,224 1.772,627 1,772,627 183,487 141,752 3,135,000 3,072,136 701,722 701,305 8,865,38815 8,865,38815 3.222,796 3,222,765 26-18 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Se e Section in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 Total Cost to Total Cost to September 30, FY 80 1980 15. .Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and N.Y. 16. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 17. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 18. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio 19. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio 20. Ohio River Basin, Pittsburgh, Pa. District Consolidated 21. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 22. Root Creek, Bolivar, New York 23. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. 24. Stonewall Jackson Lake W. Va. 25. Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. 26. Tionesta Lake Ohio River Basin, Pa. New Work Approp. Cost Maint.. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 361,696 339,274 734,700 552,980 83,000 7,227 307,000 304,269 i10,000 7,155 198,000 190,696 294,900 279,981 8,900 3,662 239,600 224,574 8,000 8,185 38,904 598,000 752,936 749,900 711,670 24,000 191,931 600,000 50,183 3,000 1,430 497,500 415,393 25,000 237,186 817,186 963,740 29,000 104,757 402,158 391,476 437,000 110,108 276,246 277,271 442,987 413,717 110,000 114,419 265,154 269,422 327,600 327,785 10,956 253,300 1,285,048 776,873 762,655 5,000,000 3,852,326 537,000 1,085,585 210,000 2,448 561,279 624,265 4,736 C92,100 673,985 -2,315 677,214 664,317 10,000 37,666 264,206 263,866 329,174 369,018 5,000 4,648 369,672 378,627 32,700 32,951 460,000 27,058 25,153 1,113,297 1,137,310 9,295,000 10,076,022 275,000 155,990 240,000 51,291 669,700 683,159 -3100,, 737, 760, -2,0 764, , 711,9 61,( 43,( 346,: 305, 434, 390, -19, 294, 290,: 13,400 13,412 661,035 727,192 2,995 1,244,700 1,201,999 12,300,000 11,234,875 30,211 7,000 187,586 708,600 721,146 378 109,310,81116 904 109,288,78217 100 8,260,578 141 8,197,271 331 5,562,53118 - 5,562,53218 900 4,745,074 562 4,659,461 000 7,039,34519 693 6,619,96720 800 3,682,116 466 3,631,313 - 47,033 - 47,033 - 17,355,09721 - 17,355,09721 100 3,338,189 939 3,289,219 271 4,253,02922 - 4,253,02922 300 3,372,164 850 3,359,691 - 985,1972.1 -985,19723 3,586,10724 3,586,10724 699,900 699,887 1,251,385 882,520 40,227,20125 40,211,7932 6,892,617 6,809,974 30,550,200 29,004,097 1,556,800 1,474,707 7,178,00527 6,960,3762" 6,073,233 6,047,061 26-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 1980 27. Union City New Work Dam, Pa. Approp. 14,559,800 Cost 1,828 957 - 14,559,800 Maint. � Approp. 151,400 221,406 205,062 209,200 1,083,468 Cost 142,817 225,969 205,308 211,746 1,079,026 28. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, Pa. Approp. 43,000 18,916,7002 Cost 3,658 2,158 - 36,588 18,910,28830 Maint. Approp. 245,700 254,697 335,924 364,900 Cost 1,878,071 248,648 254,648 330,031 368,436 1,869,294 29. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake, Approp. 647,500 461,000 -56,004 12,176,26831 Ohio River Cost 24,529 735,072 -71,976 233,521 11,923,43332 Basin, Pa. and Maint. Md. Approp. 579,500 742,726 785,803 937,100 7,677,389 Cost 604,594 680,797 769,786 944,663 7,597,978 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,354 public 'works acceleration, executive funds (1963). 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects and $13.797,000 for major rehabilitation (1978-1980). 4. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects and $12,916,923 for major rehabilitation (1978-1980). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $742 for maintenance for previous project. 6. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public works funds and $60,000 Code713 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000.000 public works funds and $25,078 Code 713 funds. 8. Includes $1,547,000 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $100,000 Code 71:3 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 9. Includes $1,523,900 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 71 fundsexcludes $100,0(0 contributed by local interest. 10. Includes $5,:51 from emergency relief funds. 11. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $131,883 Code 711 funds. 12. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $129,331 Code 711 funds. 13. Includes $156,828 Code 711 funds. 14. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 16. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $16,340 Code 711 funds and $572,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $389.300 contributed by local interest. 17. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $12,904 Code 711 funds and $562,581 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 18. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $109,670 Code 711 funds. 19. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $134,000 Code 711 funds and $484,000 Code 713 funds. 20. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $131,757 Code 711 funds and $66,865 Code 713 funds. 21. Includes $53,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,232,850 for new work expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 23. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 24. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 25. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 26. Includes $1,726,173 Code 711 funds and $1,614,045 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $1,688,704 Code 711 funds, $275,900 Code 712 funds and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,471,074 Code 711 funds, $275,900 Code 712 funds and $24,2()1 emergency relief funds. 29. Includes $43.000 ( ode 711 funds. 30. InclUdes $36,588 ('Code 711 funds. 31. Includes $2,501,364 Code 711 funds. :2. Includes $2,248.520 Code 711 funds. 26-20 TABLE 26-B PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) Aug. 5, 1886 For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sept. 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a movable dam.) June 3, 1896 For locks and dams 2 and 3 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19351 Aug. 30, 1935' For locks and dams 4 to 8, inclusive For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel in head of pool 8. June 26, 1934' Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA. (See Section 3 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 'Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. June 13, 1902 Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Mar. 3, 1905 Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Mar. 3, 1905 Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Mar. 2, 1907 Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Mar. 4, 1913 Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Sept. 22, 1922 Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Iengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Iock and dam 8 (second chamber, $504,465; Reconstruct dam 4, $397,211: Marine ways. repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. July 3, 1930 Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Jan. 31, 1931:' Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. June 26, 19342 ()peration and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. May 17, 1950 Modification of existing project as follows: 'rovide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15. inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. P'rovide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom wid(th and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. P'rovide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River. into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200(f)e()e t and a 9-foot project depth. Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, and Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756. Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong.. Ist sess. 26-21 Acts DDooccuummeennttss Acts REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District (See Section 20 of Text) Aug. 28, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 March 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 16, 1977 Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. Additional $18 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong., River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). S. Doc. 2281, 95th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Included in the Emergency Relief Administration program April 8. 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st Cong., 3d sess. 26-22 TABLE 26-C ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Ele- Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal vation Pool Level1 Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Con- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, Pa. 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $ 1,763,485 3 14.5 Cheswick, Pa. 56 360 13.5 734.5 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 1,875,665 4 24.2 Natrona, Pa. 56 360 10.5 745.0 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707,690 5 30.4 Freeport, Pa. 56 360 11.8 756.8 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 6 36.3 Clinton, Pa. 56 360 12.2 769.0 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 7 45.7 Kittanning, Pa. 56 360 13.1 782.1 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 8 52.6 Templeton, Pa. 56 360 17.9 800.0 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fiyed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 9 62.2 Rimer, Pa. 56 360 22.0 822.0 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 Total $15,630,637 Abandoned lock and dam 1 591,187 Abandoned lock and dam 2 544,929 ,Xkbandoned lock and dam 3 310,103 Demolishing old dam 1 26,001 Dredging channel 1,055,003 Total $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. ci t= Dates shown represent replacement structures. TABLE 26-D MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Ele- Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal vation Pool Level' Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level Mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- Estimated or No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock. Pa. 3 23.8 Elizabeth. Pa. 4 41.5 Monessen. Pa. 61.2 Maxwell locks and dam. Maxwell. Pa. 82.2 (;rays Landing lock and dam. ;rays landing. Pa. 85.0 Greensboro. Pa. 8 90.8 Point Marion. Pa. It2.0 Morgantown lock and dam. Morgantown. W. Va. 108.0 Hildebrand lock and dam. 6 miles above Morgantown. W. Va. 115.4 Opekiska lock and dam. 1:3.4 miles above Morgantown. W. Va. Marine ways. etc. Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10) 56 360 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib pile 110 720 56-' 360 720 56' 360 720 843 720 8.2 726.9 11.6 11.9 Rock Crib pile 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock 84 720 15.0 778.0 15.0 26.0 Rock Rock 56 56 84 360 360 600 15.0 778.0 10.0 10.5 Rock Rock 19.0 797.0 10.0 14.5 Rock Rock 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock 84 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock 84.0 600) 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $ 17,872.2125 Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19072 18.281.538s 1 Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19322 17.254.0715 6 Movable Concrete Concrete 100 Fixed Concrete Concrete 1964 30.110.889" 81.800.000' Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19252 2.639.8045 Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19252 58.808.4954 ' Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1950 8.778.000 " Movable Concrete Concrete 100 Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1959 12.506.829 " 1964 25.179.6225 250.000' 1.019,9075 780.8165 1.074.812 s 770.449 213.7765 245.9005 191.0005 210.4455 0 0 o od 0 z ci, O0 TABLE 26-D MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (Continued) (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Abail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Ele- Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal vation Pool Level' Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above her Width Level Mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- Estimated or No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost Abandoned lock and dam 11 227,6685 Abandoned lock and dam 12 200.5505 Abandoned lock and dam 13 190.6915 Abtandoned lock and dam 14 210,1276 Abandoned lock and dam 15 175.8295 1)redging 587.8996 Total $265,481,329 01 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 2. )ates shown for locks and dams Nos. 2 to 8. inclusive, represent reconstruct ion. :1. 2 ('hambers 4. Includes $3.322.057 for raising crest of dam. $2.086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926) and an estimated $53.400.000 for replacement of lock; excludes $19(i.(000 estimated non-Federal costs. 5. Actual cost; may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam. 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes estimated $16,600,000 for major rehabilitation (1980). 9. Current estimate. It 0H- 3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 26-E MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular 136,683,111 77,934,922 214,618,033 Maintenance and operation - 150,000 150,000 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) 22,549 22,549 Total 136,683,111 78,107,471 214,790,5821 1. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7,1897 and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes. TABLE 26-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, Pa., open-channel work 1934 197,000 133,8401 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, Pa. and Ohio2 1938 Buckhannon River, W. Va.3 4 1893 5,500 Cheat River, W. Va.3 4 1895 12,997 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, Ohio and Pa.7 1972 1,342,000 Pittsburgh Harbor, Pa. 1922 110,663 81,6131 Youghiogheny River, Pa. and Md. 1971 47,1956 185,6686 1. Completed. 2. January 23, 1939, Chief of Engineers recommended constructing a waterway from Ohio River through Beaver, Mahoning, and Grand River Valleys to Lake Erie (H. Doc. 178, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) 3. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 4. 5. 6. 7. No Commerce reported. Previous project data. Includes $1,700 expended under previous project. Eligible for deauthorization. 26-26 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-G OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) Estimated Costs Type of Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Adena, Ohio (Short Creek)2 16 Allegany, N.Y., unit I (Allegheny River)2 Allegany, N.Y., unit II (Five Mile Creek area)2 Bellaire, Ohio 2 Benwood, W. Va.2 7 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa. (Allegheny River) 2 Brilliant, Ohio 2 16 Brockway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)2 16 Clarington, Ohio2 16 Coraopolis, Pa.2 16 Dillonvale, Ohio (Short Creek)2 16 Elkins, W. Va. (Monongahela River Basin)4 6 Empire-Stratton, Ohio2 Follansbee, W. Va.2 16 Freeport, Pa. (Allegheny River)2 16 Industry, Pa.2 16 Johnsonburg, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)2 6 Johnstown, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) 2 5 Kittanning, Pa., part I (Allegheny River)2 5 Kittanning, Pa., part II (Allegheny River)2 17 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, N.Y. (Allegheny River Basin)2 Latrobe, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Leetsdale, Pa. 2 Martins Ferry, Ohio2 6 McKees Rocks, 8Pa.2 18 Mingo Junction, Ohio2 16 Moundsville, W. Va.2 Neville, Island, Pa.2 New Cumberland, W. Va.2 16 New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. (Allegheny River)2 Olean, N.Y. (Allegheny River) 2 I Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle)2 18 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side)2 18 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip)2 18 Portville, N.Y. (Allegheny River)2 5 Powhatan Point, Ohio2 Proctor, W. Va. 2 Punxsutawney, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)4 5 Ridgway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Rochester, Pa.2 St. Marys, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) 2 16 Smiths Ferry, Pa.2 16 Uniontown, Pa. (Monongahela River Basin)2 18 Warwood, W. Va. 2. Wellsburg, W. Va.2 16 Wellsville, Ohio, sec. 12 5 Wellsville, Ohio, sec. II2 5 West Bridgewater, Pa.2 16 Wheeling, W. Va. 2 7 Channel Levee Channel and levee Wall and levee Wall Wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Channel Channel diversion Internal drainage facilities Wall Wall Wall,levee, & channel Wall Channel Wall Wall Channel Channel Levee Wall and levee Wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Wall Wall Wall Levee Levee Levee Channel and levee Channel Wall Channel Wall Channel and wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Wall and levee 26-27 $ 283,000 697,000 980,000 7,660,000 8,500,000 11,800,000 3,240,000 477,000 2,710,000 3,080,000 388,000 1,772,6273 933,000 2,670,000 1,480,000 1,560,000 674,6643 8,865,3883 130,3173 5,940,000 6,640,000 207,6593 1,270,000 8,630,000 5,470,000 1,920,000 3,070,000 3,210,000 2,760,000 7,900,000 3,217,5311 9,390,000 22,400,000 10,700,000 2,070,4843 4,720,000 334,000 3,586,1073 628,8883 3,350,000 559,000 2,120,000 5,820,000 1,740,000 3,270,000 483,9103 157,6333 2,340,000 19,700,000 597,000 429,000 1,760,000 2,560,000 353,000 397,000 121,000 180,4853 72,000 622,000 17,000 229,000 980,000 376,000 1,160,000 113,000 517,000 3,460,000 3,814,531 9,819,000 24,160,000 13,260,000 2,423,484 5,117,000 455,000 3,766,5923 700,888 3,972,000 576,0009 2,349,000 6,800,00014 2,116,000 4,430,000 596,910 157,6333 2,857,000 23,160,0010 $ 67,000 65,000 133,000 1,870,000 3,180,000 3,080,000 276,000 167,000 249,000 466,000 58,000 40,000 28,000 232,000 21,000 136,000 130,000 2,000 352,000 1,310,000 44,400 141,000 836,000 197,000 310,000 605,000 1,830,000 421,000 148,000 $ 350,000'0 762,00012 1,113,00013 9,530,000 11,680,00010 14,880,000 3,516,000 644,000 2,959,000 3,546,000 446,00010 1,812,627 961,00015 2,902,000 1,501,000 1,696,000 804,664 8,865,388 3 132,317 6,292,000 7,950,00011 252,059 1,411,000 9,466,000 5,667,000 2,230,000 3,675,000 5,040,000 3,181,000 8,048,000 TABLE 26-G (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost" IAocation ' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Wheeling. \. Va. (North Wheeling' WVall 11,700,000 2.700.000 14,400,000 Wheeling. \V. Va. (\Wheeling Island( Wall and levee 13.300,00() 2,470.000 15,770,000 Woodlands. W. Va. Levee 206,0()()() 28.000 234,00()()( 1. All projects are ()othne ()hio. River unless otherwise . Latest co()st estimate revision 1959. notedl).1. latest cost estimate revision 1960. 2. \lso see "( )ther authorized fl()ood c(o(ntrol projects." 11. latest cost estimate revision 196!5. . ctual cost. 12. latest cost estimate revision 196)6. 1. Reprtel in d(etail in an individuai report. 13. Iatest cost estimate revision 1974. 5. Completed. 11. Iatest cost estimate revision 1977. 6. lRelrte in dletail in Annual Repl,ort for 19.11. 15. latest cost esti mate revision 1978. . leported in dletaiI in Annual Report for 1954. 16. 1)eauthorized August 5. 1977. S. latest ('()essttim ate revision 19541 unless otherwise 17. 1)eauthorized November 6, 1977. not ed. 18. l)eauthorized October 3. 1978. TABLE 26-H OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 21 of Text) Total Esti- Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream mated Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River. Pa.' Conemaugh River $ 45,934,4004 ('rooked ('reek. Pa.' Crooked Creek 4,495,9001 East Branch Clarion River, Pa.' Clarion River 9,719,6006 Kinzua D)am and Allegheny Reservoir. Pa. and N.Y.' Allegheny River 109,676,2004 IA)yalhanna. Pa.' Loyalhanna Creek 7,754,9004 Mahoning Creek. Pa.' Mahoning Creek 7,683,3006 Tionesta. 'a.' Tionesta Creek 7,796,1005 Union C(ity, Pa.' French Creek 14,709,8001 Woodcock (Creek. P'a.' French Creek 19,984,7005 Beaver: Berlin. Ohio' Mahoning River 9,165,4005 Eagle Creek. ()hio2 Eagle Creek 12,700,0003 Michael J. Kirwan, Ohio' Mahoning River 21,689,000 Mosquito Creek, Ohio' Mosquito Creek 6,049,000 Shenango River, Pa. and Ohio' Shenango River 41,414,0006 Monongahela: Youghiogheny River, IPa., and Md.' Youghiogheny River 13,346,3005 1. Reported in detail in an individual report. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 3. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 5. Latest cost estimate revision 1980. 26-28 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Project I)ates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, Ohio September 1978 Leetonia, Ohio November 1976 Big Run, Pa. August 1978 Oil City, Pa. March 1979 Bradford, Pa. July 1980 Olean, N.Y. September 1980 Brookville, Pa. ,September 1976 Portage, Pa. May 1979 Buckhannon, W. Va. May 1979 Portville, N.Y. September 1980 Burgettstown-Slovan, Pa. March 1976 Reynoldsville, Pa. August 1977 Butler, Pa. September 1980 Ridgway, Pa. May 1980 Chartiers Creek, Pa. Salamanca, N.Y. September 1980 Canonsburg- Houston Reach March 1976 Stonewood-Nutter Fort, James G(. Fulton Reach March 1976 W. Va. May 1979 Colliers, W. Va. August 1979 Sykesville, Pa. August 1978 Dubois, Pa. September 1977 Tarentum, Pa. November 1976 Eldred, Pa. June 1978 Turtle Creek, Pa. July 1980 Friendsville, Md. May 1979 Washington, Pa. March 1976 Granville, Pa. March 1976 Wellsville, Ohio October 1979 Johnsonburg, Pa. May 1980 Weston, W. Va. May 1979 Kittanning, Pa. None Wilmore, Pa. September 1977 Latrobe, Pa. May 1977 Youngstown, Pa. September 1975 26-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 26-J OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) FuFlol rR Leapsotr t Cost to September 30, 1980 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Adena, Ohio" 13,452 Allegany, N.Y., unit I (Allegheny River)' - 4,100 Allegany, N.Y., unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' 1975 64,851 Amsterdam, Ohio4 6 1964 183,072 Bellaire, Ohio' 8 - 76,487 Benwood, W. Va.2 8 1954 81,028 Big Run, Pa.4 6 1965 364,208 Black Fork at Hendricks, W. Va.6 1972 6,800 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa.' Bradford. Pa.4 1962 7,601,763 Brilliant, Ohio" Brockway, Pa." - 194 Brookville, Pa.4 1963 964,976 Buckhannon, W. Va.3 - 37,488 Buckhannon, W. Va.4 1972 1,568,661 Burgettstown, Pa.4 6 - 83,129 Butler, Pa.4 1970 1,556,181 Clarington, Ohio" Coraopolis, Pa." Dillonvale, Ohio" - 16,884 Dubois, Pa.4 1979 4,459,504 Eagle Creek Reservoir, Ohio' 8 100,000 Empire-Stratton, Ohio 33,031 Follansbee, W. Va." Freeport, Pa." Friendsville, Md. 4 6 41,529 Granville, Pa.4 6 75,908 Industry, Pa." Johnsonburg, Pa.4 1958 674,664 Kittanning, Pa., part I4 1949 130,317 Kittanning, Pa., part II'2 Lake Chautaugua and Chadakoin River, N.Y.' 1956 190,722 Latrobe, Pa.4 1951 207,659 Latrobe, Pa.4 1970 2,556,652 Leetonia, Ohio4 6 - 89,299 Leetsdale, Pa.' Martins Ferry, Ohio' 1941 25,164 McKees Rocks, Pa.'3 Mingo Junction, Ohio" Moundsville, W. Va.' Muddy Creek Dam, Pa.' 9 1o 1977 402,459 Neville Island, Pa.' New Cumberland, W. Va." New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa.' Oakdale, Pa." - 14,127 Oil City, Pa.4 6 - 43,595 Olean, N.Y.' 1954 3,217,531 Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle)'3 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side)'3 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip)'3 Portage, Pa.4 6 1965 150,386 Portville, N.Y.4 1954 2,070,484 26-30 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-J (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Powhatan Point, Ohio s Proctor,' W. Va.' 156337 Redbank Creek Lake, Pa." 156,337 Reynoldsville, Pa.4 1959 385,494 Ridgway, Pa.4 (Elk Creek) 1964 628,888 Ridgway and vicinity, Pa. (on Clarion River)6 10 1979 132,464 Rochester, Pa.' Rouseville, Pa.6 1,642 Rowlesburg Lake, W. Va. 9 1977 2,857,575 Salamanca, N.Y.4 1972 2,880,535 Slovan, Pa.4 6 57,811 Smith Ferry, Pa." St. Marys, Pa." 13,529 Sykesville, Pa.4 6 184,246 Tarentum, Pa.4 6 1964 136,591 Turtle Creek, Pa.4 1972 15,350,552 Uniontown, Pa.' 1956 - - Wallace, W. Va.6 11,035 Warwood, W. Va.' 8 - - Washington, Pa.4 1964 789,093 Wellsburg, W. Va." 6,387 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. I4 1956 483,910 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. 114 1956 157,633 West Bridgewater, Pa." Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling)' 8 Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island)' 8 - 21,700 Wheeling, W. Va.' 8 1954 189,067 Wilcox, Pa.5 - 16,761 Wilmore, Pa. - 96,853 Woodlands, W. Va.' Youngstown, Ohio4 1976 3,621,134 1. Inactive. 2. To be restudied. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Feb. 20, 1951. 4. Completed. 5. Local interests failed to meet requirements of local cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 7. Local interests failed to meet requirements of local cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 8. Eligible for deauthorization. 9. Lacks local support. 10. No longer economically justified. 11. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 12. Deauthorized November 6, 1977. 13. Deauthorized October 3, 1978. 26-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 26-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 32 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (;irtys Run. Millvale. Pa. (construction) $ 744,510 Root (Creek. Bolivar, N.Y. (construction) 727,192 Tenmile Creek, Marianna, Pa. (plans, specifications and construction) 38,210 West Little 1-ine Creek. Etna, Pa. (detailed project report) 56,855 Weston Mills. ()lean, N.Y. (detailed project report) 116 Total cost for current fiscal year: $1,566,883 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs ('raig Beach. ()hio (construction) $ 211,008 I)ry Brook. N.Y. (plans, specifications and recornaissance report) 11,743 Freeport. Pa. (construction) 70 Monongahela River at Newell Borough, Pa. (reconnaissance report and plans and specifications) 9,267 Thompson Run. Pa. (reconnaissance report, plans and specifications) 8,171 Wattersonville, Allegheny River, Pa. (reconnaissance report) 5,000 Total cost for current fiscal year: $ 245,259 Streambank Erosion Control, Evaluation and Demonstration - Section 32, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress l'roject, Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Ohio River Main Stem Demonstration Projects $ 19,550 I)emonstration Projects at Undesignated Sites 204,138 Total cost for current fiscal year: $ 223,688 TABLE 26-L COMPLETED FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES (See Section 34 of Text) No flood plain studies complleted in fiscal year 1980() 26-32 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT* Due to realignment of boundries during the year, district comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and' northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, Minn...............27-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn ............... 27-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn.......... 27-2 4. St. Croix River, Minn. & Wis ...... 27-3 5. Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. .. 27-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects ............... .............. 27-3 7. Navigation work under special authorization .. .................... 27-3 Flood Control 8. Bassett Creek, Minn. .O............ 27-3 9. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. Dak.............27-4 10. Burlington Dam, Souris River, N. Dak.............. .......... ..... 27-4 11. Chaska, Minn......... ............ 27-5 12. Eau Galle River, Wis ............... 27-5 13. Grafton, N. Dak .................. 27-6 14. Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. .... 27-6 15. Lac qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, Minn. ........... ....... 27-7 16. LaCrosse, Wis. .................... 27-7 17. La Farge Lake and channel improvement, Wis .................. 27-7 18. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. ......... 27-8 19. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn.......... 27-8 20. Mankato and North Mankato, M inn. ...... .... . ....0...... ....... 27-8 Page 21. Minot, N. Dak........................ ... 27-9 22. Pembina River, N. Dak..............27-9 23. Prairie du Chien, Wis. ........... 27-10 24. Red' Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn............. 27-10 25. Red River of the North drainage basin, Minn., S. Dak. & N. Dak..... 27-10 26. Red River of the North at Oslo, Minn..................... .. ......... 27-11 27. Rochester, Minn. ................. 27-11 28. Roseau River, Minn................. 27-12 29. Rushford, Minn....................... 27-12 30. Sheyenne River, N. Dak. ............ 27-12 31. State Road and Ebner Coulees, Wis. 27-13 32. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn............... .......... 27-13 33. Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn... 27-14 34. Wild Rice River-South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn. ................ 27-14 35. Winona, Minn. ..................... 27-14 36. Inspection of completed flood control projects...................... 27-15 37. Other authorized flood control projects ........................ 27-15 38. Flood control work under special authorization ....................... 27-15 General Investigations 39. Surveys ........ ............... 27-15 40. Collection and study of basic data .. 27-15 41. Other work under special authority ................. .27-16 " ." * * * ** * * * * * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 27-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MINN. Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, Minn. and S. Dak., and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, Minn., thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, Minn. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, Minn., and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, Minn. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition .surveys cost $64. Snagging and clearing by hired labor cost $186. Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $21,694. Condition at end offiscal year. Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, Minn. Rights-of-entry have been obtained over 123.08 acres of land over which perpetual easements will be conveyed by local interests. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1980 were $3,166,310, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $1,226,130 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MINN. Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, Minn. (See table 27-C on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contracts at Pine River for a sewage treatment facility and construction of a comfort station cost $100,000 and $18,350 respectively. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,845. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities were maintained, and miscellaneous inspections, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor including administration at a cost of $1,072,265. Contract work for dam operations, recreation and sanitation facilities cost $28,329. Environmental and archaeological contract work cost $1,703. A stability study with the Waterways Experiment Station cost $95,440. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,861 acres in fee and easements on 296,365 acres are owned by the United States. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See table 27-C for capacities and costs by reservoir.) 27-2 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT 4. ST. CROIX RIVER, MINN. & WIS. Location. From source in northwestern Wisconsin, flows southwesterly and then southerly about 164 miles to Mississippi River at Prescott, Wis., about 41.7 miles below lower Burlington Northern railway bridge, Minneapolis, Minn. For its greater part, forms boundary between Minnesota and Wisconsin. (See Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for maintenance of a channel, 9 feet in depth and of suitable width from mouth to Stillwater, Minn., 24.5 miles, created by improvement of upper Mississippi River; a channel 3 feet deep at mean low water between Stillwater and Taylors Falls (27.3 miles); improvement of harbor and waterfront at Stillwater; and a small-boat harbor at Hudson, Wis. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $714,400. Latest authorization (1954) for maintenance work on reach between Stillwater and Taylors Falls is limited to an expenditure not exceeding $5,000 per year. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion. For Hudson Harbor, see the annual report of 1970 for requirements. Terminal facilities. At Stillwater there is a concrete paved levee and a piling-and-timber trestle wharf on right bank. At other points along river, landing may be made on banks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging operations by hired labor cost $149,637 and snagging and clearing cost $8,362. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $13,073. Condition at end of fiscal year. All new work was completed in 1930, except subsequently authorized harbor at Hudson. The United States owns 2.75 acres of land in fee at Taylors Falls and has easements over 7.57 acres of land at Bayport, Minn. Extension to provide a 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater was completed August 12, 1938 when full pool at dam 3 of Mississippi River canalization project was reached. Minimum draft from Stillwater to Taylors Falls is about 1 foot at extreme low water, and from mouth to Stillwater, 9 feet. 5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MINN. Location. At southwestern extremity of Lake of the Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14999.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 feet wide out in lake; for a turning basin 500 by 900 feet to a depth of 8 feet; and for a pile-brush stone jetty on north side of channel extending from shore 700 feet into the lake. For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 1965. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $355,200. (See table 27-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sounding surveys cost $10,691. Environmental review cost $4,046 b' hired labor and $2,530 by other government agencies. Other engineering and administrative costs were $10,578. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. Shore revetment needs minor repairs. A walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 27-D. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See table 27-E. 8. BASSETT CREEK, MINN. Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The selected plan consists of flood storage in the upper Bassett Creek watershed and a new tunnel in the outlet reach under a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis. Also, floodplain regulations, flood proofing of 24 27-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 homes, evacuation of one home, flood insurance, flood forecasting and warning, and recreation trails are included in the plan. The flood storage would generally consist of providing increased temporary inundation on existing golf courses, parks and open space throughout the watershed. The outlet tunnel would be a cooperative venture with the Minnesota Highway Department which is planning a major highway in the area. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $11,400,000 and $213,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See annual report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the Phase II General Design Memorandum. By resolutions approved 12 September 1974, and 31 October 1975, the city of Minneapolis has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. A letter from the Mayor and President of the City Council of Minneapolis on 29 August 1979 reaffirmed the support of Minneapolis for the authorized project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $382,567. Condition at end offiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 9. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MINN. AND S. DAK. Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, Minn., and Big Stone City, S. Dak., at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, Minn., and Grant County, S. Dak. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $12,500,000 and $153,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. The project requires sponsorship from both the States of Minnesota and South Dakota. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District on June 10, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on November 3, 1969. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District for South Dakota on October 23, 1969 was furnished on November 18, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on November 19, 1969. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of Public Law 91-646 were provided by the Upper Minnesota Watershed District on 13 August 1974 and by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District on 15 April 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $106,471, and supervision and administration cost $8,842. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $102,569. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the new dam above Highway 75 and roads is completed. Surveys for land lines are complete, and the land acquisition program is complete. The first land payment was made on November 28, 1969 and 128 tracts have been purchased. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administering the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975 the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of the Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. 10. BURLINGTON DAM, SOURIS RIVER, NORTH DAKOTA Location. In Ward County in northwestern North Dakota above Burlington, N. Dak., on the Souris River. The damsite is north of Burlington about ly miles northwest of the confluence of the Souris and Des Lacs Rivers and about 10 miles above Minot, N. Dak. (For general location see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by the phase I design memorandum provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir near Burlington on the Souris River; modification of nine fish and wildlife refuge dams (including a 4-foot raise of Lake Darling Dam; a diversion tunnel adjoining the Des Lacs River to the Burlington reservoir; improvements at the community of Velva and improvements by local interests in seven subdivision areas between Burlington and Minot 27-4 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT and at the community of Sawyer, and regulation of future floodplain land use downstream from the dam site. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $116,000,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act. (H. Doc. 321, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. For the local flood protection works local interests will be required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including ponding areas and borrow and disposal areas for excavated material determined suitable by the Chief of Engineers and necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; operate and maintain all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of utilities, transportation facilities (except railroad bridges), pipelines, and other existing structures and improvements made necessary by construction of the project; and prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on ponding areas for interior drainage. If interior drainage ponding areas are impaired, provide substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity promptly without cost to the United States. For the dam project local interests will be required to construct, operate, and maintain local flood protection works at urban areas below Burlington Dam and outside Minot that would be inundated by the planned flood control release from the Burlington Dam project and that are not to be protected by Federal local flood protection works; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on downstream channel capacities for regulation of the reservoirs; at least annually inform affected interests that the project will not provide complete flood protection; provide guidance and leadership in preventing future development of the floodplain by use of appropriate floodplain management techniques; and adjust all waterright claims resulting from the construction and operation of the project and hold and save the United States free from damages due to such claims. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $149,568. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. 11. CHASKA, MINN. Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River and flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek at Chaska, together with appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 0.6 miles of new levee, four pumping stations, 0.9 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek, and 1.2 miles of flood bypass channel on East Creek. Approximately 1.6 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $14,900,000 and $33,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See annual report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By resolution approved 12 June 1973, the city of Chaska has indicated its willingness and intention to gain the legal capacity to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $261,605. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 12. EAU GALLE RIVER, WIS. Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, Wis., on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary. Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, Minn., and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, Wis. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt 27-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and-recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspection and evaluations were performed at a cost of $231,752. Contracts for a pool raise, water quality, conduit repair, and a maintenance building cost $24,684, $33,561, $97,956, and $35,401, respectively. Administrative costs were $32,735 Condition at end of fiscal year. Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work 'to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. 13. GRAFTON, N. DAK. Location. In Walsh County in northeastern North Dakota on the Park River, a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement is designed to protect present and future development at Grafton from damages due to floods of magnitudes up to and including the standard project flood. The plan consists of an 8.7 mile earthen ring levee completely encircling existing development and sufficient developable lands to accommodate anticipated future growth and development at Grafton. The levee would have an average height of about 8 feet and would cross the Park River in two locations, requiring a gated control structure at each location to prevent flood flows from affecting protected areas. Normal river flows would be allowed to pass as under natural conditions, providing aesthetic and environmental qualities associated with the existing natural environment of the Park River through Grafton and the immediate project area. A 2.9 mile flood bypass channel would be located to the north of and adjacent to the levee, providing sufficient capacity to carry flood flows which would normally pass through the protected area. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work exclusive of Phase I costs is $15,500,000 and $148,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 645, 941h Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By Resolution No. 685, passed 15 August 1973 by the Grafton City Council, the city has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the necessary requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design was initiated under the General Investigations program. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design is in progress under the General Investigations program. 14. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, N. DAK. Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River, about 4 miles upstream from Park River, N. Dak., and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, N. Dak., forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1285 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Estimated total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, are $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $77,467. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in 27-6 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. 15. LAC QUI PARLE LAKE, MINNESOTA RIVER, MINN. Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, Minn. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1291 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluation performed at a cost of $318,827. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 516.3 acres of land and easements on 19,826.7 acres of land. Special easements on 32.8 acres of land and 1.3 acres of land in fee were also acquired. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 16. LA CROSSE, WIS. Location. In La Crosse County in southwestern Wisconsin on the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of seven miles of levee and one mile of street raise, road and rail closure structures, necessary interior drainage collection facilities, floodplain regulation, permanent evacuation and relocation of 40 residential structures and flood proofing several businesses. Also, a paved hiking and bicycling trail would be provided on some portions of the levee system to meet identified recreation demands in the area. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work exclusive of Phase I costs is $20,800,000 and $50,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 598, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By resolution adopted 21 June 1973 the county of La Crosse has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning has not started. 17. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WIS. Location. Rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See page 1087 of Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance during construction cost $3,968. Supervision and administration cost $1,824. Condition at end of.fiscal year. General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969 and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has 27-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 been completed. Funds to complete the authorized project have been withheld and all further construction has been indefinitely suspended. Contracts have been awarded to utility companies to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has begun relocation out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. 18. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, N. DAK. Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, N. Dak., and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, N. Dak. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1287 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See page. 1288 of Annual Report for 1962. Complied with except for construction of Fargo diversion dam and ditch for which assurances furnished by city of Fargo were approved by the Secretary of War on June 26, 1947. Necessity for this feature will be reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of comfort station by contract including administrative costs was $744. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $567,951. Bank protection contracts cost $475,631. Contract for cultural resource investigation cost $1,420. Contract for recreation facilities cost $96,029. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. 19. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, S. DAK., AND MINN. Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, Minn., and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, Minn. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and the two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1289 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $154,650. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreation facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,155.35 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structures are open to public travel. 20. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MINN. Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $81,300,000. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work under contract. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. Resolutions agreeing to 27-8 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT provide formal assurances of local cooperation, when requested, were passed by the city council of North Mankato, Mankato, and South Bend Township (Le Hillier), respectively, on November 12, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of stage 3A-2 (Mankato) and Stage 4A (North Mankato) was completed. Construction of Stage. 3B-2A (Mankato) and Stage 4B (North Mankato) was continued. Construction costs for improvements at Mankato were $1,983,015, at North Mankato were $2,099,533 and at Le Hillier were $2,739. Engineering and design by contract cost $162,420 and by hired labor cost $518,296. Supervision and administration cost $277,146. Condition at end Qffiscal year. Contract work for construction of stage 1 (North Mankato), stage 2A (Mankato along the Blue Earth River), stage 2B (Le Hillier), stage 3A-1 and 3A-2 (Mankato) and stage 1-H.P. and 4A (North Mankato) is complete. Construction of stage 3B-2A (Mankato) and stage 4B (North Mankato) is underway. Detailed planning for remaining features to standard project flood design is in progress. 21. MINOT, N. DAK. Location. In Ward County in northwestern North Dakota on the Souris River, extending from Burlington through Minot to the village of Logan. The river meanders through Minot, flowing generally from west to east and divides the community into two parts. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Project provides for channel improvement within a 37.0-mile reach of the Souris River extending from Burlington to Logan. For details see Annual Report for 1973. Project was authorized in 1970 under section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. (H. Doc. 321, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Resolutions were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the Senate on June 25, 1970 and the House on July 14, 1970. Project has been modified by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work under contract. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. On May 26, 1971 the Ward County Water Management Board approved the motion to provide assurances of local cooperation. The resolution was furnished by letter dated June 16, 1971 and accepted by the District Engineer on August 9, 1971. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs by contract for the year amounted to $485. Cooperative stream gaging with U.S. Geological Survey cost $9,500. Engineering and design cost $85,018. Supervision and administration costs were $16,986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Roosevelt Park improvements, snagging and clearing Reach A-1 downstream of Minot, and channel improvements for reaches A-2, A-3, B-l, B-1A, B-1B, B-2, C, C-1, D, D-1, D-A, E, E-1 and F have been completed. A contract for three pumping stations has also been completed. Construction contract awarded for channel beautification has been completed. 22. PEMBINA RIVER, N. DAK. Location. Near the Pembina-Cavalier County line in northeastern North Dakota on the Pembina River, two miles southwest of Walhalla, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for a multiple-purpose impoundment for flood control, water supply and recreation. The earth-filled dam will be about 1,960 feet long, and 150 feet high with a fixed crest concrete spillway and outlet channel. A low-flow outlet works consists of a 10-foot circular conduit through the dam with a gated inlet tower at the conservation pool. The impoundment will have a storage capacity of 147,000 acre-feet at design pool elevation of which 15,000 acre-feet will be reserved for sedimentation over a 100-year period, 4,000 acre-feet will be for water supply and recreation, and 128,000 acre-feet will be reserved exclusively for flood control. The conservation pool would have a surface area of 800 acres with public use facilities adjoining the pool for recreation and wildlife management. Lands for wildlife habitat mitigation are included in the project. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work exclusive of Phase I costs is $37,600,000. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 116, 96th Congress, 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required prior to the initiation of construction. A September 1975 resolution of intent to assume the allocated non-Federal water supply costs has been received from the North Dakota State Water Commission. The North Dakota State Park Service has agreed by letter dated 13 August 1976 to work closely with local recreation entities to develop arrangements to provide the local cooperation for recreation. Further support of the project by the State of North Dakota was provided in letters dated 17 August 1976, 11 April 1977, and 11 July 1977. 27-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design was continued under the General Investigations program. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design is in progress under the General Investigations program. 23. PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WIS. Location. In Crawford County in southwestern Wisconsin on the left bank of the Idississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Combines total evacuation with flood proofing and land use control measures to provide the desired reduction of potential flood damages within design limits. Evacuation would be accomplished by purchase and relocation of structures in the lowest portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost (1980) to the United States for new work is $3,800,000. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was entered into with the city of Prairie du Chien on May 2, 1978 and signed by the Chief of Engineers on September 11, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs for property acquisition and relocation activities were $807,041. A contract for site restoration cost $11,623. Engineering and design cost $26,399 and supervision and administration cost $13,977. Condition at end of fiscal year. Property acquisitions and relocations are in progress. 24. RED LAKE RIVER, MINN., INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MINN. Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, Minn., and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, Minn. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, Minn., about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, Minn. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $32,000. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River initiated in February and the Clearwater River initiated in October 1948 were completed in June 1956. Replacement of a rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in July 1967. Increased slope protection downstream of the control structure was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 25. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MINN., S. DAK. & N. DAK. Location. Red River of the North basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota: Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See page 1278 of Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See table 27-10 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT 27-F for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See page 1039 of Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city' of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April '17, 1975 permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975 and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was initiated for the East Grand Forks project at a cost of $104,374. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $124,601. Maintenance building contract and a dam maintenance contract cost $59,125 and $38,547, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, Minn., is complete. Preconstruction planning is underway at East Grand Forks. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, N. Dak., started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See table 27-F at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) Costs to date for operation and maintenance of Orwell Lake and Dam are $1,834,055. Total costs for active portion of project are $8,358,277. In addition, $350,034 was expended from contributed funds for work done for local interests. 26. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT OSLO, MINN. Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Red River of the North about 20 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a levee encircling the village of Oslo and an agricultural tract north of the village. Wherever possible, the levee has been constructed contiguously with an existing emergency levee, and is about 10 feet high and 3.2 miles long with a top width of from 10 to 12 feet. The project also provides interior drainage facilities, including a pumping station, two ponding areas, interceptor and outfall sewers, and drainage ditches; highway and street ramps; temporary sandbag closures; and landscape measures. Total Federal costs (1979) for new work are estimated at $1,993,200. Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction on August 2, 1972 under the authority contained in section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the village of Oslo on October 15, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $17,205. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in June 1974. Project is complete except for construction of bank stabilization measures. 27. ROCHESTER, MINN. Location. In Olmstead County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for channel modifications supplemented by levees at and in the vicinity of Rochester, together with appropriate flood warning and floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include approximately 0.9 miles of concrete-lined channel. 7.3 miles of riprap or gabion lined channel, 1.1 miles of grass-sloped channels, 2.6 miles of levees, drop structures, bridge modifications, and interceptor sewers and ditches for interior drainage. A river corridor hiking and biking trail system, four new parks, and other environmental treatment measures are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated cost (1980) to the United States for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) 27-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. By resolution approved on February 23, 1977 the city of Rochester, the local sponsor, indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control and recreation. Formal assurances will be requested after completion of the Phase II Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $486,812. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of preconstruction planning was completed and forwarded to Congress on 27 April 1979 which was the basis for authority to proceed with the Phase II design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design. Phase II studies are in progress. 28. ROSEAU RIVER, MINN. Location. In Roseau County and northeastern Kittson County, in northwestern Minnesota, and in south-central Manitoba, Canada. (For general location of the works in United States see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Roseau River for flood control consisting of 44.4 miles of channel improvement, two sections of earth levees with lengths of 1.9 and 5.9 miles, respectively, 76 side ditch inlet transitions; remedial works along 16.6 miles of channel in Canada or an acceptable alternative therefor; one new bridge; and alteration of the existing dam in Roseau Village. Remedial works will be constructed in Canada at the expense of the United States. Estimated cost (1980) to the United States for new work is $23,000,000, including $5,128,000 for cost of work in Canada to be accomplished with United States funds. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 282, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. Local interests have formed a Roseau River Watershed District and have started proceedings to acquire rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning activities were continued relative to coordination of the project plan with Canadian interests. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $145,482. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning is in progress and coordination with Canadian interests is underway. The general design memorandum was submitted in October 1971 and approved in March 1972. Design memorandum supplements which contain dimensions of environmental features added to the project were submitted in October 1975 and June 1980 and approved in November 1975 and July 1980, respectively. The local sponsor is in the process of acquiring the rights-of-way. 29. RUSHFORD, MINN. Location. At confluence of Root River and Rush Creek adjacent to city of Rushford in Fillmore County in southeastern Minnesota. Confluence of streams is 32.5 miles above mouth of Root River, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for improvements on Root River and Rush Creek to protect city of Rushford from floods expected to occur once in 200 years. See page 1095 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 431, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See page 1095 of Annual Report for 1967 for requirements. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on March 8, 1967. The project was turned over to local interests on December 15, 1968, for operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of remedial work was completed at a cost of $1,396. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of general improvements was essentially completed in November 1968. Construction of track raise and bridge relocation by the railroad was physically completed in June 1969. Placing riprap at the railroad bridge was completed in November 1969. A contract for additional riprap on the Root River awarded in June 1974 has been completed. Contracts for various items of remedial work awarded in September 1977 and March 1979 were completed in July 1979. 30. SHEYENNE RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, N. DAK. (Formerly Kindred Lake) Location. The Sheyenne River basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. The authorized project is in Richland County, N. Dak., on the Sheyenne River, about 70 miles above its mouth and 5 miles above Kindred, N. Dak. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a multiple-purpose impoundment for 27-12 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes to control the runoff from 3,014 square miles. The improvements would be coupled with a revised operating plan for the existing Baldhill Dam and with appropriate flood plain management measures at communities along the river. See Annual Report for 1973 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for Phase I General Design Memorandum is $2,250,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 330, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of the project as authorized. On January 23, 1976, the North Dakota State Water Commission passed a resolution expressing continued interest and support in evaluating flood control alternatives on the lower Sheyenne River basin. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested after completion of the Phase II, General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $394,317. Condition at end Qf fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Due to local concerns, a changed set of planning criteria, and potential changed conditions, a complete reformulation and reevaluation of alternatives is being undertaken during preconstruction planning. 31. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WIS. Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the east side of the city of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement for State Road Coulee provides for channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth, and includes an 11,600-foot section of concrete-lined, trapezoidal-shaped channel, a 600-foot-long concrete flume, a drop structure, a stilling basin, three new street bridges, and a new railroad bridge. The city recently replaced a fourth bridge, previously included in the authorized plan. The plan of improvement for Ebner Coulee provides for diversion works about 8,600 feet long, controlling flood flows through a concrete flume, and twin precast-concrete conduits into an enlarged Miller Coulee channel and thence into a marshy area in the La Crosse River floodplain. Estimated cost (1980) to the United States for new work is $29,200,000. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on 7 April 1977 but was reactivated on 8 November 1978 after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on 17 September 1978, 13 July 1978, and 10 July 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $139,641. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 32. TWIN VALLEY LAKE, WILD RICE RIVER, MINN. Location. In Norman County in west-central Minnesota, northeast of the city of Moorhead, on the Wild Rice River about 2 miles east of Twin Valley, Minn. The Wild Rice River is a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project authorization provides for reservoir development on the Wild Rice River near Twin Valley, Minnesota, for flood damage reduction, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The principal features include an 84 foot high, 7,700 foot long, earthen dam, a gated concrete spillway with concrete chute and stilling basin, a 10 foot diameter gated circular conduit for low flow outlet works, and recreation development on the created 540 acre reservoir. Storage capacity would provide 7,500 acre-feet for recreation and sedimentation and 44,700 acre-feet for flood control. The proposed works include development of three recreation areas along the margin of the lake for public use. The Federal Government would acquire about 3,500 acres of land necessary for carrying out the purposes of the project. Approximately 2,200 additional acres will be acquired to offset fish and wildlife habitat losses associated with project construction. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $28,800,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 366, 90th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. The Norman County Board of Commissioners, by resolutions dated November 7, 1974 and September 19, 1978, 27-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 has declared its intention to provide local cooperation for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Both the Norman County Board of Commissioners and the Wild Rice River Watershed District have indicated the capability to provide assurances of local cooperation relating to flood control improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $9,046. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Project requires further authorization for mitigation lands. 33. VERMILLION RIVER, HASTINGS, MINN. Location. In Dakota County and Hastings, Minnesota, on the Vermillion River, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for improvements to portions of the existing channel, construction of 3,200-foot long floodwater bypass channel, modification of an existing mill dam, extension of an existing levee, riprap protection of erodible river bank areas, and floodplain management. Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction on January 20, 1975 under the authority contained in section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Hastings on February 22, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs were $2,248 for completion of construction engineering. Condition at end offiscal year. A construction contract awarded in August 1977 was completed in November 1978. 34. WILD RICE RIVER-SOUTH BRANCH AND FELTON DITCH, MINN. Location. In Clay and Norman Counties in west-central Minnesota northeast of the city of Moorhead, Minn. The South Branch of the Wild Rice River and Felton Ditch drain areas of 253 and 122 square miles and enter the Wild Rice River at points 29.5 and 20.5 miles, respectively, above its confluence with the Red River of the North. (For general locations, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for increasing the capacities of the South Branch and Felton Ditch channels by widening the existing channels through the floodplain. Debris removal would be accomplished in the lower reaches of both streams. In addition, short reaches of low dikes would be constructed on both banks of Felton Ditch near the upper limit of improvement. The plan also includes bridge and culvert structure alterations, new bridges, multiplate pipe arches, side ditch inlet and lateral ditch entry modifications, and a drop inlet structure. The project would provide flood protection in both watersheds for a 6-percent chance flood and outlets necessary for removal of crop-damaging surface waters from lateral and on-farm drainage systems. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $5,140,000. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 98, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was executed by the Wild Rice Watershed District on 18 October 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for archeological investigation cost $10,632. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $138,878. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Rights-of-way have been acquired by local sponsor. 35. WINONA, MINN. Location. At Winona County in southeastern Minnesota on the right bank of the Mississippi River about 725 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for completed upstream improvements authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958 providing for a continuous flood barrier about 6.1 miles long with related pumping and interior drainage facilities. Federal costs amounted to $2,147,131 of which $111,500 was expended for the portion then deferred for restudy and $17,316 was contributed by local interests. Improvement authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 152, 92d Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map) provides for levee and floodwall protection with necessary interior drainage works for the riverfront and the Lake Winona closure reaches, as well as a sound floodplain management program to prevent unwise development of the area bordered by U.S. Highway 61 and Burns Valley and Pleasant Valley Creeks. The plan would also provide the downstream flood barrier needed to prevent Mississippi River backup flows from entering Lake Winona and inundating the area now only partially 27-14 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT protected by the completed segment of the project authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act. The selected plan would also provide control of Burns Valley Creek by means of channel improvement, raising and extending the existing levee system, a drop structure, an erosion control structure, alteration of two highway bridges, and a sewer line modification. Earth levees averaging 10 feet in height total approximately 2.8 miles in length. Concrete floodwalls, also averaging about 10 feet in height, total about 3,700 feet in length. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $26,900,000 and $511,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Resolutions authorizing the project were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the House on July 29, 1971, and the Senate on November 18, 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. For improvements authorized in 1971 see Annual Report for 1972 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement required under Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was executed by the city of Winona on 6 October 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract for Reach A cost $2,322,067. A pumping station contract cost $693,415. Engineering and design cost $615,719 by contract and $578,207 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $195,809. Condition at end of fiscal year. The upstream improvement except for a portion of the project raising and extending the existing levee downstream from the Lake Winona outlet was completed in August 1967. At the request of local interests, the uncompleted portion of the project authorized in 1958 was not constructed in order that the scope of the project could be reconsidered to allow for the protection of additional lands needed by the city for industrial expansion. This work was deferred for restudy and now has been deauthorized by approval and authorization in 1971 of additional protection for Winona. Preconstruction planning for the improvement authorized in 1971 is complete. Construction on Reach A is in progress. 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See table 27-G on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $71,044. Total cost to September 30, 1980 was $450,724. 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 27-H. 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See table 27-I. Snagging and clearing of narigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Section 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). See table 27-I. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act. Public Law 526, 79th Congress). See table 27-I. Emergency flood control activities - repair, .flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation.) See table 27-I. General Investigations 39. SURVEYS Navigation studies continued at a cost of $98,004. Flood control studies continued at a cost of $1,576,576. Special studies on the Upper Mississippi River (GREAT I), coordination studies with other agencies, review of the completed projects at Redwood River at Marshall, Minn. and at St. Paul, Minn. and Phase I pre-authorization studies at Pembina River, N. Dak. and Grafton, N. Dak. were conducted at a cost of $1,371,539. Total cost of surveys for the period was $3,046,120. 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs during the period were $27,947 for International Water Studies and $205,741 for Flood Plain Management Services. Costs were $59,529 for stream flow data obtained by Corps gaging beyond cooperative stream-gaging program, and for hydraulic laboratory work in measurement and analysis of sediment load in streams. Costs were $679,122 for inspection and inventory of dams in conjunction with the 27-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 national program of inspection of non-Federal dams. Total cost for Collection and Study of Basic Data was $972,340. 41. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY See table 27-J. 27-16 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT TABLE 27-A See Section In Text 1. Project Minnesota River, Minn. 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn 4. St. Croix River Minn. and Wis. 5. Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. 8. Bassett Creek, Minn. 9. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S.Dak. 10. Burlington Dam Souris River, N. Dak. 11. Chaska, Minn. 12. Eau Galle River, Wis. 14. Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. 15. Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minn. 17. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., Wis. 18. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY77 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Apgprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost FY78 145,000 297,000 57,000 121,622 924,000 818,794 18,000 18,000 4,697 5,297 1,710,000 331,165 72,000 72,265 942,000 814,268 366,000 160,345. - 141,000 156,118 119,200 117,949 500,000 235,216 372,000 417,675 FY79 21,400 21,400 344,000 101,795 1,258,000 1,435,688 106,600 106,599 11,310 11,310 388,000 75,614 84,000 83,163 1,083,000 1,161,538 406,000 610,550 252,000 240,350 136,600 137,892 115,438 109,700 18,352 2,110,000 864,196 Total Cost to September 30 FY80 1980 20,000 20,000 55,000 183,442 1,447,300 1,302,119 23,400 23,391 6,482 6,482 178,000 125,680 -1,600,000 121,902 88,000 87,768 800,000 692,184 200,000 172,052 438,500 336,503 84,400 99,576 169,000 169,754 45,876 55,000 145,604 740,200 1,685,000 1,403,430 1,141,031 8,115,112 6,974,985 27-17 __ - 2,057,7221 - 2,057,7221 22,000 1,226,186 21,944 1,226,130 30,000 4,408,8282 122,195 4,386,7602 1,095,000 14,207,8583 1,197,737 14,151,328: - 425,000 - 425,000 - 150,410 - 150,410 178,000 937,255 171,072 930,317 - 86,105 - 86,105 31,0004 765,280 27,8454 762,125 387,000 565,000 382,567 508,247 109,000 9,200,000 115,313 9,196,765 102,000 462,700 102,569 462,199 - 5,543,500 149,568 5,495,482 244,000 444,000 261,605 433,657 - 9,039,250 - 9,039,250 398,000 2,193,305 456,089 2,147,629 - 1,396,0971 - 1,396,0971 97,000 1,472,421 77,467 1,451,121 - 964,873 - 964,873 320,000 2,618,163 318,827 2,615,763 - 17,972,000 5,792 17,738,553 - 3,307,4386 744 3,307,4386 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text 19. Project Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. 20. Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. 21. Minot, N. Dak. 23. Prairie du Chien, Wis. 24. Red Lake River, Minn., Including Clearwater River, Minn. 25. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, Minn., S Dak. and N. Dak. 26. Red River ofthe North at Oslo, Minn. 27. Rochester,Minn. 28. Roseau River, Minn. 29. Rushford, Minn. 30. Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (formerly Kindred Lake) 31. State Road & Ebner Coulees, Wis. 32. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn. 33. Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn. 34. Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn. 35. Winona, Minn. I FY77 FY78 1. Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost, New Work: Approp. Cost 125,800 123,072 7,200,000 5,002,852 6,565,000 6,506,247 100,000 80,098 36,000 36,000 121,000 181,576 30,000 15,378 130,000 124,552 2,526,000 103,000 314,000 5,457 285,000 274,549 72 515,000 205,549 500,000 98,951 13,000 6,592 325,000 320,220 FY79 164,000 164,888 3,890,000 4,288,223 350,000 318,620 575,000 588.621 Total Cost to September 30 FY80 .1980 18( 15 5,00( 5,04: 11 871 85! 138,000 138,529 3,603,000 4,769,654 1,684,000 1,568,538 106,000 109,043 49,000 48,400 3,000 348,800 2,493 260,164 - 60,000 1,332 29,248 6,000 204,000 3,932 109,998 5,000 189,000 5,054 200,443 7,000 - 3,133 41,933 7,000 638,000 1,115 623,552 - 25,000 - 24,929 7,000 232,000 3,368 360,857 3,000 96,000 5,699 146,987 - 85,000 5,486 84,844 25,000 39,914 - 1,339,727 - 1,339,727 0,000 1,921,619 4,650 1,894,332 0,000 33,033,500 3,149 32,422,409 - 21,319,500 1,989 21,154,652 5,000 1,809,000 9,040 1,788,412 - 3,120,0797 - 3,120,0797 2,000 539,702 2,000 539,702 1,000 6,638,9848 4,374 6,602,3588 153,000 1,855,534 222,273 1,834,055 - 1,535,200 17,205 1,516,843 550,000 1,199,000 486,812 1,038,446 145,000 1,278,000 145,482 1,275,781 - 3,192,333 1,396 3,192,333 387,000 1,847,000 394,317 1,825,052 150,000 456,000 139,641 445,570 - 1,911,700 9,046 1,902,092 - 999,900 2,248 999,778 150,000 635,700 149,510 634,053 1,700,t)00 3,600,000 8,555,1319 838,617 4,405,217 8,488,7499 1. Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2. Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 3. Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 4. Excludes $100 for condition surveys. 5. Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. 6. Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 8. Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit, $11,239, which is classed as"inactive" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 9. Excludes $61,872 contributed funds. 27-18 173 172 11 -2,19r 21i 9 363 371 384 34,000 3c 34,600 3 - 14] - 101 557 72f 25 605 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT TABLE 27-B Acts July 13, 1892 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 June 26, 19342 June 18, 1878 June 3, 1896 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1899 June 6, 1900 June 13, 19023 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized MINNESOTA RIVER, MINN. (See Section 1 of Text) Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to mile 14.7 RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MINN. (See Section 3 of Text) Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and Gull Lake. Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. ST. CROIX RIVER, MINN. AND WIS. (See Section 4 of Text) Dredging, etc., for a 3-foot channel between mouth and Taylors Falls. Harbor and waterfront at Stillwater. A 6-foot channel to Stillwater. The 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater. Small-boat harbor at Hudson. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MINN. (See Section 5 of Text) Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. Enlarging turning basin Documents Annual Report 1891. p. 2209 S. Doc. 144. 84th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 75, pt. 6, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess;4 Annual Report 1875, p. 372. H. Doc. 378, 69th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 184, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 184, 81st Cong., 1st sess.4 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 92, 56th Cong., 2d sess.5 H. Doc. 703, 61st Cong., 2d sess.5 Deepening to 8 feet. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Appropriation. 4. See H. Doc. 462, 71st Congress, 2d sess., for latest published map. 5. Latest published map is opposite p. 1984 in Annual Report for 1911. 27-19 TABLE 27-C RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See. Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area(square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (square Original Stage Com- Con- Total Reservoir (feet)' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) pleted Cost pleted Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1,442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1,163 173" 250.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602. 24 35.0 120,750 " 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - - 2,822,971 2,822,971 Total new work - - 681,805 3,704,956 4,386,761 Total operating and care - - 100,857 13,083,274 13,184,131 Permanent indefinite appropriation for operating and care, Feb. 1, 1895. to end of fiscal year 1936 - - - - 967,197 967,197 Rehabilitation - - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - 782,662 - $18,180,427 $18,963,089 1. Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2. Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. -.ci 0 56 o r otI0 0 0 z 0 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT TABLE 27-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30,1980 Full Report See Annual Operation And Project Report For Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, Minn.' 1961 36,415 46,488 Black River, Wis.3 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, Minn. and S. Dak.5' 6 1921 92 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, Minn. '1 5 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, Minn. 7 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, Minn. 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, Minn.' 5. 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, Minn. and N. Dak.5 s 1921 293,344 76,209 Wisconsin River, Wis. 4 5 1888 Zippel Bay Harbor, Minn.2' 1928 27,941 11,139 1. Completed. and 1887 (H. Ex. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2d sess.). Expenditures 2. Inactive. included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, Wis.'. No 3. Existing channel adequate for commerce. Portion of breakdown available. project for removal of obstructions at various points outside 5. No commerce reported. the dredged area to clear channel to full project width 6. Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, considered unnecessary to meet present navigation 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on Cong., 1st sess.). August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. 7. Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 4. Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). Rivers, Wis.'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin 8. Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 63d Cong., 3d sess.). TABLE 27-E NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) (See Section 7 of Text) Study identification Fiscal Year Costs Lake City Harbor, Minn. 47,530 Pike Island, Minn. 8,050 Trempealeau, Wis. 21,787 Warroad Harbor, Minn. 13,320 27-21 TABLE 27-F Name of Unit REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 25 of Text) Total Cost to Estimated September 30, 1980 Federal Cost Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,000 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, pumping plants 161,574 10,200,000 Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement, levees 1,639,924 1,639,9002 Total cost to date 6,524,2223 Total estimated cost 16,562,0004 'Includes $178,000 for lands and $25,000 for recreation facilities. 2Includes $67,900 for lands. 3Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge inactive unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 4The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'inactive' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $996,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-01-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and Authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated. Unit Date Authorizaton expired Cost to date Sheyenne River, N. Dak. Maple River, N. Dak. Moorhead, Minn. December 31, 1970 October 26, 1961 October 30, 1961 27-22 $37,956 1,241 27,700 ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT TABLE 27-G INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 36 of Text) Project Date Inspected Arcadia, W is ......................................... ..................... September 1980 Black River (North Bend), Wis ............................................. September 1980 Bois de Sioux River, Minn., N. Dak., & S. Dak............................ November 1979 Clearwater River, Minn ........................................................... November 1979 Cochrane, Wis........................................................... September 1980 Decorah, Iowa ........................................................... November 1979 Elk River, Minn ........................................ .... August 1980 Enderlin, N. Dak. .......................................................... October 1979 Fargo, N. Dak .......................................... ................... October 1979 Forest River, N. Dak ..................................................... November 1979 Grand Forks, N. Dak ............................ ..................... October 1979 Guttenberg, Iowa........................................................ November 1979 Hastings, M inn........................................................... Septem ber 1980 Lost River, Minn.........................................................November 1979 Marsh River, Minn ................... ............... ................ November 1979 Mustinka River, Minn................................. .................. November 1979 New Albin, Iowa ................................................. November 1979 Ottertail River, Minn ......................................................... November 1979 Park River, N. Dak ................................. ................... November 1979 Pembina, N. Dak. ........................................................... October 1979 Red Lake River, Minn. ................................................... November 1979 Redwood River, Minn. .................................................. November 1979 Rush River, N. Dak ............................................................. November 1979 Sand Hill River, Minn. .................. ..................... November 1979 Sheyenne River, N. Dak................... .................... November 1979 South St. Paul, Minn ............ ................ ................ August 1980 St. Paul, M inn ............................................................... August 1980 Wild Rice River, Minn ................................................... November 1979 W inona, M inn ...................................................... ...... September 1980 Zumbro River, Minn. .............................................. July 1980 27-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 27-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30,1980 Full Report See Annual Operation And Project Report For Construction Maintenance Dry Run, Iowa' 1966 1,790,759 - Elk River, Minn.1,2 1970 259,7003 - Guttenberg, Iowa' 1974 2,361,915 - Lost River, Minn.' 1967 563,553'1 Lower Branch Rush River, N. Dak. 1 ,2 1974 1,000,0005 Marshall, Minn. 1964 1,802,866 Minneota, Minn.1.2 1963 161,545 Mississippi River near Aitkin, Minn.' 1957 1,675,835 Pembina River Lake, N. Dak.7 1950 50,000 Red River of the North at Pembina, N. Dak.1,2 1979 2,000,000 Redwood River below Marshall, Minn.1,2 1960 202,400 - St. Paul and South St. Paul, Minn.' 1974 8,476,0128 _ Tongue River Lake, N. Dak.7 1950 23,695 Upper Iowa River, Iowa' 1964 888,445 Upper Mississippi River Basin (St. Paul Dist.) Black River Lake, Wis.9 1950 - Velva, N. Dak.1.2 1970 334,628 Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, Minn.6 1974 182,000 - Zumbro River, Minn.' 1975 1,284,100 1. Completed. requested the project be reclassified to inactive due to a 2. Project authorized by Chief of Ehgineers under small limitation of their funding capability. The project was project authority, section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as classified inactive on April 5, 1974. amended. 7. Further work deferred pending review of project 3. In addition $87, 878 was expended from Public Law document (inactive). 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and 8. Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work incorporation into the permanent project. and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of 4. Includes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 authorization expired in April 1966. Excludes $246,911 expended for work done at request of local interests. contributed funds. 9. Project never selected for construction and classified 5. Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 12 6. Preconstruction planning suspended. Local interests of Public 93-251. TABLE 27-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 38 of Text) Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Argyle, Minn. Middle River $16,870 Cook, Minn. Little Fork River 16,759 Devils Lake, N. Dak. 33,221 Enderlin, N. Dak., Maple River 53,446 McGregor, Iowa 27,032 Red River of the North, Argusville, N. Dak. 16,883 Red River of the North, Halstad, Minn. 28,827 Sauk Rapids, Minn., Benton County Ditch No., 3 28,800 Snake River, below Warren, Minn. 9,091 27-24 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780, 83rd Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Kickapoo River, Wis. $524 Maple River, N., Dak. 501 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Mahnomen, Minn., Wild Rice River $6,758 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Project Fiscal Year Costs Disaster preparedness $65,441 Flood Emergency Operations 129,075 Rehabilitation - Rushford, Minn. 5,434 Rehabilitation - Wild Rice River Levee, Minn. 76,262 Advance Measures -30,414 Total emergency flood control activites 245,798 TABLE 27-J OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY (See Section 41 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Costs Aquatic Plant Control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298) Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Program (Section 32, Public Law 93-251, as amended by Section 155 and 161, Public Law 94-587) $7,015 9,960 27-25 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT* Due to realignment of boundaries during the year, this district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southwestern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins, the Illinois and Mississippi Canal and drainage basin of Bureau Creek. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind..........28-2 2. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill ...... 28-3 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Ill.............. ...... ...... 28-4 4. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. ......... 28-4 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects . 28-4 Flood Control Bettendorf, Iowa ................. ... 28-4 Burlington, Iowa ................. .... 28-4 Chelsea, Iowa ........................ 28-4 Clinton, Iowa .............. ..... 4.. 28-5 Coralville Lake, Iowa ................ 28-5 Davenport, Iowa......................28-5 East Moline, Ill ...................... 28-5 Evansdale, Iowa.......*,.............. 28-6 Farm Creek, Ill..................... 28-6 Fulton, Ill. .......................... 28-6 Marengo, Iowa .................. .28-6 Milan, Ill...................... .... 28-6 Moline, Ill......................... .. 28-7 Mouth of Sangamon River, Ill, ....... 28-7 Flood Control (Con't.) Page 20. Muscatine, Mad Creek, Iowa .......... 28-7 21. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, Iowa................. ..........28-8 22. Rockford, Ill......... ................. 28-8 23. Rock River Agricultural Levees, Ill. ......................... 28-8 24. Saylorville Lake, Iowa ................ 28-8 25. Union Township Drainage District, Mo. ...................... 28-9 26. Waterloo, Iowa ........................28-9 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............. 28-9 28. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ ..... 28-10 29. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................ 28-10 General Investigations 30. Surveys .......................... 28-10 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... ..................... 28-10 32. Research and Development ......... 28-10 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 28-1 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, Ill., about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles); Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, Ill., waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, Ind. (4.2 miles). Previous Projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 28-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated cost of new work 1978 is $1,065,080,208 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, placed in the inactive category in June 1973, cost of $132,000,000 (July 1972) Federal and $16,300,000 (July 1972) non-Federal; Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-for-restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non- Federal; widen Pekin Bend, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the inactive category, cost of $1,360,700 (July 1972) Federal; and, widen Marseilles Canal to 300 feet, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the deferred category, cost of $1,859,300 (July 1972) Federal, are all excluded from present cost estimate. ' (See also tables 28-C, 28-H, 28-I, 28-J on authorizing legislation; existing and proposed locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost and additional features entering into cost of project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. Required cooperation under October 23, 1962 Act (Duplicate Locks) is that prior to construction local interests agree to assume title to and maintain and operate new bridge across lower approach to Brandon Road lock when bridge is placed in service. Initial assurances for the October 23, 1962 Act were received from the State of Illinois 19 December 1969. Formal assurances based on the project as reformulated in the GDM -- Phase I studies were requested from the State of Illinois 7 March 1975. Reaffirmation of assurances have not been received from the State. For details see Pages 1412 to 1414, Annual Report of 1962. Terminal facilities. Of the 13 principal cities and towns along Illinois River, about five own dock frontage, more or less improved for boat landings; four own dock frontage with no improvements; and four own no frontage except at street ends. At Peoria, there is a $400,000 modern river-rail municipal public terminal with available frontage of 1,100 feet; 205 feet occupied by a dock house and 190 feet by an open dock. Dockhouse is served by a wharf boat 45 by 230 feet, and an escalator capable of handling 1,000 tons a day. This terminal is served by equivalent of a beltline railroad. Grain barge loading facilities are available at 26 docks between Grafton and Joliet, 21 of which have grain elevators. Private coal landing terminals are at Frederick, Havana, Liverpool, Copperas Creek, Kingston Lake, and Peoria. Coal-unloading terminals are at Havana and Hennepin powerplants; at mouth of Vermillion River near LaSalle and at Joliet. Bulk-petroleum terminals are in Havana, Kingston Mines, Peoria, Peru, Seneca, and Joliet. Sand and gravel plants are at Kingston Lake, Onillicothe, Ottawa, Morris, Joliet, and Lockport. From Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, sand, gravel, oil, grain, and gasoline are shipped from Lockport, and petroleum products, steel and stone from Lemont. Two grain elevators are at Lockport. Bulk-petroleum terminals are at Argo and Forest View, Ill, and at California Avenue, Cicero Avenue, Justice and Kedzie Avenue, Chicago; one liquid industrialchemicals terminal is at Marseilles, one at Seneca, two at Morris, two at Channahon, three at Joliet, one at Willow Springs and one at Cicero Avenue in Stickney, Ill. Private coal-unloading terminals are at Ridgeland Avenue, Crawford Avenue, Loomis Street, Fisk Street, and Addison Street, Chicago, at Western Avenue, Chicago, bulk and package sugar are handled through American Sugar Refining Co. Bulk fertilizer terminals are at Marseilles (two), and Joliet. A liquid asphalt terminal is at Summit. Cement terminals are at Lemont, Summit, Forest View, and at Cicero Avenue in Chicago. A scrap iron bulk terminal is at California Avenue, Chicago. State of Illinois barge terminal, including a 1,500,000-bushel grain elevator, is at Damen Avenue, Chicago, on South Branch of Chicago River. One sand-and-gravel distribution yard is on the Calumet-Sag Channel. A petroleumunloading terminal is on Little Calumet River at Riverdale, just upstream from junction with Sag Channel; and two petroleum terminals are at 28-2 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT Homan Avenue in Blue Island. Plans for further terminals and docks between Grafton and Chicago are underway. Operations and results during period. New work: Calumet-Sag Modification. Part I - Due to a refund from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for return of escrow for Just Compensation as a result of final settlement of condemnation proceedings, funds were deobligated from the Penn Railroad Bridge in the amount of $48,000, 96th Ave. Bridge in the amount of $1,050, 104th Ave. Bridge in the amount of $700, and the Michigan Central Railroad Bridge in the amount of $4,800. These reductions were offset by contract costs of $48,66.9 for the Indiana Ave. Bridge and cost allocation charges for the Penn Railroad Bridge of $297, Ridgeland Ave. Bridge of $1,310, Indiana Ave. Bridge of $2,645, and 130th Street Bridge of $297, for a net credit to the project during the year of $1,332. Alton Pool Operation: Costs by hired labor for condition and operation studies were $114,117; water control management $8,776; and supervision and administration, $21,635. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $1,041,583 for dredging; $48,242 for engineering; and $106,926 for supervision and administration. All pools above Alton Pool: Condition and operation studies, sounding and sweeping surveys, and miscellaneous engineering and design work was completed at a cost of $1,290,107. Water control management costs were $390,295. Dredging was accomplished at a cost of $694,281. Rehabilitation: Design was completed for dam rehabilitation at Dresden Island and Starved Rock Locks and Dams. Dresden Lock and Dam rehabilitation contract has been awarded; Starved Rock rehabilitation contract award scheduled for February 1981. Total construction costs at Dresden Island Lock & Dam were $600,035. Total construction costs at Starved Rock Lock & Dam were $390,166. Operation and care of lock and dams: The locks were operated as required and necessary minor repairs were made thereto and to appurtenant structures at a cost of $6,434,974. Lock structural repairs were completed by hired labor at O'Brien Lock and at LaGrange Lock at a cost of $694,775. Dam stabilization contract was completed at Brandon Road Lock and Dam at a cost of $728,736; and rehabilitation of wickets completed by hired labor at Peoria and LaGrange at cost of $310,639. Radio tower painting contract was completed at a cost of $171,493. Total operation and maintenance costs were $10,715,300 for all pools above Alton Pool. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, exclusive of the deferred and inactive portion and the Calumet-Sag and Duplicate Locks modifications, is complete. The Calumet- Sag Modification, Part I, construction is 100% complete, except for final closing of costs with Cook County on 127th Street and Ridgeland Avenue Bridges, and with the City of Chicago on Indiana Avenue Highway Bridge and 130th Street Bridge, and the design contract for seven highway bridges. Final closing of costs for two railroad contracts (Conrail and Illinois Central Gulf Railroad) are still pending. Preconstruction planning on the Duplicate Locks has been suspended due to lack of local cooperation. Eight locks and six dams were complete and there is a channel 300 feet wide and 9 feet deep between Grafton and Lockport, Ill., with exception of Marseilles Canal which is 200 feet wide. Limiting horizontal clearance is as follows: 118 feet at a bridge in the reach from Grafton to Utica, Ill.; 110 feet at bridges between Utica and Lockport, Ill.; 80 feet at the emergency (Butterfly) dam, mile 293, between Lockport and Sag Junction; 80 feet at a bridge between the Sag Junction and Lake Michigan via Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and Chicago River and 188.5 feet at a bridge between the Sag Junction and turning basin 5 in Calumet River, via the Calumet-Sag Channel. Work remaining on 1935 modification consisting of widening of Pekin Bend and widening Marseilles Canal has been reclassified to inactive and deferred. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, has been reclassified to inactive. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, has been deferred-for-restudy. (See table 28-L for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980). 2. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, ILL. Location. Extends for 75 miles from Illinois River near LaSalle to Mississippi River at Rock Island. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. This obsolete canal has been repaired and modified as a condition for its transfer to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. Operations and results during period. None. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project completed in 1918. Canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951. Repair and modification program to be accomplished prior to disposal of canal initiated in fiscal year 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with the repair and modification program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River near Rock Falls, formerly 28-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 under navigational flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the appropriation of $6,528,000 for further repair and modificatio, and work has continued under that authority. 3. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, ILL. Location. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Rock Island County, Ill. Previous project. See page 1132, Annual Report for 1932, and page 1081, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provided for diversion of Mill Ceek into South Slough, flood gates in walls of Illinois and Mississippi Canal to carry Mill Creek flood waters across canal right-of-way into Rock River, levees, and other works for flood protection at Milan. Project was modified to restore original Mill Creek outlet into Rock River. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. Minor channel maintenance was performed at a cost of $20,658. Condition as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in 1932. In 1962-63 $73,366 was expended from Illinois and Mississippi maintenance funds for restoration of Mill Creek outlet into Rock River. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 28-B. Flood Control 6. BETTENDORF, IOWA Location. On right bank of Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Scott County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 3 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps. Estimated project cost is $8,690,000, including $1,690,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. In November 1976 a referendum to provide local cooperation funding for the project was defeated. Recently, the city has shown renewed interest in the project. An executed local cooperation agreement was approved on March 16, 1979. The project was reclassified from the "Inactive" to the "Active" category on April 10, 1979. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $141,276. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. Preconstruction planning in progress. 7. BURLINGTON, IOWA Location. Industrial area of Burlington, Des Moines County, Iowa, on Mississippi River at approximate river mile 405 above the mouth of the Ohio River. Existing project. Local protection from floods on the Mississippi River and Flint Creek by construction of earth levee, floodwall, interior drainage, and two railroad closure structures. Total estimated cost is $2,687,000, including $477,000 non-Federal cost. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests also to assume all cost in excess of $3,000,000 Federal limitation, make certain alterations of existing facilities, provide extension of a storm sewer, and prevent encroachment on right-of-way. Assurances were approved Oct. 22, 1978. Operations and results during period. Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $60,832. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction not yet initiated. 8. CHELSEA, IOWA Location. The Iowa River and Otter Creek, Tama County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from floods on the Iowa River and Otter Creek by construction of two ring levees to protect the north and south portions of the community. Plan also includes two ponding areas, two pumping stations, and four gravity outlets. Total estimated cost is $1,485,000, including $135,000 non-Federal cost. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $15,882. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction not yet initiated. Project considered not feasible. 28-4 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT 9. CLINTON, IOWA Location. On right bank of Mississippi River, 518.2 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Clinton County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 8.1 miles of earth levee, 3,080 feet of I-type concrete floodwall, 1,250 feet of precast panel freeboard wall, interceptor sewer, closure structures, ramps, 6 pumping stations, ponding areas, and gate wells. Estimated project cost is $26,600,000, including $4,352,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $4,940,442 (excluding $20,800 il local contributions). Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was started in August 1974 and is about 94 percent completed. 10. CORALVILLE LAKE, IOWA Location. On Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, in Johnson County, Iowa, about 83 miles above mouth of Iowa River. Existing project. An earthfill dam rising about 100 feet above streambed, a 500-foot uncontrolled spillway, outlet works to control flow of river to bankfull stage below dam, and a reservoir providing flood control pool of 475,000 acre-feet. In addition, a conservation pool is provided which varies from 17,000 acre-feet from February through June to 53,750 acre-feet from July to February of each year. Coralville Lake is used to store Iowa River flows temporarily during flood periods. Project minimizes flood damages on Iowa River from dam to mouth.of Cedar River, and provides a high degree of protection to lands along Iowa River below mouth of Cedar River. Project also effects significant reduction of Mississippi River flows at Keokuk, Iowa, and reduction of flows at Cairo, Ill. Benefits to conservation and recreation accrue from project. Project modified to provide for highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except' in connection with Mehaffey Bridge, which has been fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Work in connection with recreational facilities continued at a cost of $957,812. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $1,517,151. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction began in July 1949 and project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,112 acres of land were acquired in fee, and flowage easements obtained for 9,573 acres. Construction of MehaffeyBridge began in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. 11. DAVENPORT, IOWA Location. Right bank of Mississippi River, 482.4 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Scott County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection to the city from floods on Mississippi River to be provided by construction of levees and floodwall. Plan also includes interior drainage facilities and pump plants, closure structures, and recreational facilities. Estimated project cost is $33,300,000, including $5,920,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests also to bear the cost of relocations, bear not less than one-half of the separable first cost for recreational development, obtain legal control to prevent encroachment on project features, and provide pressurized sewers at three locations. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $102,075. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. Preconstruction planning in progress. 12. EAST MOLINE, ILL. Location. On left bank of Mississippi River, 489.3 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Rock Island County, Illinois. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River and Rock River floods to be provided by construction of levees, railroad raises, street raises, a closure structure, gravity drainage outlets, open ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants. Estimated project cost is $11,400,000, including $2,020,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued and construction initiated at a cost of $1,043,728 (excluding $298,377 in local contributions). Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction initiated in July 1979 and is about 21 percent complete. 28-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 13. EVANSDALE, IOWA Location. Cedar River, Black Hawk County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection to the city ef Evansdale from floods on the Cedar River to be provided by construction of levees, ponding areas, interior drainage facilities, and road ramps.Estimated project cost is $4,500,000, including $640,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests also to make all relocations and prevent encroachment on ponding areas. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $88,515. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. Preconstruction planning in progress. Construction to start Jan. 1981. 14. FARM CREEK, ILL. Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, Ill. is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. Two compacted-earth flooddetention dams, Fondulac Dam on Fondulac Creek. Tazewell County, Ill., about 1.5 miles easterly of East Peoria, Ill., and Farmdale Dam on Farm Creek, Tazewell County, Ill., about 2.5 miles easterly of East Peoria, Ill., and improvements to Farm Creek, Cole Creek, and Kerfoot Creek Channels in East Peoria, Ill. Fondulac Dam has a maximum height of 67 feet above riverbed and a reservoir capacity of 3,780 acrefeet. Farmdale Dam has a maximum height of 80 feet above riverbed and a reservoir capacity of 15,500 acre-feet. Linear feet of channel improvements are: Farm Creek, 12,000 feet; Cole Creek, 1,875 feet; Kerfoot Creek, 900 feet. Project provides complete protection to residential, business, and highly developed industrial areas to East Peoria, Ill., against design flows in Farm, Cole, Kerfoot, and Dempsey Creeks of expected frequency once in about 100 years. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (See H.D. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. Real estate acquisition for the Farmdale Dam and Spillway Discharge Channel was performed during FY '80 at a cost of $120,335. This amount included acquisition costs, relocation assistance payments and removal of buildings and mobile homes from the acquired land. See Table 28-A. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $12,139,887 of which $10,020,833 was for new work ($9,859,020 regular funds and $161,813 contributed funds),and $2,119,054 regular funds for maintenance. 15. FULTON, ILL. Location. On left bank of Mississippi River, 520.1 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Whiteside County, Ill. SExisting project. Local protection from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 12 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, road ramps, closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ponding areas, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. The improvements would also protect an adjacent rural area in the Cat Tail Drainage District, so as to provide access for the city to high ground. Estimated project cost is $17,300,000, including $2,150,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $2,061,901. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction initiated in January 1978 and is about 44 percent completed. 16. MARENGO, IOWA Location. The Iowa River and Bear Creek at Marengo in Iowa County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from floods on the Iowa River and Bear Creek by construction of new levee, improvement of existing levee, and interior drainage facilities. Total estimated cost is $2,500,000. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $1,428,943. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction initiated in June 1978 and is about 84 percent completed. 17. MILAN, ILL. Location. On south bank of Rock River, several miles from the confluence of that stream with the Mississippi River at mile 479.1 above mouth of Ohio River, in Rock Island County, Ill. 28-6 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT Existing project. Local protection against direct flooding from Rock River and Mill Creek and against backwater flooding from Mississippi River to be provided by construction of levees, flood walls, closure structure, bridges, pumping stations, drainage facilities, and street ramps. Estimated project cost is $13,300,000, including $3,480,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests will also provide relocations and obtain legal control over pondage areas. Assurances are being processed. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $241,435. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction is now under way. 18. MOLINE, ILL. Location. On left bank of Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above mouth of Ohio River, in Rock Island County, Illinois. Existing project. Local protection at Moline from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 4 miles of earth levee and flood wall, closure structures, aesthetic and recreational development and interior drainage facilities consisting of gravity outlets, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. Estimated project cost is $19,470,000, including $2,276,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests will also provide relocations, bear not less than one-half of the separable first cost for recreational development, and prevent encroachment on ponding areas. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $203,299. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. Preconstruction planning in progress. 19. MOUTH OF SANGAMON RIVER, ILL. Location. On east bank of Illinois River, 98 miles above mouth and 9.4 miles above Beardstown Highway Bridge. Projectextends for several miles upstream from mouth of river. This portion of Sangamon River forms boundary line between Mason County on the northwest and Cass County on the southwest. Existing project. Project authorized by 1936 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 186, 72nd Congress, 1st session) provided for excavation of a new outlet channel for Sangamon River about 6.7 miles long and 200 feet wide extending from Hager Slough on Illinois River to mile 6.7 above mouth of Sangamon River, and a diversion channel and remedial works necessary for maintenance of a highwater table in adjacent wild game reserve. Further remedial work was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962 (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.). Completed costs for work authorized by 1936 Flood Control Act are $764,490 Federal costs; $15,122 contributed funds; lands and damages, non-Federal costs $20,000; total $799,612. Estimated Federal cost (July 1973) for work authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act is $284,000. There was no expenditure of funds in FY '80. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by 1936 Flood Control Act is complete. Total cost of existing remedial work authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act to September 30, 1980 were $230,613 for new work and $272,848 maintenance, a total of $503,461. 20. MUSCATINE, MAD CREEK, IOWA Location. On right bank of Mad Creek, a short distance upstream from the confluence of the creek with the Mississippi River at mile 455.8 above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Muscatine County, Iowa. Previous project. See page 1338, Annual Report 1962. Existing project. Local protection at Muscatine from coincidental floods on Mad Creek and the Mississippi River to an industrial area of about 75 acres. The site is mainly upstream from the previous project, but some modification of the previous project would be involved.. The work consists of about one mile of earth levee, a short reach of concrete wall, interior drainage facilities, and closure structures for streets and a railroad. Total estimated project cost is $868,000, including non-Federal cost of $118,000 for rightof- way. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction in progress. Condition as of Sept. 30. Preconstruction planning continued for Stage II at a cost of $24,112. 28-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 21. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IOWA Location. On Des Moines River, Iowa, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. Dam (Howell) site is 142.9 miles above mouth of Des Moines River, which empties into Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above mouth of Ohio River. City of Des Moines lies northwesterly from' site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. Provides for a dam consisting of a rolled earth-fill embankment and gravitytype concrete spillway with crest gates, located near center of valley, each end of which is tied into embankment by a gravity-type nonoverflow concrete section. The dam, at crest elevation of 797 feet above mean sea level, is about 5,676 feet longand maximum height of 110 feet. Gated spillway is of concrete founded on bedrock with crest at elevation 736. Full flood control level (top of crest gates) is at elevation 780. Spillway crest gates are 45 feet high and 41 feet wide. Outlet works consisting of fourteen 5-by-9 foot gated conduits extend through spillway section and discharge into spillway stilling basin. Nonoverflow concrete sections of dam at each end of spillway are gravity-type, keyed into foundation rock. Drainage area above dam site is 12,323 square miles. With pool at full flood control elevation, lake area is about 65,500 acres; lake has a volume of 1,830,000 acre-feet of water at that height (1,740,000 for flood control and 90,000 for a permanent pool). Impoundment of floodwaters by lake results in materially reduced flood heights on Des Moines River below the dam, and also provides substantial supplementary benefits by reducing Mississippi River floods. See Table 28- C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction of recreational facilities and incidental.work continued at a cost of $942,713. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $1,435,729. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction began in May 1960. Dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for project: 47,610 acres in fee and 28,214 acres in flowage easements. 22. ROCKFORD, ILL. Location. Kent Creek, a right bank tributary of Rock River, Winnebago County, Ill. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth dam with outlet works and spillway on North Branch Kent Creek in Page Park; 12,000 feet of phannel cleanout and straightening on North Branch KeTt Creek; raise of Levings Lake dam on South Branch Kent Creek and construction of spillway and diversion channel; 10,800 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on South Branch Kent Creek; and relocations. Estimated cost is $8,380,000, including $100,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $1,738,763. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction initiated in October 1978 and is about 51 percent completed. 23. ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, ILL. Location. Along both banks of the lower Rock River in Rock Island, Whiteside, and Henry Counties, Ill. Existing project. Provides for construction of levees and appurtenant works with incidental channel improvements for flood control in five areas, along the lower Rock River, mainly agricultural in character, as follows: Area 1, Carbon Cliff to Canoe Creek, right bank, 15.8 miles (not active at this time) Area 2, Canoe Creek to Rock Creek, right bank, 16.2 miles Area 3, Rock Creek to Lyndon, right bank, 15 miles Area 4, near Spring Hill to Prophetstown, left bank, 10.2 miles Area 5, Penny Slough Levee and Drainage District, left bank, 9.1 miles Estimated project cost for Areas 2 through 5 is $28,000,000, including $7,437,000 non-Federal cost. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests will also bear the cost of relocations, except railroad bridges, and contribute in cash. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances of local cooperation after a firm project plan is established. Operations and results during period. New work: Restudy of project was continued at a cost of $147,852. Area 1 was added back into the project. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. Planning is scheduled for completion in September 1985. 24. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IOWA Location. Site is chiefly in Polk County, Iowa, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Coun- 28-8 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT ties. Dam is about 213.7 miles above mouth of Des Moines River, and about 5 miles upstream from north limits of city of Des Moines. Existing project. Dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at toe of west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and houses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over spillway weir will discharge into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir will be uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above damsite is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a large degree of flood protection to lower Des Moines River Valley. Reaches along Mississippi River downstream from mouth of Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the.dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification includes relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Estimated project cost is $100,800,000, including $1,810,000 as a cash contribution from the State of Iowa toward recreational development. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction costing $1,415,079 of recreational facilities clearing in the upper reaches of the lake, and acquisition of land in the downstream floodway corridor were in progress. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $1,362,789. Conditions as of Sept. 30. Construction began in June 1965 and the project is 90 percent completed. The dam was placed in operation in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley was completed in December 1974. Land acquisition is in progress, 25,900 acres acquired in fee, flowage easements obtained for 1,404 acres, and roadway easements obtained for 40 acres. The major work items remaining are recreational development and the project modification features authorized in 1976.. 25. UNION TOWNSHIP DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO. Location. The Union Township Drainage District is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River in Lewis County, Missouri. Previous project. See page 1420, Annual Report for 1947. Existing project. Local protection from floods on the Mississippi River, Durgens Creek, and Oyster Creek by improvement of existing levees and construction of a railroad closure structure, road ramps, modifications of a pump plant, drainage facilities, and relocation of a pipeline. Total estimated cost is $1,382,000, including $82,000 non-Federal cost. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests also to make certain relocations and alterations, prevent encroachment on ponding areas, and assume all cost in excess of $3,000,000 Federal limitation. Assurances were approved Feb. 22, 1978. Operations and results during period. Minor preconstruction planning was performed, but discontinued due to lack of local support. Condition as of Sept. 30. No construction performed. 26. WATERLOO, IOWA Location. Both banks of Cedar River at Waterloo in Black Hawk County, Iowa. Existing project. Local protection from Cedar River and Black Hawk Creek floods to be provided by construction of levees, floodwalls, pumping plants, and closure structures on both sides of Cedar River and Black Hawk Creek. Estimated project cost is $44,700,000, including $10,500,000 non-Federal costs for rights-of-way and relocations. See Table 28-C for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Preconstruction planning and construction continued at a cost of $4,016,039. Condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was started in August 1972 and is in progress. Planning in progress. Project is about 79 percent completed. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood-control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide 28-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $112,528. (See Table 28-D for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 28-E. 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 28-F. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). See Table 28-G. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) During the year, a detailed project report was completed for clearing and snagging in Penitentiary, Fork, French, and Dry Creeks, small tributaries of the Mississippi River at Fort Madison, Iowa. No construction has been performed. Cost during the period was $7,906. Snagging and clearing on Michael Creek in Louisa County, Iowa, was performed ai a cost of $74,240. Ste Table 28-F for complete list of snagging and clearing projects. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974. A bank erosion problem on the Iowa River at Wapello, Iowa, was selected by the Chief of Engineers as a demonstration site under the above cited act. The project consists of a combination of permeable timber jetties, erosion control mat, and steel jacks. Construction was accomplished in 1978. The project will be monitored for the next five years to evaluate its success. Cost during the period was $24,121. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). See Table 28-F. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Navigation and flood control studies' cost $911,892. Coordination studies with other agencies cost $1,766. Review of completed projects cost $212,521. Special studies cost $507,881. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period were $177,601 for flood plain management services, $61,181 for inspection of dams, and $17,011 for hydrologic studies, totaling $255,793. 32. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Cost during the period was $16,256 for expanded flood plain information study on Crow Creek, Scott County, Iowa. 28-10 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding 1. Illinois Waterway, New Work: Ill. and Ind. Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost 2. Illinois & New Work: Mississippi Canal, Approp. Ill. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 3. Mill Creek & Maint: South Slough at Approp. Milan, Ill. Cost 6. Bettendorf, Iowa New Work: Approp. Cost 7. Burlington, Iowa New Work: Approp. Cost 8. Chelsea, Iowa New Work: Approp. Cost 9. Clinton, Iowa New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost 10. Coralville, Iowa New Work: Reservoir, UMRB Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 11. Davenport, Iowa New Work: Approp. Cost 12. East Moline, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost, Contributed Funds Approp. Cost 13. Evansdale, Iowa New Work: Approp. Cost 14. Farm Creek, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 15. Fulton, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost 16. Iowa River, Bear New Work: Creek, Marengo, Approp. Iowa Cost 17. Milan, Ill. New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 1980 2,259,000 - 1,452,304 811,059 48 9,359,500 13,658,500 13,703,081 9,224,058 13,472,303 13,249,455 - 8,800,000 2,710,000 -59 25,600 25,758 4,320 4,320 30,000 24,571 15,000 10,796 7,529,680 4,790,135 20,000 20,125 907,000 1,113,124 180,000 157,036 250,000 241,217 192,200 101,311 440,000 196,919 20,328 18,704 50,000 60,479 59 23,500 23,500 00 25,000 26,588 47,000 38,141 1,740,000 2,954,791 600,000 690,123 126,000 72,682 962,200 1,005,169 124,000 121,327 200,000 170,390 60,000 59,036 799,200 697,105 2,600,000 1.606,898 425,000 373,840 25,000 25,412 25,000 24,333 25,000 20,722 95,000 73,846 5,000 12,996 3,685,000 4,792,679 50,129 640,000 359,850 1,066,200 989,151 70,000 79,548 460,000 494,159 200,000 29,713 170,000 170,597 230,000 421,886 2,350,000 3,080,160 602,500 288,065 135,000 119,861 14,7( 12,0t 7 91 - 126,707,7511 -1,332 126,706,4131 66,600 155,630,3122 56,579 152,095,6812 45,000 12,669,625 90,201 12,556,296 - 7,605, 1433 - 7,605,143 - 13,074,238 -505 13,069,2084 20,700 339,5535 20,658 338,8445 50,000 426,980 41,276 413,978 40,000 244,500 60,832 240,337 26,000 207,500 15,882 192,132 55,000 24,758,480 40,442 24,708,379 15,052 761,052 20,800 761,052 11,000 18,985,788 57,812 17,941,1536 56,000 10,801,005 17,151 10,352,760 00,000 1,289,717 02,075 1,273,549 55,000 2,550,300 43,728 2,534,794 50,000 350,000 98,377 328,090 01,088 331,088 88,515 318,148 -- 9,859,0207 - 9,859,0207 80,000 2,179,821 20,335 2,119,054 90,000 7,802,200 61,901 7,468,078 1, 4,51 4,9, 7 91 1,8 1,5 1' 1' 1,0 1,0, 21 2 1 1 1: 1,81 2,0 1,331,672 1,428,943 270,000 241,435 2,500,000 2,230,025 603,400 603,400 28-11 TABLE 28-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 1980 18. Moline. Ill. New Work: Approp.' 130,000 157,000 200,000 237,000 1,069,000 Cost 104,127 180,127 207,714 203,299 1,033,125 19. Mouth of Sangamon New Work:' River. I11l. Approp. - - - - 1,048,9908 9 Cost 53,887 - - - 1,408,9908 9 Maint: Approp. 26,000 7,728 3,000 1,000 504,52610 Cost 31,000 7,728 3,000 0 503,52610 20. Muscatine, Mad New Work: Creek, Iowa Approp. 255,100 200,000 15,000 19,000 621,600 Cost 22,220 399,352 39,443 24,112 617,625 21. Red Rock Dam and New Work: Red Rock Lake Approp. 32,884 1,249,000 1,000,000 700,000 92,659,484 Cost 173,735 *1,010,658 652,715 942,713 92,554,912 Maint: Approp. 1,317,100 1,878,900 1,522,700 1,480,000 9,731,293 Cost 1,318,502 1,619,083 1,774,056 1,435,729 9,592,077 22. Rockford. Ill. New Work: Approp. 95,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,750,000 4,782,736 Cost 52,560 192,831 2,018,083 1,738,763 4,767,241 23. Rock River Agri. New Work: Levees, (Areas 2-5), Approp. - - 60,000 150,000 210,000 Ill. Cost - - 59,879 147,852 208,731 24. Saylorville Lake, New Work: Iowa Approp. 6,400,000 7,300,000 2,825,000 1,490,000 91,027,200 Cost 5,356,378 6,632,743 3,768,856 1,415,079 90,650t0411 Maint: Approp. 727,000 1,188,000 1,155,600 1,454,000 5,186,700 Cost 722,501 1,087,130 1,259,863 1,362,790 5,031,879 25. Union Township New Work: Drainage Dist., Mo. Approp. 10,000 73,000 52,000 8,000 247,047 Cost 4,425 75,732 54,538 6,955 245,643 26. Waterloo, Iowa New Work: Approp. 5,000,000 3,000,000 5,670,000 4,035,000 35,357,100 Cost 3,015,158 4,321,058 6,538,275 4,016,039 35,190,075 Contributed Funds Approp. 24,300 - - - 83,300 Cost - 83,300 - - 83,300 1. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 7. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 2. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 8. Excludes $15,122 contributed funds. 3. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 9. Excludes $764,490 for previous projects. 4. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the 10. Includes $230,678 for previous projects. "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 11. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 5. Includes $85 for previous project. 6. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). TABLE 28-B OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Squaw Chute at Quincy, Ill.' 1967 70,9792 9,345 Quincy, Ill., Harbor Access Channel' 1970 35,4773 37,700 1. Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. 2. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 28-12 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19341 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 Oct. 23, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois Rivers and Harbors River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and Committee Doc. 69th dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, Ill. to heads of present S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers, 94.6 2nd sess. miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of state for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, 2nd sess. 2 exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning 2nd sess. basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of Rivers and Harbors bypassed section of Calumet River. Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. 2nd sess. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide 1st sess. with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, Ind. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration of Illinois Central R.R. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Substitute following work for that authorized by act of H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., Mar. 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary 2nd sess. and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, Ind. with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges, to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, Ill., by H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet 2nd sess. deep. 28-13 TABLE 28-C Acts Documents Acts Documenty REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 28-C (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 17. 1953 July 3. 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 18, 1968 July 3. 1930 August 13. 1968 June 30, 1948 (Section 205) June 30. 1948 (Section 205) August 13, 1968 June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 December 31, 1970 August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 (Section 201) Approved by Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate, Sept. 23, 1976 and Oct. 1, 1976, respectively 1944 Flood Control Act August 13, 1968 $48,933 to reimburse Nutiood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in Oct. 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Construct auxiliary locks at Lockport, Brandon Road, Dresden Island, Marseilles, Starved Rock, Peoria, and LaGrange. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitutes unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Congress as amended. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, ILL. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel diversion, flood gates, and other work for flood protection. BETTENDORF, IOWA (See Section 6 of Text) Levees, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps for flood control. BURLINGTON, IOWA (See Section 7 of Text) Levee, floodwall, interior drainage, and railroad closures for flood control. CHELSEA, IOWA (See Section 8 of Text) Two ring levees, ponding areas, pumping stations, and gravity outlets for flood control. CLINTON, IOWA (See Section 9 of Text) Levee, floodwall, railroad raises, street ramps, closure structures, pumping plants, and gravity drainage outlets for flood control. CORALVILLE LAKE, IOWA (See Section 10 of Text) Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DAVENPORT, IOWA (See Section 11 of Text) Levee, floodwall and pumping plants. EAST MOLINE, ILL. (See Section 12 of Text) Levee, railroad raises, street raises, closure structure, gravity drainage outlets, open ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants for flood control. EVANSDALE, IOWA (See Section 13 of Text) Levees, ponding areas, interior drainage, and road ramps for flood control. FARM CREEK, ILL. (See Section 14 of Text) FULTON, ILL. (See Section 15 of Text) Levee, railroad raises, road ramps, closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ponding areas, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants for flood control. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 31, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 348, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. None None H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 563, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. 28-14 TABLE 28-C (Continued) Acts ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized June 30, 1948 (Section 205) August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 (Section 201) Approved by Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate June 14, 1972, and June 21, 1972, respectively. 1936 Flood Control Act 1962 Flood Control Act June 30, 1948 (Section 205) June 28, 1938 October 23, 1962 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 (Section 205) October 27, 1965 MARENGO, IOWA (See Section 16 of Text) Levees and interior drainage for flood control. MILAN, ILL. (See Section 17 of Text) Levee closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants for flood control. MOLINE, ILL. (See Section 18 of Text) Levee, closure structures, and interior drainage facilities for flood control, and aesthetic and recreational development. MOUTH OF SAUGAMON RIVER, ILL. (See Section 19) MUSCATINE, MAD CREEK, IOWA (See Section 20 of Text) Levee, wall, interior drainage facilities, and closure structures for streets and a railroad for flood control. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IOWA (See Section 21 of Text) Reservoir for flood control and recreation. ROCKFORD, ILL. (See Section 22 of Text) Channel enlargement and realignment, levees, and appurtenant works for flood control. ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, ILL. (See Section 23 of Text) Levees and appurtenant works for flood control. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IOWA (See Section 24 of Text) Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. UNION TOWNSHIP DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO. (See Section 25 of Text) Improve existing levees and construct a railroad closure, road ramps, and pump plant modification for flood control. WATERLOO, IOWA (See Section 26 of Text) Levees, floodwalls, pumping plants, and closure structures for flood control. None H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 186, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. None Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 142, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 173, 85th Cong. S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. None H. Doc. 166, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administration Program Oct. 31, 1934, and Feb. 28, 1935. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet-Sag portion. 28-15 Documents Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY.1980 TABLE 28-D Project INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) Date Inspected Alpine Dam, Rockford, Ill. Banner Special Drainage and Levee District Bear Creek, Hannibal. Mo. Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Blackhawk Creek, Davenport, Iowa Canton. Mo. Clinton, Iowa Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. DeKalb, Ill. Des Moines, Iowa Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo. Drury Drainage District, Ill. Dubuque, Iowa East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, Ill. East Peoria Sanitary District, Ill. Elkport, Iowa Fabius River Drainage District, Mo. Farmers Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Galena, Ill. Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa Gregory Drainage District, Mo. Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, Ill. Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, Ill. Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, Ill. Hennepin Drainage and Levee District Hergot Diainage and Levee District" Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill. Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Lacey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Langellier Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Mad Creek, Muscatine, Iowa Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill. Marion County Drainage District, Mo. Marshalltown, Iowa Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill. Muscatine Island L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, Iowa Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Rock Island, Ill. Sabula, Iowa Sanitary District of Beardstown, Ill. Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill. October 1979 January 1980 January 1980 November 1979 October 1979 December 1979 November 1979 December 1979 December 1979 October 1979 October 1979 May 1980 December 1979 October 1979 January 1980 January 1980 January 1980 October 1979 December 1979 December 1979 October 1979 December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 January 1980 December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 January 1980 December 1979 December 1979 January 1980 December 1979 November 1979 January 1979 December 1979 December 1979 January 1980 November 1979 October 1979 November 1979 January 1980 December 1979 January 1980 28-16 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-D (Continued) Project INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) uUaattee Inspected South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill. South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. South River Drainage District, Mo. Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1, and Bay Island L&DD No. 1, Ill. The Sny Basin, Ill. Union Township Drainage District, Mo. Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. Van Meter, Iowa West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, Ill. TABLE 28-E December 1979 December 1979 December 1979 January 1980 December 1979 January 1980 May 1980 December 1979 October 1979 December 1979 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Project ILLINOIS RIVER, ILL. Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts' Big Lake Drainage and Levee Districts' Big Prairie Drainage and Levee District 8 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District' Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District' East Peoria Drainage and Levee District' Hennepin Drainage and Levee Districtsi Kelly Lake Drainage and Levee District8 Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District' Liverpool Drainage and Levee District' Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District4 Pekin LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District' Peoria, Ill.7 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District' Sea Horn Drainage and Levee District' Sid Simpson Flood Control Project' South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District' South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District' Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District' Thompson Lake Drainage and Levee District8 SANGAMON RIVER, ILL. Bell Drainage District s Clear Lake Special Drainage District s East of Chandlerville s Farmers Levee and Drainage District' Farmers Levee and Drainage District Mason and Menard Drainage District' Near Springfield on Sangamon River, Ill.' Oakford Special Drainage District' Panther Creek Levee 8 Tar Creek Levee s William L. Springer Lake, Ill. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1943 1943 2 1954 1941 1941 1946 1940 1947 1954 1943 1938 1955 1973 1941 1945 1968 1942 1942 1941 1952 1946 1965 1959 1942 1940 1941 1940 1938 1946 1979 Cost to September 30, 1980 Construction Operation and Maintenance 274,822 144,910 1,923,145 68,898 207,826 279,963 109,593 13,153 1,290,0003,6 117,731 158,383 534,480 108,797 32,281 5,789,800 220,729 171,839 185,980 9,465 1,112 103,027 30,588 155,562 93,808 38,417 1,425 4,911,3109, o 28-17 -- I -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Cost To Se'ptember 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance SALT CREEK, ILL. Donovan Levees 1945 1,821 - East of Hubly Bridges 1945 572 - Lake Fork of Salt Creeks Lussenhop Levees 1945 110 - Mouth to Mahomets - Salt Creek in vicinity of Middletown, Ill.8 1940 48 - Swiger, Whitney, Young-Hoblit Levees 1945 399 - Watts Levees 1945 1,031 - 1. Completed. 6. Includes $55,976 claims. 2. Never activated. 7. Classified inactive in November 1971. 3. Settlement of claim in Nov. 1958 ($4,250) increased cost 8. Project deauthorized in 1977. to $1,290,000. 9. Inactive status since 1975 due to lack of economic just- 4, Reported previously by St. Louis District as completed ification. under provisions of section 6, Flood Control Act of 1928. 10. Civil suit against project pending. 5. Authorized in Flood Control Act of 1962. TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Ames Lake, Iowa' Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, Mo.) 3 Blackhawk Creek at Davenport, Iowa (snagging and clearing)3 Campbells Island, Mississippi River, Ill.6 Canton, Mo.3 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo.3 Des Moines, Iowa 3 Des Moines River at Boone, Iowa (emergency bank protection)3 Dubuque, Iowa3 Drury Drainage District, Ill.3 Elkport, Turkey River, Iowa 3 Evansdale, Iowa8,9 Fabius River Drainage District, Mo.3 Fabius River Drainage District, Mo.3 Freeport, Ill. Galena, Galena River, Ill.$ Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa3 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa 3 Gregory Drainage District, Mo.3 Gregory Drainage District, Mo.8,4 Gregory Drainage District, Mo.3 Hannibal, Mo.4 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, Ill.3 Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, Ill.3 Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, Ill.3 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill.3 1974 1962 1967 1969 1964 1969 1972 1956 1974 1964 1951 1972 1941 1963 1979 1952 1949 1967 1940 1964 1972 1966 1968 1968 1949 1972 1,789,454 1,679,056 64,287 76,664 1,496,555 1,492,016 4,993,2246 13,900 10,861,1707 1,144,875 34,2006 88,019 60,500 1,621,841 286,000 844,100 '0 299,000 1,727,711 77,100 68,213 1,538,963" 110,933 1,453,217 1,043,902 42,700 4,772,498 28-18 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa3 Jackson, Minn., 4 Jefferson, Wis. (emergency bank protection)3 Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, Ill.3,8 Marion County Drainage District, Mo.S Marshalltown, Iowa 3 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill.3,8 Monticello, Iowas, 4 Muscatine, Iowa (Mad Creek)3 Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District No. 13,. Iowa 3 New Hartford, Iowa8,4 Okabena Creek at Worthington, Minn.3 ,8 Ottumwa, Iowa 3 Penny Slough, Rock River, Ill.s Raccoon River at Adel, Iowa (emergency bank protection)3 Raccoon River at Des Moines, Iowa (emergency bank protection)3 Rock Island, Ill. Sabula, Mississippi River, Iowa 3 Skunk River in Steady Run Township, Keokuk County, Iowa (snagging and clearing)3 Sny Basin, Ill.3 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill.3 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill.' South Beloit, Ill. South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill.3 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. South River Drainage District, Mo.3 South River Drainage District, Mo.S Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Ill.3 Union Township Drainage District, Mo.3 Upper Mississippi River Basin (Rock Island District)'5 Van Meter, Iowa3 ,s 1. Reclassified "inactive" because of State and local opposition. 2. Includes $885,000 for disbursement in connection with realignment of Interstate Highway 35. 3. Completed. 4. Planning discontinued because of lack of local support. 5. Inactive; recommended for deauthorization. 6. Excludes $23,323 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $145,415 contributed funds. 8. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act.) 9. Section 205 study terminated because of local problems. A project at Evansdale was subsequently authorized under the survey report procedure. 10. Excludes $118,000 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $20,626 contributed funds." 12. Excludes $269,739 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $220,000 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $252,136 contributed funds. 15. Status is as indicated in reports on Coralville Lake and Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock. 28-19 1972 1972 1973 1978 1957 1967 1978 1977 1977 1962 1970 1966 1957 1977 1940 1966 1977 1979 1958 1970 1972 1942 1968 1979 1940 1968 1941 1966 1967 1947 1967 1965 3,551,961 6,044,693 113,077 22,230 123,300 873,748 8,404,263 1,994,322 99,000 1,193,154 3,293,27613 26,530 72,432 233,145 85,800 12,854 88,870 7,550,779 411,915 40,195 14,003,560 61,400 4,956,749 269,722 61,200 1,231,243 55,300 1,106,056 3,306,695 116,576 113,842 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 28-F FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) (See Section 29 of Text) Study Identification Cost During Period G(alena. IIl. 5,000 Green Rock, Ill. 32* Ralston C(reek. Iowa City, Iowa 1,487 Hamilton Drainage District, Polk County, Iowa 1,4141 Hampshire Creek Tributary, Hampshire, Ill. 4,411' South Branch of Kishwaukee R. at Sycamore, 11l. 7,4392 *Now included in Lower Rock River Study 1. Study terminated after completion of Reconnaissance Report. 2. Reconnaissance Report currently in preparation. TABLE 28-F Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780, 83rd Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Fox River, Van Buren County, Missouri' 10 Skunk River, Mahaska County, Iowa 7,4392 Ft. Madison, Iowa 7,906 Michael Creek, Louisa County, Ill. 74,240 1. Reconnaissance Study initiated. 2. Reconnaissance Study completed. TABLE 28-F Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Farmington, Iowa on the Des Moines River 10,7881 Fox River, Clark County, Missouri 36,3202 1. Study costs to date. Construction not yet started. 2. Bank protection project completed. 28-20 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) (See Section 29 of Text) Project and Location Advance Preparation Emergency Operations, Iowa, Ill., Ind. Advance Measures: Bunchman Levee, Ill. East Moline, Ill. Henderson County, Ill. Horace Mann School, Ill. Village of Andalusia, Ill. Winnebago County, Wisconsin Rehabilitation: Bell Levee, Ill. Des Moines & Mississippi Levee Dist. No. 1, Iowa Dutch-Horton Sny Island LDD, Ill. East Frank Levee No. 1, Ill. Farmers Levee, Ill. Globe Levee, Ill. Goeken-Garman Levee, Ill. Hagar Slough Levee, Ill. Hennepin Drainage & Levee District, Ill. Herman Levee, Ill. Kelly Lake Levee, Ill. Old Canal Levee, Lee Co., Iowa Riverdale Farms, Ill. St. Francisville Levee, Clark Co., Mo. Win-Morris Cullinan Levee, Ill. Zampel Drainage Levee, Ill. Zuma-Canoe Creek Levee, Rock Island, Ill. 28-21 Federal Cost $136,423 709,330 4,374 312 846 252 713 2,371 4,966 31,221 165,037 1,850 14,344 88,612 12,371 41,409 103,868 45,820 309,968 33,973 30,849 116,230 9,136 38,492 19,944 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 28-H ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Depth on Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, Ill. 110 600 10.( 13.0 15.5 Duplicate Lock3 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, Ill. 110 1,200 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, Ill. 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Duplicate Lock3 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, Ill. 110 1,200 11.0 14.0 14.0 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, Ill. 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 I~uplicate Lock3 231.0 Utica, Ill. 110 1,200 18.5 14.0 13.0 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, Ill. 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Duplicate Lock3 244.6 Marseilles, Ill. 110 1,200 24.25 14.0 12.75 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, Ill. 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Duplicate Lock3 271.5 8 above Morris, Ill. 110 1,200 21.75 14.0 13.0 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, Ill. 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Duplicate Lock3 286.0 Joliet, Ill. 110 1,200 34.0 14.0 14.0 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, Ill. 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.02 Duplicate Lock3 291.1 Lockport, Ill. 110 1,200 30.5-39.52 14.0 14.6 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, Ill. 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 Grand Calumet River 329.5 Hammond, Ind. 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with flat pools. 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at Lockport is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. 3. Proposed. TABLE 28-I ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock, modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Duplicate Lock4 Peoria Duplicate Lock4 Starved Rock - $ 2,733,499' Concrete Piles in sand Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Piles in sand Movable (wicket type) Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Rock Movable (tainter gates) Concrete and timber Piles in sand Concrete and Piles in sand timber Concrete and Piles in sand timber Concrete and structural steel Rock 28-22 1939 1939 1933 2,744,592' 97,630,000 3,381,030' 100,802,000 885,3151 ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 28-I (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Name Duplicate Lock4 Marseilles Duplicate Lock4 Dresden Island Duplicate Lock4 Brandon Road Pool Lowering 4 Lockport Duplicate Lock 4 T.J. O'Brien Lock and dam equipment Total Locks and dams Type of Character of Construction Foundation Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Concrete and sheet piling Rock Piles in clay Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Dam Estimated Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Movable Concrete and (Bear trap)2 structural steel Fixed 3 Concrete and sheet piling 1. Actual cost. 2. Six dams completed by the Corps; 48-foot bear trap at Lockport completed by State of Illinois. TABLE 28-J 3. Control works. 3. Control works. 4. Planning on the Duplicate Locks is being held in abeyance awaiting reaffirmation of local cooperation support by the State. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 1 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rebuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works2 St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project $ 2,135,3581 813,418' 3,650,635 2,686,307 19,238,200 24,9371 77,6131 5,117,901 5,466,751 19,343,348 20,835,335' 18,362,041' 445,000 288,6001 1,081,600' $ 99,568,376 $1,065,080,208 1. Actual cost. 2. Placed in inactive status 19 November 1974. 28-23 Type of Character of Kind Construction Foundation Year Complete 1933 1933 1933 1933 1960 Rock Rock Rock Rock Piles in clay Estimated Federal Cost Under Existing Project 97,338,000 97,338,000 1,853,7251 107,545,000 2,503,3761 79,681,000 2,031,6831 216,996,000 133,6081 241,008,000 6,954,700' S1,250,3041 $965,511,832 __ ~_ Dam REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 28-K EXISTING PROJECTS See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 1. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams Mvith duplicate - Ill. and Ind. locks at seven locations Grafton to Lockport, Ill. 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 - junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, Ind. Also, Grand Calumet River Charmnel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, Ind., with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and Ship 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, Ill. TABLE 28-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. THE TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 (See Section 1 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $118.317.640 $149,725,934 $12,556,296 $280,599,870 Public Works Funds 3.960.735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1.858.936 - - 1,858,936 Total $124.137.311 $149,725,934 $12,556,296 $286,419,5411 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 28-24 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.* Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to mile 300 Location. Mississippi River rises in northern part of Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Latest map and profile showing this section of river is in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge for 2.7 miles, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 29-C, 29-D, 29-E and 29-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. Estimated cost for new work (1980) is $784,151,140, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. See House docuabove Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. ment 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Shall-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United Staztes free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations or alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth, and development of harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill., is subject to the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rightsof- way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 29-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, Iowa; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, Ill.; Hannibal, Mo.; Fort Madison, Iowa; Davenport (Lindsay Park), Iowa; Muscatine, Iowa (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, Ill.; Warsaw, Ill.; Moline, Ill.; and Clinton, Iowa, have been complied with. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of Government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See table at end of chapter for license fees collected through fiscal year 1980.) Terminal facilities. Considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. St. Paul District. New work: Studies were continued under section 107, small navigation project authority, for establishment of a small-boat harbor at Lake City, Minnesota, at a cost of $47,530. Section 107 studies were initiated at Pike Island, Minnesota at a cost of $8,050 and at Trempealeau, Wisconsin at a cost of $21,787. Planning for construction of recreation facilities at Lake Rebecca in pool 2 was continued at a cost of $64,167. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government cutterhead pipeline dredge DUBUQUE removed 10,300 cubic yards of material at 1 location at a cost of $45,520. Government derrick barge HA USER removed 240,640 cubic yards of material at 18 locations for $718,230. Other dredging and snagging cost $281,581 by hired labor and $60,877 by contract. Water quality testing for dredging cost $131,424. Dewatering operations and repair work were conducted at Lower St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam for $6,604, at Lock and Dam No. 2 for $696,056, at Lock and Dam No. 3 for $15,012, at Lock and Dam No. 5 for $1,019, and at Lock and Dam No. 10 for $612. A contract to repair spill scour and baffle blocks at Lock and Dam No. 6 cost $239,444 and contracts to repair surface of Onalaska Dam and bank erosion at Lock and Dam No. 7 cost $26,952. Contracts at Lock and Dam No. 2 for motorized gates and repair and painting of gates cost $351,679. Sandblasting and painting at locks and dams cost $405,080. An upper guidewall extension contract at Lock and Dam No. 1 cost $48,468. Scour repair contracts cost $126,000. A wall stabilization contract at Lock and Dam No. 5 cost $25,000. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $270,004 and by contract for $131,551. Other miscellaneous maintenance was accomplished at a cost of $998,193. Total cost of maintenance was $4,579,306. Rehabilitation: Stage 1 work for rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No. 1 was accomplished by contract at a cost of $9,509,822. Government furnished materials for hydraulic machinery, sheet piling, structural equipment, and miscellaneous metals cost $2,039,377. A blasting contract cost $116,600. Other miscellaneous contracts and hired labor for construction cost $183,465. Engineering and design cost $301,347 by contract and $781,178 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $627,864. Total rehabilitation costs were $13,559,- 653. Operating and care: Locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $7,365,077. Costs to St. Paul District were $141,534 for new work, $11,944,383 for maintenance and $13,559,- 653 for rehabilitation, for a total of $25,645,570. Rock Island District. New work: Planning and negotiation with local interests for rectification of seepage damage to privately owned land in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Illinois, were continued at a cost of $3,132. Preconstruction planning for small-boat harbor at Savanna, Ill., was continued at a cost of $37,929. Construction of small-boat harbor at Clinton, Iowa, was continued at a cost of $11,194 (excluding $42,338 in local contributions). Recreational work along the Mississippi River at Pools, 13, 14, 18, and 21, was continued at a cost of $147,353. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSONwas performed at various locations in seven pools at a cost of $1,303,800, a total of 603,228 cubic yards of material having been removed. Emergency channel dredging was performed by Government dustpan dredge ST. GENEVIEVE in upper pool 24 at a cost of $59,400 with 17,296 cubic yards of material removed, and also in upper pool 24 by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge DUBUQUE at a cost of $189,000 with a total of 33,741 cubic yards of material removed. Other excavation, including snagging and clearing, was completed by hired labor in four pools at a cost of $30,600. The amount of $101,000 was expended for environmental concerns in connection with channel maintenance activities, which included mussel studies and water quality sampling at proposed channel dredging sites. Repair of regulating works, primarily in pools 20 and 22, was 29-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. performed at a cost of $801,200. Structural repairs to roller and tainter dam gates, including redecking of service bridges, was performed at a cost of $38,500. Painting of service bridge and dam gates was performed at a cost of $322,900. The amount of $88,700 was expended for installation of traveling mooring kevels at two lock sites. Annual lock overhaul program was completed at Lock 16 at a cost of $622,600. Repair of lock gates at six locks cost $142,500, and other lock 'structural maintenance and repairs cost $92,800. Repairs to both lock and dam structures damaged by towboats were performed at ten lock and dam sites at a cost of $493,000. Levee repairs were performed at a cost of $42,500. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $335,500, and repairs and replacements of permanent operating equipment cost $71,500. Contractor earned $49,800 for building completion at new visitor center at Locks and Dam 15, and another contractor earned $141,900 for fabrication and installation of displays at the new visitor center. This visitor center was formally dedicated on 17 May 1980. Building maintenance and other maintenance work at various sites was performed at a cost of $37,600. Contractor earned $100,000 for upper approach bank protection at Lock and Dam 21. Engineering and design work totaled $122,700. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the maintenance features totaled $553,800. Net credits to the project were $158,700, primarily as result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Total cost of maintenance was $5,582,- 600. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation of auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14 was continued at a cost of $3,945,549. Construction of permanent closure of Old Lock 19 and drydock was continued at a cost of $345,613. Operating and care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $4,344,400; real estate management services were provided at a cost of $91,300; operation and contracted maintenance of public use areas were performed at a cost of $346,300; contract law enforcement at public use areas cost $19,400; surveys, studies, structural inspections, and miscellaneous studies were performed at a cost of $631,900; and water control management costs were $562,500. Hydrographic channel surveys and channel inspection and patrol of the project were performed at a cost of $266,000. GREAT II O&M studies totaled $310,300 (an additional $507,900 was charged against the General Investigations appropriation). Supervision and administration and district overhead for operations features totaled $1,183,800. Total cost of operating and care was $7,755,900. Costs to Rock Island District were $199,608 for new work, $13,338,597 for maintenance and $4,291,162 for rehabilitation for a total of $17,829,- 367. St. Louis District. New work: Costs incurred for New Lock and Dam 26 were $31,534 for real estate management, $887 for relocations, $22,500,000 for the dam, $6,400,000 for revetment, $2,088,926 for engineering, and $782,939 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $31,804,- 286. Maintenance: Costs incurred for the year were $1,898,667 for dredging 2,101,000 cubic yards; a credit of $1,532 for collection of subsistence; $2,467,373 for maintenance and repair of dams; $1,234,484 for maintenance and repair of locks; a credit of $66,456 for repairs to lock and dam structures damaged by towboats; $2,056 to repair road at Lock 24; $57,488 in Pool 25 and $71,045 in Pool 26 for repair of levees; $990,473 for permanent operating equipment; $20,118 for buildings, grounds, and utilities; $161,368 for engineering and design; and $499,011 for supervision and administration. Total cost of maintenance was $7,334,095. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made thereto and to appurtenant structures at a cost of $3,531,519. GREAT studies totaled $106,068. Costs to St. Louis District were $31,804,286 for new work and $10,971,682 for maintenance for a total of $42,775,968. Condition at end of fiscal year. The 9-foot channel as a whole is about 89 percent complete. For information pertaining to locks, dams and harbors, see tables at end of chapter. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, Minn.; and Prairie du Chien, Wis.; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, and Winona, Minn.; Lansing, Iowa; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, Wis.; a remedial - drainage ditch at Cochrane, Wis.; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned and controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 29-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by Department of the Interior in pools Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: Guidewall extension at Lock No. 3 (the uncompleted guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9 and 10 were reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category on April 13, 1973); realignment of channel at Wilds Bend; construction of small-boat harbor at St. Paul (Harriet Island), Minn.; and construction of additional recreational facilities. Condition of channel on 30 September 1980 was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were available in all pools. Except for Lock No. 1 which is in poor condition due to age and obsolescence, structures are in good condition. Rehabilitation of Lock No. 1 is inderway. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. Other work remaining consists of construction of guide wall extensions at Nos. 16, 18, and 21; mooring facilities at Nos. 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 22; upper approach improvement at No. 19; upper approach dike at No. 20; removal of remainder of lateral dam in Pool No. 14; rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools Nos. 14, 15, 18, 19, and 21; rectification of seepage damages in Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL.; and construction of three small-boat harbors, commercial harbor at Fort Madison, IA, and additional recreational facilities. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools Nos. 11 to 22, inclusive, consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel on 30 Sept. 1980, was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were being maintained in all pools. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams Nos. 24, 25, and 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam), except for guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction of guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25 and replacement of Lock and Dam 26. Status of land and flowage acquisitions. Acquisition of lands in Pools Nos. 24, 25, and 26, involving 41,451 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 1,235 acres have been acquired for Lock and Dam No. 26 replacement project. Condition of channel on 30 Sept. 1980 was such that controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Locks and Dam, No. 26 and Missouri River. Total Federal cost of existing project to 30 Sept. 1980 for the three District was $700,279,715, of which $256,336,398 was for new work, ($181,590,- 094 regular funds, $51,895,959 public works funds and $22,850,345 emergency relief funds), $413,596,454 regular funds for maintenance and $30,346,863 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. Project Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 77 26,000 123,236 FY 78 418,000 123,878 FY 79 Total Cost to FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 553,000 32,842,076 298,758,009 459,312 32,004,732 297,806,3531 27,096,700 44,428,500 43,184,681 35,160,441 424,705,430 26,566,899 45,552,291 38,187,969 36,254,662 420,151,1792 350,000 4,618,000 9,200,000 17,417,000 31,626,035 3,300,739 9,154,112 17,850,815 30,346,863 - 59,000 - 16,661 0 42,338 1,287,541 1,287,540 'Includes $41,469,955 for new work on previous projects. 'Includes $6,554,725 for maintenance of previous projects. TABLE 29-B TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 District Cost St. Paul New Work' District Maintenance s Rehabilitation Total Rock Island New Work4 District Maintenance Rehabilitation Total St. Louis New Work Maintenance Total 'Excludes $1,228,541 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 'Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 31rnludes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on opera Ling and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 4Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. "$687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata shares of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 'Costs subsequent to fiscal year 1953 included with operating and care. 'Includes $395,442 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. "Includes $42,978,351 expended for replacement of Lock and Dam 26. 'Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 29-5 TABLE 29-A Regular Funds $57,767,3392 157,264,383 18,879,781 233,911,503 64,389,9635 143,315,8336' 11,467,082 219,032,183 59,432,7928 113,016,238 172,449,030 Public Work Funds $24,210,071 24,210,071 17,403,322 17,403,322 10,282,566' 10,282,566 Emergency Relief Funds $9,071,214 9,071,214 11,338,865 11,338,865 2,440,266 2,440,266 Total $91,048,624 157,264,383 18,879,781 267,192,788 93,132,150 143,315,833 11,467,082 247,774,370 72,155,624 113,016,238 185,171,862 -- Lock Dimensions Greatest Length Percent Estimated Width Availa- Upper Depth on Complete Year Cost Miles of ble for Normal Miter Sill Locks, Opened of Each Lock Lock Above Cham- Full Pool Character of Foundation Dams, to and Dam Inand Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower and Work Navi- eluding Work Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam in Pool gation in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 Falls, upper lock St. Anthony 853.3 Falls, lower lock and dam Lock and dam 1 847.6 Lock and dam 2 815.2 Lock and dam 3 796.9 Lock and dam 4 752.8 Lock and dam 5 738.1 Lock and dam 5A 728.5 Lock and dam 6 714.3 Lock and dam 7 702.5 Lock and dam 8 679.2 Lock and dam 9 647.9 Lock and dam 10 615.1 Lock and dam 11 583.0 Lock and dam 12 556.7 Lock and dam 13 522.5 Lock and dam 14 493.3 Le Claire lock 493.1 (Canal) Lock and dam 15 482.9 In city of Minne- 56 apolis, Minn. In city of Minne- 56 apolis, Minn. Minneapolis- 56 St. Paul 56 1.3 above 110 Hastings, Minn. 1108 6.1 above 110 Red Wing, Minn. Alma, Wis. 110 Minneiska, Minn. 110 3 above Winona, 110 Minn. Trempealeau, Wis. 110 Dresbach, Minn. 110 Genoa, Wis. 110 3.3 below 110 Lynxville, Wis. Guttenberg, Iowa 110 3.7 above 110 Dubuque, Iowa Bellevue, Iowa 110 4.3 above Clinton, 110 Iowa 3.7 below 110 Le Claire, Iowa 3.9 below 80 Le Claire, Iowa Foot of Arsenal 110 Island Rock 110 Island, Ill. 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some limestone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 400 26.94 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No piles. 400 35.94 725.1 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles 400 35.9 - 12.57 7.6 in gravel. 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, 6008 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, ' silt and clay. 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. 600 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, gravel and silt. 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, gravel, and broken rock. 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, gravel and silt. 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, clay and gravel. 600 11.0 572.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. 600 16.0 561.0 24.011 11.0 Rock. 360 16.0 - 17.011 11.0 Limestone Sandstone Piles in gravel Piles in sand, silt and clay Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand and clay Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel Piles in sand and gravel Rock Rock Rock 1002 $18,203,0003 100 1959 100 1917 100 1930 100 1948 79 1938 100 1935 100 1935 57 1936 100 1936 100 1937 100 1937 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 12,382,0005 O 2,358,0006 I 6,492,0009 8,096,000 4,865,000* 5,081,000* M 8,009,000* 4,874,000 5,574,000* 6,061,000* 6,539,000* 4,750,000* o 7,428,000 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 95 1934 10,525,000 TABLE 29-C LOCKS AND DAMS TABLE 29-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Percent Estimated Length Complete Year Cost Width Availa- Upper Depth on Locks, Opened of Each Lock Miles of ble for Normal Miter Sill Character of Foundation Dams, to and Dam In- Lock Above Cham- Full Pool and Work Navi- eluding Work and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Lock Dam in Pool gation in Pool Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock and dam 16 457.2 1.8 above 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 98 1937 9,788,000 Muscatine, Iowa and gravel. and gravel Lock and dam 17 437.1 4.2 above 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 99 1939 5,843,000 New Boston, Ii.. and gravel. Lock and dam 18 410.5 6.5 above Burling- 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 90 1937 10,308,000 ton, Iowa Lock and dam 19. 364.2 Keokuk, Iowa 110 358 38.2 518.2 14.5 9.2 Rock. Rock 100 1913 110 1,200 15.0 13.0 99 1957 14,813,00012 Lock and dam 20 343.2 0.9 above 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and piles in 97 1936 6,281,000 Canton, Mo. sand and gravel Lock and dam 21 324.9 2.1 below 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 95 1938 8,065,000 Quincy, Ill. and gravel. and gravel Lock and dam 22 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock 99 1938 5,275,000 Saverton, Mo. Lock and dam 24 273.4 Clarksville, Mo. 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand 64 1940 10,000,000 Lock and dam 25 241.4 Cap Au Gris, Mo. 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 63 1939 13,231,000 and gravel. and gravel Lock and dam 26 202.9 Alton, Ill. 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 100 1938 12,824,000 (Henry T. 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 Rainey Dam) New Lock and 200.8 Alton, Ill. 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles in Piles in - 536,380,00013 dam 26 bedrock. bedrock Total, Locks and dams $763,411,000 1Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment; pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 'Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. SIncludes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 4Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 5Includes lower approach deredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 6In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & C appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 'Old upper guard sill. sLandward lock. 9In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. "1 Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. "Depth over uppper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. 2$640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118- 1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. "Includes cash contribution of $2,380,000. *Excludes uncompleted guidewall extensions $10,339,000 (1972) reclassified from active to inactive on 13 April 1973. c: cI) CI) 0 C z HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn.. St. Paul Harbor, Minn. Hastings Harbor, Minn. Red Wing Harbor, Minn. Red Wing Harbor, Minn. Bay City Harbor, Wis. Lake City Harbor, Minn. Pepin Harbor, Wis. Wabasha Harbor, Minn. Alma Harbor, Wis. Winona Harbors, Minn. Lansing Harbor, Iowa Prairie du Chien Harbor, Wis. Dubuque Harbor, Iowa Savanna Harbor, Ill. Clinton Harbor, Iowa Moline Harbor, Ill. Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, Ill. 840.2 In city of St. Paul, Mi'nn. 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, 839.7 Minn. Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, Minn. 791.4 In city of Red Wing, Minn. 791.1 In city of Red Wing, Minn. 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, Wis. 773.0 In city of Lake City, Minn. 767.1 In city of Pepin, Wis. 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, Minn. 751.3 Upper end of Alma, Wis. 726.0 In city of Winona, Minn., Latsch Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, Iowa 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, Wis. 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 579.4 At Dubuque, Iowa 537.3 At Savanna 519.0 At Clinton 488.0 At Moline, Ill. 484.2 At Lindsay Park 479.8 At Rock Island, Ill. Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Entrance channel to small-boat harbor. 70 9 400-1,000 300 5 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 50 175-400 300 200 9 200 5 400 5 9 12 5 5 5 5 6 400 340 280 400 230 200 100 925 2.7 (mile) 100 217,100 400 100 230,200 500 100 74,300 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 600 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 500 100 1,000 100 0 $214,0001 0 0 C O z 0 146,8002 8,700 39,5003 93,500 205,5004 41,700 56,300 89,800 6,000 100 84,700 800 100 95,300 800 100 85,500 1,000 frontage 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 100 93,100 100 55,200 0 365,000 100 118,0005 100 110,328 100 262,100 100 31,000 TABLE 29-D TABLE 29-D (Cont'd) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Davenport Harbor, Iowa 478.7 Credit Island Slough Small-boat 5 75 1,400 0 130,000 (Credit Island) Andalusia Harbor, Ill. 473.0 Andalusia Slough Small-boat 5 40 435 100 21,000 Muscatine Harbor, Iowa 455.5 At Muscatine, Iowa Small-boat 5 150 950 100 455.6 Freight terminal 353,000 approach channel 9 200 1,890 100 Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa 383.7 At Fort Madison, Iowa Small-boat 5 250 900 100 184,200 Keokuk Harbor, Iowa 363.5 At Keokuk, Iowa Small-boat 5 100-160 1,015 0 394,000 Warsaw Harbor, Ill. 359.1 At Warsaw, Ill. Small-boat 5 100 600 100 73,000 Quincy Harbor, Ill. 327.3 In Quincy Bay Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 _ Hannibal Harbor, Mo. 308.8 At Hannibal, Mo. Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,001,828 'In addition, local interests will contribute $214,000. 2In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 3In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 4In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. SIn addition, local interests contributed $58,999. 'Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. & C) C C z C zz TABLE 29-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between lock and dam 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project 'Excludes $205,000 (1955) for remedial works in Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Illinois, to be restudied after completion of Sny Basin flood control project. 2Includes $860,000 (1974) for rectifying seepage damage to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Drainage District, Illinois. 3Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch bridge, Minneapolis, Minn. (FY 1969) 4Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, Mo. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1980 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1980 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 1 Northern States Power Co. (No. 2056) Ford Motor Co. (No. 362) Total project 29-10 $ 3,359,600 7,049,700" 545 193,600 1,312,9003 12,460,8004 $784,151,140 TABLE 29-F $ 3,300 95,400 $ 60,247 5,249,040 $5,309,287 -- TABLE 29-G Acts Sept. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 MISSISSIPPI RIVER MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, Minn., including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, Minn. St. Paul Harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, Minn., harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, Wis. Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, Minn., channel enlargements small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, Minn., basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, Minn., harbor. Wabasha, Minn., harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, Minn., harbor. Lansing, Iowa, harbor. Fort Madison, Iowa, harbors. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, Iowa. Davenport, Iowa, harbor. Muscatine, Iowa, harbor. Alma, Wis., harbor Hannibal, Mo., harbor. Prairie du Chien, Wis., harbors. 29-11 _ None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3d sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 661, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Corig., 2d sess. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 29-G (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1909 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 21, 1978 'Deferred. 'Inactive. 29-12 Work Authorized Opposite Hamburg, Ill., harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, Minn., small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, Minn., in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, Mo. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, Ill.' Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee districts caused by operation of navigation pools. Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa. Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide adequate facilities for existing navigation. Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, Minn. Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna,' Moline, Andalusia, New Boston,' Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, Ill.; Bellevue,' Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk, Iowa; St. Paul (Harriet Island), Minn.; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville,' Wis. Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, Mo. Remedial works at Sandy Slough, Mo. Repair of Stone Arch bridge at Minneapolis, Minn. Commercial Harbor facilities at Fort Madison, Iowa.' Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Documents H. Doc. 254, 81st Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 507, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 95-502 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT* Due to the realignment of boundaries during the linois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, year, this district comprises Cook, McHenry, including the southern end of Lake Michigan. Lake, Kane, DuPage and Will Counties in I1- IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. ...... 30-2 2. Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Indiana ................. 30-2 3. Chicago Harbor, Ill. ............. ... 30-3 4. Chicago River, Ill. ................. 30-3 5. Indiana Harbor, Ind. ................ 30-4 6. Michigan City Harbor, Ind .......... 30-5 7. Waukegan Harbor, Ill. .... ..... 30-6 Alteration of Bridges 8. Other authorized Bridge Alteration ....................... 30-6 Beach Erosion Control 9. Hollywood-Ardmore Beach Chicago, Ill. ...... ............ 30-6 Page 10. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .................. 30-6 11. Beach erosion control under special authorization ............ 30-7 Flood Control 12. Chicago River, Ill. North Branch .... 30-7 13. Little Calumet River, Ill ............ 30-7 14. Other authorized flood control projects ........................ 30-7 15. Flood control work under special authorization .............. 30-7 General Investigations 16. Surveys ........................... 30-8 17. Collection and study of basic data ... 30-8 18. Research and development ......... 30-8 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 30-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IND. Location. On Indiana shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 18 miles east of Illinois-Indiana State line, 14 miles east of Indiana Harbor, 9 miles east of Gary Harbor, 14 miles west of Michigan City Harbor, Ind., and 19 miles southeast of Calumet Harbor, Ill. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for (a) a north breakwater 4,630 feet long; (b) a west breakwater 1,200 feet long; (c) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, extending from deep water in Lake Michigan to north end of east bulkhead; (d) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (e) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep with a width varying from 620 feet to 260 feet wide; (f) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. Project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 160, 88th Cong. 1st sess.) Authorizing act also provides the Secretary of the Army may reimburse State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of project as approved by Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six wharves and docks are available, three on West Harbor Arm and three on East Harbor Arm. One dock on the west arm is used for shipment and receipt of steel products. One dock on the east arm is used for receipt of bulk supplies for making steel and shipment of steel products. The remaining four facilities are administered by Indiana Harbor Port Commission and used primarily for handling miscellaneous bulk materials and general cargo. Operations and results during period. Mairl:enance: Inspections and miscellaneous reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $876. A. water quality assurance program was performed at a cost of $19,999. Stone was placed on the north and west breakwaters by hired labor at a cost of $980,656. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of North Breakwater and Outer West Bulkhead was completed in September 1968. Dredging was completed in August 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980, were $16,590,314, of which $13,599,990 was for new work ($13,584,000 Federal and $15,990 non-Federal), and $2,990,324 for maintenance. To date there has been no maintenance dredging, and all maintenance costs were incurred repairing the breakwater. The breakwater maintenance repairs were necessary to maintain design elevation of the north breakwater. 2. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Location. Northeastern Illinois (Cook County), near southern end of Lake Michigan, 12.5 miles south of Chicago Harbor, and known on Great Lakes as South Chicago Harbor, is in southerly part of and within corporate limits of city of Chicago, except for a part of breakwaters and of anchorages behind same, which are in Indiana. Calumet River is within Chicago city limits. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14929). For description, see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. (See table 30-C.) For a more detailed description see page 1246 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated cost for new work (1976) is $33,945,000 Federal and $20,726,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. The uncompleted portions of the 1935 and 1945 River and Harbor Acts were deauthorized in 1977. The uncompleted portion of 1960 River and Harbor Act costing $2,700,000 (1972) is considered inactive. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications and acts of 1960 and 1962. For act of August 30, 1935, requirements for dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp. remains. Terminal facilities. Calumet River and outer harbor: 33 docks handling foreign oversea, lake vessels, and river barge cargoes. Most important cargoes handled are iron ore, grain, petroleum products, coal, limestone, sand, gravel, iron and steel products, salt, and general overseas cargo. There are two boatyards, one for repairs to large lake vessels (this yard has two large drydocks), and the other boatyard has one floating drydock for repairing and building commercial river craft. Government owns two docks which are used by the Corps only. There are no other publicly owned docks on Calumet River, except one owned by the City of Chicago. Lake Calumet: Chicago Regional Port District owns and leases to others three transit sheds and two grain elevators. There are also three private docks handling chemicals, iron and steel products, and miscellaneous cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $16,245. Miscellaneous 30-2 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT preparation for dredging of disposal area and pumpout facilities was performed at a cost of $106,826. Dredging was performed by the U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS with removal of 47,998 cubic yards of material at a cost of $214,999. Damage to U.S. property resulted in the collection of $1,000. Under the diked disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design were continued at a cost of $124,292. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 79 percent complete. Work remaining to complete project consists of removing hard materials in outer harbor and completing the widening, straightening and deepening of isolated remaining sections of Calumet River. Timber crib breakwater (6,712 feet, completed in 1904; concrete superstructure completed in 1924) is in fair condition. Under permit from the Secretary of War, the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. and its predecessors removed all of south pier (completed in 1897) and replaced it with a concrete dock wall 2,961 feet long and 50 feet southerly of pier's original location. Under permits from the department, the Defense Plant Corp. built two sections of bulkheads on east side of river between a point opposite the Semet-Solvay slip and south side of former turning basin 3 at about 117th Street. United States widened and deepened the channel adjoining the new bulkhead except through the rock section, where widening was done by the corporation. Head of navigation for deepdraft vessels in the river is at turning basin 5 on north side of 130th Street. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $35,647,725 of which $21,722,594 was for new work ($18,685,991 regular funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $13,236,130 regular funds for maintenance and $689,001 regular funds for rehabilitation. 3. CHICAGO HARBOR, ILL. Location. Northeastern Illinois, near southern end of Lake Michigan; 85 miles southerly from Milwaukee, Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14928.) Previous projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. (See table 30-C.) For more detailed description see page 1242 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed Federal cost is $4,342,822, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven docks for handling various types of cargo, including overseas general cargo, salt and newsprint. Passenger excursion boats use three docks. There is one marine service dock for pleasure craft and two yacht club docks. City of Chicago owns five docks, four of which are used for commercial purposes. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $26,038. Stone was placed at the southerly extension of the exterior breakwater by hired labor at a cost of $145,828. Under the diked disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design were continued at a cost of $84,842. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Northerly arm of inner breakwater (timber 4,034 feet, with 304 feet of shore return on north end, completed in 1875; concrete superstructure completed in 1934) is in good condition. Southerly arm of inner breakwater (timber 2,544 feet, completed in 1880; concrete superstructure completed in 1930) is in good condition after rehabilitation by conversion to rubblemound completed in August 1966. Exterior breakwater (timber cribs 5,413 feet, completed in 1889; concrete superstructure completed in 1930) is deteriorated under water and was rehabilitated in 1966 by conversion of lake side of structure to rubblemound. Southerly extension (rubblemound 2,213 feet, completed in 1917), and south arm (rubblemound 1,526 feet, completed in 1920; and concrete caisson 1,185 feet completed in 1922) are in good condition. Shorearm extension (timber cribs 2,250 feet, completed in 1917; inner 1,050 feet capped with concrete superstructure 1951; next adjoining 1,000 feet capped with stone blocks 1956; outer 200 feet capped with concrete superstructure 1952) is in good condition. Channel side of north pier (concrete superstructure, 960 feet, completed in 1908, repaired in 1949, and rebuilt with steel sheet piling in 1965)-is in good condition. Water level landward of lock is controlled and maintained at an elevation lower than that of Lake Michigan except during excessive storm runoff. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980, were $10,361,316 of which $4,342,822 was for new work, $4,692,494 for maintenance, and $1,326,000 for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. Location. Cook and Lake Counties, Ill., navigable portions being wholly in Cook County and city of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14928.) For description, see page 1467 of Annual Report for 1932. 30-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Previous projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of North and South Branches (0.7 miles), in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles), in the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles), and in the North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; and for a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street. All depths are referred to normal pool, elevation 576.2 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955). Portion of project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946, is in deferred-forrestudy category. Estimate (1960) for this portion is $65,000. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. Act of July 24, 1946, provided improvement of channel is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 docks handling lake vessel and river barge cargoes. Most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel, coal, salt, cement, and petroleum products. There are three boatyards, two of which are used for servicing recreational craft and one engaged in constructing and servicing small craft as well as small Navy vessels. U.S. Government has one dock used by the Corps exclusively. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Under the diked disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design were continued at a cost of $144,998. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act. Heads of navigation for deepdraft vessels are North Avenue on North Branch and Archer Avenue on west fork of South Branch, 5.97 and 5.52 miles, respectively, from Michigan Avenue Bridge. Head of navigation for barge traffic is near Touhy Avenue on North Shore Channel, about 11 miles from Michigan Avenue Bridge. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $4,310,971, of which $544,679 was for new work and $3,766,292 for maintenance. 5. INDIANA HARBOR, IND. Location. Northwestern Indiana (Lake County), on southwest shore of Lake Michigan, 18 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14929.) Previous projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a northerly rubblemound breakwater, 1,120 feet long, an easterly reinforced concrete-caisson breakwater 201 feet long, an extension of this latter breakwater about 2,300 feet to north, and construction and placing of a light-house crib; an outer harbor entrance channel generally 800 feet wide with a depth of 29 feet; dredging an outer harbor basin to 28 feet deep, and canal entrance channel to 27 feet deep; deepening main stem of Indiana Harbor canal for a width of 190 feet with a depth of 25 feet from outer harbor to 100 feet lakeward of Dickey Place; widening canal to a bottom width of 260 feet with a depth of 22 feet from 100 feet lakeward of Dickey Place to The Forks and dredging Calumet River Branch from The Forks to 141st Street to same width and depth; a channel 22 feet deep and 160 feet wide in Lake George Branch from The Forks to White Oak Avenue; maintenance of a channel 20 feet deep and 80 feet wide in remainder of Calumet River Branch south of north line of 141st Street, except removal of sewage deposits and other city refuse, after completion and acceptance from private parties; and construction of a turning basin at The Forks 22 feet deep. That part of Calumet River Branch Channel from north line of 141st Street to Grand Calumet River has not been completed by local interest or accepted for maintenance by the United States. Cost of completed new work exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects are $4,848,980, Federal and $782,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $12,500. Uncompleted portions of the 1930 R. & H. Act, the 1935 R. & H. Act, and the 1965 R. & H. Act were deauthorized in 1977. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Act of 1937 provides enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal shall not be undertaken until local interests furnish a rightof- way 300 feet wide and construct substantial bulkheads along channel on established lines shown on map accompanying Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 13, 75th Congress, 1st session, provided that improvement on one side may proceed in any section on fulfillment of conditions for that side of section, and provided further, that 30-4 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT south of turning basin at The Forks (beginning 450 feet south of intersection of present Calumet Branch and mainstem bulkhead lines), widening and deepening by the United States shall be done only as rights-of-way and bulkheads on at least one side of the channel are continuously provided southward from above limit of turning basin at The Forks. To provide for 300-foot channel, a parcel of land (of about 4.6 acres), generally 100 feet wide, lying on east side of Calumet River Branch, commencing at north side of 141st Street and extending northward toward The Forks for about 2,170 feet, has been conveyed to and accepted by the United States. Local interests constructed about 1,350 feet of bulkhead along east side of Calumet River Branch, and reconstructed bulkhead on west side from The Forks to 141st Street. Defense Plant Corp. built a bulkhead along east side of canal between Pennsylvania Railroad Co.'s bridge and Dickey Place Bridge; the United States widened and deepened east side of this portion of widening. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. constructed a bulkhead along west side of canal between Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. bridge and the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. bridge, and the United States widened and deepened west side of this portion of widening. All prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four docks for handling iron ore, limestone and taconite; two docks for handling steel mill products by barge; eight docks for petroleum products; three docks for miscellaneous commodities and two docks used exclusively for winter mooring of vessels in layup. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were conducted by hired labor at a cost of $25,796. Structure repairs were performed on the East Breakwater by hired labor at a cost of $55,426. Under the confined disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design for a new containment area were conducted by hired labor at a cost of $169,935. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. North breakwater (rubblemound, 1,120 feet, completed in 1922) is in good condition. East breakwater (concrete caisson, 201 feet, completed in 1926) and northerly extension (rubblemound, 2,234 feet, completed in 1935) are in good condition. Head of navigation for commercial vessels is at the Baltimore & Ohio Terminal Railroad bridge on the Lake George Branch about 3 miles from outer harbor, and at 141st Street highway bridge about 2,200 feet south of The Forks on the Calumet River Branch about 2.5 miles from outer harbor. The total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1980 were $9,908,290, of which $8,277,749 were regular funds, $1,618,041 Public Works funds and $12,500 contributed funds; $4,848,980 being for new work and $5,059,310 for maintenance. 6. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IND. Location. Northwest Indiana (in La Porte County), on southeast shore of Lake Michigan, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) For descriptions, see page 1482 of Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See table 30-C. Costs of completed new work are $1,256,257 Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous project and $37,800 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $30,800. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four fish docks, one city dock, and one grain elevator in this harbor. Commodities handled at this harbor are salt and fresh fish. There are three small boatyards, which repair and construct recreational craft only. One public dock is owned by city and has not been used for commercial purposes. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Inspections and reports were conducted by hired labor at a cost of $18,484. Contract claims for maintenance dredging were resolved at a cost of $73,050, and supervision and inspection by hired labor cost $25,467. Contract for security fencing around the dredged material containment area was completed at a cost of $3,993. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Concrete superstructure, 1,304 feet, on detached breakwater, completed in 1931. Rehabilitation of the detached breakwater by conversion to a rubblemound was completed in 1969 and the structure is in excellent condition. Rehabilitation of portions of the entrance piers have also been completed and are in excellent condition. The remainder of the entrance piers, completed in 1930, are in poor condition and are being repaired. Under permit from Secretary of War, the Northern Indiana Public Service Co. removed 615 feet of inner end of west pier and about 719 feet of bulkhead south of pier, and replaced them with a steel sheet pile bulkhead located landward of former dock line. Area channelward of new bulkhead was dredged by permittee to 18 feet. Head of navigation for deepdraft commercial ves- 30-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 sels and barges is at Franklin Street Bridge at head of project, 1.45 miles above outer end of west pier. Above this point, depths are sufficient only for small shallow draft launches. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $7,409,436 of which $1,256,257 was for new work, $4,534,509 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 7. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILL. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 51 miles south of Milwaukee and about 38 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous projects. See page 1392. Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See table 30-C. For completed modifications see page 1239, Annual Report for 1963. The 1970 modification provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to that depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet; and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. Cost for new work is $604,793 Federal and $88,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Work authorized by the 1970 modification was placed in the inactive category in December 1972. Costs of $2,000,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,250,000 (July 1972) non-Federal are excluded from cost for new work. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. Terminal facilities. Four commercial docks receive coal, cement and gypsum. In addition, there are three publicly owned docks, one owned by city and used for fishing, and the other two owned by the Waukegan Port District. There is one boat yard for recreational craft. City dock is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,200. Sediment samples were taken by contract at a cost of $2,145. An economic study was performed by contract at a cost of $12,376. Supervision and inspection was performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,605. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is inactive. Anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin (1945 modification) was completed in 1966. North pier, completed in 1904, is in good condition. South pier, completed in 1903 is in good condition. The outer 600 feet of breakwater, completed in 1904, and the shorearm extension, completed in 1931, are in generally good condition except for outer 100 feet which are in poor condition. Costs to September 30, 1980, for existing project were $604,793 for new work and $3,241,924 for maintenance, a total of $3,846,717. Alteration of Bridges 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION See table 30-D. Beach Erosion Control 9. HOLLYWOOD-ARDMORE BEACH ALONG LAKE MICHIGAN, ILL. Location. On Illinois shore of Lake Michigan in City of Chicago (Cook County), on Chicago Park District land, approximately 7 miles north of Chicago Harbor. Existing project. This project was authorized in fiscal year 1980 by House Resolution 7542. The project provides for a wall, approximately 1,400 feet long, running parallel to the shoreline. The purpose of the wall is to prevent fine beach sand from being blown off the beach by either onshore or offshore winds. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurances that they will provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; provide without cost to the United States all necessary utility or other relocations and alterations; hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction of the project, except for those damages caused by negligence of the United States or its contractors; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. 'Operations and results during period. New work: Work was initiated on the detailed design analysis leading to plans and specifications at a cost of $3,504. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $3,504, all for new work. 10. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-E. 30-6 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT 11. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended. Project and Fiscal Year Costs Location to September 30, 1980 Chicago Beaches, Ill. $6,632 Flood Control 12. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. (NORTH BRANCH) Location. North Branch, Chicago River is located in Cook and Lake Counties in northeastern part of Illinois. Existing project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding, unsightliness and pollution of the river. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Sec. 116) and amended by River & Harbor Act of 1974 providing for maintenance of the project. Local cooperation. The 1970 Act provides that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion without cost to the United States; and, agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing the work. Assurance of local cooperation for the 1970 modification was approved on 31 July 1972. The 1974 Act amends the 1970 Act so that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-Federal interests paying 25 per centum of the cost of maintenance. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Engineering and design and real estate costs were $10,313. Federal funds in the amount of $2,701 were expended on a contract for snagging and clearing of the North Branch from Foster Ave. in Chicago to Voltz Road in Northbrook. The local sponsor, the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago, contributed $9,721 for the work. Supervision and inspection costs associated with the contract were $981. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial project was completed 26 May 1973. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $753,764, of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $521,880 for maintenance, ($410,994 Federal funds and $110,886 contributed funds). 13. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, ILL. Location. Rises in western LaPorte County, Indiana, near Michigan City and flows generally westerly through Porter and Lake County, Indiana, into Cook County, Illinois, to its junction with the Calumet-Sag Channel in Calumet Park, Illinois. Approximately 12 miles of the Little Calumet River lies within the State of Illinois. Existing project. Provides for clearing the channel of the Little Calumet River, Illinois, from its confluence with the Calumet-Sag Channel eastward to the Indiana State Line, of fallen trees, roots, silt, and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 66, approved 7 March 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Planning and engineering studies were performed on the Phase II silt removal portion of the project with costs of $20,822. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980 was $328,822, all new work. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-F. 15. FLOOD CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs Project and Location ..... to September 30, 1980 Advance Preparation ........... ..... $44,034 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (94th Congress, 2nd Session). Fiscal year costs Project and Location .... to September 30, 1980 North Branch, Chicago River, Ill ............................. $300 Flood damage prevention activities pursuant to Section 108 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (94th Congress, 2nd Session). 30-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Fiscal year costs Project and Location ..... to September 30, 1980 Chicagoland Underflow Plan, Ill., Phase I ................ $1,183,877 General Investigations 16. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for navigation studies were $98,596 ($97,750 by the District, $846 by the Division); $45,534 for flood control studies; $25,986 for beach erosion studies; and $1,479,919 for special studies and comprehensive basin studies ($1,281,320 by the District, $198,599 by the Division). 17. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA North Central Division fiscal year costs were $26,226 for international water studies. Flood plain management services cost $238,178 ($172,162 by the District, $66,016 by the Division); and $1,022,053 for the National Dam Safety Program ($1,022,336 by the District, and $-283 by the Division). 18. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Cost for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year was $2,947. 30-8 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding Total to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. [Federal Funds] [Contributed Funds] 2. Calumet Harbor and River Ill. and Ind. [Federal Funds] [Contributed Funds] 3. Chicago Harbor, Ill. Chicago River, Ill. 5. Indiana Harbor, Ind. 6. Michigan City Harbor, Ind. [Contributed Funds] New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 2 - 216,000 405,000 215,457 405,674 882,200 460,000 877,135 463,083 40,000 1,010,000 40,003 1,001,531 98,000 540,000 99,989 528,586 9 - 97,000 185,000 96,990 185,003 16,000 23,072 16,002 21,152 55,000 117,000 55,716 117,000 137,500 930,000 144,612 830,005 107,000 258,000 107,009 256,707 9,000 10,920 145,000 144,998 88,000 257,000 87,998 251,157 469,000 118,000 565,003 120,994 30-9 13,584,000 13,584,000 2,998,793 2,990,324 15,990 15,990 22,578,5671 22,578,5671 13,292,7742 13,281,3602 689,0013 689,0013 836,667 836,667 4,788,8274 4,788,8274 4,693,786 4,692,493 1,326,600 1,326,600 1,500,5655 1,500,5655 3,875,7576 3,875,7556 4,897,14879 4,897,14879 5,067,6658 5,061,8208 1,543,64610 1,543,64610 4,535,512 4,534,509 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,800 30,800 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 30-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 7. Waukegan New Work: Harbor, Ill. Approp. - - 823,02611 Cost - - - 823,02611 Maint.: Approp. 336,000 55,000 320,000 27,000 3,259,30912 Cost 336,758 55,005 320,001 25,326 3,257,63512 9. Hollywood-Ardmore New Work: Beach, Ill. Approp. - - - 30,000 30,000 Cost. - - - 3,504 3,504 12. Chicago River, Ill. New Work: North Branch Approp. - - - - 191,884 [Federal Funds] Cost - 191,884 Maint.: Approp. -33,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 547,000 Cost 27,583 149,921 150,087 13,995 410,994 [Contributed New Work: Funds] Contrib. - - - - 40,000 Cost - - - - 40,000 Maint.: Contrib. - 60,000 60,000 60,000 180,000 Cost - 57,982 52,904 9,721 120,607 13. Little Calumet New Work: River, Ill. Approp. 53,000 - - 50,000 358,000 Cost 53,487 - - 20,822 328,822 1. Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2. Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-1608] regarding removal of flue-dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3. In settlement, pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-16081 regarding removal of flue-dust. 4. Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5. Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6. Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7. Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8. Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9. Excludes $12,500 contributed funds. 10. Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 11. Includes $218,233 on previous projects. 12. Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 30-10 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Acts Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935i 2 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Mar. 2, 19453 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 11, 1870 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, ILL. AND IND. (See Section 2 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging areas A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide to 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach 28 feet in outer harbor; and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge to and including turning basin 5, to a depth of 27 feet in earth and 28 feet in rock; deepen turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 eet, and temporary protection for the center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Bridge [Nickel Plate] to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, ILL. (See Section 3 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater. Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. (See Section 4 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning basins. Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Apnpn. u2a5l 8R4 eepto sret,q .1, 8a9n6d H. Doc. 277, H. 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 172, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 349, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 494, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 180, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc, 581, 87th Cong., 2d sess.5 H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Apnpn. u2a7l 9R0-e2p7o9r1t, 1897, H2. dD soecs. s.710, 62d Cong., H. Doc. 1303, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. Public Law 14, 79th Cong., H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 2d sess.4 Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong., 1st sess [Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863, and Annual Report, 1909, p. 709]. 30-11 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 30-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 193010 June 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 30, 1966 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IND. (See Section 5 of Text) Outer harbor and maintenance of inner harbor channel. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and aline easterly and northerly breakwaters. Modify length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alinement of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co. about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths to 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IND. (See Section 6 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin to E Street bridge. H. Doc. 1294, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d sess.6 7 H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong., 1st sess.8 Recommendation of a Board of Engineers. Annual Report, 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Report, 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, pp. 2264-2266. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908, Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report June 1965.8 30-12 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILL. (See Section 7 of Text) June 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins. 9 Modified location of harbor entrance. Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to existing project depth. Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north pier, and enlarging inner basin. Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to that depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. HOLLYWOOD-ARDMORE BEACH ALONG LAKE MICHIGAN, ILL. (See Section 9 of Text) Provides for a reinforced concrete wall, together with grading and fill in order to stabilize the beach. Annual p. Report, 1880, 1942. Annual Report, 1882, pp. 277, 2162. H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 8 Public Law 96-304 "Supplemental Appropriations and Rescission Act, 1980." 1. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.] 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [breakwater closure.] 4. Contains latest map of harbor. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen Lake George Branch.] 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen main channel of canal and Calumet River Branch.] 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 30-13 Documents Aug. 3, 1882 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 July 8, 1980 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 30-C EXISTING PROJECTS See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Calumet Harbor and Northerly breakwater 6.714 - River, Ill. and Ind. 3. Chicago Harbor, Ill. 6. Michigan City Harbor, Ind. 7. Waukegan Harbor, Ill. Southerly breakwater North pier Approach channel Outer harbor River entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning basin No. 3 to turning basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension into Lake Calumet Turning basins 1, 3 and 5 Shore arm north breakwater North exterior breakwater Southerly extension Main inner breakwater South inner breakwater North pier Approach channel Channel and maneuver area Entrance channel Inner basin Detached breakwater West pier East pier East breakwater Entrance channel Main channel Outer basin Trail Creek Trail Creek North breakwater North pier South pier Entrance channel Channel to inner basin Inner basin Anchorage area 1Area of about 6 acres. 30-14 5,007 2,450 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,100 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,316 4,944 4,338 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 7,300 1,270 1,304 835 2,276 1,000 1,900 2,400 900 3,000 2,300 1,900 1,610 3,211 3,250 1,700 1,650 _1 3,200 3,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 190-470 740 150-425 120-150 900 50-100 50 380-500 180 375-500 -1 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 21 21 18 18 8-12 18 6 - - 25 23 23 8 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 8 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report For Calumet River Bridges' 1967 Construction Operation and Operation and Maintenance 1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6[g] of the Act of October 15, 1966, P.L. 89-670. TABLE 30-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Evanston, Illinois Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill. x For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1979 1976 1975 Construction Cost to September 30, 1980 Operation and Maintenance $766,052 $766,052 244,889 65,611 1Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. TABLE 30-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) Project KANKAKEE RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in Ind. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Little Calumet River and Tributaries, Ill. and Ind.' For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1938 1968 Construction Cost to September 30, 1980 Operation and Maintenance 53,136 'Classified inactive in November 1971. 30-15 Cost to September 30, 1980 1,625,068 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT* Due to realignment of boundaries during the year, the district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota which border the lakes. It includes U. S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 600 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 576.8 feet; Lake Erie, 568.6 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 571.7 feet. Elevations in feet are above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum- 1955). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Alpena Harbor, Mich.................31-2 2. Arcadia Harbor, Mich,........... ... 31-3 3. Ashland HarborWis .............. 31-3 4. Beaver Bay Harbor, Mich.............31-4. 5. Belle River Harbor, Mich...... .... 31-4 6. Big Bay Harbor, Mich................ 31-5 7. Black River Harbor, Mich.0............31-5 8. Black River, (Port Huron) Mich........31-5 9. Bolles Harbor, Mich...................31-6 10. Caseville Harbor, Mich................ 31-7 11. Cedar River Harbor, Mich............. 31-7 12. Charlevoix Harbor, Mich.............. 31-8 13. Cheboygan Harbor, Mich.............. 31-9 14. Clinton River, Mich..................31-9 15. Cornucopia Harbor, Wis............. 31-10 16. Cross Village Harbor, Mich. ........ 31-10 17. Detour Harbor, Mich................ 31-11 18. Detroit River, Mich. ................ 31-12 19. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. and Wis.... ... *...*.......... 31-13 20. Fox River, Wis. .................. 31-14 21. Frankfort Harbor, Mich............. 31-15 22. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, Mich.............. 31-16 23. Grand Marais Harbor, Mich......... 31-16 24. Grand Marais Harbor, Minn........ 31-17 25. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, Mich............*.***........... 31-17 26. Green Bay Harbor, Wis .......... 31-18 27. Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich......... 31-18 28. Harrisville Harbor, Mich ............ 31-19 29. Holland Harbor, Mich............... 31-19 Navigation (cont.) Page 30. The Inland Route, Mich. ............. 31-20 31. Kenosha Harbor, Wis ............. 31-21 32. Kewaunee Harbor, Wis............. 31-21 33. Keweenaw Waterway, Mich ....... 31-22 34. Knife River Harbor, Minn......... 31-22 35. Lac LaBelle Harbor, Mich............ 31-23 36. La Pointe Harbor, Wis. ......... 31-23 37. Lake St. Clair, Mich. Channels ....................... 31-24 38. Leland Harbor, Mich .............. 31-24 39. Les Cheneaux Islands, Channels Mich ................... 31-24 40. Lexington Harbor, Mich. ........... 31-25 41. Little Lake Harbor, Mich............ 31-25 42. Ludington Harbor, Mich. .......... 31-26 43. Lutsen Harbor, Minn ............ 31-26 44. Manistee Harbor, Mich........... 31-27 45. Manistique Harbor, Mich ......... 31-27 46. Manitowoc Harbor, Wis .......... 31-28 47. Menominee Harbor and River, Mich. and Wis..................... 31-29 48. Milwaukee Harbor, Wis............. 31-29 49. Monroe Harbor, Mich ............. 31-30 50. Muskegon Harbor, Mich. ......... 31-31 51. New Buffalo Harbor, Mich ......... 31-32 52. Oconto Harbor, Wis. .............. 31-32 53. Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. ........... 31-33 54. Pentwater Harbor, Mich. ......... 31-33 55. Pine River, Mich................... 31-34 56. Point Lookout Harbor, Mich. ........ 31-34 57. Portage Lake Harbor, Mich. ........ 31-34 58. Port Austin Harbor, Mich,. ....... 31-35 * All cost and Financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 31-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation (cont.) Page 59. Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich ........ 31-35 60. Port Washington Harbor, Wis ...... 31-36 61. Port Wing Harbor, Wis ............ 31-36 62. Presque Isle Harbor, Mich. ......... 31-37 63. Racine Harbor, Wis ................. 31-37 64. Rouge River, Mich ............... 31-38 65. Saginaw River, Mich., ............. 31-39 66. St. Clair River, Mich................ 31-39 67. St. Joseph Harbor, Mich,........... 31-40 68. St. Marys River, Mich............... 31-41 69. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, Mich, ...................... 31-42 70. Saxon Harbor, Wis .................. 31-42 71. Sebewaing River, Mich............. 31-43 72. Sheboygan Harbor, Wis ........... 31-43 73. South Haven Harbor, Mich.......... 31-44 74. Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wis, ................... 31-44 75. Two Harbors, Minn ................. 31-45 76. Two Rivers Harbor, Wis............. 31-45 77. White Lake Harbor, Mich, ........ 31-46 78. Whitefish Point Harbor, Mich. ...... 31-46 79. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys................. ........ 31-47 80. Other authorized navigation projects........................... 31-47 Navigation (cont.) Page 81. Navigation work under special authorization ................... 31-47 82. Authorized beach erosion control projects .................... 31-47 83. Emergency shore protection ........ 31-47 84. Beach erosion work under special authorization ..................... 31-48 Flood Control 85. Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, Mich. ....................... 31-48 86. River Rouge, Mich ................ 31-49 87. Saginaw River, Mich............... 31-49 88. Sebewaing, Sebewaing, River, Mich ...... ......... .............. 31-51 89. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 31-51 90. Other authorized flood control projects.......................... 31-51 91. Flood control under special authorization .................... 31-51 92. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters ........................... 31-52 General Investigations 93. Surveys,......... ................ . 31-54 94. Collection and study of basic data ............................. 31-54 Navigation 1. ALPENA HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Thunder Bay River which empties into Thunder Bay, Lake Huron. Harbor is 100 miles southeast of Cheboygan Harbor, Mich. River has its source in Montmorency and Alpena Counties, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Previous project. For details see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1548 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bay channel 200 feet wide and 25 feet deep from deep water in Thunder Bay to a point 300 feet lakeward of the Alpena Light; thence an entrance channel 24 feet deep, narrowing to a width of 100 feet at a point 700 feet upstream from the light; thence a river channel 100 feet wide 23 feet deep to Second Avenue Bridge; thence 18.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide for 1,600 feet to upper limit of Federal project; a turning basin at upstream end of project, basin at river mouth 19 feet deep, trapezoidal in shape, with a maximum width of 700 feet including the channel width and a maximum length of 900 feet along the channel line, including removal of existing rubble breakwater; and a 31-2 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT breakwater about 550 feet long paralleling lakeward side of new turning basin. Work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1969) is $1,100,000 (Federal) and $48,000 (non-Federal). (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 27, 1965 is subject to condition that responsible local interests give assurances that they will provide lands, easements, rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of project and aides to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil disposal areas and neces-' sary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, or the costs of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages; provide necessary terminal facilities at Abitibi Corp; dredge and maintain areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel. Local cooperation from previous River and Harbor Acts is fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Several commercial docks along Thunder Bay River used primarily for receipt of coal and petroleum products. Also a municipal marina basin about 0.25 mile southwest of river mouth. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $8,811. An adjustment of -$10,349 was made in contract for sediment sampling. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredging was continued at a cost of $19,820. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1939. The modification of existing project at Alpena Harbor, as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, was reclassified into inactive status May 22,1969 based on an unfavorable benefit-cost ratio. In 1975 the modification was recommended and reviewed for deauthorization, which was withdrawn by Congressional Resolution the same year. Project features are in good condition. Total cost to end of fiscal year for existing project were $739,284 of which $337,394 was for new work and $401,890 for maintenance. 2. ARCADIA HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,618. An adjustment of -$1,839 was made in the dredging contract completed last fiscal year. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging. An estimated 10,876 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material, was removed by hydraulic dredge at a cost of $39,470. Reconnaissance Report for major rehabilitation of the navigation was continued. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $10,782. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Future maintenance of the harbor will be based on providing a 9 foot depth. Total cost at end of fiscal year for existing project was $509,048. 3. ASHLAND HARBOR, WIS. Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) 31-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both extending lakeward from 75 feet outside harborline, all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs, and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $37,000. Condition at end offiscal year. Work authorized prior to 1960 act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 act was completed in November 1962. Breakwater is in generally good condition, except for settled portions. At end of fiscal year, controlling depths were 16 feet in 1600-foot west portion of West Channel, and authorized depths in remainder of project. 4. BEAVER BAY HARBOR, MINN. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Lake Superior 53 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn., and 56 miles southwesterly from Grand Marais, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Project as modified provides for a combination primarily of rubblemound breakwaters with a steel sheet piling cell at each side of the harbor entry totaling 540 feet in length, and an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres in size, and 8 feet deep. See page 1659 of Annual Report for 1945 for improvements authorized by the River and Harbor Act approved March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. No. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). This document contains the latest published map. Estimated Federal cost (1980) for new work is $2,900,000 and non-Federal cost is $263,000. Local cooperation. See page 1659 and 1660 of Annual Report for 1945. Local interests furnished local assurances in November 1969 in December 1976, and in September 1977 to accomodate changes in cost sharing. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $24,875. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is nearing completion with an alternate site having been adopted at the request of local interests due to shoreline changes. 5. BELLE RIVER, MICH. Location. River empties into the St. Clair River at Marine City, Michigan about 17 miles southerly from Port Huron, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14853.) Previous project. For details see page 2059, app. GG, of Annual Report 1880 and page VIII of Annual Report 1885. Existing project. A channel 75 feet wide and 15 feet deep to the Bridge Street Bridge and thence 14 feet deep to the Broadway Bridge, for a total distance of 5,400 feet. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A 1,200 foot commercial wharf exists just south of the river mouth. Small craft facilities with repair, docking and launching capabilities are present on the west bank of the river. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A reconnaissance report on the project's operation and maintenance expenses was performed at a cost of $18,137. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. 31-4 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT 6. BIG BAY HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, Mich., and 38 miles easterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for two converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A State-owned launching ramp and dock for small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A Draft Detailed Project Report is being prepared under the Section 111 authority to determine if mitigation of shore damage attributable to the existing Federal project is feasible and justified and is scheduled for completion in FY81. Total cost of new work for fiscal year is $15,097. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,277. An adjustment of -$1,691 was made in the contract for dredging last year. Maintenance dredging was performed by the Cranebarge Markus. Approximately 4,463 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $19,554. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $11,509. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. A contract for repair of breakwater, damaged by storms was completed in August 1969. A reconnaissance report was completed in July 1971 concerning erosion of the beach adjacent to the harbor. 7. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MICH. Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, Mich., and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet and on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous services and inspections were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,865. An adjustment of -$14,005 was made in the contract for dredging completed last fiscal year. The U.S. Cranebarge Markus performed dredging removing 5,147 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $35,953. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $12,019. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in June 1958. A triangular-shaped rock shoal 50 feet wide at easterly end extends along southerly side of channel. Project depths were available at the end of the fiscal year in lake approach channel and in harbor basin. 8. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MICH. Location. This river has its source in the 31-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 northern part of Sanilac County, Mich., is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet, widening 2 bends to 100 feet, 1 at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk, Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet: and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the 1-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be. $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River, near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,471. The reconnaissance report on the project's operation and maintenance expenses was completed at a cost of $17,866. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935 and the latest modification has been completed. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $1,319,494 of which $830,177 (includes $349,921 contributed funds) was for new work and $478,950 for maintenance. 9. BOLLES HARBOR, MICH. Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek, 7 miles southwest of Monroe, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an access channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth, Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous services and inspections were performed by Government forces at a cost of $26,395. Repair of 31-6 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT the disposal area, damaged by storms, was performed at a cost of$112,16 4. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $5,060. Financial closeout of the contract for construction of diked disposal area was performed. Adjustments of -$74,949 was made to the contract and -$3,045 to supervision and administration cost. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1970. (Adequate depths exist over the project length except for the upstream 800 feet). Total costs to end of fiscal year were $2,391,551 of which $474,509 was for new work ($255,000 contributed funds) and $1,917,040 for maintenance. 10. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Pigeon river on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 17 miles southwest of Port Austin, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14860.) Existing project. A small craft harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater protected channel extending from the 10-foot contour in Saginaw Bay into Pigeon River. Project depths are 10 and 8 feet. For additional details see page 1320 of Annual Report for 1963. Widening river channel from 50 to 60 feet for about 1,000 feet, with widening to 80 feet in upper 300-foot reach, is considered inactive. Estimated (1963) cost of this portion of project is $30,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Complete public boating facilities constructed by State and local agencies are available in addition to privately owned and operated marinas. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspection were performed by government forces at a cost of $18,364. A contract was awarded in the amount of $110,800 for maintenance dredging. No work was performed this fiscal year. Engineering and design for dredging cost $19,835. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1964 except for the inactive portion of the project. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $1,255,383 of which $587,314 was for new work (including $293,657 contributed funds) and $668,069 for maintenance. 11. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Cedar River on west shore of Green Bay an arm of Northern Lake Michigan about 68 miles north of city of Green Bay. Nearest harbors are Menominee, Mich., 27 southwest and at Escanaba, Mich., 20 miles northeast. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) Existing project. Two parallel entrance piers, a west pier 301 feet long and a rubblemound cast 2,100 feet long with a cellular sheet pile pierhead and sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River about 2,100 feet long; and inner channel in Cedar River 1,400 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 8 feet deep upstream to about 150 below State Route 35 bridge; and a turning basin 150 feet wide near upstream end of inner bridge channel. Estimated costs (1980) of new work are $1,188,- 000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) and $235,000 non-Federal. Total project cost is $1,423,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The 1965 modification provides that local interests will contribute in cash 15 percent of the first cost of the new navigation facilities and 50 percent of the first cost of structural modifications necessary to provide for sport fishing walkway on top of the new east pier, the total of such contributions being $198,000 (Oct 1980 estimate) to be paid in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction and to be subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public 31-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil; and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain with cost to the United States necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including an adequate public landing with provision for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water and a parking lot with adequate sanitary facilities available to all on equal terms and including dredging of berthing areas to depths commensurate with the related project depths; and reserve anchorage spaces and mooring facilities adequate for the accommodation of transient craft. Formal assurances have not been requested. Terminal facilities. There are no permanent docking, mooring or handling facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design efforts were continued in FY80 to supplement the general design memorandum, prepare environmental impact statement, and accomplish post authorization change report for rehabilitation of recreational boat harbor at a cost of $94,251. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not yet started. 12. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan. 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: (a) Provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers, to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the modified, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; (d) Accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; (e) Establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (f) If acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971; (g) Contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total first cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction is presently estimated at $652,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $8,443. Engineering and design of revetment repair at Park Island was performed at a cost of $24,410. Engineering and 31-8 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT design for repair to the north and south piers, Sections A, A1, A2, and B was performed at a cost $34,370. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1939. A controlling depth of 18 feet is available throughout the entire project, .except for minor shoaling along the channel limits and shoaling from the U.S. 31 Highway Bridge to 200 feet west and from the north bank to the channel centerline. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $3,309,596 of which $180,623 was for new work, $1,999,577 for maintenance (Emergency Bank Protection $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 13. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14881 and 14886.) Previous project. For details see page 1956 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer end of west pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from this bridge to the lock in Cheboygan River; a turning basin 21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 feet long on east side of existing project channel just below East First Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Improvement is 12,000 feet long, of which about 6,000 feet are in Straits of Mackinac. Estimated (1969) cost for recreational facilities is $2,500, excluding $2,500 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project and breakwater (1964 Act). The 1964 Act also provides that local interests must contribute in cash 50 percent of the first cost for surfacing breakwater as necessary to provide a safe walkway on breakwater for recreational fishermen, such contribution presently estimated at $2,500 to be paid in a lump sum before start of construction, subject to final adjustment after actual costs are determined. This has not been complied with due to difficulty in obtaining permanent access easement to the breakwater. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum products. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available. These facilities satisfy existing commerce and vessel traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous services were performed at a cost of $1,982. Engineering and design for repairs to West Pier were performed at a cost of $5,018. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950. The latest modification was completed during fiscal year 1969. Controlling depths of 21 feet exist in the channel from Lake Huron to East First Street, including the turning basin; 18.5 feet from East First Street to the State Road Bridge; thence 5.0 feet to the lock at the upper limits of the project. 14. CLINTON RIVER, MICH. Location. Has its source in Oakland County, Mich., flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing_to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; con- 31-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 struction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private piers and wharves along river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,174. An adjustment of -$35,431 was made in dredging contract completed last fiscal year.Administrative close-out of dredging contract by government forces cost $8,691. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was performed at a cost of $11,443. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $1,644,930 of which $234,546 was for new work, $1,095,132 for maintenance, and $289,752 contributed funds for new work. 15. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WIS. Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on South shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous services were performed at a cost of $5,000. Condition at end offiscal year. Work authorized by earlier act was completed in 1939; that for later modification in July 1958 except for extension of east pier, completed in September 1963. Controlling depths at the end of the fiscal year were 9 feet in the harbor entry and 7 feet in the basins. 16. CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On northeast shore of Lake Michigan, about 26 miles northeast of Charlevoix, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14902.) Existing project. Provides for two breakwaters having an aggregate length of about 2,300 feet with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about eight acres and ten feet deep and a flared entrance channel twelve feet deep decreasing in width to 140 feet through the breakwaters. Estimated (1980) Federal cost for new work is $2,780,000, excluding $1,730,000 contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must furnish assurances that they will contribute in cash 38 percent of the first cost of construction of the general navigation facilities and 50 percent of the first cost of facilities necessary to provide for recreational fishing on the main breakwater, such contributions presently estimated at $1,666, 000 and $64,000, respectively, to be paid in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction, subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-ofway required for the construction and maintenance of the project and of aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such 31-10 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain without cost to the United States necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including an adequate public landing with provision for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants, potable water, a parking lot with adequate sanitary facilities, and a launching ramp, open to all on equal terms, the dredging of berthing areas to be commensurate with the depth of the Federal channel improvements; establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and development of the harbor and recreation-oriented facilities with the understanding that said facilities shall be open to all on equal terms: reserve spaces within the anchorage and mooring facilities adequate for the accommodation of transient craft; provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, for recreational fishing: access facilities, parking areas, and adequate sanitary facilities; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of the recreational fishing facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $4,000 on an average annual basis; and provided further that the improvement for navigation may be undertaken independently of the public recreational fishing facilities on the main breakwater whenever funds for that purpose are available and the required local cooperation has been furnished. Terminal facilities. No facilities are available except a small launching ramp for recreational craft. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work continued on the Phase I General Design Memorandum. A Public Workshop was held 27 August 1980 in Cross Village. Site visits were made to Cross Village and the alternative sites at Good Hart and Sturgeon Bay Point in order to evaluate environmental concerns. Coordination of the report was continued with United States Fish & Wildlife Service and the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Condition at end offiscal year. Draft Phase I GDM study was approximately 40 per cent complete. 17. DETOUR HARBOR, MICH. Location. On the west side of DeTour Passage, about 2 miles upstream from Lake Huron. The passage forms the mouth of the St. Marys River which connects Lakes Huron and Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14882.) Existing project. Provides for small boat harbor and harbor of refuge by dredging a 10-foot deep entrance channel and providing a 8-foot deep access channel protected by a 1,050 foot breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Improvement authorized on 3 June 1969 under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act is subject to conditions that prior to project. construction, responsible local interests should be required to give satisfactory assurances that they will: Contribute in cash 50 percent of the first cost of construction of the recommended improvement for recreational navigation, exclusive of aids to navigation when the total cost is less than $4,000,000. In addition, also contribute all costs over $4,000,000 should the first costs exceed that amount. The required amount shall be paid in a lump sum payment prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments over the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled appropriation of Federal funds, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction and maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for disposal of spoil and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments 31-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages incident to the construction, operation and maintenance of the improvements, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its Contractors; Establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth and development of the harbor and related facilities with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; Provide and maintain without cost to the United States necessary mooring facilities and service areas, including a public landing with suitable supply facilities, reservation of space for transient craft, parking areas with adequate sanitary facilities and access roads, open to all on equal terms; Dredge the berthing areas to a depth commensurate with the depth of the Federal channel improvements; Establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by users (the Regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control); Provide any measures necessary to mitigate degraded potable water quality at the existing municipal water treatment plant should water quality, after project construction, fall below that which can be remedied with existing treatment methods; Contribute in cash 50 percent of the first cost of construction of facilities onto the breakwater structure necessary to provide for recreational fishing onto the breakwater and bear all costs of maintenance and replacement of these facilities; Bear all costs of any construction, maintenance, operation, and replacement of onshore facilities; parking areas and sanitary facilities necessary for recreational fishing; In acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and maintenance of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources has provided an indication of intent to provide the required assurances of local cooperation. Terminal facilities. Public docking, landing, parking and sanitary facilities will be provided by the State of Michigan. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were prepared at a cost of $69,065. A contract was awarded. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not started. 18. DETROIT RIVER, MICH. Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long and flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 31-C. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 571.7 and 568.6 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955.) (See Table 31- B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated 1978 Federal cost for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $159,300,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968 is considered inactive. Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1961) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port and steamship services is prepared and published as part I by Port Development Staff, U.S. Depart- 31-12 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ment of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center, Hi-Fix surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,395,088. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains, Hoffman and Lyman performed maintenance dredging removing 206,339, 141,498 and 212,293 cubic yards, bin measure of shoal material at a cost of $713,606, $294,998 and $769,953, respectively. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $11,650,000. The contract is 51 per cent complete at a cost of $5,925,007. An estimated 1,124,307 cubic yards, bin measure of shoal material was removed by contractor owned Hopper Dredge. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $793,373. Location of obstructions was performed at a cost of $95,153. Removal of obstructions cost $1,232,974 An adjustment of -$44,000 was made in Contract for repairs to compensating dike completed last fiscal year. Supervision and administration of dredging contract cost $68,942. Engineering, and design of all above work and surveys, layouts supervision and administration of all hired labor work cost $136,524. An adjustment of -$280,117 was made in contract for construction of diked disposal area Phase I. The contract for construction of Phase II awarded in fiscal year 1978 is approximately 74 per cent complete. Cost this fiscal year was $11,437,000. Engineering and design for a diked disposal area for Detroit River Sailing Courses was performed at a cost of $91,299. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration of Phase I and II cost $567,133. Total cost of maintenance was $23,196,933 of which $11,815,315 was for the diked disposal program. Condition at end of fiscal year. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. All work in Trenton Channel is complete. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of fiscal year is set forth in Table 31-C. Costs for existing project were $175,984,738 of which $74,780,103 was for new work ($72,969,197 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Work Funds) and $62,200,074 for maintenance. 19. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINN. AND WIS. Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, Minn., and Superior, Wis., are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and. dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet in inner channels. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see page 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West Channel is inactive. Estimated cost (1967) of this portion was $577,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for active portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one are privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports, building, grounds and recreation operations were performed at a cost of $359,801. Repairs to breakwaters was performed at a cost of $396,645. Park, pier and recreational facilities maintenance was performed at a cost of $33,017. An adjustment of -$55,572 was made in dredging contract completed last fiscal year. The U.S. Dipper Dredge Gaillard and Cranebarge Markus per- 31-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 formed maintenance dredging removing 191,000 and 3,375 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,205,030 and $94,052. Engineering and design for museum cost $2,587. Work on a museum expansion and an exhibit construction contract was accomplished at costs of $17,680 and $18,250, respectively. Engineering, design, survey, supervision and administration of all the above work cost $89,975. Construction of a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was completed at a cost of $100,247. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration of the diked disposal program cost $27,337. Total costs of maintenance was $2,289,049 of which $127,584 was for the diked disposal program. Condition at end offiscal year. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work on the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for the 21st Avenue West channel portion which is inactive. A detailed project report was completed in November 1974 concerning erosion of a one-half mile of reach of beach adjacent to and south of the Duluth Ship Canal. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980 was $37,562,560 of which $14,562,063 was for new work and $23,000,497 was for maintenance. 20. FOX RIVER, WIS. Location. Rises in Columbia County, Wis., and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, Wis., and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to be 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513,424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. River and Harbor Act of 1925 portion of project is considered inactive and excluded from cost estimate. Estimated cost (1924) of this portion is $2,886,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 31-E on locks and dams, Fox River, Wis.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, discharge observation, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $310,286. Lock and dams were operated and maintained at a cost of $772,318. Gates at DePere Dam were sandblasted at a cost of $100,520. Gates were rebuilt and valves overhauled at Kaukauna 1st Lock at a cost of $133,617. Repair of canal bank was accomplished at a cost of $61,637. Engineering, design, supervision, administration and other miscellaneous maintenance was performed at a cost of 373,585. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 31-E for year of completion of each.) Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and 31-14 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Except for Menasha lock, which sould be rebuilt, existing locks and dams are in generally fair to good condition. Costs for existing project to September 30, 1980 were $513,424 for new work and $27,959,370 for operation and maintenance, a total of $28,- 472,794. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 21. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters and to a maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters; thence to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along northshore of Lake Betsie. The city and state provide a recreational docking facility on northside of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous services and inspections were performed by Government forces at a cost of $45,400. Repairs to outer end of N & S Pier were performed by government forces at a cost of $78,983. The contract for repairs to Sections M, N, 0 and P of the north revetment and south pier was completed. Cost this fiscal year was $159,409. Engineering and design for repairs to revetment, Section L1 and K, was performed at a cost of $34,867. Supervision and administration of contract cost $43,881. Supervision and administration of hired labor work cost $4,606. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $80,855. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are generally above emergency repair condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $6,822,652 of which $1,955,159 (including $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $4,592,717 31-15 RPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 for maintenance and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 22. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MICH. Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 23 miles northerly from Holland, Mich. River rises in Jackson County, Mich., and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: An adjustment of $91 was made in beach nourishment (Mitigation) performed last year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and operation of safety features were performed at a cost of $170,915. Repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $44,618. Maintenance of safety features was performed at a cost of $7,279. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 62,999 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $179,916. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $17,897. Engineering and design on repair of North Pier, Section E was performed at a cost of $21,148. Other Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost was $32,387. Maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $124,000. Cost under diked disposal program was $2,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1962. Structures are generally above emergency repair condition and are scheduled for major repair on an as needed basis. Total cost of existing project to end of fiscal year were $14,263,983 of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $11,991,901 for maintenance and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 23. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 93 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a channel protected by parallel piers and for closing natural entrance channel with a pile dike. Project depths are 18 feet between piers and 20 feet in lake approach. For additional details see page 1449 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small piers, a Coast Guard Station, and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan provide facilities adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design studies under 31-16 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Section 111 P.L. 90-483 for mitigation of shore damage attributable to Federal navigation work were performed at a cost of $38,745. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections were performed at a cost of $7,564. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is complete except forwidening a portion of channel from 250 to 300 feet. Project now being maintained to 19 and 15 feet below I.G.L.D. in lieu of 20 and 18 feet which is adequate for current usage. 24. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MINN. Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet near entrance and 8 feet in small-boat basin. For additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considerd adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey, miscellaneous inspection and services cost $2,420. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is complete. Concrete seawall and both breakwaters are in good condition. Gravel pit along eastern side of harbor is too low to prevent waves from rolling into harbor during severe storm periods. 25. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing projects. Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fishing-wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A reconnaissance report was completed in January 1972 concerning shoreline erosion commencing at the south breakwater and extending for about 1 mile south of the harbor. The draft detailed project report was prepared in December 1977, with an environmental assessment addressing a plan consisting of beach restoration and periodic nourishment south of the harbor. The final detailed project report is being prepared and is scheduled for completion in FY81. Total cost of new work for fiscal year was $4,983. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $3,392. Repair to the navigation structures was performed at a cost of $27,554. An adjustment of -$20,461 was made in maintenance dredging contract completed last fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed by the Government cranebarge Markus with approximately 2,261 cubic yards of material removed at a cost of $13,205. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration costs $22,758. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Construction of a 164-foot extension to the north breakwater was completed. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Timber and round wood-pile structures are deteriorated but still in serviceable condition. 31-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 26. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WIS. Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, Wis., via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, Mich., and Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,334,- 421, Federal, and Non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A study of the feasibility of reactivating the inactive portion and modifying the authorization was continued at a cost of $28,043. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $48,389. Maintenance dredging was performed by the U.S. Cranebarge Manitowoc last fiscal year at a cost of $116,679 and $71,630. An estimated 25,750 cubic yards were removed. Removal of a pipe trestle was accomplished at a cost of $109,445. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $3,095. Preparation for U.S. Hopper Dredge Markham was accomplished by a shore crew at a cost of $26,076. Engineering design, supervision and administration cost $60,029. An adjustment of $8,140 was made in contract for construction of diked disposal area. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $11,154. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973. Dredging turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of 4 March 1915 in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. The total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1980 were $23,536,279 of which $18,005,884 were regular funds and $940,800 Public Works funds; $9,357,789 for new work and $14,178,490 for maintenance. The new work costs do not include $100,000 contributed funds. 27. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MICH. Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy 31-18 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $6,478. A contract in the amount of $1,743,300 was awarded for repair to the North Breakwater. The contract is approximately 87 per cent complete at a cost of $1,594,998. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $81,522. Cost under dike disposal program was $6. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $5,967,390 of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $4,572,288 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. Private interests have offered to provide a confined disposal facility for dredged material. 28. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft. These are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design studies performed under Section 111 P.L. 90-483 for mitigation of shore damage attributable to Federal navigation works were under review at a cost of $39,777. Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $8,061. An adjustmentof $384 was made in the maintenance dredging contract completed last fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in fiscal year 1960. Controlling depths are 12 feet in the entrance channel and 10 feet in the harbor basin. 29. HOLLAND HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart'14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. Widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1956) is $449,500. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Work authorized by act of 1954 is subject to condition that work on ither eor both proposed modifications may be undertaken by the United States provided local interests furnish all lands except 1.5 acres of Federal lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance; remove buildings and other structures, except existing revetments, from lands to be furnished; and hold the United States free from damages. Terminalfacilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 31-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $56,992. Repairs to navigation structures were performed by government forces at a cost of $90,973. An adjustment of -$30,380 was made in contract for repair of North Revetment Sections F, G, G1, and H which was completed in fiscal year 1974. The Contract awarded last fiscal year for repair to South Pier Sections I and J is approximately 96 per cent complete at a cost of $343,160. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 43,367 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $72,173. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $69,039. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $55,668. Maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 was performed at a cost of $19,000. An adjustment of -$10,311 was made in the dike disposal program. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Costs of existing project to end of fiscal year were $1,392,842 for new work ($616,415 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $7,510,391 regular funds for maintenance, and $502,452 regular funds for rehabilitation, for a total of $8,903,233. 30. THE INLAND ROUTE, MICH. Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan, to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886). Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. None for commercial cargo- handling exist along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equiped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 Highways dead end at the water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was maintained and operated on a two shift basis 1 October thru 15 November 1979. The lock was reopened for navigation 15 April 1980. The State of Michigan operated and maintained the lock at a cost of $52,355 with reimbursement by the Corps. Condition surveys, cooperative stream gaging and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $23,309. Engineering and design for master plan was performed at a cost of $18,721. Engineering and design on confined disposal area for polluted dredging was performed at a cost of $28,777. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in fiscal year 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total costs at end of fiscal year were $2,255,641 of which $770,222 was for new work and $1,337,419 for maintenance with $148,000 contributed by local interests. 31-20 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT 31. KENOSHA HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous projects. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1975) Federal Cost is $552,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Non-Federal estimate is $43,000 (July 1975) including $3,000 contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fishing wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $16,998. Maintenance dredging was performed by the U.S. Cranebarge Manitowoc. An estimated 10,628 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $48,148. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $13,853. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for dredging 25 foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which will be completed after rehabilitation of the piers. The north and south piers were completed in 1900, and the breakwater in 1909. The north pier is in excellent condition. The south pier and breakwater are in generally fair condition. The total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1980 were $7,873,562 of which $7,769,905 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $390,130 being for new work, $6,213,157 for maintenance and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work costs do not include $3,000 contributed funds. 32. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report of 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-31. Costs of completed project at $603,021, Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000-July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $18,598. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $61,792. Condition at end offiscal year. Active portion of.existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore con- 31-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 nection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier were commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April- May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in Oct. 1973 and a 24 foot section at outer end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel and interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable for about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980 was $3,258,151, of which $603,021 was for new work ($183,021 regular and $420,000 emergency relief funds) $2,037,830 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 33. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MICH. Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed cost for new work is $5,967,700. Portion of project providing for extension of lower entrance breakwater and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels is inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1957) of this portion was $3,315,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of recreational facilities, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections cost $18,338. Repairs to breakwater were performed at a cost of $44,574. Repairs to revetment were performed at a cost of $45,279. Reconnaissance Report for major rehabilitation of navigation structures was prepared at a cost of $25,697. Condition at end offiscal year. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater lower entrance, and major storm damage repairs needed for stone-covered portions of breakwaters at upper entrance. Mooring pier at Lily Pond requires repairs to halt movement and permit dredging to project depth adjacent thereto. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. 34. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINN. Location. Near mouth of Knife River on north shore of Lake Superior, 19 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn., and 7 miles southwest of Two Harbors, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel with a system of overlapping breakwaters, using the existing breakwater and a new breakwater constructed of 451 feet of rock rubblemound, and four 62.8-foot diameter steel sheet pile cells. The entrance channel is 9 feet deep and an inner straight channel is 8 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 600 feet long with a public marina and side channel at its inner end. For additional details see page 1110 of Annual Report for 1963. A modification to correct a design deficiency was authorized in 1974. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 15.08 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Local interests have installed pile-and-timber docks on both sides of 31-22 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT straight channel. Lake County has completed construction by contract of a marina along the east wing of the inner harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract to correct a design deficiency is being prepared at a cost of $18,300. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $5,981. Repairs to the navigation structures were performed at a cost of $9,092. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $3,027. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in June 1958. Breakwater and spending beach are in good condition. At end of fiscal year, controlling depths were about 9 feet in lake approach, 8 feet in channel between revetments, and 8 feet in side channels. The existing breakwater does not effectively prevent waves caused by northeasterly winds from entering the entrance channel. This results in unsatisfactory and unsafe harbor entrance conditions during storms. Mooring conditions in the main channel and Y-branches of the inner harbor are also adversely affected. Plans and specifications for construction of a breakwater to reduce wave damage and improve navigation conditions have been completed. 35. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula 41 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. Lac La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for construction of two parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 584 and 682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small, privately owned wharves are available in the harbor for use of small craft engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A state owned dock for small craft is located at northwest corner of Lac La Belle Bay. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $1,331. An adjustment of -$3,645 was made in dredging contract completed last year. Supervision and administration cost $107. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in January 1960. Controlling depths were about 11 feet in the approach channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. 36. LA POINTE HARBOR, WISCONSIN Location. At westerly end of Madeline Island in the Apostle Island group off the south shore of Lake Superior. (See Lake Survey Chart 961.) Existing project. Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Project was authorized by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act (Public Law 645, 86th Cong., as amended.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. A 400-foot L-shaped dock was constructed and rehabilitated by local interests, not as a part of the federal project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous services were performed at a cost of $162. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in June 1967. Controlling depths at the 31-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 end of the fiscal year were 10 feet in the harbor entrance and 8 feet in the basin. 37. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICH. CHANNELS Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head to Detroit River Channel. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center, Hi-Fix surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $165,314. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Markham performed maintenance dredging twice this fiscal year at a cost of $430,423. Approximately 114,964 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material was removed. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $45,675. Real estate activities, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $18,775. Cost under the diked disposal program was $681. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total costs for existing project at end of fiscal year were $16,613,215 of which $7,019,237 was for new work ($6,010,582 regular funds and $1,008,595 public works funds) and $9,829,324 for maintenance. 38. LELAND HARBOR, MICH. Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, Mich., and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver are about 3 acres in extend and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extendingto mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $14,059. An adjustment of -$6,272 was made in dredging contract completed last fiscal year. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging. Approximately 14,654 cubic yards were removed at a cost of $80,748. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $11,735. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the authorization of 1962 which was completed in 1967. Total costs of existing project to the end of fiscal year were $1,833,741, of which $1,027,089 was for new work and $806,652 for maintenance. 39. LES CHENEAUX ISLANDS CHANNELS, MICH. Location. Along the north shore of Lake Huron, about 20 miles northeast of Mackinac Island, 31-24 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14885.) Existing project. Provides for removing shoals from Les Cheneaux Islands Channels on the presently designated Small Boat Course, including the Middle Entrance between Marquette and Little LaSalle Islands, to provide a depth of seven feet over a minimum width of 100 feet, with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Privately owned marinas, open to the public, are located at Hessel and Cedarville. There are also numerous other docks located on the islands which are not open to the general public. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and vessel traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $35,208. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $71,951. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed during fiscal year 1971. 40. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MICH. Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost for new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,- 888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design under Section 111 P.L. 90-483 for mitigation of shore damage attributable to Federal navigation works was completed at a cost of $48,494. The placing of approximately 20,000 cubic yards of sand using Detroit District's sand bypass equipment was performed at a cost of $125,946. Supervision and administration cost $5,403. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $10,680. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed during fiscal year 1977. 41. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft into harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 31-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project site consists of a public dock built by State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $10,918. The design deficiency study was continued at a cost of $128,911. An adjustment of -$9,542 was made in dredging contract completed last fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed by the U.S. Cranebarge Markus with approximately 18,926 cubic yards of material removed at a cost of $85,861. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $20,137. Condition at end offiscal year. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was submitted to North Central Division in March 1978 and approved. 42. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan. 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwater, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total costs for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Has been complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The contract for construction of latest project modification is approximately 99 per cent complete. Cost this fiscal year was $2,287,607 Federal funds and $17,139 contributed funds. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $163,083. Placing of sand in connection with beach nourishment (mitigation) was continued by modification to the above contract. Cost this fiscal year was $157,716. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $38,967. Modifications to above contract in the amount of $115,534 was made for repairs to South Breakwater and North Revetment. Costs for this fiscal year on these modifications were $37,607 with completion scheduled for next fiscal year. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $24,495. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $13,903,939 of which $8,401,574 was for new work, $5,635,869 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 43. LUTSEN HARBOR, MINN. 31-26 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Location. The relocated harbor is located at the mouth of the Poplar River on the north shore of Lake Superior, 79 miles northeasterly from Duluth., Minn., and 30 miles southwesterly from Grand Marais, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Project as modified provides for two rubblemound breakwaters totaling 1,400 feet, with an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres with an 8-foot depth. For additional details see page 1658 of Annual Report for 1945 for improvements authorized by the River and Harbor Act approved March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. No. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). This document contains latest published map. Estimated Federal cost (1979) for new work is $5,820,000 and non-Federal cost is $365,000. Local cooperation. See page 1658 of Annual Report for 1945. Local interests furnished local assurances in December 1969 and again in December 1976, and confirmed in October 1979. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued by hired labor at a cost of $25,074. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is underway with studies continuing for an alternate site at the request of local interests due to private development on the authorized site. 44. MANISTEE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetments; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and city owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $35,161. Repairs to the navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $36,799. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 11,160 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $30,722. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $9,042. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project from regular funds to end of fiscal year were $6,749,912 of which $2,341,523 was for new work, $3,034,225 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitiation. 45. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On north shore of Lake Michigan 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, Wis., and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous project. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. 31-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1451 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,089. A Reconnaissance Report on the project's operation and maintenance expenses was completed at a cost of $17,713. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1961. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. All structures are generally in good condition. Project is being maintained to 12 feet below I.G.L.D. in lieu of authorized depths which is adequate for current usage. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $3,055,053 of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $1,439,365 for maintenance, and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 46. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification has been postponed. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1970) at $1,150,000, Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, 26 June 1979, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for complete modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must contribute in cash 18 percent of the first cost of the general navigation facilities, comprising extension of the deep-draft channel, such contribution being presently estimated at $18,000 (1970 price level), to be paid in a lumpsum before construction is started and to be subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project modification upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project modification; provide and maintain berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement with depth commensurate with the adjacent Federal project depth; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; and assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. 31-28 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work was initiated to prepare final designs leading to plans and specifications for the small boat harbor at a cost of $8,481. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $13,137. Repair to the breakwater was performed by hired labor at a cost of $57,285. Engineering and design for repair of South Breakwater was performed at a cost of $26,156. An economic study was completed at a cost of $12,378. Supervision and administration cost $7,421. Condition at end offiscal year: Existing project is completed except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification is inactive. Work on the 1968 modification has been postponed. The breakwater, completed in 1910, is in generally fair condition. Dredging a channel through outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Costs of existing project is $654,255 for new work and $5,688,292 for maintenance, a total of $6,342,547. 47. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MICH. AND WIS. Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, and about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361-2 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project: See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000, Federal, and $105,000 non- Federal. Costs of completed new work exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects are $221,053 Federal and $50,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for complete work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by City of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by hired labor at a cost of $11,177. An economic study was completed at a cost of $12,419. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredge spoil was continued by contract at a cost of $71,561. Condition at end offiscal year. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945 was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945 to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, and were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. The north pier is maintained for a length of about 1,202 feet. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 R. & H. Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 Modification was started August 17, 1968 and completed in October 1968. The costs under the existing project to September 30, 1980 were $221,053 for new work, $1,661,- 611 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation, a total of $3,234,516. 48. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago and about 83 31-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 miles west of Grand Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,937,804, Federal and $478,000, non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion of the 1935 River and Harbor Act was placed in the inactive category in June 1973. Estimated costs are $119,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,170,000 (July 1972) non-Federal for this portion. Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14,. 1960, except inactive portion of 1945 act. Act of August 30,1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $28,050. An adjustment of -$4,201 was made in cost for repairs to breakwater, by hired labor, performed last fiscal year. Administration of contract completed last fiscal year for repairs to the North Shore Connector and north breakwater was accomplished at a cost of $7,028. Administration of contract appeals case was performed at a cost of $3,066. Other miscellaneous maintenance work cost $7,766. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. The 1960 modification was completed in November 1962. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30,1935, city of Milwaukee dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area in the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Clybourn Street. Work.on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for inactive portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to the upper limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. Northerly 3,000 feet of north breakwater and the shore connection are in poor condition. The remainder of north breakwater is in generally good condition. South breakwater and shore connections are in generally good condition. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $6,937,804 for new work, $25,783,896 for maintenance, and $1,891,810 for rehabilitation, a total of $34,613,510. 49. MONROE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On lower reach of Raisin River, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and Raisin River to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting 31-30 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated costs of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by government forces at a cost of $74,246. An adjustment of -$43,064 was made in the cost of dredging performed by the Government hopper dredge Hoffman last year. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hoffman performed dredging this fiscal year. Approximately 119,433 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material was removed at a cost of $228,387. The cost is exclusive of financial participation in cost of dredging by industry (obtained as a result of studies on illegal deposits of industrial waste) in the amount of $8,217 from Ford Motor Company. Maintenance of dredged material pumpout facilities and pipeline were performed at a cost of $259,587. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $9,761. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $193,652. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1936, except for riprapping protective dikes on each side of the Bay Channel. Due to combined effect of severe storms and continued high water, dikes have largely disappeared. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $8,242,270 of which $987,340 was for new work (including $300,000) contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe, and $7,254,930 for maintenance (including $166,667 contributed funds-- $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company). 50. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14934.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local-cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1961) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An adjustment of $1,994 was made in cost of placing of sand for beach nourishment (mitigation). Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $39,265. Repairs to the navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $84,244. Two safety access walkways were constructed on the North Revetment by contract at a cost of $213,374. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 8,462 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $21,742. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and 31-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 administration cost $22,689. Surveys, miscellaneous inspections, and placement of sand under Section 111 P.L. 90-483 for shore erosion mitigation was performed at a cost of $288,000. Rehabilitation: The contract for rehabilitation of north pier and revetment Sections I, J, K, L and M was completed at an adjusted cost this fiscal year of -$161,381. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $20,888. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $10,472,946 of which $2,403,702 was for new work, $4,197,118 for maintenance and $3,872,126 for rehabilitation. 51. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MICH. Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, Ill. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas and a private boat club facility. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $58,959. Beach nourishment and channel maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $154,150. A contract in the amount of $784,800 was awarded for furnishing and placing 196,000 tons of sand for beach nourishment. No work was performed this fiscal year. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $23,096. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was performed at a cost of $60,246. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is complete. Total costs at end of fiscal year were $1,790,153 of which $1,285,716 was for new work and $504,437 for maintenance, federal funds, and contributed funds in the amount of $1,186,467. 52. OCONTO HARBOR, WIS. Location. On the west shore of Green Bay, about 31 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, Wis., and about 25 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, Mich. and Wis., at mouth of Oconto River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous project. For details see page 1187 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1187, Annual Report for 1958. See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two municipally owned wharves of 400 and 100 foot frontage, respectively, for miscellaneous freight, open to general public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,542. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1912. Piers were completed in 1885. Dredging channel and turning basin to existing project depth was commenced in July 1911 and completed in May 1912. The north pier was rebuilt as a rubblemound by local interests 31-32 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT in 1967. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1980 were $46,185 for new work and $1,024,820 for maintenance. 53. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICH. Location On south shore of Lake Superior. It consists of improvement of mouth of Ontonagon River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. This portion of project is inactive. (Estimated cost (1965) of this work is $6,040,000 (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorization. See page 1020 of Annual Report for 1965 requirements of 1962 Act. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year.. New Work: A reconnaissance report was completed in October 1975 concerning shoreline erosion along the Ontonagon Township park. A detailed project report was initiated at a cost of $9,150. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $5,884. A contract in the amount of $219,200 was awarded for maintenance dredging. The contract is approximately 40 per cent complete with an estimated 15,496 cubic yards of material removed at a cost of $87,680. Engineering and design on repair to revetment was performed at a cost of $11,128. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $20,632. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work authorized under previous acts was completed in 1938. Work authorized under the 1962 act is in an inactive status. Total costs to end of fiscal year for existing project were $4,333,179 of which $81,531 was for new work and $4,251,648 for maintenance. 54. PENTWATER HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The city and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $5,895. An adjustment of -$21,953 was made in contract cost for dredging last fiscal year. A contract was awarded this fiscal year for maintenance dredging. Approximately 21,129 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $72,824. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $8,182. 31-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200 foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project at end of fiscal year were $2,431,898 of which $179,899 was for new work, and $2,251,999 for maintenance. 55. PINE RIVER (ST. CLAIR COUNTY) MICH. Location. River empties into the St. Clair River at the City of St. Clair, Michigan, about 12 miles southerly from Port Huron, Michigan (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14853.) Previous project. For details see pages 5 and 21, appendix F of Annual Report for 1875 and page 5 of Annual Report for 1876. Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 14 feet deep for a distance of 2,500 feet from the mouth, thence 75 feet wide and 12 feet deep; for a total distance of 5,800 feet. Project was completed in 1899. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Both state and privately owned launching and docking facilities are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A Reconnaissance Report on the project's operation and maintenance expenses was completed at a cost of $16,304. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1899. 56. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MICH. Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100- foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by State of Michigan. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $28,502. The design deficiency study was continued at a cost of $1,666. Engineering for dredging to be accomplished in fiscal year 1981 cost $8,531. Engineering and design on confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $86,228. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed during fiscal year 1974. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $2,969,463 of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $326,878 for maintenance. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was initiated. 57. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Congress, Ist session. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) 31-34 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $16,513. A Reconnaissance Report on the project's operation and maintenance expenses was completed at a cost of $18,677. Repairs to the navigation structures were performed at a cost of $35,576. Maintenance dredging was performed by contract using a hydraulic dredge. An estimated 9,280 cubic yards of shoal material was removed at a cost of $40,499. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $20,043. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. The structures are generally in fair condition. 58. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MICH. Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of Au Sable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge at mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of docks near mouth of Bird Creek and a State-owned dock inside breakwater. Facilities accommodate recreational craft and are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $204. An adjustment of $36,375 was made in contract cost for repair to the cells on breakwater which was completed last year. Supervision and administration cost $6,844. Engineering and design on confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $4,008. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1959. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $2,266,481 of which $1,128,334 was for new work (includes $172,100 contributed funds) and $1,163,114 for maintenance. 59. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MICH. Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater additions. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $3,303. An adjustment of -$24,973 (Federal Funds) and $7,164 (Contributed Funds) was made in contract for maintenance dredging awarded last fiscal year. An adjustment of -$799 (Federal Funds) and $5,461 (Contributed Funds) was made in engineering, supervision and administration cost. A contract in the amount of $109,880 31-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 was awarded for placing of sand for maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483. No work was performed this fiscal year. Engineering and design cost $10,959. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1951 except for latest project modification which was completed in FY 1976. Breakwaters are in good condition. 60. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WIS. Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, 12 June 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The contract for construction of small boat harbor awarded last fiscal year is approximately 98.6 per cent complete at a cost of $2,406,822. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $55,801. Of the above figures $1,375,913 was contributed funds. Maintenance: Condition surveys, economic study, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $14,381. Repair of the breakwater was performed by the above contract at a cost of $233,665. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $53,594. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980 was $5,000,492 of which $3,712,287 was for new work ($602,760 regular funds and $602,995 public works funds), and $1,788,205 for maintenance. 61. PORT WING HARBOR, WIS. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart, an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth, an irregular- shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging of entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $4,000. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project is complete except channel between piers has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation require- 31-36 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ments. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Piers are in good condition. At end of fiscal year controlling depth was 12 feet in lake approach, and 10 feet between piers and in northerly portion of turning basin and 8 feet in easterly inner channel. Lands owned by the United States total 7.80 acres. 62. PRESQUE ISLE, HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior within city limits of Marquette and about 3 miles from Marquette Harbor. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet in inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A Final Detailed Project Report is being prepared under the Section 111 authority to determine if mitigation of shore damage attributable to the existing Federal project is feasible and justified at a cost of $8,213. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $7,001. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project authorized by earlier acts was completed in 1939. A contract for harbor deepening authorized by 1960 act was completed in April 1962 except for a section where rocks were encountered in southeast portion of harbor. Rock removal has been accomplished intermittently by hired labor and the project is completed. Breakwater is in good condition. A reconnaissance report was completed in November 1970 concerning erosion of the beach north of Picnic Rocks and a detailed project report is being prepared. 63. RACINE HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Milwaukee and about 64 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14925.) Previous project. See page 1389 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1235, Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $777,775, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of inner 300 linear feet of pile pier and 450 linear feet of rubblemound originally part of south breakwater but no longer considered necessary. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, 26 June 1979 under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five wharves used for handling coal, limestone, petroleum products, and fish. City provided a public wharf. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were initiated for the small boat harbor at a cost of $66,042. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $1,880. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project substantially completed in 1946. Construction 31-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 of north breakwater and shore connection was completed in November 1918. Removal of old north pier was completed in 1913. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection and removal of old south pier were commenced in June 1916 and completed in December 1924, Removal of outer shoals, widening and deepening channel through outer basin to existing project depth and width, and dredging river channel began in July and completed in November 1946. Concrete superstructure on portions of north breakwater and shore connections and timber substructures of portions of north and south breakwaters and south stub pier are disintegrating and are being repaired. 64. ROUGE RIVER, MICH. Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, Mich., 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by act of July 3, 1958 is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminalfacilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1961) prepared and published as Part 2 by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port steamship services is prepared and published as Part 1 by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $94,282. An adjustment of -$51,592 was made in cost of maintenance dredging performed by the U.S. Hopper Dredge Lyman last fiscal year. The Lyman performed maintenance dredging this fiscal year. Approximately 117,997 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material was removed at a cost of $485,687. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $144,239. Engineering, design, supervision and administration of all the above work cost $35,948. An adjustment of -$42,743 was made in contract for construction of diked disposal area Phase I. The contract for construction of Phase II awarded in fiscal year 1978 is approximately 74 per cent complete. Cost this fiscal year was $3,850,000. Engineering, supervision and administration of diked disposal program cost $152,693. 31-38 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $23,579,222 of which $675,251 was for new work and $22,903,971 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended for new work from Emergency Relief Act Funds. 65. SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27- foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide about 0.4 mile; thence 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long;' one 20 feet deep just downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1961) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as part 1 by Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Control Center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $280,163. The U.S. Hopper Dredges Hains, Lyman and Markham performed maintenance dredging removing 173,121, 19,895 and 698,350 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $587,693, $57,772 and $791,283, respectively. The cost is exclusive of financial participation in cost of dredging by industry (obtained as a result of studies on illegal deposits of industrial waste) in the amount of $41,947. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $40,853. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration of all above work cost $49,409. An adjustment of - $182,124 was made in contract awarded in 1976 for construction of diked disposal area. The contract awarded for emergency dike repair was completed at a cost of $506,824. Engineering and design was accomplished for construction of a disposal area for upper Saginaw River at a cost of $14,353. Engineering, design, supervision arid administration of diked disposal program cost $141,446. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete, except for a small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total costs for existing project to the end of fiscal year were $51,157,239 of which $13,954,660 was for new work and $31,202,579 was for maintenance. 66. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MICH. 31-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair, 576.8 and 571.7 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec; International Great Lakes Datum 1955. (See Table 31-B and 31-C for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of 24 July 1946 provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel. Estimated cost (1971) is $600,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminalfacilities. This improvement serves through commerce between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, Mich., which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of NCD Water Control Center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $162,254. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 22,076 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $101,204. Maintenance of disposal area at Harsen's Island was performed at a cost of $41,399. Location of obstructions was performed at a cost of $106,831. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $17,292. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Total cost of existing project to end of fiscal year was $27,411,517 of which $19,213,146 was for new work and $8,198,271 for maintenance. 67. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, Ill., and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88th Congress declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: An adjustment of -$798 was made in cost of beach nourishment (mitigation). Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $41,718. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains performed maintenance dredging removing 92,348 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a 31-40 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT cost of $32,794. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $98,651. Engineering, design, supervision and administration of all above work cost $39,640. Maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 of P.L. 90- 483 was performed by the U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains at a cost of $354,545. (Part of this cost was for rental of earthmoving and miscellaneous equipment). Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration of Section 111 work cost $22,566. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $62,021. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs of existing project to end of fiscal year were $9,208,178 of which $1,301,373 was for new work, $6,944,589 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 68. ST. MARYS RIVER, MICH. Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Province of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5- foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Original State locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18, 1919, to end of fiscal year 1935. Poe Lock in 1962. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 31-D. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 600 feet and at upstream side of locks is 577.8 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Estimated (1973) cost for new work is $164,630. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and Village of Detour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation, maintenance and care of Lock: Two canals and four locks were operated as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canal was open to navigation 289 days from 1 October 1979 through 30 September 1980. During that period, a total of 11,919 vessels, aggregating 104,736,118 short tons of freight and 153,703 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe, Davis and Sabin Locks. Cost for operation, maintenance and care of locks for the fiscal year was $4,852,584. Powerhouse and equipment: Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained. Cost that was done by hired labor during the fiscal year was $494,671, less a deduction of-$27,479 for interdepartmental elec- 31-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 tricity sold. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were maintained, condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $246,378. Security measures were performed by contract at a cost of $336,091. An ice boom was installed at a cost of $49,640. An engineering study on compensating works was performed at a cost of $135,029. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approaches were examined by sweeping. Removal of shoals in St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor and U.S. Derrickboats Nicolet and Harvey at a cost of $932,396. Recreational facilities: Information Center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platform were operated and maintained at a cost of $131,334. A total of 735,140 visitors used the observation and overlook platform and the Information Center facilities during the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project in effect prior to modification of 21 March 1956 is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Funds used for new work was $158,401; and Public Works Accleration Funds used for maintenance was $118,000. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $160,135,124 for new work and $122,374,080 for maintenance, for a grand total of $276,616,078. 69. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MICH. Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to city of Saugatuck. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456, 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At village of Saugatuck there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, detailed hydrographic surveys, establishment of baselines and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $57,215. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1911. Total costs for existing project to end of fiscal year were $2,605,552 of which $364,527 was for new work and $2,241,025 for maintenance. 70. SAXON HARBOR, WIS. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of harbor at Bayfield, Wis., and 21 miles westerly of harbor at Black River, Mich. It is also 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see page 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long 31-42 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT on east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,588. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed at a cost of $3,285. Supervision and administration cost $2,127. Condition at end of fiscal year. Harbor improvements were completed in November 1965 except for minor work. The project was fully completed in March 1968. Controlling depths are 9 feet in lake approach, 9 feet in channel between piers, and 7 feet in inner basin and side channel. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. A detailed project report is being prepared to develop an acceptable plan for mitigation measures. 71. SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other lightdraft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $20,445. A contract was awarded in the amount of $465,000 for maintenance dredging. The contract is approximately 61 per cent complete. An estimate of 54,493 cubic yards was removed by contract at a cost of $300,000. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $40,034. An adjustment of -$2,627 was made in contract amount for construction of diked disposal area completed last fiscal year. Supervision and administration, preparation of 0 & M Manuals cost $7,331. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $2,117,600 of which $35,573 was for new work and $2,082,027 for maintenance. 72. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230, Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $7,440. Repair to navigation structures was performed at a cost of $31,676. An economic study was completed at a cost of $12,378. Supervision and administration cost $7,584. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal area for polluted dredging was continued at a cost of $67,224. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and 31-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 completed in October 1915. Dredging turning basin was commenced in October 1928 and completed in September 1931. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16,1931, by Secretary of War. Pier is therefore maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1980 were $648,271 for new work, $2,692,975 for maintenance and $609,028 for rehabilitation, a total of $3,950,274. 73. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, woodpulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation features and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $10,179. An adjustment of -$6,026 was made in contract for an environmental study. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14 foot and 12 foot depths respectively in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized, which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to the end of fiscal year were $5,459,126 of which $797,193 was for new work, $2,699,857 for maintenance, and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 74. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous projects. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminalfacilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf. There is also a large inactive stone wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,790. An economic 31-44 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT study was completed at a cost of $12,378. Engineering and design for construction of confined disposal area for polluted dredge spoil was continued at a cost of $25,865. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1946. Breakwaters were completed in 1880, and canal revetments in 1903. Dredging and rock removal at east entrance to canal and dredging in west section of canal to existing project depth were commenced in May and completed in September 1940. Deepening and widening middle section of canal to existing project depth and width was commenced in May and completed in August 1942. Dredging turning basin was commenced in June and completed in July 1946. Breakwaters are in good condition. North revetment and section of south revetment have been rehabilitated and are in good condition. Remainder of south revetment is in fair to poor condition and required repair. Costs to September 30, 1980 for existing project were $736,303 for new work, $6,129,963 for maintenance, and $884,899 for rehabilitation, a total of $7,751,171. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 75. TWO HARBORS, MINN. Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, Minn. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 local cooperation agreement was entered into with the city of Two Harbors on 14 August 1978. Terminalfacilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed with harbor excavation contract costs totaling $157,614. Final costs are outstanding. Engineering and design costs during this period of construction were $2,206. Administrative costs were $13,239 Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $4,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized prior to 1960 act was completed in 1950. The timber superstructure of the east breakwater above low water depths badly deteriorated since its original construction in 1948 and severely damaged in a NE storm on December 12, 1968 has been repaired. A contract for replacing the timber superstructure with a concrete cap and repairing the public-use walkway was completed in 1972. Most of the authorized dredging was completed in 1962. Construction was completed in August 1980 for rock removal in areas along the easterly and northerly edges of the harbor. 76. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WIS. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463 exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion 31-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $14,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $3,555. Repairs to the navigation structures were performed at a cost of $87,657. A contract in the amount of $1,190,800 was awarded for maintenance dredging. The contract is approximately 16 per cent complete at a cost of $192,000. An estimated 15,900 cubic yards of shoal material was removed by a mechanical type (dragline) dredge. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $92,990. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing pro-- ject is complete except for inactive portion of project which consists of dredging a 10-foot width along each side of lakeward portion of entrance channel between the piers. This dredging was omitted to avoid removal of necessary riprap along entrance piers. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North pier was completed in 1908. North revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Maintenance dredging was performed removing 184,000 cubic yards of material. East and West Twin Rivers are navigable for about 3 and 7 miles, respectively, from the harbor piers for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Costs to September 30, 1980 for existing project were $147,463 for new work and $5,039,854 for maintenance, a total of $5,187,317. In addition, $58,057 was expended for minor rehabilitation. 77. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, Ill., and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel. Channel is 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1950 feet long, and extends from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminalfacilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on north side of lake about 3 miles from inner end of revetted entrancce channel. Across lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for beach nourishment were completed in FY 79 but no bids were received when advertised. Revision to plans and specifications during FY 80 cost $67,014. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $5,551. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in fiscal year 1972. The structures are in generally good condition except sections B, C & D of the south pier. Project now being maintained to 14 foot and 12 foot depths respectively in lieu of the 16 foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost to end of fiscal year is $1,979,869 of which $317,406 was for new work and $1,662,- 463 was for maintenance. 78. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MICH. Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 40 miles northwesterly from Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., and 53 miles easterly from Grand Marais, Mich. (See Great Lakes Chart 14962.) 31-46 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by two breakwater structures and for dredging a harbor basin and entrance channel, 12 feet deep. The addition of a 270-foot wave absorbing breakwater inside the harbor was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 17, 1967 to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned fishing wharf and a small-boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,058. The U.S. Cranebarge Markus performed maintenance dredging removing 9,830 cubic yards at a cost of $33,914. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $5,208. Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1960. The interior breakwater and repairs to the shore connection were accomplished by contract during fiscal year 1969. Remaining structures are in generally good condition. Total cost of existing project was $971,871, of which $771,639 was for new work and $200,232 was for maintenance. 79. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 31-F. 80. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 31-G. 81. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Studies during the fiscal year were conducted for the following harbors: Detour Harbor, Michigan $69,064, Harrisville Harbor, Michigan $39,777 and Huron River, Michigan $12,748. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 82. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Beach erosion control projects are authorized at Berrien County Shore (St. Joseph) Michigan and the Shore of Manitowoc County, Wis. For last full report see Annual Report for 1963 (Berrien County). 83. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and nonprofit public services. (Section 14 Flood control Act of 1946, as amended). Emmet County, Lake Michigan, Michigan - A contract was awarded and completed in FY 78 for placing stone and filter for protection of Beach Drive near Harbor Springs, Mich. In FY 80 the contract closeout cost was $465. Gladstone, Michigan - A contract was awarded in FY 78 and completed in FY 79 for bank protection at Highway U.S. 2, U.S. 41 and M-35. In FY 80 contract closeout cost was $1,302. Menominee, Michigan - A contract for bank protection at Highway M-35 at Menominee County was awarded and completed in FY 78. In FY 80 contract closeout cost was $808. Meridian Township - Preparation of plans and specifications was continued in FY 80 for emergency protection to the eroding shoreline of the Red Cedar River along the Riverview Cemetary and Sanitary Lift Station Properties. Total FY 80 expenditures were $40,343. Michiana, Michigan - A contract was awarded in FY 78 and completed in FY 79 for bank protection of Sites I and II. In FY 80 contract 31-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 closeout cost was $189. Muskegon Heights, Michigan - A contract was awarded and completed in FY 78 for emergency protection of water intake structure. In FY 80 contract closeout cost was $504. Thunder Bay (Alpena, Michigan) - A contract awarded in FY 79 for emergency protection to the shoreline at the Alpena Home for the Elderly was completed during FY 80. Total FY 80 expenditures were $38,202. Differing site conditions caused design to be inadequate requiring additional Federal funds. These funds are presently being acquired from Congress. 84. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. During the fiscal year studies were conducted for the following harbors: Ontonagon, Harbor, Michigan $9,150 and Escanaba Harbor, Michigan $10,110. Flood Control 85. RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MICH. Location. The Clinton River basin has an area of 760 square miles and includes parts of Macomb, Oakland, St. Clair and Lapeer Counties in the Southeastern portion of the lower peninsula of Michigan. The project itself is located in the southeastern section of the basin. Existing project. Provides for abandonment of the upper 2 miles of the Red Run Drain in Oakland County and for enlarging and paving the Red Run Drain from Dequindre Road on the west downstream to the Main Branch, Clinton River, a distance of approximately 8 2 miles. Bottom widths of the channel would vary from 70 to 240 feet. The Main Branch, Clinton River would be widened, deepened and straightened for a distance of about 4', miles. The channel width would vary from 180 to 200 feet and adjacent lands would be maintained as a floodway with a width of 500 feet. The authorized plan provides for a rectangular concrete-lined channel below this point, varying in width from 180 to 210 feet, to the existing Clinton River Cut-Off Canal, a distance of about 2 miles. The Cut-Off Canal would consist of a rectangular channel with concrete bottom 210 feet wide and steel sheet pile walls in the upper 1% miles and a trapezoidal concrete-lined channel with a 170- foot bottom width and 75-foot wide benches placed on each bank over the lower mile of the Canal to Lake St. Clair. The authorized plan would provide protection for surrounding urban areas against rainfall and flood having a 1.0 percent chance of occurrence under anticipated urbanized basin conditions in the year 2000. The cost estimate for new work (Oct 1980) is $117,000,- 000 excluding $24,075,000 to be contributed by local interests. Estimate of cost to local interests (Oct 1980) is $41,500,000. Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction of the channel improvements; presently estimated at (Oct 1980) $8,235,000 for Red Run Drain and (Oct 1980) $30,875,000 for Lower Clinton River; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; contribute in cash a sum presently estimated at (Oct 1980) $23,050,- 000, which, together with items applicable to Red Run Drain to be furnished in above, would constitute 50 percent of all flood control costs for Red Run Drain; prevent or restrict development in the project area by providing easements or by establishing and enforcing flood plain regulations where such development would result in the increase of damageable property in the flood plain or would necessitate modifications, or reduce the efficiency of, the project; prevent encroachment on the project channels and ponding areas which would decrease the effectiveness of the improvements, and, if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly provide substitute capacities to restore the effectiveness of the project channels by establishing and enforcing water quality standards commensurate with 31-48 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT Federal, State, and local standards; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and operation of any pollution abatement structures constructed by local interests on Red Run Drain in Oakland County; to bring the non-Federal share of costs to at least 50 percent of the total costs of recreation development, which may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed upon portion of the development, a cash contribution, or a combination of both; operate and maintain the recreation facilities for the life of the project; and provide access to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $484,208. 86. RIVER ROUGE, MICH. Location. River Rouge basin is in the southeastern corner of the lower peninsula of the State of Michigan, within Wayne, Oakland and Washtenaw Counties. Basin is fan shaped and extends about 24 miles from north to south and about 33 miles from east to west. Total area comprises about 464 square miles. (See Geological Survey, Detroit quadrangle.) Existing project. Provides for flood protection along main stem of Rouge River from navigation turning basin to Michigan Avenue consisting of channel enlargement and straightening and alteration or replacement of existing bridges. Channel work includes deepening, widening, straightening, and paving existing river channel for about 30,300 feet along existing channel. Realigned channel will have a length of 22,100 feet. Channel depths under design discharge conditions vary from about 25 feet at navigation turning basin to about 20 feet at Michigan Avenue. Bridge work involves construction of one new railroad bridge and alteration of two railroad bridges at Federal expense and construction and alteration of highway bridges at local interest expense. Project is designed to provide protection for a peak-flood discharge of about 24,000 cubic feet per second. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $16,955. Condition at end of the fiscal year. The existing project is complete. 87. SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. Location. Saginaw River basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel. (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) for construction of $1,448,000 for Middle and South Branches; provided local interests contribute in cash 42 percent of first cost of major drainage project on Middle Branch, and 38 percent of first cost of major drainage project on South Branch, exclusive of cost of rights-of-way and other work required as local cooperation, and give assurances satisfactory to Secretary of the Army they will construct and maintain local drainage work required to fully and effectively utilize improvements to be provided under the Federal projects; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction, floodwalls, modification of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (October 1980) of $7,340,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks, 31-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1980) of $17,774,200 for construction; provided local interest contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of costs of rights-of-ways and other work required as local cooperation; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $48,000 for construction; provided local interests modify spillway of mill dam at Corunna at their own expense, substantially in accordance with plan of District Engineer and subject to approval of Chief of Engineers, or in lieu thereof, contribute to the United States actual cost of modification to be performed by the United States; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $425,000 for construction; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1980) of $5,885,000 for implementation; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1979 of $50,794,900 for new work, of which $47,154,900 is allocated to flood control and $3,640,000 to fish and wildlife purposes; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-ofway for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting works for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood-waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion 1980 is $76,900,000 including $3,640,000 Fish and Wildlife costs and $1,985,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1980) to local interests is $11,285,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completions; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States 23 November 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished 20 February 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on 8 September 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council has, by resolution, indicated its intent to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Midland Flood Control Project. The Vassar City Council in 1976 indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Midland: The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum on the flood control project at Midland was completed in June 1980 at a cost of $14,500. The Division Engineer forwarded the report to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors for review. Shiawassee: A Draft Phase I General Design Memorandum on the project was prepared during the summer of 1980. However, at the request of local interests and interested Congressman the report is now undergoing revision to address the economic feasibility of lower levels of protection. Total cost for Shiawassee for new work is $242,500. Flint: The contract for construction of C2 and sediment removal of Section A, B, and C1 was completed at a cost of $280,528. Engineering and 31-50 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT design during construction cost $28,816. Supervision and administration cost $33,228. Vassar: The Plan of Study was prepared, submitted to North Central Division, and approved. The Preliminary Draft Phase I General Design Memorandum was initiated. Total cost for new work for Vassar this fiscal year is $80,800. Condition at end offiscal year. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. 88. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, Michigan, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $4,891. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1948 except for removal of the remaining portion of old dike located on the south side of the channel lakeward from the railroad bridge. 89. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The listed projects were inspected during this period. Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, Michigan; Kawkawlin, Kawkawlin River, Michigan; Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, Michigan; Flint, Flint River, Michigan; Frankenmuth, Cass River, Michigan; Mount Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal, Clinton River, Michigan; Red Run, Clinton, River, Michigan; East Rockwood; Silver Creek, Michigan; Estral Beach, Lake Erie, Michigan; Fort Wayne Mechanic St. Dike, St. Marys River, Indiana; Burr Oak, Prairie River, Michigan. Fiscal year costs were $90,364. Total costs to end of fiscal year were $550,248. 90. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 31-H. 91. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities. Flood Fighting (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation). On 14 April 1980, Northeast winds of 40 knots with waves about 8 feet caused substantial increases in Western Lake Erie water levels flooding several low lying areas along the shoreline. Seven (7) Corps personnel were dispatched for technical assistance. No Federal Disaster was declared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), but the Small Business Administration (SBA) did make loans available to private owners and businessess. Considerable local interest surfaced since the 14 April storm. The facilities provided under "Operation Foresight" during 1973-74 are in various states of repair and 31-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 technical assistance has been requested to determine suitability. On 29 September 1980, the Grand Haven Projects Office advised the Emergency Operations Manager (EOM) that a dam failure had been reported at Bedford Township (Calhoun Co.) Michigan. State Police were contacted and an engineer dispatched. Emergency assistance was not required since the stream had already returned to the banks. The failure generated much interest since the dam had been inspected under the National Dam Safety Program and declared unsafe. The failure had occurred in almost the exact manner predicted. Other Emergency Work for FEMA under P.L. 288. On 12 September 1980, the District was verbally advised that a disaster had been declared on 8 September 1980 for windstorms that had occurred on 16 July 1980 in ten (10) southern Michigan counties. Also verbally, a mission assignment was received from FEMA. Nine (9) engineers were assigned to prepare Damage Survey Reports. Following a 15 September orientation meeting, necessary reports were compiled and completed by 3 October. There were 125 project applicants; they were approved for a total amount of $6,788,613. Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Flood Control act of 1948, as amended. During the fiscal year studies were conducted at Flint Twp., Michigan $89,170 and Paw Paw, Michigan $9,948. 92. SURVELLIANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS Field operations. The following field operations were conducted during the current period: surface current (drogue) and velocity and current directional studies, discharge measurements, and the installation of three water level gages on the Detroit River. These operations were carried out in support of the development/calibration of Detroit District mathematical models. During the winter months, the District observes the presence of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers as an ongoing mission. The District monitors key telemetric water level gages (telemark) in these rivers for continuous updating of the hydrograph for possible detection of ice jams and associated potential for flooding to provide advance warning to area residents and other governmental agencies (in support of respective Flood Alert Plan). International Activities. The following activities were conducted specifically for the international Joint Commission (IJC) Boards and Committees: Members of the Detroit District staff attended the semi-annual appearances of the International Great Lakes Boards before the Commission, in Washington and Ottawa. a. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative for the Board of Control. In support of the U.S. Section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes; rendering outflows under Plan 1977. Plan 1977 replaced the 1955 Modified Rule of 1949, as the present approved plan of regulation for Lake Superior, in October 1979. A report describing Plan 1977 and an operational guide to Plan 1977 are being drafted by the Detroit District for the Board of Control. The Board reviewed material related to Phase II construction of Great Lakes Power Company redevelopment. An action plan was developed, in the event that water quality standards are exceeded. The present water quality plan was reviewed. In October 1979, a predischarge plan was instituted to lower the level of Lake Superior by an amount equal to the discharge that will be lost when the Canadian power canal is closed under Stage II of Great Lakes Power redevelopment. This plan was carried out through the period, with a brief suspension of the plan during the summer months due to low supplies to the Lake Superior basin. b. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. A member of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology staff, appointed to the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Under the auspices of 51-52 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT the Working Committee, the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch of the Detroit District and Water Survey of Canada reviewed and evaluated the adequacy of the 1964 Ashland Avenue Gauge Rating Equation, and developed alternate gauge rating equations which would better define the outflows from the Maid-of-the- Mist Pool. The resulting report was published in August 1980 and presented to the Working Committee. An economic evaluation of the alternatives is presently being considered, prior to the Working Committee making its recommendation to the Board. c. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, supported the Buffalo District in its activities. d. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The Detroit District Engineer is Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Personnel from the District hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittees, and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. In support of the Board and Working Committee, staff of the Detroit District are presently assisting in the detailed evaluation of eleven diversion management scenarios, five of which have been completed, and are evaluating the effects of projected increases in the consumptive uses of Great Lakes water on lake levels. Sections of the Study's main report are being drafted and others are being finalized. The Diversions Subcommittee is drafting an Annex to the main report which relates to their study work. Staff members participated in six public workshops, held throughout the basin by the Working Committee, and assisted in the publication of four newsletters pertaining to the study's activities. Members of the District also prepared for the Board's briefing of study' activities, issues and problems to the IJC. e. International Lake Erie Regulation Study Board. Chief, Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Regulation Subcommittee. Staff members also provided input to the other subcommittees. During the year, Branch personnel assisted in the development and completion of study regulation plans. Detailed evaluation of three of these plans has essentially been completed. Sections for the main report have been drafted. The Regulation Subcommittee's Appendix to the Study's main report is currently being drafted. Branch members prepared for the Study Board's briefing to the IJC, scheduled for October of FY 81. f. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is Chairman of the U.S. Section of this new Board. Established on 19 November 1979, the Board was directed to undertake studies and investigations of the meteorlogic and hydraulic data networks in the Great Lakes area, that are required or may be required by Boards of the IJC, in order to design necessary improvements and monitor the operation of the system. The Board's Plan of Study was approved by the Commission in August 1980. Work proceeded on the development of the Board subcommittees, their terms of reference and membership. These subcommittees will be separated by discipline, one group dealing with the hydrologic aspects of the basin, a second with the hydraulics of the system and a third group will deal with systems integration and the benefits which may be derived from an improved network. Plans were made to draft a letter to the IJC Boards and to selected government agencies requesting information on their present and future hydrometeorological data needs. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basin Hydraulics and Hydrologic Data. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch of the District provided ex-officio membership on this committee and its subcommittees. Operations continued, pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. Branch personnel completed the report "Establishment of International Great Lakes Datum, 1955, Second Edition." Work continued on other Committee reports, among which is a report that documents the procedures used to determine St. Clair River and Detroit River flows for the period 1900-1978. Another report being worked on in the Branch documents the discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes, Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1900-1978. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investi- 31-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 gations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e. runoff, precipitation over water, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch staff members. Branch personnel are serving as technical advisors during the review of four navigation season extension physical model studies contracted to a panel of ice experts at the end of FY 79. The panel has completed an initial review and evaluation of the model studies. At the end of FY 80, a preliminary report was submitted to the Branch. The final report is due on 1 November 1980. Hydromet. This Work Group was formed in December 1975 to investigate and report on alternatives for developing a hydrometeorological data system in the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes Basin to enhance the Corps' Water Control Management Operations and to supply information as needed by others having water resources responsibilities. The Work Group had its last meeting in February 1980 to finalize its report, "Hydromet Forecast System for the Great Lakes." The finished report was given to the new International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board to provide a groundwork for the Board's studies. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Branch provided technical information and expertise regarding lake levels and long-range still water forecasts to many interested parties such as: Congressmen, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, and concerned property owners. Explanation of the water levels was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with news media. The publication of an International (U.S. and Canada) Forecast of Great Lakes Water Levels, under the auspices of the Coordinating Committee on Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data, was continued during the period. In support of these forecasts, and to assist in lake regulation, funds have been provided to the Department of Commerce for maintenance of eleven telemetric water level gages (Telemeter) at selected sites throughout the Great Lakes to obtain more real-time data. 93. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,161,422 for navigation studies, and $724,857 for flood control studies. A special study, which continued during the fiscal year was the Great Lakes water levels study $174,133. Coordination studies with other agencies totaled $230,867. They include soil conservation coordination studies $2,957; River Basin Commission, $10,358; National Wildlife and Scenic Rivers systems, $2,981; Water Quality Management (Section 208) $5,612; Coastal Zone Management $26,075 and coordination studies with states (Section 22) $102,508 and technical assistance for erosion (Section 55) $7,524. 94. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA A draft report for the Lansing Flood Preparedness Plan was submitted to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for review in July 1980. The Clinton River Forks study was completed and transmitted to Michigan DNR for their use in the administration of the state's floodplain regulation of filling within the forks area. Phase II lake level studies for Grand Traverse Bay and Little Traverse Bay were completed in FY 80. A Phase II lake level study for Anchor Bay was initiated in FY 80 and should be completed early in FY 81. The District's commitment to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study Program continued to receive a major portion of our hydrologic and hydraulic effort. Two studies were completed and work continued on twelve studies which were initiated in FY 79. These twelve studies are scheduled to be completed in FY 81. A special hydrologic study to develop a regional flood frequency study for the Saginaw River Basin was initiated in FY 80 and will be completed in FY 81. 31-54 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Total Cost to Total Cost to September 30, 1980 1. Alpena Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. 21,079 Cost 21,079 Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 2. Arcadia Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 35,591 Cost 35,590 3. Ashland Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 176,514 Cost 177,554 4. Beaver Bay, New Work Minn. Approp. 25,000 Cost 23,908 5. Belle River, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Big Bay Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. 46,600 Cost 46,666 7. Black River, New Work Mich. (U.P.) Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. 10,720 Cost 9,944 8. Black River Harbor, New Work Mich. (Port Huron) Approp. -10,379 Cost -10,379 Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -6,079 10,379 6,570 6,570 1,646 1,646 7,287 -1,538 7,287 -1,538 - 20,500 - 9,680 67,000 58,000 67,001 57,969 9,000 19,820 53,000 53,031 65,000 - - 52,527 36,000 5,000 37,000 36,000 5,000 37,000 10,000 - 25,000 9,873 1,162 24,875 2,418 26,098 2,418 6,267 - 22,000 - 9,307 73,000 46,000 72,396 41,379 90,000 37,000 90,949 31,171 9,565 26,812 9,560 14,092 31-55 -1,694 18,137 10,000 15,097 39,000 41,649 38,000 43,832 10,612 23,337 See Section in Text Project 337,3941 337,3941 344,367 344,366 57,524 57,524 509,048 509,048 1,760,645 1,748,172 1,500,796 1,500,796 223,000 222,807 24,301 24,301 36,566 36,566 372,4332 364,8372 900,610 898,574 383,350 383,350 479,226 479,225 480,2443 480,2443 349,921 349,921 478,9504 478,9504 __ DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 9. Bolles Harbor, Mich. 10. Caseville Harbor, Mich. 11. Cedar River Harbor, Mich. 12. Charlevoix Harbor, Mich. 13. Cheyboygan Harbor, Mich. 14. Clinton River, Mich. 15. Cornucopia Harbor, Wis. 16. Cross Village, Mich. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 14,266 537,252 Cost 14,266 518,548 Diked Disposal 772,800 334,000 Approp. 622,629 484,168 Cost New Work Approp. - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 45,570 476,000 Cost 45,569 474,953 Diked Disposal Approp. - 19,000 Cost - 18,924 New Work Approp. - Cost - - New Work Approp. - 60,000 Cost - 59,981 Maint. Approp. 83,000 31,000 Cost 83,000 30,835 Rehab. Approp. - - Cost - - New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 76 9,906 Cost 76 9,906 New Work Approp. - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 29,961 1,630 Cost 29,961 1,434 Diked Disposal Approp. 23,000 10,000 Cost 22,966 6,517 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 1,000 81,000 Cost 700 81,300 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - 8,000 145,000 26,644 143,619 5,000 -78,000 4,999 77,994 10,000 151,000 11,048 38,199 10,000 - 10,076 - 100,000 100,000 99,997 94,251 26,000 - 26,019 77,000 67,000 73,819 67,223 13,000 11,000 7,000 7,000 172,161 -16,534 172,320 -16,566 16,500 11,000 18,691 11,443 67,600 5,000 67,600 5,000 70,000 79,000 69,998 77,994 31-56 426,4135 426,4135 727,933 726,490 1,190,550 1,190,550 587,3146 587,3146 749,664 636,863 31,206 31,206 200,000 194,248 180,623 180,623 2,002,700 1,999,577 1,129,396 1,129,396 504,236 504,236 471,947 469,947 549,7987 549,7987 920,889 920,820 175,200 174,312 462,653 462,653 490,307 490,307 149,000 147,992 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Total Cost to September 30, 1980 17. Detour Harbor, Mich. Contributed Funds 18. Detroit River, Mich. 19. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. 20. Fox River, Wisc. 21. Frankfort Harbor, Mich. 22. Grand Haven Harbor, Mich. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal "Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 2,000 1,907 70,000 25,000 100,000 70,029 24,877 69,065 500,000 34551 345,510 314,387 500,000 76,877,3578 76,877,3578 1,270,000 1,722,600 3,584,200 11,390,800 29,825,578 1,269,496 1,724,252 3,555,331 11,381,618 29,804,727 2,974,300 3,214,100 10,697,600 11,832,000 3,809,079 3,214,327 10,701,152 11,815,315 32,413,994 32,396;057 16,109,2589 16,109,1589 1,603,400 2,240,100 2,215,900 2,151,000 21,731,170 1,358,814 2,498,637 2,199,690 2,161,465 21,716,97310 206,000 265,000 881,000 -99,000 1,558,149 208,486 164,715 754,755 127,584 1,558,147 1,201,800 1,706,400 2,700,000 1,194,031 1,595,316 2,814,731 1,735,100 1,751,963 3,753,33411 3,753,33411 28,053,67312 28,048,67912 1,955,15913 1,955,15913 194,000 180,000 1,507,000 360,000 4,238,397 185,816 182,932 1,502,218 367,146 4,235,507 - - - - 274,776 - - - - 274,776 110,000 21,500 77,700 81,000 101,321 29,869 77,867 80,855 357,500 357,210 175,000 - 1,458,46914 174,909 91 1,458,469 268,000 199,000 543,000 481,000 11,094,29316 298,903 198,674 543,424 474,240 11,087,501 '5 - - - - 813,613 S- 813,613 31-57 See Section in Text Project __ DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 Section 111 23. Grand Marais Harbor, Mich. 24. Grand Marais Harbor, Minn. 25. Grand Traverse, Mich. 26. Green Bay Harbor, Wis. 27. Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich. 28. Harrisville Harbor, Mich. Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 5,000 5,000 -3,000 -3,005 2,000 2,000 124,000 124,000 - - 31,000 35,000 - - 26,857 38,746 130,000 102,000 225,000 7,000 129,999 101,998 224,439 7,564 1,818 74,000 19,500 2,118 74,000 19,080 - 490,000 - 28,980 491,154 - 2,000 2,420 23,000 3,000 15,841 4,983 81,000 83,044 88,000 79,000 46,000 87,637 79,019 46,448 - 110,000 40,000 - 104,788 28,043 565,000 415,000 1,385,000 445,000 565,604 410,000 1,389,452 435,343 201,000 2,696,600 2,532,000 30,000 196,002 2,508,265 2,722,338 19,094 14,634 14,633 75,000 72,968 22,323 21,000 1,683,000 22,138 21,185 1,682,999 89,000 9,000 80,459 9,569 8,379 100,000 10,000 40,000 8,297 99,564 10,517 39,777 31-58 780,400 780,400 124,000 124,000 1,056,268 1,055,871 1,659,305 1,659,305 450,972 450,972 542,341 542,341 1,230,000 1,230,000 223,771 218,595 1,121,483 1,121,483 9,881,39516 17 9,864,22616 17 8,406,71318 8,396,50718 5,804,807 5,790,901 1,200,598 1,200,598 4,329,190 4,329,188 194,504 194,504 243,100 243,100 1,602,638 1,602,414 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Total Cost to September 30, 1980 Maint. Approp. Cost 29. Holland Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Section 111 Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 30. Inland Route, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 31. Kenosha Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 32. Kewaunee New Work Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 33. Keweenaw New Work Waterway, Mich. Approp. Cost 332,687 51,696 102,000 332,686 51,693 101,555 172,000 449,000 - 56,899 564,094 -7 8,000 8,445 185,000 185,000 723,000 665,000 229,918 184,890 723,165 657,625 83,000 19,000 - - 83,000 19,000 1,075,000 331,000 21,000 -12,000 1,075,010 336,003 19,313 -10,311 131,000 75,000 47,000 92,000 131,189 72,493 46,998 94,385 81,000 23,000 23,000 30,000 76,828 25,799 24,551 28,778 235,000 75,000 95,000 79,000 236,120 75,137 95,000 78,999 15,000 - - - 16,023 - - - 71,000 145,000 71,000 71,001 145,000 71,000 - 40,300 40,554 17,000 33,000 16,964 33,036 70,000 61,792 31-59 600,523 600,519 1,392,84119 20 1,392,84119 20 5,880,132 5,872,689 102,000 102,000 502,452 502,452 1,663,300 1,663,300 918,22221 918,222 1,161,488 1,161,364 177,300 176,055 846,96922 23 846,9692223 1,856,37724 1,856,37524 1,270,275 1,270,275 4,378,600 4,378,600 752,33326 752,33325 1,722,94126 617,300 617,300 411,461 403,253 5,967,141 5,967,141 I - DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 34. Knife River Harbor, Minn. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 1,462 Cost 1,462 35. Lac La Belle New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 100 36. La Pointe Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 41,000 Cost 40,800 37. Lake St. Clair, New Work Mich., Channels Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 170,500 Cost 170,601 Diked Disposal Approp. 47,000 Cost 48,621 38. Leland Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. - Cost 471,700 277,000 27,000 132,000 278,547 470,366 20,100 133,888 1,200 - - 20,000 1,232 - - 18,300 791 6,241 18,100 791 6,241 18,100 5,000 43,000 -2,653 5,299 42,555 -2,207 7,574 5,400 7,574 5,400 1,200 162 695,000 59,000 662,00 688,197 65,500 660,187 -1,000 -5,000 -1,000 -5,500 1,000 681 Maint. Approp. 98,514 87,003 92,000 103,000 Cost 98,493 86,866 92,092 100,270 Rehab. Approp. - - - - Cost - 39. Les Cheneaux, New Work Islands Channels, Approp. - - - - Mich. Cost - - - - Diked Disposal Approp. 78,000 10,000 53,500 67,000 Cost 74,718 11,792 45,128 71,951 Maint. Approp. 12,324 2,694 1,553 35,208 Cost 12,324 2,694 1,553 35,208 40. Lexington Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. -150,000 -38,859 - 389,000 Cost -192,143 737 2,009 179,843 31-60 8,837,68427 8,832,18827 352,945 351,145 216,378 216,378 269,270 269,270 182,641 182,641 130,874 130,874 61,741 60,703 7,675,35728 7,675,35728 4,713,08429 4,710,84529 5,118,800 5,118,479 1,027,08930 1,027,08930 809,445 806,652 70,678 70,678 399,47831 399,47831 231,100 226,188 57,203 57,203 2,050,304 1,840,609 J REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Total Cost to September 30, 1980 Contributed Funds 41. Little Lake Harbor, Mich. 42. Ludington Harbor, Mich. 43. Lutsen Harbor, Minn. 44. Manistee Harbor, Mich. 45. Manistique Harbor, Mich. 46. Manitowoc Harbor, Wis. 47. Menominee Harbor & River, Mich. & Wis. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 86,931 12,650 12,650 136,027 136,027 11,879 4,674 4,674 -136,112 - 16,000 10,680 16,000 10,680 138,000 239,149 233,000 137,116 236,614 236,285 750,000 3,260,000 959,000 189,980 2,121,538 1,613,450 103,000 29,000 33,000 102,948 28,897 33,155 25,000 23,451 171,000 168,047 9,000 9,000 212,000 212,008 80,000 80,705 1,250,000 2,608,405 179,000 101,069 10,000 - 25,000 10,498 1,029 25,074 86,000 145,000 109,000 88,804 138,127 111,724 4,923 22,669 5,790 4,922 3,659 24,802 - 27,700. - 14,452 198,200 110,000 198,201 97,623 47,800 51,085 20,000 8,481 104,000 116,377 55,000 -14,000 12,404 23,596 31-61 1,088,888 1,088,888 44,004 44,004 600,47832 600,47832 1,645,774 1,645,639 8,447,20233 8,401,57483 5,713,80034 5,635,86934 357,913 357,913 244,000 243,948 2,696,52235 2,696,52235 3,189,43336 3,185,13536 1,374,164 1,374,164 1,299,35537 1,299,35587 1,439,365 1,439,365 1,088,8643 1,054,3813 2,660,82539 2,660,8249 3,081,756 3,081,756 533,47640 533,47640 1,397,23741 1,397,23741 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work Contrib. Cost 48. Milwaukee New Work Harbor, Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 49. Monroe Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 50. Muskegon Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Section 111 Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 51. New Buffalo New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 40,000 29,930 18,000 45,000 76,000 28,068 41,049 71,561 996,000 2,750,000 900,000 56,000 908,120 2,835,144 902,996 41,709 10,000 10,000 669,500 672,379 155,000 154,191 322,000 209,386 294,000 1,409,000 292,015 1,408,928 519,000 520,700 81,000 64,100 206,000 79,869 42,007 193,652 110,000 - 109,997 -6,992 182,000 213,000 294,231 208,072 - - 10,000 - - 10,000 50,000 2,405,000 1,685,000 9,982 2,444,455 1,558,182 174 12,270 1,334 - -64,000 - -63,993 - -20,533 20,943 2,510 46,000 150,000 45,998 149,998 -5,000 1,995 379,000 381,314 288,000 288,000 -263,000 -140,493 222,000 216,205 1,351,852 1,351,852 308,961 300,568 36,762 36,762 8,231,02442 8,231,02442 19,876,57443 19,862,27643 1,891,810 1,891,810 6,380,925 6,380,925 987,34044 987,34044 6,683,770 6,683,412 607,900 571,518 3,017,11046 3,017,11046 3,912,11546 3,909,11446 298,000 298,000 3,877,000 3,872,126 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 433,000 427,201 31-62 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 52. Oconto Harbor, New Work Wis. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 53. Ontonagon Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 54. Pentwater Harbor, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 55. Pine River, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 56. Point Lookout New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 57. Portage Lake, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 58. Port Austin, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 17,000 63,000 16,990 60,246 19,000 8,000 18,458 8,542 431,300 421,088 84,000 50,642 27,825 87,687 89,000 88,999 25,440 24,101 81,000 77,727 45,000 20,000 - 30,000 25,850 9,150 319,000 86,000 163,000 322,337 85,966 125,324 102,000 101,000 67,000 135,243 101,114 64,948 - 24,002 -3,500 - 4,199 16,304 29,000 31,000 39,000 28,999 31,000 38,699 22,000 13,000 94,000 21,442 13,558 86,228 -27,000 25,984 118,941 -27,114 12,884 131,308 -27,000 861,000 43,400 -28,214 861,102 43,423 12,000 20,300 14,600 20,967 4,000 4,007 31-63 80,000 77,236 130,75447 130,75447 1,032,98148 1,032,98148 396,90349 396,90349 4,403,253o 4,365,539so 179,899 179,899 2,254,052 2,251,999 13,649 13,649 27,840 27,840 2,642,584 2,642,584 205,953 205,650 129,000 121,228 256,129 256,129 1,223,970 1,223,125 1,128,33451 1,128,33451 1,000,114 1,000,114 159,000 159,000 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 59. Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich. Contributed Funds Contributed Funds Section 111 60. Port Washington Harbor, Wis. Contributed Funds 61. Port Wing Harbor, Wis. 62. Presque Isle Harbor, Mich. 63. Racine Harbor, Wis. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 350,000 335,218 5,098 184,000 180,999 -14,000 782 1,742 354,000 108,669 476,000 721,249 115,000 70,899 -12,975 -12,975 -3,082 12,975 -23,000 -22,469 12,625 36,000 10,959 42,000 43,898 269,000 272,373 120,000 110,001 127,000 126,999 445,000 104,945 110,000 110,002 1,128,000 1,086,721 395,000 301,639 140,000 1,459,000 0 1,375,913 1,751 1,751 12,000 31,400 4,000 12,000 31,400 4,000 23,000 3,000 13,546 8,213 2,800 2,801 96,200 80,136 16,000 4,000 7,000 15,998 4,001 7,001 - 28,300 - 20,318 173,000 90,000 173,000 89,907 65,000 66,042 1,787 1,880 31-64 1,245,963 1,245,963 487,018 487,018 1,436,152 1,433,600 115,000 83,527 9,158 9,158 36,000 10,959 2,916,20462 2,524,86952 1,886,0683 1,792,70713 10,621 10,621 1,599,000 1,375,913 63,393 63,393 576,619 576,619 1,216,492 1,212,251 515,032 515,032 76,500 76,500 1,298,31554 1,291,375" 2,370,4525 2,370,45256 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Total Cost to September 30, 1980 Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 64. Rouge River, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 65. Saginaw River, New Work Mich. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 66. St. Clair River, New Work Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 67. St. Joseph New Work Harbor, Mich. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Section 111 Approp. Cost 68. St. Marys New Work River, Mich. Approp. Cost 1,253,645 1,253,645 16,420 465,000 979,000 795,800 707,000 459,710 980,187 798,312 708,564 953,200 609,100 4,073,800 3,960,000 1,680,083 607,753 4,074,984 3,959,950 311,000 6,765,600 680,000 1,767,000 312,249 6,750,513 655,487 1,765,226 4,985,000 3,213,700 1,190,000 480,000 7,696,485 3,213,694 1,189,176 480,699 433,973 435,735 338,000 349,312 362,700 392,600 88,000 80,217 352,300 352,300 534,000 766,000 432,000 533,797 765,840 428,980 - - -1,000 - - -798 466,000 297,000 212,000 465,158 296,386 212,803 36,000 37,167 350,000 347,079 39,500 45,176 294,000 294,809 100,060 -13,000 -165,000 187,451 359,941 -157,050 31-65 61,000 62,021 375,000 377,111 3,948,754 3,948,754 675,25166 675,25166 11,844,78867 11,844,75667 11,060,623 11,060,406 14,917,12758 14,917,12758 13,600 13,600 16,800,880 16,767,925 15,090,400 15,090,141 19,213,24659 19,213,24659 8,201,657 8,198,271 1,804,48560 1,804,48511 5,561,949 5,561,092 962,216 962,216 307,376 307,007 1,371,300 1,371,299 160,687,07161 112 160,681,67661 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 69. Saugatuck Harbor, Mich. and Kalamazoo River, Mich. 70. Saxon Harbor, Minn. 71. Sebewaing River, Mich. 72. Sheboygan Harbor, Wis. 73. South Haven Harbor, Mich. Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 6,305,800 6,611,300 7,075,554 8,254,000 122,449,952 6,318,012 6,581,354 7,087,664 8,265,172 122,374,080 - - 13,100 S- - 13,100 66,000 82,000 31,001 57,215 35,800 112,085 31,115 57,215 - 10,000 20,000 - 2,862 11,621 12,200 11,055 116,600 113,796 12,392 13,839 10,000 10,000 -4,919 9,113 470,479 -2,115 9,113 360,479 88,000 133,000 1,046,000 3,000 74,832 137,948 1,052,331 4,704 136,000 137,880 119,000 108,945 31,000 500,151 45,000 45,000 - - - - 10,000 9,952 , 31-66 50,000 295,000 46,700 50,000 282,622 59,078 27,000 57,000 67,800 42,058 57,000 67,224 483 - 10,000 25,591 -4,151 9,999 25,590 -4,153 2,000 1,324 725 - 364,52762 364,52762 2,241,02663 2,241,02563 537,50764 521,99064 285,691 285,691 35,573 35,573 889,848 779,848 1,302,446 1,302,260 1,136,08866 1,136,08866 2,280,39266 2,280,39266 609,028 609,028 500,292 499,714 984,42667 984,42667 2,803,71768 2,803,71768 1,632,076 1,632,076 42,381 42,381 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Total Cost to September 30, 1980 Section 111 74. Sturgeon Bay, Wis. & Lake Mich. Ship Canal, Wis. 75. Two Harbors, Minn. 76. Two Rivers Harbor, Wis. 77. White Lake Harbor, Mich. 78. Whitefish Point Harbor, Mich. 85. Red Run, Lower Clinton River, Mich. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 15,000 14,977 23 - 548,000 415,000 250,000 30,790 551,221 414,520 238,102 43,168 4,000 4,176 23,800 22,876 30,000 32,300 32,000 32,000 23,000 23,000 13,000 9,000 35,000 13,000 9,000 25,865 305,000 820 126,594 23,660 23,618 0 173,058 4,000 4,000 42,000 16,104 1,380,000 41,998 16,106 376,203 82,000 42,530 1,855 24,877 1,855 24,876 14,013 14,013 31,000 67,014 5,550 5,551 47,000 45,033 590,000 725,000 790,000 290,000 589,409 722,495 596,128 484,208 31-67 15,000 15,000 1,059,72269 1,059,72269 6,103,61570 6,103,61570 255,219 246,084 884,899 884,899 4,040,71071 4,035,238 1,578,639 1,578,597 360,32072 360,32072 4,889,29273 3,885,49573 1,187,472 1,187,472 58,057 58,057 320,862 317,406 1,662,463 1,662,463 771,639 771,639 201,123 199,156 1,081 1,081 3,105,000 3,101,382 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 September 30, 1980 86. River Rouge, New Work Mich. Approp. 1,939,000 215,000 685,000 - 31,975,332 Cost 2,457,400 708,316 665,462 16,955 31,966,637 87. Saginaw River, New Work Mich. Approp. 4,250,000 2,451,859 820,000 710,000 20,643,959 (Federal Funds) Cost 4,426,221 2,127,438 1,367,890 693,449 20,620,041 New Work Approp. 173,000 (Contributed Funds) Cost 213 2,092 77,313 172,997 88. Sebewaing River, New Work Mich. Approp. - - - - 365,6427' Cost - - 365,64274 Maint. Approp. 10,000 9,000 3,000 6,000 318,144 Cost 10,000 9,000 3,000 4,891 317,035 92. Surveillance of New Work North Boundary Approp. Waters Cost Maint. Approp. 793,000 735,000 780,000 800,000 32,873,63176 Cost 793,774 736,185 770,857 754,228 32,815,94675 Includes $18,889 for previous projects. Excludes $56,500 Contributed Funds. Includes $85,849 for new work previous projects. Includes $12,008 for maintenance previous projects., Includes $255,000 Contributed Funds. Includes $293,657 Contributed Funds. Includes $25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 Contributed funds for existing projects. Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. Includes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. Includes $274,623 for rock in stockpile. Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. Includes $89,309 for previous projects. Includes $31,709 Contributed Funds. Includes $311,329 for previous projects. Includes $13,437 for previous projects. Includes $396,974 for previous projects. Includes $109,463 for previous projects. Includes $8,918 for previous projects. Includes $176,620 for new work $127,598 for maintenance. Includes $35,705 Contributed Funds. Includes $148,000 Contributed Funds for existing project. Includes $453,839 for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds. Includes $21,818 for previous projects. Includes $149,312 for previous projects. Includes $88,364 for previous projects. Includes $402,242 for previous projects. Includes $656,000 for previous projects. Includes $235,346 for previous projects. Includes $354,139 Contributed Funds. Includes $199,739 Contributed Funds. Includes $57,670 Contributed Funds. Includes $491,416 for previous project. Includes $126,451 for previous projects. Includes $354,999 for previous projects. Includes $150,910 for previous projects. Includes $3,955 for previous projects. Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 .73 74 751 31-68 Includes $54,288 for previous projects. Includes 312,423 for previous projects. Includes 36,194 for previous projects. Includes 1,293,220 for previous projects. Includes 459,305 for previous projects. Includes Contributed Funds of $300,000 for new work and $166,667 for maintenance Contributed by: Port Commission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co. $125,000 and River Raisin Paper Co., $41,667. Includes $613,408 for previous projects. Includes 446,183 for previous projects. Includes 84,569 for previous projects. Includes 8,161 for previous projects. Includes 284,802 for previous projects. Includes 113,326 for previous projects. Includes 172,100 Contributed Funds. Includes 188,495 for previous projects. Includes 15,123 for previous projects. Includes 427,240 for previous projects. Includes 79,537 for previous projects. Includes 50,084 for previous projects. Includes 962,556 for previous projects. Includes 962,556 for previous projects. Includes 1,671,660 Public Works Funds and $49,419. Includes 503,113 for previous projects. Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. Includes $90,232 for previous projects. Includes $117,554 for previous projects. Excludes $50,193 for Contributed Funds. Includes $487,817 for previous projects. Includes $87,131 for previous projects. Includes $187,233 for previous projects. Includes $131,239 for previous projects. Includes $323,419 for previous projects. Includes $219,730 for previous projects. Includes $48,404 National Industrial Recovery Act for new work funds. Includes $212,857 for previous projects. Includes $33,113 for previous projects. Includes $15,000 for previous projects. Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 1234567 89 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Sept. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, .1919 Sept. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 March 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 June 6, 1900 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 June 3, 1896 ALPENA HARBOR, MICHIGAN (See Section 1 of Text) Channel Depth of 16 Feet Rubblemound Breakwater for Protecting Channel on South Side, and Widening Entrance Channel 21 and 18 Foot Channel Depths and Turning Basin Present Project Dimensions, New Turning Basin, Removal of Old Breakwater, and Construction of New Breakwater. ARCADIA HARBOR, MICHIGAN (See Section 2 of Text) Maintenance of Existing 12-Foot Channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 3 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvement on enlarged project.' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West entended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of East Basin and West Channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. BEAVER BAY HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 4 of Text) A combination primarily of rubblemound breakwaters with a steel sheet piling cell at each side of the harbor entry totalling 650 feet in length, and an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres in size, and 8 feet deep. BELLE RIVER, MICHIGAN (See Section 5 of Text) Channels 7,5 feet wide and 15 feet to 14 feet deep. Annual Report, p. 2288, H. Doc. 830, 65th Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers Committee Doc. 1, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 42, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc, 151, 88th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. No.446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.1 See Annual Report 1897, App., KK page XVII. 31-69 Documents TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 19, 1890 July 13, 1892 Sept. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 April 23, 1970 July 6, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 2, 1882 Oct 28, 1965 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 June 13, 1902 June 20, 1938 Mar. 29, 1977 BIG BAY HARBOR, MICHIGAN (See Section 6 of Text) Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MICH. (UPPER PENISULA) See Section 7 of Text) Two converging breakwaters an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MICH.(See section 8 of Text) Channel from Mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of Projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. Deepening Channel and Settling Basin to 20 Feet, and Widening to 100 Feet 2 Bends; 1 at the Foot of 12th St., the Other Below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of Existing Channel. BOLLES HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 9 of Text) Entrance Channel in Lake Erie, Access Channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel Sheet Pile Revetment. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 10 to 8 Feet Deep Protected by Breakwater. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 11 of Text) Dredge an entrance channel (datum at 580.69 feet above mean tide at New York) and construct two parallel piers extending lakeward from mouth of Cedar River. Modification of project to provide for two parallel entrance piers including a new rubble-mound east pier with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel from Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River; and a turning basin. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 12 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake Protected Where needed by Pieirs and Revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project Depth Increased to 15 Feet. Project Depth Increased to 18 Feet. Project Depth Increases to 24 and 23 Feet, and Construction of Revetment Upstream of Highway Bridge. 31-70 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong. 2d Sess.1 Annual Report 1889, p. 2291 No Printed Report H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Dec. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Dec. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Section 107,1960 River and Harbor. Act. H. Doc. 64th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Ex. Doc. 12, 47th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 248, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.3 S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1876, p. 523 No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.1 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950. Oct. 21, 1964 Aug. 5, 1886 July 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 Sept. 3, 1954 Nov. 7, 1966 June 3, 1969 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 13 of Text) 18 Foot Channel. 81/2 Foot Channel. Turning Basin. 21 Foot Channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin Deepen to 21 Feet. Breakwater. CLINTON RIVER, MICH. (See Section 14 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing Channels and Making Cutoff, and Revetments as Needed. Widening Entrance Channel and Constructing Protected Harbor Basin. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 15 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with Maximum width of 180 feet, with 150 and 300-foot innerchannels eaich 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of east and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 16 of Text) Breakwaters with entrance channel and maneuver area. DETOUR HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 17 of Text) Small boat harbor and harbor of refuge, 10 foot channel, 8 foot deep access channel protected by 1,000 foot breakwater. DETROIT RIVER, MICH. (See Section 18 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and Removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 Feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 Feet Deep and 300 Feet Wide Through Middle Ground Opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle Between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 Feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel Below Livingstone Channel to 27 Feet to Provide Depths Adequate for 24-Foot Draft Navigation When Governing 31-71 Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 H. Doc. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.1 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1880, p. 2062 and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1886, P. 219 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Committee, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 490, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. and 32, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. Documents TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 19504 Mar. 21, 1956 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 19085 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 30, 19302 Aug. 30, 19302 Lakes are at Datum, with Necessary Widening at Approaches and Bends and Construction of Necessary Compensating Works. Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 Feet. Dredge Through East Draw of Lower Grosse Ile Bridge, and Extend 300-Foot Width of Channel North of Lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 Feet Throughout Downbound and Two-Way Channels, Except in Upper (27.7-Foot Depth) and Lower, (29-Foot Depth) Livingstone Channel, and in Upbound Channel; 27-Foot Depth in Ballards Reef Channel Below Junction with Livingstone Channel. 27.5-Foot Depth in Westerly 300-Foot Width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5- Foot Depth in Westerly 300-Foot Width of Hackett Beach, with Necessary Compensation Works. Also 28.5-Foot Depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal. Inclusive. Trenton Channel; Deepen to 27 Feet, Where Necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, About 5.5 Miles, Deepen to 28 Feet and Widen to 300 Feet Below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and Including a Turning Basin 28 Feet Deep and 15 Across in Area Outside Project Limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 Feet and Widen to 300 Feet from the Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 Feet Downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a Depth of 28 Feet. Width of 830 Feet, and Length of 1,500 Feet: Build Compensating Works to Maintain Water Levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINN. AND WIS. (See Section 19 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area for basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338,90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 31-72 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 16, 19526 July 14, 19607 Oct. 4, 1961 Aug. 5, 1886 Sept. 19, 1890 June 3, 1896 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 19258 June 26, 19349 July 3, 195810 June 23, 186611 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 June 23, 1866 June 14, 1880 Sept. 19, 1890 July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. FOX RIVER, WIS. (See Section 20 of Text) Improvement of Fox River Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108. That Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, Wis., be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 21 of Text) A New Outlet 12 Feet Deep Protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, Removal of Portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the Area in Lake Betsie Deepen Approach and Entrance Channels, Extend Inner Basin, and Dredge Recreational Anchorage Area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 22 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel, Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River Above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 [plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886]. H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong. 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Doc. 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 31-73 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Channel to Spring Lake Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 23 of Text) Existing Project, Except for Pile Dike. For Pile Dike. 800-Foot Extension of West Pier. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 24 of Text) Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. Sea walls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage basin and deepening of entrance. Small-boat basin with breakwater. Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 June 14, 1850 June 14, 1850 May 17, 1930 Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 2, 1945 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3d Sess.' Specified in Act. Annual Report 1881, p. 2050. Annual Report 1895, p. 351. H. Doc. 751, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 75, 43d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 184. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. June 23, 1866 July 13, 1892 June 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 GREEN BAY HARBOR WIS. (See Section 26 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Islands. 12 Inner channel.' 2 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western Ry. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MICH. (See Section 27 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Annual Report 1873, p. 292 31-74 GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MICH (See Section 25 of Text) Two Parallel piers, and entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. Mar. 3, 1871 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Jan. 21, 1927 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 19353 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Closing North Entrance and Dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of Portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 28 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters, 12-Foot depth entrance channel 10-Foot depth in harbor basin. HOLLAND HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 29 of Text) Artificial Channel Between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.'2 Piers and Revetments. 12 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels and Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Reveted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MICH. (See Section 30 of Text) Channel 30 Feet Wide and 5 Feet Deep Through Lakes and Rivers with Suitable Jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 31 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.12 Extending breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 32 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess., Annual Report. Annual Report 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report 1905, p. 2176. H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772, H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.8 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-75 Documents TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19353, 13 July 14, 1960 Sept. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 19363 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MICH. (See Section 33 of Text) Acquisition of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved Mar. 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 34 of Text) Dredging. Breakwater and modified channels. Construction of measures to correct the design deficiencies which results in unsatisfactory entrance and mooring conditions. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 35 of Text) Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet; an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 820 feet long with a flared approach and inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep and 730 feet long. LA POINTE HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 36 of Text) Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. 31-76 Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. P.L. 645, 86th Cong., as amended. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Ex. Doc. 105 49th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 686, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report for 1949. H. Doc. 463, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Aug. 5, 1886 July 13, 1892 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19332 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 15, 1967 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2,1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICH., CHANNELS(See Section 37 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and Dredging Channel at Grosse Point. Second Canal for Downbound Vessels. 21-Foot Depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for About 5.25 miles. 25-Foot Depth Through Canals and Channel Through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and Widening Channel to 700 Feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 Feet and Abandonment of Channel above Mouth of Southeast Bend Cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 38 of Text) Entrance Channel Protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area. Approach Channel and Removal of North Pier. LES CHENEAUX ISLANDS CHANNELS, MICH. (See Section 39 of Text) Removing shoals and bend widening over small boat course to provide 7-foot depth over 100-foot minimum width. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 40 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.1 LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 41 of Text) 12-Foot Deep Channel From Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 42 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension Reconstruction and Repairs to Existing Structures and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of Outer Ends of the Two Inner piers. Deepen Channels and Widen Opening Between Breakwaters. LUTSEN HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 43 of Text) Project as modified provides for two rubblemound breakwaters totalling 1,400 feet, with an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres with an 8-foot depth. Annual Report 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 Annual Report 1867, p. 11415 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.' 6 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1945, River and Harbor Act, p. 1658. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published map.' 31-77 Documents I -- TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1867 Sept. 19, 1890 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 193516 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1968 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 June 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 MANISTEE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 44 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 Feet to Connect with Manistee Lake, and Further Pier Extension. Depth of 20 Feet in Outer Harbor 570 Feet Wide to Outer End of South Pier 18 Feet Deep in River, South Breakwater with Shore Connection, and Extend North Pier if Required. 23-Foot Depths in Entrance Channel and 21-Foot Depths in River Channel. Remove Old South Revetment, Construct New South Pier and Revetment, and Widen River Entrance Channel. Present Project Dimensions of Channel Through Outer Basin and River and Federal Participation in Cost of Replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 45 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present Location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 46 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th St., and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MICH. AND WIS. (See Section 47 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. Annual Report 1867, p. 115. Annual Report 1891, p. 2678. H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1908, p. 648, and Unpublishes Report of Mar. 13, 1908. Approved by Secretary of War, Arr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Detailed Project Report June 1967.1 Annual Report, 1867, P. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-78 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 June 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 194517 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 183518 July 3, 1930 July 14, 193220 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Dct. 23, 1962 3ct. 23, 1962 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 48 of Text) North pier.12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater. 12 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo St., and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western Ry. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 49 of Text) 9-Foot Channel, Protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-Foot Channel, Dikes and Turning Basin. 19 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation Imposed by Act of July 3, 1930 MUSKEGON HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 50 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments Around Car Ferry Slip. Channel Deepening and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 51 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new no. and so. breakwaters 1,305 and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1960.1 S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report 1906, p. 1752. [No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions.] H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., 45, Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-79 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. OCONTO HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 52 of Text) Piers, except for inner 300 feet of south pier and 250 feet of north pier build by city.3 Present project dimensions of channel and turning basin. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 53 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. PENTWATER HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 54 of Text) Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Present Project Depth of Channel PINE RIVER, MICH. (See Section 55 of Text) Channel 100 feet wide and 14 feet deep in entrance, 75 feet wide and 12 feet deep in river. Total length is 5,800 feet. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MICH. (See Section 56 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 57 of Text) Entrance Channel 18 Feet Deep Protected by Piers and Revetments. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 58 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 59 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 Feet Deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 60 of Text) North pier and south basin.12 Annual Report 1881, p. 2066. H. Doc. 538, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Plan C.' H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Annual Report 1907, p. 682 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 163421 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. 31-80 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 July 5, 1881 July 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 11, 1870 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 193523 July 3, 195823 June 13, 1902 June 30, 1948 Aug. 5, 1977 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19353, 25, 26 July 3, 195821 Oct. 23, 196226 June 25, 1910 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. PORT WING HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 61 of Text) Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 62 of Text) Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubble mound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long. Changed designation of project. Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. RACINE HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 63 of Text) Breakwaters. Remove shoals lakeward of harbor entrance, enlarge 19-foot channel through outer basin and 19-foot channel in river. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin and in river. ROUGE RIVER, MICH.(See Section 64 of Text) 21-Foot Channel via The Shortcut Canal. 25-Foot Channel at Mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 Feet Long and Adjacent to Latter, and 21-Foot Channel Extending from Junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 Feet Wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal Widened to 150 Feet at 2 Bends. 25-Foot Channel Over Modified Limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Ave. (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. (See Section 65 of Text) Channel 200 Feet Wide, with Depth of 18.5 Feet in Bay and 16.5 Feet in River. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doe. 168, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Dec. 446, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., Annual Report for 1903, pp. 474, 1823. H. Doe. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1909, p. 1973. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 46, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 816, 77th Cong., 2d and H. Doc. 255, 78th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doe. 1063, 64th Cong., 2nd Sess.24 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 31-81 Documents TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.1 Project Depth of 18.5 Feet Extended Up River to Saginaw Turning Basin. Present Project Channel Dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 Feet Wide and 24 Feet Deep from 24-Foot Contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 Feet in River Channel Up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 Feet in River Channel Up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and Elimination of Present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-Foot Project Above 6th St. Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 New Turning Basin. 3 Deepen River Channel to 25 Feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MICH. (See Section 66 of Text) 20-Foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 Feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 Feet. Widen and Deepen Southeast Bend and Improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and Further Improve Channels in St. Clair River Between Limits of 27.1 to 30 Feet to Provide Safe Navigation by Vessels with Drafts of 25.5 Feet. A Cutoff Channel in Canada of Southeast Bend and Abandon Old Southeast Bend Channels. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 67 of Text) Interior Revetments.2 7 Benton Harbor Canal.27 Present Project Dimensions of Piers and a Turning Basin. Present Project Dimensions of Paw Paw River. Abandon Easterly 1,000 Feet of Channel Above West Line of 9th St. Turning Basin Above Mouth of Morrison Channel and Eliminate Turning Basin Near Mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of Turning Basin Near Mouth of Paw Paw River. 31-82 H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report 1880, pp. 2030, 2031 and 2049, 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. July 13, 1892 July 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Mar. 3, 1875 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 June 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 11; 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 July 13, 1892 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 July 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19349 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 June 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 ST. MARYS RIVER, MICH. (See Section 68 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by Mac Arthur Lock), Widen and Deepen Existing State Channel.27 Poe Lock.1 Dredging Through Shoals Above Falls and Shoals Below Falls Between Lower End of Canal and Upper Entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (Formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels Work in that Section of River Below Locks. David Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls. Lease Entered Into with Michigan Northern Power Co. Provided for Construction of Remedial and Compensating Works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen Upper Approach to Canals Through Vidal Shoals, Extend Anchorage and Maneuver Area Below Locks. Remove Round Island, Middle Ground Extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and Widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels Throughout Downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks Provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct New (Mac Arthur) Lock on Site of Former Weitzel Lock, Deepen Approach Channels to 27 Feet, and Reconstruct Approach Piers. Name 'Mac Arthur' Lock and Changed Name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and Construct New Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a New Structure 800 Feet Long, 100 Feet Wide and 32 Feet Deep, with Necessary Construction of Nose and Center Piers, and Widen and Deepen Channel Across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to Provide Wider Anchorage and Maneuver Areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to Provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 Feet Over Full Width to Downbound and 2-Way Channels (Including Anchorage Areas) and Over Westerly 300-Foot Width of Upbound Middle Neebish Channel, When Levels of Lake Superior and Huron are at Their Respective Low-Water Datum. Report by Maj. O. M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, Not Published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1891, p. 2810 H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3) H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. and 11. Doc. 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.1 31-83 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a Part of Project, Authorize Alteration With Cost to be Apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, June 21, 1940. June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MICH. (See Section 69 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening Entrance to 16 Feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 Feet. SAXON HARBOR, MINN. (See Section 70 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. (See Section 71 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 Feet Deep, 100 Feet Wide and 15,000 Feet Long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 72 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Ave. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 73 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge. 12 Present Dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present Project Dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WIS. (See Section 74 of Text) Breakwaters. 12 Acquisition of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. 31-84 July 9, 1956 None H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1896, Vol. 2. Pt. 5, p. 2739 Annual Report 1907, P. 6416 H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess., contains latest published map. Annual Report for 1965, p. 1023 H. Doc. 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.1 No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, Dated Dec. 21, 1934. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 3, 1873 July 13, 1892 June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-B (Continued AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1958 TWO HARBORS, MINN. (See Section 75 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WIS. (See Section 76 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment.12 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 77 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. 1907 WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 78 of Text) Breakwaters, Entrance Channel, Anchorage Basin. Breakwater Inside Harbor. RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MICH. (See Section 85 of Text) Flood control and major drainage improvements to Red Run Drain and Lower Clinton River. RIVER ROUGE, MICH. (See Section 86 of Text) Channel Enlargement and Straightening, and Alteration or Replacement of Existing Bridges. SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 87 of Text) Flood Control Improvements to Saginaw River and its Tributaries Including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. 31-85 H. Ex. Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report for 1887, p. 1952. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 [as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897]. H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate.2 8 Present Project Depth of Channel. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 431, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 148, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 July 5, 1884 July 13, 1892 Mar. 2, Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 17, 1967 Dec. 30, 1970 Oct. 23, 1962 July 3, 1958 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. (See Section 88 of Text) Aug. 18, 1941 Enlarging Present Channel of Sebewaing River, H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.1 Altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, Removal of Dike. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 3. Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 4. This modification deauthorized 5 August 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 5. Administrative Act, Section 4. 6. Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7. Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8. This portion inactive. 9. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 10. Transfer completed June 1962. 11. Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 12. Completed under previous project., 13. Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 14. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized in 1977. 15. Latest published map is in Annual Report 1914, p. 2914. 16. Superceded by Act of October 23, 1962. 17. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo St. Bridge to North Humboldt Ave. Bridge). 18. Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 19. Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 20. War Department Appropriations Act. 21. Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 22. Work recommended in H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess., included in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 23. Deauthorized in 1977. 24. Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. .25. Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth in old channel, work authorized in this act is considered inactive. 26. -This modification deauthorized 5 August 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 27. Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 28. Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-86 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-C FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Length of Channel Name of Channel (Feet) Miles from Mouth River Used by Upbound or Down- Vessels Project Width '(Feet) Project Datum Planes Above Main Above Mean Water Level at Father Point, Quebec Year (Feet) Complete DETROIT RIVER, MICH. (SEE SECTION 18 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Isle' 2 2 Channel at Heat of Detroit River. Miscellaneous Shoals and Obstructions, Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc., Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstburg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Reach (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal .30 38,800 32 44,500 25 Both Both Both 24,800 17 Both 12,200 12 Both 26,000 10 Down 10,887 12,313 42,000 5 Down Both Both 200 800 21.0 571.3 28.5 571.5-570.9 28.5 570.9-570.3 800 28.5 600 28.5 1964 1964 1964 569.8 1962 569.8 1963 450 27.7 569.8-568.6 1964 450,800 800-1,200 1,200 Both Both 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 Up - Up Up Down 17 14 14 Local Local Local Local 29.0 29.0 38.5 - 28.5-29.53 - 29.5 600 600 6000 800 300 300 250-300 27.5 21.27.54 21.28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 568.6 568.6 568.6 1961 1961 1964 568.6 1962 568.6 1964 569.8-569.5 569.5-568.9 568.9-568.6 568.6 569.9-569.7 569.7-569.6 569.6-568.8 569.8 1960 1960 1960 1929 19644 1964 1941 1904 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MICH, (SEE SECTION 66 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron Channel North of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stage Island St. Clair to Russel Island Russel Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 Both 4,100 39 Both 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 39 31 24 11 Both Both Both Both 5 Both - Both - Small Craft 800 800 800 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 576.8-576.5 1961 30.0 576.4-576.1 1962 30.0 27.4 27.3 17.2 576.4-576.1 574.9-573.8 573.8-572.4 572.4-572.1 27.1 573.1-572.0 27.1 572.1-571.7 10.0 571.7 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 'This is a Side Channel. 'This is a Side Channel. 2Extends from Deep Water Near Windmill Point to a Point Opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 Feet. sProject Depth 29.5 Feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 Feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project Depth 21 Feet in Easterly 300-Foot Width of Channel and 27.5 Fet in Westerly 300-Foot Width. 5Project Depth 21 Feet in Easterly 300-Foot Width of Channel and 28.5 Feet in Westerly 300-Foot Width. eProject Complete Except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 31-87 Project Depth (Feet) __ DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-D ST. MARYS RIVER, MICH.: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 68 of Text) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quione Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,002 $3,275,0003 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0006 $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064,7 $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sept. 18, 1919 July 11, 1943 June 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost .9 $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Recessed Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed -9 $169,2248 Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 599.5 above and 577.8 below. 2Includes Cost of North Canal. 3Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 5Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. 6Excludes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 'Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separable from cost of locks. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 31-88 FOX RIVER, WIS.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 20 of Text) TABLE 31-E Depth At Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Character Kind Year Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill of of Type of Com- Actual Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost DePere lock2 DePere dam2 Little Kaukauna lock2 Little Kaukauna dam2 Rapide Croche lock2 Rapide Croche Dam2 Kaukauna fifth lock 2 Kaukauna fourth lock2 Kaukauna third lock2 Kaukauna second lock2 60 Kaukauna first lock 2 Kaukauna Dam2 Kaukauna guard lock Little Chute combined lock: Lower Upper Little Chute second lock 2 Little Chute first (guard) lock1 Little Chute Dam2 Cedars lock 2 Cedars Dam2 Appleton fourth lock 2 Appleton lower dam2 Appleton third lock2 Appleton second lock 2 Appleton first lock 2 Appleton upper dam Menasha lock2 Menasha Dam2 7.1 DePere 7.2 DePere 13.0 DePere 13.1 DePere 19.2 Wrightstown 19.3 Wrightstown 22.8 Kaukauna 23.1 Kaukauna 23.3 Kaukauna 23.4 Kaukauna 23.6 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.4 Little Chute 25.4 Little Chute 26.4 Little Chute 26.5 Little Chute 26.6 Little Chute 27.3 Little Chute 27.4 Little Chute 30.7 Appleton 30.9 Appleton 31.3 Appleton 31.6 Appleton 31.9 Appleton 32.2 Appleton 37.0 Menasha 37.8 Menasha 6 6 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 - 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 40.0 - - 9.4 - 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 35.4 - - 6.6 - 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Rock - Concrete 1936 $229,308 Rock Fixed' 4 Concrete 1929 209,536 Clay - Concrete 1938 362,427 Clay and gravel Fixed3 4 Piers and concrete 1926 179,398 Rock - Concrete 1934 228,738 Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1930 118,975 Rock - Composite 1898 13,310' Rock - Stone masonry 1879 37,536 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 39,948 Rock - Stone masonry 1903 24,313 Rock - Stone masonry 1883 38,704 Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1931 123,763 Rock - Stone masonry 1891 12,630 Rock Hardpan Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Clay Rock Rock Clay Hardpan - Stone masonry 1879 - Stone masonry 1879 - Stone masonry 1881 - Stone masonry 1904 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1932 - Stone masonry 1888 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1933 - Stone masonry 1907 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1934 - Stone masonry 1900 - Stone masonry 1901 - Stone masonry 1884 Fixed3 Concrete 1940 - Composite 1899 Fixed3 Concrete 1937 102,304 48,555 7,8175 82,554 34,972 84,973 40,893 73,903 32,238 22,940 36,004 151,558 19,3265 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 20riginal structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sept. 18, 1872. 43Provided with sluices. Flash boards used. 5Partially rebuilt. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 31-F RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Algoma Harbor, Wis. Bayfield Harbor, Wis. Bayport Harbor, Mich. Big Suamico Harbor, Mich. Chippewa Harbor, Mich. Grays Reef Passage, Mich. Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich. Little Bay De Noc Harbor, Mich. Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich. Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich. Pensaukee Harbor, Wis. Petoskey Harbor, Mich. St. James Harbor, Mich. Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich. Traverse City Harbor, Mich. TABLE 31-G April 1980 April 1980 March 1980 March 1980 May 1980 May 1980 June 1980 April 1980 June 1980 June 1980 March 1980 June 1980 September 1980 May 1980 March 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Algoma Harbor, Wis. 1979 292,010' 794,861 Au Sable Harbor, Mich. 1979 209,7762 2,416,703 Bayport Harbor, Mich. 1975 93,597 35,471 Bayfield Harbor, Wis. 1979 183,855 63,843 Big Suamico River, Wis. 1975 20,243 102,989 Black River (Alcona Co.) Mich. 1907 Channels Straits of Mackinac, Mich. 1972 2,832,629 88,828 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, Mich. 1959 125,629 6,661 Eagle Harbor 1979 205,164 53,572 Forestville, Mich. 1969 Grays Reef Passage, Mich. 1970 190,521 612,635 Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich.3 1977 1,015,366 158,094 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, Mich. 1966 332,832 54,086 Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich. 4 1969 229,085 70,277 Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich.5 1969 136,286 19,702 Marquette Harbor, Mich. 1979 1,282,893 1,388,625 Northport Harbor Pensaukee, Wis. 1966 34,035 127,200 Petoskey Harbor, Mich. 1979 118,239 311,870 St. James, Beaver Island, Mich.6 1957 49,171 33,362 St. Joseph River, Mich. 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich.7 1978 1,954,821 11,216 Traverse City Harbor, Mich. 1976 366,579 109,225 Warroad River, Wis. . 1978 86,105 734,280 'Includes $192,774 for previous projects. 2Includes $114,786 for previous projects and $16,400 Contributed Funds. 3Includes $89,400 Contributed Funds. 4Excludes Contributed Funds of $105,004. 4Excludes Contributed Funds of $136,286. 5Excludes Contributed Funds of $7,500. 7Includes $804,453 Contributed Funds. 31-90 DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT TABLE 31-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Grand River, Grandville, Mich.' 1966 Grand River, Lansing, Mich. 1971 7,300 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) Mich.2 1975 4,471,235 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo) Mich. 1975 421,466 Kawkawlin River, Mich.3 1971 1,204,5594 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, Mich.3 1953 1,136,0085 Upper River Rouge, Mich.' 1968 7,935 'Awaiting Appropriation of Funds. 2Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 3Completed. 4Includes $204,559 Contributed Funds. 5Includes $202,996 Contributed Funds. 6Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of local cooperation. 31-91 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT* The district comprises northern Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania and western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of Lake, Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan to international boundary line east of Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Page Beach Erosion Control Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio ..... ...... 32-2 Barcelona Harbor, N.Y.... ....... 32-2 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y ............ 32-3 Buffalo Harbor, N.Y............ 32- 4 Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y .......... 32-5 Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y...........32-5 Cleveland Harbor, Ohio ............ 32-6 Conneaut Harbor, Ohio ............ 32-8 Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. ............. 32-8 Erie Harbor, Pa. . ............... 32-9 Fairport Harbor, Ohio ............. 32-10 Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio .......... 32-11 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. ....... 32-11 Huron Harbor, Ohio ............... 32-12 Irondequoit Bay, N.Y ........... 32-12 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. ...... 32-13 Lorain Harbor, Ohio ....... . 32-13 Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y ......... 32-14 Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y...... .... . 32-14 Olcott Harbor, N.Y................ 32-15 Oswego Harbor, N.Y............... 32-15 Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. ........ 32-16 Rochester Harbor, N.Y............ . 32-16 Sackets Harbor, N.Y ........ ..... 32-17 Sandusky Harbor, Ohio ........... 32-17 Toledo Harbor, Ohio............... 32-18 Vermilion Harbor, Ohio ............ 32-18 West Harbor, Ohio ................ 32-19 Wilson Harbor, N.Y............. 32-19 Reconnaissance and condition surveys 32-19 Other authorized navigation projects . 32-19 Navigation work under special authorization .............. 32-20 33. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio ....... 32-20 34, Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa ...... 32-20 35. Other authorized beach erosion control projects ................. 32-21 36. Beach erosion work under special authorization .............. 32-21 Flood Control 37. Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio ........ 32-21 38. Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y ............ 32-22 39. Ellicott Creek, N.Y ................ 32-22 40. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y., Genesee River ........... ..... 32-23 41. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio ........... 32-23 42. Reno Beach - Howard Farms Area, Ohio ......... 32-24 43. Scajaquada Creek, N.Y ............ 32-24 44. Inspection of completed flood control projects ...... ........ 32-25 45. Other authorized flood control projects ................ 32-25 46. Flood control work under special authorization ............. 32-25 Deauthorized Projects 47. Deauthorized projects ........... 32-25 General Investigations 48. Surveys ........... ............ 32-25 49. Collection and study of basic data .... 32-25 50. Hydrologic studies ............... 32-25 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed in Table 32A at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 32-1 Navigation Page 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pages 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by city of Ashtabula and one is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Elevpn terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $83,102. U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman removed 110,038 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material over an area of approximately 100,000 square yards of the lower river and outer harbor at a cost of $147,434. Repairs to about 350 linear feet of the west breakwater by U.S. derrick boat Tonawanda cost $408,711. Engineering effort, including a reconnaissance report and major rehabilitation of the east and west breakwaters, cost $93,764. Planning was continued for diked disposal area at a cost of $11,143. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. West breakwater was completed in 1915 except 580 feet of inner end which was completed in 1923, and 600 feet of outer end which was completed in 1935. East breakwater was completed in 1915; 800 feet of westerly end was removed and a lakeward extension of 700 feet was completed in 1935. Old inner east breakwater 1,200 feet long was completed in 1909, and westerly 600 feet were removed in 1913 and 350 feet in 1935. The 18- and 16-foot sections of river channel and turning basin were deepened in 1939. A 25-foot deep approach channel through east outer harbor to easterly docks and a turning basin were completed in 1960. Deepening of this area to 28 feet, as authorized by 1965 act, was initiated in July 1967 and completed in June 1968. Deepening upper 1,550 feet of river channel to 16 feet was completed in July 1960. Deepening 29-foot entrance channel, 28-foot channel through outer harbor, 27-foot approach channel to Penn Central Co's. slip, 27-foot channel in Ashtabula River to a point 2,000 feet upstream from its mouth, and 22-foot areas in east outer harbor, as authorized by the 1960 act, was initiated in May 1962 and completed in June 1963. Contract operations for removal of 250 feet of inner breakwater as authorized by 1937 act and deepening triangular-shaped area adjacent thereto as authorized by 1960 act were initiated in July 1977 and completed in December 1977. Harbor structures require repairs. Portions of both east and west breakwaters, rubblemound construction, where slope stone has pulled away, core stone has washed away, and deck stones have dropped, will be repaired under the major rehabilitation program commencing in FY 1981. East breakwater light foundation tilted due to displacement of rubblemound protection and needs repairs. Approximately one mile of the navigation channel at the upriver end, not used by commercial navigation, is maintained to 6-foot depth for recreational navigation. Costs of existing project were $12,240,147 (including $536,648 public works funds) for new work and $6,897,172 for maintenance, a total of $19,137,319. In addition, $47,000 of contributed funds were expended for new work. 2. BARCELONA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles southwesterly of Dunkirk, N.Y., and 29 miles northeasterly of Erie, Pa. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. Adopted by July 4, 1936, River and Harbor Act. Only information available is in index to report of Chief of Engineers under title "Portland Harbor, N.Y." Existing Project. For description of existing project see page 1506 of Annual Report for 1961. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $1,124,286. Non-Federal costs of $60,000 were incurred by local interests. Of this amount, $7,500 was a cash contribution and remainder was for providing necessary lands and construction of public wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $7,500. 32-2 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $2,025. Cost of biological study, by contract, was $4,418, Related in-house engineering costs and environmental studies were $13,989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project was initiated in August 1958 and completed in August 1960. Construction of concrete walkway ramp (recreation facility) was initiated and completed in June 1965. Concrete ramp was extended 40 feet shoreward in June 1966. Several sections of concrete deck on east and west breakwaters have cracked and subsided due to settlement of supporting material. The deficiency is not critical and repairs have been deferred. Costs of existing project were $1,129,237 for new work, including $4,951 for recreation facilities, and $58,932 for maintenance, a total of $1,188,169. In addition, $7,500 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. Location.Improvement is essentially that of up. per 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, N.Y., to and including Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, N.Y., Black Rock Harbor and Channel, N.Y., and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous projects. For details see items 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship, lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, is classified deferred, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1961) of this portion is $339,000. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island pier, and by other local interests for relocation of utilities. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, N.Y., and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year: Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 315 days and closed for underwater cleaning and repairs February 1 through March 22, 1980. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds were accomplished throughout year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $803,060 were distributed as follows: operation and care: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair $379,301; locks, security service and maintenance of grounds $185,368; miscellaneous inspection condition surveys and support of Water Control Center $77,132. Maintenance (structure repairs) by U.S. derrick boat McCauley cost $50,494. Clearing and snagging in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $43,284. Engineering in-house effort on installation of sanitary facilities at the lock, rehabilitation of lock control houses and pump house, and study on replacement of dewatering pumps cost $67,481. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 97 percent complete. Channel from Buffalo Harbor north entrance to opposite Sixth Avenue, North Tonawanda, is complete. Different sections of this channel were completed to project depth as follows: Lake Erie section in 1909; Black Rock Canal section in 1915; Niagara River section from lock to deep water pool above Tonawanda, in 1913; and Tonawanda section, including turning basin, 1921. Channel was further widened as follows: Triangular area at Lake Erie entrance to canal was completed in 1922 and transferred from Buffalo Harbor project in 1945; Lake Erie section was widened at bend opposite foot of Georgia Street, Buffalo, in 1924; Black Rock Canal section just south of International Bridge at Buffalo, in 1928, and opposite foot of Maryland Street, Buffalo, in 1930; and Niagara River section near westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal in 1928. Rock shoals extending above a depth of 21.4 feet were removed from Lake Erie entrance to canal and in canal south of 32-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Ferry Street Bridge, in 1937. Rock shoals extending above a depth of 22 feet were removed from Lake Erie entrance to canal, in Black Rock Canal, and in Niagara River portion of canal in 1948-49. Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal was completed in 1958. Tonawanda Creek Channel was completed in 1902. Tonawanda Inner Harbor Channel was completed in 1904. Enlargement of Tonawanda turning basin and extension of Bird Island pier were completed in 1936. Lock, including wing walls and retaining walls above lock, was completed in 1914, and 100-foot east wing wall extension in 1927. Guide pier connecting with west lower wing wall was completed in 1916, except for 200-foot northerly extension and construction of concrete platform in the angle. Upstream 300 linear feet of lower west guide pier were repaired 1951-59. Lock-operating houses were completed in 1924. Extension of guide pier as authorized by 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Work remaining to complete project consists of deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda Inner Harbor as authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act, which is classified deferred. Condition of structures range from poor to fair. Repairs to the most critical section of Bird Island pier from its northerly terminus at Squaw Island to the Peace Bridge (2,800 feet) were essentially completed during 1976. Replacement of original electrical equipment has been completed. Planning to repair or replace much of the badly deteriorated or worn out mechanical systems has been completed. The wing wall at the upper approach to the lock has shifted laterally about two feet at maximum deflection. Costs of existing project were $10,457,093 (including $1,760,000 emergency relief funds and $6,000 expended for deferred portion of project) for new work; $10,322,391 for maintenance; $11,556,690 for operating and care; a total of $32,336,174. In addition $1,356,007 expended between July 9, 1914, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 4. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non- Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 are along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $149,796. Repairs to breakwater by U.S. derrick boat McCauley cost $129,176. Installation of pump-out units by contract and hired labor cost $14,808. Maintenance dredging, Buffalo River and ship canal, outer harbor and entrance channel with disposal in Spoil Disposal Facility No. 4 was accomplished by U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman and 177,695 cubic yards, bin measure, of material were removed at a cost of $648,009. Snagging and clearing in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $11,264. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Stony Point breakwater was completed in 1899, a 1,000-foot extension was completed in 1914, 1,200 feet of shore end were sold to Lackawanna Steel Co. in 1918, and another 1,000-foot extension completed in 1935. South breakwater was completed in 1903, and a 300-foot extension completed in 1935. North breakwater was completed in 1901 and old breakwater in 1893. South pier was completed in 1869 and rebuilt in 1962. Removal of three shoals to 27 feet, on direct approach to south entrance channel was completed in 1954. Deepening to 25 feet in southerly part of outer harbor was completed in 1956. During 1955 and 1956, Buffalo River Channel, Buffalo River entrance channel, and ship canal were deepened to 22, 23, and 22 feet, respectively. Deepening 23-foot project area in outer harbor was completed in 1956 except for strips 50 feet wide along harbor line and 180 feet wide between Merchants Refrigerating Co's piers and 32-4 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT south end of city dike. Widening Buffalo River Channel at Ohio Street Bridge was completed in July 1959. Deepening north entrance channel to 25 feet in earth and 26 feet in rock, removal of 1,000 feet of old breakwater, widening southerly portion of Buffalo River entrance channel, relocation of Coast Guard facilities and construction of a detached breakwater, all as authorized by 1945 act, were completed in 1962. Removal of shoals and deepening of approach to south entrance, south entrance channel, and southerly part of outer harbor, all as authorized by 1960 act, were initiated in June 1962 and completed in May 1964. Deepening 27-foot project area of north outer harbor including the 50- and 180-foot wide strips along harbor line as authorized by 1962 act, was initiated in July 1964 and completed in September 1965. Repairs to 650 linear feet of superstructure of old breakwater were completed in August 1965 under minor rehabilitation program. Harbor structures are generally in good condition except at various points of south breakwater completed in 1902 and old breakwater completed in 1889, where slope stone on lakeside has been displaced. Repair of collapsed 1,400-foot long south pier was completed in May 1962. For disposal of dredged materials a pilot study experimental diked disposal area was constructed in 1968 and another diked disposal area at Times Beach was constructed in 1971. Construction of diked disposal area (Site 4) was completed in June 1977. Costs of existing project were $18,837,601 (including $655,500 public works funds) for new work, $39,520,588 for maintenance and $295,457 for rehabilitation, a total of $58,653,646. In addition, local interests contributed $56,805 toward construction of Times Beach Dike. 5. CAPE VINCENT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence River about 2.5 miles from Lake Ontario and 49 miles northerly from Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14800.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1634 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see page 1566 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for completed portion of project were $275,082. Deepening remainder of 16-foot area of project as authorized by 1945 act, at estimated cost of $159,000 (1954) is classified deferred. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two privately owned terminals for fish and a United States fish hatchery are located along waterfront bordering project. A ferry to Wolfe Island, Ontario, uses wharf owned by village. A yacht club dock and several other privately owned servicing and storage docks are for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services by hired labor cost $11,164. Economic study, by contract, cost $8,000. In-house engineering costs for repairs to the concrete cap of the 1,381-foot breakwater were $55,924. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is about 63 percent complete. Construction of a breakwater 1,381 feet long, completed in 1915, of which 40 feet of shore return arm was built in 1901, and deepening of 20-foot project area and a portion of 16-foot project area completed in 1947. Breakwater is of timber-crib, concretesuperstructure type. The crib is in good condition but concrete cap is disintegrating and needs repair. Contract for repairs to the concrete cap was awarded late in FY 1980 with completion scheduled during November 1981. Deepening of remainder of 16-foot area, as authorized by 1945 act, is classified deferred and remains to be done to complete the project. Costs of existing project were $275,082 for new work and $184,685 for maintenance, a total of $459,767. 6. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. Provides for navigation, flood control and recreational breakwater fishing by constructing: (a) arrowhead breakwaters in Lake Erie at mouth of Cattaraugus Creek; (b) an entrance channel, 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and eight feet deep from that depth in lake to a point 1,575 feet upstream; (c) a channel 100 feet wide, six feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and (d) development of recreational facilities at mouth for breakwater fishing. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $4,030,000 (Oct. 1980). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $2,257,000 (Oct. 1980) including cash contribution of $2,222,000 and the remainder for lands and damages. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Required cash contribution is presently estimated at $2,222,000. It is anticipated that State of New York will execute the local cooperation agreement. 32-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $45,082. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction of project remain to be done to complete project. Approximately $29,600 were expended during FY 1977 for emergency work for "Operation Runoff." As a result of record snowfalls during the 1976-1977 winter, advance measures were undertaken to reduce flood damages anticipated from the snowmelt. Work was performed under authority of Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies. 7. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839.) Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project, as authorized thru the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements were recommended by 1976 WRD Act which authorized preparation of Phase I design memorandum for proposed new work comprising of: (a) extension of lake approach and entrance channel at arrowhead entrance and deepening of those areas to 32 feet; (b) incremental removal, as required, of 500 feet of existing west breakwater spur and 400 feet of existing east breakwater spur to facilitate turning movements; (c) construction of a 1,200-foot rubblemound breakwater extension at east end of east breakwater; (d) deepening of fan shaped approach channel and a 1,000-foot wide entrance channel extending 2,900 feet into east basin, to a depth of 32 feet; (e) deepening of existing 500-foot wide east basin channel to 28 feet; and, (f) recreational facilities, for fishing on west breakwater, including pedestrian handrail, pedestrian bridge and public parking. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $62,615,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $29,315,100 is for completed work and balance of $33,300,000 (Oct. 1980) is for new work proposed by 1976 WRD Act. Estimated non-Federal cost is $10,195,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and balance of $992,000 is required cash contribution for work authorized by 1976 WRD Act. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act consisting of widening and deepening right bank of Cuyahoga River at downstream end of Cut 4 is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) is $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R & H Act consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B.&O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels and remaining work authorized by 1960 R&H Act consisting of deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including Old River to a depth of 27 feet has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,241,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1977 for details of requirements of local cooperation for work recommended by 1976 WRD Act. Assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase II General Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. There are 72 piers and wharves. Eleven are owned by city of Cleveland, of which 7 are operated by the Cleveland- Cuyahoga County Port Authority. Fourteen are on outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River and remaining 47 along deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-seven terminals have railroad connections and 39 mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1970, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum, as authorized by 1976 WRD Act, was continued, with funds provided under the Construction, General appropriation, at a cost of $84,854. Completion of Design Memo will be accomplished with funds provided under the General Investigations appropriation. Major Rehabilitation: Contract operations were initiated during May 1979 for rehabilitation of 4,400 feet of east breakwater requiring placement of 139,000 tons of stone and 29,500 dolosse concrete armor units on slopes and rebuilding the structure to its design height. Construction continued during this fiscal year at a cost of $7,397,311. At the end of FY 1980, the contract was 97% complete. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $305,287. Maintenance of Cuyahoga and Old River to 23-foot depth, by contract, employing clamshell bucket dredge, was accomplished and 598,985 32-6 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT cubic yards, scow measure, of shoaled material were removed. Total cost of contract dredging operations were $4,271,831. Repairs to approximately 600 linear feet of east and west breakwaters by U.S. derrick boats Tonawanda, McCauley and Ohio cost $793,063, including new stone purchase. U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 91,722 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material from river entrance and east and west basin channels and U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman removed 61,757 cubic yards bin measure from the entrance channel and at mouth of river at a cost of $508,033.Construction costs of fourth diked disposal area (Site 14) were finalized with an expenditure of $175,908. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 39 percent complete. River entrance channel was improved by construction of parallel piers 325 feet apart, and dredging to 25 feet deep at low-water datum up to Penn Central Co. bridge. Piers were completed in 1900 and dredging in 1935. An outer harbor, about 1,300 acres in extent, was formed by construction of an aggregate length of about 30,000 feet of breakwater, including converging arms, completed in 1915. About 1,770 linear feet of east breakwater and 1,000 linear feet of west breakwater were repaired under major rehabilitation program in 1962 and 1963. Structures are generally in fair condition. Sections of east breakwater where cover stone has been displaced and settled are in need of repair. Several lake storms in ionnection with high lake levels combined to displace several sections of the concrete cap of the west breakwater. In addition, cracks in the concrete over most of the west breakwater indicate possible crib failure. Currently about 7,200 linear feet of the east breakwater, 1,200 linear feet of the west breakwater and the entire west pier are in need of repair. Main entrance was widened to 700 feet and protected by converging arms extending lakeward from east and west breakwaters, completed in 1908. Outer harbor was deepened, 1933-35, to 25 feet at low-water datum throughout west basin, in entrance channel, and over a portion of east basin adjacent to entrance channel. Portions of channel in Cuyahoga River were widened each year from 1930 to 1942 and in 1958. Removal of 150 feet of easterly end of west breakwater and construction of 400 feet of spur breakwater to protect gap in west breakwater shore arm were completed in 1935. A concrete base for a light tower was constructed at east end of east breakwater in 1917 in lieu of east-end pierhead. Providing a 1,300-foot extension of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit was authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act and partially completed with Defense Plant Corp. funds during 1942 and remaining portion previously classified inactive was deleted from project by 1962 act. Old River to Sand Products Corp. dock was deepened to 23 feet in 1952. Replacement of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge 25 was completed April 1953. Replacement of Penn Central Co. bridge 8 was completed December 1953. Replacement of Penn Central Co. bridge 9 was completed June 1956 and channel in vicinity of structure widened during 1957. Replacement of Penn Central Co. bridge 1 was completed in January 1957. Replacement of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge 15 was completed in March 1959. Replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad bridge 3 was completed in October 1957. Widening near Penn Central Co. bridge 1 was completed in September 1957. Widening near Baltimore & Ohio Railroad bridge 3 and in vicinity of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge 15 and deepening Cuyahoga River were completed in July 1958. Widening Cuyahoga River at upstream portion of Cut 4 was completed in October 1959. Widening and deepening Cuyahoga River at Cut 10 were completed in April 1961. Deepening lake approach, entrance channel, lower portion of Cuyahoga River to bridge 1 and east and west basins (stage 1 of 1960 act) was completed in November 1962. Replacement of city of Cleveland highway bridge 33 was initiated in August 1963 and completed in June 1965. Widening portion of Cut 14 in Old River vicinity of bridge 33 was completed in June 1965. Deepening of 27- and 28-foot areas in east basin and 25-foot deep channel through remainder of east outer harbor including approach channel to Nicholson Terminal all as authorized by 1962 act was initiated in April 1964 and completed in April 1965. Deepening of downstream 1000-foot portion of Old River channel extension to 23 feet, as authorized by Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, was initiated in April 1968 and completed in August 1968. For disposal of dredged materials a pilot study experimental diked disposal area was constructed in the East basin and another diked disposal area adjacent to and easterly there of were constructed during 1968-1969. Construction of diked disposal areas, (Site 12 and Site 14) were completed in June 1975 and October 1979, respectively. Contract operations for major rehabilitation of 4,400 linear feet of east breakwater were initiated in May 1979. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of: 1976 Act - completion of preparation of Phase I General design memorandum which will be accomplished with funds provided under the General Investigations appropriation; 1960 Act Stage II - Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including Old River classified as deferred; 1958 Act - completion of preconstruction planning for and replacement of bridges 19 and 32, and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels 32-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 classified as deferred; and, 1946 Act - the widening of Cuyahoga River at downstream end of Cut 4 classified as inactive. Costs of existing project were $30,088,877 (including $616,767 public works funds) for new work, $113,411,250 (including $125,000 public works funds) for maintenance and $8,904,713 for rehabilitation, a total of $152,404,840. In addition $201,960 of contributed funds were expended for maintenance. 8. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. Entire project modification authorized by 1966 act providing for a recreational small boat harbor is classified as deferred. Estimated cost (1970) of this modification is $717,000. For completed work non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for construction of service facilities for the 1966 project modification. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for deferred project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys were done by Government plant and hired labor at a cost of $20,890. U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 49,969 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material over an area of approximately 100,000 square yards of the Conneaut River and outer harbor to project depths of 27 and 28 feet at a cost of $114,475. Breakwater repairs were made at a cost of $2,119; in-house engineering costs were $12,297. Planning continued for diked disposal facility at a cost of $36,109. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 91 percent complete. Under existing project a length of 4,445 feet of new west breakwater was completed in 1916; old east breakwater, 1,050 feet long, was extended shoreward 800 feet (completed 1911) and lakeward 900 feet (completed 1923). The 1,670-foot shore arm to west breakwater was completed in 1934. Extension of west breakwater 830 feet lakeward, east breakwater 925 feet lakeward, and removal of lake arm of west breakwater were completed in 1935; 642 feet of old west breakwater were removed in 1916, and remaining 600 feet in 1925. Two piers were constructed at mouth of Conneaut River. Removal of west pier and 459 feet of east pier were completed in 1934. East pier is now '1,008 feet long. A channel through outer harbor was deepened to 25 and 26 feet in 1938. Inner 1,200 feet of west breakwater was rebuilt to its original elevation during 1941 to 1952 and is in fair condition. Repairs to 600 feet of west breakwater and 1,200 feet of east breakwater were completed in 1964. Deepening city dock approach channel to 8 feet initiated in September 1964 and 1,150-foot long shoreward extension of east breakwater initiated in July 1965 were completed in November 1965. Removal of 995 feet of east pier was initiated in November 1965 and completed in December 1965. Deepening inner and outer harbor channels as authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act was initiated November 1965 and completed July 1967. Work remaining to complete project consists of construction of recreational small boat harbor as authorized by 1966 R&H Act presently classified as deferred. At several places along remainder of west breakwater and along east breakwater, slope stone on lake side is disintegrating and pulling away and deck stone is settling. Other harbor structures are generally in good condition. Costs of existing project were $7,541,369 (including $1,010,500 public works funds) for new work, $5,165,019 for maintenance and $651,850 for rehabilitation, a total of $13,358,238. 9. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo,N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of uncompleted small boatharbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $2,368,000(Oct. 1979) of which $418,200 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of 32-8 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT $1,949,800 is for new work authorized under Sec-, tion 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Estimated total non-Federal cost of $1,961,000 (Oct. 1979) includes $11,000 contributed for completed work and balance of $1,950,000 is required cash contribution for work authorized by 1965 F.C. Act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for com. pleted portion of project, including cash contribution of $11,000. See pages 32-8 and -9 of Annual Report for 1976 for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized under Sec 201 of 1965F.C. Act. Assurances of local cooperation were approved on May 16, 1979. To date, local interests contributed $1,950,000 toward the cost of small boat harbor project, and $11,000 for the previously completed new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year.New Work: Contract operations for small boat harbor authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1962, initiated in August 1979, were continued at cost of $1,236,918. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $2,327. Economic study of harbor and bioassay analysis and evaluation of sediments cost $29,146. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 93 percent complete. Deep draft navigation project was completed in 1951. Project structures are generally in good condition. About 800 linear feet of lake side of west pier completed in 1921 has been reinforced with stone riprap, and repairs to additional areas where concrete superstructure cracked and settled are necessary. Construction of small boat harbor, as authorized under Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, remains to be done to complete the project. Costs of existing project were $2,215,257 for new work and $1,224,303 for maintenance, a total of $3,439,560. In addition, local interests contributed $1,961,000. 10. ERIE HARBOR, PA. Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion as authorized by 1899 act is deferred and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1955)of this portion is $1,071,000. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, is classified deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated ,'cst (July 1962) of this portion is $78,000. Non-Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two off-shore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $58,274. Installation of pumpout units for use by government hopper dredges cost $37,478. U.S. hopper dredge Lyman performed experimental testing on the feasibility of beach nourishment at a cost of $5500. Sub-surface explorations, by contract, and in-house engineering for major repair of north and south piers cost $32,876. Costs related to the diked disposal program amounted to $41,254. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 71 percent complete. Breakwater and piers were completed in 1915. A 3,050-foot section of rubblemound protection work on peninsula was completed in 1921, 5,281 feet of steel-sheet piling protection work with stone facing were completed in 1930, and two experimental 300-foot stone groins and about 1,385 feet of stone-protection work at beach 2 were completed in 1943. Construction of 2,750 feet of stone-protection work, just north of Kelso groin, was completed in 1944. The 18-foot harbor basin was deepened in 1900. Widening and straightening of entrance channel was completed in 1936. Deepening entrance channel and approach channel to easterly ore dock to 25 feet except for small triangular areas along southeasterly and southwesterly limits of approach channel, was completed in 1939. The 32-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 21-foot harbor basin was deepened in 1940. Widening approach channel to easterly ore dock was completed in August 1958. Deepening entrance channel to 29 feet, and approach channel and turning basin at easterly docks to 28 feet was completed in 1962. Deepening approach channel to Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 to a depth of 27 feet in soft material, and 28 feet in hard material, as authorized by 1962 act was initiated in June 1966 and completed in August 1966. Construction of diked disposal area was completed in October 1979. Harbor structures generally are not in good condition. Concrete superstructure of north and south piers completed in 1909, has disintegrated, broken, and dropped in various sections, due to timber-crib failure at these sections. In outer 200-foot section of south breakwater, slope stone on channel side has pulled away and dropped. A length of 40 linear feet of south pier and 1,141 linear feet of north pier was reinforced and repaired with steelsheet piling and concrete. Approximately 1,400 linear feet of steel-sheet piling bulkhead with stone facing adjacent to mainland, Presque Isle protection works, constructed in 1930, in which stone facing settled was completely covered with sandfill as provided in shore. protection project authorized for Presque Isle Peninsula. Work remaining to complete project consists of completion of deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers as authorized by 1960 act, which is classified as deferred and conditional extension of north pier as authorized by 1899 act which is also classified as deferred. Deepening of channel and basin at westerly end of harbor as authorized by 1945 Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Costs of existing project were $2,860,906 for new work, $11,293,555 for maintenance and $1,154 for rehabilitation, a total of $14,155,615. In addition, $154,500 expended from contributed funds for maintenance. 11. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837). Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized thru the 1960 modification, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1977 for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this modification is $3,170,000 (1963). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000 of which $101,000 were for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non-Federal cost of $3,821,000 (1963) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and dock and bulkhead modifications. See Table 32B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $53,271. U. S. hopper dredge Hoffman removed 9,649 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material from 40,000 square yards of lake approach channel at a cost of $55,337. Removal of 40,996 cubic yards, scow measure, of shoaled material, by contract, from about 1.5 miles of Grand River channel and turning basin, restoring depths of 24, 21, and 18 feet, cost $322,430. Planning for diked disposal facility cost $16,966. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 32 percent complete. Lengths of 400 and 275 linear feet of east pier were repaired with steel-sheet piling and sandfilled, in 1949 and 1958, respectively. Other end of structure requires extensive repairs. River entrance was improved by construction of an east pier completed in 1904, and removal of old west pier and construction of bulkhead, completed in 1939. East breakwater was completed in 1931 and west breakwater in 1935. River channel was deepened to 21 and 24 feet and turning basin to 18 feet in 1939. Outer harbor was deepened to 25 feet and river channel widened at its mouth in 1940. Deepening 8-foot channel in Grand River at upper 32-10 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT end of and adjacent to west side of 21-foot project channel, was completed in 1956. Harbor structures require repairs. Concrete cap of several cells of cellular section of west breakwater requires replacement. At several places along remainder of west breakwater the slope stone has disintegrated and settled. The 6,700-foot long, rubblemound east breakwater, built in 1932 is in poor condition throughout most of its entire length. At several locations of the structure, totaling approximately 2,000 linear feet, slope stone has disintegrated and settled and core stone washed out, leaving large areas of structure only slightly above low-water datum. Work remaining to complete project consists of completion of preconstruction planning for and construction of breakwaters, dredging of approach and dock channels as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 act; and completion of preconstruction planning for and deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, as authorized by 1960 act which is classified inactive. Costs of existing project were $2,590,671 (including $187,772 public work funds) for new work, and $9,613,930 for maintenance, a total of $12,204,601. 12. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, about 17 miles east of Fairport Harbor, Ohio and 12 miles west of Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. Small boat harbor project provides for: (a) breakwaters in Lake Erie aggregating about 1,400 feet in length, with a riprapped spending beach between entrance channel and inner end of west breakwater; (b) entrance channel about 1,000 feet long and varying from 180 to 100 feet in width, 8 feet deep for outer 500 feet and 6 feet deep for the inner extending from 8-foot depth in lake into dock channel; (c) dock channel, 100 feet wide, 1,500 feet in length and 6 feet deep. widened to 200 feet at junction with entrance; and, (d) development of recreational facilities. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,000,000 (Oct. 1980). Non-Federal cost estimate of $2,000,000 (Oct. 1980) is cash contribution toward first cost of construction. Existing project was authorized under provision of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. (H.D. 402, 91st Cong. 2 sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. By letter dated November 10, 1977 the State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the responsible agency, has indicated its willingness and ability to furnish the assurances. Assurances of local cooperation will be requested upon completion of Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial or recreational facilities at the harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $149,080. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction of project remains to be done. 13. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous projects. For details see page 1972 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $4,517. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Structures are generally in good condition except for the east breakwater concrete cap where several sections have been displaced and the structure breached. 500 linear feet of west pier were reinforced with steel-sheet piling and concrete in 1958. Lakeward end of west pier (550 feet long and 880 linear feet of east pier) were reinforced with steel-sheet piling and concrete in 1962 and 1963 under a major rehabilitation program. Repairs to 300 linear feet of east pier were made during FY 1975. Deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel as authorized by 1962 act, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. During FY 32-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1978, a Reconnaissance Report was prepared under Sec. 111, PL 90-483, for prevention or mitigation of shore damage attributable to federal navigation. Costs of existing project were $249,187 for new work, $2,328,702 for maintenance, and $713,544 for rehabilitation, a total of $3,291,433. 14. HURON HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H act is deferred. Estimated cost of construction of breakwater is $12,970,000 (July 1972). Non- Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 32B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Finalization of contract payment and related in-house engineering costs were $1,038 for work authorized by 1962 act. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $46,489. Installation of dredged material pumpout unit cost $14,871. U.S. hopper dredges Markham and Hoffman removed 141,280 cubic yards and 267,600 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material, respectively, from the lake approach channel and the entrance channel to depths of 29 and 28 feet at a cost of $478,344. Costs related to the Diked Disposal Program were $18,272. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 27 percent complete. Structures are generally in good condition except for the inner 800 feet of the west pier where the concrete superstructure has cracked and settled. Repairs to 400 linear feet of west pier under minor rehabilitation program were initiated in August and completed in December 1963. Construction of diked disposal area was completed in December 1975. During FY 1978, a Reconnaissance Report was prepared under Sec.111, PL 90-483 for prevention or mitigation of shore damage attributable to Federal Navigation. Contract operations, which were initiated in May 1977, for deepening lake approach, entrance and river channels, and enlargement of turning basin as authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act were completed in August 1979. Construction of the detached breakwater authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act, has been classified deferred. Costs of existing project were $4,834,006 (including $561,262 public works funds) for new work, $11,058,196 for maintenance, and $247,030 for rehabilitation, total of $16,139,232. 15. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, N.Y. at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) entrance channel located at easterly end of bay, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 8-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels a distance of about 900 feet; (b) inner channel, 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,000 feet; (c) 7-foot deep mooring area; (d)two stone rubblemound structures 1,400 feet and 850 feet in length at entrance extending to 8-foot depth in lake; and (e) recreational facilities of 0.8 acre paved parking area, two comfort stations, stairs on highway embankment, concrete ramps leading to and over the breakwater and jetty, and hand railings on the breakwaters. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,600,000 (Oct. 1980). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $8,690,000 (Oct. 1980) including cash contribution of $1,970,000 (Oct. 1980) and remainder for lands, damages and highway bridge relocation. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 332, 84th Cong. 2nd. sess.) Local cooperation. By letter dated June 13 1980 New York State Office of Parks and Recreation reaffirmed its intent to provide assurances of cooperation. Assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase II General Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New 32-12 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT work: Preconstruction planning for the project was continued at a cost of $111,633. Condition at end of fiscal year. The work remaining to be done consists of completion of preconstruction planning for and construction of the project. 16. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $625. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1906. Structures are in good condition except the entire east breakwater. Repairs to 625 linear feet of the east pier were initiated in 1972 and completed in July 1973. A 300 -foot section of east pier and a 1,127-foot section of west pier were repaired during period September 1965 to July 1967 under major rehabilitation program. Costs of completed project were $69,066 for new work, $3,011,536 for maintenance, and $742,822 for rehabilitation, a total of $3,823,424. 17. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 28 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $26,246,000 (Oct. 1976). Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization as authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act is classified deferred. The estimated cost of $5,317,000 for this work is included in the above estimate. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15- to 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers is also deferred and estimated cost of $60,200 (July 1966) is excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Total non-Federal cost estimate is $8,853,000 (Oct. 1976) including $3,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of west breakwater shorearm. For work authorized by 1960 act, including deferred portion, non- Federal costs are estimated to be $8,805,000 for lands, relocations of utilities, modifications of existing dock and bulkheads, construction of new bulkheads and dockside dredging. For work authorized by 1965 act, classified as deferred, local interests must make a cash contribution presently estimated at $45,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 act (and modified by 1965 act) is classified deferred. All other conditions fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work - 1960 project modification: Adjustment of final costs resulted in credit of $30. 'Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection surveys and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $80,886. Installation of dredged material pumpout unit and two articulated structures in the permanent pipeline, with Government plant, to allow passage of vessels during the non-dredging season and the placement of stone bank protection in the vicinity of the pumpout cost $193,928. Breakwater repairs by U.S. derrick boat Ohio cost $19,003. U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman removed 96,094 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material from the lake approach channel, outer harbor and river channel, including turning basin to depths of 29, 28, and 27 feet at a cost of $159,104. Costs related to the Diked Disposal Program were $782. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 78 percent complete. An outer harbor as provided by constructing breakwaters and pierheads completed in 1915, except extension of west breakwater to shore, which was completed in 1921. A channel through outer harbor to entrance to Black River was deepened to 25 feet in 1937, also a channel 16 feet deep to municipal pier 32-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 was provided in 1936. Deepening outer harbor to 25 feet was completed in 1946. Entrance to river was improved by construction of parallel piers completed in 1909. Widening of two bends in river was completed in 1934. River channel was deepened to 24 feet and upstream turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock was deepened to 17 feet in 1937 and 1938. Upstream turning basin was widened in 1944. Deepening downstream basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad coal dock to 20 feet was completed in 1951. Deepening upper and lower portion of Black River (above and below 21st Street Bridge) to 27 feet, entrance channel between piers 2,200 feet long to 28 feet and 800-foot wide lake approach channel to 29 feet, an irregularly shaped area in west outer harbor to 25 feet and enlarging and deepening turning basin to 21 feet, were initiated in May 1962 and completed in November 1963. Deepening remainder of outer harbor, triangular area vicinity of East pier, to project depth 28 feet was initiated in April 1966 and completed in June 1966. Construction of new east cellular steel sheet pile breakwater shorearm 2,323 feet long with a 134-foot stone shore connection, was initiated in January 1963 and completed in October 1963. Construction of new cellular steel sheet pile outer detached breakwater was initiated in August 1964 and completed in June 1966. Removal of 250 feet of the lakeward end of the East breakwater and construction of a new pierhead was completed in November 1965. Removal of shoals in lake approach channel was initiated in September 1966 and completed in July 1967. Partial channel widening and bank stabilization at Cut 1 was in" itiated in September 1968 and completed iin September 1969. Replacement of substructure of the Norfolk and Western Railway company bridge was initiated in February 1971 and completed in November 1972. Replacement of the superstructure was initiated in August 1972 and completed in April 1975. Preauthorization studies for construction of small boat harbor as authorized by the Chief of Engineers on June 4,1968 under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act were terminated in February 1975. Local interests indicated that there is no further interest in the construction of small boat harbor at the study location. Widening of Black River at Cut 2 was initiated in July 1974 and completed in August 1974. Construction of diked disposal area was completed in April 1978. Protection works are generally in fair condition. Shoreward section of west breakwater, completed in 1921, has disintegrated and settled and in places is below low-water datum. At various locations on lake face of lakeward section of west breakwater, stones shifted leaving holes in the wall, and in many sections of east breakwater stones above water have deteriorated and shifted. Severe cracks and shifting have developed in superstructure of west breakwater pierhead. East pier, completed in 1905 was reduced in length from 1,875 feet to 880 feet in November 1964 by removal of lakeward 995 feet. Remainder of East Pier is in various stages of disrepair where concrete superstructure supported by timber cribs has cracked and settled. Remaining work, all classified as deferred, consists of widening remaining portion at bends in river channel, including construction of bank stabilization works at Cut 1 and dredging strips adjacent to east and west piers, all as authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act. Costs of existing project were $20,470,286 (including $165,000 public works funds) for new work and $16,859,396 (including $76,300 public works funds) for maintenance, a total of $37,329,682. 18. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous project. For details see page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. . Existing project. For description of completed existing project see page 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (July 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys cost $936. Biological study, by contract, was continued at a cost of $1,000. Related in-house engineering costs were $1,953. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract operations for new work initiated in May 1974 were completed in September 1975. Costs of existing project were $1,586,996 for new work and $65,967 for maintenance, a total of $1,652,963. In addition, $224,702 contributed funds expended for new work. 19. OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence 32-14 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT River, 62 miles by water from Lake Ontario. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14764.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1635 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1568 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $375,086. Removal of hard material shoals from lower basin portion of project as authorized by 1935 act, at an estimated cost of $183,000 (1954) is classified inactive. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 7 terminals in harbor and 3 in Federal project area. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: An economic study at the harbor cost $2,667. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion. Channels were deepened to 19 feet in 1913. Upper entrance channel was widened to 400 feet in 1920 and to 700 feet in 1935. Removal of elevator wharf and deepening lower basin was completed in 1935, except for removal of hard material shoals which is classified inactive. Costs of existing project were $375,086 (including $174,549 public works funds) for new work, and $1,136,122 for maintenance, a total of $1,511,208. 20. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For details see page 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $1,500. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys were made at a cost of $4,166. In-house engineering costs, including commencement of an economic study, by contract, were $8,457. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1918. Wooden superstructure was replaced with concrete in 614.6 linear feet of west pier. A length of 800 linear feet of east pier has been reinforced and repaired with steel-sheet piling and concrete. Similar repairs to 620 linear feet of west pier began in June and were completed in November 1963. Costs of existing project were $398,349 for maintenance, $14,477 for rehabilitation, a total of $412,826. Funds in the amount of $186,000 under the Public Works Acceleration Act were also expended for pier repair. In addition, $1,500 for new work, and $5,000 for maintenance were expended from contributed funds. 21. OSWEGO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non- Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal, wharves and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 act, and deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 act, are classified as inactive. Estimated Federal costs for this work are $246,000 (July 1957) and $2,419,000 (July 1966) respectively, and estimated non-Federal costs are $500,000 (July 1966) for dockside dredging for work authorized by 1940 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Seven piers and wharves in harbor and along river channel. In addition, Port of Oswego Authority owns two public terminals, one of which is west of river and includes a grain elevator and warehouse for miscellaneous freight. Other terminal is east of river and used for handling aluminum and general cargo. State of New York owns a river terminal used for mooring vessels. City of Oswego owns one dock and shore facilities for recreational craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and 32-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 hired labor cost $22,555. In-house engineering costs were $9,066. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 73 percent complete. Outer west breakwater was completed in 1882, and originally 6,032 feet long with a 119-foot gap near westerly end, but was reduced to 4,359 feet in 1931, and gap was closed in 1942. West arrowhead breakwater was completed in 1931, and east arrowhead breakwater in 1932. Old lighthouse pier, a part of west inner breakwater, and upper and lower islands in Oswego River, were removed in 1931. A depth of 21 feet was obtained in Oswego River to within 50 feet of harbor line and in outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, except a strip about 200 feet wide along harbor line east of river mouth, in 1932. Channel in Oswego River was widened to harbor lines in 1937. A channel, 16 feet deep and 100 feet wide, with a turning basin at its westerly end, was dredged in 1932 in outer harbor west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock. Channel was widened to 250 feet and deepened to 21 feet below low-water datum in 1948. Removal of shoals to 25 feet in approach to entrance channel was completed in 1957. Contract for construction of 850-foot long detached breakwater at harbor entrance was initiated in May 1957 and completed June 1960. Deepening lake approach channel to 27 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel including harbor turning basin to 25 feet and 1,600 feet of lower river channel to 24 feet, all as authorized by 1962 act, was initiated in June 1965 and completed in November 1965. Breakwaters are generally in fair condition except that slope stone in portions of west arrowhead breakwater has disintegrated and settled and core stone in a 1,500-foot section of west arrowhead breakwater has also settled in many places. Approximately 1,900 linear feet of deteriorated sections of outer west breakwater were repaired under minor rehabilitation program in 1962. Completion of inactive portions as described in paragraph for existing project, remain to be done to complete project. Costs of existing project were $7,242,039 for new work, $3,642,752 for maintenance, and $307,590 for rehabilitation, total of $11,192,381. 22. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, N.Y., and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is in the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. Existing project. Existing project, as modified by Phase I General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) two shore connected rubblemound breakwaters in Lake Ontario at mouth of Salmon River, south breakwater about 1,450 feet long and north breakwater about 350 feet long (b) sixinch diameter pipe capped at each end, to function as a sand bypass, installed through south and north breakwaters and below entrance channel; (c) entrance channel between breakwaters, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep, from deep water in lake to a limit about 1,200 feet from 8-foot depth contour in lake;(d) river channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep from inner limit of entrance channel for a distance upstream of about 450 feet. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,500,000 (Oct.1980). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $440,300 (Oct. 1980) including cash contribution of $211,300. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase II Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Port Ontario Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $232,959. Condition at end of fiscal year. Funds in the amount of $7,000 were expended in Fiscal Years 1946 and 1947 for preparation of Definite Project Report. Due to lack of local cooperation, the project was then placed in the deferred category. In January 1966, the State of New York Conservation Department expressed intent to cooperate with the Corps in construction of the project. The project was then reclassified to the active category in July 1966. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction remains to be done to complete the project. 23. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $21,191,514. Non- Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 32-16 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT 1960 act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $52,098. U. S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 188,436 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material from the lower turn. ing basin and about 1.5 miles of Genesee River Channel for restoration of the project areas to a depth of 19 feet at a cost of $312,964. Repairs to approximately 440 linear feet of west pier, by contract, were initiated at a cost of $105,354. Contract costs for bulk, elutriate and bioassay tests on harbor sediments cost $37,642. In-house engineering costs on major repairs to east and west piers were $67,004. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is completed. A length of 1,265 linear feet of west pier was reinforced with steel-sheet piling and concrete. An additional 2,600 feet of west pier and 2,700 linear feet of the east pier is failing, the crib-filling stone has escaped and concrete is cracked. A length of 550 linear feet of east pier was reinforced and repaired with steel-sheet piling and concrete during 1954 and 1955 and a 700-foot section was repaired in 1971. Present channel was completed in 1935. Stage I of work authorized by 1960 act, consisting of deepening lake approach, entrance channel, and lower turning basin, was initiated in May and completed August 1962. Stage II of work authorized by 1960 act, consisting of deepening river channel, upper turning basin, and construction of two steel-sheet pile cell dolphins, was initiated in October 1962 and completed in December 1963. Channel is unstable and requires annual dredging to maintain adequate depth. Costs of existing project were $2,191,514 (including $56,806 emergency relief funds) for new work, and $9,124,622 (including $478 emergency relief funds) for maintenance, a total of $11,316,136. 24. SACKETS HARBOR, NEW YORK Location. On south shore of Black River Bay at easterly end of Lake Ontario, about 41 miles northerly of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14802.) Previous project. For details see page 3160 of Annual Report for 1896 and page 2809 of Annual Report for 1898. Existing project. For description see page 2456 of Annual Report for 1948. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $19,010. Deepening of the harbor area to project dimensions as authorized by 1945 act, at an estimated cost of $379,000 (1954) is classified inactive. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 2457 of 1948 Annual Report for details. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $1,955. An ecomomic study of the harbor, initiated by contract, cost $1,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 5 percent complete. In 1884 a timber-crib mooring place was constructed and placed on shoal in harbor off Shiphouse Point, and in 1888, connected with shore by a dike 164 feet in length. Two stone groins perpendicular to beach were constructed in 1896. Deepening of the harbor area remains to be done to complete the project. This work was authorized by the 1945 R&H Act and is classified inactive. Costs of existing project were $19,010 for new work and $16,594 for maintenance, a total of $35,604. 25. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeasterly portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous projects. For details see page 1960 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1574 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000 including $325,000 cash contribution and remainder of $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepened channels authorized by 1960 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and 32-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned are used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $53,684. U. S. hopper dredge Markham removed 131,786 cubic yards of shoaled material over approximately 100,000 square yards of Bay channel for restoration of project depth of 25 feet at a cost of $301,430. Minor repairs to east jetty cost $3,062. Planning was continued for diked disposal area at a cost of $58,707. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Harbor structures are generally in good condition except the inner 2,000 linear feet of the east jetty protection works, completed in 1922. Paralleling outer harbor entrance channel has subsided and in many places is barely above low water datum. The easterly 1,400 linear feet of rock dike paralleling the dock channel were rebuilt in 1956. In 1963, 500 linear feet of remaining 2,355 linear feet, westerly portion, of dike were removed. Deepening Moseley, Straight, Bay Channels and deepening and enlarging turning basin, all as authorized by 1960 act were initiated in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Costs of completed existing project were $6,250,121 (including $599,500 public work funds) for new work, $8,640,199 for maintenance, and $675,606 for rehabilitation, a total of $15,565,926. In addition, $325,000 expended from contributed funds for new work. 26. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deep-draft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $161,687. U.S. hopper dredge Markham performed maintenance dredging removing 333,784 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoaled material at a cost of $1,397,915. Maintenance of spoil disposal facilities cost $84,548. Costs related to the Diked Disposal Program were $10,011. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Costs of existing project were $15,567,147 for new work and $51,715,109 for maintenance for a total of $67,282,256. 27. VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of$740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $25,116. A study to investigate possible adverse effects of harbor project was con- 32-18 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT tinued at a cost of $19,816. Maintenance dredging was performed, by contract, employing a clamshell bucket dredge with 32,568 cubic yards of shoaled material being removed at a cost of $381,527. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Repairs to piers under minor rehabilitation program were initiated in June and completed in October 1964. Contract operations consisting of new detached breakwater, new channel and extension of river channel all as authorized by 1958 act, were initiated on June 11, 1973 and completed May 24, 1974. Engineering and design studies under Sec. 111, P.L. 90-483 for prevention or mitigation of shore damage attributable to federal navigation work were initiated in FY 1978. Through FY 1978 funds for this work were made available under the Operation and Maintenance appropriation. Starting with FY 1979, funds were made available under the Construction, General appropriation. Costs of existing project were $1,156,118 for new work, $1,263,561 for maintenance, and $139,775 for rehabilitation, a total of $2,559,454. In addition, $740,679 expended from contributed funds for new work. 28. WEST HARBOR, OHIO Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northeast of Port Clinton, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing project. Existing project, as modified by Phase I General Design Memorandum, provides for two arrowhead breakwaters with an aggregate length of approximately 2,925 feet; entrance channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to mouth of natural entrance and thence 80 feet wide to a depth of 8 feet; and access channel 3,980 feet in length, 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep from inner entrance to "Y" near center of harbor where channel divides northerly about 2,733 feet and southerly about 3,895 feet. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,510,000 (Oct. 1980). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,430,000 (Oct. 1980), including cash contribution of $3,720,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio has stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $143,982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of pre-construction planning and construction remains to be done to complete the project. 29. WILSON HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806). Previous project. For details see page 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description see page 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 which includes costs of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs are for work required for 1968 R & H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $1,737. An economic study of the harbor, initiated by contract, cost $2,149. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is completed. Restoration of east and west parallel piers and construction of entrance channel were completed in 1950. The project modification authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act was selected by the Secretary of the Army for inclusion in the Small Authorized Projects program. Work consisted of channel deepening, extension, and widening at Wilson Harbor and Tuscarora Bay. The work was initiated in May 1972 and completed in September 1972. Costs of existing project were $477,904 for new work and $171,912 for maintenance, a total of $649,816. In addition, $166,998 of contributed funds, expended for new work. 30. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted at Presque Isle, Pennsylvania, Put-in-Bay, Ohio and Port Clinton, Ohio. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 32-C. 32-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 32. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-D. Beach Erosion Control 33. LAKEVIEW PARK, LORAIN, OHIO Location. In the City of Lorain, Lorain County, Ohio, on south shore of Lake Erie between 1,500 and 3,000 feet west of Lorain Harbor west breakwater. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-19 of Annual Report for 1977. The Federal cost of the completed project was $1,360,986 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) was $50,000 for relocation. In addition, local interests contributed $583,280. Annual cost of 5-year program for beach replenishment and monitoring is estimated to be $75,000. Existing project authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc. 224, 83rd Cong. 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $583,280. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. Five year monitoring program which was initiated in 1978 was continued at a cost of $16,802. Cooperative beach nourishment was conducted in FY 80 during which time 6,000 cubic yards of sand were placed within the project limits at a cost of $44,999. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project is complete. Contract operations initiated in June 1977 were completed in October 1977. Post-construction operations consisting of beach replenishment and monitoring initiated in FY 1978 will be continued. Federal costs of $61,801 were incurred during FY 1980 for monitoring program and beach nourishment for a cumulative cost of $193,754. 34. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, N.Y. and 102 miles east-northeast of Cleveland, Ohio, (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. The Water Resources Development (WRD) Act of March 7, 1974, reinstated and extended authorization for beach erosion control project, as provided in 1960 R&H Act, for a period of five years from date of enactment of 1974 WRD Act, or if the review study of such project is not completed prior to end of such period, until such study is completed and a report thereon submitted to Congress. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act provides for continued annual nourishment by stating: "At expiration of authorization provided in Section 57 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may provide periodic beach nourishment in accordance with cost sharing provisions of Section 103(a) (2) of Act of October 23, 1962." The act also authorized preparation of a Phase I General Design Memorandum. At present, recommended plan provides for construction of five sections of segmented offshore breakwaters for shore protection. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1980) is $24,896,000 which includes $2,146,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts. Estimated non- Federal cost (Oct. 1980) is $13,893,000 which includes $2,483,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts. U.S. Coast Guard costs are estimated to be $80,000 (Oct. 1979). See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts. For nourishment project as authorized by 1974 WRD Act, an agreement between Department of Environmental Resources, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Corps of Engineers was entered into on January 7, 1975. For requirements of local cooperation for work recommended by 1976 WRD Act, see page 32-19 of Annual Report for 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach replenishment as authorized by 1974 WRD Act was continued at a cost of $700,380. For its share of cost of improvement, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $321,429 for a cumulative total contribution of $1,950,001. Preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum, as authorized by 1976 WRD Act, was continued at a cost of $406,697 with funds provided under the General Investigation appropriation. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is 20 percent complete. Since project authorization, Federal participation in first costs for remaining work was changed from one-third share to 70 percent in accordance with provisions of section 103, Public Law 87-874. Construction of project works for shore protection as authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act was accomplished in two stages by separate contracts. Stage 1, completed in October 1956, provided for realignment and removal of steel-sheet pile bulkhead and placing of sandfill. Stage II, completed in September 1957, provided for construction of bulkheads and groins. Modification to six groins was accomplished in 1966. Under the periodic nourishment program authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, the first major beach nourishment was completed in 1965. Special coarse sand fill was placed in 1966. Third nourishment was completed in 1969. Fourth and final periodic nourishment of 32-20 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT the beach during the 10-year period from year of first major nourishment operation was completed in December 1971. Authority for Federal participation expired in May 1971.Under authority of 1974 WRD Act, Phase I of beach replenishment was completed in June 1975, Phase II was completed in June 1976, Phase III was completed in June 1977 and Phase IV was completed in July 1978. In FY 1978, initial funds for the preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum (1976 WRD Act) were provided under the Construction, General appropriation and subsequent funding for completion of Phase I General Design Memo will be provided under the General Investigations appropriation. Work remaining to complete the project consists of: 1974 WRD Act -completion of beach replenishment; and, 1976 WRD Act -completion of preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum. In addition, costs of $257,985 were incurred during fiscal years 1973 and 1974 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm and high lake levels. 35. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 36. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shoreline erosion control demonstration - Sec. 54 of 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 93-251. Geneva State Park, Ohio - During the year, monitoring was performed on a regular monthly basis, two topographic surveys were made, aerial and land photos were taken, gabion structure removed, reports prepared, and survey data were forwarded to Coastal Engineering Research Center, all at a cost of $91,453 for a cumulative cost of $314,843. Beach erosion activity pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Lake Shore Park at Ashtabula, Ohio - Costs of $60,556 were incurred for preauthorization studies. East Harbor State Park, Ohio - Costs of $4,557 were incurred for preparation of Reconnaissance Report. Flood Control 37. CUYAHOGA RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The project is located in northeastern Ohio, in Cuyahoga and Summit Counties, in the Cuyahoga River watershed. (See Geological Survey Map of Cleveland-South.) Existing project. Big Creek flood control improvement project, as developed in reformulation studies, Phase II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) relocation of approximately 4,950 linear feet of Baltimore and Ohio railroad mainline and 1,290 linear feet of spurline, construction of embankment for new track and construction of two new railroad bridges, (b) floodway channel, 2,700 feet long from existing channel in Brookside Park to existing channel, upstream from West 25th Street bridge, including spillway, staged channel and associated work, (c) diversion channel extending 1,000 feet from existing channel, about 140 feet upstream from West 25th street bridge to existing channel approximately 300 feet from Protector Products, including two open channel segments, and, (d) modifications to existing channel. Estimated cost (Oct. 1980) for new work is Federal $13,500,000 and non-Federal $3,245,000 for lands, damages and relocations. Existing project was authorized by Section 108 of 1970 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the Big Creek improvement project local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights of way, utility and building relocations, and highway and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction of the plan of improvement; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development of the flood plain by the use of appropriate flood plain management techniques; and prevent any encroachment on the project flood channels and ponding areas that would decrease the effectiveness of the flood control improvements and, if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly substitute capacities to restore the effectiveness of the flood control project. These items of local cooperation are different than those adopted and agreed to by the Cleveland Metro Park System. The revised Local Cooperation Agreement was formally presented to the Cleveland Metro Park System on 31 July 1980 for enactment. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $78,021. 32-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end of fiscal year. Funds in the amount of $200,000 were appropriated in FY 1973 and FY 1974. These funds were retained pending approval of the early action project by the Secretary of the Army. The funds were released in FY 1976 after the Secretary of the Army approved the project in September 1975. Termination of Pilot Sediment Removal Program was approved on December 9, 1976 as a result of a preliminary investigation that indicated that the program was no longer justified. Completion of engineering and design and construction of improvements remains to be done to complete project. 38. DANSVILLE AND VICINITY, CANASERAGA CREEK, N.Y. Location. In towns of North Dansville and West Sparta, Livingston County, New York (See Geological Survey Map Dansville, N.Y. 1942.) Existing project. Flood control improvements as developed in reformulation studies, Phase I General Design Memorandum, provide for: (a) two levees, 5 feet high, 230 and 270 feet long respectively, extending from each side of sewage plant road to southbound ramps of the Genesee Expressway, (b) steel sheet pile floodwall, 400 feet in length, along right bank between Route 36 bridge and north bridge abutment of Genesee Expressway, (c) crib wall 260 feet in length, to provide bank stabilization and protection along right bank between Route 36 bridge and Hartman Road, and (d) removal of Hartman Road bridge and construction of two 20-foot gravity walls to provide bank stabilization, protection and replacement of the existing deteriorated bridge abutments. Federal cost for new work $890,000 (Oct. 1980). Non-Federal cost estimate of $17,000 (Oct. 1980) is for lands and alteration of sewage disposal plant. Existing project was authorized by Sec. 203 of 1948 Flood Control Act (H.D. 206, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation state that prior to construction of the plan of improvement, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: a. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, disposal areas, and rights-ofway necessary for construction of the improvement, presently estimated at $8,000. b. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; c. Operate and maintain the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including provisions to prevent encroachments on the improved channel; d. In acquiring lands, easements and rights-ofway for construction of the project, the State will comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested upon completion of Phase II Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $82,090. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in 1954. In 1956, planning indicated that the project was not economically justified and authorized project was classified inactive in January 1957. As a result of tropical storm Agnes in June 1972 and significant Congressional and local interest, the project was reclassified to deferred category in June 1973. Based on recommendations contained in restudy letter report, project was reclassified to active category in August 1974. Cost of letter report was $6,000 with funds provided in FY 1973 under the General Investigation appropriation. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction of local flood protection improvements remain to be done to complete the project. 39. ELLICOTT CREEK, N.Y. Location. The proposed channel improvement is located on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in the towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. (See Geological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and Buffalo Northeast, N.Y.) Existing project. For detailed description of the original project as authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual Report for 1973. The basic authorization, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 provides authority to undertake flood control measures to alleviate flooding that is compatible with authorized project and any alternatives currently under restudy pursuant to Flood Control Act of 1970. As a result of restudy of alternatives, the project provides for: (a) widening, straightening and deepening about 2.2 miles of existing creek channel including the existing by-pass channel in Ellicott Creek Park; (b) construction of a diversion channel about 5,850 feet long between Maple Road and Millersport Highway; (c) construction of a diversion channel about 1,900 feet long through Pfohl Park; (d) construction of a diversion channel about 9,000 feet long from Niagara Falls Boulevard upstream to about Pfohl Park; (e) construction of 2 highway bridges; (f) modification of culverts at Tonawanda Creek Road; (g) foundation protection of 1 highway bridge; (h) modification of utilities and drainage outlets; and, (i) recreation facilities con- 32-22 BUFFALO, N..Y, DISTRICT sisting of a bike and hike path about 4 miles long, with open space park areas. The estimated Federal cost of existing project is $13,700,000 (Oct. 1980). The estimated non-Federal cost is $6,940,000 (Oct. 1980) which includes a cash contribution of $290,000. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976. On October 25, 1976, the New York State Department of Conservation furnished a letter of intent to cooperate toward construction of project. Formal assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase II Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $92,928. Condition at end of fiscal year. The 1970 Flood Control Act authorized construction of Sandridge Dam and downstream channel improvements. It also stipulated that before any work is initiated, a restudy of alternatives to the dam be undertaken. As a result of Restudy of Alternatives, which was completed in 1973, recommended revisions were submitted in a public notice dated March 18, 1974. Revisions to the project are described in detail in above paragraph, Existing project. The authorization of the 1970 Flood Control Act was modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 to provide for remedial flood control measures compatible with the diversion plan contained in the report of Restudy of Alternatives. Preconstruction planning was initiated in December 1974. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction remains to be done to complete the project. In addition, approximately $311,400 were expended during FY 1977 for emergency work for "Operation Runoff". As a result of record snowfalls during the 1976-1977 winter, advance measures were undertaken to reduce flood damages anticipated from the snowmelt. Work was performed under authority of Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies. 40. MT. MORRIS LAKE, N.Y. GENESEE RIVER Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, N.Y. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, N.Y. (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition $5,000 contributed funds expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir, and service facilities, condition and operation studies and miscellaneous reports were accomplished by hired labor for $298,249. Debris removal accomplished by contract, cost $90,334. Cooperative stream gaging program accomplished by Geological Survey and Weather Bureau reporting and hydroclimatic networks cost $37,500. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $101, 648. Aerial mapping, by contract, including the reservoir and an area up to 20 miles downstream of the dam and 27 miles upstream of the dam cost $56,768. Engineering and design costs of $149,974 were incurred for the preparation of a flood emergency plan,including appendix for acquisition of land downstream of dam and dam break studies, plans and specifications for debris removal, annual facility inspection, visitor center study, electrical maintenance repairs, trash boom study and heated enclosures for seismic instruments. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Construction of concrete gravitytype dam was initiated by contract March 1948 and completed May 1952. Clearing of reservoir area and construction of all appurtenances are complete. Operations and maintenance of dam, reservoir, and appurtenances are continued annually. 41. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO Location. Point Place is located on a peninsula in northeast portion of city of Toledo, Ohio. Its shores are bounded on the east by Maumee Bay of Lake Erie and on the west by Ottawa River. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction immediately north of mouth of Maumee River. Existing project. Existing project, as recommended in Phase II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) combination of protective structures consisting of 4,400 feet of steel sheet pile wall and 13,400 feet of levee; (b) three new pumping stations and 6,100 feet of new storm sewer facilities; and, (c) facilities for fishing and related recreational activities. Estimated costs (Oct. 1980) are $6,970,000 Federal and $3,040,000 non-Federal including a cash contribution of $1,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1972 Flood Control Act (H.D. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess.) Localcooperation. For details of local cooperation see pages 32-24 and -25 of Annual Report for 1978. By letter dated April 11, 1979 the city has 32-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 indicated that action on the Local Cooperation Agreement will be made after receipt of plans and specifications. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $415,773. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of pre-construction planning and construction remains to be done to complete the project. 42. RENO BEACH-HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. Existing project. Project provides for construction of 8,200 feet of roadway seawall, consisting of an earth dike, faced on the lakeward side with a quarry-run stone fill; and a steel sheet pile floodwall connecting the easterly end of this seawall at Wards Canal to the existing inland dike paralleling the canal. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,730,000 (Oct. 1980). Non-Federal cost estimate of $680,000 (Oct. 1980) is cash contribution toward first cost of construction. Project was authorized under provision of Flood Control Act of 1948. (H.D. 554, 80th Congress, 2nd Sess.). Local cooperation. Responsible local interests, prior to construction must furnish assurances satisfactory to Secretary of the Army that they will: Provide a cash contribution in the amount of 25 percent of the construction cost for Plan "A" which is estimated to be $680,000. However, the project provides that, if local interests pay the difference in cost, a more costly plan of improvement may be substituted for Plan "A" at the time of construction. The alternate plan provides for construction of an earth dike protected on the lakeward side by a steel bulkhead with steel sheet pile groins along the bulkhead, and for a steel sheet pile bulkhead connecting the end of the shore-dike bulkhead to the existing inland dike paralleling Wards Canal. Provide without cost to the United States all land, easements, rights-ofway, and borrow areas necessary for construction of the project. Make all necessary bridge alterations and provide access to all public bathing beaches at their own expense. Hold and save the United States free from all claims incident to construction and operation of the project except from damages due to the fault of the Government or its Contractors. Maintain the entire protective works after completion including the existing jetties on the east side of Cooley Creek and on the west side of Wards Canal, the bathing beaches, and their protective structures, and a sufficient outlet channel in Wards Canal to carry the free flow into Lake Erie at all times all in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Construction shall not be commenced until the non-Federal interest has entered into a written agreement to furnish such cooperation as may be required by the particular project authorization, by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646), or by other law, and such agreement has been approved. Provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-611) requiring a legally enforceable contract regarding local assurances are applicable. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be requested upon approval of the Phase II General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was initiated at a cost of $69,938. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of preconstruction planning and construction of project remains to be done. 43. SCAJAQUADA CREEK, N.Y. Location. Scajaquada Creek is a small stream draining to the Black Rock Canal and thence to Niagara River at Buffalo, New York. It flows from east to west and its drainage area is all in Erie County. About 65 percent of the watershed is upstream from the city of Buffalo, mostly in thetowns of Cheektowaga and Lancaster, and the village of Depew. (See Geological Survey Maps of Buffalo-Northeast, N.Y. and Lancaster, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-23 of Annual Report for 1977. Estimated costs (Oct. 1980) are $5,065,000 Federal and $4,060,000 non-Federal. Existing project was authorized by Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract operations for Stage I initiated in April 1978 were completed in October 1978. Contract operations for Stage II initiated in April 1979, were continued at a cost of $1,843,529. Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage I of contract operations initiated in April 1978 were completed in October 1978. Stage II, initiated in April 1979, was continued. Completion of construction of local flood protection improvements remains to be done to complete project. In addition, approximately $171,600 were expended during FY 1977 for emergency work for "Operation Runoff." As a result of record snowfalls during the 1976-1977 winter, advance measures were undertaken to reduce flood damages anticipated from the snowmelt. Work was performed under authority of Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies. 32-24 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT 44. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $14,985. Total cost to Sept. 30, 1980 was $107,155. 45. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-F. 46. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-G. 47. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS, See Table 32-H. General Investigations 48. SURVEYS During FY 1980, costs of $3,928,951 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies ..... . -.s .. $714,377 Flood Damage Prevention Studies .-.$.8.76 ,100 Shoreline Protection Studies .......$.40.4 ,785 Special Studies .................. $1,087,223 Deauthorization Review ............. $ 10,763 Coordination Studies ............. $188,461 Phase I GDM Studies .............. $647,242 49. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $22,477 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $116,791 incurred under the Operation and Maintenance appropriation for total costs of $139,268. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $184,896. During the year, flood hazard evaluation studies were continued for the Seneca Nation of Indians, NY, and NASA, Plum Brook, Ohio. 50. HYDROLOGIC STUDIES Hydrologic studies to provide drainage area information for streams in that portion of New York* State under jurisdiction of the Buffalo District were accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey at a cost of $16,833. 32-25 TABLE 32-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY80 Sept. 30, 1980 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio 2. Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. 4. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. 5. Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. 6. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. 7. Cleveland Harbor Ohio 8. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio 9. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y.. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp.. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost, 1,125,000 907,873 415,000 433,354 209,57.7 223,000 222,589 - 21,125 - 12,975 1,280,000 1,216,323 3,627,000 3,213,565 1,286,000 1,338,284 705,800 1,126,722 - 20,000 - 11,401 20,000 60,000 19,656 59,672 10,742,600 18,367,000 9,897,185 19,667,686 ,=- - 145,000 122,000 151,167 121,779 196,000 - 182,057 21,562 - 63 -- 63 32-26 7,550 340,000 276,978 20,276 17,884 1,105,000 1,128,477 1,247,613 1,247,363 35,000 31,170 55,000 46,713 150,000 64,878 17,051,500 17,208,896 3,000,000 1,042,579 144,000 130,221 650,000 210,986 13,362 5,265 950,000 685,000 744,154 10,857 20,432 843,000 803,060 934,500 938,245 1,005,000 75,088 37,000 45,082 84,854 5,788,000 6,054,122 5,450,000 7,397,311 215,000 185,800 800,000 1,236,918 1,000,000 1,499,407 25,055 31,473 12,805,339' 12,805,339' 6,902,666 6,897,172 1,185,853' 1,185,8532 59,899 58,932 10,515,120' 10,515,1203 23,296,3484 23,235,088' 23,115,1871 23,115,187' 41,404,800' 41,404,235' 295,457 295,457 275,082 275,082 1,127,206 184,685 617,000 616,061 31,653,299' 31,653,031' 114,001,877' 113,411,250' 8,914,903 8,904,713 8,346,641' 8,346,641' 5,248,002'" 5,204,802 '" 651,850 651,850 3,029,424" 3,026,507" 1,950,000 1,499,407 1,402,50212 1,400,823" BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 10. Erie Harbor, Pa. 11. Fairport Harbor, Ohio 12. Geneva-on-the Lake, Ohio 13. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 14. Huron Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Irondequoit Bay N.Y. 16. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 17. Lorain Harbor, Ohio Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 190,000 189,861 3,079,000 2,877,908 - - 290,000 613,000 290,000 613,458 - 150,000 - 125,450 155,000 152,465 2,000,000 1,456,415 63,079 50,000 49,543 100,000 80,716 44,099 44,086 325,000 322,275 5,638,000 5,857,760 25,000 27,504 1,435,000 1,276,889 5,781 70,000 70,442 83,230 114,693 420,595 413,516 3,309 775,000 781,998 1,110,000 1,267,462 922,268 896,751 162,000 133,148 5,122 2,395 210,000 910,718 57,298 643,000 481,091 100,000 86,522 35,114 35,066 164 578,000 566,583 135,000 175,382 425,000 448,004 140,000 149,080 2,000 4,517 433,000 557,976 110,000 111,633 -5,000 625 -30 439,000 453,703 32-27 3,597,87313 3,597,873 ' 11,402,81914 11,398,455'4 1,154 1,154 2,959,61111 2,959,611" 9,617,203 9,613,930 452,000 407,678 610,959" 610,95916 2,328,943 0 q28,702 713,544 713,544 5,103,795" 5,102,757" 63,079 63,079 11,098,403 11,058,196 247,030 247,030 615,000 600,563 301,394" 301,394" 3,013,051 3,011,536 742,822 742,822 20,766,558'" 20,762,489" 16,859,429 16,859,396 TABLE 32-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 18. Oak Orchard New Work Harbor, N.Y. 19. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. 20. Olcott Harbor, N.Y. 21. Oswego Harbor, N.Y. 22. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. 23. Rochester Harbor, N.Y. 24. Sackets Harbor, N.Y. 25. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio 26. Toledo Harbor, Ohio Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -26,504 - 25,673 - 15,952 169,219 131,824 299,387 327,006 - 22,593 - 18,292 286,000 285,476 204,000 156,280 813,000 816,572 32,000 37,228 137,000 171,144 734,008 735,343 - 11,000 - 10,000 153,000 268,286 3,058,142 3,048,348 530,000 529,418 4,030,000 3,718,557 12,237 17,058 9,195 11,212 6,764 70,000 70,396 90,000 76,984 580,000 576,366 1,000 784,123 766,953 2,685,390 2,949,016 3,936 3,889 8,010 2,667 11,463 12,623 32,000 31,621 205,000 232,959 1,070,000 575,062 7,000 2,955 521,700 416,883 1,554,000 1,654,161 1,586,99620 1,586,99620 70,914 65,967 646,466" 646,466" 1,274,164" 1,266,634" 140,21023 140,210 '" 444,897"2 437,30824 14,47725 14,47725 8,430,016" 8,430,016" 4,588,8152' 4,588,43727 307,590 307,950 795,0002" 793,150 '8 2,439,3082" 2,439,308" 10,240,81630 9,742,1513" 25,010"' 25,010"3 20,639 16,594 6,727,27032 6,727,2703" 8,762,899 8,640,199 675,606 675,606 17,191,842" 17,191,842" 53,270,364 51,715,109 32-28 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sec in Text Project 27, Vermilion Harbor, Ohio 28. West Harbor, Ohio 29. Wilson Harbor N.Y. 33. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 37. Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio 38. Dansville and Vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y. 39. Ellicott Creek, N.Y. 40. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. Genesee River 41. Point Place Toledo, Ohio 42. Reno Beach-Howard Farms, Ohio 43. Scajaquada Cr., N.Y. SSeece in Total Cost to Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp.. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 202,500 118,523 65,000 64,855 161,830 100,137 1,260,000 1,254,139 729,000 378,286 750,000 751,167 325,714 325,867 250,000 138,250 94,500 64,391 264,000 244,383 524,000 459,662 150,000 149,989 400,000 117,049 100,000 179,128 180,000 175,502 -53,887 7,699 46,770 12,315 350,714 900,000 875,408 321,429 321,435 190,000 207,285 120,000 146,260 398,000 396,245 690,000 710,837 125,000 123,469 400,000 118,188 90,000 40,442 1,959 2,066 25,000 54,864 750,000 757,766 321,429 310,675 250,000 338,340 93,000 83,461 260,000 257,602 647,000 666,716 300,000 122,421 790,000 1,030,000 1,715,000 848,587 1,105,336 1,843,529 140,000 426,459 100,000 143,982 9,674 3,886 70,000 61,801 750,000 768,870 321,429 331,881 87,000 78,021 75,000 82,090 72,000 92,928 32-29 1,156,11834 1,156,11834 1,263,763 1,263,561 139,775 139,775 435,000 424,781 535,24635 535,24635 194,61436 188,82636 1,581,470 1,562,572 729,000 729,000 6,845,562 6,845,434 3,277,140 3,276,814 2,476 2,476 957,000 941,061 395,300 389,002 1,519,000 1,515,906 23,365,5593' 23,365,5593' 5,250,009 5,239,192 949,000 946,651 70,000 69,938 4,255,307 4,234,808 708,000 734,473 239,000 415,773 70,000 69,938 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $7,500 contributed funds. 3. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 4. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 5. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. 6. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 7. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R & H Act. 8. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds' 9. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 10. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 11. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 12. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 13. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 14. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 15. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 16. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 17. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 18. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 19. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R & H Act. 20. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 21. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. 22. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 23. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 24. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 25. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds. 26. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 27. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 28. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 29. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 30. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 31. Includes $6,000 for previous projects. 32. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 33. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 34. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 35. Includes $57,342 for previous projects. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 36. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 37. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 32-30 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 1 of Text) June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater; pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater, extend breakwaters to present project dimensions, and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel in Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin, all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater; and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater; thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River; 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y.(See Section 3 of Text) Dredging channel through Horseshoe Reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor, to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier and towpath wall. Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess., Annual Report, 1888, p. 2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116- 3120. H. Doc. 143, 56 Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1900, p. 4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1901, p. 3343. H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 12d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess, and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 32-31 Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132. H. Doc. 654, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 1934" Aug. 30, 1935- Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907'" June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 3d sess. I. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. 32-32 Widening channel at foot of Maryland St,, Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island pier; improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project. Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)" Construction of old breakwater.", Extension of old breakwater." Stony Point and south breakwater." North breakwater." Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater." Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site." Deepening areas A, B, and D in outer harbor to 21 feet, and area C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor to 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet, in cooperation with city of Buffalo. H. Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2d sess." Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232-236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., Ist. sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. IH. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Hi.D oc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945" July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935'" Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions Deepening approach to south entrance channel to 30 feet; deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of south entrance channel; and deepen to 28 feet southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth area to Buffalo River, entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act,combined with this act as a single improvement. CAPE VINCENT HARBOR, N.Y.(See Section 5 of Text) Breakwater 1,000 feet long, and shore arm not to exceed 150 feet. Deepening to project dimensions; elimination from project of uncompleted portion of breakwater. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 7 of Text) West breakwater Part of east breakwater." Extension of east breakwater." Reconstruction of piers.' Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater; removal of easterly 150 feet of west main breakwater; elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension of west pier; and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc., 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc., 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3286-3288. H. Doc. 363, 76th Cong. 1st sess.'1" Annual Report, 1876, p.558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p.1865. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st. sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong., 2d sess. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. 32-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ,--- Aug. 30, 1935' Mar. 2, 1945u July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 6, 1966 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 175) Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit. "," Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges.' Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie- Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower 2,000 feet of river.:' Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet inmw esterly 800 feet of east basin.Y' An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending about 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater extension at east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 8 of Text) Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater; removal of portion of old west breakwater; and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realinement of west breakwater; removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal by Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. H. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 32-34 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess.4 Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935" Removal of a portion of west breakwater; extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions; construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters; deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Oct. 23, 1962 Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier; extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Nov. 7, 19668 Recreational small-boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long; access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide; closing of 100-foot gap in existing west breakwater; and personnel guard rail on west breakwater. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Mar. 2, 1827 Construction of west pier.!' ,H Mar. 2, 1867 Breakwater and excavation of entrance channel to 13 feet.9 June 3, 1896 Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. June 25, 1910 Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. June 30, 1948 Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Dec. 15, 1970 Construction of small boat harbor. (House Public Works Comm.) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 19222 ' ERIE HARBOR, PA. (See Section 10 of Text) Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle Peninsula." Deepening channel and harbor basin to 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d sess.4 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1866, pt. IV, p. 155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214. H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H. Doc. 70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p.3 2 3 7 ."' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 32-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 18251 June 3, 1896 Mar.3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 14, 1960" Work Authorized Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, deepening a portion of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over a 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin."' Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier; and deepening of harbor to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present project dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier; and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in the outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to the upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. Documents H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess. ' H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153 H. Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p.2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p.2 3 4 9 . H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess.' 32-36 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 10, 1977 Construction of small boat harbor. (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 '2 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 13 of Text) Construction of piers and breakwater." Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150-foot width. Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Dredging channel to present project dimensions. HURON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 14 of Text) Extension of west pier; construction of east breakwater; removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier; construction of new spur pier; enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of breach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pier with pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and constructing pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier; and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin, a detached breakwater 1,575 feet long 2,000 feet lakeward of outer end of existing west pier; and, abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel." LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 16 of Text) West entrance pier." Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide.' East pier and east breakwater." Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. Annual Report, 1876, pt. II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72d Cong., 1st sess H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong.. 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess.4 Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1871, p. 234. Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. 32-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935" Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913, LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 17 of Text) Breakwaters and extensions of piers to present dimensions. Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present project dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock.'" Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 to present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet of east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 28 feet, southwesterly portion of outer harbor to 25 feet and river channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project.:2 Construct bank of stabilization works at cut numbered 1 along left bank of river channel above Erie Avenue Bridge." OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 19 of Text) Deepening the several channels to 19 feet. Widening upper entrance channel to 400 feet, and city front to 350 feet. Enlarging and deepening lower basin to 21 feet, and removal of elevator wharf. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 20 of Text) Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers9 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. 32-38 H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 PL 89-298. H. Doc. 920, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 663, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 266, 72d Cong., 1st sess.4 , ' Annual Report, 1866, pt. III, p. 15 and pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d sess.4 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 11, 1870 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 Aug. 36, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 OSWEGO HARBOR (See Section 21 of Text) Construction of outer west breakwater.!' Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A).!' Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters, west outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet. " Widening channel to harbor lines in Oswego River north of Seneca St. Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.:": Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor."7 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater; and, elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 23 of Text) Construction of piers." Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers." Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of the existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier; a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, an upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Annual Report, 1874, p. 247. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess.4 32-39 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220, and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935" Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. Army 1980 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 13, 1888 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935' " Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 SACKETS HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 24 of Text) Deepening harbor area to 12 feet. Construct timber crib mooring place, and brush and stone jetty. Build 2 stone groins (OCE-June 8, 1896) Deepening to project dimensions. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 25 of Text) Construction of channel protection works. Widening of straight and dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of dock channels to 21 feet, and westerly portion of dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of dock channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of bay channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels and deepening to 26 feet; deepening the Straight Channel to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction with Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania coal dock No. 3 to 25 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard, with no Federal. dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 26 of Text) A Channel 400 Feet Wide and 21 Feet Deep from 25-Foot Contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 Feet Wide and 19 Feet Deep Above that Point and a 500-Foot Turning Basin at Upper End. A stone Revetted Earth Dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 Modified to Insure a Navigable Channel to 21 Feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Sen. Ex. Doc. 29, 47th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888 pt. III, p. 2086. Annual Report, 1896, pt. III, p. 3160. H. Doc. 732, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and AnnualReport, 1898, p. 2708. 1H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong.. 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. 1H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. 32-40 TABLE 32-B (Continued) BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 4, 1836 Mar. 3, 1875 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 101) Channel 25 Feet Deep and 500 Feet Wide from 25- Foot Contour to Mouth of Maumee River (300 Feet Wide on Each Side of Center Dike in Bay Channel),, Thence 400 Feet Wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 Feet Wide Above That Point and a Turning Basin at Upper End 18 Feet Deep. Widening at Bend of Mouth of River Opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of Center Dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge Widening at Bend Opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Dock and Turning Basin Opposite American Shipbuilding Co. Dock. Deepen Bay Channel Including Widenings to 28 Feet, Deepen River Channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 Feet and Construct New Turning Basin Below Anthony Wayne Bridge.:" VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 27 of Text) Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WILSON HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 29 of Text) Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. (See Section 34 of Text) Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced off-shore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. 32-41 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1874, p. 219. H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. Army 1980 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River at downstream and of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriation Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification 32-42 is classified deferred. 20. Public 366: 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944, approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Removal of remaining hard-material shoals in lower basin is classified inactive. 25. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 26. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is classified inactive. 27. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 26, 1962. , 28. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 29. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers classified deferred. 30. Modification classified inactive. 31. Construction of breakwater classified deferred. 32. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 classified deferred. 33. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor classified inactive. 34. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet and turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 31 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control 1974 1,137 - Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio' -2 19,7633' Black River Harbor, N.Y.4 ' 2 42,401 - Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y.2 _2 57,410 - Elk Creek Harbor, Pa." 1978 101,500 - Grasse River (Massena), N.Y.4 '7 1891 9,0003 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y.' 1973 72,052 Kelleys Island, Ohio 19741" 129,874 - Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y.' 1969 46,8043 42,355 Maumee River, above Toledo, Ohio" 1873 '5 12,000 - Morristown Harbor, N.Y:.' 1949 6,221 9,65612 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y."'' 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, N.Y.' 1964 559,45711 141,059 Ottawa River Harbor, Michigan and Ohio4 19771' 99,000 Port Bay, N.Y. Port Clinton, Ohio 1976 ' 6 71,950 424,042 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y.3 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, Ohio 1951 '" 51,609 12,532 Rocky River Harbor, Ohio 1977 592,840'" 719,935 Sandusky River, Ohio4 1894 58,0003 557 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. 6. Project classified deferred. 7. Channel improved by local interests. 8. Includes local interests' contribution of $25,742. 9. Completed. 10. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $27,563. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 13. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 14. Project classified inactive. 15. Annual Report for Detroit District. 16. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 17. Includes local interests contribution of $249,346. 18. Project deauthorized by Congress in Nov. 1977. 32-43 TABLE 32-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 32 of Text) Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost South Michigan Ave. Bridge, Buffalo, N.Y. $58,065 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects (Section 111, Public Law 90-483) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Lorain Harbor, OH $113,945 Vermilion Harbor, OH 79,400 32-44 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio: Edgewater Park' - - - White City Park' - - - Fair Haven Beach State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y. 2 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y.3 - - - Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y.' 1976 1,769,600 - Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y.4 1963 58,978 2,898 1. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954 is classified as deferred. 2. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1958 is classified as deferred. 3. Project authorized under provisions of Section 201, 1965 Flood Control Act is classified inactive. 4. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. Uncompleted portion of project is classified as deferred. 5. Project completed. 32-45 TABLE 32-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 44 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, N.Y. Owasco Outlet' 1962 371,9857 - Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, N.Y.' 1957 335,385 - Caledonia, Genesee River, N.Y. 1950 - Camp Perry, Ohio' 1967" 275,000" - Chittenango Creek and tributaries, N.Y." , 1948 12,464 - Eastlake, Ohio, Chagrin River' 1976 506,344 - Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River' 1976 8,589,824" - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.2 1951 18,691P - Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet' 1978 3,929,330" - Lackawanna, N.Y., Smokes Creek' 1971 3,542,068" - Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, N.Y.' 1954 797,300 - Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y." " - 226,429 - Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' 1954 1,681,785 - Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y.',, 1964 330,231 - Ottawa, Ohio 1967" - - Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y. 1950 281,559 - Red Creek, N.Y. 4 1975 361,241 - Reno Beach-Howard Farms, Lucas County, Ohio 1953" 4,467 - Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' 1954 3,349,248 - Warsaw, N.Y., Oatka Creek'," 1969 558,317'" - Wellsville, N.Y., Genesee River' 1978 3,145,303'" - 1. Completed. 2. Project classified deferred. 3. Local interests required to contribute $25,000. 4. Project not considered economically justified and is inactive. 5. Inactive portion of work for State ditch has been done by local interests and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 6. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 7. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 8. Excludes costs of $6,766 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 10. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes costs of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $125,000. 13. Annual Report for Detroit District. 14. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 15. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 32-46 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION iSee Section 45 of Text) Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y. 41,840 Conesus Lake Outlet, N.Y. 168,820 Euclid Creek, Ohio 63,464 Little River, Cayuga Island, N.Y. 22,837 Oneida Creek, Oneida, N.Y. 108,716 Salmon Creek, Hilton, N.Y. 79,952 W. Br. Limestone Creek, N.Y. 79,297 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962) Project Federal Cost Disaster preparedness $54,426 Emergency operations 10,984 TO rAL $65,410 Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control. (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, PL. 780, 83rd Cong. Project and location Fiscal Year Cost Grand River, Mesopotamia, OH 4,264 Ninemile Creek, Amboy, N.Y. $2,889 32-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 32-G (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 45 of Text) Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Cattaraugus Creek at NY Thruway, NY $17,484 Crawford Creek, Belfast-Caneadea, NY 9,124 Elberta Beach - Linwood Park, Ohio 743 Genesee River, Route 20A, NY 435,636' 2 Genesee River, Amity, NY 16,177 Genesee River, Caneadea, NY 2762 Genesee River, Houghton, NY 91,7812 Lake Erie at Catawba Island, Ohio 4932 Lake Erie, Angola, NY 217,3232 Mentor on the Lake, OH 17,841 Route 5, Sheridan, NY 500 1. Includes $355,516 contributed by local interests. 2. Project completed. 32-48 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-H DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Section 46 of Text) Project Type Authorization Date Act Deauthorized Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Navigation 1935 R&H Act' Aug. 1977 Crane Creek State Park, OH Beach Erosion 1962 R&H Act Nov. 1979 Erie Harbor, PA Navigation 1945 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Grandview Bay Harbor, NY Navigation 1945 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Navigation 1962 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 Maumee River above Toledo, Ohio Navigation 1872 Act Nov. 1977 Niagara River Compensating Works, NY Navigation 1930 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio Beach Erosion 1962 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Watkins Glen, NY Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 1. Extension of guide pier only, other improvements completed. 32-49 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT* This district (total area, about 226,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north of entrance to Los Angeles Harbor); lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, Ariz.), which is in southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, western New Mexico, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the United States parts of those small drainage basins in southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico west of the Continental Divide that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Channel Islands Harbor, Calif ... 33-2 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif . ................ 33-3 3. Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. ........ 33-4 4. San Diego Harbor, Calif. ...... 33-4 5. San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. ..................... 33-6 6. Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. .... 33-6 7. Ventura Marina, Calif. ........ 33-6 S. Reconnaissance and condition surveys .......................... 33-7 9. Other authorized navigation projects .......... ............... 33-7 Beach Erosion Control 10. Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects .......... 33-7 11. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .................. 33-7 Flood Control 12. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, Ariz. ..................... 33-7 13. Allenville, Ariz. ............... 33-8 14. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. .............. 33-8 15. Gila River Basin, Ariz.: ......... 33-9 15A. Indian Bend Wash, Ariz. ........ 33-9 15B. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), Ariz .......................... 33-10 15C. Phoenix, Ariz., and vicinity (including New River) ......... 33-10 15D. Tucson diversion channel, Ariz. .. 33-11 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 15E. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, Ariz ....... .......... 33-12 16. Goleta, Calif., and vicinity ....... 33-12 17. Los Angeles County drainage area, Calif. ..................... 33-13 18. Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. .......... 33-15 19. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, Calif. ............. 33-16 20. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, Nev. ............................ 33-16 21. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, Calif ............ 33-16 22. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif .......... 33-17 23. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, Calif..................... 33-18 24. Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, Calif. ..................... 33-18 25. Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, Calif. ......... 33-19 26. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, Calif. .............. 33-19 27. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 33-19 28. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ...................... 33-19 29. Other authorized flood control projects ...................... 33-19 30. Flood control work under special authorization ............ 33-19 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 33-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 General Investigations Page 31. Surveys ........................ 33-20 32. Collection and study of basic data ............................ 33-20 33. Research and development ....... 33-20 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California about a mile northwest of existing harbor of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202.) Existing project. A harbor for light-draft vessels and beach erosion control works. Ventura County, sponsor of project, requested modification of document plan of harbor improvement and submitted a modified plan that was approved and adopted by Chief of Engineers in 1957. The harbor, which provides facilities for berthing and servicing about 640 small craft and commercial fishing boats, includes an entrance channel 20 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 1,650 feet long-protected by two parallel entrance jetties 1,270 and 1,300 feet long; an entrance basin 20 feet deep, 300 to 750 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; an inner basin 10 feet deep, 900 to 1,400 feet wide, and 1,200 to 2,000 feet long; and a side basin 10 feet deep, 100 to 250 feet wide, and 900 feet long. About 6,238,000 cubic yards of dredged material from entrance channel, interior basins, and sand trap were deposited in feeder-beach area to restore downcoast shoreline. A 2,300-foot-long offshore breakwater was placed to form a sand trap in conjunction with jetties. About 2,000,000 cubic yards of material are to be dredged each biennium from sand trap formed by jetties and breakwater. This material will be deposited along the downcoast shoreline as long as the area remains under Federal ownership or use and requires beach erosion control. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 9 feet. Federal first cost of new work on completed project as modified was $5,123,345 (excluding $1,361,668 Navy funds and cost to Coast Guard for installation of aids to navigation). Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design for Harbor and Shore Protection Works Near Port Hueneme, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in May 1957. The U.S. Navy is to bear 19 percent of the cost of maintenance dredging. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One thousand and eight hundred boat slips in 6 marinas, with restroom and shower facilities; dry storage area for 300 boats with 3-ton and 1-ton hoist facilities; 2 marine construction and repair yards with 5-ton travel lift and 35-ton hoist to 100-ton boatway haulout capacities; a fuel dock facility; a sportfishing complex; 4 restaurants; a coffee shop; 800 waterfront apartments-many with adjoining slips; 274 motel units; 3 yacht club buildings; 2 public convenience docks; a 40-slip transient boat complex; a harbor administration building/ harbor patrol office and dock complex; a marine emporium complex, housing a chandlery store, a sale loft, a delicatessen, a fishing tackle shop, yacht sales, a marine engine repair facility, and an adjacent dock complex; a 7-lane free access public launch ramp, with paved parking for cars and trailers; a boaters' convenience center; a commercial fishing pier and hoist; new transient dock facilities; a large public park; and a fire station. Waterway-connected and north of the harbor is Mandalay Bay, a private keys-type waterfront homes development with an area for about 500 homes and connected dockage for boats. Transition from harborto Mandalay Bay is restricted by a 4-lane high-rise bridge with a clearance height of 29 feet at high tide. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed maintenance dredging of sand trap and entrance channel at a cost of $1,630,307 regular funds and $532,541 Navy funds. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in February 1959. Construction of north and south jetties was completed in June and September 1959, respectively. Construction of detached breakwater was completed in October 1960. Original harbor dredging was 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT completed in August 1961. Last biennial maintenance dredging was initiated in August 1979 and was completed in April 1980. 2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California in San Pedro Bay about 25 miles south of City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5147.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A stone breakwater 11,152 feet long (San Pedro breakwater) extending eastward from Point Fermin; a stone-and-earth detached breakwater 18,500 feet long (middle breakwater); a stone-and-earth detached breakwater 13,350 feet long (Long Beach breakwater); maintenance of original Long Beach breakwater south of outer end of pier A (now an integral part of pier A as extended); an entrance channel 1,000 feet wide and 40 feet deep to outer Los Angeles Harbor, with a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide of same depth opposite end of pier 1, and enlargement of entrance to inner harbor by dredging to a depth of 35 feet a triangular area at junction of inner harbor with this turning basin; irregular anchorage areas (areas A and B) 40 feet deep adjacent to 40-footdepth entrance channel; an inner harbor channel (Los Angeles channel) 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, with a turning basin at its north extremity 35 feet deep; a channel (East Basin channel) 35 feet deep and 650 feet wide extending from turning basin to slip 5; a channel (Cerritos channel) 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from slip 5 to a turning basin in Long Beach inner harbor; a turning basin 35 feet deep in Long Beach inner harbor; an entrance channel to Long Beach inner harbor 35 feet deep and 300 to 500 feet wide; a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel, dredged material to be deposited on the beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; a silt-diversion channel (Los Angeles River) for protection of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors; and maintenance of entire project, except silt-diversion channel. Dredging to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin was authorized as a modification of existing project in 1954. Dredging to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin was authorized as a further modification of existing project in 1960. As authorized in 1976, existing project was further modified to provide for depths of 45 feet in all inner harbor channels and basins of Los Angeles Harbor and in the Los Angeles entrance channel, and to provide maintenance for the new dimensions. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.5 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for project as modified is $65,548,000, comprising $29,628,000 Federal (including $28,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $35,920,000 non-Federal. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. Under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of project and for aids to navigation, including suitable spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or costs of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of project; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in related project areas; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities; contribute in cash 4.1 percent of Federal first cost of dredging project channels, such contribution to be made in a lump sum prior to construction; establish regulations concerning discharge of pollutants into waters of the harbors by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or requirements of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; and prohibit erection of any structure within 125 feet of project channels and basins. Terminal facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 81,932 feet of wharves, of which 72,426 feet are owned by the city and 9,506 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, 107,615 feet of developed wharves and bulkheads. The city owns 47,515 feet of developed wharves and bulkheads and 33,790 feet of undeveloped rock dikes. Private interests own 8,840 feet of developed wharves and 17,470 feet of undeveloped dikes. Federal Government owns 18,587 feet of developed wharves and bulkheads. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed preparation of project plan, phase I, for 1976 modification of existing project. Completed preparation of final supplemental environmental statement. Awarded contract for and initiated channel and basin dredging (1976 modification of existing project) at a cost of $276,687 regular funds and $125,353 other 33-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 contributed funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $10o,ooo000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in April 1964, except for dredging a small part of the East Basin, which was included in the 1976 modification of existing project and was later deauthorized in January 1978. Supplemental final environmental statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency in April 1980. Contract for channel and basin dredging (1976 modification of existing project) was awarded in September 1980 and is about 1 percent complete. 3. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay, 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387.) Existing project. Two randomstone entrance breakwaters-the upcoast breakwater extending 1,885 feet south by west from Morro Rock and the downcoast breakwater extending west from sandspit 1,399 feet, thence northwest 433 feet, a total distance of 1,832 feet; an entrance channel 16 feet deep, 350 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long; a Navy channel 16 feet deep, ranging in width from 350 to 800 feet from entrance channel to City of Morro Bay, and 4,500 feet long; Morro channel from City of Morro Bay to lower bay 12 feet deep, generally 150 feet wide, and 5,300 feet long; a stone dike extending 1,600 feet from Morro Rock to mainland; a quarrywaste revetment levee extending 6,930 feet along waterfront at Morro Bay to retain marginal fills; and a stone groin 1,000 feet long. A rehabilitation plan, to replace project-document plan, was approved in August 1961. Deteriorated structures and channels were restored to substantially the dimensions existing at completion of original construction, except that reconstructed breakwater is 100 feet bayward of original alinement and has flatter side slopes and heavier armor stone. Breakwater head is a trapezoidal prismoid constructed of monolithic concrete. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 8.5 feet. Federal first cost for new work for completed project was $2,612,093 Navy funds. Federal first cost for rehabilitation was $2,128,411. A map of rehabilitation plan as approved is in "Design Memorandum, General Design for Rehabilitation of North Breakwater and Continuing Maintenance of Morro Bay Harbor, Near Morro Bay, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in December 1960 and revised in August 1961. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. None required under rehabilitation plan. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers constructed by Navy; 550 feet of piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department of Parks and Recreation; 1,236 feet of floating docks constructed by City of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations and results during fiscal year. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance dredging at a cost of $1,329,538 regular funds and $116,670 other contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in March 1946. Downcoast breakwater and stone dike connecting Morro Rock and mainland were completed in 1942; retaining levee, marginal fills along waterfront, and channel to lower bay, in 1944; the upcoast (Morro) breakwater, in 1946; and navigation channels were dredged to project dimensions and stone groin 800 feet long was constructed in August 1956. Rehabilitation work, consisting of reconstruction of Morro breakwater, was completed in June 1964. Maintenance dredging to restore harbor to authorized depths and extension of stone groin by 200 feet were completed in October 1964. Last maintenance dredging was completed in April 1980. 4. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California just north of United States-Mexico boundary line, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A rubblemound jetty about 7,500 feet long on Zuniga Shoal; an entrance channel 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 12,000 feet long; removal of Middle Ground Shoal and widening entrance channel to the eastward in that vicinity to a depth of 36 feet; a bay channel 35 feet deep, 2,200 feet wide, and about 17,000 feet long, from near Whalers Bight to Naval Air Station; an anchorage area north of bay channel 1,200 feet wide, about 12,000 feet long, and 26 and 35 feet deep in the western and eastern halves, respectively; an approach to 26- 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT foot anchorage, triangular in shape, 26 feet deep and 800 feet wide; an approach to 35-foot anchorage, triangular in shape, 35 feet deep and 900 feet wide; a seaplane basin 8 feet deep, 1,500 feet wide, and about 12,000 feet long, landward of anchorage area; a turning basin 35 feet deep, opposite municipal piers; a channel 30 feet deep; 1,500 to 2,500 feet wide, and about 20,000 feet long in southern part of bay; a channel to National City and Chula Vista 20 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2,600 feet long; a seaplane basin in southern part of bay 10 feet deep, 5,000 to 8,500 feet wide, and about 21,000 feet long, using part of dredged material to fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin; and an earthen dike about 7,735 feet long to divert the San Diego River from San Diego Bay to Mission Bay. Modification of existing project was authorized in 1968 and further modification was authorized by the Chief of Engineers in May 1975, as follows: an entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending from deep water to mile 2.4, thence a channel 42 feet deep in the north bay, narrowing to 600 feet wide at mile 3.0 and continuing at the same depth and width to mile 6.57, with additional widening on the south side of the bend at mile 6.0; a trapezoidal turning basin about 2,800 feet long, 2,900 feet wide on the western side, and 1,900 feet wide on, the eastern side, all as originally dredged by the Navy; additional widening of the north bay channel on the south side of the 42-foot channel at the bends at miles 3.0, 3.7, 4.6, and 5.3 and on the north side of the 42-foot channel and turning basin between miles 6.0 and 7.2; dredging the central bay channel to a depth of 40 feet between miles 7.2 and 8.84 and to a depth of 35 feet between miles 8.84 and 11.67, with a turning basin 40 feet deep between miles 8.25 and 8.84; a channel 30 feet deep on either side of the 40-foot-deep channel, generally between pierhead lines, between channel miles 6.8 and 8.5; deepening and extending the south bay channel to a depth of 35 feet between miles 11.67 and 12.9+, with turning basins 35 feet deep between miles 11.67 and 12.24 and between miles 12.53 and 12.9+; deleting from the existing project the uncompleted triangular approaches to the 26-foot- and 35-foot-deep anchorage areas northward of the channel and adjacent to Harbor Island; and deleting from the existing project the undredged area at the south end of the seaplane basin in south bay. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.3 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1977) first cost for project as modified is $24,734,000, comprising $20,684,000 Federal (including $1,529,000 for relocation of Navy utilities and $5,000 for aids to navigation by Coast Guard) and $4,050,000 non-Federal. Dredging done with Navy funds in 1961 increased depth in entrance channel from project depth of -40 feet mean lower low water to -42 feet mean lower low water. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No.' 1, General Design for San Diego Harbor, San Diego County, California," prepared. by Los Angeles District in February 1975. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash 4.1 percent of the first cost of dredging, exclusive of the cost of spoil-retaining works, such contribution to be made in a lump sum prior to construction; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of project and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments "therefor or cost of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of project;, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in related project areas; accomplish such utility or other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes, except for such utilities as are owned by the United States Navy; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. Consist of 43,280 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned wharves, of which 19,280 feet are Port District owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for channel dredging (modification of existing project) at a cost of $400,000 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $15,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in August 1968, except for those parts deleted by the 1968 River and Harbor Act. Completed maintenance repair of rubblemound jetty on Zuniga Shoal in June 1970. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in May 1975. Channel dredging (modification of existing project) was initiated in August 1975 and was completed in April 1978. 33-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 5. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CALIF. Location. The San Diego River has its source on the tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, California, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific Ocean at the City of San Diego. Mission Bay Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and 8 miles north of San Diego Harbor. Existing project. A leveed flood channel 800 feet wide, with a capacity of 115,000 cubic feet per second, from 0.4 mile above Morena Boulevard, 3.3 miles directly to the ocean; an altered railroad bridge over the leveed river flood channel; an entrance channel about 5,200 feet long, 670 feet wide, and 20 to 25 feet deep into Mission -Bay; in the bay, a main channel and turning basin about 2,700 feet long, 1,000 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, and two anchorage basins, one about 3,200 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 15 feet deep, and the other about 1,600 feet lorig, ranging from 800 to 1,800 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; three jetties at the entrance; and stone revetment for the banks of the entrance and main channels and turning basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Approved estimated (1980) first cost is $36,700,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $19,200,000 Federal and $17,500,000 non- Federal. This project modified the flood control project: "San Diego River Basin, California" (See H. Doc. 635, 77th Cong., 2d sess.) (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have completed all requirements of local cooperation. Terminal facilities. None, with the exception of mooring facilities for recreational craft and commercial sport-fishing boats only. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplemental project plan. Continued preparation of final environmental statement. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $7,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in September 1959. Remedial work was completed in September 1970. Final environmental statement is about 35 percent complete. Supplemental project plan is about 35 percent complete. 6. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 320 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5261.) Existing project. Maintenance dredging of depths existing in 1934 in harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. See page 1014 of Annual Report for 1969 for detailed description of 1962 authorized modification. Further modification was authorized in December 1970 (Public Law 91-611) to provide for dredging and maintenance of existing project by the United States. Also, see Annual Report for 1971 for detailed description of previous authorized maintenance. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1969) first cost for project as modified is $6,810,000, comprising $3,480,000 Federal (including $40,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $3,330,000 non-Federal (including cash contribution of $3,320,000). Prior to adoption by Congress, work was authorized by Public Works Administration. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. Terminal facilities. A wharf 2,000 feet long; a pier 325 feet long in harbor for tie-up mooring for Coast Guard cutter; a landing float; an open mooring and slip anchorage for small craft; and a launching ramp for small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Awarded 3-year contract for and initiated maintenance dredging at a cost of $629,000 regular funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Last maintenance dredging was completed in June 1979. Three-year contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in December 1979 and is about 35 percent complete. Work on modified project plan is inactive. 7. VENTURA MARINA, CALIF. Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and about 6 miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. Maintenance of general navigation features of Ventura Marina, constructed by local interests, consisting of a north jetty 1,254 feet long; a middle jetty 250 feet long; a south jetty 1,071 feet long; and an entrance channel 1,750 feet long, 300 feet wide, and 20 feet deep. Existing project was modified by construction of an offshore breakwater 1,500 feet long; dredging about 800,000 cubic yards to form a 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT sand trap in the lee of the breakwater; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on the jetty crests. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. First cost of new work for completed project as modified was $3,420,375, comprising $1,711,539 Federal (excluding 40,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $1,708,836 non-Federal. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A fuel dock; guest berthing docks; boat-repair facilities, with a 60-ton travelift; 1,462 boat slips; a dry storage area for 155 boats; a 3-lane deluxe launch ramp; 2 yacht clubs; an international helicopter maintenance base; a restaurant and cocktail lounge; a carpenter .shop; sport fishing; sightseeing cruises; 3 yacht sales; marine communications; 2 marine chandleries; 3 public restroom buildings; an administration' building; paved jetties with handrails for sport fishing; and headquarters and visitor center for Channel Islands National Park. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap at a cost of $288,537 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $20,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Dredging sand trap was completed in December 1971. Breakwater construction was completed in February 1972. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in March 1972. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in February 1973. Last maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap was completed in November 1979. 8. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See table 33-C. 9. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 33-D. Beach Erosion Control 10. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $10,320 for San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, Calif. (part), in June and July 1980. 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 33-E. Flood Control 12. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, ARIZ. Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, Ariz., in a narrow gorge at river mile 39 on Bill Williams River, Ariz., a tributary of Colorado River. Existing project. A multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. Dam is a rolled-earthfill structure with a maximum height of 283 feet above streambed and a crest length of about 975 feet. Outlet works consist of a concrete-lined tunnel through the left abutment of dam; an approach channel; a bulkhead gate; a concrete intake structure with log racks at upstream tunnel portal; a control shaft and gate chamber just upstream from axis of dam; and an outlet channel that discharges into the river. The detached, broad-crested spillway with a crest length of 110 feet, which is on the right abutment, consists of an unlined channel 110 feet wide and 550 feet long excavated in rock and a concrete control sill at the crest. Reservoir has a total capacity at spillway crest of 1,046,310 acrefeet (May 1968), including 200,000 acre-feet for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 4,770 square miles, reducing flow of design flood from 317,000 cubic feet per second to a maximum outflow of 7,000 cubic feet per second. Latest approved estimated (1967) first cost for project is $14,780,000, all Federal. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must assume responsibility for damage claims and adjust water-rights claims arising from improvement. In addition to providing assurances specified in authorizing legislation, local interests would limit manmade encroachment on existing hydraulic capacity of Bill Williams River channel downstream from Alamo Lake to permit maximum releases of 7,000 cubic feet per second from the reservoir. Arizona Senate Joint Resolution No. 1, 26th Legislature, First Regular Session, was signed by the Governor on March 15, 1963, to furnish required assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; continued acquisition of rights-of-way; and administered real estate. 33-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in March 1965 and was completed in July 1968. Fish and wildlife management plan was completed in January 1968. Work remaining consists of completing acquisition of rights-of-way; construction of recreational facilities; and updating master plan. 13. ALLENVILLE, ARIZ. Location. On Gila River 1.5 miles south of Buckeye and 35 miles west of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Ariz. Existing project. Plan provides for relocating community outside flood plain to a 60-acre tract near intersection of Interstate 10 and Palo Verde Road, about 8 miles northwest of Buckeye, Ariz.; and constructing streets, utilities, community center, park, and replacement houses. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $3,723,000 ($2,866,000 Federal and $857,000 non-Federal). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages due to construction works, except those damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate works after completion; contribute 20 percent of sharable costs and bear 100 percent of all first costs in excess of $3,562,000; maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence pertaining to costs and expenses incurred in project; sell or rent houses constructed by Government and convey title to any public facilities constructed by Government to appropriate public or quasipublic entity as approved by Government; sell houses constructed by Government at not less than fair market value within 5 years of date of completion of project or pay appropriate share of fair market value of houses to Government; submit appropriate accounting to Government by 15th of March of each year and pay 80 percent of gross proceeds of sales and rentals of houses constructed by Government, without interest, for preceeding calendar year, except that, if total first costs of project exceed $3,750,000, local interests shall deduct from amount payable all such proceeds up to amount of first costs in excess of $3,750,000; comply with requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; and comply with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed preparation of project plan. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completed preparation of plans and specifications in September 1980. 14. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. In and near the Cities of Upland and Ontario and the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Calif. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a debris basin on Cucamonga Creek and a concrete channel along Cucamonga Creek from the debris basin to Prado Dam; an improved San Antonio Heights diversion system that would include debris basins and a concrete diversion channel to divert West Cucamonga Creek headwaters into Cucamonga Creek; a collection levee and a debris basin downstream from Demens, Thorpe, and Angalls Canyons and a concrete outlet channel from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; a debris basin in Deer Canyon and a channel along Deer Creek from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; the Hillside debris basin in a canyon just west of Deer Canyon with an outlet channel to Deer Creek channel; improvement of an existing levee system along the west bank of Day Creek to assure that flows from Day Canyon do not enter Deer Creek channel; turnouts to mitigate ground water basin recharge losses; landscaping appropriate for esthetic treatment; and recreational facilities in the project area. Subdrainage would be provided along specific reaches of the channels. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for modified project is $132,100,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $113,000,000 Federal and $19,100,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 2, General Design for Flood Control and Recreation, Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in June 1973. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including value of lands already acquired; perform alteration and modification of highways, roads, streets, highway bridges, utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities, deposit funds with the United States to cover cost of constructing outlets; hold the United States free from damages due to construction works and from damages arising from water-rights claims resulting from construction, operation, and maintenance of project; operate and maintain works after completion, including removal of debris (detritus) to maintain adequate storage 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT capacities in debris basins; and prevent any encroachment that would reduce flood-carrying capacities of channels and levees or that would reduce debris-storage capacities of debris basins. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed construction of fourth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Pomona Freeway to south half of Ontario International Airport. Completed construction of fifth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Ontario International Airport to Foothill Boulevard, and Cucamonga Creek debris basin. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for sixth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek debris basin, north half of Ontario International Airport box conduit, and Demens channel and debris basin; awarded contract; and initiated construction. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for seventh contract, Deer Creek and Hillside channels and debris basins, and San Antonio Heights diversion system. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for eighth contract for beautification of Cucamonga and Demens Creek channels. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual. Costs for construction of channels were $8,890,325 regular funds, and $237,657 other contributed funds; and costs for relocations were $312,518 regular funds and $1,495,247 other contributed funds. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1975. Construction of first contract, Cucamonga Creek channel at Prado Dam, was initiated in June 1975 and was completed in November 1975; second contract, Cucamonga Creek, Hellman Avenue to Remington Avenue, was initiated in June 1976 and was completed in April 1977; third contract, Cucamonga Creek, Remington Avenue to Pomona Freeway, was initiated in August 1977 and was completed in June 1978; fourth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Pomona Freeway to south half of Ontario International Airport, was initiated in June 1978 and was completed in December 1979; and fifth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Ontario International Airport to Foothill Boulevard, and Cucamonga Creek debris basin, was initiated in June 1979 and was completed in August 1980. Plans and specifications for sixth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek debris basin, north half of Ontario International Airport box conduit, and Demens channel and debris basin, were completed in February 1980; and contract for construction was awarded in August 1980. Sixth contract is about 17 percent complete. Plans and specifications for seventh contract, Deer Creek and Hillside channels and debris basins, and San Antonio Heights diversion system, are about 70 percent complete. Plans and specifications for eighth contract, beautification of Cucamonga and Demens Creek channels, are about 85 percent complete. Operation and maintenance manual is about 97 percent complete. 15. GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. 15A. INDIAN BEND WASH, ARIZ. Location. On Indian Bend Wash in Scottsdale and Tempe, Ariz. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a greenbelt floodway with an unlined inlet channel, including an unlined interceptor channel, a siphon to carry Arizona Canal irrigation waters under Indian Bend Wash, and a wasteway structure to discharge floodwaters from the canal into the inlet channel; an unlined outlet channel to discharge floodwaters into the Salt River; a collector and side channels system to relieve ponding west of the Arizona Canal; beautification; and recreational facilities. Design flood of 30,000 cubic feet per second would be controlled by improvements. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for modified project is $41,384,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $31,600,000 Federal and $9,784,000 non- Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design Memorandum Phase II, Project Design for Indian Bend Wash, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in May 1975. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil-disposal areas; accomplish modification or relocation of highways, roads, bridges, utilities, streets, and irrigation facilities (except siphon system for Arizona Canal); hold the United States free from damages due to construction works; maintain and operate works after completion; prevent any encroachment upon improved channel that would reduce its flood-carrying capacity; at least annually, notify interests affected that project will not provide complete flood protection; maintain a greenbelt floodway between inlet and outlet works (generally McDonald Drive to Van Buren Street); establish regulations for occupancy and use of floodway; provide adequate dikes, floodwalls, and floodproofing to existing structures to safely pass the 100-year flood of 30,000 cubic feet per second; bear all incremental costs of any changes in plan as authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act made solely for purpose of reducing amount of land required for flood easements; and comply 33-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 with requirements of Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Local interests supplied assurances as required by section 221 of Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed construction of fourth contract, Indian School Park, a recreational feature in greenbelt floodway. Completed construction of fifth contract, inlet channel, including a siphon and wasteway structure for Arizona Canal and associated recreational facilities. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for sixth contract, flood control features of interceptor channel. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual. Costs for construction of channels were $291,928 regular funds and $128,551 other contributed funds; costs for construction of recreational facilities were $120,188 regular funds; $10,559 required contributed funds; and $3,762 other contributed funds; and cost for relocations was $69,865 regular funds. Continued acquisition of rightsof- way. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in August 1974. Construction of first contract, outlet channel and associated recreational facilities, was initiated in January 1976 and was completed in January 1978; second contract, McDowell Plaza (formerly Hohokam Plaza), was initiated in May 1977 and was completed in January 1979; third contract, beautification of outlet channel, was initiated in June 1977 and was completed in November 1977; fourth contract, Indian School Park, a recreational feature in greenbelt floodway, was initiated in June 1978 and was completed in January 1980; and fifth contract, inlet channel, including a siphon and wasteway structure for Arizona Canal and associated recreational facilities, was initiated in July 1978 and was completed in January 1980. Plans and specifications for sixth contract, flood control features of interceptor channel, were completed in September 1980. Preparation of operation and maintenance manual is about 47 percent complete. 15B. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), ARIZ. Location. On Gila River (mile 126) about 20 miles downstream from Gila Bend, Ariz., in Gila River Basin, which is a part of Colorado River Basin. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 181 feet above streambed, crest length of 4,780 feet, and detached broadcrested spillway with a crest length of 610 feet; and a flood control reservoir with a gross capacity at spillway crest of 2,491,700 acre-feet (Mar. 1953), including 200,000 acre-feet for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 50,800 square miles, reducing flow of standard project flood of 300,000 cubic feet per second to a maximum outflow of 22,500 cubic feet per second. First cost of new work for completed project was $19,980,356, all Federal, including $357,261 for Code 710 recreation project. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must adjust water-rights claims that might result from improvement and keep flood channel of Gila River downstream from Painted Rock free from encroachment. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; administered real estate; continued acquisition of rights-of-way; and continued preparation of reservoir-regulation manual. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in 1958 and was completed in December 1959. Construction of culvert was completed in August 1967. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was initiated in August 1972 and was completed in December 1972; and second contract for construction of recreational facilities was initiated 'in November 1977 and was completed in April 1978. Work remaining consists of completing acquisition of rights-ofway; updating master plan; completing preparation of reservoir-regulation manual; and completing construction of recreational facilities. 15C. PHOENIX, ARIZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) Location. On Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, Dreamy Draw, New River, and Agua Fria River in and adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, Ariz. Existing project. Plan as modified by Division Engineer, South Pacific Division, in July 1977, provides for four dams and detention basins, one each on Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; Arizona Canal diversion channel; channel improvements on Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; flowage easements with some floodproofing along Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers; flood plain management along Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; and recreational facilities. Approved estimated (1980) first cost is $544,688,000 (full funding estimate and includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $305,298,000 Federal and $239,390,000 non- Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum - Phase I, Plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1976. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including spoil-disposal areas; perform construction, alteration, or relocation of highways, roads, highway bridges, utilities, irrigation and drainage works, and street modifications; hold the United States free from damages due to construction works; maintain and operate works after completion; prevent any encroachment upon existing or improved channels or within detention basin areas that would reduce their flood-carrying or storage capacities; hold the United States free from damages arising from water-rights claims resulting from construction, maintenance, and operation of project; contribute 2.3 percent of contruction cost; manage and maintain floodways and floodway fringes in affected watercourses and adjacent flood plains; at least annually, notify interests affected that project will not provide complete flood protection; acquire real estate interests downstream from spillways of project to assure project performance and to protect non-Federal interests from hazards of spillway flows; comply with requirements of Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646); and enter into an agreement with Arizona Game and Fish Department providing for operation and maintenance of mitigation lands. Local interests supplied assurances as required by section 221 of Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed construction of Cave Buttes Dam at a cost of $3,288,159 regular funds and $48,769 required contributed funds. Cost for bridge alterations was $40,145 regular funds. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for Adobe Dam. Continued preparation of part 1A of project plan, phase II, Cave Creek floodway delineations. Continued preparation of part 5 of project plan, phase II, Arizona Canal diversion channel. Initiated preparation of part 3 of project plan, phase II, New River Dam. Continued preparation of master plan for overall project, for Cave Buttes Dam, for Dreamy Draw Dam, and for Adobe Dam. Continued acquisition of rights-of-way. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual for Cave Buttes Dam. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final environmental statement for Dreamy Draw detention basin was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in May 1972. Construction of Dreamy Draw detention basin was initiated in October 1972 and was completed in August 1973. Final environmental statement for entire project was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in September 1976. Construction of Cave Buttes Dam was initiated in September 1977 and was completed in November 1979. Plans and specifications for Adobe Dam were initiated in October 1978 and were completed in August 1980. Part 1A of project plan, phase II, Cave Creek floodway delineations, is about 90 percent complete. Part 5 of project plan, phase II, Arizona Canal diversion channel, is about 10 percent complete. Part 3 of project plan, phase II, New River Dam, is about 10 percent complete. Master plan for overall project is about 99 percent complete; for Cave Buttes Dam, about 80 percent complete; for Dreamy Draw Dam, about 99 percent complete; for Adobe Dam, about 75 percent complete; and for New River Dam, about 10 percent complete. Operation and maintenance manual for Cave Buttes Dam is about 45 percent complete. 15D. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL, ARIZ. Location. In Pima County in drainage areas of Tucson Arroyo and Julian Wash, tributaries of Santa Cruz River near Tucson, Ariz. Existing project. Protection for city of Tucson, Ariz., and suburban areas by diverting runoff from upstream part of Tucson Arroyo drainage area to an adjacent drainage area, and thence to Santa Cruz River. After project was authorized, local interests developed a plan of improvement differing substantially from project-document plan and constructed a major part of improvement under their plan. Subsequently, local interests requested a modification of projectdocument plan to provide more flood control than would be available under plan developed by local interests. General provisions of modified plan, which replaced document plan, were approved by Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1958. Modified plan provided for increasing capacity of diversion-channel project under construction by Pima County to accommodate standard project flood discharge; and conveying floodflow to Santa Cruz River by means of an improved channel along Julian Wash. Work under modified plan involved completing diversion channel between Tucson Arroyo and Southern Pacific railroad and enlarging that channel at Tucson Arroyo; enlarging existing diversion channel between Southern Pacific railroad and detention basin; completing excavation of detention basin and increasing discharge capacity; increasing capacity of diversion channel between detention basin and Julian Wash; constructing an improved channel along Julian Wash; reconstructing or modifying eight high- 33-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 way bridges and two railroad bridges; and constructing five new highway bridges. First cost of new work for completed project as modified was $6,376,717, comprising $5,982,353 Federal (including $217,728 for Code 710 recreation project) and $394,364 non-Federal, including $1,008,000 spent for that part of completed improvements under plan developed by local interests used under modified plan. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design for Tucson Diversion Channel, Tucson, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in November 1962. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of master plan. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in April 1966. Work remaining consists of completing preparation of master plan, which is about 99 percent complete, and construction of recreational facilities. 15E. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, ARIZ. Location. On Queen Creek, Ariz., a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, Ariz. Existing project. A flood control dam and reservoir. Dam is a compacted-earthfill zoned structure with a maximum height of 149 feet above streambed and a crest length of 837 feet. Outlet works, which are at left abutment, consist of an intake structure; an ungated outlet conduit; and an outlet-and-diversion structure. The spillway, an unlined structure about 4,000 feet north of dam, consists of a broad-crested weir about 355 feet long; an approach channel 1,080 feet long; and a downstream channel about 1,300 feet long. Reservoir has a total capacity at spillway crest of 35,590 acre-feet (June 1975), of which 7,000 acre-feet are allocated for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 143 square miles, reducing flow of design flood from 110,000 to 1,000 cubic feet per second. First cost of new work for completed project was $1,867,963, all Federal, including $3,758 for Code 710 recreation project. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; continued acquisition of rights-of-way; and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1959 annd was completed in November 1960. Work remaining consists of updating master plan and completing acquisition of rights-of-way. 16. GOLETA, CALIF., AND VICINITY Location. Goleta Valley, along Atascadero Creek and its tributaries, including Tecolotito, Carneros, San Pedro, Las Vegas, San Jose, and Maria Ygnacio Creeks, from the Santa Ynez Mountains in Santa Barbara County to Pacific Ocean near Goleta, Calif. Existing project. Plan provides for about 12.5 miles of channel improvement, comprising about 1.3 miles of channel clearing and about 11.2 miles of channel construction. Channel clearing would be required on Maria Ygnacio, San Jose, Las Vegas, San Pedro, and Carneros Creeks. Channel construction would include the improvement of Atascadero Creek from San Marcos Road to ocean; Maria Ygnacio Creek from Hollister Avenue to Atascadero Creek; San Jose Creek from 0.2 mile north of U.S. Highway No. 101 to San Pedro Creek; Las Vegas Creek from Cathedral Oaks Road to San Pedro Creek; San Pedro Creek from a point 0.1 mile downstream from Stow Canyon Road to Atascadero Creek; Carneros Creek from 0.6 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101, by means of a diversion route, to Tecolotito Creek; and Tecolotito Creek from U.S. Highway No. 101 to Atascadero Creek. Plan also provides for beautification and recreation features. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $48,380,000 ($37,200,000 Federal and $11,180,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; perform necessary construction, modification, or relocation of highways (including bridges), utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities; if topography of existing Tecolotito Creek within boundaries of City of Santa Barbara is altered by City of Santa Barbara, its officers, agents, employees, lessees, or purchasers, or any other person or entity, and as a result thereof construction costs of proposed flood control channel in said creek are increased, pay for all said increased flood control construction costs; maintain and operate works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; adjust water-rights claims resulting from project; prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce floodcarrying capacities of improved channels or natural channels upstream from works; and contribute 14.7 percent of construction costs for channel improvements on Atascadero and Maria Ygnacio Creeks upstream from mouth of San Pedro Creek, presently estimated to be $540,000 apportioned share to be borne due to land enhancement benefits. Operations and results during fiscal year. Initiated and completed preparation of project plan, phase I. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Finalized draft of environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in November 1970. 17. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIF. Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, Calif. Previous project. For details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1941; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Plan provides for flood control improvements in four stream basins in Los Angeles County, Calif., as follows: Los Angeles River Basin, San Gabriel River Basin, Rio Hondo Basin, and Ballona Creek Basin. Provides for protection of about 325,000 acres in densely populated Los Angeles County, including areas in Los Angeles, Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank, and other cities. Plan provides for construction of 5 flood control dams (Hansen, Lopez, Santa Fe, Sepulveda, and Whittier Narrows); debris basins at mouths of 22 canyons; channel improvements along 101.3 miles of Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek; and channel improvements along 193.69 miles of tributary channels. All units of improvement are physically completed in those four stream basins, except the one listed below, and are described in Annual Report for 1962. Unit of improvement not physically completed in Rio Hondo Basin is Sierra Madre Wash. Plan provides for the construction of about 0.8 mile of concrete channel on Sierra Madre Wash extending from inlet to existing Santa Anita Wash channel. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation and table 33-F for latest approved estimated (1976) first costs for all units of improvement under existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way; bear expense of highway and highway-bridge modifications; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion for following units or parts of units: Los Angeles River Basin: Blanchard Canyon Blue Gum Canyon Burbank-Eastern system Burbank-Western system (lower and upper) Caballero Creek Compton Creek: Hooper Avenue storm drain to Main Street Los Angeles River to Alameda Street Dead Horse Canyon and Royal Boulevard channel Haines Canyon: Plainview Avenue to Tujunga Wash Lopez Canyon diversion Los Angeles River channel: Owensmouth Avenue to Lankershim Boulevard Stewart and Gray Road to Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean Pacoima Wash channel Sycamore Wash channel Tujunga Wash channel Verdugo Wash: Concord Street to debris basin Wilson Canyon and Mansfield Street channel Winery Canyon San Gabriel River Basin: Coyote Creek Emerald Wash and Live Oak Wash Marshall Creek San Gabriel River chinnel: Santa Fe Dam to Whittier Narrows Dam Whittier Narrows Dam to the Pacific Ocean Thompson Creek and San Jose Wash (including San Jose Creek) Walnut Creek inlet channel Walnut Creek system Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra Wash channel: Valley Boulevard to Rio Hondo Arcadia Wash system Eaton Wash Rio Hondo channel: Peck Road to Rosemead Boulevard (upper) Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower) Rubio Canyon diversion Santa Anita Wash Sawpit Wash Sierra Madre Villa channel Sierra Madre Wash Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel downstream from inlet to Washington Boulevard and downstream from La Salle Avenue to the lagoon Benedict Canyon system Centinela Creek Sawtelle-Westwood system (including Sepulveda channel). No local cooperation is required for other units or parts of units in existing project. 33-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for units in Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Compton Creek: Maintained channel in good operating condition from Alameda Street to Hooper Avenue storm drain. (b) Haines Canyon: Maintained debris basin and channel upstream from Plainview Avenue in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Hansen Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Lopez Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (e) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road: Maintained channel in good operating condition and administered real estate. (f) Los Angeles River channel, Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean: Awarded contract for and initiated phase 2 construction. of recreational facilities at a cost of $1,738,227 regular funds and $1,284,245 required contributed funds. (g) Sepulveda Dam: Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for third contract for recreational facilities; awarded contract; and initiated and completed construction at a cost of $380,353 regular funds and $380,353 required contributed funds. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for fourth contract for recreational facilities. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in San Gabriel River Basin: (a) Santa Fe Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Awarded contract for; initiated; and completed phase 3 construction of recreational facilities at a cost of $1,313,425 regular funds and $1,840 required contributed funds. Awarded contract for construction of phase 3 recreational facilities at access road. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for phase 4 construction of recreational facilities. (b) San Gabriel River channel, San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam, Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work): Maintained channel in good operating condition. (c) Whittier Narrows Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition; administered real estate; and continued preparation of reservoir-regulation manual. Completed construction of eleventh contract for recreational facilities, General Improvements, phase 1. Completed construction of twelfth contract for recreational facilities, Visitor Center Displays. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for thirteenth contract for recreational facilities, Bicentennial Park Improvements; awarded contract; and initiated and completed construction. Costs for construction of recreational facilities were $431,088 regular funds and $43,700 required contributed funds. Operations for units in Rio Hondo Basin: (a) Alhambra Wash: Maintained channel upstream from Valley Boulevard in good operating condition. (b) Rio Hondo channel, Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower): Awarded contract for and initiated phase 2 construction of recreational facilities at a cost of $1,738,227 regular funds and $1,284,245 required contributed funds. Operations for unit in Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties: Maintained channel downstream from Washington Boulevard to La Salle Avenue and downstream from Los Angeles city boundary to ocean; jetties; and Pacific Avenue bridge in good operating condition. Continued construction of first contract for recreational facilities at a cost of $629,600 regular funds and $311,620 required contributed funds. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for second contract for recreational facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Revision of basic operation and maintenance manual for channel and debris-basin units in Los Angeles County drainage area project and inserts are complete. Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Hansen Dam: Dam was completed in April 1940. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was completed in June 1976. Work remaining consists of initiating preparation of reservoirregulation manual; and initiating and completing construction of second contract for recreational facilities. (b) Lopez Dam: Dam was completed in November 1954. Work remaining consists of initiating preparation of reservoirregulation manual; and completing preparation of master plan, which is about 50 percent complete. (c) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road: Work remaining consists of constructing recreational facilities. (d) Los Angeles River channel, Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean: Construction of contract for phase 1 recreational facilities was completed in April 1977. Work remaining consists of completing construction of phase 2 recreational facilities, which is about 61 percent complete; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (e) Sepulveda Dam: Dam was completed in December 1941. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was completed in October 1974; second contract, in October 1978; and third contract, in May 1980. Work remaining consists of initiating preparation of reservoir-regulation manual; completing preparation of plans and specifications for fourth contract for recreational facilities; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (f) Tujunga 33-14 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT Wash channel: Channel was completed in February 1952. Construction of phase 1 recreational facilities was completed in June 1976. Work remaining consists of completing construction of recreational facilities. San Gabriel River Basin: (a) Santa Fe Dam: Dam was completed in January 1949. Construction of phase 1 recreational facilities was completed in January 1978; phase 2 recreational facilities, in May 1979; and phase 3 recreational facilities, in June 1980. Work remaining consists of initiating preparation of reservoir-regulation manual; initiating and completing construction of phase 3 recreational facilities at access road; completing preparation of plans and specifications for phase 4 construction of recreational facilities; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (b) Whittier Narrows Dam: Dam was completed in June 1957. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities, area A, phase 1, was completed in March 1975; second contract, nature area, in July 1975; third contract, area A, phase 2, in March 1976; fourth contract, area E, in June 1976; fifth contract, Entrada Park and Equestrian campground, in May 1977; sixth contract, area B, in May 1977; seventh contract, model hobby area, in March 1977; eighth contract, Charro Arena, in July 1978; ninth contract, Visitor Center, in September 1978; tenth contract, area B, phase 1A, in August 1978; eleventh contract, General Improvements, phase I, in December 1979; twelfth contract, Visitor Center Displays, in December 1979; and thirteenth contract, Bicentennial Park Improvements, in June 1980. Work remaining consists of completing revision of operation and maintenance manual, which is about 40 percent complete; completing preparation of reservoirregulation manual; initiating and completing preparation of plans and specifications for fourteenth contract for recreational facilities, area B group camping; initiating and completing construction of fourteenth contract; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. Rio Hondo Basin: (a) Rio Hondo channel, Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower): Construction of contract for phase 1 recreational facilities was completed in April 1977. Work remaining consists of completing construction of phase 2 recreational facilities, which is about 61 percent complete; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (b) Sierra Madre Wash: In accordance with 1st Indorsement, DAEN-CWPW, Office, Chief of Engineers, November 23, 1976, subject: Reclassification of Project, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, Sierra Madre Wash, Calif., to basic letter, November 15, 1976, work on this unit is inactive. Ballona Creek Basin: Work remaining consists of completing construction of first contract for recreational facilities, which is about 93 percent complete; and initiating and completing construction of second contract for recreational facilities. 18. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Near San Bernardino and Colton, San Bernardino County, Calif. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a rectangular concrete channel extending for 3.5 miles along East Branch of Lytle Creek from existing Foothill Boulevard inlet structure to confluence with Warm Creek; a concrete trapezoidal channel on Warm Creek for 1.5 miles from confluence with East Branch of Lytle Creek to confluence with Santa Ana River; a leveed channel extending about 1.8 miles along Santa Ana River from mouth of existing East Twin and Warm Creeks concrete channel to Mount Vernon Avenue crossing; replacement of 4 railroad bridges and 12 highway bridges; 3 new highway bridges; inlets for side drainage; and relocation and protection of utilities. Design capacities of improvements would be: East Branch of Lytle Creek, 58,000 cubic feet per second; Warm Creek, 60,000 to 90,000 cubic feet per second; and Santa Ana River, 167,000 to 234,000 cubic feet per second. Approved estimated (1980) first cost is $42,300,000 ($35,500,000 Federal and $6,800,000 non- Federal), Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 1, approved in May 1972, which contains a map of modified project plan. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; perform construction, modification, or relocation of highways and utilities; maintain and operate works after completion; hold the United States free from damages; adjust water-rights claims resulting from project; and prevent any encroachment that would reduce flood-carrying capacities of levee and channel improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed construction of seventh contract, Santa Ana River, East Twin and Warm Creeks to Mt. Vernon Avenue, at a cost of $1,034,995 regular funds. Initiated preparation of supplemental project plan. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of first contract, Lytle and Warm Creeks channel, "I" Street to Interstate 15 at Warm Creek, was initiated in September 1972 and was completed in April 1974; second contract, Lytle Creek channel, 5th Street to "I" Street, was initiated in 33-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 December 1972 and was completed in July 1974; third contract, Warm Creek channel, Interstate 15 to Interstate 10, was initiated in July 1973 and was completed in May 1974; fourth contract, Warm Creek and Santa Ana River, railroad bridge relocations, was initiated in March 1974 and was completed in June 1975; fifth contract, Lytle Creek from inlet to 5th Street and Santa Ana River from Interstate 15 to Mt. Vernon Avenue, was initiated in May 1975 and was completed in January 1976; sixth contract, Santa Ana River, East Twin and Warm Creeks to Interstate 15, was initiated in June 1976 and was completed in June 1977; and seventh contract, Santa Ana River, East Twin and Warm Creeks to Mt. Vernon Avenue, was initiated in August 1979 and was completed in December 1979. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in May 1972. Work remaining consists of completing preparation of supplemental project plan, which is about 60 percent complete. 19. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, Calif. Existing project. A flood control dam and reservoir. Dam is a rolled-earthfill structure with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, a crest length of 2,200 feet, and a detached spillway with a crest length of 200 feet. Reservoir has a total capacity at spillway crest of 89,670 acre-feet (1965), including 11,000 acrefeet for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 215 square miles, reducing flow of design flood from 94,000 cubic feet per second to a maximum outflow of about 23,500 cubic feet per second. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $18,190,000 ($17,900,000 Federal and $290,000 non-Federal). Modification of project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on November 27, 1964. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must hold the United States free from damages from water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of project; prevent encroachment harmful to existing channel downstream from reservoir; and maintain channel capacity of not less than 23,500 cubic feet per second through improved areas. In addition, local interests have agreed to operate and maintain recreational facilities constructed by the United States and to construct, operate, and maintain such future recreational facilities as may be required in addition to those constructed by the United States. Local interests contributed $250,000 in consideration of land enhancement benefits provided by modified project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1968 and was completed in May 1971. Construction of recreational facilities was initiated in July 1972 and was completed in March 1973. Construction of relocations, roads, and permanent operating equipment was initiated in August 1974 and was completed in November 1974. In accordance with 2d Indorsement, ENGCW-OC, Office, Chief of Engineers, April 13, 1971, subject: Environmental Statement, Mojave River Forks Recreation Area Project, to basic letter, January 15, 1971, the environmental statement for recreation is not required. 20. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NEV. Location. In Lincoln County, Nev., about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, Nev. Existing project. Reservoirs are interdependent units of a project for protection of lands and improvements against floods, each unit consisting of a dam and a reservoir. Operation of Pine Canyon Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 45 square miles, reducing standard project flood from 10,500 to 320 cubic feet per second. Operation of Mathews Canyon Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 34 square miles, reducing standard project flood from 8,500 to 260 cubic feet per second. First cost of new work for completed project was $1,401,248, all Federal. For further project description, see page 1355 of Annual Report for 1967. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintained dams in good operating condition and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of reservoirs was completed in December 1957. 21. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Lower San Luis Rey River Valley, along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road (river mile 7.2) to Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, Calif. 33-16 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT Existing project. Plan provides for about 5.7 miles of earth-bottom trapezoidal channel along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road to about 1 mile upstream from U. S. Highway No. 101; about 1.5 miles of channel grading, which would generally be limited to the removal of spoil banks, from about 1 mile upstream from U. S. Highway No. 101 to ocean; and about 800 feet of stone-revetted levee on the left (south) bank from the Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad to ocean. Plan also provides for beautification features. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $30,300,000 ($22,000,000 Federal and $8,300,000 non-Federal). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; perform necessary construction, modification, or relocation of highways (including bridges), utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities; maintain and operate works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; adjust water-rights claims resulting from project; prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce flood-carrying capacities of improved channel; provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development of flood plain; and contribute 10 percent of construction costs for levee and channel improvements, presently estimated to be $2,300,000 apportioned share to be borne due to land enhancement benefits. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of project plan, phase I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project plan, phase I, is about 85 percent complete. 22. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CALIF. Location. On Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, Calif. General plan of improvement. Although a single comprehensive plan for flood control has been developed for Santa Ana River Basin, improvements provided are divided into two projects in accordance with congressional authorizations. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County) project, the first of these two projects, provides for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, which includes some areas outside Santa Ana River Basin, and flood control on San Antonio, Chino, Lytle, and Cajon Creeks. Santa Ana River Basin project, the second of these two projects, provides for flood control in other areas of basin. Active units of first project are described in Annual Report for 1968. For pertinent information on second project, see table 33-I, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." Existing project. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation and table 33-G for latest approved estimated Federal first cost for all units.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for units in existing project: (a) Brea Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Maintained project in good operating condition; administered real estate; continued acquisition of rights-of-way; and awarded contract for, and initiated and completed construction of third contract (phase 2) for recreational facilities at a cost of $58,527 required contributed funds. (c) Fullerton Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition; administered real estate; and completed preparation of plans and specifications for construction of third contract (phase 4) for recreational facilities. (d) Prado Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition; administered real estate; initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for construction of third contract for recreational facilities; and initiated preparation of plans and specifications for construction of fourth contract for recreational facilities. (e) San Antonio Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (f) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work remaining consists of completing basic operation and maintenance manual, which is about 97 percent complete, and completing inserts for channel and levee improvements (Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel). Other information for units in existing project; (a) Brea Dam: Dam was completed in March 1942. Work remaining consists of updating master plan; initiating reservoir-regulation manual; and initiating and constructing recreational facilities. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Project was completed in May 1961. Construction of first contract (phase 1) for recreational facilities was completed in July 1975; second contract (phase 2) for recreational facilities, in October 1978; and third contract (phase 2) for recreational facilities, in June 1980. Work remaining consists of completing acquisition of rights-of-way; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (c) Fullerton Dam: Dam was completed in May 1941. Construction of first contract (phase 2) for recreational facilities was completed in June 1976; and second contract (phase 3), in January 1978. Work remaining consists of initiating reservoirregulation manual; initiating and completing construction of third contract (phase 4) for 33-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 recreational facilities; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (d) Lytle and Cajon Creek channel improvements: Existing project was completed in 1948 and turned over to local interests for maintenance in September 1949. Work remaining consists of completing operation and maintenance manual, which is about 97 percent complete. (e) Prado Dam: Dam was completed in May 1941. Construction of first contract for recreational facilities was completed in January 1979; and second contract for recreational facilities, in August 1979. Work remaining consists of initiating reservoir-regulation manual; initiating and completing construction of third contract for recreational facilities; completing preparation of plans and specifications for construction of fourth contract for recreational facilities, which are about 5 percent complete, and initiating and completing construction; and initiating and completing construction of remaining recreational facilities. (f) San Antonio Dam: Dam was completed in October 1956. Work remaining consists of preparation of master plan. (g) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Project was completed in November 1960. Work remaining consists of completing operation and maintenance manual, which is about 97 percent complete. 23. SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Along Santa Maria River and. Bradley Canyon in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, Calif., about 60 miles northwest of City of Santa Barbara. Improvements along Santa Maria River extend about 21.9 miles from Fugler Point (at junction of Cuyama and Sisquoc Rivers) to Pacific Ocean. Improvements along Bradley Canyon extend from Canyon mouth to Santa Maria River. Existing project. Levee and channel improvements along Santa Maria River and along Bradley Canyon. Principal features include: about 17 miles of revetted levee along left bank of Santa Maria River from Fugler Point to State Highway 1 bridge at Guadalupe; about 5 miles of revetted levee along right bank of Santa Maria River from about 1.3 miles downstream from U.S. Highway 101 to about 1.5 miles upstream from Southern Pacific railroad bridge; about 1.8 miles of channel and revetted levee from mouth of Bradley Canyon to Santa Maria River, about 21.9 miles of cleared channel along Santa Maria River from Fugler Point to Pacific Ocean; and raised Southern Pacific railroad bridge. Approved estimated (1980) first cost is $13,710,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $12,600,000 Federal and $1,110,000 non- Federal. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed preparation of supplemental project plan. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1959 and was completed in June 1963. Plans and specifications are about 70 percent complete. 24. SANTA PAULA CREEK CHANNEL AND DEBRIS BASINS (INCLUDING MUD CREEK), SANTA CLARA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Along lower Santa Paula Creek, a tributary of Santa Clara River, Ventura County, Calif. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a debris basin on Santa Paula Creek; a concrete channel along Santa Paula Creek from Santa Paula Creek debris basin to Santa Clara River; a debris basin on Mud Creek, a tributary of Santa Paula Creek; and a concrete channel along Mud Creek from Mud Creek debris basin to confluence with' Santa Paula Creek. Approved estimated (1980) first cost is $37,732,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $34,600,000 Federal and $3,132,000 non-Federal. Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 4, approved in April 1973, which contains a map of modified project plan. (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish rights-of-way; assume responsibility for damage claims; provide cost of relocation of public utilities; and maintain improvement after completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplemental project plan. Continued preparation of supplemental environmental statement. Administered real estate. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of first contract, Harvard Boulevard to Santa Clara River, was initiated in August 1973 and was completed in February 1974. Construction of second contract, Mupu School to Harvard Boulevard, was terminated in February 1975. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in September 1972. Supplemental project plan is about 50 percent complete. Supplemental environmental statement is about 50 percent complete. 33-18 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT 25. SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIF. Location. In and near the City of Fillmore, Ventura County, Calif. Existing project. Plan provides for a 2-mile long rock-revetted single levee on the east bank of Sespe Creek; 25 rock groins to divert flows away from levee toe; floodgates in levee at Southern Pacific Railroad crossing; a new east span for Old Telegraph Road bridge; reinforcement of both spans of railroad bridge; and floodproofing 2 homes on west bank. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $5,600,000 ($3,000,000 Federal and $2,600,000 non-Federal). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow area and placement of dredged material; provide a cash contribution for first costs in excess of Federal limitation; perform alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements (excluding railroad bridges and approaches, and facilities for normal interception and disposal of local interior drainage at line of protection); maintain and operate works after completion; hold the United States free from water rights claims; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on flood control works that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity or hinder maintenance and operation, and control development in project area to prevent an undue increase in flood damage potential; publicize flood plain information and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies; hold the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of project, excluding damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors, comply with requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Estate Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 646; and comply with section 221 of Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed preparation of project plan. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are about 5 percent complete. 26. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Lower Sweetwater River Valley, along Sweetwater River from Bonita Mesa Road to San Diego Bay, San Diego County, Calif. Existing project. Plan provides for about 3.4 miles of improved trapezoidal channel along Sweetwater River from Bonita Mesa Road to San Diego Bay as part of a combined flood control and highway project. Approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $34,700,000 ($18,100,000 Federal and $16,600,000 non- Federal). (See table 33-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; perform construction, modification, or relocation of highways (including bridges), utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities; maintain and operate works after completion; hold the United States free from damages due to construction of project; adjust water-rights claims resulting from construction of project; and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flood-carrying capacity of improved channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued preparation of project plan. Continued preparation of final environmental statement. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project plan is about 95 percent complete. Final environmental statement is about 95 percent complete. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $109,011. (See table 33-H on inspection of completed flood control projects. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued for the following Bureau of Reclamation projects: Hoover Dam and Twitchell Dam. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $3,866. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 33-I. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-J on flood control work under special authorization. 33-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $471 for Broadway bridge, Pantano Wash, Tucson, Ariz. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $5,496,296, of which $132,464 were for advance preparation; $2,761,897 were for flood emergency operations; $2,599,441 were for rehabilitation; and $2,494 were for advance measures. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements at fiscal year cost of $76,118 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. 31. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $4,329,965 regular funds, of which $481,728 were for navigation studies; $75,157 were for beach erosion control studies; $2,503,216 were for flood control studies; $29,643 were for special studies involving coordination with other agencies; $14,281 were for review of authorized projects; and $1,225,940 were for supplemental preauthorization studies, phase I. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $288,815 for technical services, including $2,824 for Luke Air Force Base, $2,744 for Southeast, and $140,557 for Salt and Gila Rivers, all in Maricopa County, Ariz.; $372 for Point Mugu and $645 for Ventura River, both in Ventura County, Calif.; $94,543 for flood plain management; and $291,826 for inspection of dams. 33. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year cost was $13,242 for hydrologic studies. 33-20 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 1. Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds)5 3. Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 4. San Diego Harbor, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 5. San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. 6. Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. 7. Ventura Marina, Calif. 12. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, Ariz. 13. Allenville, Ariz. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost $5,123,345' 5,123,345' $560,640 $2,043,000 $583,421 $1,755,800 13,090,9292 550,574 2,005,364 629,844 1,749,607 13,082,9862 - 335,000 445,000 1,897,000 37,303,7191 - 270,112 483,356 613,231 35,993,418 - 240,000 103,500 1,032,592 4,313,1374 - 239,849 100,118 984,783 4,261,7954 - - - 2,500,000 4,172,575 - - - 125,353 1,797,928 - - - - 87,120 - - - - 87,120 49,837 49,837 6,080,000 6,187,757 420,000 350,000 227,460 255,233 348,400 600,404 112,000 64,002 - . 465,000 465,002 1,381,628 1,382,911 -8,000 1,370 218,090 221,995 51,100 50,764 -1,875,000 81,256 -20,000 49,083 -46,150 6,937 432,000 375,963 125,000 97,718 21,000 20,998 696,000 553,906 736,000 735,968 1,025,000 1,022,849 276,500 277,120 - - 2,612,0936 - - 2,612,0936 50,000 1,400,000 4,844,3077 48,785 1,399,959 4,893,0517 - - 2,128,411 -- 2,128,411 200,000 200,000 - 122,578 122,578 1,150,000 450,000 28,094,0958 1,226,292 455,559 28,091,5858 10,000 15,000 1,504,0379 10,880 15,029 1,504,1739 - - 717,910 32,845 - 715,215 -95,818 - 1,926,56310 15,903 - 1,900,063' o 235,000 270,000 11,335,099" 238,522 228,165 11,221,5061 573,000 7,308 1,239,77212 572,770 7,540 1,239,77212 - - 172,0001:1 - - 172,0001:1 116,000 670,000 5,299,31911 256,539 669,003 5,296,767"' - - 1,711,5391' - - 1,711,53915 1,200,000 448,800 6,985,84816 1,197,803 423,228 6,957,61516 - - 16,934,06017 8,665 - 16,934,00917 248,300 212,000 2,205,799 245,607 208,931 2,192,727 40,000 179,857 219,857 12,906 195,298 208,204 33-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) See Section i COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 Total Cost to FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 See Section 13,660,000 10,360,000 14,090,894 10,568,282 n Text Project 14. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 15A. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Indian Bend Wash Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 15B. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Painted Rock Dam (Gila River) 15C. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Phoenix, Ariz., and vicinity including New River) Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 15D. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Tucson diversion channel 15E. Gila River Basin, Ariz., Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek 16. Goleta, Calif., and vicinity 17. Los Angeles County drainage area, Calif. (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 18. Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. unds) Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 7,605,000 7,118,888 20,800 648,700 655,174 2,780,000 2,694,207 121,178 194,908 381,933 220,000 ,25,087 266,330 272,879 1,754,000 1,102,308 366,000 125,000 85,000 62,990 17,134 18,028 2,870,000 3,299,835 2,873,594 2,638,556 855,000 1,693,470 -. 2,700,000 2,400,913 - -20,802 5,002 5,452,510 360,445 186,124 306 - 5,436,616 33-22 10,340,000 10,448,670 64,712 72,264 1,563,415 1,690,072 5,378,500 3,059,178 23,732 1,278,400 425,909 188,191 283,000 250,851 7,962,000 6,198,109 82,842 72,681 115,000 40,013 100,000 99,716 2,693,000 2,622,085 1,996,500 2,135,268 3,169,591 2,961,182 141,797 1,284,900 1,199,826 5,877,600 8,203,954 38,802 695,378 1,800 8,319 752,000 784,208 6,269,000 8,235,861 2,214 146,578 6,604 -30,000 48,277 20,000 20,033 2,920,000 2,664,856 2,055,600 2,116,442 554,665 491,091 2,700,000 1,760,555 3,574,144 1,747,264 1,133,000 1,199,929 58,711 43,632 31,450 194,893 1,827,000 1,803,377 5,023,000 5,064,307 359,000 178,751 296,000 -906 83,000 66,448 52,000 48,685 100,000 97,271 3,568,000 4,528,809 3,837,700 3,808,269 2,747,300 2,755,063 36,000 1,154,340 46,586,900 46,170,719 85,512 72,264 7,671,159 5,607,268 18,838,480 18,638,823 354,211 279,160 2,336,260 2,226.136 19,980,5641" 19,980,35619 4,798,648 4,772,515 27,617,297 27,030,961 741,214 422,152 421,000 78,379 6,017,62521 21 5,982,35321" " 1,867,9632:1 1,867,9632:1 398,413 394,847 100,000 97,271 372,570,98521 2" 372,257.94024 26 29,446,4202 29,364,89621 12,902,5567 12,035,798 1 36.644,8652" 36,639,8882 34,985,831 34,970,696 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 19. Mojave River Da Mojave River Basin, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 20. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, Nev. 21. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, Calif. 22. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 23. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, Calif. 24. Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, Calif. (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 25. Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, Calif. 26. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, Calif. gym, Y.~ Total Cost to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 345,000 161,242 82,748 79,733 199 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 29,665 75,000 74,758 42,000 42,000 230,000 251,898 525,000 1,888,986 1,098,900 1,205,985 540,000 447,391 272,000 180,542 47,000 244,379 2,272 60,000 56,284 100,627 -115,000 21,333 70,000 45,569 35,000 34,620 290,000 280,413 60,000 626,278 903,000 893,883 278,800 245,600 117,400 208,853 8,045 165,000 154,239 - 17,838,198 8,544 17,828,027 207,000 744,548 235,064 744,261 - 286.300 - 284,501 1,401,248 1,401,248 51,000 48,620 200,000 210,973 46,000 -2,114 2,172,500 1,965,343 29,000 262,595 150,000 106,269 49,000 17,016 25,000 24,229 481,356 478,596 1,064,000 1,060,854 47,059,6381 :31 :32 46,968,923:31 1 3: 13,691,11030 31 13,458,657:30 34 3,208,15635 3,028,526:36 6,075,134: 7 6,031,398:17 4,031,000:18 3,998,802:11 193,600 47,266 250,000 234,752 31,100 31,266 224,000 232,846 2,527,000 583,376 1,077,653 968,310 686,430 402,819 400,000 336,335 300,000 179,922 33-23 100,000 1,414,403 17,603 40,948 1,353,503 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Excludes $1,361,668 Navy funds; Coast Guard costs; and $210,748 other contributed funds. 2. Includes $7,178 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $3,057,549 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 3. Includes $2,187,047 for :new work for previous project; $1,593,667 public works funds; a credit of $33,050 for transfer of land at Reservation Point and $996,792 emergency relief funds. Excludes Federal funds spent by the Navy for new work on middle breakwater, and Coast Guard costs. 4. Includes $139,347 for maintenance for previous project and $121,523 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 5. Spent by the Corps for betterments desired by local interests. 6. Navy funds. 7. Includes $238,092 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958 and $307,945 Navy funds. 8. Includes $154,704 for new work for previous projects; $86,352 public works funds- and $1,226,793 emergency relief funds. Excludes $254,795 Navy funds for dredging entrance channel in FY 1961 to depth of -42 feet mean lower low water (or 2 feet below project depth); and Coast Guard costs. 9. Includes $59,904 for maintenance for previous projects and $116,644 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958. In addition, .includes $144 for retroactive pay increase shown in "cost" figure only, as reported in 1958 Annual Report, page 1430. 10. Includes $4,441 for betterments desired by local interests prior to modification by 1968 River and H arbor Act. 11. Excludes $557,832 other contributed funds. Includes $2,610,000 regular funds and excludes $2,910,000 required contributed funds, both for new work on flood control project, "San Diego River Basin, Calif." 12. Includes $74,240 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 13. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 14. Includes $29,198 public works funds; $11,000 working funds for work performed in addition to existing project; and $9,275 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $462,986 other contributed funds spent by the Corps for maintenance-dredging betterments desired by local interests. 15. Excludes $1,708,836 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 16. Includes $48,185 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 17. Includes $57,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1975. 18. Includes $357,469 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 19. Includes $357,261 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 20. Excludes $394,364 other contributed funds. 21. Includes $253,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 22. Includes $217,728 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 23. Includes $3,758 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 24. Includes $11,008,935 emergency relief funds for new work. Excludes $16,726,888 emergency relief funds spent by Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project and $107,939 for minor rehabilitation. 25. Includes $19,308,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,155,500 for Sepulveda Dam- $6,290,000 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACIbA prototype; $484,000 for 33-24 Hansen Dam; $7,271,000 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 Tujunga for Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $2,929,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $933,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 26. Includes $18,994,980 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,074,869 for Sepulveda Dam' $6,274,587 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACIA prototype; $426,395 for Hansen Dam; $7,120,997 for Santa Fe Dam; $214,320 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $2,927,978 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $925,334 for Ballona Creek channel). 27. Includes $12,902,556 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($956,500 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,532,500 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $200,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,500 for Hansen Dam; $2,734,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,469,000 for Santa Fe Dam; and $550,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 28. Includes $12,035,798 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($955,450 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,506,052 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $199,377 for Tujunga Wash channel; $391 417 for Hansen Dam; $2,188,148 for Los Angeles River and kio Hondo channels; $1,367,579 for Santa Fe Dam; and $427,775 for Ballona Creek channel). 29. Non-Federal funds spent by the Federal Government to September 30, 1980, for replacements required as part of local cooperation and betterments desired by local interests. Excludes $4,238,000 other contributed funds spent by the Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project. 30. Comprises funds for Brea, Fullerton, Prado, and San Antonio Dams, Carbon Canyon Dam and channel, Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel (active units). 31. Includes $5 000 working funds for San Antonio Dam' $67,361 for San Juan Dam inactive unit) (also reported under "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects"i and $85,310 undistributed funds. Excludes other contributed funds spent by the Corps as follows: $124,105 for water conservation betterments desired by local interests at Prado Dam; (8,500 for betterments desired by local interests at San Antonio Dam; $234,709 for betterments desired by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel; and $601,762 for required items of local cooperation on Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements. Excludes $290,000 spent direct by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel for local cooperation items not required. 32. Includes $4,985,731 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,253,000 for Fullerton Dam; and $2,674 000 for Prado Dam). 33. Includes $4,895,016 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,055,740 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,201,996 for Fullerton Dam; and $2,637,280 for Prado Dam). 34. Excludes maintenance for Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, which are operated and maintained by local interests. 35. Includes $3,208,156 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,379,926 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,334,230 for Fullerton Dam; and $494,000 for Prado Dam). 36. Includes $3,028,526 Code 710 funds since FY 1975 ($1,372,414 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,242,078 for Fullerton Dam; and $414,034 for Prado Dam). 37. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. 38. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooperation items not required. TABLE 33-B LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Do. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 1 of Text) Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CALIF. (See Section 2 of Text) A breakwater 8,500 feet long, easterly of Point Fermin. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. For silt-diversion works. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). Widen fairway on easterly side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 650 feet wide in East Basin from turning basin to U.S. station 406; dredge 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin a turning basin 35 feet deep at Long Beach; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done. within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot-wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet areas A and B adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in easterly direction from northeast end of existing detached breakwater; dredge about 4 million cubic yards initially for a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel and deposit material on beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of areas A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. 33-25 H. Doc. 362, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 18, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1013, 66th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 349, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 130, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 843, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 161, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 401, 86th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures H. Doc 94-594, 94th Cong., 2d sess.' Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1875 Sept. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 July 24, 1946 MORRO BAY HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 3 of Text) Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 4 of Text) Diversion dike. Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep. and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging a portion of area F (north of area C). Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista. Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to naval air station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q, Q-1, M, N, and 0. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. Dredge triangular approaches to 26- and 35-foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CALIF. (See Section 5 of Text) Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, Calif., to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. H. Doc. 283, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1873; p. 1142 H. Ex. Doc. 177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p. 2114) H. Doc. 961, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 223, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 844, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 365, 90th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 760, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' 33-26 Oct. 22, 1976 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 22, 1944 July 15, 19803 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 7, 1974 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 June 30, 1948 July 24, 1946 Dec. 31, 1970 SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 6 of Text) Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of Iocal interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. VENTURA MARINA, CALIF. (See Section 7 of Text) Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredge a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repair existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, ARIZ. (See Section 12 of Text) Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. ALLENVILLE, ARIZ. (See Section 13 of Text) Relocate community, streets, utilities, community center, and park; and replace houses. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 14 of Text) Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and a diversion system. INDIAN BEND WASH, GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (See Section 15A of Text) Channel, levees, a siphon system, and transition works. Cost of siphon system borne by United States. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (See Section 15B of Text) Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX, ARIZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN (See Section 15C of Text) Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (See Section 15D of Text) Channel improvements. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (See Section 15E of Text) Dam and flood control btsin. GOLETA, CALIF., AND VICINITY (See Section 16 of Text) Channel improvement, and beautification and recreational features. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 518, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' None H. Doc. 356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 323, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 303, 88th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 274, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 91-392, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 33-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 22, 1936 May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 Dec. 17, 19704 June 22, 1936 SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CALIF. (See Section 22 of Text) Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange ounty at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIF. (See Section 17 of Text) Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000.) Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under the comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 18 of Text) Channels and levees. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 19 of Text) Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NEV. (See Section 20 of Text) Dams and flood control basins. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel and levee, and beautification features. None 33-28 None None None H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None None None None None None None None S. Doc. 53, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of H. Doc. 688, 75th Cong., improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 3d sess. for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States, $3,500,000.) Aug. 18, 1941 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for None prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Dec. 22, 1944 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood 2d sess.' control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, Calif. July :3, 1958 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million None for prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 23 of Text) Sept. 3, 1954 Levee and channel improvements. H. Doc. 400, 83d Cong., 2d sess. SANTA PAULA CREEK CHANNEL AND DEBRIS BASINS (INCLUDING MUD CREEK), SANTA CLARA RIVER ASIN, CALIF. (See Section 24 of Text) June 30, 1948 Channel improvement. H. Doc 443, 80th Cong., 1st sess. SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIF. (See Section 25 of Text) Aug. 11, 1980(): Levee, rock groins, floodgates, bridge span, and None floodproofed homes. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 26 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong.. control and highway project. 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included in the emergency relief program, May 28, 19:35. 3. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 4. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of section 201, Public Law 89-298. 33-29 TABLE 33-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 8 of Text) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Dana Point Harbor, Calif. March 1980 Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, Calif. March 1980 Port Hueneme, Calif. July 1980 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif. March 1980 TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 9 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Dana Point Harbor, Calif. 1972 $4,737,5501 $17,4002 Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, Calif. 1974 4,238,7523 349,9304 Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. 1958 796,8975 248,0016 Oceanside Harbor, Calif.7 1979 - 3,196,5638 Port Hueneme, Calif. 1976 987,5829 17,22510 Port San Luis, Calif. 1977 1,137,75911 69,58912 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif. 1977 4,766,898'3 562,963'" 1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs 2. Includes $17,400 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 3. Excludes $4,238,752 required contributed funds; $1,843,146 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 4. Includes $69,875 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 5. Public Works .Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 6. Includes $86,783 reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. Includes $72 expended in FY 1980. 7. Excludes $491,286 other contributed funds for new work. 8. Includes $24,330 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $2,959,941 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 9. Excludes $57,609 other contributed funds and advanced funds. Includes $6,634 expended in FY 1980. 10. Includes $17,225 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 11. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes $752 expended in FY 1980. 12. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act and $14,874 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 13. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 14. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. Includes $36 expended in FY 1980. 33-30 LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor,Orange County, Calif.1 1967 $89,119 - Bird Rock area, La Jolla, San Diego County, Calif.2 1967 25,8813 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro breakwater, Calif. 1972 1,253,5944 - Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), Calif. 1968 578,7175 - Imperial Beach, Calif. 1979 627,9396 - Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, Calif. 1976 107,484 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, Calif.7 1960 7,912 Oceanside, San Diego County, Calif. 1966 1,369,5718 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), Calif. 1979 364,9859 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach, Orange County, Calif. 1979 6,201,99910 Ventura-Pierpont area, Calif. 1969 715,81911 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of 7. Plant in service. October 23, 1962, H. Doc. 602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of 8. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered 9. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset 10. Excludes $2,789,176 required contributed funds. and Newport Beach), Orange County, Calif. Includes $69,550 expended in FY 1980. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 11. Excludes $117,406 other contributed funds for beachsection 103 Public Law 87-874. nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed 3. Excludes $75,614 required contributed funds. funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Excludes $25,584 required contributed funds- $66,124 other contributed funds; $21,330 advance funds; and Coast Guard costs. TABLE 33-F LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIF.: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 17 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 1976' Project Units Federal Local2 Total UNITS IN $70 MILLION PROJECT Los Angeles River Basin: Compton Creek, Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain Haines Canyon Hansen Dam Los Angeles River channel: Lankershim Blvd. to Steward and Gray Rd. Los Angeles River channel, Long Beach Blvd. Sepulveda Dam Sycamore Wash Verdugo Wash, Concord St. to upper Canada bridge San Gabriel River Basin: San Gabriel River channel: San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work) Santa Fe Dam to Walnut Creek Santa Fe Dam Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra Wash Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties Subtotal $2,510,500 524,000 11,343,000 40,807,300 34,200 6,657,000 24,000 1,087,000 810,800 951,900 32,300 12,647,000 1,109,000 1,280,000 79,818,000 $2,510,500 524,000 11,343,000 40,807,300 34,200 6,657,000 24,000 1,087,000 - 810,800 - 951,900 - 32,300 - 12,647,000 - 1,109,000 - 1,280,000 - 79,818,000 33-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIF.: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 33-F (Cont'd) (See Section 17 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 1976' Project Units Federal Local 2 Total UNITS OUTSIDE $70 MILLION PROJECT Los Angeles River Basin: Blanchard Canyon Blue Gum Canyon Burbank-Eastern system Burbank-Western system (lower) Burbank-Western system (upper) Caballero Creek Compton Creek: Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain Hooper Ave. storm drain to Main St. Dead Horse Canyon and Royal Blvd. channel Lopez Canyon diversion Lopez Dam Los Angeles River channel: Owensmouth Ave. to Lankershim Blvd. Lankershim Blvd. to Stewart and Gray Rd. Steward and Gray Rd. to Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean Pacoima Wash channel Tujunga Wash channel Verdugo Wash, upper Canada bridge to debris basin Wilson Canyon and Mansfield St. channel Winery Canyon San Gabriel River Basin: Coyote Creek (including North Fork) Emerald Wash and Live Oak Wash Marshall Creek San Gabriel River channel: Santa Fe Dam to Whittier Narrows Dam Whittier Narrows Dam to Pacific Ocean Thompson Creek and San Jose Wash (including San Jose Creek) Walnut Creek inlet channel Walnut Creek system Whittier Narrows Dam Rio Hondo Basin: Arcadia Wash system Eaton Wash Rio Hondo channel: Peck Rd. to Rosemead Blvd. (upper) Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower) Rubio Canyon diversion Santa Anita Wash Sawpit Wash Sierra Madre Villa channel Sierra Madre Wash Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel Benedict Canyon system Centinela Creek Sawtelle-Westwood system (including Sepulveda channel) Subtotal Grand total for comprehensive plan 682,000 533,000 7,149,000 1,279,000 4,930,000 1,484,200 149,000 1,052,000 664,000 743,500 729,000 8,135,800 9,202,100 5,860,900 32,612,000 3,178,100 7,322,900 635,000 3,917,500 413,000 18,802,300 1,658,600 2,577,900 5,748,800 20,887,200 21,274,600 2,879,000 17,232,600 32,254,000 $476,000 233,000 1,850,000 268,000 2,959,000 493,000 457,000 316,000 665,000 4,247,000 81,000 9,173,000 1,306,000 2,557,000 363,000 857,000 265,000 8,426,000 1,182,000 968,000 1,797,000 3,108,000 6,095,000 1,091,000 8,715,000 38,000 1,158,000 766,000 8,999,000 1,547,000 7,889,000 1,977,200 149,000 1,509,000 980,000 1,408,500 729,000 12,382,800 9,202,100 5,941,900 41,785,000 4,484,100 9,879,900 998,000 4,774,500 678,000 27,228,300 2,840,600 3,545,900 7,545,800 23,995,200 27,369,600 3,970,000 25,947,600 32,292,000 5,236,800 1,893,000 7,129,800 4,225,100 1,194,000 5,419,100 4,412,000 550,000 4,962,000 8,165,000 2,565,000 10,730,000 1,066,400 254,000 1,320,400 3,045,700 434,000 3,479,700 2,348,600 745,000 3,093,600 781,400 366,000 1,147,400 1,732,000 248,000 1,980,000 746,600 - 746,600 15,284,900 3,785,000 19,069,900 4,083,800 4,788,000 8,871,800 9,620,700 1,492,000 11,112,700 274,736,000 76,300,000 351,036,000 354,554,000 76,300,000 430,854,000 33-32 1. Excludes estimated cost for Code 710 funds and system channel estimate, which was increased by $42,000 to estimated cost for minor rehabilitation. permit rounding of overall non-Federal estimate to three 2. Approved by Los Angeles County Flood Control significant figures. District as of September 30, 1976, except for Walnut Creek LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 33-G SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CALIF.: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST FOR ALL UNITS (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost Project Total Latest Revision Date ACTIVE UNIT' Completed: Brea Dam $1,189,0682 Fullerton Dam 411,0762 : Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements 7,612,000 Prado Dam 9,473,2732 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel 10,924,170 3 San Antonio Dam 7,001,1764 : Completed Except for Minor Completion Items: Carbon Canyon Dam and channel 5, 150,0002 1961 INACTIVE UNITS5 Aliso Creek Dam 340,000 1954 San Juan Dam 5,960,000 1954 Trabuco Dam 2,190,000 1954 DEAUTHORIZED UNIT 5 Villa Park Dam 2,270,000 1954 1. For details, see section 22 of text. 4. Includes $5,000 working funds. 2. Not including estimated cost of Code 710 funds. 5. For additional information, see "Other Authorized 3. Plant in service. Flood Control Projects." TABLE 33-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Project Date Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Whitewater River Basin, Calif. City Creek levee, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Los Angeles County drainage area, Calif., channels Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. Mill Creek levees, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Needles, San Bernardino County, Calif. Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, Calif. Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, Calif. Riverside levees, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, Calif. San Diego River channel and levees, San Diego River Basin, Calif. San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, Calif. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, Calif. Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair), Ariz. Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel, Ventura River Basin, Calif. Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements, Whitewater River Basin, Calif. April 1980 April and May 1980 April and May 1980 April, May, and June 1980 April 1980 May 1980 April 1980 April 1980 April 1980 April 1980 July 1980 July 1980 April 1980 September 1980 September 1980 April 1980 September 1980 April 1980 33-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 33-H (Cont'd) INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Project Date Ventura River levee, Ventura River Basin, Calif. September 1980 Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, Ariz. (part) June 1980 Emergency Flood Control Projects: Clifton, Ariz. June 1980 Eloy, Ariz. June 1980 Holbrook, Ariz. June 1980 Jerome, Ariz. June 1980 Tucson, Ariz. June 1980 TABLE 33-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, Calif.' " - 400,000:' Gila River Basin, Ariz.: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) (inactive) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) (inactive) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) (deferred) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, Calif.5 Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, Ariz.2 Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, Nev.;- Needles, San Bernardino County, Calif.' 2 Oro (Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, Calif.' 2 Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, Calif.' 2 Ridgecrest. Kern County, Calif.' 8 Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, Calif.' 2 San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, Calif. Santa Ana River Basin, Calif.: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee2 Mill Creek levees2 Riverside levees 2 San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel2 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif.: Aliso Creek Dam (inactive) San Juan Dam (inactive) Trabuco Dam (inactive) Villa Park Dam-' 1963 1966 1975 1970 1968 1979 1958 1950 1964 1973 1970 1973 1972 1978 1962 1961 1959 1962 1950 73,2014 2,413,051 402,867 121,5094 10,174,869 335,000 295,191 1,000,0006 1,000,0007 212,745 195,194 982,4329 1,708,428 7,753,93711 617,89011 2,104,478 3,026,97412 67,361 33-34 LOS ANGELES. CALIF.., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 33-I (Cont'd) (See Section 30 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, Calif.2 1961 2,126,672 - Tijuana River Basin, Calif.2 1979 1,703,03113 - University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, Calif. (inactive) 1975 213,313 Ventura River Basin, Calif.: Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel2 1964 939,90814- Ventura River levee2 1950 1,349,2991 - Whitewater River Basin, Calif.: Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside Countyl 2 1966 97,868 - Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs' 2 1973 819,87816- Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements2 1967 1,420,552" - Tahquitz Creek (inactive) 1974 1,063,595 - Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, Ariz. (deferred) 1973 1,831,300 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 10. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 2. Completed. 11. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 12. Excludes $327,723 other contributed funds. 4. Advance planning only. 13. International Boundary and Water Commission 5. Deauthorized by Chief of Engineers under authority funds. Includes $829 expended in FY 1980. of section 12, Public Law 93-251. 14. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. 6. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and 15. Includes $5,661 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. $91,160 other contributed funds. Excludes $17,006 other contributed funds. 7. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and 16. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds and $176,295 other contributed funds. $53,470 other contributed funds. 8. Terminated. 17. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. 9. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and $154,733 other contributed funds. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, As Amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 33-J (See Section 31 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Costs Bear Creek, La Quinta, Calif. $223,807 Newhall Creek, Newhall, Calif. 29,568 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, Calif. 125.425 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, Calif. 57,227 West Magnesia Canyon channel, Rancho Mirage, Calif. 135,70() 33-35 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT* This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California state line on the north to Cape San Martin, Calif., on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bodega Bay, Calif. ................ 34-2 2. Crescent City Harbor, Calif.......... 34-2 3. Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif .............................. 34-3 4. Noyo River and Harbor, Calif........ 34-3 5. Oakland Harbor, Calif. .............. 34-4 6. Petaluma River, Calif .............. 34-4 7. Richmond Harbor, Calif. ............ 34-5 8. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ............. 34-6 9. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif ...................... 34-6 10. San Francisco Harbor, Calif. ........ 34-6 11. San Francisco Harbor and Bay, (removal of drift), Calif ......... .. 34-7 12. San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif . .................. .... 34-7 13. Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif. ........... 34-8 14. Suisun Bay Channel, Calif .......... 34-9 15. Reconnaissance and condition surveys .......................... 34-9 16. Other authorized navigation projects ........................... 34-9 17. Navigation work under special authorization ............. ....... 34-9 Beach Erosion Control Page 18. Other authorized beach erosion control. projects..................34-9 19. Beach erosion control work under special authorization ............... 34-10 Flood Control 20. Alhambra Creek, Calif........... 34-10 21. Pajaro River Basin, Calif ........... 34-10 22. Russian River Basin, Calif........... 34-11 23. Walnut Creek, Calif. ................. 34-12 24. Inspection of completed flood control projects ...................... 34-13 25. Other authorized flood control projects ..................... 34-13 26. Flood control work under special authorization ................... 34-13 General Investigations 27. Surveys ........................ 34-13 28. Collection and study of basic data ,'.. ............. ........... 34-13 29. Coordination with other agencies .......................... 34-13 30. Research and development .......... 34-13 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 34-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. BODEGA BAY, CALIF. Location. A triangular lagoon on California. Coast, 85 miles south of Noyo River and 58 miles north of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5603.) Existing project. Entrance jetties 1,130 and 1,650 feet long; a bulkhead to retain the sandspit; a channel shore; and a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 3,000 feet long on north side of Doran Beach Spit. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 16,010 feet long to town of Bodega Bay thence southeasterly along shore, with 3 turning basins 12 feet deep and 300 to 400 feet wide at inner end of entrance channel, at junction of bay and shore channels near town of Bodega Bay, and at southerly end of shore channel; and a 4,500-foot riprapped earth mole westerly of channel along the eastern shore. Approved estimated cost for new work (1980) is $5,662,000, of which $3,752,000 (excluding Coast Guard costs) is Federal cost and $1,910,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Major rehabilitation of jetties and channels cost $397,779, exclusive of $2,000 contributed funds. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Acts of 1938 and 1965 (H. Does. 619, 7th Cong., 3d sess., and 106, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Act of October 27, 1965, requires local interests (a) contribute in cash 36 percent of the first cost of construction for the mole, an amount presently estimated at $1,543,000, and 50 percent of the first cost of dredging the Doran Beach channel, an amount presently estimated at $367,000; both amounts subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; (b) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the improvements, and of aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the cost of such retaining works; (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the improvements; and (d) provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate service frontage and public landing with suitable facilities at each location, necessary mooring facilities for local and transient boats with adequate depths in berthing areas, utilities, access roads, and parking areas (including those on the mole), and other necessary public use shore facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers. By Resolution No. 7674, dated November 12, 1963, the Board of Supervisors of Sonoma County furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design for the earth mole and Doran Beach channel is about 70 percent complete. Maintenance: Awarded contract for and initiated maintenance dredging of Bodega Bay, cost $230,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning of the earth mole and Doran Beach channel is about 70 percent complete. Work remaining is construction of earth mole and Doran Beach channel. Jetties, bulkhead, and main Bodega Bay channels and turning basins were completed in 1943. Major rehabilitation of channels and south jetty was completed in August 1961. 2. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CALIF. Location. Harbor is 17 miles south of Oregon State line, 125 miles south of Coos Bay, Oreg., 70 miles north of Humboldt Bay, Calif., and midway between San Francisco Bay and mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5895.) Existing project. A rubblemound outer breakwater extending about 3,700 feet on a bearing of S. 27 degrees E.; from Battery Point, thence about 1,000 feet on a bearing of S. 80 degrees E.; for maintenance dredging of an outer harbor basin 1,800 feet long and 1,400 feet wide to 20 foot depth at mean lower low water, except in rock; a rubblemound sand barrier from Whaler Island to easterly shore and maintenance dredging at seaward end of sand barrier; an inner breakwater extending northwesterly about 1,200 feet from Whaler Island, thence westerly 400 feet to form a protected fish-boat harbor; for removal of pinnacle rock in fish-boat harbor to 20-foot depth; and a T-shaped inner harbor basin 20 feet deep, 1,500 feet long extending along north side of Citizen's Dock for 325 feet, with a stem 1,000 feet long. Approved estimated cost for new work (1980) is $11,560,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $11,100,000 is Federal cost (excludes Coast Guard costs) and $460,000 is non-Federal cost; completed modifications $6,049,000; inactive portion of Citizen's Dock in the Inner Harbor Basin $2,500,000 and $217,000 contributed by local interests. Major rehabilitation of outer breakwater cost $525,000. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications and acts of 1927, 1937, 1945, and 1965 portion for construction of 400- foot extension of the inner breakwater. The Board, by its Resolution No., 77-10, dated September 6, 1977, reaffirmed its intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. A notification was received by letter from , the President of the Board, dated February 10, 1978, stating that the area serving the Citizen's Dock should not be included at this time. Rightsof- way are publicly owned and available for public use. An agreement in conformance with the requirements of Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, will be obtained from the local sponsor by Board of Harbor Commissioners letter dated February 10, 1978, local interests concurred in deletion of Citizen's Dock dredging and reaffirmed support for dredging in the vicinity of the oil dock. Terminal facilities. Three piers, one of which is publicly owned and from which boats are fueled; one oil terminal; and a private mooring for barges discharging petroleum products to pipelines on inner breakwater. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Planning for dredging in the vicinity of the Petroleum Dock is about 15 percent complete. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor and completion of outer breakwater repair by contract, cost $2,024,349. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for deepening and enlarging the inner harbor basin adjacent to Petroleum Dock to a depth of 20 feet and deepening of the harbor adjacent to Citizen's Dock which was found to be not economically justified and reclassified to the "Inactive" category in 1978. The 3,000-foot outer breakwater was completed in 1930, sand barrier in 1939, inner breakwater in 1946, removal of pinnacle rock in 1951, and outer breakwater extension in 1957. Major rehabilitation of outer breakwater was completed in 1964. The 400-foot extension of inner breakwater was completed in 1973. 3. HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CALIF. Location. Humboldt Bay is a landlocked harbor on coast of California, 225 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 70 miles south of Crescent City Harbor. (See Coast Geodetic Survey Chart 5832.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1982- 84 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1673 of Annual Report for 1929, and page 1689 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see pages 3 and 4 of Annual Report for 1979. New work completed in 1979, cost $7,585,928; excludes $95,000 contributed funds and Coast Guard costs and amounts expended on previous projects. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. For details see Annual Report for 1977. Terminal facilities. There are 37 wharves and piers, 3 of which are publicly owned; 4 oil terminals; 1 privately owned'submarine pipeline for petroleum products; 2 boat-building and repair plants; 1 boat-icing plant; 6 small boat fueling stations; 2 small yacht and fishboat basins, 1 of which is publicly owned; and numerous log booms and small landings; exclusive of facilities owned by the United States. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Final claim settlement on prior year work (1968 Act), cost $202,312. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor, including dredging surveys of project channels, and U.S. hopper dredges Harding and Pacific removed 224,562 cubic yards of shoaled material from the bar and entrance channel, 33,500 cubic yards from North Bay channel, cost $326,775, and completed repairs of north and south jetties by contract, cost $169,754. Condition at end offiscal year. North jetty was completed in 1925; south jetty in 1927; Arcata channel in 1931; entrance channel, 30 feet deep and 50 feet wide, in 1935; Fields Landing channel and turning basin and Eureka and Samoa channels, to 26 feet deep, in 1939; entrance channel to 40 feet deep, and Eureka, Samoa, and North Bay channels to 30 feet deep in 1954; and dredging North Bay anchorage area completed 1979. Total cost of existing project as of September 30, 1980, was $37,339,749, of which $7,680,928 was for new work ($7,585,928 regular funds, excludes Coast Guard costs, and $95,000 contributed funds) and $29,658,821 regular funds for maintenance. Project is complete. 4. NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CALIF. Location. Noyo Harbor is a cove on California coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5703.) Previous projects. For details see page 1680, Annual Report for 1929, and page 1772, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. Provides for two entrance jetties; an entrance channel into Noyo River 10 34-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 feet deep and 100 feet wide and channel in river 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending about 0.6 mile above mouth, thence connecting channel about 400 feet long to mooring basin of about 8.5 acres 10 feet deep on south bank of river. Cost of new work construction completed in 1931 was $184,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Minor rehabilitation of jetties completed in 1961 cost $222,810 exclusive of $1,700 contributed funds. A 400-foot channel extension, mooring basin and connecting channel were constructed by Noyo Harbor District in 1968. Approved estimated cost (1980) of new work including the breakwater and channel improvements, (1962 River and Harbor Act modified by 1976 WRDA), is $11,070,000, of which $10,800,000 is Federal (excludes Coast Guard costs) and $270,000 is non-Federal cost (cash contribution). (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. For details see Annual Report for 1973. Terminal facilities. None in harbor proper. In river above harbor there are 9 fish-receiving stations; 3 boat fueling docks; 2 boat building and repair plants; 1 boat. icing plant; 3 marine ways; and 1 privately owned marina facility. These facilities, together with those provided in the public mooring basin are not adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning for proposed breakwater and channel improvements is about 27 percent complete. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor including removal of 22,217 cubic yards of shoaled material from entrance and river channels, by contract, cost $201,822. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for construction of breakwaters in Noyo Harbor and additional channel improvements. Jetties, rock removal, and dredging entrance and river channels completed in 1931. Minor rehabilitation of jetties and north wall completed in September 1961. Mooring basin and connecting channel in river, constructed by local interests, was completed in October 1968. Total cost of existing project as of September 30, 1980, was $4,134,642, of which $794,872 was for new work, $3,339,770 for maintenance ($3,335,770 regular funds and $4,000 contributed funds), and $224,510 for minor rehabilitation of jetties and north wall ($222,810 regular funds and $1,700 contributed funds). 5. OAKLAND HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On eastern side of San Francisco Bay, opposite city of San Francisco. Inner harbor is between cities of Oakland and Alameda. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5535.) Previous project. For details see page 1979 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1755 of Annual Report for 1921, and page 1674 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details see Annual Report for 1977 (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. For details see Annual Report for 1973. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 31, "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif." revised 1974. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce with the construction of nine additional deepwater berths at 7th Street Terminal in 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of Fruitvale Avenue highway and bridges, including engineering and design by hired labor, cost $128,277; and U.S. hopper dredges, Biddle and Harding removed 296,200 cubic yards of shoaled material from the inner harbor and 239,900 cubic yards from the outer harbor, cost $938,981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street (River and Harbor Act 1962) and to 25 feet above Park Street (River and Harbor Act 1927) which was deauthorized November 1977. Jetties were completed in 1894. Dredging existing project channels was carried on from 1910 to 1931 when 30-foot depth was attained. The 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor was attained in 1942 with military funds. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge completed December 1973. Dredging from entrance to Ninth Avenue wharf completed February 1975. Cost of existing project as of September 30, 1980, was $28,026,514, of which $7,145,018 was for new work ($6,747,752 regular funds and $397,266 contributed funds), and $20,881,496 regular funds for maintenance. 6. PETALUMA RIVER, CALIF. Location. Rises in hills north of Petaluma, flows southeasterly about 20 miles, and empties into northwest side of San Pablo Bay about 22 miles from San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5533.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1982 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1665 of Annual 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT Report for 1919, and page 1684 of Annual Report for 1938. E.xistirg project. A channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide in San Pablo Bay to mouth of rier; thence 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide in river to Western Avenue, Petaluma, including a depth of 8 feet in turning basin; thence 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Washington Street Bridge; thence 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide to a point 935 feet above Washington Street Bridge. (A portion about 975 feet above Washington Street Bridge was recommended for deletion by report "San Francisco Bay and Tributaries," December 1974). All depths refer to mean lower low water. Section under improvement is 19.5 miles long, of which 5 miles are in San Pablo Bay downstream from mouth of river. Cost of new work, completed in 1933, was $85,063, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Existing project adopted by 1930 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 183, 70th Cong., 1st sess., which contains published map). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Local interests must furnish satisfactory areas with necessary levees, spillways, and drainage works for proper disposal of spoil from maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are wharves and piers, 1 small yacht harbor with fueling facilities, and 11 small landings, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design by hired labor, including awarding and initiating contract for maintenance dredging of the Petaluma River, cost $357,095. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1933. Total cost of existing project as of September 30, 1980, was $3,996,567, of which $85,063 was for new work and $3,911,504 regular funds for maintenance. 7. RICHMOND HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On eastern shore of San Francisco Bay about 10 miles north of Oakland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5532.) Existing project. Provides for channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent to Southampton Shoal from deep water in San Francisco Bay to outer harbor; inner harbor entrance channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from deep water to Point Richmond, with a turning basin at that point, thence a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide flaring to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with.a turn at that point 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet deep except for a depth of 30 feet at southerly apex of bend; thence 35 feet deep and 850 feet wide to entrance to Santa Fe Channel: 2,000 feet, and maintenance to depth of 30 feet of remainder of Santa Fe Channel and basin; a rubblemound training wall 10,000 feet long extending westerly from Brooks Island; approach areas 32 feet deep to within 75 feet of pierhead line in outer harbor at Point San Pablo and Point Orient; a channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long from deep water in San Pablo Bay easterly along north side of Point San Pablo; a maneuvering area at Richmond Long wharf 45 feet deep and a West Richmond Channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and about 2.5 miles long through west navigation opening of Richmond-San Rafael Bridge which are authorized but have not been constructed. New work, completed in 1957, cost $2,886,695, exclusive of $524,778 contributed by local interests. Estimated cost (1980) for 45-footdeep maneuvering area at Richmond Long wharf and for West Richmond Channel, authorized as part of "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" project, is about $23,920,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Estimated cost for all requirements under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions was $4 million (price as of dates of compliance). Local interests must furnish easements and spoil-disposal areas for maintenance dredging. (See Sacramento District Annual Report for "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" for requirements of Act of October 27, 1965.) By Resolution adopted August 6, 1963, Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County indicated willingness to meet requirements applicable to West Richmond Channel and -maneuvering area at Richmond Long wharf. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 31, "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif.," revised 1974. A privately owned dock for receipt of sand and gravel and two small-boat basins have been constructed since 1962. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning of San Francisco Bay to Stockton project continued. Maintenance: Engineering and design and U.S. hopper dredge, Harding removed 334,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from inner harbor and 149,000 cubic yards from outer harbor, cost $480.454. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project completed in 1957, except for dredging West Richmond Channel and enlarging and deepening to 45 feet the maneuvering area at 34-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Richmond Long wharf authorized as part of San Francisco Bay to Stockton project. Dredging project channels was initiated in 1918 and carried on intermittently until 1940. Training wall was completed in 1931, and channel in San Pablo Bay in 1945. Dredging authorized by act of September 3, 1954, was initiated in October 1955 and the Southampton Shoal Channel and enlarging and deepening to 35 feet the approach area to Richmond Long wharf was completed in March 1956, inner harbor channels in December 1956, Santa Fe Channel in January 1957, and removal of rock near Point Potrero in October 1957. Minor rehabilitation of training wall completed in 1967. 8. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO, STOCKTON, CALIF. (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to vicinity of Pittsburg through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel to vicinity of Pittsburg and Navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Pittsburg; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel. Approved cost estimate (1980) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. Terminal facilities. See Part 2, Port Series No. 30, 31, and 32, revised 1974, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Continued planning activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning activities continued. San Francisco Harbor Main Ship Channel was completed Feburary 1974. 9. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND DELTA MODEL, CALIF. Location. The model, including a regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, Calif., adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, Calif., as a part of the San Francisco Bay, ircluding San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and other adjacent bays, California Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81-516, Section 110). Operation and maintenance of the model was authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model has successfully reproduced to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continued. Construction of the regional visitor center was completed May 1980 and the final exhibit is about 90 percent complete, cost $1,965,818. Condition at end offiscal year. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957, and addition of Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1980, was $6,411,712, of which $3,161,483 was for the regional visitor center, $328,690 for exhibits, and $2,921,539 for maintenance. 10. SAN FRANCISCO IIARHOR. (AlI". LJoc1'tio~. Works included are in Sal IF'lranc isco, Bay. in vicinity of San Francisco'. andI in ap)roach channels to (;Golden (;ate. tilhe buy entrance. (See Coast and (Geodetic Surve'\'y ('hart 5532.) 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT I'reious projects. For details see page 1978 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1749 of Annual Report for 1921, page 1633 of Annual Report fo 192., and page 1669 of Annual Report for 1938. Exristitg project. Dredged channel through San Francisco Bar on line of main ship channel, 55 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide; removal of Presidio Shoal, Black Point Shoal, Rincon Reef Rock (inner), Rincon Reef Rock (outer), Blossom Rock, and Alcatraz Shoal westward of a northand- south line 2,500 feet west of Alcatraz Light, to 40 feet deep; removal of Arch Rock, Shag Rocks 1 and 2, Harding Rock, Point Knox Shoal westward of a north-and-south line through Point Stuart Light, and a portion of shoal channelward of pierhead line near mouth of Islais Creek, to 35 feet deep; and dredging a channel 750 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to San Francisco Airport ending in a basin 10 feet deep and about 2,000 feet wide. All depths refer to mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.7 feet at Fort Point and 7.2 feet at San Francisco Airport. Extreme ranges at foregoing localities are 10.6 and 12 feet respectively. New work completed in 1959 cost $1,658,957, exclusive of $134,591 contributed funds and amounts expended on previous projects. Deepening Bar Channel from 50 to 55 feet, authorized as part of "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" project, completed in 1974, cost $1,659,000. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed. Local interests must furnish suitably bulkheaded spoil-disposal areas for maintenance of channel to San Francisco Airport. (See Sacramento District Annual Report for "San Francisco.Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" for requirements of Act of October 25, 1965.) By Resolution adopted August 6, 1963, Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County indicated willingness to meet requirements applicable to deepening San Francisco Bar Channel. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30(, "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City," revised 1974. A new deep-water terminal has been constructed since 1962. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Planning for San Francisco Bay to Stockton project continued. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies and dredging surveys of project channels by hired labor and U.S. hopper dredge Biddle removed 778,635 cubic yards of shoaled material from main ship channel, cost $581,521. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project completed in 1959, and deepening Bar Channel from 50 to 55 feet authorized as part of San Francisco Bay to Stockton project was completed in 1974. Dredging Islais Creek Shoal was completed in 1930, deepening Presidio Shoal in 1931, removal of various rocks in 1932, deepening Point Knox Shoal in 1934, deepening Alcatraz Shoal in 1936, deepening Black Point Shoal in 1937, dredging channel and basin at San Francisco Airport in 1941, and completion of bar channel 50 feet deep in 1959. Cost of existing project as of September 30, 1980, was $16,141,311, of which $1,793,548 was for new work ($1,465,957 regular funds, $193,000 Public Works funds, and $134,591 contributed funds) and $14,347,763 regular funds for maintenance. 11. SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY (REMOVAL OF DRIFT), CALIF. Location. Project applied to San Francisco Bay, lower San Francisco Bay, Oakland Harbor, Richmond, San Pablo Bay and Mare. Island Strait, Richardson Bay, and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from San Francisco Bay and its tributary waters. New work portion of project (acquisition of plant and equipment) is estimated to cost (1962) $1,110,000 and is considered inactive since a landfill method of disposal is now being used. Existing project was authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 268, 81st Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Described in pertinent separate project descriptions. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Floating debris was collected and disposed of from project waterways by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. No new work construction funds have been appropriated. Maintenance operations under existing project commenced July 1950. Costs for removal of drift before that time were carried as maintenance on applicable authorized river and harbor projects in the area. Modification of debris-handling facilities to implement the landfill method of disposal in lieu of burning completed 1971. 12. SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CALIF. Location. Channel extends from a point in lower end of San Pablo Bay west of Pinole Point generally northeasterly across Pinole Shoal in San Pablo Bay to junction of Carquinez Strait and Mare Island Strait, thence northwesterly in 34-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Mare Island Strait along fronttage of Marel' Island Navy Yard. (See Coast an(l (;clodetic Survey Chart 5533.) I'rcriois p)rojects. For details see page 1680, Annual Report for 1938. LUisting proj)ct. DI)redged channel across Pinole Shoal in San Pablo Bay 600 feet wide, 35 feet deep, and about 8 miles long; a channel in Mare Island Strait 700 feet wide and 30) feet (leep) flaring to a turning basin generally 1,000 feet wide from former dike 6, Mare Island, to a line 75 feet southerly from causeway between Vallejo and Mare Island, 30 feet deep, excelpt at northerly end where project depth is 26 feet; maintenance of two approach areas to navy yard piers at southern end of Mare Island. New work completed in 1943 cost $282,669 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Uncompleted dredging of two approach areas at Vallejo and South Vallejo was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Estimated cost (1980) of4 lengthening and deepening Pinole Shoal Channel to 45 feet and of dredging maneuvering area 45 feet deep at Oleum pier, authorized as part of "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" project but not constructed is about $59,453,000() (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for work to date. (See Sacramento District Annual Report for "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)" for requirements of Act of October 27, 1965.) By resolution adopted August 6, 1963, Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County indicated willingness to meet requirements applicable to deepening Pinole Shoal Channel and dredging maneuvering area at Oleum Pier. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 31, "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait," revised 1974. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning for San Francisco Bay to Stockton project continued. Maintenance: Engineering and design including dredging surveys by hired labor and U.S. hopper dredges Harding and Biddle removed 1,178,500 cubic yards of shoaled material from Mare Island Strait and 149,000 cubic yards from Pinole Shoal Channel, cost $853,308. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1943 except for portion which was deauthorized November 6, 1977 (approach areas at Vallejo and South Vallejo) and enlarged Pinole Shoal Channel and maneuvering area at Oleum authorized as part of San Francisco Bay to Stockton project. Iinole Shoal Channel 35 feet deep was completed in 1929. Mare Island Strait Channel an(t turning basil, was completed in 1943. Cost of existing project as of September 3()109,80 , was $18.351,822, of which $282,669 was for new work and $18,069,153 for maintenance. 13. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIF. Location. On north shore of Monterey Bay about 65 miles south of entrance to San Francisco Bay and 14 miles north of Moss Landing, the nearest small-boat harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey charts 5402 and 5403.) Existing project. Provides for a small-boat harbor consisting of two entrance jetties, east jetty 850 feet long and west jetty 1,125 feet long. protecting an entrance channel 100 feet wide, 20 feet deep, and 900 feet long, thence 15 feet deep for an additional 370 feet; an inner harbor channel 15 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 800 feet long, thence 10 feet deep for an additional 60() feet, entering a turning basin 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 207 feet long, and a sand bypassing plant. Approved estimated cost (1980) is $4,312,000, of which $2,850,000 is Federal cost (excludes Coast Guard costs) and $1,462,000 non- Federal cost (includes $1,350,000 to be contributed by local interests). Total estimated cost includes $2,662,000 for the completed portion. Existing project authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 357, 85th Cong., 2d sess., as modified by Chief of Engineers). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed jetties and channels. For details see Annual Report 1978. Terminal facilities. In the natural harbor there is one municipally owned wharf with facilities for fueling and servicing boats and receiving, handling, and processing fresh fish. The small-boat harbor includes a municipal pier, utilities, and berthing, marine repair, and supply facilities. These are considered adequate for existing commerce but local interests have developed harbor-expansion plans to provide an additional 500 berths to meet recreational boating needs. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design including dredging surveys by hired labor and 190,250 cubic yards of shoaled material removed by contract from project channels, cost $454,933. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is about 80 percent complete. Jetties were completed in June 1963 and channel dredging in November 1963. Work remaining is provision for sand bypassing (continuation of construction involves construction of a fixed sand bypassing plant in lieu of the previous floating system (12-inch 34-8 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT hydraulic dredge) which was unacceptable), and periodic harbor maintenance dredging. 14. SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CALIF. Location. Suisun Bay is about 30 miles northeast of San Francisco, Calif., and is an integral part of waterways which provide access to the Pacific Ocean from inland ports of California. Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers flow to a junction and empty into Suisun Bay near Collinsville, and New York Slough, a distributary of San Joaquin River, which leads to head of Suisun Bay at Pittsburg, Calif. City of Sacramento is on Sacramento River about 60 miles north of Collinsville; access to city has been provided by 10-foot shallow-draft channel along river route. Sacramento River deep water ship channel, completed as an operating facility for oceangoing vessels in June 1963, provides deepdraft access to Sacramento. (For details see Improvement No. 1, Sacramento River, Calif. Sacramento District's Annual Report.) City of Stockton is on San Joaquin River about 40 miles above Pittsburg and access to city provided by Stockton deep water channel. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5534.) Previous project. For details, see Sacramento District's Annual Report page 1756 for year 1920, page 1562 for year 1926, and page 1714 for year 1928. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts, see Sacramento District's Annual Report for 1967. Total Federal cost of new work for existing project, completed in 1934, exclusive of work accomplished under public works program as part of San Joaquin River 30-foot project, was $142,027. No local interest costs were incurred (for details, see page 1741 of Sacramento District's Annual Report for 1962). Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif., (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Congress, 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 2. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along channel between western end of bay and mouth of New York Slough are three wharves, all privately owned. A naval magazine with wharves and warehouses was constructed at Port Chicago, on southern shore (mile 6). These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred from Sacramento District, January 1, 1974. Engineering and design including dredging surveys by hired labor and U.S. hopper dredge Harditli removed 285,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from Bar and Entrance channel, cost $263,064. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work under existing project was initiated in June 1930 and completed in 1934; a portion of this work was accomplished under public works program. Portion of existing project authorized before public works program was completed in 1931 except for deepening 26-foot channel across Bulls Head Point to 30 feet; this portion was subsequently included in public works program. Work under public works program was accomplished during 1933 and 1934. Channel is naviga ble all year and provides access to San Francisco Bay and navigation channels of San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers. Cost of existing project as of September 30, 1980, exclusive of work under public works program at a cost of $207,198 as a part of San Joaquin River 30-foot project, was $4,497,109 of which $142,027 was for new work and $4,355,082 for maintenance. (See table 34- A.) 15. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels and harbor structures made throughout the fiscal year. No maintenance work was accomplished on Halfmoon Bay Harbor or Monterey Harbor projects during fiscal year. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 34-C. 17. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Nalvigation actiities pursuant to section 107, Public La t 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $118,433, of which $13,752 was for Albany City SBH, Alameda County, Calif., $25,343 for Belmont Marina Channel, San Mateo County, Calif., $45,171 for Humboldt Harbor (Fields Landing), Humboldt County, Calif., $24,167 for Petaluma Harbor, Sonoma County, Calif., and $10,000 for Pillar Point Marina, San Mateo County, Calif. Beach Erosion Control 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Humboldt Bay, Calif.-Inactive (see 1958 Annual Report for full details). Santa Cruz 34-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 County, Calif. (see 1966 Annual Report for full details). 19. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shoreline erosion control demonstration act irities pursuant to section 54, Public La( 93-251, Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974. The Alameda site was completed in August 1979 at a total cost for fiscal years 1978 and 1979 of $204,822; monitoring is in progress, and fiscal year cost was $71,793. The demonstration devices were installed at Alameda, Calif., between fall of 1978 and spring of 1979 along a shoreline area subject to locally generated wave action erosion, and are situated in an area open for the public to observe their overall effectiveness. Flood Control, 20. ALHAMBRA CREEK, CALIF. Location. Creek drains an area of about 16.5 square miles and discharges into Carquinez Strait approximately 25 miles northeast of San Francisco, Calif. (See Geodetic Survey quadrangle Carquinez Strait.) Existing project. Provides for channel improvements from Carquinez Strait to Buckley Street in the city of Martinez, a diversion conduit under Alhambra Avenue from Buckley Street to junction of Alhambra Creek and Pleasant Hill Road West, channel improvements in the vicinity of Sheridan Lane and channel clearing to Wanda Way, about one-half mile upstream from Pleasant Hill Road West. Approved estimated cost for new work (1980) is $26,600,000, of which $23,800,000 is Federal cost and $2,800,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and operation of the project, including dredge disposal areas with required retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments for disposal areas; (b) provide all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, bridges (except railroad bridges) and roads, sewers, pipelines, and other alterations of existing improvements which may be required for construction of the project; (c) upon completion of construction, replace streets, pavements, drainage, and other vehicular traffic appurtenances, including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and signs, and bear the cost of removal, replacement, and modification to sewer drains, utilities, or highways beyond the area required for excavation and construction of the project; (d) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; (e) maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (f) prevent any encroachment on the flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels and on the bypassed portions of the existing channels of Alhambra and Franklin Creeks which would serve as interior drainage features of the project, or if those channels are changed by local interests, provide without cost to the United States equivalent interior drainage facilities; and (g) adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by resolution 78-1 dated January 3, 1978 requested the initiation of Phase I Advance Engineering and Design studies. Subsequently, following the passage of Proposition 13, Contra Costa County withdrew support and the city of Martinez is now the project sponsor. In accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, a written agreement covering local cooperation for the project will be executed prior to initiation of construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning delayed due to completion of a special report of alternatives. These alternatives will be presented to local interests in November 1980 to assess whether any of the proposed alternatives are acceptable to them. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning for the project is about 23 percent complete. Work remaining is flood control channel and conduit (about four miles). 21. PAJARO RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Pajaro River and tributaries drain an area of 1,300 square miles in Coast Range and empty into Monrterey Bay about 75 miles south of San Francisco. Pajaro Valley sub-basin in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties includes 112 square miles in lower 13 miles of Pajaro River. (See U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles Capitola and San Juan Bautista.) Existing project. Provides for earthfill levees on Pajaro River and Corralitos Creek with suitable bank protection and raising, enlarging, and lengthening an existing levee on Carnadero Creek, a tributary of Pajaro River near the city of Gilroy (1944 act) and for modification and extension of existing levee system on lower 12.5 miles of Pajaro River and lower 4.5 miles of Corralitos and Salsipuedes Creeks. Approved estimated cost for new work (1980) is $940,000 34-10 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT (1944 act) Federal and $310,000 non-Federal (excludes cost of previous project completed in 1949, Federal cost $748,283). Modification and extension of the existing levee system on Pajaro River and on Corralitos and Salsipuedes Creeks (1966) was placed in a deferred category in 1976 due to lack of local support. (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work performed. Requirements for Carnadero Creek levee under Act of December 22, 1944, have not been met. Act of November 7, 1966 requires local interests provide lands, rights-ofway, ponding, borrow, and spoil-disposal areas for construction; hold the United States free from damages; relocate pipelines, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities as necessary for construction; maintain and operate completed works; satisfy all claims concerning water rights arising from construction and operation of improvements; and prevent encroachment on constructed works and ponding areas and, if ponding areas are impaired, provide promptly, without cost to the United States, substitute storage or equivalent pumping capacity. Board of Supervisors of Monterey County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, by resolution adopted June 24, 1963, and Board of Directors of Pajaro Storm Drain Maintenance District of Santa Cruz County by Resolution 358-63 adopted June 24, 1963, provided assurances of required cooperation for modification authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Counties of Monterey and Santa Cruz and city of Watsonville have enacted necessary flood plain zoning ordinances. Monterey County renewed flood plain zoning indefinitely into the future on June 1, 1971. Reassurances pending resolution of local cost sharing. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning for the recommended plan of improvement for construction of a 10-foot setback levee including reconstruction of an existing levee on north side of Uvas Creek is about 65 percent complete (1944 Act). Advance engineering and design for work authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act was placed in a deferred category in 1976 due to lack of local support. Condition at end of fiscal year. Levees on Pajaro River to mile 11.8 and on Corralitos (Salsipuedes) Creek to mile 2.4 completed in January 1949. Work remaining is planning for levee modification and extension authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act which was about 52 percent complete when placed in a deferred category in 1976 and construction of a 10-foot setback levee including reconstruction of arn existing levee on the north side of Uvas Creek. 22. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CALIF. Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, Calif. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 34-B, 34-D, and 34-E, for authorizing legislation; latest approved estimated costs.) Knights Valley was deauthorized November 1977, under provision of PL 93-251. (See 1974 Annual Report for project details). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, perform necessary highway bridge and utility relocations, and prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States 'in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the construction cost, (27.8% of total construction cost, currently estimated at $73,900,000) and the annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, tentatively estimated at $274,000. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $56,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. A contract providing for reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 132,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was executed and approved by the 34-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Secretary of the Army, January 6, 1965. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning is underway for design of Hot Springs Road. The Recreation Master Plan was approved January 1980. The visitor center has been completed, and is open on a daily basis. Relocation of the Stewarts Point-Skaggs Springs Road, Unit 4 is complete; contract for construction of the Warm Springs Dam and appurtenances awarded May 1978, is 70 percent complete; contract for the cultural resources, awarded July 1978, is 65 percent complete; contract for Warm Springs Dam Fish Hatchery and related facilities awarded October 1979, is 95 percent complete; contract for project overlook awarded March 1980 is 63 percent complete; and contract for reservoir clearing, phase II awarded September 1980 is 3 percent complete. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance. Coyote Valley Dam, including recreation facilities, and condition and operation studies by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 65 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). Work remaining is construction of Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel and channel improvements on Dry Creek. Project is about 65 percent complete. 23. WALNUT CREEK, CALIF. Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo. and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, Calif. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area). Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Approved cost estimate (1980) is $101,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $77,500,000 is Federal cost and $24,000,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $18,000,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $6,000,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have also expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project and the cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1980) at $6,000,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. To date, $1,652,770 has been furnished. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the uncompleted portions of Walnut and San Ramon Creeks and all of Upper Pine Creek are continuing. The reach from the confluence of Lower Pine Creek and Walnut Creek completed October 1979 and Pine Creek existing concrete lining to Clayton Road extension completed January 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 65 34-12 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT percent complete. Total of 13.1 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, and Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Planning and design continued on remaining reaches. Work remaining is channel improvement on lower Pine (Clayton Road to Bart) and Galindo Creeks (Detroit Avenue to San Miguel Road); Walnut Creek (SPRR bridge to Broadway Avenue) and Upper Pine Creek and San Ramon bypass (Ignacio Valley Road to Rudgear Road). 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of. the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $32,094. Total cost to September 30, 1980 was $442,643. 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 34-F. 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $193,299, of which $49,158 was for City of Yountville (Hopper Creek), Napa County, Calif.; $88,106 for Salinas River, Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County, Calif.; and $56,035 for Salinas River at Soledad, Monterey County, Calif. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs of $54,009 were incurred for disaster preparedness. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $12,894 for emergency bank protection of which $6,608 was for Boronda Road Bridge, Carmel River, Monterey County, Calif., and $6,286 for Shulte Road Bridge, Carmel River, Monterey County, Calif. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration activities pursuant to section 32, Public Law 93-251, as amended by sections 155 and 161, Public Law 94-587, Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974. The Van Duzen River site completed November 1978, cost $153,662, and the Eel River site (RM6-8) completed October 1979, cost $446,150. Both sites have experienced one season of streamflow; monitoring is in progress; and fiscal year cost was $26,726. General Investigations 27. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys from regular funds were $1,677,920, of which $634,906 was for navigation; $947,543 for flood damage prevention and $95,471 for shoreline protection surveys. 28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $79,056, were incurred for flood plain management service program. 29. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Fiscal year costs of $11,098 were incurred for coordination with Soil Conservation Service and Bureau of Reclamation. 30. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year costs of $2,127 were incurred for hydrologic studies. 34-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text 1. Project Bodega Bay, Calif. 2. Crescent City Harbor, Calif. 3. Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif. 4. Noyo River and Harbor, Calif. 5. Oakland Harbor, Calif. 6. Petaluma River, Calif. 7. Richmond Harbor, Calif. 8. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) 9. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif. FY 77 'l"otal ('ost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept 30, 1980 1,300 2,518 Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 108,665 107,511 -32,000 56,451 500,000 86,304 596,000 772,885 224,500 224,500 -10,300 24,921 422,400 441,916 1,145,000 1,109,466 725,100 729,932 350,000 366,274 750,000 750,336 1,075,000 369,532 25.000 106,.000 1.072.7651 10,.571 108.674 1.060.6101 39,000 260),0)0( 0 62.183- 38,960 259,627 623.769- - - 97.779: 50,000 120,000 7.526,9721 12,473 113,944 7.483.388' 50,000 2,095,000 6.797.674; 49,253 2,095,700 6,797.6275 _ - 525,000; - _ 525.000 87,223 84.299 02,678 202,312 9,.87.299 13,000 710,600 29.79)4,(72N 45,574 679,111 29.757,028N 15,000 240,000 818,482 : 72,445 270,930 806,8571' 105,000 240,000 3,368,7541' " 12,620 239,292 3,367,867 '" - - 222,81()12 - - 222,810()1 - - 9,646,984 1:1 - - 9,646,9841:1 779,000 1,206,000 21,566,27311 778,966 1,205,305 21,565,6241-1 - - 297,1461' - - 297,1461" 25,000 508,000 4,342,1591i 24,951 392,086 4.226.19616 - - 2.886.695171 8 - - 2,886,69517 IS 317,352 542,000 8,584,11619 815,292 542,463 8,582,319' - - 164,689 - - 164,689 - 410,000 5,645,200 671,407 404,541 5,584,811 678,000 975,000 2,628,000 1,685,000 678.314 939,734 2,356 40Qq 1.965,818 6,451,7()0 6.411,711 34-14 - 2 - 2 3,500,000 3,498,570 3 558,000 1,1 519,546 1,1 - 1 297,500 4 289,700 4 630,500 630,899 10,000 45,534 77 F SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding 10. San Francisco New Work Harbor, Calif. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11. San Francisco New Work Harbor and Bay (Calif.) Approp. (Removal of Drift) ivrCaions tL. 12. San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif. 13. Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Vlalnt. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14. Suisun Bay Channel, New Work Calif. Approp. Cost 20. Alhambra Creek, Calif. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21. Pajaro River, New Work Calf. Approp. Cost 22. Russian River Basin, New Work Calif. Approp. Coyote Valley Dam Cost (Lake Mendocino) and Maint. Channel Improvements Approp. Cost Dry Creek (Warm New Work Springs) Lake and Approp. Channel Improvements Cost Calif. 23. Walnut Creek, Calif. New Work (Federal Funds) CAopsptrop. (Required Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) CCoosnttrib. FY 77 Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept 30, 1980 .2. .689.356(S1 2,, .2. ,689,3561s 2,) 511.500 820,000 8300()00 751.000 14,827,2602 512,118 818,075 831,52.4 750,834 14,823.08.142 1,080,000 985,000 1,255,000 1,260.000 14,321.182 886,841 1,122,979 1,304,726 1,257,633 14.302,811 .- - 1,369,3721. 22 .- - 1.369,372 2 -214,500 943,100 856,800 1,015,000 19.431.133: 3 223,674 941,373 858,412 1,012,515 19..428,5332:2 ....- 1.852.340 S 1.852.34() .... 160,00()2 897,000 698,900 450,000 530,000 4,975,.159 774,567 848,572 471,440 529,983 4.975,092 25 92,000 127,500 194,000 320,000 12.099,3382 2 92,000 127,500 193,965 318,963 1.098,26625 26' - - 200,000 100,000 300.000 193,014 96,683 289,697 -9,914 - 125,000 135,000 1,949,9682, 3,000 - 112,986 62,627 1,865,58127 1-"3- - 14,435,86928 " 1,733 - - - 14,435,86928 1,120,000 1,188,000 1,558.000 1,744,000 12,252.616:1 1,090,864 1,167,100 1,618,069 1,334,220 11,799,996:2 7,817,800 20,175,000 57,775,000 43,930,000 171,486,645 3,390,180 23,678,483 58,389,782 39,841,(016 166,877,954 1,332,600 -200,000 1,550,000 1,000,000 21.181,430 120,804 999,867 1,557,855 1,115,815 21.093,387::' 36,100 156,020 - 1.652,770 1 4,612 60,278 53,115 123,572 1.626,648:2 - 112,969 82.327 31,700 1,187,845: -80,359 40,452 73,375 1.155,034 :1" 34-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 34A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $66,533 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980. 3. Excludes contributed funds of $2,000. 4. Excludes contributed funds of $217,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 5. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $61,031 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956- 1980. 6. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royaltyfree rock. 7. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 8. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,641 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980. 9. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 10. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $15,436 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 11. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of. providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 12. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 13. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 14. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $501 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980. 15. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 16. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $75,909 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980. 17. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 18. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 19. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $3,138 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980. 20. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. 21. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $5,234 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980. 22. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 23. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $904 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980. 24. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds. 25. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for details. 26. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $8,588 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1980. 27. Includes $748,283 for previous project (1944 act) and $941,685 for (1966 act) which was placed in a deferred cate ory in 1976. 28. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds and $400,00C for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Work Acceleration Program. 29. Excludes $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711. 30. Excludes $1,626,803 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711. 31. Excludes $160,400 recreation user fee funds. 32. Excludes $157,227 recreation user fee costs. 33. Construction responsibility was transferred to San Francisco District January 31, 1977. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of all completed works remain with Sacramento District. 34. For land enhancement benefits provided by project. 35. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services to be accomplished at expense of local interests under local cooperation requirements in connection 'vith acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations. 34-16 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized CRESCENT CITY HIARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 2 of Text) July 18, 1918 Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 16, 1952 Aug. 13, 1968 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 June 23, 1874 June 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927' Breakwater 1 Conditions of local cooperation modified. Ri Extend breakwater to 3,000 feet long. Dredge harbor basin, 1,800 feet long, 1,400 feet Ri wide, and 20 feet deep. D Sand barrier and maintenance dredging in vicinity of S seaward end thereof. 7 Extend breakwater to Round Rock (modified by II. Chief of Engineers).3 Inner breakwater and removal of rock in inner harbor. Rc o Extend inner breakwater 400 feet and dredge T-shaped I. basin 20 feet deep. HUMBOLI)DT IARBOR AND BAY, CALIF. (See Section 3 of Text) Rebuilding the jetties. H. Depth of 20 feet and widths of 250 and 300 feet in bay I channels and for channel to Arcata Wharf. 2 Entrance channel, 500 feet wide, 30 feet deep. Ri L Widths of 400 feet in Eureka Channel and 300 feet in Ri Samoa and Fields Landing Channels, and construct Fields [ Landing Turning Basin, 600 feet wide and 800 feet long, all to a depth of 26 feet. Deepen to 40 feet and widen bar and entrance channel; H deepen Eureka and Samoa Channels to 30 feet; and 1 construct North Bay Channel, 400 feet wide, 30 feet deep. Deepen to 35 feet North Bay and Samoa Channels and outer H reach of Eureka Channel (miles 4.29 to 5.00); widen bends, 2 miles 0.75 and 2.6; and construct North Bay anchorage area 35 feet deep. NOYO RIVER AND IARIBOR, CALIF. (See Section 4 of Text) Entrance channel, jetties, and channel in river. S. 2 South breakwater in Noyo Harbor. T Mooring basin in lieu of channel extension authorized by H Act of June 30, 1948.31 2 North Breakwater in Noyo Harbor.2 S. 2 Modifies the 1962 Act to construct such breakwaters as SE may be needed to provide necessary protection, but not more than two, and to construct such additional channel improvements, including, but not limited to, deepening, widening, and extensions, as necessary to meet applicable economic and environmental criteria. OAKLAND IHARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 5 of Text) Jetties. A North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal IH canal to 18 feet. Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and H thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 3() feet deep. Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area ii to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to HIarbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. 11 34-17 )Documents I)oc.- 131. GIth (ong.. st sess. vers and Iarbo)rs ( ommittee )oc. 4. 67th ('ong., 2nd sess. I)oc. 595. 69th (ong., nd sess. vers and HIarbors ('onnmmittee )oc. 4(), 7th ('ong., 1st sess. Commerce ( onlmittee print, 5th Cong., 1st sess. Doe 688. 7(;th Cong., rd sess. fp Eorntg oinn eefirlse. in ()ffice, hief I)oc. 264, 89th (ong.' stD soecs. s.95(), 60()th Cong., .Doc. 755, 6th (Cong., nd sess. ivers and ttarbors Committee )oc. 14, 74th (Cong., 1st sess. ivers and Ilar)ors Committee )oc. 11, 75th ('Cong.. 1st sess. SDoc. 143. 82nd Cong., 2st sess. .Doe. 3(), 9()th Cong., :nd sess.' Doe. 156, 71st ('ong., 2nd sess. . Doe. 682, 76th ('ong., 3rd sess. SDoe. 289, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. Doe. 121, 87th (Cong., 2nd sess.' ec. 146, 1976 WRI)A nnual Report, Part II, L874, p. 378. I.Doc. 647, 61st Cong.. 2nd sess. Doec. 144, 67th Cong., !nd sess. Doe. 4)7, 6)th Cong., Lst sess.' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION SWork Authorized Apr. 28, 1928 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 19625 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19356 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Local cooperation requirements modified to provide Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to right-of-way for tidal canal. Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. RICHMOND HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning basin at Terminal No. 1. Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo Bay north of Point San Pablo. Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 466, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 7, 73rd Cong., 1st sess, and 10, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 598, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 715, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 395, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 26, 1937 Jan. 21, 1927 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CALIF. (See Section 10 of Text) Dredging at Islais Creek. 11. Doc. 337, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Remove Presidio Shoal, Rincon Reef Rock (Inner) Rincon H. Doc. 196, 70th Cong., Reef Rock (Outer), Blossom Rock, and Alcatraz Shoal 1st sess. to 40 feet deep, mean lower low water; remove Arch Rock, Shag Rocks 1 and 2, and Harding Rock to 35 feet deep; remove Racoon Shoal and Point Knox Shoal westward of a north-and-south line through Point Stuart Light to 35 feet deep; for a bar main ship channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. A 50-foot depth in bar main ship channel, 2,000 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee wide, remove Black Point Shoal to 40 feet deep and certain Doc. 50, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. modifications of areas to be deepened on Alcatraz and Islais Creek Shoals and abandon 34-foot depth area south of flared approach channel to Islais Creek. Channel to San Francisco Airport 750 feet wide and 10 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee deep ending in a basin 2,000 feet wide. Doc. 12, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CALIF. (See Section 12 of Text) Pinole Shoal Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, 7.6 miles 11. Doc. 104, 69th Cong., long; Mare Island Strait channel 30 feet deep, 600 feet Ist sess. wide with turning basin 1,000 feet wide. Increase width of channel in Mare Island Strait to 700 feet H. Doc. 644, 75th Cong., and increase length of turning basin. 3rd sess. Maintain approach areas to Navy Yard Piers at south end 1H. Doc. 217, 77th Cong., of Mare Island. 1st sess.' 7 34-18 Acts Documents SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized ALIIAMBRA CREEK, CALIF. (See Section 20 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Flood control channel and conduit, about 4 miles. PAJARO RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 21 of Text) Earthfill.levees on Pajaro River and Corralitos Creek, with suitable bank protection, and raising., enlarging, and lengthening on existing levee on Carnadero Creek. Levee modification and extension, Pajaro River mouth to mile 12.5 Corralitos (Salsepuedes) Creek to mile 4.5. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CALIF. (See Section 22 of Text) Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as ossible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. Documents I.2 ndI) osce.s s3.36, 90()th (:ong., II. Doc. 505. 78th Cong., 2nd sess. II. I)oc. -191, 89th ('ong., 2nd sess. II. Doc. 585, 81st Cong, 2nd sess. P2unbdl ics eLssa.w 40()1. 8th (Cong., II. I)oc. 547. 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 95. 1971 WRI)A 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Inactive. Requires determination by Area Redevelopment Administration that improvement is essential to its program for redeveloping the area. 3. A 40()-foot channel extension, mooring basin and connecting channel constructed by Noyo Harbor I)istrict. The channel extension to be maintained by the Federal Government. 4. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bri(dge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 5. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue highway I3ridge 5. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 6. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 7. Included dredging two approach areas at Vallejo and South Vallejo, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 34-19 DI)ec. 22, 1944 Nov. 7, 1966 May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 TABLE 34-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) Project Berkeley Harbor, Calif.' Berkeley Marina, Calif.' Halfmoon Bay Harbor, Calif.3 Lower San Francisco Bay, Calif. (Inactive) Monterey Harbor, Calif. (Inactive) Moss Landing Harbor, Calif. Napa River, Calif. Channels3 Dikes and Revetments (Inactive) Redwood City Harbor, Calif. San Francisco Mariina (Gas House Cove), Calif.' San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), Calif.' San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), Calif.' San Leandro Marina, Calif. San Rafael Creek, Calif. Suisun Channel, Calif. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1966 1979 1979 1935 1971 1979 1963 1963 1978 1974 1976 1976 1977 1978 1972 Cost To Sept 30, 1980 O eration and Construction Maintenance 155,5502 463,6455 6,697,3964 1,108,1826 338,2158 1,021,27410 1,672,722' 180,47214 848,22715 210,39016 32,35918 217,67720 83,0097 2,675,473" 708,89210 11 3,501,04213 615,00617 1,616,85319 755,95220 21 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645). "Completed." 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. 3. "Completed." 4. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 5. Excludes $337,918 contributed funds. 6. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administration funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) placed inactive 1974. 7. Includes $5,170 for reconnaissance and condition surveys for FY 1956-1980. 8. Excludes previous project costs. 9. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $43,112 for reconnaissance and' condition surveys FY 1956-1980. 10. Excludes previous project costs. 11. Includes $203,684 for reconnaissance and conditions surveys, FY 1956-1980 and $69,655 for pre-dredge surveys. 12. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. TABLE 34-D RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN 13. Includes $67,759 for reconnaissance and surveys condition FY 1956-1980. 14. includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and excludes contributed funds $153,618. 15. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 16. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and excludes contributed funds $138,189. 17. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $13,006 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1980. 18. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 19. Includes $81,455 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1980 and $80,951 for maintenance dredg- ing. 20. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 21. Includes $28,442 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1978-1980., i, CALIF.: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino); Channel Improvements Below Dam on Lower 98 Miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,0001 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements Below Dam 193,400,000 73,600,0002 267,000,000 Total $207,836,000 $79,198,000 $287,034,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is completed projects, initiated and exclusive of lands and damages. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid 34-20 __ SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 34-E RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CALIF.: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 22 of Text) Name Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) Channel Improvement (East Fork Below Coyote Valley Dam and Lower 98 Miles of Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake Channel Improvement (Dry Creek) Below Dry Creek (Warm Springs Dam) Nearest City Distance (California) Above Mouth Ukiah Ukiah Guerneville Healdsburg Healdsburg Height of Dam and Type Reservoir Capacity (Acre-Ft) Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet-Earthfill 122,500 of Russian River Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - Fork Mile 0 to 98, Russian - River Mile 14.4Dry Creek 319 Feet-Earthfill 381.000 Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - Creek 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 34-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 25 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual 0()eration and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, Calif. 1978 26,995,350 4(6.163' Corte Madera Creek, Calif. 1979 6,999,725:1 Coyote Creek, Calif.2 1968 705,622 East Weaver Creek, Calif.2 1965 220,6364 Eel River, Calif. (Inactive) 1971 1,272,816- Klamath River, Calif.s 1972 4,838,000 Mad River Basin, Calif. (Inactive)6 1973 4,243,7501i Napa River Basin, Calif. (Inactive) 6 1979 2,639,955 Pajaro River, Calif.7 1974 941,6857 Pinole Creek, Calif.2 1968 885,750 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, Calif.7 1970 4,620,0709 Rheem Creek, Calif.2 1962 400,000'" Rodeo Creek, Calif.2 1966 974,100 Salinas River, Calif." 1952 94,213 San Leandro Creek, Calif.8 1973 1,000,00012 San Lorenzo Creek, Calif.8 1962 5,130,82111_ San Lorenzo River, Calif.8 1966 4,314,40614 Sonoma Creek, Calif. (Inactive)'5 1973 781,500() Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks; Calif. 1979 1,102,218 1. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, Public Law 86-645). Completed. 3. Excludes $97,400 contributed funds. 4. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 5. Excludes $194,821 contributed funds and placed inactive 1973. 6. Placed inactive 1974. Excludes $225,000 applicable to Public Works Acceleration Program and $162,761 previous project, Blue Lake levee. 7. Project deferred due to lack of local cooperation. Excludes $748,283 previous project. 8. Completed. 9. Completed. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 10. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 11. Improvement inactive. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 FY 1962 and 1963 to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 12. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 14. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 15. Placed inactive 1974. 34-21 Estimated Cost $ 17.550,000' 2,484,000 261,410,000 2.590,000 I SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT* This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Na igation Page 1. Sacramento River, Calif ............ 35-2 2. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ............. 35-2 3. San Joaquin River, Calif............. 35-3 4. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.............................35-4 5. Other authorized navigation projects ............................ 35-4 Flood Control 6. Bear River, Calif ................. 35-4 7. Buchanan Dam-H. V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, Calif ....... 35-5 8. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, Calif ........................ 35-5 9. Chester, Calif......................'. 35-7 10. Cottonwood Creek, Calif. ........... 35-7 11. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, Calif......................... 35-8 12. Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev .............................. 35-8 13. Isabella Lake, Kern River, Calif...... 35-9 14. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif . ....... ... ................. ... 35-10 15. Lake Oroville, Calif ................ 35-11 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev. and Calif....................... 35-12 17. Merced County Stream Group, Calif......................... :is *.....35-12 18. Merced County Streams, Calif. ..... 35-13 19. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif.............. . ........... 35-14 20. Sacramento River and tributaries, Calif., from Collinsville to Shasta Dam .......... ... ............. 21. 35-15 Inspection of completed flood....... control projects...................... 35-17 22. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations.... ................. 35-18 23. Other authorized flood control projects.. . .. ... ....... 35-18 24. Flood control work under special authorization ........................ 35-18 Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 25. Marysville Lake, Calif . .............. 35-18 26. New Melones Lake, Calif. ........... 35-19 General Iniestigations 27. Surveys........................... 35-20 28. Morrison Creek Stream Group, Calif. Phase I, Feasibility Study...............................35-20 29. Collection and study of basic data .... 35-20 30. Research and development .......... 35-21 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 35-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF. Locatiotn. Rises in Trinity Mountains in northcentral California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, Calif. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, Calif.) I~'eioiis projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provides for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, Calif., 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. Estimated Federal cost (July 1973 of new work for shallow-draft river channel is $1,360,000 (includes $1,163,000 for deferred portion between Colusa and Chico Landing). (See table 35-B for authorizing legislation.) (See table 35-C on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallow-draft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1975." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Minor snagging and clearing continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in fiscal year 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CALIF. (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or low-lying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. Approved project estimate (October 1980) is $210,300,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $166,000,000, including basic recreation facilities ($6,070,000); Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $1,200,000; and non-Federal cost of $43,100,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($250,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest onehalf of separable cost of project allocated to recreation ($2,900,000). Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoildisposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting therefrom; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial contruction for modification of Suisun Bay, Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U. S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $250,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation ($2,900,000); and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit, regarding deepening channel between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon- Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. Following approval of General Design Memorandum covering plan of improvement between Stockton and Avon, Stockton Port District will be requested to execute an agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 91-611. Terminal facilities. See Part 2, Port Series No. 30 and 31, revised 1974, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1975, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued, including completion of salinity and mathematical model tests and completion of general design memorandum and environmental impact statement for the portion of project from Avon to Port of Stockton. San Francisco District: Continued planning activities including model studies. Condition a(t end of fiscal year. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 5 percent complete. 3. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CALIF. Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth to Suisun Bay at Iittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an 35-3 REPORT OF TIlE ('CIEF OF EN(GINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1980 artificial cut extending fromn river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Eristing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-D for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-E. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif., (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 2. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, Calif., see Port Series 32, Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., revised 1975. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Stone protection maintenance, Stockton Deep Water Channel, San Joaquin River, completed at contract cost of $352,439. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 2.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. 4. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Record and condition surveys were conducted at various times during fiscal year at several navigation projects at a cost of $15,000. 5. OTHER AUTIIORIZED NAVIGATION I()ROJECTS See table 35-F. Floold Control 6. BEAR RIVER, CALIF. Location. Drainage areas tributary to Bear River near communities of Linda and Olivehurst, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for about 7 miles of levee and channel work, pumping facilities for local drainage, and associated trail-based recreation facilities. Approved cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $9,060,000, of which $4,890,000 is Federal cost, including $40,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $4,170,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for roads and utilities and a cash contribution estimated at $34,000 for recreation facilities to be paid at time of construction. Existing project was adopted under sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1976 House Committee on Public Works and Transportation) (H. Doc. 630, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests will be required to furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, necessary for construction and maintenance of project, and including necessary modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and other existing structures or utilities; (2) make a cash contribution estimated at $34,000 for that portion of the cost of recreational facilities, which when added to cost of recreation lands, would amount to 50 percent of total first cost of recreation lands and recreation facilities; (3) hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction and operation of the completed works; (4) maintain and operate the completed works, without cost to the United States, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (5) prevent encroachment on constructed works, channels, and ponding areas that would interfere with proper functioning of project, and if ponding is impaired, provide promptly and without cost to the United States substitute storage or equivalent pumping capacity, and manage all projectrelated channels, such as existing channels below project diversions, to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions; (6) provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical future 35-4 SACRAMENTO. CALIF.. I)ISTRICT development of unprotected flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land use regulation, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce future flood losses; and (7) notify affected interests, at least annually, that project will not provide complete protection from floods greater than the design flood. Yuba County has verbally indicated several times since formal intent was included in the survey report, that they would provide or cause to be provided the necessary requirements of local cooperation. Operations anld results during fiscal year. Hydrologic and economic studies indicate that this project is infeasible. Phase I study has been suspended and recommendation made that project be reclassified to inactive status. Conditiokn at end of fiscal year. Phase I study has been suspended and project recommended for reclassification to inactive status. 7. BUCHANAN DAM-I. V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CALIF. Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Approved cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $28,860,000, of which $27,310,000 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Water and Power Resources Service (known as Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H. V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results du ringfiscal year. New work: Engineering continued. (Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances combined under one contract.) A cultural resources contract was initiated and plans and specifications for road relocation were initiated. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 131,000 acre-feet occurred June 11, 1980. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 7,850 cubic feet per second on January 13, 1980. Maximum release of 3,034 cubic feet per second on February 22, 1980, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, about 68,800 acre-feet was released for flood control and about 37,300 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $400,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Project is about 99 percent complete. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. Work remaining consists of completion of installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely), completion of the cultural resources contract, and road relocation. 8. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CALIF. Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, Calif. Littlejohn 35-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non- Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for additional recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands' and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Water and Power Resources Service (known as the Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; local interests paid $1,677,625 through December 31, 1979. A long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina providedpublic use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $100,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: Improvement of sanitary facilities at North Shore day-use recreation area was completed by contract at fiscal year cost of $47,750. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Bear Creek-Levee and channel improvement prevented $1,000,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During the rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek diversion was 510 cubic feet per second January 13, 1980. Project prevented $500,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 2,182 cubic feet per second February 22, 1980. Maximum storage in reservoir was 22,200 acre-feet on January 15, 1980, and maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 7,900 cubic feet per second on January 14, 1980. Project prevented an estimated $2,500,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. New Hogan Lake - Maintenance and operation activities continued. Construction of a seepage measurement weir at New Hogan Dam was completed at contract cost of $330,000. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 224,200 acrefeet occurred January 15, 1980. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 16,700 cubic feet per second on January 14, 1980. Maximum release of 9,644 cubic feet per second on February 22, 1980, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, about 159,800 acre-feet was released for flood control and about 87,900 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $1,000,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. Condition at end of fiscal year. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or publicuse areas. All work completed. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Additional recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. 9. CHESTER, CALIF. Location. North Fork of Feather River, immediately upstream from the town of Chester, Plumas County, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.),, Existing project. Provides for construction of a 45-foot high upgated diversion dam on North Fork of Feather River about one and one-half miles above Chester, Calif. Diversion dam would divert flows in excess of the outlet capacity of the dam into a partially leveed diversion channel for conveyance of floodflows circuitously around the town and into Lake Almanor. Major relocation works required by adoption of the plan comprise contruction of one 250-foot long bridge over the floodway and about one mile of county road. Approved cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $5,220,000, of which $8,570,000 is Federal cost; and $1,650,000 is non- Federal cost for lands, damages, and relocations (including $100,000 cash contribution for design and construction of two low water crossings). Existing project was adopted by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 314, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Minor engineering. Project prevented an estimated $1,000,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction on project began in June 1975. Diversion dam and channel improvement were completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance in October 1976. 10. COTTONWOOD CREEK, CALIF. Location. On the main stem and the North, South, and Middle Forks of Cottonwood.Creek in Shasta and Tehama Counties, Calif., on the eastern slope of the Coast Range and southern slope of the Trinity Range. Cottonwood Creek lies westerly of and drains into the Sacramento River midway between cities of Redding and Red Bluff and is one of the northermost tributaries of Sacramento River downstream from Shasta Dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for two multiplepurpose projects, construction of a 268-foot high random fill dam at Dutch Gulch site to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1,100,000 acre-feet and a 238-foot high random fill dam at Tehama site to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 900,000 acre-feet for a total storage capacity of 2,000,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Operation and maintenance of dams and reservoirs will be the responsibility of the Federal Government. Approved cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $407,000,000, all of which is Federal cost, including $4,600,000 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act. (Document not yet printed.) Local cooperation. Based on cost allocation studies contained in Cottonwood Creek Interim Review Report, about 71.6 percent of project first cost is allocated to water supply (estimated at $291,000,000 to be repaid by municipal water users) and about 3.1 percent allocated to irrigation (estimated at $12,600,000 to be repaid by water users). In addition, local interests are required to pay one-half of the separable costs of recreation lands and facilities and one quarter of the separable costs of the reservoir fisheries enhancement (estimated at $2,670,000 for the initial facilities). Local interests must also furnish assurances that they will preserve, or restore and thereafter maintain at capacities prevailing in 1970, flood channels of Cottonwood Creek downstream of the reservoirs; local interests must adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from construction and operation of'the improvements, including acquisition of water rights necessary for establishment and use of a permanent pool for recreation and fish and wildlife purposes, with exception of water rights needed for irrigation water, which are to be obtained by the Secretary of the Interior. A written agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, will be obtained from local interests prior to construction initiation. If the Secretary of the Interior is unable to make necessary repayment arrangements for irrigation services to be provided from Dutch Gulch or Tehama projects, or both, within three years after requested to do so by the Secretary of the Army, such project or projects will be constructed without the irrigation function. Shasta and Tehama Boards of Supervisors by resolutions of July 6, 1970, and August4, 1970, respectively, have indicated willingness to meet requirements of local cooperation. At a public hearing November 29, 1978, supervisors from Shasta and Tehama Counties again expressed support for project and for continuing studies, On November 30, 1979, the California Department of Water Resources expressed interest in contracting for reservoir storage to meet municipal and industrial water supply demands on the State Water Project. 35-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering studies were continued and Phase I, General Design Memorandum was essentially completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in fiscal year 1977. 11. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CALIF. Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Water and Power Resources Service (known as the Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) for irrigation service. For future non- Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fuilly complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. Engineering continued. (Construction of Buchanan Lake and Hidden Lake main dam and appurtenances combined under one contract.) Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated. Runoff of Fresno River above Hidden Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 77,100 acre-feet occurred June 5, 1980. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 7,700 cubic feet per second on January 14, 1980. Maximum release of 3,619 cubic feet per second on February 21, 1980, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, about 66,900 acre-feet was released for flood control and about 63,800 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $200,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1980. 12. HUMBOLDT RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NEV. Location. In general vicinity of Elko, Nev., on headwater tributaries of Humboldt River. River basin of approximately 16,700 square miles is a high semiarid plateau crossed by numerous steep mountain ranges separated by broad, flat valleys. River valley extends about 300 miles. Principal headwater tributaries are North Fork, Marys River and South Fork. Elevations in basin vary from about 4,000 feet in Carson Sink to about 12,000 feet in Ruby Mountains. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of three storage reservoirs on headwater tributaries and minor channel improvements at critical locations along Humboldt River above Rye Patch Reservoir. Dams are to be earthfill structures with gross storage capacities as follows: Hylton reservoir on South Fork, Humboldt River, 120,000 acre-feet; Devils Gate reservoir on North Fork, Humboldt River, 80,000 acre-feet; and Vista reservoir on Marys River, 50,000 acre-feet. All reservoirs would be operated primarily for flood control, but also for irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir will be the responsibility of the Federal Government. Approved cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $47,400,000, of which $44,600,000 is Federal cost, including $2,600,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $2,800,000 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT .ion-Federal cost for lands, damages, and reloca tions. Existing project was adopted by 195( Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 586, 81st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, local interests are required to contribute $2,762,000 in cash toward reservoir construction costs, and to furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide free of cost to the United States, all necessary rights-of-way for proposed channel improvements, and undertake all utility revisions required; (b) maintain and operate at their own expense such channel improvements and appurtenant works after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (c) hold and save the United free from all damages arising from construction of operation of channel improvements and appurtenant works; (d) enter into an agreement among themselves as to method of operation of the reservoirs for irrigation subject to flood control priority; and (e) bear not less than onehalf the separable costs of project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife presently estimated to be $1,525,000, and bear all costs for maintenance and operation for these purposes. Elko County Fair and Recreation Board, by resolution of December 5, 1969, stated that requirements of local cooperation would be provided by the District Engineer and by letter of February 24, 1976, stated that funds for local share of project were available. Nev. State Legislature has passed a bill (Senate Bill 246) to provide $50,000 for an environmental and wildlife impact investigation for project. Right to store water in project reservoirs was awarded to Elko County Fair and Recreation Board in May 1970 and ruling was upheld by court decision in October 1971. State Engineer considers that combination of Humboldt River Decree, Corps flood control operating criteria, and State ruling on water storage right constitutes operation agreement required by authorizing act. Operations a.nd4 r esults duringfiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning studies were continued. Condition att en(d of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Based on studies to date, proposed plan of improvement would consist only of Hylton Lake, formed by construction of a dam across the South Fork Humboldt River about 10 miles south of Elko, Nev. Benefitcost analysis indicates that Devils Gate and Vista Lake units are not economically feasible at this time and should be deferred. Proposed plan of improvement, total cost $32,290,000 ($23,900,000 Federal; $8,390,000 non-Federal) at October 1980 price level. - 13. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CALIF. Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, Calif., near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Water and Power Resources Service (known as the Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Water and Power Resources Service and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. All concessionaires will operate under permits granted by the Corps. Total cost 35-9 RE)PORT )OF THIE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $880,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $370,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. ice( ses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Subsequent to 1962, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount will be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicate some modification to be advisable. Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1980, amounted to $1,181,126. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: Engineering continued. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies at Isabella Dam were continued by contract and hired labor at a fiscal year cost of $84,369. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Lake was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 585,300 acre-feet occurred July 3, 1980. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 19,200 cubic feet per second on January 13, 1980, and maximum outflow of 4,575 cubic feet per second occurred July 6, 1980. Release of water for irrigation and spreading uses totaled 507,100 acre-feet and release for flood control was about 875,100 acrefeet. For the second time during the history of Isabella operation, spillway flow occurred for 15 days and.amounted to 10,800 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $20,600,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Additional recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. 14. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CALIF. Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, Calif. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non- Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Water and Power Resources Service (known as the Bureau 35-10 SA('RAMENT(). ('AIF.. )ISTRI('T of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) and local water users for irrigation .supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects.' Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1979: Terminus, $1,231,955 and Success, $552,401. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdication of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $145,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council, developing a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($34)0,000) and the marina concessionaires ($15(),()00) is about $490,000. Operations an (J iesuts duringfiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 71() funds: None. Success ILake, regular funds, None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and olperation continuedt. Dam safety assurance studies at Terminus Dam were continued at fiscal year cost of $286,810. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 144,700 acre-feet occurred on June 28, 1980(). Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir on January 13, 1980, was about 26,100 cubic feet per second. Water released for flood control amounted to 631,90()() acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases totaled 24,100 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $26,200,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods and April-July 1980 snowmelt runoff. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at Success Dam at fiscal year cost of $215,282. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above the reservoir was above normal during the year. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 14,900 cubic feet per second on January 13, 1980, and, maximum outflow of 3,225 cubic feet per second occurred on February 21, 1980. Maximum storage of 82,100 acre-feet occurred on June 6, 1980. Release of water for irrigation and spreading totaled 102,900 acre-feet and for flood control amounted to about 210,700 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $9,100,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods and the April-July 1980 snowmelt runoff. ('onditio (t t end of.fiscal jeair. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968 except for final settlement for one tract of land upon decision of pending court case. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Additional recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Additional recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. 15. LAKE OROVILLE, CALIF. Loc(ation. Dam is on Feather River, a tributary of Sacramento River in Butte County, Calif., 35-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980( about 4 miles northeast of town of Oroville, and about 70 miles above mouth of Feather River. (See Geological Survey topographic maps of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Cost shareable estimate (October 1980) is $318,200,000 (exclusive of power and recreation facilities), of which $70,000,000 is Federal contribution toward new work, exclusive of $435,000 incidental Federal costs for engineering and administration of funds in connection with flood control reservation. Amount is based upon cost allocation studies completed in fiscal year 1961 and approved by the President of the United States on January 10, 1962. Total Federal participation is based on 22 percent of actual construction cost exclusive of cost of power and recreation facilities; however, the Federal cost is limited to $85 million including actual Federal cost for engineering and administration of funds and interest at 3.5 percent per annum on actual Federal expenditures during construction period. Non-Federal (State of California) cost included in the above project amount is about $247,765,000 for construction of dam and reservoir. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Federal contribution of $426,044 was made to the State of California. Project prevented an estimated $4,000,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. Condition at end of fiscal year. State of California began relocations in May 1957 and initiated main dam contract in January 1963. Closure of main dam was completed October 6, 1967. Initial power unit went on line March 6, 1968, in Thermolito plant and the first Oroville plant unit went on line March 28, 1968. Dam was completed in September 1968. Final power units went on line July 20, 1969. As of September 30, 1980, total Federal contribution of $69,929,829 has been made to the State. 16. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NEV. AND CALIF. Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, Calif.; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, Nev. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage was 7,720 acre-feet and occurred on May 11, 1980. Maximum daily inflow of 581 cubic feet per second occurred on January 12, 1980, and maximum daily outflow of 488 cubic feet per second occurred on January 12, 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam was completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Additional recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. 17. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUIP, CALIF. Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, Calif. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Owens Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations andl results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was above normal for the year. (See table 35-G for maximum inflow storage and outflow for projects.) Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Projects prevented an estimated $6,000,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 18. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CALIF. Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, Calif., on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles, nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 17, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed fiscal year 1957. Authorized project provides for construction of three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into the Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Approved cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $89,100,000, of which $83,100,000 is Federal, including $5,265,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $6,000,000 is non- Federal. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Local cooperation. Local interests would be required to repay to the United States a portion of Castle, Burns, and Mariposa project costs allocated to general recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement (estimated at $11,480,000), and to assure maintenance, operation, replacements and extension of recreation facilities at each of the dams; to repay to the United States the coSts for irrigation service in Mariposa and Marguerite projects (estimated at $6,695,000) and furnish the water rights necessary to store water for irrigation purposes. In addition, in connection with the levee and channel improvement work, local interests would be required to: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction of improvements (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; (c) maintain and operate all levee and channel works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (d) prevent encroachments of any type that would impair the flood control effectiveness of the channels; and (e) preserve, or restore and thereafter maintain, at the capacities prevailing in 1968, the other flood channnels of Merced County Streams within proposed project limits downstream from the damsites or, in the case of unregulated streams, from the Merced Irrigation District main canal downstream to their confluence with the San Joaquin River flood control project. The Merced County Board of Supervisors by resolution March 30, 1976, has indicated willingness to support flood control aspects of the project. Local interests informally expressed intent to at least annually inform affected interests of the degree of protection provided by project. An ordinance was passed and adopted by the Merced County Board of Supervisors on August 5, 1969, to establish a primary and a secondary flood plain area to provide for the control of land use and structures within the various watersheds of their flood plain areas. City of Merced by letter of December 4, 1979, has reaffirmed intent to provide assurances of local cooperation for trailbased recreation. On November 28, 1979, the State Reclamation Board indicated intent to furnish assurances for flood control aspects of project. Assurances of local cooperation for irrigation have not been requested pending resolution of plan of improvement. A written agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91- 611, will be obtained from local interests prior to construction initiation. 35-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning studies were continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued. Plan of improvement, total cost (October 1980) $89,100,000 ($73,400,000 Federal; $15,700,000 non-Federal), recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum would reduce project scope and provide for 59,500 acre-feet of flood control storage by enlarging existing Burns and Bear reservoir projects and new construction of Castle and Haystack Mountain Dams and for construction of 33.4 miles of levee and channel improvement on Bear, Fahrens and Black Rascal Creeks. Plan would defer enlargement of existing Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam and the irrigation function associated with these facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and 27.2 miles of levee and channel improvement on Mariposa and Deadman- Dutchman Creeks. 19. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CALIF. Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, Calif., and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Water and Power Resources Service (known as the Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. Water and Power Resources Service is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law; however, local interests are testing in court the validity of reclamation law in regard to the Pine Flat contracts. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Water and Power Resources Service provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $12,294,822 for irrigation services through December 31, 1979. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rightsof- way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires-one each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Lakeview Marina (Lombardo's Fishing Village), and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $525,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost of $350,000 under provisions of a 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04- 167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: Completed improvement of sanitary facilities at Trimmer and Island Park recreation areas by contract at fiscal year cost of $233,917. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major maintenance items at Pine Flat Dam consisted of: Foundation drain drilling completed by contract, $426,716; water stop repair completed by contract, $126,943; and bridge and weir erosion repair completed by contract, $166,867. Road resurfacing at Island Park recreation area was completed by contract at fiscal year cost of $27,414. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 991,400 acre-feet occurred on July 14, 1980. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 40,300 cubic feet per second on January 13, 1980, and maximum outflow of 9,166 cubic feet per second occurred on July 3, 1980. Flood releases totaled 1,658,100 acre-feet, of which only 23,000 acre-feet reached Tulare Lakebed area. Release of water for irrigation and spreading totaled 1,022,400 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $16,600,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods and the April-July 1980 snowmelt runoff. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1947 and project was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. 20. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF., FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in northcentral California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, Calif. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy. and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet 35-15 RERI'()T ()F TIlE CHIEF ()OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980, and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18 million (October 1980), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,100,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-H on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, Calif: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1980) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $13,750,000, of which $12,200,000 is Federal cost and $1,550,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations. (c) Sacramento River, Calif., Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1980) first cost for project is $144,100,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $96,000,000 is Federal (including $1,980,000 for recreation facilities) and $48,100,000 non-Federal comprising $27,000,000 for lands and damages including relocations and $21,100,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported by California Debris Commission under Sacramento River, Calif., flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Estimated Federal cost for additional recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $80,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, Calif. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. (See table 35-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 29 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1980) at $21,100,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Water and Power Resources Service (known as Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) and the State of Calif. provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; that agency administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Water and Power Resources Service under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CALIF.. DISTRICT manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-Minor engineering and design activities continued. Inspection of bypass levees after 1979-1980 winter floodflows indicated that erosion was insufficient to justify remedial work in current fiscal year. Project prevented an estimated $300,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-- Engineering and design activities continued including preparation of plans and specifications for two bank protection contracts and one recreation facilities contract. Selection of sites for future construction units continued. Project prevented an estimated $130,000 in damages from the January-March 1980 rainfloods. (See table 35-I for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff-Engineering continued. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: Construction contract for improvement of sanitary facilities at Buckhorn campground was completed by contract at fiscal year cost of $176,132. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Bank protection at Orland Buttes recreation area completed by contract at fiscal year cost of $219,690. Road paving at administration area completed by hired labor and equipment rental at fiscal year cost of $41,503. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at fiscal year cost of $64,400. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 134,900 acre-feet occurred February 20, 1980. Maximum bihourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 28,800 cubic feet per second on January 13, 1980, and maximum outflow of 15,385 cubic feet per second occurred on February 21, 1980. Releases of water for irrigation totaled 198,700 acre-feet and flood control releases of 476,300 acre-feet were made. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 93 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 48 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection ill Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 29 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1979. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was complete in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Middle Creek; Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, Calif. and Nev.; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, Calif.; Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, Calif.; Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev.; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as 35-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF ()OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 necessary, of measures required to maintainl these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $209,713 included initiation of dam safety assurance programs for Big Dry Creek ($41,621) and Folsom Lake, Calif. ($62,479). 22. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly operations at Oroville, Folsom, Friant, Shasta, Camanche, Wanship, Echo, Pineview, East Canyon, Lost Creek, Prosser Creek, Stampede, Boca, Los Banos Detention, Big Dry Creek, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, and New Exchequer (Lake McClure), and New Melones Reservoirs were prepared and distributed. A reservoir regulation manual for flood control for New Melones was completed. Revised drafts of Camanche reservoir regulation manual and New Exchequer reservoir regulation manual were reviewed. Working agreements were prepared for Camanche and New Exchequer and sent to project owners for signature. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $151,162. Total cost to September 30, 1980, was $1,443,652. 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 35-J. 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Laiw 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Prea uthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were as follows: Calif.: Anderson Creek, $119,772; Burney Creek, $50,384; Lewis Creek, $1,034; Sand Creek, $1,023; and Fourteenmile Slough, $79,503; Colo.: Colorado River, Grand Junction, $2,000; and Utah: Coal Creek, Cedar City, $18,000. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $1,151,324, of which $77,557 was for disaster preparedness, $854,512 for flood emergency operations, and $219,255 for repair and restoration. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $20,347. Bank protection was initiated on Calaveras River, Shelton Road, Calif. ($12,661) and on Sutter Creek near lone, Calif. ($7,686). Flood insuraknce actiwities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing aind Urbani Deielopment Act, Public Lau, 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, 18 flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements (IAA) H-10-77 and H-9-79 at a fiscal year cost of $115,851 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 25. MARYSVILLE LAKE, CALIF. Location. Parks Bar site on main stem of Yuba River about 15 miles northeast of city of Marysville, Calif. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) two dams, one a 357-foot high concrete structure with earthfill abutments on the Yuba River and the other a 317-foot high earthfill dam on' Dry Creek to create a reservoir of 890,000 acre-feet for flood control, power, irrigation, general recreation and fish and wildlife purposes, (b) a powerplant with installed capacity of 750 megawatts, including pumped-storage power, and (c) an afterbay dam on the Yuba River about 3 miles downstream from the main dam. Recommended plan of improvement in Preliminary Report - Phase I General Design Memorandum, March 1977, is essentially same as authorized plan except main powerplant would have a peaking plant with initial installation (Stage 1) of 1,350 megawatts and a Stage 2 installation 10 years later of 900 megawatts for a total powerplant capacity of 2,250 megawatts. Added dam height would increase reservoir capacity to 916,000 acre-feet. Operation and maintenance of dam and powerplant will be the responsibility of the Federal Government. Approved cost estimate (October 1980) for current plan of improvement is $1,586,000,000 (Stage 1, $1,340,000,000; Stage 2, $246,000,000). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by 1966 Flood Control Act. (H. Doc. 501, 89th Cong., 2d sess.). Amended by sec. 159, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (94th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Prior to construction, responsible non-Federal interests will be required to furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) prevent encroachment on the flow-carrying capacities of the stream channels below the reservoir to 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT extent needed to provide for effective reservoir operation; (2) in accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act: (a) Administer project land and water areas for recreation; (b) pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable cost to the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and (c) bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities. In addition, local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for the construction costs and the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement cost allocated to irrigation. Costs allocated to power are also reimbursable. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Water and Power Resources Service (known as the Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) with reimbursement of costs in accordance with Water and Power Resources Service policies and procedures for the Central Valley Project. Yuba County, by letter of March 1, 1977, indicated they would provide requirements of local cooperation pertaining to development of recreation access sites along Lower Yuba River. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Only minor engineering regarding preconstruction planning studies. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of project. 26. NEW MELONES LAKE, CALIF. Location. On Stanislaus River about threequarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project shall become an integral part of Central Valley project and operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1980) Federal cost is $366,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control Act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90- 483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif. Fiscal year 1979 and 1980 appropriations were not subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Water and Power Resources Service (known as Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979). Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Water and Power Resources Service policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. 35-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued including continuation of plans and specifications for the Lower Stanislaus recreation areas. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land acquisition activities, $5,795,598; completion of paving access roads contract, $500,745; and completion of cultural resources preservation contract, $611,031. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on the Lower Stanislaus River. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Powerplant and appurtenances contract, which was awarded in June 1976, has been completed and initial testing of the powerplant was completed in June 1979. Cultural resources preservation contract was completed. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities, for which design is underway, and reservoir clearing and reservoir recreation facilities which have been deferred pending final court decision on the filling and operation of the project. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Water and Power Resources Service was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for, reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The Calif. State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of Calif. claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case currently rests with the U.S. District Court for determination as to whether any of the State's conditions were inconsistent with Federal law. Trial date has not been established. Conditions established by the State affect the late phases of construction, specifically clearing and recreational development in the reservoir area, as well as project operation. On September 3, 1980, the Department of the Interior informed the Corps that it had decided to proceed with the filling of New Melones reservoir in fiscal year 1981 and presented a schedule of peak reservoir elevations, given normal runoff conditions for the next three years. The Department of the Interior requested that the Corps proceed with the reservoir clearing contract and low level recreation facilities as appropriate, based on reservoir filling schedule. While Federal investments for power generation and irrigation have been made, realization of benefits for these purposes requires reservoir filling. Project is about 85 percent complete. General Investigations 27. SURVEYS See table 35-K. 28. MORRISON CREEK STREAM GROUP, CALIF. (PHASE I, FEASIBILITY STUDY) Phase I studies (estimated cost $2,200,000) were authorized by sec. 101(a), Water Resources Development Act, of 1976, in accordance with Report of Chief of Engineers, March 2, 1976. The October 1980 estimated project cost is $146,700,000, of which $91,300,000 is Federal and $55,400,000 non-Federal. Proposed plan of improvement would be located on streams in Morrison Creek Stream Group Basin in the central part of Sacramento County and would provide for construction of a dam with an 11,000 acre-foot reservoir at the Vineyard site on Elder and Laguna Creeks, diversion of Morrison Creek flows into this reservoir, construction of 26 miles of levee and 66 miles of channel work along streams in the basin, and purchase of lands and related construction for a 7,800-acre flood retardation basin in the Beach-Stone Lakes area. Growing urban population in Sacramento metropolitan area has created a need for additional recreation opportunities in the basin, a need for preservation of choice existing open space, and a need to preserve diverse and valuable wildlife habitat existing in the Beach-Stone Lakes area. The Hydrology Design Memorandum, Phase I studies, environmental impact studies, and streamflow monitoring activities were initiated at a fiscal year cost of $258,061. 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Under the National Program of Inspection of Dams, as authorized by the Dam Safety Act, Public Law 93-367, August 8, 1972, the dam inventory and dam inspection program continued for California, Nevada, and Utah at a fiscal year cost of $1,331,920. Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year cost of $388,307. 35-20 SACRAMENTO. CALIF., DISTRICT (See table 35-L on completed flood plain information studies.) Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $9,500. 30. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,044,996, of which $829,513 was for analytical techniques, $21&,236 for flood plain management, and $247 for earth resources satellites, all at the Hydrologic Engineering Center. 35-21 'TABLE :35-A REPORT ()OFT E CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section in Text I'roject 1. Sacramento River., Calif. 2. San Francisco Bay to Stockton. Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship ('hannels) 3. San Joaquin River. Calif. .Bear River. Calif. 7. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other)- 8. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 9. Chester, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other)" 10. Cottonwood Creek. Calif. 11. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake. Fresno River. Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other)'" 12. Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev. 13. Isabella Lake, Kern River, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other)2' Total Cost to Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept 30, 1980 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 22 608,800 598,906 1.480,000 845,464 111,900 1,129,000 312,901 491,195 -- ,660,000 260,000 ,994,235 499,547 321,500 421,500 338,807 375.380 - -6,813 212.000 24,150 4,327 196,197 835,000 552,700 819,446 613,416 30,000 2,819 27.181 20010 ()()( 26 50 46 1,77 2,03 30 31 3 26 14 1.01 1,03 6,736 :3,766 - -17,738 6,519 - 0,000 1,025.000 2,978 884,587 3,674 100,000 9,708 326,596 4,500 401.,000 9,231 383,083 - -6.888 -- - 227,984 5.994 214,915 4,000 728.800 2,827 159,598 4,000 872,000 0,558 864,295 29.86-1 3413,000() 393,001()() 250,000 1,020(),965 29 97 36 51 56 - 40,331,192' - 40,331,192' 1,682,200 27,386,5312 290,722 25,991.262: 585,000 8,559,000' 609,722 8.471.549- 5,000 41 4.182 39 - 5 - 5 6,192 3 4,500 57 3,626 55 140,000() 124,111 596,000 635.276 5 96 93 - 5.833.117" 5,833.117" 5,000 9,568,4767 7,979 9.551,153: 5.,000 55,()()0 :3,476 53.,476 - 27.309,597 1,149 27.286,436 '0.000 2,004.500 i0,952 1,977,5:39 - 111.187 - 111.187 - 23,723,.1441 1.515 23,723.144'' i9,000 6,674.169" 6.875 6.631.45912 1,294,2511:1 " - - 1,294,2511:1 1 - - 3,540,000 2.678 4,396 3.540.000 - - 69,262 - - 69,262 1,100,000 1,250,000 3.875,000 1,246,900 1,111,715 3.706.181 - - 30.555.426 285,914 13,402 30.555,426 507,000 632,000 2.017,500 526,74:3 591,310 1.964.796 - - 165.112 - - 165.112 15.000 285.000 1,122,932 41,110 220.,953 1,058.884 -200,000 -10.000 24.450,5:371 ' " 477,677 5.762 24.450.537'' 211 877.350 1,153.000 10.551.95821 951,900 1,087.662 10.483,25:322 - - 438,000 - - 438.000 35-22 820,00()0 1,136,230 775,000 677,308 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND See iS ne cTtieo xnt PPrrjcoject Funding FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 77 Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept 30, 1980 14. Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif. (Contributed Funds, Other) 15. Lake Oroville, Calif. 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev., and Calif. 17. Merced County Stream Group, Calif. 18. Merced County Streams, Calif. 19. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, ther)," 20. Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, )ther)<" 11 25. Marysville Lake, Calif. 26. Iower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, Calif. including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif., New Melones Lake, Calif.48 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 63,000 232,073 1,039,000 1,009,870 30,000 2,820 415,600 421,480 340,000 446,903 55,000 82,049 408,000 429,689 -126,374 35,720 775,000 705,090 60,000 4,475 4,814,300 2,791,835 569,400 490,031 1,290,000 1,436,523 650,000 676,798 63,650,000 66,567,474 850 1,750 1,177,000 1,137,724 11,000 27,181 116,500 113,953 1,200 1,200 211,000 250,289 96,500 51,907 1,025,000 301,904 735,000 69,734 758,600 744,143 55,525 3,710,000 4,198,665 551,000 558,434 500,000 422,511 9841 150,000 165,324 67,000,000 59,974,672 97,000 88,745 96 1,316,400 1,439,897 1,420 12,419 750,000 742,352 151,750 198,596 90,000 128,764 268,000 870,172 110,000 753,825 749,700 831,798 765,000 3,713,939 632,400 716,465 200,000 639,652 1,420 12,419 15,000 39,182 13,405,000 27,590,740 115,000 113,658 34,997,23024 34,997,23025 1,729,000 10,863,52526 1;718,138 10,810,46627 - 42,42028 - 42,42029 426,308 70,368,836 427,327 70,359,566 - 8,504,989:30 - 8,504,98930 160,000 1,490,350 152,515 1,471,608 - 2,751,25931 - 2,751,25931 117,700 892,506 125,290 890,152 655,000 3,156,000 777,725 3,134,521 250,000 43,356,26532 34 35 271,440 43,356,2653 3 4 35 1,686,000 9,760,285:36 1,657,512 9,693,271-- - 110,000 - 110,000 1,841,000 71,042,50839 4 1,516,498 70,533,97819 41 938,000 6,068,33442 921,588 6,007.5594:1 350,000 12,572,538 341,003 12,127,621 - 2,442,36246 47 - 2,442,36246 47 - 6,304,937 282 6,304,184 11,461,692 302,488,99649 10,716,483 301,213.5714 191,000 403.,000 189,147 391,549 35-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,194,867 for shallow-draft and $11,567,944 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,140,479 for shallow-draft and $10,227,063 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $2,913,800 funds for Sacramento District and $5,645,200 for San Francisco District. 5. Includes $2,886,736 costs for Sacramento District and $5,584,812 for San Francisco District. 6. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 7. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds. 8. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 9. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: $212,000, $24,150, and $140,000 for fiscal years 1977, 1978, and 1979, respectively. Total to date $897,742. 10. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: $4,327, $196,197, $124,111, and $51,515 for fiscal years 1977, 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $897,742. 11. Includes $79,000 special recreation use fees at New Hogan Lake. 12. Includes $79,000 special recreation use costs at New Hogan Lake. 13. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 14. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 15. Contributed funds, other, from State of California, for design and construction of two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. 16. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 17. Includes total Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: $40,000, $728,800, -$200,000, and -$10,000 for fiscal years 1977, 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $2,199,085. 18. Includes total Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: $2,240, $76,269, $477,593, and $5,762 for fiscal years 1977, 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $2,199,085. 19. Includes $224,000 Code 713 funds for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds for fiscal year 1977. 20. Includes Code 713 costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds: $140,587, $83,329, and $84 for fiscal years 1977, 1978, and 1979, respectively. Total to date $224,000. 21. Includes $60,000 special recreation use fees at Isabella Lake. 22. Includes $60,000 special recreation use costs at Isabella Lake. 23. Funds from California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula. 24. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities: Success Lake: $68,000, and $850 for fiscal years 1977 and. 1978, respectively. Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: -$5,000 for fiscal year 1977. Total to date $700,004. 25. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: $67,100 and $1,750 for fiscalyears 1977 and 1978, respectively. Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: $164,973 and $96 for fiscal years 1977 and 1979, respectively. Total to date $700,004. 26. Includes $100,000 special recreation use fees at Success Lake. 27. Includes $95,718 special recreation use costs at Success Lake. 28. Funds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, fiscal year 1977, $30,000 and Terminus Dam, fiscal year 1978, $11,000 and fiscal year 1979, $1,420. 29. Costs for acquisition of boarding float at Success Lake: Fiscal year 1977, $2,820 and fiscal year 1978, $27,180: Terminus Dam, fiscal year 1978, $1 and fiscal year 1979, $12,419. 30. Includes $1,200, initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for fiscal year 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. 31. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations for project. 32. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: $735,000, $110,000, and $250,000 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $1,595,100. 33. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: $69,734, $753,825, and $271,440 for fiscal years 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $1,595,100. 34. Includes Public Works Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds for recreation facilities: Total appropriations $239,235 and total costs $239,235. 35. Includes $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 36. Includes $92,300 special recreation use fees at Pine Flat Lake. 37. Includes $92,300 special recreation use costs at Pine Flat Lake. 38. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations. 39. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 40. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: $405,000, $355,000, $60,000, and $110,000 for fiscal years 1977, 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $1,000,162. 41. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: $10,675, $651,854, $51,857, and $212,747 for fiscal years 1977, 1978, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Total to date $997,294. 42. Includes $74,100 special recreation use fees at Black Butte Lake. 43. Includes $74,048 special recreation use costs at Black Butte Lake. 44. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and major and minor tributariesproject). 45. Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 46. Includes $7,984, contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT r'I'ABIE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 47. Includes $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State 49. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Develop- Economic Feasibility Report and ment for of Revised Feasibility replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 launching ramp at Black Butte Lake. reauthorization of project. 48. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries and Tuolumne River Basin, Calif.) (See table 35-J). 35-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF. (See Section 1 of Text) A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento. For work above Sacramento. The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing, at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, Calif., to provide for construction of a ship channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF., FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM (See Section 20 of Text) Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide for extensions in levees and other structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. Improvement for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included full monetary authorization). Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control Project by construction of initial 10-year phase of bank erosion control worls and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose. 3 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir 4 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-26 H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 2 H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 2 S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., 2d sess.2 PL 90-17 PL 93-251 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., 1st sess. Dec. 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 July 3. 1958 July 3. 1958 July 14, 1960 May 12, 1967 Mar. 7, 1974 June 19. 1975 SACRAMENTO. CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 35-C SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF.: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Miles from Range in Feet Place Mouth of Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme River Tidal' Tidal2 Flood3 Flood' Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.02 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 2. Tide at low water season only. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. TABLE 35-D SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CALIF.: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT' (See Section 3 of Text) Federal Non-Federal2 Corps of Coast Required Lands and Engineers Guard Cash Damages (includ- Total Modification (Construction) (Construction) Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,179 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519.500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-E SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CALIF.: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 3 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff' $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel s 7,882,000 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,(00 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement4 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento 3. For lands and construction. District, Improvement No. 2. 35-27 TABLE 35-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept 30. 1979 Full Report See Annual ()>eration and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, Calif.' 1951 - 5.752 Middle River and Connecting Channels, Calif.' 4 1974 8,354 93.494 Mokelumne River, Calif.: 1974 8,500 189.152 Navajo Reservoir, New Mex. 6 - 2,132 Old River, Calif.3 1970 23,185 631.128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif.3 9 1970 253,151 218.854 Suisun Bay Channel, Calif. 10o 11 12 1974 200,928 3.3166221: Suisun Channel, Calif.3 1973 217,677 733.489" Suisun Point Channel, Calif.3 6 16 1965 191,728 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for com- nance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have merce. been incurred since fiscal year 1969. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $58,901 for previous projects. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing 11. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contribproject for maintenance expended from contributed funds. uted funds for previous project. 3. Completed. 12. Excludes work accomplished under existing project 4. Includes $1,600 for previous project. at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration 5. Includes $790 for previous project. funds allotted to San Joaquin River, Calif. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 13. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. - $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for 7. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in previous project. fiscal year 1968. 14. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San 8. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, Francisco District, January 1, 1974. damages, and public landings. 15. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of 9. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, $5,496 and $483 for fiscal years 1963 and 1964, respectively. Calif. in February 1970, local interests accepted mainte- 16. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was nance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif., and Federal mainte- TABLE 35-G MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CALIF.: MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 17 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (bihourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 4,600 1,240 1,602 Bear 4,140 2,280 1,503 Owens 1,880 1,770 158 Mariposa 4,550 7,580 954 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF., COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST (See Section 20 of Text) ESTIMATE Unit 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek2 Lower Butte Basin3 Thomes Creek2 Willow Creek2 Bypass Levees 4 Bypass Levees 4 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin2 Current Classification Inactive Deferred Deferred Inactive Deferred Inactive Deferred Federal $1,400,000 7,286,000 1,140,000 1,290,000 7,100,000 3,010,000 3,530,000 Estimated Cost Non-Federal ' $ 340,000 2,285,000 140,000 120,000 940,000 1,787,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. extension of Moulton TABLE 35-I SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF., FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 20 of Text) Contract Contract No. 33 continuation (Bank protection, Sacramento River, miles 15.0-60.0) Contract No. 34 completion (Bank protection, Sacramento River, miles 60.0-110.0) Contract No. 34B completion (Bank protection, Sacramento River, mile 68.5) Federal $301,125 639,019 113,770 Required Contributed $100,579 140,798 24,060 35-29 Total 1,740,000 9,571,000 1,280,000 1,410,000 8,040,000 3,010,000 5,317,000 Total $401,704 779,817 137,830 ( __ extension of Moulton REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 35-J OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual OQeration and Project Report For Construction Maintenance American River, Calif.' 1959 $ 2,125,8182 Aquatic Plant Control, Calif.' 1967 1,000 Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, Calif.' 1955 1,369,9314 Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, Utahl 3 1961 217,8795 Burch Creek, Weber County, Utah3 1964 26,049 Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, Calif. 1 3 1967 664,8256 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, Calif.7 1977 687,000 Folsom Lake, American River, Calif.' 8 1957 63,014,810 Gleason Creek, Nev.9 1977 215,826 Green Valley Creek, Solano County, Calif.1 3 1963 136,0268 10 Kays Creek, Utah 3 11 1973 407,989 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, Calif.' 3 12 1977 1,503,073 Lake Camanche, Calif.' 13 1976 10,252,950 Lakeport Lake, Calif.'4 1976 2,353,00315 Little Dell Lake, Utah 1978 2,054,900 Little Valley Wash, Magna, Utah' 6 1951 Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif.'1 7 1976 27,835,263 Merced River, Calif.' 18 1976 10,918,796 Middle Creek, Calif.' '9 1967 2,643,499 Mormon Slough, Calif.' 1976 2,965,40220 New Bullards Bar, Calif.' 1972 12,890,62521 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, Calif.1 3 1974 904,27822 23 Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev;1 3 1969 133,33924 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, Utah' 1961 1,227,57025 Sevier River near Redmond, Utah' 1952 919,00026 Spanish Fork River, Utah'6 1955 20,000 Truckee River and tributaries, Calif. and Nev. 1968 1,038,960 Walnut Creek, Calif. . 1976 - 27 Weber River and tributaries, Utah28 1974 75,120 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959), for lands and relocations. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 6. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 7. Due to lack of local support, project was reclassified as "deferred" on September 15, 1977. 8. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 9. Due to lack of local support, project was reclassified as "deferred" on November 3, 1977. Fiscal year 1978 carryover funds of $27,984-were revoked. 10. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 11. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (fiscal year 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 12. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non- Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). Project prevented $2,600,000 in damages from April-July 1980 snowmelt runoff. 13. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $24,876,842. 14. Preconstruction planning complete. Necessary reaffirmation of local cooperation assurances by Lake County Flood Control and Water Conservation District not received. Project was reclassified as "deferred" on September 15, 1977. 15. Includes $298,500 costs for advance acquisition of land, Public Law 91-439. 16. Deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization1 7o.f Cprhoejrercyt . Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (non-project) at local interests 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 35-J (Cont'd) (See Section 23 of Text) expense'under l(cal cooperation requirements for acquisition services under local cooperation requirements in connection of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvements on with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. alterations. 18. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District. Final 24. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 25. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation, of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and 19. Estimated costs (fiscal year 1967) to local interests for damages including relocations. all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for 26. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward lands and damages including relocations, first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local 20. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (fiscal year 1976) for cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made (1951). lanSdttaot e ReclamationBoard. (1927. All costs and construction responsibility transferred 21. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final to San Francisco District, January 31, 1977. Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in fiscal year 1972 28. Due to lack of local assurances required by sec. 206, (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. Public Law 90-483, 1968 Flood Control Act, project authori- 22. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. zation expired as of April 16, 1972, end of 5-year period. 23. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design TABLE 35-K SURVEYS (See Section 27 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Navigation studies Flood control studies Coordination with Soil Conservation Service Coordination with Water and Power Resources Service ertaining to projects under reclamation program Fincluding PL 984) Coordination with other agencies on Truckee, Carson, and Walker River Basins $ 43,143 1,858,397 3,000 13,000 14,000 $1,931,540 TABLE 35-L FLOOD PLAIN INFORMATION STUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1980 (See Section 29 of Text) Location Montrose, Uncompahgre River, Colo. Delta, Gunnison and Uncompahgre River, Colo. Hotchkiss, North Fork Gunnison River, Colo. Requesting Agency Colorado Water Feb 1980 $44,000 Colorado Water Conservation Board Colorado Water Conservation Board CCoolnosreardvoa tiWona teBroard Date Completed Feb 1980 Feb 1980 Feb 1980/ 35-31 Federal Cost $44,000 22,000 17,000 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION* This division comprises the State of Hawaii. The division also performs such actions pertaining to preservation and protection of navigable waters on and about the island of Guam and American Samoa as provided for under River and Harbor Act of 1899. Beach Erosion Control (Cont.) 1. Auasi Harbor, American Samoa ........ 36-1 2. Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa ....... 36-2 3. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ... 36-2 4. Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii.......... 36-2 5. Honolulu Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........ 36-2 6. Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ......... 36-3 7. Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........................ 36-3 8. Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ..................... 36-3 9. Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa .............. . ....... 36-4 10. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........ ***................. 36-4 11. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... **............. 36-4 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization........................ 36-4 Beach Erosion Control 13. Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii .......... 36-4 14. Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii ... 36-5 15. Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii............ 36-5 16. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Projects ........................... 36-5 17. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............................. 36-5 18. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ................ 36-5 19. Other Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 36-5 Flood Control 20. Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii ........... 36-5 21. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii ......... 36-5 22. Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii .... 36-6 23. Namo River, Territory of Guam ........ 36-6 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 36-6 25. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 36-7 26. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 36-7 27. Work Under Special Authorization ..... 36-7 General Investigations 28. 29. 30. Surveys............................. 36-7 Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 36-7 Hydrologic Studies ................... 36-7 Navigation 1. AUASI HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the southeast end of Tutuila Island in American Samoa which is about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,500 miles northeast of Auckland, New Zealand and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190). Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 360 feet long, 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep; a 23,000 square foot, 8-foot deep turning basin and docking area; a 165-foot long exterior revetment, and a 125-foot long breakwater. The range of tide between mean low water and mean high water is 2.5 feet. Project first cost is $1,068,894 of which $973,894 (including $47,100 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $95,000 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract, combined with Aunuu Harbor, was awarded in September 1978. The construction contract amount is $851,302 with 3 modifications for Auasi Harbor. A Detailed Project Report supplement dated 6 August 1980 recommended protection of the shoreline adjacent to the harbor from erosion damage which is directly attributable to the harbor construction. The recommended plan to construct 300 feet of revetment with pertinent engineering and design and supervision and administration is estimated to be $110,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract is 74 percent complete with completion scheduled in November 1980. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-1 Navigation IMPROVEMENTS Page Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 2. AUNUU HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the north coast of Aunuu island in American Samoa which is about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,500 miles northeast of Auckland, New Zealand, and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190). Existing project. Project provides for a 7,500 square foot, 14-foot deep turning area; a 13,500 square foot, 8-foot deep mooring area; a 70-foot wide, 175-foot long; 14-foot deep access channel; a 300-foot long northern revetted mole; a 220-foot long southern revetted mole; a 90-foot long stub breakwater; and aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean low water and mean high water is 2.5 feet. Project first cost is $2,014,429 of which $1,793,629 (including $10,500 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $220,800 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract, combined with Auasi Harbor, was awarded in September 1978. The construction contract amount is $1,739,664 with 2 modifications for Aunuu Harbor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract is 74 percent complete with completion scheduled in November 1980. 3. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the west coast of Oahu, about 25 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 4110 and 4133.) Existing project. Deep-draft harbor provides for an entrance channel 4,280 feet long, 450 feet wide and 38 to 42 feet deep; and inshore harbor basin of about 92 acres and 38 feet deep; and 4,700 feet long wave absorber. Light-draft harbor provides for a main access channel 1,200 feet long, 80-140 feet wide, and 12 feet deep; and wave absorber 300 feet long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water datum. The mean tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water level is 1.8 feet; extreme range under normal condition is 2.3 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1980) is $85,200,000 of which $76,100,000 (ncluding $100,000 for Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $9,100,000 is non-federal cost, including lands and rights-of-way and cash contribution. (See table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities open to all on equal terms; provide such utility and drainage relocations or alterations as necessary; hold the United States free from damages; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $3,300,000 for deep-draft harbor. Terminal facilities. Existing privately owned barge harbor consists of a concrete marginal wharf, 250 feet long along south side of the barge basin. An offshore tanker facility is connected to the oil refinery by pipelines. Operations and results during fiscal year. Post authorization change report pending approval which includes a change in cash contribution to 4.4 percent from 2.1 percent. Inclusion of visitor center authorized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning for light-draft harbor deferred since FY 1970 as requested by the State of Hawaii. Preconstruction planning for deep-draft harbor is 98 percent complete. Construction contract award was rescheduled from January 1981 to August 1981 due to delay in completion of actions by the State of Hawaii on land use regulation procedures and to comply with requirement of Section 7, Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. A construction contract award for the Regional Visitor Center is also scheduled in August 1981. 4. HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the northeast coast of the island of Hawaii in the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19324.) Existing project. Completed portion of project comprises of a rubblemound breakwater 10,080 feet long, an entrance 35 feet deep, and a harbor basin 1,400 feet wide, 2,300 feet long and 35 feet deep. The modification of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 1960 and 1962 was deauthorized in 1977. Range of tides between mean lower low water and mean high water is 2.4 feet and extreme tidal range under normal conditions is 5.4 feet. (See Table 36-B for Authorization Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three piers, and pipelines for petroleum products, liquid fertilizer and molasses, owned by the state, and privately owned facilities for handling bulk commodities and for storage of sugar, molasses, petroleum products and liquid fertilizer. Equipment includes heavy-lift cranes. Facilities are open to all on equal terms and considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications for breakwater repair were completed and a construction contract was awarded in September 1980 for $1,538,000. Condition at end offiscal year. The construction contract is scheduled for completion in December 1981. 5. HONOLULU HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the southern coast of the island of Oahu, in the city of Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109.) 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION* Existing project. Completed portion of project comprises three channels 35-40 feet deep, two harbor basins 35 feet deep, and a double-leaf-bascule bridge. Last full report on this project is on page 1828 and 1829 of Annual Report for 1962. Uncompleted potion provides deepening seaward 3,600 feet of Fort Armstrong entrance channel to 45 feet, deepening main harbor basin and Kapalama Channel to 40 feet; widening Kapalama Channel by 60 feet along Sand Island side for 3,100 feet; and relocating project line to provide a 100-foot offset from pierheads in Kapalama Channel and at piers 9, 10 and 11, and an offset of 50 to 75 feet elsewhere in the harbor. The mean tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.9 feet. The usual extreme range is 2.3 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1979) for new work is $4,390,000 of which $4,276,000 is federal cost and $114,000 is non-federal cost. (See table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 34 piers and 2 marginal wharves, which include 3 piers and 1 marginal wharf owned by the federal government; 13 piers and 1 marginal wharf owned by the State of Hawaii; and 18 piers State owned. All non-federal piers are open to all on an equal basis, although certain ones are reserved for passenger terminals, for container ships or for handling specific bulk commodities such as petroleum products, pineapple, sugar, animal feed, and cement. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in February 1979. The construction contract amount is $3,739,500 with 6 modifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract is 72 percent complete with completion scheduled in January 1981. The construction contractor has submitted claim for changed conditions during prosecution of the work in Honolulu Harbor. Claims are in the Kapalama Basin, Kapalama Channel, Main Turning Basin and Armstrong Entry Channel. Total of these four claims is estimated to be $3,000,000. 6. KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. On the northern coast of the island of Maui, at the town of Kahului. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4124.) Existing project. Rubblemound breakwaters on east and west sides of harbor, approximately 2,766 and 2,315 feet long, respectively, and an entrance 600 feet wide between breakwaters and a harbor basin 2,050 feet wide, 2,400 feet long, and 35 feet deep. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.2 feet and extreme tidal range under normal conditions is 4.5 feet. (See table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves owned and operated by State of Hawaii which are open to shipping on equal terms. Pipelines for fuel oil, distillate, kerosene, gasoline, molasses, and water are available. There is also a bulk-sugar plant of 30,000-ton storage capacity with a conveyor loading system capable of conveying at a rate of about 750 tons per hour. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum was initiated in FY 1980 and completion is scheduled in July 1981. Condition at end offiscal year. Major rehabilitation cost is estimated to be $6,200,000 which includes estimated inflation allowance from 1 October 1980 through the construction period. Construction contract award scheduled in FY 1982. 7. KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. Kikiaola is in the Waimea-Koloa judicial district on the island of Kauai. (See NOAA Chart 19386.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 1,050 feet long, 12 feet deep, 120 feet wide; an access channel 630 feet long, width varies from 120 feet to 80 feet, depth varies from 10 feet to 6 feet; remove 130 feet east breakwater; 770 feet of east breakwater raised 3 feet; and wave absorber 270 feet long. Tree planting for beautification. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 4.0 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1980) is $1,900,000 of which $930,000 (including $20,000 for Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $970,000 is non-federal cost, including lands and rights-of-way and cash contribution. (See table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance; provide and maintain berthing or mooring facilities and utilities, and all appropriate onshore facilities necessary to insure complete and adequate project; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility, drainage, or other relocations or alterations as necessary; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $910,000. Terminal facilities. Existing dock and launching ramp owned by the State of Hawaii are open to all on an equal basis. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued in FY 1980. Condition at end offiscal year. A General Design Memorandum and final Environmental Impact Statement was completed in September 1980. 8. MAALAEA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Harbor is on the northwest 36-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 shore of Maalaea Bay on the island of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 780 feet long, 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep; 150-foot long transition area providing change in depth from 15 feet to 12 feet and flaring of width from 150 feet to about 300 feet at entrance of 6.9-acre turning basin; a main access channel 80 feet wide, 700 feet long, 8 feet deep; a 650-foot extension to south breakwater; removal of east breakwater from station 2+00 to its seaward terminus; reinforcing new head with a layer of armor stone. Tree planting for beautification. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.2 feet, and extreme tidal range under normal condition is 4.0 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1980) is $5,010,000 of which $3,210,000 (including $20,000 for Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $1,800,000 is non-federal cost. (See table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance; provide and maintain berthing or mooring facilities and utilities, and all appropriate onshore facilities necessary to insure complete and adequate project; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility, drainage, or other relocations or alterations as necessary; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $1,800,000. Terminal facilities. Existing launch ramp, berthing facilities, loading docks, ice house and fuel facilities owned by the State of Hawaii are open to all on an equal basis. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued in FY 1980. Condition at end offiscal year. A General Design Memorandum and final Environmental Impact Statement was completed in July 1980. 9. TAU SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the island of Tau, American Samoa, about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,236 miles northwest of Tahiti, and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190.) Existing project. Project provides for a 520-foot long entrance channel, 130 feet wide, 16 to 20 feet deep; a turning basin of 85,000 square feet, 16 feet deep; a rubble breakwater 290 feet long, 13 feet high; revetments with a total length of 975 feet; and a 200-foot long groin. Plane of reference is mean sea level. The range of tide between mean low water and mean high water is 2.5 feet. Project first cost is $1,567,500 of which $1,515,100 (including $4,800 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $52,400 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in January 1975. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in May 1977. The construction contract amount is $1,237,797 with 2 modifications. Construction completion delayed due to remobilization after removal of LCU and equipment breakage. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract is 99 percent complete with completion scheduled for December 1980. 10. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See table 36-C. 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See table 36-D. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigational Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Preauthorization studies initiated on Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, $20,082; studies continued on Agat Harbor, Guam, $101,807; Kane-Kai Small Boat Harbor, Oahu,' $36,960; Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Saipan, $105,136; studies completed on Drydock Island Small Boat Harbor, Guam, $5,000; Leone Boat Harbor, American Samoa, $5,000; Rota Harbor, Mariana Islands, $4,009; and study terminated on Apra Harbor of Refuge, Guam, $562. Beach Erosion Control 13. KEKAHA BEACH, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the Southwest coast of the island of Kauai near the town of Kekaha, Kauai. (See NOAA Chart 19381.) Existing project. Project provides for a 5,900- foot long rubble revetment with a crest elevation of 12 feet mean lower low water and a slope of 1 vertical to 1.5 horizontal. Total project cost is $2,667,433 of which $999,996 is federal cost and $1,667,437 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 103a of 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in July 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was completed in May 1980 for $2,420,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed. 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 14. KUALOA REGIONAL PARK, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the northeast coast of the island of Oahu, about 20 miles from downtown Honolulu, Oahu. (See NOAA Chart 19359.) Existing project. Project provides for an initial beach fill of 45,000 cubic yards of beach sand with a berm width of 50 feet, a berm elevation between 4.5 to 6.5 feet mean lower low water and a foreshore slope of about 1 vertical to 8 horizontal. Periodic nourishment is estimated to be 18,000 cubic yards once every four years. Project first cost (1979) is $637,800 of which $470,500 is federal cost and $167,300 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 103a of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1978. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in November 1979 for $478,560 but contract termination action was initiated in April 1980 due to litigation action. The Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. Condition at end offiscal year. The construction contractor claim of $448,500 is under negotiation for termination settlement. 15. SAND ISLAND, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Sand Island lies adjacent to Honolulu Harbor on the south coast of Oahu. Sand Island, approximately 520 acres in area, is connected to the island of Oahu by a bascule bridge. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109.) Existing project. Project provides for 2,382-foot revetment with crest elevation +6 to +8 and slope 1 on 1 to 1 on 1.5, stone size of 400 to 3,000 pounds. Total project cost is $629,200 of which $323,200 is federal cost and $306,000 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 103a of 1962 River and Harbor act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in May 1979. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract awarded in September 1979 was essentially completed in August 1980 for $436,902. Condition at end offiscal year. Project completion is scheduled in November 1980. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection and survey were conducted on Kaaawa Beach and Waikiki Beach in September 1980 at a total cost of $500. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 36-E 18. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Preauthorization study initiated on Kamaole Beach Park, Hawaii, $8,363; studies completed on Agfayan Bay to Saluglula Pools, Guam, $5,000; Fagasa Village, American Samoa, $1,500; Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, $29,991; Tongan Creek, Guam, $5,000; and studies terminated on Masefau Bay, American Samoa, $38; and Waiehu Shoreline, Maui, $13. 19. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shoreline erosion control demonstration program pursuant to Section 54, Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress. Monitoring program of the sandgrabber at Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, was completed at a cost of $56,989. Flood Control 20. IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Iao Stream on the island of Maui drains a portion of the slopes of the West Maui mountains, and its lower course runs into the sea just to the east of the town of Wailuku, Maui. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4124.) Existing project. Project provides for a debris basin 2.5 miles upstream of stream mouth; channel improvement from the debris basin to about 1,100 feet downstream of Market Street bridge; diversion levees and flood plain management from the channel improvements for about 1,400 feet downstream of Waiehu bridge. The standard project design discharge is 26,500 cubic feet per second at the stream mouth. Project cost estimate is $12,630,000 of which $12,030,000 is federal cost and $600,000 is nonfederal cost for lands and relocations. (See table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract amount is $10,343,275 with 29 modifications. Remaining construction completion is on the flood plain levees. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract is 99 percent complete with completion scheduled in May 1981. 21. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Kahoma Stream drainage basin is located in Lahaina Maui. Lahaina is on the west coast of Maui about 4 miles from Kaanapali. The drainage basin of Kahoma Stream totals 5.3 square miles. (See U.S. Geological Survey Chart Lahaina.) Existing project. The project provides for a debris basin 100 feet wide and 700 feet long with a 36-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 capacity of 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion levee which is 80 feet long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280 feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and a revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. Approved project cost estimate (October 1980) is $17,600,000 of which $13,000,000 is federal cost and $4,600,000 is non-federal cost for lands, damages and relocations. (See table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; provide without cost to the United States all relocation of building and utilities, highway and street bridges and driveways, railroad track and bridge, and other related facilities which may be required for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion; and prohibit encroachment on improved channels and debris basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued in FY 1980. Model study by Waterway Experiment Station initiated in June 1979 is 80 percent complete. General design conference held on June 1980. Cash contribution not applicable as cost sharing for land enhancement due to windfall no longer exists. Condition at end of fiscal year. General Design Memorandum is 65 percent complete and is scheduled for completion in FY 1981. 22. KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Kamooalii-Kaneohe Stream drainage basin is on the east coast of the island of Oahu. The drainage basin is bounded on west and south by the Koolau Mountain Range, on the east by the remnants of Kaneohe volcanic cone and on the north by Kaneohe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4134 and U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles Kaneohe, Hawaii and Honolulu, Hawaii.) Existing project. Project provides for a dam and reservoir about 3.2 miles above the mouth of Kaneohe Stream on the tributary Kamooalii Stream. Project consists of an earth-fill dam 80 feet high, with a crest length of about 2,300 feet, and about 1,000 feet of channel improvements, a concrete side channel and chute spillway and reservoir with storage of 2,500 acre-feet, of which 500 acre-feet would be for sediment reserve and recreation use and 2,000 acre-feet for flood control. Approved project cost estimate (October 1977) is $23,800,000 of which $17,800,000 is federal cost (appropriation required $21,400,000) and $6,000,000 is non-federal cost for lands, damages and relocations. Future non-federal reimbursement is $3,600,000. (See table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase II construction contract was awarded in March 1977 and project is essentially complete except for landscaping and grassing. The construction contract amount is $13,308,989 with 88 modifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase II construction contract is 100 percent complete and the project was dedicated in July 1980. The project is scheduled for transfer to the local cooperation in January 1981. The construction contract claim for sewerline work is pending. The claim amount by the contractor is $963,600. 23. NAMO RIVER, TERRITORY OF GUAM Location. The Agat-Santa Rita River (Namo) is on the west coast of the island of Guam and about 10 miles southerly of Agana, the capital city of Guam. The island of Guam is approximately 3,800 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii, and 1,500 miles south of Tokyo, Japan. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4196.) Existing project. Provides for channel improvements for the lower 2,000-foot reach of the river, and flood plain management for the area extending from the upper part of the channel improvement to the existing Agat-Santa Rita bridge. Channel improvements include realignment and enlargement of the existing river, lining the channel with riprap, providing a stub outlet channel on the upstream side of Route 2 bridge, and constructing a levee on the north bank of unnamed tributary. Total project cost is $2,325,314 in federal cost. Project authority is Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Project was approved for construction in January 1975. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract was completed in September 1979 for $2,010,738. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is not financially completed. Construction contract claim is pending since FY 1979. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were conducted on Hanapepe River Flood Protection Works, Kauai; Iao Stream Snagging and Clearing Project, Maul; and Kaunakakai Stream Flood Protection Works, Molokai, in October 1979; Kawainui Swamp Flood Protection Works, Oahu, and Kuliouou Stream Flood Protection Works, Oahu, in December 1979; and Wailoa Stream Flood Protection Project, Hawaii, in November 1979; at a total cost of $4,407. 36-6 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 36-F 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization.) Preauthorization studies continued on Asan Village, Guam, $53,225; Garapan Area, Saipan, $107,851; Lake Susupe, Saipan, $107,080; Palai 4-Mile Creek, Hawaii, $68,101; and studies completed on Umatac Flood Control, Guam, $5,000, and Waimea River, Kauai, $30,000. 27. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $103,561 of which $67,710 was for disaster preparedness and $35,851 for rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress.) See table 36-G General Investigations 28. SURVEYS Survey cost for fiscal year was $1,484,332 of which $854,816 was for navigation, $298,227 for flood damage prevention, $87,996 for review of authorized projects, and $243,293 for coordination studies with other agencies. 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA National Program Inspection of Dams cost was $189,971 and Flood Plain Management Services was $199,965 of which $60,000 was for technical services, $99,963 for flood plain management services unit, $40,000 for flood plain management planning, and $2 for guides, pamphlets and supporting studies. 30. HYDROLOGIC STUDIES Storm studies cost was $8,400. 36-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 .FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu Hawaii (Federal Funds) 4. Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 5. Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 6. Kahului Harbor Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 8. Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 9. Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Kekaha Beach Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 53,000 462,794 53,000 33,664 - 95,000 S- 294,000 41,038 - 233,000 86,000 139,442 25,000 31,952 20,000 430,930 57,282 793,000 696,166 37,929 333,000 180,951 - 5,423,440 - 5,423,440 11,084 631,100 628,658 - 1,163,000 - 62,063 2,500,000 1,273,521 531,413 2,379,441 37,000 39,442 1,260,159 325,000 2,209,473 329,745 500,766 853,000 266,563 922,874 - 52,450 - 50,400 63,396 931,500 63,396 22,509 90,000 50,000 49,940 65,000 64,971 -10,000 -40,061 778,761 - 2,038,271 -- 2,038,271 - 2,388,693 - 2,388,693 -- 6,631,020 76,859 6,617,879 - 30,200 - 30,200 95,000 1,593,400 -- 1,667,437 36-8 391,000 137,662 -8,437 5,409 696,000 675,480 -1,563 49,600 238,500 309,049 926,794 655,256 86,563 62,691 1,863,129 1,492,813 231,437 87,529 1,190,178 1,107,384 3,084,333 1,983,396 12,418,395 11,557,635 143,000 142,210 130,000 129,825 72,376 57 130,304 193,000 192,150 195,000 194,796 1,510,266 1,388,252 52,450 50,457 999,996 999,970 1,688,400 1,667,437 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SSeecetion Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept. 30, 1980 in Text 14. Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 21. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 22. Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 23. Namo River, Guam (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 61,000 61,000 31,000 2,473 45,072 20,749 10,690 39,100 39,000 18,300 167,300 114,913 26,587 401,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 4,205,000 909,894 2,598,994 2,877,168 - -230,000 - - 229,170 9,434,750 9,765,240 1,474,000 7,706,566. 6,495,122 4,073,540 1,565,312 617,000 19,751 484,113 1,611,229 311,400 239,628 10,000 96,001 161,600 230,199 365,565 475,472 358,676 177,300 96,001 323,203 303,354 401,000 365,565 310,000 10,850,000 3,695,735 10,387,584 225,000 213,603 455,000 442,773 260,000 23,924,900 2,876,368 23,610,082 62,000 61,410 2,387,314 2,319,505 36-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1907 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935; included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933 July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Jan. 21, 1927 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII (See Section 3 of Text) An entrance channel 42 feet deep, 450 feet wide, and 3,100 feet long; an inshore basin of about 46 acres, 28 feet deep, a breakwater on the north side of the entrance channel, if model study shows it to be necessary; spending beaches with wave absorbers within the harbor totaling 1,320 feet in length; and a main access channel 12 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long to a small-boat harbor on the west side of the deep-draft harbor to be developed by local interests. HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII (See Section 4 of Text) For rubblemound breakwater. Dredging entrance of Kuhio Bay without increasing original limit of cost. Extension of the breakwater and dredging in the bay. HONOLULU HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII (See Section 5 of Text) Deepening to 35 feet the inner harbor with a general width of 1,200 feet and casing the curve between the entrance channel and the inner harbor. For the channel 1,000 feet long. Channel connecting Honolulu Harbor and Kapalama Basin. Enlarging entrance channel to present project dimensions, widening of the harbor basin by 320 feet and the maintenance of the improved 400-foot wide portion of the reserved channel. A depth of 35 feet over the full width of 600 feet throughout the reserved channel; a turning basin in Kapalama Basin 35 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long; and a slip of like depth 1,000 feet long on the easterly side of Pier 39. The second entrance channel; and installation of a moveable-type bridge across the 2d entrance channel. (Modified by the Chief of Engineers.) Reopening Fort Armstrong entrance channel to 45 feet, Main Harbor Basin and Kapalama Channel to 40 feet, and relocating existing project lines. KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII (See Section 6 of Text) Extending east breakwater and dredging the basin. For the west breakwater. Extend both breakwaters and enlarge dredged basin. Enlarge harbor basin, 600 feet wide, 2,500 feet long, 35 feet deep. KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII (See Section 7 of Text) An entrance channel 1,050 feet long, 12 feet deep, 120 feet wide; access channel 630 feet long, width varies from 120 feet to 80 feet, depth varies from 10 feet to 6 feet, remove 130 feet east breakwater, 770 feet of east breakwater raised 3 feet; and wave absorber 270 feet long. Tree planting for beautification. MAALAEA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII (See Section 8 of Text) An entrance channel 780 feet long, 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep; 150-foot long transition area providing change in depth from 15 feet to 12 feet and flaring of width from 150 feet to about 300 feet at entrance of 6.9-acre turning basin; main access channel 80 feet wide, 700 feet long, 8 feet deep, a 650-foot extension to south breakwater; removal of east breakwater from station 2+00 to its seaward terminus; reinforcing new head with a layer of armor stone. Tree planting for beautification. H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., ist sess. H. Doc. 407, 59th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 417, 62d Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 235, 68th Cong. 1st sess. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2565. H. Doc. 392, 64th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 753, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 54, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 705, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 717, 81st Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 593, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1330, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 235, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 109, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (Contains latest map.) H. Doc. 353, 9th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 353, 9th Cong., 2nd sess. 36-10 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII (See Section 20 of Text) Channel enlargement, levees, a debris basin and related works. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII (See Section 21 of Text) A debris basin 100 feet wide and 700 feet long with a capacity of 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion levee which is 80 feet long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280 feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and a revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU, HAWAII (See Section 22 of Text) Provide a dam and reservoir about 3.2 miles above the mouth of Kaneohe Stream on the tributary Kamooalii Stream. Project consists of an earthfill dam 80 feet high, with a crest length of about 2,300 feet and about 1,000 feet of channel improvements at the entrance of Kaneohe Stream to Kaneohe Bay; and reservoir with storage of 2,500-acre-feet, of which 500 acre-feet would be for sediment reserve and recreation use and 2,000 acre-feet for flood control. H. Doc. 151, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 94-488, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 92-141, 92nd Cong., 1st ses. 36-11 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 31, 1970 TABLE 36-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 10 of Text) Date Reconnaissance or condition survey Project conducted Cost Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam July 1980 $ 7,942 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii June 1980 7,202 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii May 1980 5,864 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii May 1980 6,287 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii March 1980 20,668 Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii September 1980 1,367 Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii July 1980 2,344 Kawaihae Deep Draft Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii May 1980 6,898 Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii October 1979 1,150 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii September 1980 10,994 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii September 1980 3,495 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii September 1980 4,266 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa September 1980 8,336 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii July 1980 3,303 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Territory of Guam' 1978 $ 937,7984 $ 7,942 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 40,117 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii1 1967 & 1978 527,047 11 198,268 2 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1967 Hanalei Bay Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1972 1,481 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1971 781,036 3 45,462 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii 1976 751,867 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii' 1968 157,997 3,127 Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii 1966 138,188 286,777 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1975 5,972,501 8 121,692 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii5 1956 3,348,000 41,857 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 98,800 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1977 186,937 Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii 1967 372,000 6 242,298 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1972 30,378 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1962 2,127,724 7 4,210,555 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii' 1976 584,513 9 17,768 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa 1976 980,018 10 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii 1979 432,523 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1962 752,645 12 818,873 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1967 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1979 1,940,011'3 3,303 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 - 14,493 Wells Harbor, Territory of Guam 1950 2,488,056 2,111 1. Completed. 2. In addition $84,388 in Contributed Funds. 3. In addition $630,568 in Contributed Funds. 4. In addition $282,747 in Contributed Funds. 5. Abandonment authorized by R&H Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 98, 89th cong., 1st sess.) 6. In addition $370,845 in Contributed Funds. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. In addition $233,261 in Contributed Funds. In addition $62,102 in Contributed Funds. In addition $405,471 in Contributed Funds. In addition $61,953 in Contributed Funds. In addition $410,077 in Contributed Funds. In addition $200,000 in Contributed Funds. In addition $1,791,068 in Contributed Funds. 36-12 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 17 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Tb - - - -A ' - _ Cost to September 30, 1980 Operation and Project fIeopro n IJonstructLionl viaintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa 1978 $254,015 1 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 240,148 2 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii 1965 Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 176,488 3 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1975 86,235 Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii 1977 158,916 4 Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii 1972 154,3135 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa 1978 394,187 6 Poloa Area, American Samoa 1978 136,040 7 Vatia Area, American Samoa 1978 154,309 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii 1979 729,087 9 Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii1 7. In addition $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 1. In addition $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 8. In addition $132,075 in Contributed Funds. 2. In addition $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 9. In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and 3. In addition $97,075 in Contributed Funds. $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 4. In addition $60,000 in Contributed Funds. 10. No previous full report; project authorized 5. In addition $154,313 in Contributed Funds. by R&H Act of 1958. 6. In addition $312,480 in Contributed Funds. TABLE 36-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 25 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 $ 784,867 2 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, Hawaii 1979 221,500 - Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii 1950 73,748 - Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 1,265,567 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii1 1971 1,000,000 3 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii 1966 1,044,888 1. Completed. 3. In addition Contributed Funds in $540,335 received and 2. In addition Contributed Funds in $11,953 received and expended. expended. TABLE 36-G WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Bank Protection (Section 27 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Asquiroga Bay Shoreline, Guam $ 9,000 Kalapana Road Protection, Hawaii, Hawaii 4,611 Matafao Shore Protection, American Samoa 21,199 Pago Pago International Airport, American Samoa' 225,017 1. Completed. 36-13 rc,,,r,,,,r PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT* The territorial limits of the Portland District Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Steens Mountains, but not including that part Oregon and Washington which lie within the which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. Columbia River watershed downstream of the IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Channels and Harbors 1. Chetco River, Oreg......... .......... 37-2 2. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, Wash., and Portland, Oreg.......................... 37-2 3. Columbia River at Baker Bay, W ash......................................... 37-4 4. Columbia River between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island....... 37-4 5. Columbia River at the Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. ......................... 37-5 6. Columbia River between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg............ 37-5 7. Coos Bay, Oreg........................... 37-6 8. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg...... 37-7 9. Coquille River, Oreg............. .... 37-7 10. Cowlitz River, Wash ....................... 37-8 11. Depoe Bay, Oreg.......................... 37-8 12. Lake River, Wash............... ... 37-9 13. Lewis River, Wash ........................ 37-9 14. Nehalem Bay, Oreg......................... 37-9 15. Port Orford, Oreg.................... 37-9 16. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg..........................37-10 17. Siuslaw River, Oreg........................37-10 18. Skamokawa Creek, Wash............37-11 19. Skipanon Channel, Oreg ............. 37-11 20. Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg........ 37-12 21. Umpqua River, Oreg .................. 37-12 22. Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg..................37-13 23. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg........37-14 24. Yaquina River, Oreg .................. 37-14 25. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations................................ 37-15 26. Project Condition Surveys............... 37-15 27. Other Authorized Navigation Projects............................. .......... 37-15 Navigation Page Channel and Harbors (Cont.) 28. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization..................................37-15 Locks and Dams 29. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg ................................... 37-15 Flood Control Local Protection 30. Beaver Drainage District, Oreg........37-15 31. Johnson Creek, Oreg...................37-16 32. Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash ......................... 37-16 33. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, Oreg. and Wash.....37-17 34. Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg........................................... 37-17 35. Vancouver Lake Area, Wash.............. 37-18 36. Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash........ 37-18 37. Willamette River Basin, Oreg........... 37-18 38. Willamette River Basin, Oreg. - Bank Protection ................ 37-19 39. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................. 37-19 40. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..................................... 37-19 41. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization..... .......... 37-19 Reservoirs 42. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg.................... .............. 37-20 43. Blue River Lake, Oreg.................37-20 44. Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg ................ 37-21 45. Days Creek Lake, Oreg...................... 37-21 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and( also appear at the end of this chapter. 37-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Reservoirs (Cont.) Page 46. Dorena Lake, Oreg ..................... 37-21 47. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg .................................. 37-22 48. Fall Creek Lake, Oreg..................37-22 49. Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg ............... 37-23 50. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations........................37-23 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 51. Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash.......... 37-24 52. Cougar Lake, Oreg....................37-25 53. Detroit Lake, Oreg .......................... 37-25 54. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg.......37-26 55. Hills Creek Lake, Oreg............... 37-27 Multiple-Purpose Projects Page Including Power (Cont.) 56. John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash................. 37-27 57. Lookout Point Lake, Oreg........... 37-28 58. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg....... ............................ 37-28 59. The Dalles Lock and Dam- Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. .......... 37-29 60. Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power.................37-30 General Investigations 61. Surveys ........................................ 37-30 62. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..................................... 37-30 63. Research and Development ............. 37-31 Navigation Channels and Harbors 1. CHETCO RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, Oreg., 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification in 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450 foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Recommended modifications. The plan of improvement would deepen the existing navigation channel and turning basin by 2 feet, to a depth of 16 feet mean lower low water, and extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the north and 1,250 feet for the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port Commission of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for small private boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 54,300 cubic yards of material was removed by U. S. hopper dredge Pacific. - Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was initiated in July 1968 and completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was started in September 1969 and completed in March 1970. 2. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WASH., AND PORTLAND, OREG. Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan De Fuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, & 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington). Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in Southwestern Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, Wash., and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, 37-2 P()RTLANI), ()OREG., I)ISTI(' Oreg. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) SIPrevious project. For details see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, Wash., River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, Wash., 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, Wash., 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, Wash., be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, Wash.; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens (Oreg.) Channel; and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, Oreg., extended at its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, Oreg., to include a sheet-pile, sandfilled breakwater about2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth to Iarrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver about 3 feet at low stages of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver they average about 12 feet, while highlest known reached a stage of 33 feet above low water at Portland. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance upon request of Chief of Engineers, including suitable disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or costs of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; make alterations as are required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities for construction and maintenance of the project; assist in work of improving and maintaining main ship channel in Columbia and Willamette Rivers by loaning the United States a suitable pipeline dredge in good operating condition, with full crew and equipment, without charge other than reimbursement for full operating costs of dredge on a basis approved by Chief of Engineers, said operating costs to include proportionate maintenance costs based on period of time dredge is in use for the United States; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and access channels serving terminals, including 50-foot adjacent to pierhead lines, commensurate with depths provided in related project areas; and contribute in cash 1.8 percent of cost of construction of 40- foot channel by the-Corps for enhancement of land owned by Port of Portland and contribute in cash 3.5 percent of cost of construction of 35-foot channel by the Corps. Contributions in the amount of $233,026 were paid in 1964 prior to commencement of construction. Total cash contribution was $665,954. Termininal facilities. At Portland, Oregon, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths with total capacity of 8,800,000 tons equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift on-lift off and roll onroll off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. The Port of Portland also has a 450,000 cubic feet cold storage warehouse. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities with total capacity of 16,200,000 tons for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement and steel products. At Astoria, Oreg., there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver Wash., there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely out- 37-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF ()OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 fitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll on-roll off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of about 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private, with a capacity of 6,- 000,000 tons. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. The U.S. hopper dredge Biddle removed 3,275,051 cubic yards of material; U.S. hopper dredge Harding removed 3,320,858 cubic yards; the dredge Oregon, operated by the Port of Portland, removed 1,923,483 cubic yards; the U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 151,750 cubic yards. Eruption of Mount St. Helens on May 18, 1980 and the ensuing "mud flow" deposited more than 50,000,000 cubic yards of material in the Columbia River near Longview. Immediate start of dredging operations by dredges Biddle, Pacific, Harding and Oregon permitted deep draft vessel traffic to resume operations on May 23, 1980, with full draft passage available by July 30, 1980. Dredging activities are continuing with full project dimensions through the 9 mile shoal scheduled for completion by November 30, 1980 using the dredges Oregon, Lofgren, McCurdy and Ollie Riedel. Emergency dredging to September 30, 1980 equalled 10,451,226 cubic yards of material. Condition at end offiscal year. Work on the 40- foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Wash., to the sea was completed in 1976 except for observation of channel to determine if additional control structures or dredging will be required. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the early fall months immediately following the annual freshet in May- June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permits maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette River and Vancouver, Wash., depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. 3. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WASH. Location. Baker Bay is a shallow y of water about 15 square miles in extent on north side of Columbia River near its mouth. Bay is separated from river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet -eep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 10 feet deep connecting basin with deep water in Columbia River, with a width of 150 feet, increased to 200 feet for 2,000 feet at southerly end; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 5 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and ex- 'treme about 13 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and towboats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of the authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, Wash., finished December 1957, completed the project. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WASH., AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 37-4 PORTLAND, OREG., I)ISTRICT feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook: a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, Wash. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 58,950 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OREG. AND WASH. Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Washington. For description of Columbia River see Improvement No. 2. Previous project. For details see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel across bar 48 feet deep (mean lower low water), one-half mile wide to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "B" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long. The unconstructed spur jetty "B" would be about 1 mile long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Development of recreational facilities or enhancement of historical structures will require a cost-sharing (50 percent) agreement with a non-Federal agency. Oregon State Parks has indicated a willingness to participate and a contract has been consummated. Washington State Parks has indicated an interest in cost sharing at a number of projects including Ft. Canby; however, a costsharing contract has not been consummated. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Biddle removed 3,118,810 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty"A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956, was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962, was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965, was completed April 1965. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications for the proposed recreation facilities at Fort Stevens are complete. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WASH., AND THE DALLES, OREG. Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, Wash., 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, Oreg., mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, see Improvement No.2, "Columbia and lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, Wash., and Portland, Oreg." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg., 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, Oreg., a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, Wash., a boat basin at Hood River, Oreg., 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, Wash., 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water 37-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, Washington, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous idle ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paperstorage warehouse with barge slip, two boatbuilding businesses (one temporary), and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, Wash., about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of papermill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. Port of Camas-Washougal has a wharf 528 feet long at Washougal, Wash. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There are two 1-story timber and corrugated iron warehouses, each 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to tugs and barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and tugs or barges. At numerous locations over entire waterway are log rollways for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Biddle removed 260,900 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel Dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, Oreg., was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, Wash., and Bonneville, Oreg., was completed May 1960. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, Oreg., and of Camas-Washougal, Wash., turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, Wash., was completed September 1963. 7. COOS BAY, OREG. Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Previous projects. For details see page 1987 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7). 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1970 provides that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the improvement, and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable disposal areas and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages; provide without cost all alterations and relocations of utility facilities; provide and maintain without cost to the United States, depths in berthing and mooring areas and local access channels serving the terminals; adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the improved channel by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, 37-6 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT and three oil-receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300-, 576-, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200- foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, also privately owned, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. At Charleston there are four wharves, one public and three private, with usable areas of 1,200, 750, 7,000 and 12,000 square feet, respectively, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There is also a municipally owned small-boat basin, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 231,100 cubic yards; U.S. hopper dredge Harding removed 1,039,584 cubic yards; U.S. hopper dredge Biddle removed 246,819 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance to Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1970. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. 8. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OREG. Location. South Fork and Millicoma Rivers rise in Coast Range in southern Oregon, flow generally westerly and join to make Coos River, 5.3 miles above mouth of Coos River in Coos Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18587, Allegany and Daniels Creek Quadrangle.) Existing project. Originally authorized project: a channel depth of 3 feet, generally, from mouth of Coos River and 1 foot near head of navigation. Project as modified: two channels 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from mouth of Coos River to Allegany on Millicoma River, mile 13.8 and to Dellwood on South Fork, mile 14, and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mile 14.7 on South Fork, including stabilization works on Coos River. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at the mouth of Coos River is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. Tidal range at head of navigation in both forks is about 1 foot. Freshet stages usually reach a height of from 10 to 15 feet at Allegany, head of navigation on Millicoma River. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned docks and landing places on the river are used by towboats and pleasure craft. There are no publicly owned docks. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 10,- 335 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Originally authorized project providing for a channel from mouth of Coos River to head of navigation in both forks, to provide a depth of 3 feet generally and 1 foot near head of navigation, was completed in 1899. In March 1966 construction of project as modified by 1948 River and Harbor Act was completed. 9. COQUILLE RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, Oreg., 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Previous projects. For details see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at City of Coquille. Mean lower 37-7 REPORT OF THIE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 198) low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 2,500 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750- foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. 10. COWLITZ RIVER, WASH. Location. Rises in Cascade Range in Washington, flows westerly and southerly about 120 miles and.empties into Columbia River about 69 miles from its mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18524.) Previous project. For details see page 2000, An-, nual Report for 1915 and page 1763, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at low water and 50 feet wide from mouth to Ostrander (9 miles), 2.5 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Castle Rock (10 miles), and 2.5 feet deep at low water and not less than 40 feet wide to Toledo (18 miles) to be secured by snagging, dredging, and regulating works. Water level due to tides, varies from 4 feet at mouth to zero at Ostrander. During ordinary freshets a stage of 20 feet, and at extreme floods a stage of 25 feet is reached in river at Kelso, Wash. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned and operated landings, a sand and gravel dock, log rollways, and storage booms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Eruption of Mount St. Helens on May 18, 1980, resulted in deposit of 10 to 20 feet of ash, sand and gravel throughout the project. Dredging operations are underway to restore a minimum flood passage channel. Corps restoration work was provided for by PL 99 funds of $173,300,000. The work included construction of two debris retaining structures on the upper reach of the Toutle River. The structures are designed to keep debris and sediment from eroding into the Cowlitz River. To provide additional control of sediment, seven stabilization basins were excavated on the middle and lower reaches of the Toutle River. Following the May 18 eruption, the Cowlitz River hydraulic capacity was reduced from 70,000 cfs to about 10,000 cfs as a result of sediment being deposited. To restore maximum capacity prior to the winter season, excavation contracts were awarded in July to remove approximately 35,000,000 cubic yards of material. Removal of material will produce a channel of 50,000 cfs from River Mile 0 to 21.5. Construction of 3 miles of new levee and improving 4.6 miles of existing levee are underway. Levee work will provide 500-year protection for the communities of Castle Rock, Lexington, Longview, and North and South Kelso. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project as authorized in 1910 was completed in 1913. The modification authorized in January 1965 for deepening the lower 4.75 miles to 8 feet was completed in August 1968. Project is normally maintained to River Mile 4.2. Mount St. Helens eruption filled the navigation channel with mud and debris. Feasibility and timing for restoring suitable depths will be determined at a later date. 11. DEPOE BAY, OREG. Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, coordination with port authorities and resource monitoring continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and 37-8 PORTLANI), OREG., I)ISTRICT project modification accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Maintenance contract initiated May 1967 was completed July 1967. 12. LAKE RIVER, WASH. Location. Is outlet of Vancouver Lake in Washington, flows northerly 11 miles and empties into Columbia River about 88 miles above mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6154.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Ridgefield (3 miles). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A public marina at Ridgefield 2.5 miles above river mouth with facilities for moorage of 200 fishing and recreation craft. Also plywood plant which has facilities for receipt of logs by water. From Ridgefield to river mouth are several booms for storage of logs. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1931. Controlling depth 6 feet, survey of March 1965. 13. LEWIS RIVER, WASH. Location. Rises in Cascade Range 'in Washington, flows westerly and southwesterly 110 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 88 miles from its mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18524.) Previous projects. For details see page 2001, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1762, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A low-water channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mouth of East Fork (3.75 miles); 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide on East Fork from its mouth to La Center (3 miles); 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide on Lewis-River from the mouth of East Fork to Woodland (2.5 miles), secured by dredging and construction of regulating works and channel clearing to Merwin Dam (12.5 miles from Woodland). Maximumni variation of water level, due to tide, ranges from about 3 feet at mouth to 1.5 feet at La Center and zero at Woodland. During ordinary freshets a stage of 14 feet and, at extreme floods, a stage of 24 feet is reached in main river at Woodland, Wash. For latest published map see page 3557 of Annual Report for 1904. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Woodland on Lewis River there are several privately owned facilities for mooring, fishing and pleasure craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic in the area downstream of River Mile 1.8. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1927. 14. NEHALEM BAY, OREG. Location. On Oregon coast, 40 miles from Columbia River mouth and 10 miles north of the entrance to Tillamook Bay. Existing Project. Provides for a jetty about 3,850 feet long on the north side of entrance and a jetty 4,950 feet long on the south side. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 15 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. No local cooperation is required for the major rehabilitation. Terminal facilities. Facilities for pleasure craft only: Dart's Marina, Brighton Moorage, Jetty Fishery, Port of Nehalem and City of Nehalem Dock. All areas have approximately 50-60 slips. However, due to shoaling all are semi-usable. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design activities preparatory to construction contract advertisement were completed in FY 1980. Major Rehabilitation. Preconstruction planning is complete. Major rehabilitation of both north and south jetties has not been initiated. This work will consist of rehabilitating about 3,500 feet of the north jetty and about 4,400 feet of the south jetty. Federal estimated cost (1980) is $12,600,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1918. Rehabilitation work has not been initiated. 15. PORT ORFORD, OREG. Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, Oreg.) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 550-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 37-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF ()OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. About 500 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Extension of existing locally constructed breakwater by 550 feet was completed October 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. 16. ROGUE RIVER, HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OREG. Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon, flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650' feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, Oreg. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Contract dredging was accomplished to clear the boat basin entrance channel. A total of 42,614 cubic yards of material was removed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. 17. SIUSLAW RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, Calif. (See NOAA Charts 18583 and 18580.) Previous project. For details see page 1988, Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between-mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. The Water Resource Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I advance engineering and design for jetty extensions. This authorization is to take effect upon approval of the project by Chief of Engineers and Secretary of the Army, and notification to Congress of their approval. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for all completed work. Estimated costs for all requirements under terms of project authorization were $156,000 (1971). 37-10 PO()RTLANDI), OREG., I)ISTRICT Terminal facilities. The principal terminal facility on the river is at Davidson Lumber Dock at Mapleton which accommodates ocean-going barges with packaged lumber. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil, and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Across the river and below highway bridge at Glanada are floatways used by small craft. A modern dock for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton by "U.S. Plywood Champion Lumber Company and in Florence where all port docks are new. The Port has recently acquired a marine travel lift to accommodate vessels 70 feet in length or 60 tons in weight. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton, to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 97,050 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as previously authorized was completed in 1930. In March 1958, rehabilitation of north jetty was accomplished. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed December 1962. Constructed portion consists of: dredging river channel, turning basin and range construction, completed 1968; dredging 18-foot bar channel, completed December 1968; stabilizing disposal areas, completed 1970; and channel stabilization, completed 1974. Remaining work consists of extension of north jetty which has been placed in the deferred category. The Phase I study for jetty extensions has not been started pending approval of the Chief of Engineers report and receipt of initial work allowances. 18. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WASH. Location. Rises in Wahkiakum County, in southwestern part of the State of Washington, flows southwesterly and southerly about 10 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 34 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6.5 feet deep at low water and 75 feet wide, between Steamboat and Brooks Sloughs, about 1,600 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 7 feet and maximum variation of water level due to tides or freshets is about 12 feet. During ordinary freshets a stage of 12 feet is reached in creek at Skamokawa, Wash. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are several privately owned docks on Skamokawa Creek, Steamboat Slough, and Brooks Slough for use of towboats and pleasure craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project as authorized was completed in 1920. 19. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OREG. Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, Oreg. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Colimbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, Oreg., distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, Oreg., and channel 6 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to public on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use of a maximum of 80 small boats. In channel above railroad bridge, facilities consist of log rollways used for sorting logs. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft. These facilities, except during the fishing season, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, coordination with Port authorities and resource monitoring 37-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Condition at end offiscal year. Existing project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, Oreg., was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. 20. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OREG. Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Previous project. For details see pages 1989 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936. Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, Oreg. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, Oreg., by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alinement extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for all work. River and Harbor Act of 1965 required local interests provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway for construction and future maintenance and aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable disposal areas, and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; and provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals,- including the 50-foot strip adjacent to pierhead lines, commensurate with depths provided in related project areas. All necessary rights-of-way were furnished as of April 17,1968. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, coordination with Port authorities and resource monitoring continued during FY 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956, and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of north jetty was accomplished September 1965. Construction of south jetty was initiated April 1969 and was completed in September 1979. 21. UMPQUA RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Previous projects. For details see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898, and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in the river to vicinity of docks in Winchester Bay with a mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end; and a channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from main river channel near mile 8 to Gardiner, Oreg., and a turning basin of same depth, 500 feet wide, and 800 feet long, opposite Gardiner. Project was modified in 1954 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. FY 1979 Appropriation Act included authorization to extend the training jetty to the tip of the south jetty. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for all work except Scholfield River channel modification. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 37-12 PORTLANI), OREG., DISTRICT 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also, there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island. across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance, there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Completed construction of extension of 'training jetty. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 587,050 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. North jetty was completed in 1940. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Construction of a new training.jetty on south side of entrance was completed in 1951. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. The 12-foot channel in Scholfield River is currently classified inactive. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August 1963. Extension of training jetty was essentially completed in September 1980. 22. WILLAMETTE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVER, OREG. Location. Yamhill River rises in Coast Range, flows easterly, and empties into Willamette River about 42 miles above Portland. Its length from source of South Fork is about 52 miles. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey map, State of Oregon.) For description of Willamette River see Improvement No. 2. Previous projects. For details see page 1997 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1754 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Willamette River between Portland (mile 14)and Oregon City (mile 26) by a channel 8 feet deep at low water, 200 feet wide below Cedar Island and 150 feet wide thence to Oregon City; such channel improvement and contraction works as may be necessary to secure with streamflow regulation, controlling depths of 6 feet at low water and of no prescribed width, from Oregon City to mouth of Santiam River (mile 108.5), 5 feet from that point to Albany (mile 120), 2.5 to 3.5 feet deep from Albany to Corvallis (mile 132), and for necessary snagging between Corvtllis and Eugene (mile 185). Local interests dredge and maintain a 20- foot channel'to the dock at Lake Oswego for receipt of limerock. Project also provides for a channel in Yamhill River 4 feet deep at low water and 60 feet wide from its mouth to McMinnville (18 miles) secured by means of a lock and dam near Lafayette and by removal of obstructions. Section of Willamette River in vicinity of Willamette Falls at Oregon City is covered by Improvement No. 29. For Willamette River below falls at Oregon City ordinary fluctuation of stage of water is 15 feet and extreme fluctuation due to flood conditions 35 to 50 feet. Above Oregon City ordinary fluctuation is 12 to 20 feet and extreme is 20 to 27 feet. For Yamhill River ordinary fluctuation is 35 feet and extreme 48 feet. Tidal changes vary from about 2.5 feet at mouth of Willamette to zero, 26 miles above mouth. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Between Ross Island Bridge at Portland and Willamette Falls at Oregon City: Privately owned mill docks, sand and gravel wharves, a cement loading facility, a small shipyard, and oil-receiving stations. Above the falls there are privately owned landings including a facility at Pulp Siding (3 miles above the falls) with rail and water connections for shipment of clay and receipt of papermill products by barge. At Wilsonville and Newberg there are sand and gravel facilities. At numerous locations as far as Corvallis (River Mile 132) there are log rollways which are currently inactive. At Lake Oswego there is a dock for the receipt of limerock used in the manufacture of cement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, coordination with Port authorities and resource monitoring continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 18 percent complete. The 8-foot channel between Portland and Oregon City and 2.5- to 3.5- foot channel between Oregon City and Albany were completed in 1939. The 2.5- to 3.5-foot channel between Albany and Corvallis was completed in 1945. Remaining work required to complete project consists of construction of such contraction works and channel improvements as may be necessary, with streamflow regulation, to secure controlling depths of 6 feet at low water 37-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF EINGINE'ERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 from Oregon City to mouth of Santiam River, and 5 feet from that point to Albany. This remaining portion has been placed in the deferred category. Due to lack of use by commercial traffic for which facilities were provided, operation of Yamhill lock was discontinued February 7, 1954, and the lock and adjacent property reported surplus and turned over to Yamhill County January 16,1959. 23. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OREG. Location. Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736. Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, Oreg. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Te'rninal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Sunset Terminals has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. The company now has 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport has a public warf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport is constructing South Beach Marina which will handle approximately 600 small pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities will include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fhel dock, fishing pier, picnic area, and dry boat moorage for 120 boats. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Harding worked at various times throughout the season removing a total of 81,146 cubic yards of material. Contract dredging removed 2,000 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Un- 'der modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. 24. YAQUINA RIVER, OREG. Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon Coast. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depoe Creek, extending from town of Yaquina to Toledo, about 9 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depoe Creek. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 37-14 PO()RTLANDI), OREG., DI)STRICT Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head of Yaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a smallcraft shipyard. Both port and city of Toledo have public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel oil, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 8,200 cubic yards of material. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of channel work authorized March 1913 was completed 1914. 25. ALTERATION OF BRIDGES See Table 37-H. 26. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 37-E. 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 37-F. 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 37-G. Locks and Dams 29. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OREG. Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, Oreg., about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Provides for construction of a new single-lift main lock and a guard lock each with clear dimensions of 56 by 400 feet and a minimum depth over sills of 9.5 feet, to replace existing facilities which were provided for by purchase, rehabilitation, and deepening to 6 feet at low water of existing canal and locks and separation of canal from waterpower intake by construction of a concrete divisioh wall. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37- D. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Crown Zellerbach Corp. has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by concrete division wall built in lock canal by United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Rehabilitation of Lock Chamber No. 1 and remove and replace miter seals. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing canal and locks originally constructed by private interests in 1873 were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final reporton purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. Replacement of gates Nos. 6 and 7 was completed August 1967 under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in fair condition and in continuous operation except when flooded out by high water or undergoing repair. Facilities are obsolete and inadequate for existing traffic. No construction work has been done on lock and guard lock, which was authorized to replace existing facilities by Flood Control Act of 1939, and River and Harbor Act of 1945. This portion of the project has been reclassified "deferred". Flood Control Local Protection 30. BEAVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. Location. In Columbia County, Oreg., north of town of Clatskanie and extends along Columbia River and Bradbury Slough between River Miles 49.7 and 55.4. Existing project. The project originally provided for reconstruction of 10.4 miles of existing levee; construction of 0.9 mile of new levee; construction of 2.5 miles stone revetment, one pumping plant and 1.1 miles of diversion canal. The Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950 authorized additional improvements. The present plan includes raising and strengthening the existing levee and installing toe drains where required; removing two antiquated pumping stations from the levee section; constructing a new pumping station with increased capacity; removing the existing Tank Creek tide box structure; and replacing the Tank Creek tide box with a fresh water intake. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950, provides local interests furnish lands and rightsof- way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United 37-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. In addition, local interests must agree to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Land Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Title VI, of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611. A resolution of formal assurances for local cooperation was signed by the Board of Supervisors for Beaver Drainage District on June 30, 1966 and accepted by the Portland District Engineer on November 18, 1966. Drainage District officials by letter dated March 4, 1970, affirmed that their district could meet all requirements of local cooperation not later than two years from the date of that letter. Formal assurances of local cooperation have been furnished and accepted by the Portland District Engineer. In addition, a reaffirmation was made in" October 30, 1973 letter to fulfill required assurances. A written agreement was furnished from local interests and signed by the Secretary of the Army May 8, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contractual work rescheduled. Condition at end of fiscal year. The work originally authorized was completed in 1939. Design memorandum for the improvements authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950 was completed in 1962 and updated in 1974. Construction of improvement was basically completed in June 1978. 31. JOHNSON CREEK, PORTLAND AND VICINITY, OREG. Location. Johnson Creek, a minor tributary of Willamette River, rises in low foothills of Cascade Range and flows westerly through towns of Gresham and Lents, along southeast boundary of City of Portland to its confluence with Willamette River at town of Milwaukie. Existing project. Provides for channel improvements and bank protection at various locations between mile 15.26 and mouth. Through town of Gresham, project provides for about 1 mile of channel clearing and improvement; between mile 10.3 and 9.27 for channel clearing; and between mile 7.79 and mouth, for channel improvement, clearing, and revetment work including excavation of a bypass channel to pass floodwaters through constricted industrial and residential reach between mile 7.0 and 5.19. This will provide protection through Town of Gresham against floods of a frequency of once in 7 years, and between mile 10.3 and mouth against floods of a frequency of once in 25 years. Estimated Federal cost (1980) is $4,500,000. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000 (1980). The potential project sponsor, Metropolitan Service District (MSD), initiated the formation of Local Improvement District to provide funds for non-Federal costs. In November 1979, MSD advised the Corps of Engineers of its intention to sponsor the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. In July 1980 the MSD tabled action on the Assessment Ordinance for the project pending the results of a referendum vote on the Local Improvement District in February 1981. The MSD suggested to postpone the negotiation of any agreement between the MSD and the Corps concerning sponsorship until that time. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuation of AE&D is pending February 1981 referendum vote. 32. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. AND WASH. Location. On Columbia River and minor tributaries, channels, and sloughs, between Sandy River, Oreg., about 15 miles east of Vancouver, Wash., and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Plan for bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin provides for new construction and supplementing and extending projects constructed in Lower Columbia River Basin under authority of 1936 Flood Control Act: (a) Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, Oreg. and Wash. provides for bank protection works at 96 locations on Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River and mouth of Columbia River, totaling about 224,145 linear feet. Estimated total Federal cost is $24,400,000 (full funding) and non-Federal cost is $291,000; (b) See Table 37-J on Levees and Improvements to Existing Works; (c) Lower Columbia River Basin levees at new locations, Oreg. and Wash., provides for construction of flood control works at: Washougal area, Clark County, Wash., about 5.5 miles of levee and appurtenant works at a Federal cost (1972) of $1,803,488, and non- Federal cost at $98,000; and Vancouver Lake area in vicinity of Vancouver, Wash., about 18 miles of levee and appurtenant works at an estimated Federal cost (1980) of $19,500,000 and non-Federal cost at $900,000. Total estimated 37-16 PORTLAND, OREG., I)ISTRICT Federal costs (1980) for both areas of work are $21,303,488 and non-Federal costs $998,000. Approved (1980) Federal cost for all active work under project, Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash., is $65,262,329. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rightsof- way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Total non-Federal costs for all active work are $5,415,000 (1980). For details of status or requirements of local cooperation see individual project reports. Operations and results during fiscal year. See individual projects. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of improvement to existing project in Sandy Drainage District, Oreg., was completed by local interests at no construction cost to the Government. Improvements of levees have been accomplished by contract at the following locations: Multnomah County Drainage District, No. 1, Oreg., June 1962; Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg., October 1962; Woodson Drainage District, Oreg., December 1963; Rainier Drainage District, Oreg., June 1964; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District, No. 15, Wash., December 1965; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts, Nos. 2 and 13, Wash., June 1965; Midland Drainage District, Oreg., April 1967; and Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District, No. 2, Wash., June 1974. Washougal Area, Wash., (new location) levee construction has been completed. Under authorization for Lower Columbia River Basin bank protection works, construction is complete at 65 locations. 33. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OREG. AND WASH. Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, Oreg., and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,145 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Estimated Federal cost is $24,400,- 0()00 (full funding). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rightsof- way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $291,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Completed 448 linear feet of bank protection at Loop location. Bank protection work at Hall, 158th Ave. and Dockside was completed in June 1980, June 1980 and December 1979, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 84 percent complete. A total of 148,048 linear feet of bank protection work at 65 locations has been completed. 34. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OREGON. Location. In Columbia County, Oreg., along left bank of Multnomah Channel opposite Columbia River Miles 90.3 to 97.0. Existing project. The project as originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, provided for reconstruction of the existing levee system. Additional improvements provide for raising and strengthening 52,000 feet of levee, construction of toe drains, and additional pumping capacity. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950, provides local interests furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Estimated costs of all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $114,000 (1978). The Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution dated February 12, 1968, indicating approval of the proposed work and expressing their ability and willingness to provide the necessary local cooperation. Local interests have worked closely with the Corps in developing the revised plan of improvement. Rights-of-way were furnished by diking district officials April 26, 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed contract was finalized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1941. Design memorandum approved by higher authority in September 1971. Final environmental impact statement filed with CEQ April 24, 1972. Supplement to EIS was filed with CEQ July 29, 1974. Additional improvements were completed in September 1980. 37-17 RIEPORT OF TIlE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 35. VANCOUVER LAKE AREA, WASH. Location. In the southwestern part of Clark County, Wash., along the Columbia River between River Miles 96 and 103. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening an existing levee and construction of new levee with a cross levee to proposed State Route No. 501 along Lake River. State Route No. 501 would serve as a levee upstream and along the west shore of Vancouver Lake. Pumping plants and drainage structures would be provided for evacuation of surface drainage and seepage. Estimated Federal cost $19,500,000 (1980). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950, provides local interests furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Estimated costs of all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $900,000 (1980). Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning is underway; however, completion of the AE&D studies has been delayed pending resolution of local cooperation problems, such as the need for cost sharing. 36. WAHKIAKUM COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING DISTRICT NO. 1, WASH. Location. District occupies both Puget and Little Islands in Columbia River between River Miles 38.4 and 45.0. These islands are in Wahkiakum County, Wash., near town of Cathlamet. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees, removing several abandoned tide boxes, constructing a new tide box, extending an existing tide box and adding a gate well structure, constructing a new pumping station and relocating three existing pumping stations; raising the discharge lines of all pumping stations; and filling borrow ditches along the landward levee toe. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rightsof- way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed in October 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of new tide box was completed January 1976. Replacement of three pump stations and one tide box and addition of one pumphouse is complete. Final EIS filed September 18, 1972. 37. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG. Location. Willamette River, formed by Coast and Middle Forks which join a few miles above Eugene, Oreg., flows north 189 miles, and enters Columbia River 101.5 miles above its mouth. Basin has an area of 11,200 square miles and lies between Cascade Range on the east and Coast Range on the west. Major tributaries of Willamette River rise in Cascade Mountains and consist of Coast and Middle Forks and McKenzie, Calapooia, Santiam, Molalla, and Clackamas Rivers. Important tributaries that head in the Coast Range are Luckiamute, Yamhill, and Tualatin Rivers. Minor tributaries, all of which enter main stream from the west, are Marys River, Rickreall Creek, and Long Tom River. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Willamette River Basin and authorized $11,300,- 000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial development: the reservoirs and related works to be selected by Chief of Engineers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts, 1941 through 1974, authorized additional flood control and other works and increased monetary authority. (See Table 37-L on Willamette River Basin comprehensive plan, and Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies to reservoir projects. Local cooperation for other projects is in individual reports for those projects. Operations and results during fiscal yea'r. See individual reports. Condit'ion at end of fiscal year. Following projects were completed as authorized and in continuous operation: Fern Ridge Lake, August 1951; Cottage Grove Lake, March 1952; Dorena Lake, October 1952; Detroit Lake, December 1960; Lookout Point Lake, June 1961; Hills Creek Lake, June 1963; Cougar Lake, March 1964; Fall Creek Lake, November 1965; Green Peter-Foster Lakes, June-December 1967 respectively; and Blue River Lake, October 1968. Under the authorization for construction of recreation facilities at completed projects, work has been accomplished at Fern Ridge, Cottage Grove, Dorena, Lookout PIoint, and Fall Creek Lakes. Advance engineering and design for proposed construction of Ilolley Lake project was placed in 37-18 P()R'TLANI), REG., I)ISTRICT deferred status pending completion of a study to determine extent of increased capacity'required in Calapooia River for flood control operation of the project. Details of operation, construction, and financial status of projects are in individual reports. During low-water season, July- September, supplemental water releases are made from Willamette River Basin Reservoirs for conservation purposes. Interests which benefit from increased downstream flows include irrigation, navigation, power, pollution abatement, and recreation. Although optimum regulation cannot be provided for every conservation interest, water released from reservoirs during tle low-water season for a particular purpose will usually provide benefits to other conservation uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall regulation, consistent with established water-use priorities. 38. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG. - BANK PROTECTION Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, Oreg. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and revetting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection. Estimated Federal cost is $32,200,000 (full funding). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $388,000 (1980). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Annual inspection of revetments was made by helicopter in July 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 92 percent complete. A total of 467,289 linear feet of bank protection work at 219 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 103 leveed areas and 258 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Of this total, 33 leveed areas in Oregon and 18 leveed areas in Washington along Lower Columbia River; and 37 leveed areas and 16 revetments along Oregon Coast were inspected October 1979 through September 1980. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin was supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The campaign to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Periodic contact was maintained with uncooperative areas reported in FY 1980 to ascertain any change in attitude and to provide technical assistance, if requested. Of the 152 sponsors of local flood protection projects inspected in Portland District, 17 were reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $54,177 and total costs to September 30, 1980 were $750,057. 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 37-M. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 37-N. Emergency flood control activities-repair,f lood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). See Table 37-N. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.). See Table 37-N. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). See Table 37-N. 37-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Reservoirs 42. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. Location. In Jackson County, Oreg., on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 45.7, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, Oreg. Existing project. Plan provides for a gravel filled embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the right abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 4.6 miles long will provide 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project will control runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir will be operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Estimated cost of project is $96,000,000 (full funding), including $3,235,000 estimated for recreation facilities which will be constructed by the Corps of Engineers and operated and maintained by the U. S. Forest Service. (See Table 37- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction, to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The Water and Power Resources Service is currently making a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completed construction of reservoir clearing and Grouse Creek Park. Construction of the main dam, U.S. Forest Service road, and Upper Applegate Road continues. Planning for the remaining recreation facilities and other miscellaneous items continues. Initial land acquisition funds were received in March 1974 and acquisition work continues. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design memorandums approved are: site selection; hydrology and meteorology; relocations; general; real estate; land requirements plan-public use; Lower Applegate Road and detour supplement; spillway, outlet works and fish facilities; clearing and geology, foundations and embankment design; concrete aggregate, relocations of power and telephone lines, master plan and Grouse Creek Park. Final Environmental Impact Statement and Supplements Nos. 1 and 2, were filed with Council on Environmental Quality February 15, 1972, July 21, 1972, and August 24, 1976, respectively. Supplement No. 3 of the final EIS was filed with EPA December 23, 1977. An environmental assessment addressing primarily the redesign of the embankment, spillway, intake tower and regulating outlet, was published in January 1978. Another environmental assessment addressing the design changes for the Upper Applegate Road and U.S. Forest Service roads was published in April 1979. Contract for the Upper Applegate Road was awarded in July 1979 and is 93 percent complete. Main dam contract was awarded May 1978 and is 96 percent complete and clearing, awarded February 1979, is 100 percent complete. Contract for Grouse Creek Park was awarded in late September 1979 and is complete. U.S. Forest Service road contract awarded February 1980 is 81 percent complete. Construction on McKee and Murphy Fish Passage facilities was initiated in July 1980 and is 60 percent complete. 43. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OREG. Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.7 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 38 miles easterly of Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abut- -nient-OOutlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill emb iik-rent, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets 37-20 PORTLANI), ()REG., I)ISTRI(CT regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. 44. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE; OREG. Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, Oreg., on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,- 060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at four sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. No costsharing sponsor for recreation facilities has expressed an interest in this project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. 45. DAYS CREEK LAKE, OREG. Location. In Douglas County on South Umpqua River, 60 miles from its junction with North Umpqua River, 172 miles from mouth of Umpqua River, and one mile upstream from the Town of Days Creek. Existing project. Plan provides for a gravel embankment dam, 254 feet high from lowest point of foundation to crest and 1,031 feet long; a concrete gravity spillway on the right abutment with five electrically operated tainter gates; and regulating outlet works under the center of the dam. Reservoir will provide for 260,000 acre-feet of multiple-use storage for flood control, irrigation, fishery enhancement, water supply, recreation and water quality improvement and will control 640 square miles of drainage area. Authorization is for Phase I Advance Engineering and Design only. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to adopt, prior to project construction, land-use regulations which would prevent encroachment of future development on the floodway. Douglas County Commission has indicated willingness to adopt appropriate land-use regulations prior to project construction. Costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. All construction, operation and maintenance, replacement and interest costs allocated to water supply will have to be reimbursed. Assurances of present intent to make future use of water stored in Days Creek Lake have been received from potential water users. In accordance with Water Resources Project Recreation Act of 1965 (PL 89-72), a non- Federal public entity must assume 50 percent of the separable costs of project recreational lands and facilities for construction and 100 percent for the annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs, except that, as amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1974, only 25 percent of separable costs for fish enhancement are reimbursable. Douglas County and the City of Roseburg have provided preliminary assurances that they would participate in planned recreation development. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I planning continued with water quality studies and other activities to refine costs and benefits of project alternatives. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final EIS was filed with CEQ October 6, 1972. Phase I planning has been terminated and study has been placed in deferred category. 46. DORENA LAKE, OREG. Location. On Row River, Oreg., 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high 37-21 REP()IORT OF TIE CHIEF OF ENGINIEERS, U.S. AlMY 1980 from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acrefeet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles, practically entire drainage area tributary to Row River. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Future recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract, for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Dorena Lake. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Future recreation facilities construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, Oregon. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. 47. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. Location. In Jackson County, Oreg., at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, Oreg. Existing project. Plan provides for a rock and gravel embankment dam, 233 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 2,685 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the right abutment, and a regulating outlet tunnel and intake tower with multilevel intakes will be in left abutment. Reservoir 6.2 miles long will provide 95,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project will control runoff from a drainage area of 127 square miles. Reservoir will be operated to provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Estimated Federal cost of project (1980) is $108,000,000. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction, to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the Water and Power Resources Service laws and policies. On February 24, 1966 State of Oregon Water Resources- Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cfs to maintain minimum flow for fish. The Water and Power Resources Service is preparing a feasibility study for irrigation of Medford Division from Lost Creek and Elk Creek Lakes, and will determine repayment requirements by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Administration of project land continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated in July 1972. Final environmental statement was filed with CEQ June 15, 1972. The Oregon Water Policy Review Board voted October 3, 1975 not to support the Elk Creek project. Construction has been indefinitely delayed. 48. FALL CREEK LAKE, OREG. Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Additional recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Fall Creek Lake. Also, Bethel School District is costsharing 50 percent for Sky Camp. Operations and results during fiscal yIear. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshlets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of 37-22 PORTLAND, OREG., I)ISTRICT project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contracts with Lane County and Bethel School District Federally funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 49. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OREG. Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane County, Oreg., on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam, 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to heightof 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Additional recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Fern Ridge Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fihcal year. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of recreation facilities in accordance with the costsharing contract with Lane County continues. 50. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Water and Power Resources Service projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins) and (Mossyrock) a municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light. Under licensing agreement, the Tacoma City Light utility is required to provide 360,000 acrefeet of flood storage by December of each year. Because of the need for early flood storage to meet changed winter runoff, special arrangements were made to obtain the required storage by October 1, 1980 with an additional 240,000 acre-feet to be obtained in early FY 1981. Increased storage capability will assist in controlling flows to prevent downstream flood damages. The Water and Power Resources Service projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. The Water and Power Resources Service-sponsored projects during Fiscal Year 1980 were operated satisfactorily for flood control. At Mossyrock, one minor winter highwater period occurred in December while spring snowmelt runoff was near normal. During the highwater period, reservoir regulation stored approximately 93,500 acre-feet at Mossyrock. Peak discharges at Castle Rock were observed to be 36,900 cubic feet per second, well below the regulation goal of 70,000 cubic feet per second. All reservoirs filled to normal full pool levels during the refill season. Although near full pool at the time of the catastrophic Mount St. Helens eruption on May 18, 1980, Mossyrock was operated to reduce downstream flow as much as possible. Mudflows from the eruption had filled in the Cowlitz River channel below thie Toutle River an average of 15 feet, restricting the bankfull capacity from 70,000 cubic feet per second to 13,- 000 cubic feet per second. Contracts were awarded to dredge the channel to a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second and Mossyrock discharges were kept lower than normal during the summer months to provide access to the river for dredging equipment. Beginning on September 15, 1980, as downstream dredging operations allowed, out- 37-23 ItEP()RT O()F TilE CHIEF 011'U .SE. NGINEIEFS, ARMY 1980 flow from Mossyrock was increased to draft Riffle Lake after an agreement was made with Tacoma City Light as described above. Preparation of reservoir Regulation Manuals for Scoggins and Mossyrock projects is scheduled. Total cost of monitoring the five projects during Fiscal Year 1980 was $2,529. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 51. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BONNEVILLE, OREG. AND WASH. Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, Oreg., about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River see Improvement No. 2. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Washington shore to Bradford Island, which divides the river at this point. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 vertical-lift steel gates and 10 remoted main dam hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway permits operation of two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse extending across Bradford Slough to Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of two units of 43,200 kilowatts and eight units of 54,000 kilowatts each, totaling 518,400 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders and locks to serve both main channel and Bradford Slough channel. Navigation lock and powerhouse are founded on andesite, and main dam rests upon solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. Pool created by dam provides a navigable channel with a depth of 15 feet and over between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-P. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest- Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provides for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse would contain eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the total Bonneville capacity to 1,076.6 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting existing Washington shore fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the second and existing powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Estimated cost for construction of second powerhouse is $652,000,000 (full funding). Local cooperation. None required, except for non-Federal cost-sharing for development of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for main turbine was awarded October 1976 and is 90 percent complete. Contract for powerhouse excavation was awarded March 1977 and is complete. The main powerhouse contract was awarded April 1978 and is 71 percent complete. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was performed during period. During the fiscal year 4,728,935,- 000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 4,712,813,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock consisting of rafted logs, petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 7,527,918 tons during calendar year 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1953. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work 37-24 P()ORTLANDI), ()OREG., )DISTI(CT commenced in September 1970 is complete. Construction of second powerhouse is underway. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 project-wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60 seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Contracts for relocation of the highway, railroad and Town of North Bonneville as well as excavation of the powerhouse are 99 percent complete. Construction of the main powerhouse and supply contracts for associated powerhouse equipment are underway. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require costsharing) will be constructed as an integral part of that structure. Construction of future recreational facilities is contingent upon a cost-sharing contract with a non-Federal sponsor. Washington State Parks has indicated an interest in cost-sharing at a number of projects including Bonneville Lock and Dam; however, a cost-sharing contract has not been consummated. Through September 1980 power -generation totaled 157.2 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $121,800,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 52. COUGAR LAKE, OREG. Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $97,000,000 (full funding). (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Costs for power are reimbursable from power revenues. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for landscaping and road channelization of left abutment and the right abutment viewpoint was completed in FY 1979. Contract for powerhouse access improvements was awarded July 1977 and completed in March 1980. Preconstruction planning for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit was essentially completed. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 142,- 145,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 141,423,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1980 power generation totaled 2.2 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $10,500,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 53. DETROIT LAKE, OREG. Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth and 45 miles southeast of Salem, Oreg. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. One main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reser- 37-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENG(INEEIS, U.S. ARMY 1980 voir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the Town of Detroit. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 439,- 960,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 436,942,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1980 power generation totaled 13.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $12,800,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 54. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OREG. Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, Oreg. Existing project. One main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate-controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with a capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acrefeet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Future recreational development other than health, safety and general access is contingent upon a signed cost-sharing agreement with a local non-Federal sponsor. None has been signed to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance being performed. During the fiscal year 300,320,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 296,- 936,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed online August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1980 power generation totaled 4.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $22,200,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 37-26 P()RTLAND, OREG., I)STRI(T 55. IIILLS CREEK LAKE, OREG. Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 156,853,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated, of which 156,- 236,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power generation units were placed online. Through September 1980 power generation totaled 2.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $11,1)00,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 56. JOHIN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OREG. AND WASH. Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,- 000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-P. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $515,632,- 500 (full funding), consisting of $515,000,000 Corps of Engineers funds, $332,500 for Coast Guard navigation aids, and $300,000 for value of public-owned lands. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract. for modification of Spring Creek Hatchery is physically complete. Operation and maintenance: During fiscal year 9,973,533,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 9,957,857,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 6,425,684 tons during calendar year 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began July 1958, and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. Sixteen generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each are producing a total output of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Main dam completion contract is complete. Remainder of the project is essentially complete except for the service )uilding. A survey report and design memoranclum for the rehabilitation of the navigation lock was completed in FY 1979. Plans and specifications were completed in FY 1980 and rehabilitation work began in the second quarter. The estimated cost for the rehabilitation is $6,- 200,000 (full funding). Entire project is estimated to be 93 percent complete. Through September 1980 power generation totaled 125.2 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of tlhis power by Bonneville Power Administration, 37-27 REP()Ir ()OF THE CIIIEF OF ENGINEERS, 1J.S. ARMY 1980 $130,500,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 57. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OREG. Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of main stem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, Oreg. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gatecontrolled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upatream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Additional recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four project's, including Lookout Point-Dexter. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 347,- 636,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 346,072,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-I. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Use of Dexter Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Lookout Point units was effected in December 1954. Through September 1980 power generation totaled 10.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $42,000,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 58. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. Location. On upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, Oreg. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gatecontrolled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility with provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project will provide control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. The authorizing legislation provided that Lost Creek would be operated in tandem with Elk Creek Lake to meet the primary project purposes of fishery enhancement, M&I water supply, and irrigation. Since Elk Creek has not been constructed, it has been necessary to conduct studies to allocate Lost Creek storage exclusively to meet 37-28 PO()RTLANI), OREG., I)ISTRICTI' these water uses. These studies are still under way. On June 20, 1980, the Oregon Water Resources Department indicated it would issue permits to the various project beneficiaries covering all 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Rogue River hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Water and Power Resources Service is preparing feasibility study for irrigation of Medford Division from Lost Creek and Elk Creek Lakes and repayment by local interests for cost allocated to irrigation will be repaid over a period not to exceed 50 years, exclusive of a development period of up to 10 years. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications continued primarily for recreation facilities and erosion control. Contracts underway and awarded during fiscal year were principally for construction of boat docking facilities and erosion control measures. During fiscal year 275,511,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project, of which 273,345,000. kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is 99 percent complete. Remaining work consists primarily of erosion control measures and possibility of a contract for stabilization of Needle Rock slide. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Work on plans and specifications primarily for erosion control continued. Land acquisition, relocations, main dam, and powerhouse are complete. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Through September 1980 power generation totaled 813.9 million kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $3,300,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 59. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAMLAKE CELILO, WASH. AND OREG. Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 193 miles above mouth of river and 90 miles east of Portland, Oreg. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 25 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units which were installed initially and with substructure constructed for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fishwater units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. Powerhouse completed and eight units installed with capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. Total for 22 units is 1,779,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-P. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required except for non-Federal cost-sharing for development of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 7,- 970,508,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 7,950,- 705,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 6,465,468 tons during calendar year 1979. Condition at end offiscal year. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960, when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded September 37-29 REPo()IRT OF TIlE CHIEF OF ENGINEERtS. U.S. ARMY 1980 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Remaining work consists of improvement of fish facilities. Construction of future recreational facilities is contingent upon a cost-sharing contract with a non-Federal sponsor. Washington State Parks has indicated an interest in cost-sharing at a number of projects including The Dalles; however, a cost-sharing contract has not been consummated. Through September 1980 power generation totaled 151.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $180,200,000 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water Supply System were initiated in October 1979 and are scheduled to be completed in October 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. Contract on the Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. 60. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLEPURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER See Table 37-P. General Investigations 61. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $2,215,092 of which $301,174 was for navigation studies, $1,612,850 for flood damage prevention studies, $154,619 for comprehensive studies, $121,035 for coordination with other agencies and $25,414 for supplemental preauthorized studies-Phase I. 62. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Inspection of damns. The non-Federal dams being inspected under this program are hazard Category I dams (having a potential for loss of life and high property damage should a failure occur). To date 23 dams have been inspected and found to be safe. Of these 23 dams, 14 were inspected under contract with the Corps by the Oregon State Water Resources Department. ?otal FY 1980 inspection costs are $187,393. The program also includes verifying and updating the inventory of dams. Total FY 1980 costs for inventory of dams is $29,980. Internlational water studies. The Columbia River Treaty between Canada and the United States of America relating to cooperative Development of the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin was signed at Washington, D.C., on January 17, 1961, and the exchange of ratifications took place on September 16, 1964. Implementation of the Treaty by the United States and Canada entities under the guidance of the Permanent Engineering Board has continued. The two permanent committees established by the entities, the Operating Committee and the Hydrometeorological Committee, continue to function. The Entities and their coordinators and committees met on several occasions during the fiscal year. The Entities met with the Permanent Engineering Board on November 27, 1979. The Entities Operating Committee prepared three reports which are issued each year: The Detailed Operating Plan for Columbia River Treaty Storage, 1980-81; The Columbia River Treaty Hydroelectric Operating Plan, Assured Operating Plan for Operating Year 1985-86; The determeination of Downstream Power Benefits Resulting from Canadian Storage for Operating Year 1985-86. The Operating Plans are based on systems analysis studies conducted by the Operating Committee. The Hydrometeorological Committee continued the ongoing planning of hydromet systems for support of the Treaty project operations. Costs for support of both committee activities were $25,000 for the fiscal year. Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86- 645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services acconmplished during fiscal y/ear. Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 1,150. Of this total, 150 were from other Federal agencies; 300 from non-Federal agencies; and 700 from individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Cost for providing these services during FY 1980 totaled $252,077. 37-3() PORTLANDI), OREG., I)ISTRICT Hydrologic studies. Environmental and fiscal year were $4,926. ecological aspects are being considered on all Total costs for collection and study of basic data hydrologic studies. Improvements in procedures for fiscal year 1980 were $499,377. to determine reservoir temperatures, ^nitrogen supersaturation, dissolved oxygen, suspended 63. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT sediment, turbidity, design floods, flood forecasting and flood regulation are a continuing None. program. Costs for hydrologic studies during the 37-31 TABLE 37-A REPO()RT OF THE CHIEF (OF ENGINiERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Chetco River, Oreg. 2. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, Wash. and Portland, Oreg. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash. 4. Columbia River Between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island 5. Columbia River at The Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. 6. Columbia River Between Vancouver, Wash. and The Dalles, Oreg. 7. Coos Bay, Oreg. 8. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. 9. Coquille River, Oreg. *Total Cost to Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost- Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost - New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 74,000 60,439 -62,802 759,142 4,583,162 4,261,222 43,447 30,000 113,010 13,000 17,863 -28,000 12,200 7,324,573 7,357,534 298,000 236,609 7,797,051 7,766,065 1,791,765 1,792,621 276,100 276,100 135,000 130,403 100,000 99,142 256,000 269,174 "2,659 13,403 5,319,600 5,113,715 115,000 114,964 595,000 597,870 50,000 41,754 3,391,300 3,389,212 372,500 246,816 10,708,586 10,588,877 3,653,000 3,660,300 130,900 130,900 127,000 80,351 35,623 40,742 295,500 296,053 49 25 32 210,000 210,607 4,346,800) 4,604,694 209,000 208,497 34,900 35,405 -20,000 11,524 3,394,058 3,443,183 366,000 560,736 485,000 601,075 3,476,000() 3 ,473,667 79,680 79,680 73,000 124,483 33,000 24,142 308,000 309,022 - 2.043,71'3 - 2,043,713 218,00() 1,951,174 220(),562 1,950,428 - 28,349,304 2 - 28.349,304 2 ,893,300() 153,813,026 ,420,498 128.979,543 : - 665.954 - 665,954 - 941,252 - 941,252 179,000 1,951,374 129,258 1.900,437 - 220,283 - 220,283 317,000 1,636,541 317,040 1,635,870 18,000 17,207,761 7 17,000 17,206,761 .,008,000 50,856,159 ,976,030 50(),804,405 - 4,040,878 - 4,040,878 - 5,989,509 - 5,989,509 342,500 8,969,548 :352,115 8,964,192 -53,608 29,750,092 1,801 29,750,092 , ,355,000 38,603,548 2 1:, ,304,736 38,544,245 12 1:1 - 2,335,966 - 2:335,966 - 486,680 - 486,680 - 350,238 - 350,238 14 171,800 1,030,999 125,524 984,61:3 - 693.366 15 - 693,366 '. 53,000 3,250,944 ' 7 52,855 3,249,951 's 37-32 33 P()ORTLANI), OREG., D)ISTRIC'T TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 10. Cowlitz River, Wash. 11. Depoe Bay, Oreg. 12. Iake River, Wash. 13. Lewis River, Wash. 14. Nehalem Bay, 15. Port Orford, Oreg. 16. Rogue River Harbor at old BIeach, Oreg. 17. Siuslaw River, Oreg. 18. Skamokawa Creek, Wash. 19. Skipanon Channel, Oreg. Funding FY 77 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost NeAwp pWroopr.k Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 78 171,000 92,560 4,000 4,058 60,500 60,206 5,000 7,105 15,000 12,149 26,000 24,280 379,000 376,711 302,800 303,726 394,000 424,194 24,000 21,528 FY 79 -5,000 74,939 34,,301040 15,500 32,658 76,100 77,382 425,000 382,785 654,000 651,792 22,000 20,686 *Total Cost to FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 -37,907 IX 37,907 ', 32,000 1,477,872 19 33,223 1,477,446 19 - 367,364 367,364 26,000 421,764 26,471 420,938 - 2,700 - 2,700 23,000 71,036 22,916 70,617 - 58,132 21 - 58,132 20 1,500 683,947 21 2,804 683,466 21 - 302,006 s" - 302,006 ~' - 44,760 - 44,760 160,000 160,000 156,584 156,584 - 758,692 22 - 758,692 22 70,000 1,012,228 70,649 1,011,923 - 4,156,252 2:3 - 4,156,252 2:4 685,700 4,388,520 24 599,711 4,227,370 24 - 635,783 - 635,783 - 1,159,357 25 - 1,159,357 2. 385,000 6,006,543 26 27 384,838 6,001,462 26 27 - 879,285 - 879,285 - 2,400 - 2,400 35,000) 289,799 35,799 289,145 - 280,854 - 280,854 37-33 -1,000 1,505 136,000 119,431 29,000 31,170 431,000 401,559 584,500 582,035 19,200 23,337 REPORT OF TIlE CHIEF OF EN(GINEERIS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section *Total Cost to in Text Project 20. Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. 21. Umpqua River, Oreg. 22. Willamette River Above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg. 23. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. 24. Yaquina River, Oreg. 29. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. 30. Beaver Drainage District, Oreg. 31. Johnson Creek, Oreg. 33. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection Works, Oreg. and Wash. 34. Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. 35. Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. Funding Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 32,200 18,491 4,819,222 4,816,836 195,000 195,964 1,317,000 1,749,341 234,000 235,846 33 54 3,000 4,080 5,000 6,085 71,500 78,430 66,090,500 5,664,400 97,500 96,306 1,659 3,942,558 6: 23,471 :3,921,695 63 - 889,391 - 889,351 104,50() 66,00()0 928,407 116,997 67,244 928,102 ,641,000 -5,399 22,434,827 2 29 ,629,119 8,868 22,434,827 2 29 48,500 66,500() 2,253,483 :1 48,122 69,269 2,253,212 :n - - 2,839,799 - - 2,839,799 ,000,000 10,150,000 17,853,877 :1 :12 ,986,139 10,157,855 17,847,871 :11 2 745,000 964,500 16,756,305 743,274 956,832 16,744,731 - - 2,500,677 S- 2,500,677 - - 862,918 :1: ' - - 862,918 : :' 59,000 83,000 17,581,056 :' 28,416 107,520 17,570,453 15 - - 19,242,046 3 - - 19,242,046 1 461,000 287,000 13,316,507 4o 458,823 291,721 13,316,085 'o - - 12,005 - - 12,005 - - 28,800 - - 28,800 7,000 21,000 569,245 61 6,043 107,720 569,187 6' - - 520,005 36 - - 520,005 :16 330,000 1,150,200 10,562,823 :7 312,095 1,172,411 10,560,178 :17 - - 234,794 - - 2:34,794 - 50,()000 3,139,944 62 27,193 584 3,075,999 62 - 17,000 93,454 - 9,680 86,134 ,329,000 1,035,000 11,064,745 ,416,725 979,961 10,992,013 1,935,000 2,251,500 1,704,801 2,482,609 -- -- 114,400 28,879 310,000 311,073 1,949,000 1,196,817 298,000 646,097 2,299,000 1,844,802 200,000 198,142 343,000 343,077 711,305 557,000 468,568 60,000 482,344 390,000 337,448 11 40,000 93,501 7,000 61,370() 37-34 PORTLANI), ()IOREG., I)ISTRI('T TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 36. Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. 37. Willamette River Basin, Oreg. (Bank Protection) 42. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg. 43. Blue River Lake, Oreg. 44. Cottage (Grove Lake, Oreg. 45. Days Creek Lake, Oreg. 46. Dorena Lake, Oreg. 47. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg. 48. Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. 49. Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. 51. Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash. 52. Cougar Lake, Oreg. 53. Detroit Lake, Oreg. FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 1,314,000 1,950,000 107,725 743,847 1,292,692 1,429,213 Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 302,600 491,143 35,000 33,474 3,250,000 2,812,027 137,000 137,521 50,000 30,872 286,000 274,351 140,000 129,614 120,000 116,603 12,759 142,000 10,903 260,000 253,166 304,054 300,418 280,000 264,738 58,192,000 58,956,294 4,136,000 3,914,921 612,911 478,480 425,000 426,353 929,500 938,062 714,000 639,035 81,00() 79,103 14,012,000 14,449,748 114,500 118,624 366,000 368,871 622,600 512,695 45,000 50,252 143,000 150,118 30,192 494,300 556,490 193,000 159,875 71,000 311,225 336,000 344,778 75,824,000 75,663,308 3,973,600 4,571,289 566,027 737,984 357,000 353,222 842,500 790,535 33 33 1,558,275 1,626,146 225,000() 218,823 27,450,000 27,444,201 88,000 87,642 9,000 27,130 431,900 557,563 60,000 69,833 9,500 9,500 160,000 159,378 51,000 162,643 30,000 94,332 307,000 315,162 -56,984 -50,339 385,000 390,985 131,400,000() 131,713,437 5,146,900 4,873,077 900,000 877,210 474,000 484,863 925,000 960,857 *Total Cost to FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 250,000 4,990,833 194,681 4,926,163 172,550 18,462,316 49 179,958 18,461,634 49 75,000 2,907,944 84,498 2,907,842 ,130,000 81,896,609 ,078,782 81,777,895 - 32,038,225 41 - 32,038,225 41 82,300 898,691 82,210 898,040 25,000 3,749,097 42 24,904 3,749,982 42 416,000 4,396,500 43 407,342 4,382,839 43 - 1,098,780 44 -417 1,098,279 44 17,000 14,084,062 14. 16,150 14,083,212 45 202,000 2,525,474 202,962 2,524,857 24,450 9,009,529 87,739 8,964,295 14 22,118,265 46 4,084 22,117,333 46 491,000 2,476,365 478,862 2,429,004 4,786 8,327,960 47 3,140 8,325,101 47 669,000 5,703,933 48 479,303 5,513,499 48 ,336,000 577,635,604 5o 51 ,464,079 577,496,262 so ,103,000 78,637,601 52 ,293,379 78,466,644 52 -59,251 58,621,405 .s3 106,449 58,608,954 5 526,000 5,053,116 424,205 4,949,704 - 62,729,698 - 62,729,698 942,500 15,576,167 971,951 15,563,300 37-35 148 148 55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 54. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. 55. Hills Creek Lake, Oreg. 56. John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla- Oreg. and Wash. 57. Lookout Point Lake, Oreg. 58. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, Oreg. 59. The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. Funding Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost *Total Cost to FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 2,489 3,374 900,000 918,286 272,500 291,396 1,050,000 1,041,077 4,333,500 4,180,924 15,000 32,596 2,855,000 1,783,589 9,640,000 10,096,141 365,000 356,679 358,000 231,545 3,195,000 3,358,048 4 4 363,086 363,086 -27 84,005,788 S- - 84,005,788 '986,000 1,317,000 1,185,000 10,579,684 958,296 1,353,089 1,187,043 10,564,784 S- - 45,700,619 S- - 45,700,619 222,500 255,000 354,500 3,960,767 223,103 254,011 355,031 3,958,450 579,000 350,984 441,000 479,694,246 713,218 406,356 272,902 479,436,089 4,691,050 5,019,700 7,740,000 40,448,009 ,857,911 4,904,842 5,664,016 38,149,024 - 2,255,000 2,255,000 S- 2,207,522 2,207,522 -5,000 - - 88,228.395 686 - - 88,228,395 1,598,000 2,837,781 4,780,600 4,969,952 1,110,000 1,084,392 118,747 182,889 3,199,800 3,214,716 1,673,000 1,839,412 3,525,000 3,092,415 1,200,000 1,229,140 26,000 130,239 3,894,000 3,872,539 1,798,000 21,503,550 1,769,206 21,457,402 655,000 135,872,000 980,866 135,473,729 1,443,500 1,409,880 1,976,000 1,636,272 4,484,000 4,:374,992 4,118,500 4,080,091 301,149,768 5 300,809,100 45,449,948 59 45,211,797 59 *Beginning with the FY 1980 Annual Report, projects under the small navigation authority, Section 107, Public Law 86-645; and flood control authority, Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress that are newly authorized or upon which work was performed are being reported by separate entry. Along with the separate entry in this table, these projects will appear in the text of the Annual Report under their own heading. Projects under these authorizations that have been completed or are in the preauthorization stage will be reported in Tables 37-F, G or N. 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by City of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, Oregon (not part of regular project). 5. Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,137 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 6. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 7. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $258,111 allotted and $257,111 expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 8. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,- 625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 9. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393 Entrance to Oregon Slough; $161,897 Camas- Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908 Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470 Bingen, Wash., Barge Channel; and $140,619 The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 10. Includes $2,033,408 under Code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 11. Includes $802,096 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds. 12. Includes $178,801 for previous project. Excludes $8,- 387 contributed funds. 13. Includes $1,444,640 under Code 700. Deferred Maintenance. 14. Excludes $80,000 (other funds) contributed for new work by Port of Coos Bay to cover additional cost of disposing of dredge spoils in Coos Bay, Oreg.; includes $8,000 for previous project. 15. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72.- 891 contributed funds. Includes $36,000 under Code 711. 16. Includes $41,467 for previous project. 37-36 PORTLAND, OREG., I)ISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section FY 77 in Text Project Funding 17. Includes $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 18. Includes $4,999 for previous project. 19. Includes $48,184 for previous project. 20. Includes $22,252 for previous project. 21. Includes $8,098 for previous project. 22. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 23. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 24. Includes $20,750, Wedderburn Study Funds. 25. Includes $151,701 for previous project. Excludes expended from contributed funds. 26. Includes $10,611 for previous project. 27. Includes $188,000 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 28. Includes $77,209 for previous project. Excludes $592,- 622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 29. Includes $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. 30. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 31. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $276,- 500 contributed funds. 32. Includes $58,824 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Winchester Bay, and Schofield River, Oregon. 33. Includes $247,748 for previous project. 34. Excludes $484,900 Emergency Relief Administration flood control funds for bank protection. 35. Includes $51,500 deferred maintenance funds Code 700, and $35,935 for Public Works Acceleration program repair. In addition $7,500 for maintenance from contributed funds and i246,637 on operating and care of improvements under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 36. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 37. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 38. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 39. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 40. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 41. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 42. Includes $1,375,803 allotted and $1,375,687 expended under Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project. TABLE 37-B Acts Work Authorized Documents CHETCO RIVER, OREG. (See Section 1 of Text) March 2, 1945 To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Oct. 27, 1965 Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WASH., AND PORTLAND, OREG. (See Section 2 of Text) Feb. 27, 1911 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H3.r dD oSce. ss1.2178, 61st Cong., 37-37 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION *Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 43. Includes $94,700 special recreation use fees. 44. Excludes $208,440 allotted and $208,440 expended for Phase I G.I. funds. 45. Includes $554,590 allotted and $553,740 expended under Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project. 46. Includes $259,650, Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project. Includes $766,614 allotted and $765,684 expended under Code 713. 47. Includes $265,054 allotted; $262,914 expended Code 711, $2,421,978 Code 712, and $1,008,666 under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed projects and $136,482 allotted under Code 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 48. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. 49. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 50. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds and $20,240,700 National Recovery Act funds. 51. Includes $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $466,764,352 second powerhouse funds and $436,457 allotted under Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project. 52. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $777,719 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 53. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,775,000 allotment, $1,762,- 548 cost, for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 54. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Sweet Home Lake. 55. Includes $5,984 under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed projects.: 56. Includes $1,516,850 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $364,600 special recreation use fees. Includes $247,719 allotted under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 57. Includes $447,611 under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed project. 58. Includes $985,318 allotted under Code 712, $138,682 allotted under Code 711, and $16,747 allotted under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed project, and $53,082,700 additional units 15-22 funds. 59. Includes $152,719 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 60. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 61. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 62. Excludes $274,578 for previous project. 63. Excludes $424,310 for previous project. - -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF ()OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 4, 19232 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1927 July 3, 1930 Sept. 6, 19333 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 11, 1933 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, Oreg., and between Vancouver, Wash., and Mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, Wash. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from Mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, Wash., 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35-foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, Wash., 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, Oreg. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, Wash. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, Oreg. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, Wash., with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, Wash., to Mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, Wash., a turning basin at Longview, Wash., and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge Which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WASII., (See Section 3 of Text) Main channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep 37-38 II. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. 1 No Prior Report. I. Doc. 120, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess.' I. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. I. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1H. Doc. 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 69th Cong., 2nd Sess. I. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' 11. Doc. 249, 72nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.1 II. Doc. 235, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' I. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' II. Doc. 630, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.' II. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. II. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Public Works Administration II. DI)oc. 44, 73rd Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PORTLANI), OREG., D)ISTRICT TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Mar. 17, 1950 June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 Mar. 3, 1905 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 Dec. 31, 1970 West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WASH., AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THIE MOUTH, OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 5 of Text) Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore. COLUMBIA RIVER, BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WASH., AND THE DALLES, OREG. (See Section 6 of Text) Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from Vancouver, Wash., to Bonneville, Oreg. Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide from Bonneville, Oreg., to The Dalles, Oreg. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, Oreg., 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, Wash., 10 feet deep, 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet.deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide by 800 feet long. COOS BAY, OREG. (See Section 7 of Text) Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 as given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot charnel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at City of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and ancIorage area. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 8, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 249, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Committee Doc. 94, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. IH. Doc. 704; 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. 11. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H1. Doc. 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. 37-39 Documents REPORT OF TIHE CHIEF ()F ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized I)ocuments June 3, 1896 June 30, 1948 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 March 3, 1897 March 4, 1913 July 25, 1912 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 31, 1970 Sept. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OREG. (See Section 8 of Text) Dredging channel from mouth to head of navigation. For a 5 ft. depth from mouth to head of navigation on the Millicoma River and South Fork. Except on South Fork above M. 14 where 3 ft. will suffice. COQUILLE RIVER, OREG. (See Section 9 of Text) Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1,mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. COWLITZ RIVER, WASH. (See Section 10 of Text) To provide a channel 4 ft. deep from mouth to Ostrander; 2.5 ft. deep to Castle Rock. Extend channel to Toledo. DEPOE BAY, OREG. (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with entrance channel of same depth and 50 feet wide. Construction of inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. LAKE RIVER, WASH. (See Section 12 of Text) Construction of channel 6 feet deep and 110 feet wide from mouth to Ridgefield. LEWIS RIVER, WASH. (See Section 13 of Text) Provide a channel to head of navigation. Increase the control depth and widen channel. NEHALEM BAY, OREG. (See Section 14 of Text) Two rubber-stone jetties PORT ORFORD, OREG. (See Section 15 of Text) Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet feet wide, 16 feet deep ROGUE RIVER, HARBOR AT GOLI) BEACH, OREG. (See Section 16 of Text) Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OREG. (See Section 17 of Text) Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot South Jetty. II. Doc. 237, 53d Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 124, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. II. Doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. I. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 11. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 11. Doc. 1167, 60th Cong. 2nd Sess. 11. Doc. 404, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. II. Doc. 202, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. I. Doc. 350, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess. R & H Act, 11. Doc. 2, 69th Cont., Ist. Sess. 11. Doc. 64, 55th Cong., 1st Sess. I. Doc. 28, 62nd Cong., Ist Sess. I. Doc. 623, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2nd Sess. I. I)oc. 151, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 83, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 11. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. 37-40 PORTLAND, ()REG., I)ISTRICT TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 March 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 June 30, 1948 July 26, 1912 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2. 1945 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Sept. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of North Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. 9 SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WASH. (See Section 18 of Text) Channel 6.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, at low water between Steamboat and Brooks Slough. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OREG. (See Section 19 of Text) Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OREG. (See Section 20 of Text) Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, Oreg., to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. UMPQUA RIVER, OREG. (See Section 21 of Text) North Jetty, 7,500 feet long. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. A short south jetty. A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end.' Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong., 91st Sess. Final Report of Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 3, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doe. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 349, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4 S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.-5 11. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. 11. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.' 37-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 3, 1896 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19346 June 28, 19387 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 March 4, 1913 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 June 26, 19347 Mar. 2, 1945 June 22, 1936 WILLAMETTE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVER, OREG.8 (See Section 22 of Text) Improvement of Willamette River above Oregon City. Improvement of Yamhill River by lock and dam construction. Project modified in 1904 by abandoning 20-mile stretch of river between Harrisburg and Eugene as unworthy of improvement. A 6-foot channel in Willamette River below Oregon City. For 8-foot channel between Portland and Oregon City. Operating and care of lock and dam at Yamhill River and provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Streamflow regulation with controlling depths of 6 feet to Mouth of Santiam River and 5 feet to Albany with enlargement of locks at Oregon City. Operation of Yamhill Lock was discontinued February 7, 1954, and the lock and adjacent property turned over to Yambill County January 16, 1959. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OREG. (See Section 23 of Text) Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, so far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, Oreg. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel and extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin. YAQUINA RIVER, OREG. (See Section 24 of Text) Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depoe Creek. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FAILLS, OREG. (See Section 29 of Text) For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Lock. BEAVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. (See Section 30 of Text) Improvements to existing levee and additional levee and revetment construction. 1. Doc. 260, 54th Cong., Ist Sess. (Annual Report, 1896, p. 3300) Annual Report, 1895, p. 3602 Annual Report, 1904, p. 3529 iH. Doc. 438, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. 11. Doc. 372, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess.' 11. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 11. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Sec. 107 Approved R & 11 Act, HI. Doc. 579, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. II. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, p. 4374 11. Doc. 1060, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess.' II. I)oc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.M F.C. Act 1936 37-42 IPORTLAND, OREG., I)ISTRICT TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 March 20, 1950 March 20, 1950 June 22, 1936 March 20, 1950 March 20, 1950 March 20, 1950 March 16, 1938 March 20, 1950 June 22, 1936 March 16, 1938 March 20, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 March 17, 1950 March 16, 1938 Authorizes upgrading of existing improvements. JOHNSON CREEK, PORTLAND AND VICINITY, OREG. (See Section 31 of Text) Clearing and channel rectification. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 32 of Text) Bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works In Lower Columbia River Basin. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 33 of Text) Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OREG. (See Section 34 of Text) Construction of levee system. Raising and strengthening of levee. VANCOUVER LAKE AREA, WASH. (See Section 35 of Text) Raising and strengthening existing levee. WAHKIAKUM COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING DISTRICT NO. 1, WASIH. (See Section 36 of Text) Raising and strengthening all levees encircling islands. Construct drainage canal, tide box and pumping plant. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG. (See Section 37 of Text) Comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. General improvements. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG., BANK PROTECTION (See Section 38 of Text) Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of project. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. (See Section 42 of Text) Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OREG. (See Section 43 of Text) Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OREG., (See Section 44 of Text) Earthfill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd. Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 93-251 WRDA of 1974 11. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 37-43 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1977 March 16, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 7, 1970 March 20, 1950 March 16, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 20, 1937 March 7, 1974 March 20, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 March 16, 1938 June 30, 1948 DAYS CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 45 of Text) Earthfill dam. (Phase I.) Authorized $250,000 to complete Phase I. DORENA LAKE, OREG., (See Section 46 of Text) Earthfill dam. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG., (See Section 47 of Text) Rock and gravel embankment dam. Authorizes construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 48 of Text) Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OREG. (See Section 49 of Text) Earthfill embankment dam. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-BONNEVILLE LAKE, OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 51 of Text) Existing project was originally authorized Sept. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by Congress. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville Project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions therein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. COUGAR LAKE, OREG. (See Section 52 of Text) Rockfill dam. Addition of power. Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE, OREG. (See Section 53 of Text) Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating dam with power. H. Doc. 371, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 94-587, Water Resources Development Act H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 91-439, Public Works Approp. Act, 1971 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers Date Aug. 21, 1933) P.L. 93-251, Water Resources Development Act H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 P.L. 87-874 F.C. Act 1962 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 92nd. Sess. 37-44 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized March 20, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 May 26, 1960 March 20, 1950 March 20, 1950 March 24, 1965 March 16, 1938 March 20, 1950 Sept. 21, 1962 Oct. 15, 1966 March 20, 1950 GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OREG. (See Section 54 of Text) Authorized Green-Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green-Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 55 of Text) Earth and gravel fill dam. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA OREG. AND WASH. (See Section 56 of Text) Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. John Day waterfowl management area. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OREG. (See Section 57 of Text) Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Addition of power. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. (See Section 58 of Text) Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM-LAKE CELILO, WASH. AND OREG. (See Section 59 of Text) Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 53i, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration. 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. TABLE 37-C COLUMBIA AND LOWER 5. Inactive. 6. Flood Control Act. 7. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Authorization contingent upon notification to Congress of Secretary of the Army approval of Chief of Engineers' report. WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WASH., AND PORTLAND, OREG. TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1980 (See Section 2 of Text) Funds Regular Public Works New Work 28,349,304 446,296 Maintenance Total 12,99,4 15,288 128,979,543 14,515 157,328,84 460,81 37-45 Documents --- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 37-C COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETrE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WASH., AND PORTLAND, OREG. TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1980 (See Section 2 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 129,092,726 158,026,775 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Do (1975) 35 to 40-foot channel 442,928 - 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 129,117,046 158,717,049 TABLE 37-D WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OREG. PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 29 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 by 37 feet' Lift of Each Lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22.5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet & Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet2 Depth on Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of Foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed 3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price, $375,000 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zellerhigher stages of water, is at upper end of canal basin. bach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending now being operated by Portland General Electric Co. from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal 3. The dam is owned by private parties. from head race, which formerly led directly from basin and TABLE 37-E PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 26 of Text) Name of Project D)ate Survey Conducted Clatskanie River, Oreg. October 1979 Multnomah Channel, Oreg. January 1980 Youngs Bay, Oreg. November 1979 37-46 TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) 1Project Alsea River, Oreg. 2 Astoria Turning Basin, Oreg. 2 14 Cathlamet, Wash. 21 Clatskanie River, Oreg. 2 3 Columbia Slough, Oreg. 7 10 Cowlitz River, Wash. 2 14 Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Suislaw River), Oreg. 2 14 Deep River, Wash. 2 Depoe Bay, Oreg. 2 14 Elochoman Slough, Wash. 2 : Grays River, Wash. 2 3 Hammond Small Boat Basin, Oreg. 2 6 14 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), Oreg. 2 1- Multnomah Channel, Oreg. 2 : Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor) Oreg. 2 : Salmon River, Oreg. 2 3 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), Wash. 7 10 Smith River, Oreg. 2 South Slough (Charleston), Oreg. 2 1 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Oreg. 2 11 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Oreg. and Wash. 2 12 Umatilla Harbor, Oreg. 1'5I Westport Slough, Oreg. 3 17 Yaquina Bay and .Harbor Small Boat Basin, Oreg. 1,1 Yaquina River, Oreg. 2 1 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, Oreg. 2 : 1. Includes Project Condition Surveys. 2. Completed. 3. Channel adequate for present commerce. 4. Includes $15,537 for previous project. 5. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 6. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 7. Classified inactive. 8. Excludes $42,000 expended from contributed funds. 9. Excludes $19,555 contributed funds and $67,031 (other funds) contributed for additional dredging by Port of Cathlamet. 10. I)eauthorized. 11. Project abandoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1977 1971 1969 1953 1965 1975 1963 1971 1971 1941 1977 1963 1949 1963 1949 1932 1974 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1979 1971 1979 Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Construction 2,000 870,139 171,467 19,240 - 239,529 329,423 15,384 145,588 8 18,641 2,500 519,090 15,281 18,112 16,881 2,145 143,120 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 908,422 18 195.313 9,348 Operation and Maintenance 1 206,295 - 1,054 54,905 33,358 14,757 6,147 109,267 501 235,877 559,858 2,833,888 183,720 73,008 pool. 12. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 13. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds. 14. Projects authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 15. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974. 16. Project abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 17. Modification for 32-foot channel deauthorized 5 August 1977. 18. Excludes $911,629 contributed funds. TABLE 37-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 28 of Text) Study Identification Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) 37-47 Fiscal Year Costs (1980) Itr 1) 1 Sri, it I (,ri, rLAND, OREG., J REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 37-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Continued) (See Section 28 of Text) Study Identification Astoria West Side Boat Basin, Oreg. Columbia River, Ilwaco, Wash. Coquille River, Bandon Boat Basin, Oreg. Multnomah Channel, Oreg. Port of Camas - Washougal, Wash. Siuslaw Boat Basin, Oreg. St. Johns Small Boat Basin, Oreg. Umpqua River, Winchester Bay, Oreg. TOTAL Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration pursuant to Section 54, Public Law 93-251 TABLE 37-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATIONS (See Section 25 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Bridges across Columbia River at Cascade Iocks and Hood River, Oreg.' 1944 1,081,806 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, Oreg. to Vancouver, Wash.' 1961 1,154,1622 1. Completed. 2. Non-Federal Funds $1,204,100. TABLE 37-I FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Date of Peak Inflow cu. ft./sec. acre/feet Blue River Lake, Oregon Cottage Grove Lake, Oregon Cougar Lake, Oregon Detroit Lake, Oregon Dorena Lake, Oregon Fall Creek Lake, Oregon Fern Ridge Lake, Oregon Foster Lake, Oregon Green Peter Lake, Oregon Hills Creek Lake, Oregon 12 January 1980 12 January 1980 13 January 1980 12 January 1980 13 January 1980 12 January 1980 13 January 1980 12 January 1980 12 January 1980 13 January 1980 37-48 Fiscal Year Costs (1980) $51,822 24,931 67,189 26,572 44,968 14,988 9,231 37,678 277,379 67,738 43. 44. 52. 53. 46 48. 49. 54. 54. 55. 10,000 3,400 13,160 19,645 12,400 14,100 6,000 12,725 18,460 20,080 40,550 15,750 59,560 106,340 55,460 47,570 33,730 1,900 89,270 72,380 TABLE 37-I FLOO (Continued) See iSne cTtieoxnt Project 57. Lookout Point Lake, Oregon 58. Lost Creek Lake, Oregon ... TABLE 37-J )D CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS I)ate of Peak Inflow 13 January 1980 13 January 1980 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. AND WASH. LEVEES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WORKS (See Section 32 of Text) Estimated Cost of Work Location Approved 1980 Beaver Drainage District, Oreg. Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, Wash. Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, Wash. Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, Wash. Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, Wash. Midland Drainage District, Oreg. Multnomah County Drainage District 1, Oreg. Peninsula Drainage District No. 2, Oreg. Rainier Drainage District, Oreg. Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg. Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1, Wash. Woodson Drainage District, Oreg. Total Estimated Cost, Federal Funds Estimated Non-Federal Cost Locations deauthorized or reclassified inactive or deferred and excluded from above cost estimate: Bachelor Island, Wash. (Deauthorized - 1977) Clatskanie Drainage District, Oreg. (Deauthorized- 1978) Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1974) Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1978) Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg. Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash. (Deauthorized - 1977) Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg. John Drainage District, Oreg. (Deauthorized - 1979) Lake River Delta Area, Wash. Lewis River Area, Wash. (Deauthorized - 1977) Magruder Drainage District, Oreg. (Deauthorized- 1974) Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg."(Deauthorized - 1977) Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, Wash. Cost of These Locations is $2,865,000 363,000 65,345 304,794 1,661,367 304,511 1,499,186 2,600,000 593,945 15,0561 674,137 3,500,000 4,950,000 162,500 $16,558,841 $4,126,000 1,192,000(1954) 547,000(1960) 1,110,000(1957) 758,000(1960) $3,607,000 1. Cost is for Engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 37-49 j lea Infow Sorag Use Pc.ak Inflow cu. ft./scec 23,090120,48 23,09() 13,700 Storage Used acre/feet 120,480 50,870 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-K REPORT OF TIlE CHIEF OF ENG(INEERS, UI.S. ARMY 1980 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN (BANK PROTECTION WORKS), OREG. AND WASH. OPERATION AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 33 of Text) Quantity Location Nature of Work (Quinar neet) Loop Location Stone revetment 43(0 T()TAl 4:30() TABLE 37-L WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 37 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorizing Act Cost-1980 Blue River Lake, McKenzie Basin' 3 May 17, 1950. 11. I)oc.531 .) fl9: 9, 2 Cascadia Lake, South Santiam River 4 5 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries 6 Channel Improvements for Flood Control and Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River' Cottage Grove Lake, Coast Fork' Cougar Lake, South Fork McKenzie' Detroit Lake, Including Big Cliff Lake, North Santiam River' Dorena Lake, Row River' Fall Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River' Gate Creek Lake, McKenzie Basin: Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Middle Santiam' I Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Holley Lake, Calapooya River- Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, Oreg. Lookout Point Lake, Including Dexter Lake, Middle Fork' Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works North Fork, Middle Fork, Willamette River 81st Cong. Oct. 23, 1962, I. Doc.403, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950, 11. I)oc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950, 11. D)oc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. June 28, 1938, I. I)oc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. May 17, 1950, 11. I)oc.531 81st Cong.,2nd Sess. and Sept. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. June 28, 1938, 11. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. and June 30, 1948, Public Law 858. June 28, 1938, 11. I)oc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. May 17, 1950, 11. I)oc.531 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. June 28, 1938, 11. I)oc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. IDoc. 403, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950, 11. I)oc.531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. and Sept. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131. 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. and July 14, 1960, S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950, 11. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17,1950, 11. D)oc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950, I. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. June 28, 1938, 11. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess., and May 17, 1950, 11. I)oc. 531,81st Cong.,2nd Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, I. )oc.403() 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950, 11. )oc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 104,.000,000 (1975) 3,005,000 (1960) 1,214,3()002 3,749,9822 9 56.75(),4062 11 62,729,6982 14,083,2122 9 22,117,3332 9 8,325,1012 9 127.000,000 84,005,7882 45.700,6192 13,300,000 (1960) 4,500,000 (1980) 88,228,3952 9 69,600,000 37-50 PORTLANI), OREG., I)ISTRICT TABLE 37-L (Continued) WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 37 of Text) Project Willamette River Bank Protection' 1. See individual reports for details of the project. 2. Actual cost. 3. For construction in lieu of originally authorized Quartz Creek Lake. 4. For construction in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake. 5. Project classified deferred. 6. Project classified inactive. 7. Does not include $25,075,000 Reclassified Locations. TABLE 37-M OTHER AUTHORIZED I (See Sect Project COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, Wash.1 Deep River area, Wahkiakum County, Wash.' Deer Island area, Columbia County, Oreg.' Diking District 2, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Diking District 3, Clatsop County, Oreg.' 5 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, Wash.' Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, Wash.' Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, Wash.' Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, Wash.' Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg.' John Day River, Oreg., Columbia River Basin Local Flood Protection ' John Day River area, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Karlson Island, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Knappa area, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Lewis and Clark River area, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' Authorizing Act June 22, 1936, Special Report Division Engr., June 28, 1938, HI. Doc. 544,75th Cong., 3rd Sess., and May 17,1950, H. Doc. 531,81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Estimated Estimated Federal Cost-1980( 28,500.000 8. Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958, Public Law 85-820. 9. Includes cost of Recreation Projects ((710). Facilities at Completed 10. Deauthorized. 11. Does not include $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake and Strube Lake and Cougar additional unit. FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS tion 40 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1939 1941 1942 1943 1940 1938 1940 1940 1941 1941 1951 1939 1974 1942 1941 1942 1942 1940 1940 1939 Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Construction Operation and Maintenance 163,397 163,291 69,724 574,123 43,i150 258 25,609 161,381 258,795 26,810 169,542 240,939 210,220 33,080 25,773 18,789 158,419 61,186 39,475 77,774 3 37-51 __ ~ 28,500,000 Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 TABLE 37-M (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Oenpratinn and Project COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN (Continued) Multnomah Drainage District 1, Oreg.' Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, Oreg.' Peninsula Drainage District 2, Multnomah County, Oreg.' Prescott area, Columbia County, Oreg. 15 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' Sandy Drainage District, Multnomah County, Oreg.' Sauvie Island areas A and B, Multnomah County, Oreg.' Skamokawa Creek area, Wahkiakum County, Wash.' Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Upper Grays River area, Wash.' Walluski River, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Warrenton Diking District 3, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Webb District Improvement Co., Columbia County, Oreg.' Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, Oreg.' Westport District, Columbia and Clatsop Counties, Oreg.' Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, Oreg.' Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, Oreg.' Total Columbia River Basin LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, Wash.' COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, Wash.' Diking Improvement District 2, Cowlitz County, Wash.' Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, Wash.' Total Cowlitz River Basin LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Bachelor Island, Wash.'" Clatskanie Drainage District, Oreg."5 Clatskanie River area, Columbia County, Oreg.' 5 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg.is5 Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg.'5 Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg.'5 Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg.2 Report For Construction Ma'intenance 37-52 593,034 4 211,160 241,148 125 47,662 138,956 1,623,505 178,885 133,778 61,263 66,932 69,503 117,143 74,596 84,592 205,531 40,658 22,797 248,802 7,380,693 1951 1942 1942 1941 1942 1942 1951 1946 1939 1947 1942 1940 1940 1940 1940 1940 1943 1940 1942 1943 1939 1940 1939 1964 1960 1960 1961 30,000 30,000 172,521 42,978 121,165 28,592 192,735 18,543 268 4,472 8,824 I)()RTLANI), OREG., I)ISTRICT TABLE 37-M (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Project LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN (Continued) Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash.'5 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, Wash.' Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, Wash.' Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, Wash.' Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, Wash.' Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg.2 Hayden Island, Oreg.2 John Drainage District, Oreg. 5 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, Wash.' 5 Lake River Delta area, Wash.5 Lewis River area, Wash.16 Magruder Drainage District, Oreg.'s Midland Drainage District, Oreg.' Multnomah County Drainage District 1, Oreg.' Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg.'5 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Oreg.2 Rainier Drainage District, Oreg.' Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. Sauvie Island Drainage District, oreg.' Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, Wash. 2 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, Wash. Woodson Drainage District, Oreg.' Total Lower Columbia River Basin WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, Oreg.' Area east of Albany, Oreg. 5 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, Oreg.'5 Calapooia River, Oreg. 15 Cascadia Lake, Oreg.5 Coyote and Spencer Creeks, Long Tom River, Oreg,.15 East Muddy and Lake Creek, Oreg.' s Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, Oreg.' 5 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, Oreg.'5 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, Oreg.15 Gate Creek Lake, Oreg. Holley Lake, Oreg.s Mud and Baskett Slough, Rickreall Creek, Oreg.15 Pudding River, Oreg.2 1s Shelton Ditch, Willamette River, Oreg.2 Soap Creek, Willamette River, Oreg.15 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, Oreg."* West Muddy Creek and Marys River, Oreg." Wiley Creek Lake, Oreg.8 Willamette Falls Fish Ladder" For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1977 1967 1967 1967 1950 1961 1969 1960 1971 1964 1961 1961 1967 1954 1966 1971 1973 1964 1960 1966 1959 1976 1960 1959 1972 1963 1950 1967 1962 Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Construction Operation and Maintenance 1,661,367 363,000 65,345 304,794 23,754 55,594 774 304,511 1,491,425 43,292 35,265 593,945 15,056 6 674,086 48,619 1,803,488 162,500 7,678,922 1,214,300 7 4,559 11,595 1,066,114 6,819 6,465 840,001 241,992 5,000 39,624 4,056 112,000 9 37-53 Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 TABLE 37-M (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN (Continued) Willamette River Basin Channel clearing and snagging.2 Total Willamette River Basin ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, Oreg. 2 10 11 Beaver Creek near Tillamook, Oreg.' '3 Castle Rock, CowlitZ River, Wash.' Catching Inlet Drainage District, Coos River, Oreg.' 13 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, Oreg.' 13 Coquille River, Oreg.'5 Cowlitz River at Randle, Wash.'6 Lower Cowlitz River, Wash.' McKenzie River near Walterville, Oreg.' 13 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, Oreg.' Molalla River at Milk Creek location, Oreg.' 13 Molalla River at Ressel location, Oreg.' 13 Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, Oreg.'o (a) Riverside Area Units5 (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1)1 (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1)1 18 Pendleton, Umatilla River, Oreg.' 10 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, Oreg.'0 55 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, Oreg.'6 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, Oreg.' 13 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, Oreg.' 13 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, Oreg.' '3 Umatilla River (Echo), Columbia River Basin, Oreg.10 15 Umpqua River and tributaries, Oreg.' Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, Oreg.' Total All Other Flood Control 1. Completed. 2. Classified inactive. 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act funds. 4. In addition $25,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 5. Deferred. 6. Cost is for engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 7. In addition $154,751 contributed funds expended for new work, $88,784 "Required" and $65,967 "Other". 8. Recommendation for early authorization rescinded by S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. in Flood Control Act 1960. 9. Pro rata share of site selection studies. 1950 1967 1957 1959 1952 1948 1962 1962 1967 1948 1955 1952 1960 3,552,525 23,439 12 106,198 104,921 182,655 70,845 14 908 11,095 181,652 148,358 118,433 55,007 55,189 9,100 1959 267,748 1960 161,540 1939 143,263 1963 4,558 1962 11,318 1971 968,716 16 1960 288,447 1961 176,351 1960 24,145 1952 428,881 1952 45,677 3,588,444 10. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974. 11. Abandoned. Necessity for development was eliminated when Lake Umatilla was created. 12. Includes $3,328 spent in fiscal year 1960 under authorization of P.L. 685, 84th Congress. See Annual Report for fiscal year 1960, page 1887. 13. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 14. In addition $2,520 contributed funds expended for new work. 15. Deauthorized. 16. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 37-54 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) Fiscal Year (1980) Costs Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization): Clatsop Co. Drainage District, No. 5, Oreg. Santiam River, Jefferson, Oreg. Westport Slough, Woodson, Oreg. Total Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.): Stage Gulch, Stanfield, Oreg. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, Oreg. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation): Disaster Preparedness Flood Emergency Operations Advance Measures Total TABLE 37-0 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam, Oreg. and Wash.-Lake Bonneville (See Section 51 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height Above Lowest Foundation 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 Cubic Feet Per Second 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 37-55 93,837 5,000 7,239 106,576 21,126 19,642 99,504 21,554 50,820,703 50,941,761 TABLE 37-0 (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM AND POWERPLANT Project Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Pool Elevation (Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length Width Height (Roof to Bedrock) Generator (Station Unit) Generators Total Rated Capacity Speed 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 190 Feet 190 Feet 1-4,000 kw 0.8 Power Factor 1-51,500 kw 0.9 Power Factor 1-43,200 kw 0.9 Power Factor 8-54,000 kw 0.9 Power Factor 526,700 kw 0.9 Power Factor 75 Revolutions Per Minute John Day Lock and Dam, Lake Umatilla Oreg. and Wash. (See Section 56 of Text) NAVIGATION Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: 86 Feet 669 Feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Tainter 50 Ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 37-56 PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT TABLE 37-0 (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM AND POWERPLANT Project Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK The Dalles Lock and Dam Type Wash. and Oreg.-Lake Celilo Lift Normal (See Section 59 of Text) Net Clear Length Net Clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Generators Main Units Total Rated Capacity Fishwater Supply Units Station Service Units TABLE 37-P 268-257 276 500,000 Ac.-Ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 Miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 Feet 14 @ 78,000 kw Each Additional 8 @ 85,975 kw Each Ultimate 22-1,779,800 kv 2 @ 13,500 kw Each 2 @ 3,000 kw Each OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER (See Section 60 of Text) Project Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, Oreg. Waldo Lake Tunnel, Oreg.' For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1969 Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Construction Operation and Maintenance 185,000 1. Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958 (Public Law 85-820). 37-57 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT* This District comprises Washington except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Channels and Harbors 1. Bellingham Harbor, Wash...............38-2 2. Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Wash ........................... 38-2 3. Ediz Hook, Wash .......................... 3 8-2 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash.............................. 3 8-3 5. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, W ash.................................... 3 8-3 6. Lake Crockett, Wash ....................... 38-4 7. Neah Bay, Wash .......................... 3 8-4 8. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, Wash ........................... 3 8-4 9. Quillayute River, Wash....................38-56 10. Seattle Harbor, Wash.................38-5 11. Swinomish Channel, Wash...............38-6 12. Tacoma Harbor, Wash.....................38-6 13. Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin (Westport Marina), Wash.................38-7 14. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash....... ..... 3 8-7 15. Project Condition Surveys............... 3 8-8 16. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.............. ............ ............. 3 8-8 17. Navigation Work under Special Authorization................. .............. 8-8 Locks and Dams 18. Lake Washington Ship Canal, W ash............................................ 3 8-8 Flood Control Local Protection 19. Flathead River near Kalispell, Mont.............. .......................... 3.8..-.9. 20. Okanogan River, Omak, Wash......38-9 21. Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash ..... 3 8-9 Page 22. Placer Creek, Idaho................ 38-10 23. Skagit River, Wash., (Levee and Channel Improvements) ................ 38-10 24. Stillaguamish River, Wash..............38-10 25. Tacoma, Puyallup River, Wash.........38-10 26. Willapa River at Raymond, Wash..... 38-10 .27. Yakima River at Ellensburg, Wash..38-11 28. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................... 38-12 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..................................... 38-12 30. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.............................38-12 31. 32. 33. 34. Reservoirs Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash........38-12 Mud Mountain Dam, Wash ........ 38-13 Wynoochee Lake, Wash................... 38-14 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. 38-13 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 35. Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho.................. 38-14 36. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, Wash.................... ....... 38-14 37. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, Mont............. .................. .......... 38-15 38. Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power ............ 38-16 General Investigations 39. Surveys ................ .................... 38-16 40. Collection and Study of Basic Data...38-16 41. Research and Development ............. 38-16 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 38-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Navigation 1. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WASH. Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Previous projects. For details see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1888 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 3,900 feet including removal of existing rubblemound breakwater heretofore maintained under existing 'project, and using rock therefrom in construction of new breakwater, and including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Funds contributed by Port of Bellingham have been expended, ($31,581 including cash contribution of $29,421 and credit of $2,160 for services performed by the Port). In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port expended $2,157,473 for bulkheads, groins, dredging, mooring and terminal facilities and utilities, and land development. Terminal facilities. Forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor; 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway, 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway, 3 on I&J Street Waterway, and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by oceangoing vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. Also, there is one publicly owned terminal and small boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37-Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, Wash., revised 1976.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys and in January 1980 completed Squalicum Creek waterway maintenance dredging contract, involving removal of 226,238 cubic yards. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed February 1, 1961. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 2. BELLINGHAM, SQUALICUM SMALL BOAT HARBOR, WASH. Location. The existing Squalicum Small Boat Harbor is located at Bellingham, Washington, about 88 miles north of Seattle and is the only protected year-round public moorage in Bellingham Bay. Existing project. Includes construction of 1,500 lineal feet of new rubblemound breakwater, dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin. Approximately 960,000 cubic yards of material would be dredged, creating a 40-acre basin. The dredged material would be placed behind dikes to develop approximately 46 acres of backup land for support facilities and a marine park. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work, contract: Breakwater construction was completed in February 1980. Federal dredging of about 350,000 cubic yards is scheduled to be completed in October 1980. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction 99 percent complete. 3. EDIZ HOOK, WASH. Location. Ediz Hook and the City of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, Washington, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. Existing project. Provides for about 13,300 lineal feet of rock revetment and 3,100 lineal feet of rock blanketing, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition survey of revetment and immediate offshore area accomplished. Condition at end offiscal year. The project was completed on 31 October 1978. Emergency interim measures were needed to prevent the breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of the authorized project. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) 38-2 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT 4. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WASH. Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Previous projects. For details see page 704 of Annual' Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point: removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep up river to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. The 1968 modification included raising the southerly 4,100 feet of existing training dike, extending the training dike 1,500 feet farther south, and constructing a breakwater along the south and west sides of the existing small boat basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. The boat basin breakwater has been deleted at the request of the local sponsor, and the remainder of the 1968 modification has been deferred indefinitely. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must provide disposal areas for maintenance dredging including diking of those areas upstream of the 14th Street boat basin. Local interests are also required to provide and maintain an adequate public landing or wharf, with provisions for sale of motor fuel, lubricants, and potable water, access roads, parking areas, and other necessary public-use shore facilities; and make utility and other relocations or alterations as required for project purposes. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 11 in Port Gardner and 33 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels, and, also, 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. The rest are at Bayside and the Snohomish River. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Maintenance, contract: In April 1980 completed dredging of upper channel and settling basin for a total of 728,487 cubic yards. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in April 1963 except for the 1968 Modification, which has been deferred. 5. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WASH. Location. Harbor lies at Mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Previous projects. For details see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 600 feet wide and 30 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 16,000 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; a channel 14 feet deep and 100 feet wide in South Bay to Bay City; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to, Westhaven Cove; and protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet'at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In Aberdeen, there are 2 terminals with 7 berths owned by the Port of Grays Harbor handling ocean-going vessels and 10 usable privately owned piers and wharves, and 38-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1 each at Markham and Cosmopolis, 7 at Hoquiam, 5 private wharves, and 1 Coast Guard station at Westhaven Cove. Of the 22 privately owned, 1 is used for the receipt of sand and gravel, 3 for fish, and 7 for lumber or logs. In addition, there are 8 log dumps or receiving areas in Grays Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. In September 1980 U.S. hopper dredge Harding removed 108,556 cubic yards at a cost of $89,464 from the South Channel, and North Channel reaches of the navigation channel. Maintenance, contract: Approximately 1,150,- 000 cubic yards of shoaled material were removed from the North Channel, Crossover, and South Channel reaches of the project by hopper barge between April and September at a cost of $1,605,- 000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in March 1965, except for the deferred and inactive portions. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. South Reach Channel realinement was completed December 1978. For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. 6. LAKE CROCKETT, WASH. Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, Washington. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 150 feet wide, protected by a breakwater. The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately operated passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publiclyowned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Code 710 Funds: Cost-sharing agreement was finalized in 1977 with the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. Supplement for construction of recreational facilities was signed in FY 79 with construction completed in fall of 1980. Regular funds: Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition survey conducted. Coordination and completion of plans and specifications accomplished for early FY 81 dredging contract. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in January 1948. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1948.) 7. NEAH BAY, WASH. Location. On south side of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, 5 miles east of Cape Flattery, at the entrance to the Strait from the Pacific Ocean, and about 60 miles west of Port Angeles, Wash. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18480, 18485 and 18484.) Existing project.Provides for (1) rubberstone breakwater about 8,000 feet long between Waada Island and the westerly shore of the bay; and (2) reinforcement of existing rock revetment extending approximately 2,200 feet west from Baada Point, and about an 800-foot extension of the revetment westward. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is 15.8 feet. (See table 38- B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. There have been no non-Federal costs. Terminal facilities. There are six wharves at Neah Bay, including two owned by the United States which are used by the Coast Guard, and four privately owned wharves, three of which are open to general public use to accommodate small' commercial fishing vessels. In addition to the wharves, there is a facility for dumping and rafting logs. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Maintenance, contract: Breakwater repair contract placed 70,000 tons of quarry stone over 3,900 feet. Contract to be completed in FY 81. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in July 1956. Breakwater was completed in February 1944, and is in poor condition. Reinforcement and extension of revetment to the 3,000-foot length authorized by the 1954 Act were completed in July 1956. 8. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WASH. Location. Puget Sound is in western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441 and 18448.) Previous projects. For details, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938. 38-4 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with City of Seattle, of floating debris from Seattle Harbor area. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. City of Seattle is cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in Seattle Harbor. Terminal facilities. ,Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: U.S. debris boats W. T. Preston and Puget are operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters, removing floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris is loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River and at Elliott Bay. A study of the efficiency of the debris collection and disposal operations and for determining alternative disposal methods compatible with current environmental controls is underway. Maintenance, contract: 3,671 Tons of harbor debris were disposed of. Current contractor is recycling approximately 90 percent of the debris and placing the remainder in a landfill. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work consists of collecting floating and partially floating logs and larger-sized debris from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. 9. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WASH. Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) Jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; and (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel. Section included in project is 4,400 feet long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Expended $20,000 contributed funids. Terminal facilities. There are 7 wharves or docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River; 6 are privately owned. The seventh is owned by the United States, and is used by the Coast Guard. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Port of Port Angeles and used by fishing boats and pleasure craft. With the exception of the boat basin, these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys and studies were made of the river channel throughout the year. Spit emergency repair was performed with crawler equipment to reshape beach sand into berm in early spring of 1980. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in February 1960. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) The spit which protects the boat basin and navigation channel was nourished in conjunction with channel dredging contract completed in June 1973 and in 1977. The spit was rehabilitated with rock in 1974 and 1979- 80. The channel upstream of the boat basin has been classified as inactive. 10. SEATTLE HARBOR, WASH. Location. Harbor at Seattle, Wash., includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; for maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long, and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions; and dredging Duwamish Waterway 200 feet wide and 30 feet deep between West Waterway and First Avenue South, 150 by 20 feet between First and Eighth Avenues South, thence 150 feet by 15 feet to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, with turning basin 600 by 350 feet and 20 feet deep just south of First Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep, and settling basin of about 100,000 cubic yards capacity at upper end of waterway, a distance of 5.12 miles. Total length of waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) 38-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF ()OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Local cooperation. Complied with, except for inactive portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 102 wharves and piers on Seattle Harbor, exclusive of those given in report for Lake Washington Ship Canal. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and are described in Port Series No. 36-The Port of Seattle, Wash., revised 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Maintenance, contract: 205,578 cubic yards of material removed from Duwamish Waterway at upper end above First Avenue South Bridge during February and March 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1931, except settling basin at upstream end of project, which is classified inactive, and East Waterway above the 750-foot section. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) 11. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WASH. Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of projecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the-Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, 1 is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading, and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Terminal facilities for general cargo are not considered adequate for existing commerce; and Skagit County is planning for additional vessel accommodations. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various reaches of the channel. A draft supplement to the project environmental impact statement was prepared with distribution to be made in early 1981. Coordination of Fiscal Year 1981 channel maintenance dredging completed. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) The south jetty west of Goat Island has been rehabilitated to reduce shoaling from the Skagit River delta area. 12. TACOMA HARBOR, WASH. Location. Harbor includes Commencement Bay and tributary waterways at Tacoma, in Northwestern Washington (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1372 to 1376 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1875 of Annual Report for 1938 for Puyallup Waterway; and page 1702 of Annual Report for 1944, and page 1502 of Annual Report for 1954 for Blair (formerly Wapato and Port Industrial) Waterway. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Channel in City Waterway 500 feet wide and 29 feet deep from deep water in Commencement Bay to 11th Street Bridge, 500 feet wide and 22 feet deep to 14th Street Bridge, and varying from 500 to 250 feet wide and 19 feet deep from 14th Street Bridge to end of this waterway, a total length of 8,500 feet; (b) channel in Hylebos Waterway 30 feet deep, 3.1 miles long, and 200 feet wide except where width is increased to 250 feet at the bend below East 11th Street, to 300 feet at Lincoln Avenue bend, and to 510 feet and 770 feet, respectively, at the channel widening above Lincoln Avenue and the turning basin at the head of the waterway; (c) construction of two training walls, each about 700 feet long at mouth of Puyallup River; and (d) channel in Blair Waterway 2.6 miles long, including a portion seaward of East 11th Street 650 feet wide and 30 feet deep over southerly 350 feet, and 35 feet deep over northerly 300 feet; and remaining portion, 35 feet deep and 150 feet wide at East 11th Street, 600 feet wide between East 11th Street and Lincoln Avenue, and 300 feet wide between Lincoln Avenue and a 1,200-foot wide turning basin at head of waterway. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 20 feet. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 99 privately owned piers and w'.urves, 12 of which handle general 38-6 SEATTI.E, WASH., I)ISTRICT cargo, 14 handle petroleum products, 1 is a copper-handling dock, 5 handle wood chips or hogged fuel, 5 handle industrial chemicals and salt, 4 receive sand and gravel, and there is 1 ferry dock. The remainder of the privately owned facilities are used for various activities normal to a port of this size. In addition, the Port of Tacoma owns 27 wharves or terminals, including 1 industrial yard, and an industrial area. The Port of Tacoma is presently in an expansion program. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of Hylebos, Blair, and City Waterways. Study underway to determine if City Waterway project boundaries should be modified as requested by local officials. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in December 1966. For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. 13. WESTHAVEN COVE SMALL BOAT BASIN (WESTPORT MARINA), WASH. Location. Westport Marina is located in southwestern Washington at the town of Westport, on the northern tip of Point Chehalis at the mouth of Grays Harbor. Point Chehalis is the southern spit which separates South Bay of Grays Harbor from the Pacific Ocean. The city of Westport is in Grays Harbor County, about 140 miles southwest of Seattle, Washington, and 100 miles north of Portland, Oregon. Existing Project. The recently completed Federal portion of the project involved removal of a 350-foot breakwater, replacing it with an 865- foot extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, which would provide protection to a second entrance channel dredged to a depth of -16 feet mean lower low water (MLLW). The second entrance channel would relieve congestion at the existing entrance and would improve the flushing characteristics of the marina. The Federal portion also included dredging 130,000 cubic yards for an access channel and a turning basin. The project provides a net increase of 179 moorage spaces. Local interests would also construct a fish-handling and fish-processing area adjacent to the proposed entrance channel. Dredged fill would provide about 5.5 acres for expansion of water-oriented commercial enterprises. The local portion would also include dredging estimated at 60,000 cubic yards in the commercial moorage area. The Federal Government would maintain the modified general navigation facilities. Local interests would maintain the berthing areas, floats, wharves, piers, and shoreside facilities. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Construction of the new entrance, including breakwater and dredging, was completed in December 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was 100 percent complete. 14. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WASH. Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of Mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1910 (page 968), 1915 (page 2001), and 1938 (page 1861). Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram lumber mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point; 9.9 feet at Raymond; 8.9 feet at Bay Center; and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point; 19.3 feet at Raymond; 16 feet at Bay Center; and 18 feet near Naselle. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) 38-7 REPORT OF THlE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; one of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in November 1958. For further details, see Annual Report for 1959.) 15. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 38-D. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 38-E. 17. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $144,546 for Brownsville Marina, Wash.; $14,562 for East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, Wash.; $114,810 for Friday Harbor, Marina, Wash.; $5,000 for Ocean Shores Marina, Wash.; $69,365 for Kenmore Commercial Navigation Channel, Wash.; and $248,949 for Seacrest Small Boat Harbor, Wash. (For fiscal year costs for Bellingham Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Wash., and Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, Wash., see Table 38-A.) Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): Total costs for fiscal year were $455,084. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration (Section 32, Public Law 93-251). Fiscal year costs for Green River, King County, Wash. location were $436,507. Shoreline erosion control demonstration (Section 54, Public Law 93-251). Fiscal year costs of $79,903 are for Maylor Point and Oak Harbor, Wash. Locks and Dams 18. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WASH. Location. Entirely within City of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Previous projects. For details see page 2003, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, aboubl.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is about 22 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, Wash.) are set forth in Table 38-C. (See also Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 104 wharves and piers on Lake Washington ship canal and adjacent inland waters, including Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Lake Washington. Of these, 18 are publicly owned, 3 of which are privately operated. The other wharves include 61 used for building, outfitting, or repair of vessels, 6 for handling petroleum products, 38 for various industrial purposes, and 7 for mooring and servicing pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 36-The Port of Seattle, Washington - Revised 1975.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Code 710 Funds: Cost sharing agreements were finalized in 1976 and 1980 for Commodore Park 38-8 at Lake Washington Ship Canal and Fremont Park on the north side of the Fremont Canal. Construction for Commodore Park was completed in July 1978 and since then has earned numerous awards including Corps of Engineers' Honor Award for landscape architecture in 1979. Fremont Park is scheduled for completion in the spring of 1981. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year. Maintenance, contract: A $517,210 contract for entryway development was awarded in September. Also awarded in September were a $69,292 contract for trail repair and an $81,000 contract for lock wall pavement. A $777,965 electric rehabilitation contract was completed at the end of the fiscal year. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935.) Flood Control Local Protection 19. FLATHEAD RIVER NEAR KALISPELL, MONT. Location. The project is located near Kalispell, Montana, on the right bank of the Flathead River. Existing project. The project authorized in 1977 provides for protection of the communities of Evergreen and Days Acres by construction of about 33,000 lineal feet of earth levee along a 9- mile length of river. A 700 cfs pumping station would be located on Spring Creek in the community of Days Acres to remove interior drainage during flooding. Design studies began in November 1978 and have reestablished the flood plain and updated hydrology. Studies are presently underway to determine accuracy of scope of the authorized project. Estimated project cost is $5,717,000 (October 1980), including $5,520,000 Federal funds and $197,000 non- Federal costs. (See Table 38-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Flathead County has agreed to provide the required items of local cooperation including providing all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide without cost to the United States, all relocations or modifications of streets, culverts, bridges, roads, buildings, sewers and other utilities and related facilities, and adjust all claims pertaining to water rights; and prevent encroachment on the rights-of-way of the improved channel and debris barrier that would reduce the flood-carrying capacity of the river or interfere with operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. The authorized project was reevaluated based on updated survey and hydraulic studies. A meeting with local citizens and officials is scheduled in early December 1980 to update them on studies and assess local support for the project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Advance engineering and design planning is continuing. 20. OKANOGAN RIVER, OMAK, WASH. Location. The City of Omak is located generally between river miles 30 and 31 on the Okanogan River. This river, a southward-running tributary of the Columbia River, lies in Okanogan County in the north central portion of the State of Washington, and in Canada. The greater part of the city lies on the west bank of the river. Across the river, the east side is within the Colville Indian Reservation and was annexed to the city following an election in 1930. Existing project. Provides for construction of levee improvements, including 6,500 feet of levee on the east bank and about 7,700 feet of levee on the west bank. Included with the levees would be about 240 feet of concrete retaining wall. Landscape and wildlife habitat restoration is an integral part of the work. The levees will provide protection, with 3 feet of freeboard, for the urban area of Omak, against a 100-year flood. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, contract: Landscape maintenance started. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of levees and landscape placement is complete. Landscape maintenance is 96 percent complete. 21. OKANOGAN RIVER, OROVILLE, WASH. Location. The city of Oroville is located within Okanogan. County in the north central portion of Washington State. Oroville is 42 miles north of Omak, the major town in Okanogan County, and 4 miles south of the Canadian border. The city is bounded by Lake Osoyoos to the north, the Similkameen River (River Mile 4) to the west and south, and the Okanogan River (River Mile 77) to the east. The area surrounding Oroville consists of orchard land; apple farming, fruit processing, and wood processing are the main economic activities of the area. Existing project. A levee improvement plan which would provide protection against a 100- year flood, with 3 feet of freeboard, consists of 38-9 S F'Aj rlr 1, 1 , WASIL, j)jSrj',jtjCrj, REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 raising 6,900 feet of existing levee an average of 2 feet and provides 2,400 feet of new levee averaging 6 feet in height. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. No new work started. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete, and landscape maintenance is underway. 22. PLACER CREEK, IDAHO Location. Placer Creek rises in the St. Joe Mountains of northern Idaho, flows northerly about 7.8 miles, and discharges into the South Fork of Coeur d'Alene River at the City of Wallace. Existing project. Provides for flood control by construction of a 3,700 foot long concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace. A debris basin capable of storing 17,000 cubic yards of debris would be located upstream from the channel to prevent plugging of the channel. Estimated cost is $5,670,000 (October 1980), including $5,250,000 Federal funds and non- Federal costs of $420,000. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests are required to provide all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide without cost to the United States, all relocations or modifications of streets, culverts, bridges, roads, buildings, sewers and other utilities and related facilities, and adjust all claims pertaining to water rights; and prevent encroachment on the rights-of-way of the improved channel and debris barrier that would reduce the flood-carrying capacity of the stream or interfere with operation and maintenance. The City of Wallace and Shoshone County have agreed to sponsor the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. FY 80 studies completed the General Design Memorandum and began preparation of plans and specifications. Delays in completion of the hydraulic model studies prevented an early construction start in August 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are being prepared and construction is scheduled to begin in the spring of 1981, subject to acquisition of required real estate by the local sponsors and completion of model studies. 23. SKAGIT RIVER, WASH., (LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) Location. On Skagit River in Skagit County, Washington, downstream from Burlington and Mount Vernon about 17 miles to tidewater. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees and minor channel improvements reaching from the mouths of the north and south forks of Skagit River to about 17 miles upstream, all as authorized in 1966. Reformulation of the authorized project resulted from detailed review of the authorized plan, reexamination of the flood problem, consideration of alternatives, and extensive coordination. Technical data were developed through field investigations, topographic mapping, hydrologic and hydraulic studies, evaluation of flood damages, appraisals of property values within and adjacent to the flood plain, foundation and materials exploration, inventory of environmental base conditions, assessment of impacts, fish and wildlife studies, recreation studies, and detailed design investigations. Total cost of the revised program was estimated to be $55,000,000, with $13,750,000 being non-Federal costs, as estimated under President Carter's proposed costsharing policies. Local cooperation. Local interests were to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold theUnited States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; relocate buildings and utilities, roads, sewers, related and special facilities as necessary; and prevent encroachment on the improved channels. Operations and results during fiscal year. On 6 November 1979 citizens of Skagit County voted on Proposition 2 which would have granted the Skagit County Commissioners authority to indebt Skagit County in an amount not to exceed $14,- 150,000 for the purpose of constructing flood control facilities. The vote was 71.9 percent against granting this authority. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project has been placed in "inactive" category. 24. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WASH. Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, Wash.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, 38-10 and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above.low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removed brush and trees on approximately 1,200 linear feet of revetment, and repaired four areas of the revetments with riprap. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details see Annual Report for 1940.) 25. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WASH. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, Wash., flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 second-feet between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Initiated Phase I of Draft Resource Use Objective. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) 26. WILLAPA RIVER AT RAYMOND, WASH. Location. Willapa River rises in the Willapa Hills, in the southwestern part of the State of Washington, and flows in a general northwesterly direction for about 37 miles to Willapa Bay, an inlet of the Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of the mouth of the Columbia River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 6185.) Existing Project. The plan of improvement provides for a levee system at Raymond to protect municipal areas from tidal waters. The lower end of the protected area is 10 miles above the mouth of the Willapa River. The diurnal tidal range at Raymond is 9.9 feet and the extreme range is 19.3 feet. The project was authorized in 1944, but was placed in a deferred status because the City of Raymond (local sponsor) was unable to provide required items of local cooperation. A restudy of the project was requested by the Raymond City Commission in October 1970 and was completed in September 1975. Based upon the 1975 restudy, the estimated cost for construction is $2,985,000 (October 1980), including $2,730,000 Federal funds and non-Federal costs of $255,000. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; (c) maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (d) provide without cost to the United States all relocations or modifications of roads and utilities; (e) adjust all claims pertaining to water rights; (f) prevent encroachment on the rights-of-way of works that would interfere with their operation and maintenance; and (g) prevent any obstruction or encroachment on the floodway that would reduce the flood-carrying capacity in the vicinity of the project. Raymond city officials are aware of the local cooperation requirements, and expressed their willingness to sponsor the project in letter dated 4 June 1975. By letter dated 21 May 1979 the city reaffirmed their intent to comply with local cooperation requirements. Formal assurance of local cooperation will be requested after completion of the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of a combined Phase I and II General Design Memorandum (GDM) continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. A final GDM/EA (Environmental Assessment) is being prepared for submittal in December 1980. 27. YAKIMA RIVER AT ELLENSBURG, WASH. Location. Yakima River originates on the easterly slopes of the Cascade Mountains in the State of Washington and flows southeasterly ap- 38-11 SEA ri",rl, LE, WASIL, j)jSjjtjCrj, REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 proximately 175 miles to its confluence with the Columbia River. The authorized project extends from the town of Thorp past the city of Ellensburg to the Thrall area, a distance of about 15 river miles. Existing project. Provides for levees on both banks of the Yakima River. However, the project has not been constructed because Interstate 90 has changed the flooding characteristics on the left bank of the river in the vicinityof Ellensburg, Washington. The freeway embankment and levees provide protection to areas previously exposed to flooding. Flooding conditions along the right bank of the river or along the left bank near Thrall were not changed by construction of Interstate 90. Because these remaining flood-prone areas are mainly agricultural, the damages are limited. Elsewhere, flooding starts with the inundation of unleveed lands, generally brush and woodland. Reconnaissance studies conducted in 1979 under Advance Engineering and Design indicated that the project lacks economic justification and construction is not warranted. Local Cooperation. The Kittitas County commissioners concur with the conclusion that the project lacks economic justification and by letter, dated 31 December 1979, stated that local sponsorship is not warranted at the present time. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reconnaissance studies were conducted to determine economic feasibility and if further studies were warranted. The project was placed in an "inactive" category because of the lack of economic feasibility. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is classified as "inactive". 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests; and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on the Spokane and Pend Oreille Rivers in Washington; the Flathead, Clark Fork, and Missoula Rivers in Montana; and the Coeur d'Alene and St. Joe (St. Maries) Rivers and Lightning Creek (Clark Fork) in Idaho. Fiscal year costs were $29,800. Costs to date have been $301,177. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 38-F. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $5,000 for Nisqually Park, Wash.; $5,000 for Okanogan River, Okanogan, Wash.; $7,580 for Puyallup River, Sumner, Wash.; $5,000 for Skykomish, Wash.; and $104,623 for Stanwood, Wash. (See Table 38-A for costs on Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, Wash.) Emergency flood-control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) See Table 38-G. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). See Table 38-G. Reservoirs 31. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WASH. Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from Mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Wash.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. Also, supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Contributed funds expended, $2,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, turbidimeter, ditches, powerline, and other project features. The outlet works stilling basin was inspected and repaired. Work continued on water quality surveys, water storage studies, and channel capacity study. Maintenance, contract: Settlement of the fill for the relocated Burlington Northern Railway 38-12 SEATTLE, WASI., DISTRICT between stations 10989 and 10991 was under continued surveillance. The deferred construction period has been extended to cover this area to observe effect of remedial work. (Improvements to the drainage system have apparently stabilized the railroad fill.) A $41,750 gate painting con- 'tract was completed during the year. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) 32. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WASH. Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 425 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 139,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Estimated cost of recreation facilities for completed project is $644,600 (July 1974). (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, 9-foot regulating outlet tunnel, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, and fish facilities. Tank trucks hauled 668 fish past the dam. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreation facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) The Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. 33. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WASH. Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,- 000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a re-examination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. Estimated cost of the project (September 1979) is $23,392,245. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must repay all costs allocated to water supply, in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. A water supply contract was signed in August 1967. Repayment estimate is $17,900,000. This reimbursable cost is divided into three increments corresponding to three increments of storage allocated to water supply, each of which must be paid, with interest, within 50 yeais of the first use of that increment of storage. The first increment, $10,400,000, is considered nondeferrable, with annual payments beginning in January 1973. A Congressional authorized amendment permitted deferral of the major portion of the first 10 years payments. Local interests must also repay such costs allocated to irrigation as are later determined to be repayable under Federal reclamation law; and hold the-United States free from damages for water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: A $190,000 equipment storage building contract and $130,000 contract for three project residences were completed during the year and a $59,063 contract for paving the housing area access road was underway. Maintenance, hired labor: Project facilities were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam and fish facilities, roads, ditches, culverts, and visitors' facilities. A tank truck hauled 1,794 fish past the dam. Condition at end of fiscal year. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970, and the project was operational 16 December 1972. 34. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, Montana, Flathead Lake, Montana (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee Project, Washington, and Ross Reservoir, 38-13 REPORT OF THIE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Washington. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. Storage for replacement of lost valley storage and an additional flood control allocation of 58,000 feet at Upper Baker, in Washington, was provided in accordance with rule curves and flood forecasts. No lost valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $100,871. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 35. ALBENI FALLS DAM, IDAHO Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, Wash. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, Idaho, and Newport, Wash.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiplepurpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acrefeet. Estimated Federal cost of recreation facilities for completed project is $1,400,400 (July 1977). (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Code 710 funds: New work, hired labor: Engineering studies continued. Regular funds: Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreation facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point, and planning for additional areas and further development of existing areas is underway. 36. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WASH. Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at river mile 545, just upstream from Mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet Okanogan, Wash., shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 64,000 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,069,000 kilowatts. Anticipated pool raising in 1981 will increase the powerplant capability to 2,450,000 kilowatts. Modifications to rehabilitate and uprate the existing Units 1 through 16 will be completed in 1986. Estimated cost of current construction project is $350,000,000 (full funding). (See Table 38- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: New work, hired labor: Completed design memos on project security and project signs. Work is continuing on design memos for wildlife mitigation; maintenance, storage, and administrative facilities; visitor center facilities; and the uprating of Units 1 through 16. New work, contract: Continued construction on structural modification to dam, Douglas County Road relocation, powerhouse extension, ancestral burial relocations, cultural resources relocation, as well as real estate acquisition. New work initiated and completed included Bridgeport State Park, Phase I; tower obstruction lights; project operations boat house; debris boom; intake trash rack; and powerhouse air conditioner room modifications. Plans and specifications were completed for expansion of Bridgeport State Park, Phase II; wildlife mitigation items, including fencing, goose islands, and raptor poles; upstream right bank riprap; and land restoration. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Contracts were awarded to replace the bus gallery roof and for generator air coolers to replace worn-out units. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project providing initial 16 power units was completed in fiscal year 1961. (For further details, see Annual tReport for 1962.) Generator units 17 through 27 38-14 SEATTLE, WASI., I)ISTRICT are completed and producing power. Construction of dam structural modification and the powerhouse and installation of additional units is approximately 99 percent complete. 37. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MONT. Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, Mont., about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai with Columbia River. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, Mont.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project will be operated as a unit of comprelhensive system for improvement of Columbia River Basin for flood control, navigation, hydro-electric power, and other purposes. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydro-electric generating units with provision for four additional units which are currently under construction. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River Basin. Project features include: Relocation of 52 miles of Montana State Highway; 60 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, including a seven mile tunnel; 50 miles of Forest Development roads, including a 2,400 foot long steel truss bridge; construction of a selective withdrawal structure to control temperature and oxygen conditions of water released past the dam; a visitor center with an exhibit program developed and operated by the Montana Historical Society; school facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel; participation in airport facilities at Kelley Flats, Montana; use of $4,000, 000 project funds for fish production measures; acquisition and conveyance to the State of Montana not more than 12,000 acres of land, at cost not to exceed $2,000,000, for the prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project; relocating Deep Creek Bridge, Boundary County, Idaho; compensating drainage districts and owners of leveed and unleveed tracts in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, Idaho, for modification of pumping facilities, crops and other damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operation of Libby Dam; constructing central sewage collection and treatment facilities as part of the relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, Montana; and 7 campground recreation facilities. Recreation development beyond the initial 7 sites will be by the U.S. Forest Service. Cost estimate for the new work (4 units) is $489,000,000 (full funding) Corps of Engineers funds; $185,349 Federal Aviation Agency funds; U.S. Forest Service, $960,000; and $17,500 contributed funds for Kelley Flats airport facility. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Libby Additional Units and Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam Powerhouse, construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam, and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 miles of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Estimated Federal cost is $559,000,000 (full funding). Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977. (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Libby Reregulating Dam -Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydro-electric generating units at the reregulating dam with 76,400 kilowatt installed capacity. Cost to install the three units is estimated at $57,500,000 (October 1980). (See Table 38-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with (participation in construction of airport facility at Kelley Flats, Montana). Contributed funds expended $15,910. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Design efforts were completed on Rexford Bench Campground, water supply system; landscape restoration MSH 37; and Peck Gulch and Yarnell Islands Campgrounds. Design efforts were continued on powerhouse circuit breaker barriers and project administration complex. New work, contract: Construction was initiated on Rexford Bench Campground, water supply system; landscape restoration MSH 37; and Peck Gulch and Yarnell Islands Campgrounds. Construction was completed on hatchery structure; sluice repair, downstream site restoration; left abutment parking and visitor control gates; Rexford Bench Campground; powerhouse noise control; McGillivray Campground, water supply system; downstream panel repair; and visitor center modifications. On the Libby Additional Units and Reregulating Dam Project, work continues on in- 38-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 stallation of turbines and fabrication of generators for Units 5 through 8. All construction work on the reregulating dam has been halted due to court injunction. On the Libby Reregulating Dam Power Units Project, work was completed on GDM, Phase II, and the preliminary design report. Regular Funds: Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Condition at end of fiscal year. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project: Planning and design is 99 percent complete with remaining work consisting of: continued meetings with Canada for water quality protection; recreation campgrounds; wildlife land acquisition; cultural resources survey and hydrology and reservoir operations. Completed construction work includes: relocation of 60 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, Forest Service Ranger Station at Canoe Gulch, Forest Service work center at Eureka, cemetery and grave relocations, airport facilities at Kelley Flats, school facilities to assist local communities in meeting their needs for additional classrooms, reservoir clearing, relocation of town of Rexford municipal facilities, and 50 miles of Forest Development Road. Relocation of 52 miles of Montana State Highway is essentially complete with highway open to public travel since November 1974. Powerhouse and miscellaneous structures contract, including installation of power generation equipment, is complete. The project as a whole is about 98 percent complete. Canada has completed all reservoir clearing work in their portion of Lake Koocanusa, including relocation of railroads and roads. Libby Additional Units and Reregulating Dam Project. Planning and design on the Reregulating Dam has been deferred pending authorization. Remaining design work consists of completion of plans and specifications on MSH 37 and Forest Development Road relocation, Reregulating Dam. Preparation of plans and specifications continued on auxiliary equipment for Units 5 through 8 at the main Libby Dam. Libby Reregulating Dam -Power Units Project. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report has been submitted to Office, Chief of Engineers. 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER See Table 38-H. General Investigations 39. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $3,326,245, of which $528,082 was for flood control studies, $1,481,649 was for navigation studies, $90,038 was for special studies, $1,026,130 was for comprehensive basin studies, $2,000 was for review of authorized projects, and $198,346 was for preauthorization studies. 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake, Osoyoos Lake, and Skagit River Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Completed flood plain information report on Chehalis River, Aberdeen to Satsop and vicinity in Washington. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $5,511 for international water studies, $277,051 for flood plain management services, $28,340 for hydrologic studies, and $1,347,860 for inspection of dams; a total of $1,658,762. 41. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No program for FY 80. 38-16 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-A See Section in Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 Total Cost to FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 1. Bellingham Harbor, New Work Wash. '.Approp. (Federal Funds) '< Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds$ New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 2. Bellingham, New Work Squalicum Small Boat Approp. Harbor, Wash. Cost (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 3. Ediz Hook, Wash. New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 4. Everett Harbor New Work and Snohomish Approp. River, Wash. Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 5. Grays Harbor and New Work Chehalis River, Approp. Wash. Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 6. Lake Crockett, Wash. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Neah Bay, Wash. New Work Approp. Cost 93,000 93,287 46,000 46,356 57,500 57,322 662,000 675,974 1,999,880 2,973,000 2,004,493 2,708,291 246,000 225,069 22,000 21,893 415,250 399,012 95,000 89,213 717,000 708,768 550,000 510,000 -258,000 -475 38,104 38,104 150,000 166,326 320,000 164,515 16,000 4,133,200 3,792,062 60,000 30,476 3,078 3,000 -3,000 4,714,400 3,700,648 5,328,410 3,718,042 10,000 34,534 9,476 9,500 333 6,691 6,691 .. 1,566,840 1,566,840 1,566,840 1 382,300 1,042,075 384,579 1,038,188 2 3 - 31,581 - 31,581 4 - 9,103 - 9,103 189,000 1,787,217 5 200,173 1,787,150 5 1,076,000 1,626,000 848,120 1,358,120 - 5,876,880 8,977 5,876,880 25,000 63,104 25,000 63,104 2 396,000 391,395 1,775,744 - 1,775,744 6 900,000 4,889,652 1,071,683 4,889,501 2 7 - 5,618 - 5,618 441,000 457,000 441,000 457,000 2,000 5,032,851 1,249 5,032,100 8 2,660,000 55,255,664 2,661,536 55,247,014 9 - 120,592 - 120,592 - 4,606,145 - 4,606,145 - 35,834 - 35,834 - 47,889 - 47,889 22,000 352,240 10 26,657 352,240 11 4317,,885582 443362,,446559 2 - 2,057,266 - 2,057,266 38-17 REPORT (OF THE CIEIF ()OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 8. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, Wash. 9. Quillayute River, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 10. Seattle Harbor, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Swinomish Channel, Wash. 12. Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funas) 18. Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. 19. Flathead River Near Kalispell, Mont. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 5,300 5,645 893,000 926,922 393,000 388,294 179,000 368,578 328,000 317,026 156,000 154,579 99,000 88,386 325,000 761,641 653,000 669,392 3,229,200 3,053,042 52,700 52,511 805,169 794,396 540,000 1,090,000 1,950,466 507,943 1,122,245 1,950,465 - - 43,337 - - 43,337 880,000 1,168,500 11,974,502 891,983 1,162,637 11,963,478 16 - - 521,850 521,850 17 525,000 1,010,000 524,171 1,014,558 401,500 401,276 250,000 232,872 5,250 6,558 30,000 27,880 120,000 145,853 28,054 28,168 35,000 1,615,000 45,273 1,616,162 - 600,000 - 500,000 94,800 73,706 307,000 7,538 2,521,000 2,651,154 162,000 208,711 -313,000 -18 4,316,000 4,436,293 150,000 145,439 150,000 4,994,760 151,429 4,994,375 - 20,000 - 20,000 - 170,335 - 170,335 325,000 4,453,716 327,356 4,453,716 2 - 69,333 - 69,333 - 808,332 - 808,332 18 70,000 4,686,743 72,376 4,686,743 - 2,435,500 - 2,435,500 19 78,633 1,386,335 78,583 1,386,285 20 - 559,581 - 559,581 21 211,000 2,000,000 202,865 1,991,001 625,000 1,225,000 724,330 1,224,330 - 1,579,269 - 1,579,269 22 80,000 12,328,978 88,788 12,328,978 23 - 78,372 - 78,372 24 59,000 58,502 3,499,600 3,183,942 80,000 83,978 4,811,497 12 4,810,999 13 14 42,148,230 41,644,160 15 230,000 229,417 38-18 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST See Section in Text Project Funding AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 Total Cost to FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 20. Okanogan River, Omak, Wash. 21. Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. 22. Placer Creek, Idaho 23. Skagit River, Wash. (Levee and Channel mprovements) 24. Stillaguamish River, Wash. 25. Tacoma, Puyallup River, Wash. 26. Willapa River at Raymond, Wash. 27. Yakima River, Ellensburg, Wash. 31. Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Mud Mountain Dam, Wash. 33. Wynoochee Lake, Wash. 35. Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho 36. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 125,000 106,357 30,000 9,504 104,708 99,014 29,000 27,241 23,000 22,448 392,300 331,612 508,300 555,090 -65,000 -7,469 638,800 626,418 66,000 64,546 1,131,000 1,079,152 77,609,000 76,923,258 2,698,000 2,779,650 1,420,000 1,007,273 105,000 117,098 802,084 786,703 46,300 48,231 9,700 9,745 519,000 539,607 854,000 793,594 60,000 7,161 730,000 726,127 50,000 50,089 1,479,00(o 1,508,854 53,811,000 55,138,525 2,768,000 2,673,739 300,000 606,923 975,000 858,302 280,000 270,227 900,000 899,824 21,000 20,752 39,000 36,376 162,500 118,594 565,000 584,187 875,000 927,016 42,200 95,292 1,241,700 1,221,468 -200 15,990 1,451,000 1,475,653 26,980,000 27,153,982 3,779,500 3,904,552 265 385 490 601 375 384 128 143 85 72 12 2295( 3( 3( 36! 40( 83' 861 974 87r 1,33( 1,35 16,59' 15,83! 3,74: 3,66 ,000 2,225,000 27 ,048 2,220,270 27 ),000 1,669,500 28 .,845 1,656,181 28 5,000 655,000 1,471 654,698 3,000 1,934,792 3,363 1,928,904 - 220,594 - 220,594 i,000 886,845 2,008 872,683 - 3,943,853 - 3,943,853 2 ),600 255,597 !,731 255,597 ),000 445,130 30 3,906 445,130 3 ),000 30,000 ),000 30,000 37,048,061 - 37,048,061 9,000 5,977,251 0,360 5,975,025 - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 - 13,295,848 25 - 13,295,848 26 7,500 9,728,372 1,114 9,713,140 - 285,908 285,908 - 23,494,445 31 - , 23,494,443 32 4,881 5,023,069 7,626 4,865,620 - 31,878,297 33 16 31,878,297 3 0,000 16,151,556 1,010 16,137,490 7,000 421,950,235 * 5,523 420,977,094 36 3,200 40,193,135 9,785 40,062,645 38-19 -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 38-A(Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section T.. . , in Text Project Funding FY 77 Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 37. Libby Dam - Lake New Work Koocanusa, Mont. Approp. 12,170,997 (Federal Funds) Cost 13,550,271 Maint. Approp. 1,428,000 Cost 1,423,617 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 1. Includes $56,582 for previous projects. Excludes $13,- 000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes applicable portion of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $1,092 for previous project. 4. Excludes $2,157,473 expended by Port of Bellingham in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 5. Includes $131,075 preauthorization cost. 6. Includes $418,209 for previous projects. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 7. Includes $5,869 for previous projects. 8. Includes $1,249 Code 713 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. Includes $113,134 for previous projects. Excludes $162,000 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 9. Includes $37,415 for previous projects. 10. Includes $92,000 Code 713 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 11. Includes $92,000 expended from Code 713 recreation facilities at completed project. 12. Includes $787 200 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 13. Includes $485,002 for previous projects. 14. Includes $786,702 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 15. Includes $1,631,195 expended between 1916 and 1936 on operation and care of works of improvement, under provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 16. Includes $67,496 for previous project. 17. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944; and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 18. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 19. Includes $159,584 for previous projects. 20. Includes $5,347 for previous projects. 21. Includes $62,697 value in work contributed by Port of Tacoma. TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING UiI ost toL FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 - - 297,630 - - 297,630 16,760,000 20,403,800 14,123,000 515,098,140 37 15,883,188 21,483,655 13,154,883 514,025,198 38 1,670,000 1,693,000 2,005,000 9,302,079 1,645,936 1,708,685 2,033,236 9,287,574 17,500 - - 15,910 39 22. Includes $228,084 for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 23. Includes $309,177 for previous projects. 24. Includes $6,597 for previous project. 25. Includes $87,785 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 26. Includes $87,785 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 27. Includes $125,000 preauthorization cost. 28. Includes $160,700 preauthorization cost. 29. Includes $1,035 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 30. Includes $32,630 preconstruction planning costs. 31. Includes $102,200 Code 711 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 32. Includes $102,199 expended from Code 711 recreation facilities at completed project. 33. Includes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds and $971,947 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 34. Includes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds and $971,947 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities on completed project. 35. Includes $277,406,000 for 11 additional generator units and $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds and $147,983 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 36. Includes $276,432,859 for 11 additional generator units and $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds and $147,983 Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at completed project. 37. Includes $36,003,000 for additional units and reregulating dam, and for planning $475,000 for power. 38. Includes $35,927,261 for additional units and reregulating dam, and for planning $472,653 for power. 39. Excludes $185,349 Federal Aviation Agency funds for construction of Kelley Flats airport facility. LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 1 of Text) Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. HI. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. 11. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' II. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.2 S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.3 38-20 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Acts July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended BELLINGHAM, SQUALICUM SMALL BOAT HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of 1500 feet of breakwater, dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning -basin. EDIZ HOOK, WASH. (See Section 3 of Text) Construction of 10,000 lineal feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WASH. (See Section 4 of Text) Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. Raise and extend existing training dike; and construct breakwater on westerly and southerly sides of 14th Street small-boat basin. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WASH. (See Section 5 of Text) South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. 6 Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authotized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities, Deaie PrjctRpoti Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers4 P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107 H. Doc. 93-101, 93rd Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 1HD. oc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 357, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.5 Apnpn. u3a5l 17R-e3p5o3r3t, 1895, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H1. stD oSce.s s5.07, 59th Cong., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H2. dD Soecs. s.1125, 60th Cong., H2. dD Soecs. s.1729, 64th Cong., H2. dD Soecs. s.582, 69th Cong., H1. stD oSce.s s3.15, 70th Cong., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 53, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 38-21 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF ()OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 198() TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 March 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 20, 1938 Sept. 3, 1954 July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept, 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 June 13, 1902 Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal, which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel.7 Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. LAKE CROCKETT, WASII. (See Section 6 of Text) Small-boat basin. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. NEAH BAY, WASH. (See Section 7 of Text) Rubblestone breakwater. Reinforcement of existing revetment. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WASH. (See Section 8 of Text) Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WASH. (See Section 9 of Text) Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike with groins, on westerly side, to stabilize entrance." Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin." SEATTLE HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 10 of Text) Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. 13 Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WASH. (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". TACOMA HARBOR, WASH. (See Section 12 of Text) City Waterway. Report in Office, Chief of Engineers 11. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. IH. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.5 11. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. Ii. Doc. 404, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.4 Annual Report for 1893, page 342510 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 5 S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. HI. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess.5 11. Doc. 211, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. 5 11. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1892, p. 2752. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 76, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. 38-22 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Acts July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 as amended (Sec. 107) 14 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19359 Aug. 30, 193511 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept, 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 22, 1922 June 26, 19348 Aug. 30, 19359 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended May 10, 1977 June 30, 1948 as amended Hylebos Waterway. Training walls at mouth of Puyallup River (previously authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933). Blair Waterway extension. Blair and Hylebos Waterways extension. WESTHAVEN COVE SMALL BOAT BASIN, WASH. (See Section 13 of Text) Removal of 350-foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WASH. (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WASH. (See Section 18 of Text) For a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal basis. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FLATHEAD RIVER NEAR KALISPELL, MONT. (See Section 19 of Text) Construct 33,000 lineal feet of earth levee along a 9-mile length of river. OKANOGAN RIVER, OMAK, WASH. (See Section 20 of Text) Construction of levee improvements including 6500 feet of levee on the east bank and about 7700 feet of levee on the west bank. Rivers and Harbors Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 25, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and 91, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 55, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H2.d D Soee.s s.171, 84th Cong., S2. dD oSce.s s1.051, 87th Cong., Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers P.L. 86-645 H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H2. dD Soee.s s4. 81, 76th Cong., H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H1. stD oSee. ss8.00, 64th Cong., H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H1. stD oSee.s s1.540, 72d Cong., SAecc. t 4o, f F1lo9o44d Control H. Doc. 635, 94th Cong., 2d Sess.5 DOeftfaiiclee,d CPhrioejfe cotf Report in Engineersl 6 Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 38-23 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 30, 1948 as amended Dec. 15, 1970 Nov. 7, 1966 June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Dec. 22, 1944 May 17, 195021 Oct. 27, 1965 May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 OKANOGAN RIVER, OROVILLE, WASH. (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for raising 6900 feet of existing levee an average of two feet and provides 2400 feet of new levee averaging six feet in height and would provide protection against a 100-year flood. PLACER CREEK, IDAHO (See Section 22 of Text) Construction of 3,700 feet concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace, Idaho. SKAGIT RIVER, WASH. (LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees and minor channel improvements to increase minimum channel capacity from 91,000 to 120,000 cubic feet per second. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WASH. (See Section 24 of Text) Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WASH. (See Section 25 of Text) Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of City of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. WILLAPA RIVER AT RAYMOND, WASH. (See Section 26 of Text) Levee system at Raymond to protect municipal areas from tidal waters. YAKIMA RIVER AT ELLENSBURG, WASH. (See Section 27 of Text) System of Flood Control Levees Extended project expiration date to June 10, 1970 HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WASH. (See Section 31 of Text) Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WASHI. (See Section 32 of Text) Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WASH. (See Section 33 of Text) Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Detailed Project Report in Office, Chief of Engineers" Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 11. Doc. 357, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc., 89th Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess.5 S. Comm. Print, Puyallup River, Wash., 74th Cong., 2d Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 11. Doc. 701, 77th Cong,, 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.5 P.L. 85-592 S. Comm. Print, Puyallup River, Wash., 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 1H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.6 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 38-24 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar 7 197A Amend contract between City of Aberdeen and United P.L. 93-251 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended on May 4, 1977 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 AV-a . , � t] States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-years payments. ALBENI FALLS DAM, IDAHO (See Section 35 of Text) Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WASH. (See Section 36 of Text) Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MONT. (See Section 37 of Text) Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, Mont. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, Montana; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (Amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000) Acquisition of land not to exceed $2,000,000 for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, Idaho for reconstruction of Deep Creek; Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation, not to exceed $1,500,000, to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands, in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, Idaho, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. 38-25 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. s Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.5 P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.6 P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-23918 P.L. 90-48319 P.L. 91-28220 P.L. 91-625 P.L. 91-611 S. Doc. 93-29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1. Contains latest published map of Squalicum Creek 13. Includes settling basin of 100,000 cubic yards capacity Waterway. which has been classified as inactive. 2. Contains latest published map of small-boat basin. 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 7 February 1979. 3. Contains latest published map of Whatcom Creek 15. Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28,1935. Waterway. 16. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 7 June 1977. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 10 February 1976. 17. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 15 March 1979. 5. Contains latest published map. 18. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 6. Inactive. 502. 7. A portion deferred. 19. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 8. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 20. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Mis- 9. Included in Public Works Administration Program. cellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 10. Annual Report for 1913 contains latest published map 21. Conditionally authorized project, subject to establish- (Page 3127). ment of economic justification. Report on Yakima River and 11. A portion inactive. Tributaries dated September 15, 1956, established economic 12. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of justification. James Island, is included in this modification. TABLE 38-C LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WASH. PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (See Section 18 of Text) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 1-1/4 1-1/4 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter silli Feet 36 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost : 1. Low water in upper pool. 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,224,712 and the emergency gates, completed in 1923, $174,693. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 15 of Text) Name of Project l)ate Survey Conducted Washington: Anacortes Harbor Blaine Harbor Hammersly Inlet Olympia Harbor Port Angeles Harbor Port Gamble Port Orchard Bay March - September 1980 September 1980 September 1980 June 1980 September 1980 September 1980 June - September 1980 38-26 TABLE 38-D -- SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-D (Continued) PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 15 of Text) Name of Project Tacoma Harbor Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHOI (Se( Date Survey Conducted December 1979- August 1980 April 1980 RIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS e Section 16 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report For Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Construction Anacortes Harbor, Wash. Anacortes Navigation Channel, Wash. 2 17 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (I&J Street Waterway) 2 17 Blaine Harbor, Wash. 2 Brownsville, Wash. 17 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, Wash. 2 Edmonds Harbor, Wash. Flathead River, Mont. 2 Hammersley Inlet, Wash. 2 19 Hoquiam River, Wash. 2 Kingston Harbor, Wash. 2 Kootenai River, Idaho and Mont. 2 Mats Mats Bay, Wash. 2 17 Olympia Harbor, Wash. Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, Mont. 2 Port Angeles Harbor, Wash. is Port Gamble Harbor, Wash. 18 Port Orchard Bay, Wash. 2 Port Townsend, Wash. Shilshole Bay, Seattle, Wash. 2 Skagit River, Wash. 19 Stillaguamish River, Wash. Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, Wash. 1. Includes applicable portion of reconnaissance and condition survey costs. 2. Completed. 3. Excludes $59,523 contributed funds expended. 4. Excludes $5,000 contribuited funds expended. 5. Excludes $6,700 contributed funds expended. 6. Project deferred pending compliance by sponsor withl local cooperation requirements. 7. Includes $8,005 expended for previous project. 8. Excludes $117,585 contributed funds expended. 9. Includes $5,000 for mitigation shore damages study expended. 1977 1977 1966 1958 1972 1923 1966 1901 1950 1950 1967 1933 1970 1975 1918 1960 1953 1928 1974 1962 1950 1946 1975 222,345 3 825,262 5 125,634 346,650 79,305 6 274,390 7 9,811 9,000 51,294 262,570 8 9,255 137,679 10 464,782 "i 4,491 470,873 11,911 13 42,804 480,899 14 2,575,091 102,330 15 4,234 16 73,322 447,761 4 6,570 30,939 7,693 14,826 29,004 13,221 24,048 9 5,643 9,155 601,921 12 259 50,968 43,967 12,731 52,660 29,432 60,265 246,521 10. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds expended. 11. Includes $183,257 for previous projects, and $2,803 expended for restudy Fiscal Years 1971-1973. 12. Includes $14,418 expended for previous project. 13. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 14. Excludes $85,223 contributed funds expended. 15. Includes $2,500 expended for previous project. 16. For economic study, only. 17. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 18. Deauthorized 5 August 1977 (uncompleted portion). 19. Deauthorized 3 October 1978 (uncompleted portion). 38-27 Operation and ---- Maintenance 1 TABLE 38-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1980 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation Project and Report For Construction Maintenance American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash. 1 2 1957 59,582 3 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, Idaho 2 1942 152,872 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Idaho, Mont., and Wash.: Clark Fork at Missoula, Mont. 2 1968 377,012 Entiat River, Wash. 1958 Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, Idaho 2 1959 42,726 Methow River, Wash. 1958 Okanogan River, Wash. 1958 1,100 4 St. Regis River, Mont. 8 1958 1,400 4 Wenatchee River, Wash. 8 1958 - - Yakima River at Ellensburg, Wash. 1970 14,300 4 Dungeness River, Clallam County, Wash. 1 2 1964 392,106 5 St. Maries, St. Joe River, Idaho 2 1942 357,698 - Sammamish River, Wash. 2 1967 2,582,537 6 - Shelton Creek, Wash. 1 2 7 1979 872,020 - Skagit River, Wash. (Avon Bypass) 1968 54,468 4 Spokane, Spokane River, Wash. 1939 2,944 4 Startup, Wallace River, Wash. 1 2 1970 271,713 - Upper Puyallup River, Wash. 2 1938 71,495 - Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, Wash. 1977 544,331 - Yakima, Yakima River, Wash. 2 1948 381,961 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 5. Includes Public Works Acceleration Act funds of section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. $340,067. 2. Completed. 6. Excludes $689,523 contributed funds expended. 3. Excludes $10,000 contributed funds expended. 7. Includes $100,221 preauthorization cost. 4. Preconstruction planning only. 8. Deauthorized 3 October 1978. TABLE 38-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Project Federal Cost EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES Advance preparation Flood emergency operations Repair and restoration: Clallam County, Wash. Skagit County, Wash. Snohomish County, Snohomish River, Wash. Whatcom County, Wash. Total EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Dungeness River, Sequim, Wash. Hoh River, County Road 216, Wash. Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, Wash. Fiscal Year Costs (1980) $ 111,249 399,428 161,930 351,838 329,852 842,705 $2,197,002 Fiscal Year Costs (1980) $ 95,402 17,654 136,978 38-28 SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 38-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Project Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, Idaho' Lower Hoh Indian Village, Forks, Wash. Pilchuck River, Everett, Wash. Rock Creek Road, Granite City, Mont. Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, Wash. Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, Wash. Total 1. Project terminated; unable to obtain easements. TABLE 38-H OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER (See Section 38 of Text) Project Priests Rapids Dam, Columbia River, Wash. 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1954 Costs to Sep. 30, 1980 Construction Operation and aintenance 350,000 38-29 Federal Cost 12,000 60,610 50,000 103,878 127,860 $ 604,382 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT* This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge near Richland, Washington. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Channels and Harbors 1. Other Authorized Navigation Projects...... ....... 3 9-1 Flood Control Local Protection 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects.................3 9-1 3. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..... e0FId.... ........... 39-2 4. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects....................................3 9-2 5. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......... 33.9..-.2..... Reservoirs 6. Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho..........39-2 7. Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho .................. 3 9-3 8. Mill Creek Lake, Wash....................39-3 9. Ririe Lake, Idaho......................39-4 10. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg......................................... 39-4 11. Zintel Canyon Dam, Wash................ 39-5 12. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations................. 3 9-5 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Page Including Power 13. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho............. 3 9-5 14. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea-Wash....................... 3 9- 6 15. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, Idaho & Wash............................39-7 16. Little Goose Lock and Dam- Lake Bryan-Wash ..... D.......... 39-7 17. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, W ash............................................ 3 9-8 18. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, W ash.........................................3 9-9 19. Lower Snake River, Wash., Fish and Wildlife Compensation .............. 39-9 20. McNary Lock and Dam--Lake Wallula-Oreg. & Wash.............. 3 9-9 21. McNary Second Powerhouse, Oreg. & Wash.......... ...... 39-10 22. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Oreg., Wash. & Idaho ........................ 39-10 General Investigations 23. Surveys . ....................... ............... 39-11 24. Collection and Study of Basic Datan. ..............................s. .. 39-11 25. Research and Development ............. 39-11 Navigation Channels and Harbors 1. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 39-C. Flood Control Local Protection 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 39-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization should be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-D for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved June 22, 1936, as amended, applies to all the flood control projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. No projects were recommended for deauthorization during period. Condition at end of fiscal year. In accordance with provisions of Section 12, Public Law 93-251, the Payette River, Idaho project was deauthorized on 3 October 1978. Mill Creek, Wash. and Touchet River, Wash. were deauthorized 5 August 1977. Boise River was reclassified to inactive status due to lack of economic feasibility. 3. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to main-. tain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. See Table 39-E for inspections made during fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $69,563. Total costs to September 30, 1980 have been $460,220. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 39-F. 5. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, P.L. 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 39-G. Emergency flood control activities-advance preparation, flood fighting, and rehabilitation (P.L. 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for period were $66,309 for advance preparation, $190,017 for flood emergency operations, and $11,076 for repair and restoration. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of, flood control (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780, 83d Cong. as amended by Sec. 26 of the 1974 Water Resource Development Act). There were no Federal costs for snagging and clearing this fiscal year. Emergency stream bank and shoreline protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act as amended by Sec. 27 of the 1974 Water Resource Development Act). There were no Federal costs for emergency streambank and shoreline protection this fiscal year. Small flood control projects authority (Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended by Sec. 205 of the 1962 Flood Control Act, Sec. 61 of the 1974 Water Resource Development Act and Sec. 133(b) of the 1976 Water Resource Development Act). Federal costs for small flood control projects for fiscal year were $52,024. Reservoirs -6. BLACKFOOT RESERVOIR, IDAHO Location. On Blackfoot River in Caribou County, Idaho, about 40 miles southeast of City of Blackfoot. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets Paradise Valley, Cranes Flat, Portneuf, and Henrys Fork location and surroundings in immediate vicinity of project.) Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. Blackfoot Reservoir is owned and operated by Fort Hall Agency of Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior. Main dam, which is about 55 feet high above streambed, is a rockfill structure with a concrete core. China Hat Dam, an earthfill structure, closes an arm of reservoir near its upstream end to minimize storage loss due to seepage in pervious formation of that area. Existing main dam structure includes a 3,800-cubic-foot-per-second spillway on the right abutment and an outlet tunnel in left abutment with a capacity of 2,000 cubic feet per second. Reservoir has a usable storage capacity of 413,000 acre-feet at design maximum water surface Elevation 6124. However, due to experience with seepage losses from southern end of reservoir, operating level has been limited to about Elevation 6120, or about 340,000 acre-feet storage capacity. Water stored in reservoir is used to irrigate lands in Fort Hall Indian Reservation in vicinity of Blackfoot and south. Recommended modifications to the project would maintain the present maximum operating pool level at Elevation 6120.5. The spillway capacity would be increased to21,700 cubic feet per second by lowering the crest elevation from 6118.5 to 39-2 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT 6112 and increasing the spillway width from 51 feet to 86 feet. The spillway would be equipped with new gates and would contain the outlet works. The existing outlet would be abandoned. China Hat Dam would be raised from Elevation 6122 to 6124. The project modification will require only limited additional lands (110 acres) in the construction areas, no mitigation of fish and wildlife resources, and no relocations. Construction to be accomplished by the Corps, with continued operation of project by Bureau of Indian Affairs. Estimated Federal cost of proposed modified operation (October 1978) is $4,600,000. Local cooperation. None required. Condition at end of fiscal year. The postauthorization report was approved by Office of Management and Budget 9 January 1973. However, the General Design Memorandum on "Maximum Operating Pool," was disapproved by higher authority because the modification as proposed was a correction for dam safety rather than flood control as authorized. A letter dated 2 July 1979 was forwarded to the Bureau of Indian Affairs indicating that the Corps of Engineers does not intend to pursue additional funding for the modification. Efforts are being made by the Bureau of Indian Affairs to obtain funds for this work through their own agency. 7. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, IDAHO Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of City of Boise. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. For further details see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962. Federal cost of completed project was $19,081,250. Expenditures on recreation facilities for completed project have been $480,- 189 raising total project cost to $19,561,439. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation for flood control, recreation, and irrigation continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. A feasible method of achieving better flood control through diversion into New York Canal, through Lake Lowell, and into the Snake River has been developed but rejected by local interests due to the infrequent use of this diversion method. Since 1961, $38,090,200 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. Final Environmental Impact Statement on the initial project was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 29 November 1976. A revised draft Environmental Impact Statement for the modification work was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 18 September 1978. During the detailed investigation of outlet capacity and the potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976 but to date it has not been funded. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The Boise Project Board of Control completed a planning report and in January 1979 applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for license to construct and operate power facilities at the project. On 10 June 1980, the Boise Project Board of Control was granted a license to construct and operate power facilities at the project. The Chief of Engineers on 2 September 1980 filed a petition of appeal. Construction has not been initiated on the project. 8. MILL CREEK LAKE, WASH. Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, Wash., on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. Off-stream earthfill storage dam about 145 feet high and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. A channel through the City of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. For further details see page 2005 of Annual Report for 1962. Federal cost of original project was $2,162,155. Adding recreation facilities has thus far increased project costs by $68,446 to $2,230,601. Not included in that cost is $80,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of the channel through Walla Walla. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. Supplement No.1 to Design Memorandum No.5, "Fish Passage Facilities" and Design Memorandum No. 6, "Storage Dam Rehabilitation," were completed and Design Memorandum No. 6 was approved in June 1980. With completion of the plans and specifications for the concrete cutoff wall at the dam, the contract was advertised for bid on 24 September 1980. 39-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Operation and Maintenance: Routine maintenance by Government forces continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation area. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of channel through City of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Park and recreation facilities were opened to public July 1, 1964. Since 1942, $3,339,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 12 December 1975. The purpose of the rehabilitation of the existing project is to correct the seepage and internal erosion which have occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir requiring limited flood control use of the project. 9. RIRIE LAKE, IDAHO Location. On Willow Creek, a tributary of Snake River, in Bonneville County, Idaho. The channel improvement extends from junction of Sand and Willow Creeks to a point on Snake River about 4 miles upstream from City of Idaho Falls, Idaho. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map, Ucon, Idaho.) Dam is about 5 miles below confluence of Willow Creek and Meadow Creek and about 15 miles northeast of City of Idaho Falls, Idaho. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map, Poplar, Idaho.) Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A rockfill dam about 840 feet long at the crest and about 184 feet high above streambed and downstream channel construction. Spillway has a concrete-lined channel in right abutment. Outlet works utilize a reinforced concrete conduit leading from an intake tower upstream to a stilling basin downstream at the toe of left abutment. Lake has gross storage capacity of 100,000 acre-feet; 90,000 acre-feet of active space for flood control, irrigation, and recreation and 10,000 acre-feet of space for sediment storage and conservation. Floodway channel is about 8.0 miles long with a capacity of 900 cubic feet per second. Authorization specified that the project shall be constructed by the Corps of Engineers and operated and maintained by the Water and Power Resources Service. Federal cost of completed project is $39,716,448 including $30,000 for value of public-owned lands, Local cooperation. Complete except for irrigation contracts. Operations and results during fiscal year. Completion contract for miscellaneous deficiencies was completed which completes all project construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began June 1967 and was completed in September 1980. All necessary real estate has been acquired. Entire project is 100 percent complete. A Project Transfer Agreement with the Water and Power Resources Service (Bureau of Reclamation) was signed on October 14, 1976 for transfer of the project for flood control and recreation use only until the irrigation water rights and space allocation issues are resolved. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality February 13, 1973. 10. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OREG. Location. On Willow Creek just upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. Project will provide flood protection to the City of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam will be a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs and an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs. The outlet works will be uncontrolled except for provisions to release lake inflows during periods of low flow and for future irrigation. Gross storage capacity of the project will be 13,- 250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive ,irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities will be provided. Estimated Federal cost (full funding) is $44,900,000. Local cooperation. Local interests will not be required to share in construction costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on 20 December 1979. The provisions of the Clean Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued 12 January 1980, and a Section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on 15 February 1980. Land acquisition is about 38 percent complete which enabled the first relocation contract to be awarded 30 September 1980. 39-4 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT Condition at the end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications for remaining relocation work are about 60 percent complete. Design Memo. No. 2, "Phase II General Design Memo," and the supplemental Real Estate Design Memo. No. 3A were approved 29 February 1980. Morrow County by letter dated 27 August 1979 indicated they would be interested in.. cost-sharing for recreational development after completion of the project and after studies were made to determine visitor use. 11. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WASH. Location. In Zintel Canyon, 2.1 miles southwest of Kennewick, Wash., in Section 16, Township 8, North, Range 29 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The recommended project consists of an overflow dam, 109.5 feet high above streambed and 725 feet long at the crest length including overflow dike and floodwalls. The dam will be primarily roller compacted concrete (RCC). The extension dike will have an impervious core protected both upstream and downstream by riprap and rockfill slope. The dike will extend from near the left abutment of the main dam for 1,250 feet across a saddle in the left bank; it will have a top width of 17 feet and a maximum height of 31.3 feet and will consist of a random impervious fill. The spillway will be an ungated overflow 450 feet wide between floodwalls; maximum spillway discharge will be 36,800 cubic feet per second. The outlet will consist of a 48-inch conduit through the dam with a fixed orifice at the intake sized to pass a maximum flow of 60 cfs. A supplemental gated opening will permit increased releases up to 165 cfs under maximum streamflow conditions. Downstream channel will consist of 12,000 feet of unimproved natural channel between the damsite and a conduit intake structure, 4,195 feet of buried conduit, and an improved open channel 1,025 feet long. Project will provide flood control for the City of Kennewick, Wash. A permanent pool will not be maintained. Project adopted by resolution of House Committee on Public Works December 15, 1970 and by resolution of Senate Committee on Public Works December 17,1970 under authority of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (P.L. 298, 89th Cong.). Estimated Federal cost (October 1979) is $5,200,000. Estimated non-Federal cost for land and relocations is $731,000. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality 8 January 1975. Local cooperation. City of Kennewick unable to meet sponsorship requirements at this time. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design Memo No. 3, "Type of Dam, Spillway and Outlet Works," was completed and sent to higher authority on 26 September 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is delayed pending ability of sponsor to meet requirements of local cooperation. 12. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Water and Power Resources Service (WPRS). Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the WPRS. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control was accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $84,894. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, IDAHO Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, Idaho, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, Idaho. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A straight concrete gravity dam about 717 feet in maximum structural height above foundation and 3,300 feet long at crest elevation 1613. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control, and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into a rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs and affords substantial recreational benefits. Powerhouse includes two 90,000 and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units, with provisions for three additional 220,000 kilowatt units for an ultimate in- 39-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 stalled capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Fish passage at Dworshak Dam is not feasible, and a hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of fish runs. The reservoir area has been habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Project plans include acquisition of land outside reservoir limits to mitigate losses of big game winter browse areas inundated by reservoir. Estimated total cost for new work is $328,040,- 000 consisting of $325,300,000 (full funding) for construction and $2,740,000 for value of publicdomain lands. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts were awarded in May 1980 to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service to conduct field tests evaluating the impacts of greater fluctuation downstream of the dam by the addition of a 220,000 kilowatt fourth generating unit. These agencies will be evaluating the impacts on fish, wildlife, recreation, and safety. However, the runoff was not sufficient during FY 1980 to conduct the studies and will be continued into FY 1981. Wildlife habitat browse development continues on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Acquisition efforts continue for lands outside reservoir limits to mitigate losses of winter browse areas. One major recreation site-Three Meadows Group Camp-remains to be completed. A contract for three log dumps on the upper reservoir was awarded in December 1979 and is 95 percent complete. Supplement No. 8 to Design Memo No. 14.1, "Reuse System I Modification for Support of Ponds and Nursery," was approved in September 1980. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A hatch of 2,- 700,000 smolts weighing 280,000 pounds was released in the spring of 1980. This hatch was spawned from 4,939 adult steelhead that returned to the hatchery in 1979. 2,519 adult steelhead were spawned in the spring of 1980 and are expected to produce 2,700,000 smolts at 330,000 pounds for release in the spring of 1981. Fish releases into the reservoir were 112,000 catchable rainbow and 1,500,000 fingerling rainbow trout. A total of 1.75 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project started April 1963 and is estimated to be 96 percent complete; it became operational for flood control June 1972 and has prevented about $728,000 in potential flood damages downstream since then. All project lands have been acquired except those required to replace the loss of wildlife browse areas from inundation by reservoir. Relocations are estimated to be 100 percent complete; dam 100 percent; fish and wildlife facilities 86 percent; powerplant 100 percent; reservoir clearing 100 percent; and recreation facilities 64 percent. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 220,000 kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. Fluctuation studies are underway to evaluate the impact of greater fluctuation downstream of the dam by the addition of a fourth generating unit. Power generating Unit No. 1, 90,000-kilowatt capacity, was put in service March 1, 1973; Unit No. 2, also 90,000-kilowatt capacity, began producing April 6, 1973; Unit No. 3, 9,220,000- kilowatt capacity, went on the line April 20,1973. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, garbage can, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres recreation site was opened to the public in August 1976. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, car-trailer parking, comfort stations, and fully developed overnight camping. Freeman Creek recreation site will be open to the public in the spring of 1981. Facilities will provide boat launching, handling docks, overnight parking, comfort stations, and a swim area. Power generation through September 1980 has been 13.62 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $57.0 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. 14. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-LAKE SACAJAWEA, WASH. Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula and 12 miles east of Pasco, Wash. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and relocation of railroads. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, and incidental irrigation. Dam has normal operating range between elevations 440 and 437 mean sea level. The lake extends upstream about 31.9 miles, providing slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Beginning at south end, project consists of a concrete nonoverflow section, concrete powerhouse, spillway dam, concrete nonoverflow section, 39-6 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT navigation lock, and an earth and rockfill embankment at north abutment. Fish passing facilities, including two ladders, are provided. Powerplant now has three 90,000-kilowatt units and three 111,000-kilowatt units installed. Spillway dam is 610 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 391 mean sea level is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide by 51 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 mean sea level and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 15 feet deep is provided from mouth of Snake River to dam. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated cost for new work is $167,793,595 consisting of $129,578,479 for the completed project, $36,378,316 (full funding) for power units 4 through 6, $87,000 for U. S. Coast Guard navigation aids, $22,300 for value of public-domain lands, $1,645,000 for recreational facilities, and a non-Federal contribution of $82,500 toward an artificial fish spawning channel. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts continuing for habitat development. Visitors' facilities have been completed. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts were awarded and completed for modifying the navigation lock, floating bulkhead, and replacing a floating guidewall anchor cable. Contracts were also awarded for replacing three 115-kilovolt oil circuit breakers, bank restoration at Charbonneau and Levy parks, painting the intake gantry crane and maintenance of the recreation areas. 2.39 Billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 3,- 263,292 tons of cargo passed through navigation lock during calendar year 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started December 1955 and the project was placed in useful operation January 1962. Installation of three 111,000 kilowatt additional generating units is complete with power-on-line date of January 1976 for Unit No.6. Modifications to the fish facilities are 99 percent complete. An Environmental Impact Statement concerning power units 4 through 6 was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality August 1971. Power generation through September 1980 has s been 41.41 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $72.8 million tothe U.S. Treasury ( from sale of power by Bonneville Power Ad- i ministration, c 15. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, IDAHO AND WASHINGTON Location. On the Snake River, River Mile 141.3, 1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge connecting the towns of Lewiston, Idaho and Clarkston, Washington. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The project will consist of a new fixed high-level four lane highway bridge and approaches on U.S. Highway 12 across the Snake River to be constructed at a cost "not to exceed $21,000,000." Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests are to provide without cost to the-United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the bridge and its approaches and after construction to own, operate toll free, and maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non-Federal costs for land and relocation are $755,193. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract for the main bridge was awarded in January 1980 for the basic bridge structure including two of the three additives. Construction of the bridge is about 30 percent complete. Condition, at end of fiscal year. Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 16 July 1979. 16. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BRYAN, WASH. Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Lower Monumental Lake, about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, Wash., and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, Idaho. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Improvements provide navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Dam has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 mean sea level. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,670 feet long and about 160 feet high above streambed and consists of a powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and necessary nonoverflow sections. Fish passing facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through spillway vhich connects to powerhouse fish collection ;ystem and south shore ladder. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt generating units for a :apacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam can pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per secnd. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear 39-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Relocations along the lake include 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 5.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated cost for new work is $220,387,676 consisting of $160,413,215 for the completed project, $59,585,461 (full funding) for power units 4 through 6, $87,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids, and $302,000 for value of publicly owned land. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts continued for wildlife habitat development. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A total of 2.73- billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 2,517,156 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began June 1963 and the project was opened to navigation May 1970. Installation of three 111,- 000 kilowatt additional generating units is complete with power-on-line date of July 1978 for Unit No. 6. Recreational facilities along Lake Bryan are 100 percent complete, the initial project is 100 percent complete, and installation of power units 4 through 6 is 100 percent complete. Modifications to the fish facilities are 99 percent complete. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 8 January 1975. Power generation through September 1980 has been 26.93 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $42.2 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. 17. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WASH. Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, Idaho. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. Provides for a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities, and requires about 8 miles of backwater levees along Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, Idaho. Benefits afforded by project include slack-water navigation, power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Water surface at the dam varies between Elevations 738 and 724 to maintain a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 in the Lewiston, Idaho-Clarkston, Wash., area. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt units. Spillway has a capacity for a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is a single-lift type (105 feet maximum) with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $364,459,511 consisting of $318,111,000 for the initial installation, $46,211,511 for power units 4 through 6, $135,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids, and $2,000 for value of publicly owned lands. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts continuing for repair of stator winding on generators No. 1, 2, and 3. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts were awarded for grounds maintenance service. A total of 2.78 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 1,- 402,102 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started July 1965 and is about 99 percent complete. Acquisition of lands is 100 percent complete. Lake was filled 15 February 1975 and the first power generating unit went on the line 15 April 1975. An Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality November 1971. A revised statement to include the additional units was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 23 July 1975. Installation of three additional 135,000 kilowatt generating units is complete with Unit No. 6 power-on-line date of May 1978. Remaining items of work are due primarily to design deficiencies on Generators 1, 2, and 3, City of Lewiston's water intake, navigation lock, bascule bridge, and additional remaining work on the Lindsay Creek drainage structure intake. Construction completion percentages are: relocations 99; lake area 99; dam 100; navigation lock 100; fish facilities 100; powerplant 100; recreation facilities 99; backwater levees 100; and installation of power units 4 through 6,100. Power generation through September 1980 has been 14.38 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $33.9 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. 39-8 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT 18. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WASH. Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea, about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, Wash., and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A dam, powerplant, fish ladders, navigation lock, appurtenant facilities, and relocation of railroads and highways. Dam has normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537. The lake extends about 29 miles upstream to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam is concrete gravity with earthfill and rockfill abutments, is 3,800 feet long including abutments, spillway, navigation lock, and powerhouse, and is about 135 feet high above streambed. There are two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000- kilowatt units for a total capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway is 508 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 483 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 8 radial gates, each 50 feet wide and 61 feet high. Deck is at Elevation 553 feet and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type, with lock chamber 86 by 675 feet and minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated cost for new work is $236,504,061 consisting of $184,712,361 for the completed project, $51,704,700 (full funding) for power units 4 through 6, and $87,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts continuing on wildlife habitat development. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts were awarded for resurfacing concrete in the navigation lock chamber and replacing the floating guidewall anchor cable. A total of 2.67 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Cargoes totaling 2,652,101 tons passed through navigation lock during calendar year 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began June 1961, and the project was opened to navigation April 1969. Deferred construction on the Union Pacific Railroad is complete. Installation of three 111,000 kilowatt additional generating units is complete with power-on-line date of April 1979 for Unit No.6. The initial project is 100 percent complete. Remaining item of work consists of wildlife habitat development. Power generation through September 1980 has been 29.58 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $49.5 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 21 May 1976. 19. LOWER SNAKE RIVER, WASH., FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Wash., and Oreg. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The project will consist of a series of fish hatcheries and wildlife development areas at sites to be selected. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). Estimated Federal cost of the project is $184,000,- .000 (full funding). Lbocal cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The first release from the McCall, Idaho summer chinook hatchery was made this year. Also the adult trapping facility, that will provide the fish egg supply for the McCall Hatchery, became operational. Design has been completed for a spring chinook hatchery for Oregon at the Lookingglass site. A major contract was awarded for an access road to the Iookingglass Hatchery site. Final design was begun on a steelhead and chinook hatchery for Washington at the Lyons Ferry site, and a steelhead rearing facility for Idaho by expanding the Hagerman National Fish Hatchery. Studies are underway to identify other potential hatchery sites in Oregon and Idaho. Preliminary contacts were made with the counties involved and landowners who may be interested in participating in the off-project wildlife program in Washington. Condition at end of fiscal year. The real estate design memorandum, feature design memorandum on the McCall Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, and the offproject wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. 20. McNARY LOCK AND DAM--LAKE WALLULA, OREG.-WASH. Lpcation. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, Oreg., and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. 39-9 IEIO()RT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. A concrete dam 7,300 feet long overall and 183 feet high above streambed, powerplant with 14 power generating units, navigation lock, fishways, levees and pumping plants, incidental irrigation, and modification of railroad bridges over Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-H. Estimated total cost for new work is $328,212,- 000 consisting of $319,643,000 (full funding) for construction, $69,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids, and $8,500,000 for modification of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge over Columbia River by the Coast Guard. Expenditures on recreation facilities for completed project have been $1,289,- 554. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The second year of a three-year contract for dredging of the navigation channel was completed. A contract was awarded to furnish 39 traveling fish screens. These screens will be placed in the powerhouse intake bulkhead slots to divert downstream migrating fingerlings from passing through the power turbines. This contract is ahead of schedule and is scheduled for completion in FY 1981. Also, a contract was advertised for furnishing a fish transportation barge for downstream migrating fingerlings. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Contracts were awarded for heat pump No. 1 repair, navigation lock gate lubrication equipment, transformer cell drains, powerhouse roof repair, spillway bridge painting, fish attraction water diffuser repair, electrostatic air filter replacement, and main unit transformer painting. Approximately 6.01 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 5,- 926,078 tons of commodities passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1979. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started May 1947 and is 100 percent complete except for modification of fish facilities and dredging of the upstream navigation channel. Project placed on permanent operating basis and lake raised to Elevation 340 in November 1953. Except for maintenance interruptions, all 14 power units have been in commercial operation since February 1957. Power generation through September 1980 has been 156.26 billion kilowatt hours, representing a gross income of $234.4 million to the U.S. Treasury from sale of power by Bonneville Power Administration. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1976. 21. MCNARY SECOND POWERHOUSE, OREG. & WASH. Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth near Umatilla, Oregon and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. The existing project is described in Section 20. It is recommended that the second powerhouse add approximately 742,- 000 kilowatts (6 power generating units) to the existing project. The project will also include levee access and beautification in the Pasco- Kennewick-Richland area, relocation and improvement of visitor facilities located near the power plant, and protection of existing recreation facilities and fish and wildlife habitat, and a fish hatchery for steelhead and fall chinook to compensate for losses due to the addition and operation of the second powerhouse. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $521,000,000 at October 1980 prices. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The hydraulic model was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Feasibility report for a second powerhouse was approved 29 June 1976. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on 25 February 1977. A Phase I General Design Memo was approved on 6 May 1980. 22. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OREG., WASH., & IDAHO Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 231. Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, Wash., 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962. Existing project. See Table 39-B for authorizing legislation. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack-water navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, Idaho. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for that portion of improvement below Lewiston, Idaho. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30,1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, Idaho, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. 39-10 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam--Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam--Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Tables 39-A and 39-I. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 11 privately owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slackwater navigation to Snake River Mile 138, the site of Lewiston, Idaho. That slack-water reaches the Lowiston, Idaho-Clarkston, Wash., area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. See individual reports for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite locks and dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, Idaho, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and navigation aids were maintained. Condition at end of fiscal year. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite are in full operation. Lower Granite construction is about 98 percent complete. (See individual reports for details.) General Investigations 23. SURVEYS The Upper Snake River and Tributaries is the principal on-going survey. This study is addressing flood damage reduction between Palisades Dam and American Falls Reservoir and the potential for supplemental water storage for power generation and streamflow augmentation. The Columbia River and Tributaries is a survey study being directed by the North Pacific Division in which the Walla Walla District is participating. A reconnaissance study was initiated during FY 1980 to investigate the feasibility of utilizing an outlet at McNary Lock and Dam to furnish water downstream on the Oregon shore for municipal, industrial, irrigation, and fish enhancement use. Also, identification of additional potential water storage sites for the Columbia River System was continued. Total cost of surveys during fiscal year was $555,354. That sum was spent for: flood control studies, $312,631; special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, Water Quality Management, Cooperation with States, National Wild and Scenic River System, and Technical and Engineer Assistance on Shore Erosion, $138,095; supplemental preauthorization studies - Phase I, $82,962; and review of authorized projects, $21,666. 24. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $384,121. That sum was spent for dam inspection program $132,903, dam inventory $20,251, flood plain management services $75,967, and technical services $155,000. 25. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT A cooperative research program between the Walla Walla District and the Waterways Experiment Station is being conducted as part of a nation-wide survey to investigate the effects of fluctuating water levels upon riparian shorelines and vegetation. An experimental pond, which approximates the proposed worse-case conditions of peaking on McNary Reservoir through the use of pumps, automatic timers, and water control gates, and two shoreline plots in the reservoir itself are being made for the plantings. The first year of field monitoring (FY 1979) suggested that at least seven species of plants may survive well under peaking conditions: Russian olive, mulberry, elderberry, wild rose, willow, tufted hairgrass and slough hedge. In general, shoreline plantings protected against sand deposition and erosion by snow fencing were found to increase algae production at the expense of some vascular plants. The higher plant life, particularly the woody species, appeared to be smothered by algae mats resulting from an inadequate flushing of the site. Other information indicates that the high alkalinity of the area binds some of the nutrients to soil particles leading to nutrient deficiencies for some plant species. The second year of field monitor.ing (FY 1980) suggests that four herbaceous and woody species may be capable of surviving 18-hour periods of flooding. In addition, 15 species may be capable of surviving 10 hours of flooding, 20 species capable of surviving 6 hours of flooding, and 22 species capable of surviving at water's edge. 39-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 A second research program being conducted by ment includes two research work units which are agreement with the Waterways Experiment Sta- design, carrying capacity, and user behavior and tion involves the administration of McNary Lock methodology to determine concessionaire opporand Dam, Lake Wallula, as a Recreation tunity. Research and Demonstration Unit. This agree- 39-12 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding 2. Columbia River New Work Basin Local Flood Approp. Protection Proj- Cost ects 6. Blackfoot Reser- New Work voir, Idaho Approp. Cost 7. Lucky Peak Lake, New Work Idaho Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Mill Creek Lake, New Work Wash. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 9. Ririe Lake, New Work Idaho Approp. Cost 10. Willow Creek Lake, New Work Oreg. Approp. Cost 11. Zintel Canyon Dam, New Work Wash. Approp. Cost 13. Dworshak Dam and New Work Reservoir, Idaho Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14. Ice Harbor Lock New Work and Dam, Wash. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 15. Lewiston-Clarkston New Work Bridge, Idaho Approp. Cost 16. Little Goose Lock New Work and Dam, Wash. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17. Lower Granite Lock New Work and Dam, Wash. Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18. Lower Monumental New Work Lock and Dam, Approp. Wash. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 Total Cost to FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 11,036,177 11,036,177 95 10,481 80,689 580,600 577,301 724,300 736,092 5,893,000 4,307,827 -1,728 1,409 1,893 1,552,000 1,505,186 2,766,010 2,821,792 1,193,000 1,189,123 2,246,800 2,208,108 20,235,000 20,490,056 1,235,600 1,249,947 24,980,411 25,175,694 1,712,900 1,619,659 17,288,000 17,677,509 1,317,190 1,358,880 5,000 5,000 406,000 413,837 436,500 506,140 582,000 2,218,252 3,290,000 3,382,258 3,179,200 3,201,492 683,000 852,845 2,302,500 2,442,709 545,000 540,969 6,906,483 6,891,559 3,070,000 3,097,058 10,025,517 10,166,143 2,769,400 2,864,329 19,360,000 19,334,751 2,497,600 2,517,347 7,500 7,500 50,000 49,961 389,000 399,478 775,400 773,744 1,150,000 1,040,498 373,100 372,662 4,720,700 4,722,655 3,126,200 3,128,900 1,567,200 1,567,782 2,937,700 2,949,302 880,000 869,359 3,281,000 3,322,622 2,029,900 2,016,697 5,877,100 5,905,756 2,290,500 2,296,935 3,156,400 3,193,911 1,708,800 1,693,972 - 267,626 - 267,626 35,000 19,580,681 1 15,797 19,561,439 2 495,700 5,054,204 451,111 5,006,537 2,230,601 3 - 2,230,601 3 196,900 4,542,609 196,946 4,540,952 473,830 473,830 465,524 465,524 - 39,716,448 138,623 39,715,701 1,778,275 2,842,574 1,423,064 2,486,925 15,000 400,046 15,000 400,046 7,618,000 312,408,196 4 7,204,811 311,983,276 3,629,100 20,671,869 6 3,584,353 20,619,523 5 2,126,000 165,991,945 6 2,047,262 165,911,722 7 3,117,100 25,748,349 19 2,677,636 25,275,405 19 6,535,000 7,960,000 6,521,804 7,932,132 2,569,600 217,697,676 8 2,348,876 217,474,983 9 2,318,800 15,491,113 2,142,940 15,291,684 3,905,395 358,649,645 10 3,491,903 358,231,053 11 2,811,100 11,307,862 2,612,169 11,089,205 1,367,300 236,097,061 12 1,363,277 236,087,662 13 3,398,000 14,969,391 3,230,045 14,775,135 39-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 39-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 Total Cost to FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 19. Lower Snake Fish New Work & Wildlife Approp. Compensation, Idaho, Cost Oreg. & Wash. 20. McNary Lock & New Work Dam-Lake Wallula- Approp. Oreg. & Wash. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21. McNary Second New Work Powerhouse, Oreg. & Approp. Wash. Cost 22. Snake River Down- New Work stream from Johnson Approp. Bar Landing, Oreg., Cost Wash., & Idaho Maint. Approp. Cost - 1,560,000 6,480,000 4,538,600 - 12,578,600 1,558,244 6,481,737 3,663,819 11,703,800 862,018 4,233,000 646,565 4,443,220 4,540,100 4,438,800 4,766,408 4,672,075 1,275,000 1,274,875 63,696,411 36,975,000 64,532,382 37,245,298 3,456,700 7,665,000 312,591,486 14 3,534,504 7,534,824 312,458,406 Is 4,457,200 6,386,600 63,956,875 20 4,461,398 5,258,598 62,783,994 20 -- 1,275,000 125 - 1,275,000 13,881,700 9,968,295 978,871,090 16 13,990,071 9,251,318 978,140,183 16 6,512,490 10,644,500 8,981,900 11,663,000 67,912,339 17 6,436,594 10,926,920 8,971,919 10,677,118 66,823,350 is 1. Includes $499,431 appropriated for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 2. Includes $480,189 expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 3. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $68,- 446 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation facilities at Completed Projects. 4. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds - appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $375,000 appropriated and $365,239 expended for additional unit. 5. Includes $8,370,000 regular project operation and maintenance funds appropriated for and expended by' Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $16,900 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. 6. Includes $713,150 appropriated for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $35,700,- 316 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 7. Includes $713,150 expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $35,620,093 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 8. Includes $57,284,461 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 9. Includes $57,061,768 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 10. Includes $46,211,511 appropriated for additional units TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZIN( 4 through 6. 11. Includes $46,211,510 expended for additional units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. 12. Includes $51,384,700 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 13. Includes $51,375,301 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 14. Includes $1,289,986 appropriated for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Excludes $3,069 for navigation channel (Section 107). 15. Includes $1,289,554 expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 16. Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85,000 for previous projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 17. Includes $186,570 appropriated for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $241,254 open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 18. Includes $186,570 expended for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $237,551 open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 19. Includes $32,200 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. 20. Includes $40,600 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. G LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, ACTIVE LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho. Levee left bank. Blackfoot River, Idaho. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, Idaho. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Hi. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 39-14 May 17, 1950 TABLE 39-B (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. Levees and channel clearing, straightening, and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, Idaho. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, Idaho. Revetted levee. Malheur River, Oreg. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Palouse River, Wash. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Payette Valley, Idaho. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized 3 October 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho. Bank protection. Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. October 23, 1962 July 24, 1946 Oct. 22, 1976 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 15, 1963 BLACKFOOT RESERVOIR, IDAHO (See Section 6 of Text) Modify existing Bureau of Indian Affairs dam to add exclusive flood-control storage space. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, IDAHO (See Section 7 of Text) Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WASH. (See Section 8 of Text) Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concretelined channel. RIRIE LAKE, IDAHO (See Section 9 of Text) Storage project for flood control, irrigation, recreation & sports fishery. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OREG. (See Section 10 of Text) Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, KENNEWICK, WASH. (See Section 11 of Text) Dam and storage space for temporary detention of flood flows plus channel improvement downstream. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, IDAHO (See Section 13 of Text) Preparation of detailed plans. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-IAKE SACAJAWEAWASH. (See Section 14 of Text) H. Doc. 568,87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 526-79 Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 562, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 416, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 88-96 39-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 39-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2. 1945 Oct. 22, 1976 Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, IDAHO & WASH. (See Section 15 of Text) Four lane highway bridge and approaches. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BRYANWASH. (See Section 16 of Text) Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WASH., AND II)AIIO (See Section 17 of Text) Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WASH. (See Section 18 of Text) Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. LOWER SNAKE RIVER WASH., FISH AND WILDII)IFE COMPENSATION PLAN (See Section 19 of Text) Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. McNARY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE WALLULA-OREG., AND WASH. (See Section 20 of Text) Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. MCNARY SECOND POWERHOUSE, OREG. & WASH. See Section 21 of Text) Second powerhouse with ten generating units. SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, WASI. AND IDAHO (See Section 22 of Text) Open-river navigation. Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, Idaho, only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. P.L. 94-587 11. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. II. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. HI. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Wash.1 1968 1,851,195 1,108,259 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary Projects. 39-16 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. IH. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 11. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 94-587 I. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 TABLE 39-D WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Status Sep. 30, 1980 Federal Project Cost Appropriated Cost Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho ' 2 42,796 42,796 Blackfoot River, Idaho 2 391,143 .391,143 Boise Valley, Idaho 1 Ada County Unit 3 4 1,060,000 46,084 46,084 Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. ' 4 8,639,000 102,458 102,458 Heise-Roberts Extension, Idaho Henrys Fork Unit 427,800 27,800 Snake River Unit 2 3,375,158 3,375,158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, Idaho ' 2 59,942 59,942 Lower Walla Walla River, Wash. (not feasible) - 4,000 4,000 Malheur River, Oreg. Vale Unit 1 2 325,581 325,581 Mill Creek, Wash. 9 3,537 3,537 Mud Lake Area, Idaho (not feasible) - 5,996 .5,996 Palouse River, Wash. 4 914,000 - - Payette Valley, Idaho 8 - 23,178 23,178 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho 1 Pocatello Unit 2 6,456,032 6,456,032 5 Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho 2 32,335 32,335 South Fork Clearwater River, Idaho 6 3,899 3,899 Teton River, Idaho (not feasible) 10,387 10,387 Touchet River, Wash. 9 11,198 11,198 Weiser River, Idaho 1 4 1,565,000 112,757 112,757 7 Whitebird Creek, Idaho 6 1,896 1,896 TOTAL 11,036,177 11,036,177 1. See Table 39-F. 6. Emergency construction at this location has obviated 2. Completed Project. need for project. 3. Economic justification of work proposed has been es- 7. Includes $75,000 spent on unfeasible Cambridge and tablished in compliance with conditions set forth in Flood Midvale areas. Control Act of 1950. 8. Deauthorized 3 October 1978. 4. Deferred for restudy. 9. Deauthorized 5 August 1977. 5. Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. TABLE 39-E INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 3 of Text) Blackfoot, Blackfoot River, Idaho September 1980 Jackson Hole, Snake River, Wyo. August 1980 Camp Wooten, Tucannon River, Wash. September 1980 Link Location, Boise River, Idaho January 1980 Carey, Little Wood River, Idaho July 1980 Lyman, Lyman Creek, Idaho August 1980 Colfax, Palouse River, Wash. June 1980 Mission Creek, Idaho January 1980 Culdesac, Lapwai Creek, Idaho January 1980 Pocatello, Portneuf River, Idaho July 1980 Esquatzel, Coulee, Wash. January 1980 Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho July 1980 Ferry Butte, Snake River, Idaho June 1980 Vale, Malheur River, Oreg. July 1980 Gooding Area, Little Wood River, Walla Walla, Mill Creek, Wash. July 1980 Idaho February 1980 West Richland, Yakima River, Wash. January 1980 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, Idaho August 1980 Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, Idaho August 1980 39-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 39-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 4 of Text) Project Bear Creek, Kendrick, Idaho 1 2 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho ' Blackfoot River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 1 Boise Valley, Columbia River Basin, Idaho (a) Ada County Unit 3 Catherine Creek Lake, Oreg. Colfax, Palouse River, Wash. Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, Idaho Dayton, Touchet River, Wash. ' Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, Wash. 1 2 Gooding Area, Idaho ' 2 Grande Ronde Lake, Oreg. 3 Grande Ronde Valley, Columbia River Basin, Oreg. 3 Ileise-Roberts Area, Snake River, Idaho ' Heise-Roberts Extension, Columbia River Basin, Idaho (a) Henrys Fork Unit 3 (b) Snake River Unit ' Jackson Hole, Snake River, Wyo.' Kendrick, Potlatch River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho I Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, Idaho 1 2 Lewiston Levees 4 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. 1 2 Lyman Creek, Idaho 1 2 Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, Oreg. ' Malheur River, Columbia River Basin, Oreg. (a) Vale Unit I Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, Oreg. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho 1 2 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Columbia River Basin, Idaho (a) Pocatello Unit ' Pullman, Palouse, Wash. Shelley Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 1 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, Idaho Tomanovich-Salmon City, Idaho 1 2 Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Wash. 1 2 Weiser River, Columbia River Basin, Idaho 3 Yakima River, West Richland, Wash.' 2 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1970 1958 1965 1967 1978 1966 1973 1966 1967 1954 1966 1958 1955 1968 1978 1960 1972 1950 1961 1971 1957 1961 1968 1965 1969 1964 1958 1974 1955 1971 1960 1964 Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Construction Speration and Maintenance 133.5 18 42.796 391.143 46,084 1,552,00() 5,557.240 183,100 380,617 292.792 59,167 102,458 1,575,838 27,800 3,375,158 2,388,270 59,942 176,833 402,018 230,315 55,894 325,580 2,337,628 . 54,538 6,456,032 99,540 32,335 2:34,100 7 128,635 73,932 112,757 6 2:38,890 $ 1. Completed project. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Deferred for restudy. 4. Withdrawn as a local flood protection project in June 1959. Included as a feature of Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Snake River, Wash. 5. Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. Includes $550,- 875 spent under Public Law 99 authority. 6. Includes an estimated $75,000 spent for planning on unfeasible areas. 7. Inactive. Five-year limitation on project authorization began May 17, 1974. 8. Includes $9,000 contributed funds. 39-18 TABLE 39-G WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 5 of Text) Fiscal Year Costs Farewell Bend, Weiser Vic. $15,059 Snake River, Blackfoot, Idaho 5,000 Touchet River and Coppei Creek 31,965 TABLE 39-H PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project SPILLWAY DAM Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (See Section 13 of Text) Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Wash. (See Section 14 of Text) Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by'Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 Cubic Feet Per Second 1613 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 55 Ft. 2 428 Feet 3 3 2 @ 90,000 kw; 4 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 Feet March 1973 1600-1445 Feet 1605 Feet 2,000,000 Ac.-Ft. 53 Miles 17,090 Acres 175 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 100 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet May 1962 39-19 TABLE 39-H (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, Wash. (See Section 16 of Text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed . Rating, Each Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 10 671 Feet 6. 3 @ 90,000 kw; 3 @ 111,009 kw 603,000 kw 226 Feet December 1961 440-437 Feet 446 Feet 31.9 Miles 9,200 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 80 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 93 Feet 98 Feet 101 Feet 15 Feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 60 Ft. 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 39-20 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-H (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. (See Section 17 of Text) Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Wash. (See Section 18 of Text) 810,000 kw 244 Feet March 1970 638-633 Feet 646.5 Feet 37.2 Miles Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 638 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length 10,025 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 92 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 95 Feet 100 Feet 105 Feet 15 Feet Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 60.5 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 Feet April 1975 738-733 Feet 746.5 Feet 38 Miles 8,900 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 91 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 39-21 TABLE 39-H (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U,.S. ARMY 1980 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project McNary Lock and Dam, Oreg. and Wash. (See Section 20 of Text) Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevation: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 97 Feet 98 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 61 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 Feet May 1969 540-537 Feet 548 Feet 28.7 Miles 6,590 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 78 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 67 Feet 75 Feet 92 Feet 15 Feet November 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 Feet Vertical Lift 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 22 39-22 WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT TABLE 39-H (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 1,348 Feet 241 Feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 Feet November 1953 340-335 Feet 356.5 Feet 64 Miles 38,800 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 242 Miles TABLE 39-I SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OREG., WASH., AND IDAHO (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance of Engineers to Sep. 30, 1980 to Sep. 30, 1980 Percent Constr. Projects Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Completed Started Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Totals Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals 129,578,479 129,578,479 129,578,479 1,645,000 36,378,316 167,601,795 160,413,215 59,585,461 219,998,676 318,111,000 46,211,511 364,322,511 184,712,361 51,704,700 236,417,061 713,150 35,700,316 165,991,945 160,413,215 57.284,461 217,697,676 312,438,134 46,211,511 358,649,645" 713,150 35,620,093 165,911,722 160,413,215 57,061,768 217,474,983 312,019,543 46,211,510 358,231,053 184,712,361 184,712,361 51,384,700 51,375,301 236,097,061 236,087,662 25,748,349 25,275,405 25,748,349 25,275,405 15,491,113 15,491,113 11,307,862 11,307,862 14,969,391 14,969,391 15,291,684 15,291,684 11,089,205 11,089,205 14,775,135 14,775,135 100 FY 56 43 98 99 100 96 99 98 100 98 100 99 99 FY 57 FY 71 FY 63 FY 74 FY 65 FY 74 FY 61 FY 75 39-23 TABLE 39-I (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OREG., WASH., AND IDAHO (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance of Engineers to Sep. 30, 1980 to Sep. 30, 1980 Percent Constr. Projects Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Completed Started Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,613' 34,613 1 236,904 233,201 Open River Pasco to Lewiston - - 4,350 4,350 Totals Existing Project 988,374,656 978,470,940 977,740,033 67,757,969' 66,668,980 99 Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 988,774,806 978,871,090 978,140,183 67,944,539 66,855,550 1. New work appropriations used for maintenance priorto 1953. 39-24 ALASKA DISTRICT* This District Consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Channels and Harbors 1. Anchorage Harbor, Alaska.........40-1 2. Bar Point Harbor, Alaska...............40-2 3. Dillingham Harbor, Alaska............40-2 4. Homer Harbor, Alaska....................40-2 5. Hoonah Harbor, Alaska................40-3 6. Kake Harbor, Alaska.................... 4 0-3 7. Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska ....... 40-4 8. Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska ................ 4 0-5 9. Nome Harbor, Alaska..................... 4 0-5 10. Stikine River, Alaska...................... 40-6 11. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................................... 4 0-7 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authority....................... 4 0-7 Beach Erosion Control 13. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization.................... 4 0-7 Flood Control Local Protection Page 14. Talkeetna River, Alaska ............... 40-7 15. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...............4 0-8 16. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 4 0-8 17. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 4 0-8 Reservoirs 18. Chena River Lakes, Alaska.............. 4 0-8 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 19. Bradley Lake, Alaska.....4........... 40-8 20. Snettisham, Alaska ........ 4 0-8 General Investigations 21. Surveys ..........S. d....................4 0-9 22. Collection and Study of Basic Data................................. 40-9 23. Research and Development ............. 40-9 Navigation Channels and Harbors 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,000 foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 35 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977 was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587, and funded in FY 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: The maintenance dredging contract awarded in May 1979 included provisions for flattening the side slopes at the northern and southern project limits. The fiscal year 1980 maintenance dredging contract was * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 40-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 awarded in March 1980 and 262,300 cubic yards of material were removed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Dredging was accomplished jointly by local interests and United States Army to provide a depth of 35 feet alongside the newly constructed City Dock and 32 feet at a distance of 50 feet from Ocean Dock in July 1961; city and Army funds were used. Ocean Dock was destroyed in the March 27, 1964 earthquake. Emergency dredging was performed at City Dock July and August 1965. The first phase of new work in the authorized project, consisting of dredging the port area to a depth of 35 feet, was accomplished October 1966 through June 1967. During the design stage, the project basin was modified to match City Dock, including expansion then underway. By contract, the city completed dredging of Terminal No. 3 (north of Federal limits) to a depth of 35 feet. Terminal No. 3 was incorporated into Federal Limits during 1978. Maintenance dredging was accomplished across the entire project to the authorized depth of -35 feet mean lower low water during 1980. 2. BAR POINT HARBOR, ALASKA Location. On coast of Revillagigedo Island, on northeasterly side on Tongass Narrows. Ketchikan is approximately 220 nautical miles southeast of Juneau, Alaska. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8075, 8094, and 8095.) Existing project. As originally authorized and constructed, Bar Point Basin consisted of a 780,- 000 square foot basin at depths of 10 and 15 feet below mean lower low water, protected by three rock breakwaters. Authorized expansion of Bar Point Harbor provided an additional 25 acres protected by two concrete floating breakwaters, 963 feet and 120 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.3 feet, with an extreme range of 26 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are four small-boat floats, including two in project basins, and two ferry docks. Privately owned facilities include two general cargo docks open to public use, one of which serves as a passenger terminal; three oil wharves, which include facilities for fueling small boats; and approximately 25 industrial wharves, piers, and floats. Additional facilities are available at Saxman and Ward Cove . in the immediate area. One wharf is used exclusively for Government vessels. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work was initiated in April 1979 and, after repair of wind damaged floating breakwater, completed in April 1980. 3. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, ALASKA Location. At head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on right bank of Nushagak River just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeasterly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage, Alaska. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 9052.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek; and a sheet pile sill across the basin outlet with a top elevation of 7 feet above mean lower low water. During design stage the project was revised to include a rock sill with adjacent scour-protection blankets and the embankment was relocated to include a berm between the basin and the embankment. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30.0 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three docks at the city of Dillingham, all privately owned, and a publicly owned small-boat float in the project basin. Two docks are used for salmon-cannery operations; the third is an oil handling and bunkering terminal. Small-boat approach and floats were installed in small-boat basin in summer of 1963, and were demolished by winter ice movement. New floats were installed May 1971, and are removed before fall freezeup and replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered from the anchorage just below Snag Point, and are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Government plant and hired labor performed maintenance dredging from July through September 1980. 80,000 cubic yards of material were dredged this fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was accomplished across entire project to the authorized depth of +2 feet mean lower low water during 1980. 4. HOMER HARBOR, ALASKA Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. Harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit which varies to one-quarter mile in 40-2 ALASKA DISTRICT width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8554 and 8531.) Previous projects. See page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964. Existing project. Provides for sheltered smallboat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 10 acres ,in area, with a 2.75-acre berthing area 14 feet deep and a 7.25-acre anchorage area 15 feet deep, below mean lower low water; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small-boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. A separate basin with unloading facilities for barges and small boats is being constructed by private interests. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: During FY 1980, 11,700 cubic yards were removed by the Government-owned pipeline dredge Warren George. The material was disposed of in a low depression located on the southern tip of the spit. Condition at end of fiscal year. The harbor for the original project was started in September 1961, completed in June 1962 and essentially destroyed by the March 27, 1964 earthquake. Emergency repair work, which included raising the first leg of the breakwater, was accomplished July and August 1964. The harbor was restored by construction of an extension to the breakwater, removal of part of the original breakwater to form an entrance, removal of basin material inland, and disposal of the material to form a protective berm around the landward side of the basin. Restoration work began August 1964 and was completed March 1965. Expansion of the harbor began November 1964 and was completed March 1965. Local interests extended length of basin and protective berm by 700 feet in fiscal years 1968 to 1970, with supervision by the Corps to insure the integrity of the Federal project. Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was completed in June 1980. A survey of the entrance channel during June 1980 indicated project depth was available throughout the Federal limits. 5. HOONAH HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Hoonah is located on the eastern shore of Port Frederick, a deep tidal fjord on the northeastern shore of Chichagof Island in southeastern Alaska. The city is 70 miles west of Juneau. (See National Geodetic Survey Charts 8202 and 8302.) Existing project. Consists of an authorized small-boat basin to be 16 acres in extent, and an entrance channel and turning basin; with the entrance channel 100 feet wide and 400 feet long (widening to 150 feet for 600 feet along the western edge of the basin) all to a depth of 18.5 feet below mean lower low water; three rubblemound breakwaters 140, 800, and 1,459 feet long; and one rubblemound diversion dike 1,165 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is 25 feet. Estimated project cost is $4,330,000 (October 1980), including $4,299,000 Corps of Engineers funds, $7,- 000 Coast Guard funds, and $24,000 non-Federal cost. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are two general cargo docks, a ferry dock and a small boat float attached to one of the cargo docks. Privately owned facilities are one oil dock and one industrial-oil dock. Facilities are not sufficient or suitable for moorage of more than a small portion of the resident and transient commercial fishing vessels operating at Hoonah. The constructed harbor will provide the necessary moorage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1979 and completed in September 1980. 6. KAKE HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Kake Harbor is located in the city of Kake, on the northwest corner of Kupreanof Island in southeastern Alaska, 39 air miles west of Petersburg, Alaska, and 850 water miles northwesterly of Seattle, Washington. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 8201.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,580-foot-long west breakwater and a 900-foot-long south breakwater, enclosing a 7- acre berthing area. Poor foundation conditions found during preconstruction investigations have forced modification of the project to include a 1,760-foot-long west breakwater and a 1,750-footlong south breakwater. Estimated project cost is $8,868,000 (October 1980), including $8,843,000 Corps of Engineers funds, $15,000 Coast Guard funds, and $10,000 non-Federal cost. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher 40-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 high water is 14.0 feet with an extreme range of 22 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation.Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation; hold and save the-United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, necessary mooring facilities and utilities including a public landing with suitable facilities open to all on equal terms; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such utility or other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; and establish regulations concerning discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. The City of Kake, as project sponsor, has indicated a willingness and ability to provide the local cooperation requirements. Terminal facilities. At Kake, a publicly owned wharf with seaplane float for float equipped airplanes and shallow-draft vessels is located within area of proposed basin. At cannery 1 mile from city, there are two privately owned deep-draft piers: one for cargo, open to all local boat owners, the second for fuel, including a float for fueling small boats. At Portage Cove, there is one publicly owned small-boat float. Facilities are not considered adequate for present commerce due to the following deficiencies in small-boat facilities: the complete lack of protection in the directions of the most severe storms; shallow water at Portage Cove float and its approaches; ice formation on the cove during the winter months causes major boat damage and limits the use of the mooring float; and transportation problems between city and present small-boat float at-Portage Cove. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Preconstruction planning was continued during Fiscal Year 1980. Additional field exploration verified the poor subsurface conditions which necessitated the realignment and lengthening of the proposed breakwaters. The Draft General Design Memorandum and Draft Environmental Impact Statement were distributed for public review in August 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Finalization of Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement is scheduled during Fiscal Year 1981. 7. METLAKATLA HARBOR, ALASKA Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small-boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Proposed new basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Estimated project cost of proposed basin is $4,264,000 (October 1980) including $4,132,000 Corps of Engineers funds, $8,000 Coast Guard funds, and $124,000 non-Federal cost. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on existing basin. For proposed basin, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and quarry rights required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing depths, surface area, and necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including a public landing with suitable supply facilities open to all on equal terms; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility or other relocations as necessary for project purposes; and establish regulations prohlibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general-cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small-boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction continued. 40-4 ALASKA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing basin was constructed April through June 1956. Construction of new work is 85 percent complete with a scheduled completion date of December 1980. 8. NINILCHIK HARBOR, ALASKA Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, Alaska, about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8554.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. Project was modified in design stage to delete pile jetty and revise harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, was accomplished 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 33.5 feet. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, limited to shallow-draft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are: a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small-boat floats in project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep-draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished with 10,000 cubic yards removed in 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in October 1961 and completed in November 1961. Modifications to reduce sedimentation and prevent beach erosion on the seaward sandspit were completed November 1969. Emergency dredging was accomplished June 1970 and June 1971. Maintenance dredging has been accomplished annually since 1971. A survey of the basin during May 1980 indicated project depth was available throughout the Federal limits. 9. NOME HARBOR, ALASKA Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome, Alaska, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 9302 and 9380.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet deep at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing waterfront improvements on easterly beach by means of rock-mound seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. Project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total actual costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of original project authorization are $2,500 annually. Local interests also maintain seawall. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Maintenance dredging by contract was accomplished throughout the ice-free season. An estimated 17,- 600 cubic yards were removed in FY 1980. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of original 335- and 460-foot jetties and revetments was completed in 1923. Reconstruction of jetties with concrete to modified lengths of 240 and 400 feet was completed in 1940. Dredging entrance channel and original 200- by 250-foot basin was completed in 1922. Construction of seawall was completed June 1951. Dredging 400-foot extension of basin was commenced in 1949 and was completed in 1951. Maintenance dredging is performed annually within the basin and throughout 40-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 the entrance channel. Jetty repairs were made in 1954 and July through October 1965. 10. STIKINE RIVER, ALASKA Location. Rises in northwestern Canada and flows southwesterly through Canada for about 200 miles, then about 30 miles westerly across Panhandle of Alaska to Sumner Strait. Mouth of river is on coast of mainland about 3 miles north of Wrangell. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8201.) Existing project. Snagging Stikine River from its mouth for about 30 miles to Canadian border. The Canadian Government maintains that portion of the river between Alaskan border and Telegraph Creek, British Columbia, a distance of 130 miles. The head of navigation is at Telegraph Creek, B.C., about 160 miles above the mouth. No data is available concerning stages of high and low water in river. At mouth, tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 13.9 feet, and maximum range is about 25 feet. Tidal effects have been reported at a distance of 20 miles from the mouth. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None along Alaskan portion of river. Vessels operating on Stikine River are dependent on terminal facilities at Wrangell Harbor. Facilities include a city operated pier for general cargo and passengers; two publicly operated small-boat mooring floats; two privately operated small-boat fueling floats; a State of Alaska Ferry Pier, and three industrial wharves. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Memorandum of Understanding between Corps and Forest Service, signed August 1972, provided for Forest Service personnel to do project clearing. However, due to environmental restraints, no work was accomplished until 1977 after completion of an environmental assessment. The work has been accomplished annually by the U.S. Forest Service since 1977. Condition at end of fiscal year. Removal of snags from the river between its mouth and the Canadian border was accomplished as needed by contract under maintenance funds, from 1938 to 1964 when annual snag removal was initiated. Removal of snags and clearing of trees on shore as potential snags was accomplished October 1967 through May 1968, June through October 1969, and August and September 1971.-Memorandum of Understanding, providing for Forest Service personnel stationed in area to do clearing, signed August 1972. Operations were discontinued until 1977 when an environmental assessment of the work was completed. Snagging and clearing operations began again in 1977 and have continued since, maintaining the river fairly free of navigational hazards within the main channel. 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 40-C. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Costs for the fiscal year were: Barrow Harbor $541, Bethel Harbor $201,645, Cordova Harbor $94,041, Craig Harbor $28,633, Dillingham Harbor $36,702, Homer Harbor $7,398, Juneau Harbor $82,020, Mekoryuk $68,910, Ninilchik Harbor $35,810, Port Lions $19,823, Seldovia $5,000, Whittier $8,675. (See Section 2 for Bar Point.) Navigation activities pursuant to Section 54, Public Law 93-251 (Shoreline Erosion Control). Total costs for the Erosion Control Demonstration Program for the fiscal year were $174,638. Beach Erosion Control 13. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 874, 87th Congress (Preauthorization.) Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $5,000 for Shishmaref, Alaska, beach erosion. Flood Control Local Protection 14. TALKEETNA RIVER, ALASKA Location. At the town of Talkeetna near the confluence of the Talkeetna and Susitna Rivers, 80 miles north of Anchorage, Alaska. Previous project. Provided for stabilization of 1,500 feet of riverbank of the Talkeetna River with a brush and natural timber fascine for a distance of 1,000 feet below the Alaska Railroad bridge as emergency bank protection for the town of Talkeetna. Construction began in March and was completed in May 1951 at a cost of $24,898 under authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act approved 24 July 1946. Existing project. Consists of riprapping 1,660 feet of the riverbank downstream from the 40-6 ALASKA DISTRICT railroad bridge to prevent further cutting of the east bank north of the town of Talkeetna, Alaska, and construction of a 1,200 foot dike to divert river flow away from the riverbank. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Matanuska-Susitna Borough provided without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project; agreed to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction work; agreed to maintain the works after completion in accordance with Federal regulations. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial facilities because Talkeetna River is not navigable to commercial vessels. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Project was started in June 1979 and completed in July 1980. Condition at end offiscal year. Turnover date to the Borough was October 15, 1979. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Skagway River (Skagway), Klutina River (Copper Center), Gold Creek (Juneau), Lowell Creek, and Salmon River (Hyder). Minor repairs at each project were recommended to the responsible local authority. Total costs for the fiscal year: $16,886. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 40-D. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $125,577 for advance preparation and $3,831 for emergency operations. Reservoirs 18. CHENA RIVER LAKES, ALASKA Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, Alaska, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and thieir tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks C1, D1, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Existing project. Provides for a dam on the Chena River, 17 miles east of Fairbanks, a dam on the Little Chena River about 11 miles upstream from its confluence with the main Chena River, and a 22-mile levee system along the Tanana and Chena Rivers. Estimated Federal cost is $270,- 000,000 (full funding), and estimated non- Federal cost is $12,675,000. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the levees and drainage works; provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for the construction of the levee and interior drainage works; accomplish without cost to the United States, all necessary relocations of buildings, streets, and utilities as required for the levee project; maintain and operate the levee system and interior drainage works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The North Star Borough formally signed this agreement on February 1, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction started on the fish ladder at Moose Creek Dam. Fishway trash boom completed. Completed interior drainage channels B and C. Completed repair of several slough blocks. Condition at end of fiscal year. Moose Creek Dam and Floodway is operational and capable of controlling Chena River floods. Recreation facilities around borrow pit lake will be constructed in summer 1985. Completion of levee to mouth of Chena River has been delayed, because of local opposition, probably till winter 1980-81. Chena River monitoring program will determine the number and location of groins which will be constructed over a 10-year period. Interior drainage channel A scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1981. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 19. BRADLEY LAKE, ALASKA Location. At the head of Kachemak Bay near southwestern end of Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, about 100 air miles south of Anchorage and 25 miles northeast of Homer. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8552.) Existing project. Provides for a main dam raising waters of Bradley Lake from an elevation of 1,090 feet to elevation 1,196 feet; a small dam to divert water from nearby drainage; an underground power tunnel, surge tank, and penstock to deliver water to a powerhouse located near tidewater, with an initial installed capacity of 70,000 kilowatts and transmission facilities to serve the Cook Inlet area. Latest cost estimate for new work (October 40-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 1980) is $194,000,000. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. However the local utility has indicated that it will construct the necessary transmission lines connecting a substation located approximately 17 miles from the project with the Homer and Kenai/Soldotna load centers. Operations and results during fiscal year. A reanalysis of the Bradley Lake hydropower project was completed by the Alaska District during 1978, while the Alaska Power Administration completed a marketability analysis during the same period. Based on additional data and analysis, the plan of development was revised such that the lake would be raised to 1170 feet, the powerhouse would be underground, and the installed capacity would be increased to 118,000 kilowatts. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Reappraisal of the project was undertaken because of rising costs of alternative fossil fuel-fired generation. The analysis showed the project offers net benefits and that Bradley Lake power is marketable. Advanced Engineering and Design studies have been initiated and are currently underway. 20. SNETTISHAM, ALASKA Location. At mouth of Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 28 nautical miles southeast of Juneau, Alaska. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a two-stage power project. The initial stage tapped Long Lake and constructed an underground powerhouse with the installation of two power units with space for a third unit, and construction of a transmission line to Juneau, Alaska. The ultimate stage would provide a dam at the head of Long Lake to increase the energy capability of Long Lake and to tap Crater Lake. Both Crater Lake and the Long Lake Dam are in a "Deferred" status. From Long Lake (elevation 815'), the water is transported through an approximately horizontal tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400-foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the underground powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a generating capacity of 46,700 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by 138 kilovolt overhead transmission lines except for a submarine calle traversing Taku Inlet. Crater Lake ultimate phase of construction provides for tapping Crater Lake (elevation 1,022') to drive a third turbine to be installed in the underground powerhouse (constructed under the Long Lake phase of initial construction) to provide an additional generating capacity of 27,000 kilowatts. Estimated cost of initial stage construction is $81,423,000 (October 1978). The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. (See Table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Minor deficiencies were corrected. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated 11 July 1967. The Long Lake phase of the first stage of the project is complete. Permanent relocation of the Salisbury Ridge section of the line was completed in October 1976. General Investigations 21. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs of $1,723,020 for surveys include $426,089 for navigation studies, $1,188,931 for flood control studies, and $108,000 for coordination studies. 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies and others at a fiscal year cost of $227,838. Other activities included the completion of Type 15 Flood Insurance Studies for the communities of Kotzebue, Dillingham, Nome, Ft. Yukon and Galena. Total funds expended for the dam inspection program were $157,000, $147,000 for inventory accomplished by the State under contract to the Corps of Engineers and $10,000 for inspection. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $16,197. 23. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT A Flood Plain computerized analysis of development plans for a new capital city for the State of Alaska at Willow, Alaska, was completed with an expenditure of $2,000 in fiscal year 1980 and printing costs of $7,128. 40-8 TABLE 40-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Anchorage Harbor, Alaska 2. Bar Point Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 3. Dillingham Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 4. Homer Harbor, Alaska 5. Hoonah Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 6. Kake Harbor, Alaska 7. Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) 8. Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska 9. Nome Harbor, Alaska (Contrib. Funds) Funding FY 77 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1 Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. ' Contrib. Cost 25,000 30,735 166,000 168,313 338,000 808,175 2,500 2,500 FY 78 FY 79 703,558 1,713,550 738,923 1,516,681 48,000 1,511,556 34,933 1,058,225 - 1,318,421 1,027,297 470,000 538,722 10,000 35,684 325,000 324,867 158,036 163,796 25,000 48,206 275,000 285,021 133,9()00 112,035 11 22 33 - 1,505,000 - 1,502,647 - 1,225,000() - 1,011,479 151,000 150,516 25,000 575,00() 25,007 573,807 1,800 9,719 1,800 9,719 - 886,60()() - 211,600 223,000 220,227 390,000 390,825 2,500 2,500 227,200 229.931 526,20()() 528,007 2,500 5,000 'otal Cost to FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 40-9 515,400 503,078 173,655 173,655 - 533.235 - 533,235 ,196,70() 7.471,925 ,387,648 7,464,733 343,792 2.000,000 806,461 1,.996,271 - 1.318,421 240,495 1,267,792 - 548,790 - 548,790 841,000 3.358,622 335.076 2,847,522 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 - 1,509,677 - 1,509,677 247,000 2.012,910 268.821 2,()012,866 - 67,974 - 67,974 .243.000 3,955,000 ,244.096 3953,74:3 - 1,225,000 11:3,525 1.125,004 255,000 560,700 253,210 558,426 160,00) 4,241,470 .116,770 4,197,()47 - 66,42() 66,420 - 926,600() 328,483 580,083 - 428,720 - 428.,720 208,000 2.047,285 206.635 2.045,878 - 1,348,240 - 1.348,240 506,00() 6,281921 472.901 6,248,291 - 125 - 125 2,5()0 145,000 2.500 145,00() REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 40-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 10. Stikine River, Maint. Alaska Approp. 21,000 3,782 1,000()()( 14,000()() 141,168 Cost 7,000 17,760 12.986 8.249 135.381 14. Talkeetna River, New Work Alaska Approp. - - 498,000 25,00) 525,50) Cost - - 497,472 16,722 516,694 18. Chena River Lakes, New Work Alaska Approp. 28,185,000 31,050,000 23,047,159 8,77.000)() 140.689,659 Cost 27,882,261 31,216,531 23,150,52() 8.752,012 140.555.540 19. Bradley Lake, New Work Alaska Approp. 15,000 10,000 530,00() 2,765,000 3,561,000 Cost 569 24,431 485,628 2,719.207 3.470,835 20. Snettisham, New Work Alaska Approp. 2,025,000 44,917 -22,159 -18,200 81.382,856 Cost 1,588,610 509,074 9,979 -19,239 81,377,715 1. Includes applicable portion of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys appropriations and costs. TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 : Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec 201) (Auth. Oct. 12, 1972) Aug. 13, 1968 ANCHORAGE HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 1 of Text) Deep water harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' Extension of project limits. BAR BOINT HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 2 of Text) Construct two breakwaters 963 feet, and 120 feet. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 3 of Text) Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 4 of Text) Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. IIOONAH IIAIARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel, a rubblemound breakwater and diversion dike and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 15.1 acre harbor area. KAKE HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 6 of Text) Basin 7-acre berthing area, 15 feet deep, inclosed by a 1,580-foot west rock breakwater and a 900-foot south rock breakwater. 11. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L. 94-587 Section 107 Approved June 29, 1978 11. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 11. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 11. Doc. 92-200, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 S. Doc. 70, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.2 40-10 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec 201) (Auth. Oct. 12, 1972) July 3, 1958 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 June 16, 1948 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1958 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 METLAKATLA HARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 7 of Text) Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acres in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Improvement consists of entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. NINILCHIK IARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 8 of Text) Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410-foot jetty. NOME IIARBOR, ALASKA (See Section 9 of Text) Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long.4 Sea wall. STIKINE RIVER, ALASKA (See Section 10 of Text) Snagging from mouth to Canadian border. TALKEETNA RIVER, ALASKA (See Section 14 of Text) 1200-Foot dike, 1,660 feet of bank revetment. CHIENA RIVER LAKES, ALASKA (See Section 18 of Text) Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River. BRADLEY LAKE, ALASKA (See Section 19 of Text) Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission facilities. SNETTISHIAM, ALASKA (See Section 20 of Text) Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission facilities. I. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess.Z II. Doc. 1st 34, 85th Cong., Sess.2 II. Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 HI. Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.2 Report of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948. HI. Doc. 210, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.2 11. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., S. Doc. 89, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 II. Doc. 455, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 II. Doc. 40, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.2 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized 6 November 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZE] (See Sect 3. P.L. 88-451. 4. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". D NAVIGATION PROJECTS tion 11 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance 1 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, Alaska 2 3 Cook Inlet Shoals, Alaska 2 Documents 1920 1977 128,896 1,220,000 40-11 2,981 5,000 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 40-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance 1 Cordova Harbor, Alaska 2 Craig Harbor, Alaska 2 Douglas Harbor, Alaska 2 Dry Pass, Alaska 2 Egegik River, Alaska 2 Elfin Cove, Alaska 2 Gastineau Channel, Alaska 2 Haines Harbor, Alaska 2 Humboldt Harbor, Alaska 2 Iliuliuk Harbor, Alaska 2 Juneau Harbor, Alaska 2 Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska 2 11 King Cove Harbor, Alaska 2 Kodiak Harbor, Alaska 2 Myers Chuck Harbor; Alaska Naknek River, Alaska 2 Neva and Olga Straits, Alaska 2 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, Alaska 2 12 Pelican Harbor, Alaska 2 Petersburg Harbor, Alaska 2 Port Alexander, Alaska 2 5 Rocky Pass, Alaska 2 Seldovia Harbor, Alaska 2 Sergius Whitestone, Alaska 2 Seward Harbor, Alaska 2 Sitka Harbor, Alaska 2 Skagway Harbor, Alaska 2 St. Michael Canal, Alaska 2 3 Valdez Harbor, Alaska 2 Wrangell Harbor, Alaska 2 Wrangell Narrows, Alaska 2 1978 1974 1963 1960 1972 1959 1964 1977 1977 1941 1974 1979 1974 1973 1970 1961 1960 1972 1964 1972 1949 1960 1974 1973 1973 1973 1972 1916 1968 1969 1979 843,534 377,260 282,019 943,351 4,441 154,191 789,461 1,000,000 * 3,679,683 '" 66,037 1,381,150 1,602,417 2,264,948 1,891,212 9,700 20,789 155,009 370,415 369,683 252,932 17,000 337,668 1,051,883 1,798,010 709,841 1,611,009 133,180 377,062 647,027 8 537,020 3,562,343 1. Includes applicable portion of reconnaissance and condition survey costs. 2. Complete. 3. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 4. Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 5. Inner channel deauthorized under Sec. 12, PL 93-251, 6 November 1977. 6. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 7. Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation. 8. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation. 9. In addition $925,500 of State funds, 10. In addition $857,000 of State funds. 11. West breakwater deauthorized under Sec. 12, PL 93- 251, 2 November 1979. 12. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 40-12 PROJECTS 752,132 128,063 86,047 87,795 19,578 28,394 206,967 42,047 31,872 13,188 459,498 506,031 29,767 84,426 18,257 6,906 169,421 48,781 130,426 11,843 89,762 93,324 22,190 301,823 79,940 121,577 560 304,390 208,159 888,084 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1980 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Ma intenance Fairbanks, Alaska a 1964 310,000 1,624 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, Alaska 2 1943 557,000 2,657 Gold Creek, Alaska 2 1975 876,006 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, Alaska 2 9 1973 260,681 - Lowell Creek, Alaska 2 1945 416,382 : 30().771 I Salmon River, Alaska 1963 37,770 7 " 8 Skagway River, Alaska 2 1966 26,385 1. Reauthorized, see Section 18, Chena River Lakes. 2. Completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance. 3. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. In addition, $12,000 expended from contributed funds. 5. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 7. In addition, $138,957 expended for emergency flood activities (1963). 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. 9. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 40-13 BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The Board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and is comprised of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as Chairman. Five members are Division Engineers rotated from within continental U.S. Army Engineer Divisions. The seventh member, assigned full time to the Board as Resident Member, also directs the staff in carrying out the responsibilities of the Board. The Board meets on call of the Chairman. The Board has several statutory duties. It conducts independent reviews of Corps survey reports covering water resources projects and reports its conclusions and recommendations to the Chief of Engineers. The Chief of Engineers then forwards the reports with his conclusions and recommendations to the Secretary of the Army for transmission to the Congress. The Board also conducts independent reviews of special reports ordered by the Congress. And it considers and approves general plans for major modification and reconstruction of any lock, canal, canalized river or other work for the use or benefit of navigation. In addition to its statutory duties, the Chief of Engineers has assigned further duties to the Board. It reviews Corps policies and procedures as directed, additional special reports for the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers, and reports of other Federal agencies pertaining to water resource development as directed, and conducts annually a 10-month program of inservice training for approximately 15 Corps planners-generally at GS 12 and 13 levels-in all aspects of Federal water resources development. The training program helps meet Corps needs for increased numbers of qualified people in the planning field. The Board also has administrative responsibility for processing proposed reports of the Chief of Engineers, along with Final Environmental Impact Statements, to states and Federal agencies for their 90-day review. In addition to other duties, the Resident Member of the Board is second alternate for the Secretary of the Army on the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, and is ex-officio secretary of the American Section, Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC), a quasi-official organization. Board members as of September 30, 1980 are: MG Joseph K. Bratton, Acting Chairman of the Board, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Pulaski Building, Washington, D.C. MG Bennett L. Lewis, Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, North Atlantic, New York, NY MG William E. Read, Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Lower Mississippi Valley, Vicksburg, MS BG Richard M. Wells, Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, North Pacific, Portland, OR BG Hugh G. Robinson, Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Southwestern, Dallas, TX COL Clyde A. Selleck, Jr., Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Missouri River, Omaha, NE COL Albert C. Constanzo, Resident Member, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Fort Belvoir, VA Official Board Actions. In compliance with resolutions of the Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the Board completed official 37 report reviews during Fiscal Year 1980. The favorable reports category includes favorably recommended projects for Federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for construction by any agency of the Federal Government. The urban studies listed below fall under this latter category. Reports Recommending Favorably for Federal Contruction. The Board recommended 11 projects estimated to cost a total of $221,296,300, of which $159,335,300 is the first cost to the United States and $61,961,000 the first cost to non-Federal interests for work and cash contributions. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, California Mississippi River, Coon Rapids Dam to Ohio river - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa White River Navigation to Batesville, Arkanss kansas Rock River, Rockford and Vicinity, Illinois (Loves'Park Interim) Wilmington Harbor - Northeast Cape Fear River, North Carolina Folly Beach, South Carolina Boggy Creek, Austin, Texas Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, New Mexico Cache Creek Basin, California Boston Harbor, Massachusetts (Debris Study) Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes Project, Maine: Fish and WildlifeMitigation Report Two project reports recommending Federal 41-1 construction-Lower Jordan, Utah and Ste. Genevieve, Missouri-were returned by the Board to reporting officers for further study. One additional favorable report was recalled by the reporting officers without Board action: Wayne County, Michigan. Reports Recommending Unfavorably for Federal Construction: During Fiscal Year 1980, the Board concurred on the unfavorable recommendations of the reporting offices for Federal construction of 18 projects: Texas Coast Hurricane Study Spring Creek, Wakulla County, Florida Intracoastal Waterway from Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River: Re Lanark Village to St. George Sound, Florida Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Louisiana Section - High Level Highway Crossings Des Moines Riverbank Erosion Study, Iowa and Missouri Murderkill and St. Jones Rivers, Delaware Bear Creek Watershed, Trinity River Basin, Texas Baltimore Metropolitan Streams, Maryland Delaware Bay Shore, New Jersey Old Fort Bayou, Jackson County, Mississippi Bayou Manchoc and Amite River, Louisiana New Rochelle-Echo Bay Harbors, New York Raritan River and Washington Canal and South River, New Jersey Mill Brook, Arlington, Massachusetts Indian River Inlet and Bay, Delaware Connecticut River Streambank Erosion, Wilder Lake, New Hampshire and Vermont to Turners Falls Dam, Massachusetts Clopton Crossing Lake, Texas Jackson Mills and Mine Falls Dam, Nashua, New Hampshire General Design Memoranda. The Board reviewed and submitted favorable recommendations on 2 General Design Memoranda during the reporting period: McNary Lock and Dam, Second Powerhouse, Columbia River, Oregon and Washington, and Wears Creek, Jefferson City, Missouri. Urban Studies. In response to Congressional resolutions, the Board submitted favorable findings on 4 urban studies during Fiscal Year 1980: Ponce Regional Water Resources Management Puerto Rico Metropolitan Region of Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas Metropolitan Anchorage, Alaska Camden Metropolitan Urban Study During Fiscal Year 1980, the Board held three meetings: November 14, 1979; April 2-3, 1980; and July 23-24, 1980. Since 1902 the Board has acted on 8,489 survey reports, recommending favorably on 3,754 and unfavorably on 4,733. 41-2 1980 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: MG R. C. Marshall, U.S. Army, President until his retirement Jul. 31, 1980; Mr. Roy T. Sessums, civil engineer; Mr. Richard Hall, civil engineer until he resigned effective Nov. 2, 1979; MG Louis W. Prentiss, Jr., U.S. Army; MG Richard L. Harris; U.S. Army, and Mr. Sam E. Angel. COL John L. Cannon, U.S. Army, served as Secretary of the Commission in the office of its President, Mississippi River Commission Building, Vicksburg, Miss. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, La. (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, Mo. (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, Ill. (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, La. (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, Mo., and Rock Island, Ill. (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, including south bank levee of Red River to Hotwells, La.; construction of four salinitycontrol structures for fish and wildlife enhancement in lower Mississippi River Delta region; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, La. (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, La.; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, La., to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, Miss. (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, Ark. (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, Ark., and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, Ark.; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a streambank erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portion east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, La., Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, Ark. and La., and Bayou * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-I) and 42-E) and cost and financial statement (Table 42-U) are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Lafourche, La.; Yazoo River Basin, Miss., including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, Miss.; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Ark., including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, Mo. (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, Mo., on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, Ill., on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City area, Ill.; except operations above Cairo, Ill., do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, Tenn.; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, Ark., and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Are, Ark.; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, Ark.; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries,, Ark.; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, Mo. and Ark., including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, Ark.; Little River diversion channel, Mo., and L'Anguille River, Ark.; Wolf River Basin, Tenn.; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, Tenn.; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, Tenn. and Ky.; West Kentucky tributaries, Ky.; Mud Lake pumping station, Tenn.; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, Ill. Field operations of the Commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing onethird of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction-St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, Mo. (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, Ill. (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, Ill. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, Ill. (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO. Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, Minn., and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, Minn. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, Mo., 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an -alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1980, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time ranges in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 57 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 feet during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, La., and Cape Girardeau, Mo., provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, La., and Cairo, Ill.; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $7,109,553,000 (Oct. 1, 1979, price levels) and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1980, of $2,914,082,179, the entire project is about 41 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See volume 1 of two-volume Port Series No. 21, 1969, "Ports on the Gulf Coast of the United States," for Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, La.; Port Series No. 20, 1977, for New Orleans, La.; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to the Gulf of Mexico (47th edition), 1979. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, including maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1980, was $2,945,872,837. (See Table 42-S.) (See also Tables 42-R, 42-T, and 42-U for additional financial statements.) Operations and results during fiscal. year. Commission activities: The 210th session was held Oct.29-Nov. 2, 1979, on board the U. S. MV Mississippien route on the Mississippi River from Cape Girardeau, Mo., to Morgan City, La. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed en route, as well as an on-site inspection of the Old River Complex. Approximately 225 persons attended public meetings held at Cape Girardeau, Mo.; Memphis, Tenn.; Lake Providence, La.; and Morgan City, La. About 40 of the representatives presented various problems pertaining to flood control and navigation. This session adjourned at Morgan City, La., at 4:45 p.m., Nov. 2, 1979. The 311th session was held Apr. 28-May 2, 1980, on board the U.S. MV Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Cairo, Ill., to New Orleans, La. Major features of the project were inspected, including bank protection works, contraction works, levees, and general channel conditions. Public meetings held at Cairo, Ill., Memphis, Tenn., Vicksburg, Miss., and New Orleans, La., were attended by about 135 representatives of local governmental, navigation, levee, commercial, and other interests. About 26 of those in attendance addressed the Commission and presented problems pertaining to flood control and navigation. This session was adjourned at New Orleans at 11:00 a.m., May 2, 1980. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Road-map-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1979 (48th) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, Ill., to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. Approximately 1,346 flight-line miles of infrared color; 6,980 flight-line miles of black-andwhite aerial photography (various scales); and about 196 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District-Series conversion of the East Delta, West Delta, Breton Island, Venice, Southwest Pass, Barataria, Black Bay, Empire, Fort Livingston, and Pointe a la Hache, La. quadrangles were completed and are scheduled for printing. Memphis District-Series conversion of U. S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500- scale quadrangles of Hayti, Mo.-Ark.; Malden, Mo., and Pascola, Mo., are in progress. Revision of 42-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 Rolla, Paducah, Poplar Bluff, Dyersburg, Memphis, and Blytheville, scale 1:250,000, is in progress. Vicksburg District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500- scale quadrangle with addition of flood control features of Malvern, Moro Bay, El Dorado, Strong, and Felsenthal, Ark. are in progress. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 48.4 feet at Cairo gage on Apr. 2 and 3, 1980, and maximum discharge of 1,160,000 cubic feet per second, occurred on Apr. 4, 1980, at Hickman, Ky., and crest stage of 32.1 feet at Memphis on Apr. 7, 1980, with maximum discharge of 1,239,000 cubic feet per second on Apr. 7, 1980. Vicksburg District-Peak stages observed on the Mississippi River Vicksburg Reach are as follows: Arkansas City 34.3 feet, 9.7 feet below bankfull; Greenville 45.4 feet, 2.6 feet below bankfull; Vicksburg 40.5 feet, 2.5 feet below bankfull and Natchez 48.1 feet, 0.1 foot above bankfull. No significant long duration flooding occurred on Ouachita River, with only a few stations slightly exceeding above bankfull stages. Near record rainfall during March and April caused significant flooding throughout the Yazoo Basin. Peak stages on the Yazoo River at key downstream stations are as follows: Lambert, 31.8 feet, 0.8 foot above bankfull; Swan Lake 29.2 feet, 3.2 feet above bankfull; Greenwood 35.5 feet, 0.5 foot above bankfull and Yazoo City 34.5 feet, 5.5 feet above bankfull. Peak stages on the Big Black River were as follows: West 21.0 feet, 9.0 feet above bankfull, and Bovina 38.9 feet, 11.9 feet above bankfull. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 52.17 feet msl on Apr. 14, 1980, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 16.30 feet msl on Apr. 13, 1980. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum of 36.36 feet msl on Apr. 16, 1980. On the Red River the Alexandria gage recorded 63.77 feet msl on Apr. 19, 1980. Studies and Investivations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. Studies continued on various requests for modifications of the existing project, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as amended (see Table 42-D). The following report was completed: The Stage I report for the study to determine whether the existing Mississippi River channel should be modified to provide a navigation channel with greater dimensions than now authorized between Cairo, Ill., and Baton Rouge, La., recommended that the study be placed in the inactive category. Preliminary results of the study indicated that a channel with greater dimensions was not justified at this time. The study was placed in the inactive category in July 1980. Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potomology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Planned investigations into the major cause-and-effect relationships attributable to major changes in stagedischarge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are about 60 percent complete. Individual studies in hydrology, channel geometry, sedimentation, and hydraulic characteristics are complete and an interim report on results of the studies will be completed in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1981. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 16.7 miles of levees in the Main Stem System and surfaced 2.3 miles of roads on Atchafalaya River levees and built 6.3 miles of berms on the South bank-Lower Red River. See Table 42-K. 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Vicksburg District-Constructed 8.2 miles of berms, and 6.9 miles of levees, in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-Constructed 3.2 miles of berms on the Main Stem. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42-M, and 42-N.) There are 1,608.3 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.5 are in place with 1,128.6 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.1 miles, of which 2,195.3 are in place with 1,476.8 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 complete. Of the authorized 706.7 miles of berms, 457.9 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 1,708.5 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,614.6 miles of authorized levees off the main stem, of which 1,104.2 are in place with 807.6 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 9.8 miles and 795.7 miles of graveled or hardsurfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For last summary of levee work accomplished under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act, see Table 42-N, pages 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G). Work included dredging 25,558,800 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following Dlant: New Orleans District, channel maintenance dredging was performed by the dredge Jadwin. Vicksburg District, two Government-owned dustpan dredges and one leased cutterhead dredge. The Vicksburg District channel maintenance dredging was performed by the dredges Jadwin and Ockerson. The harbors were maintained with the leased contract cutterhead dredge Lewis James, Memphis District, two Government-owned dustpan dredges, one leased cutterhead dredge, and one contract dustpan (ICP). The Memphis District channel maintenance dredging, mile 599 to 800, was advertised under the Industry Capability Program in November 1979. Bids were opened December 1979. One bid was received 'from the dredging industry with Bean Corporation filing a protest. The harbors were maintained with the leased contract cutterhead dredge Natchez. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded to Bean Corp. May 1980 under ICP on LMR Miles 599 to 800. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42- I, and 42-J.) Construction of 16.73 miles of new bank revetment and 126,238 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 7.81 miles of new dikes were constructed. In addition, work on tributaries consisted of placement of 4,759 squares for maintenance. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, Ill., and Baton Rouge, La., included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintaining bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contract pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and obtaining their views as to needs of navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alinement improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 777.75 miles of operative bank revetment and 183.89 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9- by 300-feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 99.8 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 61.43 miles of revetment and 5.20 42-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 miles of dikes on other channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. New work by contract: Construction of floodside and landside berms and levee enlargement continued intermittently on the east and west protection levees, although there was considerable delay during the year due to exceptionally high water flooding the borrow pits. One contract on the west protection levee, initiated in a prior year, was completed over a distance of 0.8 mile with placement of 6,076 cubic yards. One contract on the east protection levee, initiated last fiscal year, was completed over a distance of 0.8 mile with placement of 112,136 cubic yards. An additional 20.2 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms are under construction on the west protection levee involving placement of 1,044,393 cubic yards during this period and 25.5 miles of levee enlargement and floodwall on the east protection levee with placement of 1,027,223 cubic yards. Maintenance by hired labor: Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrell Locks, Morganza Control Structure, and numerous drainage and flood control structures were operated and maintained. Maintenance by contract: Construction of a levee setback at Goudeau, initiated in a prior year, was completed Dec. 11, 1979. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 923,900 cubic yards by one leased cutterhead dredge from Berwick Bay harbor between Jul. 28 and Sep. 5, 1980. Dredging at Three Rivers consisted of removal of 82,800 cubic yards of shoal between Nov. 18 and Nov. 25, 1979. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, La. The project is 28 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $1,270,000,000 which includes funds for Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 229.5 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel improvement by dredging to reduce flow line, and bank stabilization. The channel has been enlarged to 60,000 square feet from mile 54.5 to 96.2, and 40,000 square feet from mile 96.2 to 112.3. Enlargement to 100,000 square feet from mile 54.5 to 112.3 remains to be done. Drainage improvements in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area have not been initiated. Approximately 36.7. miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by contract: Dredging for the removal of shoal from the entrance channel was performed, resulting in the removal of 221,600 cubic yards between Sep. 14 and Sep. 28, 1980. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The project is 16 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $699,200 and cash contributions of $650,000. Completion of the remaining 2.5 miles is dependent on economic justification by developments on the initial channel. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition and operation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 18 percent complete, 'based on the current estimated cost of $21,900,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, La., to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. 42-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Condition as of Sep. 30. Maintenance by contract: A contract for cleaning and painting the entire steel portion of the weir structure, initiated last fiscal year and completed Jan. 28, 1980. Contract for maintenance repairs to spillway structure, awarded Jul. 18, 1980, and initiated Aug. 20, 1980, is 60 percent complete. Construction of the spillway was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, and 1979. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: Contract for stone trenchfill, at Cotton Revetment, mile 115.9 to 113.3, was initiated in a prior fiscal year with 76,518 tons of stone placed. Contract was completed Feb. 7, 1980. A contract for surfacing roads on existing levee crown was initiated Feb. 14, 1980, and completed Apr. 5, 1980. Item R- 80.5-R, was awarded Oct. 23, 1978, initiated Apr. 12, and completed May 21, 1979. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition, operation, and engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929 and is 47 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $37,000,000. Of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized, 59.2 miles are complete. (See Table 42-K for status of levees and Table 42-H for status of revetments.) OLD RIVER, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, operation of a picket boat at the inflow channel to the low-sill control structure during high river stages, and engineering studies. Maintenance by contract: During the period Sep. 29 to Sep. 30, 1980, 19,262 cubic yards of shoal were dredged from the lock forebay; contract for painting the Old River lock bridge initiated May 6, 1980, and was completed Jul. 10, 1980. Scour repairs in the low-sill structure, were initiated Aug. 10, 1980, and completed Aug. 24, 1980, with 22,021 tons of stone placed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is 25 percent complete based on the current estimated Federal cost of $306,000,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels, February 1961; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 3.3 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Principal items remaining to complete the project consist of constructing additional bank protection works, providing additional scour protection in the inflow and outflow channels, an additional gantry crane for the low-sill structure, and construction for the prevention of marine accidents at the low-sill structure. TECHE VERMILION BASINS, LA. (WATER SUPPLY) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: New work by contract consisted of constructing a conveyance channel control structure in West Atchafalaya Basin Floodway. This contract, initiated in a prior fiscal year, was completed Jul. 16, 1980. A contract for construction of a pumping station was awarded Apr. 22, 1980, initiated May 27, 1980, and is 20 percent complete. A contract for the initial construction of a conveyance channel was initiated Oct. 26, 1979, and is 70 percent complete. Contract for the state canal siphon and bypass channel was initiated Oct. 18, 1979, and is 30 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 35 percent complete based on the current estimated cost of $34,600,000. Construction was authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as modified by the Flood Control Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-789 approved Nov. 7, 1966)of the following: a low leveed excavated channel on the west bank of the Atchafalaya River north of Krotz Springs; an inverted siphon under Darbonne Bay; a grated control structure in the WABPL; a gated culvert in the berm between Bayou Courtableau and the WABPL borrow pit 42-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 to the south; a slotted weir in Bayou Fusilier near Arnaudville; and a navigable sector control structure in the Loreauville Canal. Improvements are to provide additional surface water in Bayou Teche, Vermilion River, and the WABPL borrow pit to satisfy the present and future needs for municipal, industrial, and irrigation water supply and to prevent pollution of these streams. Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, ARK AND LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. Planning and design were continued on project features. Contracts for the pumps and motors, recreational facilities, Connerly Bayou Dam, and Ditch Bayou Dam are under way on the Lake Chicot Pumping Plant Project. The slurry trench, used to control under seepage at the pumping plant, is complete. A contract has been negotiated for the relocation of the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridge, located in Reach 3, Big and Colewa Creeks; however, work on the bridge relocation has been delayed. (b) Red River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. The channel improvement contract for Wild Cow Bayou has been completed, and an additional channel work contract is under way on the Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant. Construction activities for enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee includes Item 1, 7.8 miles completed Aug. 29, 1978; Item 3A, 3 miles completed Jun. 5, 1980; Item 3B, 7.1 'miles completed Nov. 28, 1978. Design and right-of-way acquisition are continuing. Design of the Six Mile Bayou drainage structure and connecting channel is continuing. The Sicily Island Levee Project GDM has been approved and the Vicksburg District has initiated preparation of Item 1 Plans and Specifications for Sicily Island Levee. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 744.6 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additional 57.2 miles of channel previously enlarged has been further enlarged and 61.6 miles of the Tensas River have been cleared and snagged. (b) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising necessary to conform to the Refined 1973 MR&T Project Flood Flowline on the Mississippi River. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 68.6 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, ARK. Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bank-protection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, Ark. and Okla. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. YAZOO BASIN, MISS. Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. A review of the protection provided to Greenwood and vicinity is under way. (c) Main stem. Planning is under way to provide drainage structure and levee closure at Wasp Lake, Lower Tchula Lake, and Bee Lake. Channel maintenance. Random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control continued, as required, in Coldwater, Tallahatchie, and Yazoo Rivers, and Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel. (d) Big Sunflower River. A Phase II GDM for additional work in the Steele Bayou Basin was approved Dec. 20, 1978. No additional work has been initiated. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. Construction of Panola-Quitman Floodway, Item C, has been terminated prior to completion. Big Sand Creek Levee Extension, to the hills, and Yalobusha River (left bank) Levee are presently under way. Construction on Teoc Creek Levee is complete. (2) Bank Stabilization. A contract for bank stabilization on South Fork Tillatoba Creek, let in Fiscal Year 1978, has been completed. (3) Channels. Removal of plugs on Alligator-Catfish Bayou channel at the site of recent bridge relocations will complete the Alligator-Catfish channel enlargement project. 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Controls in Alligator-Catfish channel may be necessary prior to removal of the plugs. A study is under way to evaluate these needs. (4) Structures. Ascalmore-Tippo, Item 4, closure and overflow structure, and Ascalmore-Tippo, Item 3, Tallahatchie River control structure, are under construction. The planning of the Pelucia Creek Levee Project is nearly complete and the results will be printed as Supplement B to the Greenwood Protection Works (GDM #1). Maintenance of channels of Yalobusha, Little Tallahatchie, and Yocona Rivers; Cassidy, David, Burrell, and Bobo Bayous; and Ascalmore Creek, by random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control, continued. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction and maintenance of public use facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 267.0 feet above NGVD on Apr. 19, 1980, when storage in the flood control pool was 632,400 acre-feet. Peak inflow was 20,800 cubic feet per second on Mar. 20, 1980. On Sep. 30, 1980, pool elevation was 246.9 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 223,100 acre-feet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction and maintenance of public use facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were operated and maintained. Maintenance snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 233.2 feet above NGVD on Apr. 19, 1980, when storage in the flood control pool was 1,484,900 acre-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 64,600 cubic feet per second on Mar. 17, 1980. On Sep. 30, 1980, the pool elevation was 212.6 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 467,800 acre-feet. (h) Sardis Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction and maintenance of public use facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 278.1 feet above NGVD on Apr. 21, 1980, when storage in flood control pool was 1,382,100 acre-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 46,050 cubic feet per second on Mar. 18, 1980. On Sep. 30, 1980, pool elevation was 252.0 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 383,800 acre-feet. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction and maintenance of public use facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 239.0 feet above NGVD on Apr. 16, 1980, and storage in flood control pool was 549,700 arce-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 61,200 cubic feet per second on Mar. 17, 1980. On Sep. 30, 1980, pool elevation was 218.4 feet above NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 103,400 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo Area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. The Satartia Area backwater levee is complete except for a small gap at levee station 169+60. Plans and specifications are being prepared for Structure and Item 1 of the Rocky Bayou Levee System. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four of the seven Greentree Reservoirs are under construction without pumps. Water will again be pumped into one of the four this fall with portable pumps. Two of the remaining three will be under construction in Fiscal Year 1981. The project is 27 percent complete. (k) Upper Yazoo projects. The first three items of work, approximately 33 miles of channel improvement, beginning at Yazoo City, Miss., and extending upstream to just south of Silver City, Miss., has been completed. The next item of work, Item 2A-1, consisting of approximately 4 miles of channel improvement is under construction. The channel improvement has been completed with one cutoff closure plug and a training dike remaining to be constructed. Completion of this remaining work is scheduled for the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1981. Item 2A-2, consisting of 7 miles of channel improvement, will be awarded in Fiscal Year 1980 and is scheduled for completion in Fiscal Year 1981. Planning is continuing on the remainder of Items 2 and 3. (1) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek 1A; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupam Boque, Items 4A, 4A- 1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature iscomplete 42-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 and a final report is scheduled for submission to Congress in December 1981. Data collection, monitoring, and evaluation of completed projects will continue through Fiscal Year 1983. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 35 percent complete. A total of 47.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed. Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, ARK. AND MO. Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Little River drainage. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Missouri State Highways 153 and 25 bridges and protection of Route 84 bridge across Ditch 19 was completed. Reimbursable contract for alteration of St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Bridge across Ditch 19 was completed. Contract for two county bridges, Ditch 19, Item 2, was awarded and completed. Contract for two county bridges, Castor River, Item 1 was awarded and is 29 percent complete. Contract for Ditch 81 Extension, gravel surfacing, was completed. Contract for construction of Ditch 19, Item 1, Parcel 2, was completed. Contract for Ditch 81 Control Structure, scour repairs, is under way and 93 percent complete. (b) Upper St. Francis River and floodway. Reimbursable contract for alterations of Arkansas State Highway 119 bridge across Buffalo Creek Diversion was completed. Contract for three county bridges across Ditch 21A was completed. Two contracts for four county bridges across Buffalo Creek Diversion were completed. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Arkansas State Highway 181 bridge across Ditch 21A is under way and 18 percent complete. Contract for construction of county bridge across Ditch 21A was awarded; work has not begun. Contracts for channel enlargement, Items 1 and 2, Cockle Burr Slough and Buffalo Creek Diversion were completed. Contract for fertilizing and seeding, Cockle Burr Slough, Item 2, was completed. Contract for construction of design deficiency repairs, St. Francis Lake Control Structure was completed. Contract for construction of Low Flow Restoration was awarded and is 30 percent complete. Contract for gravel surfacing, above Kennett to Senath was completed. Contract for construction of Inter-River Culvert was awarded and is 98 percent complete. Contract for erosion control, Dam 10, was awarded; work has not begun. Reimbursable contract for emergency repairs, U.S. Highway 63 bridge across Ditch 61 was completed. Brush kill operations performed by hired labor forces on 42 miles of channel were initiated and completed. Contract for channel cleanout, below North End Control Structure was awarded and is 98 percent complete. Contract for scour repairs, Ditch 63, below Rivervale was awarded and completed. Contract for scour repairs, Wappapello to Crowleys Ridge was awarded and is 96 percent complete. Contract for gravel resurfacing, Elk Chute was completed. Contract for gravel resurfacing, State Line Degraded Levee was awarded; work has not begun. Contract for construction of Drainage District No. 17 Pumping Plant is under way and 94 percent complete. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Reimbursable contracts for alterations of Arkansas State Highway 149 bridge across Fifteen Mile Bayou were completed. Reimbursable contracts for alterations of Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad bridge across Blackfish Bayou, Item 2, and the relocation of two St. Francis County Roads along Blackfish Bayou, Item 2, is in Phase II construction; work has not begun. Reimbursable contract for alteration of four county bridges, Big Creek, Item 2, is in Phase II construction, a subcontract was awarded for one bridge; work has not begun. Contract for construction of county bridge, Blackfish Bayou, Item 2, was completed. Contract for channel cutoff and enlargement, Rivervale Outlet Ditch, Part No. 1, was completed. Contract for channel enlargement and diversion, Item No. 1, Big Creek is under way and 34 percent complete. Contract for construction of Haleside Drainage Rectification was completed. Contract for gravel surfacing, below Birdeye, was completed. Contract for construction of W. G. Huxtable Boat Launching Ramp was completed. Two contracts for gravel resurfacing, Madison to Marianna and Princedale were completed. Contract for culvert repairs and shoal removal, Tyronza River were completed. Contract for landside ditch cleanout, Princedale, was awarded and completed. Brush kill operations performed by hired labor forces on 44 miles of channel were initiated and completed. Contract for paving access road to W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant was awarded and completed. Contract for construction of dewatering wells at W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant was awarded; work has not begun. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 74 percent complete. (b), (c), and (d) St. Francis River and Tributaries (Upper and Lower). Project was initiated during 1937 and is 73 percent complete. (e) Wappapello Lake, Mo. Project was initiated in 1938 and completed in 1941. 42-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep., 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was' initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, ARK. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursable contract for alteration of U.S. Highway 70 bridge across Bayou DeView was completed. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad bridge across Bayou DeView was completed (remaining work, installing sway bracing, has been deleted from the contract. Another contract will be negotiated, whenever the channel is excavated, to complete the sway bracing). Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 7 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TENN. AND KY. Operations and results during fiscal year. Two contracts, one for furnishing storm water pumps and diesel engines and the other for construction of Lake No. 9 Pumping Plant were completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 87 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TENN. Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River, Tenn. Contract for channel improvement, Item No. 1, Parcel No. 2, Main Stem, Obion River, was completed. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridges across South and Middle Forks, Obion River, is essentially complete (remaining work, installing sway bracing, will be performed after channel excavation under the bridges has been completed by others). (b) Forked Deer River, Tenn. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridges across North and South Forks, Forked Deer River, is in progress and is 96 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Obion River, Tenn. Project was initiated during 1961 and is 57 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River, Tenn. Project was initiated during 1966 and is 15 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursable contract for alterations of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridge across Obion Creek, Item No. 3, is under way. Phase I planning is complete, but construction has not started. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 7 percent complete. 42-11 TABLE 42-A Mileage Above Head of Passes 0-9571 10-81 11-25 38 45 59 75 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 101-234 235 279-287 287-303 303-314 306-572 437 437-721 490 537 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS _ 42-12 Locality Head of Passes, La.-Cairo, Ill. The Jump-New Orleans, La. Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, La. Homeplace, La. Bohemia, La. Myrtle Grove, La. Scarsdale, La. Bohemia, La.-New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. New Orleans, La. New Orleans-Morganza, La. New Orleans-Baton Rouge, La. Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, La. Morganza-Old River, La. Old River, La., control Old River-Cypress Creek, Ark. Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. Vicksburg-Lake View, Miss. Wilson Point, La. Greenville Harbor, Miss. Improvement Dredging, revetment, and contraction work Main line levee, right bank Main line setback, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Remarks Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (H D 308/74/1). Included in Miss. Delta Region, La. feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in Miss. Delta Region, La. feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in Miss. Delta Region, La. feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD '308/74/1). Included in Miss. Delta Region, La. feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 19662 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 803-873 857 Locality Long Lake, Helena, Ark. Henrico-Helena, Ark. St. Francis River- Commerce, Mo.3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, Tenn. Tiptonville-Obion River Near Mud Lake, Tenn. 890 St. Johns Bayou, Mo. 890 New Madrid Floodway, Mo. 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Point, Mo. 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, Ky. 922 Hickman, Ky. 946 Peafield, Mo. 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district, Mounds, Mound City, and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, Ill. Cape Girardeau, Mo., to Rock Island, Ill. 1. Cairo, Ill., is on Ohio River about 3 miles abov4 mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislati e its ion." 3. Commerce, Mo., is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 42-13 __ Improvement Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Main line levee, left bank, levee extension, and diversion Obion River Pumping station and adjacent channel improvements Drainage floodgate and levee closure Drainage floodgate and levee closure Floodway, right bank Main line levee, left bank Floodwall, left bank Drainage floodgate Floodwalls and levees Floodwalls, levees, and pumping plant Levees, both banks Levees Remarks Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Intermittent (Sec. 6) Intermittent (Sec. 6). TABLE 42-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA.' Atchafalaya Basin. Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Flood ways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrel' Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick' Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 42-14 Remarks Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levees, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 0-17 17-40 40-51 Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA. Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, La., and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Bouef diversion Bayou Boeuf Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf. Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee New channel 42-15 East bank, levee TABLE 42-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 51-60 Bayous Boeuf-Rapides New channel diversion 17-42 Upper Cocodrie 87-107 40 60 87 82-145 3-56 3-56 5 56 Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA. Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, La. AMITE RIVER, LA. Amite River, La. LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA. Moncla-Hotwells Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA. Eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, La. TENSAS BASIN, ARK. AND LA. Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, La. Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, La. Ouachita River Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, and structures Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 13, 1977. MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). 42-16 (23) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. Boeuf River, Ark. and La. 0-32 Below Bayou LaFourche 0-56 Bayou LaFourche 151-235 Boeuf River, Ark. and La., above Bayou LaFourche 210-286 Canal 19 286-296 Canal 19 extension 0-75 Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 0-8 Fleschmans Bayou 0-7 Caney Bayou 0-33 Big Bayou 0-10 Canal 18 0-9 Kirsch Lake Canal 0-14 Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. 0-170 Bayou Macon 0-34 Canal 43 0-35 Canal 81 Lake Pumping plant and drainage Chicot structure Tributary of Bayou Macon 0-6 Rush Bayou Tensas River, Ark. and La. 0-160 Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River 0-16 Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, La. 0-0.2 Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. 23-98 Yancopin-Pine Bluff 35-98 Fletcher Bend, Ark., to Pine Bluff 48-102 North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, ARK. Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Ark. YAZOO BASIN, MISS. 0-75 Yazoo Backwater area 0-381 Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake 75-366 Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvements Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.2,3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 (6) (6) (s) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E. (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. 42-17 Remarks I TABLE 42-B (Continued) Mileage Above Mouth 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Locality Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocona River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, Miss. Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, Miss. Bogue Phalia 42-18 Improvement Levees, left bank Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, Miss., and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Remarks Intermittent. Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-4 Ditchlow Bayou Channel improvement Little Sunflower River Deer Creek 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, ARK. Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, Ark. CACHE BASIN, ARK. Cache River, Ark. Bayou DeView, Ark. ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, ARK. AND MO. Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, Ark. Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, ARK. L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement 42-19 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. TABLE 42-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Mouth Locality Improvement Remarks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES 0-25 Wolf River and tributaries, Tenn. Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky. Porter Gap, Tenn. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TENN. AND KY. 0-20 Running Reelfoot Bayou, Tenn. 0-15 Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, Ky. and Tenn. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY. 0-47 Obion Creek, Ky. LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO. Delta to Ancell, Mo. MISSOURI RIVER, MO. 0-28 Mouth to St. Charles, Mo. 0-120 Mouth to Havana, Ill. OHIO RIVER, ILL. AND KY. Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, Ill. Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtanent structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Channel improvement Levees Levees Levees (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 19702 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970, See Table 42-D. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). Floodwall, levee, revetment, and pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Archafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, La., and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Teche Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3.Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4.Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-20 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Yalobusha Yocona Little Tallahatchie Coldwater St. Francis Nearest town to damsite Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Drainage area, square miles 1,320 560 1,545 1,000 1,310 Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres 10 6 11 5 4 Volume, thousand acre-feet 86 58 108 31 31 Elevation, feet, mean sea level 193 230 236.0 209.3 354.7 Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres 65 28 58.5 33 23 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,252 602 1,462 494 582 Runoff, inches 17.8 20.2 17.7 9.3 8.4 Outlet gates: Number 3 2 4 3 3 Size, feet 7.5 by 14 8 by 16 6 by 12 8.5 by 19 10 by 20 Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 10.7 9.4 10.0 10.0 18.0 Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Chute Chute Chute Chute Gravity Length, feet 200 200 400 300 740 Elevation, crest, feet, mean sea level 231 268 281.4 2:38.3 394.7 Discharge capacity, thousand cubic 52 50 132 89 229 feet per second Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres 106 41 90 63 32 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,385 554 1,447 858 521 Runoff, inches- 19.7 18.5 17.6 16.1 7.5 Elevation, feet, mean sea level 247.5 284.0 301.0 256.3 413.7 Dam: Type, earthfill Rolled Rolled Hydraulic Rolled Rolled Length, thousand feet 13.9 8.4 15.3 11.5 2.7 Elevation, crest, feet, mean sea level 256.0 293.0 311.4 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, Miss.; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, Mo. 42-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in flood-control works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carrd Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rightsof- way for flood control work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, Tenn. (Nonconnah Creek is correct title) Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, Ark. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River; construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, La.. including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River, and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and .revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, Tenn. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, Ill. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie, La. Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, Miss. Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, Miss.' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark.' Improve Bayou Lafourche, La. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees (below Plum Bayou).' 42-22 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public 351, 72d Cong. Public 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1. 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong.. 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191. 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong.. 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong.. 1st sess. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization 42-23 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 --- -- Work Authorized Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, La.' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, Mo. Big Sunflower River, etc. Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, Mo., with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, Ark. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), La.' Flood protection at Des Arc, Ark. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, Ark. and Mo. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, Ark. and Mo. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Ark. Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, La.' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, La. Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, La. Bank protection, Amite River, La. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, La., levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, Ark. Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, La. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), Miss. Improve New Madrid Floodway, Mo., including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, Ky. and Tenn. Improve Greenville Harbor, Miss. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. Document H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. T Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53. 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85. 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. D1oc. 478, 83d Cong.. 2d sess. S. DI)oc. 160, 83d Cong.. 2d sess. S. D)oc. 15. 86th ('ong.. 1st sess. I1. I)oc. 108. 85th Cong.. 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 White River backwater area pumping plant. 42-24 Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-$50 million. Modification-Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), La. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, Miss. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, Ark. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, La., project. Modify St. Francis River, Mo. and Ark., project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, Ark. Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, La. Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, La. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, Miss., and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, Miss. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, Ark. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, Mo., and Drainage District No. 17, Ark. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, Ill., and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, Miss. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, Miss. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, Miss. Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, La. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report revised - March 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 31, 1970 Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively.4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, La., that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), Ky., to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, Tenn. and Ky., authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in Ky. and Tenn. b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, Miss. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, Ark. Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, Miss. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, Miss. (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, Miss. (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, La. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), Tenn., to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, Miss., feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, La. and Ark., feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo., feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, La., feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93- 251. Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-149, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. 42-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITTLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Modification of Cache River Basin, Ark., feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1 - Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda - On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Mo., project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26, 1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. and Miss., project: Reportof OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, Tenn. and Miss. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), Tenn., to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky.: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, Tenn. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93- 251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. 42-26 TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Unpublished Vicksburg Dis- Ind. on VXD Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant trict report dated May 31, May 31, 1977, channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of 1977, on Cynthia and Six Letter Report.2 '%Concordia Parish, La. Mile Bayous, La. Jun. 28, 1980 The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for Public Law 96-285, the preservation and development of environmental resources Jun. 28, 1980. and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries 3. Date minor modification was approved under discreproject as shown in Table 42-E. tionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was ap- 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. proved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 42-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improve- 1941, p. 943 ments, Tenn. Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, La. 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, Ark., to Gillett, Ark., 1946, p. 1053 on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou). Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and 1946, p. 108:3 De Valls Bluff, Ark. Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou 1945, p. 982 Macon, La. Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton 1948, p. 1059 Rouge, La. (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, La. 1953. p. 773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, La. 1953, p. 737 42-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Project Title Estimated Cost Fiscal Year 1980 (1979 Price Levels) Completed features' Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Baton Rouge Harbor, La. Atchafalaya Basin, La. Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, La. Old River, La. Lower Red River- South Bank Red River levees, La. Eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, La. Mississippi Delta Region, La. Teche-Vermilion Basins, La. Tensas Basin, Ark. and La. Lower Arkansas River, Ark. Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, Ark. Yazoo Basin, Miss. Lower White River, Ark. Cache Basin, Ark. St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. L'Anguille Basin, Ark. West Tennessee tributaries, Tenn. Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. & Ky. Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. & Ky. Reelfoot Lake, Tenn. & Ky. (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. & Ky. West Kentucky tributaries, Ky. Bushley Bayou, La. TOTAL $ 164,733,000 1,015,000,000 3,010,000 4,000,000 2,424,000,000 8,260,000 1,180,000,000 20,300,000 286,000,000 35,400,000 44,600,000 24,200,000 32,700,000 325,000,000 33,500,000 130,900,000 808,000,000 44,200,000 116,000,000 278,000,000 9,150,000 59,200,000 6,340,000 (9,960,000) 440,000 9,520,000 16,600,000 30,500,000 $ 7,109,553,000 1. Includes Bonnet Carre, Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; and miscellaneous features. 42-29 _ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Location Fiscal Year 1980 Mileage Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 221.6 221.6 Main stem channel 234-320 250.0 250.0 Vicksburg Main stem channel 320-600 4,630.0 4,630.0 Vicksburg Harbor 437 44.0 44.0 Greenville Harbor 537 552.0 552.0 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 19,600.0 19,600.0 Memphis Harbor 726 261.2 261.2 TOTAL. 25,558.8 25,558.8 42-30 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear ' (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Lower Childress-Fort Jackson, La ... 22 Buras, La. ........................ 25 Tropical Bend, La. ................... 30 Port Sulphur, La. ................ 39 Point Michel, La. ................... 44 Diamond, La ....................... 49 Gravolet, La......................... 51 Junior, La ........................... 54 Harlem, La. ........................ 56 Myrtle Grove, La ..................... 59 Monsecour, La. ..................... 61 Alliance, La. ....................... 62 Belair, La. .......................... 65 Jesuit Bend, La. .................... 68 Linwood, La. ....................... 71 Oak Point, La. ..................... 72 Scarsdale, La. ...................... 75 English Turn, La. ................... 78 Poydras, La ........................ 82 Cutoff, La. ........................ 88 Third district reach, La. ............. 93 Algiers Point, La. .................. 95 Gouldsboro Bend, La. ............... 96 Gretna Bend, La.................... 97 Greenville Bend, La. ................ 100 Carrollton Bend, La. ................ 104 Avondale Bend, La. ................. 109 Kenner, La. ........................ 114 Luling, La ......................... 119 Good Hope, La ...................... 126 Waterford, La. ..................... 128 Montz, La. ........................... 132 Lucy, La. ........................... 136 Reserve, La ........................ 138 Willow Bend, La. ................... 144 Angelina, La. ....................... 145 Vacherie, La ....................... 148 Belmont, La ..... ................. 152 Rich Bend, La..................... 157 RRRR RRL RL RL RLRL RL RL R L R RRR L R L R L R L R L R L R L R 13,975 10,020 21,295 9,125 835 3,920 605 - 49,682 - 49,700 75,587 - 30,855 - -. 75 5,393 - - - - 60 15,875 105 2,358 -. - 10,194 17,283 20,692 21,363 6,247 o 8,750 17,435 17,570 13,975 15,925 10,020 7,150 21,295 e 17,545 0 9,125 7,040 5,940 6,910 22,836 15,761 21,101 7,728 4,960 9,662 22,045 15,015 22,371 9,089 27,528 14,980 8,385 16,717 17,826 20,947 3,238 19,000 13,295 21,240 6,406 14,124 - - - - - - - - - -,40 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Standard revetment: Romeville,, La. ..................... 161 St. Alice, La ....................... 165 Burnside, La. ...................... 170 Aben, La. ......................... 172 St. Elmo. La ....................... 174 Smoke Bend,.La. .................... 177 Marchand, La. .................... 180 Philadelphia Point, La. ............ . 183 New River Bend, La ................ 185 White Castle, La. ................... 193 St. Gabriel, La. ..................... 201 Plaquemine Bend, La. .............. 209 Manchac, La. .................. 215 Missouri Bend, La. ................ 222 Arlington, La ........................ 227 Port Allen, La. ..................... 231 Allendale, La. .................... 238 Springfield Bend, La. ............... 244 Arbroth, La. ....................... 250 Grand Bay, La. ..................... 258 Bayou Sara, La .................... 265 Red Store, La. .................... 269 Arrow Bend, La. ................... 272 Boies Point, La .................... 275 Morganza, La ...................... 279 Iowa Point, La. ................... 282 Brunette Point, La. ................ 285 Greenwood Bend, La. ............... 289 Hog Point, La ...................... 296 Carr Point, La. .................... 304 Above Old River, La. ............... 305 L -R L RL RL RL RL RL RL RRL RRL RL RRL RL RR R 4,885 - 75 28,187 �- �- .- 5,377 10,599 3,902 6,934 12,641 7,213 3,164 3,072 5,280 4,194 15,334 22,577 O 16,050 It 5,433 4 10,240 17,075 0 4,660 5,379 24,394 32,235 O 14,371 35,475 ', 22,592 G 16,193 12,244 11,320 17,940 25,690 13,190 7,090 .w 4,780 > 7,830 13,600 16,094 20,513 11,375 o 8,038 14,987 8,673 8,600 4,800 Fort Adams, Miss .................. 308 Point Breeeze, La .................. 313 Coochie, La ...................... 317 Palmetto, Miss ..................... 322 Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ........... Dikes: None OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel ..................... 315 Inflow channel .............. 315 Outflow channel ................... 315 Total standard revetment, Old River ... .............. L RRL L RR 17,219 11,165 17,150 30,864 5,366 64,660 315 257,637 74,148 - 1,087,477 (12.24 Miles) (205.96 Miles) - - - - - - - 2,415 - - - - - - - 4,365 - - - - - - - 10,879 17.659 Dikes: None ATACHAFALAYA RIVER Below Confluence of Red and Atachafalaya Rivers Standard revetment: Mile One, La. ...................... 1 Coville Bayou, La. .................. 3 Legonier, La. ....................... 4 Simmesport, La. .................... 6 Kuhlman Bayou, La. ................. 7 Odenburg, La. ...................... 9 Cason, La., ........................ 12 McCrea, La. ........................ 13 Woodside, La. ...................... 14 Provosty, La. ...................... 17 Crooked Bayou, La. ................. 18 Mercier, La. ........................ 22 Barberton, La. ..................... 23 Evans Point, La. ................... 24 Goudeau, La. ....................... 26 Morris Bayou, La. .................. 27 Goodwood, La. ..................... 28 Red Cross, La. ...................... 29 Melville, La ........................ 30 Cross Bayou, La. ................... 31 Melville South, La. ................ 33 L R L R L R R L R L R L RL R L R L R L R 2,124 2,635 - v-- (3.34 Miles) E Cn - 4,150 - 6,550 0 - 8,940 - 10,636 g - 5,565 2 - 5,375 2 - 10,798 0 - 5,027 - 13,002 - 7,768 - 9,600 - 10,478 - 3,592 - 4,961 - 3,938 - 3,800 - 8,505 - 8,065 - 4,870 - 3,815 - 4,070 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) ATACHAFALAYA RIVER-continued Standard revetment: Toles, La. .......................... 35 L Petite Prairie, La. .................. 36 R Holloway Lake, La. ................. 37 L Bayou Sherman, La. ................ 38 L Krotz Springs, La. .................. 40 R Sherburne, La. ...................... 43 R Bayou Big Graw, La. ............... 46 R Morgan City, La. .................... 115 L Total standard revetment ....... Dikes: $4 None LOWER RED RIVER Below Confluence of Old and Mississippi Rivers Standard revetment: Long Lake, La ..................... 10 R Naples, La. ........................ 7 R Turnbull Island, La. ................ 9 L Total standard revetment RED RIVER2 Standard revetment:3 Dupre, La. ....................... 69 R Bringol, La ........................ 73 R Egg Bend, La ...................... 75 R Cologne Bend, La. .................. 77 R Roxana, La. ......................... 83 R Ryland, La. ....................... 88 R Whittington, La. .................... 89 R Smith, La. ......................... 91 R Latanier, La. ....................... 93 R Hudson, La. ........................ 99 R 6,355 8,381 0 7,085 5,200 4 4,625 7,035 c 8,394 3,410 m - - - - - 4,759 - 193,990 (36.74 Miles) - - - - - - - 6,652 - - - - - - - 6,190 - - - - - - - 6,815 S- - - - - 19657 0 z C c (3.72 Miles) 2,690 4,000 2,400 650 3,325 3,925 2,900 2,700 2,460 1,458 - - Robert, La ......................... 102 Alexandria Front, La. .............. 105 Callahan, La. ...................... 110 Cotton, La. ........................ 116 Rapides, La ....................... 119 Boyce, La ........................... 125 Total standard revetment, Red River ................ Dikes:3 Choctaw Bayou Bend, La. ........ 71 Bringol (Egg Bend), La. .......... 73 Egg Bend, La .................... 75 Cologne Bend, La. .............. 77 Echo, La. ..................... 78 Richardson, La. ................ 79 Alexandria, La. ................ 105 Bertrand, La. .................. 122 Total dikes, Red River .......... RRRRRR RRRRR RRR 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). - - - - - - - 5,500 - - - - - - - 5,280 4,000 14,700 1,030 4,548 - - - - - - - 61,566 (11.66 Miles) - (Rock groin) 2. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 3. Includes all types of dikes and retards. 2,000 2,477 900 1,850 1,900 2,700 270 7,630 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 0 TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, La................. 329 R -20,805 Dead Mans Bend, Miss .............. 335 L 10,380 - 36,886 10,380 St. Catherine Bend, La. ............. 350 R -8,810 Morville, La. .. ................... 356 R 11,815 Natchez Island, Miss. ............... 357 R - -2,180 Carthage, Miss .................... 361 L 2,945 120 8,558 13,525 Natchez Front, Miss................ 364 L - -6,510 Gibson, La. ...................... 371 R -22,735 Ashland, Miss.-La ................. 374 L 14,872 Kempe Bend, La. .................. 383 R -26,655 Browns Field, La ................. 389 R 9,280 Goldbottom, Miss. ................. 392 L - - - - - - 30,250 Hardscrabble, La .................. 398 R - - 3,463 - 22,530 Grand Gulf, Miss .................. 403 L 2,675 20 7,694 - - 7,344 - 47,196 Point Pleasant, La.-Miss. ............ 413 R - - - 1,573 5,327 -32,345 Togo Island, La................... 415 R - - -5,670 Lake Karnac, La.-Miss............... 419 L -19,260 Diamond Point, La.-Miss............. 423 R - - - 12,125 Reid-Bedford, La. ................. 429 R - - - - 18,392 Racetrack, Miss................... 433 L - - - -13,935 Barge Line Terminal, Miss. ......... 437 L 3,040 Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. ............ 437 L - - - - 7,350 Delta Point, La. ........... ........ 437 R - - - - 7,650 King's Point-Opposite Delta Point, La.-Miss. ............ 439 L 19,330 a False Point, La. ................. 443 R -12,860 C Marshall-Brown's Point, La.-Miss. 446 L - - - 4,052 - 19,580 Milliken Bend, La................. 453 R 44,650 Belle Island, La.-Miss. ............ 460 L 24,160 Goodrich, La ..................... 467 R - - - - - 11,660 - 37,220 Fitler-Cottonwood, Miss. ........... 474 L - - - 6,412 - 28,427 Hagaman, La. ...................... 481 R 37,756 Ben Lomond, Miss. ................. 486 L 10,235 Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, La.-Miss ....................... 488 R - - - - - 4,723 - 52,124 Lake Providence, La................ 489 R - - - - - - -11,600 Mayersville, Miss. .................. 497 L - - - - - 3,148 - 34,992 ;o i Oi M I 0d Sarah Island-Opossum Point, La.-Miss ......................... Carolina, Miss ..................... Cracraft, Ark ..................... Worthington, Miss.-Ark .......... Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, Miss. .......-........... American Cutoff, Miss.-Ark....... Sunnyside-Lakeport, Ark .. ... Vaucluse, Ark. ........ ....... Island 84, Ark.-Miss .............. Warfield Point, Miss. ............... LaGrange Towhead, Miss ......... Spanish Moss, Ark. ................. Leland Cutoff, Ark ............... Tarpley Island, Miss. ............... Miller Bend, Miss. .................. Island 82, Ark. ................... Ashbrook Island, Miss. ........ Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, Ark. Huntington Point, Miss........... Pair O'Dice, Ark ................. Eutaw-Mounds, Miss. ............... Cypress Bend, Ark ............... Catfish Point, Miss. .................. Ozark, Ark.-Miss. .............. Prentiss, Ark.-Miss .............. Rosedale Bend, Ark. .............. Riverton, Miss. ................... Klondike, Ark. ................... Victoria Bend-Terrene, Miss....... Big Island, Ark. .................... Smith Point, Miss............... Dennis, Miss. ..................... Cessions, Miss ................... Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River. 503 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 539 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 585 586 588 593 598 601 611 615 RL RR LL RRLLL RL RL RRRL RL RL RL LLRL RLL L 490 1,165 16,970 11,080 22,210 8,350 - 45,653 - . 2,980 -- 33,685 - . 4,300 - 13,475 - - 4,320 - 9,130 -- 4,580 -- . 1,300 -- 2,000 .29,360 3,080 3,455 -.- 40,560 .- 10,045 - 9,095 3,665 - 40,188 4,980 - 26,585 - . - 20,075 - 22,015 296 - 20,315 4,820 12,500 S. -- 23,400 .- - 29,245 S- 16,515 S- 18,185 - ." 18,480 16,00010,910 16,000(3) . 140 53,138 2,063 6,492 49,743 (2314,2.7309 ,105 Miles) c, 0 ci 0 TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Operations This FY Nonop- Oper Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thri ocationHead Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Lines (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet MISSISSIPPI RIVER--continued Dikes: (3) Jackson Point, Miss ................. 330 L - - - - - - 4,2 Natchez Island, La.-Miss. ............. 358 R 2,680 920 - - - 7, Waterproof Bar, La. ................ 379 R - - - - - - - 11,3 Spithead Towhead, Miss. ............ 386 L - - - - - -3, Browns Field, La. ................. 388 R -4, Cottage Bend, La.-Miss. ............. 389 L -- - - - 14,; Bondurant Towhead, La. ........... 394 R -4, Coffee Point, La. ................... 405 R - - - - - -3, Yucatan, Miss. .................... 410 R - - - - - 9, Togo Island, La. .................... 416 L- 8 Below Racetrack, Miss. .............. 430 L 6,1 Racetrack Towhead, Miss .......... 431 R - - - - - - - Marshall Cutoff, La ................ 448 R 5,1 Willow Cutoff, La. ................. 462 R 1,9 Point Lookout, La .................. 478 R 2,7 Ajax Bar, Miss. ................... 482 L 1,645 2,185 20,7 Ben Lomond, Miss. ........ ....... 488 L - - - - 24,6 Balshed Ldg., Miss. ................ 493 L - - - - - - - 8,2 Wilson Point, La................... 500 R 3,5 Corregidor, Miss. ................... 505 L 6,7 Carolina, Ark ...................... 509 L 2,8 Cracraft Lower, Ark. .............. 510 R 9,6 Cracraft, Ark ...................... 513 R 3,8 Leota, Miss. ....................... 514 L 7,5 Island 86, Ark. ...................... 520 R 6,5 Seven Oaks, Ark ................... 523 R 5,7 Walnut Point, Miss. ................ 525 L 4,7 Refuge, Miss...................... 528 L 5,240 - - - 5,2 Island 84, Ark. .................... 532 L 4,5 Leland Bar, Ark.-Miss. ............. 538 R 14,4 Leland Neck, Ark. & Miss. .......... 540 L - - - - - - - 4,3 Tarpley Cutoff, Miss.-Ark. ........... 540 R 5,1 Island 82-Miller Bend, Ark.-Miss. ...................... 544 R&L - - - -13,6 a- I ar ) )51 )75 372 5614 8354 0 765 0 121 !60 m )10 ?46 O 39 (52 Z 664 0 )10 Z '51 m '09 ;674 38 92 30 97 14 4 09 < 71 92 4 54 25 40 80 28 15 00 46 Ashbrook-Miller Bend, Ark.-Miss ..................... Ashbrook Cutoff, Miss ............ Chicot Ldg., Ark ................ Catfish Point, Miss ............... Below Prentiss, Miss .............. Malone Field, Ark ............... Terrene, Miss ...................... White River Landing, Ark. .......... Montgomery Towhead, Ark. ........ Victoria Bend, Ark. ................. Smith Point, Miss............... Island 70, Miss. ...................... Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ...... ARKANSAS RIVER5 Standard Revetment: Menard Bend, Ark ............... Como, Ark. ........................ Morgan Bend, Ark. ............... Yancopin, Ark. .................. Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ................. Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, Ark. .............. Morgan Bend, Ark. ................ Fletcher Bend, Ark ................ Total dikes, Arkansas River ....... 547 549 564 571 580 585 590 591 592 596 600 608 L&R L RL RR L R RRLL S1-0 ,799 8,728 ..... 17,451 5,290 4,240 7,549 .7,921 2,201 6,071 5,0334 7,602 14,949 9,565 (1.81 Miles) Miles Above Mouth 31 34 36 24 30 36 39 L R L R 3,105 339,455 (64.29 Miles) 11,770 , 11,720 5,250 2,800 31,540 (5.97 Miles) 4 1,848 3,658 2,187 Z 7,693 (1.46 Miles) R L R 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. Changed to correct previous errors. 5. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, Ark. and Okla., under Little Rock District. TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Operations This FY Nonop- Opei Construction erative tiv Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thr Head Bank Exten- Prior Thi Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY F Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Lin (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)' (Suare) Feet) Fee MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, Ark .................... 598 R - - - - - - - 3,9 Scrubgrass Bend, Ark. .............. 600 R .. - 7,3 Henrico, Ark..................... 606 R 25,0 Cessions Towhead, Ark ............. 615 L 10,6 Knowlton, Ark. .................... 620 R 16,9 Island 67, Miss. .................... 621 L 7,6 Island 68 Bar, Ark. ................. 622 R 6,4 Ludlow, Ark...................... 626 R 10,3 Rescue Landing, Ark.-Miss.. ......... 629 L 27,0 Fair Landing, Ark. ................. 632 R 23,8 Burke Landing, Miss. ............... 637 L . 19,0 Island 62, Ark..................... 638 R . 9,0 Island 63, Miss ..................... 639 L . 2,347 - 11,4 Island 63 Bar, Miss. ................ 639 L .. - - 3,7 Oldtown Bend, Ark. ............... 644 R 25,9 Horeshoe, Miss.................... 647 L 16,3 Westover, Ark..................... 650 R 12,7' Delta-Friars Point, Miss. .......... 655 L 30,0 Helena, Ark. ....................... 660 R 36,4 Trotters Landing, Miss .. ............. 665 L 32,9( Flower Lake, Miss.................. 667 L - - 16,3 St. Francis, Ark ................ 672 R 24,6( Harbert Point, Miss. ............... 675 L 9,0( Walnut Bend, Ark. .............. 680 R 27,2 Mhoon Bend, Miss. ................ 685 L 35,8 Peters, Ark ....................... 692 R 23,6 Commerce, Miss................... 695 L - - - - 11,6 Porter Lake, Ark................... 700 R 34,1 Pickett, Miss.-Ark. ................ 703 R 12,5 Norfolk-Star, Miss.................. 709 L 35,5 Cow Island Bend, Ark. .............. 714 R 22,2' Cow Island Bend (Upper), Tenn ........................... 716 R 6,8 Coahoma, Tenn. .................... 717 L 9,2' Ensley, Tenn ...................... 723 L 36,5 Dismal Point, Ark. ................ 724 R 7,2( Bauxippi-Wyanoke, Ark. ............ 730 R 23,3( rae 'u is aar t) O 05 15 40 15 00 25 45 90 0 20 M 90 70 30 54 95 95 85 30 90 60 8055 > 63 65 20 28 G 75 g 15 55 75 82 74 53 70 66 00 00 Presidents Island, Tenn. ............ 733 Hopefield Point, Ark.-Tenn. ......... 736 Loosahatchie-Memphis, Tenn. ....... 737 Loosahatchie Bar, Tenn. ............ 740 St. Clair, Ark ...................... 742 Island 40, Tenn.-Ark. ............. 744 Brandywine, Ark.-Tenn. ........... 750 Shelby Forest, Tenn. .............. 753 Dean Island, Ark .................. 756 Cedar Point-Densford, Tenn. ........ 759 Chute of Island 35, Tenn. ............ 764 Lookout Bar, Tenn. .............. .. 772 Lookout, Tenn. ...................... 774 Sunrise Towhead, Tenn. ............ 776 Lower Bullerton, Ark. .............. 782 Kate Aubrey Towhead-Island 30, Tenn. ......................... 786 Osceola, Ark ....................... 786 Osceola, Ark ........................ 786 Ashport-Keyes Point, Tenn. ......... 791 Kate Aubrey, Tenn ................. 793 Island 26, Tenn. .................... 798 Bend of Island 25, Tenn. ............ 803 Barfield, Ark. ..................... 808 Obion-Tamm, Tenn. ................ 819 Huffman-Hickman, Ark.-Tenn. ...... 826 Heloise, Tenn ...................... 831 Island 18, Mo. ....................... 836 Linwood Bend, Tenn. ............... 841 Blaker Towhead, Tenn. ............. 845 Bells Point, Mo ....................... 845 Gayoso-Caruthersville, Mo. .......... 848 Island 15, Tenn ....................... 851 Hathaway Landing, Tenn. .......... 852 Robinson Bayou, Mo. ............... 852 Fritz Landing, Tenn. ............... 857 Lee Towhead, Mo. ................. 859 Bend of Island 14, Tenn. ............ 859 Above Lee Towhead, Tenn. .......... 861 Little Cypress, Mo. ................ 864 Merriwether-Cherokee, Tenn. ....... 869 Linda, Mo. ........................ 876 Below Toney's Towhead, Tenn. ...... 879 New Madrid Bend, Mo. ............. 886 Kentucky Point, Ky. ................ 887 New Madrid Bar, Ky. ............... 888 New Madrid, Mo. ................... 889 La Forge, Mo. ..................... 892 Slough Landing Neck, Tenn.-Ky. ....................... 899 IL RL RRRRL R L RRR RR RRRL RRL RL RL RLL RRLL RLLLL RL RL RL RRR L 3,750 - - - - - - 12,755 - 5,390 - 31,293 - 2,070 - 2,9302 - 30,750 - 18,010 - 9,550 - 7,555 - 20,190 - 29,190 - 2,9902 - 5,005 - 14,615 - 27,320 - 28,658 - 1,3503 - 5,823 - 44,232 - 2,500 - 15,690 22,730 m - 44,040 2 - 49,831 - - 26,984 p - 12,935 m 22,170 - 14,850 - 17,087 - 5,420 - 25,600 - 3,630 - 1,000 0 - 22,630 2 - 15,670 - 8,470 - 12,050 - 4,943 - 32,240 - 41,058 - 11,950 - 20,895 - 30,348 - 7,960 - 15,375 - 5,559 - 20,680 3,980 32,940 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Winchester Towhead, Mo. ......... Island 9, Ky.-Tenn ............... Milton Bell, Mo .................. Chute of Island 8, Ky. ............. Bend of Island 8, Mo .............. Island 8, Ky ..................... Hickman-Reelfoot, Ky. ............ Beckwith Bend, Mo .............. Williams, Ky .................... Wolf Island, Ky. ..................... Columbus, Ky ................... Belmont, Mo ..................... Island 3 and 4, Ky. ................ Campbell, Ky ................. Pritchard, Mo . .................. Mayfield Creek, Ky ............... Wickliffe, Ky .................... Cache-Cairo, Ill. (Ohio River) ......... Total revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River ........... Dikes: Henrico, Ark. ....................... Below Knowlton, Ark. .............. Island 67, Miss. ................... Below Ludlow, Ark. ............... Sunflower, Ark ................... Island 64, Ark ...................... Island 62, Ark ...................... Island 63 Bar, Miss. ............. Island 63, Miss. .................. Kangaroo Point, Ark. ............... Friars Point, Miss. ......... .... Montezuma Bar, Miss. ............ Montezuma Towhead, Ark. .......... Prairie Point, Ark. ................ St. Francis Towhead, Miss. ....... Below Walnut Bend, Ark ............ 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 949 953 958 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 671 676 R L R L RRL RL RL RRLRLL R RRL RL RRLL RLL RR L R 7,730 (1.46 Miles) (4) - - - 2,347 1 3 3 - 12,430 ) 75 .00 - 300 20 - - 5,540 27,935 14,375 12,620 9,800 13,260 41,909 14,588 10,015 17,585 3,825 5,785 19,970 6,865 15,045 5,935 8,455 26,152 1,779,855 (337.09 Miles) o C C z z Ct' Ct' 0D 0o 6,310 8,250 4,320 5,040 5,520 7,330 23,180 2,600 5,640 5,730 6,870 12,430 3,450 10,336 3,380 6,420 kPI (5 Bordeaux Point, Miss. .............. 681 L 4,920 Commerce, Miss. ................... 694 L 5,700 Basket Bar, Ark .................... 696 R 5,060 Buck Island, Miss. .................... 700 L 4,890 Porter Lake, Ark. ................. 701 R 7,930 Pickett, Miss. ..................... 704 L 7,180 Seyppel, Ark. ..................... 706 R 11,640 Cat Island, Ark. ..................... 710 R 15,590 Coahoma, Tenn. .................... 718 L 20 - 4,640 Armstrong, Ark.-Tenn. ............. 720 R 100 - 18,690 Dismal Point, Ark. ................ 724 R 600 - 22,170 Hopefield Point, Ark. ................ 736 R 1,330 Robinson Crusoe, Tenn. ............. 738 R - - 21,670 Loosahatchie Bar, Tenn. ............. 739 R - - 3,950 Above Loosahatchie, Tenn. .......... 742 L - 8,990 Redman Point, Ark. ............... 743 R - - 7,750 Randolph Point, Tenn. ............... 747 L - - - - 16,740 Poker Point, Ark. ................. 748 R - - - 200 - 8,050 Corona Bar, Tenn.-Ark. ............. 755 R 750 - 8,430 Densford, Tenn. ................... 757 L - - - - 50 - 7,780 Cedar Point, Tenn. ................ 759 L - - - - 75 - 2,890 Below Richardson Landing, Tenn. . ........................ 767 L - - 5,950 Lookout, Tenn.-Ark ................ 771 R 400 - 5,538 Plum Point, Tenn. 784 L 5,760 Kate Aubrey, Tenn ................. 791 R 11,260 Keyes Point, Tenn. ............... 791 L 10,620 Ashport-Goldust, Tenn.-Ark. ......... 795 R 17,330 Forked Deer, Tenn. ............... 798 L 8,550 0 Island 25, Ark. ...................... 804 R 5,450 Nebraska Point, Tenn. .............. 808 L 11,050 11,050 Below Tamm Bend, Tenn. ........... 813 L - 150 - 8,300 Wrights Point, Ark. ............... 820 R - -27,990 Island 21, Chute, Tenn. .............. 824 L -3,170 Head of Island 21, Tenn. ............ 828 L -5,460 Island 20, Mo.-Tenn. ............... 831 R 18,139 Island 18, Tenn. ......... ..... 837 L 5,395 5,395 Tennemo, Tenn ................... 842 L, 2,505 Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, Mo. ...... ......... 844 R 25,877 Sandy Hook, Tenn. .................. 850 R 2,350 Island 15, Tenn. ........... ...... 851 L 7,016 Robinson Bayou, Mo. ................ 853 R 7,040 Hathaway, Tenn ..................... 854 L 13,670 Island 15 Neck, Tenn. .............. 854 L 21,100 Above Lee Towhead, Tenn. .......... 859 L 1,300 Below Cherokee, Tenn. .............. 866 L 6,230 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER--continued Dikes: Stewart Towhead, Mo............... 871 R - - - - - - - 18,290 Ruddles Point, Mo.................. 874 R - - - - - - - 8,130 Kentucky Point, Ky................. 887 L 2,784 - - - - - - 11,550 Morrison Towhead, Mo.............. 890 R - - - - - - - 1,070 Donaldson Point, Mo................ 905 R - - - - - - - 8,320 Island 9, Ky ....................... 906 L - - - - - - - 7,010 Campbell, Ky ...................... 942 L -.. 2,610 Pritchard, Mo.................... 944 R -.. 9,390 Island 1, Ky ....................... 948 L - - - - - - - 15,260 Total dikes, Memphis District, Mississippi River ............. 31,659 - - - - - - 631,476 (6.0 Miles) (119.6 Miles) 1. Gross squares-articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Lumber mattress revetment 3. Rock groins. 4. Stone in pile dike. 5. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 6. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 0 0 0oz t12 0 0== TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Fifth Louisiana Levee District ............ Levees ............................ Floodwalls........................ Old River structures and levees .......... Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ......... Levees ............................ Floodwalls -..... ..................... Morganza structure and levee .......... Morganza forebay levee ............... Port Allen lock ............. ........ Lafourche Basin Levee District ......... Levees ............ ................ Floodwalls ......................... Harvey Canal lock ................... Plaquemines West Levee District .......... Levees ............................. Floodwalls ......................... Buras Levee District ................... Levees ............................ Floodwalls ......................... Empire lock ........................ Baton Rouge front levees ................ Pontchartrain Levee District ............ Levees ............................ Floodwalls ......................... Bonnet Carre' guide levees ..... . ...... Bonnet Carre forebay levee' ....... Bonnet Carre' structure ............... East Jefferson Levee District ................ Levees ................................ Floodwalls .......................... Orleans Levee District ...................... (16.8) 15.5 1.3 (126.3) 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 (81,7) 81.5 0.1, 0.1 (37.9). 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 (2.1) (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 (11.6) 11.6 (16.8) 15.5 1.3 (126.3) 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 (81.7) 81.5 0.1 0.1 (37.9) 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 (2.1) (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 (11.6) 11.6 (5.3) 5.3 (-) (-) (7.1) 7.1 (-) (-) (-) - (13.2) 11.9 1.3 (57.4) 49.8 0.8 6.7 0.1 (28.6). 28.4 0.1 0.1 (28.1) 28.1 (34.1) 34.1 (0.9) (81.9) 67.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 (8.8) 8.8 (-) (-) (-) (15.5) - - - 15.5 (5.3) (118.7) 5.3 - - 118.7 (0.1) 0.1 (-) (-) (-) (4.7) 4.7 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (0.1) 0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (27.2) (27.2) ( (13.7) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-J (-) (-) cl C1 0 z (15.5) 15.5 (118.7) 118.7 (81.6) 81.5 0.1 (37.9) 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 (2.1) (110.8) 110.8 (11.6) 11.6 (81.6) 81.5- 0.1 (37.9) 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 (2.1) (110.8) 110.8 (11.6) 11.6 !n (18.4) (24.7) TABLE 42-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Left descending, east bank Levees ............................ Floodwalls ........................ IHNC lock ........................ Right descending, west bank Levees ............................ Floodwalls .......................... Algiers Canal lock ................... Lake Borgne Basin Levee District ......... Levees ............................ Floodwalls ............ ............ Grand Prairie Levee District ...... ....... Levees ............................ Floodwalls ........................ Total Mississippi River ............. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees ..................... Hotwells to Moncla, La., levees .......... Floodwalls ......................... Total Lower Red River ............. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises ..................... East bank Atchafalaya River ........... Bayou des Glaises .................... West bank Atchafalaya River ........... Simmesport Ring Melville Ring ....................... 4.6 8.6 0.1 13.8 0.1 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 4.6 8.6 0.1 13.8 0.1 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 2.3 2.3 0.1 (4.3) 4.3 (-) -. 8.9 0.1 (10.8) S10.8 (16.7) 16.7) 4.6 4.6 6.32 13.8 13.8 (-) (-) - (-) (-) - (-) (-) - (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 (-) (-) - (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 0 0 a!, 0 z c 0 511.6 511.6 16.7 294.2 10.1 - 0.1 479.6 - 485.92 (59.2) (59.2) (-) (33.3) (-) (-) (-) (59.2) (6.3) (34.0) 59.2 59.2 - 33.3 - - - 59.2 6.3 34.0 59.2 59.2 33.3 59.2 6.3 34.0 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 (-) (143.9) - 52.5 - 7.9 - 55.6 - 1.6 - 4.1 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 (-) (43.9) - 20.2 - 12.0 4',l t" Krotz Springs Ring .................. Mansura Hills to Hamburg ........... . West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet ......... Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal .... Morganza upper guide levee ............. East protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ............. Total Atchafalaya Basin and Floodway ...................... Total-Main Stem System . ......... LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA. Lake Pontchartrain, La ............. .. Item A levees ...................... Item B levees ....................... Item C levees....................... Total......................... 1.7 20.5 (128.7) (56.5) (8.9) 1.7 20.5 (128.7) (56.5) (8.9) 1.7 20.5 1.7 20.5 (-) (50.7) (-) (-) (127.7) (56.5) (8.9) (9.6) (8.9) - 11.7 (-) (50.7) (-) (-) (-) (8.9) (106.7) (106.7) (2.3) (16.4) - - - (105.0) (2.3) (16.4) 449.2 449.2 2.3 229.5 - - 446.5 2.3 119.9 1,020.0 1,020.0 19.0 557.0 10.1 0.1 985.3 8.6 639.8 (17.4) (17.4) (-) (17.4) (-) (-) (-) (17.4) (-) (17.4) 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 - - - 5.0 - 5.0 10.1 10.1 - 10.1 - - - 10.1 - 10.1 2.3 2.3 - 2.3 - - - 2.3 - 2.3 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. 2. Levees and roads presently in place will be elminated as floodwalls are constructed. i: c ci: z TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY2 pleted3 FY5 FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVEREast bank in Mississippi ................. 178.34 178.3 - 109.1 159.1 1.2 99.7 168.4 - 168.4 Greenville Harbor dikes ................. 7.8 7.8 - 7.8 - - - West bank in Arkansas ................. 75.6 75.6 - 38.4 50.2 7.0 43.6 75.4 - 75.4 West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) ........................ 198.7 198.7 6.9 53.6 89.1 63.1 197.8 - 197.8 Total Mississippi River ................ .. 460.4 460.4 6.9 208.9 298.4 8.2 206.4 442.5 - 442.5 YAZOO RIVER BASIN Headwater ........................... 620.76 300.1 8.6 125.1 - - - 620.7 10.1 276.5 Backwater .......................... 96.6 44.6 - 0.0 - - 96.6 - 39.0 Total Yazoo River Basin ............... 717.3 344.7 8.6 125.1 - - - 717.3 10.1 315.5 ARKANSAS RIVER. ARKANSAS North bank .......................... 61.57 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 South bank ........................... 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Total Arkansas River ................. 146.9 141.6 - 141.6 33.0 - 33.0 131.5 - 128.5 RED RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Total Red River backwater ..... ....... . 274.0 156.5 3.0 81.38 - - 256.7 - 141.9 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 5. Based on refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line. 6. Includes 33.1 miles of local protection works: 61.3 miles along Whittington Auxiliary Channel: 210 miles in Upper Yazoo Projects: 156.1 miles along main stem: and 160.2 miles on tributaries. 7. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 8. Revised to reflect 1973 project design flow line. C0 P-3 0 o 0 0 TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Mounds, Ill .......................... Mound City, Ill. ...................... Cairo Drainage District ................. Cityof Cairo ......................... Little River Drainage District ............ Levee District No.2, Scott County, Mo. ..................... Levee district No. 3, Mississippi County, Mo . ................ St. Johns Levee and Drainage District ..................... St. Francis Levee District of Mo. .......... City of Hickman, Ky. .................. Fulton County Levee District of Fulton County, Ky. ................... . Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, Tenn. .................. Madrid Bend Levee District .............. Lake County Levee and Drainage District ................... Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ................ Tiptonville-Obion levee extension ......... St. Francis Levee District of Ark. .... ..... Helena Improvement District No. 1 ........ Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 ........... Laconia Drainage and Levee District of Phillips County, Ark ........ ........ Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Desha County, Ark. ................... Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Desha County, Ark. .......... Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District ............................ 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.73 55.7 1.4 16.7 4.5 9.6 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.1 6.6 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.7 55.7 1.4 16.7 4.5 9.6 15.9 21.3 156.7 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.1 - 3.9 - 2.7 - 13.8 - 6.2 - 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.2 - 55.7 - 1.4 16.74 4.54 9.64 15.9 - 21.3 - 153.24 - 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.14 6.6 0.3 2.7 7.8 2.9 8.0 4.2 0.9 2.4 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 - 3.6 - 1.1 - 8.5 - 3.5 - 19.3 13.8 4.9 3.2 3.2 26.0 26.0 42.7 10.6 16.3 0.6 7.3 13.0 94.6 2.4 13.4 8.4 12.1 10.4 10.6 46.6 55.1 0.5 16.3 0.3 4.5 - 9.6 4.5 15.9 73.9 2.4 13.4 21.3 6.5 156.7 4.7 23.9 8.4 20.5 10.6 16.5 46.1 - 55.1 16.3 4.3 9.6 15.9 21.3 156.7 4.2 23.9 20.5 16.5 6.6 4 93.6 93.6 93.6 85.7 CC 4 C IW It 0Z 85.7 93.6 93.6 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Grade and Section In In Com- Location In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY New Madrid, Mo., St. Johns Levee and Drainage District ........... .. 0.3 - - - 0.3 0.3 Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee ....................... 35.33 35.3 35.3 35.3 - 35.3 Total Mississippi River ............. 636.3 629.5 - 625.5 373.5 3.2 226.7 604.1 - 595.1 ST. FRANCIS RIVER East bank ............. .............. 159.5 156.2 - 156.2 - - - 156.7 - 81.7 West bank ............................ 148.7 146.7 - 146.7 - - - 144.3 - 38.8 Total St. Francis river .............. 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 LITTLE RIVER East bank (left) ....................... .. 40.7 40.7 - 40.7 - - - 40.7 13.1 West bank ........................... 35.1 35.1 - 35.1 - - - 35.1 - 23.7 Elk Chute ................... ..... 39.9 339999 39.9 - - - 39.7 - 17.3 West Basin and middle valley ............ 14.4 14.4 - 14.4 - - - 13.4 - 13.4 Total Little River .................. 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 LOWER WHITE RIVER White River backwater levee ............. 40.2 40.2 - 40.2 - - - 38.8 - 38.8 Augusta to Clarendon .................. 49.2 39.5 - 39.5 - - - 49.2 - 36.2 Clarendon levee ....................... 6.2 6.2 - 4.4 - - - - - - Total Lower White River ............ 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 MEMPHIS HARBOR Memphis Harbor ...................... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 1.5 10.5 10.5 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Shown complete. Authority MSRC-ED-TL (MD 19 Mar. 80) 1st Ind. 21 Apr. 80. 0 0 56 0 c 0 r 3 Jm o v m cs Ce' TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1980) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Total Total Grade and Section In Com- In Cornm- Location In Total System plete System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built Thru When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVERMAIN STEM New Orleans District, Table 42-K ......... Vicksburg District, Table 42-L ..... ..... Memphis District, Table 42-M ............ Subtotal-Main Stem ................. TRIBUTARIES (OFF MAIN STEM) INCLUDED IN MR&T SYSTEM Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-NOD ....... Lower Red River-South Bank-NOD ....... Arkansas River-South Bank-VXD ......... Subtotal-Tribs. in MR&T System ....... Total in MR&T System ............ . OTHER TRIBUTARIES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, La.-NOD ........... Yazoo River Basin-VXD ............... Arkansas River-North Bank-VXD ........ Red River Backwater-VXD ............. St. Francis River-MD ................. Little River-MD ...................... Lower White River-MD ................ Memphis Harbor-MD ................. Subtotal-Other Tribs. in MR&T Project ..................... Grand Total in Project ............... 511.6 460.4 636,39 511.6 460.4 A295 16.7 294.2 6.9 208.9 - 65; 5 10.1 298.4 '7RQ r - 0.1 479.6 8.2 206.4 442.5 32 2 60n4A9 1 - 485.9 - 442.5 A S 1 ,, .t ,,. .4Qt). P 0 1 4 .4 - 0 . -- A.ACU. I. D l.U - ,i ..1 1,608.3 1,601.5 23.6 1,128.6 682.0 11.4 433.2 1,526.2 - 1,473.5 449.2 449.2 19.0 229.5 - - - 446.5 2.3 119.9 59.2 59.2 - 33.3 - - - 59.2 6.3 34.0 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 593.8 593.8 19.0 348.2 24.7 - 24.7 589.8 8.6 235.0 2,202.1 2,195.3 42.6 1,476.8 706.7 11.4 457.9 2,116.0 8.6 1,708.5 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 717.3 344.7 8.6 125.1 - - - 717.3 10.1 345.5 61.5 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 274.0 156.5 3.0 81.3 - - - 256.7 - 141.9 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 1,614.6 1,104.2 11.6 807.6 15.3 - 9.8 1,567.2 10.1 795.7 3,816.7 32,995 54.2 2,284.4 722.0 11.4 467.7 3,683.2 18.7 2,504.2 to, C1 C 0d ci: z6 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Comn- This This Percent ated -pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) Bayou des Glaise diversion channel ........ . 1938 6.0 - 6.0 100 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie ....... . 1946 92.6 - 63.4 75 Charenton drainage and navigation canal ... 1939 6.3 - 6.3 100 Wax Lake Outlet ...................... ... 1938 5.7 - 15.7 100 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway ............. . 1933 244.2 - 186.4 49 Morganza Floodway ................... . 1941 3.3 - 3.3 100 Old River outflow channel . .............. . . 1956 7.4 - 7.4 100 Old River inflow channel ................. 1960 0.4 - 0.4 100 Old River lock approach channels ......... . . 1961 2.2 - 2.2 100 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) ....... . 1958 5.0 - 2.5 44 Eastern Rapides-S.C. Avoyelles ...... .... .. - 83.5 - - Teche-Vermilion Water Supply . .......... - 6.3 42-52 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MISS Big Sunflower River ............................. Quiver River ................................. Deer Creek .................................... Steele Bayou ................................... Steel Bayou' ................................... Main Canal ..... f............................... M ain Canal . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... Black Bayou ................................... Big Sunflower River tributaries .................... Quiver River tributaries .......................... YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ............................... YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MISS. Upper Yazoo Project ............................. Coldwater River ................................ Arkabutla Canal ................................ Tallahatchie Canal .............................. Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ....................... Greenwood protection works ....................... Yocona River .................................. Bobo Bayou .................................... Cassidy Bayou ................. ................. Cassidy Bayou3 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . Bear Creek Diversion ............ � .. *.......... Lake Cormorant ............... *.........*... Hurricane Bayou .............................. Opossum Bayou ................................. Abiaca Creek .................................. Chicopa Creek ................ *............. ... Bear Creek .................................... Rocky Bayou .................... *.............. Whiteoak Bayou ................................. Miscellaneous ditches ........................... Yalobusha River ................................ Yazoo River .......... *. *....*............. Whittington Auxiliary Channel ..................... Tchula Lake ....................... *........... David-Burrell Bayou ............................. McKinney Bayou ................................ Hillside Floodway ................................ Yazoo City protection works ....................... Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous .......................... Alligator-Catfish Bayou .......................... Pelucia Creek ................................... 1947 1947 1947 1947 1965 1959 1957 1960 1960 1976 1941 1948 1940 1939 1971 1952 1944 1943 1939 1940 1956 1964 1957 1960 1964 1953 1975 1973 1975 - - - - - - 1975 199.1 69.6 7.0 54.9 71.2 21.1 '22.2 36.5 227.2 35.4 39.9 179.0 54.6 0.4 74.8 48.0 2.9 1.8 16.1 69.0 26.0 4.8 20.9 2.5 20.8 7.7 7.0 23.3 7.8 55.9 12.3 46.0 160.2 30.8 26.4 40.4 3.5 11.0 1.6 29.8 8.3 6.4 - 199.1 - 69.6 - 7.0 - 54.9 - 51.6 - 21.1 - 227.2 - 35.4 39.9 4.1 33.2 - 54.6 - 0.4 - 73.5 - 48.0 - 2.9 - 1.8 - 16.1 - 69.0 - 46.0 160.2 S 30.8 -26.4 -40.4 3.5 11.0 1.6 -15.1 - 18.2 - 2.9 42-53 100 100 100 100 50 100 100 100 100 18 100 100 85 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 35 99 5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1980) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA. AND ARK. Bayou Lafourche ................................ 1949 45.3 - 45.3 100 Bayou Lafourche ... . .......................... 1972 43.0 - 4.4 10 Big & Colewa Creeks ............................. . 1947 81.4 - 81.4 100 Big & Colewa Creeks5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 - 51.5 60 Tensas River ................................... 1947 96.5 - 96.5 100 Tensas River s .................................. 1968 160.0 - 61.0 38 Boeuf River. Ark. and La. .......................... 1953 103.9 - 103.9 100 Fleschmans Bayou, Ark. .......................... 1963 6.6 - 6.6 100 Caney Bayou, Ark. ............................... 1964 7.4 - 7.4 100 Canal 18, Ark. .................................. 1963 10.3 - 10.3 100 Big Bayou, Ark. ................................. 1952 33.3 - 33.3 100 Black Pond Slough, Ark. .......................... 1962 14.3 - 14.3 100 Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. ......................... 959 150.8 - 150.8 100 Rush Bayou, Ark. ............................... 1964 6.7 - 6.7 100 Canal 19, Ark. ................................... 1957 50.2 - 50.2 100 Canal 43, Ark. .................................. 1956 34.5 - 34.5 100 Canal 81, Ark. .................................. 1957 32.7 - 32.7 100 Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal .......................... -- 15.0 - - Kirsch Lake Canal ............................ - 9.3 - - Canal 19 Extension .............................. 1964 9.4 - 9.4 100 Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ........... ...... ..........- 2.5 - - - RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA. Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ........................................ 1976 6.9 - 4.6 66 Six MileBayou, La. ................................ 1.5 - - GRAND PRAIRIE, ARK. ......................... - 338.1 BAYOU METO, ARK............................ .. 164.9 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project . 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 103.5 miles of channel to the project. 42-54 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1980) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, Mo. ................. 1952 9.6 9.5 100 ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, Mo. ..................... ........ 1963 291.3 9.1 208.7 72 St. Francis River, Mo. and Ark. ........................ 1953 574.2 16.6 325.2 57 West Memphis Drainage, Ark. ........................... 1951 19.8 - 19.81 1001 Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, Ark. ....................... , 1960 28.0 - 28.0 100 Tyronza River, Ark, ................................... 1939 12.7 - 12.7 100 L'Anguille River, Ark. ..............................(.2.). ......11.2..0........ LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARK. Cache River Basin, Ark .............................. 1972 231.5 - 7.2 3 Big Creek and tributaries, Ark .......................... (2) 103.8 - WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, Ky ...................................... (2) 41.7 - - WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Miss. River, Western Tenn. tributaries. (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) ....................... 1952 34.3 34.3 100 Obion River Diversion Channel, Tenn. (1946 Act) ...................................... (2) 9.3 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Ky. and Tenn......... ........................................... 1974 15.8 - 3.0 19 Running Reelfoot Bayou, Tenn. ...................... 1955 19.7 - 19.7 100 Miss. River Below Cape Girardeau; West Tenn. tributaries. (1948 Act) ...................... 1961 225.0 - 84.8 38 Wolf River and tributaries, Tenn. ....................... 1960 25.5 - 25.5 100 1. Inadvertently omitted last year. 2. Not started. 42-55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 42-R COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1980 Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: Memphis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin Lower White River Cache Basin, Ark. Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping Recreation facilities-completed projects Reelfoot Lake No. 9, Tenn.-Ky. Mud Lake, Tenn. Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Streambank erosion control Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Lower Red River Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin Channel improvement Bonnet Carre' Teche-Vermilion Basin water supply Inspection of completed works Mapping Major Rehabilitation Old River Subtotal Total Federal Funds CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Memphis District: Little River Drainage St. Francis River-Huxtable Pumping Plant New Orleans District: Old River Mississippi River Levees Teche-Vermilion Basin Total Contributed Funds Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 51,242 4,382,234 10,012,695 491,972 6,072,096 1,429,598 87,978 205,000 144,345 11,892 22,889,052 11,489,866 16,135,120 18,328,394 10,973,101 2,435,884 1,565,514 7,472,459 263,690 15,970,720 119,334 54,202 25,445,919 -- 527,154 169,069 446,407 11,167,721 10,210,047 120,759 102,680 .. $ 1,122,261 1,122,261 -- -- -- 1,346,769 -- -- -- -- -- 59,362,365 22,743,837 1,346,769 -- -- 716,050 45,398 .... 13,047,316 1,174,226 -- 703,360 123,972 -- 3,353,059 5,096,776 -- 41,383 80,931 -- 30,124,953 5,928,462 -- 24,564,567 10,110,069 -- -- 833,105 7,237,202 --.. -- 96,290 -- -- 28,533 -- -- 5,424,874 -- 79,117,238 28,897,238 716,050 161,368,655 77,086,994 3,185,080 843 --.. 4,732 -- .. -- 85,015 -- -- 231,000 -- 193,237 -- - 198,812 316,015 -- 161,567,467 77,403,009 3,185,080 42-56 Item MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1980 District or Installation and Class of Work ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, Ark. Contraction works DeValls Bluff, Ark. Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, La. Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, La. Atchafalaya River and Basin, La. Bonnet Carre' Spillway, La. Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal Total completed works Allotments $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 Accrued Expenditures Unexpended Balance Sep. 30,1980 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,352 169,352 1,076,520 1,076,520 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,732,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,055 39,546,055 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17,384,030 17,384,030 -- 699,185 699,185 -- 3,375,492 3,375,492 -- 14,212,198 14,212,198 -- 1,258,916 1,258,916 -- 1,112,967 1,112,967 -- 540,838 540,838 -- 2,701,566 2,701,566 -- 10,098,817 10,098,817 -- 35,992,117 35,992,117 -- 5,513,110 5,513,110 -- 387,917 387,917 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 42-57 TABLE 42-S (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1980 District or Installation and Class of Work UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees: Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, Tenn.-Ky. St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage Lower White River: Clarendon levee, Ark. Augusta to Clarendon, Ark. White River backwater levee, Ark. Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Cache Basin, Ark. West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake, Tenn. Subtotal Vicksburg Distict: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, etc. Red River backwater levee, La. Tensas, Cocodrie pumping plant Lake Chicot pumping plant Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel' Unexpended Accrued Rnaln Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30l1980 $ 579,462 $ -- 1,897,980 -- 2,477,442 -- $ 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 137,001,354 98,000 294,827,307 56,354,400 81,245,000 439,434 7,890,000 9,019,908 159,115,382 965,429 34,138,892 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,502 108,651 20,355,900 8,050,000 1,320,000 75,000 823,905,720 158,318,990 7,049,414 15,676,286 39,017,000 43,383,046 15,393,300 27,731,600 276,622,565 23,549,260 57,590,540 958,175 22,339,600 21,382,400 16,115,700 39,718,900 7,468,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 663,992 637,684 58,080 211,754 -- 227,166 -- 491,165 -- 66,617 -- -- -- 424,620 194,407 395,048 63,108 3,433,641 1,388,704 136,337,362 98,000 294,189,623 56,296,320 81,033,246 439,434 7,662,834 9,019,908 158,624,217 965,429 34,072,275 498,715 1,779,846 10,624,502 108,651 19,931,280 7,855,593 924,952 11,892 820,472,079 156,930,286 7,049,414 15,676,286 38,986,667 43,129,549 14,897,137 26,631,662 276,244,878 23,549,260 56,958,696 958,175 21,915,914 20,935,570 15,943,653 38,916,878 7,271,772 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 42-58 30,333 253,497 496,163 1,099,938 377,687 -- 631,844 423,686 446,830 172,047 802,022 196,228 -- -- -- ._._._ _ MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1980 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Vicksburg District: (Continued) Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Main Stem Tributaries Tributaries-Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Big Sunflower, etc. Yazoo backwater Yazoo backwater-Muddy Bayou Upper auxiliary channel Steambank erosion control, evaluation and demonstration Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion basin water study Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Channel improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (south bank levees) Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River levees Atachafalaya Basin: Atachafalaya Basin Floodway Atachafalaya River navigation Old River Subtotal Total uncompleted projects ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake pumping station, Tenn. Harris Fork Creek, Ky. & Tenn. Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region Teche-Vermilion basin water supply E. Rapides and south central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal Total advance engineering and design Total completed works, uncompleted works and advance engineering and design Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1980 $ 20,438,000 37,482,310 612,484 10,840,200 23,912,300 49,011,400 5,177,000 22,698,006 13,799,000 $ 20,355,527 36,637,986 612,484 8,989,336 23,434,498 48,491,793 5,145,136 22,007,855 13,582,152 $ 82,473 844,324 -- 1,850,864 477,802 519,607 31,864 690,151 216,848 969,758,709 958,725,797 11,032,912 14,061,000 11,017,008 3,043,992 4,089,008 3,982,280 106,728 35,945,266 35,945,266 -- 311,385,117 310,519,920 865,197 17,521,000 17,504,334 16,666 200,680 200,680 -- 141,412,000 137,712,589 3,699,411 365,615,537 360,220,650 5,394,887 303,463 303,463 -- 81,251,000 77,110,436 4,140,564 971,784,071 954,516,626 17,267,445 2,767,925,942 2,736,191,944 31,733,998 30,000 30,000 -- 420,000 420,000 -- 365,000 363,903 1,097 65,000 65,000 -- 175,000 175,000 -- 350,000 350,000 -- 370,000 350,909 19,091 1,775,000 1,754,812 20,188 29,700 29,700 -- 29,700 29,700 -- 69,753 69,753 -- 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- 665,247 629,022 36,225 1,844,000 3,648,700 2,937,007,142 1,807,775 3,592,287 2,905,216,731 36,225 56,413 31,790,411 42-59 -- TABLE 42-S (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1980 STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1980) Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1980 RECREATION FACILITIES-COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Program Funds Memphis District: Wappapello Lake, Mo. $ 989,300 $ 989,053 $ 247 Wappapello Lake, Mo., Rockwood Landing 203,286 203,286 -- Subtotal 1,192,586 1,192,339 247 Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- Enid Lake 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- Arkabutla Lake 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- Grenada Lake 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- Subtotal 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- Total Eight-Year Program Funds 8,865,695 8,865,448 247 Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies 2,945,872,837 2,914,082,179 31,790,658 Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 1,022,416,855 1,016,354,588 6,062,267 Total rehabilitation 23,700,000 17,640,786 6,059,214 Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 28,911,881 28,208,506 703,375 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 4,035,801,873 3,991,186,359 44,615,514 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1980 4,067,870,782 4,023,255,268 44,615,514 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been exluded from this report. TABLE 42-T STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1979 Engineer District Expenditures Rock Island $ 10,891,384 St. Louis 59,338,602 Memphis 203,850,460 Vicksburg 81,322,043 New Orleans 406,707,641 Total 762,110,130 42-60 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT' Total Project Funding FY 77 FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sep. 30, 1980 Mississippi River and General investitributaries (Regular gations: Funds)' Alloted 2,335,000 2,705,000 2,979,000 3,090,000 28,911,8812 Cost 2,331,438 2,851,968 3,174,950 3,185,080 28,208,507 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Alloted 164,094,253 171,502,300 154,682,286 134,796,000 2,896,030,422 Cost 145,472,811 174,524,955 161,036,108 161,368,655 2,864,239,762 Maintenance Alloted 64,300,000 62,080,000 64,973,000 67,837,000 1,072,795,406 Cost 65,039,637 56,171,198 65,355,105 71,662,120 1,066,733,137 Rehabilitations Alloted -- 11,000,000 8,200,000 4,500,000 23,700,000 Cost -- 7,426,312 4,789,600 5,424,874 17,640,786 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Alloted -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 19,285 5,000 68,500 193,871 8,711,629 Cost 618,764 4,011 68,663 198,812 8,706,791 Maintenance Contributed 90,670 70,948 76,245 427,594 1,406,634 Cost 72,717 72,731 99,397 316,015 1,284,657 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1980): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total alloted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1980 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1980 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1980: Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 77: $230,729,253; FY 78: $247,287,300; FY 79: $230,834,286 and FY 80: $210,223,000 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 78, teletype. $2,929,174,369 8,865,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 14,885,922 14,378 28,911,882 1,022,416,855 4,036,323,632 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,607,475 4,067,870,782 42-61 2,969,572,836 14,900,300 1,051,328,737 32,068,909 4,067,870,782 COASTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER Organization and Functions. The U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) was established under authority of Public Law 172, 88th Congress, which abolished the former Beach Erosion Board [organized under authority of Sec. 2, the River and Harbor Act of 1930, as amended (33 U.S.C. 426)] and directed that its functions other than the review of reports of investigations made concerning erosion and protection of shores of coastal and lake waters, be vested with the Coastal Engineering Research Center. (The report review function was transferred to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, putting reports on beach erosion control and shore protection studies under the same review procedures as reports in other phases of the water resources study program of the Corps.) The authorizing act also provided that the function of the Coastal Engineering Research Center be conducted with the guidance and advice of a Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB), to be constituted by the Chief of Engineers in the same manner as the former Beach Erosion Board. The CERB is composed of four senior officers of the Corps of Engineers, three of whom are normally division engineers of coastal and Great Lakes divisions, and three prominent civilians who are outstanding in the field of coastal engineering. The CERB functions as an advisory board to the Chief of Engineers, who makes all appointments to it. As a management tool to the Chief of Engineers, the CERB meets semi-annually or at the call of the president of the board to consider the coastal engineering research program of the Corps of Engineers. The board also provides broad policy guidance and reviews plans and fund requirements for research and development in the field of coastal engineering. It recommends priorities for accomplishing research projects in consonance with the needs of the coastal engineering field and the objectives of the Chief of Engineers. The CERB also performs other duties as assigned by the Chief of Engineers. During fiscal year 1980, members of the Coastal Engineering Research Board were: Major General E.R. Heiberg, III, U.S. Army, Director of Civil Works, Office Chief of Engineers, President; Brigadier General Norman G. Delbridge, Jr., Division Engineer, South Pacific Division; Brigadier General Hugh G. Robinson, Division Engineer, Southwest Division; Major General Richard L. Harris, Division Engineer, North Central Division; Major General Joseph K. Bratton, Division Engineer, South Atlantic Division; Dean Morrought P. O'Brien, Dean Emeritus, College of Engineering, University of California at Berkeley; Dr. Robert G. Dean, Professor of Civil Engineering and Marine. Studies, University of Delaware; and Professor Robert L. Wiegel, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley. Colonel Ted E. Bishop served as Executive Secretary to the Board and Commander and Director of the Center. The Shoreline Erosion Advisory Panel. CERC provides administrative and technical support to the Shoreline Erosion Advisory Panel (SEAP) which was established by Section 54, Public Law 251-the "Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974." The Panel is charged with providing general guidance and expert technical advice to the Chief of Engineers on the establishment, conduct, and evaluation of results of a national shoreline erosion control development and demonstration program. The program aims to develop low-cost shore protection in sheltered and inland waters. The Panel consists of 15 membersall non-Federal employees-who are knowledgeable about various aspects of shoreline erosion problems. Members come for various geographical areas and represent institutions of higher education, professional organizations, state and local agencies and private organizations. They are: Mr. Joseph M. Caldwell (resigned 5 September 1980), Chairman; Dr. Billy L. Edge, Vice Chairman; Mr. Robert Baum; Prof. E.W. Behrens; Prof. Ernest F. Brater; Mr. John Habel; Prof. J.W. Johnson; Dr. Lee Koppelman; Mr. Omar J. Lillevang; Mr. William D. Marks; Ms. Evelyn Pruitt; Dr. Robert A. Sweeney; Mr. Arthus Theirs; Dr. W.W. Woodhouse, Jr.; and Dr. Donald J. Zinn. Colonel Ted E. Bishop served as executive Secretary during FY 80. The Coastal Engineering Research Center is the principal research and development facility of the Corps in the field of coastal engineering. CERC conceives, plans, and conducts research and data collection in coastal engineering and nearshore oceanography. Research is directed toward application to shore and beach erosion control; flood and storm protection; the location, layout, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of harbor and of coastal and offshore structures; navigation improvement; and recreation. Research provides a better understanding of the littoral forces (e.g., waves, winds, water levels, tides, currents) and the resultant coastal processes and the interaction of these forces and processes with shores and beaches, coastal and offshore structures, and the materials forming these shore, beaches, and structures. CERC publishes findings and data resulting from research and other information concerning coastal phenomena which are useful to the Corps of 43-1 Engineers and the public and it provides consulting services to the Corps of Engineers and other public agencies as requested or directed. CERC also operates a Coastal Engineering Information and Analysis Center to collect, evaluate, analyze, and disseminate coastal engineering information. Operations and results during FY 80. The staff of the Coastal Engineering Research Center provided consulting services and reviewed Corps projects in the areas of beach erosion control, navigation and coastal ecology. In keeping with the responsibility for publishing information and data concerning coastal phenomena, a number of technical reports by staff members were published by CERC or in other professional technical journals during the fiscal year and others were currently undergoing edit. Seven Technical Papers, nine Miscellaneous Reports, nine Coastal Engineering Technical Aids, one Technical report and one Special Report were issued. Two reports were published in the GITI (CERC-WES) report series. Eight techical papers by CERC staff published elsewhere in the technical press were issued as CERC reprints. A course in coastal engineering, specifically on the Shore Protection Manual and its use, was given twice, once at CERC and once in SPD, for Corps personnel. Lectures were given by staff members to universities and to technical and nontechnical groups. Members of the staff participated in a number of committees of various technical societies (particularly ASCE). A staff member served as a U.S. Delegate to the Permanent International Commission of the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Third Commission on Waves, in Brussels, Belgium. Contract research to supplement staff activities was carried out at univesities and with institutions and commerical concerns; funds were supplied other Corps offices for data collection; and funds were provided the Waterways Experiment Station to assist in carrying out laboratory portions of the generalized tidal inlet study and weir jetty study. At the end of the year work and studies by the staff were in progress in such areas as: wave data analysis techniques; analysis of wave spectra; sources of sand for use as beach fill; development of criteria for evaluating suitability characteristics for beach fill; relation of.longshore transport to incident waves; techniques for measuring longshore transport rates; wave direction measurements (including use of radar); use of vegetation for shoreline stabilization; coastal siltation problems peculiar to the Alaskan environment; use of remote sensing in coastal studies; geomorphology of the Atlantic, Great Lakes and Gulf coastal zones ecological effects of rubble structures; correlation of wave climate and beach deformation; effects of long-term water-level changes in the Great Lakes; wave refraction and effects on design waves; development of standarized coastal revetment designs; and evaluation of completed coastal work. The construction of the CERC Field Research Facility for coastal engineering studies has been completed at Duck, North Carolina. The Facility is a 1840 foot concrete and steel pier and a 4600 square foot laboratory building, housing a ninemember permanent staff. A basic environmental measurements program will routinely measure, record and publish data on the meteorological and oceanographic conditions at the site. CERC has installed wave height and period gages, current meters, and temperature and salinity gages. Tide gages have been installed by the National Oceanographic Survey of the department of Commerce, and the Natinal Weather Services has installed a weather station. 43-2 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION* This Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, Calif., on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, Calif., so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans............. 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, Calif. (debris control) ................ Page 44-1 44-2 Navigation (Cont'd) Page 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, Calif. 44-2 Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, Calif. ............ 44-3 Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provides for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners are fully investigated by California Debris Commission and permits to operate are issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Governmentconstructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. (See table 44-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Mineowners must bear all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results dutring fiscal yeCar. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 44-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CALIF. (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, Calif. (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in fiscal year 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Water and Power Resources Service (known as the Bureau of Reclamation prior to November 6, 1979) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Water and Power Resources Service on a 5-year renewable basis. This agency will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Water and Power Resources Service. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W- 1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1980, amounts to $894,393; these funds are paid to California Debris Commission and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1980, amounts to $973,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance and operation activities continued at North Fork Dam at a cost of $7,955; and at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $316,880, including recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of fiscal year 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debriscontrol structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATIONRESTRAINING BARRIERS, CALIF. Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, Calif.) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major 44-2 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two golddredging 'companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Only minor costs. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of' project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic yards are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7- mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF. Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ord Bend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ord Bend in Glenn County, Calif., 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet, and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 44-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1980) cost for existing project (exclusive of above supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,960,000 of which $68,960,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st 44-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Local interests costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Levee repair to right bank Yolo Bypass and left bank Cache Slough accomplished by contract, $19,148. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of existing project began in fiscal year 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates: channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin: installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypas' were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough. (See table 44-C for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1980.) 44-4 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 44-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds, Qther) 6 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, )ther) 8 4. Sacramento River, Calif. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding FY 77 Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 243,000 3 253,221 3 40,000 26,077 32,000 25,427 - - . 50,000 87,334 2,316 Total Cost to FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 Sept 30, 1980 313,530 304,953 281,353 37 285,586 32 - 821,325 - 821,325 5,043,9991 5,043,9991 " 7,990 3,386,0444 4,835 3,318,876s 11,000 1,420 - 12,420 1 12,419 - 12,420 361,482 361,482 6,000 -15,202 10 1,563,6567 20,122 1,255 10 1,563,6567 1,053,904 1,053,904 -- - 361,777 S- - 361,777 30,000 - - 1,585,223 19,464 1,245 -8 1,562,022 -- - 1,053,904 - - - 1,053,904 -- - 34,000 -- - 34,000 50,000 25,000 65,000 67,616,3359 31,407 67,981 20,491 67,551,9129 - - - 1,979,104 - - 1.979,104 10,724,085'" 10,724,085'" - - 9,6861" - - - 9,686" 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $397,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($364,654), Code 710 appropriations. 3. Includes $397,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($364,654), Code 710 costs. 4. Includes $2,545,962 from regular funds and $840,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 5. includes $2,526,794 from regular costs and $792,082 from IHydraulic Mining in California costs. 6. Funds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 44-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 TABLE 44-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 1st sess.' (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)' REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS (See Section 1 of Text) Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF. (See Section 4 of Text) Additional levee construction and reconstruction, including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, and multipurpose reservoirs.2 Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, Sacramento River from Chico Landing to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing.2 Bank protection works at critical locations, Sacramento River.2 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 20. 74th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 44-C SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIF.: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $65,385,443 $1,979,104 $67,364,547' Public Works 1,486,469 1,486,469 Total U.S. $66,871,912 $1,979,104 $68,851,016 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds $76,915,991 $1,988,790 $78,904.787 1. includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous proect funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 44-6 H. Does. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess., and 367, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 103, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Dec. 22, 1944 and May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 U. S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and functions. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Chief, Research & Development Office, in accordance with General Orders No. 4, 1974. It was originally established as a hydraulic laboratory, June 18, 1929, under the President, Mississippi River Commission, by direction of the Chief of Engineers. COL Nelson P. Conover, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. WES, the Corps of Engineers largest laboratory complex for research, testing, and development, consists of four technical laboratories: Hydraulics, Geotechnical, Structures, and Environmental. The Hydraulics Lab, the largest such lab in the world, utilizes a wide range of working models and computer-based numerical models for research and analysis in such areas as dam, levee, river, and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Lab deals with almost 200 technical projects including soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Lab uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and nonnuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and the various construction materials with emphasis on concrete, especially the testing, repair, and preservation of existing concrete structures. The Environmental Lab researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environment. Some of the different research programs are Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, and the Recreation Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Lab range from waste management to environmental regulations to military aspects such as terrain and camouflage. These labs are engaged in research and engineering investigation in support of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research in these and related fields, develops methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services in its specialized fields of competence. Such services include essential technical support and instrumentation development in scientific and engineering computer services. Subject to approval of the Chief of Engineers, studies and investigations may be undertaken for other agencies. WES maintains an extensive scientific and engineering reference library to serve specialized needs of the Corps of Engineers; issues publications of general interest (including translations) which can help eliminate duplication of effort throughout the Corps in conducting experimental studies; operates DOD Information Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, and Soils Mechanics; and maintains the Corps of Engineers Engineering Computer Programs Library (including audiovisual training aids). During Fiscal Year 1980, 203 WES numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for WES, 49 contract translations, and 56 unnumbered publications (conference reports, special study reports, etc.) for WES and other offices were printed and distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. The Mississippi River Commission print plant is an organizational element of WES and produced a total of 65 million production units from its fully equipped printing facility with one-third being provided by contract in support of WES, MRC, LMVD, and its Districts. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is, in general, initially financed by a revolving fund, with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1980 was $62,636,836 which included $11,245,830 performed by contract. Of the reimbursable work $35,011,736 was charged to civil funds, $27,433,462 was charged to military funds, and $191,638 to non-Governmental concerns. The plant replacement and improvement program was $5,050,200 for this period. 45-1 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESSES (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearinghouse where the views and experiences of engineers and port operators of the nations of the world are exchanged on problems relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements. Its objective is "to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation." The Association developed during the period of 1885-1902 from an international interest in perpetuating a series of Congresses for the exchange of technical information on problems related to inland and ocean navigation. The Permanent International Commission was formed during the 8th International Congress at Paris in 1900 and led to the formation of PIANC during the 9th International Congress at Dusseldorf, Germany in 1902. The United States became a member nation by authority of an Act of Congress approved June 28, 1902, which provided for annual appropriations toward the maintenance of the Association. In 1902, the United States appropriated $3,000 annually for support and maintenance of the Permanent International Commission of Congresses of Navigation and for payment of the actual expenses of properly accredited national delegates of the United States to meetings of the Congresses and Commissions. An increase in the appropriation to $5,000 annually was authorized by the 1948 River and Harbor Act and an increase to $22,000 annually by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. The current appropriation of $45,000 was authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act. Of this amount, an annual subvention of $6,000 is paid by the American Section to the International Association in Brussels, Belgium. The objective of the Association-to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation-is met by holding International Congresses and publishing technical bulletins and other documents. The Congresses are held in various member countries, usually at four-year intervals. The Association is supported principally by member governments, but membership also extends to corporations and to individuals. Member governments are represented at the Congresses and at meetings of the Permanent International Commission by delegates, the number of official delegates to be determined by the amount of the annual subsidy paid by the government, but not to exceed ten in number. Corporate members may send one official representative to the Congresses. Currently, the Permanent International Commission has 40 countries represented. Individual membership is of two classes-Annual and Life-depending on the method of payment of dues. There are currently 1,177 annual international members, 730 life members, and 591 corporate members. Membership of the American Section on September 30, 1980 totaled 595, consisting of 128 life members, 402 individual members, and 65 corporate members. 63 new individual members and 11 corporate members were added to the American Section during the calendar year; 22 individual members and 5 corporate members were deleted either through resignations, death, or non-payment of dues. The affairs of the Association are managed by the Permanent International Commission composed of delegates from the supporting governments. The National Commission constitutes the governing body of the American Section and the U.S. Members of the Permanent International Commission. The Director of Civil Works, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army, and the Resident Member, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, are the ex-officio Chairman and Secretary, respectively, of the National Commission. The Secretary handles all administrative matters of the American Section. During Fiscal Year 1980, National Commissioners were: Major General E.R. Heiberg III, USA, ex-officio Chairman; Colonel Albert C. Costanzo, CE, ex-officio Secretary; Mr. Harry N. Cook; Colonel Herbert R. Haar, Jr., USA (Ret); Rear Admiral Donald G. Iselin, USN; Mr. Vernon J. Ljungren; Mr. William R. Murden; Mr. John J. Nachtsheim; Honorable David W. Oberlin; and Mr. James R. Smith, who resigned on 17 May 1980 and was replaced by Mr. James M. Goldston, effective July 2, 1980. Lieutenant General John W. Morris, Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army, served as one of four international Vice-Presidents of PIANC appointed by the Permanent International Commission. His term of office expired in June 1980 and he was appointed as an Honorary Vice-President. Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret), Secretary-General, XXth International Navigation Congress, 1961, is ex-officio member of the Permanent International Commission. Honorary American members of the Permanent International Commission include Colonel Carl H. Bronn, USA (Ret); Mr. Carl B. Jansen; Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret); and Colonel Alvin D. Wilder, USA (Ret). The annual meeting of the Permanent International Commission was held in Naples, Italy on 46-1 June 3, 1980 and was attended by nine National Commissioners and one alternate. Lieutenant General John W. Morris also attended. American representatives attended meetings of International Study Commissions during the fiscal year. Mr. John Davis attended two meetings of the Commission for the Study of Locks, Ship Lifts, and River Weirs. Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret) attended three meetings of the Permanent Committee for Developing Countries (PCDC). Mr. J.W. Hershey represented the American Section at the first meeting of Permanent Technical Committee (PTC) No. 1, and Mr. Eugene H. Harlow represented the American Section at the. first meeting of PTC No. 2. Mr. Robert A. Jachowski represented the American Section at two meetings of the Commission for the Study of Waves; Mr. John Nichol represented the American Section on the Sport and Pleasure Navigation Commission; and Mr. Dennis Padron represented the American Section on the Fender Design Commission. 46-2 INVESTIGATIONS OF PROJECTS UNDER THE FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission, composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all waters over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the commission be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Secs. 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Departments of War, Interior, and Agriculture was removed and the commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Parts II and III were added to that act. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no waterpower license affecting navigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army 'October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 95-91 Stat. 565 (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy, was activated on October 1, 1977. delegated this authority to the Chief of Engineers. The Chief of Engineers, in turn on September 5, 1980 delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4 (e) approval of plans for non-Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: 320 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control and navigation were furnished to the Commission. The review action included approval of plans of structures for 49 projects in accordance with Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. Recommendations were furnished to the Commission concerning the impact of licensed projects on the existing and proposed Federal water resource projects. Recommendations also were provided to the Commission about the environmental impacts of proposed and existing licensed projects. Necessary expenses in excess of nominal amounts for transportation and subsistence of personnel engaged in investigations and cost of supervision under provisions of the Federal Water Power Act can be paid from appropriations made for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.' All other costs of administration of laws in question are paid from funds available for general expense of the Corps of Engineers. No expenses were paid from appropriations made for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission during the fiscal year. 47-1 REGULATORY AND SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL ACTIVITIES 1. REGULATORY ACTIVITIES Authorities. Regulatory activities of the Corps of Engineers, primarily processing applications for permits are conducted under the following authorities: Sections 9 and 10 (structures in and alterations of waterways, e.g., boatdocks) of the River and Harbor Act of 1899; Section 103 (ocean dumping) of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972; and Section 404 (discharge of dredged and fill material) of the Clean Water Act. The Corps also reviews applications submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency and state agencies under Section 402 (discharge of pollutants) of the Clean Water Act. Work Completed. During the fiscal year 14,937 permits and letters of permission were issued and 350 permits were denied. In addition, over 12,000 other applications were reviewed but found not to require permits. A total of 47 regional general permits were issued to the public at large, bringing the total number of such permits in effect to over 300 by the end of the fiscal year. A.total of 5,078 violations were investigated during the year. In addition, in support of its regulatory responsibilities, the Corps held 334 public information meetings and permit application hearings, prepared 14,941 environmental assessments, began work on 53 environmental impact statements, and reviewed approximately 10,000 Environmental Protection Agency and state applications under Section 402. In other actions during 1980, the Corps concluded permit processing agreements with the Departments of Agriculture, Transportation, Interior, Commerce, and the Environmental Protection Agency. These agreements, required under the Clean Water Act, covered procedures to minimize paperwork, delays and duplication of effort. Also in 1980, the Corps published proposed revised permit regulations which will reduce the regulatory burden on the public. For obligations and expenditures see Table 48-A INVESTIGATION AND REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Under authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those which obstructed navigation. For obligations and expenditures see Table 48-B. TABLE 48-A. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance Allotments Total Funds Available Obligations Unobligated Balance Expenditures Unexpended Balance Allotments Total Funds Available Expenditures Unexpended Balance 30 Sept 79 $ 758,333 +43,266,752 $44,025,085 -42,704,316 30 Sept80 $ 1,320,769 30 Sept 79 $ 2,318,575 +43,266,752 $46,899,012 -42,950,007 30 Sept 80 $ 3,393,653 Obligations Unobligated Balance Allotments 30 Sept 79 Total Funds Available Obligations Unobligated Balance 30 Sept 80 Expenditures Unexpended Balance Allotments $ 255,040 + 195,896 450,936 - 252,278 $ 198,658 30 Sept 79 $ 560,529 + 195,896 Total Funds Available Expenditures Unexpended Balance 30 Sept 80 756,425 - 534,319 $ 222,106 48-1 TABLE 48-B. REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and Districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation on numerous international boards and committees. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering or technical boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other informal arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources of joint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer membership during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. A discussion of the International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board, which was established during FY 80, follows Table 49-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the other boards and committees see the FY 77 Annual Report, Vol. II. TABLE 49-1. IJC BOARDS OF CONTROL HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 1. Int. Lakes Superior 2. Int. St. Croix River 3. Int. Lake of the Woods 4. Int. Lake Champlain 5. Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River YEAR ESTABLISHED 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr., Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma WA 3. Washington Dept. of Ecology, Olympia *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, Asst. Admin., Massena, NY 3. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. 4. NY State Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle 49-1 IJC ENGINEERING OR STUDY BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 11. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineering 12. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 13. Int. Lake Erie Regulation Study 14. Int. Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board YEAR ESTABLISHED 1948 1975 1977 1977 1979 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, WPRS, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Washington, D.C. *1. New York Depart. Envir. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Envir. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commission, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior, F&WS, Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res. 3. New York Dept. Envir. Conser. 4. Dept. of Interior, F&WS, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. NCEED-L, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Eng. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr. NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. OCE, DAEN-CWE, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. 49-2 International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board The Governments of the United States and Canada, in a reference dated February 21, 1977, requested the International Joint Commission to examine, provide advice and make recommendations on unmet data needs in order to assist the governments in improving the Great Lakes data collection network. Pursuant to this reference, the Commission established the International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board on November 19, 1979 and appointed the Board members on January 25, 1980. The Board is composed of 6 members, 3 from each country. The Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Board is B.G. DeCooke, Chief, Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch, Detroit District, Corps of Engineers, and the Canadian Chairman is Mr. D.F. Witherspoon, IWD, Environment Canada. The Board was directed to undertake the necessary studies and investigations and to give advice to the Commission on all matters, within the reference, which must be considered before the report is taken to the governments. In its investigation, the Board is to compare data collection and analysis methods presently used and advise the Commission concerning their adequacy and compatability; assess the adequacy of the data collection system with respect to coverage and timely response; and advise the Commission concerning changes and additions to the data networks required to assure that meteorologic, hydrologic and hydraulic data needs of the International Great Lakes System are met. 49-3 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the supervision of the Chief, Research and Development Office. CERL, which is located in Champaign, IL, was officially dedicated on July 25, 1969, and is one of the Corps' five major laboratories. The laboratory is closely affiliated with the University of Illinois, sharing laboratory, library, computer, and personnel resources with the University. Colonel Louis J. Circeo, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. CERL research programs are oriented toward the support of the total Army, the Army in garrison, the military installation, the Department of Defense, and to the nation as a whole. The laboratory, which has base support, combat support, and civil works missions, is engaged in a construction research program designed to improve planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of a variety of Army facilities. The ultimate goal of the overall research effort is to create products that will save the Army resources. Research findings are transmitted directly to the field, as well as to private industry and the academic community. Within the Corps, research supports both military and civil works projects in the general areas of environmental quality, energy, materials, engineering management, and military engineering. In the area of environmental quality, CERL has developed a broad-based program designed to maintain military readiness standards, while still conforming to environmental quality regulations. These programs have included development of methods to predict noise impacts, water and air pollution control techniques, adaptations of currently used technologies to more stringent fluid and solid waste control, and computerized methods to cut the time and costs involved in environmental impact assessment. Energy research is oriented toward helping the Army meet its energy conservation goals. These projects include development of computer simulation technology for selection of more fuel-efficient energy systems and design methods and exploration of alternative fuel sources like solar energy and biomass. CERL's materials program is designed to lower the Army's costs for construction, modification, operation, and maintenance of its facilities. These projects include investigations on protective coatings, polymer technology, seismic criteria, quality monitoring systems, and materials syntheses and selection programs. CERL supports the Army decision-maker through its engineering management programs that are designed to increase facility efficiency and productivity. The development of automated data processing systems for management information, cost estimating, profit determination, architecture and design, corrosion mitigation, pavement management, housing contract maintenance, and habitability information have helped reduce costs throughout the military. CERL's military engineering program provides direct support to the battlefield engineer and to the maintenance of military readiness. This research has developed training aids, field-protective structures to increase combat survivability, and methods to enhance the effectiveness of operations during combat situations. During Fiscal Year 1980, CERL produced 89 publications, of which 32 were technical reports, 26 were Army-level publications, and 31 were publications presented in the public domain. In addition, CERL personnel prepared 10 scientific publications and presented 23 papers at scientific meetings. CERL personnel prepared and presented 13 training programs in areas such as corrosion, pavement evaluation, and solar energy. Operations and results during the period. Work performed during Fiscal Year 1980 was funded both directly and through reimbursable programs. CERL's total program was $12.455 million, of which $6.768 million was direct RDT&E funding and $5.687 million was reimbursable funding from the Office of the Chief of Engineers, Corps Divisions and Districts, and other Federal agencies, such as the Air Force, Navy, Department of Energy, and Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES Organization and functions. The US Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) began during World War I as a temporary Engineer Detachment, formed to test aerial photography for topographic mapping. Since that time, ETL has grown into a sophisticated, modern research and development laboratory, applying the latest advances in optics, electronics, computer data processing, space sciences, and related technologies to military and civil problems in mapping, surveying, land naviagion, and geodesy. ETL is now a field operating agency of the Corps of Engineers and is commanded by Colonel Daniel L. Lycan. The Engineer Topographic Laboratories is the only defense research and development laboratory that addresses the full range of development from basic research to a final product in the topographic sciences. Support is provided to both the Military and Civil Works elements of the Corps and also to other agencies. To provide this support, ETL is organized into five operational elements, three of which are developmental laboratories. The Geographic Sciences Laboratory performs research and development associated with the extraction and presentation of geographic data for the Army in the field. The Topographic Development Laboratory supports technological development in surveying and mapmaking. The Computer Sciences Laboratory develops advanced computer techniques and systems for processing, analyzing, and displaying topographic data derived from digital photography. The Research Institute performs most of the Laboratories' basic and applied research, and the Terrain Analysis Center prepares terrain studies needed by field Army elements, as directed by the Assistant Chief of Staff of the Army for Intelligence. During Fiscal Year 1980, copies of 45 Engineer Topographic Laboratories numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for the Engineer Topographic Laboratories were distributed to Corps' offices and interested outside agencies. ETL is the the principal Corps of Engineers laboratory for remote sensing. Nearly every aspect of the work done at ETL involves this technology. Research Institute personnel are investigating the types of data derived from sensors and means for exploiting those data. Central to this work are studies regarding the possibilities of automating image interpretation. The Computer Sciences Laboratory staff is investigating the digital processing of remote sensing data. Geographic Sciences Laboratory members have defined remote sensing inputs required for Army terrain graphics and terrain data bases. In addition, a remote sensing consultant conducts short courses on remote sensing for Corps of Engineers and other government personnel. Finally, ETL also assists the Corps of Engineers Civil Works Directorate with remote sensing information relating to inland waterways, water resources, and flood control. Operations and results during FY 80. The Engineer Topographic Laboratories' total program for Fiscal Year 1980 was $33,144,000. This included work done for other agencies as well as effort for the Corps of Engineers. $18,961,000 of this program supported work performed by contract. Reimbursable work in Fiscal Year 1980 included $235,000 charged to civil funds and $95,000 to nongovernmental concerns. 51-1 U.S. COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (USACRREL), located in Hanover, New Hampshire, was created in January, 1961. It merged the Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment, created in 1949, and the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory, created in 1953, both of which were outgrowths of the Amry's World War II experience at bases in Alaska, Iceland and Greenland. The laboratory's mission is: to conduct and coordinate research and surveillance of technology applicable to the Amry's needs in those geographic areas of the world where cold presents a severe problem at least one year in ten. USACRREL's basic and applied research covers a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in the physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, fresh water ice, sea ice, and frozen ground. Basic research supports applied research in construction, transportation, and other problems encountered in arctic, subarctic, and temperate cold regions. Major cold regions research topics include ice engineering, energy conservation, environmental impact and preservation, roads and airfields, offroad mobility problems, control of snow and ice, and wastewater management. As the only Federal laboratory dedicated to cold regions research, USACRREL has a national reputation and maintains close ties with Federal and state agencies for whom it provides consulting services as needed on a reimbursable basis. As the center of cold regions scientific and engineering expertise for the Corps of Engineers, USACRREL supports Corps districts and divisions by publishing field engineering reports, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, and making field visits to consult on engineering problems. Operations and Results During FY80. During FY80, USACRREL published and distributed well over 200 scientific and engineering reports (CRREL Reports, Special Reports, Technical Notes, internal reports, journal articles, conference papers, and translations), contributed to 13 U.S. Army publications, and sponsored nine technical seminars and meetings. Also during FY80 the laboratory completed a nine-year program of research on the land treatment of wastewater, which included publishing several major documents and sponsoring an international symposium on the subject. USACRREL is currently managing the technical revision of the highly regarded federal manual, Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater (EM 1110-1-501). The Ice Engineering Program completed Lake Huron/St. Clair River ice control model in its refrigerated laboratory, and published the initial draft of the Corps' Ice Engineering Manual, the first of its kind. Laboratory scientists helped Corps personnel in Alaska evaluate the potential environmental effects of a major construction project to inject salt water into the Prudhoe Bay oil reservoir. This process might yield a secondary recovery of over one billion barrels of oil. A USACRREL-designed pilot water treatment plant in Alaska proved very effective in removing glacial sediment from a Kenai water supply, making the water potable. The Alaskan Project Office is working with the Alaska District monitoring the effects on the Tanana River of the construction of a major flood control project. Laboratory personnel in Alaska have also solved the problem of ice fog from Army field generators and are working now toward controlling ice fog from Yukon stoves (used to heat troop tents) and various military vehicles. USACRREL also developed new techniques for constructing snow fortifications which can provide superior protection in shorter time than standard U.S. methods or current Soviet techniques. A troop test was conducted with the 172nd Infantry Brigade in Alaska to demonstrate the effectiveness of these snow fortifications against Soviet weapons. In addition a USACRREL research team consulted with the Lake Placid Winter Olympics Committee on the strength of the lake ice on which the awards ceremonies were conducted. The total authorized strength of USACRREL is 280-266 civilian and 14 military-with a budget for FY80 of over $12 million. USACRREL has five main buildings in Hanover which total 240,000 square feet on 24 acres of land. The buildings include the main laboratory with a new three-story addition, the ice engineering facility, the logistics and supply building, the plant and equipment building and the equipment storage building. In addition, the laboratory maintains an Alaskan Projects Office in Fairbanks which has six buildings totaling 30,000 square feet. The Alaskan Projects Office also manages the laboratory's unique permafrost tunnel, a 360' shaft drilled into frozen soil, serving as the site for numerous field studies on permafrost. 52-1 WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) was established by the Chief of Engineers on July 30, 1979. Under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works of the Office of the Chief of Engineers, the Center is commanded by Colonel Maximilian Imhoff. Several WRSC elements are based at Fort Belvoir, Virginia: the Institute for Water Resources; Dredging Division; Data Collection and Management Division; the Publications and Training Division; and the Center's administrative support functions. Elements located elsewhere are the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California; the Marine Design Branch in Philadelphia and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center in New Orleans. The specific activities in support of the WRSC mission are established to: a. Organize, manage and perform studies for meeting regional, multi-regional and national objectives in the area of water resources management and development. b. Perform research and development in the areas of water resource planning and hydrologic engineering under the program direction of the Research and Development Office. c. Provide all Corps offices with services and assistance in the area of hydrologic engineering and in other closely related technical areas. d. Manage and administer the Corps dredging program and related plant activities including the Plant Replacement and Improvement Program. e. Provide design, engineering and other technical services relating to the procurement, construction or alteration of floating plant. f. Collect, compile, analyze, and distribute data on, or relevant to, ports and navigation systems within the United States. g. Plan, develop and evaluate data collection and management systems related to water resources to incorporate technological development of remote sensing, data communications, and computer graphic systems. h. Manage and coordinate special national scope programs such as the Natinal Program of Inspection of Non-Federal Dams and the Streambank Erosion Control Demonstration Program. i. Publish Water Spectrum magazine, and other water resources related documents. j. Organize, manage and coordinate the foreign technical training program as it relates to the Civil Works activities of the Corps. Operations and results during Fiscal Year 1980: The hopper dredges HYDE and ESSAYONS and the self-propelled cutterhead dredge GUTHRIE were retired from service during the year. Of the three new Corps hopper dredges scheduled, the small class YAQUINA was christened, the keel was laid for the large class WHEELER, and design was completed on the yet unnamed medium class dredge. The state-of-theart captured-air-bubble high speed hydrographic survey boat RODOLF made a demonstration tour through the Gulf and East Coast prior to delivery to Portland District. In response to national emergencies, the Corps hopper dredges BIDDLE, HARDING and PACIFIC provided crucial response to restoration of navigation on the Columbia River after the eruption of Mt. Saint Helens. Corps hopper dredges MCFARLAND and LANGFITT provided immediate response to restore navigation in the major ports of Freeport and Corpus Christi, Texas, after those Gulf cities were stricken by Hurricane Allen. The Corps special purpose split-hull dredge CURRITUCK responded to an emergency at East Pass, Destin, Florida. Under the requirements of Public Law 95-269, the Corps completed a report which identified the minimum hopper dredge fleet and the report on the nonhopper dredge fleet neared completion. The Corps Industry Capability Program (ICP)- established in FY 77 to determine the private dredging industry's ability to perform contract dredging in a timely manner and at reasonable cost-continued into its third full year. Twenty of the thirty projects awarded under the ICP were awarded to private industry. This amounted to $35.3 million being awarded to industry out of a total program of nearly $53 million. The Corps spent an estimated $288 million and moved 244 million cubic yards of material in its overall dredging effort to maintain the nation's waterways. The Corps' program to provide modern work facilities moved ahead with completion of designs, plans and specifications of two new major buildings, the Civil Works Water Resources Building at the Army Corps of Engineers Command Complex at Fort Belvoir and a Norfolk District headquarters building. The National Dam Inspection Act, Public Law 92-367, gave the Corps additional responsibility to inspect nonfederal dams nationwide. At the end of FY 80 the Corps had initiated 6,854 inspections, completed 6,632 and approved and furnished 5,894 53-1 inspection reports to state Governors and dam owners. An estimated 1,900 dams remain to be inspected by the scheduled completion date of 30 September 1981. Of the 6,632 dams inspected, 1,937 were found to have deficiencies which rendered them unsafe. The Corps recommended emergency action for 97 of the unsafe dams to eliminate the possibility of immediate failure. Updating and verification of the Inventory of Dams was essentially complete at the end of FY 80. The original inventory compiled in 1975 contained approximately 49,000 dams. The inventory, by the end of FY 80, contained 65,586 dams of which 2,008 did not meet the minimum size requirements. The Corps of Engineers continued to take advantage of space-age technology by increasing its use of Data Collection Platforms (DCP's) in 1980. 158 radio frequency authorizations were issued for operation of the DCP's in 1980, an increase of 100 percent from the previous two years. During FY 80, ten Port Series Reports, covering 24 ports were published and offered for sale, ten others covering 30 ports, were completed and sent to the printer, and funds were obligated for one more report covering four ports. In addition to a number of policy and research studies addressing a wide variety of water research planning techniques needs, the Institute for Water Resources continued work on its two major studies, the National Hydropower Study and the National Waterways Study. As it has in past years, in FY 80 the Institute continued to operate its substantial training program. The 11 courses presented were attended by more than 500 Corps employees. The Corps' Hydrologic Engineering Center continued to consolidate past research results into field-usable products and to concentrate on applications, documentation, and information dissemination. The HEC also conducted 10 training courses, 4 workshops and 1 seminar during FY 80. WRSC arranged individual training programs for 30 foreign trainees from 9 countries. In addition to the one-day visit programs approved in the divisions and districts, WRSC arranged 18 visitor programs for 49 foreign engineers and scientists from 13 countries. 53-2 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 Permanent Characte Pool of Da Cal. Year Total (Acreage)1 Community Placed in Storage or No Project Heigh Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet Arizona ristics m It Length ) (Feet) Alamo Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch Arkansas Blue Mountain DeQueen Dierks Gillham Millwood Nimrod California Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Farmington Fullerton Hansen Harry L. Englebright Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake Isabella Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group: Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mohave River New Hogan Colorado Gila Gila Gila Arkansas Red Red Red Red Arkansas Sacramento Santa Ana San Joaquin Santa Ana Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin Mojave San Joaquin Bill Williams River Gila River Santa Rosa Wash Queen Creek Petit Jean River Rolling Fork River Saline River Cossatot River Little River Fourche La Fave River Stony Creek Brea Creek Chowchilla River Carbon Canyon Creek East Fork, Russian River Littlejohn Creek East Fullerton Creek Big Tujunga Wash Yuba River Fresno River Kern River Pacoima Wash Martis Creek Bear Creek Burns Creek Mariposa Creek Owens Creek Mojave Calaveras Wenden Gila Bend Casa Grande Superior Paris DeQueen Dierks Gillham Ashdown Plainview Orland Fullerton Chowchilla Brea Ukiah Farmington Fullerton Los Angeles Marysville Madera Bakersfield San Fernando Reno Merced Merced Merced Merced Victorville Valley Springs 1968 1959 1974 1960 1947 1977 1975 1975 1966 1942 1963 1942 1975 1961 1959 1952 1941 1940 1941 1975 1953 1954 1971 1954 1950 1948 1949 1971 1963 A-1 1,046,310 2,491,700 198,550 35,590 257,900 136,200 98,600 221,800 1,854,930 336,010 160,000 4,010 150,000 6,610 122,500 52,000 760 26,090 69,000 90,000 570,000 440 20,400 7,700 7,000 15,000 3,600 89,670 325,000 560 NPP NPP NPP 2,910 1,680 2,970 1,370 24,500 FRWX FRWX FWX FX FRWX FSQRW FSRAW FSQW FSW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth 3,550 FRWX Concrete 770 FIRX NPP FRX Earth Earth 470 FIRW Earth & Rock NPP FRX Earth 1,700 NPP NPP 120 400 5,000 1,850 NPP 71 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP 715 FRX F FRX FRWX DR FIRW FIRX FX FSR FFFF FRWX FIRX Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock 283 181 75.5 149 115 160 153 160 88 103 975 4,780 12,500 837 2,800 2,360 2,500 1,750 17,554 995 156 2,970 87 1,765 205.5 99 160 60 46 97 280 163 185 50 113 92 55 88 75 200 210 1,800 2,610 3,500 7,800 575 10,475 1,142 5,730 4,952 1,300 2,670 1,830 4,075 1,330 790 2,200 1,960 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 Permanent Characte Pool of Da Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Heig Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Fee North Fork Pine Flat Prado San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Success Terminus Whittier Narrows Colorado Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad Connecticut Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson Idaho Lucky Peak Illinois Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Sacramento San Joaquin Santa Ana Santa Ana San Gabriel Los Angeles San Joaquin San Joaquin San Gabriel Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Purgatoire Housatonic Connecticut Housatonic Housatonic Thames Thames Housatonic Thames Columbia Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi American River Kings River Santa Ana River San Antonio Creek San Gabriel River Los Angeles River Tule River Kaweah River San Gabriel River and River Hondo Bear Creek South Platte Rivr Cherry Creek Arkansas River Pugatoire River Branch Brook West Branch, Farmington River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Natchaug River Northfield Brook Naugatuck River Quinebaug Boise River Kaskaskia River Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Auburn Piedra Corona Upland Duarte Van Nuys Porterville Visalia El Monte Denver Denver Denver Lamar Trinidad 1939 1954 1941 1956 1948 1941 1960 1961 1957 1978 1974 1950 1948 1977 1970 1969 1966 1968 1952 1965 1960 1965 1956 1967 1951 1951 1970 Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson Boise Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville 14,700 1,000,000 196,240 7,650 32,640 17,400 85,000 150,000 35,150 28,290 235,000 93,920 621,000 158,500 8,700 97,700 4,030 6,970 52,000 2,430 42,000 26,800 306,000 983,000 15,500 3,780 684,000 280 NPP NPP NPP NPP NPP 400 345 DR FIRX FRX FX FRX FRX FIRX FIRX Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth NPP FRWX Earth 105 FRX Earth 1,348 FRX Earth 852 FRX Earth 1,678 FIRX Concrete & Earth 213 FIRXW Earth 20 FR Earth 760 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 FRSX FRW FR FRW FRW F FRW 2,850 FIR 26,000 NPP NPP 11,100 FSNRWA FF FSNRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 155 429 106 160 92 57 142 250 620 1,820 2,280 3,850 23,800 15,444 3,490 2,375 56 16,960 170 148 141 118 200 5,120 12,500 14,300 13,780 6,860 154 933 223 57 97 68 118 142 70 250 67 80 67 108 1,300 630 520 12,420 810 2,000 2,550 1,700 6,570 1,275 1,000 3,000 A-2 ristics tm ht Length t) (Feet) Rend Lake Upper Mississippi Big Muddy River Indiana Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie Iowa Coralville Rathbun Red Rock Saylorville Kansas Clinton Council Grove Elk City Fall River John Redmond Kanopolis Marion Melvern Milford Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Creek Wilson Kentucky Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River- Martins Fork Nolin Rough River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Benton 1970 East Fork of Whitewater River Brookville Mill Creek Terre Haute Raccoon Creek Rockville Wabash River Huntington Mississinewa Peru Salt Creek Harrodsburg Patoka River Ellsworth Salamonie Wabash Upper Mississippi Iowa River Missouri Chariton River Upper Mississippi Des Moines River Upper Mississippi Des Moines River Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Iowa City Centerville Des Moines Des Moines Wakarusa River Lawrence Grand (Neosho) Council Grove Elk River Independence Fall River Fall. River Grand (Neosho) Burlington Smoky Hill River Salina Cottonwood River Marion Marias Des Cygnes Melvern Republican River Junction City Delaware River Perry 110 Mile Creek Pomona Verdigris River Toronto Big Blue River Manhattan Saline River Wilson Barren River Glasgow Middle Fork of Kentucky River Buckhorn Carr Fork Hazard Licking River Farmers Johns Creek Paintsville Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Pikeville Little Sandy Grayson Green River Campbellsville Martins Fork Harlan Nolin River Kyrock Rough River Leitchfield 1974 1952 1960 1969 1967 1964 1978 1966 1958 1969 1969 1975 1977 1964 1966 1949 1964 1948 1968 1973 1967 1969 1963 1960 1962 1965 1964 1960 1976 1974 1949 1968 1967 1969 1978 1963 1958 294,000 18,900 FQRSW Earth 54 10,600 359,600 228,120 132,800 153,100 368,400 441,000 301,600 263, 600 492,000 552,000 1,830,000 602,000 397,200 112,265 284,300 256,400 630,250 450,000 143,850 363,000 1,160,000 770,000 246,500 199,700 2,346,000 776,000 815,200 168,000 47,700 614,100 93,000 164,360 118,990 723,200 21,000 609,400 334,400 2,250 FRSW Earth & Rock 182 1,400 FRX Earth 150 1,100 FRX Earth 117 500 FRW Earth 91 1,100 FRW Earth 137 3,280 FARS Earth 93 2,010 FRSQW Earth & Rock 84 976 FRW Earth 133 1,820 FARW Earth 11,000 FNRWXQ Earth 8,950 FARWQ Earth 74,000 FARWQ Earth 100 85 110 125 7,000 FSWAX. Earth 144 3,235 FSQR Earth 96 4,450 FSQ Earth 107 2,350 FSX Earth 94 9,280 FSQR Earth 86.5 3,815 FRWX Earth 131 6,200 FRQS Earth 67 6,930 FRQWX Earth 98 15,600 FRSXW Earth & Rock 126 12,200 FRSXW Earth & Rock 96 4,000 FRSWXQ Earth & Rock 86 2,720 FX Earth 90 15,800 FRWXQ Earth & Rock 139 9,000 FIRWXN Earth 127 4,340 FARS Earth 3,000 950 1,790 5,332 8,100 1,400 1,550 6,100 1,400 10,600 5,676 6,750 9,250 6,500 4,840 6,015 21,790 8,467 8,375 9,700 6,300 7,800 7,800 4,712 7,500 5,600 146 3,970 550 FR Earth 162 530 FQRW Earth & Rock 130 6,790 FQRW Earth & Rock 148 1,100 FARW Earth 118 569 FARW Rock 195 1,050 FQRW Earth & Rock 120 5,070 FQRSW Earth & Rock 142 578 FQ Concrete 97 2,890 FAR Earth & Rock 174 2,180 FRX Earth & Rock 124 A-3 1,020 720 2,740 913 1,100 1,460 2,350 574 990 1,530 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 Permanent Characte Pool ofDa Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Heig Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet Louisiana Bayou Bodcau Wallace Lake Massachusetts Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Tully West Hill Westville Minnesota Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River Lac Qui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake Mississippi Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake Red Red Connecticut Connecticut Thames Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Blackstone Thames Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Red River of the North Red River of the North Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Pascagoula Lower Mississippi Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Ware River Millers River Little River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Tully River West River Quinebaug River Minnesota River Chippewa River Minnesota River Minnesota River Otter Tail River Red Lake River Coldwater River Yocona River Yalobusha River Okatibbee Creek Little Tallahatchie River Shreveport Shreveport Barre South Royalston Charlton Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington Chester Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red Lake Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis 1949 1946 1958 1941 1958 1966 1960 1959 1941 1965 1949 1960 1961 1973 1950 1950 1950 1953 357,300 88,300 24,000 49,900 12,700 3,740 30,000 12,800 49,000 32,400 22,000 12,350 11,100 NPP FR Earth 2,300 FR Earth NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 NPP 360 NPP NPP FRW F FRW FRW FRW 275 FRWS 300 FRW NPP FRW 23 FRW 45,000 12,700 FRW (2) 122,800 35,000 14,100 NPP 6,500 5,100 FRWX FRWX FRWX Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock 210 FARS Earth & Rock 1951 2,680,000 279,000 FARSX Earth & Rock 1943 1951 1954 1969 525,300 660,000 1,337,400 142,400 5,100 6,100 9,800 1,280 FRSW FRSW FRSW FQSR Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth 1940 1,570,000 10,700 FRSW Earth & Rock 76 12,850 48 4,934 62 885 56 1,400 66 85 55 55 160 164 62 51 78 3,255 1,050 520 2,140 1,200 1,360 1,570 2,400 560 25 13,700 23.3 17,975 21 4,100 19.5 11,800 47 1,355 15.5 36,500 95 99 102 67 117 11,500 8,400 13,900 6,543 15,300 A-4 ristics m ht Length t) (Feet) Missouri Clearwater Long Branch Pomme de Terre Wappapello White Grand Chariton Missouri Lower Mississippi Nebraska Harlan County Papillion Creek and Tributaries: Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Salt Creek & Tributaries: Olive Creek (Site 2) Bluestem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach (Site 9) Yankee Hill (Site 10) Connestoga (Site 12) Twin Lakes Pawnee (Site 14) Holmes Lake (Site 17) Branched Oak (Site 18) New Hampshire Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain Nevada Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon New Mexico Abiquiu Cochiti Conchas Galisteo Jemez Canyon Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut Connecticut Colorado Colorado Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Rio Grande Rio Grande Black River Little Chariton Pomme de Terre River St. Francis River Republican River Knight Creek Tributary of Big Papillion Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook Pemigewasset River Contoocook River Piscataquog River Otter Brook Ashuelot River Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon Rio Chama Rio Grande Canadian River Galisteo Creek Jemez River Piedmont Macon Hermitage Wappapello Republican City Omaha Omaha Kramer Sprague Holland Hickman Denton Denton Pleasantdale Emerald Lincoln Raymond Webster West Petersborough Franklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Caliente Caliente Abiquiu Pena Blanca Tucumcari Albuquerque Bernalillo 1948 1980 1962 1941 1952 1975 1973 1964 1963 1963 1964 1966 1964 1966 1965 1963 1968 1941 1950 1943 1962 1962 1958 1941 1957 1957 1963 1975 1939 1970 1953 413,000 65,000 650,000 613,200 1,630 FRWX Earth & Rock 2,430 FRSQW Earth 7,820 FRWX Earth & Rock 4,100 FR Earth & Rock 850,000 13,600 FIRWX Earth & Rock 17,900 5,200 5,470 10,260 9,280 6,640 7,560 10,640 8,080 29,520 6,510 97,560 46,000 12,800 154,000 71,500 87,500 18,300 32,500 6,270 7,750 1,215,000 722,000 529,000 89,000 110,450 390 FQRX Earth 137 FRX 174 315 303 196 208 230 255 728 100 1,780 NPP NPP NPP 200 120 85' 265 FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth NPP FX Earth NPP FX Earth 223 1,200 3,020 F FRWX FIRX NPP FRX 284 FX Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth 154 4.225 71 3,800 140 109 107 4,630 2,700 11,827 67 1,940 70 1,460 45 57 52 48 52 63 58 65 55 70 75 67 140 76 115 133 86 3,020 2,760 1,650 2,250 3,100 3,000 2,075 5,000 7,700 5,200 1,150 1,030 1,740 790 2,000 1,288 1,670 71 800 92 884 325 251 200 158 136 1,540 28,815 14,840 2,820 780 A-5 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 Name Los Esteros Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam New York Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point North Carolina W. Kerr Scott North Dakota BaldhiU Bowman-Haley Homme Pipestem Ohio Alum Creek Berlin Caesar's Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Dillon East Fork Michael J. Kirwan River Basin Pecos Rio Grande Rio Grande Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Yadkin-Pee Dee Red River of the North Missouri Red River of the North James River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Stream Pecos Rio Hondo } Rocky Arroyo Canacadea Creek Canisteo Creek Ouleout Creek Genesee River Otselic River Yadkin Sheyenne River North Fork, Grand River South Branch of Park River Pipestem Creek Alum Creek Mahoning River Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Olentangy River Licking River Little Miami River West Branch, Mahoning River Permanent Pool (Acreage)' or No Pool (NPP) NPP NPP 124 NPP 210 170 1,200 Project Functions FIRXW F FRW F .FRW FR FRW Type Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth Community in Vicinity Santa Rosa Roswell Hornell Hornell Sidney Mount Morris Binghamton Wilkesboro Valley City Haley Park River Jamestown Africa Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Holland Delaware Zanesville Williamsburg Newton Falls Cal. Year Placed in Useful Op. 1979 1963 1949 1939 1950 1952 1942 1963 1950 1967 1951 1974 1975 1943 1978 1974 1968 1951 1961 1978 1966 Total Storage (Acre-Ft.) 449,000 166,200 14,640 7,950 33,550 337,000 86,440 153,000 70,700 92,980 3,650 146,880 134,800 91,200 242,200 63,700 102,500 132,000 273,800 284,500 78,700 Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Characteristics of Dam Height Le (Feet) (F 212 98 118 90 113 130 215 95 148 61 79 67 107 93 96 165 72 93 92 118 200 83 ngth Feet) 1,950 4,885 2,940 1,260 1,200 2,010 1,028 4,900 1,740 1,650 5,730 865 4,000 10,000 5,750 2,750 6,620 3,880 18,600 1,400 1,450 9,900 A-6 -- 1,470 FARSX Earth .325 1,950 51 885 348 240 13,300 1,010 727 950 1,325 18,760 570 FARS FSRWX FARS FRWX FRSW FARSWQ FRSQW FQRW FRW FARWX FRWX FRSQW FAQRS Mosquito Creek Cortland 1944 104,100 Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Wills Creek Ohio North Branch Kokosing River Lake Ohio Paint Creek Ohio Tom Jenkins Ohio West Fork Mill Creek Ohio Oklahoma Birch Canton Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Oologah Optima Pine Creek Waurika Wister Oregon Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Columbia Columbia Columbia Indian Fork New Cumberland Sugar Creek Beach City Sandy Creek Bolivar Black Fork Mifflin Brushy Fork Tippecanoe Tuscarawas River Dover McGuire Creek Leesville Walhonding River Nellie Lake Fork Mohicanville Stillwater Creek Piedmont Clear Fork Perrysville Seneca Fork Senecaville Little Stillwater Creek Tappan Wills Creek Conesville North Branch of Kokosing River Fredericktown Paint Creek New Petersburg East Branch, Sunday Creek Gloucester Mill Creek Mount Healthy Birch Creek Barnsdall North Canadian River Canton Wolf Creek Woodward Salt Fork, Arkansas River Cherokee Polecat Creek Sapulpa Kiamichi River Hugo Caney River Bartlesville Arkansas River Ponca City Verdigris River Claremore North Canadian River Hardesty Little River Wright City Beaver Creek Waurika Poteau River Wister Blue River Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Cottage Grove Row River Cottage Grove 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1937 1937 1936 1937 1938 1937 1936 1937 1973 1972 1951 1952 1977 1948 1942 1941 1950 1974 1950 1976 1963 1978 1969 1977 1949 1968 1942 1949 49,700 71,700 149,600 88,000 54,000 203,000 37,400 285,000 102,000 65,000 87,700 88,500 61,600 196,000 14,900 145,000 26,900 11,380 58,200 383,800 100,700 271,400 55,030 966,700 289,000 1,348,000 1,519,000 229,500 465,780 343,500 427,900 85,000 30,060 70,500 1,540 FRX 420 FRX NPP FR 1,350 FRX 1,800 FRX 350 FRX 1,000 FRX NPP FR NPP FR 2,270 FRX 850 FRX 3,550 FRSX 2,350 FRX 900 FRX 98 FRW 710 FRSQW 394 FRSWX 200 FRX 1,137 FSQRW 7,900 FSI 1,820 FSX 8,690 FRWX 920 FRWXS 13,250 FSQRW 3,750 FSAX 17,040 FSQRW 1,120 FSN 5,340 FSRW 3,750 FSQW 10,100 FISQWR 4,000 FSAX 975 FINR 1,155 FINR 1,885 FINR Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth 65 64 87 48 64 83 74 111 46 56 113 45 3,700 5,600 6,300 1,390 950 824 1,695 2,330 1,220 1,750 775 2,350 52 1,550 87 1,950 71 1,400 118 700 84 944 100 1,100 97 3,193 68 15,140 85 12,225 68 89 101 94 125 137 6,010 2,920 10,200 5,200 9,466 4,000 120 15,200 124 22,470 106 16,600 99 5,700 319 114 145 1,329 2,110 3,352 A-7 Mosquito Creek Ohio 700 FARSWQ Earth 47 5,650 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 Permanent Character Pool of Dan Cal. Year Total (Acreage)1 Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) Fall Creek Columbia Fern Ridge Pennsylvania Alvin R. Bush Aylesworth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque Crooked Creek Curwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kinzua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenango Stillwater Tioga-Hammond Lakes Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River Columbia Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Middle Fork, Willamette River Long Tom River Kettle Creek Aylesworth Creek Pohopoco Tulephocken Conemaugh River Cowanesque River Crooked Creek West Branch, Susquehanna River East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Lackawaxen River Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenanago River Lackawanna River Tioga River Crooked Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny River Eugene Eugene 1965 1941 Renovo East Jermyn Lehighton Reading Saltsburg Lawrenceville Ford City Clearfield Wilcox Blanchard Wilkes-Barre Honesdale York Warren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Honesdale Huntingdon Sharpsville Forest City Tioga Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence 1962 1970 1971 1979 1952 1980 1940 1965 1952 1969 1961 1959 1942 1965 1942 1941 1960 1973 1966 1960 1979 1979 1940 1970 1973 1943 115,000 110,000 75,000 1,760 68,250 50,000 274,000 89,000 93,900 124,200 84,300 99,000 110,000 24,500 28,000 1,180,000 95,300 74,200 52,000 762,000 191,400 12,000 62,000 63,000 133,400 47,640 20,000 254,000 1,865 10,305 160 NPP 947 22,900 300 410 350 790 90 1,730 90 NPP NPP 1,900 210 170 290 8,300 1,910 85 470 680 480 NPP 118 450 FINR FINR FRW F FQRSW FAQRS F FR FRW FR FARXQ FRW FNRW F FRW PFAQR FRW FRW FNRW FRW FAQRW FS FR FR FRW F FQRXA FARWXQ Rockfill & Concrete Rockfill & Concrete Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Rockfill Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth 193 49 165 90 170 5,100 6,624 1,350 1,270 4,200 98 1,175 137 151 143 131 184 100 263 109 83 177 144 162 140 225 68 77 140 122 154 88 90 184 1,265 3,100 1,480 2,850 1,725 6,835 3,500 1,255 1,000 1,877 960 926 1,230 1,700 720 1,700 2,738 6,000 1,050 1,420 4,650 1,610 A-8 istics Length (Feet) South Dakota Cold Brook Missouri Cottonwood Springs Missouri Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Dam Red River of the North White Rock Red River of the North Texas Addicks Bardwell Barker Belton Benbrook Canyon Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O'the Pines Granger Dam and Lake Grapevine Hords Creek Lake Kemp Lavon Lewisville Navarro Mills North Fork Lake 0. C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman Vermont Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village San Jacinto Trinity San Jacinto Brazos Trinity Guadalupe Red Brazos Trinity Colorado Red Trinity Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Creek Bois de Sioux River Bois de Sioux River South Mayde Creek Waxahachie Creek Buffalo Bayou Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadalupe Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek Hords Creek Wichita River East Fork, Trinity River Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River North Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River West River Ottauguechee River Black River West River Ompompanoosuc River Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton Addicks Ennis Barker Belton Fort Worth New Braunfels Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Wichita Falls Fort Worth Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Paris Comanche Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana Jamaica North Hartland Springfield Townshend Union Village 1953 1970 1941 1941 1948 1965 1945 1953 1950 1962 1959 1980 1951 1948 1972 1953 1953 1962 1980 1950 1967 1963 1966 1966 1964 1957 1961 1960 1960 1961 1950 7,200 8,400 164,500 85,000 204,500 140,000 207,000 1,097,600 258,600 740,900 842,100 244,200 435,500 25,310 502,900 423,400 989,700 212,200 130,800 396,400 189,100 374,200 507,500 630,400 726,400 2,654,300 54,600 71,420 51,067 33,700 38,000 36 FRWX Earth 41 FRWX Earth 10,925 6,500 NPP 3,570 NPP 7,400 3,770 8,240 18,700 4,400 7,380 510 15,590 11,080 23,280 5,070 1,310 5,440 5,993 4,610 11,460 6,430 7,270 20,300 75 220 290 100 FRX FRX Earth Earth FX Earth FRSX Earth FX Earth FIRSX Earth FNRXA Earth FRSX Earth FRS Earth FRSWX Earth FNRSXA Earth FARSX Earth FX Earth & Rock FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSWX Rock FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Earth FRSX Concrete & Earth FRSX Earth FRW FRW FRW FRW NPP FRW Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth 170 1,100 A-9 127 123 14 16 925 1,190 9,100 14,400 61,166 15,400 72,844 5,524 9,130 6,830 10,600 16,320 12,850 6,800 8,890 9,499 32,888 7,570 6,700 40,885 7,080 13,460 26,175 15,624 24,618 18,500 49 82 37 192 130 224 97 115 137 91 115 69 125 82 164 128 96 86 80 200 140 100 265 185 120 133 915 1,520 2,940 1,700 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 Permanent Characte Pool of Da Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Heig Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Fee Virginia John W. Flannagan North Fork of Pound River Washington Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain Wynoochee West Virginia Beech Fork Bluestone Burnsville East Lynn R. D. Bailey Summersville Lake Sutton Tygart River Wisconsin Eau Galle Ohio Ohio Green Columbia Puyallup Chehalis Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Chippewa Pound River North Fork, Pound River Green River Mill Creek White River Wynoochee River Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pole Creek Guyandot River Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Eau Galle Haysi Pound Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw Montesano Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn Justice Summersville Sutton Grafton Spring Valley 1963 1966 1961 1942 1953 1972 1977 1952 1977 1970 1979 1965 1960 1938 1969 145,700 11,293 106,000 8,300 106,000 70,000 37,540 631,000 65,400 82,500 203,700 413,800 265,300 287,700 43,600 310 FAQR Concrete & Earth 106 FR Rock 1,600 225 NPP 1,150 450 1,800 550 823 440 407 270 620 FAS FR FR FSARI FRW FRWX FQRW FQRW FQRW FANR FARWX FNARX Rock Earth Rock Concrete & Earth Earth Concrete Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Rock Concrete Concrete 150 FR Earth 250 960 122 600 235 145 425 177 86 180 89 122 310 390 220 230 675 3,200 700 1,700 1,080 2,048 1,400 650 1,397 2,280 1,178 1,921 122 1,600 A-10 ristics Im ht Length t) (Feet) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS September 30, 1980 California Big Dry Creek Camanche 2 Cherry Valley3 Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar2 New Don Pedro3 New Exchequer 2 Oroville2 Tahchevah Creek Colorado Pinon Canyon Connecticut East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook Maryland Savage River Missouri Bear Creek New York Onondaga San Joaquin San Joaquin Tuolumne Alameda Rio Hondo Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Sacramento Whitewater Colorado Housatonic Housatonic Connecticut Connecticut Potomac Big Dry Creek Mokelumne River Cherry Creek Arroyo Del Valle Eaton Wash Yuba River Tuolumne River Merced River Feather River Tahchevah Creek Pinon Canyon Arroyo East Branch Naugatuck River Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook Savage Upper Mississippi Bear Creek Oswego Onondaga Creek Fresno Clements Sonora Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Torrington Torrington Winchester Winchester Western Port Hannibal Syracuse 1948 1963 1956 1968 1937 1968 1970 1966 1964 1965 1964 1964 1962 1963 1970 1952 1962 1949 16,250 431,500 268,000 77,000 956 960,000 2,030,000 1,026,000 3,539,000 960 4,350 4,350 8,620 9,700 1,480 20,000 8,700 18,200 NPP NPP 475 200 NPP 1,910 3,520 1,900 5,838 NPP F FRS FS FRS F FIRPW FISP FIR FIRSW F NPP FRW NPP FR NPP F 10 FR NPP F 360 FRS NPP F NPP F Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth Concrete Earth & Rock Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth ,Earth Earth 40 171 315 223 82 645 565 480 770 42 20,038 2,450 2,500 900 1,795 2,323 1,920 1,200 6,850 3,610 92 700 .92 73 178 68 100 1,200 940 1,160 184 1,050 65 1,450 67 1,782 A-11 Oklahoma Lugert-Altus4 Markham Ferry5 Pensacola 5 Utah Red Arkansas Arkansas North Fork, Red Grand (Neosho) River Altus Locust Grove Grand (Neosho) River Disney 1948 1964 154,145 6,260 FISR 444,500 10,900 FRP 1941 2,197,000 17,000 FRP Big Wash Jail Branch Waterbury North Branch, Winooski River Milford East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville 1961 1960 1958 1958 1,200 12,050 64,700 20,300 NPP F NPP F 900 F Earth Concrete Concrete 90 FR Concrete 34 2,814 65 1,460 158 1,800 115 1,525 NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS: A -Low Flow Augumentation D -Debris Control F -Flood Control I -Irrigation N -Navigation P -Power Q -Water Quality Control R -Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) 'Acres of water surface at top of permanent pool. 2 Federal Government contributed for flood control storage. 3 Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase, New Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection, construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco, and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 'Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. SConstruction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. S -Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X -Water Conservation and Sedimentation A-12 Big Wash Vermont Beaver East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville Winooski Winooski Winooski .Concrete Concrete & Earth Concrete 98 90 147 1,112 4,494 6,565 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1980 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful- Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Abiquiu Dam, NM ..................................................... Almeda Creek, CA ............ ..................................... .... Alum Creek Lake, OH ..... ......................... ..................... Applegate, OR ....................................................... .. . .................... Aquilla Lake, TX ... ........ .......................................................... A rcadia Lake, OK ........................................................................ Arkansas-Red Basins Chloride Control (Area VIII), OK, TX, and KS (Stage I) ................. Aubrey Lake, TX .............. ........................................... B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC ....................................................... Bear Creek Lake, CO ................................... .................... Beech Fork Lake, W V ........................................................................ Big H ill Lake, K S ..................................................................... ..... Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA and SD ........................................ ........... Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area, KY and TN ................................ Big Stone Lake & Whetstone River, MN and SD ............................................ Black River, Harnett County, NC (Sec. 205) ...................................................... Bloomington Lake, MD and WV .......... ..................... ..................... Brookville Lake, IN ........... ......................................... ............... ........ Brush Bayou, LA .............................................................................. Buchanan Dam, H.V. Eastman Lake, CA ................................................ Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ...................................... .................... Buffalo Bayou & Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker Dams ............... ...... ........... Bull Run, PA (Sec. 205) .......................................................... Burnsville Lake, WV ....................................................................... Caesar Creek Lake, OH ......................... ............................................. Candy Lake, OK ...... .............. ......... ......... .................... ...... Carr Fork Lake, KY ...................................................................... Cave Run Lake, KY ....................................................................... Central and Southern, FL ................................................................... Charles River (Natural Valley Storage), MA ................................................. Chartiers Creek, PA .......................................... ............. .............. Chatfield Lake, CO ................ ............................................................ Chena River Lakes, AK .................. ......................................................... Chillicothe, OH ........... ...................................................................... Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, OH ................................ ............. Clayton Lake, OK ... ....................... o................ Clinton, IA ....... ...... ............. .. ........ .............................o..o..... .. . ........ Clinton Lake, KS. .. .......................................................................... Cochiti Lake, NM ......................................................................... Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL ........................................... 1978 1965 1970 1974 1977 1980 1976 1975 1967 1973 1970 1974 1977 1979 1972 1978 1971 1966 1977 1971 1956 1977 1979 1972 1971 1976 1966 1965 1950 1977 1969 1967 1973 1971 1967 1975 1974 1972 1965 1975 1975 11997755 1980 1978 1975 1980 1974 1975 1978 1976 1974 1976 1974 1975 1980 1979 1983 1982 1982 1985 1983 1987 1986 1982 1986 1982 1981 1986 1980 1980 1983 1982 1980 1980 Indefinite 1981 1982 1985 1984 1984 1981 1984 Indefinite 1982 1983 1985 1984 1984 1980 1983 1981 1982 1981 1981 Major Rehabilitation Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Major Rehabilitation Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Non-structural local protection (acquisition of natural reservoir lands) Local protection Reservoir Reservoirs and levee Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection B-1 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1980 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .............................................................. 1958 - Indefinite Copan Lake, O K ............................................................ ...................... Corte M adera Creek, CA ................................................................... Cowanesque Lake, PA ..................................................................... Cucam onga Creek, CA ...................................................................... D ade County, FL .................................................. ........................ D ayton, K Y ..................................................................... ........... Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA ............................................. Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX...................................................... East Fork Lake, OH ....................................................................... East Lynn Lake, W V ......................................................................... East M oline, IL ......................... ...................................... .............. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet & Jamaica Bay, NY, Part I ......................... East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL ............................ ................................. El Dorado Lake, KA ........................................................................ El Paso, TX ............................................................................... E lizabeth, N J ........................................................ ......................... Elk Creek Lake, OR ........................................................................ Evansville, IN ............................................................................... Falls Lake, NC ................................... ....................................... Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY ...................... ................................ Four M ile Run, VA ......................................................................... Four Rivers Basin, FL ..................... ................................. Frazer-W olf Point, M T .................. : ........................... ....................... Freeport and Vicinity, TX .................................. ................................. Fulton, IL ................................................................ Gathright Lake, VA .................................. ... .......... ..................... Greenville, TX .............. . .................. ................... ................ Gypsum, KS (Sec. 205) ............................................................... Harrisonville Levee and Drainage, Dist., IL ....................... .................... Highland Bayou, TX .................... ......... ........ .... .. .. ............ H illsdale Lake, K S ............................. ......... ... . . .... . . .. ............. Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME (Sec. 14) .......................................... ........... Iao Stream, Maui, HI ........................................ ... .. .... ........... Indian Bend Wash, AZ ............................... ...... ................ Israel River, Lancaster, NH (Sec. 205) ......................... ....... ........... Joe Creek, OK ................... . .... .. ........................ Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME (Sec. 14)............................................ Kaneohe, Kailua Area, Oahu, HI ................ .. . ..................... Kansas City, KS (1962 Mod.) ............................................................ Kaw Lake, OK .................. .............................................. B-2 1973 1966 1973 1976 1975 1978 1967 1973 1970 1965- 1980 1975 1972 1974 1971 1972 1972 1939 1973 1963 1974 1966 1980 1966 1978 1967 1973 1978 1974 1974 1975 1979 1977 1976 1979 1978 1980 1976 1971 1966 1980- 1970 1973 - 1979 1980 1980 1976 1983 Indefinite 1982 1985 1982 1983 1985 Indefinite 1984 1981 1984 1988 Indefinite 1984 Indefinite 1988 Indefinite 1988 1986 Indefinite Indefinite 1989 1981 1981 1983 1981 1981 1981 1981 1984 1982 1980 1981 1983 1981 1981 1980 1981 Indefinite 1981 Reservoir, channel improvement and levees Reservoir� Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection - Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Beach replenishment Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection (hurricane, flood) Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Lake Pontchartrain, LA ......................... ............................. Lakeview Lake, TX ...................... ................................................... Larose to Golden Meadows, LA ................................................ Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX .. ........ . Lawrence, KS.. ..................................................... Leaf River, MS (Sec. 14) .. ................................................... Levee Unit 5, Wabash River, IN ................ ............................... Lewisville Dam, TX ........................ ................... ..... Little Blue River Channel, MO ........................................... Little Blue River Lakes, MO ..................................... . Long Branch Lake, MO ............... ..... ................................. Los Esteros Lake, NM .................. ........... ....................... .............. Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA ................................ Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA .............. Mankato and N. Mankato, MN .............. ................................. Marengo, IA ............. ......................................... Marion, KS ...................... ............ ............................... Martins Fork Lake, KY .. ........ ..... ....................................... Mason J. Niblack Levee (Pumping Facilities), IN ............... .................... McGee Creek Drainage and Leeve Dist., IL ........................................ Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME (Sec. 14) ............ ... ...................... Milan, IL ........... ........ . ..................... ............................ Minot, ND ........................................ Miss P. Aq. Area 8, Elsberry, MO ............................ ............. Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND and SD ............................. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO................ ................. Muscatine (Mad Creek), IA (Stage I) .......................................... Muskingham River Project Deficiencies, OH ... ....................... Namo River, Guam (Sec. 205) ........................................................... New Athens, IL .................................................... New London, CT .............................. ....... .. .. ........... New Orleans to Venice, LA ......... .... . . .. . ................ ... Newark, OH ........................................................ North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA ........................................ .. Optima Lake, OK ........................................................ Pago Pago International Airport, American Samoa (Sec. 14) ............... ............. Paintsville Lake, KY ............. ............ ................................... Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE ........ ........................ Park River, Hartford, CT ............................ ............. Patoka Lake, IN .............. .... ................. ................. Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO ....................... ................ ........... Phoenix AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) ................................... Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX ................... ............................ Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ........................... ... o............... Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME (Sec. 14) ................ .............................. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV .................. ......................... Rapid City, SD (Sec. 205) .................................................. ........... Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections .............. Red River below Denison Dam, TX ................ . .............. ........... Rend Lake, IL .................... .. ...... ..... .......... ................ Ririe Lake, ID .......................... ....... . .. ......... .... Rock Island, IL ..................................................... 1967 1975 1972 1970 1967 1979 1964 1979 1975 1978 1973 1974 1962 1973 1971 1978 1974 1973 1975 1979 1979 1980 1972 1979 1965 1948 1978 1976 1978 1965 1978 1969 1976 1979 1966 1979 1973 1972 1976 1972 1977 1973 1966 1975 1979 1967 1977 1965 1948 1966 1967 1971 1976 (mod.) 1969 1980 1979 1979 1978 1976 1980 1978 1980 - 1978 1974 1978 1980 1979 1970 1976 1974 Indefinite 1985 1992 1983 1981 1980 1983 1982 1984 1985 1986 1983 1986 1980 1986 1980 1980 1981 1980 1983 1980 1985 1980 1981 1982 1992 1980 1986 1980 1981 1983 Indefinite 1982 1980 1981 1980 1986 Indefinite 1981 1982 1982 1991 1982 1988 1980 1985 1980 Indefinite 1981 1979 1980 1980 Local protection (hurricane) Reservoir Hurricane protection Reservoir and channel improvement Local protection Local protection Local protection Major Rehabilitation Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Major Rehabilitation Local protection Local protection Local protection (hurricane) Local protection (hurricane) Local protection Local protection Reservoir Emergency protection Reservoir Reservoirs Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection (hurricane, flood) Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection (Levees and bank stabilization) Reservoir Reservoir Local protection B-3 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1980 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Rockford, IL (Kent Creek) ..................................... ............... Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA ........................................................... Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA .................. .................... Sacramento River Flood Control, CA .................. .......................... Sacramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, CA ................. .................... Saginaw River, MI ............................. ............... Saline River and Tributaries, IL .............................. ............................. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE ............................................... San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ................... ...................... San Gabriel River, TX .......................................... ............................ Santa Maria Valley Levees, CA ......................................... Saylorville Lake, IA ................. ........................ ................ Scajaquada Creek, NY ......... ............................................. Shelton Creek, WA .............................................. Skiatook Lake, OK ................................... ..................................... Smithville Lake, MO ............................................................ Southwestern Jefferson County, KY .................................................... St. Louis, MO .............................................. Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV ............................. . ........................ Sturgis, SD (Sec. 205) .............. ............................................ Taylorsville Lake, KY ................. ...................... ................ Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization) ........................................... Three Rivers TX ............................. ............ Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA .................................................... Tombigbee River Tributaraies, AL and MS ...................... ........................ Trinidad Lake, CO ...... ......................... .............................. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX .................................................... Wahkiakum County Cons. Diking Dist. No. 1, WA ............................. ........... Walnut Creek, CA ...... o.......o...... ......................................... Waterloo, IA ............................................................................. Waurika Lake, OK ................ .........................................- Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR ........................ ................ Willow Creek, OR ................................... .. .......... . ............ W inona, MN ........ ....... .. .. ......... ........ . .... ...... .............. Yatesville Lake, KY ...................... . .................................. Yonkers, NY ....... o........ ....................... ............................. 1979 1963 1963 1918 1949 1965 1968 1961 1957 1973 1959 1965 1978 1976 1974 1974 1974 1959 1977 1979 1974 1962 1979 1972 1965 1968 1968 1959 1964 1973 1971 1938 1974 1979 1964 1975 1964 1964 1980 1977 1973 1980 1978 1977 1977 1982 1990 Indefinite 1981 1984 1986 1980 1981 1989 1982 1982 1981 1980 1978 1985 1982 1986 1980 1987 1981 1987 1983 1982 1981 Indefinite 1981 1985 1979 1984 1982 1982 1985 1983 1984 1987 1981 Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoirs & Levees Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection (hurricane, flood) Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection B-4 APPENDIX C Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1980 Locks Dams Authorized Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Project Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length De Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (f Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL Claiborne Lock and Dam Millers Ferry Lock and Dam Jones Bluff Lock and Dam Allegheny River, PA and NY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Walter F. George Lock and Dam Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock Dismal Swamp Canal Route: Deep Creek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keystone Lock Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Black Rock Lock Black Warrior, Warrior, and Tombigbee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam 81.82 142.32 245.42 6.7 14.5 24.2 30.4 36.3 45.7 52.6 62.2 107.64 154.35 182.85 Claiborne, AL Camden, AL Benton, AL Aspinwall, PA Cheswick, PA Natrona, PA Freeport, PA Clinton, PA Kittanning, PA Templeton, PA Rimer, PA Chattahoochee, FL Columbia, GA Fort Gaines, GA 11.56 Great Bridge, VA 10.66 Deep Creek, VA 33.26 South Mills, NC 1.58 Berwick, LA 72.58 New Iberia, LA 0.0 Buffalo, NY 116.610 Coffeeville, AL 213.210 Demopolis, AL 84 84 84 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 82 82 82 75 52 52 45 36 68 110 110 600 600 600 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 450 450 450 600 300 300 300 160 30 45 45 11 13 10 12 12 13 18 22 33 25 88 16 16 16 11 12 9 10 11 11 14 11 14 19 18 13 13 13 12 11 10 11 11 10 10 11 14 13 13 3 167 167 12 127 127 12 127 127 79 97 97 8 8 8 625 5 22 22 600 600 Movable Movable Movable Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Movable Movable Movable None None None None Fixed None 3,1603 9,9003 14,9623 1,393 1,436 876 780 1,140 916 984 950 5,924 620 13,371 1973 60.5 1969 103.1 1974 88.0 1934 1934 1927 1927 1928 1931 1937 1938 7.8 9.7 6.2 5.9 9.4 6.9 9.6 9.8 99999999 1957 46.7 6 1963 28.5 6 1963 85.0 6 1932 1940 1941 1951 175 1913 1914 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 100 100 100 9 90 9 50 9 50 8 80 34.5 6 80 21 200 33 13 13 Movable 1,185 1965 96.6 9 200 40 13 13 Fixed 1,485 1962 47.9 9 200 C-1 i Channel pth Width eet) (feet) APPENDIX C (Continued) Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1980 Locks Dams Authorized Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Project Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length De Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type, (feet) Opened (miles) (fe I Channel pth Width et) (feet) Warrior Lock and Dam 261.110 Eutaw, AL Wm. Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam 338.110 Tuscaloosa, AL Holt Lock and Dam 347.010 Holt, AL John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam (new lock) 365.11o Adger, AL 110 95 110 110 600 460 600 600 22 28 64 13 13 12 12 19 13 Movable Fixed Movable 68 13 13 Fixed 1,832 1962 77.0 9 700 1940 8.9 9 1,138 1969 18.1 9 1,170 1975 42.7 9 2.7 Cocoa, FL Cape Fear River, NC Lock and Dam No. 1 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC Lock and Dam No. 2 99.0 Browns Landing, NC William O. Huske Lock and Dam 123.0 Tolars Landing, NC Central and Southern Florida S-61 Lock S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock Columbia River, OR and WA Bonneville Lock and Dam The Dalles Lock and Dam John Day Lock and Dam McNary Lock and Dam Cross-Florida Barge Canal Inglis Lock, Dam and Spillway Eureka Lock and Dam Henry H. Buckman Lock 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 56.0 Frostproof, FL 46.0 Avon Park, FL 32.0 Sebring, FL 25.0 Sebring, FL 16.0 Okeechobee, FL 12.0 Okeechobee, FL 146.0 Bonneville, OR 190.0 The Dalles, OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 282.0 Umatilla, OR 168.611 Inglis, FL 20.0 90.4 Palatka, FL Cumberland River, KY and TN Barkley Dam 30.6 Kuttawa, KY Cheatham Lock and Dam 148.7 Ashland City, TN Old Hickory Lock and Dam 216.2 Old Hickory, TN Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir 313.5 Carthage, TN 90 40 40 40 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 76 86 86 86 84 84 84 110 110 84 84 600 3 14 14 None 200 200 300 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 500 675 675 675 600 600 600 800 800 400 400 11 99 2666765 9 9 12 12 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 65 32 24 88 15 15 110 15 15 75 15 20 28 20 20 57 26 60 59 18 15 14 14 15 11 13 14 12 14 10 14 13 Fixed Fixed Fixed None None None None None None None 1965 200 200 200 200 12 125 275 1934 32.0 8 229 1917 24.0 8 220 1935 20.0 8 100 100 100 1963 8 1964 28.0 3 1967 10.0 3 1965 14.0 3 1965 7.0 3 1964 9.0 3 1964 4.0 3 20 30 30 30 30 30 30 Movable 2,680 1938 47.5 27 Movable 8,735 1957 25.0 14 Movable 5,900 1968 76.0 14 Movable 7,365 1953 64.0 14 Movable 5,100 1968 11.0 12 Movable 3,830 1971 12 None 1972 21.2 12 Movable 9,959 1964 118.1 9 Movable 801 1959 67.5 9 Movable 3,605 1957 97.3 9 Movable 1,138 1973 71.9 9 300 250 250 250 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 C-2 Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaveral Lock Fox River, WI DePere Lock DePere Dam Little Kaukauna Lock Little Kaukauna Dam Rapide Croche Lock Rapide Croche Dam Kaukauna Fifth Lock Kaukauna Fourth Lock Kaukauna Third Lock Kaukauna Second Lock Kaukauna First Lock Kaukauna Dam Kaukauna Guard Lock Little Chute Combined Lock Lower Upper Little Chute Second Lock Little Chute First (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton Fourth Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton Third Lock Appleton Second Lock Appleton First Lock Appleton Upper Dam Menasha Lock Menasha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 412 Barren River: Lock and Dam No. 113 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock Harvey Lock Algiers Lock Bayou Boeuf Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Port Allen Lock Vermillion Lock Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates 7.1 DePere, WI 7.2 DePere, WI 13.0 DePere, WI 13.1 DePere, WI 19.2 Wrightstown, WI 19.3 Wrightstown, WI 22.8 Kaukauna, WI 23.1 Kaukauna, WI 23.2 Kaukauna, WI 23.4 Kaukauna, WI 23.6 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 26.4 Little Chute, WI 26.5 Little Chute, WI 26.6 Little Chute, WI 27.3 Little Chute, WI 27.4 Little Chute, WI 30.7 Appleton, WI 30.9 Appleton, WI 31.3 Appleton, WI 31.6 Appleton, WI 31.9 Appleton, WI 32.2 Appleton, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 19.08 Intracoastal City, LA 9.1 Spottsville, KY 63.1 Calhoun, KY 108.5 Rochester, KY 149.0 Woodbury, KY 15.0 Greencastle, KY 92.6'14 New Orleans, LA 98.3'14 Harvey, LA 88.014 Algiers, LA 93.3 Morgan City, LA 131.0'15 Plaquemine, LA 228.514 Port Allen, LA 162.7 Abbeville, LA 238.5's Lake Charles, LA 404.1'1s Freeport, TX 36 36 36 36 37 37 35 35 40 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 84 84 84 36 35 56 75 75 75 75 56 84 56 75 75 146 146 146 144 144 144 144 144 147 144 144 144 144 144 145 145 144 9 7 8 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 14 7 10 8 9 10 10 8 10 12 Movable 8 10 Movable 9 10 Movable 7 7 7 6 7 6 6 6 7 6- Movable 9 6 9 8 6 8 6 Movable 7 7 Movable 8 8 Movable 6 9 7 6 7 6 Movable 7 8 Movable None 600 16 16 600 600 138 138 360 640 425 800 1,156 797 1,202 1,182 1,206 12 14 17 16 12 11 Fixed 15 12 Fixed 7 6 Fixed 7 7 Fixed 15 12 9 Fixed 99 10, 109 69 109 45 39 69 1936 986 1929 1936 588 1926 1934 461 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 603 1931 1891 1879 1879 1881 1904 562 1932 1888 654 1933 1907 549 1934 1900 1901 1884 691 1940 1899 401 1937 401 1968 482 1956 519 1956 353 1836 409 1839 276 1934 327 327 None 127 137 None 137 137 None 137' 137 None 147 14' None 147 14' None 117 117 None 137 13 None 157 15 None 1923 1935 1956 1956 1952 1961 1934 1950 1943 5.9 5.9 6.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.46 1.4 0.1 0.8 3.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 5.1 44.0 6 6 6 666 66 6 666 6 6 6 66 6 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 lOO- 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 12 125 54.0 9 45.4 9 40.5 6 19.1 6 200 200 200 200 15.1 6 200 12 12 16 16 12 12 16 16 12 150 125 150 150 125 125 200 200 125 C-3 APPENDIX C (Continued) Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1980 Locks Dams Authorize Miles Above Community Mouth In Vicinity Lift at Width Available Normal Depth on Sills of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Chamber Full Width Level Upper_ Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Colorado River, TX East Lock West Lock Hudson River, NY Troy Lock and Dam 444.8 Matagorda, TX 444.8 Matagorda, TX 153.8 Troy, NY Illinois Waterway, IL LaGrange Lock and Dam 80.2 Beardstown, IL Peoria Lock and Dam 157.7 Peoria, IL Starved Rock Lock and Dam 231.0 Utica, IL Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL Marseilles Dam 247.0 Marseilles, IL Dresden Island Lock and Dam 271.5 Morris, IL Brandon Road Lock and Dam- 286.0 Joliet, IL Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL Thomas J. O'Brien Lock and Dam 326.5 Chicago, IL 75 1,200 75 1,200 44 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 59 15 7 157 None 59 15 7 15 7 None, 493 17 16 13 Fixed 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 1,000 10 11 19 24 22 34 40 2 16 13 Movable 16 12 Movable 17 14 Movable 19 14 Movable 17 12 Movable 18 14 Movable 12 15 None 14 14 Movable 1954 1954 1,495 1917 1,066 1939 536 1939 1,280 1933 1933 819 1933 1,616 1933 2,373 1933 1933 257 1960 12 125 12 125 2.2 14 200 77.5 73.3 13.6 26.9 24.6 14.5 5.1 6.9 999 9 99 9 9 Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir Kanawha River, WV Winfield Lock and Dam Marmet Lock and Dam London Lock and Dam Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia Lock and Dam Kentucky River, KY Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 11 30.0 Alanson, MI 31.1 Winfield, WV 37.8 Marmet, WV 82.8 London, WV .8 Ellis Grove, IL 4.0 Carrolton, KY 31.0 Lockport, KY 42.0 Gest, KY 65.0 Frankfort, KY 82.2 Tyrone, KY 96.2 High Bridge, KY 117.0 High Bridge, KY 139.9 Camp Nelson, KY 157.5 Valley View, KY 176.4 Ford, KY 201.0 Irvine, KY 17.8 56 56 56 84 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 360 360 360 600 145 145 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 C-4 28 24 24 18 12 Movable 18 12 Movable 18 12 Movable 32 18 11 Movable 8 14 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 8 15 Fixed 8 6 Fixed 9 7 Fixed 6 6 Fixed 10 6 Fixed 9 6 Fixed 9 7 Fixed 11 6 Fixed 11 7 Fixed 9 6 Fixed 10 6 Fixed 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 83 1967 4.0 5 30 834 1937 36.7 9 300 707 1934 15.0 9 300 707 1934 7.8 9 300 130 1973 424 1839 400 1939 465 1844 543 1844 556 1844 413 1891 350 1897 257 1900 362 1907 472 1907 208 1906 35.0 9 225 27.0 11.0 23.0 17.2 14.0 20.8 22.9 17.6 18.9 24.6 19.9 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Project d Channel - -- Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 14 Lake Washington Ship Canal Hiram M. Chittenden Lock Large Lock Small Lock 220.9 Ravenna, KY 239.9 Willow, KY 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 1.3 Seattle, WA 1.3 Seattle, WA 52 52 52 148 148 148 80 760 28 123 17 18 17 10 6 10 6 9 6 26 33.7516 29 26 16 16 Fixed Fixed Fixed Movable 240 1910 248 1915 248 1917 235 1916 19.0 6 9.1 6 9.6 6 100 100 100 17.0 34 150 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK Norrell Lock and Dam 10.3 Arkansas Post, AR Lock No. 2 13.3 Arkansas Post, AR Dam No. 2 40.5 Arkansas Post, AR Lock and Dam No. 3 50.2 Grady, AR Lock and Dam No. 4 66.0 Pine Bluff, AR Lock and Dam No. 5 86.3 Redfield, AR David D. Terry Lock and Dam 108.1 Little Rock, AR Murray Lock and Dam 125.4 Little Rock, AR Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam 155.9 Conway, AR Lock and Dam No. 9 176.9 Morrilton, AR Dardanelle Lock and Dam 205.5 Russellville, AR Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam 256.8 Ozark, AR Lock and Dam No. 13 292.8 Fort Smith, AR W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam 319.6 Fort Smith, AR Robert S. Keer Lock and Dam and Reservoir 336.2 Sallisaw, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam 366.6 Webbers Falls, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam 401.6 Muskogee, OK Newt Graham Lock and Dam 421.6 Inola, OK Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Lock and Dam No. 26 Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dam No. 19 Lock and Dam No. 18 Lock and Dam No. 17 Lock and Dam No. 16 Lock and Dam No. 15 Lock and Dam No. 14 Lock and Dam No. 13 185.116 Granite City, IL 202.917 Alton, IL 241.417 Cap Au Gris, MO 273.41 Clarksville, MO 301.217' Saverton, M O0 324.917 Qunicy, IL 343.2'17 Canton, MO 364.217 Keokuk, IA 410.517 Burlington, IA 437.11' New Boston, IL 457.217 Muscaline, IA 482.917 Rock Island, IL 493.117 LeClaire, IA 493.317 LeClaire, IA 522.517 Clinton, IA 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 100 110 110 110 80 110 110 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 1,200 600 600 360 600 600 600 600 600 358 1,200 600 600 600 600 360 320 600 do00o 30 20 20 14 17 18 16 19 19 54 34 19 20 48 30 21 21 16 15 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 17 18 14 14 15 18 14 19 16 15 14 15 14 21 16 15 21 16 15 24 24 15 15 10 10 10 38 38 10 89 16 16 11 11 11 19 10 16 10 19 12 19 12 18 14 17 12 15 12 14 9 15 13 17 14 16 13 17 12 27 11 27 11 18 11 21 14 19 13 Fixed Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Fixed 717 1967 1967 5,010 1968 6,920 1968 6,630 1968 7,640 1968 9,080 1968 3,930 1969 1,650 1969 1,940 1969 3,290 1969 3,630 1969 4,740 1969 7,400 1970 7,230 1970 4,370 1970 11,490 1970 1,630 1970 3,240) 1963 Movable 1,725 1938 Movable 1,296 1939 Movable 4,280 1940 Movable 1,024 1938 Movable 1,066 1938 Movable 2,144 1936 Fixed 4,434 1913 1957 Movable 1,350 1937 Movable 921 1939 Movable 1,099 1937 Movable 1,203 1934 1922 Movable 1,343 1939 Movable 1,066 1939 3.0 36.9 15.8 20.3 21.8 17.3 30.5 21.0 28.6 51.3 36.0 26.8 16.6 99 9999 9999999 30.4 9 34.9 9 20.1 9 23.6 9 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 150 150 17.8 9 200 38.5 32.0 27.8 23.7 18.3 21.0 46.3 26.6 20.1 25.7 10.4 200 200 200 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 29.2 9 NS 34.2 9 NS C-5 APPENDIX C (Continued) Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1980 Locks Dams Authorize Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Project Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length De Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (f Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 5A Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 1 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam St. Anthony Falls Upper Lock and Dam Monogahela River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 Locks and Dam No. 3 Locks and Dam No. 4 Maxwell Locks and Dam Locks and Dam No. 7 Locks and Dam No. 8 Morgantown Lock and Dam Hiderbrand Lock and Dam Opekiska Lock and Dam Ohio River Lock and Dam No. 53 Lock and Dam No. 52 Smithland Lock and Dam 556.717 Bellevue, IA 583.017 Dubuque, IA 615.117 Guttenberg, IA 647.917 Lynxville, IA 679.217 Genos, WI 702.517 Dresbach, MN 714.317 Trempealeau, WI 728.517 Winona, MN 738.117 Minneiska, MN 752.817 Alma, WI 796.917 Red Wing, MN 815.217 Hastings, MN 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 847.617 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN 56 56 853.317 Minneapolis, MN 853.917 Minneapolis, MN 11.2 Braddock, PA 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 41.5 Monessen, PA 61.2 Maxwell, PA 85.0 Greensboro, PA 90.8 Point Marion, PA 102.0 Morgantown, WV 108.0 Morgantown, WV 115.4 Morgantown, WV 18.4 Mound City, IL 42.1 Brookport, IL 35.3 Smithland, KY 56 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 500 400 400 400 56 400 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 56 56 84 84 84 110 110 110 110 360 720 360 720 360 720 720 720 360 360 600 600 600 600 600 1,200 1,200 1,200 9 11 89 11 865978 12 12 38 38 17 13 Movable 19 13 Movable 15 12 Movable 16 13 Movable 22 14 Movable 18 12 Movable 17 13 Movable 18 13 Movable 18 12 Movable 17 13 Movable 17 14 Movable 22 13 Movable 16 15 13 8 Fixed 13 10 25 14 10 Movable 49 16 14 Fixed 9 9 8 8 17 17 20 20 15 19 17 21 22 12 12 12 22 22 16 16 Fixed 16 16 12 12 Fixed 12 12 20 11 Movable 20 11 21 15 Movable 21 15 11 10 Fixed 15 10 Movable 18 15 Movable 14 15 Movable 14 18 Movable 849 1938 1,278 1937 763 1936 811 1938 897 1937 940 1937 893 1936 682 1936 1,619 1935 1,367 1935 365 1938 822 1930 1948 574 1932 1917 188 1959 3,584 1963 748 1951 1953 670 1907 1907 535 1932 1932 460 1965 1965 610 1926 560 1959 410 1960 530 1960 366 1964 15 10 Movable 3,978 1929 15 11 Movable 3,073 1928 15 11 Temp. Lock 1969 34 12 Movable 3,560 1980 34 12 26.3 32.1 32.8 31.3 23.3 11.8 14.2 9.6 14.7 44.1 18.3 32.4 5.7 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.5 9 100 3.8 9 100 12.6 9 17.7 9 19.7 9 23.8 9 5.8 9 11.2 9 6.0 9 7.4 9 7.0 9 23.7 9 35.8 9 99.7 9 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 300 300 300 C-6 d Channel pth Width eet) (feet) Uniontown Locks and Dam 135.0 Uniontown, KY Newburgh Locks and Dam Cannelton Locks and Dam McAlpine Locks and Dam 204.9 Newburg, IN 260.3 Cannelton, IN 374.2 Louisville, KY Markland Locks and Dam 449.5 Markland, IN Capt. Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam 544.8 Chilo, OH Greenup Locks and Dam 640.0 Greenup, KY Gallipolis Locks and Dam 701.8 Hogsett, WV Racine Locks and Dam 743.5 Letart Falls, OH Belleville Locks and Dam 777.1 Reedsville, OH Willow Island Locks and Dam 819.3 Waverly, WV Hannibal Locks and Dam 854.6 New Martinsville, WV Pike Island Locks and Dam 896.7 Warwood, WV New Cumberland Locks and Dam 926.6 Stratton, OH Montgomery Island Locks and Dam 949.3 Industry, PA Dashields Locks and Dam 967.7 Glenwillard, PA Emsworth Locks and Dam 974.8 Emsworth, PA Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie Lock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Ortona Lock and Dam W.P Franklin Lock and Control Structure 15.1 Stuart, FL 78.0 Moore Haven, FL 93.6 LaBelle, FL 121.4 Fort Myers, FL 110 110 110 110 110 110 -56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 56 110 56 50 50 50 56 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 600 360 600 360 600 360 250 250 250 400 22 34 12 Movable 3,516 1975 22 34 12 16 16 25 25 37 37 37 35 35 30 30 30 30 23 23 22 22 22 22 20 20 21 21 18 18 21 21 18 18 10 10 18 18 13 2 11 3 32 16 32 16 38 13 38 13 49 12 19 11 19 11 50 15 50 15 45 15 45 15 45 15 45 15 18 15 18 15 37 15 37 15 37 15 37 15 35 15 35 15 38 17 38 17 17 18 17 18 17 15 17 15 16 15 16 15 13 18 13 18 17 13 16 13 14 12 10 11 12 11 13 - Movable 2,272 1975 Movable 1,965 1972 Movable 8,627 1961 1921 1930 Movable 1,395 1963 1963 Movable 1,756 1962 1962 Movable 1,287 1962 Movable 1,132 1937 Movable 1,202 1970 Movable 1,206 1969 Movable 1,128 1973 Movable 1,098 1972 Movable 1,306 1965 Movable 1,315 1961 Movable 1,379 1936 Fixed 1,585 1929 Movable 1,717 1921 170 1941 1953 104 1937 1,150 1965 Movable None Movable Movable 69.9 9 300 55.4 116.3 75.3 95.3 99 95.2 9 61.8 9 41.7 9 33.6 9 36.4 9 35.3 9 36.0 9 29.9 9 22.7 9 18.4 9 7.1 9 6.2 9 15.1 15.6 15.6 7.9 300 400 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 1,000 400 300 300 300 300 300 Old River, LA Old River Lock 304.0 Simmesport, LA Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR & LA Jonesville Lock and Dam (Black River) 25.0 Jonesville, LA Columbia Lock and Dam (Quack River) 117.2 Columbia, LA Lock and Dam No. 6 (Quack River) 223.4 Felsenthal, AR Lock and Dam No. 8 (Quack River) 282.8 Calion, AR 75 1,200 84 84 55 55 600 600 268 268 C-7 35 18 14 None 30 18 10 14 - 14 - 13 14 7 17 7 Tainter Tainter Movable Movable 80 90 90 90 1963 12 125 - 1972 - 1972 314 1923 306 1926 92.2 106.2 59.4 55.2 9 9 918 918 100 100 100 100 110 1,200 APPENDIX C (Continued) Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1980 Locks Dams Authorize Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Project Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length De Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type1 (feet) Opened (miles) (f i Channel pth Width eet) (feet) Pearl River, MS and LA Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock 28.719 Pearl River, LA 40.819 Bush, LA 14.019 Sun, LA 42.8 West Sacramento, CA Snake River, WA Ice Harbor Lock and Dam 9.7 Pasco, WA Lower Monumental Lock and Dam 41.6 Kahlotus, WA Little Goose Lock and Dam 70.3 Starbuck, WA Lower Granite Lock and Dam 108.0 Pomeroy, WA St. Marys River, MI 65 65 65 86 86 86 86 86 310 310 310 600 17 15 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 None None None 4 13 13 None 665 100 15 15 675 98 15 15 675 98 15 15 675 100 15 15 Movable Movable Movable Movable 1951 11.1 7 1951 3.2 7 1951 13.2 7 1961 1.5 13 120 2,790 1962 3,800 1969 2,655 1970 3,200 1975 31.9 14 28.7 14 37.2 14 32.0 14 South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 80 110 800 1,200 80 1,350 80 1,350 22 31 31 22 32 32 None None 22 24 23 None 22 24 23 None Savannah River, GA Savannah River Lock and Dam 187.2 Augusta, GA 56 360 15 14 12 Movable 360 1936 16.2 9 90 Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KY2m Kentucky Lock and Dam 22.4 Gibertsville, KY Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam 206.7 Hamburg, TN Wilson Lock and Dam Main Lock 259.4 Florence, AL Auxillary Lock 259.4 Florence, AL General Joe Wheeler Lock and Dam Main Lock 274.9 Florence, AL Auxillary Lock 274.9 Florence, AL Guntersville Lock and Dam Main Lock 349.0 Guntersville, AL Auxillary Lock 349.0 Guntersville, AL Nickajack Lock and Dam 424.7 Chattanooga, TN Chickamauga Lock and Dam 471.0 Chattanooga, TN 110 110 600 600 110 600 60 292 110 600 60 400 110 60 110 60 600 360 600 360 C-8 56 11 13 Tainter 7,976 1944 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 94 13 13 Bulkhead 3,728 1959 94 11 11 Bulkhead 3,728 1927 48 13 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1963 48 15 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1962 39 39 39 49 13 13 13 12 13 11 10 14 Tainter Tainter Tainter Tainter 3,837 1965 3,837 1939 3,763 1967 5,654 1940 184.3 9 52.7 9 300 300 15.5 9 300 15.5 9 300 74.1 9 300 74.1 9 300 75.7 9 75.7 9 46.3 9 58.9 9 300 300 300 300 80 80 80 250 250 250 250 1943 27 1968 1914 1919 Watts Bar Lock and Dam 529.9 Breedenton, TN 60 360 58 12 12 Tainter 2,646 1942 72.4 Fort Loudon Lock and Dam 602.3 Lenoir City, TN 60 360 72 12 12 Tainter 3,687 1943 49.8 Melton Hill Lock and Dam (Clinch River) 23.1 Kingston, TN 75 400 54 13 13 Tainter 1,072 1963 38.2 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR Lock No. 1 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 20 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 2 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 3 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 4 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 .4 Guard Lock 26.4 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 23.6 'Fixed: crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable: includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow. 2Above mouth of Mobile River. 3Includes length of earth dikes. 'From mouth of Apalachicola River. 5From mouth of Chattahoochee River. 6Above Norfolk, VA. ,With reference to mean low water. 'From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. SAverage high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. oFrom foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL. "From mouth of St. Johns River. 12Green River Dam 4 failed May 24, 1965, when a portion of the dam washed out. Repairs are deferred pending completion of General Investigation Survey on Green River. 13pool of Barren River Dam 1 is maintained for small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. "4Above Head of Passes. "From New Orleans, LA. 6Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. "Above the Ohio River. sChannel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. "eFrom mouth of West Pearl River. 2OTennessee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 2300-foot width from lock to mouth of Clinch River and 175-foot width upstream to Clinton, TN. C-9 9 300 9 300 9 30021 6 150 6 NS APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1980 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project AIWW-Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC ............................ Aquatic Plant Contol ............................................................ Atchafalaya River and Bayou Chene Boeuf and Black, LA ....................... Auasi Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (Sec. 107) ........................... Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (Sec. 107) .......................... ................ Bar Point Harbor, AK (Sec. 107) ................................................ Berkeley Marina, CA (Sec. 107) ................................................. Biloxi Harbor, MS (Sec. 107) .................................................... Brazos Island Harbor, TX (1960 Act) ............................................ Calumet Harbor & River, IL and IN ............................................ Calumet-Sag. Mod., II Waterway, IL and IN, Part 1 .............................. Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ............................... Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) ...................................... Cleveland Harbor, OH ............ .................................... Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ............................................ Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ................................................ Crescent City Harbor, CA ....................................................... Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE, Philadelphia to Sea (Anchorage) ............... Dunkirk Harbor, NY................................... ............ Elizabeth River, Southern Branch, VA .......................................... Emsworth Locks and Dams, Ohio River, PA ...................................... Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, NY ............................................... Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Chocolate Bayou, TX ................................ Honolulu Harbor, HI ............................................................. Hoonah Harbor, AK ............ ................................ ............ Inland Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE and MD, Part II ....... Kaskaskia River, IL............ .................... ........... Lock and Dam 26 Replace IL-MO .. ................................. Lock and Dam 53 (Temp. Lock), IL and KY .............................. Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbors, CA .... ........... ................... Ludington Harbor, MI ................. ....................................... Masonboro Inlet Jetties (AIWW-Wilmington Dist.), NC .......................... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System ............................... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System .............................. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ......................................................... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers ......................... Mississippi River between Missouri River & Minneapolis, MN .................... 1974 1959 1974 1978 1978 1979 1980 1979 1979 1964 1955 1962 1967 1979 1977 1972 1970 1964 1979 1979 1980 1973 1980 1979 1979 1962 1966 1980 1974 1978 1977 1977 1950 1963 1979 1910 1978 - 1980 4,1980 1980 1966 1968 1966 1968 1980 1974 1968 - Indefinite Indefinite 1979 1981 1981 1980 1980 1983 1982 Indefinite Indefinite 1982 Indefinite 1981 1983 1984 1983 Indefinite 1981 1980 1981 Indefinite 1981 1981 1981 Indefinite 1984 1989 1981 1983 1979 1980 1979 1984 1981 1992 1981 Replacement of existing bridges Control and eradication of aquatic plants Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging and breakwater Floating breakwater Breakwater Dredging Dredging and jetty expansion Dredging and channel, widening and deepening Channel improvements and relocation Replacement of existing locks and dams 43-45 inclusive Deep draft channel widening and deepening, deferred anchorage construction Rehabilitation of breakwater Rediversion of river and powerhouse construction Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging Major rehabilitation of locks and dams Dredging and beach replenishment Dredging Dredging Breakwater and dredging Dredging and bridge construction Lock, dam and channel Replace existing structure Temporary lock Dredging Dredging and breakwater Jetties Bank stabilization Locks and dams Dredging and breakwater Regulating works Rehabilitation of old Lock No. 14 at LeClaire, IA D-1 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1980 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .................. M ississippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA .............................................. M ississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA ........................................... Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to mouth ..................................... Mobile Harbor (Theodore Channel).................... ................ Monongahela River Locks and Dam 3, PA.............. ................ Murrells Inlet, SC............................................ .......... New York Harbor, NY and NJ ....................................... Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, NJ ............... ........... Newburg Locks & Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY............... ......... Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.) ................... ............ Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA .......................................... Overton'-Red River Waterway, LA ................ .................... Pohoiki Bay, HI (Secd. 107) .............................................. ............ Port Everglades Harbor, FL ............................................... Red River Emergency Bank Protectioni............... .................. Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA ............................. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA .................. ................ San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) . Santa Cruz Harbor, CA ..................".......................... Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and KY ................ .............. Squalicum, Bellingham, WA....... ................ ................. St. Lucie Inlet, FL ................. * ........... ..".... ........ Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel).................. ................ Tau Harbor, American Samoa (Sec. 107).................. ............. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS............................. Texas City Channel, TX (Industrial Canal) ........................... ............ Two Harbors, MN ................................................. Umpqua River, OR..................................................... Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ........................... Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI............................... Wallisville Lake, TX .............. ......................................... Willow Island Locks and Dam, Ohio River, OH and WV ......................... 1979 1958 1977 1912 1979 1978 1977 1976 1970 1965 1966 1964 1968 1978 1979 1973 1974 1948 1971 1962 1971 1976 1979 1976 1977 1973 1980 1979 1979 1965 1977 1967 1967 D-2 1980 1969 1967 1980 1970 1972 1982 1984 1980 1984 1982 1981 1980 1990 Indefinite 1983 Indefinite 1983 1981 1979 1981 1982 1988 1984 1990 Indefinite 1985 1979 1981 1985 1981 1986 1982 1980 1980 1982 1979 Indefinite 1982 Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No. 1 Breakwaters and seawall Dredging channel and jetties Navigation and bank stabilization Dredging Major rehabilitation of locks and dam Jetties and dredging Collection and removal of drift Dredging Replacement of existing locks and dams 46 and 47 Deep draft channel, deepening and deferred anchorage construction Replacement of existing lock and dams 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 Bank stabilization Breakwater Dredging Bank protection Channel improvement and realignment" Dredging and breakwater Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging Sand bypassing plant Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 Small boat harbor Dredging, jetties & breakwaters. Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging and Locks and dams Dredging Dredging Jetty extension Replacement of locks and dams 48 and 49 Dredging and breakwater Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity concontrol, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreation Replacement of locks and dams 15-17 APPENDIX E Multiple-Purpose Power Projects in Operation September 30, 1980 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed in Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Project Height Length Community Capability Useful Oper- Power Installation Installation Installation Functions Type2 (Feet) (Feet) in Vicinity (acre-feet)' ation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Albeni Falls, ID Pend Oreille Newport, WA 1,153,000 1952 Allatoona Lake, GA Etowah Cartersville, GA 670,000 1950 Barkley Dam & Lake Barkley, KY & TN Cumberland Grand Rivers, KY 2,082,000 1964 Beaver Lake, AR White Eureka Springs, AR 1,952,000 1963 Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpe), SD Missouri Chamberlin, SD 1,910,000 1964 Blakely Mountain Dam- Lake, Ouichita, AR Ouachita Hot Springs, AR 2,768,000 .1953 Bonneville L&D, Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Columbia Bonneville, OR 537,000 1938 Broken Bow Lake, OK Mountain Fork Broken Bow, OK 1,368,800 1968 Buford Lake Sidney Lanier, GA Chattahooche Buford, GA 2,554,000 1956 Bull Shoals Lake, AR & MO White Mountain Home, AR 5,408,000 1952 Carters Coosawattee Carters, GA 472,756 1975 Center Hill Lake, TN Caney Fork Lancaster, TN 2,092,000 1948 Cheatham L&D, TN Cumberland Ashland City, TN 104,000 1952 Chief Joseph Dam (Rufus Woods Lake), WA Columbia Bridgeport, WA 518,000 1955 Clark Hill Lake, GA & SC Savannah Augusta, GA 2,900,000 1952 Cordell Hull L&D, TN Cumberland Carthage, TN 310,900 1973 Cougar Lake, OR S. Fork, McKenzie Blue River, OR 219,000 1963 Dale Hollow Lake, TN & KY Obey Celina, TN 1,706,000 1943 Dardanelle L&D, AR Arkansas Dardanelle, AR 486,200 1969 DeGray Lake, AR Caddo Arkadelphia, AR 831,900 1969 Denison Dam (Lake Texoma), TX & OK Red Denison, TX 5,312,300 1944 Detroit Lake, OR, including Big Cliff Lake, OR North Santiam Mill City, OR 461,000 1953 Dworshak Dam & Reservoir, ID N. Fork, Clearwater Orofino, ID 3,468,000 1972 Eufaula Lake, OK Canadian Eufaula, OK 3,798,000 1964 Fort Gibson Lake, OK Grand (Neosho) Ft. Gibson, OK 1,284,400 1950 Fort Peck Dam Missouri Glasgow, MT 8,900,000 1938 1955 42,600 1950 74,000 1966 130,000 1965 112,000 1965 468,000 1956 75,000 1938 518,400 558,20 1970 100,000 1957 86,000 1953 340,000 1975 500,000 1951 135,000 1958 36,000 1956 2,069,000 1953 280,000 1974 100,000 1964 25,000 1949 54,000 1965 124,000 1972 68,000 40,00 1945 70,000 1954 118,000 1973 400,000 1965 90,000 1953 45,000 1944 185,300 - 42,600 NFPR - 74,000 FPRW - 130,000 NPFR - 112,000 FPSR - 468,000 NFPRIW 75,000 FPRWN 04 1,076,600 NPR - 100,000 FPWSR 86,000 NFPW - 340,000 FPR - 500,000 FPRW - 135,000 FPR - 36,000 NPR - 2,069,000 PIR - 280,000 NFPRS - 100,000 NPR - 64,500 NFPRI - 54,000 FPR - 124,000 NPR 0 108,000 FNPRSA - 175,000 FPSRN - 118,000 NFPRI - 1,060,000 PNFR - 90,000 FNPSR - 67,500 FPR - 185,300 NFPRIW E-1 Project River C 90 C 190 CE 157 CE 228 E 95 E 235 C 122 E 225 E 192 C 258 ER 450 CE 250 C 75 C 220 CE 200 CE 93 ER 445 C 200 C 68 E 243 E 165 C 382 C 717 E 114 CE 110 E 251 1,055 1,250 9,959 2,575 10,570 1,100 2,690 2,750 5,400 2,256 1,950 2,160 801 4,300 5,680 1,306 1,738 1,717 2,683 3,400 17,200 1,528 3,287 3,200 2,900 21,026 -- ---- -- APPENDIX E (Continued) Multiple-Purpose Power Projects in Operation September 30, 1980 Flood Control and/or Total Nav. Feature Storage Placed in Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Project He' Project River Community Capability Useful Oper- Power Installation Installation Installation Functions Type2 (F in Vicinity (acre-feet)' ation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Fort Randal Dam (Lake Francis Case), SD Missouri Garrison Dam (Lake Sakakawea), ND Missouri Gavin's Point Dam (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Missouri Green Peter Lake, OR including Foster Lake, OR Middle Sa Greers Ferry Lake, AR Little Red Hartwell Lake, GA & SC Savannah Hills Creek Lake, OR Middle F Ice Harbor L&D (Lake Sacajawea), WA Snake Jim Woodruff Dam (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL Appalach John Day L&D (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA Columbia John H. Kerr Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA Roanoke Jones Bluff L&D, AL Alabama J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones Keystone Lake, OK Arkansas Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel Libby Dam, Lake Koocanusa, MT Kootenai Little Goose L&D (Lake Bryan), WA Snake Lookout Point Lake, including Dexter Lake, OR Middle F Lost Creek Lake, OR Rogue Lower Granite L&D, WA Snake Lower Monumental L&D, WA Snake McNary L&D-Lake Wallula, OR & WA Columbia Lake Andes, SD Riverdale, ND Yankton, SD ntiam Sweet Home, OR Heber Springs Hartwell, GA ork, Willamette Oakridge, OR Pasco, WA icola Chattahoochee, FL Rufus, OR Boydton, VA Benton, AL Nashville, TN Tulsa, OK London, KY Libby, MT Starbuck, WA ork, Willamette Lowell, OR Trail, OR Pomercy, WA Kahlotus, WA Umatilla, OR 5,700,000 24,200,000 1953 1954 1954 320,000 1956 430,000 520,000 1956 1957 100,000 491,000 2,844,000 2,842,700 356,000 417,000 367,300 2,500,000 2,750,300 234,200 652,000 1,836,500 435,600 2,000,000 565,000 483,000 465,000 484,000 376,000 1,550,000 1967 1962 1961 1961 1962 1957 1968 1952 1972 1967 1964 1973 1972 1970 1954 1977 1975 1969 1953 E-2 1967 1964 1962 1962 1962 1957 1969 1953 1975 1970 1968 1978 1975 1970 1955 1977 1975 1969 1954 100,000 96,000 264,000 30,000 603,000 30,000 2,160,000 204,000 68,000 28,000 70,000 61,000 420,000 810,000 135,000 49,000 810,000 810,000 980,000 320,000 - 430,000 NFPRIW NFPRIW -100,000 NFPRIW - 100,000 - 96,000 - 330,000 - 30,000 - 603,000 - 30,000 - 2,700,000 - 204,000 - 68,000 - 28,000 - 70,000 - 61,000 420,000 848,000 - 810,000 - 135,000 - 49,000 - 810,000 - 810,000 645,0001 1,625,000 PFNIR FPRS NFPRS NFPRI NPRI NPRW NPRFI FPAR NPRW FPRW FNPWSR FPRW FPR NPRI NFPRI DFPISWR NPRIF NPRI NPRI E E E C C CE GE CE CE CE CE CE CE E R C CE CE CE CE CE CE 165 202 ight Length eet) (Feet) 10,700 11,300 74 8,700 340 243 204 304 123 67 161 144 101 147 121 282 420 160 243 345 157 155 110 1,380 1,704 17,852 2,150 2,790 6,150 5,900 22,285 14,962 2,716 4,600 1,420 3,055 2,655 3,381 3,600 3,200 3,800 7,365 Millers Ferry L&D, AL Alabama Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR Little Missouri New Melones Lake, CA6 Stanislaus Norfolk Lake, AR & MO North Fork Oahe Dam (Lake Oahe), SD & ND Missouri Old Hickory L&D, TN Cumberland Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D, AR Arkansas Philpott Lake, VA Roanoke Robert S. Kerr L&D & Reservoir, OK Arkansas Sam Rayburn Dam & Reservoir, TX Angelina St. Mary's River, MI Great Lakes Snettisham, AK8 Speel Stockton Lake, MO Sac Table Rock Lake, AR & MO White Tenkiller Lake, OK Illinois The Dalles L&D (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Columbia Water F. George L&D, GA & FL Chattahoochee Webbers Falls L&D, OK Arkansas West Point Lake, AL & GA Chattahoochee Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Wolf Creek Dam (Lake Cumberland), KY Cumberland Camden, AL 331,800 1969 Murfreesboro, AR 407,900 1950 Oakdale, CA 2,400,000 1978 Norfolk, AR 1,983,000 1943 Pierre, SD 23,500,000 1959 Hendersonville, TN 545,000 1954 Ozark, AR 148,400 1969 Bassett, VA 318,500 1951 Sallisaw, OK 493,600 1970 Jasper, TX 3,997,600 1965 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 1855 Juneau, AK 352,400 Stockton, MO 1,674,000 1969 Branson, MO 3,462,000 1958 Gore, OK 1,230,800 1952 The Dalles, OR 53,000 1957 Fort Gaines, GA 934,000 1963 Webbers Falls, OK 165,200 1970 West Point, GA 604,500 1975 Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 Jamestown, KY 6,089,000 1950 1970 75,000 1950 25,500 1979 300,000 1944 80,550 1962 595,000 1957 100,000 1969 100,000 1954 14,000 - 1972 110,000 1966 52,000 1952 18,400 1973 46,700 27,0009 1973 45,200 - 1959 200,000 1954 36,550 1957 1,806,800 1963 130,000 1974 60,000- 1975 73,375 - 1954 30,000 - 1952 270,000- 75,000 NPRW 25,500 FPRW 300,000 FIPRW 163,000 FPRS 595,000 NFPRIW 100,000 NPR 100,000 NPR 14,000 FPAR 110,000 NPR 52,000 FPWR 18,400 NP 73,700 P 45,200 FPRW 200,000 FPR 36,550 FPR 1,806,800 NPR 130,000 NPRW 60,000 NPR 108,375 FPRW 30,000 FPR 270,000 FPR CE 90 11,380 C 183.5 941 ER 625 1,560 C 216 2,624 E 245 9,300 CE 98 3,605 C 58 2,480 C 220 892 E 75 7,230 CE 120 19,430 Control Gate Clo 18 338 128 5,100 CE 252 6,423 E 197 4,350 CR 300 8,875 CE 114 13,585 E 84 4,370 CE 97 7,250 CE 159 17,695 CE 258 5,736 Nomenclature for Project Functions: A -Low Flow Augumentation D -Debris Control F -Flood Control I -Irrigation N -Navigation P -Power R -Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S -Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) 'Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool level 2G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 3Above streambed 4Bonneville Second Powerhouse 5McNary Second Powerhouse Units 6 Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Water and Power Resources Services 'Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration 'Crater Lake Unit 9Weir for Long Lake E-3 APPENDIX F MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION - SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Nameplate Project Year for for Scheduled Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Bonneville Second Power House, OR and WA ................................. 1974 1981 1984 PR 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO ....................................... 1966 1983 1984 FSRPW 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ...................... 1965 1981 1985 FRPRW 160,000 Libby Additional Units 5-8, MT .............................................. 1967 1984 1984 P 420,000 Richard B. Russel Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC ............... 1975 1986 1987 FRP 600,000 St. Stephens, Cooper River, SC .............................................. 1977 1983 1983 NWD 84,000 KEY D -Redevelopment F -Flood Control I -Irrigation N -Navigation P -Power R -Recreation S -Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife F-1 Capacity Ultimate Installation 558,200 58,000 160,000 420,000 600,000 84,000 APPENDIX G FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS PROJECTS By District (in thousands of dollars) By Region (in thousands of dollars) Cumulative Cur DISTRICT During FY 80 Through FY 80 Region During FY 80 Throu New England Mid-Atlantic Gulf and South Atlantic Ohio Tennessee Great Lakes Upper Mississippi Souris-Red-Rainy Missouri Arkansas-Red-White Lower Mississippi Rio Grande Texas and Gulf Colorado Great Basin California Columbia-North Pacific Alaska Hawaii Memphis New Orleans St. Louis Vicksburg Kansas City Omaha New England Baltimore New York Norfolk Philadelphia Buffalo Chicago Detroit Rock Island St. Paul Alaska Portland Seattle Walla Walla Huntington Louisville Nashville Pittsburgh Pacific Ocean Charleston Jacksonville Mobile Savannah Wilmington Los Angeles Sacramento San Francisco Albuquerque Fort Worth Galveston Little Rock Tulsa 75,911 16,740 28,086 289,655 0 9,594 00 2,243 108,025 4,087,675 46,260 14,910 117.761 0 1,981,428 514,257 2,117 4,254 7,298,916 1,050,000 2,189,004 0 82,297 0 2,243 74,499 4,228 13,259 0 993 8,760 0 506 00 2,117 509,360 2,846 2,051 103,422 139,768 23,002 23,463 4,254 134 0 21,190 2,245 4,517 1,851,209 247,980 0 46,379 1,159 13,751 3,803 100,477 7,298,916 iulative gh FY 80 4,966,506 40,981,355 1,043,447 21,664,977* 3,918,598 1,433,527* 642,736 2,295,278 62,054 5,532 25,252 362,134 45,444 30,606 506,502* 271,122* 17,319 3,005,312 180,690 71,113 2,951,541 845,035* 423,996 2,678,285 9,867 3,0311 489,645 138,684 13,392 130,9021 6,352,833 1,929,925 56,621* 217,712* 1,027,192* 2 311,437 251,339* 833,017* 100,193,968 *Revised Figures 'Adjustment in boundaries of Charleston and Wilmington Districts 2Includes 2 projects previously in New Orleans District TOTAL 665,736 2,350,364 775,654* 6,889,371* 9,486 411,695 1,676,590* 185,732* 5,352,125* 2,077,468* 66,692,262* 145,176* 1,338,629* 312,331 3,525 8,023,523* 3,257,115 17,319 9,867 100,193,968 TOTAL G-1 INDEX The following abbreviations are used in the index: LMK VICKSPURG, MISS., DISTRICT LMM MEMPHIS, TENN., bDISTRTCT LMN NFf ORLEANS, LA., OISTRICT LMS ST. LOUTS, MO., DISTRICT MR&T MISSISSIPPI, RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES PROJECT MRK KANSAS CITY, MO*, DISTRICT MRO OMAHA, NEAR., DISTRICT NAP MALTIMOURE, MOt OIbTRTCT NAN NFW YORK, N.Y., ISTDTCT NAO NORFULKe VA., DISTRICT NAP PHILADELPHIA, PAp DISTRICT NCB 8IJFFALO, N.Yo, DISTRICT NCC LHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT NCO MISSISSIPPI RIVER BFTWEFN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. NCE DETROTT, MICH., DISTRTCT NCR ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT NCS ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT NED NEW ENGLAN DIVISION NPA ALASKA DISTRICT NPP PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT A ABERDEEN CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 ABERDEEN, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 ABILENE, KANS. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22 AgIDUTU DAM, N. MEX. (SWA) 17-6, 17-13, 17-lb ABSECON CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 ABSECON INLET, N.J. (NAP) 3*2, 3-21, 3-24 ACCONTINK CREEK, VA. (NAB) 4-39 ADAMS CREEK, S. C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-17 ADAMS LFVEE, IN. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-31 ADAMS, HUOSIC RIVER BASIN, MASS. (NAN) 2-5 ADUTCKS DAM, TEX. (SMwG) I-.2 ADDISON, N.Y. (NAB) 4-17, p4-31, 4-, *4- ADENA, OHIO (SHORT CREEK) (ORP) 26-21 26-30 AOKIN BRANCH LENOIR COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-22 AFONO AREA AND AUA AkEA, AMERICAN SAMOA (POO) 36-13 AGANA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, GUAN (POD) 36-12 ALA WAI SMALL bOAT HARBOR, OAHU HAWAII (POD) 36-12 ALABAMA BAYOU, LA. (MR+T) 42-24 ALABAMA RIVER AT MONTGOMERY, ALA. (SAM) 10-AR ALARAMA-COOSA HIVERS, ALA. AND GA. (SAM) 1A-19, 10-31, lA-AD, l- 45 ALAMEDA CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 ALAMU LAKE, 8ILL WILLIAMS RIVER, ARIZ. (SPL) 3)3-7, 33W21 ALAMOGORDO DIVERSION CHANNEL, TULAROSA (CLOSED) BASIN, NEW MEXICO (SWA) 17-1b ALBANY AND PORTS ON HUDSON RIVER NY 53-5 ALBEMARLE AND CHESAPEAKE CANAL (GREAT BRIDE, VA.) NAO 5-29 ALBENI FALLS DAM, D1AHO (NAS) 3*-IA, 3 A8-193 W-25 ALbUQUEROUE DIVERSION CHANNELS N. MEX. (SWA) 17-1 17-13 ALFORD, GREEN RIVER, MA. (NEU) 1-A5, 1-47 ALGOMA HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-90 ALHAMBRA CREEK, CA. (SPN) A-I0, A3-15, 34-19, 3*-21 ALMAMBRA OASH, RIO HONDO BASIN, CA. (SPL) 3-31I ALISO CREEK DAM, (INACTIVF), SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-34 ALLATOONA LAKE, COUSA RIVER RASTN, GA, (SAM) 10-22, 10-31, ID-AD ALLFGANYA , UN.IrY U(IFITVE MILE CREEK AREA) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 ALLEGANY, N.Y. UNIT 1 (ALLEGHFNY RIVER) (ORP) 26-27, 2b-30 ALLEGHENY RV, PA. (ORP) ?b-2, 26-18, 26-21l ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. LOCKS AND DAMS (ORP) 26-23 ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA., OPEN-CmANNEL WOR (0RP) 26-26 ALLFNTUWN, LEHIGH RIVEFR, PA, (NAP) 3-30 ALLENVILL, ALRIZ. (SPL) 33-, 33-1 NP S NP UORRUM ORL ORN ORP POD SAJ SAM SAN :AS SAW SPK SPL SPN SWA SWF SWG SWL bWT SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER DIVIblUN HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KY., OIVISION NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT PITTSBURGH, PA.t DISTRICT PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION JACKSONVTLLE, FLA., DISTRICT MORILE, ALA., DISTRICT CHARLEST10N, S.C., DISTRICT SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT LUS ANGtLES, CALIF., DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT ALBUQUENRQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT FORT WORTH, TED., DISTRICT GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK, ARK. DISTRICT TULSA, UKLAo., DISTRICT ALLEY BAY, RBEALS, ME., MA, (NED) 1-47 ALLIGATOR HARBOR. FLA, (SAM) 10-43 ALLYWAY CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 ALLUVIAL VALLEY MAPPIN (MR+T) 42-3 ALMA HARBOR, WISt (NCD) 29-8, 29-11 ALMOND LAKE, N.Y. (NAB) 4-1T, 4-31, 4-43, 4-44 ALMOND VILLAGE, N. Y, (NAB) 4-46 ALOHA-RIGOLEITE AREA, GRANT AND RAPIDES PARISHES, LA. (LMN) 11-53 11-54 ALPENA HARBOR, MICH, (NCE) 31-2, 31-55, 31-69 ALPINE DAM, ROCKFORD, ILL. (NCR) 28-16 ALPINE, IEXAS (SNA) 17-16b ALSEA RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-47 ALTERATION OF BERWICK BAY BRIDGE (LMN) 11-50 ALTERNATIVE FOR SUGAR HILL RESERVOIR (NED) 1-49 ALTON HARBORS, ILL. (NCD) 29-12 ALTON, IN. (ORL) 24-31 ALTUS RESERVOIR, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SAT) 19I-18S 19-35 ALUM CREEK LAKE, OHIO (ORH) 25-4r, 25-Tb ALVIN R. RUSH DAM, PA. (NAB) 4-24e# 4-3 AMAZON CREEK, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 AMERICAN LAKE, VICINITY OF FORT LEWIS, WASH. (NPS) 38-28 AMERICAN RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-30 AMES LAKE, IOWA (NCC) 28-18 AMESBURY, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-46 AMESBURY, POWWOW RIVER, MA. (NED) 1-A7 AMITE RIVER AND BAYOU MANCHAC, LA. (LMN) 11-50 AMITE RIVER AND TRIRUTARIES, LA. (LMN) 11-54 AMITE RIVER, LA. (MR+T) 42-16, 42-23, 92-28, 42-51, 42/57 AMSTEROAM, OHIO (ORP) 26-?9, 26-30 ANACORTES HARBOR, WASH, (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 ANACORTES NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WASH. (NPS) 38-27 ANACOSTIA RIVER AND FLATS (NAB) 4--39 ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, 0. C. AND MO. (NAB) 4-14t, 4-30,v 4-38 ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, PRICE GEORGES CO., MD. (NAB) 4- 46 ANAHEIM BAY HARBOR, ORANGE COUNTY, CA. (SPL) 33-31 ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TEX. (SwG) 15-10 ANCHORAGE HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-I, 40-9, 40-10 ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA, (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 AND IDAHO (NPW) 39-10, 39-19, 36-16, 39-23, 39q-24 ANDALUSIA HARBOR, ILL. (NCD) 29-2, 29-9, 29-12 ANDERSON PARK, NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (NAO) 5-24 ANDOVER LAKE, CT. (NED) 1-99 ANDREWS RIVER, HA. (NED) 1-2, 1-28 ANGLER-USE SITES, MERAMEC BASIN, MO. (LMS) 14-21 ANNAPOLIS HARBOR, MD. (NAB) 4-39 ANSONIA, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-45, 1-47 APALACHEE BAYT, FLA. TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. (SAM) 10-36 APALACHICOLA BAY TO ST. MARKS RIVER, FLA. (SAM) 10-36 I-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 APALACHICOLA BAY, FLA. (SAM) 10-2, 10-28, 10-33 APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FLA. (SAM) 10-36 APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA. GA. AND FLA. (SAM) 10-22, 10-31, 10-40, 10-46 APUON MOUTH OF YUKON RIVER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-11 APPELTON FIRST LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 APPELTON FOURTH LOCK, WIS. (CC) 31-89 APPELTON LOWER DAM, wTS. (NCC) 31-89 APPELTON SECONO LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89q APPELTON THIRD LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. (NPP) 37-20, 37-35, 37-4 APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-2, 5-17t 5-20 APPONAUG COVE, R.I. (NED) 1-39 APPOQUINIMINK RIVER, DEL. (NAP) 3-28 AGUASHICULA RESERVOIR, PA. (NAP) 3-30 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL BUFFALO, NY.e DISTRICT (NCO) 32-43 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT (SAN) 7-2, 7-11, 7-13, 7-17 GALVESTON, TX., DISTRICT (SWG) 15-2, 15-17, 15-21, 15-32 JACKSONVILLE, FL,, DISTRICT (SAJ) 9-2, 9-14, 9-26, 9-28, 9*31 MOBILE, AL., OISTRICT (SAM) 10-3, 10-28, 10-33 NFM ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-2, 1-28 NEW ORLEANS, LA., OISTRICT (LMN) 11-2, 11-35, 11-40 NEW YORK, NY., DISTRICT (NAN) 2-2, 2-30, 2-34 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT (NAP) 3-28 SACRAMENTO, CA., DISTRICT (SPK) 35-30 SAVANNAH, GA., OISTRICT (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-12, 8-15 SEATTLE, WA., DISTRICT (NPS) 38-8 SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION (SwG) 15-2, 15-17, 15-21, 15-32 WILMINGTON, NC., ODISTRICT (SAW) 6-27 AQUIA CREEK, VA. (NAB) 4-39 AQUILLA LAKE, TFX. (SWF) b16-3, bt-17, 16-20 ARBUCKLE RESERVOIR, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-18, 19-35 ARCADIA HARBOR, MICH, (NCE) 31-3, 31-55, 31-69q ARCADIA LAKE, DEEP FURK RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-5, 19-23 ARCADIA WASH SYSTEM, RIO HONDO BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 ARCADIA, WIS. (NCS) 27-23 ARCH CREEK, DADE COUNTY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-52 ARCHERS CREFK, S. C. (SAN) 7-17 AROSLEY, N.Y. (NAN) 2-18, 2-32, 2-38 AREA EAST OF ALBANY, OREG. (NPP) 137-53 ARECIBU HAR8OR, P. R. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 ARGYLE, MINN. MIDDLE RIVER (NCS) 27-24 ARK-RFD RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL (SwT) 19-6 ARK-ED RIVEM BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, OKLA. AND TEX. (SWT) 19-6 ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES (SWT) 19-6, 19-23 ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLURIDE CONTROL, WICHITA RIVER, TEX. (bWT) 19-6, 19-23 ARKABUTTA LAKE, MISS. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-21, 42-60 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK. OKLA. & KANS, (SWL) (SWT) (MR&T) 18-?e 1-11, 18-15, 18-lta 18-13 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., AND KANS. (SWT) 19-3 ARKANSAS RIVER STANDARD REVEIMENTS AND DIKES (MR+T) 42-29 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. PROJECT LEVEES (MR+T) 42-48 ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK (MR+T) 42-51 ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK (PR+T) 42-51 ARKPORT DAM, N.Y. (NAB) 4-18, 4-31, 4-43, 4-44 ARLINGTON LAKE, MO. (MRK) 20-22 ARLINGTON, ALKALI CANYON, UREG. (NPP) 37-54 ARMUCHEE CREEK, A, (SAM) 10-44 ASHLAND HARBUR, IS. (NCS) 31-3, 31-55, 31-69 ASHLAND, KY. (URH) 25-27 ASHLEY RIVER, S. C. (SAN) 7-17 ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (NCB) 32-2, 32-11, 32-26, 32-31 ASQUIROGA BAY SHORELINE, GUAM (POD) 36-13 ASTORIA TURNING BASIN, OREG. (NPP) 37-47 ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY PROJECT LEVEES (MR+T) 42-46 ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA. (LMN) 11-3, 11-35, 11-40 ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, MORGAN CITY TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA* (LMN) 11-4, 11-35, 11-40 ATCHALAFAYA RIVER BASIN, LA. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-14, 42-23, 42-23, 42-29, 42-338 42-34, 42-51, 42-52, 42-56 ATCHALAFAYA RIVER, SIANDARD REVETMENTS (MR+T) 42-33, 42-34 ATCHISON# KANS. (MRK) 20-22 ATHALIA, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 ATHENS, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 ATLANTIC BEACH CHANNELS, N,C, (SAW) 6-27 ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 ATLANTIC COAST OF N.J. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLETS (NAN) 2-44 ATLANTIC GULF SHIP CANAL, FLA. (SAJ) 9-44 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK. VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NAOYSAW) (SAN) (SAS) (SAJ) 7-2v 7-11 7-13 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-2 , 9-26 9-31 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) (SAW) 6-2, 6-21p 6-24 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETAEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER (NAOrSAWeSANSASSAJ) 5-2e 5-17, 5-20, 5-24 AU SABLE HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 AEASI HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA (POD) 36-1, 36-8 AUBBEY LAKE, TEl. (SAF) 16-3, 16-17, 16-20 AUBURN N.Y. OWASCO OUTLET (NCB) 32-46 AUGUST LEVEE, KANS. (SWT) 19-37 AUGUSTA TO CLAREDON LEVEE (MReT) 42-11 AUGUSTA, KY. (ORH) 25-27 AUNUU HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA (POD) 36-2, 36-8 AURORA, WESTERLY CREEK*KELLEY ROAD DAM, COLOHADO (MRO) 21-20 AVOCAe N.Y. (NAB) 4*18s 4*31, 4*43, 4-44 AVON HARBOR, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA. (NAB) 4-16, 4*31, 4-42 B B. EVERETT JORDAN 0DAM AND LAKE N.C. (FORMERLY NEW HOPE LAKE, NC.) (SAW) 6-12, 6-22 BACHELOR ISLANO, WASH. (NPP) 37-52 BACK CREEK, MD, (NAB) 4-40 BAD RIVER, BANK PROTECTION, FORT PIERRE, S.D. (MRO) 21-20 BAD STOUX RIVER, SCHOFIELD BRIDGE NEAR FLANOREAU, S.U. (MRO) 21- 20 BAGADUCE RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39 BAGAOUCE RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39, 1-49 BAILEY, R.U. LAKE, W.VA, (ORH) 25-12, 25-18 BAINBRIDGE, N. Y. (NAB) 4-46 BAIRBOURVILLE, KY. (ORN) 23-18 BAKER, BROOK, MA. (NED) 1-46, 1-49 BAKERS HAUILOVER INLET, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 BALOWIN ANU HANNON SLOUGHSo MONTGOMERY, ALA. (SAM) 10-44 BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT. (NED) 1-13 BALLONA CREEK CHANNEL AND JETTIES, BALLONA CREEK BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31i, 33-32 BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRIC1) (NAU) (NAB) 5-3, 5"17, 5-20 BALTIMORE HARRUR AND CHANNELS, MD. (NAB)(NAO) 4-2, 4*33, 4-29 BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN STREAMS, MARYLAND (BERH) 41-4 BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES (MR+T) 42-3t1, 42"32, 4e-36, 42-36, 42-"40, 42-42, 42-44 BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION ARK. (SWL) 18-'2, 18-11, 18-19, 18-17, 18-20 BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK., AND UKLA. (SwT) 19-4, 19-23 BANK STABILIZATION, INDEX, ARK. TO DENNISON DAM, TEX. (RED RIVER WATERWAY) (SWT) 19-36, 19-37 BANK STABILIZATIUN, RED RIVER BELOW OENNISUP (SWT) 19-37 BANNER SPECIAL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 BANNING LEVEE-SAN GOHGONIO RIVERe WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-35 BAR HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 BAR POINT HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-10 BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA. (LMN) 11-4, 11-35, 11-40 BARBERS POINT HARBOR OAHU HAWAII (POD) 36-2, 36-8, 36-10 BAkCELONA HARBOR, NY. (NCB) 32-2, 32-3, 32-26 BARDOWELL LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-3, 16-17, 16-20 BARKER DAM, TEX. (SWG) 15-42 BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE RARKLEY, KY. AND TENN. (ORN) 23-2, 23-14, 23 -19 BARNARD. KANS. (MRK) 20-22 BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-21, 3-24 BARNESAT LIGHT, N.J. (NAP) 3-3e 3-29 BARNETT CREEK, KY. (ORL) 24-31 BARRE FALLS DAM, MA. (NED) 1-i13, 1-30, 1-44 BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24-7e 24-21, 24-34 BARTLEYe NEBR. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22 BASS HARBOR BARe ME. (NED) 1-39 BASS HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 BASSETT CREEK, MINN. (NCS) 27-3e 27-17 BASTROP BAYOU, TEX. (SAG) 15-32 BATAVIA AND VICINITY, TONAWANDA CREEK, N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 BATHe N. V,. (NAB) 4-45, 4-46 BATON ROUGE AND LAKE CHARLES, LA. 53-5 BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVIL'S SWAMP)e LA. (MR+T) 42-b6, 42-23, 42-24, 42-28, 42-29, 42-30, 42-58, 42-57 BATTLE CREEK, BANK PROTECTION, BATTLE CREEK, NESB. (MRO) 21-20 BAUD4TTE HARBOR, MINN. (NCS) 27-21 BAY CITY HARBOR, WIS. (NCD) 29-3, 29"8, 29-12 BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-30, 2-34 BAY RIVER, NC, (SAW) 6-27 BAYARD, W. VA. (NAB) 4-46 BAYFIELD HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-90 BAYO PLAQIEMINE BRULE, LA. (LMN) 11-50 BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES ARK,. AND LA. (LMK) 12-5, 12-8, 12-9, 12-11p 12-12 BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, ARK. AND LA. (LMN) 11-24, 11-37, 11 45, 11-52 BAYOU BOUCAU RESERVOIR, LA. (LMN) 11-25, 11-37, 11-45 BAYOU BOOCAU RESERVOIR, LA. (LMN) 11-51 BAYOU BODCAU, RED CHUTE, AND LOGGY BAYOU, LA. (LMN) 11-54 BAYOU BONFOUCA, LA. (LMN) 11-50, 11-53- BAYOU CHOUPIQUEo LA. (LMN) 11-54 BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-15, 42-25, 42-29, 42-56, 42-59 BAYOU CODEN ALA. (SAM) 10-3, 10-28, 10-33 BAYOU DORCHEAT, LOGGY BAYOU AND LAKE BISTENFAU, LA. (LMN) 11-50 11-53 BAYOU DUPRE, LA. (LMN) 11-50 BAYOU GALERE, MISS. (SAM) 10-44 BAYOU GROSSE TETE, LA. (LMN) 11-50 BAYOU LA BATRE, ALA. (SAM) 10-3, BAYOU 10-28, 10-33 LA LAUTRE, ST. MALO) AND YSCLOSKEYILA (LMN) 11O50 BAYOU LACOMBE, LA. (LMN) 11-50 BAYOU LAFOACrIE, LA. (LMN) 42-22 BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA. (LMN) 11-5 11* 35, 11-40. BAYOU MANCHOC AND AMITE RIVER (BERH) 41-S BAYOU NICHOLAS, COUSHATTA, LA. (LMN) 11-54 BAYOU NICHULAS-COUSHATTA, LA. (LMN) 11-52 BAYOU QJUEVE OE TORTUE, LA. (LMN) 11O50 BAYOU RAPIDES, LA. (LMNe MR+T) (LMN) 11-54 BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA. (LMN) 11-50 BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA. (LMN) 11*6, 11-35, 11-40 BAYOU TECHE, LA. (LMN) 11*7, 11-35, 11-41, 11-47 BAYOU TERREBONNE, LA. (LMN) 11-50 BAYOU VERMILION, LA. (LMN) 11-50 BAYOU, PIERRE, LA. (LMN) 11-25, 11-37, 11*45, 11-52, 11-53, 11-54 BAYOUS D'ARBONNE AND CURNEY LA. (LMK) 12-11 1-2 INDEX BAYOUS DES GLAISES DIVERSION CHANNEL, LA. (MR+T) 42-23, 42-25, 42-28, 42-52, 42-57 BAYOUS RAPIDS BOEUF AND COCODRIE (MR+T) 42-52 8AYPORT HARBOR, MICH, (NCE) 31-90 BAYPORT, FLA, (SAJ) 9-440 542 BAYTOWN, TEX. (SWG) 15-12, 1519 130, 1542 BEACH FORK LAKE, w,VA. (ORH) 25-5, 25-16 BEALS HARBOR, HE. (NED) 1-39 BEALS ISLAND, ME. (NED) 1-25 BEAR CREEK (SPK) 35-17 BEAR CREEK DAM (CITY OF HANNIBAL, MO.) (NCR) 2818 BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO. (MRO) 21-3, 21-14 BEAR CRFEK WATERSHED, TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TEXAS (BERH) 41-4 BFAR CREEK, HANNIBAL, MO. (NCR) 28-16 BEAR CREEK, KENDRICK, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 BEAR CREEK, LA QUINTA, CA. (SPL) 33*35 BEAR CREEK, LONG TOM RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 BEAR RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-4, 35-22 BEARDS RROUK RESEVOIR, N*H. (NED) 1-49 BEATRICE RIG,BLUE RIVER, NEBR. (MKR) 20-21, 20-22 BEAUFORT HARBOR, N.C. (SAW) b6-3 6-21. 6-25 BEAVER AND MAHONING RIVERS, PA, AND OHIO (ORP) 26-26 BEAVER AND MAHONING RIVERS, PA. AND OHIO (RP) 26-26 BEAVER BAY HARBOR, MICH, (NCS) 314, 31-55, 3169 dEAVER BROOK LAKE, N.H. (NED) 1-49 BEAVER CREEK NEAR TILLAMOOKr OREG. (NPP) 37-54 BEAVER CREEK, MONTEZUMA, GA, (SAM) 10-44 BEAVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OREG. (NPP) 37-15, 37-34, 37-42, 3749 BEAVER LAKE, ARK. (SWL) 18-7, 18.12t 18-21 BEAVER SLOUGH AT CLINTON, IOWA (NCD) 29 2 29-10, 29-12 BEDFORD, EAST FORK, 102 RIVER, IOWA (MRK) 20-22 BELFAST HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 BELHAVEN HARBOR, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 BELL DRAINAGE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-17 BELL FOLEY LAKE, WHITE RIVER ARK. (SL) 18-21P 18-22 BELLATHE, OHIO (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 BELLAMY RIVER, N.H. (NED) 1-39 BELLE FOURCHE, BELLE FOURCHE RIVER, S.D. (MO) 21-20 BELLE FOURCHE, CHEYENNE RIVER, S. OAK. (MRO) 21-21 BELLE RIVER HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-0, 31-55, 31-69 BELLEVILLE LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO (OR) 22-2, 22-A BELLEVUE HARBOR, IOWA (NCD) 29-12 BELLEVUE, KY. (ORL) 24-31 BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WASH. (I AND J STREET WATERWAY) (NPS) 3827 BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WASH. (NPS) 38-21 3B-1 7 38-20 8ELLINGHAM, SQUALICIEM SMALL BOA HARBOR WASH. (NPS) 382, 38-17, 38-21 BELPRE, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 BELTON LAKE MODIFICATION, TEX. (SWF) 16-15 BELTON LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-4, 16-17, 16-20 BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA. (NAP) 3-1b, 3-23 BELZONI CITY, MISS. (MR+T) 42*8 BENBROOK LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-4, 16-17 16-20 BENEDICT CANYON SYSTEM, BALLONA CREEK BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 8ENNETT-MCDONALDO-SMITHLAND 0.0., LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 BENNINGTON RESERVOIR, N.H. (NED) 1-49 BENNINGTON, VT, (NAN) 2-45 BENSON CREEK AREA (ORL) 24-31 BFNWOOD, W. VA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 BERKELEY HARBOR, CA. (SPN) 34-20 BERKELEY MARINA, CA. (SPN) 34-20 BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO (ORP) 26-4, 26-18 BETHLEHEM, PA. (NAP) 3-30 BETTENDORF, IOWA (NCR) 28-4, 28-011 28-14 BETTERTON HARBOR, MD. (NAB) 4-40 BEVERLY HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 BID SIIAMICO HARBUR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 BIG (CUNNINGHAM) CREEK, OHIO (NCB) 32-43 BIG AND LITTLE SALLISAW CREEKS NAVIGATION PROJECT, OKLA. (SWT) 19-3, 19-23 BIG BAY HARBOR, MICH. (NCS) 31-S5, 31-55E 31-70 BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARNE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, S.D. (MRO) 21-10. 21-15 BIG 8FND, W.VA. (ORH) 25-28 BIG BLACK RIVER, MISS. (LMK) 12-11, 12-12 BIG BLUE LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-7, 24-21, 24-35 BIG BLUE RIVER, SEWARD, NEBR. (MRK) 20-22 BIG CEDAR CREEK, GA. (SAM) 10-45 BIG CHOCTAW BAYOU, LA. (LMK) 12-12 BIG CREEK AND L'ANQUILLE RIVER, WHITE RIVERR BASIN, ARK. (LMM) 13 -q9 BIG CREEK CANAL, MILLINGTON, TENN. (LMM) 13-9 BIG OERBY, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 BIG DRY CREEK DAM AND DIVERSION, CA. (SPK) 35-30 BIG ORY CREEK DAM, CA. (SPK) 35-17 BIG FOSSIL CREEK, TEX. (SwF) 16-23 BIG HILL LAKE, VERRDIGRIS RIVER BASIN KANS. (SWTI) 19-7, 19-23 BIG HOLE RIVER, PENNINGTON BRIDGE, NEAR TWIN BRIDGES, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 BIG HORN RIVER, TWO LEGGIN BRIDGE, NEAR HARDIN, MONT. (MAD) 21-19 BIG LAKE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. (SAJ) A-43 BIG PIGEON AND LITTLE PIGEON BAYDOS, LA. (LMN) 11-50 BIG PINE LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, TE. (SAT) 197 19-23 BIG PRAIRIE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-17 BIG RUN, PA. (ORE) 26-29, 26-30 BIG SANDY LAKE, TEX2 (SE) 16 16 6-20 BIG( OSRAM)N DY2 5-R7I,V ER2,5 -9W,. VA2.5 -2A0ND KY. INCLUDLING LEVISA AND TUG FORKS BIG SIOUX RIVER AT 50 0CITY, I.A AND S.D. (MRO) 21*3, 21-14 BIG SIOUX RIVER, FINK BRIDGE, NEAR FLANDREAU RAPID CREEK, RAPID CITY, S.D. (MR ) 21-20 BIG SIOUX RIVER, .1 A K. AND IOWA (MRO) 21-2, 21-18 BIG SLOUGH I MAYO 0ITCH, ARK. (MR+T) 42*S8 BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA, KY. AND BIGT ENSNP.R IN(GO,R N)T FX2.3 -5(,S HE2)3 -1106-23 BIG STONE LAKE AND wHETSTONE RIVER, MINN. AND S. DAK. (NCS) 27-4, 27-17 BIG STRANGER CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MISS. (LMK) (MR+T) 18-?2 18-23, 18-24, 18-25, 16-28, 18-59 BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MISS. (LMK)(MR&T) 12-11 BIG SWAN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILLINOIS RIVER, ILL. (LMS) 14-13 BIG TIMBER CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-2. BIG WALNUT LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-7, 24-21, 24-35 BIG WALNUT, UHIO (ORH) 25-28 BIG WASH, MILFORD, BEAVER COUNTY, UT. (SAC) 35-30 BIG WASH, MILFORD, UTAH (SPK) 35-17 BILLINGS, MONTANA (MRO) 21-21 BILOXI HARBOR, MISS. (SAM) 10-4, 10-28, 10-33 BINGHAMTON, N.Y. (NAB) 4-18, 4-31, 4-43, 4-44 BIRCH HILL DAM, MA. (NED) 1-13, 1-44 BIRCH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-7, 19-23, 19-34 BIRCH, WVA. (ORH) 25-28 BIRD ROCK AREA, LA JOLLA, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA. (SPL) 33-31 BISCAYNE BAY, FLA., HURRICANE PROTECTION (SAJ) 9-52 BISHOP CREEK, PELHAM, ALA. (SAM) 10-45 BLACK BAYOU LAKE, LA. (LMN) 11-53 BLACK BAYOU RESERVOIR, LA. (LMN) 11*54 BLACK BAYOU-PINE ISLAND AREA, LA. (LMN) 11-54 BLACK CREEK, GADSDEN, ALA. (SAM) 10-44 BLACK FORK AT HENDRICKS, W. VA. (ORP) 26-30 BLACK RIVER (ALCONA CO.), MICH. (NCE) 31-90 BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MICH. (NES) 31-5e 31-55, 31-70 BLACK RIVER HARBOR, N.Y. (NCB) 32-13, 32-14, 32-43 BLACK RIVER POPLAR BLUFF, MO. TO KNOBEL ARK. (SWL) 18-22 BLACK RIVER, (PORT HURON), MICH. (NCE) 31-5, 31-55, 31-70 BLACK RIVER, ARK. & MO. (SWL) 1B-20, 18-22 BLACK RIVER, HARNETT COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) b-11, 6-22 BLACK RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 BLACK RIVER, wIS. (NCS) 27-21, 27-23 BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY. (NCA) 32-3, 32-4 32- 26, 32-31, 32-32 BLACK HOCK LAKE, CT. (NED) 1-17, 1-31, 1-45 BLACK WALNUT HARBOR, MO, (NAB) 4-40 BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (SAM) 10-4, 10-26, 10- 28, 10-34, 10-41 BLACKBIRD CREEK NEAR MACY, NEBR. (MRO) 21-21 BLACKFOOT AREA, SNAKE RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-14, 39-17, 39-18 BLACKFOOT RESERVOIR, IDAHO (NPW) 39-2, 39-13 39-15 BLACKFOOT RIVER, COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 BLACKFOOT RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 BLACKHAWK CREEK AT DAVENPORT, IOWA (SNAGGING AND CLEAR) (NCR) 28- 18 BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA. AND R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-43 BLACKSTONE, MA. (NED) 1-25 BLACKWATER DAM, N.H. (NED) 1-20, 1-32, 1-45 BLACKWATER RIVER, FLA,. (SAM) 10-6, 10-28, 10-35 BLACKWATER RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-26 BLAINE HARBOR, WASH. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 BLAKELY MOUNTAIN DAM-LAKE OUACHITA, OUACHITA RIVER, ARK. (LMK) 12 -4, 12-8 BLANCHARD CANYON, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 BLIND SLOUGH DIKING OTSTRICT, CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-51 BLOCK ISLAND-HBR OF REFUGE, k.I. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 BLOOMINGTON LAKE, NORTH, BRANCH, POTOMAC RIVER, MD. AND W. VA. (NAB) 4-14, 4-30, 4-38 BLUE GUM CANYON, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA. (NAP) 3-17, 3-23 BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, ARK. (SWL) 18-4, 18-11, 18-13, 18-18 BLUE RIVER BASIN (KANSAS CITY DISTRICT) (MRK) 20-17 BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO. (MRK) 20-3, 20-14 BLUE RIVER LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-20, 37-35, 37-43, 37-48, 37-50 BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, W.VA, (ORH) 25-5, 25-16 BLUFF CREEK, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 BOARD UF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS (PERH) 41-1 BODEGA BAY, CA. (SPN) 34-2, 34-14 BOEUJF AND TENSAS RIVERS AND BAYOU MACON, ARK. AND LA. (MR+T) 42-54 BOEUF RIVER, LA. (LMK) 12-11 BOGGY CREEK, AUSTIN, TEXAS (BERH) 41-4 BOGGY CREEK, OKLA. (SWT) 19-36 BOGUE CHITTO, LA. (SAM) 10-43 8018ODIE SS IOUX RIVER, MINN., N. DAK. AND S. DAK. (NCS) 27-23 BOISE VALLEY, BOISE RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 BOISE VALLEY, COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 BOLLES HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-6, 31-56, 31-70 BON SECOUR RIVER, ALA. (SAM) 10-42 SON SECOUR RIVER, ALA. (SAM) 10-43 BON SECOUR, ALA. (SAM) 10-43 BONNETT CARRE SPILLWAY, LA. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-22, 42-56, 42-57 BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BONNEVILLE, OREG. AND WASH. (NPP) 37 -24, 37-35, 37-44, 37-55, 37-57 BONPAS CREEK, IL. (WABASH RIVER BASIN) (ORL) 24-31 BONUM CREEK, VA. (NAB) 4-40 BOONE COUNTY, KY. (OHIO RIVER) (ORL) 24-36, 24-37 BOONEVILLE LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24-34 BOTHBAY HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 BOSTON HARBOR, MA. (NEO) 1-3, 1-28, 1-38 BOSTON HARBOR. MASSACHUSETTS (DEBRIS STUDY) (NED) 41-A BOSWELL LAKE, OKLA. (SwT) 19-36, 19-37 BOULDER CREEK, BOULDER, COLO. (MRO) 21-21 BOUND BROOK, SCITUATE, MA. (NED) 1-47 BOWMAN*HALEY LAKE, NO. (MRO) 21-4, 21*14 BACKENRIAGE, TARENTUM AND NATRONA, PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 BRADFORD, PA. (ORP) 26-29, 26-30 BRADLEY LAKE, ALASKA (NPA) 40-7, 40-8, 40-10, 40-11 BRAINTREE, MA, (NED) 1-25 BRANDON ROAD LOCK AND DAM, ILL. (NCC) 28-22, 28-23 BRANFORD HARBOR, CONN. (NED) 1-39 BRANSON COVE, LOWER MACHO00C RIVER, VA. (NAB) 4-40 BRANT ROCK BEACH, MARSHFIELD, MA. (NED) 1*49 BRAY CREEK, HOUSTON, MISS. (SAM) 10-45 BRAYMER LAKE, SHOAL CREEK, MO. (MRK) 20-22 8RAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TEX. (SWG) 15-2, 15-17, 15-21, 15*34, 15*35 15-Al 1-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 p BRAZOS RIVER, TEX., VELASCO TO OLD WASHINGTON (SwG) 15-32 BREA DAM, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33 -33 BRETON BAY, MO. (NAB) 4-40 BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-28e 9-37 BREVOORT LEVEE, IL. (ORL) 24-3b BRIAR CREEK, N. C. (SAN) 7-18 BRIDGE ALTERATIONS AUTHORIZED CHICAGO, IL.e DISTRICT (NCC) 30-15 NASHVILLE, TN., DISTRICT (ORN) 23-5 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-10 PORTLAND, OR., DISTRICT (NPP) 37-48 BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CT. (NED) 1-39, 1-49 BRIOGEPORT, CT. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 BRIDGEnATER, VA. (NAB) 4-46 BRILLIANT, OHIO (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 BRISTOL HARBOR, R.I. (NED) 1-3, 1-28 BROAD CREEK RIVER. DEL. (NAB) 4-40 BROAD CREEK, BEAUFORT COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 BROAD CREEK, MDe (NAB) 4-40 BROAD CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 BRUADUKILL BEACH, SUSSEX COUNTY, DEL. (NAP) 3-29 BROAOK1LL RIVER, DEL. (NAP) 3-28 8ROADWATER CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 BROCKWAY LAKE, VT. (NED) 1-49 6ROCKNAY, PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER BASIN) (ORP) 26-27 BROCKWAY, PA. (ORP) 26-3 BROEUF BASIN, ARK. (MReT) 42-24 BROKEN BOW LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-19, 19-26, 19 -35, 19-36 BROKEN RUW MUD CREEK, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 BROMLEY, KY. (ORL) 24-31 BRONX RIVER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-30, 2-34 BROOKFIELD LAKE, YELLOW CREEK, MO. (MRK) 20-22 BROOKLYN, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 BROOKPORT, IL. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-B, 24-21, 24-34 BROOKVILLE, PA, (ORP) 26-29, 26-30 BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT (SAJ) 9-18, 9-28, 9-38 BROWNS CREEK, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-30, 2-34 BROWNSVTLLE, WASH. (NPS) 38-27 BROWNWOOD CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. NSWF) 16-23 8RUCES EDDY (OnORSHAK) DAMAND RESERVOIR, IDAHO (NPW) 39-5e 39-13 39-15, 39-19 BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, N.C. (CAPE FEAR TO NORTH CAROLINA-SOUTH CAROLINA STATE LINE) (SAw) 6-30 BRUSH BAYOU, LA. (LMN) 11-26, 11-38, t11-45 BUCHAN4 N DAM-H. V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOACHILLA RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-5 p 35-22 BUCK CREEK, N. C. AND S. C. (SAN) 7-18 BUCKHANNON RIVER, W. VA. (ORP) 262AK BUCKHANNON RIVER, N. VA. (ORP) 26-26 BUCKHANNON, W. VA. (ORP) 2b-29, 26-30 BUCKHORN LAKE, KY. (URL) 24-8, 24-22, 24-34 BUCKS HARBOR, MACHIASPORT, ME. (NED) 1-39 BUCKSPORT HARBOR, ME. (NED) .1-39q BUENA VISTA, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 BUENA VISTA, VA. (NAO) 5-27 BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TEX, (SWG) 15-12, 15-19, 15-30 BUFFALO CREEK, MEADOW GROVE, NEBR. (MRO) 21-21 BUFFALO CREEK, SCRANTON, N. DAK. (MRO) 21-21 BUFFALO HARBOR, NY. (NCR) 32-4, 32-5, 32-2b6, 32-32, 32-33 BUFFALO RIVER, MISS. (LMK) 12-12 BUFFALO, NY. 53-5 BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MASS. (NED) 1-24, 1-33, 1-46 BULL RUN, PA. (NAB) 4-15, 4-30, 4-38 BULL SHOALS LAKE, ARK. (SWL) 18-8, 18-12, 18-21 BULLOCKS POINT COVE, R.I. (NED) 1-39 BUNKER HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 BURBANK-EASTERN SYSTEM, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 BURBANK-WESTERN SYSTEM (LOWER ( LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 BURBANK-WESTERN SYSTEM, (UPPER), LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 BURCH CREEK, WEBER COUNTY, UT. (SPK) 35-30 BURGETTSTOwN, PA. (ORP) 26-30 BURGETTSTO*N-SLOVAN, PA. (ORP) 26-29 BURIAL HILL, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 BURKETTS CREEK, AMONY, MISS. (SAM) 10-45 BURLINGTON DAM, SOURIS RIVER, N. OAK. (NCS) 27-4, 27-17 BUkLINGTON HARBOR, VT. (NAN) 2-43 BURLINGTON, IOWA (NCR) 28-4, 28-11, 28-14 BURLINGTON, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, INO. (NCD) 30-2, 30-9 BURNSV1LLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, W.VA, (ORH) 25-6, 25-17 BUSH, ALVIN R., PA. DAM (NAB) 4-24, 4-32 BUSHLEY BAYOU, LA. (MR+T) 42-29 BUTLER, PA. (ORP) 26-29, 26-30 BUTTERMILK BAY CHANNEL, MASS. (NED) 1-39 BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-43 BYRAM RIVER AT PEMBERWICK, CONN. (NAN) 2-45 C CABELLERO CREEK, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA (BERN) 41-4 CACHE LA POUODRE RIVER, FT. COLLINS, COLO. (MRO) 21-20 CACHE RIVER AND BAYOU DEVIEW, ARK. AND MU. (MR+T) 42-23 CACHE RIVER BASIN, ARK. (MR+T) 42-11, 42-19, 42*29, 42-59 CACHE RIVER DIVERSION, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 CADDO LAKE, LA. (LMN) 11-26, 11-38e 11-45, 11-52 CADET BAYOU, MISS. (SAM) 10-6, 10-28, 10-35, 10-43 CADLE CREEK, MO. (NAB) 4-40 CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH, (ORL) 24-9, 24-22, 24-34 CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-9, 24-22, 24-34 CAHABA RIVER, ALA. (SAM) 10-43 CAIRO-MOUNDS, MOUNDS CITY, ILL. (LMM) 42-24 CALAPOOIA RIVER, OREG, (NPP) 37-53 CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA. (SPK) 35-5p 35-22 CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA. (LMN) 11-8, 11-35p 11-41 CALCASIEU RIVER AT COON ISLAND, LA. (LMN) 11-50 CALCASIEU RIVER AT DEVIL'S ELBOW, LA. (LMN) It-8e 11-35o 11-41 CALCASIEU RIVER SALT WATER BARRIER, LA. (LMN) 11-50 CALEDONIA, GENESEE RIVER, N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 CALF PASTURE, CT. (NED) 1-1, 1-42 CALIFORNIA BRANCH, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION (CDC) 44-1 CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, ILL. AND INDIANA (NCC) 30-2, 30-9, 30- 11, 30-14 CALUMET RIVER BRIDGES, ILL. (NCC) 30-15 CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MO, (NAB) 4-40 CAMBRIOGE PORT LAKE, VT. (NED) 1-49 CAMDEN HARBORe ME. (NED) 1-39 CAMELSBACK DAM (GILA RIVER) (INACTIVE), ARIZ. (SPL) 33-34 CAMP GROUND LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24-10 24-22 CAMP PERRY, OHIO (NCB) 32-46 CAMP WOOTEN, TUCANNON RIVER, WASH. (NPW) 39-17 CAMPBELL'S ISLAND, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ILL. (NCR) 28-18 CAMPBELL'S ISLANO MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ILL. (NCR) 28-18 CAMPTI-CLARENCE AREA IN NATCHITOCHES PARISH, LA. (LMN) 11-52, 11- 54 CANAPITSIT CHANNEL, MA. (NED) 1-39 CANAVFRAL HARBOR, FLA, (SAJ) 9-3, 9*26, 9-31, 9-40 CANDY LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-8 CANE RIVER, LA. (LMN) 11-50 CANEY FORK RIVE, TENN, (ORN) 23-4, 23-10, 23-13 CANISTEO, N.Y. (NAB) 4-19, 4-31, 4-43, 4-44 CANNELTON LOCKS AND DAM, IND. (ORD) 22-3, 2?-9 CANNELTON, IN. (URL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 CANONSBURG-HOUSTON REACH (ORP) 26-29 CANTON LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(SAT) 19-8s 19-23, 19-30, 19-34 CANTON LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SNT) 18-18 CANTON, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-47 CANTON, MO. (NCR) 28-b16, 28-18 CANYON LAKE, TEX. (SAF) 16-5, 16-17, 1b-20 CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA. (NAO) 5-26 CAPE COD CANAL, MA. (NED) 1-3, 1-28 CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N.C. (SAW) 6-12 CAPE FEAR RIVER, N.C. ABOVE WILMINGTON (SAW) 6-4, 6-21e 6-29 CAPE FLORIDA STATE PARK (SAJ) 9-45 CAPE GIRAROEAU, MO., NO. 2 (LMS) 14-21 CAPE GIRAROEAU, MO., REACHES NOS. 1, 3 AND 4 14-21 CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. (NAO) 5-3, 5-20 CAPE MAY CITY, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-29 CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, N.J. (NAP) 3-14, 3-23 CAPE PORPOISE HARSOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 CAPE PORPOISE, ME. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 CAPE VINCENT HARBOR, NY. (NCB) 32-5, 32-26, 32-33 CAPTAIN ANTHONY MELDAHL LOCKS AND DAM, KY, (UORD) 22-3, 22-8 CARBON CANYON DAM AND CHANNEL, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33-33 CAROEN'S BORUTTOM DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO.2 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 CAREY, LITTLE WOOD RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 CARL L. ESTES DAM AND LAKE, TEx. (SWF) 16-23 CARLYLE LAKE, ILL. (LMS) 14-be6, 14-7, 14-14, 14-22 CAROLINA AND VICINITY, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6b-23 CARR FORK LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24-10, 24-22, 24-34 CARRABELLE BAR AND HARBOR, FLA. (SAM) 10-43 CARRABELLE HARBOR, FLA. (SAM) 10-42 CARROLLTON, KY. (ORL) 24-31 CARTERS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA. (SAM) 10-31 CARTERS LAKE DAM, GA. (SAM) 10-20, 10-45 CARTHAGE LEVEE, MO. (SWT) 19-3b6, 19-37 CARVERS HARBOR, VINALHAVEN, ME. (NED) 1-39 CASCADIA LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-50, 57-53 CASEVILLE HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-7, 31-56, 31-70 CASEYVILLE, KY, (ORL) 24-31 CASHIE RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 CASSVILLE HARBOR, WIS. (NCO) 29-12 CASTLE ROCK, COWLITZ RIVER, WASH. (NPP) 37-54 CASTLEWO00D LAKE, CHERRY CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, COLO. (MRO) 21-21 CATCHING INLET DRAINAGE OISTRICTe COOS RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 CATHANCE RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39 CATHERINE CREEK LAKE, OREG. (NPW) 39-18 CATHLAMET, WASH. (NPP) 37-47 CATLETTSBURG KY. (ORH) 25-27 CATTARAUGUS CREEK, N.Y. (NCB) 32-43 CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY. (NCR) 32-5, 32-6, 32-Pb CAVE RUN LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24-11, 24-22, 24~34 CAVE-IN-ROCK, IL. (ORL) 24-31 CECIL M. MARDEN LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-11, 24-22, 24-34 CEDAR BAYOU, TEx. (SWG) 15-32 CEDAR KEYS HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 CEDAR POINT LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. (SwT) 19-8, 19-23 CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-7, 31-56, 31-70 CEDOAS LOCK AND DAM, WIS. (NCC) 31*89 CFLING DAM, KY. (ORN) 23-2, 23-14, 23-19 CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. (ORN) 23-7, 23-10, 23- 18 CEATINELA CREEK, RALLONA CREEK BASIN, CA. (SPLI 33-32 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (SAJI 9-22, 9-29, 9-38, 9-46, 9-48, 9-49, 9-SO CEROEO-KENOVA, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 CERL 50-1 -14 INDEX CHAMBERBURG, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 CHANNEL BETWEEN NORTH AND SOUTH HERO ISLANDO LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT. (NAN) 2-43 CHANNEL CLEARING AND SNAGGING ON WILLAMETTE RIVER AND MAJOR TRIBUTARIES, (NPP) 37-50, 31-55 CHANNEL CONNECTING PLAIN DEALING CREEK AND OAK CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4 -40 CHANNEL CONNECTING THOROUGHFARE BAY WITH CEDAR BAY, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 CHANNEL CONNECTING YORK RIVER, VA. WITH BACK CREEK TO SLAIGHTS WHARF (NAO) 5-26b CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-21 CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASSE FLA. (SAJ) 9-3 9-26, 9-31 CHANNEL FROM PAMLICO SOUND TO RODANTHE. N*C. (SAW) 6-27 CHANNEL FROM PHOEBUSo VA. TO DEEP WATER IN HAMPTON ROADS (NAU) 5-26 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS (MR+T) 42-5, 42-14, 42-15, 42-16o 42-17, 42-18, 42-19, 42-20 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS FOR FLOOD CONTROL AND MAJOR DRAINAGE IN 16 bTREAMS TRIBUTARY TO WILLAMETTE RIVER (NPP) 37-50 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CALIF. (SPL) 33-2p 33-21 CHANNEL TO ARKANSAS PASS, TEX, (SWG) 15-39 CHANNEL TO BARROOM BAY TEX. (SWG) 15-39 CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, IEXAS (SWG) 15-10 CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (NAO) 5-4p 5-17, 5-20 CHANNEL TO PALACIOS, TEX. (SwG) 15-39 CHANNFL TO PURT BOLIVAR, TEX. (SWG) 152, 15-17o 15-21, 15-34, 15 -35. 15-41 CHANNEL TO PORT MANSFIELD, TEX. (SAG) 1539 CHANNEL TO ROCKPORT, TEX. (SAG) 15-39 CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TEX. (SWG) 15-39 CHANNELS STRAITS OF MACKINC, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 CHARITON RIVER, MO. (1944 ACT) (MRK) 20-22 CHARITON-LITTLE CHARITON BASIN, MO. (1965 ACT) (RK) 20-22 CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA. (NED) 1-12 CHARLES RIVER DAM, MA. (NED) 1-11, 1-30 CHARLESTON HARBOR, S. C. (SAN) 7-3t 7-11, 7-13 CHARLESTOWN AND GEORGETOWN, SC 53-5 CHARLESTOWN, N.H. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-8, 31-56, 31-70 CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-3v 9-26 9-31 CHARTIERS CREEK, PA. (ORP) 26-29 CHARTIERS CREEK, PA. (ORP) 26-4o 26-18 CHASKA, MINN. (NCS) 27-5, 27-17 CHATFIELO LAKE, CO. (MRO) 21-14, 21-21 CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MASS. (NED) -39 CHATMAM STAGE HARBUR, HA. (NED) 1-3, 1-39 CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER, HELEN, GA. (SAM) 10-45 CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER, WALTER R. GEORGE TO WEST PT. DAM. GA. (SAM) 10-47 CHATTANOOGA, TENN. AND ROSSVILLE, GA. CORN) 23-18 CHEAT RIVER, W VA. (ORP) 26-26 CHEAT RIVER, W. VA. (ORP) 26-26 CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TENN.(URN) 23-2, 23-14, 23-19 CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-9, 31-56, 31-71 CHEESEUUAKE CREEK, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 CHEFUNCTE RIVER AND BOGUE FALIA, LA. (LMN) 11-50 CHELSEA, IOWA (NCR) 28-4, 28-11p 28-14 CHENA RIVER LAKES, ALASKA (NPA) 40-74 0-10, 40-11 CHENEY RESERVOIR, NINNESCAH RIVER BASIN, KANS. (SWT) 19-l18 19-35 CHERRY AND RED FORK CREEKS CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, OKLA, (SWT) 19-36 p 19-37 CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO. (MRO) 21-4, 21-14, 21-16 CHERRYFIELD, ME. (NED) 1-25, 1-47 CHESAPEAKE, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 CHESCONESSEX CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 CHESHIRE, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 CHESTER RIVER (SPK) 35-17 CHESTER RIVER, MD. (NAB) 4-4, 4-34, 4-29 CHESTER' RIVER, PA. (NAP) 3-28 CHESTER, CA. (SPK) 35-7, 35-22 CHETCO RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-2, 37-32, 37-37 CHICAGO HARBOR, ILL. (NCC) 30-3o 30-9, 30-11o, 30-14 CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. (NCC) 30-3, 30-9, 30-11 CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. NORTH BRANCH (NCC) 30-7, 30-10 CHICKAMAUGA LOCK AND DAM, TENN, (ORN) 231 b CHICOPEE FALLS, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-44, 1-47 CHICOPEE, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-44, 1-47, 1-49 CHIEF JOSEPH DAM-RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WASH (NAS) 38-14e 38-19, 38-25 CHILLICOTHE, OHIO (ORH) 25-2, 25-10, 25-12# 25-16 CHILO, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 CHINCOTEAGUE BAY, VA. (NAO) 5-4, 5-17, 5-20 CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE, VA. (NAO) 5-26 CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA. (NAO) 5-4e 5-17, 5-21 CHINO CANYON IMPROVEMENTS, PALM SPRINGS, WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-35 CHIPPEWA HARBOR, ISLE ROYALE, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 CHIPPEWA HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 CHITTENANGO CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 CHOCOLATE BAYOU CHANNEL, TEX. (SWG) 15-39 CHOCTAW BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, LA, (LMN) 11)5 0 CHOCTAAHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FLA. (SAM) 10-36 CHUCTAwHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FLA. (SAM) 10-36 CHOCTAAHATCHEE RIVER, FLA. (SAM) 10-45 CHOCTAWHATCHEE RIVER, FLA. AND ALA. (SAM) 10-43 CCHHOOPUTTAEANKU LROICVKE R,A MDOA.M M(ON.A B)1 7 4-(4S0AL) (SAT) t8-16 CHOUTEAU LOCK AND DAM, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(SWT) 19 4 , 19-30, 19-34 CHOUTEAU, NAMCOKI AND VENICE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 CHOWAN RIVER, N.C. (NAO) 5*26 CHOWAN RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 CHRISTIANSTED HARROR, VI. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-48 CINCINNATI, OH. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 CINCINNATI, OH. (UNIT 2) (ORL) 24-31 CINCINNATI, OH. (UNIT 4) (ORL) 24-31 CITY CREEK LEVEE, SAN BERNAOINO COUNTY, CA. (SPL) 33-34 CITY CREEK LEVEE, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33 CITY OF AURORA, WESTERLY CREEK, COLO. (MRO) 21-21 CLAC6ORNE HARBUR, MO, (NAB) 4-40 CLACKAMAS RIVER AT DIXON FARM LOCATION, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. (SAM) 10-20, 10-31, 10-45 CLANTON, ALA, (SAM) 10-44 CLAREDON LEVEE, ARK. (MR+T) 42-11 CLAREMONT LAKE, N.H. (NED) 1-49 CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO. (LMS) 14-13, 14-16, 14-19 CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH. (ORL) 24-12, 24-22 CLARENOON TO LACONIA CIRCLE, WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARK. (LMM) 13-9 CLARINGTON, OHIO (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 CLARK FORK AT MISSOULA, MONT. (NAS) 38-28 CLARK POINT, NEW BEDFORD, MA. (NED) 1-42 CLARKSON, MIDDLE FORK, MAPLE CREEK, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 CLARKSON, NEBRASKA, MAPLE CREEK, (MRO) 21-21 CLARKSVILLE, ARK. (SwL) 18-22 CLATSKANIE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 CLATSKANIE RIVER AREA, COLUMBIA COUNTYe OREG. (NPP) 37-46, 37-52 CLATSOP COUNTY DIKING DISTRICT 4, OREG. (NPP) 37-S2 CLATSOP COUNTY DIKING OISTRICT 6, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 CLATSOP COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT t1, OREG. (NPP) 37-52, 37-55 CLAYTON LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-8, 19-23, 19-36 CLEAR CREEK AND CLEAR LAKE, IEX. (SWG) 15-3, 15-17, 15-21, 15-35 CLEAR CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 CLEAR CREEK, TEX. (SWG) 15-13, 15-19, 15-30 CLEAR LAKE SPECIAL DNAINAGE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-17 CLEARWATER LAKE MO. (ShL) 18-4, 18-11, 18-21 CLEARWATER PASS, FLA. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-26, 9*31 CLEARWATER RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-23 CLENOENIN, W.VA. (ORH) 25-28 CLEVELAND AND LAKEWOOD, OHIO (NCB) 32-45 CLEVELANU HARBUR, OHIO (NCB) 32-6, 32-7, 32-8, 32-26, 32-33, 32- 34 CLEVES, OH. (ORL) 24-31 CLIFF WALK, R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 CLIFTON, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 CLINCH RIVER, TENN., AND VA. (ORN) 23-17 CLINTON HARBOR, CONN. (NED) 1-39 CLINTON HARBOR, CT. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 CLINTON HARBOR, IOWA (NCD) 29-2, 29-8, 29-11, 29-12 CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KANSAS (MRK) 20-3, 20-14 CLINTON RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-9, 31-56, 31-71 CLINTON, IN. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-31 CLINTON, IOWA (NCR) 28-58, 28-11, 28-14, 28-16 CLOPTON CROSSING LAKE, TEXAS (BERH) 41-5 CLOVERPORT, KY. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36 CLYDE PARK, SHIELDS RIVER, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 CLYDE, R.I. (NED) 1-49 COAL CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES (LAKE CITY), TENN. (ORN) 23-18 COAL CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 COAL GROVE, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 COAL RIVER, W.VA. (ORM) 25-27 COAN RIVER, VA. (NAB) 4-40 COAST OF CALIFORNIA, POINT MUGU TO SAN PEDRO BREAKWATER, CA. (SPL) 33-31-. COASTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH BOARD (CERB) 43-1, 43-2 COASTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER (CERC) 43-1, 43-3e 43-4, 43-5 COASTERS ISLAND HARBOR, R.I. (NED) 1-39 COBSCOOK BAY, ME. (NED) 1-39 COCHECO RIVER, N.H. (NED) 1-39 COCHECO RIVER, N.H. (NED) 1-47 COCHGALECHEE CREEK, ALA. (SAM) 10-45 COCHITI LAKE, N. MEX. (SWA) 17-6, 17-13, 17o15, 17-16 COCHRANE, WIS. (NCS) 27-23 COCKRELLS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 COEUR O'ALENE, SPOKANE RIVER, IDAHO (NPS) 38-28 COHASSET HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 COLO REGION RESEARCH ENGINEER LABORATORY (CRREL) 52-1 COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-21, 3-24 COLOWATER CREEK, ALA. (SAM) 10-47 COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT. (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-44 COLFAX, GRANT PARISH, LA. (LMN) 11-53, 11-54 COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WASH. (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF ORIFT BALTIMORE, MO., DISTRICT (NAB) 4*4, 4-9, 4-34, 4-36 NEW YORK, NY., DISTRICT (NAN) 2-12, 2-31, 2-37 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT (NAO) 5-5, 5-18, 5-21 SAN FRANCISCO, CA., DISTRICT (SPN) 34-7 COLLIERS, W. VA. (ORP) 26-29 COLLINSVILLE, ALA. (SAM) 10-44 COLONIAL BEACH, VA. (NAB) 4-13, 4-37, 4-41 COLORADO RIVER CHANNEL, TEX. (SWG) 15-39 COLORADO RIVER, MATAGORDA, TEX. (SWG) 15-33 COLORADO SPRINGS, FOUNTAIN GUE BOUILLE RIVER, COLO, (TEMPLETON GAP FLOODWAY) (SWA) 17-16 COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLANETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER WASH., AND PORTLAND, OREG. (NPP) 37-2, 37-32, 37-37t 37-38, 37-45 COLUMBIA DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 3, ILL. (LMS) 14-3, 14- 14, 14-17 COLUMBIA DRAINAGE DISTRICT t, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 COLUMBIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ABOVE CELILO FALLS TO KENNEWICK, WASH. (NPW) 39-16 COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WASH. (NPP) 37-4, 37-32, 37-38 COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OREG. AND WASH. (NPP) 37*5, 37-32, 37-39 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, (NPP) 37*51, 37-52 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (NPW) 39-1, 39-13, 39-14 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS, IDAHO, MONT., AND WASH. INPS) 38-28 COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINONK WASH., AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND (NAP) 37-4, 32-32, 37-39 COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WASH., AND THE DALLES, OREG. (NPP) 37-5, 37-32, 37-39 COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY ENTITIES 49-2 COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY PERMANENT ENGINEERING BOARD 49-2 COLUMBIA RIVER, WENATCHEE TO KETTLE FALLSe. WASH. (NPS) 38-27 COLUMBIA SLOUGH, OREG. (NPP) 37-47 COLUMBUS, LOUP RIVER, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 COLUMBUS, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 COMPO, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 1-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 COMPTON CREEK, HOOPER AVE. STORM ORAIN TO MAIN ST., LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 COMPTON CREEK, LOS ANGELES RIVER TO HOOPER AVE. STORM DRAIN, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SP) 33-31, 33-32 COMPUTER SCIENCES LABORATORY 51-1 CONANT BROOK DAM, MA. (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-44 CONCHAS LAKE, N. MEX. (SWA) 17-2, 17-13 CONCORDIA, KY. (ORL) 24-31 CONEMAUSH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN (ORP) 26-5. 26-18 CONETOE CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 CONEY ISLAND CREEK, NY. (NAN) 2-43 CONEY ISLAND INLET, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 CONKLIN-KIRKWOOD, N. Y. (NAB) 4-46 CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (NCB) 32-8, 32-26, 32-34, 32-35 CONNECTICUT kIVER (ABOVE HARTFORD)t CONN. (NED) 1-39 CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT., N.H., HA. AND CT. (NED) 1-12, 1-39, 1-43 CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CONN, (NED) 1-4, 1-28 CONNECTICUT RIVER STREAMBANK EROSION, WILDER LAKE, NEW HAMPSHIRE AND VERMONT TO TURNEkS FALLS DAM, MASSACHUSETTS (NED) 41-5 CONNECTICUT RIVER, HARTFORD, CT. (NED) 1-49 CONNECTICUT RIVER, W. STEWARTSTOAN, N.H. (NED) 1-07 CONSOLIDATED 0DIKING AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1, COWLITZ COUNTY WA SH. (NPP) 37-51 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY (CERL) 50-1 CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS OHIO RIVER (ORP) 26-2 CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS OHIO RIVER, OH. (ORO) 22-1, 22-5, 22-6 CONSIRUCTIUN OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER, KY. (ORL) 24-2 CONTENTNEA CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 CONTENTNEA CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 CONWAY COUNTRY DRAINAGE & LEVEE DISTRICT NO.1 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 CONWAY COUNTRY LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 6 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 CONWAY COUNTRY LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2e&8 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 COOK INLET SHOALS, ALASKA (NPA) 40-7, 40-11 COOK, MINN. LITTLE FORK RIVER (NCS) 27-24 COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TEX. (LMN) 11-54 COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TEX. (LMN) b16-5, 16-17, 16-20 COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, So. C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-11, 7-14 COOPER RIVER, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 COORDINATING COMMITTEE ON GREAT LAKES BASIC HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGIC DATA BOARD 49-2 COORDINATING COMMITTEE ON GREAT LAKES BASIN HYDRAULES AND HYDROLOGIC DATA 31-53 COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OREG..(NPP) 37-7, 37-32, 37-40 COOS BAY, OREG. (NPP) 37-6, 37-32, 37-39 COOSA RIVER NAVIGATION (SAM) 10-21 COOSA RIVER, P ONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, ALA. (SAM) 10-31 COPAN LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWY) 19-, 19-24, 19-34 COPES CORNER LAKE, NEW YORK (NAB) 4-43, 4-44, 4-46 COQUILLE RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 COQUILLE RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-7, 37-32, 37-40 CORALVILLE LAKE, IOWA (NCR) 28-5, 28-11, 28-14 COkAOPOLIS, PA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 CORBIN (LYNN CAMP CREEK), KY. (ORN) 23-18 COkBIN, KY. (ORN) 23-18 CORDELL HULL LOCK AND DAM, TENN. (ORN) 23-2, 23-14, 23-19 CORDOVA HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 CORE CREEK, N.C. (SAw) 6-30 COREA MARBUR, ME. (NED) 1-39 CORNING, N.Y. (NAB) 4-19, 4-31, 4-43p 4-44 CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WIS. (NCS) 31-10, 31-56, 31-71 CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TEX. (RESTORATION PROJECT) (SWG) 15-12, 15- 19, 15-30, CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. (SWG) 15-3e 15-17, 15-21, 15-34 ,15-35, 15-41 CORPUS CHRISTI, TEX., CHANNEL TO NAVY SEAPLANE BASE, ENCINAL PENINSULA (SwG) 15-32 CORSICA RIVER, MO. (NAB) 4-40 CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 CORTLAND, N. Y. (NAB) 4-45, 4-46 COSSATOT RIVER, ARK. (SWT) 19-36 COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OREG' (NPP) 37-21, 37-35, 37-43v 37-48 COTTONWOOD CREEK DAM, BOISE, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 COTTONWOOD CREEK, CA. (SPK) 35-7. 35-22 COTTONWOOD SLOUGH PUMPING PLANT, ILL. (LMM) 13-9 COTUIT HARBOR, MA. (NED) 1-49 COTUIT HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 COUGAR LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-25, 37-35, 37*44, 37-48, 37-50 COUNCIL BLUFFS, IOWA (ACT OF 1936) (MRO) 21-22 COUNCIL BLUFFS, IOWA (ACT OF 1944) (MRO) 21-22 COUNCIL BLUFFS, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANS. (SWT) 19-9e 19-24 COURTENAY CHANNEL, FLA. (SAJ) 9*43v 9-44 COVE ISLAND, CT. (NED) -11e 1-42 COVINGTON, KY. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36e 24-37 COW CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KANS. (SWT) 19-37 COwANESGUE LAKE, PA, (NAB) 4-22, 4-32, 4-44. 4-45 COWLITZ COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICK 1, WASH ( NPP) 37-53 COWLITZ COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2, WA SH. (NPP) 37-49, 37-53 COWLITZ COUNTY DIKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICK 15, WASH. (NPP) 37-49, 37-53 COWLITZ COUNTY DIKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 13, WASH. (NPP) 37-49 37-53 COWLITZ COUNTY DIKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2, WASH. (NPP) 37-49, 37-5 3 COWLITZ COUNTY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1, WASH. (NPP) 37-52 COwLITZ RIVER AT RANDLE, WAS,. (NPP) 37-54 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN (NPP) 37-52 COwLITZ RIVER, WASH. (NPP) 37-47 COwLITZ RIVER, WASH. (NPP) 37-8, 37-33, 37-40 CORPEN SWAMP, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 COYOTE AND SPENCER CREEKS, LONG TOM RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 COYOTE CRFEK (INCLUDING NORTH FORK), SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 COYOTE CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 CRABTREE SWAMP, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 CRAIG HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 CRANE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 CRANES CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 CRAWFORD COUNTY LEVEE DISTRICT, ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 CREEDE, WILLOW CREEK, COLO. (FLOUDWAY) (SWA) 17-16 CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA. (SPN) 34-2, 34-14, 34-17 CRIEHAVFN HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 CRISFIELO HARBOR, MO. (NAB) 4-5, 4-29, 4-34 CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. (ORP) 26-5, 26-18 CROOKED CREEK, LAKE & LEVEE, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 CROOKED SLOUGH HARBOR, WINONA., MINN. (NCD) 29-12 CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-26, 9-31, 9-40, 9-41 CROSS RIP SHOALS NANTUCKET SOUND, MASS, (NED) 1-39 CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MICH. (NCF) 31-10, 31-56, 31-71 CRUTCHO CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, OKLA. (SWT) 19-37 CRYSTAL RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43t 9-44 CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-8, 33-22 CUCKOLD CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 CUIVRE RIVER, MO. (LMS) 14-19 CULDESAC, LAPWAI CREEK, IDAHO 39-17 CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE (ORN) 23-12 CUMBERLAND RIVER BELUW NASHVILLE, TENN. (ORN) 23-12 CUMBERLAND RIVER, TENN AND KY. (URN) 23-1, 23-10, 23-12, 23-14 CUMBERLAND, KY, (ORN) 23-10, 23-17 CUMBERLAND, MD., AND RIDGELY W. VA, (NAB) 4-15, 4-31, 4-38 CUMMINGS PARKe CT. (NED) l-11, 1-42 CUNNINGHILL COVE, MO. (NAB) 4-40 CURRENT RIVER, ARK. & MO. (SWL) 18-20 CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA. (NAB) 4-24, 4*33 CUSHMAN MAPLETON CHANNELS (SUISLAW RIVER) OREG. (NPP) 37-47 CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, HA. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 CUYAHOGA RIVER BASIN, UOHIO (NCB) 32-21 CYPRESS BAYOU AND WATERWAY BETWEEN JEFFERSON, TEX., AND SHREVEPORT, LA. (LMN) 11-50 CYPRESS CREEK, MCLEAN COUNTY, KY. (ORL) 24-36 CYPRESS CREEK, MO, (NAB) 4-40 D DADE COUNTY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-28, 9-38 DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. AND KY. (ORN) 23-7, 23- 10, 23-18 DALLAS FLOODWAY, TEX. (SWF) 16-23 DAM "A" LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-15, 16-20 DAMARISCOTTA RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39 DAMS AND LAKES (MR+T) 42-21 DANA POINT HARBOR, CA. (SPL) 33-30 DANBURY, CT. (NED) 1-25, t1-47 DANSVILLE AND VICINITY, CANASERAGA CREEK, N.Y. (NCB) 32-22, 32-29 OARBY CREEK, LANDSOOWNE, PA. (NAP) 3-30 DARDANELLE LOCK & DAM (NO.10) ARK. (SWL) 18-8, 18-12, 18-13, 18-15 DASHIELOS LOCKS AND DAM, PA. (ORD) 2 2 - 2 o 22-7 DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AI.A. (SAM) 10-e6, 10-28, 10-35 DAVENPORT CENTER LAKE, N.Y. (NAB) 4-41 DAVENPORT HARBOR, IOWA (CREDIT ISLAND) (NCD) 29-9 DAVENPORT HARBOR, IOWA (LINDSAY PARK) (NCO) 29-2, 29-8, 29-11, 29-12 DAVENPORT, IOWA (NCR) 28-5, 28-11, 28-14 DAVID BAYOU, MISS. (MR+T) 42-24 DAVID 0. TERRY LOCK & DAM (NO. 6) ARK. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 DAVIDS CREEK LAKE, IOWA (ACT OF 1968) (MRO) 21-22 DAVIS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 DAY, JOHN RIVER AREA, OREG. (NPP) 37-51 DAY, JOHN, LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OREG. AND WASH. (NPP) 37-2 7, 37-36, 37-45, 37-56 DAYJOHNRIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37/51 DAYS CREEK LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-21, 37-35, 37-44 DAYTON, KY. (ORL) 24-3, 24-21, 24-31 DAYTON, TOUCHET RIVER, WASH. (NPW) 39-18 DAYTON, WYO. (MRO) 21-22 DE KALB, ILL. (NCR) 28-16 DE-AUTHORIZED PROJECTS BUFFALO, NY., DISTRICT (NCB) 32-49 LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT (ORL) 24-31, 24-32, 24-38 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT (SAM) 10*16, 10-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-27, 1-49 DEAD HORSE CANYON AND ROYAL BLVD. CHANNEL, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 DECORAM, IOWA (NCS) 27-23 DEEP CREEK, ACCOMACK CO., VA. (NAO) 5-26 DEEP CREEK, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-23 DEEP CREEK, NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (NAO) 5*5, 5-17, 5-21 DEEP FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, OKLA. (SWT) 19-36 DEEP RIVER AREA, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, WASH (NPP) 37-51 DEEP RIVER, WASH. (NPP) 37-47 DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO (ORM) 25-6, 25-17 DEER ISLAND AREA, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-51, 37-53 DEER ISLAND THOROUGHFARE, ME. (NED) 1-39 DEGONIA AND FOUNTAIN BLUFF LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-21, 14-22 DEGRAY LAKE, CADDO RIVER, ARK. (LMK) 12-4, 12-B, 12-12 OELAWARE BAY SHORE, NEW JERSEY (BERH) 41-4 DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DEL. (NAP) 3-15, 3-23 DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO (ORH) 25-6, 25-17 DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, N.J. (NAP) 3-5, 3-21 1-6 INDEX DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND TRENTON, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-21, 3-24, 3-27 DELAWARE RIVER, N.Y., N.J., AND PA., AT OR NEAR MOUTH OF NEVERSINK RIVER (NAP) 3-28 DELAWARE RIVER, PA., N.J. AND DEL PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (NAP) 3-4, 3-21, 3-25, 3-27 DELPHI, IN (ORL) 24-31, 24-36,# 24-37 DENNIS CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 DENNISOUN DAM-LAKE TEXOMA, RED RIVER BASIN, TEX. AND OKLA. (SWT) 1q-19, 19-26, 19-35 OEPERE LOCK AND DAM, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 DEPOE BAY, ORFG. (NPP) 37-A7 DEPOE BAY, OREG. (NPP) 37-8, 37*33, 37-40 UEQUEEN LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARK. (SWT) 19-9, 19-24, 19-34, 19-36 DERBY, CT. (NED) t-25, 1-47 OES ARC, ARK. (MR+T) 2-23, p42-57 DES MOINES AND MISSISSIPPI LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR) 28-16, 28-1 8 DES MOINES RIVER AT BOONE, IOWA (EMERGENCY RANK PROTECTION) (NCR) eR-lB DES MOINES RIVERBANK EROSION STUDY, IOWA AND MISSOURI (BERH) 41-4 OES MOINES, IOWA (NCC) 28-16, 28-B1 DETOUR HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-li 31-57, 31-71 O0TROIT LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-25, 37-35 37-4, 37-48, 37-50 DETROIT RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-12, 31-57, 31-71, 31-87 DEVALLS BLUFF, ARK. (MR+T) 42-57 DEVIL EAST TWIN, AND WARM CREEKS CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS AND LYTLE CREFK LEVEE, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33 DEVILS LAKE, N, OAK. (NC8) 27-24 DEWEY LAKE, KY. (ORH) 25-7, 25-17 DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES PROJECT, MAINE: FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION REPORT (NED) 41-4 DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, ME. (NED) 1-22, 1-33 DICKINSON BAYOU, TEX. (SWG) 15-32 DIERKS LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARK. (SWT) 19-10, 19-24, 19-34p 19-36 DIKING AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT t11, COWLITZ COUNTY, WASH. (NPP) 3 7-52 DIKING AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5, COWLITZ COUNTY, WASH (NPP) 37- 51 OIKING DISTRICK LAND 3 (PUGET ISLAND) AND LITTLE ISLAND WAHKIA KU M COUNTY, WASH (NPP) 37-51 DIKING DISTRICT 2, CLATSOP COUNTY OREG. (NPP) 37-51 DIKING DISTRICT 3, CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG (NPP) 37-51 DIKING DISTRICT 5, CLATSUP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-51 DIKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1,PACIFIC COUNTY, ASH. (NPP) 37-51 DIKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 13, COWLITZ COUNTY, WASH. (NPP) 37-52 DIKING IMPROVEMFNT DISTRICT 2, COWLITZ COUNTY, WASH. (NPP) 37-52 DIKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4, WAHKIAKU COUNTY, WASH (NPP) 37-51 ODILLINGHAM HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-2, 40-9 40-10 DILLON LAKE , OHIO (ORH) 25-7, 25-17 OILLONVALE, OHIO (SHORT CREEK) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 DISMAL SWAMP CANAL (SOUTH MILLS, N.C.) (NA) 5-24 DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, (DEEP CREEK), VA. (NAO) 5-24 DIVELY DRAINAGE & LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 DODGE CITY, KANSAS (SWA) 17-2, 17-13, 17-14 DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, ALA. (SAM) 10-7, 10-28, 10-35 OOHFNY BEACH STATE PARK (DOHENY STATE BEACH), CA. (SPL) 33-31 DOMEROY, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 DONOVAN LEVEE (NCC) 28-18 DORCHESTER BAY AND NEPONSET RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-39 DOERNA LAKE, TOREG. (NPP) 37-21, 37-35, 3744, 37-48, 37-50 DOOUBLE BAYOU, TEX. (SWG) 15-A, 15-17, 15-23, 15-36 DOUBLE CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-2 DOUGLAS HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 DOUGLASS LAKE, KANS, (SWT) 19-37 DOVER, KY. (ORH) 25-27 DOWNEYVILLE LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-35 DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1, CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG (NPP) 37-51 DRESDEN ISLAND LOCK AND DAM, ILL. (NCC) 28-22, 28-23 DRINKWATER, SEWER, MO. (LMM) 13b, 13-7, 13-8 DRUM INLET, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 DRURY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR) 28-lb DRURY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR) 28-18 DRY BROOK, NY. (ORP) 26-32 DRY CREEK, HAWARUEN, IOWA (MRO) 21-22 DRY FORK AND EAST FORK LAKES, FISHING RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-22 DRY PASS, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 DRY RUN, IA. (NCS) 27-24 DUBOIS, PA, (ORP) 26-29, 26-30 DUBUQUE HARBOR, IOWA (NCD) 29-2, 29-8 0UBUQUE. IOWA (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 DUCK CREEK (SPK) 35-17 DUCK CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. (SWF) lb-b, 16-17, 16-20 DUCK CREEKP SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CA. (SPK) 35-30 DUCK ISLAND HARBOR, CONN. (NED) I-3 DUCK POINT COVE (HEARNS CREEK), MD. (NAB) 4-5, 4-29, 4-35 DDUUCLKU THR-IVSEURP,E RITOERN N.H AR(BOOWRN,) 2M3I-N1N7. AND WIS. (NCS) 31-13, 31-57, 31-72 DUNGENESS RIVER, CLALLAM COUNTY, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY. (NCR) 32-B, 32-9, 32.26, 32-35 DUVAL COUNTY, ELA. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-28, 9-38 DUIRURY HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 DYERSRURGH, TENN. (LMM} 13-9 DYERSBURGH, TENN, (SOUTHWEST) (LMM) 13-4, 13-7, 13-8 UTMEWS CREEK, VA, (NAD) 5-26 E E. HARTFORD, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 EAGLE BAY AND FORT YATES HIGHWAY BRIDGES, N.D. (MRO) 21-22 EAGLE HARBUR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 EALMOUTH LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24-13, 24-22, 24-34 EAST BARE DAM, WINOOSKI RIVER, VT. (NAN) 2-45 EAST RAY (HANNA REEF), TEX. (SWG) 15-32 EAST BOTHBAY HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 EAST BRANCH DAM, CT. (NED) 1-47 EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. (ORP) 26*-b 26-18 EAST BRANCH, CT. (NED) 1-25, t-AS45 EAST 8RIMFIELD LAKE, MA. (NED) 1-24, 1-33, 1-46 EAST CAPE GIRARDEAU AND CLEAR CREEK DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL, (LMS) 14-21, 14-22 EAST CHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 EAST FORK LAKE, OH. (ORL) 24-12, 24-22, 24-34 EAST HARTFORD, CT. (NED) 1-47 EAST LIVERPOOL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 EAST LYNN LAKE, .VA. (ORHD) 25-8, 25-17 EAST MOLINE, ILL. (NCR) 28-5, 28-11 28-14 EAST MUDDY AND LAKE CREEK, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 EAST MUDDY CREEK, MO. (MRK) 20-22 EAST NISHNABUTNA RIVER, PAGE Co. BRIDGE, NEAR ESSEX, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 EAST NISHNAROTNA RIVER, RED OAK, IOWA (MRO) 21-22 EAST OF CHANDLERVILLE (NCC) 28-17 EAST NF HUBLY BRIDGE (NCC) 28-18 EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FLA. (SAM) 10-7, 10-29, 10-35 EAST PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. (SAM) 10-8, 10-29, 10-35 EAST PEORIA DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 EAST PEORIA SANITARY DISTRICT, ILL. (NCC) 28-lb EAST POINTr, FLA. (SAM) 10-43 EAST POINT, LA. (LMN) 11-54 EAST POPLAR BLUFF & POPLAR BLUFF, MO. (SWL) 18-22 EAST RAINELLE, W.KY. (OH) 25-27 EAST RIVER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 230, 2-34 EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PART II) (NAN) 2-45 EAST ROCKAWAY INLET 10 ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y (PART I) (NAN) 2-161,2 -32 2-38 EAST ROCKAAY INLET, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-34 EAST SIDNEY LAKE, N.Y. (NAB) 4-t9, 4-32, 4-43, 4-4 EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILL. (LMS) 14-7, 14-14 14-17, EAST WEAVER CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA. (MR T) 42-16, 42-29, 4252, 42-59 EASTLAKE, UHIO , CHAGRIN RIVER (NCB) 32-46 EASTPORT HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 EATON WASH, RIO HONDO BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 EAU GALLE RIVER, WIS. (NCS) 27-5, 27-17 EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-q4 ECHO BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 EDENTON HARBOR, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 EOGARTOWN HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 EDINBURG LAKE, PEARL RIVER, MISS. (SAM) 10-17, 10-30, 10-39 EDISTO RIVER, NORTH FORK, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 EDISTO RIVER S. C. (SAN) 7-17 EDISTO RIVER, VICINITY CANADYS LANDING, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 EDIZ HOOK, WASH, (NPS) 38-2 38-17, 38-21 EDMONDS HARBOR, WASH, (NPS) 38-27 EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH, (NED) 1-20, 1-32, 1-45 EEL RIVER, BRAZIL WATERWORKS, IN. (ORL) 24-3b EEL RIVER, CA. (SPN) 34-21 EGEGIK RIVER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 EIGHTEEN MILE ISLAND, OLDHAM CO KY, (ORL) 24-36 EL DORADO LAKE, WALNUT RIVER BASIN, KANS. (ST) 19-10, 19-24 EL DORADO, KANS. W. BR., WALNUT RIVER, CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT (SWT) 19-37 EL PASO, TEX. (SWA) 17-3, 17-13, 17-14 ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-A, 14-14, 14-17 ELDRED# PA. (ORP) 26-29 ELIZABETH, N.J. (NAN) 2-19, 2-32, 2-38 ELK AND LITTLE ELK RIVERS, MD. (NAB) 4-40 ELK CITY LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS* (SWL)(SWT) 19-10, 19- 24, 19-30, 19-34 ELK CREEK HARBORr PA. (NCB) 32-43 ELK CREEK LAKE ROGUE RIVER BASIN, DREG, (NPP) 37-22, 37-35, 37-44 ELK CREEK, CLYDE, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 ELK RIVER, ALA. AND TENN. (ORN) 23-17 ELK RIVER, MINN. (ACS) 27-2a, 27-23 ELK RIVER, W.VA. (DAM) 25-15, 25-20 ELK-CITY LAKE, KANS, (SAL) (SAT) 18-lB ELKHORN RIVER, 0 STREET BRIDGE, NEAR GRETNA, NEB. (HRD) 21-20 ELKHORN RIVER, RAY BRIDGE, NEAR NORFOLR, NEW, (MAO) 21-20 ELKINS, A. VA, (MONOGBMELA RIVER BASIN) (OAF) 26-27 ELKINS, A. VA. (DAP) 26-6, 26BI ELKLAND, PA. (NAB) 4-45, 4-46 ELKPORT, IOWA (NCR) 28-16 ELKPORT, TURKEY RIVER, IOWA (NCR) 28-18 ELLERBE CREEK, DURHAM COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) b-3D ELLICOIT CREEK, N.Y. (ACA) 32-22, 32-29 ELLIS SWAMP, GATES COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TEA. (SAF) 16-6, 16-17, 16-20- ELMIRA, N.Y. (iAAB) 4-20, 4-32, 4-43, 4-44 ELUCHoMAN SLOUGH, AI. (NPP) 37-47 ELOY, ARIZ. (SPL) 30-3A ELOY, ARIZ, (SPL) 33-34 ELTIN LOVE, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 EMERALD WASH AND LIVE OAK WASH, SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA, (SPL) 33-32 1-7 REPORT OF THlE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 EMERGENCY dANK PROTECTION ACTIVITIES BUFFALUO NY.e, DISTRICT (NCB) 32-48 NOT FOUND IN MANUAL LHICAGO, IL., DISTRICT (NC0) 30-15 OETRUITP MI., DISTRICT (NCE) 31-47 HUNTINGTON, W.VA., DISTRICT (ORH) 25-29 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT (MRK) 20-11 LOS ANGELES, CA., DISTRICT (SPL) NUT FOUND IN MANUAL MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT (SAM) 10-19 NASHVILLE, TN., DISTRICT (URN) 23-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-26 OMAHA, NE., DISTRICT (MRO) 21-9 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION (POD) 36-7 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT (NAP) 3-30 PITTSBURGH, PA., OISTRICT (ORP) 26-b16, 2b-3? PORTLAND, UR., DISTRICT (NPP) 37-19, 37-55 EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES ALASKA DISTRICT (NPA) 40-7 ALBUllUERUUE, NM., DISTRICT (SWA) 17-11 BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT (NAB) 4-47 BUFFALO, NY., DISTRICT (NCB) 32-47 CHARLESTON, SC., DISTRICT (SAN) 7-9 CHICAGO, IL., DISTRICT (NCC) 30-7 UETRUII, MI., (NCE) 31-51 FORT WORTH, TX., DISTRICT (SWF) 16-15 GALVESTON, TX., DISTRICT (SWG) 15-16 HUNTINGTON, WV., DISTRICT (ORH) 25-15 JACKSONVILLE, FL., DISTRICT (SAJ) 9-25 KANSAS CITY, MUO., DISTRICT (MRK) 20-11 LITTLE ROCK, AR., DISTRICT (SWL) 18-7 LOS ANGELES, CA., (SPL) 33-19 EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES, NEW ORLEANSLA., DISTRICT (LMN) 11-55 EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES-REPAIRS, FLOOD KTGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (NAB) 4-47 EMMET COUNTY, LAKE MICHIGAN, MICH. (NCE) 31-47 EMPTRE-STRATTEN, OHIO (ORP) 26-30 EMPIRE-STRATTIN, OHIO (OkP) 26-P, 26-30 EMSWORTH LOCKS AND DAMS, PA. (ORD) 22-2e 22-7 ENDEWLIN, N. DAK. (NCS) 27-23 ENOERLIN, N. OAK., MAPLE RIVER (NCS) 27-24 ENDICOTT JUHNSON CITY AND VESTAL, N. Y. (NAR) 4-46 ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORY (ETL) 51-1 ENGLAND POND LEVEE, IL. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 ENGLISH, IN. (LITTLE BLUE RIVER) (ORL) 24-36, -24-37 ENID DIVERSION CANAL AND LEVEE, UKLA. (SWT) 19-36 ENID LAKE, MISS. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-2t1, 42-60 ENID LEVEF FLOODWAY, OKLA. (SWT) 19-37 ENTIAT RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 ERIE HAR809BOR,P A. (NCB) 32-9, 32-10, 32-27, 32-35, 32-36, 32-49 ESCAMBIA-CUNECUH RIVERS, FLA. AND ALA. (SAM) 10-0, 10-29, 10-35 ESCANABA HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-47 ESCATAWPA RIVER, PASCAGOULA, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 ESQUATZEL COULEE, CONNELL WASH., (NPW) 39-18 ESUUATZEL. CUULEE, WASH. (NPW) 39-17 ESSEX RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-39 EUDORA FLOUDWAY, MISS. (MR+T) 42-22 EUFAULA LAKE, CANAUIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(SWT) 19-20, 19-26 19-30, 19-35 EUFAULA LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18 EVANSDALE, IOWA (NCR) 28-18 EVANSOALE, IOWA (NCR) 28-5, 28-11, 28-14 EVANSTON, ILLINOIS (NCC) 30-15 EVANSVILLE, IN. (ORL) 24-3, 24-21, 24-31, 24-36 . EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WASH. (NPS) 38-3, 3B-17, 38-21 EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 EXETER RIVER, N.H. (NED) 1-39 EXPERIMENTAL CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECT, RED RIVER BASIN, ESTELLINE AND GUTHRIE, TEX. (SWT) 19-37 FABIUS RIVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO. (NCR) 28-16 FABIUS RIVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO. (NCR) 28-18 FABIUS RIVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO. (NCR) 28-18 FAIR HAVEN BEACH STATE PARK (NCB) 32-05 FAIRBANKS, ALASKA (NPA) 40-7, 40-13 FAIRBANKS. TANANA RIVER CHENA SLOUGH, ALASKA (NPA) 40-13 FAIRBURY, LITTLE BLUE RIVER, NEBR. (MRK) 20-22 FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA. (SPK) 35-30 FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (NCB) 32-10, 32-11, 32-27, 32-36 FAJARO0 HARBOR, P.R. (SAJ) 9-44 FALL BROOK LAKE, PA. (NAB) 4-2, 0406 FALL CREEK LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-22, 37-35, 37-40 37-08, 37-50 FALL RIVER BASIN, SD. (MRO) 21-5, 21-14 FALL RIVER HARBOR, MA, (NED) 1-5, 1-28 FALL RIVER LAKE, KANS. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18 FALL RIVER LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANS. (SAT)(SWL) 19-10, 19-24, 19-30, 19-34 FALLS LAKE, N.C. (SAW) 6-16 FALMOUTH HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 FAR CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 FARGO, N. OAK. (NCS) 21-23 FARM CREEK, ILL. (NCC) 28*6, 28-11, 28-14 FARMERS LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 FAULKNER COUNTY LEREE DISTRICT NO. I ARKANSAS HIVER, ARK. (SWA) 18-22 FEATHER RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-28 FEDERAL WATER POWER ACT 47-1 FERGUSON CREEK, LONG TOM RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 FERN RIDGE LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-23, 37-35, 37-44, 37-48, 37-50 FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-5, 9q26, 9-31 FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE 0' THE PINES, TEX. (LMN) 11*54 FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O'THE PINES, TEX. (LMN) b16-7 16-17, 16- 20 FERRY BUTTE, SNAKE RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 FILBERTS CHEEK, N.C. (SAw) 6-30 FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (NAN) 2-16, 2-32, 2-38 FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. (NAN) 2-20, 2-32, 2-38 FIRE ISLAND INLET, N.Y. (NAN) 23#5, 2-43 FISHING BAY, MOD. (NAB) 4- 40 FISHING CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4 -40 FISHING CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 FISHTRAP LAKE, KY. (URH) 25-8, 25-17 FITCHBURG, CT. (NED) 1-47 FIVE MILE RIVER HABOR, CT. (NED) 1-39, 1-49 FLANNAGAN, JOHN W. DAMAND RESERVOIR, VA. (URH) 2549, 25-17 FLAT CREEK, LONG TOM RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 FLAT ROCK CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TULSA, UKLA. (SWT) 19-36, 19q -37 FLATHEAD RIVER NEAR KALISPELL, MONT. (NPS) 38-9, 38-18, 38-23 FLATHEAD RIVER, MONT, (NPS) 38-27 FLOOD CONTROL (MR+T) 42-56, 42-57 FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCY ACTIVITIES BUFFALO, NY., OISTRICT (NCB) 32-25, 32-b6, 32-47 HUNTINGTON, w.VA., DISTRICT (ORH) 25-13 NASHVILLE, TN., UISTRICT (URN) 23-6, 23-7 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT (OkP) 26-16 FLOOD PLAINSTUDIES COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR FORT WORTH, TX., DISTRICT (SwF) 16-16, 16b-23 KANSAS CITY, MU., DISTRICT (MRK) 20-13 LITTLE RUCK, A., DISTRICT (SWL) 1B-9 LOUISVILLE, KY., ODISTRICT (ORL) 24-20, 24-40 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT (SAM) 10-21, 10-47 NEW YORK, NY., DISTRICT (NAN) 2-29, 2-46 OMAHA, NE., DISTRICT (MRO) 21-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., OISTRICT (ORP) 26-17, 26-32 SACRAMENTO, CA., DISTRICT (SPK) 35-31 TULSA, OK., DISTRICT (SWT) 19-22 FLOOD REPORTS (MR+T) 42-4 FLOODWALL AND LEVEES AT PORTLAND, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 FLORENCE LEVEE, KANS. (SAT) 19-34, 19-37 FLOYD RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA (MRO) 21-22 FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 FLY CREEK, ALA. (SAM) 10-9, 10-29, 10-35 FOLLANSBEE, W. VA. (ORP) 2b-27, 26-30 FOLLY BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA (SAN) 41-4 FOLLY BROOK, WETHERSFIELU, CT. (NED) 1-44, 1-47 FOLLY RIVER, S. C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-11, 7-13, 7-14 FOLSOM LAKE, AMERICAN RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-30 FOREST HEIGHTS, MO. (NAB) 4-46 FOREST RIVER, N. OAK. (NCS) 27-23 FORESTVILLE, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 FORKED DEER RIVER, TENN., INCLUDING SOUTH FORK (LMM) 13-9. FORSYTH, MONT. (MRO) 21-222 FORSYTHE, YELLOWSTONE RIVER, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 FORT CHARTRES AND IVY LANDING DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 5 AND STRINGTOWN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 4, ILL. (LMS) 14- 21 FORT CHARTRES AND IVY LANDING DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 5 ILL. (LMS) 14-21 FORT CHARTRES AND IVY LANDING DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. ,So ILL. (LMS) 14-21 - FORT COBB RESERVOIR, WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-18, 19-35 FORT FISHER AND VICINITY, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-22 FORT GIBSON LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, UKLA. (SWL)(SWT) 19 -20, 19-26, 19-30, 19-35 FORT GIBSON LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18 FORT KENT, ME. (NED) 1-25 FORT LEAVENWORTH, KANS. BRIDGE REMOVAL (MRK) 20-20 FORT LOUDON LOCK.AND DAM, TENN. (ORN) 23-16 FORT MACON STATE PARK, N.C. (SAW) b-28 FORT MADISON HARBOR, IOWA (NCD) 29-2, 29-4, 29-9, 29-11, 29-12 FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-26, 9-32 FORT NIAGARA STATE PARK, N.Y. (NCB) 32-45 FORT PECK LAKE, MT. (MRO) 21-2, 21-14 FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-5 9-26e 9-32 FORT PIERCE, FLA. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-28e 9-38 FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE MISSOURI RIVER BASIN#, S.D. (MRO) 21-10, 21-15 FORT SCOTT LAKE, MARMATON RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22 FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 FORT SUPPLY LAKE, NORTH CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19q-tt, 19-24 t19-30 FORT WORTH FLOODWAY (CLFAR FORK), TEX. (SWF) 16-23 FORT WORTH FLOODWAY (WEST FORK), TEX. (SAF) 16-23 FOSS RESERVOIR, WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-18 19q-35 FOSTER JOSEPH SAVERS DAM, PA. (NAB) 4-24, 4-33 FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. (SAJ) 9-24, 9-29, 9-39, 9*51 FOURCHE CREEK, LITTLE ROCK, ARK. (SWL) 18*22 FOURMILE RUN, VA. (NAR) 4-15, 4-31, 4-38 FOX POINT BARRIER, R.I. (NED) 1-47 FOX RIVER LOCKS AND DAM, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 FOX RIVER, WIS. (NCC) St-10, 31-57, 31-73 FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA. (NAP) 3-17, 3-23 FRANKFORT HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-15, 31-57, 3t-73 FRANKFORT, BLACK VERMILLION RIVER, KANS. (ARK) 20-22 FRANKFORT, KY. (KENTUCKY RIVER) (ORL) 24-31, 24*36 FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, N.H. (NED) 1-20, 1-32, 1-45 FRAZER-WOLF POINT, MT. (MRO) 21-5, 21-14 FRAZEYSBURG, OHIO (ORM) 25-28 FREE NANCY BRANCH AND FOURTH CREEK, N. C. (SAN) 7-18 FREEPORT ANO VICINITY, TEx. HURRICANE*FLO00 PROTECTION (SWG) 15* 13, 15-19, 15-30 FREEPORT HARBOR, TEx. (SwG) 15-4, 15-17, 15*23, 15-34, 15-36, 15- FREEPORT, ILL. (NCR) 28-18 FREEPORT, PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 FREEPORT, PA. (ORP) 26-32 FREMONT, OHIO, SANOUSKY RIVER (NCB) 32*46 1.-8 INDEX FRENCH BROAD AND LITTLE PIGEON RIVERS, TENN. (ORN) 23-17 FRENCHBORO HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 FRESHWATER BAYOUr LA. (LMN) 11-9, 11-35, 11-41 FRIENDLY, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 FRIENOSVILLE MD. (ORP) 26-29 FRUM NORTH LITTLE ROCK TO GILLETTe ARK. (ABOVE PLUM BAYOU) (SWL) 18-22 FT. PAYNE, ALABAMA (SAM) 10-47 FULLERTON DAM, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33-33 FULLERTON, KY. (ORH) 25-27 FULTON CO., GEORGIA (SAM) 10-47 FULTON, ILL. (NCR) 28-6, 28-11, 28-14 FULTON, JAMES G. REACH (ORP) 26b-5, 2b-29 G GALAX, VIRGINIA (ORH) 25-27 GALENA , GALENA RIVER, ILL. (NCR) 28-18 GALFNA, ILL. (NCR) 28-16, 28-20 GALISTEO DAM, N. MEX. (SWA) 17-7, 17-13, 17-16 GALLEPULIS LOCKS AND DAM, W. VA. (ORD) 22-2. 22-8 GALLIPULIS, OHIO (ORM) 25-27 GALVESTON AND TEXAS CITY, TX. 53-5 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TEX. (SWG. 15-5, 15-17, 15-24, 15- 34, 15-36, 15-41 GAPWAY SWAMP, N. C. AND S. C. (SAN) 7-18 GAPWAY SAMP N.C. &A S.C. (SAW) 6-30 GARDENERS CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 GARDNER, MA. (NED) 1-25) 144p 1-47 GARLAND CITY, ARK. (LMN) 11-52 GARLAND CITY, ARK. (LMN) 11-54 GARNETT LAKE, POTTAWATOMIE CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22 GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, N.D. (MRO) 21- 10, 21-15 GASCONADE RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-20 GASTINEAU CHANNEL, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 GATE CREEK LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-50, 37-53 GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA. (NAU) 5-13P 5-19, 5-23 GAULEY RIVER, W.VA. (ORH) 25-20 GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN. N.E. AND S.D. (MRO) 21-11, 21-12, 21-15 GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWRIS AND CLARK LAKE, RELOCATION OF NIOBRARA, N.E. (MRO) 21-11, 21-1S GAYSVILLE LAKE, VT. (NED) 1-49 GENEGANTSLET LAKE, N. Y. (NAB) 43-46 GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA. (NAP) 3-18, 3-23 GENERAL JOE WHEELER DAM (ORN) 23-16 GENEVA, ALABAMA (SAM) 10-47 GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO (NCB) 32-11, 32-27 GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES LABORATORY 51-1 GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, ALA, AND GA, (SAM) 1024t 10-32. 10-40, 10-46 GEORGES RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39 GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S. C. (SAN) 7-4p 7-11, 7-14 GERING VALLEY, GERING DRAIN AND TRIBUTARIES. NEB. (MRO) 21-20 GERING VALLEY, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 GIL TOWNSHIP LEVEE UNIT, IN. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-37 GILA AND SALT RIVERS LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, ARIZ. (SPL) 33-34 GILA RIVER BASIN, ARIZ. (SPL) 33-9, 33-22 33-34 GILES CREEK, ELKHORN, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 GILL TOWNSHIP LEVEE, IN, (ORL) 24-36 GILLHAM LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARK. (SWT) g19-111,9 -24, 19-34, 19-36 GIRTY'S RUN, MILLVALE, PA. (ORP) 26- 7 26-18e 26-32 GIW TO PORT BIENVILLE, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 GLADSTONE, MICH. 31-47 GLASGOW, MILK RIVER, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 GLASGOW# MONT. (MRO) 21-22 GLEASON CREEK, NV. (SPK) 35-30 GLEN COVE CREEK, N.Y. (NAN) 25. 2-30o 2-34 GLEN COVE HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 GLOUCESTER MAROR, ANNISQUAM RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-39 GLOVER CREEK, OKLA. (SwT) 19-3b GOLCONDA, IL, (ORL) 24-31e 24-36, 2437 GOLD CREEK, ALASKA (NPA) 40-13 GOLDSBORO, NEUSE RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 GOLETA, CALIF,, AND VICINITY (SPL 33-12. 33-22 GOODING AREA, IDAHO (APR) 39-18 GGOoOoSrEI NGC REAEREKA,, MDL.I TT(LNEA B)R O8O-04 0RIVER, IDAHO (APR) 39-17 GOADOONS CREEK, HATIIESBURG, MISS. (SAM) 10-17, 1031, 1039 GORDONS LANDING, LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT. (NAN) 2-43 GOSHEN CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 GOVERNOR'S RUN, MD. (NAB) 4.40 GOWANIJS CREEK CHANNEL, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 GRAFTON HARBOR, ILL. (NCD) 29-12 GRAFTON, N. OAK. (CS) 27-6 GRAND BAYOU PASS, LA, (LMN) 11-50 GRAND CALIIMET RIVER, ILL. (NCC) 28-22 GRAND FORKS, N. DAK. (NCS) 27-23 GRAND HAVER HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MICA. (NCE) 31-16, 31-57. 31 73 GRAND MARAIS HARROR, MICH. (NCE) 31-16, 31-58, 31-74 GA AND MORAIS HARBOR, AINN. (ACS) 31-17, 31-58, 31-70 GRAND pRA.IE-BAYOI METO, ARK, (MR3T) 1 -17, 42-23, 42-24, 42-29 GRAND RIVF , (RANOVILLE, MICH. (NCE) 31-91 GRAND RIVF, LANSING, MICH. (NCE) 31-91 GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-17, 31-58, 31-74 GRANDE ISLE AND VICINITY, LA. (LMN) 11-26, 11-38t 11-45 GRANDE RONDE LAKE. OREG, (NPW) 39-18 GRANGE RONDE VALLEY, COLUMoIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. (NPW) 39-18 GRANGE RONDE VALLEY, OREG. (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 GRANT PARISH, BELOW COLFAX, LA. (LMN) 11-53, 11-54 GRANT'S CANAL LAKE PROVIDENCE, LA. (MRtT) 42-23p 42-57 GRANVILLE, PA. (URP) 2b-29, 26-30 GRAPEVINE LAKE, IEX. (SWF) 16-7, 16-17, 16-20 GRASSE RIVER (MASSENA), N.Y. (NCB) 32-43 GRASSY CREEK, JACKSON COUNTY, IN. (ORL) 24-36, 24t-37 GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WASH. (NPS) 38-3, 38-17, 38-21 GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MICH, (NEE) 31-90 GRAYS RIVER, WASH. (NPP) 37-47 GRAYSON LAKE, KY. (ORH) 25-8, 25-17 GREAT BEND, KANSAS (SWA) 17-16 GREAT CHAZY RIVER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-30, 2-34 GREAT FALLS, MT. (MRO) 21-5, 21-14 GREAT KILLS HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 GREAT LAKES TO HUDSON RIVER wATFkwRAY, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 GREAT PEE DEE RIVER, S. C. (SAN) 7-17 GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SAT) 19q-11, 19-24i, 19-34 GREAT SALT POND, R.I. (NED) 1-38 GREAT SODUS BAY HARROR, NY. (NCB) 32-t11, 32-27, 32-37 GREAT SOUTH BAY, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-43 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY. (ORL) 24-2, 24-21, 24-25, 24-27, 24- GREEN BAY HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-18, 31-58, 31-74 GREEN BAY LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 2, IOWA (NCR) 28-16, 28 -18 GREEN HARBOR, MA. (NED) 1-5, 1-2b GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OREG. (NPP) 37-26, 37-36, 37-45, 37-48, GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY, (ORL) 24-13, 24-22, 24-34 GREEN ROCK, ILL. (NCR) 28-20 GREEN VALLEY CREEK (SPK) 35-17 GREEN VALLEY CREEK, SOLANO COUNTY, CA. (SPK) 35-30 GREENE, J. Y. (NAB) 4-46 GREENFIELD BAYOU LEVEE, IN. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-31 GREENPORT HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 GREENUP LOCKS AND DAM,* W. VA. (ORD) 22-2, 22-A GREENUP, KY. (ORH) 25-27 GREENVALE CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-5,. 5-17, 5-21 GREENVILLE HARBOR, GREENEVILLE, MISS. (MR+T) 42-25, 42-30 GREENVILLE HARBOR, MISS. (MR+T) 42-23, 42-57 GREENVILLE, TEX. (SWF) 16-71, 6b-17, 16-20 GREENWICH BAY, .. (NED) 1-39 . GREENWICH HARBOR, CONN, (NED) 1-39 GREENWICH POINT BEACH, CT. (NED) 1-49 GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARK. (SWL) 18B8, 18-12, 18-21 GREGORY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 GREGORY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO. (NCR) 28-18 GRENADA LAKE, MISS. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-21, 42-60 GREYBULL, BIG HMORN RIVER, WY. (MRO) 21-19 GREYBULL, WYO. (MRO) 21-22 GROVE LAKE, SOLDIER CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 GUADALUPE RIVER (REMOVE LOG JAMS), TEX. (SAG) 15-33 GUAYANES HARBOR, P.R. (SAJ) 9-44 GUILFORD HARBOR, CONN. (NED) 1-39 GUILFORD POINT, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA. AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) (SAM) 10-9, 10-29, 10-36 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (NER ORLEANS DIST.) (SAM)(LMN)(SWG) 11-10, 11-36 11-41, 11-48 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND THE MEXICAN BORDER (SWG) 15-6, 15-18, 15-25, 15-34, 15-39, 15-40, 15-41 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY ST. MARKS TO TAMPA BAY, FL. (SAJ) 9-44 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LOUISIANA SECTION-HIGH LEVEL HIGHWAY CROSSINGS (BERH) 41-4 GULF, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 GULFPORT HARBOR, MISS. (SAM) 10-10, 10-29, 10-36, 10-43 GULL LAKE RESERVOIR, MINN, (NCS) 27-2 GUNTERSVILLE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. (ORN) 23-16 GUTTENBERG# IA. (NCS( 27-24 GUTTENBERG, RIOWA (NCS) 27-23 GUYANDOTTE RIVER, W.VA. (ORH) 25-20 GYPSUM, GYPSUM CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-3, 20-14 H HACKLEMAN CORNERS LAKE, CEDAR CREEK, MO. (MRK) 20-22 HAINES CANYON, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 HAINES HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 HALEIwA BEACH, 0AHU HAWAII (POD) 36-13 MALEIwA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 HALFMOON BAY HARBOR, CA. (SPN) 34-9, 34-20 HALL MEADOW BROOK DAM, CT. (NED) 1-47 HALL MEADOw BROOK, CT. (NED) 1-25 HALL MEADOw, CT. (NED) 1-45 HAMBURG HARROR, ILL. (NCD) 29-12 HAMBURG L-575, NISHNABOTNA RIVER, 10WA (MRO) 21-21 HAMILTON DRAINAGE DISTRICT, POLK COUNTY, IOWA (NCC) 28-20 HAMLIN BEACH HARBOR, N.Y. (NCR) 32-43 HAMLIN BEACH STATE PARK, N.Y. (NCB) 32-45 HAMMERSLEY INLET, WASH. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 HAMMONASSETT, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 HAMMOND BAY HARBUR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 HAMMONU SMALL BOAT BASIN, OREG. (NPP) 37-47 HAMMUNUSPOAT, USREGO RIVER BASIN, N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 1-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 HAMPSHIRE CREEK TRIBUTARY, HAMPSHIRE, ILL. (NCC) 28-20 HAMPTON CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-6, 5-17e 5-21 HAMPTON HARBOR, N.H. (NED) 1-5, 1-28, 1-38 HAMPTON INSTITUTE, VA. (NAO) 5-24 HAMPTON, N.H. (NEO) 1-11, 1-42 HANA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII (POD) 3b-12 HANALEI BAY SMALL OAT, HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 HANAPEPE BAY, KAVAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 HANAPFPE RIVER, KAUAI, HAWAII.(POD) 36-13 HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT. (NED) 1-17, 1-31, 1-45 HANGING ROCK, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 HANNIRAL HARBOR, MO. (NCD) 29-2, 29-9, 29-11 HANNIBAL LUCKS AND DAM, W.VA. (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 HANNIBAL, MO. (NCR) 28-18 HANSEN DAM, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 HANSON, HOWARD A, UAM, WASH. (NAS) 38-12, 38-19, 38-24 HAkRBOR BEACH HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-18, 31-58, 31-74 HARBOR OF BALTIMORE, MO., PREVENTION OF UBSTHUCTIONS AND INJURIOUb DEPOSIrS (NAB) 4-6, 4-29, 4-35 HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL (NAP) 3-b6, 3-21, 3-25, 3-5 HARBOR OF REFUGE, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 HARBOR OF REFUGE, PT. JUDI1H, R.I. (NED) 1-39 HAkOWICK DAMS (NAN) 2-45 HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NEBR. (MRK) 20-4, 20-14o 20-21 HARLEM RIVER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 HARPERS FERRY, W.VA. (NAB) 4-46 HARRASEEKET RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39 MARRIET ISLAND HARBOR, ST. PAUL, MINN. (NCD) 29-8 HARRIET ISLAND, MINN, (NCD) 29-12 HARRIS FORK CREEK, TENN. AND KY, (MR+T) 42-29, 42-59 HARRISBURG, IL. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 HARRISON COUNTY, MISS. (SAM) 10-44 HARRISONVILLE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-5, 14-14 , 14-17 HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-19, 31-58, 31-75 HARROOSRURG, KY. (TOwNBRANCH) (ORL) 24-36b HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-12, 20-16, 20-21, 20-22 HARTI-OkO WHITE RiVER, VT. (NED) 1-47 HARTFORD, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-44, 1-47 HARTFORD, VT. (NED) 1-44 HARTFORD, WVA, (ORH) 25-27 HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-5t 14-14, 14- 17 HARVE, MILK RIVER, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 HARVEY CANAL, BAYOU BARATARIA LEVEE, LA. (LMN) 11-54 HASTINGS HARBOR, MINN. (NCO) 29-3e 29-8e 29-11 HASTINGS, MINN. (NCS) 27-23 HAVERHILL, MA. (NED) 1-25 HAVRE, MONT. (MRO) 21-22 HAVRE, SCOTT COULEE-BULL HOOK DAMe MONT. (MRO) 21-19 HAWAII HONOLULU, PORT ALLEN, HAWILIWILI, KAHULAIe KAWAIHAE, MILO AND KAUNAKAKAIT 53-5 HAWAROEN, DRY CREEK, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 HAwESVILLE, KY. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 HAY (WEST HARBOR), FISHER'S ISLAND, N.Y. (NED) 1-39 HAY CREEK, BIROSBORO, SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, PA. (NAP) 3-15, 3- HAYDEN ISLAND, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 HAYS, BIG CREEK, KANS, C(MRK) 20-22 HAYWARD CREEK, MA. (NED) 1-25 HAYWARD CREEK, QUINCY BRAINTREE, MA. (NED) 1-47 HEEIA-KEA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 HEISE-ROBERTS AREA, SNAKE RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 HEISE-ROBERTS EXTENSION, COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 HEISE-ROBERTS EXTENSION, SNAKE RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 HELENA HARBOR, ARK. (LMM) 13-1, 13-7, 13-8 HELLENS CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 - HELM LAKE, IL. (ORL) 24-35 HEMPSTEAD COUNTY LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 1, ARK. (LMN) 11-53, 11-54 HEMPSTEAD HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-43 HENDERSON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO Is ILL. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 HENDERSON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 2o ILL. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 HENDERSON COUNJY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO.3, 266. (NCR) 28-b16, 28-18 HENDERSON, WeVA. (ORN) 25-27 HENDRICK'S HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-39 HENNEPIN DRAINAGE ANO LEVEE DISTRICTS (NCC) 28-16be 28-17 HENRY T. RAINEY DAM, ILL. (NCD) 29-4, 29-7, 29-10 HERGOT DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16 HERKIMER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 HERREID SPRING CREEK, S. OAK. (MRO) 21-22 HERREIO, SPRING CREEK, S.0. (MRO) 21-20 HERRING BAY & ROCKHOLD CREEK, MO. (NAB) 4-40 HERRING CREEK, NOD. (NAB) 4-40 HEYRURN LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-12e 19-24, l19- 34 HTCKMAN HARBOR, KY. (LMM) 13-2, 13-7, 13-8 HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVERe CA. (SPK) 35-7, 35-22 HIGGINSPORT, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 HIGHLAND BAYOU, IEX. (SW6) 15-14, 15-19, 15-31 HILLS CREEK LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-27, 37-36, 37-45, 37-48, 37-50 HILLSBORUOGH BAY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-52 HILLSBUROUGH RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-36 HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-4, 20-14, 20-21 HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-6, 14-14, 14* 17 HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII (PUD) 36-2, 36-8, 36-10, 36-12 HINGHAM HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 HIWASSEE RIVER, TENN. (ORN) 23-17 HOCKINGPORT, OHIO CORH) 25-27 HODGES OAM, SAN DIEGUITO RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-34 HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA. (NED) 1-24, 1-33, 1-46 HOGTOWN CREEK, FLA. (SAJ) 9-52 HOLBROOK LEVEE, LITTLE COLORADO RIVER, COLORADO RIVER BASIN. ARIZ. (SPL) 33-34 HOLBROOK, ARIZ. (SPL) 33-34 HOLLAND HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-19, 31-59, 31-75 HOLLEY LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-50, 37-53 HOLLYWOOU*ARDMORE BEACH, CHICAGO, ILL. (NCC) 30-6, 30-10, 30-13 HOLMES BAY, WHITING, ME. (NED) 1-17, 1-31 HOLMES CREEK, FLA. (SAM) 10-43. HOLSTON RIVER, TENN. (ORN) 23-17 HOLYOKE, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-44, 1-47 HOMER HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-2, 40-be6, 40-9, 40-10 HOMME LAKE AND DAMe N. OAK. (NCS) 27-6, 27-17 HOMOCHITTO RIVER, MISS. (LMK) 12-11, 12-12 HOMOSASSA RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 HONEY HILL LAKE, N.H. (NED) 1-49 HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD. (NAB) 4-39, 4-40 HONOKOMAU SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 HONOLULU HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII (POD) 36-3, 36-8 HONOLULU HAR80 R, OAHU. HAWAII (POD) 36-2, 36-8, 36-10 HOONAH HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-3, 40-9, 40-10 HOUPER, ELKHORN RIVER, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 HOOPER, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 HOUSIC FALLS, HOOSIC RIVER BASIN, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 HOP BROOK LAKE, CT. (NED) 1-18, 1-31, 1-45 HOPKINS CREEK, GREENVILLE, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, N.H. (NED) 1-20, 1-32, 1-45 HOUIJIAM RIVER, WASH. (NPS) 38-27 HORDS CREEK LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-8, 16-18, 16-21 HORN HARBOR, VA. (NAU) 5-26 HORNELL, N.Y. (NAB) 4-20, 4-32, 4-43, 4-44 HORSELEG CREEK, ROME, GA. (SAM) 10-45 HORSESHOE COVE, FLA. (SAJ) 9-44 HOSKINS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 HOT SPRINGS, FALL RIVER CHANNEL, S.D. (MRO) 21-20 HOULKA CREEK, CHICKASAW AND CLAY COUNTIES, MISS. (SAM) 10-17, 10- HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA. (LMN) 11-13, 11-36, 11-42 HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT. (NED) 1-17 HOUSATONIC RIVER SALISBURY, CT. (NED) 1-18, 1-32, 1-45 HOUSATONIC RIVER SHEFFIELD, MA. (NED) 1-18, 1-32 HOUSATONIC RIVER, CONN. (NED) 1-39 HOUSATONIC RIVER, CT, (NED) 1-49 HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. (SWG) 15-7, 15-18, 15-26, 15-34, 15-36 , 15-41 HOUSTON, TX. 53-5 HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WASH. (NAS) 38-12, 38-19, 38-24 HOWARD MILL LAKE, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-22 HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-30, 2-35 HUDSON RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-44 HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-30, 2-34 HUGO LAKE, KIAMICHI RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-12, 19-24, 19-34, 19-36 HULAN LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-12, 19-25, 19- 34 HUMBOLDT HARBOR & BAY, CA. (SPN) 34-3. 34*9, 34-14, 34-17 HUMBOLDT HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 HUMBOLDT RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NEV. (SPK) 35-8, 35-22 HUNINGTON, HA. (NED) 1-44, 1-47 HUNT DRAINAGE DISTRICT AND LIMA LAKE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR ) 28-16, 28-18 HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S. C. (SAN) 7*8, 7-12, 7-15 HUNTINGOON, TENN. (LMM) 13-5, 13-7, 13-8 HUNTINGTON HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-13, 24-22 HUNTINGTON, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 HURON HARBOR, OHIO (NCB) 32-12, 32-27, 32-37 HUTCHINSON LEVEE AND CHANNEL, KANS. (SWT) 19-36, 19-37 HYANNIS HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 HYDRAULICS AND HYDROLOGY OF THE GREAT LAKES 31-53 HYDROMET 31-54 1-20 BRIDGE, JACKSON, MISS. (SAM) 10-45 IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII (POD) 36-5, 36-9, 36-11 ICE HARBOR AT MARCUS HOOK, PA. (NAP) 3-28 ICE HARBOR AT NEW CASTLE, DEL. (NAP) 3-28 ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-LAKE SACAJAWEAr WASH. (NPW) 39-6, 39-13 39-1,S 39-19, 39-23 IDA GROVE, IOWA (MRO) 21-22 IDA GROVE, MAPLE RIVER-ODEBOLT CREEK, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 ILIULIUK HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, ILL. (NCR) 28-3, 28-11 ILLINOIS RIVER LEVEES (LMS)(NCC) 14-20 ILLINOIS RIVER, ILL. (NCC) 28-17 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (LMS) 14-2 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILL. AND IND. (NCC) 28-2, 28-11, 28-13, 28-22 IMPERIAL BEACH, CA. (SPL) 33-31 INDIAN BEND WASH, ARIZ, (SPL) 33-9, 33-22 INDIAN CREEK AREA, ILLINOIS RIVER, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 INDIAN CREEK, CORYDON, IN. (ORL) 24-368 24-37 INDIAN GRAVE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 INDIAN HILLS, OH. (LITTLE MIAMI RIVER) (ORL) 24-36 INDIAN ISLAND, ME. (NED) 1-25 INDIAN LAKE, BLUE RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 INDIAN MILL CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY. (ORL) 24-37 INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL, (NAP) 3-6, 3*21, 3*25, 3-27 INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DELAWARE (NAP) 41-5 INDIANA HARRORe IND. (NCC) 30-4, 30-9, 30-12 INDIANAPOLIS, IN. (FALL CREEK SECTION) (WHITE RIVER) (ORL) 24-37 INDIANAPOLIS, IN. (OL) 24-36 INDIANOLA, NEBR. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22 INDUSTRY, PA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 INLAND ROUTE, MICH. (NCE) 31-20, 31-59, 31-75 INLAND WATERWAY FROM CHINCOTEAGUE BAY, VA. TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (NAP) 3-28 INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL., AND MO. (NAP) 3-7, 3-22, 3-26 INLAND WATERWAY FROM FRANKLIN TO MERMENTAU RIVER, LA. (LMN) 11-50 I-10 INDEX INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (NAP) 3-7, 3- 21, 3-25 INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD, (NAB) 4-8E4 -29 4-3A6 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SAW) 6-17 INTER COUNTY 0.0D., LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY, MIAMI TO KEY WEST, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 INTERNAL JUINT COMMISSION (IJC) 31-52 INTERNATIONAL CHAMPLAIN-RICHELIEU BOARD O9-2 INTERNATIONAL GREAT LAKES DIVERSIONS AND CONSUMPTIVE USES STUDY BOARD 31-53 INTERNATIONAL GREAT LAKES DIVERSIONS AND CONSUMPTIVE USES STUDY BOARD 49q-2 INTERNATIONAL GREAT LAKES TECHNICAL INFORMATION NETWORK .BOARD 49 2, 49-3 INTERNATIONAL GREAT LAKES, TECHNICAL INFORMATION NETWORK BOARD 31 -53 INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION BOARD OF CONTROL (IJC) 49-1, 493 INTERNATIONAL KOUTENAY LAKE BOARD OF CONIRUL 49-1 INTERNATIONAL LAKE CHAMPLAIN BOARD OF CONTROL 49-1 INTERNATIONAL LAKE ERIE REGULATION STUDY BOARD 49-2 INTERNATIONAL LAKE ERIE. REGULATION STUDY BOARD 31-53 INTERNATIONAL LAKE MEMPHREMAGOG BOARD 49-2 INTERNATIONAL LAKE OF THE wOODS CONTROL BOARD 49-1 INTERNATIONAL LAKE SUPERIOR BOARD OF CONTROL (NCD) 49-1 INTERNATIONAL LAKE SUPERIOR BOARD OF CONTROL 31-52 INTERNATIONAL NIAGARA BOARD OF CONTROL (NCE) 49-1 INTERNATIONAL NIAGARA BOARD OF CONTROL 31-52 INTERNATIONAL NIAGARA COMMITTEE 49-2 INTERNATIONAL NIAGARA WORKING COMMITTEE 31-52 INTERNATIONAL OSOYU0S LAKE BOARD OF CONTROL 49-1 INTERNATIONAL RAINY LAKE BOARD OF CONTROL 49-1 INTERNATIONAL SKAGIT RIVER BOARD OF CONTROL 42-1 INTFRNATIONAL SOURIS-RED RIVERS ENGINEERING BOARD 49-2 INTERNATIONAL ST. CRUIX RIVER BOARD OF CONTROL (NED) 49-1 INTERNATIONAL ST. LAURENCE RIVER BOARD OF CONTROL 31-53 INTERNATIONAL ST. LAWRENCE RIVER BOARD OF CONTROL (NCE) 49-1 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY BRIDGE (BARGE CHANNEL) DREG. (NPP) 37-47 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY FROM APALACHICOLA BAY TO ST. MARKS RIVER: RE LANARK VILLAGE TO ST. GEORGE SOUND, FLORIDA (BERH) 41-4 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY FROM THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO BAYOU TECHE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSA HATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-27, 9-32 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-27, 9-32 INVESTIGATIONS OF PROJECTS UNDER THE FEDERAL POWER ACT 47-1 IOLA LEVEE, KANS, (SwT) 19*36, 19*37 IOWA RIVER, BEAR CREEK, MARENGO, ILL. (NCR) 28-11 IOWA RIVER-FLINT CREEK LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 16, IOWA (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 IPSWICH RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-39 IRUNDEOUOIT BAY, NY. (NCB) 32-12e 32-27 IRONTON, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-9 35-22 ISLAND CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40NAB) 4-6, 4 ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD. (NAB) 4-6 -29, 435 ISLAND LEVEE, IN. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-31 ISLE AU HAUT THOROUGHFARE, ME. (NED) 1-6v 1-28 ISLE OF SHOALS HARBOR, ME. AND N.H. (NED) 1-39 ISRAEL R., LANCASTER, N.H. (NED) 1-44 ITHACA, N.Yo CAYUGA INLET (NCA) 32-46 J J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR# OHIO RIVER BASIN, TEN. (ORN) 23-8, 23-10, 23-18 JACKFORD CREEK, OKLA. (SWT) 19-36 JACKSON AND EAST JACKSON, MISS. (SAM) 10-44 JACKSON CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 39-18 JACKSON HOLE, SNAKE RIVER, WYO. (NPW) 39-17 39-18 JACKSON MILLS AND MINE FALLS DAM, NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE (BERH) 41 -5 JACKSON, KY. (KENTUCKY RIVER BASIN) (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 JACKSON, MINN. (NCR) 28-19 JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-7e 9-27, 9-33 JADWIN, GENERAL EDGAR DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA. (NAP) 3-18, 3-23 JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (NAN) 27p 2-30 2-35 JAMES G. FULTON kEACH (ORP) 26-5, 26-29 JAMES RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-7, 5-18, 5-21 JAAMREVSITS OWCNR EERKE,S ERVVAO. IR(,N AON). 5O-A2K6. (MRO) 21-22 JEFFERSON RIVER, BANK PROTECTION, NEAR WATERLOO, MONT. (MRO) 21- 19 JFFE9 N IER ILO CREEK BRIDGE, NEAR THREE FORKS, MONT. MRO) 2-9 JEFFERSON, MIS. (EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION ) (NCR) 28-19 JEFFERSONVILLE(CLARKSVILLE, IN* (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 JEMEZ CANYON DAMe N. MEX. (SWA) 17"e 17-14, 17-16 JENKINS, TOM, DAM, oHIO (ORH) 25-13, 25-19 JENKS LEVEE, ODLA. (SWY) 19-36, 19-37 JENNINGSE, CT. (ED) 1-11, 1-42 JEROME, ARIZ. (PL) 33G34 JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FLA. (SAM) 10-24, 10-32, 10-40, 10*46 JOE CREEK, TULSA, ORLA. (SWT)19 -12, 19-25 JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM.LAKE UMATILLA, DREG. AND WASH. (NPP) 37-27, JOH3N7 -3D6A,Y 3R7I(V4E5R , O3R7E-G5.6 (NNP P) 37-51 JOHN DAY RIVER, OREG., COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTIU N (NPP) 37-51 JOHN DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 JOHN HOLLIS BANKHEAD LOCK AND DAM (SAM) 10-5 JOHN MARTIN RESENVOIR, COLU. (SWA) 17-3, 17-13 JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, GRAND (NEOSHU) RIVER BASIN, KANS. (SWT) 19-13, 19-25,. 19-34 JOHN REDMOND WILDLIFE REFUGE, KANS. (SWT) 19-37 JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. (ORH) 25-9, 25-17 JOHN'S PAS, FLA. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-27, 9-33 JOHNSON BAY, LUBEC, ME. (NED) 1-19, 1-32 JOHNSON BAYOU, LA. (SWG) 15-32 JOHNSON CREEK, OREG. (NPP) 37-16, 37-34 JOHNSON CREEK, PORTLAND AND VICINITY, OREG. (NPP) 37-43, 37-50 JOHNSON GORGES (NAN) 2-45 JOHNSONBURG, PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER BASIN) (ORP) 26-27 JOHNSONBURG, PA. (URP) 26-29, 26-30 JOHNSTOWN. PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER BASIN) (URP) 26-27 JOHNSTUWN, PA. (URP) 26-7, 26-18 JONES BLUFF LOCK AND DAM, ALA. (SAM) 10-21, 10-31, 10-45 JONES INLET, N.Y. (NAN) 2-8, 2-30, 2-35 JONESPORT HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-6, 1-29 JONESVILLE, LA. (MR+T) 42-28, 42-57 JOSIAS RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39 JOYCE CREFA, CAMDEN COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) 6-15, 6-23 JULIAN, ROCK CREEK, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 JUNEAU HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-6, 40-12 K KAAAWA BEACH, OAHU, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 KAEMPFER BROOK, LIBERTY, N.Y. (NAP) 3-30 KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII (POD) 36-5, 36-9, 36-11 KAHIJLUI BEACH ROAD MAVI, HAWAII (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-10, 36-12 KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-10, 36-12 KAILUA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 KAIMU BLACK SAND BEACH, HAWAII, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 KAKE HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-3, 40-9, 40-10 KALAMA RIVER (SOUTH AREA) LEVEE, COWLITZ COUNTY, WASH. (NPP) 37-5 3 KALAMAZOO RIVER (BATTLE CREEK), MICH. (NCE) 31-91 KALAMAZOO RIVER, (KALAMAZOO), MICH. (NCE) 31-91 KALAPANA ROAD PROTECTION, HAWAII, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 KALAUPAPA HARBOR, MOLOKAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 KANAWHA RIVER, W.VA. (ORH) 25-2, 25-16 KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU HAWAII (POD) 36-6, 36-9, 36-11 KANKAKEE RIVER, ILL. AND IND. (NCC) 30-15 KANOPOLIS LAKF, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-4, 20-1j 20-21 KANSAS CITY, KANSAS RIVER, KANS. (1962 MOD.) (MRK) 20-5, 20-15 KANSAS CITYS ON MO. AND KANSAS RIVERS, MO. AND KANS. (MRK) 20-4, 20-14, 20-17 KANSAS RIVER AND MINOR TRIHUTARIES (MRK) 20-21 KANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION, KANSAS (MRK) 20-2, 20-14 KAPAA TOWN, KAVAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 KAP.AAKEA HOMESTEAD FLOOD CONTROL, MOLOKAIe HAWAII (POD) 36-13 KARLSON ISLAND.CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-51 KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-6, 14 -14, 14-18 KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. (LMS) 14-2, 14-6, 14-7e 14-14, 14-17, 14-18 , 14-20 KASKASKIA RIVER, ILL. (LMS) 14-2, 14-6, 14-7, 14-14, 14-17, 14-18 , 14-20 KAUKAUNA DAMe WIS. (NCC) 31-89 KAUKAUNA FIFTH LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 KAUKAUNA FIRSJ LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 KAUKAUNA FOURTH LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 KAUKAUNA GUARD LOCK, MIS. (NCC) 31-89 KAUKAUNA SECOND LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 KAUKAUNA THIRD LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 KAUNAKAKAI HARBOR, MOLOKAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 KAUNAKAKAI STREAM, MOLOKAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 KAW LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-13, 19-25, 19-34 KAWAIHAE DEEP DRAFT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 KAWAIHAE HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 KAWAINUI SWAMP, OABU, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA. (SPK) 35-10t 35-23 KAOKAWLIN RIVE, MICH. (NCE) 31-91 KAYS CREEK, UT. (SPK) 35-30 KEACH DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILLINOIS RIVER, ILL. (LMS) 14- 21 KEEHI LAGOON O e HAWAII (POD) 36*12 KEENE, N.H. (NED) 1-25, 1-44, 1-47 KEHOE LAKE, KY. (ORM) 25-9, 25-18 KEKAHA BEACH, KAUAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-4, 36-8 KELLEYS ISLAND. OHIO (NCB) 32-43 KELLY LAKE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-17 KENDRICK, POTLATCH RIVER, COLUMBIA RIVERBASIN, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 KENDRICK, POTLATCH RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 KENNEBEC RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 KENNEBEC RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39 KENNERUNK RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 KENNEBUNK RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-39 RENNESAB, GEORGIA (SAM) 10-47 KENOSHA HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-21, 31-59, 31-75 KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, KY. (URN) 23-16 KENTUCKY PENINSULA, KY. (OHIO RIVER) (ORL) 24-36 KENTUCKY RIVER, KY. (ORL) 24-2, 24-21, 24-29 KEOKUK HARBOR, IOWA (NCD) 29-9, 29-12 I-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 KERN RIVER-CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT INTERIIE (SPK) 35-17 KERN RIVER-CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT INTERTIE, CA. (SPK) 35-30 KERTON VALLEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCC) 28-16 KETCHIKAN HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 KEWALO HARBOR, OAHU# HAWAII (POD) 36-12 KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-21, 31-59, 31-75 KEwEENAW WATERWAY, MICH. (NCE) 31-22, 31-59, 31-76 KEY WFST HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 KEY WEST, FLA. (SAJ) 9-45 KEYPORT HARBUR, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 KEYSTONE LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(SWT) 19-20, 19-26, 19-30, 19-35 KEYSTONE LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18 KIAMICHI RIVER, OKLA. (SWT) 19-36 KIHEI BEACH, MAUI, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUAIe HAWAII (POD) 36-10 KIKIAOLA SMALL BOAT MARBORe MAUI, HAWAII (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-10 KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 KINGS CREEK, VA, (NAO) 5-26 KINGSTUN HARBOR (NORTH PLYMOUTH), MASS. (NED) 1-39 KINGSTON HARBOR, WASH. (NPS) 38-27 KINGSTON, EDWAROSVILLE, PA. (NAB) 4-46 KINGSTREE BRANCH, WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA, AND N.Y . (ORP) 26-8, 26-19 KIRWAN MICHAEL J. DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO (ORP) 26-9, 26-19 KISHWAUKEE RIVER AT DE KALB, ILL. (NCR) 28-19 KISSIMMER RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 KITTANNING, PA. (ORP) 26-29 KITTANNING, PA, PART I (ALLEGHENY RIVER) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 KITTANNING, PA. PART II (ALLEGHENY RIVER) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 KITZMILLER, OMD. (NAB) 4-46 KLAMATH RIVER, CA. (SPN) 34-21 KLUTINA RIVER, COPPER CENTER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-7, 40-13 KNAPPA AkEA, CLAISOP COUNTY, OREG, (NPP) 37-51 KNAPPS NARROWS, MDO. (NAB) 4-6, 4-29, 4-35 KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINN. (NCS) 31-22, 31-60, 31-76 KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA. (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-44 KNORB'S CREEK, NC. (SAW) 6-26, 6-27 KODIAK HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 KOUTENAI RIVER, BONNERS FERRY, IDAHO (NAS) 38-29 KOOTENAI RIVER, IDAHO AND MONT (NPS) 38-27 KUALOA REGIONAL PARK, OAHU, HAWAII (POD) 36-5, 36-9 KULIOUOU STREAM, OAHU, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 L L'ANGVILLE RIVER, ARK, (MR+T) 42-19, 42-23, 42-29, 42-56 LAD NO.11, ARK. (SWL) 18-15 LA CROSSE, WIS, (NCS) 27-7 LA FORGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WIS. (NCS) 27-7, 27-17 LA GRANGE LOCK AND DAM, ILL. (NCC) 28-22 LA POINTE HARBOR, WIS. (NCS) 31-23, 31-60, 31-76 LA TRAPPE RIVER, MO. (NAB) 4-7, 4-29, 4-35 LAC LABELLE HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-23, 31-60, 31-76 LAC QUI PARLE LAKE, MINNESOTA RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-7, 27-17 LACEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCC) 28-lb LACEY LANGELLIER, WEST MANTANZAS AND KERTON VALLEY DRAINAGE, AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-17 LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA. (NAB) 4-16, 4-42, 4-38 LACKAWANNA, N.Y., SMOKES CREEK (NCB) 32-46 LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-7, 5-18, 5-21 LAGO DE CERRILLOS, P.R. (SAJ) 9-39 LAGO DE PORTUGUES, P.R. (SAJ) 9-39 LAGOON POND, MARTHA'S VINEYARD, MASS. (NED) 1-39 LAGRANGE BAYOJJ, FLA. (SAM) 10-43 LAHAINA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MAVI HAWAII (POD) 36-12 LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALOHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, N. OAK. (NCS) 27 -8, 27-17 LAKE CAMANCHEe CA. (SPK) 35-30 LAKE CHARLES DEEP WATER CHANNEL, LA. (LMN) 11-50 LAKE CHAUTAUYA AND CHADAKOIN RIVER, N.Y. (ALLEGHENY RIVER BASIN) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 LAKE CITY HARBOR, MINN. (NCD) 29-3, 29-8, 29-11 LAKE CITY HARBOR, MINN. (NCS) 27-21 LAKE CITY, TENN. (ORN) 23-18 LAKE CRESCENT AND OUNN CREEK, FLA. (SAJ) 9-44 LAKE CROCKETT, WASH. (NPS) 38-4, 38-17, 38-22 LAKE DOUGLAS, DECATUR COUNTY, GA. (SAM) 10-44 LAKE ERIE (ERIE, PA. AND CONNEAUT, ASHTABULA, FAIRPORT HARBOR, LORAIN, HURON AND SANDUSKY, OH. 53-5 LAKE ERIE-OHIO CANAL, OHIO AND PA. (ORP) 26-26 LAKE ERIE-OHIO CANAL, OHIO AND PA, (ORP) 26-26 LAKE FORK LAKE, SAINE RIVER, TE. (SWF) I-23 LAKE FORK OF SALT CREEK (NCC) 28-18 LAKE KEMP, WICHITA RIVER BASIN, TEx. (SWT) 19-13, 19-25, 19-34 LAKE KREBS, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 LAKE MICHIGAN-LAKE BLUFF, ILL. (NCC) 30-15 LAKE MICHIGAN-LAKE FOREST, ILL. (NCC) 30-15 LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 LAKE OCKLAWAHA, FLA. (SAJ) 9-4 LAKE OGLETON, MD, (NAB) 4-40 LAKE OROVILLE, CA. (SPK) 35*11, 35-23 LAKE PLACID HINTER OLYMPICS COMMITTEE 52-3 LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA., (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (LMN) 11-27, 11-38, 11-45 LAKE PUNTCHARTRAIN, LA, (MR+T) 42-16, 42-23, 42-28, 42-51, 42-57 LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA. PROJECT LEVEES (MR+T) 42-47 LAKE PORT LAKE, CA. (SPK) 35-30 LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA, (LMK) 12-1, 12-8, 12-9 LAKE RIVER DELTA AREA, WASH, (NPP) 37-53 LAKE RIVER, WASH. (NPP) 37-9, 37-33, 37-40 LAKE ROUSSEAU, FLA. (SAJ) 9-4 . LAKE SHELRYVILLE, ILL. (LMS) 14-b, 14-7, 14-14, 14-15 LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. (SAM) 10-23, 10-32, 10-40, 10-46 LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICH,, CHANNELS (NCE) 31-24, 31-60, 31-77 LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, S. OAK. AND MINN, (NCS) 27 -8, 27-18 LAKE TRAVERSE, MINN. AND S. OAK. (NCS) 27-21 LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WASH. (NPS) 38-8, 38-18, 38-23, 38-26 LAKEVIEW LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-8, 16-18, 1b21 LAKEVIEW PARK, LORAIN, OHIO (NCB) 32-20, 32-29 LAMBERTVILLE, N.J. (NAP) 3-30 LAMOILLE RIVER, VT. (NAN) 2-45- LAMPRFY RIVER, N.H. (NED) 1-39 LANCASTER, CAYUGA CREEK, N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, N.H. (NED) 1-14, 1-30 LANCASTER, MA, (NED) 1-25 LANGELLIER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCC) 28-16 LANGSTON CREEK, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 LANKERSHIM BLVD. TO STEWARD AND GREY RO, LOS ANGELES RIVER CHANNEL, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31, 33,32 LANSING HARBOR, IOA (NCD) 29-3, 29-8, 29-11 LAPWAI CREEK, CULDESAC, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 LARCHMONT HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 LARGO SOUND CHANNEL, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA. (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (LMN) 11-28, 11-38, 11-45 LAS ANIMAS, COLO. (SWA) 17-4, 17-10, 17-13, 17-14 LAS CRUCES, N. MEX. (SWA) 17-4, 17-13, 17-14 LAS TUNAS BEACH, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA. (SPL) 33-31 LAS VEGAS WASH TRIBUTARIES, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NEV. (SPL) 33- 34 LATROBEe PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER BASIN) (ORP) 2b-27 LATROBE, PA. (ORP) 26-29, 26-30 LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY. (ORN) 23-8, 23-10, 23-18 23-19 LAVACA-NAVIDAD RIVER, TEX., HALLETTSVILLE PROJECT (SWG) 15-33 LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. (SWF) 16-9, 16-18, 16-21 LAVON LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-9, 16-18, 16-21 LAWRENCE, KANSAS RIVER, KANS, (MRK) 20-5, 20-15, 20-21 LAWRENCEBURG, IN. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 LAZER CREEK LAKE, THOMASTON, GA. (SAM) 10-46 LEADING CREEK, W.VA. (ORH) 25-28 LEAF AND CHICKASAWHAY RIVER, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 LEBONON JUNCTION, KY, (ORL) 24-36, 24-37 LECLAIRE LOCK (CANAL) (NCD) IOWA 29-b LEE COUNTY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-45 LEE, HOUSATONIC RIVER, MA, (NED) 1-47 LEE, MA. (NED) 1-25 LEECH LAKE RESERVOIR, MINN. (NCS) 27-20 LEESVILLE, VA.-ROANOKE RIVER, SEC. 32, DEMO. PROJECT (SAW) 6-15, 6-23 LEETSDALE, PA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 LEIPSIC RIVER, DEL. (NAP) 3-28 LEITH CREEK, S. C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 LELAND HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-24, 31-60, 31-77 LEMON CREEK, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 LES CHENEAUX ISLANDS, CHANNELS, MICH. (NCE) 31-24, 31-60, 31-77 LETART FALLS, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 LETART, w.VA,. (ORH) 25-27 LEVEE UNIT NU. 5, WABASH RIVER, IN. (ORL) 24-4, 24-21, 24-36 LEVEE UNIT NO. 8, IN, (ORL) 24-36. 24-37 LEVEES (LMK)(LMS)(MR+T) 42-4, 42-5, 42-25, 42-29, 42-30, 42-45, 42-46, 42-48, 42-49, 42-51, 42-51, 42-57, 42-58 LEVEES OF THE GREAT LAKES 31-54 LEWES, DELAWARE (NAP) 3-7, 3-29 LEWIS AND CLARK RIVER AREA, CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-51 LEWIS RIVER AREA, WASH, (NPP) 37-53 LEWIS RIVER BASIN (NPP) 37-52 LEWIS RIVER, WASH. (NPP) 37-9, 37-33, 37-40 LEWISPORT, KY. (ORL) 24-31 LEWISTON LEV4ES, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, IDAHO AND WASHINGTON (NPW) 39-7, 39-13 39-16 LEWISVILLE DAM, TEX. (SWF) 16-10, 16-18, 16-21 LEXINGTON HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-25, 31-60, 31-77 LIBBY DAM-LAKE KOOCANUSA, MONT. (NAS) 38-15, 38-20, 38-25 LIBERTY LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, TEX. (SWG) 15-33 LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. (NAN) (NAP) 2-22, 2- 32, 2-38 LIBERTY STATE PARK, N.J. (NAP) 3-15, 3-23 LICK RUN, ROANOKE, VA. (SAW) 6-30 LICKING RIVER, KY. (ORL) 24-30 LIOOKEY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-45 LIGHTHOUSE POINT, CT. (NED) -11e 1-42 LIGHTING CREEK, CLARK FORK, IDAHO (NPS) 38-28 LINCOLN, N.H. (NED) 1-25 LINCOLN, SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 LINK LOCATION, BOISE RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 LINTON, N. OAK. (MRO) 21-22 LISLE,' N.Y. (NAB) 4-21, 4-32, 4*43, 4*44 LITTLE BAY DE NOE HARBOR, MICH, (NCE) 31-90 LITTLE BAY, YT.X (SAG) 15-32 LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, MO. (MRK) 20-5, 20-15 LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO. (MRK) 20-b, 20-15 LITTLE CAILLOU BAYOU. LA, (LMN) 11-50 LITTLE CALUMET RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ILL. AND IND. (NCC) 30-15 LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, ILL. (NCC) 28-2 LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, ILL. (NCC) 30-7, 30-10, 30-15 LITTLE CHUTE DAM, HIS. (NCC) 31-89 LITTLE CHUTE FIRST (GRAND) LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 LITTLE CHUTE SECOND LOCK, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 LITTLE CHUTE, LOWER AND UPPER LOCK, WIS, (NCC) 31-89 LITTLE COVE, CREEK, GLENCOE, ALA. (SAM) 10-44 LITTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-10, 20-16, 20-21 LITTLE CREEK, KENT ISLAND, MD. (NAB) 4-40 LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT. (SPK) 35-30 LITTLE EGG HARBOR, N.J. (NAP) 3-2 1-12 INDEX LITTLE GUOSE LUCK AND DAM*LAKE BRYAN, WASH. (NPW) 39-7, 39-131 3q-6, 39-20t 39-23 LITTLE HARbOR, N.H. (NED) 1-38, 1-39 LITTLE HARBOR, N.H. (NED) 1-39 LITTLE HARBOR, WOOUS HOLE, MASS. (NED) 1-39 LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, W.VA. (ORHM) 25-20 LITTLF KAIKAUNA LOCK AND DAM, WIS. (NCC) 31-89 LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MICH, (NCE) 31-256, 31-ble 31-77 LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-26 LITTLE MANATEE RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-44 LITTLE MISSOURI RIVER, ARK. (LMK) 12-11, 12-12 LITTLE NECK dAY, N.Y, (NAN) 2-43 LITTLE NEMAHA RIVER, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 LITTLE PAPILLIUN, LITTLE PAPILLION CREEK, NEB. (MRO) 21-20, 21-22 LITTLE RIVER (CREEK),V(AN. (AO) 5-26 LITTLE RIVER AT CAYUGA ISLAND, N.Y. (NCB) 32-43 LITTLE RIVER BASIN, MO. (MR+) 42-10, 42-51, 42-56, 42-58 LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO. (MRAT) 42-20, 42-58 LITTLE RIVER INLET, N. C. AND S. C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-t 7-14 LITTLE RIVER PROJECT LEVEES (MR+T) 42-50 LITTLE RIVER, OF' (NAP) 3-9, (3-2? LITTLE RIVER, LA. (LMK) 12ll LITTLE RIVER, ORKLA. (SWT) 19-36 LITTLE ROCK LEYEE, ARK., EAST END FOURCHE BAYOU (SWL),18-13 18-22 LITTLE ROCKFISH CREEK, HOPE MILLS, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 LITTLE SIOUX RIVER AND THIBUTARIES, IOWA (MRO) 21-22 LITTLE SUOUS LAY HARBOR, NY. (NCB 32-13, 32-27, 32-37 LITTLE SUGAR CREEK, CHARLOTTE, N C. (SAN) 7-18 LITTLE SUGAR CREEK, CHARLOTTE, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 LITTLE TALLAHATCHIE RIVER, MISS. (LMK) 12-11 LITTLE TENNESSEE RIVER, TENN. (ORN) 23-11 LITTLE VALLEY WASH, MAGNA, UT. (SPK) 35-30 LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA. (NAB) 4-7p 4-29, 4-35 LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA. (NED) 1-14, 1-30 LIVERPOOL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 LIZA JACKSON STATE PARK, FT. WALTON, FLA. (SAM) 10-43 LOCK & DAM NO. IS, ARK. (SWL) 18-3, 18-1b LOCK & DAM NO. 2, ARK. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 LOCK & DAM NO. 9, ARK. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 LOCK A& DAM NO. 4o ARK. (SWL) 183,.18-15 LOCK DAM NO. 5, ARK., (SWL) 183, 18-15 LOCK A DAM NO. 9 ARK, (SWL) 18-3 A18-I5 LOCK AND DAM NO. LOCK AND DAM NO. 2, MN. (NCD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 2, ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 2, AR. (SAL) LOCK ANQODAM NO. 2, MN. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 2, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, AR, (SWL) LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, MN. (NCD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, MONOGAHELA RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, AR. (SWL) LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, WI. (NCD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 56, ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. , AR, (SAL) LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, MN. (NCO)I LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, MN. (NCD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 6t ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 6 WI. (NCD)I LOCK AND DAM NO. 7, ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (ORP) ,LOCK AND DAM NO. 7, MN. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 7, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. , ALLEGHANY RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 8, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DAM NO. 8, WI, (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 9, ALLEGHENY RIVER PA. (ORP) LOCK AND DOM NO. 9, AR. (SWL) LOCK AND DAM NO. 9 1WI. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 10, IA. (NCD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, AR, (SWL) LOCK AND DAM NO. 11, IA. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 12, IA. (NCD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, AR. (SWL) LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, IA. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, OK, (SWT) LOCK AND DAM NO. 14e IA. (NCD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 15, IL. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 16, IA. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 17, IL. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 18, IA. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 19, IA. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 20, MO. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 21, IL. (NCO) LOCK AND DAM NO. 22, MU., (NCD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 24, M. (0CD) LOCK AND DAM NO. 25, IL. (C0)D LOCK AND DAM NO. 52, IL. (ORD) LOCK AND DAM MO, f5, IL. (ORD) LOCK AND DAM MO. 54, IL. TURD) LOCK HAVEN, PA. (NAB) LOCK -53, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 3*55, FL. (SAJ) LOCK -57, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 5-8, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 5-59, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 3-60, FL. (SAJ) LOCK S-61, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 3-62, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 3-63, FL. (SAJ) LOCK S*63A, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 5-65, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 3-65A, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 3-658, FL, (SAJ) LOCK S-65C, FL. (SAJ) LOCK 3-650, FL. (SAJI LOCK $-65E, FL. (SAJI LOCK S-96, FL. (SAJ) LOCK S-96A FL. (SAJ) LOCK S-157, FL. (SAJ) LOCK S-1588 FL. (SAJ) LOCK S-193 (HGS-6MO0) (SAJ) LOCK S-3086, FL. (SAJ) LOCK S-310 (HGS-2MOD) (SAJ) LOCK AND OAM NO. 13, (POOL) CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT ARKANSAS RIVER 6ASIN, OKLA. (SWI) t9-4 LOCK AND DAM NO. 53, TLL. (ORD) 22-3 LOCK AND DAM I (NCD) MINN. 29-21 29-3, 29-4, 29-6, 29-10 LOCK AND DAM 10 (NCD) IOWA 29-2 29-3 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 11 (NCO) IOWA 29-4, 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 12 (NCO) IOWA 29-4, 29-b LOCK AND DAM 13 (NCD) IOWA 29-2, 29-b LOCK AND DAM 14 (NCD) IOWA 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29-b LOCK AND DAM 15 (NCO) ILL. 29-3, 29-4, 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 16 (NCD) IOWA 29-3, 29-4, 29-7 LOCK AND DAM 17 (NCO) ILL. 29-4 29-7 LOCK AND DAM 18 (NCO) IOWA 29-2, 29-4, 29-7 LOCK AND DAM 19 (NCD) IOWA 29-3, 29-4, 29-7 LOCK AND DAM 2 (NCD) MINN, 29-2, 29-3, 29-6, 29-11 LOCK AND DAM 20 (NCD) MO. 29-2, 29-4, 29-7 LOCK AND DAM 21 (NCD) ILL. 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29-7 LOCK AND DAM 22 (NLOD) MO. 29-2, 29-4, 29-7 LOCK AND DAM 24 (NCD) MO. 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29-7,-29-12 LOCK AND DAM 25 (NCD) MO. 29-3, 29-4, 29-7 LOCK AND DAM 26 (HENRY To RAINEY DAM) (NCD) ILL. 29-4, 29-7, 29- 10, 29-12 LOCK AND DAM 3 (NCD) MINN. 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 4 (NCO) WIS. 29q-3, 29-4, 29-6 LOCK AND D AM 5 (NCO) MINN. 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 5A (NCD) MINN. 29-3, 29-4, 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 6 (NCD) WIS. 29-2 29-3 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 7 (NCD) MINN. 29-2, 29-3v 29-4, 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 8 (NCO) WIS. 29-3, 29-4, 29-6 LOCK AND DAM 9 (NCD) WIS. 29-3, 29-4, 29-6 LOCK HAVEN, PA. (NAB) 4-16, 4-31, 4-38 LOCK S-157, FL. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK S-158, FL. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK S-53, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK S-65, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK -96, FLA*. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK 5-96A, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK S55, FL. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK*593 (HGS-6 MOD) FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCKS3O (HGS-2 MOD) FLA(SAJ) 9-47 LOCK*S57, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK-SS8, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK*S59, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK*S6O, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCKS6t, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK-S62, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK-S63, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK-S63AE, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK*S658, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK-S65C, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK-S65D, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK-S65E, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCK-308B, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 LOCKLIES CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 LOCKPORT LOCK AND DAM, ILL. (NCC) 28-22, 28-23 LOCKS AND DAM NO. 52, ILL. (ORY) 22-3 LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-21 LOGAN CREEK, BANK PROTECTION, NEAR BANCROFT, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 LOGAN, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 LONG BEACH ISLAND, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 LONG BRANCH WAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-6, 20-15 LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. (NAN) 2-9, 2-43 LONG LAKE AREA, HELENA, ARK. (LMM) 13-5, 13-7, 13-8 LONG LAKE AREA, VICINITY OF HELENA, ARK. (LMM) 42-25 LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-33 LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-28, 37-36, 37-45, 37-48, 37-50 LOPEZ CANYON DIVERSION, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 LOPEZ DAM, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 LORAIN HARBOR, OIO (NCB) 32-13, 32-20, 32-27, 32-38, 32-44 LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA. (SPL) 33-3s 33-21 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ORAINAGE AREA, CA. (SPL) 33-13, 33-33, 33-22 LOS ANGELES RIVER CHANNEL, LONG BEACH BLVD. LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 LOS ESTFROS LAKE, N. MEx. (SWA) 17-5, 17-13, 17-15 LOST AND LITTLE LOST CR., CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, OKLA. (SWT) 19-37 LOST CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREG. (NPP) 37-28, 37-36, 37" 45, 37-48 LOST CREEK, COLUMBUS, NEBR. (MRO) 21-23 LOST RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-23 LOST RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-24 LOUISVILLE LAKE, IL. (ORL) 24-14, 24-23p 24-35 LOUISVILLE, KY, (ORL) 24-31, 24-37 LOUISVILLE, KY. (ORL) 24-36 LOOP RIVER, COLUMBUS, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 LOW HEAD LOCKS AND DAM, OKLA. (SWT) 19-4, 19-23 LOWELL CREEK, ALASKA (NPA) 40-13 LOWELL CREEK, ALASKA (NPA) 40-7 LOWELL, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-46, 1-47 LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK. (MR+T) 42-8, 42-17, 42-56, 42-58 LOWER AUCHUMPKEE CHEEK LAKE, ROBERTA, GA. (SAM) 10-46 LOWER BIG SIOUX RIVER, IOWA AND S. OAK. (MRO) 21-22 LOWER BRANCH RUSH RIVER, N. YAK. (NCS) 27-24 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION WORKS OREG. AND WASH, (NPP) 37-17, 37*34, 37-43, 37-50 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, (NPP) 37-52 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. AND WASH. (NPP) 37-16, 37-43, 3 7-49 LOWER COWLITZ RIVER, WASH. (NPP) 37-54 LOWER ORY CREEK, LOWDEN, WASH. (NPw) 39-18 LOWER GILA RIVER LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS (GILA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES DOWNSTREAM FROM PAINTED ROCK DAM (INACTIVE), ARIZ. (SPL) 33-34 LOWER GRAND RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-22 LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WASH. (NPW) 39-8, 39-13, 39-16, 39- 21,r39-23 1.13 REPORT OF THlE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 LOWER GUYANDOTTE RIVER BASIN, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 LOWER HOM INDIAN VILLAGE, FORKS, WASH. (NAS) 38-29 LOWER JOROAN, UTAH (BENH) 41-4 LOWER MACHODUC CREEK, VA. (NAB) 4-40 LOWFR MONUMENTAL LOCK AN D DAM, WASH. (NPW) 39-9, 39-13, 39-16, 39 -21, 39-23 LOWER RED RIVER STANDARD REVETMENTS (MR+T) 42-34 LOWER kEO RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA. (MR+T) 42-7, 42-16, 42-29, 42-34, 42-51, 425b6, 42 4, 42*46 LOWER SAN FRANCISCO BAY, CA, (SPN) 34-20 LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING TUOLUMDE AND S IANISLAUS RIVERS, CA. (SPK) 35-23, 35-30 LOWER SNAKE RIVER, ,WASH., FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION (NPW) 39-9, 39-14, 39-16 LOWER ST FRANCIS RIVER, ARK. (MR+T) 42-10 LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MO. (NAB) OCEAN CITY HAR0BOR AND LOWER WALLA WALLA RIVER, WASH. (NPA) 39-17 LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, ARK, (MR+T) 42-19, 42-29, 42-58 LOWFR WHITt RIVEN LEVEES (MR+T) 42*11, 42*24, 42-P9, 42-51, 42-58 LOWER WHITE RIVEN PRUJECT LEVEES (MR+T) 42-5U LOWER WOONSOCKET, R.I. (NED) j-47 LOWES WHARF, MO. (NAB) 4-40 LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. (ORP) 26-8 26-19 LIIUBEC CHANNEL, ME. (NED) 1-39 LUCKY PEAK LAKE, IDAHO (NPW) 39-3, 39-13, 39-15 LUDINGION HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-268 31-1, 31-77 LUDLOW LAKE, VT. (NED) 1-49 LUKFATA LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-13, 19-25, 19-36 LUMRO RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-23, 27-24 LUSSENHOP LEVEE (NCC) 28-18 LUISEN HARBOR, MINN. (NCC) 31-26, 31-61, 31-77 LYFORD LEVEE, IN. (ORL) 24-36,b 24-37 LYMAN CREEK, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 LYMAN, LYMAN CREEK, IDAHO (NVW) 39-17 LYNCHES RIVER AND CLARK CREEK S, C. (SAN) 7*6, 7-11 7-14 LYNN HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-39 LYNN-NAHANT BEACH, MA. (NED) 1-42 LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA. (NAO0) 5-26 LYILE ANU CAJON CREEKS CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA, (SPL) 33-33 LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-15, 33 -22, 33-33, 33-34 M MAALAEA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-10 MACHIAS RIVER, ME, E)D ) 1-40 MACKAY CREEK, NC. (SAW) 6-27 MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 MACKINOW CITY HARBOR, MICH, (NCE) 31-90 MACY-,B LACKBIRD CREEKrN,E B. (MRO) 21-20 MAD CREEK, MUSCATINE IOWA (NCC) 28-16 MAD RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPN) 34-21 MAD RIVER LA Er CT. (NED) 1-47 MAD RIVER, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 MADISON BAYP, MD. (NAB) 4-40 MADISON, NEBR. UNION AND TAYLOR CREEKS (MRO3 21-22 MADISON, OUNION AND TAYLOR CREEKS, NEB& (MRO) 21-20 MAGRUDER DRAINAGE DISTRICTE, COLUMBIA COUNTY, DREG, (NPP) 3751, 3 MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA, (ORP) 26-9, 26-19 MAIDEN CREEK RESERVOIR, PA. (NAP) 3-30 MAIN DITCH Ob HAMBURG, IA . (MRO) 21-23 MAIN STEM 42-5E, 42-30, 42-51 MAINTENANCE & REPAIR FLEET 8 MARINE TERMINALS, ARK. (WL) 18-3 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, OKLA, (SWT) 19 -5 MALDEN RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-40 MALHEUR IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, SNAKE RIVER, REG. (NPW) 39-1 MALHEUR RIVER, COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. (NPW) 39-18 MALMEUR RIVER, DREG. CNPW) 39-15, 39-17 MAMARONECK HARBOR, N.Y (NAN) 28, 2-31, 2-35 MANASUAN RIVEp, N.J. (NAP) 3-9, 3-22, 3-26, 3-11 MANATEE COUNTY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-28, 9-38 MANATEE RIVER, FL. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 MANCHESTER HARBOR, MA. (NED) 1-49 MANCHESTER, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 MANOAN, HEART RIVER, N. OAK. (MRO) 21-22 MAN.AN, LOWER HEART RIVER, ND. LHRO) 2a-20 MANELE SMALL BOA; HARBOR, LANAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 MANRASSET BAY, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 MANHATTAN, KANSAS RIVER, KANS. CMRK) 20-21, 20-22 BLAAYNOOUE,C E ARK, (LECN 11-52, 11-5 MANISTEE HARBOR, WIH. INCA) 31-27, 31-61, 31-78 MANISTIDUE HARBOR, MICH. (RCA) 31-27, 31-61, 31-78 MANITOWOC HARBOR, ,eIS, (NCCI 31-28, 31-61, 31-78 MWANKATD AND NORTH RANKATO, MINN. (NCS) 27-8, 27-18 MANOBIN RIVER, MD. CRAB) 4-40 MANOOSNOC, WA, (NED) 1-46 MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT, CNED) 1-25, 1-33, 1-46 WANTED (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N.C, (SAW) 6-5, 6-21 MANTUA CREEK, N.J, CRAP) 3-5, 3-28 MAPLE RIVER, N, OAK. (NCS) 27-22 RAPLESHADE, OHIO CORH) 25-27 MARAIS DES CYGNES RIVER CMRK) 20-4, 20-7 MARLEHEAD HARBOR, RA, CNED) 1-49 MARCH RIVER, MINN. NCS) ?7-23 MARERGO, IOWA (RCA) 2W-b, 28-11, 28-15 MARIETTA, OHIO CORN) 25-27 MARINA DEL RAY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA. ISPL) 33-30 MARION COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, HO. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 MAkION DIVERSION CHANNEL AND LEVEE, KANS, (SOT) 19-36 MARION LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KANSAS (SWT) 19-14, 19-25, 19-34 MARION, KANSAS (SWT) 19-14, 19-25 MARKHAM FERRY LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SwT) 18-18 MAHKHAM FERRY RESERVOIR, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLA, (SWL) (SWT) 19-21, 19-30, 19-35 MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, INO. (ORO) 22-3, 22-b6, 22-9 MARMARTHt LITTLE MISSOURI RIVER, N.O. (MRO) 21-20 MANMOUTH, N. DAK. (MRO) 21-22 MARQUETTE HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 MARSEILLES LUCK AND DAM, ILL. (NCC) 28-22, 28-23 MARSH CREEK, GENEVA, N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 MARSHALL CREEK, SAN GABRIEL RIVEN BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 MARSHALL, MINN. (NCS) 27-24 MARSHALLTOWN, IOWA (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 MARSHLAND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-51 MARTIN, JOHN, RESERVUIR, COLO. (SWA) 17-3, 17-13 MARTIN, KY. (ORH) 295-3, 25-16 MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY, (ORN) 23-5, 23-10, 23-18 MARTINSFERRY, OHIO (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NEV. AND CA. (SPK) 35-12, 35-23 MARYSVILLE LAKE, CA. (SPK) 35-18, 35-23 MARYSVILLE, KANSAS (MRK) 20-22 MASON ANO MENARD ORAINAGE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 MASON J. NIBLACK LEVEE, WABASH RIVER, IN. (OWL) 24-4, 24-21, 24- 31, 24-37 MASON, W.VA. (ORM) 25-27 MASSILLON, OHIO (ORH) 25-3, 25-16 MAIAFAO SHORE PROTECTION AMERICAN SAMOA (POD) 36-13 MATAGOROA SHIP CHANNEL, TEX. (SWG) 15-8, 15-18, 15-27, 15-37, 15- 41 MAIAWAN CREEK, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 MATINICUS HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 MATS MATS BAY, WASH, (NPS) 38-27 MATTAPOSETT HARBOR, MA. (NED) 1-49 MATTITUCK HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-9, 2-31, 2-36 MATUNUCK BEACH, SOUTH KINGSTON, R.I. (NED) 1-42 MAUDALVA BAY SMALL BOAT HARBOR, OAHUp, HAWAII (PO0) 36-12 MAUMEE RIVER, ABOVE TOLEDO, OHIO (NCB) 2-18, 32-43 MAURICE RIVER, NJ. (NAP) 3-28 MAYAGUE7 HARBOR, P. R. (SAJ) 9*43, 9-44 MAY81, VA. (ORH) 25-28 MAYSVILLE, KY. (ORH) 25-27 MC GEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-9, 14-15e 14-18 MC GREGOR, IOWA (NCS) 27-24 MCALPINE LOCKS AND DAM (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-9 MCCOOK LAKE, S. DAK. (MRO) 21-22 MCKEES ROCK, PA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 MCKENZIE RIVER NEAR WALTERVILLE, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 MCKINNEY BAYOU, ARK. (LMN) 11-52 MCKINNEY BAYOU, ARK, AND TEXAS (LMN) 11-29, 11-38, 11-45 MCLEAN BOTTOM LEREE DISTRICT NO. 3 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK, (SWL) 18-22 MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, SECOND POWERHOUSE, COLUMBIA RIVER, OREGON AND WASHINGTON (NPW) 41-5 MCNARY LOCK AND0 DAM-LAKE WALLULA-OREG.-WASH. (NPW) 39-9, 39-14, 39-16, 39-22 MCNARY SECOND POWERHOUSE, OREG. AND WASH. (NPW) 39-10, 39-14, 39- 16 MEADOW GROVE, BUFFALO CREEK, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 MEDOMAK RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 MELBOURNE HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 MELTON HILL LOCK AND DAM, TERN. (ORN) 23-lb MELVERN LAKE AND POMONA LAKE (ROAD IMPROVEMENT)# KANSAS (1974 AUTHORIZATION) (MRK) 20-21 MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-7, 20-15, 20-21 MEMPHIS HARBOR PROJECT LEVEES (MR+T) 42-50, 42-51 MEMPHIS HARBOR, TENN. (MR+T) 42-30 MEMPHIS, TERN. DISTRICT (MR#T) 42-2, 42-3, 42-4, 42-5, 42-40, 42-49, 42-5S 1, 42-56, 42-57, 42-58, 42-60 MEMPHIS, TNe vDISTRICT (LMM) 13-6 NASHVILLE, TN.e, DISTRICT (URN) 23-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-27 NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT (LMN) 1-55 NEW YORK, NY., DISTRICT (NAN) NOT FOUND OMAHA, NE.* DISTRICT (MRO) 21-9 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION (PO0) 36b-7 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT (NAP) 3-20 PITTSBURGH, PA,, DISTRICT (ORP) 26-b16 PORTLAND, OR., DISTRICT (NPP) 37-19, 37-55 ROCK ISLANDe IL., DISTRICT (NCR) 28-10, 28*21 SACRAMENTO. CA., ODISIRICI (SPK) 35-18 SAN FRANCISCO, CA., DISTRICT (SPN) 34-13 SAVANNAH, GA, ODISTRICT (SAS) 8-8 SEATTLE, WA., DISTRICT (NPS) 38-12 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT (LMS) 14-13, 14-21 ST. PAUL, MN., DISTRICT (NCS) 27-15, 27-25 TULSA, OK., DISTRICT (SWT) 19-18 VICKSBURG, MS., DISTRICT (LMK) 12-7, 12-13 AALLA WALLA, WA., DISTRICT (NPW) 39-2 WILMINGTON, NC., DISTRICT (SAW) 6-18 MEMPHIS, WOLF RIVER AND NORCONNAM CREEK, TENN. (LMM) 13-9 WENASHA LOCK AND DAM CNCC) 31-89 MENEMSHA CREEK, MARTHA'S VINEYARD, MA, (NED) 1-7, 1-29 MEROMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, RICH. AND WIS. (NCC) 31-29, 31-61, 31 MENOMIREE, MICH. CNCE) 31-47 MERAMEC PARK LAKE, MU. (LMS) 14-8, 14-15 MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO. CLMSI 14-8, 14-18, 14-20 MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA. (SPK) 35-12, 35-23 MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA. (SPK) 35-13, 35-23 MERCET RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-30 MERCER LAKE, AELDON RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20--22 MEREOOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINA6E AND LEVEE DISTRICI, ILL. (LMS) 14-9, 14-15, 14-18 MERFOOSIA, ILL., AND MEREO0SIA WILLOW CREEK AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, ILL. (LMS) 14-9, 14*15, 14-18 MERHERNIN RIVER, N.C. CR60) 5-26 MERMEN1AU RIVER, BAYOU NEZPIOUE, AND BAY DES CAONES, LA. (LMN) 11 -50 MERMENTAU RIVER, LA. (LMN) 11-13, 11-36, 11-42 1-14 INDEX MFRODOSIA LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 MEROM, IN. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-36 MFkRDIAN TOWNSHIP, MICH. (NCE) 31-47 MFRRIAM, TURKEY CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 9132 MERRICONEAG SOUND, HARPSwELL, ME. (NED) 1-19, 1-32 MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, N.H. AND MA. (NED) 1-19, 1-46 MERRIMACK RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-40 METAMORA LAKE, IN. (URL) 24-34 METHOW RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 METLAKATLA HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-4, 40-q, 40-I METROPOLIS, IL. (ORL) 24-31 MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 MIANUS RIVER, CONN. (NED) 1-40 MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO (ORP) 26-9, 26-19 MICHIANA, MICH, (NCE) 31-47 MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IND, (NCC) 305, 30-9, 30-12, 30-14 MIDDLE CREEK (SPK) 35-17 MIDDLE CREEK, CA. (SPK) 35-30 MIDDLE GILA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, UPPER END OF SAFFORD VALLEY TO BUTTES DAMSITE (CAMELSBACK DAMSITE TO SALT RIVER, ARIZ. (SPL) 33-34 MIDDLE-RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION* BERNALIO0 TO BELEN, NEW MEXICO (BERM) 41-4 MIDDLE RIVER AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, CA. (SPK) 35-28 MIDDLE RIVER AND DARK HEAD CREEK, MO. (NAB) 4-40 MIDDLE, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 MIDDLEPORT, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 MIDDLnESBORU, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY. (ORN) 23-6# 23-10, 23-18 MIDDLESBORU, KY. (DIVERSION CANAL) (ORN) 23-18 MIDDLESBORO* KY. (YELLOW CREEK) (ORN) 23-17, 23-18 MIDLAND DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG (NPP) 37-49, 37- 51, 37-53 MILAN, ILL. (NCR) 28-6, 28-11, 28-15 MILES CITY, MONT. (MRO) 21-22 MILES CITY, MT. (MRO) 21-6, 21-14 MILFORD HARBOR, CONN. (NED) 1-40 MILFURD HARRUR, CT. (NED) 1-7, 1-29, -38, 1-40 MILFORD HAVEN, VA. (NAO) 5-26b MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-7, 20-15, 20-21 MILL BROOK, ARLINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS (BERH) 41-5 MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, ILL. (NCR) 28-4p 28-l1 28- 14 MILL CREEK LAKE, OHIO (ORH) 25-10, 25-18 MILL CREEK LAKE, WASH. (NPW) 39-3, 39-13 39-15S 39-17 MILL CREEK LEVEES, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 3334 MILL CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 MILL CREEK, OH. (ORL) 24-5, 24-21e 24-36 MILL CREEK, TEX. (SWG) 15-33 MILL CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 MILL FOUR DRAINAGE DISTRICT, YA2UINA RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 MILL LAKE, BLUE RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-22 MILLCREEK, BUCKS COUNTY, PA. (NAP) 3-30 MILLEN, OHIO (ORH) 25-27 MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, ALA. (SAM) 10-21, 10-31, 10-45 MILLERSBURG, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 MILLICAN LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-10, R16-1186 -21 MILLWOOD LAK,E LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARK. (SWT) 19-14, 19-25, 19-34 r 19-36 MILLWOOD, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 MILTON HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 MILTON-FREEWATER, WALLA WALLA RIVER, OREG. (NPW) 39-18 MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-29, 31-62' 31-79 MINGO CREEK, S. C. (SAN) 7-17 MINGO JUNCTION, OHIO (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 MINING CITY LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24-34 MINNEOTA, MINN. (NCS) 27-24 MINNESOTA RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-2* 27-17 27-19 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. (NCO) 27-2 MINOT, N. DAK. (NCS) 27-9, 27-18 MISIOURI RIVERe MO. (MR+T) 42-20 MISPILLION RIVER, DEL. (NAP) 3-10, 3-22 MISQUAMICUT, R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 MISSION AND LAPWAI CREEKS, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 MISSION CREEK, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 MISSISSINEMA LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-14, 24-23 MISSISSIPPI AND LEECH RIVERS, MINN. (NCS) 27-21 MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA NO. 10, MO. (LMS) 14-21 MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA NO,. 12 MO. (LMS) 14-21 MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA A, MO. (LMS) 14-10, 14-15, 14 -18 MISSISSIPPI RIVER ALLUVIAL VALLEY MAPPING (MR+T) 42-3 MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO. (MR+T) 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (MR+T) 42-1 42-31# 42-32, 42-36, 42*38, 42-61 MISSISSIPPI RIVEN AT ST. LOUIS# MO. (LMS) 14I10, 14-15, 14-18 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN BRAINAR AND GRAND RAPID MNN. (NCS) 27-21 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. (ST LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES L AND D 26 REPLACEMENT) (LMS) 14-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MlNNEAPOLIS, MINN. (NCD) 28-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. (NCD) 29-1, 29-5, 29"11 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BEEwEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO. AND ILL. (LMS) 14-2, 14-5, 14-12, 14-17 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION (MRET) 42-I MISSISSIPPI RIVER DELTA AT AND BELOW NEW ORLEANS, LA., (NEW URLEANS TO VENNICE, LA., (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (LMN) 11-30, 11- 38, 11-45 (MN+T) 42*2, 42-29. 42*55 MISSISSIPPI RIVER DELTA REGION, LA. 42-56, 42-58 AS, MIN* (NLS) 27-2, 27-17, MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATER RESERVO M 27-19, 27- 0 MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (MR+T) 42-12, 42-14 MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES (LMK)(LMS)(MR+T) 42-4, 42-20, 42-29, 4?-45, 4 -6, 24B, 42-49, 42*51, 42-56, 42-57, 42-55 MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN NAVIGATION STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS MISSISSIPP1 RIVER NEAR AITHKIN, MINN. (NCS) 27-24 MISSISSTPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA. (LMN) 11-17, 11-36, 11-43 MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ALTON TO GALE, ILL., UNDERSEEPAGF MEASURES (LMS) 14-21 MISSISSIPPI RIVEk, RATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MFXICO, LA. (LMN) 11-14 11-36, 11-42 MISSISSIPPI RIVER, COON HAPIDS DAM TO OHIO RIVER-GREEN BAY LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 2, IOWA (BERM) A41-4 MISSISSIPPI NIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA. (LMN) 11-16, 11-36, 11-43 MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, MICHOUD CANAL, LA. (LMN) 11-50 MISSISSQUOI RIVER AT RICHFURO, VT. (NAN) 2-45 MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, N.E. AND S.D. (MRO) 21-6, 21-14 MISSOUkI RIVER AT NEW HAVEN, MO. (MRK) 20-22 MISSOURI RIVER BANK PROTECTION, GREENWOOD, S.D. (MRO) 21-20 MISSOURINT RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEB., KANS., AND MO. (MRO) 21-7, 21-15,.21-17 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBR., KANS., AND MO. (RULO, NEHR TO MOUTH) (MRK) 20-7, 20-15, 20-18 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, I.A. TO MOUTH (MRO) 21-7 p 21-21 MISSOURI RIVER MAIN STEM (MRK) 20-21 MISSOURI RIVER, ATEN, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 MISSOURI RIVER, bANK STABILIZATION, FORT BENTON, MOUNT. (MRO) 21- 19 MISSOURI RIVER, GARRISON DAM TO LAKE OAHE, N.D. (MRO) 21-6, 21-14 MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, N.E. TO SIOUX CITY, I.A. (MRO) 21- MISSOURI RIVER, MARINA, SIOUX CITY, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 MISSOURI RIVER, NIOBRARA, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA. TO RULU, N.E. (MRO) 21-2, 21-14, 21-16 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA TO FORT BENTON, HUNT. (MRO) 21- MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA TO RULO, NEBR. TERMINAL FACILITIES (MRO) 21-18 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NEHR., TO MOUTH) (MRK) 20-2, 20-14, 20-17, 20-19, 20-21 MOBILE BAY, ALA. TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. (SAM) 10-36 MOBILE HARBOR, ALA. (SAM) 10-10, 10-29, 10-37 MOBILE, AL. 53-5 MOCCASIN SPRINGS, MO, (LMS) 14-19 MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA, (SPL) 33-16, 33-22 MOKELUMNE RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-28 MOLALLA RIVER AT MILK CREEK LOCATION, OREG. (NPP) 37*54 MOLALLA RIVER AT RESSEL LOCATION, OREG (NPP) 37-54 MOLINE HARBOR, ILL. (NCD) 29-2, 29-8, 29-12 MOLINE, ILL. (NCR) 28-7, 28-11, 28-15 MONOCACY CREEK, BETHLEHEM, PA. (NAP) 3-30 MONOGAMELA RIVER AT NEWELL BOROUGH, PA. (ORP) 26-32 MONOGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA. (ORP) 26-2, 26-18, 26-21, 26-26 MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA. LOCKS AND DAMS (ORP) 26-24, 26- 26 MONOOSNOC BROOK, MA. (NED) 1-47 MONDOSNOC L4KE, MA. (NED) 1-47 MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA. (NAB) 4-39, 4-40 MONROE FLOODWALL, LA, (LMK) 12-6, 12-8, 12-9, 12-12 MONROE HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-30, 31-62, 3-79 MONROE LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-15, 24-23, 24-34 MONTEREY HARBOR, CA. (8PN) 34-9, 34m20 MONTGOMERY CO. ALABAMA (SAM) 10-47 MONTGOMERY LOCKS AND DAM, PA. (ORD) 22-7 MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA (SAM) 10-47 MONTICELLO, IOWA (NCR) 28-19 MONTOUR FALLS, OSWEGO RIVER BASIN, N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 MOORE HAVEN LOCK, LOCK S-65, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 MOOREFIELD, W,VA. (NAB) 4-44 MOORES FERRY, VA. (ORH) 2548 MOORHEAD, MINN. (NCS) 27-23 MtOOSABEC BAR, ME. (NED) 1-40 MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-21 MOREHEAD, KY. (TRIPLETT CREEK) (ORL) 24-36 MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA. (LMN) 11-54 MORGANZA FLOODWAY, LA. (MR+T) 42-14, 42-22, 42-52, 42-57 MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (NAN) 2-9, 2-31, 2-36 MORMON SLOUGH (SPK) 35-17 MORMON SLOUGH, CA. (SPK) 35-30 MORRISON, BEAR CREEK, COLO. (MRO) 21-22 MORRISTOWN HARBOR, N.Y. (NCB) 32-43 MORRO BAY HARBOR, CALIF. (SPL) 33-4, 33-21 MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OHIO (ORP) 26-10, 26-19 MOSS LANDING HARBOR, CA. (SPN) 34-20 MOTT, N. DAK. (MRO) 21-22 MOUND CITY LOCKS AND DAM, ILL. (ORD) 22-10 MOUNDS AND MOUND CITY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, ILL. (LMM) 13-9 MOUNOSVILLE, W. VA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 MOUNT CLEMENS, CLINTON RIVER, MICH, (NCE) 31-91 MOUNTAIN BROOK DAM, N.H. (NED) 1-49 MOUNTAIN FURK RIVER, OKLA. (SWT) 19-36 MOUNTAIN PARK (TOM STEED LAKE), RED RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-18, 19-35 MOUTH OF COLORADO RIVER NAVIGATION CHANNEL, TEX. (SWG) 15-39 MOUTH OF SANGAMON RIVER, ILL. (NCC) 28-7, 28-12, 28-15 MOUTH OF YAZO0 RIVER, MISS. (LMK) 12-11 MOUTH TO MAHOMET (NCC) 28-18 MT. CARMEL, IL. (ORL) 24-36, 24-37 MT. HOLLY, N.J. (NAP) 3-30 MT. MORRIS LAKE, N.Y., GENESEE RIVER (NCA) 32-23, 32-29 MUD AND BASKET SLOUGH, RICHREALL CREEK, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 MUD CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, OKLA. (SWI) 19-37 MUD CREEK, BROKEN AD0, NEBR. (MR) 21-22 MUD LAKE AREA, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 MUD LAKE PUMPING STATION, TENN. (MR+T) 42-29 MUD LAKE, TENN. (MR+T) 42-56, 42-58, 42-59 MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WASH. (NAS) 38-13, 38-19, 38-24 MUD RIVER, W.VA. (ORM) 25-28 MUDDY BAYOU, MISS. (MR+T) 42-24 MUDDY HOOK AND TYLER COVES, MD. (NAB) 4-39, 4-40 MULBERRY CREEK, VA, (NA0) 5-26 MULBERRY FORK AND CANE CREEK, ALA. (SAM) 10-47 I-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 MULLET KEY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-45 MULTNOMAN CHANNEL, OREG. (NPP) 37-47 MULTNOMAH DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 OREG. (NPP) 37-49, 37-52, 37-53 MUNCIE, IN. (ORL) 24*36, 24-37 MUNDAY FLOODWAY, TEX. (SWF) 16-23 MURDER ANO BURNT CORN CREEKS, UREWTON, ALA. (SAM) 10-17, 10-31, 10-40 MURDERKILL AND ST. JONES RIVERS, DELAWARE (NAP) 41-4 MURDERKILL RIVER, DEL. (NAP) 3-10, 3-2e MURFREESBORO DAM AND LAKE (LMK) 12-12 MURRAY LOCK & DAM (NO. 7), ARK. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 MURRELLS INLET, S. C. (SAN) 7-be 7-11, 7-15 MUSCATATUCK RIVER, CROTHERSVILLE, IN. (ORL) 24-36 MUSCATINE HARBOR, IOwA (NCD) 29-2, 29-9, 29-11 MUSCATINE ISLAND L AND 0 D, LOUISA DO NO. 13, IOWA (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 MUSCATINE, IOWA (NCR) 28-19 MUSCATINE# MAD CREEK, IOWA (NCR) 28-7, 28-12, 28-15 MUSKEGON HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-31, 31-62, 31-79 MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OHIO (OHM) 25-10, 25-18 MUSKINGUM RIVER, OHIO (ORM) 25-3, 25-4, 25-7, 25-10, 25-11, 25-20 MUSTINKA RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-22, 27-23 MYERS CHUCK HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40*12 MYSTIC RIVER, CONN. (NED) 1-40 MYSTIC RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-40 MYSTIC, CT. (NED) 1-49 N NAGEL 0.0., LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA (MRU) 21-21 NAKNEK RIVER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 NAMO RIVER, TERRITORY OF GUAM (POD) 36-6e 36-9 NAN COVE, MD.O (NAB) 4-40 NANDUA CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 NANSEMONO RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-26 NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK)e (DEL. AND MD.) (NAB) 4-39, 4-40 NANTICUKE RIVER AT BIVALVE, MD. (NAB) 4-40 NANTICOKE RIVER, MO. (NAB) 4-40 NANTUCKET (HARBOR OF REFUGE), MASS. (NED) 1-40 NAPA RiVER, CA. CHANNELS (SPN) 34-20, 34-21 NAPATREE BEACH, R.I. (NED) 1-49 NARRAGANSETT PIER, R.Io (NED) 1-49 NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 NARROWS DAM*LAKE GREESON, LITTLE MISSOURI RIVER, ARK. (LMK) 12-5, 12-8 12-12 NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. (NAN) 2-10,o 2-31, 2-36b NASHUA, N.H. (NED) 1-25, 1-46, 1-47 NATASKET BEACH, MA. (NED) 1-42 NATCHEZ PORT AREA, MISS. (LMK) 12-12 NATCHITOCHES PARISH, LA. (LMN) 11-53, 11-54 NAVAJO RESERVOIR, NM. (SPK) 35-28 NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-10, 16-18, 16-21 NAVA0SOTA LAKE, NAVOSOTA RIVER, TEX. (SWF) 16-23 NAVIGATION MURK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (CALCASIEU PASS CHANNEL IN OLD RIVER BEND AT CAMERON, LA.) (LMN) 11-50 NAwILIWILI HARBOR, KAUIA, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 NAWILIWILI SMALL BOAT HARBOR, KAUIA, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 NEABSCO CREEK, MO. (NAB) 4-40 NEAMS BAY, WASH. (NPS) 38-4 38-17, 38-22 NEALE SOUND, MU. (NAB) 4-39, 4-40 NEAR OAROANELLE, ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 NEAR SPRINGFIELD ON SANGAMON RIVER, ILL. (NCC) 28-17 NEAVITT HARBOR, MD. (NAB) 4-40 NECHES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, SALT WATER BARRIER AT BEAUMONT, TEX. (SWG) 15-8, 15-18, 15-27 NEEDLES, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-34 NEHALEM BAY, OREG. (NPP) 37-9, 37-33, 37-40 NEMARKET CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-27 NEODESHA LAKE, KANS. (SWT) 19-37 NEODESHA LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18 NEON-FLEMING, KY. (ORL) 24-36,be 24-37 NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N.C. (SAW) 6-15 NEUSE RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6b6b, 6-21, 6-26, 6-29 NEVA AND OLGA STRAITS, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 NEVILLE ISLANO PA. (ORP) 26-27* 2b-1 NEW ALBANY, IN. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36e 24-37 NEW ALBIN, IOWA (NCS) 27-23 N BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBORS, MASS. (NED) 1-40 NEw BEDFORD, MA. (NED) (REGULAR FUNDS) 1-32 NEW BOSTON HARBOR, ILL. (NCO) 29-12 NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31*32, 31*62, 31-79 NEW BULLAROS BAR, CA, (SPK) 35-30 NEW CUMBERLAND LOCKS AND DAM, STRATTON, OHIO (ORD) 22-7 NEw CUMBERLAND, W. VA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 NEW HARBOR, NE. (NED) 1-40 NEN HARMONY BRIDGE, IL. AND IN. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-SI NEW HARTFORD, IOWA (NCR) 28-19 NEw HAVEN BREAKWATER, CONN. (NED) 1-40 NEw HAVEN HARBOR, CT. (NED) 1-7, 1-29, 1-38 NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (NAP) 3-11, 3-22 NEW KENSINGTON AND PARNASSUS, PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 NEW LONDON HARBOR, CT. (NED) I-B, 1-29 NEW LONDON, CT. (NED) 1-22, 1-33 NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MO. (MR+T) 42-23, 42*24, 42-55, 42-57, 42*58 NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO. (LMM) 13/2, 13-7 13-8 NEW MARTINSVILLE, W.VA, (ORH) 25-27 NEW WATAMORAS, OHIO (0RH) 25-27 NEW MELONES LAKE, CA. (SPK) 35-19 NEw ORLEANS, LA. DISTRICT (MT+T) 42-1, 42-3, 42*4, 42-5, 42*31 42-32, 42-45, 42-51, 42-52, 42-56, 42-57, 42-60 NEW PASS, SARASOIA, FLA. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-33 NEW RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-44 NEW RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 NEW RIVER, ONSLOW COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) 6-S30 NEW RIVER, VA. AND W.VA. (ORH) 25-20 NEW ROCHELLE HARdOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 NEW ROCHELLE-ECHO BAY HARBORS, NEW YORK (NAN) 41-5 NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, (NAN) 2-11, 2*31, 2-36 NFW YORK HARBOR - ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (NAN) 2- 12P 2-31, 2-37 NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. (NAN) 2-10, 2-31, 2-36 NEWARK, OHIO (ORH) 25-3, 25-16 NEwBEGUN CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 NEWRURG, IN. (OHIO RIVER) (ORL) 24-36, 24-37 NEWBURGH LUCKS AND DAM, IND. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA. (NED) 1-8, 1-29, 1-38 NEWHALL CREEK, NEWHALL, CA. (SPL) 33-35 NEWPORI BAY HARBUR, CA. (SPL) 33-30, 33-7 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. (SPL) 33-7, 33-31 NEWPORT HARBOR, R.I. (NED) 1-40 NEWPORT NEWS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 NEWPORT, KY. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36e 24-37 NEWPORT, OHIO (OH) 25-27 NEWPORT, WHITE RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 NEWPORT-WILDERS, KY. (ORL) 24-5, 24-21 NEWT GRAHAM LOCK K DAM NU. 18 (SWL) (SWT) 18-16 NEWT GRAHAM LOCK AND DAM, VERDIGRIS RIVER bASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(ST) 19-4, 19-30, 19-34 NEWTOWN CREEK, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 NIAGARA RIVER, N.Y. (NCB) 32-19, 32-43 NIANTIC BAY AND HARBOR, CONN. (NED) 1-40 NIASARA REMEDIAL WORKS, N.Y. (NCB) 32-43 NIBLACK, LEVEE, IN. (ORL) 24-3b NICHOLASVILLE, (TOWNFORK) VICINITY, KY. (ORL) 24-36 NICHOLS, N. Y. (NAB) 4-45, 4-46 NICKAJACK LOCK AND DAM, TENN. (ORN) 23-16 NIMROD LAKE, ARK. (SWL) 18-5, 18l, 18-13, 18-18 NINILCHIK HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-5, 40-be6, 40-9, 40-11 NISHNABOTNA RIVER AT HAMBURG, IOWA (MRO) 21-22 NIXON CREEK, TENN. (LMM) 13-9 NOLIN LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24-15, 24-23, 24-34 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11 NOMINI BAY AND CREEK, VA. (NAB) 4-40 NONCONNAH CREEK, TENN. (LMM) 42-22, 42-26 NOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA. (ORP) 26-15, 26-20 NOOKAGEE LAKE, MA. (NED) 1-47 NOOKAGEE, MA. (NED) 1-46 NORFOLK FLOODWALL, VA. (NAO) 5-27 NORFOLK HARBOR, VA. (NAO) 5*8o 5-18, 5-21 NORFOLK, NER. (MRO) 21-22 NORFOLK, NORTH FORK, ELKHORN RIVER, NER. (MRO) 21-20 NORFORK LAKE, ARK. (SWL) 18*6, t1812, 18-21 NORMAL, KY. (ORH) 25-27 NORMAN LAKE (LAKE THUNDERBIRD)e LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-18, 19-35 NORRELL LOCK & DAM (NO. 1) & ENTRANCE CHANNEL ARK. (SWL) 18-4, 18-15 NORTH ADAMS HOOSIC RIVER BASIN, MASS. (NAN) 2-45 NORTH ALEXANDER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 NORTH ANDOVER & LAWRENCE, MA. (NEO) 1-49 NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OHIO (ORH) 25-11, 25-18 NORTH CANAAN, BLACKBERRY RIVER, CT. (NED) 1-45 NORTH CANAAN, BLACKBERRY RIVER, MA. (NED) 1-47 NORTH CANAAN, CT. (NED) 1-25 NORTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 NORTH FORK (SPK) 35-17 NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA. (ORH) 25-11, 25-18 NORTH FORK, PIT RIVFR AT ALTURAS, CA. (SPK) 35-30 NORTH FRANKFORT AREA (ORL) 24-31 NORTH HAMPTON BEACH, NORTH HAMPTON, N.H. (NED) 1-42 NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT. (NED) I-15, 1-31 NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 NORTH NASHUA RIVER, MA. (NED) 1-20, 1-32, 1-46, 1-47 NORTH PLATTE RIVER, BANK STABILIZATIUN, MINATARE, NEB. (MRO) 21- 20 NORTH SCITUATE, HA. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 NORTH SECOND ST., MEMPHIS TENN. (WOLFE RIVER BRIDGE) (LMM) 13-6, 13-7, 13-8 NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. (NAN) 2-44 NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, PVT (NED) 1-15, 1-31 NORTH WILDWOOD, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 NORTHAMPTON, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-44, 1-47 NORTHEAST (CAPE FEAR) RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-30 NORTHEAST HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 NORTHEAST RIVER, MD. (NAB) 4-40 NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT. (NED) 1-18, 1-32, 1-45 NORTHPORT HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 NORTHPORT HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-90 NORWALK HARBUR, CT. (NED) 1-8, 1-29 NORWALK, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-47 NORWALK-WILTON, CT. (NED) 1-49 NORWICH, CT. (NED) 1-47 NORWICH, N.Y. (NAB) 4-46 NOTTSNAY RiVER, VA. (MAO) 5-9, 5-18, 5-22 NOItUAFE RIVER, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 NOYO RIVER & HARBOR, CA. (8PN) 34*3, 34-14, 34-17 NU WOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-11, 14-15, 14- 18 1-16 INDEX 0 0. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TEX. (SwF) 16-11, 16-18, 16-21 OAMHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN S.D. AND N.U. (MRO) 21- 11, 21-16 OAK BLUFAS TOWN BEACH, MA. (NED) 1-11-42 OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY. (NCR) 32-14, 32-28 OAKDALE, PA. (ORP) 26-30 OAKFORD SPECIAL DRAINAGE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 UAKLAND BEACH, WARWICK, R.I. (NED) 1-10, 1-29 OAKLAND HARBOR, CA. (SPN) 34- 34-14, 34-17 OBEY RIVER, TENN. (ORN) 23-17 OBION RIVER, TENN, (LMM) 13-9 UCCOGUAN CREEK, VA. (NAB) 4-40 OCCOHANNOCK CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 OCEAN BEACH, SAN DIEGO CUNTY CA. (SPL) 33-31 OCEAN CITY, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 OCEANA, W.VA. (ORH) 25-4i 25-16 25-26 OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA. (SPL) 33-30 OCHOLOCKNEE (OCHLOCKNEY) RIVERGA,. AND FLA. (SAM) 10-43 OCONTO HARBOR, WIS, (NCC) 31-32, 31-63, 3180 OCRACOKE INLET, N.C. (SAW) 167, b-el 6-30 OFFATS BAYOU, TEX. (SG) I5-39 OFU SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AMERICAN (POD) 36-12 UGOENSBURG HARBOR, NY. (NCB) 32-14, 32-28, 32-38 OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) (URH) 2511, 25-18 OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DIST.) (0RN)23*6, 23-13, 23-17 OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) (ORP) 26-10, 26-19, 26-22, 26-6, 26-27, 26-28 OHIO RIVER BASIN, (LOUISVILLE DIST.)(OR 24-1624-232425 24-34 OHIO RIVER, ILL. AND KY. (MR+T) 42-20 OHIO RIVER, OPEN CHANNEL WORK (ORD) 25-2 OIL CITY, PA. (ORP) 26-30 OIL FIELD SWAMP, N. C. (SAN) 7-18 OKABENA CREEK AT WORTHINGTON, MINN. (NCR) 28-19 OKANOGAN RIVER, OMAK, WASH. (NPS) 38-9, 38-19, 38-23 OKANOGAN RIVER, OROVILLE, WASH. (NPS) 38-9t 38-19, 38-24 OKANOGAN RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 OKATIBBEE LAKE, MISS. (SAM) 10-16, 10-30, 10-39 OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-9 9-27, 9-337 942 OKLAHOMA CITY FLOODWAY, OKLA. (SWT) 19-364 1937 OKLAWAMA RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-lo, 9-27* 9-34 OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. (NCO) 32-IS 32-28, 32-38 OLD FORT BAYOU JACKSON COUNTY MISSISSIPPI (BERM) 41-4 OLD HARBOR, KODIAK ISLAND, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TENN. (ORN) 23-2t 23-14, 23-19 ULD RIVER, CA. (M*)427e 4223, 4229e 42-3 425;4 � 6 OLD RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-2B OLD RIVER, LA. (MR.T) 42-7, 42-23, 42-29, 42-33# 42-52, 42-56, 42-58 OLD RIVER, STANDARD REVETMENTS (MRT) 42-33 OLD TOWN CREK, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 OLD TOWN, C~NOSCOX RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-47 OLDMANS CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 OLEAN, NY (ALLEGHENY RIVER) (ORP) 26-27 OLEAN, N.Y. (ORP) 26-30 OLYMPIA HARBOR, WASH. (NPS) 38-26b 38-27 OMAHA, MISSOURI RIVER, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 OMAHA, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 ONAGA LAKE, VERMILLION CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-8, 20-15 ONANCOCK RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-26 ONONOAGA CREEK, NEDROWe N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31*33' 31-48, 31-63, 31-80 0OLOGAH LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18 OOLOGAH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(SWT) 19-14, 19-25, 19*30, t19-34 0OSTANAULA AND CUOSAWATEE RIVER, GA. (SAM) 10-43 OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER (ORY) 22-4, 22-5, 22-11 OPEN RIVER LEWISTON TO JOHNSON BAR LANDING (NPW) 39-24 OPEN RIVER PASCO TO LEWISTON (NPW) 39-24 UPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER (ORP) 26- 3 OPTIMA LAKE, NORTH CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA.(SWT) 19-15, 19-25 19-34 ORANGE RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9- 4 3t 944 OREGON SLOUGH (NORTH PORTLAND HARBOR) OREG. (NPP) 37-47 0RO GRANDE WASH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33*33, 33-34 OROWOC CREEK, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 ORWELL RESERVOIR (OHERTAIL RIVER) (NCS) 27-22 OSAGE RIVER, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (MRK) 20-12, 20-21 USAGE RIVER, MO., LOCK AND DAM (MRK) 20-20 OSAWATUMIE, OSAGE (MARAIS DES CYGNES) RIVER, KANSAS (MRK) 20-21 OSAWATOMIE, POTTAWATOMIE CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARK. (LMM) 13*2, 13-7 1323 OSWEGO HARBOR, N.Y. (NCR) 32-1SP 32-28, 32-39 OTTAWA RIVER HARBOR, MICHIGAN AND OHIO (NCO) 32-43 UTTAwA, OHIO (NCB) 32-46 VER, KANS (MRK) 2022 OTTAwA, USAGE (MARAIS DES CYGNES) RIVER KANS. (MRK) 20-22 OTTER BROOK LAKE, N.H. (NED) 1i-15, 1-31 UTTER CREEK, VT. (NAN) 2-43 OTTER TAIL RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-22, 27-23 OTTUMWA, IOWA (NCR) 28-19 EN, ARK. (LMK) 12-2, 12-8, OUACMITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMO 12-9, 12-10 AND LA (LMK) 12*4, 12*9 DUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIESI ARK. AND UUACMITA RIVER BASIN, ARK. AND LA. (LMK) 12-13 OOUVAECRHTIONTAo AERDI VERRI VELRE VEwEAST,E RWLAAY., (LMK) 1276, 1361,,1212 LA. (LMN) 11-17, 11-36, 11-43 UWASCO INLET AND OuTLET, MONVILLE AND DRY CREEK. STATE DITCH AND CRANE BROOK, N.Y. (NCR) 32.46 OENSBORO, KY. (ORL) 2-51 OWENSM0UTH AVE. TO LANKERSHIM BLVD., LOS ANGELES RIVER CHANNEL, CA. (SPL) 33-32 OWL'S HEAD HARBOR, ME, (NFO) 1-40 UXFORD, MD. (NAB) *41 uxFORD, N.Y. (NAB) 4-21, 4-32, 4-43, 4-4 OYSTER CHANNEL, VA. (NAO) 5-26 OYSTER CREEK, TEX. (SWG) 15-32 OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK & DAM (N0.12) ARK. (SWL) 18-9, 18-12, 18-13, 18-15 OZONA, FLA, (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 p PACOIMA WASH CHANNEL, LOS ANGELES RIVER CHANNEL, CA. (SPL) 33-32 PAUUCAM, KY. T(rL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 PAGAN RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-26 PAGO PAGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, AMERICAN SAMOA (POD) 36-13 PAGO PAGO TO NUUULI, AMERICAN SAMOA (POD) 36-13 PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO (ORM) 25-11, 25-18 PAINT ROCK RIVER, ALA. (ORN) 23-18 PAINTED POST, N. Y. (NAB) 4-43, 4-44, 4-46 PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER) ARIZ. (SPL) 33;10, 33-22 PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY, (ORH) 25-12, 25-18 PAJARO RIVER BASIN, CA, (SPN) 34-10, 34-15, 34-19, 34-21 PAJARO RIVER, CA. (SPN) 34-21 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA. FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROwARD COUNTY LINE (SAJ) 9-21, 9-28, 9-38 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM LAKE WORTH INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET (SAJ) 9-45 PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-27, 9-34 PALM BEACH, FLA., SIDE CHANNELAND BASIN (SAJ) 9-44 PALOUSE RIVER, WASH. (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-1 PAMUNKEY RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-26 PANACEA HARBOR, FLA. (SAM) 10-42, 10'43 PANACEA, FLA. (SAM) 10-43 PANAMA CITY & PENSACOLA, FL., AND PASCAGOULA AND GULFPORT, MS. 53-5 PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FLA. (SAM) 10-11, 10-29, 10-37 PANOLA*OUITMAN FLOODWAY, MISS. (MR.T) 42-24 PANTEGO CREEK AND CUCKLERS CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 PANTHER CREEK LEVEE (NCC) 28-17 PANTHER CREEK, KY. (GREEK RIVER BASIN) (ORL) 24-37 PANTHER CREEK, SPENCER COUNTY, KY. (ORL) 24-36 PANTLIER CREEK LAKE, W.VA. (ORH) 25-28 PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, LAKES, N.E. (MRO) 21-7, 21-15 PARISH CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CT. (NED) 1-15v 1-31, 1-44 PARK RIVER, N. DAK. (NCS) 27-23 PARKER CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 PARKERSBURG, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 PARROTTS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISS. (SAM) 10-12, 10-30, 10-37 PASCAGOULA RIVER, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 PASQUOTANK RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 PASS CHRISTIAN HARBOR, MISS. (SAM) 10-43 PASS CHRISTIAN, MISS. (SAM) 10-42 PASS MANCHAC, LA. (LMN) 11-50 PASS-A-GRILLE PASS, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. AND N.Y. PHASE I (NAN) 2*22, 2-32, 2-38 PAT MAYSE LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, TEX. (SwT) 19-15, 19-25, 19-34 PATCHOGUE RIVER, CUNN. (NED) 1-40 PATOKA LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-16, 24-23, 24-34, 24-36 PATTONSBURG LAKE, GRAND RIVER, MO. (ADVANCE HIGHwAY RELOCATION) (MRK) 20-22 PATTONSBURG LAKE, GRAND RIVER, MO. (ADVANCE TOWN RELOCATION) (MRK) 20-22 PATTONSBURG LAKE, GRAND RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-22 PATUXENT RIVER, MO. (NAB) 4-40 PAVETTE VALLEY, IDAHO (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 PAWCATUCK RIVER, R.I. & CT. (NED) 1-49 PAWCATUCK RIVER, R.I. AND CONN. (NED) 1-40 PAWCATUCK, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-47 PAWTUCKET, R.I., (NED) 1-49 PAWTUXET COVE, R.I. (NED) 1-40 PEARL RIVER LOCK NO. 1, PEARL RIVER, LA. (SAM) 10-42 PEARL RIVER LOCK NO. 2, BUSH, LA. (SAM) 10-42 PEARL RIVER LOCK NO. 3, SUN, LA. (SAM) 10-42 PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. (SAM) 10-12, 10-30, 10-38 PEARL RIVER, MISS. AND LA. JACKSON, MISS. (SAM) 10-44 PEARL RIVER, MISS. EDINBURG TO JACKSON (SAM) 10-43 PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NEBR. (MRO) 21-23 PECAN BAYOU LAKE, PECAN BAYOU, TEX. (SWF) 16-23 PECK RD. TO ROSEMEAD BLVD. (UPPER), RIO HONDO CHANNEL RIO HONDO BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 PECONIC RIVER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 PECOS, TEXAS (SWA) 17-16 PEEKSKILL HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 PEKIN LAMARSH DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-16, 28-17 PELICAN HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 PEMBINA RIVER LAKE, N. DAK. (NCS) 27-24 PEMBINA RIVER, N. OAK. (NCS) 27-9 PEMRINA, N. DAK. (NCS) 27-23 PEMBROKE CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 PENOER, NEAR.-LOGAN CREEK (MRO) 21-23 PENDLETON LEVEES, UMATILLA RIVER, DREG. (NPP) 37-54 PENDLETON, UMATILLA RIVER, DkEG. (NPP) 37-54 PENINSULA DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1, MULINOMAH COUNTY , OREG. (NPP) 37- 52, 37-53 PENINSULA DRAINAGE DISTRICT 2, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 374 9, 37-52, 37-53 PENNY SLOUGH DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR) 28-16 PENNY SLOUGH, ROCK RIVER, ILL. (NCR) 28-19 PENOBSCOT RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-38, 1-40 PENOBSCOT RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-*0 1-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 PENSACOLA BAY, FLA. TO MOBILE BAY, ALA. (SAM) 10-36 PENSACOLA HARBOR, FLA. (SAM) 10-13, 10-30, 10-38 PENSACOLA LAKE, GRANU.D (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(SWT) 19-21, 19-27, 19-30, 19-35 PENSACOLA LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18 PENSAWKEE HARBOR, WIS. (NCE) 31-90 PENTWATER HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-33, 31-63, 31-80 PEORIA LOCK AND DAM, ILL. (NCC) e8-22 PEORIA, ILL. (NCC) 28-17 PEPIN HARBOR, MIS. (NCO) 29-8, 29-12 PEPPER CREEK, DEL. (NAP) 3-28 PEPPERELL COVE, ME. (NED) 1-40 PERDIDU PASS CHANNEL, ALA. (SAM) 10-14A, 10-30, 10-39 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESS (PIANC ) 46-1 PEROUIMANS RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 PEROUIMANS RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. e1, 2 AND 3, MO. (LMS) 14-11, 14-15, 14-18 PERRY LAKE AREA (ROAD IMPROVEMENTS) KANSAS (MRK) 20-8, 20-15 PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-8, 20-15, 20-21 PERTH AMBOY, N.J. (NAN) 2-44 PETALUMA RIVER, CA. (SPN) 34-4, 34-14 PETERSBURG HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 PETIT ANSE, TIGRE, AND CARLIN BAYOUS, LA. (LMN) 11-18, 11-36,11- 43 PETIT JEAN RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 PETOSKEY HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 PEYTON CREEK, TEX. (SWG) 15-33 PHILLIPPI CREEK BASIN, FLA. (SAJ) 9-52 PHILLIPS LAKE, MA. (NED) t1-21, 1-32, 1-46 PHOENIX, ARIZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) (SPL) 33-10, 33-22 PIANC 41-2 PIANC 46-I PICAYUNE, MISSISSIPPI (SAM) 10-47 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST) (MRK) 20-9, 20-3, 20-7, 20-8, 20-11, 20-12, 20-15, 20-18 PICK*SLOAN MISSOURI RIVER BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST) (MRO) 21-8, 21-16b PICKWICK LANDING LOCK AND DAM, TENN. (ORN) 23-16 PIERCE, ELKHORN RIVER, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 PIERCE, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 PIG ISLAND GUT, ME. (NED) 1-40 PIKE ISLAND LOCKS AND DAM, W. VA. (ORD) 22-7 PILCHUCK RIVER, EVERETT, WASH. (NAS) 38-29 PILOT ROCK, BIRCH CREEK, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 PINAL CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS (GLOBE) DEFERRED, (SPL) 33-34 PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS, DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NEV. (SPL) 33-16, 33-22 PINE BLUFF METRO AREA, ARK. (LMK) 12-13 PINE CREEK LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, TEX. (SWT) 19-15, 19-26, 19- 34, 19-36 PINE CREEKWANGLE INLET, MINN. (NCS) 27-21 PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-14 PINE FORD LAKE, MO. (LMS) 14-8 14-15 PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, ARK. (SWL) 18-5 18-11 PINE RIVER RESERVOIR, MINN. (NCS) 27-22 PINE RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-34, 31-63, 31-80 PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-21, 9-28, 9-38 PINEVILLE, KY. (ORN) 23-18 PINEVILLE, RED RIVER, LA. (LMN) 11-53, 11-54 PINOLE CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 PINON CANYON DAM, TRINIDAD, COLO. (SWA) 17-16 PIONEER LAKE, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 PIPESTEM LAKE, N.D. (MRO) 21-8, 21-15 PITHLACHASCOTEE RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 PITTSBURGH HARBOR, PAO (ORP) 26-26 PITTSBURGH HARBOR, PA. (ORP) 26-26. PITTSBURGH, PA. (GOLDEN TRIANGLE) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 PITTSBURGH, PA. (NORTH SIDE) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 PITTSBURGH, PA. (THE STRIP) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 PKE ISLAND, MINN. (NCS) 27-21 PLACER CREEK, IDAHO (NPS) 38-10, 38-19, 38-24 PLAINVIEW LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT (SWF) 16-23 PLATTE RIVER AND LOST CREEK, SCHUYLER, NEBR. (MRU) 21-22 PLATTE RIVER NEAR SCHUYLER, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 PLATTE RIVER, BANK PROTECTION, LOUISVILLE, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 PLATTE RIVER, M.U.D. PROTECTION, CEDAR ISLAND, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 PLATTE RIVER, MO. CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT (MRK) 20-22 PLATTSBURGH HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 PLEASANT BAY, MASS. (NED) 1-40 PLEASANT RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 PLEASANTOWN, TEX. (SWF) 16-23 PLUM CREEK, BANK STABILIZATION, AURORA, COLO. (MRO) 21-20 PLUM ISLAND, MA. (NED) 1-42 PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-40 PLYMOUTH TOWN, MA. (NED) 1-11 PLYMOUTH, PA. (NAB) 4-46 POCAe ROVA. (ORHM) 25-28 POCATELLO, PORTNEUF RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 POCOMOKE RIVER, MD. (NAB) 4-8, 4-30, 4-36 POHOIKI BAY, HAWAII, HAWAII (POD) 36-t2 POINT JUDITH, R.I. (NED) 1-49 POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-34, 31-63, 31-80 POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO (NCR) 32-23, 32-29 POKEGAMA RESERVOIR, MINN. (NCS) 27-20 POLECAT CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, OKLA. (SWT) 19-36 POLLOCK RIP SHOALS, NANTUCKET SOUND, MASS. (NED) 1-40 POLOA AREA, AMERICAN SAMOA (PO0) 36-13 POLSON BAY, FLATHEAD LAKE, MONT. (NPS) 38-27 POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-9, 20-16, 20-21 POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KANS. (MRK) 20-9, 20-16 POMONA LAKE, OSAGE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS (MRK) 20-21 PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-27, 9-34 PONCE HARBOR, P. R. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-28 PONCE, P.R. (SAJ) 9-39 PONTIAC DIVERSION, R.I. (NED) 1-49 PORT ALExANDER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 PORT ALLEN HARBOR, KAUIA, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 PORT ANGELES HARBOR, WASH. (NPS) 38-26. 38-27 PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TEX. HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION (SWG) 15-14, 15-19, 15-31 PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-35, 31-63, 31-80 PORT BAY, N.Y. (NCB) 32-43 PORT CLINTON, OHIO (NCB) 32-43 PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-28, 9-35 PORT GAMBLE HARBOR, WASH. (NPS) 38-2b6, 38-27 PORT HENRY HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 PORT HUENEME AND HUMBOLDT BAY, CA. (SPECIAL REPORT BY REQUEST OF SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION) 53-5 PORT HUENEME, CA. (SPL) 33-30 PORT JEFFERSON HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, N.Y. (NC8) 32-16, 32-28 PORT ORCHARD BAY, WASH. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 PORT ORFORD, OREG. (NPP) 37-9, 37-033, 37-40 PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S. C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-11, 7-15 PORT SAN LUIS, CA. (SPL) 33-30 PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MICH. (MNCE)31 -36 31-64, 31-80 PORT ST JOE HARBOR, FLA. (SAM) 10-14, 10-30, 10-39 PORT TOWNSEND, WASH. (NPS) 38-27 PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-36, 31-64, 31-80 PORT WING HARBOR, WIS. (NCS) 31*36, 31-64, 31-81 PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MICm. (NCE) 31-34, 31-63, 31-80 PORTCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 PORTLAND HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-9, 1-29 PORTLAND, IN. (SALAMONIE RIVER) (ORL) 2436,b 24-37 PORTLAND, OHIO (ORM) 25-27 PORTNEUF RIVER AND MARSH CREEK, COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 PORTNEUF RIVER AND MARSH CREEK, IDAHO (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER. ME. AND N.H. (NED) 1-9, 1 -29 PORTSMOUTH HARBOR, VA. CHANNEL TO NANSEMOND ORDNANCE DEPOT 1 (NAO) 5-26 PORTSMOUTH-NEW BOSTON, OHIO (ORM) 25-28 PORTUQUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (SAJ) 9-24, 9-29, 9*39 PORTVILLE, N.Y. (ALLEGHENY RIVER) (ORP) 26-27, 26-30 POSTEN BAYOU, ARK. AND LA. (LMN) 11-52, 11-54 POTEET, TE. (SWF) 16b-23 POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, D.C., COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (NAB) 4-9, 4-30, 4-36 POTOMAC ESTUARY PIBST WATER TREATMENT PLANT, D.C. (NAB) 4-26, 4-33 v 4-33, 4-39 POTOMAC RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES AT AND BELOW WASHINGTOND, D. C. ELIMINATION OF WATERCHESTNUT (NAB) 4-40 POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. (NAB) 4-40 POTOMAC RIVER AT LUWER CEDAR POINT, MD. (NAB) 4-40 POTOMAC RIVER AT MOUNT VERNON, VA. (NAB) 4-40 POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, D.C. (NAB) 4-40 POTOMAC RIVtR NORTH SIDE OF WASHINGTON CHANNEL, D C. (NAB) 4-39v 4-40 POTOWOMUT RIVER, R.I. (NED) 1-40 POWDER SPRINGS, GEORGIA (SAM) 10-47 POWHATAN POINT, OHIO (ORP) 2b-27, 26-31 PRADO DAM, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33-33 PRAIRE AND SILVER CREEK, GRAND ISLANOD, NEBR. (MRO) 21-23 PRAIRE DU CHIEN, WIS. (NCS) 27-10, 27-18 PRAIRIE DU CHIEN HARBOR, WIS. (NCD) 29-3, 29-8, 29-11 PRAIRIE OU PONT LEVEE AND SANITARY DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 PRAIRIE Dl RUCHEN AND VICINITY, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 PRATTVILLE, AUTAUGA CREEK, ALA. (SAM) 10-44 PRE-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES FOR BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT (NAB) 4-13 BUFFALO, NY., DISTRICT (NCB) 32-21 DETRUIT, MI., DISTRICT (NCE) 31-48 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-11. 1-42 NEW YORK, NY., DISTRICT (NAN) 2-IS NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT (NAO) 5-13 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT (NAP) 3-14, 3-29 SAN FRANCISCO, CA., DISTRICT (SPN) 34-10 ST. PAUL, MN., DISTRICT (NCS) NOT FOUND PRE-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PRE-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES FOR FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES ALASKA DISTRICT (NPA) NOT FOUND BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT (NAB) 4-26 BUFFALO, NY., DISTRICT (NCB) 32-25, 32-47 CHARLESTON, SC., DISTRICT (SAN) 7-9, 7-18 CHICAGO, IL., DISTRICT (NCC) NOT FOUND DETROIT, MI., DISTRICT (NCE) 51-52 FORT WORTH, TX., DISTRICT (SWF) 16-15 HUNTINGTON, W.VA., DISTRICT (ORH) 25-ISe 25-29 JACKSONV1LLE, FL., DISTRICT (SAJ) 9-25, 9-52 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT (MRK) NOT FOUND LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT (ORL) 24-20, 24-40 MEMPHIS, TN., DISTRICT (LMM) 13-6 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT (SAM) 10-19 NASHVILLE, TN., DISTRICT (ORN) 23-7 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-26, 1-48 NEW YORK, NY., DISTRICT (NAN) 2-28 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICK (NAO) NOT FOUND OMAHA, NE., DISTRICT (NRO) 21-9, 21-22 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION (POD) 36-7 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT (NAP) 3-20, 3-30 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT (ORP) 26-16, 26-32 PORTLAND, OR., DISTRICT (NPP) 37-19, 37-55 ROCK ISLAND, IL., DISTRICT (NCR) 28-10, 28-20 SACRAMENTO, CA., DISTRICT (SPK) 35-1B SAN FRANCISCO, CA., DISTRICT (SPN) 34-13 SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT (SAS) 8-8 SEATTLE, WA., DISTRICT (NPS) 38-12 ST. LOUIS, MU., DISTRICT (LMS) 14-13 ST. PAUL, MN., DISTRICT (NCS) 27-15, 27-24 TULSA, OK., DISTRICT (SWT) NOT FOUND VICKSBURG, MS., DISTRICT (LMK) 12-7 WALLA WALLA, WA., DISTRICT (NPW) 39-2e 39-19 WILMINGTON, NC., DISIRICT (SAW) 6-18, 6-31 PRE-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES FOR NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES ALASKA DISTRICT (NPA) 40-6 BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT (NAB) 4-13 1-18 INDEX BUFFALO, NY., DISTRICT (NCS) 32-20, 32-44 UETROIT, MI., DISTRICT (NCE) NOT FOUND GALVESTON, TX., DISTRICT (SWG) 15-11, 15-32 JACKSONVILLE, FL., DISTRICT (SAJ) 9-17 MEMPHIS, TN., DISTRICT (LMM) 13-3 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT (SAM) 10-45 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-l0, NO, I-F TALE NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT (LMN) NEW YORK, NY., DISTRICT (NAN) 2-16 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT (NAD) PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISIUN (POD) PORTLAND, OR,, DISTRICT (NPP) SAN FRANCISCO, CA,, UISTRICT (SPN) SBVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT (SAS) SEATTLE, WA., DISTRICT (NPS) ST. PAUL, MN., DISTRICT (NCS) TULSA, OK., DISTRICT (SWT) VICKSBURG, MO,# DISTRICT (LMK) WILMINGTON, NC, DISTRICT (SAW) PRESCOTT AREA, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, HIS. (NCE) 31-31# 31-64, 31-81 PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULAp ERIE, PA. (NCR) 32-2U 32-29, 32-41 PRESTILE STREAM, BLAINE, ME, (NED) 1-23p, 1-33 PRESTON DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 PRIESTS RAPID OAM, COLUMBIA RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-29 PRINCENTON, WoVA. (OM) 25-28 PRINEVILLE AREAP CROOKED RIVER AND OCHOCO CREEK. OREG. (NPP) 37-5 4 PRINEVILLE AREA, CROOKED RIVER AND OCHOCO CREEK, OREG. (NPP) 37-5 PROCTOR LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 1bllb-18, 16-21 PROCTOR, OTTER CREEK BASIN, VT. (NAN) 2-45 PROCTOR, W. VA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-31 PROCTORVILLE, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 PROMPTON LAKE, PA, (NAP) 318, 3-23 PROSPECT, CT. (NED) -11, 1-42 PROTECTION NEW YORK, NY., DISTRICT (NAN) 2-29 PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RoI. (NED) 1-40 PROVINCETOWN BEACH, CT. (NED) 1-49 PROVINCETOWN HARBOR, MA. (NED) 1-49 PROVINCETOWN HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-40 PT. PLEASANT, W.VA. (ORH) 25-27 PUDDING RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 PUEBLO ARKANSAS RIVER, COLO. (FLOODWAY LEVER EXTENSION) (SWA) 17-16 PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WASH. (NPS) 38-4, 38-18, PULLMAN, PALOUSE, WASH. (NPW) 39-18 PULTNEYVILL# MARBOR, N.Y. (NCB) 32-43 PUNGO CREEK, N.C0 (SAW) 6-30 PUNGO RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 PUNXSUTAWNEYe OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. (ORP) 26-11, 26-19 PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER BASIN) (ORP) 26-27 PUT IN BAY, OHIO (NCB) 32-43 QUAIL WASH LEVEE, JOSHUA TREE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-34 GUEENS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 QUEENSTOWN HARBOR, MD, (NAB) 4a-39, 4-40 QUILLAYUTF RIVER, WASH. (NPS) 38-5, 38-18-18, 38-22 UINBY CRFEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 QUINCY HARBOR, ILL. (NCO) 29-1, 29-9, 29-12 QUINCY SHORE, MA. (NED) 1-lit 1-42 QUINCY, ILL., HARBOR ACCESS CHANNEL (NCR) 28-12 QUINNIPIAC R., MILL R., CT, (NED) 1-38 R R.D. BAILEY LAKE, W.VA. (ORH) 25-12, 25-18 RACCOON CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-12, 3-22, 3-26 RACCOON RIVER AT ADEL, IOWA (EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION) (NCR) 28* 19 RACCOON RIVER AT DES MOINES, IOWA (EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION) (NCR) 28-19 RACINE HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-3?, 31-64. 31-81 RACINE LOCKS AND DAM, DM30 (ORD) 22-2v 22-8 RACINE, OHIO (DAM) 25-28 RAHWAY RIVER, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 RARWAY, N.J. (NAN) 2-45 RAMWAY, SOUTH BRANCH, N.J. (NAN) 2-45 RAINER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-49. 37* 52, 37-53 RAINEY, HENRY 7, DAM, ILL. (NCD) 29-4, 29-7, 29*10 RALSTON CREEK, IOWA CITY, IOWA (NCC) 28-20 RANCOCAS RIVER, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 RANOLEMAN LAKE, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-23 RAPID CITY, CEDAR CANYON DAM S.D. (MRO) 21-20 RAPTO CREEK, RAPID CITY, 8,0, (MRO) 21-, 21-15 RAPIDE CROCHE LOCK AND DAM, HIS. (NCC) 31-89 kAPPAHANNOCK RIVER AT BOWLERS WHARF, VA. (NAO) 5-26 RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA. 9,10,12 (NAD) 5-26 HAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (NAO) 5-3, 5-20' RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, N.J. (NAN) 2-23, 2-32, 2-38 RARITAN RTIVER AND WASHINGTON CANAL AND SOUTH RIVER, NEW JERSEY (NAN) 41-5 RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT OFF CHANNEL, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 RARITAN RIVER. N.J. (NAN) 2-13, 2-31, 2-37 RATHBUN LAKE FISH HATCHERY (MRK) 20-22 RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER TOWA (MRK) 20-10. 20-16 RAVENSWOOD, W.VA. (ORH) 25-28 RAYSTOWN LAKE. RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA. (NAB) 4-17, 4* 31, v4-38 REU BROOK HARBOR, BOURNE, MASS. (NED) 1-40 RED CREEK, N.Y. (NCB) 32-4b RED DALE GULCH, RAPID CITY, S. DAK. (MRO) 21-22 RED LAKE AND RED LAKE RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-21, 27-23 REU LAKE RIVER, MINN., INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27 -10, 27-18 RED OAK, NISHNABOTNA RIVER, IOWA (MRO) 21-21, 21-23 RED RIVER AT EAST GRAND FORKS, MINN, (NCS) 27-22 RED RIVER AT FARGO, N.D, (NCS) 27-22 RED RIVER AT GRAND FORKS, N. OAK. (NCS) 27-22 RED RIVER BACKWATER AREA (IMK) (MR+T) 42-8; 42-16, 42*23, 42-24 42-25, 42-26,s 42-7, 45-51, 42-54 - RED RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES (MR+T) 42-48 RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (TULSA DISTRICT) (SWT) 19-15 RED RIVER BELOW DENNISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) (LMN) 11*31, |I- 52, 11-53 RED RIVER BELOW DENNISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (NEW ORLEANS OST.) (LMN) 11-31, 11-38, 11-46, 11-52 RED RIVER BELOW FULTON, ARK. (LMN) 11-50 RED RIVER DIKES (MR.)) 42-35 RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (LMN) 11-19, 11-37, 1144 RED RIVER FROM FULTON, ARK., TO MOUTH OF WASHITA RIVER (SWT) 19-5 RED RIVER IN VICINITY OF SHREVEPORT, LA. (LMN) 11-53 RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT OSLO, MINN. (NCS) 27-11, 27-18 RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT PEMBINA, N. DAK. (NCS) 27*24 RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MINN., S. OAK. AND N. OAK. (NCS) 27-10. 27-18, 27-22 RED RIVER OF THE NORTH, ARGUSVILLE, N. OAK. (NCS) 27-24 RED RIVER OF THE NORTH, HALSTAD, MINN. (NCS) 27-24 RED RIVER OF THE NORTH, MINN. AND N. OAK. (NC8) 27-21 RED RIVER PARISH, LA. (LMN) 11-54 RED RIVER STANDARD REVETMENTS (MRT) 42-34 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA., ARK, OKLAe, AND TEX. (LMN) 11-50 RED RIVER WATERWAY, SHREVEPORT, LA., TO DAINGERFIELD, TEX. (LMN) 11-50 RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA. (LMN) 11* 20, 11-37, 11-44 RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA., TO INDEX, ARK. (LA) 11-32f 1t -38, 11-46 RED RIVER, ARK. (SWT) 19-36 RED RIVER. TENN. (ORN) 23-17 RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IOWA (NCR) 28-8, 28-12, 28-15 RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-48, 31-67, 31- 85 RED WING HARBOR, MINN. (NCD) 29-3, 29-8, 29-11, 29-12 REUBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CALIFORNIA (BERN) 41-4 REDBANK CREEK LAKE, PA. (ORP) 26-31 REDDIES RIVER LAKE, N.C. (SAN) 7-9, 7-12, 7-16, 7-17 REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA. (SPL) 33-30 REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA. (SPN) 34-20 REDWOOD CREEK, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CA. (SPN) 34-21 REDWOOD RIVER BELOW MARSHALL, MINN. (NCS) 27-24 REEDS BAY SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII (POD) 36-12 REEDSPORT LEVEES, UMPOUA RIVER OREG. (NPP) 37-54 REEDY RIVER, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 REELFOOT LAKE AREA, KY. AND TENN. (MR+T) 42-23, 42-25, 42-56, 42-58 REESE RIVER, BATTLE MOUNTAIN, NV. (SPK) 35-30 REEVESVILLE, IL. (COCHE RIVER) (ORL) 24-31e 24-36e 24-37 REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS (CDC) 44- 1. 44-5. 44-6 REGULATORY AND SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL ACTIVITIES 48-1 REHOBOTH BEACH TO INDIAN RIVER INLET, DEL. (NAP) 3-29 REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (SAJ) 9-13, '-28, 9-35, 9-43 REMOVING SNAGS AND WRECKS FROM MISSISSIPPI RIVER BELOW MOUTH OF M ISSOURI RIVER AND FROM OLD AND ATCHAFALAYA RIVERS (LMK) (LMM) I 2-11 REMOVING SNAGS AND WRECKS FROM MSSISSIPPI RIVER BELOW MOUTH OF M ISSOURI RIVER AND FROM OLD ANAL ATCHAFALAYA HIVERS (LMK) (LMM) 13*9 REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT (SAM) 10-14, 10-30, 10- 39 REMOVING WATER-HYACINTH, LA, (SAJ)(SAM)(LMN) 11-22, 11-37, 11-44 REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, ILL. (LMS) 14-12, 14l-16b, 14-19 RENO BEACH - HOWARO FARMS AREA, OHIO (NCO) 32p4, p32-29 RENO BEACH - HOWARD FARMS, LUCAS COUNTY, OHIU (NCB) 32-46 REPUBLICAN RIVER, NEBRASKA AND KANSAS (MRK) 20-3, 20*21 REVERE BEACH, MA. (NED) 1-10, 1-30, 1-11 REYNOLOSVILLE, PA. (URP) 26-31 RHEEM CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 RHODE9 POINT T YLERTON, MD. (NAB) 4-40 RICE CREEK, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 RICHLANO CREEK, ILL. (LMI) 14-21 RICMLAND LAKE, MO. (MRK) 20- 2 RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA. (NAO) 5-13, 5-19, 5-23 RICHMOND HARBOR, CA, (SPN) 34-5, 34-14, 34-18 RICHMOND HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 RICHMONO, VA, (NAO) 5-14, 5-19, 5-23 RICHMOND'S ISLAND HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1 40 RIOGECREST, KERN COUNTY, CA. (SPL) 33-34 RIDGRAY AND VICINITY, PA. (ON CLARION RIVER) (ORP) 86*31 RIOGRAY, PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVER BASIN) (ORP) 26-27 RIOGWAY, PA. (ELK CREEK) (ORP) 26-31 RIO GRANDE BASIN, N. MEX. (SWA) 17-, 17-8, 17-13, 17-15, 17-16 RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, N. MEX. (SWA) 17-A, 17-14, 17-15. 17*|6 RIPLEY, UHIO (ORM) 25-8 RIRIE LAKE, IDAHO (NPW) 39*4, 39-13, 39-15 RIVER ROUGE, MICH. (NCE) 31-49, 31-68, 31-85 RIVEROALE, MA. (NED) 1-44, 1-47 RIVERSIDE LEVEES, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-34 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 RIVERV1FW, W.VA. (ORH) 25-28 ROANOAK LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-23 ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA., AND N.C. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR (SAW) 6-23 ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA., AND N.C., PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. (SAW) 6-23 ROANOKE RIVFR, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-22, 6-29 ROARING RIVER, WILKES COUNTY, N. C. (SAN) 7-18 ROBERT S. KERR LUCK & DAM NO. 15 (SWL) (SWT) 18-16 ROBERT S. KERR LUCK ANU 0DAM RESERVUIN, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SHT) 19-21, 19-27, 19-30, 19-35 ROCHESTER AND MCCLEARY'S BLUFF LEVEE, IL. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36 ROCHESTER AND MCCLEARYS BLLIFF LEVEE, IL. (OHL) 24-37 RnOCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (NC6) 32-16, 32-28, 32-39 ROCHESTER, MINN. (NCS) 27-11, 27-18 ROCHESTER, PA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-31 ROCK CREEK ROAD, GRANITE CITY, MONT. (NAS) 38-29 ROCK HALL HARBUR, MD. (NAB) 4-9, 4-30, 4-36 ROCK ISLAND DISTRICT (NCD) 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29-4, 29-5 ROCK ISLAND DISTRICT (NCR) 42-57, 42-58, 42-60 ROCK ISLAND HARBOR, ILL. (NCD) 29-2, 29-8 ROCK ISLAND, ILL. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, ILL. (NCR) 28-8, 28-12, 28-15 HOCK RIVER ROCKFORD AND VICINITY, ILLINOIS (LOVES PARK INTERIM) (BERH) 41-4 ROCKFORD, ILL. (NCR) 28-8, 28-12, 28-15 ROCKLAND HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-38s 1-40 ROCKLAND HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 ROCKLAND LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-15, 16-21 ROCKPORT HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-40 ROCKPORT HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 ROCKPORT, IN. (OHIO RIVER) (ORL) 24-36 ROCKY FORD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-17 ROCKY FORK, OHIO (ORM) 25-28 ROCKY PASS, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO (NCB) 32-43 RODEO CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OREG, (NPP) 37-to10, 37-33, 37-40 ROISCLAIRE, IL. (ORL) 24-36, 24-37 ROLANO DRAINAGE DISTRICTr ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 ROLLING FORK RIVER, ARK. (SWT) 19-36 ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-22 ROME, COOSA RIVER, GA. (SAM) 10-44 ROME, MOHAWK RIVER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 ROOT CREEK, BOLIVAR, N.Y. (ORP) 26-11, 26-19, 26-32 ROSE CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, SAN DIEGO, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33- 34 ROSEAUl RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-12, 27-18 ROSENDALE, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 WOSEVILLE, OHIO (ORH) 25-4, 25-16, 25-26 ROSSVIEW RESERVIOR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. AND KY, (ORN) 23-18 ROUGE RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-38, 31-65, 31-81 ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTSP, KY. (ORL) 24-17, 24-23 24-34 ROUGH RIVER, KY. (ORL) 24-31 ROUSES POINT, LAKE CHAMPLIN, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 ROUSEVILLE, PA. (ORP) 2 6-31 ROWLESbURG LAKE, W. VA. (ORP) 26-31 ROYAL RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 RUBIO CANYON DIVERSION, RIO HONDO BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 RUuY RIVERN, WHEATLY BRIDGEr NEAR TWIN BRIDGES, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 RUSH RIVER, N. OAK. (NCS) 27-22 RUSH RIVER, N. DAK. (NCS) 27-23 RUSHFOD, MINN. (NCS) 27-12, 27-18 RUSSELL AND ALLISON LEVEE, IL. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-31 RUSSELL, KY. (ORM) 25-28 RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPN) 34-Lt, 34-15, 34-19 RUTLANDO OTTER CREEK, VT. (NAN) 2-45 RUITLEDGE HOLLOW CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT POTEET, TEX. (SWF) 16- 23 RYE HARBOR, N.H. (NED) 1-40 RYSCO SHIPYARD CHANNEL, FLA. (SAM) 10-43 S SABINE RIVER AND TRIBS., TEXAS (ECHO TO MORGAN BLUFF) (SAG) 15-32 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TEX. (SWG) 15-9, 15-18, 15-28, 15-34, 15- 37, 15-38, 15-41 SABILA, IOWA (NCR) 28-16 SABULA, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IOWA (NCR) 28-19 SACKETS HARROR, N.Y. (NCA) 32-16, 32-17, 32-28, 32-40 SACO RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 SACO RIVER, ME. (UNCOMPLETED PORITON) (NED) 1-49 SACO, BEAVER CREEK, MONT, (MRO) 21-19 SACO, MONT. (MRO) 21-22 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA. (CDI) 44-2, 4-5 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA. FROM CULLINSVILLE 10 SHASTA DAM (SPK) 35-15, 35-23, 35-26, 35-29 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA. (CDC) 44-3, 445, 44-6 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-2, 35-22, 35-26, 35-27 SACRED HEART HUSPITAL, YANTON S.D. (MRO) 21-20, 21-22 SAb HARBUR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 SAGINAR RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-39, 31-65, 31-Al SAGINAW RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-49, 31-68, 31-A5 SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, MF. (NED) 1-22 SAKONNET HARBOR, R.I. (NED) 1-40 SARONNET RIVER, R.I. (NED) 1-40 SALAMANCA, N.Y. (ONP) 26-31 SALAMONIE LAKE, IN. (ORL) 24-17, 24-23 SALEM CHURCH LAKE, VA. (NAO) 5-27 SALFM HARBUR, MASS. (NED) 1-40 SALEM RIVEH, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 SALTNA, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22 SALINAS RIVER, CA. (SPN) 34-21 SALINE PUINT, LA. (LMN) 11-53, 11-54 SALINE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, IL. (ORL) 24-6, 24-21, 24-36 SALINE RIVER, ARK. (LMK) 12-11 SALINE RIVER, ARK, (SWI) 19-36 SALISRURY, CT. (NED) 1-45 SALKAHATCHIE RIVER, S. C. (SAN) 7-17 SALMON CREEK AT UAKRIDGE, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 SALMON RIVER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-13 SALMON RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-47 SALT CHEEK AND TRIBUIANTES, N.E. (MRU) 21-8, 21-15 SALT CREEK IN VICINITY OF MIUDLETOWN, ILL. (NCC) 28-18 SALT CREEK LAKE, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 SALT CREEK, BARNARO, KANS, (MRK) 20-22 SALT CRFEK, ILL. (NCC) 28-18 SALT LAKE CITY, JOROAN RIVER, UT. (SPK) 35-30 SALUDA RIVER, S. C. (SAN) 7*18 SAM RAYRURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TEX, (SWF) 16-158 16-21 SAMMAMISm RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 SAN ANTONIO AND CHINO CREEKS CHANNEL, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33-33 SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TEX. NSwF) 16-12, 16-18, 16-21 SAN ANTONIO UAM, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA.- (SPL) 33-33 SAN ANTONIO FLOODWAY, TEX. (SWF) 16-23 SAN BERNARD RIVEN CHANNEL, TEX. (SwG) 15-39 SAN DIEGO (SUNSET CLIFFS), CA. (SPL) 33-31 SAN DIEGO CREEK, ALICF, TEX, (SWG) 15-33 SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CALIF. (SPL) 33-4, 33-21 SAN DIEGO RIVER (MISSION VALLEY), SAN DIEGO RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-34 SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA. (SPL) 33-6, 33-21 SAN DIEGO RIVER CHANNEL AND LEVEES, SAN DIEGU RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33 SAN FRANCISCO BAY & DELTA MOUEL, CA. (SPN) 34-6, 34-14 SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA. (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) (SPK) 35-2, 35-22 SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA. (SPN) 34-6, 34-14 SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR & BAY, CA. (SPN) 34-7, 34-15 SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA. (SPN) 34-6, 34-25, 34-18, 34-20 SAN FRANCISCO MARINA, CA. (SPN) 34-20 SAN GABRIEL CANYON TO SANTA FE DAM, APPROACH CHANNEL TO SANTA FE DAM (REMEDIAL WORK), SAN GABRIEL RIVER CHANNEL, SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 SAN GABRIEL RIVER, CA. (SPL) 33-7, 33-31 SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TEX. (SWF) 16-12, 16-18, 16-21 SAN JACINTO RIVER LEVEE AND BAUTISTA CREEK CHANNEL, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33*34 SAN JOAQUIN RIVERe CA. (SPK) 35-17 SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-3, 35-22, 35-27 SAN JUAN DAM (INACTIVE), SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-34 SAN JUAN HARBOR, P. R. (SAJ) q-15, 9-28, 9-35 SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO (SAJ) 9-45 SAN LEANDRO CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 SAN LEANDRO MARINA (BREAKWATER), CA. (SPN) 34-20 SAN LEANDRO MARINA, CA. (SPN) 34-20 SAN LORENZO CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-21 SAN LONENZU RIVER, CA. (SPN) 34-21 SAN LOIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-16, 33 -22 SAN PABLO BAY & MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA. (SPN) 34-7, 34-15, 34-1A SAN RAFAEL CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-20 SAND CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KANS. (SWT) 19-36, 19-37 SAND HILL COVE, R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 SAND HILL RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-22,t 27-23 SAND ISLAND, OAHUP, HAWAII (POD) 36-5, 36-9 SAND LAKE, OKLA. (SWT) 19-37 SANDBURG CREEK, SPRING GLEN, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (NCR) 32-17, 3e-?8, 32-40 SANDUSKY RIVER, OHIO (NCB) 32-43 SANDY BAY (HARBOR OR REFUGE), CAPE ANN, MASS. (NED) 1-40 SANDY BAY, CAPE ANN, MA. (UNCOMPLETED PORTION) (NED) 1-49 SANDY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MULINOMAH COUNTY, OREG, (NPP) 37-49, 37- 52, 37-53 SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARDO, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 SANDY HOOK BAY, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 SANDY LAKE RESERVOIR MINN. (NCS) 27-20 SANDY RIVER AND SLEEPY HOLLOW, OREG. (NAA) 37-55 SANDY SLUIIGH HARBOR, MO. (NCD) 29-10, 29-12 SANFORD RESERVOIR (LAKE MEREOITH), CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-18, 19-35 SANITARY DISTRICT OF BEARDSTOWN, ILL. (NCC) 28'16 SANTA ANA BRANCH, PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY BRIkUGE TO PACIFIC OCEAN, LOS ANGELES RIVER CHANNEL, CA. (SPL) 33-32 SANTA ANA RIVER BASlN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33-17, 33-22 33-34 SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CAt OEVIL, EAST TWIN, AND WARM CREEKS CHANNEL IMPROyEMENIS (SPL) 33-34 SANTA ANITA WASH, RIO HONOD BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA. (SPL) 33-6, 33-21 SANTA CLARA RIVER LEVEE IMPROVEMENI, SANTA CLARA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-35 SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CA. (SPN) 34-B, 34-15 SANTA FE DAM TO WALNUT CHEEK, SAN GABRIEL RIVER CHANNEL, SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 SANTA FE DAM TO WHITTIER NARROWS DAMe SAN GABRIEL RIVER CHANNEL, CA. (SPL) 33-32 SANTA FE DAM, SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 SANTA FE RIVERAND ARROYD MASCARAS, N. MEX. (SWA) 177, 17-9, 17-14 SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANIA MARIA RIVER RASIN, CA. (SPL) 33* 1B, 33-2 SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33* 33 SANTA PAULA CREEK CHANNEL AND DFBRIS BASINS (INCLUUING MUD TREEK) 1-20 INDEX , SANTA CLARA RIVFR bASIN, CA. (SPL) 3-1A, 33-28 SANTA ROSA WASH (TAT MUMULIKOT DAM AND LAKE ST. CLAIR), ARIZ. (SL) 3-33, 33-34 SANTEE RIVER, N.C. AND S.C. (SAN) 7-17 SANTIAM RIVER, JEFFERSON, OREG. (NAA) 37-55 SARDIS LAKE, MISS. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-21, 42-0 SARDIS, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 SASANOA RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 bASCO MILL, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 SAUGATUCK HANBHOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-42, 31-66, 31-84 SAUGERIIES HARROR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 SAUK RAPIDS, MINN. RENTON COUNTY DITCH NO 3 (NCS) 27-24 SAUVIF ISLAND AREAS A AND B, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-49, 37-52, 37-53 SAVAGE RIVER DAM, MD. (NAB) 4-46 SAVANNA HARBOR, ILL. (NCD) 29-2, 29-8, 2912 SAWMILL BRANCH, S.C. (SAN) 7-I8 SAWMILL RIVER ELMSFORD-GkEENbUG, N.Y* (NAN) 2-24, 2-32, 2-38 SAMPIT WASH, RIO HONDO BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 SAWTELLE-WESTWOOD SYSTEM (INCLUDING SEPULVEDA CHANNEL). BALLONA CREEK BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 SAXON HARBOR, IS. (NCC) 31-42, 31-66, 31-84 SAXONVILLE, RMA. (NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND AUSHNET, RA. (NED) 1 -21, 1-32, 1-4b6 SAYERS , pOSTER JOSEPH, PA. DAM (NAB) 4-2, 4-33 SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IOWA (NCR) 28*8, 28-12, 28-15 SCAJAQUADA CREEK, N.Y. (NCB) 32-24, 32-29 SCAPPOUSE DRAINAGE DISTRICI OREG. (NPP) 37-17, 37-34, 37-43, 37-4 SCARBORO RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-38, 1-40 SCARBORO RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 SCHUYKILL RIVER ABOVE FAIRMOUNT DAM, PA. (NAP) 3-28 SCHUYLER, LOST CREEK AND PLATTE RIVER, NEB (MRO) 21-20 SCHUYLER, PLATTE RIVER, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. (NAP) 3-12e 3-2, 3-26 SCIOTO RIVER AT PORTSMOUTH, OHIO (ORH) 25-20 SCIOTOVILLE, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 SCITUATE HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-40 SCITUATE, MA, (NED) 1-25 SCOTT COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILLINOIS RIVER, ILL. (LMS )14-21 SCOTTS CREEK, S. C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7T-16 SCRANTON, BUFFALO, N.D. (MRO) 21-20 SCRANTON, PA. (NAB) 4-42, 4-46 SCUPPERNONG RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-16, 6-23 SCUPPERNONG RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 SEA HORN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-1 7 SEAHORN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT. ILL. (NCC) 281b SEARSPORT HARBUR, ME. (NED) 1-38, 1-40 SFARSPORT HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 SEASIDE PARK, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 SEATTLE HARBOR, WASH. (NPS) 38-5, 38-18t 38-22 SEATTLE, WA., DISTRICT (NPS) 38-12, 38-28 ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT (LMS) 14-13 ST. PAUL, MN., DISTRICT (NCS) 27-15 TULSA, OK., DISTRICT (SWT) VICKSRURG, MS., DISTRICT (LMK) 12-7 WALLA AALLA, WA,, DISTRICT (NPW) 39-2 SFBEWAING RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-43, 31-66, 351-84 SEBEAINB, SEBEWAING RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-51, 31-68, 31-86 SEEKONK RIVER, R.I. (NED) 1-40 SELDOVIA HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 SFLKIRK SHORE STATE PARK (NC8) 3215 SELLERS CREEK, MENDENHALL* MISS. (SAM) 10-45 SEPILVEDA OAM, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 SERGIUJS WHITESTONE, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENIURA COLJNTY, CA. (SPL) 33-19, 33-22 SEVIER RIVER NEAR REDMOND, UT. (SPK) 35-30 SEVIER RIVER, CA. (SPK) 35-17 SEWARD HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 SEWARD, NEFR. (MRK) 20-22 SHAD LANDING STATE PARK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 SHALLOTTE RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 SHANK RIVER, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 SHAWNEETOWN, IL. (URL) 24-31, 24-36 SHEFPSHEAD BAY, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 SHEFFIELD, MA. (NED) 1-45 SHELBURNE, N.H. (NED) 1-25 SHELEY BRIDGE, TALLAHATCHIE RIVER, MISS. (LMK) 42-24 SHELL CREFK, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 SHELL POINT, WAUKULLA CO., FLA. (SAM) 10-43 SHELLEY AREA, SNAKE RIVER, COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, IDAHO (NPW) 39- 18 SHELLEY AREA, SNAKE RIVER, IDAHO (NPN)3-1 39-17 SHELION CREEK, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 SHELTON DITCH, WILLAMETTE RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 SHENANO RIVER LAKE, OHIU RIVER BASIN, PA. AND OHIO (ORP) 26-11, 26-19, 264 (M) 21-19 SHERIDAN, BIG AND LITTLE GOOSE CREEKS, WY. R)21-19 SHERIDAN, wYU. (MRU) 21-22 bHERWOOD ISLAND pARK, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 SHEYRDYGAN HARBOR, WI. (NCC) 31-43, 1-66, 31-84 SHEYENNF RIVER, N. OAK. (NCS) 27-12, 27-18, 27-22, 27-23 bHIDLER LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. ( ) 1-b, 19-26 SHIFLOS RIVER, NEAR CLYDE PARK, MONT. (MAX) 21-2 SHILSHULE BAY, SEATTLE, RASH, (NPS) 38-27 SHINNFCOCK INLET, N.T. NAN) 2-43 SHIPYARD RIVER 5, C. (SAN) 7-7( 7-12, 7-15 SHUAL HARAUR AND COMPTUN CREEK, N.J. (NAN) 2-83 SHOOTFRS ISLAND, N.Y. AND N.J. (NAN) 2-17, 7-32, 2-3A SHORELINE ERuS1ON ADVISORY PANEL (SEAP) 43- SHURT, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 SHUSHANE RIVER, LOVELL WY O, wY (MRO) SHOSHONE RIVER, bANK PROTECTION, LOVELL,. WY, 7RO) 21-19 SHUT POUCH CREEK, SUMTER COUNTY, 5, C. (SAM) 7-IA SHREWBURY RIVER, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 5T0 STMPSOTN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT (NCC) 28-17 SIERRE MADRE VILLA CHANNEL, RIO HONOU BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 SIERRE MADRE WASH, RIO RONDO BASIN, CA. (SPL) 3?-32 SIRES BRIDGE LAKE, MDC AND PA. (NAB) 4-46 SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-22, 6-25 SILVER TO CEDAR, CT. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 SIMMONS BAY, N, C. (SAN) 7-18 STMMUNS BAY, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 SIMPSON CREEK, S. C. (SAN) 7-18 bIUIX CITY, FLOYD RIVER, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 SIOUX FALLS, BIG SIOUX RIVEP, S.D. (MRO) 21-20 STUUX FALLS, S. DAK. (MRU) 21-22 SISTERVILLE, W.VA. (ORH) 25-28 SITKA HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 SITUSLAW RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-10, 37-33, 37-40 SKAGGS FERRY, BLACK RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-22 SKAGIT RIVER, DEADMAN'S SLOUGH, WASH. (NAS) 38-29 SKAGIT RIVER, PRESSENTIN CREEK, WASH, (NAS) 38-29 SKAGIT RIVER, WASH. (AVON BY-PASS) (NAS) 38-28 SKAGIT RIVER, WASH. (LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) (NPS) 38-10, 38-19t 38-24 SKAGIT RIVER , WASH. (NPS) 38-27 SKAGOAY HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 SKAGMAY RIVER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-7, 40-13 SKAMOKAWA (STEAMBOAT SLOUGH), WASH, (NPP) 37-47 SKAMOKAWA CREEK AREA, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, WASH (NPP) 37-52 SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WASH. (NPP) 37-11, 37-33, 37-41 SKIAIOOK LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SNT) 19-16b, 19-26 SKIPANON CHANNEL, OREG.(NPP) 37-11, 37-33, 37-41 SKUNK RIVER IN STEADY RUN TOWNSHIP, KEOKUK COUNTY, IOWA (SNAGGING AND CLEARIN) (NCR) 28-19 SLAUGHTER CREEK, M (NAB) 4-39. 4-40 SLOVAN, PA. (ORP) 26-31 SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECT AT SIOUX CITY, IOWA (MRO) 21-18 SMITH CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 SMITH RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-47 SMITH'S CREEK (WILMINGTON), N.C. (SAW) 6-27 SMITH'S CREEK, PAMLICO COUNTY, N.C. (SAW) b-26, 6-27 SMITHLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY. (ORO) 22-3, 22-9 SMITHLAND, KY. (0RL) 24-31 SMITHS FERRY, PA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-31 SMITHVILLE CHANNEL, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-22 SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-10, 20-16 SMOKEY HILL, SALINE, AND SOLOMON RIVERS (MRK) 20-21 SMYRNA RIVER, DEL. (NAP) 3-28 SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES ALBUGUERQUE. NMX. DISTRICT (SWA) 17-12 BUFFALO, NY., DISTRICT (NCB) NOT FOUND CHARLESTON, SC., DISTRICT (SAN) 7-10 HUNTINGTON, w. VA., DISTRICT (ORH) 25-15, 25-29 LOUISVILLE, KY., DIST1RICT (ORL) 24-20, 24-40 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT (SAM) 10-19 MEMPHIS, TN., DISTRICT (LMM) NOT FOIJUND NASHVILLE, TN., DISTRICT (ORN) 23-7 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (NED) 1-26 ROCK ISLAND, IL., DISTRICT (NCR) 28-10, 28-20 ST. PAUL, MN., DISTRICT (NCS) 27-15, 27-24 VICKSRURG, MS., DISTRICT (LMK) 1-7 WALLA WALLA, WA., DISTRICT (NPW) 39-2 SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OREG., WASH., SNAKE RIVER, BELOW WARREN, MINN. (NCS) 27-24 SNETTISHAM, ALASKA (NPA) 40-8, 40-10, 40-11 SNOW,ICE AND PERMAFROST RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT 52-1 SNY BANK, ILL. (NCR) 28-19 SNY ISLAND LEVEE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCD) 29-1, 29-2, 29-4, 29-10 SNY ISLAND LEVEE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 SOAP CREEK, WILLIAMETTE RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 SOCORRO pIVERSION CHANNEL, TRIBUTAkIES OF RIO GRANDE, NEW MEXICO (SWA) 17-16 SOMERVILLE LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-13, 16-19, 16-21 SONOMA CREEK, CA. (INACTIVE) (SPN) 34-21 SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA. (SAM) 10-45 SOUTH AMSTERDAM, MOHAWK RIVER, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 SOUTH BANK ARKANSAS RIVER, (HEAD FOURCHE ISLAND TO PENNINGTON BAYOU), .ARK. (SWL) 18-22 SOUTH BANK ARKANSAS RIVER, LITTLE ROCK TO PINE BLUFF, ARK. TUCKER LAKES (SWL) 18-22 SOUTH BANK WHITE RIVER, PETERSBURG, PIKE COUNTY, IN. (ORL) 24-36 SOUTH BEARDSTOWN AND VALLEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28 17 SOUTH BEARDSTOWN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-17 SOUTH BELOIT, ILL. (NCR) 28-19 SOUTH URANCH OF KISHWAUKEE R. AT SYCAMORE, ILL. (NCC) 28-20 SOUTH BRISTOL HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 SOUTH COVENTRY LAKE, CT. (NED) 1-49 SOUTH CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 SOUTH DEER CREEK LEVEE, OUKLA. (SWT) 19-36 SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (NAN) 2*25, 2-33, 2-39 SOUTH FORK OF CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY. (OkN) 23-17 SOUTH FORK OF THE SANTA CLARA RIVER, SANTA CLARITA VALLEY, CA. (SPL) 33-35 SOUTH FORK, CLEARWATER RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 SOUTH FRANKFURT AREA (ORL) 24-31 SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MICH, (NCE) 31-44, 31-66, 31-84 SOUTH ORANGE, N.J. (NAN) 2-25, 2-33, 2-39 SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO. (MRO) 21-9 SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLO. (MO) 21-17 SOUTH PLATTE RIVER LEVEES AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, CHATFIELD LAKE TO FT. MORGAN, COLO. (MO) 21-22 SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, BANK PROTECTION, DENVER, COLO. (MRO) 21-20 SOUTH PLYMOUTH LAKE, N.Y. (NAB) 4-46 SOUTH POINT, OHIO (ORH) 29-28 SOUTH PORTSMOUTH, KY. (ORH) 2*-2A SOUTH QUINCY DRAINAGE AND LEVFE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 SOUTH RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 SOUTH SLOUGH (CHARLESTON), OREG. (NPP) 37-47 SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINN. (NCS) 27-23 SOUTH TUNRRIOGE LAKE, VT. (NED) 1-49 SOUTHERN NEW YURK FOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (NAB) 417, 4-38 4-43, 4- 4 SOUTHPORT HARBOR, CONN. (NED) 1-40 SOUTHPORT, CT. (NEU) 1-11, 1-42 SOUTHWEST HARROW, RE. (NED) 1-40 SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY. (ORL) 24-6, 24-21 SWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MISS. (SAM) 10-44 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 SPANISH FORK RIVER, UT. (SPK) 35-30 SPEWRFLL RLIIFF LAKE, GA. (SAM) 10-25, 10-32, 10-41, 10-46Ab SPUKANE SPUKANE RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 SPRING CITY, TENN. (URN) 23-18 SPRING CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, SPRINGDALE, ARK, (SWT) 19-37 SPRING CREEK, AKULLA COUNTY, FLORIDA (BERH) 41-4 SPkING LAKE URAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) e8-17, 28- SPRINGDALE LEVEE, ARK. (SWT) 19-36 SPRINGER, WILLIAM L. LAKE, ILL. (NCC) 28-17 SPRINGFIELU, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 SQUAM CHUTE AT QUINCY, ILL. (NCR) 28-12 ST FRANCIS BASIN, ARK. AND MO. (MR+T) 42-10, 02-19, 42-23, 42-24 42-25, 42-26, 42-29, 42-51, 19-54, 19-56, 19-58 ST FRANCIS RIVER PROJECT LEVEES (MR+T) 42-50 ST JOHNS BAYOU AND NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MO. (MR+T) 42-26 ST LOUIS DISTRICT 42-57, 42-58, 42-60 ST REGIS RIVER, MONT. (NAS) 38-28 ST. ALBANS HARBOR, LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT. (NAN) 2-43 ST. ANTHONY FALLS, LOWER LOCK AND DAM (NCD) 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29- b, 29-10, 29-11, 29-12 ST. ANTHONY FALLS, UPPER LOCK (NCD) MINN. 29-1, 29-3, 2q-4, 29-6 29-11. 29-12 ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-13. 9-28, 9-35 ST. CATHERINES SOUND, MD. (NAB) 4-10, 4-30, 4-37 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-39, 31-65, 31-82, 31-87 ST. CROIX RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 ST. CROIX RIVER, MINN. AND WIS. (NCS) 27-3, 27-17, 27- 19 ST. FRANCIS AND L'ANGUILLE RIVERS AND BLACKFISH BAYOU, ARK. (LMM) 13-9 ST. GENEVIEVE HARBOR, IOWA (NCD) 29-2 ST. GEORGE CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 ST. JAMES HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 ST. JAMES, BEAVER ISLAND, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 ST. JEROMES CREEK, MO. (NAB) 4-40 ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-33 ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE (SAJ) 9-33 ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO THE OCEAN (SAJ) 9-33 ST. JOHNS RIVER, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 ST. JONFS RIVER, DEL. (NAP) 3-28 ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-40, 31-65, 31-82 ST. JOSEPH RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 ST. LOUIS DISTRICT (NCU) 29-3, 29-A4, 29-5 ST. LUCTE INLET, FLA. (SAJ) 9-14, 9-28, 9*35 ST. MARIER, ST. JOE RIVER, IDAHO (NAS) 38-28 ST. MARKS RIVER, FLA. (SAM) 10-42, 10-43 ST. MARYS RIVER, MICH. (NCE) 31-40, 31-65, 31-82 ST. MARYS, PA. (ALLEGHENY RIVFR BASIN) (ORP) 26-27 ST. MARYS, PA. (ORP) 26-31 ST. MARYS, W.VA. (ORM) 25-28 ST. MICHAEL CONAL, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 ST. MICHAELS HARBOR, MO. (NAB) 4-39, 4-40 ST. PATRICKS CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 ST. PAUL (HARRIET ISLAND), MINN. (NCD) 29-12 ST. PAUL AND SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINN. (NCS) 27-23, 27-24 ST. PAUL DISTRICT (NCD) 29-2, 2q-3, 29-5, 29-11 ST, PAUL HARBOR, MINN. (NCD) 29-8, 29-11 ST. PETERS CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-40 ST. PETERSBURG HARBOR, FLA. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-28, 9-35 ST. THOMAS HARBOR, V.1. (SAJ) 9-44 STAGE GULCH, STANFIELD, OREG. (NAA) 37-55 STAMFORD HARBOR, CT. (NED) 1-9, 1-29 STAMFORD HARBOR, CT. (2 PROJECTS UNCOMPLETED PORTIONS) (NED) 1-49 STAMFOND, CT. (NED) 1-23, 1-33 STAMFORD, CT. (NED) 1-25 STARLINGS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-9, 5-18, 5-22 STARI-UP, WALLACE RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 STARVED RnCK LUCK AND DAM, ILL. (NCC) 28-22 STARVED ROCK LOCKS AND DAMS, ILL. (NCC) 28-3 STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WTS. (NCS) 27-13, 27-18 STATEN ISLAND RAPID TRANSIT RAILWAY CO. BRIDGE ACRUSS ARTHUR KILL, N.Y. 2-43 STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. (NAN) 2-26, 2-33, 2-39q STE. GENEVIEVE, MISSOURI (LMS) 41-4 STEELE BAYUU BASIN, MISS. (MR+T) 42-25 STEINHATCHEE RIVER, FLA, (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 STEWARD AND GRAY RD. TO SANTA ANA BRANCH, PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY BRIDGE, LOS ANGELES RIVER CHANNEL, CA. (SPL) 33-32 STEWART CANYON DEBRIS BASIN AND CHANNEL, VENTURA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-35 STIKINE RIVER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-6, 40-10, 40-11 STILLAOUAMISH RIVER, WASH. (NPS) 38-10, 38-P24, 38-27 STILLHUUSE HOLLOW OAM, TEX. (SWF) 16-13, 16b-19, 16-22 STILLWATER CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, OKLA. (SWT) 19-37 STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA. (NAB) 4-22, 4-32, 4-38 STILLWELL DRAINAGE DISTRICT, TILLAMOOK BAY, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 STUCKTON AND MURMON CHANNELS, CA. (SPK) 35-26 STOCKTON HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-38, 1-40 STOCKTON HARBOR, ME. (NFD) 1-40 STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO. (MRK) 20-12, 20*lA, 20-21, 20-22 STONE ARCH BRIDGE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINN, (NCD) 29-10, 29-12 STONE HARBOR, N.J. (NAP) 3-P9 STONEHOUSE CREEK, JEFFERSON CO, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, H. VA, (OAP) 26-12, 26-19 STONINGTON HARBOR, COMM. (NED) 1-40 STUNINGTON HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-49 STONY CREEK, BRANFORO, CONN, (NED) 1-40 STRATFORD, CT. (NED) 1-49 STREAMBANK EROSION CONTRUL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT (MRO) 21-12, 21-lb STROUBE LAKE & COUGAR ADDITIONAL UNIT, (SOUTH FORK MCKENZIE) (MODI FICATION TU COUGAR LAKE) DREG. 37-50 STUART GULCH DAM, BOISE, IDAHO (NPR) 39-18 STUMPY POINT BAY, N.C. (SAw) 6-9, 6-22 STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WIS. (NCC) 31-44, 31- b7, 31-85 STURGIS, KY. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 STURGIS, S.D. (MRO) 21*8, 21-15 SUBDISTRICT NO. 1 OF DRAINAGE UNION NO. I AND BAY ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT NO. I, ILL. (NCR) 28-19 SUICKER BROOK, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 SUGAR AND BRIAR CREEK, N. C. (SAN) 7-18 SUGAR HILL RESERVOIR, N.H. (NED) 1-49 SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA. (SPK) 35-28 SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA. (SPN) 34-9, 34-15 SUISUN CHANNEL, CA. (SPK) 35-P8 SUISUN CHANNEL, CA. (SPN) 34-20 SUISUN POINT CHANNEL, CA. (SPK) 35-28 SULLIVAN FALLS HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 SULPHUR RIVER, ARK, AND TEXAS (LMN) 11-50 SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WVA, (ORH) 25-13, 25-8 SUMPAWANUS (BABYLON CREEK) INLET, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 SUNBURY, PA. (NAB) 4-46 SUPERVISION OF THE HARBOR OF HAMPTON ROADS (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS (NAU) 5-10, 5-18 SUPERVISOR OF NER YORK HARBOR (NAN) 2-15, 2-32, 2-41 SIIlRFSIDE-SUNSET BEACH, CA. (SPL) 33-7, 33-31 SORRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, N.H. (NED) 1-16, 1-31 SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AT AND BELOW HAVRE DE GRACE, MD. (NAB) 4-40 SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, N.Y. AND PA. (NAB) 4-22 ,4-38 4-45 SUSQUEHANNA RIVER WILLIAMSPORT, PA. (NAB) 4-41 SUTTON LAKE, W.VA. (ORH) 25-13, 25-19 SUWANNE RIVER, FLA. (SAJ) 9-43, 9-44 SWANTON HARBOR, VT. (NAN) 2-43 SWAYERSVILLE, AND FORTY FORT, PA. (NAB) 4-46 SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATEW RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-19e 33-22 SWIFT CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 SWIFTCREEK, PITT AND CRAVEN COUNTIES, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 SWIGER, WHITNEY, YOUNG-HOBBIT LEVEE (NCC) 28-18 SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WASH. (NPS) 38-be6, 38-18, 38-22 SYCAMORE WASH, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 SYKESVILLEe PA. (ORP) 26-31 SYRACUSE, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 SYRACUSE, OSWEGO RIVER BASIN, N.Y. (NCB) 32-46 T T. J. O'BRIEN LOCK AND DAM, ILL. (NCC) 28-22, 28-23 TABLE ROCK LAKE MO, (SWL) 18-9, 18-12, 18-21 TACOMA HARBOR, WASH. (NPS) 38-6, 38-18, 38-22, 38-27 TACOMA PUYALLUP RIVER, WASH. (NPS) 38-11, 38-19, 38-24 TAHCHEVAH CREEK DETENTION BASIN AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33-35 TAHQUITZ CHEEK (INACTIVE), WHITEwATER RIVER bASIN, CA. (SPL) 33- 35 TALKEETHA RIVER, ALASKA (NPA) 40-6, 40-7, 40-10, 40-11 TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MISS. (SAM) 10-16, 10-30, 10-39 TALLAHATCHIE AND COLDWATER RIVERS, MISS. (LMK) 12-11 TALLAPOOSA RIVER, ALA. (SAM) 10-43 TAMAQUA, PA. (NAP) 3-16, 3-23 TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS, (SAJ) 9-36 TAMPA AND PORT MANATEE, FL. 53-5 TAMPA HARBAUR, FLA. (SAJ) 9q-b16, 9-28, 9-36 TANGEMAN, LITTLE NEMAHA RIVER, NEB, (MRO) 21-20 TANGIFR CHANNEL, VA. (NAO) 5-10, 5-18, 5-22 TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA. (LMN) 11-22, 11-37, 11-44 TAN CREEK LEVEE (NCC) 28-17 TAR RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 TAR RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 TAR RIVEN, PRINCEVILLE, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 TAHENTUM, PA. (ORP) 26-31 TARRYTOWN HARBOR, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 TASKINAS CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 TAU SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA (PO0D) 36-4, 36-8, 36-12 TAUNTON RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-40 TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 TAYLORS BAYOU, TEX. (SWG) 15-148 15-19, 15-31 TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY. (ORL) 24718, 24-23 TAYLORSVILLE, KY. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 TECHE VERMILION BASIN, LA. (MR+T) 42-7, 42-15, 42-24, 42-29, 42-52, 42-56, 42-98, 42-59 TELEGRAPH CANYON CREEK, CHULA VISTA, CA. (SPL) 33-35 TELL CITY, IN. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 TEN KILLER FERRY LAKE, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-21, Q19P7, 19-30 TENANTS HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 TENASILLAHE ISLAND, Ct ASOP COUNTY, DREG. (NPP) 37-52 TENKILLER FERRY, LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18 TENMILE CREEK AT MARIANNA, PA. (ORP) 26-13, 26-19, 26-32 TFNNESSEE CHUTE, (MEMPHIS HARROR), TENN. (MR+T) 42-23 TENNESSEE RIVER, TENN., ALA., AND KY. (ON) 23-3, 23-1, 23-12, 23-16, 23-17 TEINESSEE-OMBlGBEE-wATERWAY ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (URN) 23-4, 23-10, 23-13 TENSAS BASIN, ARK. AND LA. (MR+T) 42-8, 42-16, 42-29, 42-36e 42-58 TFNSAS ROEUF AND RED RIVERS, LA. (MR+T) 42-27 TFNSAS RIVER AND BAYOU MACON, LA. (LMK) 12-11 TERRAIN ANALYSIS CENTER 51-1 TERRE HAUTE (CONUVER LEVEE), IN. (URL) 24-36, 24-37 TETON RIVER, IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 TFXAS CITY AN VICINITY, TEX., HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION (SG) 15-15, 15-19, 15-31 TFXAS CTTY CHANNEL, TX. (SwG) 15-9, 15-18, 15-29, 15-34, 15-38 THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT., R.I,, AND MA. (NED) 1-24 THAMES RIVER, CONN. (NED) 1-40 1-22 INDEX THE CA*CAUES CANAL, COLUMBIA RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-4 THE DALLES LUCK AND DAM-LAKE CELILO, WASH. AND OREG. (NPP) 37-29, 37-361 37-45, 37-57 THE DALLES-CELILO CANAL, OREG. AND MASH, (NPP) 37-47 THE ISLAND LAKE, VT. (NED) 1-49 THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE 51-1 THE SNY BASIN, ILL. (NCR) 28-17 THOMASTONIDAM, CT. (NF) 1-19, 1-32, t1-45 THOMPSON CREEK AND SAN JOSE WASH (INCLUDING SAN JOSE CREEK), SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 THUMPSUN IAKE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT (NCC) 28-17 THOMPSON RUN, PA. (ORP) 26-32 THREE FORKS, LUWER MADISON RIVER, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 THREE FORKS, MONT. (MRU) 20-2 THREE ISLAND RESERVIOR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TENN. (ORN) 23-19 THREE RIVERS, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1- 4 4 THREE RIVFRS, TEX. (SWF) 16-13, 16-19, 16-22 THUMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (NAO) 5-R10 5-19, 5-23 THUMPERTOWN BEACH, FASTHAM, MA* (NED) 1-49 TICKFAm RATALBANY, PUN CHATOULA, AND BLOOD RIVERS, LA. (LMN) 11-50 TICONDEROGA RIVER, N.,Y (NAN) 2-43 TIJUANA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-35 TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MDO, (NAB) 4-10, 4-30 TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OREG. (NPP) 37-12, 3734, 37-41 TIOGAHAMMOND LAKES, PA. (NAB) 4-23, 4-32, 4-44p 4-45 TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. (ORP) 26-14, 26-19 TIPTONVILLE UBION RIVER, TENN. (MRT) 42-25 42-28 TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK & DAM (NO, 8) ARK. (SWL) *18(-1 8-15 TOCKS ISLAND (RELOCATION OF U.S. ROUTE 209 ONLY) PA. (NAP) 3-30 TOCKS ISLAND LAKE, PA., AND N.Y. (NAP) 3-30 TODD SWAMP, S. C, (SAN) 7-18 TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (NCB) 32-18, 32-28, 32-40 TOLU, KY. (ORL) 24-31 TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO (ORH) 25-13, 25-19 TOMAHAWK LAKE, BLUE RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-22 TOMANOVICH-SALMON CITY, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18S TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MISS. AND ALA. (SAM) 10-18, O10-31, 10-40 TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISS. AND ALA. (SAM) 10-18, 10-31, 10-40 TOMS RIVER, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 TONGUE RIVER LAKE, N, DAK. (NCS) 27-24 TOPEKA, KANSAS RIVER, KANS. (MRK) 20-21, 20-22 TOPOGRAPHIC DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY 51-1 TORONTO LAKE, KANS. (SWL) (SwT) 1-18S TORONTO LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KANSAS (SWL)(SWT) 19-16, 19 26, 19-30, 19-34 TORRINGION EAST BRANCH (NED) 1-45 TORRINGTON, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-45 TORRIN6TON, WEST BRANCH (NED) 1-45 TOTAL COWLITZ RIVER BASIN (NPP) 37-52 TOTAL LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, (NPP) 37-53 TOTUSKEY CREEK, VA. (NAO) 5-26 TOUCHET RIVER, WASH. (NPw) 39-17, 38-19 TOWANDA LAKE, WALNUT RIVER BASIN# KANSAS (SWT) 19-16, 19-26p 19- 35 TOWN REACH, PLYMOUTH, MA. (NED) 1-42 TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-16, 16-19 TOWN BRANCH, SUMMERVILLE, GA. (SAM) 10-45 TOwN CHEEK, AMERICUS, GA. (SAM) 10-44 TOWN CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-41 TOWN CREEK, S, C, (SAN) 7*7p 7-12, 7-15 TOWN NECK BEACH, SANDWICH, MA. (NED) 1- 4 2 TOWNCREEK, HARRODBURG, KY. (ORL) 24-37 TOwNSHEND LAKE, VT. (NED) 1-16, 1-31 TRABUSCO DAM (INACTIVE), SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY ), CA. (SPL) 33-33, 33*34 TRADEWATER RIVER, KY. (ORL) 24-30 TRANGUITAS CREEK, KINGSVILLE, TEX. (S5G) 15-33 TRANIFRS CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 TRAVERSE CITY HARBUR, MICH. (NCE) 31-90 TREASURE ISLAND, MO. (LMM) 13-4, T13-7, 13-8, 13-9 TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DTBRIS SHUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA. (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 TRED AVON RIVER, MD. (NAB) 4-41 rREMEALEAU, WIS. (NCS) 27-21 TRENT RIVER, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 TRENT RIVFR, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 TRENTON LAKE, IHOMPSUN RIVER MO. (MRK) 20-22 TREXLFk LAKE, PA. (NAP) 3-19, 3-23 TRINIDAD LAKE, COLO. (SWA) 17-9, 17-14 TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TEX*. (SG) 1514, 15-18, 15-30, 15 -34 TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TEX. (SWF) 16-2, 16-17, 16-22 TRIPETT CREEK, MUREHEAD, KY. (LICKING IVER) (ORL) 24-37 TROUBLESOME CREEK, HINUMAN, KY. (ORL) 24-3b TRUCKEE HIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA.# AND NV. (SPK) 35-30 TRUCKEE RIVER, CA. (SPA) 35-17 TRUSSVILLE, ALA. (SAM) 10-4 U TRUTH OR CONSFQUENCES (HOT SPRINGS) UNIT, N. MEX. (SWA) 17-B 17-16 N W 9 1 TICANNUN RIVER, CAMP wOOTEN, WASH.(NPw) 39-lB TUCKAHOE RIVER, MD, (NAB) 4-11, 4-30 TIJCKER1ON CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 TUCSON, ARIZ. (SPL) 33-SR TUJUINGA WASH CHANNEL, LOS ANGELES RIVER CHANNEL, CA. (SPLI 33-32 TULLY LAKE, MA. (NED) 1-16, 1-31 TULSA AND REST TULSA LEVEE, OKLA. ((SAT) 1S3, 19-37 TURKEY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, OKLA. (SAT) 19-37 TuRKEY CREEK, SUMTER COUNTY, S. C. (SAN) 7-1A TURNER PRAIRE, MILL CREEK, DREG. (NPP) 37-53 TURTLE CREEK CHRNNEL IMPROVEMENT, YUKON, OKLA. (SWT) 19-37 TURTLE CREEK, PA, (0AP) 26-31 TUSCUN DIVERSION CHANNEL, ARIZ. (SPL) 35-11, 33-22 TUSKAHOMA LRKF, UKLA. (SRT) i -37 TUTTLE CHEEK LAKE (ROAD IMPROVEMENT), KANSAS (1974 MUDIFICATION) (MRK) 20-?1 TwELVEMILE BAYOU, LA. (LMN) il-SR TAIN VALLEY LAKE, RILD RICE RIVE, MINN. (NCS) 27-13, 27-18 THITCH COVE BIG THORoFARE, MD. (NAB) 4-41 TAO HARBORS, MINN, (NCS) 31-45, 31-67, 31-85 TWUO RIVERS DAM, N, MEX. (SWA) 17-10, 17-14 TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WIS. (NCC) 31-45, 31-67, 31-85 TWONE, PA. (NAB) 4-23, 4*32, 4-39 TYASKIN CREEK, MD. (NAB) 4-41 TYGART LAKE, W. VA. (ORP) 26-3, 26-18 TYLERS BEACH, VA. (NAO) 5-26 U J.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY (USACRREL) 52-1, 52-2, 52-3 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 3 RESEARCH LABORATORY (CERL) 50-1 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES (ETL) 51-1 UATESVILLE LAKE, KY. 25-14, 25-19 UMATILLA HARBOR, ORFG. (NPP) 37-47 UMATILLA RIVER (ECHO), COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 UMPQUA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, OREG. (NPP) 37-54 UMPOUA RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-12, 37*34, 37-41 UNADILLA, N.Y. (NAB) 4-46 UNION CITY DAM, PA. (ORP) 26-14, 26-20 UNION LAKE, MO. (LMS) 14-21 UNION RIVER, ME. (NED) 1-40 UNION TOWNSHIP DRAINAGE DISTRICT, MO. (NCR) 28-9, 28-12, 28-15, 28-17, 28-19 UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT. (NED) 1-17, 1-31 UNIONTOWN LOCKS AND DAM, KY. (ORD) 22-38 22-9 UNIONTOWN, KY. (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 UNIONTOWN, PA. (MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN) (ORP) 26-27 UNIONTOWN, PA. (ORP) 26-31 UNIVERSITY WASH AND SPRING BROOK, RIVERSIDE, CA. (INACTIVE) (SPL) 33-35 UPPER CHIPOLA RIVER, FLA. FROM MARIANA TO ITS MOUTH (SAM) 10-43 UPPER GRAND RIVER, MO, (MRK) 20-22 UPPER GRAYS RIVER AREA, WASH. (NPP) 37-52 UPPER IOWA RIVER, IOWA (NCS( 27-24 UPPER MACHODOC CREEK, VA. (NAB) 4-I41 UPPER MARLBORO, MDO. (NAB) 4-46 UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN (ROCK ISLAND DISTRICT) (NCR) 28-19 UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (LMS) 14-12, 14- 19 UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN (ST. PAUL DIST.), BLACK RIVER, WIS. (NCS) 27-24 UPPER PIJYALLUP RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 UPPER RIVER ROAD, JEFFERSON CO., KY. (ORL) 24-36 UPPER RIVER ROUGE, MICH. (NCE) 31-91 UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD. (NAB) 4-11, 4-30, 4-37 UPPER WHITE RIVER, ARK. (SWL) 18-20 URBAN AREAS AT ALTON, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 URBANNA CREEK, VA. (NA0) 5-26 UTICA LAKE, OHIO (ORH) 25-28 UTICA, IN. (ORL) 24-31 V VALDEZ HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 VALE, MALHEIIR RIVER, OREG. (NPw) 39-17 VALLEY CITY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 VALLEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCC) 28-17 VALPARISO, FLA. (SAM) 10-45 VAN BUREN, ARKANSAS RIVER, ARK. (SAL) 18-22 VAN METFR, IOWA (NCR) 28-17, 28-q19 VANCEBURG, KY. (ORH) 25-28 VANDALIA IRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, NO. 21, ILL. (LMS) 14-21 VATIA AREA, AMERICAN, SAMOA (PD00) 36-13 VAUGHN, MONT. SUN RIVER (MRO) 21-22 VAUGHN, SUN RIVER, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 VELVA, N. OAK. (NCS) 27-24 VENTNOR, MARGATE AND LONGPORT, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 VENTURA MARINA, CA. (SPL) 33-6, 33-21 VENTURA RIVER LEVEE, VENTURA RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-34, 33-35 VENTURA-PIERPONT AREA, CA. (SPL) 33-31 VEDUGO WASH, CONCORD ST, TO UPPER CANADA BRIDGE, LOS ANGFLES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-31 VEROUGO WASH, UPPER CANADA BRIDGE TO DEBRIS BASIN, LOS ANGELES RIVFR BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 VERMILION HARPUR, UHIO (NCB) 32-18, 32-29, 32-41, 32-44 VERMILION LOCK, LA. (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (LMN) 11-22, 11-37, 11- 44, 11-12 VERMILLION RIVER, HASTING, MINN. (NCS) 27-14, 27-18 VERONA LAKE, VA. (NA) 4-46 VICINITY OF NFHALEM, NEHALEM RIVER, OREG (NPP) 37-54 VICKSBURG HARBOR, MISS. (MR+T) 42-30 VICKSBURG, MISS. DISRICT (MR+T) 42-1, 42-4, 42-5, 42-36, 42-44 42-51, 42-56, 42-57, 42-59, 42-70 VICKSBURG-YAZO AREA (HARBOR), MISS. (MR+T) 42-23, 42-57 VICTORY LAKE, VT.(NED) 1-49 VILLA PARK DAM, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA. (SPL) 33J33 VILLAGE CREEK, JACKSON & LAMMENCE COUNTIES, ARK. (SAL) 18-21 1-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1980 18-22 VILLAGE CREEK, S. C. (SAN) 7-17 VILLAGE CREEK, WHITE RIVER, AND MAYBURY LEVEE DISTRICT, ARK. (SWL) 18-14 VILLAGE OF NEW ATHENS, ILL. (LMS) 14-7, 14-15, 14-20 VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TEX. (SWG) 15*15, 15-19, 15-31 VINCENNES, IN. (WABASH RIVER) (OWL) 24-37 VINCENNES, IN. (%ABSASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-31, 24-3b VINEYARD HAVEN, MASS. (NED) 1-40 VINTON WATERWAY, LA. (LMN) 11-50 VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2, VA. (NAU) 5-15, 5-19, 5-23 VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. (NAO) 5-12, 5-19, 5-23 VIRGINIA KEY AND KEY RISCAYNE, FLA. (SAJ) 9-45 W W. D. MAYO LOCK & DAM NO. 14 (SWL) (SWT) 18-16 W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N.C. (SAW) 6-17, 6-23 W. P. FRANKLIN LOCK AND DAM, FLA. (SAJ) 9-47 w.D. MAYU LOCK AND DAM, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(SWT) 19-4, 19-30, 19-34 WABASH RAILROAD BRIDGES, ILLINOIS RIVER MEREDOSIA AND VALLEY CITY , ILL. (LMS) 14-19 WABASH RIVER BASIN, IN., ILL., AND OH. (ORL) 24-18, 24-26, 24-33 WABASHA HARBOR, MINN. (NCD) 29-3, 29-8, 29-11 WACCAMAW RIVER & SEVEN CREEKS, N.C. & S.C. (SAW) 6-30 WACCAMAW RIVER AND SEVEN CREEKS. N, C. AND S. C. (SAN) 7-18 WACCANAW RIVER, N. C. AND S. C. (SAN) 7-17 WACO LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-14l, 16b-19e 16-22 WAHKIAKUM CO. OIKING DISTRICT 4, WASH. (NPP) 37-53 WAIKIKI BEACH, OAHU, HAWAII (POD) 36-12, 36-13 WAILOA, STREAM AND TRIBUTARIES, HAWAII, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 wAIMEA BEACH, KAUAI, HAWAII (POD) 36-13 WAKE ISLAND HARBOR, WAKE ISLAND (POD) 36-12 WALDO LAKE TUNNEL AND REREGULATING WORKS NORTH FORK MIDDLE FORKP WILLAMETTE RIVER OREG. (NAA) 37-50, 37-57 WALLA WALLA, MILL CREEK, WASH. (NPW) 39-17 WALLA WALLA, WASH. (NPW) 39-15 WALLABOUT CHANNEL, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3v 2-43 WALLACE CHANNEL, PAMLICO SOUND, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 WALLACE LAKE, LA. (LMN) 11-33, 11-38, t11-46, 11-51, 11-53 WALLACE. W. VA. (ORP) 26-31 WALLIS SANDS STATE BEACH, N.H. (NED) I-11, 1-42 WALLISVILLE LAKE, TEX. (SWG) 15-11 WALLUSKI RIVER, CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 WALNUT BAYOU CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, ARK. (SWT) 19-36, 19-37 WALNUT CREEK (SPK) 35-17 WALNUT CREEK INLET CHANNEL, SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 WALNUT CREEK SYSTEM, SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA, (SPL) 33-32 WALNUT CREEK, CA. (SPK) 35-30 WALNUT CREEK, CA. (SPN) 34-12, 34-15 WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. (SAM) 10-25. 10-32, 10-41, 10-46 WALTER FRANCIS E DAM, PA. (NAP) 3-17, 3-23 WAPANAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, OAHUp HAWAII (POD) 36-12 wAPPAPELLA LAKE, MO. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-21 WAPPAPELLO LAKE. ARK, (MR+T) 42-58, 42-59 WAPPINGER CREEK AT PLESANT VALLEY, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 wAPPINGER CREFAK, N.Y. (NAN) 2-43 WARE, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 WAREHAM HARBOR, MASS. (NED) 1-40 WAREHMAMMARION, MA. (NED) 1-49 WARREN RIVER, R.I. (NED) 1-40 WARRENTON DIKING DISTRICT 1, CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 WARRENTON DIKING DISTRICT 2, CLAISOP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 WARRENTON DIKING DISTRICT 3, CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 wARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MINN. (NCS) 27-3, 27-17, 27-19 WARRUAD HARBUR, MINN. (NCS) 27-21 WARROAD RIVER AND BULL DOG CREEK, MTNN. (NCS) 27-24 WARSAW HARBOR, ILL. (NCD) 29-2, 29-9, 29-12 WARSAW, N.Y. OATKA CREEK (NCB) 32-46 WANWICK COVE, R.I. (NED) 1-40 WARWICK RIVER, MU. (NAB) 4-41 WARWOOD, W, VA. (OPR) 26-P7, 26-31 WASHINGTON AGUEDUCI (NAB) 4-26, 4-47 WASHINGTON CANAL AND SUUTH RIVER, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 WASHINGTON 0. C. AND VICINITY (NAB) 4 46 WASHINGTON HARBOR, D.C. (NAB) 4-11, 4-30, 4-37 WASHINGTON, PA. (ORB) b-31 WASHUU6AL AREA LOVEES, CLARK COUNTY, WASH. (NPP) 37-53 WATFR RESOURCES SIJPPURI CENTER (WRSC) 53-1 WATFRBURY RESERVOIR, WINOOSKI HIVER BASIN, VT. (NAN) 2-45 WATFRBURY, WINOOSKI RIVER BASIN, VI. (NAN) 2-45 WATFRBURY/WATEWTUwN, CT. (NEU) 1-25, 1-45 WATERCE RIVER, S. C. (SAN) 7-17 WATERFORD, HUDSON AND MOHAWK RIVERS, N.Y. (NAN) 2-45 WAlFRLU0, ELKHURN RIVER, NEB. (MRO) 21-20 WATERLOO, IOWA (NCR) 28-9, 28-12, 28-15 wATERLOO, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N.C. (SAW) b-9, 6-22, 6-26 WATERWAY CONNECTING PORT TOWNSEND AND OAK BAY (NPS) 38*-7 WATERWAY CONNECTING SWANGUARTER BAY WITH DEEP BAY, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, ALA. AND MISS. (SAM) 10-15, 10-30, 10-39 WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE, LA., TO GULF OF MEXICO (LMN) 11-23, 11-37, 11-44 WATERWAY FROM INDIAN RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH BAY, DEL. (NAP) 3-13 , 3-22 WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA. (BAYOUS GRAND CAILLOU AND LECARPE, LA.) (LMN) 11-23, 11-37p 11-48 WATERWAY FROM LITTLE CHOPTANK RIVER TO CHOPTANK RIVER, MD. (NAB) 4-41 WATERWAY FROM WHITE LAKE TO PECAN ISLAND, LA. (LMN) 11-90 WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (NAO) 5-11, 5-19, 5-23 WATERWAY-NORFOLK, VA. TO SOUNDS OF N.C. (SAW) 6-27 WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION (WES) 45-1 WATTERSONVILLE ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA, (ORP) 26-32 WATTS BAR LOCK AND DAM, TENN. (ORN) 23-16 WATTS LEVEE (NCC) 28-18 WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILL. (NCC) 30-6, 30-10, 30-13, 30-14 WAURIKA LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 19-17, 19-26 WAVERLY, W.VA. (ORH) 25-28 WAX LAKE, LA. (MR+T) 42-52, 42-57 WAYCAKE CREEK, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN (BERH) 41-4 WEARS CREEK, JEFFERSON CITY. MISSOURI (BERH) 41-5 WEBB DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT CO., COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK & DAM NO. 16 (SWL) (SwT) 18-b16 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWT) 1Q- 22, 19-27, 19-30 WEBER RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, UT. (SPK) 35-30 WEISER RIVER, COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, IDAHO (NPW) 39-18 WEISER RIVER, WEISER AREA, IDAHO (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 WELLFLEET HARBOR, MA. (NED) 1-9, 1-29 WELLS HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-40 WELLS HARBOR, TERRITORY OF GUAM 36-12 WELLSBURG, W. VA. (ORB) 26-27, 2b-31 WELLSVILLE, N.Y.v GENESEE RIVER (NCR) 32-46 WELLSVILLE, OHIO SEC. I (ORP) 26-27, 26b-31 WELLSVILLE, OHIO SEC. II (ORP) 26-27, 26-31 WENATCHEE RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 WENATCHEE, CANYONS LAND 2, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 WESSAGUSSETT, MA. (NED) 1-11, 1-42 WEST AGURS, LA. (LMN) 11-33, 11-38, 11-46 WEST AICHALAFAYA FLOODWAY, LA. (MR+T) 42-14 wEST BRANCH CHISHOLM CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KANS. (SwT) 19-37 WEST BRANCH OF SUSGUEHANNA RIVER, PA. (NAB) 4-23, 4-32,p 44p 4* wEST BRANCH OF SUSUUEHANNA RIVER, PA. (NAB) 4*45, 4-46 WEST BRIDGEWATER, PA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-31 WFST BROOKFIELD RESERVOIR, MA. (NED) 1-49 WEST CANAAN LAKE, N.H. (NED) 1-49 WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH. (ORL) 24-19, 24-23, 24-31 WEST FURK, W.VA. (ORM) 25-28 WFST GLENDIVE, YELLOWSTONE RIVER, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 WEST HARBOR, OHIO (NCR) 32-19, 32-29 WEST HICKMAN AREA, HICKMAN, KY. (LMM) 13-4, 13-7, 13-8 WEST HILL DAM, MA. (NED) 1-11 WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-24, 42-25, 42-29, 42-55, 42-56, 42-58, 42-59 WEST LITTLE PINE CREEK, ETNA, PA. (ORP) 26-32 WEST MAGNESID CANYON CHANNEL, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA. (SPL) 33-35 WEST MATANZAS DRAINAGE AND EVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (NCC) 28-17 WEST MUDDY CREEK AND MARYS RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 WEST NISHNABOTNA RIVER, MILLS CO. BRIDGE, NEAR HASTINGS, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 NEST NISHNAROTNA RIVER, MILLS CO. BRIDGE, NEAR MALVERN, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 WEST NISHNABUTNA RIVER, NEAR HANCOCK, IOWA (MRO) 21-21 WEST OF MORRILTON, ARKANSAS RIVER ARK. (SWL) 18-22 WFST OHEONTA LAKE, N. Y. (NAB) 4-46 WEST ONEONTA LAKE, N. Y. (NAb) 4-43, -44 WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND ALA. (SAM) 10- 26, 10-32, 10-41 WEST POINT LAKE, WEST POINT, GA. (SAM) 10-46 WEST POINT, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER, GA. (SAM) 10-44 WEST POINT, ELKHORN RIVER, NEW. (MRO) 21-20 WEST PUINT, KY. (OWL) 24-31 WEST POINT, NEBR. (MRO) 21-22 WEST RICHLANU, YAKIMA RIVER, WASH. (NPW) 39-17 WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA. (NED) 1-25 WEST STFARTSTOWN, N.H. (NED) 1-25 WFST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TENN. (MR+T) 42-11, 42-20, 42-25, 42-26 WFST TERRE HAUIE, IN. (WABASH RIVER) (ORL) 24-31, 24-36, 24-37 WFST THOMPSON LAKE, CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-33, 1-46 WEST WARREN, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (NAN) 2-14, 2-32, 2-38 WESTCOIT COVE, CUNN. (NED) 1-40 WESTFIELD, MA. (NED) 1-49 wFSTHAVEN COVF SMALL BOAT BASIN (WESTPORT MARINA) WASH. (NPS) 38-7, 38-18, 38-23 WESTLAND DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT CO., COLUMBIA, OREG. (NPP) 37-52 WESTUN MILLS OLEAN, N.Y. (ORP) 26-32 26-32 WESTUN, VT. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 WESTPORT DISTRICT COLUMBIA AND CLATSUP COUNTIES, OREG. (NPP) 37-5 2 wESTPORT HARBOR AND SAUGATUCK RIVER, CONN. (NED) 1-AO WESTPORT HARBOR AND SAUGATUCK RIVER, CT. (UNCOMPLETED PORTION) (NED) 1-A WFSTPORT RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-40 WESTPORT SLOUGH, OREG. (NPP) 37-47 WESTPORT SLOUGH, WOOUSON, OREG. (NAA) 37-55 WESTPORT, CT. (NED) 1-49 wESTVILLE LAKE, MA. (NED) 1-25, 1-33, 1*A6 WETHERSFIELD, CT. (NED) 1-25 WEYMOUTH BACK RIVER, MASS. (NED) 1-40 WEYMOUTH, MA. (NED) 1-25 WEYMOIITH-FORE & TOWN RIVERS, ROSTON HR., MASS. (NED) 1-40 WHEELING, A. VA, (NORTH WHEELING) (ORP) 26-28, 26*31 WHEELING, W. VA. (ORP) 26-27, 26-31 WHEELING, W. VA. (WHEELING ISLAND) (ORP) 26-28, 26-31 WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-46, 31-67, 31-85 WHITE 0AKOIKE, BLADEN AND PENDER COUNTIES, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 WHITE RIVER ARK. (ABOVE PEACH ORCHARD BLUFF) (SWL) 18-20 1-24 INDEX WHITE RIVER BACKWATER AREA, ARK. (LMM) 42-23, 4-2-24 WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISIRICT) (SWL) (MR&T) 18-6. 18-12o 18-13 WHITE RTVFR FISH HATCHERY, ARK. (SWL) 18-21 WHITE RIVERNAVIGATION TO BATESVILLEf ARKANSAS (BERH) 41-A4 WHITE RIVER, ARK. (BELOW NEWPORT).(LMM) 13-3, 13-?7, 13-8 WHITE RIVER, ARK. (LMM) 42-22, 42-23, 42*28, 42-55, 42*56, 42-58 WHITE RIVER, IND, (ORL) 24-30 WHATERIRP CREEK# IDAHO (NPW) 39-17 WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MICH. (NCE) 31-46, 31-b7, 31-85 WHITESBURGo KY. (NORTH FORK KENTUCKY RIVER) (ORL) 24-36 wHITINS CREEK# VA. (NAO) 5-26 WHITLOW RANCH DAM, DUEEN CREEK, ARIZ. (SPL) 33-12, 33-22 wHITMANVILLE, MA. (NED) 1-46 WHITNEY LAKE, TEX. (SWF) 16-16, 16-19, 16-22 HITNFY POINT LAKE. NY. (NAB) 4-21, 4-32, 4-43p 4-44 WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, N. Y (NAB) 4-44 WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE N.Y. (NAB) 4-22, 4-32, 4-44 WHITTIER NARROWS DAM TO LOS ANGELES RIVER (LOWER), RIO HONDO CHANNEL, RIO HONDO BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 WHITTIER NARROWS DAM TO PACIFIC OCEAN, SAN GABRIEL RIVER CHANNEL, CA. (SPL) 33-32 WHITTIER NARROWS DAM, SAN GABRIEL RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 WICHITA NO VALLEY CENTERA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KANS. (SWT) 1936, 19-37 WICKFORD HARBOR, 4.I. (NED) 1-40 wICOMICO RIVER, MD. (NAB) 4-12, 4-30, 437 WILCOXT, PA. (ORP) 26-31 WILD RICE AND MARCH RIVERS, MINN. (NCS) 27-22, 27-23 WILD RICE RIVER, SOUTH BRANCH AND FELTON DITCH, MINN, 27-14, 27- 18 WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA. (SPN) 34-21 WILOERS. KYO (ORL) 24-31 WILEY CREEK LAKE, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 WILKES-BARRE, HANOVER TOWNSHIP, PA. (NAB) 4-46 WILLAMETTE FALLS FISH LADDER, OREG. (NPP) 37-53 WILLAMETTE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 31 -13,37-34P37-42 WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OREG. (NPP) 37-15I 37-34P 3 7-42, 37-4b WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN CHANNEL CLEARING AND SNAGGING (NPP) 37-54 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREG. BANK PROTECTION (NPP) 37-19, 37"35# 37-43s 37-51 WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WASH, (NPS) 38-7, 38-18, 38-23 WILLAPA RIVER AT RAYMONO WASH. (NPS) 38-11 , 38-1938-24 WILLIAM A. THOMPSON HARBOR, IOWA (NCD) 29-2 WILLIAM L. SPRINER LAKE, ILL. (NCC) 28-17 WILLIAMETTE RIVER BASIN, ORE6. (NPP) 37-18, 37-43, 37-53 WILLIAMSON, W.VA. (ORM) 25-28 WILLIAMSPORT, PA. (NAB) 4-46 WILLIAMSTOWN, A.VA. (ORH) 25-28 WILLISTON, ND0 WATER INTAKE (MRO) 21-11. 21-15 WILLISTON NORTH DAKOTA (MRO) 21-240 WILLOUGHBY CHANNEL, VA. (NAO) 5-26 WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, UREG. (NPW) 39-4, 39-13, 39-15 WILLOW ISLAND LOCKS AND DAM, W.VA, (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 WILMINGTDON HARBOR DEL. (NAP) 3-13, 3-23 3-26 WILMINGTON HARBOR N.C, (SAW) 6-10 b-22 WILMINGTON HARBdOR-NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA (SAW) 41-4 WTLMORE, PA. (ORP) 26-31 WILSON CANYON AND MANSFIELD ST. CHANNEL, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 WILSON HARBOR N.Y. (NCA) 32-19, 32-29, 32-41 wILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVEN, KANS. (MAK) 20-11, 20-16, 20-21 WILSON LOCK AND UAM, ALA. (ORN) 23-16 WTLSON POINT HARBOR, CONN. (NED) 1-41 WILTUN N,H, (NEU) 1-25 WINFRY CANYON, LOS ANGELES RIVER BASIN, CA. (SPL) 33-32 WINFIELD LEVEE MUDIFICATION, KANS. (SWT) 19-37 WINFIELD LEVEE, KANS. (SAT) 19-37 WINNIRIGOSHISH RESERVOIR MINN. (NCS) 27-20 WINNIPESAUKEE LAKE, N.H. (NEU) 1-41 WINONA HARBOR, MINN. (NCO) 29-3, 29-8, 29-12 WINONA, INT. (NCD) 29-11, 29-12 WINONAU MINN. (NCS) 27-1N8-v1 4 27-23 WINOOSKI RIVER, VT. (NAN) 2-45 WINSLOW (TRIOUTAIES OF LITTLE COLORADO RIVER) LITTLE COLORADO RIVER BASIN BANIZ, (PART) (SPL)I 33-34 33-35 WINSTFADe CT. (NED) 1-25, 1-44 WINTER HARBOR, (NAEMDE) 1-41 WINTER HARBOR, VA. (NAO) 5-li T -9, T5-23 WINTHROP HARBOR, MASS., (NED) 1-41 WINTHRUP, MA. (NED) 1-11, -38,. 1-42 WISCONSIN RIVER, WIS. (NCS) 27-21 WISARI POINT CHANNEL, VA (NAO) 5-26 wrSTER LAKE, OKLA. (SWL) (SW) 18-18 WISTER LAK, PTEAU RIVER BASIN, OKLA. (SWL)(SwT) 19-17o 19-2A, 14-34, 19-35 WIHLACOOCHEE RIVER, LA. (J 9-43, 9 4 WOLF AND JORDAN RIVERS, HISS. (SAM) 0-4 WOLF AND JORDAN RIVERS, HISS. (AM) 10-43 WOLF CREEK DAM-LAKE CUBLAND, OHIO RIVER RASIN. KY. ORN) 23-, WOL2F3 -1R0I,V ER2 3.(1MEMPHIS HARROR), TENN. (LAM) 13-3. 13-7, 13-8 WOLF RIVER (MEMPHID HAROR), TENN. (IRA) 42-22 WOLF RIVER AND T IBUIAR1ES, iENN. (MRHT) B2-24, 42-57 WOLF-COFFEE LAKE, BLUE RIVER, KANS, (MRK) 20-22 WO ISLAND HAROR, HF, AND POD AT RIDDEFORD (NED) 1-41 WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ILL. (LHS) 14-21 WOODARIDGE CREEK, N.J. (NAN) 2-43 WOUOBIORY CREEK, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 WOOLANDS, A, VA. (flAP) 26-78, 76-31 WOUDLYNNE, N.J. (NAP) 3-3D WOOMONY, CT, (NED) 1-11, 1-42 W OOS HOLE CHANNEL, MAS, (NED) 1-41 WODOSON DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-49, 31 wOONSOCKET, N.M. (NED) 1-25 WORCESTER, MA, (NED) t-25 *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1981--730-143/ -- 1-3 WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA (NPA) 40-t2 WRANGELL NARROWS, ALASKA (NPA) 40-12 WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TEX. (LMN) 11-54 WRIGHT PATMAN OAM AND LAKE, TEX. (LMN) 16-14, 16-19, 16-22 WRIGHT'S CREEK, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-28 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 WRIGHTSVILLE DAM, WINOUSKI RIVER BASIN, VT. (NAN) 2-45 WRSC 53-1 WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WASH. (NAS) 38-13v 38-19, 38-24 WYOMING VALLEY, PA. (NAB) 4-25, 4-33, 4-39 Y YADKIN RIVER (SAW) 6-29 YAOKIN RIVER BASIN, N.C. & S.C. (SAW) 6-17 YAOKIN RIVER, N, C, (SAN) 7-17, 7-18 YAKIMA RIVER AT ELLENSBURG, WASH, (NPS) 38-11, 38-19, 38-27, 38-28 YAKIMA RIVER, WEST RICHLAND, WASH. (NPW) 39-18 YAKIMA YAKIMA RIVER, WASH. (NAS) 38-28 YALOBUSHA RIVER, MISS. (LMR) 12-11 YAGUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OREG. (NPP) 37-14, 37*34, 37-42 YAQUINA RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-14, 37-34, 37-42, 37-47 YAZO0 BASIN (MRAT) 12-13 YAZO0 CITY, MISS. (MR+T) 42-8 YAZOO RIVER BACKWATER AREA IN VICINITY OF TATARTIA, MISS. (MR+T) 42-22 YAZOO RIVER BASIN PROJECT LEVEES (MR+T) 42-48 YAZO0 RIVER BASIN, MISS. (MR+T) 42-8, 42-9, 42-17, 42-22, 42-23 42-24, 42-25, 42-29, 42-48, 42-51, 42-53, 42-56, 42-58, 42-59 YAZO0 NIVFR, MISS. (LMK) 12-3, 12-8, 12-9 YELLOW JACKET CREEK, HOGANSVILLE, GA. (SAM) 10-44 YELLOWJACKET CREEK AND HOGANSVILLE BRANCH, GA. (SAM) 10-47 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, BANK PROTECTIONs BILLINGS, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, GREYCLIFF BRIDGE, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, HIWAY 23 BRIDGE, NEAR SIDNEY, MONT. (MRO) 21* 19 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, NEAR MILES CITY, MONT. WATER INTAKE AND SEWAGE LAGOON (MRO) 21-19 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, REEDPOINT, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, SPRINGDALE BRIDGE, MONT. (MkO) 21-19 YELLOWSTONE RIVER. VOGES BRIDOGE, NEAR BIG TIMBER, MONT. (MRO) 21- 19 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, W. GLENDIVE, MONT. (MRO) 21-22 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, WATER PLANT, LIVINGSTON, MONT. (MRO) 21-19 YELLOWSTONE RIVER, YELLOWSTONE CO. BRIDGE, NEAR BILLINGS, MONT. (MO) 21-19 YONKERS, N.Y. (NAN) 2-27, 2-33, 2-39 YORK HARBOR, ME. (NED) 1-41 YORK RIVER, VA. (NAO) 5-26 YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. (NAO) 5-3, 5-20 YORK, COODORUS CREEK, PA. (NAB) 4-25,t 4, 33, 4-39 YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA. AND MDO (ORP) 26-1 5, 26-20 YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER, PA. AND MD. (ORP) 26-26 YOUGHIUGHENY RIVER, PA. AND MD. (ORP) 26-26 YOUNGS BAY AND YOUNGS RIVER, OREG. (NPP) 37-46, 37-47 YOUNGS RIVER DIKES, CLATSOP COUNTY, OREG. (NPP) 37-46, 37-52 YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO (ORP) 26-31 Z ZANESVILLE, OHIO (ORM) 25-28 ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WASH. (NPA) 39-5, 39-13, 39-15 LIPPEL BAY HARBOR, MINN. (NCS) 27-21 1-25 (wa UA cc 0 l- 1** r 0 M. 1*-* CA U) 50 0 O) 2 0 La (U) cc 0 w
0000 -0 -J0 SU) w-o ~ 0 co o tD c C _ a) C C :V 0 U)